TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ItsHambone
@ItsHambone - Hambone
RFK Jr: "The whole Opioid Crisis was engineered by the Sacklers and the other big pharmaceutical companies along with corrupt FDA officials." @RobertKennedyJr #Kennedy24
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pharmaceutical companies like Merck, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Glaxo have paid billions in penalties for dishonest practices, resulting in harm and deaths. The opioid crisis and Vioxx are examples of collusion between pharma and regulators, leading to thousands of deaths. Regulatory agencies have become puppets for the industry, depriving the public of informed consent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Traditionally, pharmaceutical industries are you know, it is a criminal enterprise. And, you know, I'm not saying that lightly. The 4 principal companies of Merckx, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Glaxo that produce, for example, all the vaccines in America have paid $35,000,000,000 collectively over the last decade in criminal penalties and, you know, damages, for lying to doctors, for defrauding regulators, for falsifying science, and for killing, hundreds of thousands of people. I mean, the whole opioid crisis was engineered by, by the Sacklers and by the other big pharmaceutical companies along with, corrupt FDA officials. And that that is a crisis and now kills a 100 this year killed a 106,000 American kids, twice the number of kids that died during the 20 year Vietnam War.
Vioxx is another good example. That was another symptom of the corrupt collusion between pharma and the regulatory agencies. And the the capture of those agencies by that industry, you know, which which has become the agencies themselves have become sock puppets for that industry. And they killed, between a 120,000, 500,000 people with a drug they marketed as a headache medicine and a, you know, arthritis medicine when they knew that it caused heart attacks. And they didn't tell the public that.
They concealed that from the public. So, you know, a lot of people would have said, oh, it caused heart attacks? Well, I'll take an aspirin, but they weren't allowed to make that choice because the far pharma and the collusion with the collusion of the regulators, took that information, deprived the public of informed consent.
@ItsHambone - Hambone
RFK Jr explains how money sent to Ukraine is a "Money Laundering Scheme" for BlackRock: @RobertKennedyJr #Kennedy24 https://t.co/3UvV2JBLjq
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker points out that the budget for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the US is $12 billion, while Ukraine receives 12 times that amount in one year. The speaker mentions that even after the war in Ukraine ends, the US will spend half a trillion dollars on rebuilding the country, with contracts for rebuilding being even larger than war contracts. The speaker highlights a statement made by Mitch McConnell, who suggests that the money sent to Ukraine actually goes to US military contractors, benefiting the country. The speaker implies that this reveals a money laundering scheme involving companies like Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The entire budget for EPA is $12,000,000,000, so that's all we have for the environment in this country. We're giving 12 times that to Ukraine in 1 year, and that's just the beginning because Even if the Ukraine war ended today, we'll still just spend a half a trillion there rebuilding the country. The contracts to rebuild are even bigger than the war contracts. So Mitch McConnell was asked in in March because the Republicans are supposed to be concerned about budget deficits, And he said, can we really afford a $113,000,000,000 he was at? He said, don't worry.
It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to US military contractors, so it's good for our country. Oh, he just admitted Exactly what we've all been saying, that it's all just a money laundering scheme, a Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing and Lockheed. Who do you think owns every one of those countries?
@visiblesoulfire - AwakeningDivinity
@ItsHambone @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/H0egdidTCL
reSee.it AI Summary
According to RFK Jr, none of the 72 vaccines given to children have been tested against a placebo. In 2016, he sued HHS to provide placebo studies for any vaccines, but they couldn't. #Kennedy24 @RobertKennedyJr @patrickbetdavid
@ItsHambone - Hambone
RFK Jr: "Not a single one of the vaccines, the 72 vaccines now administered to our children, have ever been tested against a placebo. And I in fact, sued HHS in 2016 and said, show me any placebo studies that you have for any vaccines, and they were unable to do so. None of them have been tested." #Kennedy24 @RobertKennedyJr @patrickbetdavid
Video Transcript AI Summary
None of the 72 vaccines for children have been tested against a placebo. The speaker sued HHS in 2016 to find placebo studies for vaccines, but none were found. The safety testing for the polio vaccine was only 48 hours, while the hepatitis b vaccines were tested for 4-5 days. This means that any adverse events occurring after that time period were not considered. Without placebo testing, the risk profile of current vaccines is unknown, and it cannot be determined if vaccines cause more harm than good. The speaker questions the ethics of mandating medical products with unknown risks for children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So not a single one of the vaccines, but 72 vaccines now are children have ever been tested against the placebo. And I, in fact, sued HHS in 2016 and said, show me any placebo studies that you have for any vaccines, and they were unable to do some none of them have tested. And You don't have to sue them like I did. Anybody can go on their cell phone and look up manufacturer's insert hepatitis b vaccine, Gardasil vaccine, polio vaccine. Do you know how many days, the current polio vaccine?
Do you know how many days it was safety tested for, Alan? 48 hours. The hepatitis b vaccine, the Glaxo version was 4 days. The Merck version, 5 days. That means that if the baby they gave that to had a seizure on day 6, it never happened.
If the baby died on day 6. It never happened. If the baby got food allergies diagnosed 2 years later, it never happened. If the baby got autism, which is not diagnosed till 4 years of age, 4.2 years of age, it never happened. Autoimmune diseases, You cannot see those if you have a short term studies, and you can't see any risk if you don't test against the placebo.
And my question is, nobody knows because of that, nobody knows risk profile or any vaccine that is currently on the schedule. And that means nobody can say with any scientific certainty that vaccine is averting more injuries and deaths than it's causing. And my question is, how in the heck Can we be mandating to children that they take a medical product for which we do not know the risks. And to me, that is criminal.