TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Inquiry_Canada
reSee.it AI Summary
What happens when a mandate strips away not just choice, but hope? James shares a heartbreaking story of his wife, who faced immense pressure to get the COVID-19 vaccine to keep her job. Despite her fears about fertility and adverse effects, she received no support or options from her workplace. Over time, she endured bullying and isolation, ultimately documenting her struggles in a log. Tragically, just days after losing her job, she took her own life, highlighting the profound human cost of coercive vaccination policies.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
What happens when a mandate strips away not just choice, but hope? James' heartbreaking story reveals the devastating human toll behind coercive vaccination policies. A couple in their late 30s were planning for a future together and hoping to start a family. But when his wife was forced to take the COVID-19 vaccine to keep her job, fear and uncertainty took hold. Concerns about fertility, pregnancy risks, and growing reports of adverse effects made her deeply hesitant — yet her workplace refused to offer informed consent or consider exemptions. Over months, she was bullied, shamed, and isolated by colleagues, union representatives, and management. Instead of compassion or dialogue, she faced relentless pressure and ridicule. She documented the ordeal in a 40-page log, describing the psychological abuse she endured, a document her husband only discovered after her death. Just eleven days after losing her job, she took her own life. Her story is a devastating reminder that mandates are not just policies - they carry real, irreversible consequences. The mental, emotional, and social weight of coercion can destroy lives far beyond the physical risks of any medical intervention.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"She passed away, so, she was mandated to take the COVID shot." "We were looking at potentially having a child." "I was 40 and she was 38." "She was the more the holdout in it." "She endeavored to try to achieve a form like informed consent through her workplace." "Over about six or seven months, they put the workers off who would not take the shot." "She left a 40 page log of the experience she had." "On November 31, it was her last day of work, and eleven days later she took her own life." "I was working night shift." "They smashed the back window, the front window, and they were able to get into the vehicle." "They told me she's gone." "In that moment, I lost my mind."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She passed away, so, she was mandated to take the COVID shot. And we were looking at potentially having a child. I was 40 and she was 38, So it was kind of towards the later time of what we would really have to make that decision. It was something we talked about for a couple years and she was open to to the kind of concept, she was she was the more the holdout in it. Right?
I thought she'd make a beautiful mother just like she was a beautiful wife to me. And so she was mandated to take the shot. Though she was concerned perhaps about because there wasn't a lot of information about it concerning how it might affect the pregnancy or how it might affect, you know, like to take it and then to get pregnant, this kind of thing soon after to having taken it or how it might affect the term of the pregnancy. And we knew another woman who was pregnant who took the shot and she had a miscarriage relatively shortly after. And there was a gentleman who she worked with who also took it because they were mandated.
Right? And from what she told me, that gentleman had a serious heart issue having to do with, you know, what they believe was related to the shot. So at that point, she was really against it. She was really hesitant to do so, and she felt that it wouldn't yeah. That there wasn't enough information concerning it.
Right? So she endeavored to try to achieve a form like informed consent through her workplace because they were the ones from what I understand, BC Transit was not provincially mandated to enforce the vaccine mandates that they, like, privately chose to engage in the mandates themselves. And so over the course of about six or seven months from when they actually gave the mandate to the point in time when they put the workers off who would not take the shot, we it was basically our entire life. Like, entire life was trying to research this thing to try to understand whether it would be safe for her to take in her position. And also researching what sort of form of exemption a person could look to get concerning the COVID vaccine as well.
Right? She was essentially bullied and coerced and intimidated, At least based on she left a 40 page log of the experience she had. And in in my opinion, upon reading all of that, which I was only was only avail available to me posthumously. I didn't know she was writing it. But the the treatment she believed she received was abhorrent.
Like as opposed to trying to understand her position or provide informed consent or framework for that to exist, she was just instead bullied and coerced from all angles, from from colleagues she'd had for years and people within her union, and this kind of thing. Right? That's On November 31, it was her last day of of work, and
Speaker 1: eleven days later, she took her own life. I was
Speaker 0: I was working night shift, so I was asleep. And I woke up or She told me she was going out before I went to sleep. She had a few things to take care of. I woke up that night, maybe 8PM or something, just kind of like I hadn't gone to sleep till late till two or three or four. And I woke up after a couple hours of sleep just to see if she was back and go to the bathroom.
She wasn't back. I So sent her a text, and I just went back to sleep. And in many ways,
Speaker 1: that's the greatest regret I have in my
Speaker 0: life. Because when I woke up later, it was it was much later. It was like one or two in the morning. So I went around the house and I looked for her and I noticed she hadn't even received my text my text like it hadn't normally on the phone you can see when it pings to their phone and when a person receives your text. Right?
And she still hadn't even received it, means she hadn't even looked at her phone. So they did a welfare check and the police came by and I let them come in, search the apartment, whatever, just to show she wasn't there. I hadn't, you know, didn't know what was going on and they asked if she had a vehicle and I said, yes, I believe it's down in the parkade. So we went down to the parkade and she was in her vehicle. And she was just laying there in the back seat and I thought maybe she'd I, you know, I just couldn't understand it in my mind.
I really couldn't wrap my mind around it on any level. So, but so I started trying to shake the vehicle to try to rouse her, like to try to get her up. And the she didn't move or anything like that. And the police asked me if there was a spare set of keys to run upstairs and grab the keys. And I told them to smash the windows in the vehicle, smash out the window, and get in there because I'd done emergency response for years before that, and I knew for whatever like, that if there was something going on with her that she needed help and she she needed it immediately.
So they smashed the back window, the back passenger, and they were unable to get the door open. So I had them smashed the front window, and they smashed that too, and then they were able to get into the vehicle. And I was a few feet away at the time, but I mean, I saw her laying there and they reached forward. I guess they must have grabbed her. She was either cold or something, something because they knew she was they told me she's gone.
And
Speaker 1: in that moment, I lost my mind. Right? And I don't even know if I've recovered to this day or if I ever will. To tell you the honest truth,
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
VAERS data: 90,000 reports, 700 deaths in first month. Traditional vaccine threshold: 50 deaths. Why no questions? Why no halt? Public in the dark about experimental jabs. CDC, FDA, HHS silent. Safety signals ignored. #StoptheShots https://t.co/7AfQTC2RTk
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions how many people injected with mRNA products knew they weren't receiving a traditional vaccine, suggesting many, including medical professionals, are unaware due to the perception of conspiracy.
The speaker claims there was a sufficient safety signal in VAERS to halt the rollout in January, citing almost 90,000 VAERS entries and nearly 700 deaths within the first month. They state that historically, products causing over 50 deaths have been pulled from the market.
The speaker questions why the CDC, HHS, and FDA aren't investigating this data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I really would like to know how many people of the billions who are injected with these products knew that they were being injected with something that wasn't a traditional vaccine. I'd really like to know, because I can pretty much guarantee that most people didn't. I don't even think people know today. A lot of even medical professionals, they don't know this because they're turning a blind ear to it when when it's suggested to them because it's been it's been, you know, made out to be some kind of conspiracy theory. We had enough of a safety signal from theirs to stop the rollout of these products from a safety signal perspective in January.
I'm talking, like, the 1st month after the rollout started in December 17th. We had almost 90,000, entries into theirs, spread across many age groups and almost 700 deaths. Now the last time, to my knowledge, a product went on to the market and killed more than 50 people. That product was pulled. Number of people who are considered allowed to die or become disabled or have neurological conditions or etcetera, etcetera, before the product is full.
An even better question might be why aren't we even asking questions? Why aren't the CDC, the HHS, and the FDA, the owners of this data, asking question.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
In her testimony, former CBC reporter Marianna Klowak admitted, "We betrayed the public. We broke their trust... I had witnessed the collapse of journalism... We were in fact pushing propaganda." #Transparency https://t.co/sisb3Hm5mG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that the CBC betrayed the public trust by shutting down one side of the debate, branding chosen experts as trustworthy while portraying others as spreaders of disinformation, regardless of their background. As a journalist, the speaker was contacted by people with stories of suffering, including the vaccine-injured, those who lost jobs due to vaccination status, families torn apart, depressed students, and parents agonizing over vaccinating their children. The speaker felt the burden of these untold stories and felt they had failed to give voice to their truth. The speaker witnessed the collapse of journalism and believes they were pushing propaganda, defined as one-sided information broadcast to influence opinion, or manipulative persuasion in service of an agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We, we betrayed the public, we broke their trust and we had been riding on a reputation of excellence for years. And now we were quickly shutting down one side of the debate. And how were we doing that? We branded the doctors and the experts the CBC chose that we used in our stories. We, we branded them as competent and trustworthy.
And those who questioned and challenged the narrative were portrayed as dangerous and spreading disinformation. And that was regardless of what their specialty was, what their background was, and what their experience was. And I just also want to sort of give you a window into how this affected me personally. As a veteran journalist, I, I had solid contacts in the community. I had people calling me with stories.
So I was seeing, and I was hearing, and I was absorbing all their stories of suffering and pain, and they were sharing them with me. And these stories weren't being told. Some of those were from the vaccine injured. Some, were from people who had lost their the job because of their vaccination status. Those whose families had been blown apart and they'd been ostracized.
University students who were depressed over repeated lockdowns and mandates, and parents who were calling me that were agonizing on whether they should vaccinate their child or not. So all these stories were sitting inside of me. They were left with me. And I felt the crushing burden and the weight of their their truth not being given a voice. And it affected my well-being because these people trusted me and I felt I had failed them and I had let them down.
It was like I had failed these people as a journalist to give voice to their truth. So I had witnessed, in a very short time the collapse of journalism, news gathering, investigative reporting. And the way I saw it is that we were, in fact, pushing propaganda. And to define propaganda, it's information, ideas, opinions, or images that give one part of an argument, which are broadcast, published in order to influence the person's opinion. And mental health workers have their own, definition of propaganda as manipulative persuasion in the service of an agenda.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Every province in Canada had detailed pandemic plans, all resembling and supported by the national plan. In 2005, W.H.O.'s study led to Alberta's plan redesign, rewritten in 2006 and updated in 2014. Yet, these comprehensive plans were ignored all across Canada. Why? https://t.co/nD92t8e7Sg
Video Transcript AI Summary
Every province and territory in Canada had pandemic plans similar to Alberta's. The Government of Canada's plan supported the provincial ones. In 2005, the WHO studied 15 NPIs. I helped redesign Alberta's plan in 2005 to focus on NPIs. Plans are updated every 10 years; Alberta's was in 2014.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every province and territory in Canada had plans. They had pandemic plans that look very similar to the Alberta one. All 13 of 13 are available on pandemicalternative.org because we collected them and the Government of Canada plan looked very similar to being a supporting plan for the 13 provincial plans. A supporting plan, not the leading plan. This document, the WHO document, first came out with the comprehensive study of all 15 NPIs in the summer of 2,005.
So the Deputy Minister of Health at the time asked me to co chair with her the mission analysis session where we would completely redesign the Alberta plan because NPIs had not been studied in-depth before and clearly, the Alberta plan was inappropriately based on using a number of NPIs. So that's why in 2005, we rewrote the Alberta plan. It was published in 2006 after my retirement. And it was upgraded because all hazard specific plans are rewritten every 10 years by every province and territory in Canada. Our the one in Alberta was republished in 2014 after another comprehensive review, basically looking like the one from 2,005.
In my opinion, they burnt them all.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Fear was rampant during the pandemic. Doctors labeled those refusing experimental jabs as "bad humans," fueled by top-down hate. Canadians faced a psyops operation to enforce compliance. Coercion for ineffective solutions damaged trust in public health. #cdnpoli https://t.co/8BnmDxHMJO
Video Transcript AI Summary
We all felt fear during the pandemic. Some doctors criticized those who didn't get vaccinated. The hate comes from the top down, influencing behavior. Canadians were targeted in a psyops operation by the military to create fear and compliance. Misinformation about masking affected trust in public health officials. Some people believe the vaccine doesn't work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The fear factor, we've all felt that. It was incredible, what we were dealing with. I'm I'm gonna point out just to say, you know, you're not allowed to go to hockey and and criminal acts. This is a doctor who wrote this, and wrote it about 5 or 6 days after receiving my letter. This is another doctor, stating that those of us who chose not to take the experimental jab were bad humans.
Recently, I think that the hate is sewed from the top down, there's no doubt about that. And as I say, the same as I said in my own hospital, it gives permission to people to act bad when the leader's acting bad. And what Canadians don't realize is that we were subject to a psyops operation. This is acknowledged in the CBC. The Canadian military ran a psyops operation against us.
And when they told us they were going to shut it down, they continued to do it. And that was to stoke fear and get us to be compliant. So, not acknowledging that if you course people into taking something that ultimately doesn't work, that might affect people's continued uptake on this. I think it's complete nonsense that a small group of people that have been pointing to data all the way through are responsible for the fact that our public health officials no longer have the trust they once had. You know, the masking misinformation has been a personal we masked our children like everybody else did at the beginning.
It killed me because he knew it didn't work.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Why are pregnancy outcomes and deaths hidden in a maze of links? 87 spontaneous abortions, 427 deaths—are the baby deaths included? How much federal funding is in CBC's "advertising income"? Constant government ads but no pharma ads, just disguised experts denying side effects. https://t.co/Cah1xEA49J
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks questions about pregnancy outcomes and the Liberal government platform. They discuss the CBC's income sources, suspecting hidden government funding. The conversation also touches on pharmaceutical advertising differences between Canada and the US. The speaker criticizes CBC reporters for not covering the National Citizens Inquiry, suggesting they are avoiding facing the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My question there is and you may not know the answer, but under pregnancy outcomes, it says spontaneous abortions, 87 and then it's got deaths, 427. Are the 87 deaths of the babies in the mother's tummies not included in the 400?
Speaker 1: I don't know that. And the reason is this is not an easy website to navigate. So the information is there, but it is more than likely intentionally obfuscated by you have to go through link to link to link to link. So there is was something under deaths and it says 427 and more than likely you will be able to find if they are included or if they are an additional, but I don't know what the answer is.
Speaker 0: My second question has to do with the slide you have on the Liberal government platform, 3 points that it had on there. And my question to you about that, is that the current Liberal platform?
Speaker 1: I downloaded that today.
Speaker 0: You don't know if that's the current platform?
Speaker 1: That's today.
Speaker 0: That's today.
Speaker 1: Today. That's up there. You can look that up under, platform reelection, I think it is, something like that. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So today, I just want to make sure I've got this right. So today, the platform that the Liberals are running on is require that travelers must be vaccinated, ensure that vaccines are across the federal public service and that crown corporations and federally regular workplaces will ensure that vaccines are prioritized, that is still their platform today.
Speaker 1: A reelected liberal government will is what it says, and then it gives those ones. And I've not augmented them all except to add the highlights from my own notes.
Speaker 0: I wanted to make sure I understood that. Could you also now show the graph of the income for the CBC?
Speaker 1: Yes. That is off the CBC's annual report, and the second one on the right was provided by Doctor. Jordan Peterson.
Speaker 0: My question on that is I'm looking at some of the other and I'm asking this question because I've seen it from other witnesses. There's various other items there. They've got government funding revenue. They've got, advertising. How much federal government is in their advertising income?
Because we see the federal government advertising on CBC constantly. Is there additional government funding hidden in some of those other stripes that should be in the government funding?
Speaker 1: I don't know the answer to that, but I'll tell you that I certainly suspect it. The whole thing's a sham. So then more than likely, they're hiding other things. But what's very interesting what you say about the federal government advertising, when I travel to America, I see almost entirely pharmaceutical advertising. And there are very strict rules that they must announce the side effects, and it's almost comedic to listen to the side effects.
They they list this horrible list of side effects to their their bills, and then they say, but ask your doctor about getting it. In Canada, we don't have pharma advertising on television, but we have a de facto pharma advertising in this science up first group that is disguising itself as experts, going on the CBC, and denying the side effects, saying they don't exist.
Speaker 0: Yes. Also in your slide, you don't have to bring it up, but your slide about CBC story ideas and you listed a few things about investigation, I mean, I I would I ask you, wouldn't a good source of those stories be for some CBC reporter be sitting here following the National Citizens Inquiry? And why do you think none of them have done that?
Speaker 1: I think they would have a hard time wiping the egg off their face once they realize they have blood on their hands. They're not coming. They don't wanna hear this.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Seven minutes after a COVID shot, Stephanie's mom collapsed and died. The coroner, without an examination, declared natural causes. Witnesses to her collapse stayed in line for their shots. #StoptheShots https://t.co/ZaChqXGpvL
Video Transcript AI Summary
After getting the shot at Shoppers, she texted me, then died 7 minutes later. I insisted the shot killed her healthy mom, but the coroner claimed it was natural causes without examining her. I knew they were lying.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When she was at Shoppers, right after she got the shot, she texted me and told me she was waiting her 15 minutes. And, I said, good job. And then, I think it was about 7 minutes later, she died.
Speaker 1: And then the corner came and she sat beside me and I kept saying, I was screaming out loud to the doctors, to the corner, to everybody saying, The shot killed my mom. The shot killed my mom. Like there was no way the shot did not kill my mom. My mom was healthy. She was super healthy.
There was no health problems with my mom at all. When she left my house that day, she was perfectly fine. And then she got that shot. And then she died. 7 minutes after she died.
And I see her in the hospital right after and she was gone. And so I kept telling them it was the shot. It was the shot. And the coroner hadn't even looked at my mom, hadn't even touched my mom. She just sat there right beside me in the chair.
And I said, no, it's the shot. And the coroner said, no, it's natural causes. And I knew right then, you're lying. You're lying to me. There's no way you know that.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Within the first year of COVID, billionaires' wealth surged by $1.3T. The central bank injected $5T directly into the economy. 75 million lost their jobs, and big companies thrived at the expense of small businesses. Coincidence or manipulation? #TruthMatters https://t.co/KkDdZwz0qh
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the pandemic in the United States, wealth moved upward with the number of billionaires increasing significantly. The Central Bank injected $5 trillion directly into the economy, benefiting big companies while small businesses suffered. This led to job losses and a shift in market share towards larger corporations. The imbalance in wealth distribution became more pronounced as a result of these actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What happened in the United States in the pandemic is you had an explosion of wealth moving upward. So when we started the pandemic in the United States or if we go back to 1990s, say, there were approximately 60,000,000,000 years in the United States, by the start of the pandemic, there were 614 within I think the 1st 12 months, the number of billionaires grew by 56. Well, the billionaire class grew by over $1,000,000,000,000 estimated in the U. S. To be $1,300,000,000,000 Some of that came from the fact that as part of going direct reset, the Central Bank injected approximately $5,000,000,000,000 into the economy.
And it was notably the it was notable the way it was done because it was injected instead of doing it through the reserve circuit, which is normally the way a central bank would inject money, it injected it directly into the economy. And what that did was that bubbled certain aspects of the economy. At the same time, the pandemic shut down others. So I'm going to grossly oversimplify just to help you understand what this how this works conceptually. When I inject an enormous amount of money printed by the central bank into one group of people.
And at the same time, I shut down all the businesses and the income of another group of people. I think the estimate in the 1st year was 75,000,000 people lost their jobs. So if I inject a lot of capital available to the big companies and shut down all the small companies, then, of course, the big companies are in a position to significantly increase their market share by taking it from the small companies and easily being able to pick up assets cheap because now people whose income has been lost or shut down or limited have reason to sell assets to generate money to survive.
reSee.it AI Summary
The COVID-19 mRNA injection contains 40 trillion active mRNA particles, while traditional vaccines have around 80 inactive viral particles. Dr. Shoemaker believes this difference affects the immune system, especially in children. #StoptheShots @CShoemakerMD
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Did you know: A traditional vaccine, such as the Polio vaccine, typically contains around 80 inactive viral particles. In contrast, the COVID-19 mRNA injection contains approximately 40 trillion active mRNA particles. Dr. Shoemaker suggests that this considerable difference has a notable effect on the immune system, particularly in children. #StoptheShots @CShoemakerMD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Essentially, COVID-19 vaccines are harmful due to the high number of mRNA molecules they contain, which can negatively impact the immune system. This is especially concerning for children whose immune systems are still developing. It is crucial to prevent children from receiving these vaccines to allow their immune systems to mature properly. This issue was recognized in Denmark and should also be addressed in Canada.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Essentially, what we have been forced to fight here with COVID-nineteen, it's a subtle, purposeful immunologic poison that's been put into our bodies and for which there was a plan. It's because the shots are immunotoxic to everyone that receives it, whether you're 50 or whether you're 5 years of age. It's worse in childhood because the children have such a strong immune system. Strong immune systems are what react to spike being inappropriately in their cells. And if your cells, your myocardial cells, are filled up with 40,000,000,000,000 and that's the number, by the way 40,000,000,000,000 mRNAs are in every shot you take 40,000,000,000,000.
There's only 80 viral entities that are in every polio shot you take. So if you get your 4 shots of polio over a lifetime or circumstance as a young child, you've had 3 20 little viral entities enter your body entities that are inert, entities that can't reproduce or make more polio spike if there was such a thing inside you. It just won't happen. It's just the inert shell of the virus, and the body can make a proper immune response to that. And this is bad news whether you're an adult or a child, specifically problematic for children because their innate immune system has to develop over the 1st 10 years.
And when you give this sludge into the bodies of children, you are making your innate immune system not develop. The kind of things that keep you safe in the sandbox. The kind of things that keep you safe as a 16 year old moving around the world being exposed to new things. You need a strong innate immune system that has not been hijacked by an inappropriate item put into you at age 5. So that's why it was so important for it to stop in children as quickly as it did in Denmark.
And that's why it's equally important that it happened here in Canada.
reSee.it AI Summary
In Canada, key events in 2021-2022 include authorization of Pfizer vaccine for children aged 12 and up, approval for children aged 5 to 11, and recommendation for 5 to 11-year-olds to receive a 2-dose primary series. A COVID-19 genetic vaccine for children under 5 was approved. No specific testing for adverse effects on children was done prior to approval. Unfortunately, a person named Sean Hartman passed away 33 days after receiving the COVID-19 injection. #TruthMatters #NeitherSafeNorEffective
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Timeline of Basic Events Canada 2021-2022 👉May 5, 2021: The Pfizer vaccine is authorized for use in children aged 12 and up. 👉October 30, 2021: Health Canada approves the pediatric Pfizer vaccine for children aged 5 to 11. 👉November 19, 2021: Health Canada authorizes Pfizer vaccine for children 5 to 11 years of age 👉January 28, 2022: Public Health Agency of Canada recommends children 5 to 11 receive a complete 2-dose primary series of Pfizer pediatric vaccine, and 12 to 17 receive a primary series of vaccines. 👉October 5, 2022: Health Canada approves a COVID-19 genetic vaccine for children under the age of five. No specific testing for adverse medical effects of the vaccines on children was required or performed prior to the approval and recommendation of vaccines. 👉September 27, 2021: Sean Hartman was found dead, 33 days after receiving the COVID-19 injection. (@Answers4Sean) #TruthMatters #NeitherSafeNorEffective
Video Transcript AI Summary
On September 26, 2021, Sean played hockey, then tragically passed away the next morning. He feared needles but got vaccinated to keep playing. Soon after, he had severe symptoms, but the doctor didn't find a cause. His autopsy results were inconclusive. His loved ones started a Twitter page for support, but the pain of his loss is overwhelming, especially at night. His mother, a truck driver, struggles with grief daily.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On September 26, 2021, Sean went to play hockey that night and, everything seemed okay. He came home and went to bed. And on the morning of September 27th, Sean was found dead on the floor beside his bed. Sean's biggest fear in the world was needles. He was terrified of them.
It was his biggest fear. But he wanted to play the game he loved, so he took the vaccine. 4 days after that, he went to the hospital to emergency. He had brown circles around his eyes. He was vomiting.
He had a rash and an extremely sore shoulder opposite to his injection shoulder. The doctor failed to do any blood work. He didn't do a D dimer. He didn't do a troponin test. He gave him Advil and sent him home.
He's just such a great kid. It's almost like an angel. That's how special he was. I had to wait, 3 long months for autopsy results. They did a complete autopsy with genetic testing and toxicology.
And and the cause of death is unascertained. They can't tell me why he died. They have no explanation why he died. I started a a Twitter page to get support because I was completely lost and didn't know where to turn. And, I've met some of the nicest people I've ever met in my life who support me and help me get through this.
And it's really hard though. Every day is so hard. The hardest part for me is sleeping. I I wake up every hour. I cry multiple times a day.
I'm a truck driver and so I'm alone with my thoughts all day and I think about Sean so much.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Full testimony: https://rumble.com/v3f1wpa-dan-hartman-apr-01-2023-toronto-ontario.html?mref=1sktjm&mc=2l88w
Dan Hartman - Apr 01, 2023 - Toronto, Ontario
Dan Hartman’s son Sean was an avid hockey player and was required to be vaccinated to keep playing the game he loved. Four days after receiving his shot he went to hospital with an adverse reaction. S
rumble.com
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
"What they created was not a vaccine." -Dr. Charles Hoffe Full testimony: https://rumble.com/v3qvij5-dr.-charles-hoffe-may-03-2023-vancouver-british-columbia.html?mref=1sktjm&mc=2l88w #StoptheShots
Video Transcript AI Summary
No successful coronavirus vaccine has been made. Gene-based vaccines were tested on animals, leading to sickness and death. Despite concerns about safety and lack of long-term data, Canada continued vaccine rollout. A doctor raised safety concerns, was reprimanded for causing vaccine hesitancy, and saw neurological issues in patients post-vaccination. Questions to health authorities went unanswered, leading to a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People need to know that there has never been any successful vaccine made against coronaviruses. And so when the first dangerous coronavirus appeared in 2002, which came out of Wuhan in China, which was called the SARS virus, Following that, scientists tried to make a gene based vaccine against it because all previous conventional vaccines against coronaviruses had failed to either be safe or effective. So they would test they tested this on laboratory animals. Ferrets and mink and other animals like that are very susceptible to coronaviruses and so they developed a gene based vaccine which they tested on these laboratory animals. And when they took blood from these laboratory animals that had been vaccinated, they found they had antibodies to the coronavirus and they realized that they had discovered a brilliant new cheap and effective way of making vaccines.
However, several months later, when they challenged these laboratory animals with the infectious organism that they had been vaccinated against, they found that these laboratory animals became extremely sick and many of them died. So this new type of vaccine turned out to be a complete failure. In fact, what they had created was not a vaccine, but an anti vaccine Because instead of protecting those animals against this new virus, it actually made them more vulnerable than if they had not been vaccinated. The reason why I'm telling you that is that I'm going to show you what has happened to Canada and exactly the same thing has happened here. So, when I heard that they were again using gene based vaccines against SARS CoV-two, the second SARS virus, I was not filled with hope or confidence because I knew that the previous efforts had been a disastrous failure.
And when I heard that with the new vaccines they weren't even doing animal trials, I was even more concerned. When I realized that they were rolling this out with no long term safety data, it had only been the shots had only been tested on a select group of relatively healthy adults, no children, no pregnant people, no frail elderly, no First Nations people, a lot of demographic groups that had had literally not been tested on at all. And it was Warp Speed Technology which is a disaster for any vaccine and particularly for a brand new technology that had no history of safety or effectiveness. So 2 and a half months into the vax rollout when 12 countries in Europe had already shut down the AstraZeneca vaccine because of life threatening blood clots. And Canada was continuing to barrel on with it because Trudeau said even though it wasn't safe for the people of Europe, it was fine for Canadians.
I thought that this was a significant safety signal that we could not afford to ignore. And so, I sent an email to a group of doctors, medical colleagues, doctors, nurses and pharmacists in the Littin, Lillooet area of Southern British Columbia saying, we have reached a turning point in this vaccine rollout. There is a serious safety signal in Europe. And for any healthcare practitioner to administer these shots without informing the people of the risk of harm, there is a serious liability issue for those people because there is no informed consent. I sent this as a private email to 18 colleagues.
1 of those people sent this to the regional health authorities and 3 days later, I was in a meeting with my superiors there who told me that I was guilty of causing vaccine hesitancy and that that private email was being sent to the College of Physicians and Surgeons as a complaint because I was putting people at risk by creating vaccine hesitancy. And I was told that I was not allowed to say anything negative about these vaccines in the course of my work as an emergency room doctor. And I was told that if I had any questions about them, the questions were not to be directed to my colleagues but to the medical health officer in charge of the vaccine rollout for our area. So I accepted my reprimand. I then began to see very serious neurological problems arising in my own patients.
I had been these people's family doctor for 29 years. I knew them very well. And when I saw new disease processes initiated in these people that I had no explanation with, that all started anywhere between, anywhere up to 72 hours after their shot in every case, I sent a letter to this medical health officer that I had been told to direct my questions. And I asked them what disease process was being initiated by this gene based therapy and how, as these people's doctors, should I be treating it? And I asked whether it was ethical to continue this vaccine rollout in the light of the evidence of harm.
And the silence was deafening. That letter was sent as a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Dr. Charles Hoffe - May 03, 2023 - Vancouver, British Columbia
In his attempts to bring attention to the suffering of his patients from the shots he had administered to his patients, Dr. Charles Hoffe questioned his superiors in health as to whether him submittin
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Eric Payne's career suffered after expressing his opinion against vaccinating children. His testimony in Toronto and Red Deer sheds light on his experiences.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
For saying vaccines are not right for kids, this expert doctor's career is still in ruins. https://westernstandard.news/opinion/slobodian-for-saying-vaccines-are-not-right-for-kids-this-expert-doctors-career-is-still-in-ruins/53640 "Before COVID-19 arrived, Dr. Eric Payne was a sought-after pediatric neurocritical care physician and clinical researcher in Calgary. He remains so. However, he has walked through a veil of darkness. This is what happened to him." #StoptheShots
SLOBODIAN: For saying vaccines are not right for kids, this expert doctor's career is still in ruins
The vaccine policy he fought has been quietly withdrawn
westernstandard.news
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Dr. Eric Payne's full Toronto testimony: https://rumble.com/v3f1u9e-dr.-eric-payne-apr-01-2023-toronto-ontario.html?mref=1sktjm&mc=2l88w
Dr. Eric Payne - Apr 01, 2023 - Toronto, Ontario
Dr Payne is a neurologist who questioned the efficacy of the vaccines and provided lengthy data to the College of Physicians detailing the problems associated with the mandates. He talks about how his
rumble.com
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Full Red Deer testimony: https://rumble.com/v3qu77n-dr.-eric-payne-apr-28-2023-red-deer-alberta.html?mref=1sktjm&mc=2l88w
Dr. Eric Payne - Apr 28, 2023 - Red Deer, Alberta
Testimony Code: 2304RED304"
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
According to a post, there is evidence suggesting that vaccinated individuals' hearts work 46% harder for six months, resulting in 18 million beats with close to 50% more energy required per beat. This information was presented by Dr. Shoemaker at #ICS5. The post also mentions Dr. Shoemaker's full NCI testimony. #StoptheShots.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
"If your heart is having to work 46% harder than a non-vaccinated person's heart, for six months, that's 18 million beats... Every one of those beats is at close to 50% more energy required than a [unvaccinated] person's heart. It only happens after the vaccine." There is now evidence of this from Tokyo, Oxford, New York, and Houston. @CShoemakerMD presentation at #ICS5 #StoptheShots
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses concerns about the origins of COVID-19 and the risks of childhood vaccination. They highlight a study showing increased heart inflammation in vaccinated individuals, urging for vaccine mandates to be dropped and vaccines to be reviewed. The study from Tokyo, New York, and Houston reveals that vaccinated individuals have 46% higher heart glucose uptake, indicating increased heart strain. The speaker emphasizes the need to address these findings and stop the potential harm caused by vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we're going to talk a little bit in the cardiologic vein shortly. But I felt I just want to make a quick comment about the sad news on tumor and oncogenesis. It's pretty exhausting to see that, isn't it? It's pretty exhausting to think that certain people were whispering in Fauci's ear to try to make something real nasty, real interesting, research some terribly difficult things. Maybe call it something that would be beneficial to mankind as he got Dazik and others to do it over in Wuhan.
But they did their thing, they made it as toxic as they did. I don't know who all the theys are, I don't know who whispered in Fauci's ear, I don't know what elements of the deep state had a stake in this. But elements of the deep state does have a stake in this. You'll have to ask them what their morality is. You'll have to ask them why.
But those words and eminent stories about cancer, oncogenesis that we've let this happen to ourselves and we're having to run around, try to fix something that's been humanly generated, it's pretty awful. What I'll now show you is a wonderful hero of all of ours who has always spoken after Zeb Zelenko and among many others. Doctor McCullough has a few words on cardiology for us to listen to from about a year ago. Thank you.
Speaker 1: As we sit here today, my estimates are 95% of Americans who have died of COVID 19, and we're approaching nearly a million of these poor souls. And tens of millions of hospitalizations could have been avoided with a comprehensive early treatment approach. So as we sit here today, if the topic of discussion is childhood vaccination, It is clear based on publications of representative data that the risks far outweigh any potential benefits of vaccinating children, and the data are clear. And in the last few weeks now, reports have come in, One from Connecticut with oversight from the pathology from the University of Michigan and from the University of Minnesota on 2 teenage boys who died on days 3 4 after the Pfizer vaccine. And the parents were horrified to find the children dead at home.
Autopsies were performed, and the conclusion was crystal clear, the vaccines caused the death with massive heart inflammation and evidence of superimposed catecholamine injury on the heart. Fatal reports have come in from Choi and from Verma, Choi and Korea, Verma from Washington University in Saint Louis. It is clear that a vaccine is being pushed, is being encouraged in mandating that in fact results in death of children. Results in death of children. One death is too many.
As I've shared with you, in millions of children receiving the the vaccine, they don't die of COVID 19 respiratory illness. But in fact, they die
Speaker 0: of the
Speaker 1: vaccine. It's my viewpoint as a physician and as a public citizen that all vaccine mandates should immediately be dropped and all current vaccines be pulled from the market and undergo a very intensive review on safety and efficacy and figure out where the vaccine program has gone wrong. Those are my comments. Thank you.
Speaker 0: And my comment would be that that careful review should last about 7 years. And it should start tomorrow. And there should not be an RNA platform vaccine being used anywhere in the world as instantly as we can make that happen. We're now going to talk further on the cardiology aspect from study from Nakahara in Tokyo. Doctor.
Nakahara was from Keio University in Tokyo. He also had participation from the cardiology department of Mount Sinai in New York City. Also, participation from University of Oxford in England. And fourthly, with participation from the McGovern Medical School in Houston, Texas. And all 4 of these locations were required because of the multiple types of PET scans that would have to be assessed.
And they assessed it over about a year and a quarter. From out of it, if we could have just the, that's our first slide, very good and that's the size of it. Okay. Well, essentially that's the front page of the study. And it's stating that FDG is it's called, which is a fluorinated form of glucose, which is picked up on a PET scan and which you can see the heart how hard it's working.
And if we could go ahead now from to the next slide, if you'd be so kind. Thank you. This is normal looking bodily and cardiac tissue in any of us. Everything's a little bit of a soft gray, except for the brain. Look at the brain just glowing away there with using glucose.
My goodness, it turns black because it's picking up so much glucose and utilizing it. The brain needs sugar. The brain can't burn or metabolize fats and other things. It can only burn and utilize for its energy sources sugar. So there's the brain looking normally black.
Notice that down in the kidneys there's a little bit of kidney, kidneys of course are dealing with sugar, and they excrete it even into the bladder at the bottom a little bit of a black circle there. So in a moment, we'll be seeing new black spots that we don't normally see. And this is what Nakara Hara, doctor Nakahara and others have shown us that everyone who gets a double COVID shot has harm to their heart. Not 2%, 3% getting the myocarditis. No, not just that.
There is an FDG evidence of extra work. And to me, extra work means harm. If your heart is having to work 46% harder than a non vaccinated person's heart, and it has to do it for 6 months. That's 18,000,000 beats. You're setting yourself up for your heart to beat 18,000,000 times in 6 months, and every one of those beats is at close to 50% more energy requiring than a normal person's heart.
And it only happens after the vaccine. And here's the proof coming up. We can go past that to one more slide. Thank you so much, Robert. The first two on the left are unvaccinated individuals.
By the way, there were 300 unvaccinated individuals in the study. They were being PET scanned for tumor follow ups, certain kind of inflammatory conditions and the like that was requiring PET scan follow-up. It wasn't because of heart disease, it was just regular folks. 300 of whom were unvaccinated, 700 of whom were vaccinated. 2 unvaccinated are on the left.
Dark black brain with lots of sugar. Heart looking pale gray, no excess sugar utilization in those 2 unvaccinated hearts. You look on the right hand side, you see all the sugar uptake of course normally in the brain again. Oh my goodness, down in the heart it's a dark black as the brain. That's a very big deal ladies and gentlemen.
Doctor McCullough would tell you that a 10 to 12 percent elevation of uptake of this glucose nuclei would be a very dangerous thing. He would be very, very concerned for that patient because they're having a 10 to 12 percent elevation in this index. This is showing that degree of blackness is literally a 46% elevation of glucose uptake going on in the heart. And similarly with the last one on the right, not quite as deep and dark as the third one over, but still deep and dark comparatively speaking. The left ventricle in particular is working really hard in that last patient to the right.
And if you look below those 2 patients, you'll see that black crescent of the myocardial tissue in a severe black crescent of glucose uptake. And this is not imaginary. This is real and it's for a reason and it's only in vaccinated folks. It doesn't happen. See the nice pale gray circles to the left?
It doesn't happen in unvaccinated people. Only in the 700 vaccinated patients of the 1,000 patient study, they had this change. And you'd see it in a colorific sense, the deep red never appears in the 2 unvaccinated people to the left for the and it appears severely in the right. The overall figure was a 46% elevation of effort and inflammation in the heart, basically of everyone because this was averaged. It was averaged.
Maybe there was one out of those 300 people who didn't have it but the other 299 must have had it massively. Basically, everybody is getting a message to the heart, you gotta work harder. And that message is only existent because of what the other doctors have already told you about. Your heart is being attacked, it's not yet at a myocarditis level, but it is being attacked. And your body is doing its best to cope and to keep up.
If we could have the final slide or the coastal final slide. In this one, again, to the left are 2 patients who actually got 2 scans. They got it before they got the shot. They got it the scan done after they got the shots. To the left, not little bit of action on one of them.
But look to the right. It it aggregated, it worsened. Whatever was the degree of heart inflammation or heart extra work and heart extra glucose uptake, It raised up in both individuals. This is an individual case not a group case. But in these two individuals in both instances they went from less black to more black.
Column 1 is less black before the shots. Column 2, more black, heavy black after the shots. A goal will go to 3, that's a new patient. Again, before the shots in column 3, pale gray, not much going on, normal glucose uptake. Column 4, do you want that to be your heart?
Take a look at column 4. Do you want that? These people were asymptomatic. These people had no complaints. They were just having their standard cancer care and and they, they they did it in a very sophisticated manner.
They made sure that there were no confounding factors. And the 1,000 patients put into the study were clean and pure in terms of not being inappropriately affected by confounding factors such as having had some chest radiotherapy or anything like that. All such patients were taken out. So these were average folks. Actually, from the point of view of the heart, they were average.
And their hearts were no longer average. They went from gray levels of glucose uptake to black levels. 46 to 56 Sorry, 46 to 50 percent higher effort. We don't need that. I don't know if I have one more slide.
If we do, I'll take a look. And if we don't, that's okay. Thank you, Robert. If we just Oh, no. Just that's fine.
We're done. What I'll finish by saying let me just check my time. It's great being here today. My heart after my 2 shots, it's still ticking. Doesn't feel as good as it should.
I know not just from studies that things aren't optimal. I know from stories that it's not optimal. I know from seeing soccer players falling on the pitch when they're 22 and dead. I know that hearts are not optimal and normal. And we now have the evidence from Tokyo, from Oxford, from New York and Houston.
We have evidence, absolute evidence since September of 2023 that all hearts work 46% harder for 6 to 8 months after the jabs. Oh, bless us all. We know we're right. We have to stop it. Thank you.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Dr. Shoemaker's full NCI testimony: https://rumble.com/v3ygd7s-dr.-christopher-shoemaker-may-19-2023-ottawa-ontario.html
Dr. Christopher Shoemaker - May 19, 2023 - Ottawa, Ontario
Dr. Christopher Shoemaker presents a stunning overview of vaccines and the pandemic. In an appeal to the doctors of the world, Dr. Shoemaker pleads, "So dear doctors of the world, let’s none of us be
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Edward Dowd discusses the repercussions of COVID response, highlighting three dimensions: Excess Deaths, Excess Disability, and Lost Work Time. The post-vaccine rollout in 2021 saw a surge of 500,000 excess deaths, with a shift from older to younger populations. In 2020, those aged 65 and above accounted for 73% of excess deaths, decreasing to 57% in 2021. @DowdEdward #StoptheShots
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Delving into the complexities of COVID response repercussions, Edward Dowd unveils three critical dimensions: Excess Deaths, Excess Disability, and Lost Work Time. Shockingly, the post-vaccine rollout in 2021 saw an alarming surge of 500,000 excess deaths, marking a significant shift from older to younger populations. In 2020, those aged 65 and above bore 73% of excess deaths, a proportion plummeting to 57% in 2021, with younger cohorts accounting for 43%. @DowdEdward #StoptheShots
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mister Ed Dowd from Finance Technology discussed the human and economic costs of pandemic policies in the US since 2021. He highlighted a significant increase in excess deaths and disabilities among the working-age population post-vaccine rollout, emphasizing the need for further studies. The data used for analysis was deemed indisputable and compared to actuarial tables from the insurance industry. Despite challenges in obtaining insurance data, the findings point to a concerning trend of excess mortality and disabilities linked to the vaccine. The information is available on their website for reference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our next participant is mister Ed Dowd. Mister Dowd is currently a founding partner of Finance Technology, spelled with p h. He has worked on wall street most of his career for firms such as HSBC, Donaldson, Lufkin and Genrette, Independence Investments and most notably at Black Rock as a portfolio manager where he managed a $14,000,000,000 growth equity portfolio for 10 years. Mister Dowd.
Speaker 1: Thank you, senator Johnson. A pleasure to be here and an honor. At Finance Technologies, which was founded in June of 2022, we've been tracking excess deaths, disabilities and injuries across the globe, mostly Western nations. But today, I am going to speak to
Speaker 0: the U.
Speaker 1: S. And we are going to talk about our estimated human and economic costs of the pandemic policy since, 2021. Here's my statement. The US government, along with the WHO, declared a pandemic in 2020 and a number of policy responses that we were told would slow the spread of COVID 19 and allow us to come up with a vaccine in record time dubbed Operation Warp Speed. The 2020 repulse policy responses included societal lockdowns, masking and social distancing.
In 2021, we began the rollout of a vaccine solution that was predominantly a novel mRNA based technology with the vendors predominantly being Pfizer and Moderna. The solution this solution had never undergone human trials prior 2020 and was approved under an EUA in late 2020 within record time for a vaccine and a noticeably short trial period. The government deemed these products safe and effective and told the nation they prevent you from getting and transmitting COVID 19. These statements have since been proven false. It has become clear that the U.
S. Government, along with the health regulators, do not desire an honest accounting of these policies that were imposed mostly under federal mandates. I will, predominantly focus on the human and economic costs since the beginning of 2021, which if they were favorable to the current regime, you would be hearing them scream these results from the rooftops. I will focus on 3 buckets, which we break down as excess deaths, excess disabilities and lost work time, in other words, injuries. When analyzing the excess death human costs, it's interesting to note that in 2020, there were approximately 458,000 excess deaths, of which 73% were aged 65 and older and 15 to 64 comprising just 27%.
Note, we were told in 2020 that the COVID nineteen risk of death is primarily in the older populations. However, in 2021, with the rollout of the quote unquote safe and effective vaccine, there were approximately another 500,000 excess deaths, but a mix shift had occurred from older to younger. In 2021, the 65 plus age category was 57%. Remember, it was 73% in 2020 of the total while the 15 to 64 cohort increased to 43%. The absolute excess death increase from 20 to 21 for the productive working age 15 to 64 was 73%.
So in 2020, 124,000 people perished excessively. And then in 2021, it rose to 215,000, 73%. For for a virus that kills old people, this mix shift is an epic failure for the so called vaccine solution. The total excess death since the rollout of the vaccine in the US, including 21, 22, and 23 is approximately 1,100,000. We estimate the economic cost to productive working age people dying at 15.6 1,000,000,000.
When analyzing disabilities, it is interesting to note that there were no excess disabilities in 2020. Using the civilian labor force, we have calculated an increase of 2,300,000 individuals with disabilities costing the economy an estimated 77,000,000,000. We want to note that the excess disability number for total population 16 plus is 3 a half 1000000. When analyzing lost work time, which we call injuries, we estimate 28,400,000 individuals are chronically absent, resulting in an estimated economic cost of 135,000,000,000 since 2021. Work time loss peaked in 2022 at 67% above the 20 19 timeframe and has since dropped to 22% in 2023.
So there has been improvement, but it's still standard deviations above the long term trend. To sum up the post pandemic policy scorecard since 2021, excess deaths, 1,100,000 total with 300,000 in the 15 to 64 age group for a total cost of $15,600,000,000 Excess disabilities, $2,300,000 $3,500,000 for total population, estimated cost, 77,000,000 dollars Excess worth excess lost work time, 28,400,000 individuals, estimated cost, 135,000,000,000 Total human cost is 33,000,000 and total economic cost, 227,000,000. 33,000,000 is about 10% of the US population. If you assume it's vaccine related, that's 13% of the vaccinated population if you assume 20 5% did not get on the did not get the vaccine. It should be noted this compares to 458,000 excess deaths, 0 excess disabilities and a total economic cost of 50,000,000,000 for 2020.
Obviously, the policy cure was undeniably worse than the illness. We at Finance Technologies understand that there may be many cofactors in these results, but we believe the vaccine introduction is predominantly responsible for what we are calling the post pandemic policy scorecard. The blame of the vaccine could be the blame of the vaccine could be put to rest if studies were conducted of vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals. Independently of whether it's the vaccine or not, as a nation, we should all collectively want to know what is actually causing these tragic health results. However, the silence by the health authorities and the US Government strongly suggest they know the answer to that question.
Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister Dowd. Now, again, you're a a finance guy. You're a numbers guy. You're not a doctor. And one of the reasons you stepped forward is because our federal agencies aren't conducting the studies.
They simply don't want to know, in in my mind. So you you threw out a lot of numbers there. First of all, can you just talk about the quality of your data? Again, what as as you heard with my oversight letters, they're not providing their analysis of their VAERS, you know, their safety surveillance systems. So now people like you, and there are other people that are just taking a look at death statistics or disability statistics.
Those take a while to be published. But talk about just the quality and really the indisputable nature of the data that you've used to come up with this analysis.
Speaker 1: Yes. So we we've calculated excess deaths, disabilities and injuries. Excess deaths, we wrote methodology papers on how we calculate them. We 3 different methods. We prefer the second method.
These can be compared to the actuarial tables from the insurance industry, which saw similar excess death in their group life policy. So these excess deaths are undeniable. What is going on currently is certain governments are now changing how they calculate these numbers. The, ONS just announced a change to the calculation methodology for their excess death number, which reduces obviously the excess deaths because they like that result better. We suspected that might happen.
So that's why we wrote our methodology papers and published them in September of 2022. And, the actuarial tables that the insurance companies use haven't changed. So excess deaths are continuing. The insurance companies are seeing the same excess mortality, especially in the working age population. So these deaths are undeniable.
This is you can't you can't hide the dead bodies, unfortunately.
Speaker 0: So, again, you publish all your information on your your website. Was it One America? Is that the insurance company that it's kind of the first revelation of this, was it for insurance company out of Indiana?
Speaker 1: One America CEO Scott Davis in a Chamber of Commerce, meeting revealed that he had seen 40% excess mortality in the, millennial age group, 25 through 44 and even as high actually for 25 through 64. And he said that's 10% increase be once in a 200 year flood or a 3 standard deviation event. 40% was off the charts. Just off the charts.
Speaker 0: And we haven't really heard anything since that point in time other than from people like you. What what because we tried helping you get insurance data and we were just pretty well blocked. The insurance companies, they did not want to cooperate with us and provide us their information. Can you talk a little bit about that?
Speaker 1: Yes. So what they're doing is, unfortunately, there's still a lot of controversy in the insurance industry where a lot of people don't even wanna look at the vaccine issue. A lot of these CEOs mandated and got the jab themselves. They're in a state of denial. They have raised prices in group life policy, so the losses are less now.
Losses will be coming in whole life policies due to a Byzantine accounting dynamic. So we expect to see reserves taken once they lower their long term mortality assumptions and or raise their long term mortality assumptions, I should say. And we'll see losses start running through their P and Ls this year and next. With it, I have whistleblowers and there's been discussions at board level meetings about the continued excess mortality, and they dance around every issue, except the vaccine. Not mentioned.
Speaker 0: So, again, you you talked about an awful lot of numbers, but my big takeaway is that what you found out is in working age population, there was just an extraordinary increase in excess deaths and disabilities starting in 2021. Not 2020 during the pandemic before we had a vaccine, but after the vaccine rollout. I mean, is that pretty much your
Speaker 1: That that that that's correct. And that's my thesis as to why the vaccine causes. There was a huge mix shift from old to young starting in 21. Disabilities weren't apparent in 2020. And if you look at disability numbers, and you can you can drill down into them, the rate of change for the employed in our country in disabilities between 2021 2023 was 38%.
So that was a rate of change increase of 38% versus the general US population, which has been 9. And not in labor force, only 4%.
Speaker 0: So I encourage everybody to go look at his data and it's indisputable, basically. So thank you, mister Dowd.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Watch Edward Dowd's full NCI testimony here 👇 https://rumble.com/v3qvi85-edward-dowd-may-03-2023-vancouver-british-columbia.html
Edward Dowd - May 03, 2023 - Vancouver, British Columbia
Mr. Edward Dowd, a veteran Wall Street investment manager and founder of the Humanity Project, presents the U.S. data derived from insurance companies during the COVID vaccines and mandates. When spea
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
In my posts, I discuss the hospital environment during COVID-19, including nurses creating dancing videos on social media. I also explore the choices nurses had to make regarding COVID-19 vaccines and the reported losses of healthcare staff due to mandates by public officials. #CanadaHealthcare
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Cindy Campbell illustrates the hospital environment amid COVID-19, shedding light on the circumstances that allowed nurses to create dancing videos on social media. Additionally, she delves into the choices nurses faced regarding COVID-19 vaccines and explores the discrepancy in reported losses of healthcare staff attributed to mandates by public officials. #CanadaHealthcare
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the pandemic, many operating rooms were closed, leaving a surplus of staff. Nurses were often assigned to less critical tasks like testing and surveillance, which contradicted the perception of them being overworked. The staff had more free time than ever before, as seen in videos of them dancing and goofing around. However, the public was not given an accurate picture of the situation. Nurses were given the option to resign without negative consequences, which many younger nurses chose to do to protect their future in the profession. This information was not properly conveyed, leading to misunderstandings about the healthcare system's losses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I think people didn't understand about the pandemic is, let's say, you were to take an area like the operating room, let we had let's call it, let's say we have 16 rooms. When you start closing those rooms, down to say emergency rooms only, which is what they did, so let's say that was I forget, let's call it 5 ORs functioned out of 16, you now have a surplus of staff, that you, because again, you can't just tell people not to come in when they have have been booked or are secured or guaranteed work, part time, full time staff. Recovery room is also staffed to accommodate that number of, of patients which was dramatically reduced. From what I was seeing, there was a lot of excess nurses that were often being used to do quite menial jobs, not menial, important, but jobs that wouldn't necessarily have conveyed what what the nurses at that time were being depicted as being quite stressed out and overworked. A lot of them were doing, testing, surveillance of people coming into the hospital, that kind of thing.
And, I did note that the staff rooms were amply full of staff. And, just, you know, like when you see those, videos of the staff dancing and doing the conga lines and the the pillows in their pants and stuff and goofing around, that would have been a a a fantasy for me it in my work to be able to have that much time. Never in my history of work would have we been able to have danced around. That's never. Again, I think what a lot of people aren't understanding when they're told about losses in health care is they're not given an accurate picture.
We hear people like, Doris Grinspun, from the RNAO, disqualifying and just dismissing this as a small few, a small few number. Meanwhile, what they're not telling people is that, the hospital at that time said to nurses and everyone, hey. If you if you wanna leave right now, leave, and we won't put a black mark on your record, and we won't report you to the college, because it is processed that once every time a nurse is is terminated, that report would go to the CNO. And of course, justifiably, that worries and concerns a lot of nurses. So a lot of nurses resigned, and possibly even, I can't say it was equal number or even more, I don't know, but let's just say that anyone younger looking to, keep working in the profession, for very numerous reasons would have much more taken the opportunity to have accepted the resignation route versus the termination route.
reSee.it AI Summary
In Canada, Influenza cases drastically decreased from 55,379 to just 69 in 2020-2021. Dr. Stephen Bate proposes renaming the illness and highlights variations in vaccination rates for individuals over 70 in Newfoundland and Labrador. Check out his analysis here: nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/witness/dr-stephen-bate/
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
In Canada, Influenza cases plummeted from 55,379 to a mere 69 between 2020 - 2021. Dr. Stephen Bate raises an intriguing possibility, suggesting a potential renaming of the illness. He offers a visualization of PCR cycles and scrutinizes the discrepancies in vaccination rates for individuals over 70 in Newfoundland and Labrador. https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/witness/dr-stephen-bate/ #cdnpoli
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker discusses the significant reduction in confirmed influenza cases in the United States and Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. They mention that in the US, there was a 99.995% reduction in cases, while in Canada, the numbers dropped from 55,379 to 69. The speaker suggests that this may be due to a renaming of cases or the high cycle thresholds used in PCR testing. They also mention discrepancies in reporting and vaccination status data in Newfoundland and Labrador. The speaker notes that all 11 deaths reported in a specific period were fully vaccinated individuals, and they personally know unvaccinated individuals over the age of 70.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I looked at data for the influenza virus. And in the USA in 20 19 2020, there were 36,000,000 cases confirmed. And in 2020, 2021 flu season, there's no data. They said it was too little to find and I did find one reference and the number was 1675. This represents a 99.995 percent reduction in influenza cases confirmed in the United States.
Infer what you will. In Canada, those numbers went from 55,379 to 69 the following year. And I know that, say what you like. It seems something may have gotten renamed. But at the end of the day, there were more COVID cases reported than flu cases previously.
So how did that happen? I'd like to point out one thing with my bit of a mathematical mind. I looked into the, Cycle thresholds were being run on PCR tests. In Newfoundland and Labrador where I'm from, they're running at 45. Now I know Doctor.
Carey Mullis who developed the PCR test, stated that anything above about 26 cycle thresholds was meaningless because there's too many false positives. To put it into perspective, I did a little math. And if you have a loony in your hand. Your duty is worth $1. And if you ran that at 45 cycle threshold, which is to multiply it by 2 45 times, it's a effort of magnification.
It comes out to over $31,000,000,000,000 To put that into a more visual, perspective, that one loony weighs 7 grams. And if you took 7 grams and multiply that by 2 45 times, You'd have the mass of enough Titanics to lay end to end for 1200 kilometers. In Newfoundland and Labrador, they've they've been Doing pie charts, they've stopped. I'll I'll everyone I've talked to point out their discrepancies have ceased to report vaccination status data. So, but in Newfoundland and Labrador, all told, I think we've had 3 or 400 deaths.
I haven't looked at it recently. They haven't reported it recently, so I don't But I know that between May 11th June 8, 2022, there were 11 deaths reported, and they used to do daily updates and say how many cases were from which area, which age groups and so forth? They noted in that release on June 8, 2022 that of the 11 deaths, very sadly and tragically, one had occurred. Our first death in the under 20 age group and the same time another one was reported in the 30 to 39 age group. And to to this date, they are still the only 2 under the age of 40.
All 11 deaths that week were fully vaccinated. So not a single unvaccinated person under the age of 40 has died in Newfoundland and Labrador from attributed to COVID during the entire pandemic. I also know personally that in Newfoundland and Labrador, they've reported for almost a year now that a 100% of the over 70 population is fully vaccinated. Personally, I know about 20 people in 2, small towns totaling about 14,000 people, Globertown and And, Gander, I have a list of 21 people over the age of 70 that are unvaccinated. And for this to be true, for the 100% to be not 9.9, there could only be 31 in the whole province.
Dr. Stephen Bate - Mar 16, 2023 - Truro, Nova Scotia - National Citizen's Inquiry - Canada's Response To Covid-19
Dr. Bate is a career dental surgeon who is also a skilled mathematician and statistician. During the pandemic he thoroughly evaluated the official government statistics related to Covid that were released and found numerous inconsistencies, including the numbers of adverse events that were removed.
nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
reSee.it AI Summary
In a profound discussion, Michelle Leduc Catlin reconnects with Sammy Monaghan, who shares her challenges with her late son's blood transfusion. Sammy reveals a policy change by Canada Blood Services, prohibiting specific family members from donating. She sheds light on the pressure she faced at Halifax IWK Children's Hospital, risking parental rights. Sammy advocates for safe blood and believes COVID-19 mRNA ingredients compromise the supply. Learn more at https://safeblood.ca/en/.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Michelle Leduc Catlin reconnects with Samantha (Sammy) Monaghan in a profound Follow-Up Friday discussion, delving into the challenges Sammy faced with her late son following a blood transfusion from a vaccinated blood supply. Sammy reveals startling insights about Canada Blood Services, highlighting a policy change since 2019 that prohibits requesting transfusions from specific family members. She shares her experiences at the Halifax IWK Children's Hospital, shedding light on the pressure she endured to accept the transfusion, risking the loss of parental rights. Sammy has embarked on a mission for safe blood, advocating for choice in transfusion recipients, asserting that the blood supply is compromised by COVID-19 mRNA ingredients. Explore her journey at https://safeblood.ca/en/. #FridayFeeling
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Sam shares her heartbreaking story about her son's death due to a tainted blood transfusion. She explains that her son had a rare genetic condition called fumarate deficiency and needed regular blood transfusions. However, when she tried to donate her own blood or find a safe blood donor, she was denied by Canadian Blood Services. Sam believes that the blood supply is tainted and that the organization is more concerned with profit than patient safety. She is now working with Safe Blood Canada to raise awareness and advocate for the ability to choose safe blood donors. Sam urges parents to do their research and be cautious about what they inject into their children's bodies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, Sam.
Speaker 1: Hi. How are you?
Speaker 0: I'm good. Thank you. How are you doing?
Speaker 1: Well, I finally got moved. It's kind of been a whirlwind since I lost my son. It will be a year, November 21. So, yeah, I had to sell my stuff and kind of lose everything and then I ended up moving 3 hours past outside the city because the housing market is completely nuts. And, so I have just been looking for work and trying to, still do some research on this whole vaccine thing and blood and I've been doing, my research and all that stuff as well as looking for employment and suffering with depression, of course, because of my son.
But, other than that, I've been quite busy with all that stuff.
Speaker 0: So let's just go back because that you just Covered a huge amount of Yeah. Information there, and I wanna go back for Those people who haven't seen your testimony. So with all of these follow-up interviews, I encourage people to go watch the original testimony. In your case, you have a unique, a unique testimony for the NCI, Because we're not talking about a vaccine injury, we're talking about a tainted blood vaccine Death.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. The death of your son.
Speaker 0: So I'm I'm not even sure where to begin because it's So I can't imagine everything that you're dealing with. But I want to go back to the beginning Where you found out that your son needed a blood transfusion, and you actually Guy, I think you said 300 plus people?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I had about 300 donors plus my father, plus Plus, his father and I, were both o positive, so we could have donated blood to him as well. And it's not that I didn't want him to have the blood. I just wanted him to have safe blood because I've been studying this. I've been in natural medicine.
I don't do vaccines. I try to stay away from the drugs. Only in medical emergencies would I even go that route. So, He's been all natural, organic, looked after extremely well, and that's why he was doing so well Other than the issues I had with his weight, which was connected to his genetic condition. Other than that, you know, we were doing really well.
Speaker 0: Let's start there. Let's go back to your son had a genetic condition. What was that condition? And then explain the things you were doing to keep him well.
Speaker 1: He had a rare genetic condition called fumarate deficiency, and he's the only one in Canada and there's like 25 cases worldwide. So it's a mutation in the gene, and you could carry that gene and never ever know and show no symptoms of carrying that mutation in the gene, but if you meet up with another person, then you could have a child with fumarate deficiency and it's a terminal illness And it controls your Krebs cycle which controls the metabolism and it's kind of like the motor to your body working properly. And, which caused polymicrogyria, which was a brain disorder I was dealing with which caused seizures. And they told me that he was also blind. I think he could see.
He reacted to lights and my face and things like that. I don't know if he could see a 100%, but I knew he could see something. They also said that he couldn't hear, but That turned out that he could hear. And, anyways, they told me that I probably had about 6 or 7 months with him and that he would pass away, but He ended up living and he was doing really well. I really didn't know what to do with him because it was I had 2 children previously and I had always healthy children, so to have a child that was this ill was really hard for me but I had a background in naturopathic medicine so I just started doing natural remedies.
I took him to chiropractor, osteopath For his spine, I put him on herbs and a certain diet for his seizures. I tried to cater, like, the high fat and raw diet and ended up getting rid of the seizures. And he would have partial seizures, but they were very, very short, Probably about 5 seconds long. They didn't harm him any, so I didn't see any need of being on medication because they weren't impacting his life or Putting him in any type of danger. And the medication, when we did have him on seizure medication, made it worse.
It wasn't making him sicker. So So I ended up taking him off the seizure medication and putting him on just CBD oil and everything went beautifully. And he lived a long life and, he was probably the 2nd oldest child in Canada To be as old as he was, and he'd still be alive today and still thriving if If what happened didn't happen. So So Yeah.
Speaker 0: But first, I just wanna acknowledge, like, that's Incredible that his life expectancy was 6 to 7 months, and because of the incredible lengths you went to to treat him naturally, That he was alive at 11 years old.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Fumorase deficiency is incompatible with life. You can't live with a, fumarate deficiency. You can't live with levels above 45, and his was 6,000. So obviously, his body found a way around his PrEP cycle and completed the cycle.
I don't know if it's just because of what I was doing, or he just He just needed to be with me, you know, I don't know why it happened the way it did, but it seems if you don't, like, The way that I treated him, it seemed to prolong his life, And I I was really happy with what I did the way I did it because it made it made everything a lot easier.
Speaker 0: Okay. So a year ago, approximately a year ago, you discovered that he needed a blood transfusion. So what happened that that came about?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Sometimes kids with Fumorase Deficiency can have issues with their their hemoglobin or their iron stores, which I always kept track of. But with COVID happening, I wasn't able to get in as much as I liked. I lost my nursing care. Everything went to hell And, I wasn't up to par with the blood as I should have been, but I was going probably every 3 to 6 months. But he was doing well because I would supplementate his iron stores with iron and multivitamin and healthy foods.
So I'm assuming his levels were fine. But, the day that I went in, he had a swollen elbow. So, I would always go in if there was anything that I felt Abnormal. And then I would get his, port flushed. I had a nurse that would come and flush his port.
I would go in and test his blood to make sure his levels were fine. And that day I went in to check his levels, his hemoglobin was extremely low. They said 25, but I never did see the blood results, and I never did get his medical files. And I've said, okay. No problem.
So, we will get Luke's blood transfusion, and I wanna be his donor. And and then that's I was refused right away. I could not be his donor. I said, okay, well, I have other people, like over 300 people that can donate to my son That's non vaccinated and you know my views on it. They know what kind of parent I was.
I was outside the box. They know that I was alternative parent, that I treated my son holistically. So they know this because they lived with me in that hospital for 11 years. They knew my personality. They knew what I was like.
And they knew I was a good spokesperson for my son. I was completely turned away from Canadian Blood Services, And they told me that that couldn't be done, that I couldn't be a donor. And they stopped that. They said in 2019, And, I would have to take the blood from the blood clinic.
Speaker 0: So in 2019, they stopped the option To donate your own blood?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Which is kind of kind of weird. Kind of adds up to 2020 When all this started happening.
Speaker 0: That's, an interesting coincidence.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And I'm on an organization now with Safe Blood, so I, it's a business That's run by George Delta, and he's from Switzerland. So we are Trying to organize something in Canada with safe blood. But again, we're going through all these avenues where people want to Store their blood or people want to have people to come in and donate their blood and everybody is being refused. The only safe way is auto transfusion, and we don't even know if that can even be done in the hospitals anymore.
Speaker 0: So okay. I I really wanna get this straight because I this is really shocking to me that so you're You cannot store your store your own blood. And and the option doesn't exist. The option doesn't exist to Donate your own blood.
Speaker 1: No. There's nowhere this is stored and the, Canadian Blood Services is completely denying it. Now I did do a little bit of research on the Canadian blood service.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: So it's there
Speaker 0: there's I think there's a slight delay. They're denying what? That that's not a possibility? Or what is it they're denying?
Speaker 1: It's not a possibility. They they don't do that. It has to be The Canadian Blood Services blood or you don't get anything or you die. That's that's your options. And I know this because I'm on the Board for Safe Blood.
I'm the team leader for Safe Blood Canada. And I know this because I talk to people on a daily basis that are being refused. People have to go for surgeries, And if that surgery doesn't go good and they need blood, they're shit out of luck. They can't they can't do auto transfusion. They've been denying that.
And not only have they been denying auto transfusion, they've been denying anybody to use their own blood from their partner or whoever would be a match. The only thing I can think of
Speaker 0: Previous to 2019, that was a possibility?
Speaker 1: People, yeah, people were people were getting blood transfusion from their family members or their their child was getting it from their parent, whoever, but The best blood to get for your child is your blood because you created that child. It should always come from the parent. And I think the reason I've done my research on the Canadian Blood Services. So basically, they collect the blood for free. We give it to them and then they sell it back to the province with our tax dollars and then pay it for salaries and compensations of $308,000,000.
And their total revenue for income is in the billions, $1,000,000,000. $1,000,000,000, that's a big number. It's in the 1,000,000,000. So that's their total revenue. They're bringing in 1,000,000,000 of dollars off free blood.
So That's probably another reason why they don't want people to use their own blood because they won't be making the money that they're making now. They're making 1,000,000,000 of dollars off people's blood. And if they start letting people store their blood, Then they have to admit maybe there's something wrong with the blood supply. Maybe we should look into that.
Speaker 0: I so first of all, I think most Canadians would be as shocked as I am right now to find out that Canadian Blood Services Is a revenue generating company that is making that profit that we're actually paying for. So people donate thinking that, you know, they're donating their blood for free. But this company is making money.
Speaker 1: They also had some interesting expenses too, which was $28,000,000 in professional and consulting fees. These are large numbers. Large numbers. And I can give you the data of what we did to get all this research. And it was it was pretty shocking.
So that's a big reason why they they they don't let people store their own blood or Let their family members give their blood to to them. And there's a big, big right now, it's really big for people to store their own blood Or get a family member to donate their blood if they're a match. Or do auto transfusion, which they take the blood out, they they oxygenate it, they clean it, whatever they do, and
Speaker 0: they put it back
Speaker 1: in your body. That's if your blood hemoglobin levels are not low to an unhealthy unhealthy Life and math or like life and death matter like my son. Supposedly, my son needed the blood now, and, I didn't have a lot of time on my hands, but the IWK has the blood cleaning downstairs. They could have took me downstairs, Took my blood out, whatever my son needed, did what they needed, the fuse it, they clean it, they give it to my child, and everything would have been Everything would have been great. They have a lab right inside IWK.
But it was the blood clinic, Canadian Blood Services, that denied the request. And I said, okay, so what happens if I refuse? So if if I refused, then my periodontal rights would have been removed and I would have been removed from the hospital. I know how this would have went because the doctor in the ER told me this was how it was going to go. And I talked to the doctor that was injecting the blood into my son.
And, I got them to sign a $1,000,000 liability. I got all the nurses to sign a $1,000,000 liability. If anything happened to my child, they would be liable. And they laughed. They laughed at me.
They thought this was some big joke, and I was crazy. 6 weeks later, my child drops dead Sitting on my knee. He just he just stops blinking. Everything just shuts off. He just stops Breathing.
There is no there was no distress. There was nothing, and and the only thing that I could think it could have been, My doctor thinks it was cardiac arrest. That's what he put on the death certificate, but I think it was a blood clot in the brain because that's why everything just stopped. You know, people die. They don't die with their, they just don't stop blinking.
Their brain and everything just doesn't shut off that fast. You have some type of distress, And he was showing no distress that day. He had a full cardio, a cardio Heart done up. He he, like, he had all the the, the tests done for his heart before he got the blood. He had all his blood work done.
He had everything done up before he got the blood. His heart was great, so why did he die 6 weeks later?
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: So somebody's responsible for
Speaker 0: Have you been able to Yeah, have you been able
Speaker 1: to talk to me? My child passed away. She was the one that was testing his blood every week and I said, okay, so instead of testing his blood every 3 to 6 months, like you guys had him on a schedule, obviously that's not good enough, even with me substituting With iron supplements. So obviously, he's not absorbing, right? So he's not absorbing the nutrients from his food or his supplements.
So we have to keep Track of that. And then that's when all COVID happened and all went crazy, but I was still getting him in every 3 to 6 months. And then I also had a naturopathic doctor as well that we were keeping track of everything. And I had a doctor in Mexico that I worked with that I would send Sent his medical files down too, and then when I did send his medical files down too, she said he had parasites and Candida. Wonderful!
So he had that for God knows how long. The doctors here couldn't tell me this. Well, that's would be a reason why he's not absorbing anything, And and then that's when he died. I I got his passports. I got everything ready to go down and see this doctor, but he passed away before I could get down there.
I could've fixed everything, but not after the injection. There's nothing I could've done.
Speaker 0: Okay. Let's go back. You talked about Canadian Blood Services and the organization you're working with. Can you give us the website, URL so that we can share that with people. What is the site of that organization?
Speaker 1: Okay, Safe Blood Canada, and let me get it here. His name is George Delta Pietra, and he's from Sweden, and he's organized all this I think he's got it in 50 countries now. Obviously, we can't get it Canada because the blood clinic is tight lipped on Who controls the blood supply here? They do.
Speaker 0: Okay. So does the information is the information about Canadian Blood Services On that website?
Speaker 1: Yep. And then you'll see my stories on there as well.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Great.
Speaker 1: We were checking his blood after he had it done, and his levels were coming up beautifully, everything was great. He passed away, and I never heard anything from them again. Like, there was no, oh my God, I'm sorry. There was nothing. Everybody completely cut me off from IWK.
They didn't call me. We were at the hospital for 11 years of his life. Nothing. Not even
Speaker 0: And I
Speaker 1: Sorry. You're sorry.
Speaker 0: Wow. So IWK, what does that stand for?
Speaker 1: Jesus, even I Isaac Walton Keagan, something like that. I wouldn't even know. Yeah, it's IWK Hospital in Halifax. Yeah, it's, it is a great, it is a great hospital, you know. They do save lives.
And I'm not putting down everybody at the IWK. I'm just saying the way it went down, the way the show went down there on Unit 7, The way it went down was really freaking crazy. You know, it shouldn't have went down that way. I shouldn't have been treated with Zero respect even with not wearing a mask in there. They treated me.
I couldn't have his dad in. I couldn't have his sister in. I couldn't have his family members in. I had to watch all this go down with no support, with absolutely no support, just threatened if I don't do what they wanna do, Then I then I can't stay. I can't be in the hospital.
And, of course, I wanted to be with my son. So
Speaker 0: not only are you dealing with this life and death Situation with your son. You're having to deal with it alone because of the COVID masking policies and, I guess
Speaker 1: And the research.
Speaker 0: On top of that, I want to go back to they actually threatened to take your parental rights away from you.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Because it was a life and matter it was a life and death situation. My son needed blood, and I wanted to stall it by giving him safe blood. I wanted to make sure it was safe.
Even even let's just say we're not even dealing with, COVID. Let's say we're not even dealing with the vaccines or anything the The vaccine ingredients inside the vaccine. Let's say we're not dealing with any of that. I wanted to make sure my son was very unique. He was very rare.
I wanted to make sure that he got my blood and he wouldn't react to strangers' blood. You see what I'm saying? He's very rare. So how do we even know that his levels with his hemoglobin 25, so they said, How do we even know they were real numbers? Because with kids with fumorase deficiencies, their numbers could be high but really low or their numbers can be low but be really high.
It was that type of that was what we're dealing with, and that's why medication never worked with him. He his his system wasn't regulated. It couldn't regulate it couldn't regulate medication. It it just was it was a complete disaster, And it made things worse.
Speaker 0: If I if I if I hear you correctly, you know, I mean, his situation was so unique That there should have been at least some kind of exploration conversation about Options. I mean, was what was the document that you asked them to sign?
Speaker 1: I asked them to sign a $1,000,000 liability for any liability that, anything that would happen to my son after the fact That if he got this blood and he didn't react well to it or something happened afterwards, I wanted them to sign A liability, which they all did. They signed it. But I also had to sign under distress, of course, Any rights, right? So they give you a form when they're when they're giving blood or products or something like that, and they make you sign a form. And, so I also had to sign that.
So God knows what I sign. My mind wasn't really Right then, I wasn't really in a good headspace because, you know, to me To me, I was holding a gun up to my child's head, and I had to push the button. You know, I had to pull the trigger, and That was horrible. So I I don't forgive myself for that, You know, and I blame myself.
Speaker 0: No. No. Same way I I'm thinking that people listening to this would want you to know that you were An extraordinary mother as you just went above and beyond.
Speaker 1: You will take an
Speaker 0: impossible impossible position. And and, you know, that's one of the things that we've learned With the NCI is the impossible positions that people will put in, but this is not Your fault.
Speaker 1: I I don't even know how I could've stopped it. I go back to the day. I go back to it all the time, like, what could we do different? And I I don't know how I could handle it any different. But I I just feel like nobody cares, and nobody's paying that price.
My my life's a mess, and it's just crazy, you know? And no lawyer will even touch it.
Speaker 0: Why do you think all this?
Speaker 1: Because the hospital's protected. You know, they retain lawyers. They retain the top lawyers here in in Halifax. Would I even go after the hospital? I should be going after the blood clinic.
They got $1,000,000,000,000 in their pocket. Well, how am I gonna beat them? They just get the best lawyers and tell everybody I'm crazy. Unless I have the research, which I do have lots of research done that the blood is tainted. We know that.
I have lots of doctors that I've researched that had researched the blood, And a lot of people are getting very sick from blood, blood banks, and a lot of people are dying from ingesting or getting the blood from from blood banks. So I know I'm not crazy, and I know that my child died from something, and and it wasn't nothing that I did. I treated that kid like like gold. I did everything everything possible to keep him alive. And I was dealing with a very, very rare, rare disease, And, I was I was the zoning researcher.
You know, I was the only one doing research. Nobody was doing research on fumarate They can't make money off 25 people. They can't make money off 1 person.
Speaker 0: You know? You said that his doctor, thought that he died of cardiac arrest. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: This is not his pediatrician. He was also to his pediatrician 3 weeks before he died And everything was great. You know, he was gaining weight.
Speaker 0: The cardiac arrest was not something that was he was at risk for, Correct?
Speaker 1: No. No. And and they did want it they did do an autopsy. They said it was underlying conditions. Of course they were gonna say that.
Now they wanted, they said, do you want us to go forward to do, another autopsy but it would take 2 to 3 months? And, Like, again, I wasn't in the right frame of mind. I was I was, like, crazy with shock and depression and and it was just I didn't even know what I was doing. You know, I should have said yes, but then I find out they're all lying anyways. You know, all these All these undertakers and the people that work at the funeral homes are seeing things but keeping it quiet, so why would I wanna Do an autopsy and and and cut up my child and and do all this stuff I just couldn't even comprehend, you know, why I would go to all this lengths to only for them to lie anyways.
So I decided, you know, I'm just gonna cremate my son. I didn't I couldn't I couldn't fathom him in the ground and, I just wanted him near me and and I wanted him cremated, so I ended Cremating him, and now he sits on a little teddy bear, ceramic, teddy bear. And that's what I got. After everything I've done, everything I've been through, this is where my child sits on a little shelf out my kitchen with lights around and a candle. And that's all I got.
And this is I didn't get a I didn't get any apology from the IWK. I didn't I didn't get anything. They didn't even contact me To to even send condolence, nothing. But they were calling every week when he got the blood, Make sure he was okay because maybe there was something to what I was saying. People are dropping dead left and right.
Speaker 0: And this is is the, is the impact from tainted blood the, main focus or part of the focus of the organization you're working with?
Speaker 1: It is. It's, It's gathering a database to have match people up with, like, let's say if I had O positive, then I would go into the database and pick out another person that had O positive. They would meet me at the hospital. We would do the transfusion, and I would use their blood. That is done in other countries, not here.
Canada is the only place in Australia, is another another country that they can't do it at as well, Where they they can't, go into the hospital and have somebody's blood donated to them or their family member or whatever. So right now, there's really nothing that I can do with Safe Blood other than, people can contact me, And they can go through the database, and they can they can go to Mexico. They can get the service done down there. I know, Doctor. Young.
I'm a friend with Doctor. Doctor. Young in the U. S. He's a naturopathic doctor.
He knows people that had went to to the States to get blood transfusions down there by their partner or their relatives or what have you, But you just can't do it in Canada for some reason.
Speaker 0: I I Sam, I'm just I'm completely flabbergasted. I I think What you're telling us right now is so important, and I I I wanna thank you. I mean, I think You are at the beginning of some purpose around all this. I I Just to raise awareness
Speaker 1: there has to be something, you know? There has to be something. There has to be a reason why my son gave up his life. There has to be a reason because I kept seeing the numbers 111222, And I couldn't understand why I kept seeing them numbers, and he was 11, and he died on the 11th month of 2022. That was the date he was going to die, and that's why I kept seeing the numbers, and that is weird.
And till this day, I still keep seeing them, which I think, you know, some crazy thing he's just trying to communicate with me or something. But I think he's he he died for a very special reason and and that was To save others. Is this the craziest essence?
Speaker 0: No. It doesn't sound crazy at all because the information you've given us today Is is huge. I think that most people have no idea, first of all, that Canadian Blood Services makes those kinds of profits I think that people also need to know about your story and that this is happening with other people. And I think people need to know that they cannot get the blood they want. They can't have their own family donate blood to them.
This is Yeah. You know, that's shocking.
Speaker 1: And, I mean, I wouldn't have known that Had I not been involved with Safe Blood, I wouldn't known that. But see, I'm in the database, so I see people that are being refused. People contact me. People email me. People call me, you know, begging me, like, what can I do?
And I said, You know, unless you leave Canada and get it done elsewhere and pay for it, I don't know what to tell you. We're trying our hardest to be able to open up Our own safe blood database and but, you know, to open up our own storage to store blood, it's a very, very Expensive procedure, you know, it would be very expensive for us to do, so it's just not possible right now. But For people to be able to choose who they want to donate blood to them, that should never have been taken away from anyone. So if let's say if you had a child and that child needed blood a blood transfusion And you say, okay, well, I'm a match. That's fine.
The child's gonna have my blood. You wouldn't be able to do that. Well, what if your child had the same faith as my child? It's only a matter of time before it happens to another person. Do I know a 100% that my child died from The blood that was injected into them, I don't know.
I'm not a 100% sure, but it's not the angle I was going at. The point is my perianthal rights were removed. That's my angle that's what I'm going at Because I know I can't fight a $1,000,000,000,000 company. I can't fight IWK. They're probably a $1,000,000,000 company, too.
You know, they probably pull in tons of money that we don't know about. I didn't do my research on them yet, but we're dealing with a $1,000,000,000,000 company. Do you really think they're going to safeguard them themselves for people like me and you and everybody else that wants To bring in people to come donate their blood now? No, that's gonna impact what they're gonna make as a revenue and they would have to amend, okay, well we're gonna let Joe and and Tracy do this, but we're not gonna let anybody else. If they open the floodgates to it, they'd have to let everybody do it.
And that would cut into revenue, and then they have to say, okay, well, maybe the blood supply isn't safe. How do we know it's not? How do we know it's safe? How do we know it's not safe? Like
Speaker 0: Yeah. It sounds like an investigation needs to be done into the blood supply, into the whole structure of the Canadian Blood Services system. I Look at HIV. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Look at HIV. Look how many people that killed before they got the grips onto it. So if that can get to the blood through the blood supply, then how do we know graphene can't get through the blood supply or or hydrogel can't get through the blood I mean, I've studied this. I know what's in it. The nanotech, like, we're we're dealing with crazy ingredients inside this this vaccine.
How do we know that it's fleshed out if they don't even know what the hell is in it? So how do they know?
Speaker 0: Is there any
Speaker 1: We don't even know what we're dealing with.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Is there anything else you want Canadians to know? You want Anything else you want to say? I want to give you the last word. I know there's nothing I can say that can possibly make a difference to in terms of what you've gone through, but I I wanna thank you for speaking out and for everything you did for your son, because All of that is all going to be part of the historical record of this country, and I believe the truth will come out.
So the last word is yours.
Speaker 1: Just just hug your kids. You know, love your kids because you never know when they close their eyes, if that's the last time you're going to see them. And I always wonder what I could have done different. Well maybe Maybe, I don't know. Maybe I should have, like, I mean should have, could have.
I don't even know what I could have done differently, but just be very careful what you're injecting into your kids. You always have to be very careful with drugs or vaccines or any of this shit because we don't know What's safe and what's not safe?
Speaker 0: Well, I think, Sammie, you're you're pointing to something really important. That this is a wake up call for all of us. That what Ever we put into our children's bodies, into our own bodies, we need to do our own advocacy work. You know, you are an excellent Advocate for your son, but we need to be advocates for ourselves, for our families because we can't that anything is safe and effective.
Speaker 1: Exactly. And if you don't do your homework and something happened to your child, Then who's to blame? You know, I always done my research. I've always done my research in with foods, vaccines. I always I always had the research done long before I had children, what I was going to do when I had children, how I was going to raise them.
If you don't do your homework and something happens, then you're going to be very, very sad person, a very, very sad parent if you lose your child, especially with the way that happened to me because I knew everything. So it's like I knew all this stuff. I knew about the vaccines. I knew about the blood clinic. I knew about everything, So it was extremely hard for me to go through it because I knew what was going to be the outcome of what took place afterwards, And it was a very sad day afterwards.
Speaker 0: Please keep us Hosted of how things go with your organization, anything you're looking. You're doing really important work. I wish you all the best In restarting your life, I I can't imagine, but you sound like an incredibly Strong, smart, and resilient woman. And I am grateful to you on behalf of all Canadians, everyone watching this interview. Thank you, Sammy.
Speaker 1: And thank you for interviewing me.
Safe Blood Donation - home page
Safe Blood Donation - home page
safeblood.ca
reSee.it AI Summary
In the early days of COVID-19, fear spread, causing concerns about virus transmission even between dogs. Premier McNeil ends the educational phase and enforces social gathering restrictions with police-issued tickets. #ThrowbackThursdays
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Remember when? March 29, 2020 In the initial days of COVID-19, widespread fear led people to worry about the transmission of the virus even between dogs in neighbourly interactions. Moreover, Premier McNeil declares that the educational phase of COVID-19 regulations is over, signaling a shift to enforcement through police-issued tickets for social gathering restrictions. #ThrowbackThursdays
Video Transcript AI Summary
A caller asks if their dog interacting with their neighbor's dog during a walk ruins the intention of social distancing. The doctor reassures that there is no evidence that cats or dogs transmit COVID-19, so as long as the humans maintain social distancing, the dogs interacting is not a problem. The caller then asks the premier about police enforcing social gathering restrictions and if there is a guideline for giving tickets. The premier explains that police will enforce the law as they see fit, but there has been an educational component and most people in Nova Scotia are respecting the law.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We'll go to Kyle Shaw from the coast. Go ahead, Kyle. Thanks, Tina. For doctor Strang, I'm wondering if my dog is putting me at risk. I take the dog for a walk.
My neighbor's out for a walk. Me and the neighbor say hi to each other. We're standing safely apart, but the dogs are touching each other. Maybe I've touched my neighbor's dog. Have we just ruined the intention of social distancing?
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. This has been looked at and is what we could call is is this is this COVID nineteen, as you know, she's passed Between humans, between animals and humans and there's really no evidence at all that, cats, dogs, Are are part of the transmission of this. So so as long as you're social distancing from your neighbor, your your the 2 dogs saying hi to each other face to face is not a problem.
Speaker 0: Go ahead with a follow-up if you have one. Thank you. It's for the premier. It's a follow-up, it's come up a couple times about police and enforcing Social gathering, restrictions. Right it came out that there's no tickets have been given yet.
I'm wondering if there has been a guideline that they should not be giving tickets because this is early days, or as far as you're concerned, police may give a ticket in if the case warrants it in their opinion.
Speaker 2: Well, obviously, police would execute the law as they see fit. I can tell you there was an educational component to this. Fact of the matter is the majority of Nova Scotians are respecting the law.
reSee.it AI Summary
Former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney urged unvaccinated Albertans to get vaccinated, highlighting the vaccines' remarkable protection against infection and severe disease. He stated that unvaccinated individuals aged 20-59 faced a 50-60 times higher risk of hospitalization. Let's examine the data then and now to understand the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Remember When? Former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney urged unvaccinated Albertans to get vaccinated, emphasizing the 'amazing protection against infection and severe disease' provided by COVID-19 vaccines. He asserted that unvaccinated individuals aged 20-59 faced a 50-60 times greater risk of hospitalization. How did the data align with these claims then, and what does the current data reveal about the protective efficacy of the injections? #NCI #ThrowbackThursday #COVID19 #NeitherSafeNorEffective #Canada #Alberta #abpoli #cdnpoli
Video Transcript AI Summary
The delta variant of COVID-19 is causing a rise in hospitalizations among unvaccinated Albertans. Vaccines provide excellent protection against infection and severe disease, even with the delta variant. We appreciate the 2.9 million Albertans who have been vaccinated. However, due to a large number of unvaccinated individuals, the delta variant is spreading widely and causing more severe outcomes in unvaccinated adults. Since July 1st, unvaccinated people aged 20-59 have a 50-60 times higher risk of hospitalization compared to those who are vaccinated. It is crucial to get vaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As it is everywhere across the country and most of the world, the delta variant of COVID nineteen is causing concerning rises in hospitalizations in our province almost entirely amongst unvaccinated Albertans. COVID nineteen vaccines continue to provide amazing protection against infection and severe disease even with the Delta variant. So I'd like to thank the 2,900,000 Albertans who have chosen to roll up their sleeves. But because of the large group of people who have no vaccine protection, we have seen the delta variant spread widely and cause severe outcomes at much greater rates in unvaccinated adults. Since July 1st, unvaccinated people between the ages of 20 to 59 have had 50 to 60 times higher risk of hospitalization than those who are vaccinated.
Let me just repeat that. People between 2059 who are not vaccinated have 50 to 60 times greater chance of hospitalization than those who are fully vaccinated. Please get vaccinated.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada's Chief Public Health Officer, played a role in the 2010 film "Outbreak: Anatomy of a Plague." She emphasized the importance of proactive measures like tracking, monitoring, mandatory quarantine, and detention centers for non-compliant individuals. These measures have been integrated into the Canadian legal framework for some time. Dr. Tam's message was clear: it's better to be cautious and evaluate later if we've overreacted.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Remember When? Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada's Chief Public Health Officer, was prominently featured in the 2010 film "Outbreak: Anatomy of a Plague," where she provided insights into both reactionary and preemptive measures for handling infectious disease outbreaks. In this film, she discussed measures such as tracking and monitoring, mandatory quarantine, and the establishment of detention centers for individuals unwilling to cooperate, all within the legal framework at that time. Notably, Dr. Tam suggested in the film that it's better to be preemptive and precautionary and then think about whether you've overreacted. How long have these measures been embedded within the Canadian legal framework? #NCI #ThrowbackThursday #COVID19 #Canada #cdnpoli #TruthMatters #NeitherSafeNorEffective
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is one of the worst case scenarios for an infectious disease outbreak. Cooperation from the public is crucial, and noncompliant individuals can be quarantined through legal measures. Tracking and monitoring may be implemented, including the use of bracelets and police involvement. It's better to be proactive and cautious, even if some perceive it as an overreaction. Taking decisive early action is essential in such a serious situation. In this case, police checkpoints have been established on all bridges, and individuals leaving the city must provide proof of vaccination. Those who refuse are taken to temporary detention centers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think the public has to know this is one of the worst case scenarios in terms of an infectious disease outbreak and that their cooperation is sought. If there are people who are noncompliant, there are definitely, laws and and public health, powers that can quarantine people in mandatory settings. It's potential you could track people, put bracelets on their, arms have police and other setups to ensure quarantine is undertaken. Is it is better to be preemptive and a cautionary and take the heat of people thinking you might be overreactionary. Get ahead of the curve, and then think about whether you've overreacted later.
But it's such a serious situation that I think decisive early action is the key.
Speaker 1: Police checkpoints are set up on all the bridges, And everyone leaving the city is required to show proof of vaccination. Those who refuse to cooperate are taken away to temporary detention centers.
reSee.it AI Summary
The CDC used different PCR cycles for COVID-19 testing, leading to false positives. Dr. Natalie Bjorklund Gordon noticed discrepancies between government messaging and her mRNA expertise.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
The CDC employed two distinct PCR diagnostic levels: for the general population, tests were conducted at 44 cycles, increasing the likelihood of false positives. In contrast, other groups were subjected to only 17 cycles, reducing the risk of false positives. This approach led to a substantial number of people being misdiagnosed with COVID-19. Dr. Natalie Bjorklund Gordon, a Geneticist and Epidemiologist with training in mRNA technology observed disparities between the government's messaging and her mRNA education. #NCI #Canada #cdnpoli #mRNA #COVID19 #CovidVaccines #NeitherSafeNorEffective #StoptheShots #TruthMatters
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expressed concerns about the use of PCR as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19, stating that the high number of cycles used could lead to false positives. They also criticized the use of different standards for different populations. The speaker chose not to take the mRNA vaccine due to government statements that seemed contradictory and nonsensical. They questioned the effectiveness and safety of mRNA technology, citing a case where a person died after receiving an experimental mRNA treatment. The speaker also questioned the use of the spike protein in the vaccine and the decision to use a new technology instead of existing vaccine methods. They highlighted issues with the Pfizer vaccine's statistics, including cases of Bell's Palsy and protocol deviations. The speaker mentioned the problem of antibody dependent enhancement in previous attempts to develop coronavirus vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I think you said you were familiar with mRNA technology. Is that right? Yes. And what were your thoughts about that leading up to, what we saw happen in, with with the development of the vaccines? I was puzzled by the use of the The PCR as a diagnostic technique, I was also puzzled by, I heard that they were doing 44 cycles of PCR.
And based on my understanding, that's far too high and you're going to get an enormous number of false positives. At some point, the CDC had also So made 2 different standards, for for looking at different Populations that were being affected by the virus. So they were using 44 cycles for the general population as a diagnostic tool, But in other situations, they were using 17 cycles so that they could be very sure that they weren't getting a false positive. So the way they used the PCR test guaranteed that huge numbers of people were going to be diagnosed as having COVID who didn't have COVID or who had flu or who had something unrelated. That was my opinion.
I chose not to take the mRNA treatment for a very specific reason. The government was telling me things that didn't make any sense to me. For example, they were saying that the government of Manitoba I'm referring to now, That the, this vaccine would not stop transmission, but we all had to have it to stop the pandemic. And that was nonsensical to me. They said the vaccine stays in your arm.
So you're going to inject something into highly vascularized muscle in your arm with connections through the lymph system, But it's gonna stay in your arm and it's not gonna stay in your arm. They said that the mRNA could not be reversed or inscribed into DNA because that's not the way cells work. Well, it's nonsense. Most of the time, it's DNA RNA protein. But particularly when cells are rapidly dividing, you can get the mRNA Back into the DNA.
So I was concerned about how that was going to work. I was also concerned about the mRNA technology as a whole because We'd been hearing about mRNA technology and the great miracles that it was going to do for at least 15 years before. And to my perspective, it had not lived up to its initial promise. We heard stories That were discussed in group seminars that, there was a young man who had cystic fibrosis and they were going to use mRNA injections in an Adenovirus and his particular situation as an experimental treatment to try to cure cystic fibrosis. And everything looked right.
All of our knowledge and everything showed us that this would have been the right thing. Now, I was not personally involved in this. This is just reports I heard from other scientists who were involved. And this young man accepted the risk. He was informed that it was experimental.
He took the drug and he was dead in 24 hours. And they had no idea why he died. And to me, the mRNA technology was a failed technology. And the reason it failed was not because the ideas were wrong, but because we don't understand enough about how cells work to be able to guarantee that The, that the mRNA was going to work the way it worked. And that really bothered me.
And I also wondered how do they control how much of this Spike protein is going to be produced and how is, this spike is the infective portion of the virus and it's what binds to the receptors. And if you recall my very complicated diagram, when you have something bind to a receptor up at the surface level, it's going to send massive numbers of biochemical Signals all over the place. So, why were they using the spike as the thing they were going to inject you with and why were they using this strange new technology when we already have a whole vaccine technology that we had used successfully? It it it just didn't make any sense. And I'm not an anti vaxxer.
As as a medical person, I have been vaccinated Far more than the average member of the general public. All my children were vaccinated. I had to attend autopsies, so I had extra vaccines that the general public aren't even offered. I had the Shingrix vax. I got the flu vax every year.
I am not an anti vaxxer. I just everything about this bothered me. And then I decided, well, maybe I'm crazy. Maybe the government knows what they're doing. So I decided to pull up the Pfizer, EUA memorandum On the drug itself and have an actual look at their statistics.
And I recall reading it and as I was reading it, I literally felt The hairs on the back of my neck start rising. There were so many things that were wrong with this. There were 4 cases of Bell's Palsy, in the case group that weren't in the control group. And Bell's palsy is a neurological condition and you can't miss that because the person's whole face looks like So that indicated to me that this could mean that this virus was having neurological effects. And if you look at Table 2, Page 18 of that, there were 3 11 cases And 60 placebos that were excluded for protocol deviations.
Now a properly conducted study, those two numbers be identical. You shouldn't have 5 times as many people who are excluded for protocol deviations. That's just wrong. And that shows there's something seriously wrong with your study. And they didn't comment on that.
And I recall thinking at the time, what was the protocol deviation? Did these people die? Because there was no explanation, and the demographics were wrong. They were doing this on younger people, not older people. They made this dismissive little paragraph about, antibody dependent enhancement and how it wasn't a problem.
Every time that there has been an attempt to have a coronavirus vaccine, It has created this problem of antibody dependent enhancement.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Hoffe's evidence of harm prompted @cpsbc_ca to warn physicians against challenging the public health narrative, risking investigation and disciplinary action. #Canada #CovidVaccine #TruthMatters
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Shortly after Dr. Hoffe presented evidence of harm to Dr. Bonnie Henry, @cpsbc_ca issued a notice to all physicians, warning that any doctor challenging the public health narrative would face investigation and potential disciplinary action. #NCI #Canada #Cdnpoli #ThisisCanada #NeitherSafeNorEffective #COVID19 #CovidVaccine #TruthMatters
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shares their experience with a vaccine safety specialist who advised them to submit vaccine injury reports. However, when the speaker sent in six reports, public health denied them and claimed there was no evidence of harm. The speaker also mentions that after they wrote a letter to a doctor, the College of Physicians warned doctors not to contradict the public health narrative or they would be investigated and disciplined. This warning has led to doctors staying silent and not questioning the narrative. The speaker submitted 14 vaccine injury reports, but all were denied by public health, who claimed they were coincidences and not vaccine injuries. The speaker concludes that reporting vaccine injuries is impossible as public health censors them to maintain the belief that side effects are rare.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so I should mention to you just the other thing that I think is a really important thing. This vaccine safety specialist told me the only thing she was willing to advise me, was that I needed to submit vaccine injury reports. So initially, the first 6 that I sent in, literally, the public health were putting out notices to our community saying that my allegations that anyone had vaccine injuries were false and that there was no evidence of harm. And 1 month after my letter to doctor Bonnie Henry, the College of Physicians put out a notification to all doctors warning doctors that anyone that contradicted the public health narrative would be investigated and, if necessary, disciplined. This was their response to me revealing the evidence of harm, was to tell doctors that they were not allowed to reveal evidence of harm.
You were not allowed to contradict the safe and effective narrative. Otherwise, you would be investigated and disciplined. And so when people wonder why people continue to think that the side of those people that have believed what the media have told us. It's because doctors have been warned that they're not allowed to question the narrative. They're not allowed they're too afraid.
They have to feed their family. They don't want to lose their medical license. They don't want to end up like me, under investigation. And so this has helped push the narrative that, well, doctors are seemed to be all on board because they don't say anything. Well, they've been warned not to say anything.
So I ultimately submitted 14 vaccine injury reporting forms. And out of those, every single one was denied by public health. Every single one, they would literally phone, they would send a report back to me saying these are not vaccine injuries, these are all coincidences and this person needs their next shot and they would phone up the patient and tell them that this is not from your shot, you need to get your next shot. So I discovered that it was impossible to report the vaccine injuries because they literally get censored by public health so that they can carry on telling everyone that the side effects are incredibly rare.
reSee.it AI Summary
The BC government's decision to stop reporting COVID vaccination outcomes raises questions. Was it due to data complexity or a shift in the vaccination campaign narrative? #COVID19 #Canada #BritishColumbia #vaccination #transparency
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Do you think the BC government removed data and ceased reporting COVID vaccination outcomes due to complexity in data interpretation, or because it no longer aligned with the vaccination campaign narrative? #NCI #Canada #NeitherSafeNorEffective #COVID19 #cdnpoli #COVIDvaccine #BritishColumbia #bcpoli @MakisMD
Video Transcript AI Summary
The British Columbia government released data on hospitalizations, intensive care, and deaths, along with the vaccination status of the population. The last dataset, from July 16, 2022, showed that 89% of COVID-19 deaths were among the vaccinated, with 77% of those deaths being triple vaccinated individuals. Despite making up only 52% of the population, the triple vaccinated accounted for a disproportionately higher percentage of deaths. The dataset was deleted on July 28th, with the government citing difficulty in interpreting the data. In comparison, the Alberta government deleted their data without any explanation or press release.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted to show for comparison that it wasn't just the Alberta government that was deleting data, it was the British Columbia government as well. And, here, the British Columbia government was putting out these nice graphics, as to The hospitalizations, intensive care, and deaths. And, but they also break down of of of, What portion of the population is triple vaccinated, double vaccinated, unvaccinated? And so you could actually compare to how it compares to the population. And I'd like to point out that this is the last data that the British government British Columbia government ever put out.
This is July 16, 2022. And the deaths, the vaccinated make up 89% of the deaths, COVID nineteen deaths. And it is again driven by the triple vaccinated. 77% of the deaths are triple vaccinated. And if you look at all the way to the left, it shows you what proportion of the population are the triple vaccinated.
They are 52% of the population, but they're making up 77% of the deaths. And so if you had a vaccine that simply did nothing and didn't work, you would expect, you know, 52% of the population would be having 52% of the deaths. And in fact, they have a disproportionately higher percentage of deaths. And again, I interpret this as vaccine injury in the triple vaccinated leading to death. And so the This was the last dataset that was put out by the British Columbia government.
The BC government deleted this dataset on July 28th. And I would like to make a comparison to the Alberta government in that the BC government actually put out a press release stating that they were stopping reporting of this data, case outcomes by vaccination status, that that they would be removing this data. And they put out this press release, and the explanation they gave was that the data had become hard to interpret. And compare this to the Alberta government. The Alberta government did not put out any press release when they deleted their data.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
"If you don't study history, you'll never know what's coming" Is it possible that history is quietly repeating itself, unnoticed by many? #NCI #ThisisCanada #History #Canada #cdnpoli #TruthMatters #NationalCitizensInquiry
Video Transcript AI Summary
I never imagined witnessing a fascist dictate on our nation, as described by my relatives who survived the Hungarian occupation by the Nazis and Russians. Studying history has taught me that if we don't learn from it, we won't know what's coming. It's shocking to see the mistreatment of the unvaccinated and elderly in our country, which my relatives and I consider to be fascism. The unvaccinated have been treated terribly, pitted against the vaccinated. This division and mistreatment reflect fascist tendencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I understand that you're a descendant of Holocaust survivors. Can you tell us about some discussions you've had with family members?
Speaker 1: Well, for starters, I never imagined in my lifetime that I would be witness to a fascist dictate on the nation, And from what I have learned in history and from relatives who not only survived the Hungarian op occupation by the Nazis. They also survived the occupation by the Russians And from everything that I have learned from them, as well as from my days in my history class, I was always told by our history teacher that if you don't study history, you'll never know what's coming. Well, never in my lifetime could I imagine that I would see a fascist dictate on our nation. And by that, I mean, from what my relatives have described, fascism. The unvaccinated and the elderly in this Country were treated terribly.
That's fascism. The unvaccinated, Particularly have been treated horribly. They were pitted against the vaccinated. That's fascism.
reSee.it AI Summary
During the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, embalming expert Laura Jeffery noticed a concerning trend: people arriving at funeral homes with shoulder band-aids. She also witnessed healthy individuals experiencing blood clots, a new occurrence in her field. #COVID19 #vaccine #bloodclots
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
As the initial COVID-19 injection rollout unfolded, embalming experts like Laura Jeffery began to observe a noteworthy trend - individuals were increasingly arriving at funeral homes with band-aids on their shoulders. Furthermore, she encountered cases of otherwise healthy individuals succumbing to blood clots, a phenomenon previously unseen in her practice. #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #ExcessMortality #ExcessDeaths #Clots #COVID19 #COVIDVaccines #NeitherSafeNorEffective
Video Transcript AI Summary
A healthy and fit man died from blood clots, which was unusual. The embalmer noticed people coming in with band aids and thought nothing of it at first. However, he started seeing small scars on everyone's shoulders, indicating a problem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So you have someone that's, ugh, so healthy. Like, you can't miss it. Like, healthy. Like, if that gentleman walked in the room right now, we would all turn our heads and say, my goodness, what a good looking man.
Right? Healthy, strong, fit, tall, like, huge, healthy person.
Speaker 1: Gone, right away.
Speaker 0: Just and his family told us that now he was invest his his his death was investigated And his family told us point blankie, died from clots. That's what they were told.
Speaker 1: And had you ever, seen a person that age and that fitness that had died of blood clots?
Speaker 0: Had I ever seen that before?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Heavens. No. No. No. Too healthy.
No. No. Not healthy people.
Speaker 1: Okay. So that's why that sticks out in your mind is it was so unusual.
Speaker 0: It sticks out in a lot of people's minds. I'm sure.
Speaker 1: Now did you start seeing any, basically scarring or anything like that on shoulders?
Speaker 0: Yeah. So, for a long time, people were coming in with that, like, a little band aid right? And I'd kind of go, okay, Laura, it's it's just a band aid. Like, ignore it, even though like, it was just unusual deaths with a band aid. Right?
Right? That's how I'm supposed to look at it because I'm not a doctor. I'm an embalmer. But the reality is I'm looking at this and I'm going, yeah. Yeah.
There's a little tiny are you down on everybody's shoulder? So that tells me, I mean, band aids what? They last, what? 2, 3 days if you're lucky, right? So that tells me there is a problem.
reSee.it AI Summary
The National Citizens Inquiry's Commissioner's report reveals that COVID-19 injections, approved under an interim order, lack safety and efficacy testing. Findings emphasize the need for further examination. Read the full report at nationalcitizensinquiry.ca. #Canada #COVID19 #CovidVaccine
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Have you had the chance to read the National Citizens Inquiry's independent Commissioner's report? Within the interim report, the Commissioner's findings underscore that the COVID-19 injections, approved under the interim order, have never been approved or tested for safety and efficacy. Read the full report here: http://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/commissioners-report… #NCI #NeitherSafeNorEffective #Canada #cdnpoli #COVID19 #CovidVaccine @MichelleLCatlin
Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Citizens inquiry's independent commissioners have released an interim report stating that the COVID-19 injections, referred to as vaccines, were approved through an interim order without being proven safe or effective. The government's own documentation supports this claim. The report can be found on our website, and we encourage everyone to download and share it widely. The vaccines are deemed neither safe nor effective. This is Michelle Ledukatlin reporting for the National Citizens inquiry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The independent commissioners of the National Citizens inquiry have just released an interim report. According to the government's own documentation, the COVID 19 injections, known as vaccines, were never proven safe or effective. They were approved through a new process called an interim order. You can go and find this evidence for yourself at our website, download the commissioner's report, please share it far and wide. Neither safe nor effective.
For the National Citizens inquiry, I'm Michelle Ledukatlin.
reSee.it AI Summary
In cancer clinics, patients often feel dehumanized. They are seen as their illness, not as individuals. This dehumanization is a concerning issue in medicine. Let's prioritize empathy and remember that patients are more than just their masks. #Healthcare #Empathy
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
"You're in a cancer clinic and you feel abused by everybody... They didn't want to know you, they wanted to know your mask" - Marjaleena Repo Do you agree that there has been dehumanization in the practice of medicine? #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #cdnpoli #NeitherSafeNorEffective #TruthMatters #COVID19 #medicine #doctor #PHAC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reflects on the rapid dehumanization that occurred in the medical field, where masks became a means of punishment. They question how this transformation happened and express concern for the loss of humanity in health professionals. The speaker recounts feeling abused and disrespected, with personal contact being solely focused on their mask. They fear that society has been distorted and wonders if it is possible for people to regain their previous selves and treat others with respect. The speaker shares an experience of being questioned and receiving abusive emails, feeling like the only victim in the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dehumanization, the medicine disappeared as a human practice and it did it so quickly. And then the masking just became a method to punish you in every which way. It was just incredibly fast And in my head was constantly here, how can this be? How can it happen? Who are these people?
What happened to them? Did they all get processed somewhere that they came out this way that they can't they don't hang on to their humanity and I'm talking all about profession, Health professionals that they absconded. I didn't see any resistance. I didn't see the they didn't have Kindly, you're in a cancer clinic and you feel abused by everybody without because they didn't want to know of you, they don't want to know you. They wanted to know your mask.
They wanted to make personal contact with your mask And that was the horror of it. It's going to hold total distortion very quickly of the whole society. At the end. I don't see how we can get back, how these people can get back to that. How can they find their previous self shift they had them and become human beings again and treat others with essential respect.
And this is what I've lost systematically a sense of feeling that I'm respected. I'm respected because any times I can be questioned by total strangers and then the nameless strangers, like 100. There was maybe 300 abusive emails to orchestrated by a disc jockey who had nothing better to do. And he actually praised the event the what they had done because we kicked ass. Well, the only ass that they kicked was me.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Why are the death counts now lower than previously reported? "They're very carefully now, removing people that died with COVID and not from COVID... They're cleaning up their act..." - Lt. Col. David Redman #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #COVID19 #TruthMatters #cdnpoli #data
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker presents data on COVID-19 deaths in Canada. They point out that the official number of deaths reported by the government is 52,000, which is used to create fear. However, the speaker reveals that the actual number of deaths is 36,000, as provinces and territories have been adjusting their data to exclude deaths with COVID rather than from COVID. The speaker suggests that this is an attempt to cover up the true impact of the disease.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the latest, and I've stopped updating this chart. This is at the end of 3 years. So this is March of this year, and what you see is Canada's data as a country. But what's really interesting on this, if you look over here on the right hand side, you will see that it says that As of the end of March, there was 52,000 Canadians died of COVID, and that's the number that Theresa Tam still uses to scare the hell out of you every day that this is a horrible disease. But quietly behind the scenes, every province and territory in Canada has been amending their data.
If you see the number on the other side, circled in red. This is from exactly the same day off of exactly the same website from the Government of Canada. You'll see that it's 36 1,000 died, not 52,000. Why is that? Because they're very carefully now removing all the people that died with COVID, not from COVID, okay.
So they're cleaning up their act before we come looking for them.
reSee.it AI Summary
National Citizens Inquiry Administrator, Ches Crosbie, wrote letters to Manitoba's Minister of Health and six political parties. The Manitoba Deputy Minister of Health responded. #NCI #Canada #Manitoba #mbpoli #NeitherSafeNorEffective #cdnpoli
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
National Citizens Inquiry Administrator, Ches Crosbie, has issued letters to both the Minister of Health for Manitoba and the six registered political parties in Manitoba. Below, you will find the contents of these letters, as well as the response from the Manitoba Deputy Minister of Health. #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #Manitoba #mbpoli #NeitherSafeNorEffective #cdnpoli
reSee.it AI Summary
Allegations of sexual misconduct against Canadian Chiefs of Defense Staff and their resistance to COVID19 vaccine mandates raise questions about a possible correlation. Are those in power who opposed vaccine mandates more susceptible to such allegations? #Canada #COVID19 #VaccineMandates
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
What is the link between allegations of sexual misconduct against several Canadian Chiefs of Defense Staff and the implementation of COVID-19 vaccine mandates? It raises the question of whether there is a correlation between those in such positions who resisted mandating vaccines and the subsequent allegations of sexual misconduct against them. @ValourLegal #NCI #ThisisCanada #CAF #TruthMatters #NeitherSafeNorEffective #cdnpoli #Canada #COVID19 #covidvaccines
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Chief of Defense Staff is accused of sacrificing the military and their families for political gain. They were used as guinea pigs for an experimental medical treatment, with the damage being hidden. This is seen as a war crime and a dangerous act by leaders who consider themselves above the law. The military, already weakened and lacking personnel, lost 1,000 members due to the vaccine mandate, with more expected to be affected. In Canada, the military serves the King, not the Prime Minister, giving the King power over the government and police. There is strong belief that the vaccine mandate came from the Prime Minister's office, based on a pattern of removals and promotions tied to sexual misconduct allegations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Chief of Defense Staff has shown that he is willing to sacrifice the entire military and their families under his command for political gain. Setting up these men and women to be guinea pigs for an experimental medical treatment and then hiding the damage from it would be a war crime if it was done to prisoners of war. It certainly was a war crime in World War II. Yet, General Ayer did it to his own people, and he thinks he is untouchable to answer for it. A military with leaders who see themselves above the law is a dangerous thing.
History teaches us that and it's a lesson not to be forgotten. And this experiment has gone wrong. A weakened military already suffering from not enough people in the ranks then lost 1,000 more to the mandate and likely 1,000 more to come who were permanently damaged from the injections. The count will only rise as time moves forward. In Canada, it should be noted that we have an additional check for our military that no one even thinks about.
Soldiers, sailors and aircrew do not serve at the pleasure of the Prime Minister in this case, Justin Trudeau. He has no power over our military. They serve at the pleasure of the King of Canada. Technically, The king can turn the military on the government or the police. Keep in mind, the king has the power to dismiss the prime minister or dissolve parliament through the Governor General.
Speaker 1: Based upon what you've learned and based upon what we've seen in your presentation, Do you have reason to believe, to suspect or indeed, to conclude that there is a political direct in mind in other words, That this vaccine mandate is actually coming from the same source as for example, the Ministry of Transport Order or the other Federal, such orders directing other people in the public service, the federal public service to be vaccinated?
Speaker 0: Yes, I do. I have No doubt in my mind that this came from the prime minister's office. Part of the Evidence or the support to that belief is that, we seem to have a real trend where General Vance was Chief of Defense Staff when vaccines first emerged. He didn't bring in a mandate. And as you recall, he was removed under the cloud of a sexual misconduct delegation.
Admiral Macdonald then took his place. Within a few weeks, he was under a cloud of suspicion for sexual misconduct because I've seen his briefing note and it's clearly states but he could not bring in a mandate. General Fortin was in charge of vaccine rollout in Canada. I I suspect, that he also said you couldn't bring out a mandate, which, through the sworn testimony from the Peckford hearings. The, prime minister's office was clear that this was coming from that from the prime minister, who was angry at being heckled and demanded that a mandate be brought in.
That's sworn testimony from his office. So then we get General Fortin accused of sexual misconduct. We then have General Eyre come in as acting CDS at the time. He has given a briefing note from General Kadu that you can't do this basically, And General Kadu is then accused of sexual misconduct. There's a real pattern there, and, then he brings in, the vaccine mandate, he goes from being acting Chief of Defence Staff to full Chief of Defence Staff and gets a promotion, I see as a reward for being obedient to higher powers.
reSee.it AI Summary
The National Citizens Inquiry's interim report reveals a significant finding: COVID-19 vaccines are deemed neither safe nor effective. Delve deeper into this critical information by exploring the complete report, reading the open letter to the Prime Minister, and listening to the live press conference. Find out more at nationalcitizensinquiry.ca. #NCICanada #COVID19 #Vaccines #cdnpoli #FridayMorning
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
ICYMI: The interim report of the National Citizens Inquiry is now available. Within the report, the Commissioner's analysis of pivotal testimony reveals a significant finding: COVID-19 vaccines are deemed to be Neither Safe Nor Effective. To delve deeper into this critical information, explore the complete interim report, read the open letter addressed to the Prime Minister, and listen to our live press conference below. https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/commissioners-report/ #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #NeitherSafeNorEffective #COVID19 #COVIDVaccines #Vaccines #cdnpoli #ICYMI #fridaymorning
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Neither Safe, Nor Effective https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/commissioners-report/ In the aftermath of the National Citizens Inquiry press conference held on September 14th, we are pleased to make available the commissioners' interim report and an open letter to Prime Minister @JustinTrudeau from the NCI…
Commissioners Report - National Citizen's Inquiry - Canada's Response To Covid-19
nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
reSee.it AI Summary
The National Citizens Inquiry presents its interim report and an open letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Find them here: nationalcitizensinquirycacommissionersreport. The report questions the safety and effectiveness of the Covid vaccine. #NCICanada #cdnpoli #COVID19
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Neither Safe, Nor Effective https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/commissioners-report/ In the aftermath of the National Citizens Inquiry press conference held on September 14th, we are pleased to make available the commissioners' interim report and an open letter to Prime Minister @JustinTrudeau from the NCI Administrator. You can access these documents by following the link below! #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #CommissionersReport #NeitherSafeNorEffective #cdnpoli #COVID19 #CovidVaccine
Commissioners Report - National Citizen's Inquiry - Canada's Response To Covid-19
nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Remember when? Former Manitoba Premier, Brian Pallister, says vaccination is the key to avoiding lockdowns. That they are strengthening the value of being vaccinated and the utility of vax passes #NCI #ThrowbackThursday #NeitherSafeNorEffective #ThisisCanada #Canada #Manitoba
Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccines are crucial for ending the pandemic, preventing future lockdowns, and getting our lives back. The speaker thanks everyone for their willingness to get vaccinated and urges them to protect themselves, fellow Manitobans, businesses, the economy, and the healthcare system. To combat the upcoming 4th wave, all frontline provincial employees working with vulnerable populations must be fully immunized or undergo frequent COVID-19 testing by October 31st. Designated public sector workers must also be fully immunized or undergo testing. Mandatory mask use in all indoor public places is being implemented to further protect against the delta variant and a potential 4th wave. The value of vaccination and the vax pass are being emphasized.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've said it before and I'm going to say it again and we'll keep saying it until everybody does it. Vaccines are our safest and only way out of this pandemic. Vaccines are our protection against the 4th wave. Vaccines are our protection against future lockdowns. Vaccines are how we get our lives back.
Thank you to you for your willingness to do your part. Roll up your sleeve not once, but twice. And protect yourself and protect your fellow Manitobans. Protect our businesses too, our small business community. Protect our economy and to protect our communities and our healthcare system as well.
Experts are saying that the 4th wave will be an even greater threat in terms of its numbers of cases, than the 3rd. This is why today, we're announcing that all frontline provincial employees who work with vulnerable populations must be fully immunized by October 31st or undergo frequent COVID nineteen testing. All designated public sector workers will be required to be fully immunized and provide proof of vaccination or vaccination or undergo frequent COVID nineteen testing in order to ensure the safety of their workplace and the people they serve. As an additional protection measure against the rising delta variant and a possible 4th wave, we are also announcing today that we are requiring mandatory mask use in all indoor public places. In other words, we're strengthening the value of being vaccinated and the utility of the vax pass in our province.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
As a parent, how did you discuss the COVID-19 vaccine with your children? Were you able to openly address any concerns with them? #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #Student #Children #kids #cdnpoli #COVID19 #covidvaccines
Video Transcript AI Summary
A parent shares their experience with their oldest child who was in 3rd year of biology at Queen's University. They informed their child about the lack of long-term safety data for the vaccine and expressed their desire for her not to take it. Despite the risk of being kicked out of school, their child decided not to take the vaccine. Ironically, she later contracted COVID from a fully vaccinated friend but recovered. She faced difficulties with her mental health and being ostracized by fearful friends. Eventually, the mandates were dropped, allowing her to return to school, but she is now a semester behind. The parent's other children also experienced negative impacts from remote learning, including lack of socialization and limited activities. The youngest child had a speech impediment and received online therapy, but faced challenges when returning to school due to mask requirements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I start with my oldest, who happens to be was in 3rd year of biology at Queen's University, we made her aware that the vaccine had no long term safety data and that we did not want her to take it. And we showed her the information and we held our breaths and we let her decide for South, what she wanted to do. There was very real threat that she'd be kicked out of school. And she was. We are grateful that she decided she wasn't going to take it, but it was very difficult.
Speaker 1: What happened to her exactly?
Speaker 0: So ironically, she the January before she was, dismissed from university, She, got COVID and, from a fully vaxxed friend, and we tried to say, well, I mean, what difference does it make? This friend is allowed to return after the Christmas break. She is not. They both had COVID. She's fully recovered now.
Anyways, so no. There was none of that. She had to come home. She went through a very difficult time with, maybe not depression, but feeling very low, being ostracized by friends who was who were afraid. Her roommates made her life very difficult.
Very somebody who'd always been popular, just couldn't believe that her friends would turn their backs, that these kids were ruled by fear, Total fear.
Speaker 1: Did your daughter know if she was gonna be going back to school?
Speaker 0: She had no idea if she would ever be able to go back and she was devastated.
Speaker 1: What ended up happening?
Speaker 0: So, she came home. She worked and then, the mandates were dropped and she was allowed to return in September of this pre this previous September. Of course, now she's semester behind. So she's going to have to go back and finish to get her degree.
Speaker 1: And your other children, what grades are they in?
Speaker 0: So, my middle 2 are in were in high school throughout. And then my youngest is now in grade 7.
Speaker 1: What did you see in terms of the impact on them?
Speaker 0: Ugh. Mentally, huge. So, we've heard this morning about all the, crazy school requirements and the cohorts and the not being able to socialize The lies and the fear that was instilled in all of these children. And of course, they felt they had no social lives. It was depressing.
They didn't leave their rooms. They had no sports. They had no outlet. No clubs. No nothing.
Speaker 1: In your school district, was it mostly remote learning over the last 3 years?
Speaker 0: Remote learning. Yep. And Luckily, a very good friend of mine is a retired high school teacher, so she was able to help my teens. And my son, I said, No, you're not logging in. We're going to homeschool for the for the time that you're meant to be online.
Speaker 1: From your personal viewpoint, what did you see in terms of the effects of remote learning?
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, if I if I focus on my youngest son, there's no socialization. There's nobody to play with. He had a diagnosed speech impediment. And, Luckily, we were fortunate enough that his speech therapy could continue online. When I when he did return to work and they were meant to be masked, I said, no.
I mean, show me the data that a masked child with a speech impediment isn't going to be adversely affected. And it didn't exist. So we were given an exemption. He was the only 1 in the school of 250, who's got a spine of steel, who was unmasked. The following year, I was no longer able to just say as a parent, my child will not be masked all day, and that we had to use his speech impediment as the reason for them to tick that box.
reSee.it AI Summary
Join the National Citizens Inquiry on Sep 14, 12 PM EST for a live press conference. Commissioners will reveal crucial info from their report. Watch on various platforms. Don't miss this first glimpse. #NCICanada #TruthMatters
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT! Join the National Citizens Inquiry on Thursday, September 14th, at 12 PM EST for an exclusive live press conference. During this event, the commissioners will unveil a pivotal segment of crucial and timely information extracted from their official report. We will be live on X/Twitter, Facebook, Rumble, and at http://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca Don't miss this first peek at the commissioner's report! #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #Report #Important #SpecialAnnouncement #PressConference #cdnpolitics #TruthMatters @MichelleLCatlin @RebelNewsOnline @TrueNorthCentre @Canadians4Truth @BLNewsMedia @RebelNews_CA @CBCNews @CTV @nationalpost @globalnews @EpochTimes @westernstandard @DruthersNews @freespeechtv @super_spreaders @LauraLynnTT @FreeWCH @CCCAlliance @RealAndyLeeShow @canindependent @wideawake_media @OdessaOrlewicz @WSOnlineNews
Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Citizen Inquiry is hosting its first online live press conference since the hearings earlier this year. The commissioners will release a part of their report, focusing on a critical piece of evidence. With new variants and possible mandates, the commissioners believe it is important to share their thoughts and recommendations. This historical event will take place on September 14th at noon EST. You can join on X (formerly known as Twitter), Rumble, or the National Citizen Inquiry website. Don't miss out on the truth coming out. - Michelle
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everyone. I have a big announcement for you. You will not want to miss the National Citizen Inquiry's 1st online live press conference since the hearings this past spring, we are going to be having a live conference with media asking questions after the commissioners release a part of their report. We've been waiting for 4 months since the hearings ended this past spring and there is 1 piece of evidence that has come up that is so critical, particularly now when we're hearing about new variants and possible mandates and the commissioners felt that it was really important to release this part of the report with their thoughts on it. Their recommendations.
Again, you will not want to miss this. This is historical. The National Citizen Inquiry's first live press release with the 1st peek at the commissioner's report. So please join me on Thursday, that is September 14th, it will be at noon EST. So that's 9 a.
M. Pacific and you can join us on X, formerly known as Twitter. You can join us on Rumble or you can go right to our website nationalcitizen inquiry. Ca. The truth is coming out.
You will not wanna miss it. For the National Citizens Inquiry, I'm Michelle
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Shouldn't Health Canada be concerned about plasmid DNA contamination in COVID-19 injections and initiate an investigation into potential health risks? #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #PHAC #HealthCanada #DNA #COVID19 #CovidVaccines
@DonaldBestCA - DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY
"Microbiologist @Kevin_McKernan found the amount of DNA in the injections to be potentially 18 to 70 times higher than the limits set by one regulatory agency." Journalists @Matt_HorwoodET & @NChartierET report the horrific truth that Health Canada ignores for political reasons:…
reSee.it AI Summary
The human cost of COVID mandates and vaccinations in Canada is a concern. Some officials involved are distancing themselves from accountability, suggesting growing recognition of the harms. #Canada #COVID19 #COVIDMandates
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
What has been the human cost of COVID mandates and vaccinations in Canada? Some officials who were involved in implementing these measures are now distancing themselves from accountability, do you think this indicates that the harms are becoming more acknowledged by the public? #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #cdnpoli #COVID19 #COVIDMandates @DowdEdward
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern over the lack of alarm raised by authorities regarding the data presented. They believe there is a cover-up happening. They mention that some individuals involved in lockdowns and policies are backtracking on their actions. The speaker estimates that there have been 300,000 excess deaths, 1,360,000 disabilities, and 26,600,000 injuries due to the vaccine. They also calculate economic costs, including $5.2 billion in damages from deaths, $52 billion from disabilities, and $89 billion from lost wages and productivity. The total estimated cost is close to $150 billion. The speaker acknowledges that the impact on productivity cannot be measured accurately but suggests it could be significantly higher than the given numbers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We should be hearing everybody raising alarm bells. And the mere fact we're not is all personally, that's all I watch what people do know what they say. And this data that I've presented today, they see the data, everyone sees this data. This is not hard to get at. So, the mere fact that this is silence deafening silence from CDC, the NIH, the politicians and the media is all I need to know that this is a cover up in process.
Lately, we've seen from some of the people who are involved in the lockdowns and the policies start to backtrack and pull 180s and claim they never they force anybody to do anything. So, we're in the early days of this becoming, I think, a general public awareness. And inquiries like yours are a great benefit to wake up people because I'm just mortified that the agencies that were developed to protect us from profiteering from corporations seem to have been over the decades bought and, compromise in my humble opinion. I'll go through the human cost, was 300,000 we've calculated 300,000 excess deaths we believe due to vaccine in 'twenty one and 'twenty two. We think that number is probably conservative.
We estimate 1,360,000 disabilities due to the vaccine, We think that's conservative. And then 26,600,000 injured, we believe that's conservative for about twenty $8,000,000 to $29,000,000 in total, so 10% of the U. S. Population. But 30% of the employed workforce, if all those people are employed, which probably you're not, but it's still devastating to the employed of the country.
The numbers we calculated For the economic costs were from the national accounts, salaries and wages. So we took the average salary and imputed the following numbers. Deaths amounted to $5,200,000,000 in damages in 2022. Obviously, we used 21% and 2022. The disabled, cumulative disabled, we estimate at $52,000,000,000 and the injured through lost wages and work time And productivity, which we can't calculate, we just calculate what the actual salaries were, is about $89,000,000,000 for a sum total of close to approximately $150,000,000,000.
What we don't that's what we can measure. What we can't measure is lost productivity, which has a multiplier effect on wealth in the economy. So, that's that number could be anywhere from 2x to 10x the number we just gave you.
reSee.it AI Summary
11 years ago, Dr. Jessica Rose discovered that lipid nanoparticles from injections can travel beyond the injection site, even reaching places like the ovaries in animal trials. However, public health messaging misled by claiming the contents of COVID-19 injections stayed localized. This raises questions about transparency. #COVID19 #Vaccines #PublicHealth
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
According to Dr. Jessica Rose, it was known 11 years ago that lipid nanoparticles travel from the site of injection to places like the ovaries, in animal trials. Why was public health messaging saying that the contents of the COVID-19 injection stayed at the injection site when it was known that it didn't? #NCI #ThisisCanada #TruthMatters #Canada #cdnpoli #COVID19 #COVIDVaccines #Vaccines @JesslovesMJK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Studies show that more people who received the injections are ending up in the hospital and dying. Repeat injections can lead to tolerance issues by the immune system, preventing an effective immune response. The speaker is concerned about the damages caused by these products and believes that the voices of the injured have been silenced. They suggest that the potential cytotoxicity of the spike protein should have been considered before proceeding. The exclusion criteria in the original trials excluded people with preexisting autoimmune conditions, which may be related to hyper inflammation. The speaker believes that the adverse events reported are a result of systemic damage caused by the spike protein. They also mention that the contents of the injection were expected to remain at the injection site, but evidence suggests that lipid nanoparticles can travel to the ovaries. The speaker suspects that there is information being withheld from the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The studies that I've reviewed show, more people are ending up in the hospital and dying in the group that were injected. There are also a number of problems with repeat injections that are related to issues of tolerance by the immune system. It seems like there's a very clear Story developing now that tolerance is being induced by repeated exposure to the spike antigen. And basically, what that means is that you're not going to be mounting any kind of immune response to that protein or anything related to it. So basically, if you're exposed to this virus challenged by it, then you're not going to bound to an effective immune response.
And So I'm not sure I agree that these products have saved many lives. I'm much more focused on the damages that they've done. That's my meat. That's what I'm primarily focused on because I don't think that the people who were injured have a voice. It's been taken away from them.
And I want to be a voice for them. So this is my focus.
Speaker 1: It seems to me that this knowledge that Spike could be potentially cytotoxic It was probably known somewhat in the scientific literature before we decided to go ahead. So why is it that it was dismissed or ignored?
Speaker 0: I can't imagine that the people who are working on this didn't hypothesize that since The modus operands of this technology is to induce an immune response, an inflammatory response against the SPITE protein that they wouldn't have anticipated that wherever the spike was going to be presented on MHC molecules or embedded in whatever cell, then an immune response was going to be amounted in order to kill those cells and that would cause, in some people, hyper inflammation. I mean, This comes back to the original trials where the exclusion criteria lists were so long. They discounted people with preexisting autoimmune conditions, for example. And a lot of these have to do with hyper inflammation or a hyperinflamed state. So It could be this is one of the things that I've, hypothesized that we're seeing the worst effects of these products in people who had pre existing conditions like some kind of hyper inflamed state, which a lot of people have.
So I find it impossible to imagine that they didn't anticipate fate, a potential problem or the potential problem that most people who are reporting adverse events are reporting on. And this is the systemic notorious damage being done, say, to blood vessels or wherever the spike protein lands, like I said. And just to reinforce this, we were explicitly told that the contents of the needle were going to remain primarily at the injection site. We were really, really this was hammered home. And they also knew, I want to reiterate this to make this very clear.
As we know from the FOIA requested pharmacokinetic data and also from a paper, which you can find in the supplementary material in my slides from 11 years ago that confirms that they knew this is published in the literature that these types of lipid nanoparticles traffic to the ovaries in the same animals. And the reason we do that, we do animal models is because we basically have the same organ system. So traffics to the ovaries and whisked our rats. So probably traffics to the ovaries in humans. And lo and behold, it does.
So there's a lot of things I know it's a long winded answer, but there are a lot of things that they did know. And we know that they knew now because of forced FOIA requests. We wouldn't know this half of what we know about the data or that these studies that they did and didn't do if we weren't asking for this data that they don't want to reveal. So I dare say that there's a lot that they knew, there's a lot that they know now and are they're obfuscating from the public because it would be bad for the program.
reSee.it AI Summary
The correlation between COVID19 infections and WiFi hotspots/5G deployment is stronger than with population density. Could electromagnetic interference (EMI) from radiation play a role in illness? Symptoms of EMI and COVID19 overlap significantly. #Canada #COVID19 #EMI #WiFi
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Why does the correlation between COVID-19 infections and the presence of Wi-Fi hotspots and 5G deployment appear to be stronger than with population density? Is there a possibility that electromagnetic interference (EMI) from radiation, as suggested by Dr. Magda Havas, plays a role in illness, given the significant overlap in symptoms between EMI and COVID-19? #NCI #Canada #ThisisCanada #5G #COVID19 #EMI #WiFi #cdnpoli #hotspot #viralvideo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Postulate 1 suggests that radiofrequency radiation from wireless technology weakens the immune system, increasing the risk of infections and potentially leading to higher death rates. Postulate 2 states that severe infections, referred to as biological trauma, can be triggered by radiofrequency radiation and other toxins, potentially leading to electromagnetic interference (EMI) and related illnesses and injuries. EMI can be caused by natural or human-made sources and can affect both electronics and humans. Postulate 3 highlights the similarity between COVID-19 symptoms and electromagnetic symptoms, making it difficult to differentiate between the two. The deployment of 5G technology during the pandemic coincided with the increase in radiofrequency radiation, further complicating the identification of the source of illness. Factors like population density and Wi-Fi hotspots also seem to influence the spread of the virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are ideas or theories to start a discussion, all of which are based on scientific evidence. Postulate 1 is that radiofrequency radiation, and this is coming from a lot of our wireless technology. It impairs the immune system, which increases the risk of infections and this could lead to a higher case load and a higher death load. Postulate 2 is that severe infections, which I call biological trauma, activity to radiofrequency radiation and other toxins and it could increase the risk of developing EMI And I call it EMI cubed. And EMI cubed stands for electromagnetic interference, electromagnetic illness and electromagnetic injury.
If the interference is prolonged, it could relate in illness. And if the illness is severe, it could result in injury. Injury can also be due to acute exposures to high levels of radiation. The technical definition for electromagnetic is unwanted noise or interference in electrical path or circuit caused by an outside source. EMI can be caused by natural and human made sources.
For example, lightning could be the source and your computer can be the victim. So, so I mentioned that electromagnetic interference can cause electronics to operate poorly, malfunction or stop working completely. And it can also cause humans to operate poorly, malfunction and stop working completely, and that's because we're electromagnetic as indicated by the activity of our brain and heart activity. Postulate number 3 is that the symptoms of COVID nineteen are very similar to the symptoms of electromagnetic they overlap considerably. And so, it's difficult from just the symptoms to determine what you have.
Someone who has electromagnetic interference could actually be suffering from COVID and someone who has COVID, but perhaps has not been tested or tested negative, could be suffering from electromagnetic interference. And this is assuming that the tests are accurate and they haven't always been. During the lockdown, there was a deployment of 5 gs technology. So while the rest of us We're staying in our homes. The telecommunication industry was very quickly erecting 5 gs antennas across the globe And they both they coincided with the SARS CoV virus.
And we know that once the 5 gs technology is deployed that it causes an increase in radio frequency radiation that I'll present in a few minutes, and that increases your risk of developing electromagnetic interference. And since we can't tell the difference between the 2, it's Difficult to know what people are suffering from. During the pandemic, I was busy looking at the data that was coming primarily from Johns Hopkins University, but a number of other organizations around the globe. And this is showing COVID-nineteen cases at the early stage of the pandemic. And one of the questions that I had was why do levels of infection differ globally for this respiratory virus.
And in attempt to try to make sense of this, I looked at various confounding factors that could be involved in this pandemic and posted that information on my website, trying to make sense of the COVID nineteen pandemic with a global perspective. And the 1st confounding environmental factor I looked at was population and density. And here, you can see population density in the figure at the bottom and the COVID nineteen cases at the top. And there were a number of anomalies. For example, the population in India and Africa are quite high, Yet the number of COVID cases reported at the early stages was very low.
And if we look at this, graph that shows you Population density along the X axis and COVID nineteen cases along the Y axis, you can see, there is a linear relationship with Africa falling slightly below the line. But if we add North America and Europe to this, It follows a very different trajectory. So there's something else happening in North America and Europe to make this, to make so many people, develop the virus. Now the map of COVID nineteen more closely resembles Wi Fi hotspots, And these are global Wi Fi hotspots as of 2020 compared to April 7, 2020 for the virus. And you can see here there are a number of similarities with very high levels in North America and Europe and very low levels in Africa some of the other parts of the globe.
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
Looking back, do you consider it naive to have attempted to alert people to the potential repercussions related to the COVID-19 vaccine? Were you met with any hostility from friends, family, or employers due to your efforts? #NCI #ThisisCanada #COVID19 #cdnpoli #VaccineInjuries
Video Transcript AI Summary
On May 22, 2021, my dad went to get his second dose of the COVID vaccine. Sadly, within 45 minutes of the injection, he became very ill and passed away six days later. I rushed to the hospital after receiving a call from my mom, who said he wasn't talking anymore. Despite not being on the visitors' list, I managed to see my dad with the doctor's permission. He didn't look well, but I didn't believe he was dying. I planned to go home, but before I could even get there, my mom told me he had passed away. I felt he waited for me to arrive and then leave. After his death, I tried to warn people, but no one took it seriously. Friends, family, and even public figures dismissed his death.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On May 22, 2021, my dad went to the local grocery store pharmacy for his 2nd dose of the COVID vaccine. He then went around the store and purchased T bone steaks, asparagus and ice cream sandwiches, all of which he did not get to enjoy because unfortunately within 45 minutes of the injection, he was dying. He managed to drive himself home for the last time. He was hospitalized that night and sadly 6 days later, he succumbed to his injuries. At that time, I was working on a project in Waitburn, Saskatchewan.
My mom had called and said, he's not talking anymore. I said, why he's not talking anymore? I couldn't imagine that. She said, you should come home. I went to work, I tied up some loose ends, I said I'll be back and I made my way to Yorkton.
Upon arrival at the hospital, I didn't even know if I was going to get to see my dad. I wasn't one of the people on the visitors' lists. So, as I waited in the entrance to the hospital, while they called the ward to see if I was able to see my dad, I had called my mom to find out where exactly they were because I was going to see my dad regardless. And my mom my mom said I will come and get you and she made her way down the hallway. I ran to embrace her.
She was about to lose her husband of 47 years. Hospital workers were screaming at us, social distancing. I responded this is my mother and I will embrace my mother at any time that I want. Fortunately, the doctor allowed me to go in to see my dad. I got there.
He clearly was not well. I took his hand. I said, Dad, I made it home for you. The doctor came in and said he was dying. At the time, I didn't believe it.
He had survived so much. I didn't think a needle would take him out. Either way, the plan was I was going to go home. He wasn't expected to survive the night. They had actually told me I could bring my dog into the room.
So I Went to my mom and dad's house to get my dog and to get my clothes and I didn't even make it halfway across town and my mom said he had died. I feel like he waited for me to get there and then he waited for me to leave. Upon his death, my immediate response was to warn people. In hindsight, I see how naive I was because no one wanted to be warned. My dad's death was belittled and denied by friends, Family, my employer, my Prime Minister, my Premier, my MLA and my Member of Parliament.