reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @IV_Musketeer
reSee.it AI Summary
I wonder how much damage bluetooth tech has done to the human brain. I’m told the headphone jack removal was planned obsolescence. I also learned the Bluetooth logo comes from Nordic/Viking runes, Haglaz and Bjarkan. Meanwhile, iPhone seems “approved” for CCP, and I’m now second-guessing my iPhone 16 purchase for my daughter—what open-source privacy phone options exist?
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
.@Apple Planned Obsolescence The “Truth” about why the headphone jack was removed. I wonder how much damage has been done to the human brain with bluetooth tech? https://t.co/3Fy7QBLR1C
Video Transcript AI Summary
In September 2016, Apple removed the 3.5mm headphone jack and said it took “Courage,” framing the change as beneficial for users. The speaker argues the change was never about courage, phone thinness, or user benefit, and claims the headphone jack had long proven reliable.
The speaker says the 3.5mm headphone connector, invented in 1877, was originally designed for telephone switchboard operators and remained essentially unchanged through world wars and decades of consumer electronics. They claim it required no power, no pairing, and no battery and functioned reliably whenever plugged in.
Apple’s three stated reasons for removing the jack are presented as failing:
1) Thinner phones: the speaker claims the iPhone 7 (the first without a jack) was thicker than the iPhone 6.
2) Water resistance: the speaker cites the Sony Xperia Z3 as having full IP68 waterproofing (the highest rating in 2014) while keeping the jack.
3) Better audio: the speaker claims Bluetooth compresses audio and that the 3.5mm jack plays uncompressed, so Apple replaced “better audio” with “worse audio.”
The speaker then claims the real motivation was financial and points to timing: three months after removing the jack, Apple launched AirPods priced at $159. They state AirPods grew into a $15 billion-per-year business and argue this scale depended on phones no longer having the old port.
The speaker highlights Apple’s MFi licensing program, claiming that companies making Lightning or USB-C headphones must pay Apple, while 3.5mm is an open standard with no Apple licensing fee. They then compare competitors: the speaker says Samsung ran ad campaigns mocking Apple and specifically showed an employee telling iPhone users they need a dongle, then a double dongle. The speaker claims Samsung removed its own headphone jack in 2019 without a press release or explanation and later deleted those ads from its YouTube channel, and that major Android manufacturers followed within two years.
The conclusion offered is that removing the port enabled lock-in: AirPods are said to auto-connect and switch instantly, show battery level on-screen, and work best on Apple devices. The speaker argues that switching away from iPhone would also mean switching earbuds, turning earbud compatibility into a switching cost. They state Apple framed this as “courage” for customer benefit while charging $159 for what they claim customers already had.
Full Transcript
Okay, so in September 2016, Apple stood on a stage in San Francisco and said something that made millions of people genuinely angry. Courage. Courage. They called it "Courage" to remove a hole. Now, ten years later, I wanna tell you what was actually going on, because it was never about "Courage". It wasn't about your phone being thinner, and it definitely wasn't for you. Here's something almost nobody knows: the headphone jack, invented in 1877, before the car, before the airplane, before electric lightbulbs were even, you know, common in homes. It was designed for telephone switchboard operators, those women you see in old photos plugging cables into giant boards. And that exact connector, basically unchanged, survived world wars, the Walkman, the iPod, fifty years of consumer electronics, without a single meaningful complaint. It needed zero power, zero pairing, zero battery, zero latency. You plugged it in, it worked, every single time. Apple gave three reasons, and each one collapses like a wet napkin the second you actually look at it. Reason one: thinner phones. Sure, except the iPhone seven, the first one without a jack, was actually thicker than the iPhone six. Look it up. Reason two: water resistance. Okay, so the Sony Xperia Z3 had full- IP68 waterproofing, the highest rating in two thousand fourteen, two years before Apple removed the jack, and it kept the jack. Sony figured it out. Funny how that works. Reason three: better audio. This one is just genuinely insulting. Bluetooth compresses audio. Every audiophile on the planet knows this. The three point five millimeter jack plays uncompressed. So they replaced better audio with worse audio and called it an upgrade. So if none of those reasons are real, what is? Let's do something radical. Let's follow the money. Three months. Three months after they removed the headphone jack, Apple launched AirPods priced at one hundred fifty-nine dollars. That timing isn't a coincidence, that's a business plan. AirPods went from zero to a fifteen billion dollar a year business. Fifteen billion. That's bigger than Spotify. That's bigger than Twitter was at its peak. And it literally couldn't exist, not at that scale, if your phone still had the old port. And here's the part nobody talks about enough: Apple has a licensing program called MFI, Made For iPhone. Every company that wants to make a Lightning or USB-C headphone has to pay Apple, every single one. The three point five millimeter jack? Completely open standard, no license, no fee, no Apple getting a cut. Now, Samsung. Oh, Samsung. They ran entire ad campaigns mocking Apple for this. There's a Samsung ad where their own employee tells iPhone users they need a dongle, then a double dongle. The internet loved it. Samsung removed their headphone jack in twenty nineteen, quietly, with no press release, no explanation, no courage speech, they just did it, and then deleted those ads from their YouTube channel. Every major Android manufacturer followed within two years. Almost like they all got the same memo, but here's the part that no tech review ever says out loud: this wasn't just about headphone revenue, this was about lock-in. Your AirPods work best, auto-connect, instant switch, battery shown on screen, only on Apple devices. If you ever wanna leave iPhone, you're also leaving your headphones. Your earbuds are now a switching cost. They didn't remove a port, they added a subscription to your ears, one you didn't notice you were signing up for. They said it took courage to remove the headphone jack, and maybe they were right. It takes a certain kind of courage to look your customers in the eye, tell them it's for their benefit, and charge them a hundred fifty nine dollars for what they already had. On this channel, we pull apart ordinary things the world just accepted. If that sounds like your kind of rabbit hole, you know what to do, and if you don't, the button is right there. It's free, and unlike AirPods, it doesn't require a proprietary charger.
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
Bluetooth
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
the Bluetooth logo has an interesting origin that combines Nordic history and symbolism it was created by combining two runes of Viking script, specifically the runes Haglaz ( ales) and Bjarkan ( ᚼ) https://t.co/JKtVcGlTDe
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
why is iPhone the approved phone for CCP 🇨🇳? makes one think; must watch, especially for the tech retards like me just received new iPhone 16’s for my daughter and i, but am second guessing my purchase what are options for open source-privacy phones? 📱 Why the iPhone 16 Should Scare You Sh¡tless! https://youtu.be/_c8UrgGG3NA
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
is AI the “plausible deniability” for the invasion of privacy sought by the elitists, i.e., the technocratic government to which we’re being introduced? the scapegoat if you will? are we unwittingly acquiescing to our own demise of liberty and privacy being enamored by https://t.co/1zW21cReq4
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
John Kiriakou, an ex-CIA analyst and frequent guest on the who’s-who of podcasts recently… why Android is inferior to Apple https://t.co/P6m9JlIVQ3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says they use an iPhone, claiming “everybody I know” and “everybody at the CIA” uses an iPhone. They explain that when iPhones were unusual and hard to find, they used Android phones, and that all staff were assigned Androids; they also mention that they were originally assigned Nextels, described as walkie-talkie devices. The speaker recounts taking a Nextel to Bulgaria, where it beeped all night and people tried to send walkie-talkie-style messages, leading them to turn it in.
They say the group transitioned to iPhones because Android phones are “so hard to crack,” and they advise against using Android devices. The speaker associates the risk with “the Chinese, the Russians, the Iranians, the Cubans,” and “most importantly, the Israelis,” and urges not to “do an android.” They then broaden the point beyond phone choice, suggesting people should consider what other aspects of life expose their secrets. They conclude by recommending that people assume “these bad guys are everywhere,” since, they say, they actually are everywhere.
The speaker’s key takeaway is to make stealing personal secrets as hard as possible, and they close with a directive: “number one on your things to do today list, drop that android,” repeating “drop that Android.”
Full Transcript
You use an Android cell phone? What? Why don't you just send your password to the Chinese? What? Android? Of course I use an iPhone. Everybody I know uses an iPhone. Everybody at the CIA uses an iPhone. We actually started with androids when iPhones were so unusual they were actually hard to find. And they assigned all of us androids. They actually assigned originally all of us nextels. Remember nextel? They were like walkie talkies. I took one to Bulgaria one time, and the thing was beeping all night long, people trying to send me like walkie talkie messages. I, I turned it in, I'm like, I'm not doing this anymore. Anyway, we all transitioned to iPhones 'cause they're so hard to crack. Androids, dude, you don't wanna do an android. The Chinese, the Russians, the Iranians, the Cubans, most importantly, the Israelis. Yeah, don't do that. Makes me think, what else in life are you exposing your secrets? Yeah, not good. Just assume that these bad guys are everywhere, because in reality, they actually are everywhere. And you wanna make stealing your personal secrets as hard as you possibly can, so number one on your things to do today list, drop that android Yeah, drop that Android
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
why is iPhone the approved phone for CCP 🇨🇳? makes one think; must watch, especially for the tech retards like me just received new iPhone 16’s for my daughter and i, but am second guessing my purchase what are options for open source-privacy phones? 📱 Why the iPhone 16 https://t.co/rghpaFtVyp
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
ballroom bunker https://t.co/XtoZU4WZZT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Trump is not building a ballroom. Andrew Kerr, an architect with over twenty years of federal project experience, posted on Facebook and walked through step by step why this ballroom makes no sense. He did the math: $300,000,000 at 90,000 square feet would be about $3,333 per square foot, and he said that even luxury federal construction doesn’t usually approach $1,000 per square foot. The geometry of the renderings is nearly impossible, showing a building with a 380 by 235 foot footprint, but interior views show maybe 200 by 100 feet, which is 20,000 square feet, so that can’t exist in the same building. Construction drawings look like they were thrown together in about a week, and he suggested they were probably thrown together by Grock, or whoever’s still wandering around the White House from Doge. So the million dollar question is what is he building? The answer, he suggests, is an underground data center.
Think about where they’re building. It’s not random. It’s the East Wing, where the PEOC bunker is, the tunnel systems that connect the White House to the Treasury to other federal buildings, and where all of the secure communications infrastructure lives. That’s prime underground real estate. It reminds me of Larry Ellison’s Oracle data centers in underground Jerusalem: nine stories deep, 160 feet below ground, 460,000 square feet, costing $319,000,000 per bunker. The White House is already at $300,000,000 for this “ballroom,” and it’s only climbing.
Fiscally, it feels like a more apt comparison to those. Outside of architecture anomalies, the fact that this is privately funded should have been the first red flag. This is Donald Trump, the man who has spent taxpayer money on stuff that benefits him. He spent over $3,900,000,000 in taxpayer money just to make over Air Force One. Didn’t he also have Secret Service pay room bills at Mar-a-Lago? This suggests it isn’t serving him; it’s serving someone else specifically.
Look at the donor list: defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Booz Allen Hamilton, tech giants like Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Palantir, crypto companies like Coinbase, Ripple, and Tether, and telecoms like T-Mobile and Comcast. These aren’t people funding a party space; these are companies with interests in government infrastructure, data, and operations. They’re funding infrastructure that directly serves them. Also, about Larry Ellison’s vision to automate the government: many tech pros talk about automating federal operations or creating a single digital platform for the government, which would require a supremely secure physical home for that system. Placing it directly under the White House would eliminate latency problems and ensure the President has direct physical control over the system’s core. Centralizing control and securing the brain of the government. It’s dystopian in many ways, and these are real developments happening worldwide. The companies funding this are buying access to integrate their systems with how the government operates, and that’s what $300,000,000 will get you. I guess.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. So Trump is not building a ballroom. And I feel like I've known this in my soul, but now I feel like I have irrefutable proof. Thanks to Andrew Kerr, an architect who posted on Facebook a few days ago and blew this case wide open. And he, by the way, has over twenty years of experience working on federal projects, and he walked through in his Facebook post step by step why this does not make any sense, this ballroom.
I mean, for one, he just kinda did the math. $300,000,000 at 90,000 square feet would be about $3,333 per square foot. He said that even luxury federal construction doesn't usually approach $1,000 per square foot. He also mentioned the geometry of these renderings being nearly impossible because the renderings are showing a building that would need a 380 by 235 foot footprint, but the interior views show maybe 200 by 100 feet. And that's only 20,000 square feet, so that can't exist in the same building.
Not to mention that the construction drawings, he said, look like they were thrown together in about a week, and I think that's pretty generous considering I think that they were probably thrown together by Grock within, I don't know, a couple of minutes, probably by Big Balls or whoever's still wandering around the White House from Doge. So the million dollar question then becomes, well, what is he building? And the answer, I think, is that he's building an underground data center. Hear me out. Hear me out.
Think about where they're building, because it's not random. It's the East Wing, and that's where the PEOC bunker is. And just think about the significance of that, because that is where the tunnel systems are that connect the White House to the Treasury to the other federal buildings. It's where all of the secure communications infrastructure lives. I mean, that's prime real estate, just underground.
Honestly, this kind of reminds me of the Oracle data centers that Larry Ellison built underground in Jerusalem. You know, the ones that were nine stories deep, a 160 feet below the ground, 460,000 square feet. And guess how much those cost? $319,000,000 per bunker. Yeah.
And the White House is already at $300,000,000 for this ballroom, and it's only climbing. Fiscally, it feels like a more apt comparison to I feel like. Even outside of the architecture anomalies, the fact that this is privately funded should have been our first red flag. I mean, this is Donald Trump we're talking about, baby. I mean, the man who has absolutely no problem spending taxpayer money on stuff that just benefits him.
This is the same guy who spent over $3,900,000,000 in taxpayer money just to make over Air Force One. Didn't he also make Secret Service pay to, say, at Mar A Lago, like he charged the room bill to them? Just ridiculous. When So he suddenly won't spend government money on this, this means this isn't actually serving him. This means that this is serving someone else specifically.
Look at the donor list. You've got defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Booz Allen Hamilton, and you've got tech giants like Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Palantir. You've got crypto companies like Coinbase, Ripple, and Tether, and then telecoms like T Mobile and Comcast. These aren't people who are funding a party space. These are companies who have very specific interests in government infrastructure, government data, and government operations.
Don't get it twisted, they are funding infrastructure that very directly serves them. Also, about Larry Ellison's vision, the one that he spoke about in the keynote the other day that I made a video on, the part where he said that he wants to automates the government. I mean, a lot of these tech pros have been talking about automating the government. And if you wanna automate federal operations or create a single digital platform for the government, then that means you need a supremely secure physical home for that system. And by placing it directly under the White House, you eliminate latency problems and you ensure the President of The United States has direct physical control over the system's core.
Because remember, it's about centralizing control and securing the brain of the government. I know, it sounds very dystopian, and in many ways it's because it is. But these are very real things that are happening around the world. And the companies that are funding this, well, they're buying access. They want their systems integrated to how the government operates, and that's what $300,000,000 will get you.
I guess.
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
Answer: Yes Pet vs. Human Pharmakeia https://t.co/g2kA3b7n5H
Video Transcript AI Summary
A licensed pharmacist in four states speaks about what they describe as a scam that blurs the line between animal and human medication. The pharmacist presents an example using diphenhydramine, a 25 milligram tablet. They compare an “animal” version (purchased for pets) to a human version, illustrating price and packaging differences.
For the animal version, the pharmacist shows a container of diphenhydramine 25 mg with a label indicating it contains 100 tablets and costs $10. In contrast, the human version is shown as a diphenhydramine 25 mg tablet with a much larger supply—365 tablets—and a price of $7.27. The pharmacist highlights that the animal product is nearly half the price and contains over triple the amount of tablets when compared to the human product.
A key point raised is the comparison of inactive ingredients. The pharmacist notes that the inactive ingredients are identical between the two products, with the animal product described as “pupper version” at the bottom and the human version at the top. The pills are described as visually identical in color and appearance, with both being described as pink, and the human version also depicted as the same pill in the comparison.
Throughout the segment, the pharmacist emphasizes the similarity between the two products, drawing attention to the price difference and the sameness of active ingredients and inert components. The overarching claim is that this similarity and cost discrepancy raise questions about the practice of selling animal-formulated versions of human medications at lower costs or in different quantities.
At the end, the pharmacist questions the overall integrity of the U.S. pharmaceutical market with the line, “Bro, is the entire United States just a scam?” This closing remark underscores their skepticism about the relationship between animal and human medications and the pricing dynamics demonstrated in the example.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am a licensed pharmacist in four states, and beyond these doors, I'm going to dispel a scam that blurs the line between animal and human medication. This is something that shocked me as a pharmacist, and I came here to get an animal medicine, and I'll show you why. Right here, this is diphenhydramine. It's a twenty five milligram tablet. You get a 100 of them for $10.
Now let's compare this to the human version. For the second part, we have to go to a human pharmacy and get some. Right here is what we want. So this is diphenhydramine twenty five milligram tablets. You get three hundred and sixty five tablets here, and it's $7.27.
The reason why I became skeptical of these products is right here. That's nearly half the price and over triple the amount. The inactive ingredients. You can see, the pupper version on the bottom that's made for dogs and the human version on top that's made for humans. Again, same active ingredient.
Now, do you notice anything about the inactive ingredients? Yeah. They're identical. How about that? Yep.
Nice and bright and pink. And this is the human version. Yep. Take a look at the human version. They're the exact same pill.
Bro, is the entire United States just a scam?
reSee.it AI Summary
I trace the strategy behind Israel's actions in Gaza, citing Secret History #4: How Evil Triumphs. I flag a linked claim about a 1933 Chicago pageant simulating child sacrifice to Moloch, titled The Romance of a People, organized by the Zionist Organization of America. I also note a post titled Moloch and a reference to a 1985–1988 LA alleged satanic ritual abuse.
@IV_Musketeer - 4th Musketeer
the strategy behind Israels actions in Gaza full: https://youtu.be/BtlWoqWLm9Q Secret History #4: How Evil Triumphs #ChildSacrifice #Ritual https://t.co/gaB3WKTDX1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that what is happening in Gaza is a ritual sacrifice. She notes that Israel is besieging and bombarding Gaza and acknowledges disturbing videos seen on social media, but contends that the truth is far more disturbing than the common description of events.
She claims that throughout human history, civilizations have practiced ritual sacrifice before war, citing the Aztecs (temples with thousands of human skulls and mass murder of enemies in public) and the Phoenicians/Carthaginians (child sacrifice), with Romans also practicing human sacrifice by parading enemies through Rome and then strangling them at the Temple of Jupiter after a triumph. She states that this is sacrifice, though not always labeled as such.
The central question she raises is why such sacrifices occurred in these civilizations and why, she says, Israel is doing something similar in Gaza today. She emphasizes that 47% of Gaza’s population is 18 years old, so the majority of those killed are children, calling this a striking and blatant aspect of the situation.
She asserts that the world can clearly see what is happening in Gaza, and that the Israelis seemingly want the world to hate them. She notes widespread protests around the world against Israel’s actions in Palestine and argues that if Israel wanted to achieve its aims, there would be more effective, secret methods (for example, poisoning water or air to cause cancers), which could eliminate Gaza’s population over 20–30 years without public discussion. Instead, she claims, Israel chooses to do this openly to provoke global outrage.
The speaker contends that this is intentional, designed to create the ultimate taboo—disgust and contention that unite the world against Israel. She connects this to a belief in extreme forms of Jewish eschatology, suggesting that some in the Israeli government want to accelerate an end-times scenario in which Israel fights the entire world with God’s help.
She uses a Chinese military analogy: fighting with a river behind your back, where forcing an army to retreat to a dangerous river leads to a surge of energy to destroy the enemy. She equates the river to the taboo of killing children, arguing that there is no exit for Israel—either they go all the way or the world destroys them. She concludes by noting that online, this narrative is circulating globally and causing trouble everywhere.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What what is happening in Israel? Right now, as you know, Israel is besieging, bombarding Gaza. You might have seen the videos on social media. It is disturbing. It is terrible what is happening.
The word that is happening, the word that we use for what what is happening in Gaza is this word. You are not allowed to say this word on YouTube, but that is the intention. What I will argue though is that the truth is far more disturbing than this. What is really happening in Gaza is a ritual sacrifice. And this happens quite often in human history.
If you go back and you look at the real history of humanity, this happens quite often. Some of the most famous examples are the Aztecs. We've dug up temples of the Aztecs, and inside the temples are thousands and thousands of human skulls. So before they went to war, they practiced human sacrifice. They would commit mass murder of their enemies in public.
So the Aztecs were really famous for this. The Phoenicians, specifically the Carthaginians. We will discuss some later this semester, but the Phoenicians were also famous for a particular type of sacrifice, which is child sacrifice. The Romans wrote histories insulting the Phoenicians for practicing this sort of sacrifice. But the Romans themselves practiced human sacrifice.
What they would do is that after every major war, they would capture all the major leaders, all their enemies, and they would parade their enemies through the streets of Rome. This is something called a triumph. At the end of the triumph, they would gather enemies at the Temple Of Jupiter. Jupiter is their god. And then they would strangle to death their enemies.
That's sacrifice. That's human sacrifice. They didn't call that. Okay? And they sort of disguised it, but we know for a fact that they did do this.
So the question for us is, why is it that this happened? Why do the Aztecs do it? Why do the Phoenicians do it? Why do the Romans do it? And why is it today, the Israelis do it in Gaza?
And remember, okay? What the Israelis are doing is quite horrific because it is really this sort of sacrifice. Why? Because 47%, almost half of the population of Gaza is 18 years old. So the majority of people who are getting killed are in fact children.
What is most striking or blatant about what's happening in Gaza is that we can all see it for ourselves. And it's almost as though the Israelis want us to see it and want us to hate them. Right? You can see all over the world popular opinion is turning against Israel. You have these popular protests all around the world protesting what is happening in Palestine.
If they really want to do this, right, there are actually much more effective ways of doing this. For example, you could just poison their water or you could poison the ear so that everyone in Gaza gets a fast cancer. Right? We have the technology to do this. So so Israel could do it secretly and no one would talk about it.
And in twenty years' time, thirty years' time, the popul population of Gaza would all be gone. It would be a very secret. Right? Instead, they choose to do this in front of the world. And my argument to you is that this is intentional.
They want the world to hate them because by doing this, they create the ultimate taboo. Right? We find this disgusting and contentious so the entire world will unite against Israel. But guess what? That's what their religion wants.
In the extreme form of Jewish eschatology or the religion, they believe that at the end of the world, Israel will fight the entire world and God will help Israel triumph in the end. So what's really happening in Gaza is that there are extremists within the Israel government who want to accelerate the process of the end of the world where Israel will face the world. And if you think about it, the entire idea of this ritual sacrifice is to unite the Israeli population. And what's extremely disturbing and horrifying about it is that this works. Why?
Well, let's use an analogy. K? The analogy is this. In Chinese history, the most popular military stratagem is to fight with a river behind your back. You guys have heard of this strategy.
Right? Where, okay, an army is losing. Okay? It's it's being scattered by the enemy. So what the general does is forces the army to retreat to a river.
And now with the river blocking your escape, you have a choice. You can either drown in river or you can fight to the death. And most soldiers will choose to fight to the death. And so at this point, the soldiers are unified. They're galvanized.
They're energized, and then they find a surge of energy to go and destroy their enemy. K? This is the most popular military stratagem in ancient Chinese history, and guess what? It's the same as Israel doing this right now in Gaza. It's the same logic.
Yes? You you have a question? So what is the river for the Israel? Like Yeah. That that that's a good question.
What's the river over here? Right? The river is a taboo. Right? What's the worst thing you can do in modern society?
Killing children, guys. Right? So there's no exit for Israel. You either go all the way or the world comes and destroys you anyway. And in fact, what's really interesting is that if you go online, you will see it's really it's going around the world and causing trouble everywhere.
@IV_Musketeer - 4th Musketeer
Moloch
@IV_Musketeer - 4th Musketeer
Moloch Was My Babysitter - Satanic Ritual Abuse in Los Angeles 1985-1988 part I #Wilson https://t.co/LUEeAF6T2k
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am recounting my story from the 1980s in Los Angeles, beginning in 1985 when I was just under two years old. I attended rituals described as satanic but labeled as part of the Canaanite religion. I claim I killed dozens of people at these events, and that I did so as part of these rituals.
My parents denied all of this. My mother was a hippie, and my father was an engineer and computer programmer who worked with robots; I was his greatest robot. At the rituals, hundreds of people, about 300, gathered in the basement of a giant Los Angeles mansion. They would sacrifice kids, and next to that circle was a box painted on the ground—a golden rectangular box. A man dressed like Moloch, buff with gold body paint and wearing a bullhead helmet, stood at the edge. When our fathers, our handlers, dropped us off, Moloch would raise his arms. This is the Moloch, and this is the golden box. The blonde and redhead kids sat in the golden box and watched Warner Brothers cartoons, waiting to be used for the rituals.
I was in the front right quadrant; the red-haired girl was in the back left quadrant. The kids in the golden box were essentially child actors. Instead of calling these rituals, they were called routines. Before entering the circle, we received a bloody handprint on our faces. A woman, described as busty and topless, wearing a mask, would come out with a tray of blood. A guest would remove their hood, approach the golden box, dip their hand in the blood, and press it against our faces with the middle finger parallel to the nose. The bloody hand mark was common in America, with variations like the mark of the beast, the wild animal symbol, or a reptile claw dragged from the top down.
We would then be painted and cleaned up to watch cartoons again. One ritual called hugs involved adult hugs that were not affectionate; they were sexual. I recall the dog humping my leg during one of these moments, which I misinterpreted as hugging. I have fond memories of the red-haired girl, who attended that first year, 1985. We performed a “wild animals” routine where, instead of following exact scripts, participants improvised while several people watched. I was placed on a cart and pushed toward a table covered with blue tarps; in the middle lay a trough of organs, with the red-haired girl nearby examining the intestines. We were sedated humans to be treated as animals—began slowly, then grabbed and touched organs, escalating to biting as a human body. The scene was messy beyond blood, including various internal contents.
There was a bar area with barrels of alcohol on a wagon, and a German schnitzel girl with blonde hair and pigtails. I sat on a circular table with arches at the ends to separate drinks, and I ate a cracker at the end of the events, which was smeared with a substance that tasted like blood and spice. I refused to eat it one year and my father came over with his Boston accent, saying, “They’ll kill you mother.” I eventually ate the cracker and watched a cartoon of a black cat named Pussy Foot, which showed a cat drinking milk slowly and closely. I had to imitate the cat’s licking and then assume a “kitty” position on the ground. They would then pick me up by my sides and place me in front of a woman’s vagina for the orgies, where I would look away.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I killed more people than Scarface before kindergarten. As a kid in the nineteen eighties, I used to attend these rituals, commonly known as satanic rituals. They're actually from a religion known as the Canaanite religion. At these events, I would generally kill people. I killed dozens of people.
Well, this is my story. My parents, they would deny all of this what I'm gonna tell you, man. My mother was a hippie. My father was also a drug user. He was an engineer and a computer programmer and a robot maker, and I was his greatest robot.
All the kids at these events were, like, robots, basically. Small wonders. So in 1985, just under the age of two, I started going to this house in Los Angeles, this giant mansion. In the basement of this mansion, there was a huge circle of people, hundreds of people, like 300 people, much bigger than the eyes wide shut circle, and they would sacrifice kids. Next to that circle was a box, a golden box rectangle on the ground, painted on the ground.
There was a guy on the edge who was dressed like Moloch. He had he was buffed like a WWF wrestler, covered in gold body paint, and he had a huge helmet on that looked like a bullhead. And when our parents would drop us off there, our fathers, our handlers, Moloch would raise his arms up. This is the Moloch, and this is the golden box. This is where the blonde and redhead kids would sit and watch cartoons, exclusively Warner Brothers cartoons, waiting to be used for the rituals.
I was in the front right quadrant. This is the red haired girl, the back left quadrant. So the kids in the golden box were essentially child actors. Instead of the calling these rituals, they were called routines. And before we went into the circle, we got a bloody handprint on our faces.
Now a a busty blonde or redheaded woman, topless, with a a mask would come out with a tray full full of blood. And one of the guests from the event would take their hood off. They come into the golden box, and they would dip their hand, their palm in here, and they would put it in front of our face like this, press it with the middle finger parallel to the nose. That was the standard face paint. Now the first blood hand is very common in America.
You see it as the pedestrian crosswalk symbol. Does it look familiar? But there are other variations of it, like the mark of the beast, the wild animal symbol, or the reptile claw dragged from the top down, from the forehead down. So we would get our faces painted before we went out and did our routine, and we get cleaned up and we watch cartoons again. Yeah.
Another one called hugs. Hugs. Adult hugs. You can believe they don't, like, give lovely hugs. They're not hugging kids at these events.
Hugs are sex. This is funny. When I was a kid, this dog was humping my leg, I'm like, he's hugging me. I have very fond memories of the red haired girl. She was a little older than me.
She was only there the first year, so it was 1985. I did my first event with her. We did wild animals, with the blood hand and then this. And wild animals is like a, sort of improvised event, unlike a lot of the other ones. You're supposed to do exactly what they say.
This one, you're acting like a wild animal. So there's these people in front of me. They're going like, girl, you're a wild animal. Girl. They do the they do the hand and then they go girl, you're a wild animal.
Girl. Girl. Right? And then I'm I'm, like, on a cart of some type of thing. And I'm being pushed up to this table, like a sort of a table.
It's it's covered in blue tarps on either side. In the middle, there's this big, like, trough of organs. And on the other side, there's a red haired girl. And I see her, like, looking at the intestines. She's kinda, like, touching the intestines a little bit.
And, but this is this is like a human being that they that they have sedated. And we're wild animals. You're supposed to improvise, but you're really encouraged to just, like, start kinda slow, and then you kinda work for grabbing things, touching things, then you're like, you start biting and and you're just like a human being as a human body. And stuff is just you know, you can imagine how messy it gets. It's not just blood.
There's all sorts of things in the human body. When I first remember this stuff, I have this intense feeling, like, of all the other years after the first year, every, every other year, I was like missing the red haired girl. Like, I was like bummed out that she wasn't there. I'm just like depressed basically waiting for her to come back. There was a bar, but it wasn't like a bar with bottles of alcohol.
It was like they had barrels of alcohol. And they were on this wagon, like a old timey wagon. And I think there were three at least three barrels of booze. I think it was wine and whiskey. In front of it was a, like a German schnitzel girl, one of those, like, Oktoberfest girls, like straight up German looking.
Like, she had blonde hair, I think she had pigtails and, like, the skirt and everything. That was strange. In the the bar area, I would go to there at the end to eat the cracker, and there's these tables that are go up from the ground, and they're circular. And they have two arches. This isn't that important.
It's just a little detail that I remember because I and it was like these four quadrants. And these arches, I guess, keep people from messing with each other's drinks or something, but I would be sat on the table. So I was, like, more like a adult hype. And I think it kinda made me feel like I was part of the group more because I was up at that level of eyeline with adults. Yeah.
That's where I ate the cracker too. Okay. So at the end of the events, you have to eat a cracker with the stuff on it, the smear. It tastes like blood, basically like gross blood with some spice in it. I don't know what the spice was.
It was totally disgusting, and I didn't like it at all. And one year, I refused to eat it, and they had to get my dad. And he comes over to me. He's off somewhere else. He comes over and he goes, they'll kill you mother with this Boston accent.
That was his go to, and he could get me to do anything there. Am I telling you that? They'll kill you mother. So I ate the cracker. They had me watch a cartoon of a a cat.
I think it was called Pussy Foot. It was a black cat, and it it was, like, a close-up, a full body, but close-up of it drinking lapping milk out of a saucer. It wasn't like a real quick licking like cats do. It was like slow, like, one second or even longer, one and a half second where, like, thick, thick, thick. Right.
They had me impersonate that and do that. And I had to get in the kitty position, like, laying down on the ground. And I'm, like, almost in a little ball, licking a little. Right? And then they would pick me up by my sides and put me in front of a woman's vagina and the orgies.
And, usually, she was on her back. And I would just look away.
@IV_Musketeer - 4th Musketeer
Epstein's Niece Exposes ALL From Bill Clinton to Cult of Baal Exclusive with Anya Wick - Podcast 771 https://youtu.be/sDr-xPKSmTA https://t.co/mFCopygGVo
@IV_Musketeer - 4th Musketeer
watch the spot above the “FR” on his shirt… why is it there and why does it move? https://t.co/TYsrWy3WEr
@IV_Musketeer - 4th Musketeer
President Trump confirms death of Charlie Kirk https://t.co/EhmAsddxoq
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
hmmm…🔍 #vanillaskies https://t.co/swmdCgkuTy
Video Transcript AI Summary
This photo from Congress shows a historical image of New York City with strange elements like a painted car and people. The photo appears to have been altered, with parts painted over. It raises questions about what was being hidden. The original photo is presented as a glass plate negative, but it's unclear why the alterations were made.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here is a picture straight from the live area of Congress presented as a historical photo of New York City, and this is where we get into the so called vanilla skies. This is classified as a negative, a glass plate negative, which means that this photo was taken straight from the camera, and that's how it was. At first glance of this photo, obviously, this thing down here looks a little weird, but everything else seems normal. Right here, when we zoom in, this is a painted car. Yeah.
I knew it. What the I know it. That's like a cartoon drawing. And over here, we got people that are blatantly, like, painted in, right? Like, this is painted.
You know what I mean? Those are paint strokes. There's, like, no denying that. Now look at this. When we get up here, this is all painted here.
This is a building here in the original photo. Right? This is all painted in. So people are saying, like, what are they actually trying to hide by painting over these things? Because this right here, like, this from here up is all, like, you know, fake except for these right here.
These are real buildings. You could tell. But what was here that they needed to paint and cover? Even in the Library of Congress, it doesn't say that, a, it's a retouched photo. It's presented as a glass plate negative.
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
12.21 Take it away. https://t.co/HFoNnjE17T
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
August 24, 2023 - December 21, 2023 119 days < > 911 Timestamp - Timestamp = 4 hours 50 minutes shy of 119 days > 45 Again, great expectations. https://x.com/iv_musketeer/status/1694887862334800335?s=46 https://t.co/nQtmQZFjXr
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
Suppressed Technology https://t.co/x2rJwKgyAs
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a 1998 Ford Explorer Sports, known for being a gas guzzler. However, the speaker has found a solution to improve gas mileage. By using distilled water with a teaspoon of baking soda as a catalyst and applying 12 volts of electricity, they separate hydrogen from oxygen. This hydrogen is then sent into the combustion chamber, resulting in a 100% burn instead of the usual 30%. The benefits include improved engine performance, quieter idling, increased torque, and horsepower.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. My name is Grant, and this is a 1998 Ford Explorer Sports. Now I'm not sure if you're familiar with Ford's Explorer line, but they have a reputation of being horrible gas guzzlers, and I can actually attest to that. I did the mileage test on my truck and found but I was getting 13.6 miles per gallon highway, which as far as I'm concerned is absolutely unacceptable. Last year I spent $11,000,000,000 on gasoline.
Okay. I made that number up, but it sure felt like it. Well, I did something think about it, and now I'm getting 56% better gas mileage, which translates to 56% savings in my pocket at the gas How did I do it? My truck is now a water hybrid. Check this out.
Well, technically, it's a hydrogen on demand hybrid. What we have here is distilled water with 1 teaspoon of baking soda used as a catalyst. We tickle that water with 12 volts of electricity. And what it does is it separates the hydrogen from the oxygen. That gas is then sent into the combustion chamber where I was formally getting a 30% burn.
That's right. In all of your gas vehicles, you only get A 30% fuel burn, which translates to 70% of your fuel, of your gas comes out of your tailpipe. Now, However, I'm getting a 100% burn in my combustion chamber, which means a few benefits. Number 1, after a couple hours of running hydrogen, it had blown Years of deposits out of my engine. My engine actually idles so quietly in city traffic, I can't even hear it.
My torque increased. My horsepower
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
Ron Wyatt Discoveries [2022] Gomorrah, Red Sea Crossing, Mt Sinai, Noah's Ark, Blood of Christ https://youtu.be/PIpvIVLQ2Dk
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer
Yahushua 🩸 https://t.co/3MIC9OukmB
Video Transcript AI Summary
I collected a canister of dried blood and had it analyzed. We put the blood in saline solution and observed it for 72 hours. Then, we placed it in a growth medium and examined it under a microscope. The white blood cells were dividing, and we determined that there were 24 chromosomes. 23 chromosomes came from the mother and father, while 1 was the sex determinant from the father. This blood, which was almost 2000 years old, was still alive. The test subjects were amazed as they had never seen dried blood remain alive before.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I collected about 3 quarters of that little canister full of this dried blood. We have this analyzed. We put, an amount of this blood in some normal saline and, have body temperature and we swirl this gently for 72 hours. When we put this in a growth medium for another 72 hour and put it under a microscope. The white blood cells were dividing.
We were able to get chromosome count. There were 24 chromosomes. 23 Christ got from agree. We got 1 which was the sex determinant or the why from his heavenly father for a total of 20 were. All of us have 46.
We get 23 from our mother and 23 from our father. Now, this blood, folks, was still alive after almost 2000 years. The people that did the test thought I had pulled a fast one of depend on them. Never in their lives have they ever seen any dried blood that was still alive.
@IV_Musketeer - The Fourth Musketeer