TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @HopeRising19

HopeRising19
Posted - March 9, 2026 at 6:58 PM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 12:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a Würzburg study (PLOS ONE) testing 9 placentas. In 2 placentas vaccinal mRNA was detected; all nine were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. One case: mother had 3 Pfizer doses (2 pre-preg, 1 in 2nd trimester) plus mild infection at 36 weeks; vaccinal mRNA found in decidual surface cells. Another case: mother had 2 Moderna doses pre-pregnancy; vaccinal RNA in villous endothelial cells. Long-term implications unknown.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

VACCINAL RNA DETECTED IN CELLS LINING THE PLACENTAL BLOOD VESSELS THAT INTERFACE WITH FETAL CIRCULATION A brand new study from University Hospital of Würzburg PLoS One 21(3): e0344185. Key findings pertaining to the ability of vaccinal spike protein bio distributing through the placenta, to developing fetus: 9 placenta's were tested, and in two placentas VACCINAL mRNA was detected. All 9 of the placentas were negative for Sars Cov II RNA (e.g. this was vaccinal RNA NOT Infection RNA) One placenta belonged to a mother who: *took 3 doses of Pfizer Comirnaty - 2 pre pregnancy and 1 during second trimester, followed by a mild Covid infection at 36 weeks gestation. *Vaccinal mRNA was detected in decidual surface cells (maternal side, part of the uterine lining interfacing with the placenta) One placenta belonged to a mother who: *took 2 doses of Moderna mRNA 1273 (the Moderna Covid vax) PRE PREGNANCY ONLY. No Covid infection at any time. *Vaccinal RNA dectected in villous endothelial cells (fetal side, lining the blood vessels in placental villi that interface with fetal circulation) VACCINAL RNA DETECTED IN CELLS LINING THE PLACENTAL BLOOD VESSELS THAT INTERFACE WITH FETAL CIRCULATION The authors interpret these findings as evidence that modRNA from mRNA vaccines can be taken up or transferred into placental cells, potentially leading to local production of spike protein Long term implications for future health of children who have been exposed to vaccinal mRNA through fetal blood circulation? Unknown (study link in comments) Video shows the last ACIP meeting, during discussion of BIODISTRIBUTION of LNP's and vaccinal mRNA

Video Transcript AI Summary
For biodistribution, Pfizer did not use the actual spike mRNA product in their studies. Instead, they substituted in a luciferase reporter mRNA packaged in the same lipid nanoparticles. This approach allowed them to track where the mRNA traveled in rodents. The studies showed that following intramuscular injection, most of the mRNA remained at the site of injection, but there was also notable levels detected in the liver. Despite the limitations of this approach, which can underestimate low level or transient distributions to other tissues, it nevertheless showed that the vaccine components do not remain confined to the injection site. Next slide. For Moderna, no dedicated biodistribution study was performed with the COVID mRNA itself. Instead, data was provided from a surrogate product, a CMV mRNA, mRNA-sixteen 47, which used the same lipid nanoparticle formulation. In their rat study, after intramuscular injections, high levels of the mRNA were detected at the injection site, but also in multiple organs such as the draining lymph nodes, spleen, eye, and liver. Lower levels were also found across a wide range of tissues, including the heart, lungs, testes, and brain. Importantly, this study clearly showed that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Next slide. Consistent with what is seen in animal studies, the vaccine mRNA and its spike protein have been detected in humans across multiple tissues, including blood, lymph nodes, the heart, and even the brain. These findings make it clear that the mRNA does not remain confined to the injection site. Importantly, persistence has been documented well beyond the initial hours or days, lasting weeks in some tissues, and in certain studies detectable for many months. Next slide. To summarize the biodistribution data, it's important to note that neither Moderna nor Pfizer used their actual commercial mRNA vaccine products in the preclinical biodistribution studies. Instead, they relied on surrogate construct packaged in same or similar lipid nanoparticles. Second, the results of those studies show that the mRNA and lipid nanoparticles were not confined to the injection site. Systemic distribution was observed with evidence that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Consistent with these findings, studies in humans have confirmed that vaccine mRNA can be detected in multiple tissues, including lymph nodes, the heart, the central nervous system, and blood. Finally, persistence is not just short term. In some reports, mRNA has been detected for weeks to months, and in certain cases as long as seven zero six days post vaccination. Taken together, these data highlight that biodistribution is broad and persistence is longer than initially expected, raising important questions and concerns for ongoing research and safety monitoring.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For biodistribution, Pfizer did not use the actual spike mRNA product in their studies. Instead, they substituted in a luciferase reporter mRNA packaged in the same lipid nanoparticles. This approach allowed them to track where the mRNA traveled in rodents. The studies showed that following intramuscular injection, most of the mRNA remained at the site of injection, but there was also notable levels detected in the liver. Despite the limitations of this approach, which can underestimate low level or transient distributions to other tissues, it nevertheless showed that the vaccine components do not remain confined to the injection site. Next slide. For Moderna, no dedicated biodistribution study was performed with the COVID mRNA itself. Instead, data was provided from a surrogate product, a CMV mRNA, mRNA-sixteen 47, which used the same lipid nanoparticle formulation. In their rat study, after intramuscular injections, high levels of the mRNA were detected at the injection site, but also in multiple organs such as the draining lymph nodes, spleen, eye, and liver. Lower levels were also found across a wide range of tissues, including the heart, lungs, testes, and brain. Importantly, this study clearly showed that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Next slide. Consistent with what is seen in animal studies, the vaccine mRNA and its spike protein have been detected in humans across multiple tissues, including blood, lymph nodes, the heart, and even the brain. These findings make it clear that the mRNA does not remain confined to the injection site. Importantly, persistence has been documented well beyond the initial hours or days, lasting weeks in some tissues, and in certain studies detectable for many months. Next slide. To summarize the biodistribution data, it's important to note that neither Moderna nor Pfizer used their actual commercial mRNA vaccine products in the preclinical biodistribution studies. Instead, they relied on surrogate construct packaged in same or similar lipid nanoparticles. Second, the results of those studies show that the mRNA and lipid nanoparticles were not confined to the injection site. Systemic distribution was observed with evidence that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Consistent with these findings, studies in humans have confirmed that vaccine mRNA can be detected in multiple tissues, including lymph nodes, the heart, the central nervous system, and blood. Finally, persistence is not just short term. In some reports, mRNA has been detected for weeks to months, and in certain cases as long as seven zero six days post vaccination. Taken together, these data highlight that biodistribution is broad and persistence is longer than initially expected, raising important questions and concerns for ongoing research and safety monitoring.
HopeRising19
Posted - September 21, 2025 at 5:12 AM
Saved - September 22, 2025 at 7:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Yesterday, the CDC's vaccine advisory committee confirmed that mRNA COVID injectables do not remain in the arm and can cross the blood-brain barrier. This information was presented by Dr. Charlotte Kuperwasser, a professor at Tufts University specializing in cancer biology. The meeting was livestreamed, and I’ve included the full link in the comments for those interested in more details.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

USA CDC VACCINE ADVISORY COMMITTEE CONFIRMS.....mRNA COVID INJECTABLES CROSS BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER.... Yesterday America's leading vaccine advisory committee (ACIP) confirmed on public livestream... *mRNA Covid injectables do NOT stay in the arm *mRNA Covid injectables cross the sacred BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER The speaker is: Charlotte Kuperwasser, PhD, is a professor in the Department of Developmental, Molecular and Chemical Biology at Tufts University School of Medicine. She specializes in cancer biology, with a focus on mammary gland biology and endocrine signaling. (full meeting link in comments)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer did not use the actual spike mRNA; a luciferase reporter mRNA in the same lipid nanoparticles tracked biodistribution in rodents. After injection, most mRNA remained at the injection site, but notable levels were detected in the liver; limitations may underestimate low-level distributions, yet components are not confined to the injection site. Moderna did not perform a dedicated biodistribution study with the COVID mRNA; data came from a surrogate CMV mRNA (mRNA-sixteen 47) in the same lipid nanoparticle. In rats, high levels at the injection site and in draining lymph nodes, spleen, eye, and liver; lower levels in heart, lungs, testes, and brain, with the mRNA crossing the blood brain barrier. In humans, vaccine mRNA and its spike protein have been detected across blood, lymph nodes, heart, and brain, with persistence lasting weeks to months and reportedly seven zero six days post vaccination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For biodistribution, Pfizer did not use the actual spike mRNA product in their studies. Instead, they substituted in a luciferase reporter mRNA packaged in the same lipid nanoparticles. This approach allowed them to track where the mRNA traveled in rodents. The studies showed that following intramuscular injection, most of the mRNA remained at the site of injection, but there was also notable levels detected in the liver. Despite the limitations of this approach, which can underestimate low level or transient distributions to other tissues, it nevertheless showed that the vaccine components do not remain confined to the injection site. Next slide. For Moderna, no dedicated biodistribution study was performed with the COVID mRNA itself. Instead, data was provided from a surrogate product, a CMV mRNA, mRNA-sixteen 47, which used the same lipid nanoparticle formulation. In their rat study, after intramuscular injections, high levels of the mRNA were detected at the injection site, but also in multiple organs such as the draining lymph nodes, spleen, eye, and liver. Lower levels were also found across a wide range of tissues, including the heart, lungs, testes, and brain. Importantly, this study clearly showed that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Next slide. Consistent with what is seen in animal studies, the vaccine mRNA and its spike protein have been detected in humans across multiple tissues, including blood, lymph nodes, the heart, and even the brain. These findings make it clear that the mRNA does not remain confined to the injection site. Importantly, persistence has been documented well beyond the initial hours or days, lasting weeks in some tissues, and in certain studies detectable for many months. Next slide. To summarize the biodistribution data, it's important to note that neither Moderna nor Pfizer used their actual commercial mRNA vaccine products in the preclinical biodistribution studies. Instead, they relied on surrogate construct packaged in same or similar lipid nanoparticles. Second, the results of those studies show that the mRNA and lipid nanoparticles were not confined to the injection site. Systemic distribution was observed with evidence that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Consistent with these findings, studies in humans have confirmed that vaccine mRNA can be detected in multiple tissues, including lymph nodes, the heart, the central nervous system, and blood. Finally, persistence is not just short term. In some reports, mRNA has been detected for weeks to months, and in certain cases as long as seven zero six days post vaccination. Taken together, these data highlight that biodistribution is broad and persistence is longer than initially expected, raising important questions and concerns for ongoing research and safety monitoring.
HopeRising19
Posted - March 29, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Saved - March 30, 2025 at 6:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ten nurses on the same ward have developed brain cancer, prompting employers to investigate potential workplace causal factors. So far, no environmental causes have been identified. I wonder if the employers are being thorough enough by asking critical questions: Did each nurse receive an mRNA Covid vaccine? Were these vaccinations administered on-site? What were the batch numbers of each injection? Are there any common batch numbers among the ten nurses? I’m curious if these questions are being raised.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

10 nurses on the same ward develop brain cancer. The employers are doing due diligence to determine any causal connections in the workplace. They can find not environmental causal factors. Are these employers honest enough to ask 1) Did each of these nurses take an mRNA Covid injection? 2) Were they injected through onsite vaccination roll outs? 2) What was the batch number of each injection? 3) Are there any batch numbers in common with these 10 nurses? What do you think....are they asking these questions?

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

10 nurses who work on the same ward have brain tumours diagnosed. TEN. Occupational health say they've checked and there is no environmental cause. Case closed. What happened to curiosity? What happened to science? What happened to humanity? https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/newton-wellesley-hospital-nurses-brain-cancer-cases/

Nurses at Massachusetts hospital concerned about growing number of cancer cases among staff Nurses at Newton-Wellesley Hospital say they're concerned about growing numbers of cancer cases among longtime nurses. cbsnews.com
HopeRising19
Posted - February 26, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Saved - February 27, 2025 at 5:02 PM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

WE WERE TOLD THAT HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE KILLED 17,000 COVID PATIENTS... Turns out it was a lie. Paper retracted (link in comments)

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38171239/

Deaths induced by compassionate use of hydroxychloroquine during the first COVID-19 wave: an estimate - PubMed Although our estimates are limited by their imprecision, these findings illustrate the hazard of drug repurposing with low-level evidence. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
HopeRising19
Posted - February 8, 2025 at 6:16 AM
Saved - February 8, 2025 at 6:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been curious about USAID's involvement in New Zealand media. After years of seeking investigative journalism on the impacts of Pfizer's mRNA vaccine, I discovered that USAID has funneled nearly $472.6 million through Internews Network, which collaborates with thousands of media outlets and has trained over 9,000 journalists. Notably, Internews has partnered with Group M New Zealand to launch a program supporting vetted news sites like Stuff and 1News. This raises questions about media integrity and potential censorship initiatives. More developments are likely ahead.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

HAVE YOU BEEN WONDERING IF USAID HAS A FINGER IN THE PIE OF NZ MEDIA? I have. After four years of trying to find someone in NZ legacy media to do some genuine investigative journalism into the thousands of NZ lives changed by the Pfizer mRNA...and drawing a blank. Yesterday it came to light that USAID has pushed nearly half a billion dollars ($472.6m) through a secretive US government financed NGO, "Internews Network" (IN), which has “worked with” 4,291 media outlets, producing in one year 4,799 hours of broadcasts reaching up to 778 million people and "training” over 9000 journalists (2023 figures). I.N HAS ALSO SUPPORTED SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP INITIATIVES. Internews Network has offices in over 30 countries. AND NZ MEDIA HAS SHAKEN HANDS WITH INTERNEWS In 2023 Internews (and its USAID funding) teamed up with Group M New Zealand (Group M is the worlds leading media investment company). “In New Zealand, Group M and Internews are launching with a list of 25 metro and regional news sites on board that have been vetted. These include Stuff, NZME, Business Desk, Newshub and 1News, and will continue to expand. “ The 2023 press statement: "GroupM New Zealand is introducing ‘Back to News,’ an industry-first programme aimed at enabling brands to support quality journalism by reallocating media budgets to credible news publishers. The programme provides New Zealand advertisers with access to high-quality, brand-safe ad environments on vetted local, national, and international news sites." Undoubtedly more to come on this story. (links in comments)

HopeRising19
Posted - February 5, 2025 at 9:43 AM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 7:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently discovered that Auckland University has received nearly $296 million from USAID. This agency, part of the U.S. government, focuses on foreign aid and development assistance. Interestingly, this funding comes at a time when the newly established Department of Government Efficiency is scrutinizing every dollar spent, particularly under the Trump administration. The significant amount allocated to Auckland University raises questions about the agency's spending priorities.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

WHY HAS AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY RECEIVED US$296 MILLION DOLLARS FROM USAID!! The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is an independent agency of the United States government that is primarily responsible for administering civilian foreign aid and development assistance. It is the agency that the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (under Trump) is tearing apart and analysing every single dollar of spend. And right there in the spend.... Auckland University has received almost $300 MILLION dollars from them. (link in comments)

HopeRising19
Posted - December 3, 2024 at 6:45 AM
Saved - December 3, 2024 at 8:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I questioned the definitions behind New Zealand's COVID-19 death tally through an OIA request. I learned that prior to 2021, anyone who died within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test was classified as a COVID death. This included cases where the cause of death was unrelated, like accidents. In July 2022, the categories were updated to distinguish between deaths where COVID-19 was the underlying cause, a contributing factor, or unrelated. Up to that point, 1,431 deaths were reported as COVID-related, including those from violence and accidents.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

IF YOU WERE MURDERED BUT TESTED POSITIVE FOR COVID.....YOU WERE A NEW ZEALAND "COVID DEATH" We submitted an OIA to fully understand the definitions underpinning the New Zealand Covid death tally We asked: Please explain how the definition of a Covid death has changed since 2021, including the date of changes and the reasons for the change. Answer: Prior to 2021, any person who passed away within 28 days of a COVID-19 positive test was reported as a ‘COVID-19 death.’ Due to the complexity of determining the cause of death, it often took time to obtain accurate and comprehensive mortality data relating to whether COVID19 was the underlying cause of death, a contributing factor alongside other health conditions (such as a cancer), or incidental to the death (e.g., in cases like a traffic accident). In July 2022 the reporting categories for COVID-19 deaths were updated. This was undertaken as data analysis processes became more streamlined, allowing for faster and more accurate reporting. The revised reporting categories included: • deaths with COVID-19 as the underlying cause, • deaths where COVID-19 served as a contributing factor alongside other health conditions, and • deaths unrelated to COVID-19, even if a recent positive test had been reported. Ref: H2023032730 (PS up to July 2022 there were 1,431 deaths where the patient tested "positive" for Covid 19 - these included people killed by gun shot and car accident. THEY WERE ALL LISTED AS COVID DEATHS) @TanyaUnkovichMP @CaseyCostelloMP @winstonpeters @dbseymour @chrisluxonmp #nzcovidinquiry2 (acknowledgements to @c_plushie for the video)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Clarification was sought on how deaths are classified as either from or with COVID-19. The approach has been inclusive, counting any death with COVID-19 as related. For instance, many deaths in residential care were categorized as probable cases despite not being swabbed. Recently, 15 deaths were reported, all classified as with COVID-19. The majority of reported deaths involved COVID-19 as a contributing factor, but it’s acknowledged that individuals could have died from other causes, such as accidents or pre-existing conditions. This aligns with international reporting norms, which include anyone who dies while having an acute COVID-19 infection, regardless of the underlying cause.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jessica? Can Speaker 1: I just get some clarification, Doctor? Linfield, about when someone is classified as with who someone who died with COVID-nineteen or of COVID-nineteen? And then how we list them if they did die of COVID-nineteen? Speaker 2: Yes. So what I can say is right from the start of the pandemic, we've been very inclusive in our approach to categorizing deaths as COVID-nineteen related deaths. Speaker 3: We've taken a very liberal approach to mortality. If someone dies with COVID 19, we are counting that as a COVID 19 death. Speaker 2: We've been very inclusive in our in our approach to categorizing deaths as COVID-nineteen related deaths. So you might recall when we hit a number of deaths, sadly last year related to age residential care, a number of those people had not actually been swabbed because of the nature of their conditions. But they were categorized as probable cases because of their symptoms and the situation. However, we still included every single one of those in our overall, death numbers. So the latest case we had was someone who had a confirmed COVID-nineteen infection. Whilst, they had a significant serious pre existing illness, we have categorized them the death as COVID-nineteen related. Speaker 4: Can I ask you for a point of clarification? You said today tragically 15 people have died from COVID. Did I from it or with it? Speaker 0: At the moment, it's with COVID-nineteen. Sadly, today, the Ministry of Health is reporting a further 15 deaths from COVID-nineteen. No, well, the official statistics reflect people who have died with COVID-nineteen. Speaker 4: Hi, Minister. It's Ryan here. Just really quickly, you know the COVID deaths that we talk about on the TV at 6 o'clock news, 4 or 500 people have died with COVID. How many are we certain have died of COVID? Speaker 0: The majority of those are, you know, COVID 19 played a factor in the you know, played a role in their passing. You know, COVID 19 played a role in their passing. 1 it's a it's a very difficult, area to to to do. We follow the international norm. So the international norm is to report people who have died within a period of time after they have contracted Speaker 4: Yeah. But those people could have died it could have could have been a car crash, cancer, all sorts of things, right? Speaker 0: And and that is absolutely the case in in all of the international statistics around this. Speaker 5: I mean, this is it, isn't it? When when we see these stark figures, they report it in very sort of ponderous tones on the television. You know, we've had, you know, 500 more deaths or 4 whatever whatever it is on any given day. Speaker 0: Taking the total number across the UK to 41,759. Speaker 5: These are deaths with COVID, not of COVID. So you can be in hospital for a whole variety of other reasons. You can have heart disease. You can have cancer. If you test positive for COVID, you still end up on these these, on on these statistics, don't you? Speaker 2: That that's and see, this is what I'm saying. Speaker 4: And this one takes a bit of explaining. What are Speaker 2: the details? Speaker 6: Well, Simon, today the Ministry of Health added another debt to its COVID 19 recording, but also said it was a case subject to a police investigation that's ongoing. Now 1 news here, 1 news understands that this is in relation to Operation Metals, a homicide investigation launched after a man named Robert Hart sustained serious gunshot injuries outside a Newland Motel last week, and he died despite 1st aid attempts. Now since his death, health authorities say he tested positive for COVID 19, and one who understands that several people are also isolating. So then you have to ask how someone who sustained these types of injuries and then died ends up as part of our COVID 19 death tally. Now the Ministry of Health says that's because under the World Health Organization guidelines, anyone who dies while also having an acute COVID 19 infection is recorded as part of a nation's death tally, whatever the cause of death might be.
HopeRising19
Posted - November 29, 2024 at 4:35 AM
Saved - November 29, 2024 at 9:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pfizer never tested whether their mRNA vaccine would prevent transmission, as highlighted by the NZ Covid Inquiry. The messaging from NZ's marketing campaigns falsely claimed it would protect others, with no supporting evidence. Studies from 2024 indicated that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine may have actually increased the risk of infection. This lack of testing and misleading information is viewed as a significant medical failure. Similar claims were made by a Pfizer representative in the European Parliament, emphasizing that the notion of vaccination protecting others was unfounded.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

NO NZ....PFIZER NEVER EVER TESTED IF THE MRNA WOULD PREVENT TRANSMISSION In light of the NZ Covid Inquiry findings... Once again we re-iterate.... Pfizer NEVER tested whether their mRNA product would PREVENT TRANSMISSION It was the NZ Marketing campaigns that made that particular lie up "do it for your whanau and to protect grandma". There was NEVER any evidence that the Pfizer mRNA prevented transmission. In fact from 2024 onwards, three Cleveland Clinic studies showed us that the Pfizer mRNA INCREASED RISK OF INFECTION That is why a novel mRNA product should never in a million years have been mandated to the NZ population. Medical crime of the century (video below is Senate investigation in Australia. The two stooges who flatly refuse to answer the questions, are of course from Pfizer)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thank you, Senator Canavan. Did Pfizer test if the COVID-19 vaccine could stop or reduce virus transmission before its late 2020 approval? To bring the vaccine to patients, we needed to show it was safe and effective in preventing illness, severe disease, and hospitalizations. The primary goal was to protect the vaccinated individual. I appreciate that, but my question remains unanswered. On December 3, 2020, your CEO stated that it was uncertain if vaccinated individuals could carry and spread the virus. Was he correct that Pfizer did not know if the vaccine could reduce transmission? We designed our clinical programs with regulatory agencies to demonstrate the vaccine's safety and effectiveness in preventing infections. Okay, let’s move on.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Senator Canavan. Thank you, Chair. Thank you, gentlemen, for appearing today in your evidence. Did Pfizer test whether your COVID-nineteen vaccine could stop or reduce the transmission of the virus before its approval and rollout in late 2020? Speaker 1: Senator, to bring this vaccine to patients, we were required to show that the vaccine was safe and effective in preventing illness, in preventing severe disease and in preventing hospitalizations. The primary purpose of vaccination was and remains to protect the person who received the vaccine. Speaker 0: I'll just repeat the question. I appreciate that, but there hasn't been an answer to it. And perhaps I might just add into the record that on the 3rd December 2020, your CEO, Mr. Albert Bourla, told NBC News, and I quote, When he was asked whether vaccinated people could carry and spread the virus, he responded to NBC News that, and I quote, I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now. So was Mr. Bourla correct that as of December 3, 2020, Pfizer did not know whether the vaccine could stop or reduce the spread of the virus? Speaker 1: Senator, as with all vaccines seeking regulatory authorization, the requirement is to demonstrate in robust clinical programs that the vaccine is safe and effective in preventing the infection, and in this case, in preventing severe disease one more sorry Speaker 0: to interrupt, but I've got very little bit of time. I've got 5 minutes. So is it yes or no? Did you test whether transmission would be reduced or stopped before the approval of the vaccine? Speaker 1: Senator, we designed our clinical programs in agreement with regulatory agencies. The purpose of which was to demonstrate the vaccine was safe and effective in preventing infections. Speaker 0: Okay. All right. We might just move on then.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

And the same evidence from the Pfizer representative in the European Parliament No Pfizer did NOT ever test if their mRNA product would prevent transmission The NZ media and governmental messaging that kicked off in February 2021 was a PROPAGANDA MARKETING CAMPAIGN Zero evidence that "get vaccinated to protect your whanau" was anything but mythology

HopeRising19
Posted - November 19, 2024 at 7:10 PM
Saved - November 19, 2024 at 7:31 PM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

ICAN lodged a Freedom of Information application with the FDA asking for ALL THE CLINICAL TRIALS ESTABLISHING SAFETY OF FLU VACCINES FOR PREGNANT WOMEN How many were there? You guessed it.... ZERO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Clinical trials are essential to determine a product's safety and effectiveness, especially for vaccines intended for pregnant women. For a vaccine to be licensed for this demographic, specific trials must be conducted. A request was made to the FDA for the clinical trials used to license the flu shot for pregnant women, but after much delay, it was revealed that no such trials exist, as the flu shot has never been licensed for pregnant women. Consequently, promoting the flu shot for this group is considered off-label use, which pharmaceutical companies cannot legally advertise. Instead, the CDC handles this promotion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trials are what we rely upon to find whether a product is safe and effective. And once there's a clinical trial, that's what the FDA would rely upon to then license it for that particular use. When you, and so to have a vaccine license for pregnant women, you'd need to have a clinical trial with pregnant women. You'd wanna know Right. Whether it's safe and effective before promoting it to that demographic. Speaker 1: Would think. I mean, I'm sure that's what every pregnant woman's assuming when they see a poster Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: That says the CDC says get your flu shot to protect your baby. They're assuming that's been well tested. Speaker 0: So we, so as you said, we we FOIA the FDA. Yep. Simple request. Please provide all the clinical trials relied upon to license the flu shot for pregnant women. Right. The I I distinctly remember the phone call with the with the representative from the FDA, got on the phone with me and and and and tried to say, you know, we'll just give you all the clinical trials that were used to license the flu shot. And I said, I I said, thank you very much. But my client, ICANN, is not requesting all the clinical trials, just those relied upon to license the flu shot for pregnant women. Right. That's it. And it was a lot of hemming and hawing. Weeks, months passed, never got anything, so we decided, okay, time to go to court. We went to federal court. We sued them, and they finally admitted, that's right. We don't have any clinical trials. Because you know what? It's never been licensed for pregnant women. That's why, as you just pointed out, though, when you see a flyer promoting a flu shot for pregnant women, does it say the company's name on it? No. Why? Because that's an off label use. It's not a licensed use. If a pharmaceutical company promoted a flu shot for pregnant women, that would be illegal. Really? Yes, because it's not an approved use by the FDA. Hence, it's an off label use. Hence, if a pharmaceutical company were to do that, they would be violating federal law. So who does all the promoting for flu shot for pregnant women? CDC. Exactly.
HopeRising19
Posted - November 17, 2024 at 7:18 PM
Saved - November 18, 2024 at 8:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a video featuring Kanwal Gill, a Principal Scientist at Pfizer, who candidly shared that mRNA vaccines have been around for 50 years but never made it to clinical trials due to known side effects. The conversation was filmed without her awareness.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

PRINCIPAL PFIZER SCIENTIST SPEAKS TRUTH, NOT AWARE CAMERA IS ROLLING... This video was covertly filmed by a Pfizer employee. The woman speaking is the Principal Scientist at Pfizer, Kanwal Gill “We had no idea how it’s going to look like. MRNA vaccines have been there for 50 years, but nothing went to clinical trial because MRNA have been known to have side effects.” Acknowledgement to whistleblower @justintegrity_

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a meeting on October 6, 2021, questions arose about the ethics of administering experimental booster shots and whether financial motives influenced their rollout. The discussion highlighted that while mRNA vaccines have been researched for decades, they had not previously reached clinical trials due to known side effects. Pfizer and Moderna utilized the pandemic's emergency status to expedite their vaccines. A collaboration with BioNTech, initiated before COVID-19, led to the development of mRNA technology. The urgency of the pandemic required rapid action, leaving little time for thorough deliberation. Katherine Janssen, a key figure in vaccine development at Pfizer, emphasized the ongoing efforts to create effective vaccines against COVID-19.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This video here is from October 6, 2021. I had a meeting with my manager, Conwell Gill, a principal scientist working on the vaccine formulation at Pfizer. In this meeting, I asked her if it was okay to give people another experimental injection regarding the booster shots or if there was a drive for money. So are we But Speaker 1: we get do we Speaker 2: know that, like, I mean, just thinking, like, ethically, like, is it okay to, like, give people another experimental injection? Like, are are we sure it's gonna be safe and effective? Are we just rolling these out because we wanna roll them out for money? Like Speaker 1: Yeah. This is a real time data, not real time data. We don't even know. When we started AbsaRxample, we had no idea how it's gonna look like. MRNA vaccines have been there for 50 years. No. But nothing went to clinical by it Because mRNA vaccines have been known to have side effects. Speaker 2: Right. But Speaker 1: Moderna was has been working on it for 10 years. This is not the new thing. Right? But why it did not reach trial was because of all these side effects. We, Pfizer, and Moderna used the emergency and the pandemic to kind of get through with now. Okay. But, you know, we didn't but even CDC noted, we don't have the Speaker 2: never get FDA approved until until we had this emergency. Right? Like, we had to try something new. So but why didn't we try, like, a vaccine formulation that has been effective in the past, like, with egg yolk or something that you they use with flu. Right? Speaker 1: Yeah. So we here did not do it because we already have collaboration with Beyond Tech on flu before actually COVID happened. So mRNA so what hap what a story behind me starting on this because Beyond Tech guy is with Sahin, the Beyond Tech CEO, he called Catherine Jensen. Speaker 2: Sorry. Speaker 1: Yeah. He called Catherine Jensen and he's like, hey, I have this technology, but I don't have the sources to make it big. So CatStream was like, well, we have we had a collaboration in place before for flu. So we we wanted to give it a shot. It is a new MLM thing. Nobody knew anything about it. We never had we never had this. We are everything is just fresh from last year. Speaker 2: Learning on the fly. Speaker 1: We had. We were turning elephant on a fly. Pandemic, just roll it out. Roll it out. Roll it out. There was no time to think. It was a time to act. Speaker 0: Who Conwell was mentioning in this clip is Katherine Janssen, the former head of vaccine research and development at Pfizer. Speaker 3: I'm Katherine Janssen. I developed vaccines which helped millions of people around the world to be protected from nasty and deadly infections. Currently, I'm developing a vaccine candidate to help prevent COVID 19.
HopeRising19
Posted - November 15, 2024 at 1:26 AM
Saved - November 15, 2024 at 8:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that Pfizer's marketing in New Zealand relied on disinformation to mislead the public regarding the safety and efficacy of their mRNA Covid vaccines. The rollout in February 2021 was supported by an extensive and costly marketing campaign, which included psychological nudges aimed at fostering a sense of social responsibility among citizens. This campaign emphasized the need to vaccinate to protect vulnerable populations, such as the elderly. Notably, 12 weeks prior to the rollout, Pfizer had communicated different information to the FDA.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

MARKETING OF PFIZER IN NZ USED DISINFORMATION TO MISLEAD THE PUBLIC... Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for an Unapproved Product Review Memorandum - November 2021 The information in this document (or similar) was also tendered to NZ Medsafe as part of the Pfizer applications for NZ Provisional Consent for the Pfizer mRNA Covid injectables. In February 2021 NZ rolled this product out with the largest and most expensive marketing campaign in its history. The campaign reassured all New Zealanders of the SAFETY AND EFFICACY of the product It also involved a huge psychological nudge campaign telling New Zealanders that they must take the vaccine to "protect granny" Social conscience and responsibility was a key driver of uptake. 12 weeks before our roll out PFIZER THEMSELVES told the FDA this... (link in comments see pg 51) #nzcovidinquiry2 @TanyaUnkovichMP @CaseyCostelloMP @winstonpeters @dbseymour @DrShaneRetiMP

HopeRising19
Posted - November 1, 2024 at 7:56 AM
Saved - November 1, 2024 at 8:07 PM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://www.immune.org.nz/news/insider-view-what-it-was-like-working-at-new-zealands-first-mass-vaccination-event

Insider view: What it was like working at New Zealand’s first mass-vaccination event - Immunisation Advisory Centre Dealla Smith, COVID-19 Immunisation Education Facilitator for IMAC, has been clocking up her vaccination experience since the COVID-19 rollout began, working as both an educator and vaccinator. immune.org.nz
HopeRising19
Posted - October 15, 2024 at 8:07 PM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 2:00 PM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

SOON UK READERS WILL READ THE TRUTH ABOUT COVID VAX HARM... The UK Daily Mail has an average monthly reader reach of around 36 million. THEY ARE ASKING COVID VACCINE INJURED TO SUBMIT THEIR STORIES @nzherald I'm wondering when you will be making the same request? No? https://t.co/gVpfUIYpmU

HopeRising19
Posted - October 5, 2024 at 8:19 PM
Saved - October 6, 2024 at 5:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
My name is Sharon Hooper, and I am a COVID vaccine-injured New Zealander. After receiving one dose of the Pfizer vaccine, I experienced severe headaches, heart palpitations, and numbness in my left leg, arm, and chin. I was hospitalized with suspected TIA and faced various symptoms, including swelling, burning pain in my extremities, debilitating fatigue, and vision disturbances. While my symptoms have slowly improved in 2024, I haven't returned to my pre-vaccine energy levels. My claims for ACC and exemption for a second dose were both declined.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

MY NAME IS SHARON HOOPER AND I AM A COVID VACCINE INJURED NEW ZEALANDER... 1 dose (Pfizer) batch FK0-115-013 Severe headache followed by sore feet, heart palpitations 16 days later - numbness down left leg, arm and chin. Tremor in left leg Hospitalised with suspected TIA (mini stroke) Swelling over wrists. Lump over left inner elbow Burning and painful feet and hands Debilitating fatigue followed vision disturbances, dizziness, brain fog difficulty using computers Symptoms slowly improved this year (2024) but not back to pre vaccine energy ACC DECLINED EXEMPTION FOR SECOND DOSE DECLINED @nzcovidinquiry2 @TanyaUnkovichMP @BrookevanVelden

HopeRising19
Posted - September 23, 2024 at 9:23 PM
Saved - September 24, 2024 at 7:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reflected on a recent interview with NZ vaccinologist Helen Petousis Harris, where she hesitated to comment on lawsuits against Pfizer. She suggested that claims of prior knowledge about vaccine harm were unfounded, noting that risks were unknown during the rollout. This contrasts with her earlier statements made to Michael Laws just four months prior. It raises questions about consistency in her messages. As the saying goes, "If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything."

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

ALWAYS TRY TO REMEMBER WHAT YOU SAID IN PREVIOUS INTERVIEWS...MRNA HARM Last week, when @LeahPanapa @theplatform_nz asked NZ vaccinologist Helen Petousis Harris @PetousisH what she thought of states like Kansas suing Pfizer, Helen 'ummed and ahhed'.... "I think one of the issues is, people are sorta claiming that there was knowledge about harm at the time when we were rolling out the vaccines, and people weren't told. And the problem is, actually, there were risks with the vaccine that weren't known early on." Really Helen? That's not quite what you told Michael laws four months ago. How does that saying go again? Oh yes . . . "If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything." #nzcovidinquiry2

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Last week, when @LeahPanapa @theplatform_nz asked @PetousisH what she thought of states like Kansas suing Pfizer, Helen 'ummed and ahhed'.... "I think one of the issues is, people are sorta claiming that there was knowledge about harm at the time when we were rolling out the vaccines, and people weren't told. And the problem is, actually, there were risks with the vaccine that weren't known early on." Really Helen? That's not quite what you told Michael laws four months ago. How does that saying go again? Oh yes . . . "If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything." @nzdsos @HopeRising19 @CranmerWrites @RCR_NZ @voices_nz @TanyaUnkovichMP @winstonpeters @nzfirst @stkirsch @P_McCulloughMD

HopeRising19
Posted - September 18, 2024 at 9:54 PM
Saved - September 19, 2024 at 1:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
This week, I was shocked to hear about former All Black Keven Mealamu's collapse due to a heart issue. He has been a strong advocate for Covid mRNA vaccinations, using his influence to encourage others to get vaccinated.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Supremely fit former All Black Keven Mealamu this week had a "shock collapse" with a heart issue. Keven used his platform and influence to encourage everyone to take Covid mRNA injections (link in comments)

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2021/10/coronavirus-the-two-things-you-can-do-in-auckland-once-restrictions-change.html

The two things you can do in Auckland once COVID-19 restrictions change tonight The city's phased reopening includes expanding people's bubbles, and opening retail, hospitality, and schools. newshub.co.nz
HopeRising19
Posted - September 12, 2024 at 9:59 AM
Saved - September 14, 2024 at 1:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am sharing findings from the FDA's largest longitudinal study on post mRNA myocarditis, involving 333 patients aged 30 or younger across 38 hospitals from April 2021 to November 2022. While 80% had mild initial symptoms, 82% showed late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac MRI, indicating myocardial injury. Notably, 60% of those with initial LGE continued to show it after 178 days, suggesting myocardial fibrotic remodeling, which can lead to serious complications like heart failure and arrhythmias. Ongoing clinical surveillance of these patients is crucial.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

DEEPLY CONCERNING FINDINGS IN LARGEST LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF POST MRNA MYOCARDITIS... FDA completes largest longitudinal study of post mRNA Myocarditis. 333 post mRNA Myocarditis patients (aged 30 or less) across 38 American hospital sites April 2021 - November 2022 *80% showed mild initial clinical course with 17% showing Cardiac dysfunction. *In contrast 82% showed Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) with Cardiac MRI - suggestive of MYOCARDIAL INJURY (heart muscle injury) *60% of those with LGE on first assessment, had continued LGE on their follow up MRI at 178 days. *The persistence of late Gadolinium Enhancement (in the absence of myocardial oedema) is suggestive of MYOCARDIAL FIBROTIC REMODELLING (an essential component of heart failure) *In adults with viral myocarditis, LGE at presentation is a predictor of LONG TERM MAJOR ADVERSE CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS even if cardiac function is preserved *Adult and animal studies found persistence of LGE lead to poor clinical outcomes and subsequent development of DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY *In other conditions, including viral myocarditis, LGE can be a harbinger of HEART FAILURE DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY ARRHYTHMIAS AND SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH Authors state: "As the long-term significance of this myocardial damage is UNCLEAR, continued clinical surveillance of affected patients is warranted." Importantly, the implication of myocardial injury, should be taken very seriously. This is because of the dangers associated with myocardial injury. Such damage to the heart muscle (myocardium) can impair the heart's ability to function properly. This damage can lead to serious complications such as HEART FAILURE ARRHYTHMIAS MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION CARDIOGENIC SHOCK This is a deeply, deeply concerning study from the FDA (study link in comments) #nzcovidinquiry2

HopeRising19
Posted - September 13, 2024 at 8:19 PM
Saved - September 14, 2024 at 10:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
My name is Julie, a nurse with 37 years of experience. I worked through the initial COVID lockdowns and faced the vaccine mandates. Despite my concerns about vaccine safety, I received the COVID vaccine to keep my job. Shortly after, I experienced severe side effects, including tachycardia and swollen lymph nodes. My attempts to seek help were met with barriers, and I ultimately chose to resign rather than take the second shot. I’ve since focused on improving my health and want others to know they are not alone in their struggles.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

JUST ONE OF THE NZ NURSES WE LOST THROUGH COVID MRNA INJURY AND MANDATES... Julie Batch number FK0115 (written by Julie Oct 2022) My name is Julie, and I am a Mandated Health Worker with a 37yr nursing career. I had worked through the first lockdown, and had been in the Isolation Ward. Many of my colleagues requested not to work in this area for various personal reasons, but there was a group of us that rotated through, but also worked in our own areas as well. (There was internal discussion about whether this policy increased a risk of Covid spread, but it didn't change). We were not inundated with patients, and with many things cancelled the hospital was pretty calm... but there was an air of waiting for pandemic numbers to hit. NZ borders were closed, MIQ was in operation, but the Covid admissions and presentation numbers didn't escalate. Then the Vaccines became available in New Zealand, and we went from recommended to MANDATED I was researching the data safety manufacturers sheets prior to the mandates. By 1st November, I could no longer find them through search engines. The Medsafe site had 8 month old information, and then the emergency use authorization for the Covid vaccine was extended for two further years. I emailed Medsafe, but they replied to say their information was not updated, but now they refer straight to the WHO site information. In 2019 I had experienced a flu vaccine reaction, (trunk and upper limbs rash, and exhaustion), and had reported this to CARM myself. Never have I had any previous reactions to any vaccines, and I have had the annual flu shot as this was offered free through our workplace. So I was worried, I did not want this Covid vax, but I was one of the last take it in my area. So to keep my job, I had it in November prior to the mandate deadline. My arm was a little sore, but within 24hrs the lymph nodes under my arm, and the outer aspect of my breast felt full, swollen and tender. I had no rash, was tired, but tiredness was a normal for my shift worker very busy job. Day 15 post shot, I experienced TACHYCARDIA, CHEST PAIN, PALPITATIONS. I was at work, and did my own obs (BP, heart rate, oxygen sats). In the weeks that followed, these palpitations continued intermittently, and not related to exercise, or any other precipitating events. The swollen lymph persisted. I also noticed that small fresh cuts on my hands were not bleeding. I saw my GP, but she could not help me with applying for an exemption. Instead offering to make an appointment for the second to be administered in the Emergency Department. I was deemed High Risk, and she said there is a group that travels to areas to administer the vaccine to people like me. She did not send me for ECG, or bloods or any further investigations. She did listen with a stethascope to ensure there was no "rub", a sign of pericarditis. I registered my own Adverse Event on CARM, a time consuming process- logged in as a health professional, the site kicked me off three times, and if the drug name was not spelled correctly it would not allow the forms to be accessed. It seems that a busy health professional would find the time required a real barrier. ALSO CARM ADVERSE REPORTING IS NOT A REQUIREMENT FOR THE COVID VACCINES nor do people realise they can register their own events. Or those of their loved ones. Rather than take the second mandated shot I RESIGNED. I did not have the emotional bandwidth to go through the hospital process of refusing the mandates, and the pathway of interviews and procedures the hospital had in place. There was short discussion with the manager of my area, (and in a public space) but she backed away from applying pressure. I therefore finished my career January 1st 2022.I have had much help with finding ways to improve my health, and taken steps to manage my symptoms. Thank you for reading, and please realise that we are not alone. Julie #nzcovidinquiry2

HopeRising19
Posted - September 13, 2024 at 5:02 AM
Saved - September 13, 2024 at 2:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared stunning new guidance from the Florida Department of Health recommending against mRNA COVID vaccines due to safety concerns. This is part one of a two-part video series, with the second part available in the thread below. Check the comments for the official guidance link.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

STUNNING NEW GUIDANCE RE COVID BOOSTERS FROM FLORIDA DEPT OF HEALTH.... Absolute science based TRUTH Zero agenda FLORIDA NOW OFFICIALLY RECOMMENDS ITS CITIZENS NOT TO USE MRNA COVID VACCINES DUE TO SAFETY CONCERNS This is part one of a two part video series. Part two also posted in thread below (link to official guidance in comments) #nzcovidinquiry2 @TanyaUnkovichMP @BrookevanVelden @winstonpeters @dbseymour @DrShaneRetiMP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Florida Department of Health, under Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladipo, published guidance on updated COVID-19 boosters. On August 22, 2024, the FDA approved updated mRNA vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna for ages 12+ and granted emergency use authorization for ages 6 months to 11 years. The guidance states the booster approval occurred without human clinical trial data and does not protect against the dominant strain, which accounts for 37% of US infections. There is limited data showing substantial protection against the virus or variants. The federal government hasn't required manufacturers to prove boosters prevent hospitalization or death, and has failed to provide sufficient safety and efficacy data or acknowledge safety concerns, including prolonged mRNA/spike protein circulation, increased risk of lower respiratory infections, and increased risk of autoimmune disease. The Florida Department of Health encourages healthcare providers to discuss this guidance with patients. Based on global immunity and available data, Dr. Ladipo advises against mRNA COVID vaccines. Providers concerned about high-risk patients should prioritize non-mRNA vaccines and treatments.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi everyone, it's Linda here from the Health Forum NZ. Today I wanted to share Speaker 1: with you some new guidance related to the updated COVID-nineteen boosters, guidance that has just been published by the Florida Department of Health. The Surgeon General for Florida is Doctor Joseph Ladipo. So this is an unprecedented event. I have not seen any other Department of Health from anywhere in the world publish this kind of honest, science based guidance as their official recommendations around COVID-nineteen vaccines. So this is what they say. It's a very long piece so I'm going to just chunk pieces out for you. They start by saying that on August 22, 2024, the US FDA approved and authorized updated versions of mRNA vaccines from Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna That's for COVID-nineteen obviously, approved for people aged 12 and over and the FDA at the same time provided emergency use authorization for babies aged 6 months through to children aged 11 years. So this is where the truth starts. They state, the most recent booster approval was granted in the absence of booster specific clinical trial data performed in humans. Furthermore, this booster does not protect against the currently dominant strain, accounting for approximately 37% of infections in the United States. There are currently limited data to inform whether these boosters offer any substantial protection against the virus and subsequent circulating variants. Although randomized clinical trials are normally used to approve therapeutics, the federal government has not required COVID-nineteen vaccine manufacturers to demonstrate their boosters prevent hospitalisation or death from COVID-nineteen illness. Additionally, the federal government has failed to provide sufficient data to support the safety and efficacy of COVID-nineteen boosters or acknowledge previously demonstrated safety concerns associated with COVID-nineteen vaccines and boosters including prolonged circulation of mRNA and spike protein in some vaccine recipients, Increased risk of lower respiratory tract infections Increased risk of autoimmune disease after vaccination Listen to this, how about this guidance: Healthcare providers are encouraged to share information in this guidance in discussions with patients regarding the mRNA COVID vaccines and boosters. So the Florida Department of Health, rather than gagging their medical professionals the way, the Medical Council in New Zealand has done, they are actively encouraging them to share this information with their patients. Based on the high rate of global immunity and currently available data, the Florida State Surgeon General, that's Doctor. Joseph Ladipo, advises against the use of mRNA COVID vaccines. Any provider concerned about the health risks associated with COVID-nineteen for patients over the age of 65 or with underlying health conditions should prioritize patient access to non mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccines and treatment. I'm gonna make a part 2 because this video is fairly long. So this is absolutely stunning folks, first time anywhere in the world has published this kind of true non agenda driven information underpinned by science and facts as official health department recommendations pertaining to COVID-nineteen mRNA products. Part 2 coming up.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

PART TWO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Florida Department of Health released new COVID booster recommendations, citing safety and efficacy concerns regarding mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. According to the recommendations, the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines present a risk of subclinical and clinical myocarditis and other cardiovascular conditions. The vaccines may be associated with an increased risk of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriasis. Studies found the mRNA COVID vaccines are associated with negative effectiveness up to 4 to 6 months, and vaccinated individuals developed an increased risk of infection. Elevated levels of mRNA and spike protein from the mRNA COVID vaccine persist among some individuals for an indefinite period, which may carry health risks. Potential DNA integration from the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines poses a unique and elevated risk to human health and to the integrity of the human genome. There is an unknown risk of potential adverse impacts with each additional dose. The recommendations conclude with self-help measures for optimising health, such as staying physically active, minimising processed foods, prioritising vegetables and healthy fats, and spending time outdoors to support necessary vitamin D levels.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi everyone, Linda from the Health Forum NZ with Part 2 of a 2 part series on the new COVID booster recommendations that have just been published today from the Florida Surgeon General Florida Surgeon General and the Department of Health in Florida. I will post both Part 1 and Part 2 of this video, so continuing to share with you the new recommendations from Florida Department of Health. They also say safety and efficacy concerns: Providers and patients should be aware of outstanding mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccine safety and efficacy concerns: 1. The mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccines present a risk of subclinical and clinical myocarditis and other cardiovascular conditions amongst otherwise healthy individuals. 2, the mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccine may be associated with an increased risk of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, otherwise known as POTS. 3, the mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccine may be associated with an increased risk of autoimmune disease including SLE which is systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. Throughout the pandemic, studies across geographic regions found that the mRNA COVID vaccines are associated with negative effectiveness up to 4 to 6 months as efficacy weighing studies showed that COVID-nineteen vaccinated individuals developed an increased risk of infection. Elevated levels of mRNA and spike protein from the mRNA COVID vaccine persist among some individuals for an indefinite period which may carry health risks. Potential DNA integration from the mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccines pose unique and elevated risk to human health and to the integrity of the human genome including the risk that DNA integrated into sperm or egg gametes could be passed on to offspring of mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccine recipients. There is unknown risk of potential adverse impacts with each additional dose of the mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccine. Currently individuals may have received 5 to 7 doses and counting of this vaccine over a 3 year period and then they finish their recommendations by actually talking, by actually recommending self help measures for optimising health such as staying physically active, minimising processed foods, prioritising vegetables and healthy fats, and spending time outdoors to support necessary vitamin D levels. Truly, this is stunning official medical guidance from the Florida Department of Health, and it puts to shame every other department of health the world over that is sticking to the official agenda of safe and effective in the face of endless peer reviewed science proving otherwise. So I would just personally like to say a huge thank you to Surgeon General of Florida, Doctor Joseph Ladipo for having incredible integrity and caring about the health of the people of his state and speaking the truth. Thank you Doctor. Ladipo.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/FLDOH/bulletins/3b56786?

Updated Guidance for COVID-19 Boosters for the Fall and Winter 2024–2025 Season content.govdelivery.com
HopeRising19
Posted - September 13, 2024 at 7:41 AM
Saved - September 13, 2024 at 8:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently attended a press conference where Professor Emeritus Seiji Kojima from Nagoya University spoke about the dangers of Covid-19 vaccines, describing them as "poison" and labeling the situation a "massacre." His remarks highlighted the urgent need to address public perception regarding vaccine safety. Professor Kojima has an extensive academic background in materials science and has held various prestigious positions throughout his career, including chairing several international conferences and receiving notable awards in his field.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

JAPANESE PROFESSOR RE COVID VACCINATION IN JAPAN...."IT WAS A MASSACRE" This is Professor Emeritus Seiji Kojima, Nagoya University, Japan. He spoke at a press conference on September 12, 2024. A conference about the risks and dangers of Covid 19 vaccines. "The perception of that poison, to what extent is it present? So this time, I will talk about it. , I didn't tell everyone about it, but I'll speak it up now, regarding the poison... IT WAS A MASSACRE!" "It's poison. It was a massacre." (link in comments) CV in comments #nzcovidinquiry2

Video Transcript AI Summary
日本語: スピーカーは、毒という認識がどこまであるかについて言及。今回は話さなかったが、口頭で、毒は虐殺をしたと述べている。 English: The speaker mentions the extent to which the perception of poison exists. They didn't talk about it this time, but verbally stated that the poison committed genocide.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: その 毒 と いう 認 識 が どこ ま で ある か それ で 今 回 私 が た ん に は 話 さ なかっ た ん です が 口 で 話 し ます が 毒 です ね 虐 殺 を し た ん です ね

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Seiji Kojima received B.S. and Sc.D. degrees in the Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Japan, in 1974 and 1979, respectively. He joined the Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, as a JSPS PD Fellow in 1979. In 1980, he joined the Institute of Applied Physics, University of Tsukuba, as a Research Associate. From 2002, he was a full professor in the Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba. From 2011 to 2015, he was the Chair of the Institute of Materials Science, University of Tsukuba. Since 2017, he has been a professor emeritus, University of Tsukuba. His major fields of study are materials science and advanced broadband spectroscopy. He was the Chairman of the Organizing Committee of the 8th Russia/CIS/Baltic/Japan Symposium on Ferroelectricity (RCBJSF) in 2006, the Chairman of the Organizing Committee of the Tsukuba International Conference on Materials Science (TICMS) in 2013, and the Chairman of the Organizing Committee of the 35th Ultrasonic Electronics Symposium (USE) in 2014. He was the delegate of the 10th field in the Physical Society of Japan from 2007 to 2008. He received the JJAP Editorial Contribution Award from the Japan Society of Applied Physics in 2008. He has been an editorial board member of the journal “Ferroelectrics” since 2006 and the journal “Materials” since 2021.

HopeRising19
Posted - September 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM
Saved - September 9, 2024 at 10:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trust, once lost, cannot be regained. I shared a video compiling statements from the Canadian government and Ministry of Health regarding the safety and efficacy of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections during pregnancy. The stark contrast between their assurances and the official legal documents is shocking. New Zealand faces the same issue, with our local documents also indicating that "safety and efficacy during pregnancy" is still marked as missing information.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

ONCE TRUST IS GONE IT'S GONE FOREVER... The video below is a compilation of statements by the Canadian government and Ministry of Health, with date stamps. The proclamations pertain to the "safety and efficacy" of both Pfizer and Modern mRNA injections IN PREGNANCY. Overlaying the statements, are the official legal technical data sheets for the products. The huge discrepancy between the legal documents and the glib assurances of "safety and efficacy" from Government spokes people is ASTOUNDING Here in NZ we have the IDENTICAL situation....with our own NZ versions of the same documents. To this day in NZ "safety and efficacy during pregnancy" are STILL listed as MISSING INFORMATION

Video Transcript AI Summary
Clinical trials for the COVID-19 vaccine didn't include pregnant women initially, but there's no biological reason the vaccine wouldn't be effective and safe during pregnancy. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommends vaccination for pregnant individuals. Data supports that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective in pregnancy, and protective antibodies are transmitted through breast milk to the infant. The vaccines do not affect fertility in women or men, and there's no way they can. There's no reason to worry about impacts on fertility from the COVID-19 vaccines, theoretically or based on over a year's worth of data. Good safety data exists for vaccines in pregnancy, with no reason to believe there will be concerns related to pregnancy. The vaccine is safe, tested, and recommended by the World Health Organization and the FDA for pregnant women for their own protection and the safety of their loved ones.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the vaccine, clinical trials, didn't include pregnant women. Certainly these initial clinical trials, but there's no biological reason why the vaccine wouldn't be effective and safe in, in in in during pregnancy. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization has also said, look. We know that those clinical trials didn't include group. But Speaker 1: Everybody who is pregnant, when your vaccine time comes up, it absolutely is something that you should do. And we do encourage that. There's lots of good data now that supports they are safe and effective in pregnancy. And just last week, we had a study that showed that protective antibodies are transmitted through breast milk to the infant as well. So I encourage all pregnant women I can say unequivocally, these vaccines do not affect fertility, both in women or in boys or in young men. They do not affect fertility. There's no way that they can do that. Speaker 2: There's no reason to be worried about impacts on fertility from the COVID 19 vaccines. Theoretically, we're not worried about it. There's no reason that the reproductive system would be involved in the response to the vaccine, And we also have more than a year's worth of data that shows us that there's no association or concern, on fertility and pregnancy outcomes from the COVID 19 vaccine. Speaker 3: There is, good safety data so far with the vaccines in pregnancy and no reason to believe that we will see concerns, particularly related to pregnancy. Speaker 0: COVID 19. Speaker 4: But it is also safe. It has been tested. We are by the World Health Organization, by the FDA, and this is something that we wanna make sure that we can protect everyone. Women who are pregnant is entirely safe and recommended for them to receive the vaccine for themselves, their own protection, the safety of their Speaker 0: loved one.
HopeRising19
Posted - September 5, 2024 at 9:34 AM
Saved - September 5, 2024 at 11:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m heartbroken to hear that renowned NZ psychologist Nigel Latta has been diagnosed with stomach cancer and given only 6 to 12 months to live. It’s shocking to see so many healthy individuals facing similar fates in recent years. Nigel played a key role in promoting the Covid-19 vaccination in NZ.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

NIGEL LATTA - ONLY MONTHS TO LIVE... Well known NZ Psychologist Nigel Latta has been given 6 to 12 months to live. Stomach Cancer. It is overwhelming the number of cases of otherwise healthy people, who should have decades of life in front of them.....passing quickly from cancer in the past 2 - 3 years. Nigel was a part of the NZ Covid 19 vaccination campaign, encouraging New Zealanders to overcome their fear and take the mRNA products. (link in comments)

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/kiwi-tv-star-nigel-latta-reveals-terminal-cancer-diagnosis-pyschologist-has-under-year-to-live/GYBA6WR5PFGKLNZSMQBKE7VCVI/?fbclid=IwY2xjawFGWItleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHbaF5xfK2I297iA2EeLe_wt2rvXrWOeJTHr_64DL0cSu1n47tOlpYmJf8A_aem_m6jklYIZcoDumAzXabSBIg

NZ Herald - Breaking news, latest news, business, sport and entertainment - NZ Herald Latest breaking news articles, photos, video, blogs, reviews, analysis, opinion and reader comment from New Zealand and around the World - NZ Herald nzherald.co.nz
HopeRising19
Posted - September 4, 2024 at 4:01 AM
Saved - September 4, 2024 at 1:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can no longer publicly support COVID vaccines. For over three years, I've felt pressured to defend a medical intervention that nearly took my life and caused immense suffering. It’s time to acknowledge the reality of my experience and the impact it has had on me.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSOR SAYS "NO I WILL NO LONGER PUBLICLY SUPPORT COVID VACCINES.... Prof Gemma Carey Public Health Academic Covid vaccine injured (link in comments) https://t.co/bYtVfejISM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://t.co/odPAbNsCm3

@gemcarey - Prof Gemma Carey, PhD MMedSci

For 3+ years now I have been professionally and personally expected to defend a medical intervention that nearly cost me my life, and caused suffering beyond what I thought the human body was capable of enduring or experiencing We have reached a point…

HopeRising19
Posted - September 2, 2024 at 8:46 PM
Saved - September 3, 2024 at 12:33 PM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Just in case you missed it.... FIVE USA STATES ARE NOW SUING PFIZER Kansas leads the charge... https://t.co/HC3T3k6sEI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act for misleading statements in marketing its COVID-19 vaccine, violating previous consent judgments. This is the first of a multistate collaboration. The suit alleges Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, despite possessing reports of adverse events and miscarriages in pregnant women who received the vaccine, and a study suggesting links to infertility in rats. Pfizer denied links between its vaccine and myocarditis/pericarditis, even though the US government, military, and foreign governments had found such a connection. Pfizer claimed its vaccine protected against variants, but data showed it was effective less than half the time. Pfizer urged vaccination to protect loved ones, implying it stopped transmission, but later admitted it never studied transmission. Pfizer allegedly coordinated with social media platforms to censor critical speech. Pfizer declined Operation Warp Speed funding to avoid government oversight. By February 2024, Pfizer delivered over 3.3 million vaccine doses in Kansas, accounting for over 60% of all doses given. The suit focuses on deceptive marketing, not injury claims, as vaccine manufacturers have federal immunity for tort suits.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you for being here today. We, brought together this press conference to make the following announcement, and that is today, Kansas is filing, a civil suit against the Pfizer Corporation under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, seeking enhanced civil monetary penalties, damages, and injunctive relief for misleading and deceptive statements made in marketing its COVID 19 vaccine. Pfizer also violated, previous consent judgments with the state of Kansas in which Pfizer promised never to use deceptive information to market their products. Kansas' case is the first of a multistate collaboration with Kansas being the first of 5 states to file suit. Before I go further, let me put this in context. As we all know, during the COVID 19 pandemic, there was a great deal of panic and anxiety. Many people who were elderly or who suffered from various medical conditions had already died when the vaccines became available. And when that time came, when the vaccines became available, every one of us had to make 2 decisions. Am I going to take the vaccine? And if so, which vaccine will I choose to take? And these decisions were being made in a hurry. In some ways, you could say even being made under duress. In such an environment, it is imperative that Kansans making that decision receive the truth. They needed the truth. All Americans needed the truth. And in multiple respects, Pfizer did not provide the truth. Much of the information, in this lawsuit came out as a result of a FOIA lawsuit seeking information from Pfizer that still had not been made public. And it was only a result of that effort that some of the in in information in this lawsuit, is available. I urge everyone to read the 69 page complaint, that goes into great detail about the specific statements that were made and the misleading nature of those statements made to Kansas consumers. The following is a quick summary of, I think, some of the 4 most egregious examples of misleading the public in Kansas. Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women. However, in February of 2021, Pfizer possessed reports for 458 pregnant women who received Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine during pregnancy. More than half of the pregnant women reported an an adverse event and more than 10% reported a miscarriage, many within days of the vaccination. Pfizer also possessed information from its own October 2020 study on pregnancy in rats indicating that its COVID 19 vaccine was likely linked to infertility, loss of litters, and stillborn offspring. Number 2, safety relating to heart conditions like myocarditis. Fire Pfizer consistently denied any evidence of a connection or safety signal between its COVID 19 vaccine and myocarditis or pericarditis. Indeed, on January 18, 2023, when asked whether its vaccine caused strokes or my myocarditis, Pfizer chairman and CEO Alan Bourla stated, quote, we've not seen a sig a single signal, although we have distributed billions of doses, end quote. A signal that he was referring to as a safety signal which refers to a negative consequence. However, as Pfizer knew, the United States government, the United States military, foreign governments, and others had found that Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine caused myocarditis and pericarditis. Number 3, effectiveness regarding variant variance. Pfizer also claimed that its COVID 19 vaccine protected against COVID 19 variance even though data available at the time showed Pfizer's vaccine was effective less than half the time against variance. Finally, transmission. Pfizer urged Americans to get vaccinated in order to protect their loved ones, clearly indicating a claim that Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccination stopped transmission of COVID 19. Pfizer Pfizer later admitted that it never even studied transmission of it after, its vacs recipients received the vaccine and whether they could say it stopped transmission. After making these misleading statements, Pfizer also engaged, in some censorship attempts. Emails revealed that Pfizer officials coordinated with social media platforms to censor any speech critical of Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine safety and effectiveness. It should also be noted that Pfizer elected not to join the federal government's vaccine development program known as Operation Warp Speed and declined that development funding. When asked about that, Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla said Pfizer did not participate in the program in order to, quote, liberate, end quote, Pfizer's scientists and to avoid government oversight of its vaccine development. He also said, quote, they want reports. I don't want to have any of that, end quote. Referring to they when he said they, he's referring to the federal government. Pfizer's misleading statements contributed to success in marketing its vaccine in Kansas. By February of 2024, Pfizer had delivered over 3,300,000 doses of its vaccine in the state of Kansas. This is this accounted for over 60% of all vaccine doses given in the state of Kansas. The suit is being filed today. And as I mentioned before, it is part of a multistate effort in which more suits may follow depending on Pfizer's reaction. This is about marketing products to the public. As I think most people know, the federal government conferred immunity on the vaccine manufacturers for tort suits, seeking damages from injuries they received, but that did not free any of the vaccine manufacturers, from their obligation to not mislead the public or make deceptive statements in marketing it. So this is, principally about the marketing efforts, that were made and how they and and how they contradicted what the company knew.
HopeRising19
Posted - September 2, 2024 at 7:13 AM
Saved - September 3, 2024 at 1:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I highlighted that Pfizer acknowledged significant risks and uncertainties regarding their vaccine in contracts, including the one signed by Albania in July 2021. This clause, stating that Pfizer's efforts were "aspirational" and subject to risks, appears in contracts worldwide, including New Zealand's. At the same time, the New Zealand government was promoting the vaccine as safe and effective, which contradicts Pfizer's own statements in these legally binding agreements.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

AT THE SAME TIME PFIZER ACKNOWLEDGED SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES WITH THEIR VACCINE.... New Zealand was MANDATING the product This is the Albanian contract with Pfizer for purchase of Covid 19 vaccines. NOTE WHEN IT WAS SIGNED July 2021. The clause below shows that in July 2021, Pfizer themselves were admitting that their vaccine was "aspirational" in nature, and subject to "significant risks and uncertainties". This paragraph appears in ALL the contracts that have been leaked around the world....including the recently released South African contract (released by judicial order) It almost certainly will have been in the NZ contract too. 2.1 (b) Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that (i) Pfizer’s efforts to develop and manufacture the Product are aspirational in nature and subject to SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES In July 2021 in New Zealand, the same month the first of the vaccine MANDATES began in New Zealand.... The NZ Government, Ministry of Health and media were driving vaccination, and insisting the vaccines were SAFE AND EFFECTIVE Thus contradicting what Pfizer themselves were saying in legally binding contracts (link in comments) @TanyaUnkovichMP @BrookevanVelden @DrShaneRetiMP @winstonpeters @dbseymour #nzcovidinquiry2

HopeRising19
Posted - September 1, 2024 at 8:53 AM
Saved - September 1, 2024 at 11:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reflect on Jacinda Ardern's words during the NZ Covid response. The key takeaway? If someone in power claims to be "the single source of truth," it's a red flag. From that moment, I adopt a high state of vigilance and question everything they say.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

This is the former NZ Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, speaking during the NZ Covid pandemic response. What is the learning from this? If anyone in power EVER tells you they are "the single source of truth" Immediately assume a red alert, high vigilance state of doubt and questioning. Trust NOTHING they say from that point forth

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts their organization is the most up-to-date and trustworthy source of information, along with the director general of health and the ministry of health. For clarification of rumors, the public is directed to covid19.govt.nz, and advised to dismiss any other sources. The speaker states they will continue to be the single source of truth, providing information frequently and sharing everything they can. Anything else should be taken with a grain of salt.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We will share with you the most up to date information daily. You can trust us as a source of that information. You can also trust the director general of health and the ministry of health. For that information, do feel free to visit at any time to clarify any rumor you may hear, covid19.govt.nz. Otherwise, dismiss anything else. We will continue to be your single source of truth. We will provide information frequently. We will share everything we can, everything you are, frequently. We will share everything we can. Everything you are, else you see, a grain of salt.
HopeRising19
Posted - August 30, 2024 at 10:40 PM
Saved - August 31, 2024 at 2:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was taken aback when NHK aired a one-hour program on August 28, detailing the harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The response was overwhelming, with over 2,000 viewers sharing their thoughts, indicating that the reported harms were more extensive than we had thought. Meanwhile, I can't help but notice the decline of legacy media in New Zealand, and I find myself waiting and hoping for them to investigate and report on what I believe is the greatest medical misadventure in our history.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

JAPANS LARGEST NATIONAL BROADCASTER SCREEN ONE HOUR PROGRAM ON COVID VACCINE HARMS.... Japanese citizens were left stunned when NHK, Japan's largest national broadcaster, on 28th Aug aired an hour long comprehensive report on the harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The program received messages from over 2,000 viewers, revealing that the extent of the harms was greater than previously believed. As the NZ legacy media (including @TVNZ) continues to crumble around our ears.... And we continue to WAIT and HOPE that they will investigate and report on the greatest medical misadventure story in the history of our country. #mrna #pfizer

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Japanese citizens were left stunned when NHK, Japan's largest national broadcaster, on 28th Aug aired an hour long comprehensive report on the harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The program received messages from over 2,000 viewers, revealing that the extent of the harms was greater than previously believed.

Video Transcript AI Summary
視聴者から2000件を超えるメッセージが寄せられた。3回目のワクチン接種後から頭痛が2年以上続いている人がいる。国の申請簡略化を強く求めている。ワクチン接種直後に母親が難病を発症し亡くなったという人もいる。救済制度を申請中だが、ワクチンとの関連を疑うと伝えただけで心ない言葉を浴びせられたという。2回目のワクチン接種後、両下肢に痛みとしびれを覚え歩行困難になった人もいる。入院中に制度を知り、2年かかって手帳が交付された。40代の元医療従事者は、3回目の接種後から腕の痛みやしびれ、倦怠感に3年近く悩まされている。同業者や病院から心ない言葉を投げかけられたこともあり、国やメディアに行動を求めている。 More than 2000 messages were received from viewers. One person has had headaches for over two years since their third vaccination. They are strongly requesting simplification of the national application process. Another person's mother developed a rare disease and died immediately after vaccination. They are applying for the relief system, but they say they were subjected to unkind words just for saying they suspected a connection with the vaccine. Another person experienced pain and numbness in both legs after the second vaccination, which led to difficulty walking. They learned about the system while hospitalized and received their handbook after two years. A former healthcare worker in their 40s has been suffering from arm pain, numbness, and fatigue for nearly three years since the third vaccination. They have been subjected to unkind words from colleagues and hospitals, and are calling for action from the government and the media.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 視聴 者 の 皆 さ ん から も 2000 件 を 超 える 今 日 メッセージ いただき ま し た 。 たくさ ん ありがとうございます 。私は 三 回 目 の ワクチン を 打っ て から 頭 痛 が ひどく なり 、当初 より 軽 く は な っ た も の の 二 年 以上 症 状 が 続い て い ます 。 もう 二 年 半 も ワクチン 後 遺 症 です あ まり に も たくさ ん の 病 院 を 回り すぎ て 書 類 が 用 意 で き ず と に か く 自己 治 療 を 続け て い ます 国 の 申 請 の 簡略 化 を 強 く 求め ます 足 が 痛 い の で 書 類 も 取り に 行き に く い の で で、 簡略 化 を 早 急 に し て ほ し い です。 ワクチン 接種 直 後 に 母 が 難 病 を 発症 し 亡 く なり ま し た 。 救 済 制 度 に も 申 請 し 、審査 を 待っ て いる 状 況 です。 闘病 中 から 亡 く な っ て 申 請 書類 を 集 め て いる 期 間 、ワクチン と の 関連 を 疑っ て いる と 伝え る だけ で 、何 度 も 心 な い 言葉 を 浴 び て き ま し た 。社会 全 体 が ワクチン を 疑 う 雰 囲 気 を 許 さ ず 、被害 者 を 追い 詰め て き た こと も 行 動 し て ほ し い です と い っ た メッセージ を いただき ま し た 。 私 は 二 回 目 の コロ ナ ウイルス ワクチン 接種 後 、両 下 死 に 痛 み と し び れ を 覚え 、 そうこう し て いる うち に 歩 行 困 難 と な っ て し ま い ま し た 。 入 院 中 に こ の 制 度 の こと を 知り 、二 年 かかっ て 今 年 の 二 月 に 手 帳 が 交付 さ れ ま し た 。もっと 早く こ の 特 集 が 見 たかっ た です ね 。でも 、こう やっ て 取り 上げ て い た だけ て 、周囲 の 人 に 少 し で も 健 康 被 害 を 理 解 いただけれ ば 幸 い です。 四 十 代 三 津 さ ん です。 元 医 療 従事 者 です。 ワクチン 3 回 目 の 接種 後 から 、 接種 し た 腕 の 痛 み や し び れ 、 倦怠 感 な ど に 悩 ま さ れ て い ます 。 3 年 近 く 苦 し ん で い ます 。 同業 職 、 通 院 し た 病 院 から 心 な い 言葉 を 投げ かけ ら れ た こと も あります 。 実際 に 苦 し ん で いる 人 も 多 い と 思い ます 。 国 も メディア も しっかり 行 動 し て ほ し い です と 、この 副 反 応 の 苦 し み 事 態 を 知っ て も っ と 知っ て ほ し い と いう 声 が まず 届い て お り ます 。
HopeRising19
Posted - August 28, 2024 at 7:11 AM
Saved - August 28, 2024 at 7:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched a promotional video featuring Chris James, the NZ Director General of Health, discussing the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, which had just received Provisional Approval. His body language struck me as incongruent with the occasion; he appeared dejected, with a downward gaze and nervous gestures. Despite his assurances, I noted that by this time, the USA's VAERS had reported 736 deaths linked to COVID vaccines within just a few weeks, raising concerns about the information being conveyed to the public.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

NZ DRUG REGULATOR BODY LANGUAGE AND WORDS TELL A DIFFERENT STORY.... This video is a promotional video to assure the NZ public of the SAFETY and EFFICACY of the Pfizer mRNA injection, that had just been given a Provisional Approval in NZ, the day before. The first thing that struck me was the dejected and depressed demeanour of Chris James....considering just the day before this video Medsafe had achieved the momentous moment of Provisional Approval for the Pfizer mRNA. His disengagement with the camera, fixed downwards gaze, repeated gulping, body blocking with clasped hands and ring rolling....are all completely discordant body language for such a joyful and momentous occasion. Listen carefully to the dialogue as Chris extolls both the efficacy and SAFETY of the product. Watch the body language very carefully. This video was produced on February 4th Chris James speaks of the close relationships with International drug regulators (and their pharmacovigilance databases) to attest to the safety of the product. By the time this video was recorded the USA Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting database (VAERS) already had 736 POST COVID VACCINE DEATH REPORTS These reports were lodged for different types of Covid vaccines, and from multiple countries. The products had been available for approximately 4 to 6 weeks by this time VAERS is a passive reporting system, and a report does not automatically mean a causal connection with the product - however a staggering 736 death reports in a period of 4 to 6 weeks is completely unprecedented. Of the reports lodged in December 2020 and only for USA use, there were 19 deaths recorded, all in elderly and frail (the first demographic to receive the product) VAERS ID number: Some of the death reports include: 908245 - same day cardiac arrest 909095 - 2 days post injection died in bed 913143 - 2 hours post injection 913881 - 2 days post injection 914604 - 4 days died in sleep 914690 - 1 day post injection 914805 - 1 day post injection 914898 - 2 days post injection 914917 (age 63) - Myocardial Infarction 4 days 914961 - 1.5 HOURS post injection 914994 - 1.5 HOURS post injection 915562 - same day 915682 - cardiac arrest same day By February 2021 VAERS had received 1571 REPORTS OF DEATH FOLLOWING COVID VACCINES Do you think New Zealanders would have understood this, from watching the video below with the NZ Director General of Health and the head of our drug regulator Medsafe? (links in comments below) @TanyaUnkovichMP @winstonpeters @chrisluxonmp @DrShaneRetiMP @dbseymour @BrookevanVelden #nzcovidinquiry2

HopeRising19
Posted - August 22, 2024 at 8:11 PM
Saved - August 23, 2024 at 10:38 AM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://tkp.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/3.PSUR-1.pdf

Seite nicht gefunden – tkp.at tkp.at
HopeRising19
Posted - August 22, 2024 at 8:16 PM
Saved - August 22, 2024 at 9:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that a recent court ruling forced the release of Pfizer's Post Marketing Surveillance report, which they wanted to keep confidential for 75 years. In the first 90 days of the COVID vaccine's use, there were 1,223 reported deaths. This data was also held by NZ Medsafe, which I confirmed through an Official Information Act request. Meanwhile, the media and government continued to promote the vaccine as safe and effective.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

HOW MANY DEATHS WERE REPORTED TO PFIZER IN FIRST 90 DAYS OF COVID VAX USE? It's called a Post Marketing Surveillance report and YOU were never supposed to see it. A USA judge ordered the release of this document.... despite the wishes of Pfizer and the CDC, who petitioned to keep the Pfizer documents confidential for SEVENTY FIVE YEARS. In the first 90 days of product use, Pfizer received 1223 REPORTS OF DEATH NZ Medsafe held this data too. We know because we asked in an OIA. The media and the government just trundled on telling you SAFE AND EFFECTIVE (link in comments) #nzcovidinquiry2

HopeRising19
Posted - August 13, 2024 at 4:46 AM
Saved - August 13, 2024 at 12:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want you to understand the reality of living with serious Pfizer mRNA injury in New Zealand. Rozanne, vibrant and strong, shares her journey three years post-vaccination. Despite her efforts to move on, she faces permanent injuries and a range of debilitating symptoms, including excruciating head pain, cognitive impairment, fatigue, and seizures triggered by minimal exertion. While some symptoms have improved, many persist, forcing her to lead a quiet life. Rozanne continues to push through challenges, striving to enjoy life despite the ongoing struggles.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

I WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS THE REALITY OF LIVING WITH SERIOUS PFIZER MRNA INJURY IN NEW ZEALAND... Rozanne has everything to live for. She is vibrant, courageous and unbelievably strong....but THIS is the reality of her life, three years on from her Pfizer injections. I wrote to her and asked her how she is now. Here is her response, in her own words... Video's filmed in the past week. Currently awaiting results from new Neurological testing QUOTE: How am I now... I am trying to move on with life, and learning to live with the permanent injuries Below is a list of the symptoms, ailments, afflictions, and physical disabilities I suffered in the weeks / months after the vax - they can give you a comparison with my 2nd list below of what I'm still working with / suffering today: •Excruciating drilling head pains •Brain fog & loss of mental clarity •Cognitive function impaired •Nausea, vomiting, hallucinations •Vertigo •Loss of sleep •Bizarre dreams •Hypersensitivity to low / high frequencies •Tinnitus •Loss of vision or eyesight fog •Pressure and pain behind eyes •Facial numbness •Fatigue & exhaustion •Vibration throughout body / limbs •Spine / Back pains •Muscle spasms •At times, Inability to sit or stand unassisted •Ongoing tiredness •Ongoing muscle fatigue •Ongoing body twitching •Chest tightness and pains •Struggling to breath •Ongoing tightness of the chest (heart?) •Fluttering, vibrations and pounding within chest. •Limb aches and pains •Tingling in limbs, pins & needles •Throbbing in the knees •Left shoulder joint collapses – causing loss of left arm use at times •Ongoing left shoulder pain / issues •Pains & discomfort in ovaries •Blood blackened / thickened / sticky •Periods stopped (went from perimenopausal to well off the scale post-menopausal Ailments which still effect me now (July 2024) •Consistent pain in right hand side of brain (MRI identified a white spot/dead spot in my brain there now) •Brain fog & loss of mental clarity - improved but not good - I still feel like I'm concussed •Cognitive function impaired - improved but not good - I still feel like I'm concussed •Vertigo - only intermittently now •Tinnitus - 100% still there •Facial numbness - slight right hand side of face •Fatigue & exhaustion - now diagnosed as Chronic Fatigue •Vibration throughout body / limbs •Muscle spasms - glitches / twitching •Ongoing tiredness •Ongoing muscle fatigue •Ongoing body twitching •Ongoing tightness of the chest (heart?) •Fluttering, vibrations and pounding within chest. •Limb aches and pains •Tingling in limbs, pins & needles •Post menopausal I was unable to work / was out of employment until November 2022 as I tried to allow my body/brain to recover and fought my way through the brain fog to be able to make sense of life and office functions again. The twitching & glitching developed into Seizures which are triggered when I exert myself even slightly (go for a walk / play a game of mini-golf / hang out the laundry ... nothing strenuous) - locking up my body for 30-40 secs at a time - so to manage this and the "Chronic Fatigue" I pretty much am living a very quiet life these days. If I have an event or activity coming up I steel up my strength for weeks, knowing the day out is going to drain me and bring on seizures afterwards, but I don't really see how else I'm supposed to live and still try to enjoy life, so I push myself through. In general I'm trying to get on with life - and living with what this is. Rozanne @winstonpeters @TanyaUnkovichMP @dbseymour @DrShaneRetiMP @chrisluxonmp #nzcovidinquiry2

HopeRising19
Posted - August 10, 2024 at 8:45 AM
Saved - August 10, 2024 at 6:29 PM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/health/vaccination-incentive-offered

Vaccination incentive offered A Māori social service is now able to provide an incentive for families to get vaccinated after an "eternally frustrating" road for funding. Te... odt.co.nz
HopeRising19
Posted - July 31, 2024 at 12:28 AM
Saved - July 31, 2024 at 1:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Health NZ is updating their GENDER DIVERSITY policy, set to release in July 2024. The new policy emphasizes that menstruation is not exclusive to femininity, acknowledging that people of all genders, including non-binary, agender, and even many men, can menstruate.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Health NZ (Te Whatu Ora) are our NZ hospital care providers. They are currently updating their GENDER DIVERSITY policy. Their new policy released July 2024 states: “Having a period is not a feminine thing, and people of all genders menstruate, including non-binary people, agender people and EVEN PLENTY OF MEN .”

HopeRising19
Posted - July 28, 2024 at 8:30 PM
Saved - July 29, 2024 at 12:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I inquired about the number of New Zealanders who received medical exemptions for COVID vaccination due to anaphylaxis after their first dose. According to the response from an NZ OIA, 125 individuals applied for a medical exemption on these grounds, but only 11 were granted exemptions while 114 were declined. Despite the Pfizer technical data sheet stating that those who experienced anaphylaxis should not receive further doses, individuals were instead advised to get their next dose in a hospital setting. This situation feels unjust.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

WE ASKED "HOW MANY PEOPLE RECEIVED COVID VAX MEDICAL EXEMPTIONS DUE TO ANAPHYLAXIS FOLLOWING FIRST DOSE? I n NZ OIA Ref: HNZ 00028251 How many New Zealanders experienced a life threatening Anaphylactic reaction following their first dose of the Pfizer injection....and then faced employment mandates, and applied for a MEDICAL EXEMPTION? We asked in an NZ OIA. Answer: 125 New Zealanders applied for a Medical Exemption (2a) on these grounds. 11 were exempted 114 WERE DECLINED To this very day the Pfizer technical data sheet stresses that anyone who experienced an Anaphylaxis is CONTRAINDICATED for further doses. In NZ, you were instead declined an exemption and told to have your next dose at a hospital emergency department with a team and a crash cart on hand. THIS IS CRIMINAL #nzcovidinquiry2 @winstonpeters @dbseymour @chrisluxonmp

HopeRising19
Posted - July 23, 2024 at 8:30 PM
Saved - July 24, 2024 at 7:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve received a massive data dump from a whistleblower, a former employee of the German Robert Koch Institute, revealing unredacted meeting minutes from the RKI crisis team from 2020 to 2023. This data, totaling 10 GB, exposes contradictions in Germany's Corona policy, showing that many decisions were politically motivated rather than scientifically based. I express my gratitude to the whistleblower and journalist Paul Schreyer for their courage and dedication. Now, we can begin an honest review of the Corona measures in Germany. Happy digging!

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

BREAKING NEWS - MASSIVE WHISTLEBLOWER DATA DUMP - GERMAN CORONA RESPONSE!!! A former employee of the German Robert Koch Institute has released a MASSIVE data dump relating to all aspects of the German Corona response: English translation: We end the drama surrounding the redactions of the #RKIProtokolle at this point. Here is the complete data set of all meeting minutes of the@rki_decrisis team, from 2020 to 2023, unredacted, including 10 GB of additional material: https://rki-transparenzbericht.de A whistleblower, a former employee of the Robert Koch Institute, approached me and passed on the data set to me. Personal details are of course subject to informant protection, but I can say this much: The person did it for reasons of conscience. For the truth, for a full review of the Corona measures - and not least for the people of this country. Even if the RKI has played a rather inglorious role in the last four years by giving in to an intrusive policy that violated fundamental rights, there have also been people in the RKI over the last four years who have stood on the side of the citizens and who did not agree with the actions of their authority, the contradictory recommendations to politicians, and the rubber-stamping of arbitrary political decisions. The new RKI leak should therefore also be understood as a handout, as a gesture of reconciliation: between citizens - across administrative borders, firewalls and walls in people's minds. We should remember that there are also people in seemingly faceless authorities: people who have their own minds, who, just like us, have their own thoughts, and who want a better future for all of us: free from totalitarianism, political paternalism and the systematic violation of physical self-determination rights. This spirit - our connection as citizens to one another - is uncancellable. Those in power know this. It is what they fear most. The Achilles heel of the current political system is us humans, because each and every one of us has power. As a precaution, we have uploaded the logs to various other hosting platforms in addition to the page https://rki-transparenzbericht.de . If a download link is overloaded, simply try the next alternative: Proton Drive: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee1069c49b HiDrive: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee1d3e115eMega: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee20d26de9TG: https://tolink.to/f/fo669f0bc6b4970Uploady: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee2899a2bb Pixeldrain: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee2d979412 The download alternatives to the 10 GB of additional material will follow in a few hours. Until then, please download from the leak website. Some of my colleagues and I have already read the protocols. You need strong nerves to read some of them because of the blatant contradictions they contain. The RKI protocols prove that our corona policy was not based on rational, scientific considerations. Numerous political decisions, such as 2G, the facility-related and planned general vaccination requirement, or the vaccination of children, were purely political decisions for which the RKI, as an authority bound by instructions, provided supposedly scientific legitimacy. We will find out why Christian Drosten, despite the bold announcement in his book, apparently had a bad feeling about having his name redacted in the protocols - and we will be reminded that Jens Spahn had already spoken out in favor of a large-scale child vaccination campaign before the EMA and STIKO recommendation. We will learn that the RKI did not object when the EMA and Pfizer wanted to cancel the Phase III trials and test the vaccine equally on the entire population - so that the emergency approval could be granted more quickly. And we will learn that the RKI unfortunately voted in favour of both facility-specific and general vaccination requirements despite knowing about the lack of protection for others and the serious side effects. I bow with the deepest respect to an incredibly brave and honest former RKI employee, to whom we have today to thank. My deepest thanks also go to the journalist Paul Schreyer, who got the ball rolling in the first place through his persistent legal battle over the RKI protocols. You both have rendered this country an invaluable service. I would also like to thank my colleagues who have worked passionately in the background over the last few weeks to make today's leak in its many dimensions possible in the first place. With the completely de-redacted data set of all RKI crisis team protocols, an uncompromising and honest review of Corona policy in Germany can now begin. In the end, the truth always wins. With that in mind: Happy Digging!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thank you for your interest. The focus is on the impact of COVID measures on children. School closures, mask mandates, and vaccine campaigns are discussed. The effectiveness of these measures, especially on children, is questioned. The need for unbiased reporting and thorough investigation is emphasized to prevent further harm to children.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dear sir or madam, thank you for your interest. First of all, we would like to thank the courageous people with backbone who made the RKI protocols, including comprehensive accompanying documents available to the public. Thanks must also be given to Invalov Velasquez for good journalistic work so that this person can turn to someone and know that it is in good hands. This must definitely be emphasized. In my remarks, I would like to focus on the usefulness of the corona measures towards children and young people. The current health minister, Lauterbach, has already admitted that children and young people are the most or even the most affected, have made the greatest sacrifices in the course of pandemic policy. The federal minister for family affairs speaks of 73% of children and young people who are psychologically stressed due to the measures and not due to a virus. The damage caused is extensive, partly irreversible and enormous, and will keep us busy for decades. What happened? Germany had some of the longest school closures in all of Europe. Mandatory mask wearing for hours on end, for months, sometimes outdoors, regular random testing, we've just heard how useful that is, of healthy children, the closure of playgrounds, the child's need for contact, completely reluctant social distancing requirements and then the promotion of a new and little tested vaccine. Not to be forgotten is the strategy developed by the Ministry of the Interior to deliberately frighten children and to suggest that they are to blame for the death of their parents if they do not comply with hygiene rules. However, according to federal law, the child's welfare must be given priority in all political decisions. Therefore, especially for this group, our future, there is an urgent need for clarification as to whether the decision makers based their containment measures on scientific facts and whether the welfare of the child was their primary concern or not. To do this, the focus must be on whether children were ever at significant risk at all, according to the expertise of the Robert Koch Institute. Let us take a look at excerpts from the crisis team's minutes, which are now freely accessible to anyone interested. An employee of the RKI arrives on 26th. February 2020 before any school closures from China, and he states the following. I quote, children 2% of cases in large study. Children's hospital confirms all without complications. Done. Also not prevalent in transmission chains. Schools and daycare centers are not a priority. Children are not important links in transmission chains. Role of children rather untypically subordinate. Coordinate. I'm Mike influenza. More studies must follow. Middle of March. School closures are on the way, and the RTI states the following. 11. March. Reactive school closures in areas not particularly affected are not recommended. 12, March, Christian Drosten, I quote, no more events and closing schools. That is something we have to do now. 13, March, mister Spahn ordered this word should always be entered in the search bar for the protocols that a passage on school closures be inserted into the criteria for the risk assessment of major events. The politicians wanted that. In another publication cited by mister Drosston, the effectiveness of school closures was modeled. Publication caution, but refers to influenza. You might have noticed the contradiction. Corona, and this was confirmed in the coming months, was less dangerous for children than influenza. Going to the swimming pool or being in traffic. In April 2020 after the first school closures, a review paper is cited in the RKI protocols. Quote, school closures probably did not have a major impact on controlling the epidemic. Even in August 21, it remains the case quote that children have a low risk of severe disease compared to other respiratory diseases. This in turn means that children have been forced to take measures to protect the well-being of others at the expense of their own health. A historic taboo break. And also highly controversial because in the fall of 2021, the protocols that we can now read state quote, younger children are very rarely index persons. They become infected in the family. Sequence 7. Nov 21. Let us now turn to the measures to which children were obliged. The mask, Nov 20. It is inconvenient and dangerous for masks to be used by laypeople. Influence? Rather not possible. The consultations take place simultaneously. RKI was not asked in advance. The mask requirements were introduced nonetheless, and as expected, had no medical effectiveness. However, there are significant side effects, especially in children and adolescents. When the topic of FFP2 masks came up, the RKI said that from a technical point of view, it is not without problems to generally recommend FFP2 masks. A general requirement to wear FFP2 masks is not considered sensible. 13. January 21. The RKI ponders in its second thought. Gee winter 2021, whether FFP 2 masks should be recommended for schools. Quote, so far there is no convincing evidence that FFP 2 is better, especially not in children. In October 2022, FFP 2 masks were made mandatory on public transport for children aged 6 to 13. And how effective were these measures? In general, it was already clear in autumn 2020 that the success of measures cannot be satisfactorily answered with RKI data. We know which factors are driving up the incidences and know of sensible measures, but we will not be able to prove this with RKI data. An unbelievable statement. In January 2021, measures in schools and day care centers cannot prevent outbreaks. September 2021. An increase in consultations due to Vaccination of children. Since corona did not pose a significant threat to children, there was never a medical reason for a conditionally approved and experimental vaccination, which as was clear from the beginning, only offered self protection, if at all. What does it say about the protocols? Pediatric professional associations are hesitant about vaccinating children. Politicians are already preparing vaccination campaigns so that the relevant age groups will be vaccinated by the end of the holidays. The minutes state that the Stake KO, the standing committee on vaccination, still does not rate the benefits of vaccination as higher than the risk posed by the disease. From August, 12 to 17 year olds should get vaccinated per The RKI also recognizes this and is looking for explanations to justify the vaccination of children. Suddenly, they change direction and try to show what long term effects the disease can have on children. On July 30, 2021, there is talk of changing the If it were included as a target, that would change the rating. If it were included as a target, that would change the rating. Modeling colon, vaccination of adolescents has no influence on the course of the 4th wave. There was no valid data at the time and there's no valid data today showing that SARS CoV minus 2 infections in children lead to particularly long term effects. The STECO chairman himself said that there is no such thing as long COVID in children. On the same day, the booster vaccination is given as has already been quoted, you can do it twice. Quote, recommendations for boosters are complex, especially demanded by politicians and Pfizer. So far, there is not enough data available. July 21, targeting younger people in vaccination quote, for example, influenza vaccination challenge on YouTube. Quote, it must be cool to get vaccinated. There are further indications of political influence. Quote, to Todd. At present, a booster vaccination for children is also being considered from a ministerial perspective. Although there's no recommendation and in some cases no approval for this. Regarding the monitoring of the safety of the previously advertised vaccines, it is stated on January 23, quote, monthly report and vaccination dashboard will be discontinued in May. Assessment of vaccine side effects will no longer be possible. This must be accompanied by very good communication so that it does not fall back on the RKI. Conclusion. In principle, all these medical facts are not new. Doctors and internationally highly respected scientists pointed out early on, but mostly in vain, that the measures posed a greater danger to children than the virus itself. The RKI also knew this. An unbiased look at Sweden was enough to consider these indications as proven. However, these voices were removed from the debate space right from the start. It is now clear that the RKI was also aware of this medical madness. Now it is finally time for the press to do its job, to meticulously work through the records and to inform the public objectively and fully. Anything else would be a further betrayal of the children and young people of this country after the politically controlled child hostile pandemic policy supported by so many educators, associations, doctors, parents, and journalists.
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - Proton Drive - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - HiDrive - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - Mega - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle Telegram - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - Uploady - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - Pixeldrain - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to

@aya_velazquez - Aya Velázquez

Wir beenden das Drama um die Schwärzungen der #RKIProtokolle an dieser Stelle. Hier kommt der komplette Datensatz aller Sitzungsprotokolle des @rki_de-Krisenstabs, von 2020 bis 2023, ungeschwärzt, inklusive 10 GB Zusatzmaterial: https://rki-transparenzbericht.de/ Ein/e Whistleblower/in, ein/e ehemalige Mitarbeiter/in des Robert-Koch-Instituts, ist auf mich zugekommen und hat mir den Datensatz zugespielt. Einzelheiten zur Person unterliegen selbstverständlich dem Informantenschutz, aber soviel kann ich sagen: Die Person hat es aus Gewissensgründen getan. Für die Wahrheit, für eine vollumfängliche Aufarbeitung der Corona-Maßnahmen - und nicht zuletzt für die Menschen in diesem Land. Auch wenn das RKI in den letzten vier Jahren eine eher unrühmliche Rolle gespielt hat, indem es vor einer übergriffigen, grundrechtswidrigen Politik eingeknickt ist: Auch im RKI gab es in den letzten vier Jahren Menschen, die auf der Seite der Bürger standen, und mit dem Handeln ihrer Behörde, den widersprüchlichen Empfehlungen an die Politik, und dem Abnicken politischer Willkürentscheidungen nicht einverstanden waren. Der neue RKI-Leak ist daher auch als eine Handreichung, als eine Geste der Versöhnung zu verstehen: Zwischen Bürgern - über behördliche Grenzen, Firewalls und Mauern in den Köpfen hinweg. Wir sollten uns daran erinnern, dass in vermeintlich gesichtslosen Behörden auch Menschen sitzen: Menschen, die ihren eigenen Kopf haben, die sich, ebenso wie wir, ihre Gedanken machen, und für uns alle eine bessere Zukunft wollen: Frei von Totalitarismus, politischer Bevormundung und der systematischen Verletzung körperlicher Selbstbestimmungsrechte. Dieser Geist - unsere Verbundenheit als Bürger untereinander – ist uncancelbar. Die Mächtigen wissen das. Es ist das, wovor sie am meisten Angst haben. Die Achillesferse des aktuellen politischen Systems sind wir Menschen, denn jeder einzelne von uns hat Macht. Vorsichtshalber haben wir die Protokolle neben der Seite https://rki-transparenzbericht.de/ auch auf diversen weiteren Hosting-Plattformen hochgeladen. Wenn ein Download-Link überlastet sein sollte – einfach die nächste Alternative ausprobieren: Proton Drive: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee1069c49b HiDrive: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee1d3e115e Mega: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee20d26de9 TG: https://tolink.to/f/fo669f0bc6b4970 Uploady: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee2899a2bb Pixeldrain: https://tolink.to/f/fo669ee2d979412 Die Download-Alternativen zu den 10 GB Zusatzmaterial folgen in wenigen Stunden. Bis dahin bitte auf der Webseite zum Leak herunterladen. Einige Mitstreiter und ich haben die Protokolle bereits gelesen. Man braucht für die Lektüre teilweise starke Nerven, aufgrund der darin enthaltenen, eklatanten Widersprüche. Die RKI-Protokolle beweisen: Unsere Corona-Politik basierte nicht auf rationalen, wissenschaftlichen Abwägungen. Zahlreiche politische Entscheidungen, wie etwa 2G, die einrichtungsbezogene und geplante allgemeine Impfpflicht, oder die Impfung von Kindern, waren rein politische Entscheidungen, für die das RKI als weisungsgebundene Behörde eine vermeintlich wissenschaftliche Legitimation lieferte. Wir werden erfahren, warum Christian Drosten trotz der vollmundigen Ankündigung in seinem Buch offenbar Bauchschmerzen damit hatte, seinen Namen in den Protokollen entschwärzen zu lassen – und wir werden daran erinnert, dass sich Jens Spahn schon vor der EMA-und STIKO-Empfehlung für eine großangelegte Kinder-Impfkampagne aussprach. Wir werden erfahren, dass das RKI nicht widersprach, als die EMA und Pfizer die Phase-III Studien ausfallen lassen wollten, und die Impfung gleich breit an der gesamten Bevölkerung austesten - damit es mit der Notzulassung schneller geht. Und wir werden erfahren, dass sich das RKI leider trotz des Wissens um fehlenden Fremdschutz und schwerste Nebenwirkungen sowohl für die einrichtungsbezogene, als auch für die allgemeine Impfpflicht aussprach. Heute Morgen um 10 Uhr werde ich zusammen mit einigen Mitstreitern, die mit mir zusammen in den letzten Wochen die RKI-Protokolle analysiert haben, eine Live-Pressekonferenz aus dem „Sprechsaal“ in Berlin-Mitte, Marienstr. 26, zum heutigen Leak geben. Die Pressekonferenz wird live auf X gestreamt: Pressevertreter und interessierte Bürger sind dazu herzlich vor Ort eingeladen. Für Fragen zum neuen RKI-Leak stehe ich auch die nächsten Tage zur Verfügung. Ich verneige mich in tiefstem Respekt vor einer/m unfassbar mutigen und integren ehemaligen RKI- Mitarbeiter/in, dem/der wir den heutigen Tag zu verdanken haben. Mein tiefster Dank gilt ebenfalls dem Journalisten Paul Schreyer, der durch seinen beharrlichen Rechtsstreit um die RKI-Protokolle diesen Stein überhaupt erst ins Rollen gebracht hat. Sie beide haben diesem Land einen unschätzbaren Dienst erwiesen. Des Weiteren möchte ich meinen Mitstreitern danken, die im Hintergrund die letzten Wochen passioniert mitgeholfen haben, den heutigen Leak in seinen vielen Dimensionen überhaupt erst möglich zu machen. Mit dem vollständig entschwärzten Datensatz aller RKI-Krisenstab-Protokolle kann nun eine kompromisslose und ehrliche Aufarbeitung der Corona-Politik in Deutschland beginnen. Am Ende siegt immer die Wahrheit. In diesem Sinne: Happy Digging! 💥

RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - Proton Drive - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - HiDrive - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - Mega - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle Telegram - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - Uploady - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
RKI Krisenstab Protokolle - Pixeldrain - ToLink.to Schützen und verschlüsseln Sie kostenlos Ihre Links vor Abuse und bösen Menschen dank modernster Captcha Technologie. tolink.to
HopeRising19
Posted - July 24, 2024 at 7:07 AM
Saved - July 24, 2024 at 7:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned about a significant whistleblower leak from the Robert Koch Institute in Germany. An ex-employee revealed extensive data showing that the government prioritized political agendas over scientific advice in their Covid response. Check out the full press conference linked in the comments.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

HUGE WHISTLEBLOWER LEAK FROM GERMAN ROBERT KOCH INSTITUTE... A (now) ex employee has released a huge amount of data from the chief science institute in Germany, involved in advising the German government on the SCIENCE of the Covid response. Except.... What is evident from the leak is that the Government overrode the science, instead making "agenda driven" political decisions. (link to full press conference in comments)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ein Whistleblower vom Robert Koch Institut enthüllt Uneinigkeit mit der Coronapolitik und Ministeriellen Weisungen. Öffentlichkeit wurde getäuscht und Minister Lauterbach erklärte die Pandemie fälschlicherweise für beendet. RKI Mitarbeiter zweifeln an der Pandemie und distanzieren sich von der Hysterie, die sie selbst erzeugt haben. Die Pandemie wurde politisch beendet, obwohl medizinisch keine Notlage bestand. English Translation: A whistleblower from the Robert Koch Institute reveals disagreement with the Corona policy and ministerial directives. The public was deceived and Minister Lauterbach falsely declared the end of the pandemic. RKI employees doubt the pandemic and distance themselves from the hysteria they created. The pandemic was politically ended, even though there was no medical emergency.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dass mir zugespielt wurde von einem Whistleblower Slash einer Whistleblowerin aus dem Robert Koch Institut. Die Person arbeitet also es handelt sich hierbei eine Gewissensentscheidung. Das also es handelt sich hierbei eine Gewissensentscheidung. Das heißt, die Person hat war nicht einverstanden mit der Coronapolitik der Bundesregierung, war nicht einverstanden mit der Art und Weise, wie ihr Institut vorauseilend gewissen politischen Weisungen entgegengekommen ist, auch eigene wissenschaftliche Prinzipien ja, 'n Stück weit verraten hat. Und Es Es hat diverse Treffen gegeben und diverse Übergaben von Material und das Material ist seit gestern vollständig. Das Speaker 1: Erstens Erstens, ministerielle Weisungen und zweitens Täuschung der Öffentlichkeit. Beides ist wichtig, weil die Öffentlichkeit denkt, dass die über tausend RKI Mitarbeiter Wissenschaft gemacht haben, die Politik beraten haben und die Politik sich dann nach dieser Wissenschaft gerichtet hat. In In den Medien wird von einer Pandemie der Ungeimpften gesprochen. Aus fachlicher werden? Und dann die Antwort werden? Und dann die Antwort, nein, der Minister sagt das bei jeder Pressekonferenz vermutlich bewusst, kann eher nicht korrigiert werden. Das heißt, Sie wissen, dass der Minister in der Öffentlichkeit lügt, also bewusst, aber Sie trauen sich nicht, das richtig zwanzig. Für mich das Highlight der ganzen Sammlungen. Minister Lauterbach hat Anfang April die Pandemie für Deutschland für beendet erklärt. Wie gehen wir damit Es gibt kein landesspezifisches Ende einer weltweiten Pandemie. Ja, man sieht, Sie haben sich selber in diese Pandemie reingesteigert und man kann als abschließende Bemerkung beim RKI im Grunde folgende Tendenz ausmachen. In den Protokollen von März zwanzig Prozent Leerstand in den Kliniken gibt, was es noch nie gegeben hat, schreiben normal seit zehn Prozent Leerstand. Sie sagen aufgrund ihrer klinischen Überwachungssysteme, also Sentinel und so weiter, dass die Zahl der Erkältung insgesamt völlig normal ist. Man sieht, dass sie dem Ganzen distanziert gegenüberstehen. Das ändert sich aber und ich deute es so, dass sich viele RKI Mitarbeiter selber in die von ihnen erzeugte Psychose mit reingesteigert haben. Und am Schluss ganz erschreckt erfahren, ups, jetzt wird gesagt, die Pandemie ist zu Ende. Aber warum? Das ist doch alles wie vorher. Ja, stimmt. Es gab eben nie eine Pandemie im medizinischen Sinne, also im Sinne des Notstands, sondern es gab nur eine einer Pandemie und die wurde dann beendet, als es politisch nicht mehr übertun war.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRFjwgmn3Sc

HopeRising19
Posted - July 20, 2024 at 3:23 AM
Saved - July 20, 2024 at 6:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I highlighted the missing information regarding the June 2022 Covid vaccines that the FDA identified during the VRBPAC meeting. Key areas lacking data included the vaccine's use in pregnancy, lactation, effectiveness, long-term safety, interactions with other vaccines, and its application for immunocompromised individuals, frail elderly, those with autoimmune disorders, and babies under six months. New Zealanders were not provided this crucial information during the Informed Consent process.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

WHILE KIWI'S WERE MANDATED TO TAKE THE MRNA...THE FDA DEEMED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION "MISSING" June 2022 Covid vaccines FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting of June 15th, 2022: Areas the sponsor identified as missing information included: *use in pregnancy *use during lactation *VACCINE EFFECTIVENESS *long term SAFETY *interaction with other vaccines *use in IMMUNOCOMPROMISED *use in FRAIL ELDERLY *use in patients with autoimmune inflammatory disorders *use in babies less than 6 months of age At NO time were New Zealanders given this information as part of an Informed Consent process. (link in comments)

HopeRising19
Posted - July 16, 2024 at 7:58 AM
Saved - July 17, 2024 at 1:31 AM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Australian distance running champion Stewart McSweyn had an episode during the 5000m in Tokyo. Struggling to breathe the assumption was at first COVID. It turns out it was a recent BOOSTER CAUSING PERICARDITIS And here it is written in a newspaper!! PS I JUST DISCOVERED THIS WAS IN 2022

HopeRising19
Posted - July 16, 2024 at 7:10 AM
Saved - July 16, 2024 at 7:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In two recent Official Information Act responses, contradictory answers were given regarding the availability of information on adverse events following Covid-19 immunization by batch. In February 2022, it was stated that batch numbers are recorded in the COVID Immunisation Register (CIR). However, in June 2024, Medsafe revealed a new database that can report on serious adverse events by batch, while in July 2024, a request for adverse events by Pfizer batch was declined, claiming the information did not exist. This lack of transparency is concerning.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Two Official Information Act responses within a month revealing seemingly contradictory answers. We have known since February 2022 that 'batch numbers...are recorded in the COVID Immunisation Register (CIR). When an Adverse Event Following Immunisation (AEFI) report is made, the AEFI assessment is generated to include the CIR information alongside the information in the AEFI report.' On 7 June 2024 Medsafe responded to a December 2021 request revealing a new database has the ability to report on serious adverse events following Covid 19 immunisation by batch. However, on 2 July 2024, a request for adverse events following Covid injection by Pfizer batch, was declined by Medsafe on the grounds that the information did not exist. This appears to be an appalling lack of transparency... #nzpol #Covid_19

@nzdsos - NZDSOS - NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science

** Breaking ** Two Official Information Act responses within a month revealing seemingly contradictory answers. We have known since February 2022 that 'batch numbers...are recorded in the COVID Immunisation Register (CIR). When an Adverse Event Following Immunisation (AEFI) report is made, the AEFI assessment is generated to include the CIR information alongside the information in the AEFI report.' On 7 June 2024 Medsafe responded to a December 2021 request revealing a new database has the ability to report on serious adverse events following Covid 19 immunisation by batch. However, on 2 July 2024, a request for adverse events following Covid injection by Pfizer batch, was declined by Medsafe on the grounds that the information did not exist. This appears to be an appalling lack of transparency... #nzpol #Covid_19

HopeRising19
Posted - July 13, 2024 at 7:58 AM
Saved - July 13, 2024 at 10:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There's a bird flu summit happening in October, and the program looks interesting. They will be discussing countermeasures, antivirals, vaccines, and how to counter misinformation. Topics include engaging stakeholders, providing updates, fact-checking, monitoring and responding to misinformation, and utilizing digital platforms and social media channels. Check out the program in the comments.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Have you seen the BIRD FLU SUMMIT planned for October? You REALLY should read the program (link in comments) Yes....the word "COUNTERMEASURES" used frequently Yes the words ANTIVIRALS and VACCINES used frequently. And they even have a whole section on: How to Effectively Counter Mis- and Dis-information • Engaging Stakeholders and Communities • Provide timely and transparent updates • Fact-Checking and Debunking • Monitoring and Response to Misinformation • Utilizing Digital Platforms and social media channels https://birdflusummit.com/Bird%20Flu%20Summit%20Brochure.pdf…

Contact Us This is seo description birdflusummit.com

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://birdflusummit.com/

Bird Flu Summit This is seo description birdflusummit.com
HopeRising19
Posted - July 10, 2024 at 8:16 AM
Saved - July 10, 2024 at 8:00 PM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

BREAKING - IMPORTANT NEWS FOR ALL KIWI'S WHO WERE MANDATED IN EDUCATION AND HEALTH SECTORS Please listen and SHARE WIDELY Please copy and paste the written version of this post (see in comments) into a letter to your MP. This is huge news https://t.co/ZoPq8FjG0w

Video Transcript AI Summary
Linda from Health Forum NZ shares a bombshell revelation from NZTS0S about a Ministry of Health report showing low transmission risk in schools and healthcare settings. Despite this, the government implemented unnecessary vaccine mandates causing harm. Expert witnesses in court failed to disclose this information, potentially committing perjury. NZTS0S seeks to appeal to the Supreme Court for justice. They urge affected individuals to share this revelation to hold those responsible accountable. Financial support may be needed for the appeal. Take action by contacting MPs and spreading awareness on social media. This urgent message highlights the need for accountability and justice.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, everyone. It's Linda here from the Health Forum NZ. I've just got something really important that I would like to share with you tonight. This is some news from, New Zealand teachers speaking out with science or NZTS0S. So, the message is headed bombshell revelation. Nztsos have uncovered a science and insights report that was published by the Ministry of Health in October 2021 which totally demolishes the Labour government's narrative around the grave risk that existed in schools and health care settings at the time. Because of this discovery, we now know that before the health and education mandate order was signed, the government had in its possession high quality evidence that the risk of transmission in schools and healthcare settings was insignificant and that the vaccination mandate was therefore totally unnecessary. There's no easy way around the importance of this document. It's the Ministry's own contact tracing data. It has a very large sample size making it highly reliable Over what over 11, 000 education contexts were analyzed, and it's the most relevant piece of information that that they would have had in their possession in relation to the vaccine mandates. It told the government that in health care settings, only 1 in 500 contacts became infected. While in educational settings, just 1 in 1, 000 contacts became infected. Yet knowing all this, Hopkins went ahead and signed the mandate order that brought so much unnecessary pain and suffering on so many. Can it get get any worse than this? Well, unfortunately, it can. Health and education workers, nzdsos and nztsos went to the high court in March 2022 to have the vaccination mandate order declared unlawful. The crown produced sworn affidavits from 4 witnesses, mister Hipkins, miss McKay Mackay, doctor Towne and doctor Bloomfield with doctors Towne and Bloomfield being accepted by the court as expert witnesses Now there are very strict rules that control the evidence of an expert witness. They must swear to assist the court impartially and also that they will tell the court if any part of their evidence is incomplete or inaccurate without some qualification. Doctors Towne and Bloomfield both would have known about this highly relevant Ministry of Health Analysis, but they did not reveal this to the court. NZTSOS believed that by keeping this from the high court, doctors Towne and Bloomfield clearly contravene the rules for expert witnesses and potentially open themselves to a charge of perjury. Another crown witness, miss miss McKay also kept highly relevant information from the court. She correctly told the court that only 11 applications for serious service disruption exemptions had been granted, but she failed to tell the court that 1 application alone was for 971 workers and and that by the date of her affidavit, these 11 applications covered a total of 2, 833 workers. All of this while hundreds of other phone workers were being terminated because of what the court approvingly termed the government's 0 tolerance approach, if only the court had known. NZTS0S is now seeking leave to appeal to the supreme court and 1 of their claims that these is that these serious omissions in the evidence presented by the crown's witnesses has led to a miscarriage of justice. What can you do to help? Well, if the n zed TS0S appeal is accepted, they're going to need financial help, but that can wait for the moment. Right now, they need everyone who's been affected by the mandate to help share this bombshell revelation. We need to make it difficult for the supreme court to quietly decline their application in the hope that it will all just go away So can you please write to your MP? Can you share this post with others? If we do all our bit, if we all do our bit to publicize this bombshell, we may yet succeed in holding to account those who've perpetrated this grave injustice. So that is a a very urgent, and shocking post from n zed teachers speaking out with science. I will also put the, written copy of this post beneath the video. So please help them write to your MP copy and paste this post into a letter to your MP and please share it widely on social media. Thank you.
HopeRising19
Posted - July 8, 2024 at 9:01 PM
Saved - July 10, 2024 at 3:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Helmut Sterz, former CEO of Pfizer's Global Research & Development, reveals that no proper toxicology analysis was conducted on Pfizer's mRNA before it was administered to millions of people. Watch the interview with John Leake for more information.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

FORMER PFIZER CEO OF GLOBAL RESEARCH SPEAKS OUT!!! Dr. Helmut Sterz, former CEO of Global Research & Development at Pfizer’s lab in Amboise, France: NO PROPER TOXICOLOGY ANALYSIS WAS PERFORMED ON THE PFIZER mRNA prior to its injection into hundreds of millions of people Watch the groundbreaking interview with John Leake and Dr. Helmut Sterz on Courageous Discourse: (link in comments)

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

Dr. Helmut Sterz, former CEO of Global Research & Development at Pfizer’s lab in Amboise, France: NO proper toxicology analysis was performed on the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA "vaccine" prior to its injection into hundreds of millions of people. Watch the groundbreaking interview with John Leake and Dr. Helmut Sterz on Courageous Discourse: https://shorturl.at/EHRKo #MFEducation

Video Transcript AI Summary
BioNTech's studies lacked clear guidance and evaluation of results from contract laboratories. The reproductive toxicology studies on pregnant animals showed side effects were dismissed as unimportant or already seen in control populations. This lack of seriousness in safety strategy was concerning.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: IIII know that the studies that the few studies that were that were performed, under the, auspices of, BioNTech, were done in contract laboratories. And, I must say that must I cannot see any guidance, real guidance, in the evaluation of the results. They, got the results, and, that was it. I mean, coming back to reproductive toxicology, the part which, where they treated pregnant animals, and they they, they studied 3 different compounds of the same basis. They just, the the side effects that they observed were just said, okay. That's not important. Or that, we we have seen that already, amongst the, like, control, populations in the past. This this, this really shocked me, and I can't see that there was a real serious, strategy for safety.
ShortURL - URL Shortener ShortURL is a tool to shorten a long link and create a short URL easy to share on sites, chat and emails. Track short URL traffic and manage your links. shorturl.at
HopeRising19
Posted - July 7, 2024 at 8:43 PM
Saved - July 8, 2024 at 8:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The NZ drug regulator, Medsafe, initially stated that the risk/benefit balance of the Pfizer vaccine was unclear and they were unable to recommend its approval. However, they were overruled by the Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee (MAAC) and instructed to grant provisional approval. This information was not communicated to the public, leading to a lack of informed consent. #nzcovidinquiry2

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Just weeks before needles starting going into NZ arms, the NZ drug regulator Medsafe stated: "The risk/benefit balance (of the Pfizer) is not clear" Medsafe wrote to Pfizer and advised it that it was UNABLE TO RECCOMEND APPROVAL OF THE VACCINE Medsafe were then effectively "over-ridden" by the Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee (MAAC) MAAC instructed Medsafe to grant provisional approval. All the while, New Zealanders were told ONLY "Safe and Effective" Almost nobody in NZ understood that our very own drug regulators had told Pfizer, effectively "we can't authorise your vaccine, because we don't know if there are more benefits than the obvious risks involved with using it". NOBODY RECEIVED "INFORMED CONSENT" @winstonpeters @dbseymour @chrisluxonmp #nzcovidinquiry2

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://t.co/DNNC75Ki9x

HopeRising19
Posted - July 7, 2024 at 8:43 PM
Saved - July 7, 2024 at 8:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The NZ drug regulator, Medsafe, initially stated that the risk/benefit balance of the Pfizer vaccine was unclear and was unable to recommend its approval. However, they were overruled by the Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee (MAAC) who instructed Medsafe to grant provisional approval. This information was not effectively communicated to the public, resulting in a lack of informed consent. #nzcovidinquiry2

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Just weeks before needles starting going into NZ arms, the NZ drug regulator Medsafe stated: "The risk/benefit balance (of the Pfizer) is not clear" Medsafe wrote to Pfizer and advised it that it was UNABLE TO RECCOMEND APPROVAL OF THE VACCINE Medsafe were then effectively "over-ridden" by the Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee (MAAC) MAAC instructed Medsafe to grant provisional approval. All the while, New Zealanders were told ONLY "Safe and Effective" Almost nobody in NZ understood that our very own drug regulators had told Pfizer, effectively "we can't authorise your vaccine, because we don't know if there are more benefits than the obvious risks involved with using it". NOBODY RECEIVED "INFORMED CONSENT" @winstonpeters @dbseymour @chrisluxonmp #nzcovidinquiry2

HopeRising19
Posted - July 4, 2024 at 5:55 AM
Saved - July 4, 2024 at 6:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Ministry of Health denies the assumption that COVID-19 vaccines were expected to stop transmission. They state that they never said the Pfizer vaccine would stop transmission. This response was given in relation to an Official Information Act request for information on vaccine transmission. #NZMOH #COVID19 #Pfizer #transmission

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

NZ MOH - WE NEVER SAID THE PFIZER WOULD STOP TRANSMISSION.... I kid you not New OIA Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) transferred from Health New Zealand – Whatu Ora to the Ministry of Health – Manatū Hauora (the Ministry) on 9 April 2024. You requested: “Transmission: All information including briefing, legal advice, other advice, questionnaires, cabinet papers, etc, and similar information which stated that the vaccine had not been tested to ascertain if it stopped transmission. Due to the anticipated volume of information concerning this issue, I am happy for the information to be sent to me in tranches; RESPONSE The Ministry (of Health) does not accept the premise of your request. IT IS BASED ON THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTION THAT THERE WAS AN EXPECTATION THAT COVID 19 VACCINES WOULD STOP TRANSMISSION Gaslighting Back Pedaling 101 Ministry of Health Ref: H2024039261

HopeRising19
Posted - July 2, 2024 at 8:07 PM
Saved - July 3, 2024 at 7:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There are concerns about the New Zealand government pressuring the Ministry of Health to not publish adverse event data from the early Pfizer vaccine rollout. The Ministry is aware that no safety data has been published yet, and there is political concern about how this data will be perceived. However, they are actively encouraging the data to be published to address any potential safety issues.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

PRESSURE FROM NZ GOVT FOR MOH NOT TO PUBLISH ADVERSE EVENT DATA IN EARLY PFIZER ROLL OUT? NZ Independent Safety Monitoring Board Pg 10 "The Ministry (of Health) is aware that no safety data has been published to date. THERE IS POLITICAL CONCERN SURROUNDING HOW THIS DATA WILL PRESENT The Ministry is working through how not publishing the data initially, could imply a high rate of adverse events and safety issues, and are actively encouraging the data to be published." (link in comments)

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/h202200492-documents-redacted.pdf

Page not found - Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora Sorry, we can't find the page you're looking for. Please check the spelling and try again. If you still can't find what you're looking for, get in touch. tewhatuora.govt.nz
HopeRising19
Posted - June 29, 2024 at 9:50 PM
Saved - June 30, 2024 at 9:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The first post discusses the increase in excess mortality among young people aged 15 to 24 in Norway, with a particular focus on the impact of Covid vaccination. The post questions whether the mRNA injection could be a contributing factor to the elevated mortality rates. The second post references another statement supporting the claim made in the first post.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

YOUNG PEOPLE DYING AT CATASTROPHIC RATES IN NORWAY... This chart shows the increase in Excess Mortality for people aged 15 to 24 in Norway. The solid blue lines indicate the rise in excess mortality The dark blue line shows the cumulative level of Covid vaccination over time, for this age group. In 2023 Excess Mortality for this previously healthy, robust age demographic was MORE THAN 60% ELEVATED Why? Is this the slowly evolving impact of mRNA injection? Norway was a highly mRNA injected population. Under 18's all received Pfizer mRNA. Over 18's chose from Pfizer or Moderna (link in comments) #nzcovidinquiry2

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

We don’t have exactly that age range but statement likely true. https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/yearly%20Excess%20Death%20Rate%20Analysis%20-%20Eurostat.htm

EU - Yearly Excess Death Rate Analysis phinancetechnologies.com
HopeRising19
Posted - June 29, 2024 at 9:03 AM
Saved - June 29, 2024 at 7:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A member of the NZ Medicine's Advisory Committee, who held shares in Pfizer and other Covid vaccine companies, was unable to attend the meeting to decide on the provisional consent of the Pfizer Covid injection. Questions arise about her attendance in other meetings and the decisions she was allowed to vote on, considering her conflict of interest. #nzcovidinquiry2

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

HOW COULD PFIZER SHAREHOLDER BE A MEMBER OF NZ MEDICINE'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE? In February 2021 the NZ Medicine's Assessment Advisory Committee met to decide on the provisional consent of the Pfizer Covid injection in NZ. Look at what was declared in the "conflicts of interest" statements for Committee members. Someone declared that they (newly) now held SHARES in each of the four Covid vaccine companies: Pfizer Moderna Vitalis Johnson and Johnson This woman (identity unknown) had clearly purchased these shares since the previous meeting as they were declared as a new "conflict of interest". She was precluded from attending the meeting that would decide whether or not to consent a Provisional Approval to Pfizer. BUT What other meetings DID she attend? What decisions was she allowed to vote on? How could she be allowed to hold shares in Big pharma companies manufacturing Covid vaccines.... but still be a member of the NZ Medicine's Advisory Committee? #nzcovidinquiry2

HopeRising19
Posted - June 28, 2024 at 8:31 PM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 11:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the span of two weeks, Medsafe initially refused to consent the Pfizer vaccine due to missing safety information. However, they later changed their decision and gave consent, despite over 50 outstanding requests for additional data.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

WHY AND HOW? Something happened in the two week space between Medsafe refusing to consent the Pfizer vaccine because of MISSING SAFETY INFORMATION.... And then reneging and consenting the product. Two weeks after making this statement, they consented the Pfizer Covid vaccine. They consented it with over 50 outstanding requests for further data remaining.

HopeRising19
Posted - June 27, 2024 at 6:14 AM
Saved - June 27, 2024 at 1:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
After three years, I was finally able to speak about vaccine injuries on New Zealand mainstream media. It felt like a relief after being locked out for so long. I hope many New Zealanders learned something important in those four minutes. #nzcovidinquiry2

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

IT TOOK NEARLY 1000 DAYS TO GET THESE FOUR MINUTES... It has taken three years Yesterday I finally got to speak the words VACCINE INJURY on New Zealand "mainstream media". Talk Back radio - all 4 minutes of it It felt like balm to my soul after nearly 1000 days of being locked out of any kind of MSM coverage of the taboo topic....and our work supporting Covid mRNA injured. I hope many thousands of New Zealanders learned something potentially life saving in those few brief moments #nzcovidinquiry2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chris Hopkins mentioned regret over the lengthy lockdown in Auckland. Linda from the Health Forum in New Zealand discussed the underreporting of COVID vaccine adverse events. She highlighted the serious impact on thousands of New Zealanders. Linda also mentioned the risk of "long vaccine" resembling long COVID. For more information, visit the Health Forum NZ website.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And even Chris Hopkins said, yeah. You know, with the benefit of hindsight, we probably shouldn't have locked Auckland down as long as we did. You think? That's why we wanted the vaccine. I didn't care. Anything. Just let people be with their loved ones. Let us out of these artificial constraints. Hello, Linda. Speaker 1: Oh, hello. Hi. Is that Carrie? Speaker 0: Yes. It is. Speaker 1: Hi, Carrie. Good morning. My name is Linda, and, I wanted to ring up and call to talk to you this morning because I started a voluntary organization in New Zealand 3 years ago called the Health Forum, and our purpose and role for the last 3 years has been supporting New Zealanders who are COVID vaccine injured and also families of, bereaved as what families that are bereaved following the vaccine. And I just wanted to call up and, talk to you about what we've been seeing in the last 3 years. Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 1: Okay. So I feel very emotional, Kerry. This is unprecedented because we've worked so hard to try to get any mainstream New Zealand media to talk about these people who are the hidden victims in New Zealand. So my voice is shaking because here I am live on air on mainstream media talking about the reality. What many New Zealanders do not understand is that med MedSafe, specifically CALM who record adverse events following vaccination, MedSafe themselves acknowledge that only approximately 5% of actual adverse events, including serious adverse events, are ever reported to them for a wide variety of reasons. And most Kiwis don't understand that in spite of that, let's say still hold 66,000 adverse event reports for COVID vaccines in New Zealand. And of those, according to a recent OIA that we've just received, 20,000 plus, just short of 21,000 of those events have been categorized by MedSafe as serious adverse events. Now what that means is that they required hospitalization or they prolonged existing hospitalization or they resulted in permanent disability or death. So that, if you acknowledge that what MedSafe tells us, there's approximately a 5% reporting of events, that is thousands of New Zealanders whose lives are potentially permanently changed by harm from the mRNA vaccine. Have you done until now. Speaker 0: Have you done comparisons between the, health effects caused by, say, long COVID or the heart conditions caused by having COVID to compare and contrast Speaker 1: those infectious? Yep. Yes. Absolutely. One of the problems with that, though, of of course, is we're told that, you must have the vaccine because it will prevent long COVID. So one of the things we know now that's been acknowledged internationally is that there is something called long vaccine, which is a type of vaccine injury that looks very much like long COVID. And so the the research clearly defining what is actually long vaccine and what is actually long COVID, it it's still lacking. We still don't have trials that clearly differentiate because the the problem is that the vaccine doesn't stop you getting COVID. It doesn't prevent you from having an infection. Yep. So you can be vaccinated and be exposed to harm from long vaccine, and then you can catch COVID. And, of course, each time you're vaccinated and some New Zealanders, elderly New Zealanders now are up to dose 7 and dose 8, each time you're revaccinated, you're exposed to a risk of long vaccine, and it won't prevent you from getting an actual COVID infection. And once you have COVID infection, you're exposed to the risk of long COVID also. Speaker 0: Sure. Okay. We're gonna we're going to have to move on just because of the time imperatives. Where do people go to get more information, Linda? Speaker 1: Thank you, Carrie. Anybody who has vaccine injury or is bereaved is welcome to contact us. Our website is the health forum nz dotco.nz, and we'll be really happy to help you. Speaker 0: Thank you, Linda.
View Full Interactive Feed