TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @HustleBitch_

HustleBitch_
Posted - March 2, 2026 at 11:24 PM
Saved - March 3, 2026 at 6:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched sworn testimony where Clinton faced the Epstein hot tub photo. He smiles, says he didn’t know the photo, confirms the Brunei trip, and Epstein and Maxwell were present. He was exhausted, sat in the tub five minutes, then went to bed. When asked who else was in the water or if anyone was under 18, there’s a pause. He admits it happened privately, denies sexual activity, says he doesn’t know the others. The exchange suggests hesitation and evasion.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 UNDER OATH. PERJURY ON THE LINE. THEY DROP THE EPSTEIN HOT TUB PHOTO IN FRONT OF CLINTON — WATCH HIS FACE WHEN THE QUESTION HITS During sworn congressional testimony, with perjury on the line, Bill Clinton is confronted with the hot tub image tied to the Jeffrey Epstein files. His response? He smiles and says he “didn’t know” the photo was taken. He confirms the trip to Brunei. Acknowledges "Mister Epstein" and Ghislaine Maxwell were present. Claims he was exhausted, sat in the hot tub “five minutes,” then went straight to bed. But as questions narrow to who else was in the water and whether anyone was under 18, there’s a noticeable pause. He admits it was all happening in private. He denies any sexual activity. Where have we heard that before? Says he doesn’t know who the others are. This wasn’t a press interview. This was under oath. What do his facial expressions and body language tell you?

HustleBitch_
Posted - February 27, 2026 at 12:09 AM
Saved - February 27, 2026 at 1:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the auto parts industry is in “deep trouble.” Remanufacturers like Cardone and Trico filed Chapter 11; factories are closing, employees are laid off, rebuilds shut, and shelves lack key components. A 2018 power steering pump can cost $600. Rebuilt parts kept older cars affordable; if remanufacturing fades, shops struggle to source parts, prices spike, and maintenance becomes harder. Most drivers don’t know this yet. Is this temporary or a shift to newer cars?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 AUTO PARTS MANUFACTURERS COLLAPSE — FACTORIES SHUT DOWN AND PARTS ARE DRYING UP, “WE’RE IN DEEP TROUBLE” A repair shop owner says the industry is in “deep trouble.” And what he’s seeing is alarming: • Major remanufacturers like Cardone and Trico filed Chapter 11 • Factories broken apart • Employees laid off • Rebuild operations shut down • Fewer alternators, pumps, brake components hitting shelves He tried sourcing a power steering pump for a 2018 truck. Nothing. Only option? A $600 Motorcraft unit. “Six hundred dollars… that makes it hard for anybody to even have an older vehicle.” And here’s the bigger concern: Rebuilt parts kept older cars affordable for decades. If remanufacturing disappears… Shops can’t source. Prices spike. Older vehicles get harder to maintain. And the strangest part? Most drivers have no idea this is happening yet. What happens when millions of older cars need parts that aren’t there? Is this temporary restructuring… or the beginning of a quiet shift toward newer vehicle dependency?

HustleBitch_
Posted - February 23, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Saved - February 24, 2026 at 3:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Missouri state senator Nick Schroer display a loaf that’s sat in his office for over two and a half years with zero mold. He crushes it, it springs back, and he says it smells fine. He plans to push legislation for clearer labeling on what we’re actually putting into our bodies, asking what exactly we’re eating.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 STATE SENATOR HOLDS UP 2.5-YEAR-OLD ALDI BREAD WITH ZERO MOLD — “WHAT THE HELL IS IN OUR FOOD?” On camera, Missouri state senator and attorney Nick Schroer displays a loaf he says has been sitting in his office for over two and a half years. It has zero mold. He crushes it flat. It springs right back. “It smells fine,” he says. Two. And. A. Half. Years. Bread is flour and water. It’s supposed to decay. It’s supposed to grow mold. This one hasn’t. Schroer says he plans to push legislation demanding clearer labeling on what we’re actually putting into our bodies. If something that should break down doesn’t… what exactly are we eating?

HustleBitch_
Posted - February 3, 2026 at 6:29 PM
Saved - February 4, 2026 at 2:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m Melinda Gates. I’m speaking of a reckoning around Jeffrey Epstein and the people around him. The girls’ pain was beyond heartbreaking and dragged up painful times from my marriage. The unanswered questions aren’t mine—they’re for those people and my ex-husband. I left the marriage and stepped away from the foundation, grateful to be away from the muck. With Epstein files resurfacing, the questions now loom over Bill Gates.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 MELINDA GATES WARNS OF A “RECKONING” - BREAKS HER SILENCE ON EPSTEIN AND POINTS STRAIGHT AT BILL GATES In a raw on-camera moment on the Wild Card with Rachel Martin podcast, Melinda Gates says “we’re having a reckoning” as she finally speaks about Jeffrey Epstein and the people around him. She calls what happened to those girls “beyond heartbreaking” - and admits the Epstein revelations drag up “very painful times” from her marriage. Then she draws a hard line. The unanswered questions, she says, are not for her - they’re for “those people… and my ex-husband.” She explains she had to leave the marriage, had to step away from the foundation, and says she’s “grateful to be away from all the muck.” With Epstein files resurfacing and names back in the spotlight, her timing feels impossible to ignore. The reckoning she’s talking about doesn’t sound abstract - it sounds personal. And the man left holding the questions is Bill Gates. How much does Melinda Gates really know - and what does it mean for Bill Gates?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reflects on a societal reckoning around the Epstein case, insisting that no girl should be put in the situations associated with him and the people around him. The speaker emphasizes the heartbreak of the situation, recalling the ages of the girls and even mentioning their own daughters to illustrate how painful and personal the issue is. There is a strong personal lens: the speaker remembers the ages of those girls and the painful times in their own marriage. They note that they moved on and pushed the memory away, and they are in a unexpectedly beautiful place in life now. They state that the questions surrounding what happened are for the people involved and for their ex-husband, not for the speaker, who feels detached from “the muck” and content to be away from it. When asked about the dominant emotion elicited by the news, the speaker describes it as unbelievable sadness. This sadness extends to the young girls affected, and the speaker expresses sorrow for what those girls endured. The speaker explains that they had to leave their marriage and felt compelled to leave the foundation, underscoring a personal journey of moving forward. Despite moving on, the speaker holds a sense of sorrow and a desire for justice. They express hope that there is justice for the women who have come forward, acknowledging the gravity of their experiences. The speaker notes that they have seen these women publicly speaking in Washington, D.C., and reiterates that what those women went through is unimaginable. Overall, the message combines a call for a reckoning and accountability with a personal narrative of healing, resilience, and a desire for justice for the survivors. The speaker remains focused on the human impact of the events, the pain of the victims, and the importance of addressing the harm done.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think we're having a reckoning as a society. Right? No girl no girl should ever be put in the situation that they were put in by Epstein and whatever was going on with all of the various people around him. No girl. I mean, it it's just it's beyond heart heartbreaking. Right? I remember being those ages those girls were. I remember my daughters being those ages. Right? So, for me, it's personally hard whenever those details come up. Right? Because brings back memories of some very, very painful times in my marriage, but I have moved on from that. I purposely pushed it away, and I moved on. I'm in a really unexpected, beautiful place in my life. So whatever questions remain there of what I don't can't even begin to know all of it, those questions are for those people and for even my ex husband. They need to answer to those things, not me. Well And I am so happy to be away from all the muck. I wonder what your dominant emotion is when you read these news articles. Just unbelievable sadness. Unbelievable sadness. Right? And again, I'm able to take my own sadness and look at those young girls and say, my god. How did they how did that happen to those girls? Right? And so for me, it's just sadness. Sadness for you know, I I've left I had to I left my marriage. I had to leave my marriage. I wanted to leave my marriage. I had to leave the I felt I needed to eventually leave the foundation. So it's just sad. And it's kind of like, at least for me, I've been able to move on in life. And I hope there's some justice for those now women. Right? We see them standing up in front of microphones in DC. What they went through is just unimaginable, I think.
HustleBitch_
Posted - February 3, 2026 at 1:59 PM
Saved - February 3, 2026 at 2:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m referring to a viral claim that Windows updates secretly turn on OneDrive, making Microsoft’s servers the primary copy rather than your local backup. People report family photos, work files, and years of data erased; clean desktops with a “Where are my files?” icon. It isn’t ransomware. Turning OneDrive off can delete everything locally; deleting files to free up space deletes them everywhere. The exit is a buried menu or a YouTube tutorial.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 BILL GATES’ MICROSOFT CAN ERASE YOUR ENTIRE COMPUTER - AND MOST PEOPLE DON’T REALIZE IT UNTIL IT’S TOO LATE A man is going viral after exposing what millions of Windows users are just now realizing about Bill Gates’ Microsoft. "I think they should have to go to jail for this." Windows updates quietly turn on OneDrive without a plain English warning. Your files don’t get “backed up.” They get moved. Your computer becomes a temporary access point. Microsoft’s servers become the primary copy. Then the trap snaps shut. People report: • Family photos gone • Work files wiped • Years of data erased • Clean desktops with no warning • A little icon asking: “Where are my files?” Many thought it was ransomware. It wasn’t. Turning OneDrive off can delete everything locally. Deleting files to “free up space” deletes them everywhere. The only way out? A buried menu… or a YouTube tutorial. Nowhere does it clearly say: “We are transferring your entire computer to our servers.” Millions clicked “Update” without knowing this was included. If a company can silently take control of your files and delete them with one wrong click - how is this not malware?

Video Transcript AI Summary
OneDrive on Windows allegedly behaves like malware by spontaneously deleting all files from your local machine without warning or confirmation. The speaker claims that after a Windows update begins using OneDrive, there is no plain-language warning to opt out, and it starts uploading everything on the computer to Microsoft servers. Some users notice this when a slow or metered Internet connection causes large uploads, or when OneDrive warns that it is running out of space. According to the speaker, once the process starts, all data on the local computer is uploaded to Microsoft servers and appears on the desktop as an icon labeled “Where are my files?” The message suggests that all of your life’s work has been deleted from the local machine “without ever asking you.” The user may then be forced to download the files back to the local computer, which can be extremely slow on slow or metered connections, requiring many gigabytes to be re-downloaded. After the user downloads the data again, they may choose to delete it from OneDrive. However, deleting files from OneDrive results in the same files being deleted from the local machine, again with no warning or pop-up. The only way to delete the files from OneDrive without removing them from the local machine, the speaker claims, is to follow a YouTube tutorial with detailed steps; options to prevent this are buried in menus and do not state in plain English what they do. The speaker contends that OneDrive is not a traditional cloud backup but secretly makes the user’s machine secondary to OneDrive’s machine, with the cloud copy being the primary. When working on the local machine, the system is treated as temporarily accessing the cloud copy rather than using local storage. This allegedly slows down the machine since data must be uploaded and downloaded to the cloud rather than read from and written to the hard drive. The claim is that at no point does OneDrive explain in plain language that it intends to take everything on the computer and put it on Microsoft’s machine instead. The speaker emphasizes that this is unintuitive and easy to accidentally delete everything, and questions why such behavior was allowed to go forward without intervention. The core concern is that OneDrive’s behavior makes the cloud copy the authoritative version, with local data being secondary, and no clear, explicit warning about this transition.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think they should have to go to jail for this. I'm only barely joking here. If you're unaware, for the last few years, Windows has come with a piece of malware called OneDrive, and OneDrive, if you're not careful, will spontaneously delete all of the files off of your computer. Not on their computer on OneDrive. I mean off of your machine, the one that's in your house. If you have been fortunate enough to not have your life ruined by OneDrive, just Google that word and you will find a torrent of people saying, It took everything. All of my photos and videos of my family, all of my work files, everything is gone. OneDrive will not give you any warning whatsoever that it is about to do this. It will not give you a confirmation button to hit. It will not give you a pop up or anything. Here's how it happens. At some point, your Windows computer will update to start using OneDrive. At no point in the process will you be given any kind of a plain language warning to opt out of it. It will just start doing it. Then at some point, you will notice that it is quietly uploading everything on your computer to Microsoft servers. Some of you will only notice this because you're on a slow or metered Internet connection and it's trying to upload 40 gigabytes of video and work files and private records. Or you may have only found out when OneDrive gave you a warning that it was running out of space. So you will look up how do I make it stop doing that and you will find the option to turn off OneDrive backup. Then you will get onto your computer the next day to find everything is gone. Everything on your computer was deleted by Microsoft. And on your desktop, completely clean of icons, will be one cheeky little icon that says, Where are my files? Many, many people who saw this assumed they had been hit by a ransomware attack or a virus where some hacker has stolen all of their data and is now holding it hostage. So you click on that icon and it says don't worry all of your life's work is now on our machine. We helpfully deleted it from your machine without ever asking you. But we're still not at the worst part because at this point you'll be forced to download all of your stuff back to your machine. Again, God help you if you're on a slow or metered internet connection because you now have to grab the many gigabytes of work and slowly bring it back. At which point you will say, Okay, Microsoft, I don't want you to have my files. I want to delete them off of OneDrive. On your local computer, you will have all of the files on your local machine now, and then it will show where those files are also on OneDrive. You will go into OneDrive and you will delete them. Only to find that when you delete them off of Microsoft servers, they go in and delete them off your computer again with no warning, with no pop up, without anything. The only way to delete the files off their machine without also deleting them off of your machine is to go find a YouTube tutorial walking through the detailed steps on how to do it. To be absolutely clear, to make OneDrive not do this requires looking it up. There is no intuitive way to do it. They intentionally buried those options in the menus and none of those options say in plain English what they do. At no point in any of this does it come out and say in plain English, Hey, do you want us to take everything on your computer and put it on our computer instead? If it did say that, everyone would say no. They realize this. The issue is that by now everybody is familiar with the concept of storing files on the cloud. Lots of machines offer the cloud as a backup if you want. You would assume that that's what OneDrive is. It's a chance to back up your files in case something happens to your local machine, but that is not what it is. OneDrive secretly transfers your machine to their machine so that their machine is the primary. Those files are the copy of the files. When you work on your local machine, they treat it as you temporarily accessing those files. This, of course, massively slows down your machine because instead of writing and reading data to your hard drive, you're having to upload and download it to the cloud. What this means in practice is if anything happens to the file on their machine, it's deleted everywhere because you no longer have it. It's only on their machine. You're just allowed to temporarily access it. And at no point anywhere do they explain in plain language that this is what they're doing. It is so unintuitive that it is very easy to accidentally delete everything you have everywhere. Do you understand when OneDrive says that it's full and you go in to delete some things to free up space, it deletes it from your machine, too? I genuinely cannot believe that this was allowed to go out the door like this or that nobody else stepped in to stop them.
HustleBitch_
Posted - February 1, 2026 at 11:23 PM
Saved - February 3, 2026 at 12:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watch a man calmly describe gassing bananas with ethylene—organic and regular—entering a gassing room, turning on the gas, “And we are gassed.” Industrial-scale exposure happens quietly, unseen, turning green to yellow on a timed shelf. It’s so normalized no one questions it. You really thought bananas ripened naturally?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 THEY’RE GASSING YOUR BANANAS - AND IT’S ALL ON CAMERA A man calmly walks through the process on video. “Another day of gassing.” He starts with ethylene gas. Selects the gassing room. "We do gas organic and regular bananas." He dumps the gas liquid. Walks to the control machine. Closes the sealed door. Presses the menu. Turns the gas ON. “And we are gassed.” Industrial-scale chemical exposure done routinely, quietly, and out of sight. Green bananas go in. Yellow bananas come out. Perfectly timed for shelves. It’s so normalized that nobody ever questions it. You really thought the bananas you eat just ripened naturally?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes a banana ripening operation focusing on room three. The operator explains that ethylene liquid is used, which turns into a gas, to gas the bananas. In this setup, both organic and regular bananas are treated, but the key difference is how they are arranged: nothing is stacked with regular bananas beneath organics, because that would make it not organic. Organic bananas are kept stacked in a row. The process starts with preparing the gas: two bottles of ethylene are poured into a small machine. After loading the liquid, the room’s temperature is set to 60 degrees on both sides. Once this configuration is complete, a sign is placed to indicate that the room is active. During the next step, the operator and a colleague begin to check the bananas. One banana is pulled out after gas treatment, and the operator notes that this particular banana is about three days post-gassing and begins to turn yellow. A pulp thermometer is used to check readings: the operator mentions both a temperature reading and the pulp condition for this banana, indicating that these readings are part of the quality check. The colleague also checks the other side of the banana or the batch, and the operator describes what the other side looks like. The overall observation is that the bananas are starting to yellow from both sides, with the left and right sides being compared to ensure even ripening and consistent results. In summary, the procedure involves using ethylene liquid to gas bananas in room three, with strict stacking rules to keep organics separate from regular bananas. Two ethylene bottles are used, the room is set to 60 degrees on both sides, and the bananas are periodically checked using a pulp thermometer and visual inspection to confirm yellowing and ripening progress about three days after gassing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Day of gassing another room out here. We use our ethylene liquid, which turns into a gas. Gonna be doing room three today. These are the bananas for today. So in here, we do gas organics and regular bananas, but the only difference is that nothing is stacked. Only organics are stacked in a row. You never put regular bananas under organics because then it makes it not organic. So grab our liquid, put it in a little machine. Two bottles for this one. Pour it out. The room. Change the temperature to 60 degree, both sides. Once this is done, this is all set. We turn our little sign here saying that it's So we're gonna come here Speaker 1: to check them Speaker 0: out. We're gonna pull a banana out. This is one of them. This is maybe three days after it's been gassed. Starts to turn yellow. We have this little pulp thing that checks the temperature and the pulp on these. It gives us a reading. We're Speaker 1: gonna check this side. Speaker 0: And this is what the other side looks like. Starting to break in a little bit of yellow. Both of them compare left and right side.
HustleBitch_
Posted - January 29, 2026 at 2:06 AM
Saved - January 29, 2026 at 3:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report Erika Kirk appears in her father’s apocalypse video. The alleged Kent Frantzve YouTube channel has one video, 11 years old, showing Erika staring at a Don’t Tread on Me patch, then spiraling footage of disasters and a “PLAN FOR DISASTER NOW” sign. The channel goes dark for 11 years. Erika’s mother runs a company with DHS/DoD links. One upload, one message, then silence—seemingly intentional, not forgotten.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 ERIKA KIRK APPEARS IN HER FATHER’S APOCALYPSE VIDEO - ONE UPLOAD, THEN HIS YOUTUBE ACCOUNT GOES DARK FOR 11 YEARS The YouTube account allegedly belongs to Kent Frantzve - Erika Kirk’s father. He spent his career as a program manager at Raytheon, a defense giant tied to U.S. government operations. The account is 11 years old. There is exactly one video. In it, Erika Kirk is shown staring at a “Don’t Tread on Me” patch along with footage that spirals into something far darker: glowing objects in the sky, cities burning, floods swallowing streets, hurricanes and tornadoes, men at war, FEMA camps, and a warning sign that reads “PLAN FOR DISASTER NOW.” Then the account goes completely dark for more than a decade. Add the family backdrop: Erika’s mother runs a company with government-linked work involving Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense. One upload. One message. Then silence. This doesn’t look like a forgotten home video. It looks intentional. Almost staged to sit there… waiting. So why would a defense-linked family leave a single apocalyptic “plan for disaster” video online, untouched, for 11 years?

HustleBitch_
Posted - January 27, 2026 at 11:18 PM
Saved - January 28, 2026 at 12:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I put three autoimmune diseases into remission without meds. Doctors hate this conversation. I eliminated ultra-processed foods and ate real foods—grains, dairy, protein, produce—minimal ingredients, no junk. Two years later, I’m a completely different person. Three diseases? In remission. Doctors aren’t taught nutrition in med school; they’re taught to prescribe. My message: you do not have to be sick. If food can make you sick, it can make you well.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 “I PUT THREE AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES INTO REMISSION - WITHOUT MEDS” - AND DOCTORS HATE THIS CONVERSATION A woman is going viral after saying something most people are never encouraged to test for themselves. She says doctors told her she’d be on medication for life. Chronic pain. Permanent management. No real recovery. Instead, she eliminated ultra processed food and ate everything in its truest form. Real grains, real dairy, real protein, real produce. Minimal ingredients. No chemical junk. No “food-like products.” “A lot of us think we have to be on medication for the rest of our lives to feel good, when in reality, we just need to eat differently.” Two years later, she says she’s a completely different person. Three autoimmune diseases? In remission. “Doctors aren’t taught nutrition in med school. They’re taught to prescribe medication.” Her message is simple: “You do not have to be sick.” If food can make you sick… can food also make you well?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I put three autoimmune diseases into remission, not to mention a bunch of other health conditions that I was dealing with, and I want to share how I did that. A little disclaimer: I am not a doctor and I have no medical background whatsoever. I was a desperate person who refused to believe I had to be on medication for the rest of my life or endure this pain forever. I did research, studied, and took matters into my own hands. After a lot of trial and error, two years later I am a completely different person, and I’m going to share what I did. It’s going to feel too good to be true or too simple, but I’m telling you right now that the way you eat changes everything. The best way I can describe it and simplify it for others is that humans need to be eating food in their truest form. I view it as the way God put it on the earth is the way it should be eaten. The more processed it is, the more terrible it is for our bodies. So I eliminated all processed food, and if it is processed, it is very minimally processed. A perfect example: I will eat potato chips, but I have to pick up the bag, look at the label, and if it says potatoes, sea salt, avocado oil as the three ingredients, I will eat those because it is very simple ingredients. I’m not going to pick up a bag of Lay’s. Another example: I am not going to buy bread at the store. Bread at the store or any flour is empty calories, bleached, all the nutrients taken out. Instead, I buy whole wheat berries, mill them myself, and make bread from that because that is bread in its truest form. I believe we should be able to eat dairy and gluten, but it all needs to be in its truest form, and when it is, our bodies can handle it. The reason people are sick and cannot eat certain foods is because of the way they are processed or modified. I think the biggest issue with humans and why we’re all so sick is because we are eating all of the wrong things and not getting enough nutrients in our diets. If you eat whole grains in their truest form, dairy in its truest form, lean protein, fruit, vegetables in their truest form, meaning no pesticides, no glyphosate, organic fruits and vegetables. I don’t think all fruits and vegetables have to be organic—only some are sprayed with pesticides, but it’s called the dirty dozen; look into that. As long as we are eating things in their truest form and avoiding processed junk, processed sugar, soda, fast food, we are giving our bodies what it needs to thrive and to heal itself. Not saying this fixes everything—there may be conditions that can’t be fixed by this—but people could be surprised by how many issues would go away if we ate the way we were meant to. If you want, I can share an example of a day of eating. Just say the word. I hope you have a great night and remember you do not have to be sick. Doctors are not taught nutrition in medical school—they are taught to prescribe medication. A lot of us think we have to be on medication for the rest of our lives to feel good, when in reality we just need to eat differently.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I put three autoimmune diseases into remission, not to mention a bunch of other health conditions that I was dealing with, and I wanna share with you guys how I did that. Small disclaimer: I am not a doctor. I have no medical background whatsoever. I was just a desperate girl refusing to believe that I had to be on medication for the rest of my life, that I had to endure this pain for the rest of my life, that I was never going to feel normal again. I refused to believe it. So I did research upon research and studied and took matters into my own hands. A lot of trial and error and two years later I am a completely different person. So yeah, I'm going to share with you what I did. And it's going to feel like it's too good to be true. It's going to feel too simple. But I'm telling you right now that the way you eat changes everything. So the best way that I can describe this and kind of simplify it for other people and make it easy to remember is basically humans need to be eating food in their truest form. So I kind of view it as like the way God put it on the earth is the way that it should be eaten. And the more processed it is, the more terrible it is for our bodies. So I basically eliminated all processed food and if it is processed, it is very minimally processed. This is a perfect example. I will eat potato chips, but I have to pick up the bag, look at the label, and if it says potatoes, sea salt, avocado oil as the three ingredients, I will eat those because it is very simple ingredients. But I'm not going go pick up a bag of Lay's. So that's a perfect example. Another great example is I am not going go buy bread at the store. Bread at the store, any flour at the store is just empty calories, no nutritional value, bleached all the nutrients taken out of it. Instead, I'm going to buy whole wheat berries, mill them myself, and make bread out of that because that is bread in its truest form, if that makes sense. I believe that we should be able to eat all of these things, we should be able to have dairy, we should be able to have gluten, but it all needs to be in its truest form and I think that when it is in its truest form, our bodies can handle it. But the reason people are sick and not able to eat these certain foods is because of the way that they are processed, way that they are modified. Sorry it got dark so I turned on my car light but basically, I was gonna say, I think the biggest issue with humans and why we're all so sick is because we are eating all of the wrong things, and we are not getting enough nutrients in our diets. If you are eating whole grains in their truest form, dairy products in their truest form, lean protein, fruit, vegetables in their truest form, meaning no pesticides, no glyphosate, organic fruits and vegetables. I don't think all fruits and vegetables have to be organic, only some are sprayed with pesticides, but it's called the dirty dozen. Look into that. Anyway, that was a little side note. As long as we are eating things in their truest form and we're kind of avoiding the processed junk, the processed sugar, the soda, all of that, the fast food, we are going be giving our bodies what it needs to thrive and to heal itself, and we're gonna we're gonna be healthy. We're gonna feel good. Not saying that this can literally fix everything because I'm sure that there are some conditions or medical issues that can't be fixed by this, but I think that people would be really surprised with how much how many issues would go away if humans ate the way that they were supposed to. So that is it for you for now. If you guys want to know like an example of like a day of eating, would love to do that. Just say the word, but I hope you have a great night and just know that you do not have to be sick. Doctors are not taught nutrition in med school. I don't know if you knew that. They literally are not taught nutrition. They are taught to prescribe medication. And so a lot of us think we have to be on medication for the rest of our lives to feel good, when in reality we just need to eat differently.
HustleBitch_
Posted - January 23, 2026 at 6:27 PM
Saved - January 24, 2026 at 8:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read Tony Blair in the UAE urging cloud services and a unified digital identity as the backbone. Ellison warns: this is the last year you’ll log in with a password. AI-assisted biometric verification would judge identity—face, voice, fingerprint—deciding if you are who you claim. Identity centralizes in digital IDs; access becomes conditional, with no resets or anonymity. If AI says you’re not you, you lose banking, services, travel, participation.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 HOLY SH*T! GLOBAL ELITES BEGIN AI-ENFORCED BIOMETRIC CONTROL: “THIS IS THE LAST YEAR YOU WILL EVER USE A PASSWORD” On stage in the UAE, Tony Blair explains what must come first for AI-run governments to function properly: cloud services, massive data centers, and a unified digital identity - the “basic digital infrastructure” required so the rest of the system can work effectively. Then Larry Ellison says the most frightening part: “This is the last year you will ever log on with a password.” Ellison argues passwords are too easily stolen, too flexible, too human. The replacement isn’t a better password - it’s AI-assisted biometric verification, where the system recognizes your face, your voice, and even your fingerprint, and then decides whether it is “absolutely certain” that you are who you claim to be. Read that carefully. AI doesn’t help you log in - it judges your identity. Your body becomes the credential. Your biology becomes the key. Logging in is no longer something you do; it’s something that’s done to you. And once identity is centralized into digital ID systems tied to cloud infrastructure and AI enforcement, access stops being a right and starts becoming conditional. There is no password reset for your face. No workaround for your voice. No anonymity once your identity is the system. If AI decides you’re not you, you don’t just lose an account - you lose access: to banking, services, systems, travel, and participation itself. This isn’t about convenience or security. It’s about control at scale, announced calmly, publicly, and without apology. When your face is the password, how do you opt out without erasing yourself?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The UAE is positioned at the forefront of using AI in government. The conversation highlights the importance of building basic digital infrastructure—cloud services, data centers, and digital identity—as a foundation for an effective digital system. Speaker 1 emphasizes that securing this digital infrastructure is crucial. He predicts a passwordless future, stating that this could be the last year you log on to an Oracle system with a password. He describes biometric logins where the computer recognizes the user, can verify identity through voice, and may prompt for a fingerprint on the return key. He argues there is no reason to enter a password because passwords are too easily stolen. The approach involves using the latest security technology, with biometrics assisted by AI to ensure authentication. He concludes that this will verify identity, even asserting that the system can make sure that the user is, in fact, Tony Blair.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're here in The UAE, which is really at the forefront of of the use of AI in government. One of the things that people often ask from from developing countries, but also developed countries is, well, what is what's the importance of having that basic digital infrastructure in place? You know, cloud services, data centers, digital identity. How important are these things to to put in place so that the rest of the system works effectively? Well, Speaker 1: I I think one of the most important things is not to put the digital infrastructure in place and make sure it is secure. There are new technologies right now. This is the last year you will ever log on to an Oracle system with a password. We have biometric log on log ins that the computer recognizes you. It recognizes your voice. It might ask you to put your index finger on the return key. And we know we're absolutely certain it's you. There's no reason to enter a password. In fact, passwords are too easily stolen. We can make sure that we we're using the latest security technology, and it is gonna be biometrics assisted by AI to make sure that you are, in fact, Tony Blair. And I I'm sure you are.
HustleBitch_
Posted - January 18, 2026 at 3:57 PM
Saved - January 19, 2026 at 5:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I bought Tom’s of Maine fluoride-free toothpaste for my child. After reports of a class-action about lead and arsenic, my child’s doctor called with elevated lead in his blood. So I tested the toothpaste myself. The swab was orange; when lead is detected it turns purple. It happened three times in a row with the same tube, same brand marketed for kids. If this has lead, I wouldn’t buy from them. What are regulators doing all day?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 MOM TESTS “NATURAL” KIDS TOOTHPASTE - LEAD TEST TURNS PURPLE ON CAMERA “This is my son’s toothpaste.” A mother says she bought Tom’s of Maine fluoride-free toothpaste for her child. After seeing reports of a class-action lawsuit alleging lead and arsenic, her child’s doctor calls with elevated lead levels in his blood. So she does what regulators didn’t. She tests the toothpaste herself. “This swab was orange,” she says. “When lead is detected… it turns purple.” The test turns PURPLE on camera. She tests it again - PURPLE. A third time - PURPLE AGAIN. Same tube. Same brand. Marketed for KIDS. Tom’s of Maine - now owned by Colgate - sells this as “natural.” Parents in the comments are asking how long children have been brushing this into their mouths twice a day while no one said a word. “If this has lead,” she says, “I personally wouldn’t buy anything from them.” If a mom with a $10 test kit can allegedly find lead in kids’ toothpaste… what exactly are regulators doing all day?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker describes buying Tom’s of Maine Kids Natural Fluoride Free Silly Strawberry toothpaste for their son for Christmas. They mention a class action lawsuit alleging high levels of lead in this toothpaste. On 01/16/2026, their son’s doctor alerted them that high levels of lead were detected in the son’s blood. The speaker tests the toothpaste for lead using a lead test swab, showing orange before testing and purple when lead is detected. They state they have done the test twice and that a third swab is actively turning purple on camera. They note there are three swabs in the test kit, all turning purple, and specifically reference the “Original Tom’s of Maine, fluoride free, silly strawberry flavored toothpaste.” They express uncertainty about whether other flavors or types from the brand contain lead and state they would not buy anything from the brand. They also mention the brand makes deodorant and other products.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So I got this toothpaste here for my son for Christmas. Toms the original Toms of Maine kids natural fluoride free silly strawberry flavor. And I just saw something the other day. Today, the date is 01/16/2026. I just saw something the other day about there being a class action lawsuit for high levels of lead and our snick in this toothpaste. And coincidentally, my son's doctor just called me today from his well check, the other week. They detected high levels of lead in his blood. So I already did this once, but I'll do it again, showing it on camera. I'm doing a lead test on this toothpaste. So this is a lead test swab. You can see it was orange. When lead is detected, it will turn purple. I already did this once, twice, actually. I lied. I did it twice. Each time, you can see it changed colors. Let me pick this up. And you can see this one's actively changing color on camera. Let me take this out of the bag here. So, yeah. There's three swabs. Three purple swabs. Original Toms of Maine, fluoride free, silly strawberry flavored toothpaste. I don't know if any of this brand has other flavors or types of toothpaste that contain lead. I personally would not buy anything from them. I know they make deodorant and stuff too. So I'm just putting this out there for people. They have lead in their products.
HustleBitch_
Posted - January 13, 2026 at 12:41 AM
Saved - January 13, 2026 at 4:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion notes that Steve Jobs was born Abdul Lateef Jandali to Abdulfattah Jandali, a Syrian immigrant, and Joanne Schieble; he was adopted by Paul and Clara Jobs, who renamed him Steven Paul Jobs. The meme aligns with the core facts, including a later anecdote about Jobs dining at a restaurant run by his biological father, whom Jobs never met. He did meet his mother and half-sister as an adult but avoided his biological father.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 STEVE JOBS WAS BORN AS ABDUL LATEEF JANDALI - AND THE INTERNET IS MELTING DOWN OVER IT Social media is going feral as people resurface claims about Steve Jobs’s origins - that before Apple, before the black turtleneck, before the all-American tech myth, there was Abdul Lateef Jandali, tied to a Syrian Muslim lineage through his biological father, Abdulfattah Jandali. People are arguing over how a detail this fundamental could stay buried for decades while one of the most iconic American brands in history was being built - and whether the legend was always more engineered than organic. The man obsessed with branding, image, and narrative control… now has his own origin story detonating in real time. Was this simply ignored - or deliberately kept out of the spotlight?

@GoodLionTV - Nick Alvear | Good Lion TV

**Yes, it's basically real** — with one small clarification on the exact name spelling. Steve Jobs **was adopted** right after birth. His biological father was **Abdulfattah "John" Jandali** (عبد الفتاح الجندلي), a Syrian Muslim immigrant who came to the US as a graduate student. His biological mother was Joanne Schieble (later Joanne Simpson), an American of Swiss-German descent. According to multiple sources, including statements from his Syrian cousin Bassma Al Jandaly (a journalist who wrote about the family) and references in biographies/Wikipedia, Steve Jobs' **birth name** (before the adoption) was **Abdul Lateef Jandali** (عبد اللطيف الجندلي) — the Arabic version of the name that appears in the meme as "Abdul Lateef Jandandali" (just a slight misspelling/transliteration variation, like "Jandalali" vs "Jandali"). The adoptive parents, Paul and Clara Jobs (a working-class couple — Paul was a mechanic/machinist), renamed him **Steven Paul Jobs** (Steve). Fun extra fact that makes the story even wilder: Years later, Jobs unknowingly ate multiple times at a Mediterranean restaurant in Silicon Valley that his biological father managed/owned. Jobs even shook his hand once and was remembered by Jandali as "a sweet guy and a big tipper" — neither of them knew they were father and son at the time. Jobs met his biological mother and half-sister (novelist Mona Simpson) as an adult, but he chose never to meet his biological father. So yeah… the meme is pretty accurate (and hilariously shocked) about the Syrian adoption twist. Mind-blowing family history for the guy who built Apple. 😭😂

HustleBitch_
Posted - January 12, 2026 at 7:36 PM
Saved - January 13, 2026 at 3:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read about the Active Denial System, a silent directed-energy weapon DARPA allegedly uses to override the nervous system and make bodies feel burned, causing panic, paralysis, and collapse with no visible evidence. It was deemed too unpredictable for Iraq, yet discussed for domestic use during D.C. protests, and reported in Venezuela as sudden, unexplainable health failures. If these weapons exist, the real danger is knowing who’s being controlled and why.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 DARPA HAS AN INVISIBLE WEAPON THAT COOKS YOU ALIVE - AND IT’S ALREADY BEING USED ON PEOPLE WHO CAN’T PROVE IT The Active Denial System is real. A silent directed-energy weapon with DARPA fingerprints all over it, built to override the human nervous system by convincing your body it’s being burned alive from the inside, triggering panic, paralysis, vomiting, loss of motor control, and collapse without bullets, sound, marks, or evidence - the perfect weapon if you don’t want witnesses or accountability. The U.S. military admitted it was too unpredictable for Iraq, yet during the D.C. protests there were reportedly discussions about domestic use - a moment that showed how fast extreme battlefield technology can move from foreign war zones to civilian streets once it leaves no blood, no proof, and no accountability. Then there’s Venezuela. Guards tied to the Maduro operation described a sudden invisible force - crushing pressure in the skull, nosebleeds, vomiting blood, bodies dropping instantly, people unable to stand or move afterward, no shots fired, no gas, no explosions, no explanation - just human systems failing all at once like someone flipped a switch on their biology. They call it “non-lethal.” They say it’s “just heat.” They promise “no lasting effects.” That’s exactly how you describe a weapon designed for quiet use - when you want compliance without martyrs, injuries without proof, and control without headlines. DARPA doesn’t build deterrents. It builds future enforcement systems, and systems like this don’t get shelved - they get smaller, quieter, and harder to detect. If invisible weapons already exist that can shut the human body down on command, the real terror isn’t whether they’ll be used - it’s how many times they already have been, and how you’d ever know the difference between a “medical emergency” and a weapon test.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the defense department's active denial system as a nonlethal weapon to control crowds, secure perimeters, and deter pirates. He notes it can be used to “shoot first and ask questions later,” a claim attributed to the military stance on its use. The system is described by Speaker 0 as not radioactive, not a microwave, and not a laser beam. It is a man-sized beam of millimeter waves that can be fired from up to a thousand meters away and is designed to make the target feel extremely hot so they move. He recounts his personal experience: at about fifty degrees outside, the sensation felt like it was “about a thousand,” and after about 1.5 seconds, one sixty-fourth of an inch of skin reached 130 degrees. He says the effect is temporary and that as soon as he steps away, it’s over; the DOD claims there are no lingering effects, no cancer risk, and no risk to a fetus or reproductive capability—“it’s just heat.” The system’s drawback is acknowledged: it propagates through the air and requires line of sight to targets. Speaker 0 states a prototype costs $10,000,000 and that there are no plans to deploy one anytime soon. Speaker 2 introduces the active denial system with a visual of a dish emitting a beam toward people who might do harm, claiming it will “make you stop in your tracks,” feel like you have a vomit, feel like you’re on fire, and even “put voices in your head.” He asserts the technology can affect people in dramatic ways. The speaker references the Emerald Tabas and a scene with Thos, describing a moment when a staff is raised and a ray of vibration stops a group of people, suggesting that this is the active denial system in use. He adds a broader claim: “Same technology just a different year. What’s we’re doing now, we’re just simply rediscovering everything that already exist.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can't see it, hear it, or smell it, but it makes unruly mobs do this. The defense department's active denial system, a nonlethal weapon that can be used to control crowds, secure perimeters, and keep pirates at bay. It could be a game changer. This is one of the things Speaker 1: that we can shoot first and ask questions later. Normally, you can't do that. Speaker 0: The military says the active denial system is not radioactive, it's not a microwave, and it's not a laser beam. It's instead a man sized beam of millimeter waves that can be fired from up to a thousand meters away that are designed to get the subject, whoever's standing on this x, really, really hot so that they move. And it's about 50 degrees out here right now, but I just felt like it was about a thousand. And I've never been inside a tub that somebody dropped a hair dryer in, but I would imagine that that's what it feels like. After about one point five seconds, one sixty fourth of an inch of my skin was a 130 degrees. But as soon as I stepped away, it was over, and the DOD says there aren't any lingering effects. There's no, cancer risk. There's no, risk to a fetus or reproductive capability. It's just heat. But the DOD admits this system does have a drawback. Speaker 1: We are propagating through the air. We are, therefore, relatively line of sight. And so we need to be line of sight with targets. Speaker 0: A prototype costs $10,000,000, and there are no plans to deploy one anytime soon. Speaker 2: You've heard of the active denial system in the military. It's this dish that sends out a beam of frequency towards people that are looking to do harm. It'll make you stop in your tracks. It'll make you feel like you got a vomit. It'll make you feel like you're on fire. It can even put voices in your head. It's called the active denial system in the military. In the Emerald Tabas, Thos has this group of people coming at him because they don't know who he is when he lands his ship. He says, I raised my staff and sent out a ray of vibration which stopped them still in their tracks. Sounds like the active denial system to me. Same technology just a different year. What's we're doing now, we're just simply rediscovering everything that already exist
HustleBitch_
Posted - January 9, 2026 at 6:05 PM
Saved - January 11, 2026 at 12:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read about a buried 10-year documentary on EMP threats. Inside, Erika Kirk isn’t observing or hosting—she’s briefing national security professionals with a former CIA energy specialist on how an EMP or physical attack could collapse the U.S. grid. The footage is technical and unusual. It raises questions: why was she in that briefing, who invited her, and why is it unexplained? When do coincidences stop being coincidences?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 HOLY SH*T! IT KEEPS GETTING WORSE: A BURIED CIA VIDEO JUST SURFACED… AND ERIKA KIRK IS IN IT A 10-year-old documentary about EMP attacks and U.S. power grid vulnerability has quietly surfaced - and buried inside it is Erika Kirk. She’s not observing. She’s not a host. She’s in a role most civilians never get near, briefing national security professionals alongside a former CIA National Security & Energy Specialist on how an EMP or coordinated physical attack could collapse the U.S. power grid. This isn’t casual footage. It’s technical. It’s inside-baseball. And it’s the exact kind of material most people never get near, let alone present. Which raises some very uncomfortable questions: Why was she in that role? What qualified her to brief on national security threats? Who brought her into that room, and why is none of it explained? Back then, this clip passed quietly. Today, with everything surrounding her, it hits very differently. At what point do “coincidences” stop being coincidences?

HustleBitch_
Posted - January 7, 2026 at 11:32 PM
Saved - January 8, 2026 at 2:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that an American orthopedic surgeon, online as “The Little Misdiagnosed,” quietly gathered 100,000+ patient stories from people labeled with Ehlers-Danlos, POTS, MCAS, dysautonomia, endometriosis, brain fog, GI issues, all with similar labs but different labels. Her claim: the problem isn’t damaged organs but leaky barrier systems causing nonstop immune alarms, with the body in survival mode while medicine treats symptoms in silos. She calls it Cellular Barrier Permeability Theory—a framework, not a diagnosis. If specialists keep treating parts, how many people were dismissed because the system lacked an explanation?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 THIS DOCTOR ADMITS SHE’S BEEN QUIETLY TRACKING 100,000+ PATIENTS - AND SAYS MEDICINE IS MISDIAGNOSING MILLIONS “I am so nervous to make this video.” For 2+ YEARS, an American orthopedic surgeon known online as “The Little Misdiagnosed” quietly collected 100,000+ patient stories from people diagnosed with Ehlers-Danlos, POTS, MCAS, dysautonomia, endometriosis, brain fog, GI disorders - different labels, same complaints, same “normal” labs. Her claim: • The problem is NOT damaged organs. • It’s leaky barrier systems triggering nonstop immune alarms. • A body locked in survival mode while medicine treats symptoms in silos - a body-wide signaling meltdown sliced into pieces instead of treated as a system. She calls it the Cellular Barrier Permeability Theory - not a diagnosis, not advice - but a framework that explains why so many people are sick yet told “nothing’s wrong” while their lives fall apart. If specialists keep treating pieces and no one treats the system… how many people were dismissed because the explanation didn’t exist yet?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Erin Nance, known as Little Misdiagnosed, introduces a theory called the cellular barrier permeability theory or the CBPT. She has created over 1,200 educational videos about diseases misdiagnosed in women, and has analyzed over 100,000 comments, emails, and DMs from viewers who shared their stories. She emphasizes that CBPT is a theory, not a diagnosis, not medical advice, and not peer reviewed yet. CBPT proposes that many chronic illnesses are not about one broken organ but about problems with barrier systems not being tight enough. The body relies on barriers such as the skin barrier, the gut barrier, the blood-brain barrier, and the blood-nerve barrier to control what enters and what stays out. In Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, where connective tissue is already fragile and relies on collagen, the barrier is more prone to leaky. An infectious or inflammatory trigger, such as a virus, can act as an immune-activated stressor to these barriers. Mast cells reside at barrier sites and their job is to sound alarms when something enters inappropriately. If barriers are leaky, mast cells may pull the alarm constantly, creating a persistent signaling state. The result is a body-wide signaling problem that can present as MCAS, POTS, dysautonomia, GI issues, brain fog, and related symptoms. These presentations can occur even though tissues are not visibly damaged, and labs or imaging often appear normal. Because there is no detectable physical damage, patients are frequently treated as if nothing is wrong. The hypothalamus is highlighted as a weaker barrier site; it regulates the autonomic nervous system, heart rate, blood pressure, sweating, and hormone release. Chronic immune signaling can keep the body in survival mode at all times. Some individuals with underlying genetic differences, such as MTHFR variants, may be more disposed to leakier barriers and to oxidative stress. CBPT is not medical advice, not a diagnosis, and not universally applicable to every medical problem. It is a jumping-off point for clinicians and researchers to consider whether different specialties are addressing the same underlying problem from different angles. The theory matters because many people are suffering in the cracks between specialties where labs look normal and nobody feels normal. Nance invites patients, clinicians, and researchers who see overlap in chronic illnesses to share their stories and expertise, acknowledging that anyone watching could benefit. She plans to create more videos detailing aspects of the CBPT theory, with the aim of helping people feel better.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am so nervous to make this video. If you have never seen my face or heard my voice, I am Doctor. Erin Nance. I go by Little Misdiagnosed, and I primarily make educational videos about diseases that are primarily misdiagnosed in women. I'm talking about Ehlers Danlos syndrome, POTS, MCAS, dysautonomia, endometriosis. And over the course of generating over 1,200 videos where at the end of every video, I ask viewers to share their story with me, I have analyzed over 100,000 comments, emails, DMs from you telling me your story. So for over two years, I have been collecting dots from hundreds of thousands of you so that I can connect these dots. And this has allowed me to come up with a theory, not a diagnosis, not medical advice, but a way to connect these dots that medicine typically treats separately. A theory is not a fact yet. Take germ theory, right? The idea in medicine that diseases were caused by these small microorganisms that could only be seen by a microscope. It took years before people accepted that germ theory was true. And what I'm calling this theory is the cellular barrier permeability theory or the CBPT for short. I know it's a mouthful, but just stick with me. The idea is simple. What if many chronic illnesses were not about one broken organ, and instead were about problems with the barrier systems not being tight enough? Our bodies depend on barriers: the skin barrier, the gut barrier, the blood brain barrier, the blood nerve barrier to help control what things get in and what things stay out. In Ehlers Danlos, that connective tissue is already more fragile. It depends on collagen. The barrier is already ripe for being more leaky. Then add an infectious or inflammatory trigger like a virus, not an ongoing infection, but an immune activated stressor to that barrier. Now let's bring in mast cells. Mast cells literally sit at these barrier sites. Their job is to sound the alarm when something gets in when it shouldn't get in. But if these barriers are already leaky, then the mast cells are pulling the alarm constantly, nonstop, sending off these signals. And what we have is a body wide systemic problem, a signaling problem that can look like MCAS, POTS, dysautonomia, GI issues, brain fog. Again, not because the tissues are damaged, but because there's a signaling problem. And it's why everyone's labs look normal. There's nothing abnormal that's found on imaging studies, and everyone is treated as if there's nothing wrong with them because they can't find anything wrong because there's nothing physically damaged that we can measure. There's even an area in the brain, the hypothalamus, which is a weaker barrier spot. And what does the hypothalamus do? It controls the autonomic nervous system, the heart rate, the blood pressure, the sweating, the release of hormones. This chronic immune signaling keeps the body in survival mode 20 fourseven. And for some people who have underlying genetic differences like MTHFR variants, this makes them more disposed to leakier barriers to not being able to handle oxidative stress. Now what this theory is not is it is not medical advice, it is not a diagnosis, it is not peer reviewed yet, and it is not saying that everyone who has a medical problem has this same, original cause. But it is a jumping off point. It is a way for neurologists, immunologists, pain specialists, orthopedic surgeons like myself to think, are we all approaching the same problem but from different angles? And this matters because people are suffering in the cracks between specialties where everyone looks normal, but nobody feels normal. This theory does not replace medicine. It invites medical experts to zoom out. So if you are a patient, if you are a clinician, if you are researcher who also sees this overlap in many different chronic illnesses, please share your story, share your expertise. You never know who's watching these videos. Thank you so much for watching. I will be creating many more videos going into detail about certain aspects of this CBPT theory. Thank you again for watching, and I hope you all feel better.
HustleBitch_
Posted - December 25, 2025 at 4:22 AM
Saved - December 25, 2025 at 8:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeing a viral video where a woman blasts Erika Kirk, saying she’s “not a grieving widow,” calling her a psychopath and accusing her public tour of being inauthentic. She cites glitz, outfits, nonstop speeches, and interviews as evidence, claims Turning Point USA was hijacked after Charlie’s death, and notes AmFest optics like Ben Shapiro’s surprise appearance. She urges warnings to students and families. Is this grief playing out publicly, or are the optics driving it?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 “NOT A GRIEVING WIDOW” - WOMAN SAYS ERIKA KIRK IS A “PSYCHOPATH” AND CLAIMS TURNING POINT WAS HIJACKED A woman is going viral after unleashing a brutal rant about Erika Kirk, claiming in the video that her behavior following the death of her husband Charlie Kirk doesn’t make sense. In the video, the woman points to glitz, glam, fireworks, multiple outfit changes, nonstop speeches, interviews, and a full public tour, flatly declaring: “This is absolutely not a grieving widow.” She later adds: “This is a test for everybody's intelligence.” She goes further, calling Kirk a“psychopath” in the video, and says her sudden ability to step into leadership and give polished speeches overnight contradicts years of podcasts and interviews where both Charlie and Erika stressed that a mother’s primary role was being home with the kids - not running organizations or taking center stage. The woman also calls out Turning Point USA, alleging the group was “hijacked” after Charlie’s death. She highlights what she describes as suspicious optics at AmFest, including Ben Shapiro appearing as a surprise speaker and then criticizing figures Charlie was publicly close to - including Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens - at Charlie’s own event. She claims none of this is accidental, and urges viewers to warn students, families, and recruits about getting involved. The accusations are blunt, emotional, and spreading fast. Is this grief playing out differently in public… or are the optics exactly why this video is blowing up?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that Erica Kirk is not a grieving widow but a psychopath, contending there was a plan to hijack Charlie Kirk’s organization and that Erica was part of it. They claim Erica’s actions are highly suspicious: she delivers multiple speeches and participates in hours-long interviews while on a book tour, all while supposedly grieving, and they question where Charlie and Erica’s children are given she appears to be living it up on stage with fireworks. They allege she and Charlie did multiple interviews together discussing family roles and that the mother’s role in the home was vital, yet she suddenly becomes a CEO and nonstop public figure “overnight,” contradicting prior statements about Erica’s primary role at home. The speaker calls this a test of intelligence and dismisses the possibility of genuine intent. A central sign cited is Ben Shapiro’s appearance as the opening speaker at Amfest, despite not being on Charlie’s published list of Amfest speakers. The speaker notes that Shapiro speaks after Erica and uses the platform to bash Charlie’s close friends, including Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, accusing Shapiro of hostility and implying ulterior motives. They mention Shapiro’s last podcast with Carlson involved controversial questions about a country, and they reference Fox News and other media figures as complicit, alleging they’re paid off by that country and are “singing along.” The speaker highlights that Turning Point USA raised $100,000,000 and frames the organization as deceptive, arguing that people are being fooled and should wake up. They urge warning peers—siblings, cousins, friends—about Turning Point at colleges and high schools, suggesting people should withdraw support and avoid recruitment. The claim is made that Erica Kirk’s ex-boyfriend, Cabot Phillips, now speaks on college visits on behalf of Charlie, despite Erica claiming she had dated nobody for five years before Charlie. Photos allegedly show Erica with Cabot on dates, and Cabot is described as suddenly joining Turning Point USA’s “debate me” movement. Overall, the speaker contends that Turning Point USA has been hijacked, that Erica Kirk and Charlie Kirk are involved in a calculated scheme, and that the leadership has been replaced or compromised, including the “killing” of their CEO. They urge people to stop supporting the organization and to inform others who might be recruited by it, insisting that common sense should prevail.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The glitz, the glam, the multiple outfit changes, the multiple speeches given on stage with the fireworks and everything, it's time to flat out say that this is absolutely not a grieving widow. And, yes, I'm talking about Erica Kirk. Erica Kirk, I'm talking to you. You are a psychopath. You have to be an idiot to think that at this point, with all we've seen so far, that you believe what's going on. Clearly, there was a plan to hijack Charlie's organization, and she was a part of it. Clearly. Okay? I'm I'm pretty I'm about 99.9 sure at this point because the actions are very suspicious. She's able to put these speeches together and give multiple speeches, take hours and hours out of her days to do multiple interviews to multiple news stations. She's on a book tour. She's doing all this stuff. Okay. Where the hell are their kids? Their poor kids who just lost their father has a mother who's literally having the time of her life glowing on stage with fireworks behind her as she's giving these speeches that were clearly planned. Charlie and Erica have multiple interviews together where they're just doing a podcast talking about family roles and the roles of men and women, husband and wife. Every single one of them, they stress how it's so important for the mother to be with the kids and how important the mother is in the home and that he would never ever ask or expect Erica to be working, to be running anything because her most important role is at home. And yet she just whips this out of nowhere. She's just able to pull this out of a hat, her ability to be a CEO and do these all appearances, she's a completely different person overnight just spawned out of nowhere. This is like a test for everybody's intelligence. If you are buying that, you are not intelligent, genuinely. Okay? Because it is so clear what's going on. The biggest sign of all is the fact that Ben Shapiro was the opening speaker at Amfest. Charlie put out a tweet literally a few months ago back in August listing all of the speakers for Amfest. Ben Shapiro was nowhere on the list of speakers. He was not even on the list. There were, like, 12 people listed. Maybe I'll post it here. But he was nowhere on the list, but yet he speaks right after Erica speaks. And not only that, but he proceeds to bash Charlie's best friends. One of them being Tucker Carlson, who he's always loved, who he's always loved speaking with and having speak at those events, who he's documented being like, yes. We're absolutely having Tucker at this event. Yes. I'm getting shit from it, but I don't care. Like, he's a good person, and he I like his ideas and blah blah blah blah blah, and Candace Owens. Ben goes on stage and just continuously bashes them at Charlie's AmFest that he wasn't even supposed to be speaking at in the first place because, obviously, they are not friends. They were not on good terms. His last podcast ever was with Ben Shapiro where he dropped a lot of information questions to Ben Shapiro that clearly Ben Shapiro did not like about a certain country. You got Fox News and all of these psychopaths who are paid off by that country, all just singing along and acting like everything is fine. No big deal. This is all great. A $100,000,000 raised for Turning Point. Guys, we're all being fooled. It's time to wake up. They do not work for us. They work for a foreign country, not America. If you have any siblings, if you have any cousins, any friends who are looking to get into Turning Point at these colleges, these high schools, warn them what's going on. Luckily, I mean, not luckily because it's not luck. It's definitely not luck. It's just so many people are against Turning Point USA and what's going on. They're very aware of what's going on. Most people in the world, they don't have the support that they need to keep going from actual people. You could just see that based on Twitter, based on all of social media. They're getting just hosed in the comments. They're getting no attention in the positive. And now we're finding out that Erica Kirk's ex boyfriend, Cabot Phillips why is her ex boyfriend now doing these college visits and speaking on behalf of Charlie as well? A little weird considering she said that she had dated nobody before Charlie for five years. She's literally seen in photos with this Cabot guy on dates with him. And now suddenly he's a part of Turning Point USA as well. He's suddenly a part of this college, you know, debate me, let's talk together movement. Bullshit. Time we call all of this bullshit, and we don't let it continue. Stop giving them your support. Let the people who are actively being recruited know to not give them their support. They've been completely hijacked, and they killed off their CEO. Guys, it's time to grow some common sense.
HustleBitch_
Posted - November 4, 2025 at 1:44 AM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 8:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Kimberly-Clark quietly bought Kenvue, Tylenol’s parent, in a $48 billion deal, weeks after Trump and RFK Jr. raised autism warnings. I’m left wondering: did they buy a brand or bury a problem?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 BREAKING: TYLENOL JUST SOLD FOR $48 BILLION. THE TIMING ISN’T A COINCIDENCE. First the warnings. Now the $48 billion deal. Just weeks after Trump and RFK Jr. raised alarms about autism risks, Kimberly-Clark quietly bought Kenvue, Tylenol’s parent company, in a $48 billion acquisition. Did they buy a brand or bury a problem?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 discusses important findings from autism research that families should know when making decisions. The FDA will act on acetaminophen use during pregnancy, with the FDA responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including later diagnosis of ADHD and autism. Scientists have proposed biological mechanisms linking prenatal acetaminophen exposure to altered brain development, and the FDA has evaluated contrary studies that show no association. Today, the FDA will issue a physician’s notice about the risk of acetaminophen during pregnancy and begin the process to initiate a safety label change. HHS will launch a nationwide public service campaign to inform families and protect public health. The FDA recognizes that acetaminophen is often the only tool for fevers and pain in pregnancy, as other alternatives have well-documented adverse effects. HHS encourages clinicians to exercise their best judgment and use acetaminophen for fevers and pain in pregnancy by prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary duration and only when treatment is required. Thanks to politicization of science, the safety of acetaminophen against the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children has never been validated. Prudent medicine therefore suggests caution with acetaminophen use by young children, given that strong evidence also associates it with liver toxicity. Some studies have found that use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses. The FDA will drive new research to safeguard mothers, children, and families. In addition to a possible acetaminophen connection to autism for pregnant women, infants, and toddlers, the research has revealed that folate deficiency in a child’s brain can lead to autism. There are also other confirmation studies. One finding cited is that two studies show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism, highly likely because they’re given Tylenol. The speaker notes that none of this is positive, but it is information that should be paid attention to. Speaker 0 comments that there is a tremendous amount of proof or evidence, though he is not a doctor, and that he studied this a long time ago.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Effective immediately, the FDA will be notifying physicians that the use of well, let's see how we say that. Acetaminophen. Acetaminophen. Is that okay? Yes. Which is basically commonly known as Tylenol. During pregnancy, it can be associated with a very increased risk of autism. Nothing bad can happen. It can only good happen. But with Tylenol, don't take it. Don't take it. And if you can't live, if your fever is so bad, you have to take one because there's no alternative to that. Sadly, first question, what can you take instead? It's actually there's not an alternative to that. And as you know, other, other of the medicines are absolutely proven bad. I mean, they've been proven bad with the aspirins and the Advils and others. Right? And they've been proven bad. So I'd like Speaker 1: important findings from our autism work that are vital for parents to know as they make these decisions. First, HHS will act on acetaminophen. The FDA is responding to clinical and laboratory studies and suggest a potential association between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including later diagnosis for ADHD and autism. Scientists have proposed biological mechanisms linking prenatal acetaminophen exposure to altered brain development. We have also evaluated the contrary studies that show no association. Today, the FDA will issue a physician's notice about the risk of acetaminophen during pregnancy and begin the process to initiate a safety label change. HHS will launch a nationwide public service campaign to inform families and protect public health. FDA also recognized that acetaminophen is often the only tool for fevers and pain in pregnancy, as other alternatives have well documented adverse effects. HHS wants therefore to encourage clinicians to exercise their best judgment and use of acetaminophen for fevers and pain in pregnancy by prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary duration and only when treatment is required. Furthermore, thanks also to the politicization of science, the safety of acetaminophen against the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children has never been validated. Prudent medicine therefore suggests caution that acetaminophen use by young children, especially since strong evidence also has associated it with liver toxicity. Some studies have also found the use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses. FDA will drive new research to safeguard mothers, children, families. In addition to a possible acetaminophen connection for to autism for pregnant women, infants, and toddlers, our research has revealed that folate deficiency in a child's brain can lead to autism. There's also just there's other many, many other confirmation studies. One of there's two studies that show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism, and highly likely because they're given Tylenol. So, you know, none of this is this positive, but all of it is stuff that we should be paying attention to. Yeah. Speaker 0: But, you know, there's a tremendous amount of of proof or evidence, I would say. He's a non doctor, but I've studied this a long time ago.
HustleBitch_
Posted - November 4, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 7:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard a pilot say, we’re number three in our line… but there are four lines. The controller won’t reveal the sequence. I have no idea how long it’ll take to get off the ground. Flights stuck for hours at DFW. No communication. Even the pilots are in the dark. If they don’t know… who does?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 PILOT ANNOUNCEMENT STUNS PASSENGERS - “I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT’S GOING ON.” “We’re number three in our line… but there’s four lines. The controller’s not willing to tell anybody what their sequence is… I have no idea how long it’s gonna take to get off the ground.” Flights stuck for hours at DFW. No communication. No explanation. Even the pilots admit they’re being kept in the dark. If the pilots don’t know… who the hell does?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says they are number three in a line of four. The controller is not willing to tell anyone what their sequence is, so there is nothing to report. They have no idea how long it will take to get off the ground, but being third in line suggests they’re getting close.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're number three in our line, there's four lines. And the the controller is not he's not really willing to tell anybody what what their sequence is. So don't have anything to tell you. I have no idea how long it's going to take to get off the ground. But again, we're number three in our line, so hopefully we're getting close.
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 25, 2025 at 2:58 AM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 6:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting a claim: new footage allegedly shows the same detective who let Charlie’s staff remove cameras and the officer who grabbed the mic finding a holster and handgun about 9 minutes after the shooting, then tagging it with a UVU officer, near Charlie’s tent. They reportedly removed cameras earlier. Why isn’t this on the news? How many coincidences before it’s a pattern?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 BREAKING: THEY FOUND A LITERAL SMOKING GUN MINUTES AFTER CHARLIE KIRK WAS ASSASSINATED? New footage from an eyewitness shows the same detective who allegedly allowed Charlie’s staff to remove the cameras and SD cards, along with the same officer who grabbed the microphone Charlie was holding at the crime scene. WATCH as they reportedly discover a holster and handgun approximately 9 minutes after the shooting and order a UVU officer to tag it. Notice how close it is to Charlie's tent. ⚠️ WHY HAVE YOU NOT SEEN THIS ANYWHERE ON THE NEWS? ⚠️ Same men. Same moment. How many “coincidences” before it’s a pattern?

HustleBitch_
Posted - November 16, 2025 at 5:36 AM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 5:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Discussion centers on a 1988 Australian study reporting that, with identical calories and UV exposure, mice fed saturated fats had fewer UV-induced skin tumors than those fed polyunsaturated fats. Switching to seed/polyunsaturated oils increased tumors; switching to saturated fats reduced them. The exchange quotes the study, notes its design (isocaloric groups, Skh:HR-1 mice, chronic UV), and cites PubMed PMID 3241840 as validation. The claim fuels ongoing debates about fat quality and skin cancer risk.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 THE SKIN CANCER LIE: WHAT IF IT WAS NEVER THE SUN? According to the man in this video, a 1988 Australian study found something explosive. Two groups of hairless mice were given the same calories and the same UV exposure. As he puts it, “the only difference was the type of fat they ate.” He says the mice eating seed oils, the same oils in most processed foods, “started to develop skin tumors after UV exposure.” At the same time, “the mice eating saturated fat like butter were completely fine. Same UV light but no tumors.” And when researchers switched the protected mice over to seed oils, he says “tumors started showing up.” His summary is blunt: “seed oils plus sun equals tumors.” If this experiment is even partly accurate, then a huge piece of the skin cancer conversation may have been ignored for almost forty years. If this was discovered in 1988, who buried it and why?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The claim is that skin cancer isn't caused by the sun but by diet, a notion known for almost forty years. In 1988, Australian researchers ran a study on hairless mice, exposing them to UV light. They split the mice into two groups with the same calories and the same UV exposure; the only difference was the type of fat they ate. The mice eating polyunsaturated fats—seed oils like soybean oil and canola oil, common in processed foods—started to develop skin tumors after UV exposure. Conversely, mice eating saturated fats like butter were completely fine, with no tumors, despite the same UV exposure. The study found that when the protected, saturated-fat mice were switched to seed oils, tumors started showing up. It appears that seed oils actively promote cancer growth when exposed to UV light, while saturated fat is protective. Based on the study, seed oils plus sun equals tumors, and saturated fat is protective. This is described as confirmation that eating unnatural processed oils is probably a bad idea.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So apparently skin cancer isn't caused by the sun because it actually might come from your diet and this has been known for almost forty years. So back in 1988 Australian researchers ran a study on hairless mice and exposed them to UV light and what they found was pretty wild. So they split the mice into two groups. The same amount of calories were given to both groups and then they also had the same amount of UV light exposure too. The only difference was the type of fat that they ate. And this is where things get really crazy because the mice eating polyunsaturated fats like your standard seed oils like soybean oil and canola oil, the oil that's practically in every kind of processed food. Well they started to develop skin tumors after UV exposure. Conversely though the mice eating saturated fats like butter were completely fine. Same UV light but no tumors. But it actually gets even more interesting because when they looked at the protected mice, the ones eating saturated fat, and then they switched them over to seed oils, tumors started showing up. So it appears that the seed oils seem to be actively promoting cancer growth when being exposed to UV light. So based on the study seed oils plus sun equals tumors and then saturated fat is actually protective. And so this is just more confirmation that eating unnatural processed oils is probably a bad idea.

@believer75527 - R Believer Kingdom of God

Grok: see PubMed 3241840🔥 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3241840/ @SecKennedy @CaseyDeSantis @FLSurgeonGen @VigilantFox The 1988 Australian Study on Dietary Fat and UV-Induced Skin Cancer in Hairless Mice "Effect of dietary lipid on UV light carcinogenesis in the hairless mouse", published in Photochemistry and Photobiology in November 1988 (Volume 48, Issue 5, pages 689–696). It was conducted by researchers at the Blacktown Hospital and the University of Sydney in Australia, including lead author Valerie E. Reeve (a prominent Australian photobiologist known for her work on UV radiation and skin cancer prevention), along with M. Matheson, G.E. Greenoak, P.J. Canfield, C. Boehm-Wilcox, and C.H. Gallagher. Key Details and "Explosive" Findings.🔥This research examined how the type of dietary fat influences ultraviolet (UV) light-induced skin cancer in a controlled mouse model, holding calories and UV exposure constant across groups. Here's a breakdown: -Study Design: - Subjects: Albino hairless mice (Skh:HR-1 strain), ideal for UV studies due to their lack of fur and visible skin changes. - Groups: Mice were divided into isocaloric (same calorie) diet groups differing only in fat composition: - One group fed a diet with 5% total fat, primarily polyunsaturated (from corn oil, rich in omega-6 fatty acids).-Another with 20% total fat, also polyunsaturated (same source). - UV Exposure: All mice received identical chronic simulated solar UV irradiation (mostly UVB, mimicking sunlight) on their backs, starting at sub-erythemal doses and escalating to induce tumors. - Duration: Diets began 4 weeks before UV exposure and continued throughout the ~40-week tumor observation period. - Outcome Measures: Tumor incidence (percentage of mice developing tumors), latency (time to first tumor), and multiplicity (number of tumors per mouse), primarily squamous cell carcinomas.- Core Finding (The "Explosive" Part): -Contrary to expectations that higher fat levels would worsen outcomes, the quantity of fat (5% vs. 20%) did not significantly affect tumor susceptibility. Both groups showed similar tumor yields under UV exposure. However, the qualitative difference in fat type was dramatic: When diets were switched to saturated fats (e.g., from beef tallow, low in polyunsaturated fats), tumor development was strongly suppressed—fewer tumors formed, and latency increased. In contrast, polyunsaturated fats (omega-6 rich) allowed tumors to progress more readily. This suggested that polyunsaturated fats promote UV carcinogenesis, possibly by enhancing inflammation, immunosuppression, or oxidative damage in UV-exposed skin, while saturated fats offer relative protection.- Broader Implications: - This challenged prior assumptions about "high-fat" diets broadly promoting cancer and highlighted fat quality over quantity. - It built on earlier work (e.g., 1984 studies by the same group on fat levels and beta-carotene) and influenced later research showing omega-3 fats (e.g., from fish oil) could counter these effects by reducing prostaglandin-mediated inflammation. - Human relevance: The findings contributed to evidence that diets high in omega-6 polyunsaturated fats (common in processed foods) may heighten skin cancer risk from sun exposure, while shifting toward saturated or omega-3 sources might mitigate it. This has informed dietary guidelines for skin health in high-UV regions like Australia. -Why "Explosive"? The result was provocative because it implied everyday dietary choices (e.g., vegetable oils vs. animal fats) could dramatically alter skin cancer risk independently of calories or sun avoidance— a hot topic in 1980s nutrition debates amid rising skin cancer rates in Australia (the "sunburned country"). If this matches the video (likely featuring Reeve or a summary by a health influencer), it's spot-on. For the full paper, check academic databases like PubMed (PMID: 3241840) or Wiley Online Library.

Effect of dietary lipid on UV light carcinogenesis in the hairless mouse - PubMed Effect of dietary lipid on UV light carcinogenesis in the hairless mouse pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
HustleBitch_
Posted - November 26, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Saved - November 26, 2025 at 6:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeing a viral TikTok of a 3D printed “steak” from Redefine Meat: vegan yet meaty in looks, smell, and texture, with an “umami punch” in tacos. The creator calls it disgusting-smelling but very meaty. Meanwhile, a Campbell’s hot-mic claim about bio-engineered meat in soup fuels fear that 3D-printed meat could already be in our food. I’m left wondering what I’m really eating.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 YOU’RE EATING 3D PRINTED MEAT AND DON’T EVEN KNOW IT A viral TikTok is blowing up after a creator shows off a 3D printed “steak” from Redefine Meat and the footage is freaking people out. He holds it up and says: “It’s meaty and fibrous just like real meat… but 100% vegan.” “It looks meaty… it smells meaty… it’s got layers of protein and fat just like meat.” “I’m not gonna lie - it smells disgusting.” “Does it taste like meat? That is VERY, VERY meaty.” He loads it into tacos, takes a bite, and says it has the same umami punch you get from real meat. All while the internet is STILL reacting to the Campbell’s executive caught on hot mic claiming: “There’s bio-engineered meat in the soup!” “I don’t wanna eat a fu*king piece of chicken that came from a fu*king 3D printer!” Now people are connecting dots they never expected to connect. Because if 3D printed meat already looks, smells, and tastes like meat…how much of this stuff is already in the food supply without anyone realizing it? Does this make you curious…or straight-up terrified about what we’re REALLY eating?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a three-dimensionally printed steak made by Redefine Meat, describing it as meaty and fibrous, with appearance and texture similar to real meat. They note that it looks meaty, smells meaty, and has layers of protein and fat comparable to genuine meat, and that it is pretty juicy. They acknowledge that it smells disgusting, but frame this as something they are willing to be open-minded about. After loading the product into their tacos, the speaker confirms that the visual and olfactory cues align with meat. They proceed to taste the presentation, asking whether it tastes like meat. The response is affirmative: it is very meaty, with an umami flavor reminiscent of meat, capturing the characteristic savory profile. The speaker gives a positive verdict on the overall experience, using the phrasing “Banging.” to convey enthusiasm. They reference the tacos from Club Mexicana, noting that, as always, the Club Mexicana tacos are a 10 out of 10. They finish by stating a clear recommendation to try the dish, expressing that others should definitely give it a try.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've got this three d printed steak from Redefine Meat that is meaty and fibrous, just like real meat but 100% I'm gonna stick it in a Club Mexichon or Taco. I mean, it looks meaty. It smells meaty. It's got the layers of protein and fat that you would find in meat, and it's pretty juicy. I'm not gonna lie, it smells disgusting. I probably would think meat smells disgusting too, so I'm gonna be open minded. Right, now that we've loaded up our tacos, it's time to give it a try. It looks like meat, it smells like meat, does it taste like meat? That is very, very meaty. It's got that umami flavor that you get when you see a meat. Banging. And as always, Club Mexicana Club Mexicona Tacos are 10 out of 10. Definitely recommend giving it a try.
HustleBitch_
Posted - November 23, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Saved - November 24, 2025 at 3:27 AM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 THEY TRIED TO SCRUB THIS VIDEO FROM THE INTERNET It blew up then suddenly vanished everywhere. Every time it goes viral, it gets deleted. When something disappears this fast, there’s always a reason and it’s never the reason they give you. So what exactly were we not supposed to see?

Video Transcript AI Summary
All that talk you heard about five g interfacing with the shots, it's true. DARPA research and the operational programs to infect us with remote controllable prion clusters in the brain before they even rolled out COVID. I just got chills. This is so evil. I mean, this is how you take over. You colonize people. You implant everybody with these, whether you've had the shot or not, it's everywhere. You get these proteins growing in you. They hit you with the frequency, and it looks like you've died of a stroke. Man, this is bad. All over your brain, hit you with it. Crystals grow the next few days, cut through arteries, cut through veins, cut through capillaries, stroke out. Or he says we can just hit it with a light dose and just fog everybody out and make them sick where they can't think straight.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All that talk you heard about five g interfacing with the shots, it's true. DARPA research and the operational programs to infect us with remote controllable prion clusters in the brain before they even rolled out COVID. I just got chills. This is so evil. I mean, this is how you take over. You colonize people. You implant everybody with these, whether you've had the shot or not, it's everywhere. You get these proteins growing in you. They hit you with the frequency, and it looks like you've died of a stroke. Man, this is bad. All over your brain, hit you with it. Crystals grow the next few days, cut through arteries, cut through veins, cut through capillaries, stroke out. Or he says we can just hit it with a light dose and just fog everybody out and make them sick where they can't think straight.
HustleBitch_
Posted - November 19, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Saved - November 20, 2025 at 9:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m 14, Eloise, and I posted a video after Megyn Kelly called Epstein’s victims “the barely-legal type.” I remind everyone under 18 is a child, no loopholes. If a 14-year-old must explain this to a national audience, something’s seriously wrong. Kids my age shouldn’t be the moral compass in adult rooms. What’s the part no one wants to say out loud?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 14-YEAR-OLD’S RESPONSE TO MEGYN KELLY’S EPSTEIN COMMENTS JUST SHOOK THE INTERNET A 14-year-old girl named Eloise just uploaded a video that’s blowing up across social media and has triggered one of the biggest debates of the week. She says she wasn’t even planning to speak because “this is an adult topic,” but after hearing Megyn Kelly describe Epstein’s victims as “the barely-legal type… like 15,” she decided someone her age needed to say something. And she doesn’t hold back: “Kids in my grade are turning 15 right now. Some of us still have baby faces. Some of us still have braces. Some of us still call our parents when we’re scared at night. Some of us STILL look like middle schoolers - because we basically are.” “Under federal law, anyone under 18 is a child. No loopholes. No technicalities.” But the part that detonated the internet is this: “If a 14-year-old has to get online to explain this to a grown adult with a national platform… then SOMETHING is seriously wrong.” “Kids my age shouldn’t have to be the moral compass in rooms full of adults.” Now the clip is everywhere with people arguing law, ethics, wording, responsibility, media framing, and whether a 14-year-old should even be part of this conversation. What’s the part of this situation no one wants to say out loud?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Eloise, a 14-year-old, addresses Meg and Kelly with a personal reality check on a topic she considers adult in nature. She notes she initially didn’t want to speak up because she felt the topic wasn’t appropriate for a child, and even her mom made a separate video about it. After hearing Megan describe Epstein as not interested in eight-year-olds but in the “barely legal” range like 15, Eloise says a teenager’s perspective is needed. She explains a concrete, present-day context: people in her grade are turning 15 now, some still have baby faces, braces, and still call their parents when they’re scared at night. She emphasizes that many of them still look like middle schoolers because they basically are. She finds it terrifying that a grown woman would need a teenager to explain this to her, highlighting a disconnect between adults and the realities of minors. Eloise then addresses a point she perceives Megan misses: under federal law, anyone 18 is a child, with no asterisk or exception. She pushes back against the idea that “they hit puberty” or that “older kids don’t count,” insisting that “Anyone 18 is a child.” She accuses Megan of stating facts that aren’t factual and says her statements were minimizing, framing abuse as a mere technicality. The core message she wants Megan to hear is that if a 14-year-old must go online to explain to a grown adult with a national platform that children are children and there is no age at which abuse becomes less bad, then the problem isn’t confusion but corruption. Eloise asserts that kids her age aren’t supposed to be the moral compass for adults who should have known better, but they are. She closes by stating that if her voice makes Megan uncomfortable, that discomfort is appropriate because the real issue is that adults defend predators by debating a child’s age. In Eloise’s view, such defenses reveal a failure to protect the truth, and she argues that a freshman’s critique should not be necessary to make this point.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Meg and Kelly. I'm Eloise and I'm 14 years old. I wasn't even gonna say anything because the topic is an adult one. My mom even made a video about it yesterday because we didn't feel it was an appropriate topic for a child to speak about. But after hearing you go on camera and explain that Epstein wasn't into eight year olds, just the barely legal type like 15, I realized you might need an actual reality check from a literal child. So let me help you out. Megan, people in my grade are turning 15 right now. Some of us still have baby faces. Some of us still have braces. Some of us still call our parents when we're scared at night. Some of us still look like middle schoolers because we basically are. And the fact that a grown woman needs a teenager to explain that is honestly terrifying. Here's the part you seem confused about. Under federal law, anyone 18 is a child. No asterisk. No, but they hit puberty. No, older kids don't count. Anyone 18 is a child. You said you were just giving facts, but here's the real fact. What you said wasn't factual, it was minimizing. It was making abuse sound like a technicality. And Megan, here's the part you really need to hear. If a 14 year old has to get on the internet and explain to a grown adult with national platform that children are children and there's no age where abuse suddenly becomes less bad, then the problem isn't confusion, it's corruption. Because kids my age aren't supposed to be the ones correcting you. We're not supposed to be the moral compass in a room full of adults who should have known better, but here we are. If my voice makes you uncomfortable, good. It should because the minute adults start defending predators by debating the age of a child, you're not protecting the truth. You're protecting the predator and you shouldn't need a freshman to tell you that.
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 22, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Saved - October 22, 2025 at 7:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson appeared on Dancing with the Stars, quipping, “I thought they called the wrong guy… my dance experience is just drinking too much at weddings,” and “I think of myself as a Cha-Cha master.” How did we forget this?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 TUCKER CARLSON WAS ON DANCING WITH THE STARS?! Before the primetime monologues podcasts and political wars Tucker hit the DWTS ballroom saying: “I thought they called the wrong guy… my dance experience is just drinking too much at weddings.” “I think of myself as a Cha-Cha master.” How did we all forget this ever happened?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The segment centers on political journalist Tucker Carlson and his dance partner Elena Grinyenko as they take to the ballroom in a reality-dance show. It opens with introductions: Tucker Carlson explains his career in magazines, newspapers, and television, noting thoughts about some unknown number of Israeli forces in the hundreds or thousands. Elena Grinyenko introduces herself as the current Britain champion and expresses her aim to dance “for hot, sexy, and most of all, very feminine.” Tucker jokes about his limited dance experience, while Elena quips and Tucker admits he’s more nervous dancing than in Beirut. The duo prepares for a cha-cha routine, with Elena instructing and Tucker attempting to follow, joking that he plans to think less and let the physicality carry him. Throughout rehearsal, Elena guides Tucker through timing and steps: two and three, a rhythm to the cha-cha, and a plan to keep the process simple so he can have fun. Tucker builds self-assurance, declaring he has total confidence and sees himself as a Cha Cha master, hoping to impress enough to get through one or two shows. Elena emphasizes the need to ease into the routine and maintain momentum, while Tucker expresses a desire for victory in Latin dance. After the performance, the judges’ feedback is mixed. Carrie Ann Inaba compliments the moment and demeanor, Len Goodman notes the choreography and execution, and Bruno Tonioli bluntly calls the performance “an awful mess.” The hosts and judges discuss the overall impression, with a playful tone despite the critique. The segment also includes commentary signaling the show’s ongoing narrative: anticipation of the judges’ scores and Tucker and Elena’s prospects for the competition. The judges announce their scores: Carrie Ann five, Len four, Bruno three, totaling 12 out of 30. Acknowledging the low score, the hosts remind viewers to vote to help them survive the next elimination, underscoring audience participation as crucial. Tucker remarks that the experience rattled him more than Hezbollah, but he remains optimistic about gradually winning Bruno Tonioli over, suggesting the “seeds of affection” may develop over time. The broadcast then teases the upcoming content: a break leading to a segment called the sequin crossfire, and a transition to Disney Channel’s High School Musical graduates, moving from the ballroom to another televised moment. The show closes the segment with the announced 12/30 score and a call to vote to keep Tucker and Elena in the competition.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Political journalist Tucker Carlson and his professional partner Elena Grenyenko. Speaker 1: My name is Tucker Carlson. I'm a journalist. I wrote for magazines and newspapers for about ten years, and I've been in television news for about six. There are some unknown number of Israeli forces in the hundreds, maybe the thousands. When I first got the call about doing this, I thought, well, they must be calling the wrong guy. My dance experience consists of drinking too much at a couple rehearsal dinners. Speaker 2: It's all about the wedding performance, baby. Speaker 3: My name is Yelena Grinyenko, and I'm current Britain champion. I'm gonna dance for hot, sexy, and most of all, very feminine. Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson. Speaker 3: Liana, nice to Speaker 2: meet you. Speaker 3: Nice to Speaker 0: meet you. Speaker 1: I will be more nervous dancing, I think, than I was in Beirut. Speaker 3: Cha cha. One, cha cha two, cha two. Speaker 4: Okay. When Speaker 3: it comes to Tucker and natural ability for dancing, Back. Back. Oh, back. And that's why I have to take a little bit softer approach, so he can just go for it and have fun. Come on, listen up. Let's do that. Let's be kidding. Speaker 1: I'm listening up. I can do that. Speaker 3: Two and three. See, that was a good one. Oh. Speaker 1: I'm starting to like the cha cha. The key I've decided to this whole enterprise is don't think. This is a physical thing. Speaker 3: Two, that's a good one. Speaker 1: I have total confidence. I think of myself as a Cha Cha master. Speaker 3: Yeah. Okay. Good. So show me that. If I'll be able to get him through a show one, that'd be great. If I could get him through a couple of shows, that'd be just amazing. Speaker 1: What I wanna achieve? Victory. Victory in Speaker 2: Latin dance. Dancing the cha cha cha, Tucker Carlson and his partner Elena Grignenko. Speaker 0: Alright. Nice, Elena. Thank Very nice to meet over here. Alright. I love the way you built the anticipation America wondering, is he gonna get up? Speaker 2: I can't I can't believe I just did that. Speaker 0: You did Speaker 2: great. I loved it. Speaker 0: Well, that was I had fun. Carrie Anne, do you agree? Uh-oh. Speaker 2: I know. Know. Like it anyway. Speaker 5: That you had so much fun. So far, you like you had the Speaker 3: best time on the dance floor Speaker 5: and I love it. That's the best part. Well, I have to say it's a dance competition and you didn't dance for half the numbers so I can't really give you a good score on that one. I'm sorry. I'm glad you had a great time. Speaker 2: Thank you. Well, Speaker 4: Tucker, the best part was the start. All the problems started as soon as you stood up. But let me tell you, I think you are a natural ballroom dancer. I think the Walls, Foxtrot, Quick Step, and Tango are gonna be your dun. Speaker 2: Yes. I Speaker 4: agree. Back next week for that crickety quick step. Speaker 0: Okay, Bruno. Speaker 2: What an awful mess. And what you spend half a day with me look like you were sitting in a toilet. I'm sorry. That was dreadful. Bruno, mess. Speaker 5: No. No. No. Speaker 2: No. No. That was that's kind of an artful put why you spend half of your time with the Lou? I don't know. I don't understand it. You're Speaker 0: like Okay. Alright. Speaker 2: Why is that? Alright. This is a cha cha cha. Speaker 0: After the break, we'll come back to the sequin crossfire and find out how Tucker and Elaine scored with the judges. And then, get ready as we starve the Disney Channel movie, High School Musical graduates from the classroom to our ballroom live. Welcome back. Okay. Before the break, Tucker Carlson performed a Cha Cha that Bruno, in his inimitable way, said, he's a mess. Let's see how they scored it. Speaker 2: The judges have their scores. Carrie Ann Inaba. Five. Len Goodman. Four. Bruno Tonioli. An awful mess. Free. Well, Speaker 5: a total of 12 with a little extra thrown in there from Bruno. Now I know that obviously he had a sort of the rat a tat tat of Bruno's rapid fire, but, you know, you're used to dangerous war zones, certainly this has got to be a piece of cake for you. Speaker 1: Rattled me more than Hezbollah, honestly. Speaker 2: But I enjoyed it much more. And you know what? I'm gonna win Bruno over. Speaker 1: I mean, it's gonna take some time. But I feel like I feel like the seeds of affection are there, and once he kinda marinates me a little bit, we'll Speaker 2: be friends. Speaker 5: Alright. Bruno, turn on your oven. There you go. We'll ready to bake. Alright. 12 out of 30 for Tucker and Elena. Of course, if you wanna help them survive tomorrow night's elimination, then call the number on your screen to vote because you got the power to keep them right here. Tom? Alright.
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 21, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 9:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I opened a 1958 Encyclopedia Americana and found a line about US flights over unknown parts of Antarctica discovering a 13,000-foot dome near 80°S, 90°E. It was printed before the Antarctic Treaty, then scrubbed from later editions. A dome in Antarctica, documented in print, then erased. What did they see there and why was it buried?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 1958 ENCYCLOPEDIA MENTIONS A 13,000-FOOT “DOME” IN ANTARCTICA - THEN IT DISAPPEARED A man cracks open a 1958 Encyclopedia Americana and finds a line no one talks about: U.S. flights over “unknown parts of the continent” discovered a massive dome rising 13,000 feet high near 80° South, 90° East. This was printed before the Antarctic Treaty, before the entire region was sealed off from public access. A dome. In Antarctica. Documented in print. Then scrubbed from later editions. What did they see down there and why was it buried?

HustleBitch_
Posted - October 20, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:42 AM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 ANOTHER MAN FLASHES A BADGE UNDER THE TUNNEL - SECONDS AFTER CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT New footage just surfaced showing yet another guy flashing a badge under the tunnel moments after the shooting. How many badges were down there that day and who the hell were they working for? https://t.co/TuFfk5KK6v

HustleBitch_
Posted - October 21, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:24 AM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 BREAKING: NEW FOOTAGE RELEASED OF CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION - IN THE TUNNEL Never-before-seen video shows the moment in the tunnel, where chaos unfolded in seconds. What do you notice? https://t.co/n39iPpjOR5

HustleBitch_
Posted - October 21, 2025 at 3:54 AM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m watching Skyler Baird, the “eyewitness” behind Charlie when the shot rang out. Four interviews claim he was a random bystander, but he moved from the crowd to the front just before the shot. Days later he’s center front at Charlie’s memorial with a media badge, rows from the stage, after saying he probably couldn’t get in. His sparse Facebook—2.4K followers, 7 posts—shows a “digital creator” tag and abundant access. Front row for the assassination, then VIP at the memorial? Placement, not coincidence. Witness or setup?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 WATCH THIS CLOSELY. 🚨 THE “EYEWITNESS” FROM CHARLIE KIRK’S ASSASSINATION ENDED UP VIP AT HIS MEMORIAL Meet Skyler Baird, the guy seen right behind Charlie’s head when the shot went off. He gave four VERY STRANGE interviews claiming he was just a random bystander… but the footage doesn’t lie. He started back in the crowd, then somehow moved to the front row moments before the shooting. Days later, he’s on the main floor center at Charlie’s memorial with a MEDIA badge, just rows from the stage after saying he probably couldn’t even get in. His Facebook? 2.4K followers. 7 posts. No content. No history. Just a “digital creator” tag and front-row access everywhere. He was front row for the assassination… then cleared three security checkpoints to sit VIP at the memorial? That’s not coincidence. That’s placement. Was he a witness… or part of the setup?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes Skyler as having given about four different interviews online right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. She notes he is seen with glasses on top of his head, front row at the scene, and somehow sits on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial during the memorial service. She asks, “Who is this guy? How is this possible? And why are his interviews so odd?” She points out that on the day of the shooting Skyler was in the front row and near a bodyguard. Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 recount Skyler’s position: “Maybe 10 or 15 feet away when it happened. Close as he could.” They describe Skyler with sunglasses on his head, and a Charlie Kirk bodyguard in front of him, with Skyler off to the side in the corner when Charlie began taking questions. They note the bodyguard is directly in front of Charlie, Skyler to the side, matching Skyler’s own account of being “front row, Noel in front of him,” with a bodyguard to his left and one in front of him. They say Skyler was “front row and center.” Speaker 0 then says Skyler later appeared sitting on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial, with a floor pass for a press conference, literally “maybe 10 or so rows from the front of the stage.” They claim this is documented on Skyler’s Facebook page. They mention Skyler’s Facebook shows two, perhaps “two point, I think, k” followings, with from 2018 to 02/2025 only about seven posts and about 10 pictures, implying a sparse content profile for a “digital creator.” Speaker 3 describes Skyler’s earlier claim about getting into the stadium: “Just made it to the stadium. There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. … There’s been people waiting in line since 05:30 in the morning.” He says Skyler went past multiple security layers to obtain a media badge and a floor pass, and then ended up on the Main Floor “a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial.” The speakers question how he could gain access and yet appear to be late, then have a media pass and seating positions. Speaker 4 adds, “So, again, why go into detail acting as if you were late, you didn’t even know you were gonna get in, yet somehow you end up with a passing all these checkpoints to get a media pass around your deck, end up on the First, you know, Main Floor just a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial that day. It’s just like it’s a big act, a big show that this guy's putting on. It’s like he was handpicked to do all these interviews. He was handpicked to have front row that day because he was up, you know, farther up in the crowd before Charlie got there.” Speaker 4 closes with a segment featuring a clip of another person describing a mythic, imagery-laden interpretation: “An indecision night. I photoshopped in my mind. I photoshopped the blood away. I photoshopped Charlie, sat him back up, put his smile back on, and rewound the tape… I rewound the bullet going back up into the rifle. I stuck a flower inside the rifle.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. The Skyler guy gave about four different interviews online right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. Oddly enough, he is also seen right there with the glasses, right behind Charlie's head. The day that he was shot, he was front row to witness it. And then in all of his media interviews, he never once says he's press or anyone of importance, yet somehow he is able to sit on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial. Who is this guy? How is this possible? And why are his interviews so odd? And wait until you see where he was at the beginning of the day and then how he has moved to the front row. Very odd. Speaker 1: Watch the video for, like, 10. Speaker 2: It's like Speaker 3: Maybe 10 or 15 feet away when it happened. Speaker 2: Close as he could. Speaker 1: To my left is security. In the front of me is a security guard and then nothing else. Just Charlie Speaker 2: Baird says. Speaker 0: Okay. If you notice here, Skyler is the air is pointing it, and he's got those sunglasses kinda on top of his head, and then you're gonna see Charlie's bodyguard right there. So you see how they're kinda up against the wall? This was taken before it all started. This was around noon. So he's kinda up in the crowd, and the bodyguard is up in the crowd, which I find very odd because he's, like, behind the gate up into the crowd. And what you're gonna see next is it'll be the live footage of someone recording it, and this is around, like I said, noon, I believe. There they are. The bodyguard's kinda looking back towards him, and that's Skyler right there with the glasses on his head. Now do you see how far back they are kind of in the audience? Now you're actually gonna see where Skyler and the bodyguard move to a completely different area once Charlie gets there and the questions get started. So there is the bodyguard directly in front of Charlie, and then Skyler is over to the side with those sunglasses on his head directly off to the side corner of Charlie. So and that's exactly how he described it in that interview where he was and how he was positioned, how he said he was front row, Noel was in front of him. He had a bodyguard to the left of him and one in front of him. And so that is Skyler right there, front row and center. So this guy got front row seats. He's done all these interviews. And then I go and I find his Facebook and find out that at the memorial service, he was sitting on the Main Floor and had a floor pass press conference and was sitting literally, like, maybe 10 or so rows Speaker 3: Ruins that. Speaker 0: From the front of the stage. Speaker 2: He's since found some clarity. Speaker 1: Story was that Charlie Kirk was murdered for his political views. Speaker 2: And as everyone contemplates what's next Speaker 1: there's a cancer growing in our society. Speaker 2: He hopes for reflection Speaker 3: because there's a real cancer in our society and it's not just But Speaker 2: I know you were talking about the excitement there and focusing on the positives. So how do you wanna make sure that that he's remembered? Speaker 0: Okay. Now here he is sitting on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial, and I'm gonna get to that in a second because it's on his Facebook. But when we get to his Facebook page, something I really noticed was he's got two point, I think, k followings. So you think he'd have, like, a lot of stuff on his page that is interesting because, I mean, I'm gonna follow something, someone if their page has got, you know, all this awesome content on it and I wanna go back and, you know, view it all. He literally, from 2018 to to 02/2025, has maybe seven posts and like 10 pictures. This is his page, his Facebook page. I followed it so I could, you know, following it so I could view everything as if I'm following him. No reels, no nothing. He's a digital creator for what? This is all he has. That's 02/1978 post. But listen to him here. Speaker 3: Just made it to the stadium. There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. Yeah. They're definitely protecting this place. The all signs point to us not being able to get in, but the stadium's already overflown. The overflow's already overflown, and this is an hour before start time. There's been people waiting in line since 05:30 in the morning. Speaker 0: Okay. Notice how he said, and I don't know if I'm gonna be able to get in because people have been waiting out here forever. Okay. But then he gets a floor pass and gets to sit literally a few rows back on the Main Floor with a Did you hear pass that says media? How? Who is this guy? Speaker 3: I went past the first layer, letting him know that I was here for media. Went past the second layer. And the third layer required me to have a badge, and then we took it down to the floor. So that became requisite of me to get a badge. Speaker 4: So, Speaker 0: again, why go into detail acting as if you were late, you didn't even know you were gonna get in, yet somehow you end up with a passing all these checkpoints to get a media pass around your deck, end up on the First, you know, Main Floor just a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial that day. It's just like it's like it's a big act, a big show that this guy's putting on. It's like he was handpicked to do all these interviews. He was handpicked to have front row that day because he was up, you know, farther up in the crowd before Charlie got there. And then lo and behold, he's literally front row right there to see when Charlie, you know, was shot. Who is this guy? It's like he was planted in. Everything about this guy just screams or he flags me. Something is off. Who is he and who is he tied to? And seriously, go watch his videos. They are bizarre. Speaker 4: An indecision night. I I photoshopped in my mind. I photoshopped the blood away. I photoshopped Charlie, sat him back up, put his smile back on, and re rewound the tape in my mind. I rewound the bullet going back up into the rifle. I I was being transported up into this where the rifle was, and I I stuck a flower inside the rifle. I rewound the tape more in my mind's eye and the shooter. He goes down the stairs. I'm rewinding him. I'm I'm push
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 13, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Saved - October 14, 2025 at 5:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Malibu after the Palisades fire: two New Zealand billionaires quietly buy the ashes and rebuild with AI-designed houses built by robots in China for $28 per sq ft, vs about $2,000 locally. 99% cheaper, 100% suspicious. Designed in Italy, manufactured in China, shipped across the Pacific. Foreign billionaires, foreign tech, foreign control. When AI homes replace American neighborhoods at 1% of cost, you’re not rebuilding—you’re beta-testing the future of housing. It feels like a global experiment disguised as real estate.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 SOMETHING VERY STRANGE IS HAPPENING IN MALIBU After the Palisades fire leveled hundreds of homes, two billionaire brothers from New Zealand have been busy quietly buying up the ashes. They are now rebuilding Malibu with AI-designed houses built by robots in China for just $28 a square foot. For context: Malibu’s average build cost is $2,000 per sq ft. That’s 99% cheaper and 100% suspicious. Designed in Italy. Manufactured in China. Shipped across the Pacific. Foreign billionaires. Foreign tech. Foreign control. When AI homes start replacing American neighborhoods at 1% of the cost… you’re not rebuilding, you’re beta-testing the future of human housing. This looks like a global experiment disguised as real estate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for summary approach: - Identify the core events, players, and outcomes presented. - Capture all key numeric data and financial figures exactly as stated. - Preserve the sequence: fire impact, lot sales, buyers, company and project details, production costs, expansion plans. - Highlight any unique or surprising details without interpretation. - Exclude filler, repetitions, and off-topic content. - Translate any non-English parts (not needed here) and present in English. - Maintain the original claims precisely, avoiding judgments or added qualifiers. - Keep the total word count within 374-468 words. The Palisades fire burned a total of 340 oceanfront homes in Malibu Beach to the ground. Since then, 11 of those burn lots have sold, nine of which were bought for $65,000,000 by two billionaire brothers from New Zealand, Nick and Matt Mobred, who cofounded toy giant, Zuru, best known for Buncha Balloons, Robofish, and now AI designed prefabricated modular homes they plan to put along the Malibu Coast. The designs will be created in Milan, Italy and include fire resistant materials like concrete, porcelain, triple glazed windows, and flat roofs. Then they'll be manufactured largely by robots at a Zuru factory in China and shipped across the Pacific to Malibu, where they'll be assembled right here along the coast. Zuru claims it can deliver these homes for the shockingly low production cost of $300 per square meter, which is just $28 per square foot. That means a 2,700 square foot home would only cost about a $100,000 to produce and ship, then sell for a projected 10 to $30,000,000. But the Mowbray brothers aren't just looking to make a quick buck. If these AI homes work in Malibu, they plan to build them in cities across The US, Europe, and Asia, making AI homes a global mainstream solution not just for luxury communities but for middle class neighborhoods as well. So what do you think? Is this the future of home building or just billionaires playing Malibu monopoly? Let me know in the comments. Wanna live on Malibu Beach but don't wanna wait for a prefabricated modular AI home? Buy this oceanfront home. A remodeled three bed, four bath with three oceanfront decks asking 9,975,000.000.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Billionaire brothers from New Zealand are buying up dozens of burned out lots from the Palisades fire on Malibu Beach. Speaker 1: With plans to build rows of AI designed homes built in China along the coast. Speaker 0: Is this an experiment gone awry or the future of home building? I'm LA realtor, Neal. Let's dive in. Speaker 1: The Palisades fire burned a total of 340 oceanfront homes in Malibu Beach to the ground. And since then, 11 of those burn lots have sold, nine of which were bought for $65,000,000 by two billionaire brothers from New Zealand, Nick and Matt Mobred, Speaker 0: who Speaker 1: cofounded toy giant, Zuru, best known for Buncha Balloons, Robofish, and now AI designed prefabricated modular homes they plan to put along the Malibu Coast. The designs will be created in Milan, Italy and include fire resistant materials like concrete, porcelain, triple glazed windows, and flat roofs. Then they'll be manufactured largely by robots at a Zuru factory in China and shipped across the Pacific to Malibu, Speaker 0: where they'll be assembled right here along the coast. Speaker 1: Zuru claims it can deliver these homes for the shockingly low production cost of $300 per square meter, which is just $28 per square foot. A mere fraction of Malibu's average cost to build, which goes up to 2,000 a square foot. That means a 2,700 square foot home would only cost about a $100,000 to produce and ship, then sell for a projected 10 to $30,000,000. Speaker 0: But the Mowbray brothers aren't just looking to make a quick buck. Speaker 1: If these AI homes work in Malibu, they plan to build them in cities across The US, Europe, and Asia, making AI homes a global mainstream solution not just for luxury communities but for middle class neighborhoods as well. Speaker 0: So what do you think? Is this the future of home building or just billionaires playing Malibu monopoly? Let me know in the comments. Speaker 1: Wanna live on Malibu Beach but don't wanna wait for a prefabricated modular AI home? Buy this oceanfront home. A remodeled three bed, four bath with three oceanfront decks asking 9,975,000.000.
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 13, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 8:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw a second unknown man on camera flashing a badge moments after Charlie Kirk was assassinated. He’s in sandals, strolling through chaos, flashing what looked like a law-enforcement badge before vanishing. Bystanders asked, “Who the f* is that guy?” Kash Patel says the FBI didn’t show up for 26 minutes. Who were these “law enforcement” guys, who sent them, and why would a cop appear in flip-flops at a political assassination?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 SECOND FAKE COP CAUGHT ON CAMERA 🚨 A second unknown man was seen on camera flashing a badge moments after Charlie Kirk was assassinated. WATCH CLOSELY: he’s wearing sandals, strolling through the chaos like he owns the place, and flashes what looks like a law-enforcement badge before disappearing. His vibe was so off that even bystanders can be heard asking, “Who the f* is that guy?” And here’s the kicker... Kash Patel says the FBI didn’t show up for 26 minutes. So who the hell were these “law enforcement” guys walking around flashing badges before they even got there? Who sent them? And what kind of “cop” shows up to a political assassination… in flip-flops?

HustleBitch_
Posted - October 10, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 7:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watch this closely: why was Phil Lyman laughing when Charlie Kirk got shot? Why does he say “no” yet admit he witnessed it all? He starts to talk about the assassination, then cuts off and freezes. His friend was murdered minutes before—what was he smiling about?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 WATCH THIS CLOSELY. 🚨 Why was Phil Lyman laughing and smiling while discussing Charlie Kirk getting shot? And when asked if he saw what happened... why does he say “no” when later admitting he was a "witness to everything that happened"? He starts to talk about the assassination… then cuts himself off mid-sentence and freezes. His “friend” had just been murdered minutes earlier, so what exactly was he smiling and laughing about?

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are outside the student life alongside. What's your name? Name is Makayya. Wait. Can I see what happened? How are you? Did you see what happened, Phil? No. You were there too? Oh, yeah. It's interesting because I was there. I I was a witness to everything that happened. I was talking to Charlie Charlie just before he took the stage, and I was I was in very, very close proximity. Can I see what happened? How are you? Did you see what happened, Phil? No. No. Charlie was a friend of mine. No. We know one thing, Charlie Kirk died. I was pretty
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are outside the student life alongside. What's your name? Name is Makayya. Wait. Can I see what happened? How are you? Did you see what happened, Phil? No. You were there too? Oh, yeah. It's interesting because I was there. I I was a witness to everything that happened. I was talking to Charlie Charlie just before he took the stage, and I was I was in very, very close proximity. Can I see what happened? How are you? Did you see what happened, Phil? No. No. Charlie was a friend of mine. No. We know one thing, Charlie Kirk died. I was pretty
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 10, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 5:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
HOLY SH*T! WATCH THIS CLOSELY. “1...2...3... ACTION!” I’m told Charlie Kirk got shot. Is this another paid actor? I spot Phil Lyman with a script, nodding in sync as the line lands. The countdown woman wears that shirt. How deep does this go?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 HOLY SH*T! WATCH THIS CLOSELY. 🚨 “1...2...3... ACTION!” “I SAW CHARLIE KIRK GET SHOT.” Remember him? Is this another paid actor? Watch none other than Phil Lyman holding what appears to be a script and nodding perfectly in sync as the guy delivers his line. And the woman counting down before filming? Check out her shirt. How deep does this really go?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. He collapsed in his seat. He fell over to the side. There was a gunshot that rang out. He was dragged off and carried out of the venue. He had blood on his arms. He had blood on his shirt. I saw somebody get shot today. I was standing in probably the third row in the bottom. I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over, and he was carried off. It's high right now. Everybody's in shock, including myself. Where's your mama?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: +1, 23. I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. +1, 23. I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. He collapsed in his seat. He fell over to the side. He was carried off. He had blood on his arms. He had blood on his shirt. He was dragged off and carried out of the venue. There was a gunshot that rang out. Are you okay? I'm no. I'm not okay. I saw somebody get shot today. Yeah. I'm hoping so. I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. He collapsed in his seat. He fell over to the side. He was carried off. He had blood on his arms. He had blood on his shirt. He was dragged off and carried out of the venue. There was a gunshot that rang out. You okay? I'm no. I'm not okay. It's I saw someone get shot today. Yeah. Good question. Did you guys see what happened? Yes. I saw him. What's are you recording this? Yes. You're live right now. Well, we're we're recording. I don't know if we're live because of the cell service. Hang on. I was standing in probably the third okay. I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over, and he was carried off. Step, we're not doing this. Get off me. We're not The head's off me. Shut up. Get off me. Shut Running high right now. Everybody's in shock, including myself. Where's your mama?
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 9, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 10:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the shooter was much closer to Charlie Kirk than initially thought. Candace Owens suggests that multiple people may have been involved, possibly deciding who would take the shot at the last minute. She theorizes that a rifle was fired to mask the sound of a smaller gun, which likely came from the front of Charlie. We're searching for someone in the audience who could fit this description. The lack of footage from behind Charlie raises questions about what is being concealed, indicating there’s significant deception at play.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨THE SHOOTER WAS MUCH CLOSER - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE CROWD 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “It is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day, maybe even deciding in the last hour which one of them would take the shot.” “It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun… which had to come from the front of Charlie.” “We are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie, and likely in the audience.” “That goes a long way in explaining why they’re hiding the footage from behind Charlie’s head.” “Of all the cameras, why grab that one first?” “There’s a lot of hiding and definitively a lot of lying going on.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discusses Fed operations and JFK shooting, stating 'there are often decoys, even decoy sounds' and that 'it is totally plausible' there were multiple people who knew who would take the shot. They say 'a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun,' and, considering the trajectory, that the shot 'kinda had to come from the front of Charlie.' This is 'my well informed opinion' and suggests 'we are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie and likely in the audience.' The speaker claims this explains why footage behind Charlie's head is hidden, calling it 'crucial first and foremost.' They claim 'the person who took the cameras down was absolutely not instructed to do so by law enforcement' Question 'why grab the one behind his head first?' They note a 'remarkable blind spot on the left of Charlie' and ask for footage accordingly.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now it is possible given what we know about Fed type operations and what we know about the JFK shooting, which we are still not allowed to tell the truth about, but we all know what the truth is, that there are often decoys, even decoy sounds. That it is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day who found out maybe even in the fine hour, of last hour, which one of them was going to take the shot, right? It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun, which maybe actually kinda had to if we're considering the trajectory that I'm telling you here to here, kinda had to come from the front of Charlie. And I will say that that is now my well informed opinion, well informed opinion that we are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie and likely in the audience. And that goes a long way, by the way, in terms of trying to explain why they're maybe hiding the footage from behind Charlie's head. Maybe that is the reason that that footage was so crucial first and foremost. Now there are tons of other cameras. That one gets grabbed first. It seems to me that there's a lot of hiding, and there's definitively a lot of lying that's going on. I told you Tyler Boyer lied. He just lied. The person who took the cameras down was absolutely not instructed to do so by law enforcement. He just wasn't. Okay? So why say that? Also, why grab the one behind his head first? Of all the cameras, why that one first and foremost? And when I actually think about the clip that I was shown, it was more to the right. I actually feel that there is this remarkable blind spot on the left of Charlie, which is why I was asking if anybody had footage, not footage if you're sitting there and taking footage this way. But if you are Charlie, I want to see what he would have seen looking slightly to his left.
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 9, 2025 at 11:39 PM
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 8:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m shocked by the blatant display of corruption surrounding the Charlie Kirk story. Candace Owens highlights that the attempt to make this a public execution has backfired, igniting anger rather than fear. She reflects on how the world witnessed this event live, comparing it to the JFK assassination, and emphasizes that the trauma inflicted is profound. The internet generation is mobilizing, and we’re not going to forget or calm down. The question remains: who orchestrated this public execution?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

WHOA!!! 🚨 YOU WANTED A PUBLIC EXECUTION - NOW YOU GOT OUR ATTENTION 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “You’d have to get rid of all of us - seven billion people - if you want us to just forget about the Charlie Kirk story. No one’s forgetting it.” “I don’t know whose sadistic idea it was to make this a public execution. But let me tell you where you made the mistake.” “In 1963, when JFK was shot, people didn’t watch it on TikTok. You made us watch this live, around the world. You traumatized all of us... not in the way you meant to.” “You wanted to make us fearful. Instead, you made us angry. Angry that corruption is this blatant, this in our face.” “We’re grieving because you assassinated Charlie Kirk in front of the entire world.” “You wanted this to be a public execution. That disturbs me. So you get what you get.” “This is the internet generation. You get TikTokers, military guys, ballistic experts, psychics, all of us. We’re running this now.” We’re not calming down. We’re not forgetting. Who ordered the public execution?

Video Transcript AI Summary
"You gotta just give up. It's it's gonna come out. Whatever it is, it's gonna come out. There you would have to and I wouldn't put it past you. You'd have to get rid of all of us." "You got, like, 7,000,000,000 people you've got to ethnically cleanse right now if you wanted to just forget about the Charlie Kirk story." "In 1963, when JFK was shot, people didn't watch it on TikTok." "You traumatized all of us." "We're grieving because you assassinated Charlie Kirk in front of the entire world." "If you had pretended he slipped and fell on some ice in the winter, maybe you wouldn't have this response."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You gotta just give up. It's it's gonna come out. Whatever it is, it's gonna come out. There's you would have to and I wouldn't put it past you. You'd have to get rid of all of us. You got, like, 7,000,000,000 people you've got to ethnically cleanse right now if you wanted to just forget about the Charlie Kirk story. It's no one's forgetting it. Okay? Not the ballistics guys on YouTube that we're all listening to. But no one's no one's gonna let this one go because and by the way, that's your fault. I don't know whose sadistic idea it was to make this a public execution, but let me tell you where you made the mistake. Okay? In 1963, when JFK was shot, people didn't watch it on TikTok. People mostly read about it, and then the feds lied about it, and they heard about it. But to be able to have us watch that live around the world, you traumatized all of us. And not in the way that you meant to. You meant to traumatize us and maybe then make us fearful and scared. And, yeah, that happened. Then you made us really angry that corruption is allowed to be like this, just so blatant and so in our face, looking at us as if we're nothing. And what are you going to do about it? That's the attitude. What are you going to do about it? You wanted to traumatize us and then to, on a dime, flip and look us in the face and go, how dare you ask questions? People are grieving. Yeah. We're grieving because you assassinated Charlie Kirk in front of the entire world. If you had pretended he slipped and fell on some ice in the winter, maybe you wouldn't have this response. But you got our attention because you went after our attention. You wanted this for whatever sadistic reason. You wanted this to be a public execution, and that disturbs me. So you get what you get. Okay? This is the Internet generation. You get TikTokers that are asking questions. You get our military guys. You get our ballistic boys. You get the TikTok medium psychic ladies. You get everybody. All of us are here. Okay? So it's like a high school class. You got all different types of characters here, but we're running this. Okay? We're running this. And we're not gonna be nice to any substitute teachers that you try to throw in there and try to calm down. Nope. We're not doing that. Okay? We're not calming down. We're pretty upset, and we're gonna stay upset.
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 9, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 12:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m shocked to share that Charlie Kirk was confirmed to have been shot from the front, and the gun used was not what was initially reported. Candace Owens stated that the bullet hit his neck and did not exit, with a fragment recovered. She fact-checked this information and noted that no bullet from a .30-06 was found, as indicated on his death certificate. This revelation seems to validate the claims made by hunters about the type of gun involved.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

HOLY SH*T! 🚨 100% CONFIRMED - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE FRONT… AND IT WASN’T THE GUN THEY TOLD US 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “Charlie’s neck did indeed stop the bullet. Without question. 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit. A fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources. They didn’t recover a bullet from a 30 odd 6. There is not one reflected on Charlie Kirk’s death certificate. Hunters rejoice. You guys were right. It means he was shot with a completely different gun.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Now I can tell you the part that he is telling the truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet without question." "Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit." "And at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck." "They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six." "They found a 30 odd six bullets." "Charlie's death certificate certainly would have reflected that." "There is not one reflected onto Charlie Kirk's death certificate because they did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six." "Andrew has claimed that he had a conversation with the surgeon who offered up the idea that it really was just your modern Christian miracle." "What are we to make of that?"
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I can tell you the part that he is telling the truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet without question. Okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, And I'm telling you this 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the bullet did not exit. And at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. And I'm going to tell you exactly where it was recovered from. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources now. I've actually been sitting on this for a little bit over a week. Right around here. So think about almost in line with your shoulder blade right in the center. Now why is that helpful? Because it gives us a bullet trajectory. Okay? It went in here where you saw that and it was stopped and a fragment was pulled from right if you're just touching your spine in line with your shoulder blade. That leads us obviously to the part that he's maybe not being forthcoming about. They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. They didn't recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. This didn't happen. Okay? They found a 30 odd six bullets. Charlie's death certificate certainly would have reflected that. In suicide in suicide situations, that's just one example, medical examiners feel free to chime in. I've spoken to quite a few. But when the gun and the bullet are known, they are reflected onto the death certificate. Okay? There is not one reflected onto Charlie Kirk's death certificate because they did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. Hunters and military men rejoice. It turns out that common sense still rules the roost. Okay? You guys were right. You're absolutely right. And this is why I hate politics because it requires us to submit to the idea that we were all somehow born yesterday. That really can just life really can just be a Marvel comic with people that are I guess a DC comic where there are men of steel that are able because they're young to stop 3,000 pounds of energy that is coming at them. That didn't happen. So where does that leave us guys? Well, the part that is now extraordinarily suspicious is that Andrew has claimed that he had a conversation with the surgeon who offered up the idea that it really was just your modern Christian miracle. Charlie was just young and his bones had a lot of density, which made him stronger somehow than a cape buffalo, enough push ups in asparagus, and you too can stop 3,000 pounds of energy coming at you. What are we to make of that? What are we to make of the fact that Charlie did not do that actually? It means that he was shot with a completely different kind of gun, obviously. Okay? The kind where this would make sense that it didn't cut through him. The kind where it would make sense that outside of an artery effectively exploding from the front, there was, you know, his neck didn't explode, which that particular weapon that they were trying to tell us Charlie was killed with would have gone through about seven necks. Okay?
HustleBitch_
Posted - October 2, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 4:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared new footage of a police officer positioned above Charlie Kirk’s tent just before the assassination. He had a clear view of the rooftops, but then vanished right after the shot was fired. This raises questions about whether he was protecting Charlie or facilitating the attack.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 THE COP WHO SAW IT ALL - THEN VANISHED 🚨 WATCH THIS CLOSELY. New footage shows a police officer stationed directly above Charlie Kirk’s tent at 12:22 PM, just one minute before the assassination. From that vantage point, he had a perfect line of sight on the Sorensen, Losee, and Woodbury rooftops. But one minute later, the shot is fired… and the cop is suddenly gone without a trace. So was he protecting Charlie or clearing the way for the shot?

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 30, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 11:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered potential suspects in Charlie Kirk's assassination. At 12:15:18 PM, a man resembling the FBI's shooter, Tyler Robinson, was seen near Charlie's tent, acting suspiciously with a piece of fabric and planting something on the railing. Moments later, another individual interacted with that spot. Additionally, at 12:06 PM, another man was spotted on a nearby roof, and by 12:23 PM, footage showed a "shooter" fleeing another building. This sequence suggests a coordinated effort rather than random chaos, raising questions about the number of individuals involved.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 I JUST FOUND CHARLIE KIRK'S ASSASSIN(S) 🚨 WATCH THIS VERY CLOSELY. At 12:15:18 PM outside the Sorensen Center, a man matching the FBI's shooter Tyler Robinson with black hat, maroon shirt, sunglasses, black backpack, is spotted directly overhead and in-line with Charlie's tent, possibly from where the bullet traveled. He’s holding a piece of fabric in his left hand, using it to cover his grip as he plants something on the railing. Seconds later, another figure suspiciously touches that exact spot, slips something into his pocket, then slams out three fist-bumps on the rail. THE SIGNAL. But of course, this isn’t the only sighting: • Just before this, at 12:06 PM, another man is seen on the roof of the Woodbury Building. • At 12:23 PM, the FBI’s footage shows a "shooter" running off the Losee roof. Three different buildings. Three different times. Same window of 17 minutes. This wasn’t chaos. This was choreography. So the question the FBI won’t touch: how many assassins were REALLY involved in Charlie Kirk’s death?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Look how look how tiny that is. Wow. It's my own DIY streaming setup. So it's professional ones, not like $5. Yeah. This is the mic right here. This is the receiver for this. Yeah. It's a it's half over that transmitter. Really? So that way, if I have multiple cameras, you don't miss any angle, you know. Who makes that camera? Logitech. Yeah. It's always an emphasis. It's a Levo. It's for the game. I have a big a bigger one at home that I like to bring out here. It's a pretty wide angle. It has a micro four thirds lens. Oh, it does? Yeah. It's that big. Yeah. It's like a cube, like this big.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look how look how tiny that is. Wow. It's my own DIY streaming setup. So it's professional ones, not like $5. Yeah. I just don't remember what that is. I've seen I've seen small ones, but I haven't seen them in some. This is the mic right here. This is the receiver for this. Yeah. It's a it's half over that transmitter. Really? So that way, if I have multiple cameras, you don't miss any angle, you know. Who makes that camera? Logitech. Yeah. It's always an emphasis. It's a Levo. It's for the game. I have a big a bigger one at home that I like to bring out here. It's a pretty wide angle. It has a micro four thirds lens. Oh, it does? Yeah. It's that big. Yeah. It's like a cube, like this big.
HustleBitch_
Posted - September 29, 2025 at 9:02 PM
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 6:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my second court appearance, I confirmed my presence to the judge. The state prosecutor mentioned the substantial amount of discovery in my case, describing it as voluminous. My public defender noted the massive digital discovery and stated we do not intend to waive a preliminary hearing. Additionally, the prosecutors addressed the gag order imposed by Judge Tony Graf, which prevents anyone involved in the case from speaking to the press. The combination of extensive discovery and the gag order raises questions about the situation.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 TYLER ROBINSON SPEAKS IN 2ND COURT APPEARANCE 🚨 Judge: “Do we have Mr. Robinson present?” Tyler Robinson: “Yes, your honor.” The state prosecutor declares: “There is a substantial amount of discovery in this case. It is voluminous to say the least.” His public defender responds: “Massive amounts of digital discovery…and it is not our intent to waive a preliminary hearing in this matter.” Prosecutors also raised the gag order slapped down by Judge Tony Graf, a ruling that muzzles everyone tied to Charlie Kirk’s assassination from talking to the press. When a case already has “massive” discovery…and now they’re silencing every voice that could leak what’s inside…what does that tell you?

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the State of Utah versus Tyler James Robinson, the court admitted Michael Burt, Richard Novak, Prohakviche and Catherine Nestor as counsel, finding the combined experience meets Rule eight. The State stated discovery under Rule 16 must be provided to the defense within five days of a defense request, noting discovery is voluminous and the information will be exchanged efficiently. The court addressed the pretrial/publicity protection order issue, seeking clarification on the phrase 'all witnesses,' since many witnesses are yet to be identified; the court ruled that as witnesses become known, they must be informed of the order. The defense requested resetting the waiver hearing due to massive digital discovery, checking in 30 to 60 days; detention hearing timing to be decided later. The court set October 30 at 10 AM for the next hearing, in person, and stated, 'I will not put my finger on the scale of justice.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do we have mister Robinson present? Speaker 1: Yes, your honor. Please Speaker 0: be seated. Good morning. Court is now in session. Calling the case 251403576, State of Utah versus Tyler James Robinson. Counsel, could you enter your appearances, please? Speaker 1: Chad Gronander, Jeff Gray, Lauren Hunt, Ryan McBride, and Chris Ballard for the state, your honor. Speaker 0: Good morning, counsels. Speaker 2: Good morning, your honor. Kathy Nestor, Michael Burt, and Richard Novak on behalf of mister Robinson. Morning, your honor. Speaker 0: Good morning to you all. Speaker 1: Good morning. Speaker 0: And to the jail. Do we have mister Robinson present? Yes, your honor. Alright. Mister Robinson, good morning to you as well. Counsel, as we begin, I have entered orders allowing the admittance of mister Michael Burt, Mr. Richard Novak, Prohakviche and appointing them along with Ms. Catherine Nestor to be Mr. Robinson's counsel. The court enters findings that the combined experience of counsel meets and exceeds the requirements of Rule eight. Counsel, do we have what would we like to accomplish today? Speaker 1: I have two items, judge. I just wanted to make a record that under Rule 16 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure respect to discovery, the state is required to provide to the defense within five days of the defense's request the discovery that we relied on in making this charging decision. Be prepared to do that, so we'll look for defense counsel's request over the next day or so and we'll provide that to the defense. Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 1: We also, for the court's information, we met this morning with the defense team briefly in our office to talk about discovery and the process, so we'll be working together. There is a substantial amount of discovery in this case, your honor. It's voluminous to say the least, and we're working on a process where we can exchange information as quickly as possible and be efficient in that process. The other item I had, Your Honour, I saw that over the weekend there was a protection order pretrial and trial publicity order entered by Your Honour. And I just was seeking some clarification on page two, at the end of the first paragraph, it reads, To that end, lawyers participating in the investigation or litigation of this case shall inform all witnesses, investigators, consultants, staff members, or other members of the prosecution or defense teams about the prohibitions contained in this order. The state we're seeking some clarification with respect to the phrase all witnesses, your honor. There are a number of witnesses that have yet to be identified, that will likely be used in the state's case. This occurred in front of 2,000 to 3,000 students at Utah Valley University. So we're in the process of identifying those witnesses. And so those individuals are presently unknown right now. So we're looking for a little clarification from the court, and I suppose, we're not gonna make any arguments today, but there may be some follow-up pleadings that we may need to file. Speaker 0: Thank you. Miss Nestor, did you want to be heard about that issue? Speaker 2: No, your honor. We would defer to whatever the court wants to advise them on that matter. I mean, I think it's fairly obvious that we don't know who all the witnesses are in this case yet. I think it's just important that if anyone, is identified that they have information about this order. So I think other than that, we wouldn't weigh in on any other matter. Speaker 0: Thank you. Well, thank you for that question. That's an important one. The court will rule that as the witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order. Obviously, there are potentially many witnesses, and so it's not the expectation that you would be able to do that upfront. But as they become known, I would ask that you inform them of this. Anything else, counsel? Speaker 1: Nothing from the state. Nothing else, judge. Thank you. Miss Nestor. Speaker 2: Thank you, your honor. We recognize that we are here today for a waiver hearing. We it is not our intent to waive a preliminary hearing in this matter. We are gonna be seeking that one be set. However, based largely on what the state just referred to as far as the voluminous nature of the discovery materials, we do think it would be prudent to simply reset for another conference, another waiver hearing a little bit down the road where we have a better idea once we start seeing the discovery as it rolls in. I do recognize we're going to be getting that first batch in five days, but it's my understanding from our meeting today that there is massive amounts of digital that is going to be coming. And we until we can kind of get our heads around exactly what we're dealing with and how much we need to process, it it's gonna be difficult for us to give you a reasonable expectation of when we will be ready to do the prelim. So we are asking today that we put that decision off. And maybe we could check-in in thirty to sixty days and just kind of let the court know where we're at and how much we're looking at and how much time we may need to set a preliminary hearing. Also, far as a detention hearing, we are not asking the court to address that issue at this time. Under the statute, the issue is gonna come down to the question of whether there's substantial evidence, which right now we're just not in a position at all to be able to even argue to the court. So we are probably going to ask that the court delay that decision possibly until the time of the prelim. But if it's sooner, we will ask the court for a hearing. But at this time, we are not asking the court to make any decisions on that matter. Speaker 0: Thank you, counsel. In regards to the next hearing date, how about October 30 at 10AM? Speaker 1: That works for the state, your honor. Thank you. Alright. Speaker 2: That's fine for the defense, your honor. Speaker 0: Alright. Now as we are at the begin anything further from counsel from either side? Speaker 1: No, your honor. Thank you. Speaker 2: No, your honor. Thank you. Speaker 0: As we are at the beginning of this case, it is my intent to only speak when I'm needed or it is necessary. But today, I do wish to provide guidance and expectations that you can have for this court and wish to enter an order as well. As this case moves forward, mister Robinson's constitutional rights will be protected at every stage. He sits before this court presumed innocence, and that presumption remains unless and until each element of every offense charged against him is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. At the same time and as applicable, victims are entitled under our constitution to be treated with fairness, respect, and dignity, free from harassment or abuse. Justice demands that both of these principles, the rights of the accused and the rights of victims, be honored without compromise. I remain steadfast in my oath that I made fifty six days ago to support and defend the constitutions of The United States and of Utah. I will carry out my duties with fidelity, transparency, and impartiality, treating every person who appears before me with the dignity and respect they are inherently do because they are human beings. Let me be clear. I will not put my finger on the scale of justice. These proceedings will be open to the public, conducted in accordance with the law, and handled with diligence and competence to ensure that justice is never compromised. It is the standing order of this court that mister Robinson shall be allowed to appear in person so he can fully engage with his attorneys and participate in these legal proceedings. Counsel, regardless of who is watching, whether it is the nation or a single individual, we must fulfill our roles with integrity, civility, and diligence. I encourage each of you to give your very best to this case. Neither mister Robinson nor the people of Utah deserve anything less than the fair and impartial administration of justice. In regards to the next hearing council on that October 30 date at 10AM, It's the court's intent that be in person if it be the wish of counsel for the defense for mister Robinson to be present. Speaker 2: It is, your honor. Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you. Counsel, anything else that we can address today? Speaker 1: Your honor, we appreciate the court's comments with respect to your honor's role in this case. In like matter, we commit to approach this case with integrity, with professionalism, and civility. We are truth seekers. We will aggressively pursue the truth in this case. Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you. Alright, counsel. Unless there's anything else, thank you for being here. This court is in recess. Speaker 1: Thank you. I might stand by now. Okay.
HustleBitch_
Posted - September 29, 2025 at 10:40 PM
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 1:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed that after Candace Owens questioned the nephew of former Utah State Rep Phil Lyman about his posts retracing the killer's steps in Charlie Kirk's assassination, he immediately made his profile private. I'm curious about what he revealed that prompted this action.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 PROFILE SCRUBBED IMMEDIATELY AFTER CANDACE QUESTIONS HIM 🚨 WATCH THIS CLOSELY. Candace Owens pressed the nephew of former Utah State Rep Phil Lyman after he posted videos and photos retracing the killer’s steps in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Moments later his entire profile goes private. Here are the photos and videos he scrubbed from the public eye. What did he reveal that couldn’t stay public?

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Pacing back and forth. Sent it to the FBI and said, if there's an accomplice you know." "the camera from here to here took way too long." "If you time how long it took him to get from that little part over to here, was way longer than it should have been." "So I wondered if the girl had given him stuff." "Sam's across the street, he was right here." "The gun was dumped up here?" "Our sacred hill." "This is where we sled every year." "There's the hut that all of you guys would build." "Grandpa would buy extra nails every year." "I saw Erwin on TV as well. They interviewed Erwin out front." "And that's the tunnel where they released the photos of him entering because you can't cross the street anymore than the that underground tunnel. You see that handrail right there? Uh-huh. That's the photo they had of him going down tunnel."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because I got here, like, about ten minutes minutes before he walked by. And then I was talking to mom, and we were doing all this stuff. And then I look out the thing, and there was somebody, like, right here. But they were just, like, kind of doing this kind of stuff, not really Speaker 1: Pacing back and forth. Sent it Speaker 0: to the FBI and said, if there's an accomplice you know, because the the camera from here to here took way too long. If you time how long it took him to get from that little part over to here, was way longer than it should have been. So I wondered if the girl had given him stuff. Like, if there is an accomplice sorry. You're filming. Speaker 1: And it said right here, that picture from Sam's across the street, he was right here. Speaker 0: Yep. Speaker 1: And so you say the gun was dumped up here? Speaker 0: Oh, I'll show you where. Our sacred hill. Speaker 1: This is where we sled every year. Speaker 0: There's the hut that all of you guys would build. Grandpa would buy extra nails every year. So this is where you could see him in this area. Speaker 1: And I saw the officers right there and then on the basketball team. Speaker 0: So some of these footprints would be hit for sure. Speaker 1: That's right. I would play there as a kid in those sports and to have been there at that rally. Speaker 0: I Speaker 1: saw Erwin on TV as well. They interviewed Erwin out front. Oh, and there's the Losey Center right there, the roof of the building on which he was on. Speaker 0: I didn't know where this was. So that's right where he was? Speaker 1: Yes. The Losi Center. Look at that cat. Speaker 0: Way closer than I thought it was. Speaker 1: Mhmm. So he must have known how to scout out and like, I had this on my calendar for weeks. And so it said it was in the courtyard, and so he must have been there's EVU. He must have known because it said it would be in the courtyard and all the events that take place. He enters through that little driveway. Speaker 0: Who came and checked this all out? Speaker 1: This is Briggs' former house. Speaker 0: So that's the roof you shop from? Speaker 1: Yeah. The Lossy Center. Uh-huh. That's the career center of the university where I did my interviews for internships. Speaker 0: That's the Wilson Center where he shot from. Speaker 1: Yep. And this is Briggs Steel's old house. And so Blake would Speaker 0: have dropped down somewhere. Speaker 1: And there's grandma's old house. And so where do you say the gun was dropped? Speaker 0: Well, the house is right here, Speaker 2: and there's one of the places up here that doesn't have the fence. Speaker 0: So he probably just ran up in there and dropped it, but it's like, this isn't that far. I was thinking he went a long ways up in there, Speaker 1: but it's No. Speaker 0: And it could be actually over here. Speaker 1: And that's the tunnel where they released the photos of him entering because you can't cross the street anymore than the that underground tunnel. You see that handrail right there? Uh-huh. That's the photo they had of him going down tunnel. Mhmm. To get through. And
HustleBitch_
Posted - September 27, 2025 at 3:09 PM
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 7:25 AM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 WALK-THROUGH OF UVU REVEALS A SEA OF CAMERAS Nearly every corner. Every entrance. Every rooftop. Cameras everywhere…mounted, hidden, overlapping. So with that much surveillance inside and outside Utah Valley University…what are they hiding from us? https://t.co/BPbMD6qk5K

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 25, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 6:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user questioned the identity of an object with a trailing wire related to the Charlie Kirk investigation. Another user suggested that Stew Peters provides a clear explanation regarding the matter.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

One question has never been answered throughout the Charlie Kirk investigation: What exactly is this object with a trailing wire? https://t.co/28YUtTOKK2

@pa49932 - KP

@HustleBitch_ I think stew Peter’s nails it https://t.co/YIoa2MVqcW

Video Transcript AI Summary
- "Robinson didn't kill Charlie Kirk." - "Charlie Kirk's Israeli security detail killed Charlie Kirk and Charlie Kirk's assassin is caught on tape." - "That is the explosion from Charlie Kirk's lavalier lapel mic." - "First we had exploding pagers, now we have exploding mics." - "That proves that all of the activity came from the mic that Charlie Kirk was wearing." - "That's the assassin." - "This guy, brown shirt guy, he's the assassin." - "He pushes the detonator." - "We have video now from destiny that shows the handoff of this remote detonator." - "Tyler Robinson did not kill Charlie Kirk." - "If you want security, the Israelis know what they're doing." - "But in no way did that trigger man, that assassin, the brown shirt with the sunglasses act alone."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Robinson didn't kill Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's Israeli security detail killed Charlie Kirk and Charlie Kirk's assassin is caught on tape. Blake Bednar has brought us this video. We'll break it down. Take a look at this. Here it is from the wide angle. Watch Charlie Kirk's right side of his t shirt. Watch the lavalier lapel mic. Do you see it explode? Let's bring it in just a little bit closer. Watch this, put it in a freeze frame. That is the explosion from Charlie Kirk's lavalier lapel mic. Wanna see it again? Bring it in closer. Remember when we told you that that was absolutely an exit wound? Yeah, it is. Check the trajectory of the round that was deployed from that lavalier lapel mic. That went directly from Charlie Kirk's lapel, that went directly from underneath Charlie Kirk's white t shirt up through his neck and created the exit wound that we told you was an exit wound immediately when we saw that exit wound. First we had exploding pagers, now we have exploding mics. Do you remember the vector analysis from John Bray? That proves that all of the activity came from the mic that Charlie Kirk was wearing. Remember the palm gun guy in the brown shirt, that shadowy looking guy with the sunglasses? Yeah. He pushes the detonator. Clear as day. That's the assassin. That's the guy that pushes the detonator, perfectly aligns with the explosion that pushes that projectile through Charlie's right side of his neck and out the left side creating the exit wound. That might just look like the chaos that you would expect after someone was publicly executed in broad daylight in front of 3,000 people. But in no way did that trigger man, that assassin, the brown shirt with the sunglasses act alone. We have video now from destiny that shows the handoff of this remote detonator. We had John Cullen on the program last week, and he made a great point about ballistic acoustics being altered to hide the location of the real shooter. Well, the same can be said to distract from the fact that there was no shooter. Tyler Robinson did not kill Charlie Kirk. This guy, brown shirt guy, he's the assassin. Oh, wait. If you want security, the Israelis know what they're doing.
HustleBitch_
Posted - September 27, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Saved - September 27, 2025 at 3:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The new footage reveals unsettling activity around Charlie Kirk’s body right after the shot. I notice a man leaning over a table, discreetly palming and pocketing something while pretending to scroll on his phone. Another individual makes a suspicious grab and stealthily passes an object before returning to the scene with it in hand. The rapid exchange of items and the behavior of those involved suggest a level of coordination that feels rehearsed rather than chaotic. This raises questions about whether we are witnessing a cover-up rather than random events.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 THE HANDOFFS JUST GOT EVEN WORSE 🚨 WATCH THIS NEW FOOTAGE VERY CLOSELY. Right after the shot, the scene around Charlie Kirk’s body looks anything but normal. One man leans over the table, palms something, slips it off, shoves an item into his pocket, then instantly masks it by scrolling his phone like nothing happened. Another man makes a quick grab, questionably bumps into another, and stealthy passes something along. Moments later, the same man reappears on camera, running back with a small object clenched in his hand. Too many hands. Too many objects moving. Too many things concealed in seconds. This doesn’t look random. It looks rehearsed. Does this look like chaos...or a coordinated cover-up to you?

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 26, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Saved - September 26, 2025 at 10:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I pointed out that the first dispatch call about Charlie Kirk being shot was at 12:23 PM, but the mention of a rooftop or rifle didn’t come until 12:34 PM, creating an 11-minute gap. It raises questions about what was really happening while everyone focused on the Losee rooftop.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 NOT ONE CALL OF A SHOOTER ON THE ROOF - HERE’S THE PROOF 🚨 The very first dispatch call of Charlie Kirk being shot came at 12:23 PM. LISTEN CLOSELY: the first time you hear anything about a rooftop or a rifle isn’t until 12:34 PM. That’s an 11-minute gap. So while everyone was locked on the Losee rooftop through their cell phones…what was really going on?

Video Transcript AI Summary
- "UVU in Orem has had an active shooter at the Charlie Kirk event." - "Hey. We did have shots fired." - "the shooter is on top of the building on the far north side just east of the library wearing jeans, black shirt, black mask, long rifle." - "Alpha alpha eleven, I've got one in custody." - "Need a we need EMS here. We've got one down in the crowd." - "they're trying to lock the library down now." - "I assume this is possibly another victim." - "we are staging at the front of the school by the roundabout." - "We're getting several calls. We're trying to get more information." - "One in custody."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 34, we have shots fired. Charlie Kirk is down. Speaker 1: Alpha one or alpha 11, we have shots fired. Shot fired. Speaker 2: 430 tonight. Speaker 3: 531, I copy to +1 050. Speaker 2: 438. Copy. See you. Shots fired. Speaker 3: Can you please see where I came from? Speaker 2: +1 862, you put 4? 430, sorry. Speaker 3: 62 and go for you. You can suspend. Speaker 2: Stand for. Speaker 3: 1. Go ahead. Speaker 2: Can I have your response to an animal problem? I'm working 300 US 189. Came in from San Pete. Say that the cows are out on the east side of the road. The gate is down, and say that one cow is out. They've only received one call, and I'm working on calling the brand inspector. 1, go ahead. Speaker 3: +1 46108. Possible shots fired. Was a noise. Speaker 2: +1 224. Speaker 1: Hey. We did have shots fired. He's on his way to the ambulance. Speaker 3: He's on Speaker 1: his way to the hospital. Speaker 2: +1 46. Speaker 3: You're gonna find me that abandoned. 3229. Copy. En route from 263. Speaker 2: I copy. 1224. Speaker 4: Engine thirty one and medic ambulance thirty five, respond to a known incident type at three, off off in Utah Valley U on fire two. Medic ladder one zero six, respond to sick person at 925 South 1300 East. Respond on city fire one. Medic ladder one zero six, respond to sick person at 925 South 1300 East. Respond on city fire one. Time of 12:24. Speaker 5: Fifty. Speaker 2: I copy. Speaker 1: Need a we need EMS here. We've got one down in the crowd. Speaker 2: 67. Okay. Speaker 3: +1 224. Speaker 2: 703236. Yeah. +1 24. +1 224. 3229, Jet traffic. 48234. Speaker 3: Yeah. I'm stopping two semis at 300 North 500 West that are losing gravel all over the road. 44. Thank you. Speaker 2: +1 225. Speaker 3: Medic 35 now. Speaker 5: Copy. Speaker 3: 402 have arrived, and those vehicles have been moved. You can hear this one short. Speaker 2: +1 225. Copy. 300 North 500 West. Three units that can clear and respond to assist UVU with an active Speaker 3: 457, go ahead. Speaker 1: Alpha alpha eleven, I've got one in custody. Speaker 2: Last unit, 109. Copy. One in custody. Speaker 3: 36. You can clear that out. There's no report. All the bus stops letter area. +1 0446 full shape. Copy, 90215. Salt Lake 38, clear, Redwood. Speaker 2: 38104 at +1 225. Speaker 3: 444-1023. Speaker 2: 444104 at +1 225. Speaker 3: Sorry. 457 will go help. Speaker 2: +1 04. Speaker 3: 314. Battalion thirty four is en route. Where are you at? Eleven. Speaker 2: For UVU by the fountain reported one individual that was shot unknown where the shooter went. Copy. Ninja, we need a car. We're getting inundated with smoke. Speaker 3: Metro squad thirty one, route, UVU. AJ sixty, I need to put you located. I'll be clear. Speaker 2: All units, be advised, UVU in Orem has had an active shooter at the Charlie Kirk event. We're getting several calls. We're trying to get more information. Copy. Speaker 4: Battalion thirty four, respond to unknown incident type at three in Utah Valley U on Fire two. Speaker 3: 355 en route. Speaker 2: I copy. Speaker 3: 62, be out at South. 329 en route. Speaker 2: 62 at +1 239. Speaker 3: Engine thirty one en route. 63 en route. 529, traffic. Speaker 5: Copy. 529 Speaker 3: Thank you. Speaker 2: We're not sure yet. We're just trying to get units that way. Speaker 3: 02:12, I'll be arriving shortly. Code right at our channel, please. All units just respond. Don't call out. Speaker 2: 311, copy. Speaker 1: Hey. I need somebody in the car now. Speaker 3: Southlake Alpha 324 code 13. I'll be at 600 Easton State on local tango 032 Zulu whiskey. Speaker 4: Squad thirty one, respond to unknown incident type at three off off in Utah Valley U on fire two. Speaker 3: 405 en route. Speaker 2: Go ahead. 87119 en route. Copy. 600 East. Speaker 5: And where do you need me? Speaker 3: 138. 1838 West Barbary Drive. 104. Come down to stage area. Speaker 2: Copy. 1226. 480. Copy. 23. +1 24. Speaker 3: Sorry. Copy. 359108. Speaker 2: I copy. +1 226. Speaker 3: +1 50, Speaker 2: I copy. +1 226. Speaker 3: 212. Everybody get off the radio. I've got a black SUV northbound on Wolverine Way. Passenger door is open. Someone's trying to hang out of it. 405 will be en route to the Center 500 West, so we can go further. Speaker 2: Copy. Speaker 3: 356, hang out. Speaker 2: Copy. Speaker 3: 1. 222, can you show me a 212 continuing northbound from 400 South. Again, black SUV. Speaker 2: 6822, radio cutout. +1 09. Speaker 3: Sorry. 32. Clear. Speaker 2: 130 Central. Speaker 3: 60, copy at +1 050. Speaker 2: +1 250. Speaker 3: 6822, can you show me out at the reservoir on the spin inspection? Speaker 2: EJ60. Speaker 6: 130. Speaker 3: Reaches South of High School on for the Second Street. Speaker 2: Just for typing. We're receiving your report of shots fired at UVU. Speaker 3: Metro battalion thirty four. Do we know if anybody was injured or if they would like us to stage? Kyle, are you on here? Speaker 2: 104. Speaker 3: I'm currently 1080 Northbound 50 South. Speaker 2: In the Quad Building. I copy. It looks Speaker 5: like they've got the shooter in custody right now. We've got several 911 calling, but we can't get any Speaker 3: Central. I assume this is possibly another victim. They've got one hanging out of the car. Speaker 2: Do I have North End deputies that can respond? Speaker 5: Any patient condition? Speaker 3: +1 32. I'll head that way. Speaker 2: Frank, 2. +1 32. Per your views notes, they have one in custody. We're still gathering information. We need Speaker 3: keys to the SUV, the one zero four, right now. Copy. Do you have a lot for us to enter on? Speaker 2: Standby. Copy. Speaker 3: Battalion thirty four for medic 35. White. Hey, Newell. Do you want me to follow you or go to the school? Passing that. So wait 751104117 Murray. 2530. I'll head that way as well. If you'll keep me updated, I don't have a cat. Medic, call over. Speaker 2: Sounds like maybe another individual. 248. +1 257. 435. +1 014. I copy. 2530. In a vehicle 50 South 1200 Westin, or may have one hanging out of the car. We're not sure if they're a patient or if they're just trying to get out of the area. Speaker 3: Hey, Newell. I'll meet you at center on 1200. 22, arrive heading 78626. Speaker 6: 130 is the Quad Building, just our main entrance. Speaker 2: Go ahead. I was unable to make contact with the branch inspector, but I did leave a voice mail. 52 or 5152. Speaker 3: Alright. I got our guy here still on Road southbound. The three prover units responding to Oren. Switch over to Oren, Maine. Speaker 4: Engine eighty one and medic ambulance 80 three, respond to unconscious person at 120 West Vine Street. Respond on Deck Fire 2 near 5100 South, engine eighty one and medic ambulance 83. Respond to unconscious person at 120 West Vine Street. Respond on Deck Fire 2 near 5100 South. Time on 12:57. Speaker 3: Alpha what? Speaker 2: 12:27. We're just gonna book him under the name that we've got. Speaker 4: We can go to the jail, and I'll fill up his paperwork. Ladder 30 3, respond to unknown incident type at three off off in Utah Valley U on Fire 2. Speaker 2: Standby. 405, Speaker 3: I copy. Switching. Speaker 2: 271, switch. 120 Central. Speaker 3: What's going on? 2530 is going where? Salt Lake 726. I've had negative contact today. Speaker 2: 726104 at. Robert, your channel is passed with three j main. It says three j dispatch. Speaker 3: Yeah. I the we officers respond to this area we can cordon off this this scene. UVU is saying they have shots fired. Speaker 2: +1 20. Speaker 3: 51151742. Speaker 2: 26872. I copy the parking problem. 20308 Anne Marie 311. Copy on the agency assist. Speaker 3: Yeah. There's a bunch of people on their phone. What's going on? Speaker 2: Are you just kinda loving for training today? Copy. Speaker 3: Copy. +1 228. 08. Speaker 2: And for at night, can I please prepare the squad? Eleven. Speaker 3: Copy. Speaker 2: 4617 South District Edge Way, Apartment Charlie 12 104 at twelve three. Speaker 3: +1 0441041. Speaker 2: Spanish Forks requesting you check the location for a runaway Kellen Walker. He's a 15 year old male. Speaker 3: Where is their scene at? Speaker 5: At 12:28. Speaker 3: Metro engine thirty one, do you have a, victim count? Speaker 2: One day 20. Was just gonna advise them a colleague's got going in to UVU, but if you're just +1 011, you can +1 026. Speaker 3: I'll notify Chipman of those hospital. We're about there in just a couple minutes with the victim. Speaker 2: He should be listed on the MCIC. This is possibly his girlfriend's house. Speaker 3: 13. Speaker 5: Negative. We've got one for sure. Speaker 3: Albert UVU, it sounds like. Copy. Speaker 2: Hey. We're both well. Speaker 3: Apparently, they're saying they already have one in custody, though, so I wonder if there's any else that's so large. I'm gonna need one other with me at Tippenonga Hospital, please. 18 And A Half to Tippenonga Hospital. Street level, copy. Speaker 2: Copy. We're trying to get further details on a location. It looks like 5 J 20. Copy. Accident with injuries. 1220. Yeah. Speaker 3: Would you Speaker 2: be willing to go check out that traffic hazard? 62 And Fortieth West. Speaker 4: Medic ambulance 53 and tower fifty one, respond to accident with injury at 300 North 700 East Street. 300 North 700 East Street. In American Forks, medic ambulance 53 and Tower 51300 North 700 East Street. Speaker 3: Ravinson 103. Speaker 2: 3 J West, possibly 1080 on a vehicle northbound 580 South Wolverine Way, a black SUV. That'll be 300 North and 700 East. Third North, 700 East. They are blocking. The RP is the one calling. Want to be checked out. It feels shocky. It's gonna be a brown Nissan Maxima and a light blue VW Bug. We're just getting more information. Speaker 3: Riveting one o. I'm gonna be transporting one female to the police department from Oak Hills Middle beginning 8878. Roger from line to 33. Speaker 2: May I advise there's possibly another victim, one hanging out of the vehicle? Speaker 3: Yes, please. Speaker 2: Copy. Thank you. +1 229. We're trying to get a good channel for responding units as well. +1 220. Speaker 5: Go ahead. Speaker 3: We just got signaled by PD to call them. Were they following us? They sent to the hospital? 28, copy. Coverage code 3. Speaker 2: Yep. Copy. Switching to 3J. L 13. Speaker 3: I need 2530. Speaker 2: K. I'll be en route to the jail as well. Speaker 3: Copy. +1 229. Speaker 2: Go ahead. Speaker 5: Affirm. We got officers en route to the hospital. Do we be with them? Speaker 2: 25. Speaker 3: 5251 all be in Roseville. Sounds alright. I don't know. Just trying to figure it out. Speaker 2: 5251. Thanks. 2835. Speaker 3: 351023. Hey. Do you do you want the roll to meet? 10:00. Speaker 2: 13. Speaker 3: 527. Copy. +1 229. Speaker 2: Copy. +1 229. 527. Speaker 5: Can you copy my last traffic? Speaker 3: You're low volume one. Can you repeat that, please? Do you have a report of a crash at 300 North 700 East 5 G? South Units, where do Speaker 2: you need us in this stage? Speaker 6: There was a good car pulling out Speaker 3: of 711, but, you didn't hear me, Kyle. I said traffic to 1133. We did not copy that traffic. Speaker 5: We do have officers following the victim to Tampa Nova Hospital. Speaker 2: One male. The email is 27049. Copy. Speaker 3: Central Tower 51 responding. I can help you with whatever you need. It's just been chaos. Can you repeat, please? Did you have your radio on? Are you laser beaming your radio? No. I I said it right when you passed me because you were headed towards it. You just didn't use your ears. Probably, don't see him. Copy that. We confirm if they want us to meet them there or if they want us to go to UVU? Speaker 2: 1983 West 500 North. Speaker 3: Thank you. I've got the R 01 scene, just FYI. Standby. 2J405. You're just gonna have to redispatch my vehicle fast. Speaker 2: Copy. Speaker 3: 330. Where do they need us? Speaker 2: 1983 West 500 North. Speaker 3: 2609. Copy that. Follow-up. Speaker 2: 281. Speaker 3: Copy. I don't have a portable. I don't get my vehicle. Speaker 2: I copy. Medic ambulance 53. Speaker 6: 1J130. Speaker 3: Ladder33, Engine34, we're in the area. We'll head towards camp. K. We still want to place an order today. Speaker 2: Alright. Copy. Thanks. I'll pull up from dispatch. Speaker 3: Zarzaur, do you have traffic? Speaker 2: Tower 51, medic ambulance five three responding to an accident with injuries. 300 North 700 East 300 North 700 East. The color brown Nissan Maxima is shaky. Just wants to be checked out. Unknown injuries at this time. She advised they are blocking the intersection, and she's not able to open the door of her vehicle. At 12:30. Speaker 3: Copy. Thank you. We'll be backing out to UVU. Speaker 2: Is there any units on Level 1? Speaker 3: Yeah. We're probably getting cut back from COVID. Speaker 6: Is the UVU incident operating off this channel? Speaker 5: Metro copies. Speaker 2: Responding to UVU. 281. Speaker 3: 2550. Sean, did you say you needed a 78? 711. Will you show me +1 011? Salt Lake up at 386108. Speaker 2: I copy. 2550. I have other units that have switched to 3. Alpha one, can you copy dispatch? This is 3 just not trying to get alpha one. Speaker 3: Yep. That'd be wonderful. Patrick, do you have the best access yet? Speaker 2: Alright. Copy. +1 230. Oh, sorry about +1 230. Just advising there is another report. Speaker 3: Copy. Something. Speaker 5: Standby. Speaker 3: Tower, 512. Speaker 2: Deborah, this is UVU dispatch. He is not answering me. Standby. Also, what check? Gunshot heard near the library at UVU. They're trying to lock the library down now. Still gathering. Speaker 3: 2526 helping out as well. She's saying they just got another reporter shot somewhere at UVU library. Yeah. I'm behind you. Speaker 2: 2526. UVU dispatch. We're gonna be taking over the air. If you can stop responding. +1 37. Speaker 3: When you're behind now, we're gonna gonna go around. +1 Speaker 2: 37, confirm me you're en route. Okay. Speaker 5: Taylorville 20. Speaker 2: 69, can you create me an animal problem at 4343 North 100 East and then clear it out? Speaker 3: 330. I'm on campus. I just need to know where to go. Speaker 2: Go on in. Go ahead. Speaker 3: Sure. 107 to Hudson. 502. I'm en route. Do they want our airplane if they're still pursuing? Speaker 2: Confirming. 4343 North 100 East. Hello. Check. What's your j? 28Alpha13. Copy. Hi. Copy. You're at Huntsman at 1231. Speaker 3: 2626 on service. Speaker 2: +1 04. Freight. 1130. We've patched Ora, Maine, and UVU so you can go to Ora, Maine with any traffic. Speaker 3: Salt Lake Sierra Twenty, Sierra 27. Show us arrived. Speaker 2: Standby for nine one. Speaker 3: Someone should ask big sergeant if we can go. Speaker 2: I have you arrived at 12:31 five g 09:10 three four four. Speaker 3: +1 33, Speaker 2: Are there any 20 alpha units that correspond and advise where three days needed? Speaker 3: Copy. Go for Speaker 2: Yeah. Units covering. Speaker 3: 5J9 on service. Standby. 5J71, I'll be able to 5J9. Speaker 2: 5J71. Speaker 3: 265 on my right. Speaker 2: +1 04. +1 33, go ahead. What's your traffic? Speaker 5: +1 55. We're en route. Speaker 3: Alpha two, if three j can respond into the courtyard, the north side of the fuel gateway. Ladder 33, we took Campus Drive on the north side of campus. May you take the opposite? Kyle, you can go if you want. Speaker 2: Okay. Copy. Responding to the courtyard north side of the cable gateway. 1 +1 30. Go ahead. Speaker 3: Last unit's on service. Speaker 7: Would that drive it for 33? Speaker 3: Sounds good. Dude, someone just, ran into the bike or ran into the back of someone's car and is injured now too. Speaker 6: +1 014 for all units responding to the EVU. The engine is off of Zone 1. It's warm PD one. Speaker 3: 2 15. I'm arrived at the corridor. I have Overwatch on the bridge. Affirm. Lighter 33, engine 31. We took Campus Drive on the North Side of campus. We'll try to scrape for a a fast responding, and then maybe you take the other side. 26J26 on service traffic. I can't get anything on one one. I'll be at Founders in Redwood on a white SUV Hyundai. Speaker 2: Copy. Speaker 3: 326. Speaker 2: I Speaker 3: have two medic units with me on the South Side of Hugo Gateway. Where do we need to go? Can you show me on duty and I can't find the airport? Copy that. Do you wanna sneak a South side then? Speaker 2: I copy. One thirty ahead traffic covering. Can you repeat the channel they're operating off of? Copy. Speaker 3: Copy. Take 12 South down to the roundabout. 589 on the service. Speaker 7: Liner 33, copy. Speaker 6: Affirmative zone one, and it's forum PD one is the channel the incident's operating off of. Speaker 2: Actually, stand by. 482, go for. Speaker 3: Charlie, it's all like 324, go ahead. Speaker 2: 324, go ahead. Speaker 3: I have 233. Hey, Jensen. Where do you need me? Salt Lake 381060. Good for engine four, medic 101232. Captain thirty one, battalion thirty four, we just got waved in by an officer to that front parking lot by the roundabout. Sorry. 589. 68 South Bingard Highway Southbound, local 603 3230, go ahead. Hey. I have two medic units on the South side of Fuel Gateway. What do you need us? Salt Lake 133108. Speaker 2: 155 Central. If you could switch to three j main channel, it's gonna be Zone 1 or MPD 1 coordinate with units. 1232. You need to go to the North Side? 6 as in South Bay, your southbound at 1232. Speaker 3: Yeah. There's a bunch of marked vehicles, ambulances, and everything parked up front. 5 J 9. Can I get the next state tax wrecker for a black Hyundai Accord Honda Accord tango zero three two Zulu whiskey? Speaker 2: I copy. Speaker 3: Metro squad thirty one. Speaker 6: One thirty. Speaker 5: Copy. Speaker 3: Up in North Doors. I'll I'll meet you there. So Metro from squad thirty one. Also, you need a you need a another ambulance to the roundabout just in front of you view in the main admin building. Looks like there was an accident involving a motorcycle. We need another ammo there. Copy. Charlie, copy. 359. Code 38. There's a 12. Go to the area. That, TARP is gone. They're supposed to be on traffic. On should any of us go or no? Speaker 2: 235. I'll be coming. 352 Go ahead. +1 30. 2722 for traffic. Speaker 3: 8230 South Redwood Road. Yeah. I'm gonna be out at Tempanoagos Hospital. Speaker 2: 12. Go ahead. Speaker 3: Misty Drive in 6200 South. That's on Hotel 972 Charlie Lima. Speaker 6: 1 J 130. I have deputies en route. Where do you need assistance at? Speaker 3: Adam, Kyle, and Jill Strap are gone. Speaker 2: I copy. Alright. +1 232. Speaker 5: +1 04, do you have any patient condition on that? Speaker 3: Central Tower 510. This is the American port command. Speaker 2: Take a response to the courtyard north side of the Bugle Gateway. Copy. +1 233. Unknown. 24. Copy. Speaker 3: What's your Utah County Sheriff's vehicles coming up as well? Speaker 8: 1 30. If they can go into Lot 1, there'll be a gate. We'll get Speaker 3: that gate open. You guys can come back and find the pond. You guys gonna go off that? No. I don't think we have enough people in the city. Speaker 2: 130 Central. Speaker 3: 119 on the en route to New York also. Speaker 2: Copy. 119. 403. You can send me call 53. Speaker 3: Copy. 21, clear and available. Speaker 5: Copy. Speaker 3: It's attempt to locate a reckless. I grid up Walmart at 13502 South Hamilton View Road 3550 West. 350 en route to UVU. Is it just four of us right now? 342 and 341, same. 342 and 341. Speaker 8: West Side where the ponds are. Ballpark. It's just gonna be east of the ballpark. There's gonna be a road, How about one? There'll be a gate there. We'll see if we can Speaker 3: get that on for you. Speaker 2: Copy. 350. Speaker 3: Complainant said a female in a black SUV was speeding through the parking lot and almost hit Speaker 4: Medic ambulance twenty four and engine 24, respond to accident at 26500 I 15 Southbound, and then 265 I 15 S B, Provo Center Street in Provo on fire one. Speaker 3: Medic thirty 5, arrive. Central show, medic ambulance five three. Right? Yeah. That's what I was saying. You could go, but we probably need two, probably three in the city. Speaker 5: Copy. Speaker 3: Plate number MikeRomeoSierraFoxOscarX-ray. $1.99 en route to New York. Speaker 2: Medic ambulance five three. Speaker 3: Copy. 73. Speaker 2: 199. Speaker 3: Last thing going northbound. It's located 1230. Speaker 9: 1 J 129. I've got all of County T 9 headed that way. Where do you need us? Speaker 2: Alpha 1. Go ahead. Speaker 3: +1 323. Speaker 2: Can we get Speaker 3: three j's detected unit here? 1 2010. Speaker 2: 13Bravo20 Speaker 3: What's going on at UVU? Speaker 2: At the courtyard. 120. I copy. Speaker 3: For now, are you turning because that's too close to you? We have you affirmative. Speaker 2: We have three parts on shots fired. Speaker 3: Hey. We're on scene. I'm southbound on I 15. Just coming up on University Parkway. I'll be en route as well. +1 36. I'll be en route to assist as well. Speaker 2: I copy. They're operating off of Zone 1 or MPD 1. Speaker 3: Metro medic twenty four is en route. Copy. Speaker 5: Copy. Speaker 3: Okay, Jay. 321. Engine twenty four, en Route. Speaker 2: 321. Speaker 3: 153. Salt Lake Alpha 456, code 38. Speaker 2: 1J129. I copied your traffic. They're requesting a response to the courtyard north side of the Google Gateway. Copy. Sorry. Just confirming. Was that affirm on checks? 153. Standby. Speaker 3: And you're gonna have to return. Richard, just keep my case open. I gotta go back and do some follow-up. I mean, not to you. Copy. Southwest 1323, mark. Speaker 5: Station 24, you'll be responding to an accident with injuries at southbound from Provo Center Street. Speaker 2: One thirty seven. 137. Speaker 3: Go ahead. 224-2430 in 8J. Speaker 2: Affirm. I copy. 71324. Speaker 3: Okay. 129. Speaker 2: Talk to a student. He said that the shooter is on top of the building on the far north side of maybe the CS Building or just east of the library. He's wearing jeans, black shirt, black mask, long rifle. I copy at 1234. Speaker 8: 1 J 130, the gate is open. Speaker 3: 5 J 34. Can you show me on the PI? Speaker 2: At 12:34. 5 J 34. Copy. Speaker 3: Copy. Speaker 8: East Side Of Ballpark, the two ponds, there'll be a parking lot called Lot 1 directly south of the building. Speaker 3: Dang. The shooter is still there? Yeah. If they're letting, like, a fire truck back in here, like, they should be clear. Right? 5G50 traffic. Speaker 4: Medic ladder twenty one, respond to fire alarm at 1100450 South State Street. Respond on Deck Fire 4 near 0 East. Medic ladder twenty one, respond to fire alarm at 1100450 South State Street. Respond on Deck Fire 4, near 0 East. Time out 12:34. Speaker 3: Ten four. Speaker 2: Five 02:30. Speaker 3: Head to 11:32. Speaker 5: Go ahead. Speaker 3: 810 East 50 South, blue Honda Odyssey. Plate. Speaker 5: Ladder 32. Go ahead. Speaker 4: Medic ambulance 34, respond to transport at 830 North 980 West Street in Norham on Fire one. Speaker 3: Yeah. I'm with you, though. I'm done. I'll just hang around. Speaker 2: I copy. +1 235. Just confirming. Is it 810 East Standard North? Speaker 3: Do you have an ambulance en Speaker 6: route for this motorcycle accident? Speaker 5: Yeah. We do. I just don't have a call yet. Sorry. I'm trying to Make one. Speaker 3: 153. 50 South. We have four two j units arriving on scene. 334, traffic. Speaker 2: Stand up, line up. Speaker 3: You repeat my last seven to contact on you? Speaker 2: Can Can't barred. Do want text? Speaker 3: All incoming units coming to UVU. There was one shot. We are staging at the front of the school by the roundabout. Speaker 2: Copy. I copy. +1 852. Speaker 3: Go ahead. Speaker 2: We didn't get an arrest check. We forgot. Speaker 3: We're good. Speaker 2: 334. Go ahead. Negative. Not right now. Okay. Stand 4. Speaker 3: Copy. 21. 60, go to 2. +1 29 traffic. Hey. The units arriving. If we can get multiple rolls of crime scene tape and meet us in the, quad in the center, we need to tape us off and push some of the people out. Speaker 2: Go ahead. Speaker 3: 711 on. 7800 South, 4000 West, Local Tango 197 Juliet Alpha. Speaker 2: What was the last? All units responding to you, we use just be advised, we have information that the shooter is on top of the building on the far north side just east of the library wearing jeans, black shirt, black vest. We are
HustleBitch_
Posted - September 25, 2025 at 4:18 AM
Saved - September 25, 2025 at 7:38 PM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

WATCH as George Zinn in the crowd appears to set something down…then raises his arms, aiming a pretend gun straight at Charlie Kirk’s tent. Seconds later, he waves his hat in a bizarre “surrender.” Who hired him to draw attention away from the tent? https://t.co/MsND39B9iU

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 24, 2025 at 3:04 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 9:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I received a new description of the assassin that doesn't align with the FBI's account of Charlie Kirk's shooter. The police scanner described someone in all black, equipped with a long gun, tactical helmet, mask, and vest. They seemed young, skilled, and highly trained, resembling a foreign agent. Who do you think of?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 CANDACE OWENS RECEIVES NEW ASSASSIN DESCRIPTION THAT DOESN'T MATCH FBI STORY It doesn't match the FBI's description of Charlie Kirk's shooter but DOES match the police scanner description released: - Wearing all black - Black long gun - Black tactical helmet - Black mask - Tactical vest "Young. Skilled. Highly-trained. Looked like a foreign agent." Who's the first person that comes to mind?

Video Transcript AI Summary
A firearms trainer questions the FBI timeline: "the shooter dropped onto the roof at 12:15" and notes the earliest timeline as "12:22 ... the shots." He cites metadata "begins at 12:22 and goes into 12:23, the very minute that Charlie gets shot," and says he "had just stopped recording about twenty seconds before the shot rang out." He describes the shooter as "dressed in tactical gear, and he was wearing a face mask" and says he looked "like a foreign agent." After George Zinn's arrest, he told campus, "this is the wrong person" and that "the person you're looking for is wearing tactical gear and is obviously young"—a description that "never made its way out" while the public saw "the now infamous, veteran's shirt with the American flag on it and some jeans." He claims the gun FBI found was not the gun he saw; "the gun that he saw was smaller." He texted: "watching the video of the impact ... the assassin may have used a 10 or 20 round magazine ..." "I would guess that he was shot with a Hornady VMAX or similar lightweight two twenty three bullet designed for very rapid expansion. If they found small shards of copper rather than one large copper coated lead slug, that's the gun and bullet I would expect was used."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He was a very much, and maybe this is a poor way of saying it, a straight shooter said, yes. You know, I have a training. I, I don't wanna give too many identifying details here, but this person himself has a lot of experience with guns and knows guns and helps to train people in that sort of a capacity. And said that they observed that individual, the FBI saying that the shooter dropped onto the roof at 12:15. Didn't make sense to him. He said earliest it was 12:22 that the individual ran across, set up, took the shots. And I said, well, you must have been there because he then sends me the I I wanted to see all of the metadata of when he took that footage, and it the metadata begins at 12:22 and goes into 12:23, the very minute that Charlie gets shot. And he says, yeah. I saw the shots. I had just stopped recording about twenty seconds before the shot rang out. And he said that he told them a description of what the shooter looked like, and it was not the description that the entire world received less than twenty four hours later of this person, Tyler Robinson, wearing jeans. I said, was he wearing jeans? He said, no. Actually, this person was dressed in tactical gear, and he was wearing a face mask. And he said, according to him, and like I said, he has a lot of experience with guns, that this person looked to him like a foreign agent. I don't I don't know if he's wearing all black, how he got that, but he said there's no he was very certain that this person was skilled, knew exactly what he was doing, and was highly trained, like a highly trained assassin, so to speak. Okay? He then says something else. As soon as George Zinn got arrested and that started circulating, he ran to someone on campus and said, this is the wrong person. I observed this person with my eyes. You have the complete wrong description. Person you're looking for is wearing tactical gear and is obviously young because I watched him sprint back after taking the shot. I saw this with my own two eyes. And for whatever reason, that never made its way out. That we can see of a description of a person wearing tactical gear, we're kinda left with this idea that he was wearing the now infamous, veteran's shirt with the American flag on it and some jeans. So he also said something that we had not heard, which is that he knows guns, and the gun that the FBI found was not the gun that he saw, that the gun that he saw was smaller. And I'm going to read you directly a text message that he sent me, again, protecting his identity. He said, watching the video of the impact, hearing the sharp crack instead of a big hunting rifle's boom, and seeing what looked like a shorter rifle platform, albeit with the absence of the shape of a standard 30 round magazine, the assassin may have used a 10 or 20 round magazine only expecting to shoot once or twice. I would guess that he was shot with a Hornady VMAX or similar lightweight two twenty three bullet designed for very rapid expansion. Of course, I don't have access to any autopsy reports like you might, but if they found small shards of copper rather than one large copper coated lead slug, that's the gun and bullet I would expect was used.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Is going to be wearing all black, black long guns, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is going to be wearing all black, black long guns, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.
HustleBitch_
Posted - September 24, 2025 at 2:40 AM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 9:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I observed advanced drones, not just hobby models, hovering closely as Charlie Kirk was assassinated. They moved so quickly and stealthily that they were almost invisible, capturing everything on film before vanishing without a trace. It’s clear that someone with significant power and resources orchestrated this. The implications are concerning, and I urge everyone to connect the dots and consider who might be behind this.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 THEY WERE MUCH CLOSER THAN YOU THINK - WATCH AND PAY ATTENTION 🚨 Multiple advanced drones, not hobby toys, but stealth-shaped machines hovered overhead as Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Almost too fast for cameras to capture, nearly invisible to the naked eye as they blasted across from all angles within FEET of Charlie's tent. They filmed EVERYTHING. Then they disappeared without a trace. Someone with power and access put them there. Who has that kind of reach and why? You already know the answer. CONNECT. THE. DOTS.

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 24, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 9:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my concerns about an incident following the assassination of Charlie Kirk. A man named Russell Kennington, dressed in scrubs, was arrested for trespassing and obstructing justice at the crime scene. He entered the area, claiming he was "reminiscing and filming" just hours after the shooting. This raises questions about his motives and why this situation isn't receiving more attention. I previously recorded someone on the roof of the same building shortly before the incident, which adds to the mystery surrounding these events.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 WHY HAVEN’T YOU HEARD ABOUT THIS MAN YET? September 11th, the day after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, a man dressed in scrubs and doctor’s lab coat was arrested for breaking into the crime scene at UVU and filming evidence. He didn’t run to the Losee...no, instead he went directly to the Woodbury. Sound familiar? The very building where I caught someone on video on the roof 17 minutes before Charlie was shot and killed. This guys name? Russell Kennington, 38. Arrested for criminal trespass and obstruction of justice, felony level. He reportedly crossed inside two sets of yellow crime scene tape, claiming he was “reminiscing and filming the scene” and “following the shadows”. So why was a man disguised as a doctor, sneaking into the crime scene just hours after the shooting and why is NO ONE talking about it?

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 24, 2025 at 1:02 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 6:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just uncovered something that changes everything. In slow motion, right after the shot, it looks like there were one or two quick handoffs near Charlie Kirk's body. A man reaches for something on Charlie's table, hands it off, and then acts strangely on his phone. Another person nearby also seems to pocket something. Something feels off, and I'm determined to find out what it is.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

I JUST CAUGHT WHAT THEY DID AND IT CHANGES EVERYTHING. 🚨 WATCH THIS VERY CLOSELY 🚨 Seconds after the shot, slow-motion appears to show one, possibly two, lightning-quick handoffs and immediate concealment right next to Charlie Kirk's assassinated body. A man reaches to Charlie’s table, snatches something, hands it off, tucks an item into his pocket, then acts weirdly on his phone like nothing happened. The man next to him also seems to pocket something. SOMETHING ISN'T RIGHT. And we're finding out exactly what it is.

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 22, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 11:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Sixteen years later, Trump and RFK Jr. echo sentiments once criticized in the past by Jim Carrey and Jenny McCarthy regarding vaccines. McCarthy questions the increase in vaccines since 1990, attributing it to greed, while Carrey highlights the U.S. administering more vaccines than other Western countries. They advocate for parental education and choice in vaccination, suggesting a need to delay or space out vaccines and scrutinize their necessity. Both express skepticism about the motivations behind public health recommendations, linking them to pharmaceutical profits.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

16 years later…Trump & RFK Jr. are saying exactly what Jim Carrey & Jenny McCarthy were BLASTED for. MCCARTHY: I don't know what happened in 1990? There was no plague that was killing children that we had to triple the amount of vaccines. Let's be smart! CARREY: What happened after 1989 that warranted 26 more vaccines? Are all of them absolutely necessary? MCCARTHY: Greed. Greed! KING: Because they wanna make money. MCCARTHY: Of course! CARREY: It's twice as many as anywhere else in 30 countries in the Western world. We give twice as many shots as any of those countries. Why is that? KING: Well, what are you against? Don't vaccinate for this, but vaccinate for that? MCCARTHY: Yes! CARREY: I think we have to choose which ones are absolutely necessary. KING: How do I know which one? MCCARTHY: You should educate yourself. We want to empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chickenpox? Do we need the hepatitis B shot on the second day of life? CARREY: I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our public health any longer have our best interests at heart all the time. Parents have to make their own decisions, educated decisions. They have to look at the information. MCCARTHY: Space out the vaccines...delay them till after one...clean out the toxins that are in them. We don't NEED that many. KING: Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save a life or prevent a disease? I don't understand. CARREY: Uhhh...the AAP is financed by the drug companies?? Uhhh...Medical schools are financed by the drug companies? This is a HUGE business. Vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry. $13 billion. MCCARTHY: They control medical schools! CARREY: What we're asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"I don't know what happened in 1990. There was no plague that was killing children that we had tripled the amount of vaccines." "Happened after 1989? The vaccine schedule mourn to 26 more vaccines. Agreed. Are all of them absolutely necessary? They wanna make money." "It's twice as many as anywhere else in in 30 countries in the Western world." "But We give twice as many shots as any of those countries." "Should you should educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves." "Do we need to have the chickenpox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life?" "I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time." "Parents have to take have to make their own decisions, educated decisions."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know what happened in 1990. There was no plague that was killing children that we had tripled the amount of vaccines. Speaker 1: Happened after 1989? The vaccine schedule mourn to 26 more vaccines. Agreed. Are all of them absolutely necessary? They wanna make money. Speaker 0: Of course. Speaker 1: It's twice as many as anywhere else in in 30 countries in the Western world. But We give twice as many shots as any of those countries. Why is that? Well, what what are you against? Don't vaccinate for this, but vaccinate for that? Yes. I think we have to choose which is absolutely necessary. Speaker 0: Should you should educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chickenpox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life? Speaker 1: I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time. Parents have to take have to make their own decisions, educated decisions. They have to look at the information. Speaker 0: Space out the vaccines. Delay them till after one. Clean out the toxins that are in them. We don't need that many. Speaker 1: Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save that could save a life or prevent a disease? I don't I don't understand. I The AAP is financed by the drug companies. Medical schools are financed by the drug companies. This is a huge business. Vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry. $13,000,000,000 They control medical schools. What we are asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.
HustleBitch_
Posted - September 22, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Saved - September 23, 2025 at 3:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This is alarming. Before standing on the chair where Charlie Kirk was assassinated and removing the video footage from the scene, I noticed something odd. A man climbed the wall, poised with his camera, seemingly anticipating the chaos before it erupted. How did he time everything so perfectly?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 THIS IS NOT GOOD. 🚨 Before standing on the very chair Charlie Kirk was sitting in when he was assassinated...and before removing the video camera and footage from the crime scene, something strange happened. The same man climbed the wall, perched above the chaos, camera locked and ready, waiting for the stampede of innocent bystanders to flee from the shooting. He was ready before the panic ever began. How did he know how to always time everything so perfectly?

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Saved - September 20, 2025 at 6:50 AM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 WATCH AND LISTEN CLOSELY 🚨 Acoustic analysis and crowd reactions prove Charlie Kirk's assassin was MUCH closer than they want you to know. Notice where they are standing. Watch their faces. The jolts. The jumps. Natural instinct never lies. https://t.co/RoUBv5g1fI

View Full Interactive Feed