reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Iwendtster
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m not suicidal, and I’m not accusing anyone—I’m just raising questions as a private citizen about the truth. My elite life-insurance health qualification and my history support that I’m happy and fulfilled. Everything here is opinion except the photo and audio, which are factual. The last picture, taken by Mikey McCoy, is troubling given the timing before Charlie was killed.
@Iwendtster - Ian
*I am not sulcldaI. I recently had a life insurance policy taken out and qualified “elite” in health. I have never taken drugs in my life except for the adderral I am prescribed going on almost 20 years now. I do not drink alcohol and my relationship with my wife and kids is phenomenal. I am VERY happy and fulfilled in life and have never once ever considered taklng my own Ilfe.* I am also not accusing anyone of anything with this post but merely raising questions as a private citizen concerned with knowing the truth. Everything is a matter of opinion and not fact with the exception of the photo taken and audio message sent. Those are factual. This is the last picture taken and it was taken by Mikey McCoy. Everyone should be asking why. Especially since it was right before he looked at Dan flood and right after he looked at him again and almost 5 seconds before Charlie was klIIed. Share this far and wide. We should also be asking why he is reaching out to married women old enough to be his mother and speaking this way. So many questions and so many things don’t add up. But as many have believed since the beginning, Mikey might be the key to this whole thing.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims he knows what Mikey McCoy was doing when Mikey pulled up his phone: he was taking a picture of Charlie Kirk, which Speaker 0 says is “the last picture taken of Charlie Kirk before he was killed.” Speaker 0 says the photo shows a timestamp indicating Charlie Kirk was killed at approximately 10:23:30 Mountain Standard Time. Speaker 0 asserts that, based on the timestamp, Mikey took the picture between both times Charlie “looks at Dan Flood,” meaning Mikey looked at Dan Flood, then pulled his phone up and took the picture, then looked at Dan Flood again right before Charlie was killed. Speaker 0 presents this timing as something he believes he has right, and urges viewers to share the information widely, calling it one of the craziest things seen regarding “this case yet.”
Speaker 2 says the question “every single person on planet Earth” should ask is why Mikey McCoy took a picture of Charlie Kirk right before he was killed.
Speaker 0 then explains how he obtained the picture, saying it came from a follower who is a “stranger” with “nothing to do with Turning Point” and “nothing to do with” Speaker 0 or Mikey. Speaker 0 says the follower is a married woman whom Mikey McCoy responded to in DMs and sent the photo to. Speaker 0 adds that Mikey also sent the woman an audio message. Speaker 1 reads the audio message content from Mikey: Mikey says he does not even give out his phone number, that it is probably weird that he is giving it to her, and that since she messaged him, he has sometimes thought about stuff and “feel[s] like the Lord brings up on my heart again, just to talk to” her. Mikey says he does not know who he is to question it, mentions that he is “the world’s worst texter” and apologizes, says it has been nice talking to her and that he appreciates her reaching out and taking the time. Mikey says he does not talk to everyone, does not have time to talk to everybody, and that he thinks it may be “the Holy Spirit” or something. He ends by saying it was nice meeting her and thanking her.
Speaker 0 says that when he hears this message, it “sounds really weird,” and repeatedly asks whether he is “crazy.” Speaker 0 says the woman is old enough to be Mikey’s mother, and frames the message as “hitting on an older married woman.” Speaker 0 claims he has “always felt like something is weird about Mikey” and that Mikey “comes off as somebody who is like reaching out for help because he’s been abused or whatever,” while also asking whether Mikey is reaching out for help or “hitting on this woman.”
Speaker 0 emphasizes that the woman “does not have” a “massive following,” and claims it is not likely Mikey sent the photo to someone he expected to spread it widely. Speaker 0 says Mikey has “some explaining to do,” asking why Mikey looked at Dan Flood, then took the picture, then looked at Dan Flood again right before Charlie was killed, and asking why Mikey messaged the random older married woman. Speaker 0 concludes by suggesting “there’s more to this story” and implying it may explain why others “keep you out of the spotlight,” while stating “I’m just a conspiracy theorist.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know you didn't see this. You're not gonna believe this and you're for sure gonna think it's AI, but it's not and I have proof. Guys, I know exactly what Mikey McCoy was doing when he pulled his phone up. So share this far and wide because this is probably one of the craziest things that anybody has seen regarding this case yet. He was taking a picture of Charlie Kirk. This picture. This is the last picture taken of Charlie Kirk before he was killed. by Mikey McCoy. Look at the timestamp. Charlie was killed at approximately 10.23.30 Mountain Standard Time. Look at the timestamp. If I have this right, based on the timestamp, this means that Mikey took this picture between both looks at Dan Flood. So he looks at Dan Flood, then he pulls his phone up, takes the picture, and then looks at Dan Flood again right before Charlie's killed. If I have this right.
Speaker 2: So, the question every single person on planet Earth right now should be asking is why did Mikey McCoy take a picture of Charlie Kirk
Speaker 0: right before he was killed. Every single person should be asking that. But there's more. Because the way that I got this picture was one of my followers who is an absolute stranger. She has nothing to do with Turning Point. She has nothing to do with me, nothing to do with Mikey. Just a follower who is a married woman who Mikey McCoy responded to in DMs and sent this photo to. But in addition to this photo, he also sent her an audio message. Listen to this.
Speaker 1: hi this is mikey um to answer your question i actually don't even give out my phone number um like really to anybody either um and truthfully like it's probably even weird i'm giving it to you but um i i don't know like ever since you messaged me like there's sometimes i think about stuff or like I'm talking to people. I just feel like the Lord brings up on my heart again, just to talk to you. So I don't, I like, I don't know who am I to really question it, but, um, I'm also like the world's worst texter. So I'm sorry. I think that also correlates to being even worse at Instagram messaging. Anyways. Um, it's been nice talking to you. I really appreciate you, um, reaching out and just, you know, taking the time and, Again, like, I don't talk to everybody. Like, I don't also really have time to talk to everybody. But, yeah, I don't know. I just feel like, I don't know, maybe it's the Holy Spirit or whatever. But nice to meet you, and thank you for always taking the time.
Speaker 0: I don't know about you guys, but when I hear that, it sounds really weird, okay? All the stuff about the Holy Spirit and God and whatever, like, brother, brother. It sounds like you're just hitting on an older married woman. She's old enough to be your mother. And so that to me is really strange. Am I crazy? Am I crazy? Like why, what, huh? What do you take from that? You tell me. I have said this from day one. I have always felt like something is weird about Mikey. I've always felt like he is, he comes off as somebody who is like reaching out for help because he's been abused or whatever. I don't know, man. I'm just saying, that's a weird message that Mikey is sending to some random married lady who's old enough to be his mother, who has nothing to do with Turning Point whatsoever. Is he reaching out for help, or is he hitting on this woman? What is going on? By the way, for all of you that are asking, she also does not have some, like, massive following. So it's not like he's sending this photo to somebody who he thinks is gonna be able to get the photo out to the masses. Like, it's so weird. So Mikey McCoy has some explaining to do. Why did you look at Dan Flood and then take the picture and then look at Dan Flood again right before Charlie was killed? If I have that time stamp right. Why are you messaging some random woman who's old enough to be your mother and seemingly hitting on her? If you weren't hitting on her, why does this seem like it's a cry for help? Mikey, what's going on? Where are you, buddy? What are you doing? What's with this behavior? Kind of seems like there's more to this story, Mikey. It kind of seems like something's going on with you. And it kind of seems like maybe that's why all of these people are doing everything they can to keep you out of the spotlight, even though you were in the spotlight in the beginning. But hey, I'm just a conspiracy theorist.
@Iwendtster - Ian
So Officer Tatum says he’s done with people “just asking questions” and that you’re either ignorant or a Jew hater. Which one was your friend, Charlie then @TheOfficerTatum ? “We better keep asking the questions because it’s the only thing that keeps us free.” -CK Oops. https://t.co/dUldk8TulG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker raises several connected points about accountability and messaging around major U.S. foreign and domestic issues. First, they highlight the perceived urgency of a rapid twenty-hour response from a country the size of New Jersey, noting that such a response begs for a big explanation. They then point to what they describe as America underwriting the Israeli government to the tune of $4,000,000,000 annually, arguing that American taxpayers deserve answers about what they are buying with that funding.
A central concern voiced is the possibility of a regional or world war arising from an intelligence failure, and the speaker asks for clarity on how the U.S. is funding or supporting actions in the region in light of that risk. They emphasize that they and others deserve to know what the financial backing is achieving.
The speaker also recounts personal experience with being smeared for their views, including being labeled a Jew hater, an anti-Semite, and a conspiracy theorist because of what they have said. They insist on not backing down in the face of such smears.
Drawing on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, the speaker references multiple narratives they say they encountered: the claim that the virus originated from a bat in the Himalayas, the assertion that the vaccine was safe and effective, and the insistence that ivermectin was “horse-paced.” They express a belief in the importance of asking questions, framing it as the thing that keeps people free.
In sum, the speaker calls for transparency about large-scale U.S. financial support to Israel, questions about the potential consequences of intelligence failures leading to broader conflict, and a sustained commitment to inquiry in the face of public criticism, tying these to broader lessons they took from the COVID era.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm going to continue to ask the question, a twenty hour response in a country the size of New Jersey. That that begs a big explanation. And more importantly, America is significantly underwriting the Israeli government $4,000,000,000 a year. We as American taxpayers deserve answers to this. We deserve answers.
Also, if we're going to get into a regional or world war based on an intel failure. So I mean, we pay for this. What are we buying? Right? I got smeared as a Jew hater, an anti Semite, and conspiracy theorist because I said exactly what I just said.
And I refused to back down despite all the smears thrown at me because I learned during COVID. I learned when they told us that it came from a bat in the Himalayas. I learned when they told us the vaccine was safe and effective. I learned when they told us that ivermectin was horse paced that you better keep asking questions because it's the only thing that keeps us free. Thank you so
@Iwendtster - Ian
WHY IS IT THAT ANY AND EVERY PERSON THAT IS IN OUR GOVERNMENT OR HAS ANY KIND OF INFLUENCE SEEMS TO SUFFER THE SAME FATE IF THEY SPEAK OUT ABOUT THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT AND EPSTEIN? We all know the answer I think. But just in case you don’t… Watch this. https://t.co/f6NvOH1RBo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Initially, I resented the fact that there was no appreciation for nuance. I watched the APAC process—donors scanned via QR codes, 'like on the spot' donations—demoralizing. I saw someone 'rooting around in my stuff that should not have been there'. I argued that 'policy outgrowth seems to be an obsession about The Middle East that has not served my generation well.' There’s critique of a figure 'supposed to be in the place of Pam Bondi' who was 'ousted' for alleged acts. The House Ethics Committee investigation 'started long before I was speaker' and involved 'they paid underage women for sex and drugs.' Alan Dershowitz is noted as outspoken about Matt Gaetz. Epstein: 'not a pedophile'—'16 year olds, 17 year olds, 18 year olds'—and documents: '29 documents... over 400 pages' naming Clinton, Dershowitz. 'Epstein was working for foreign governments' and 'a foreign government that took him out.' 'I'm a conspiracy theorist.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bet you didn't see this.
Speaker 1: Initially, I resented the fact that there was no appreciation for nuance. Like, if you if you asked any questions about any decision of the Israeli government in any place regarding settlements, regarding Gaza, regard whatever, You were like, you you had deviated from the script. And I just in any policy area, I I had resentment over that. And then I saw the way the APAC worked, and that that was weird for, like, a country lawyer like me. I remember my first APAC reception, and, like, your fundraiser tells you you have to go, and your chief of staff tells you have to go, your committee chairman all tell you have to go.
And you get there and you wear this name badge, and I remember there's a QR code on it. And what we were supposed to do was go talk to donors. And then if they liked you, they scanned your QR code to make a donation, like, on the spot. And so it was this can you just imagine how demoralizing that is to, like, be told that your job for the next several hours to go chat people up, hoping they would scan you like a can of tomato soup on the way out of the meeting? Wow.
That is so freaking weird. And then, you know, I was in Israel. I went multiple times, and I did not like the fact that I found someone in my room rooting around in my stuff that should not have been there at the King David Hotel when I came back to my room when no one was expecting me to be back in my room.
Speaker 2: And I just Presumably Israeli law
Speaker 3: Well, I don't know who it was.
Speaker 1: I just thought, like, this is weird. All of these things combined are odd, and then the policy outgrowth seems to be an obsession about The Middle East that has not served my generation well.
Speaker 0: So all the why do you always point to this country and this organization as far as, like, our congress goes? And what about all the other ones that are paying our our politicians? What about all the other foreign lobbies? Blah blah blah. How many of them are putting QR codes on our congresspeople?
I'll wait. I'll wait. You can fight it all you want. You can try to Hasbro everybody to death, but you're wrong. Also, isn't it interesting that the guy that's talking about this was also the one that was supposed to be in the place of Pam Bondi?
I wonder why it is that he wasn't confirmed. Well, for those of you that know, he was ousted right before he was supposed to be confirmed for alleged, you know, sexual acts and all those different things that have happened to like, you know, everybody else like Julian Assange. And I mean, the list goes on and on and on. Right? But, you know, in case you don't remember, here's a little refresher.
Speaker 3: He said you would get booed off the stage. What's your response to him?
Speaker 4: Well, you know, he looks very unhinged. I mean, a lot of people have concerns about him. And I'm not sure if he's on something, but I do hope he gets the help that he needs. But more importantly, I hope the young women get the justice they deserve when it comes to him.
Speaker 3: I mean, you're referring to the House Ethics Committee investigation that is ongoing
Speaker 4: Yeah. With with his partner in jail because they paid underage women for sex and drugs. Yeah. That's what I'm
Speaker 3: referring to. He he has denied all of that. I'm wondering, doesn't he deserve the presumption of innocence here?
Speaker 4: Well, people are in jail. The women have confirmed it. He came to me. If I saw I still want to be speaker, I could have done something illegal and stopped the ethics committee investigation that started four years before.
Speaker 3: He told you to stop the other Yeah.
Speaker 4: Transmission. That that's what the that's what the whole motion to vacate was about. He he wanted me to engage and thought somehow I started this investigation. It started long before I was ever speaker. I and as you know, with congress, I don't get involved in ethics.
It's an equal number. They could investigate me. It's it's it has to be its own arm and branch. And so he wanted to leverage me to try to do that. And if I didn't, he wanted to do a motion to vacate.
Speaker 3: And he he's denied that, of course, that he urged you to stop the investigation.
Speaker 4: No. I had other members come to me. He came to me. I had other people who were on
Speaker 1: the scene
Speaker 3: that he
Speaker 4: talked to. Yeah. Yeah. So, no, there's no denying it.
Speaker 0: Isn't it interesting that Alan Dershowitz was one of the people that was very outspoken about making sure that Matt Gaetz wasn't confirmed?
Speaker 2: The president doesn't get to make even his own cabinet choices. It would be easy to imagine a constitution that says, look, the president can't appoint judges without confirmation because that's a different branch, but his own cabinet members should be able to be appointed without confirmation. But that's not the way the system works. And so there'll be either a full confirmation process or a an attempt to make a recess appointment, which will almost certainly be challenged and go to the supreme court. The supreme court in the 2014 decision allowed for these recess appointments, but four justices, three of whom are still in the court, wrote a concurring opinion raising questions about it.
So it's very much a work in progress.
Speaker 0: Where have I heard about Alan Dershowitz before though? Oh, that's right.
Speaker 2: Let me make two points that will be very controversial and you may disagree with them completely. Jeffrey Epstein was not a pedophile. That term has a specific meaning. It means people who are sexually attracted to prepubescent girls or boys. That is 11, 12 years old.
That's the definition of all psychiatrists and of the law. Epstein was interested in 16 year olds, 17 year olds, 18 year olds. He was a bad person, did terrible, terrible things. The word pedophile is not a correct description of what he was. What?
Speaker 5: Sometimes there were other people on the island that were important people. I saw Alan Dershowitz on the Island. It was more of a business meeting another time.
Speaker 6: What? Breaking news here. A third batch of documents pertaining to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has just been released. We've been combing through this. Nate Voie has been helping us do so.
He's live from our New York City newsroom. What are we learning here, Nate?
Speaker 7: Hey, Sandra. So 29 documents were just released in the past hour, over 400 pages. We're going through it as quickly as we can. And once again, names in the Clinton family have come up. So, of course, these names coming out as part of a twenty fifteen defamation lawsuit between Virginia Dufres, one of the accusers of claims that she was sex trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislain Maxwell, Epstein's confidant.
Names that were searched or at least discussed to be searched through Maxwell's phone as part of that defamation case include Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Prince Andrew, law dot harbor dot e d u was one of the the phrases to be searched through her phone as well as Alan Dershowitz, the attorney.
Speaker 3: But wait. There's more. Hang on to your seat, baby, because this one's a screamer.
Speaker 2: Wanna destroy Hamas, you have to kill the civilians who are being used as human shields. It's a tragic choice. I wish Israel didn't have to make it.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: But it's a choice in
Speaker 3: Let me bring the stuff
Speaker 7: up back here.
Speaker 2: Them by Hamas. Let me Okay. Argue that they're wrong, but you can't argue that it's their responsibility. Okay.
Speaker 3: I'm
Speaker 0: And then is it you know, what was what was Matt Gaetz saying specifically about the Epstein file? What was he saying about this this whole situation? Check this out.
Speaker 1: On Epstein, Bill Barr is the one that needs to be called in to give to give sworn testimony on what happened there at at at Bureau of Prisons because that is that is not that there's just no way that the story you're getting is the real story there. No freaking way. And Bill Barr knows it. Actually think it was a I actually think that on Epstein, it was a foreign government that took him out. I don't think it was a domestic enterprise.
Speaker 0: And recently, what else has he been saying?
Speaker 1: But I think the far more interesting question is what was Epstein doing and who was he doing it for? And you and I discussed this previously, but I think it's worth repeating for your audience. Jeffrey Epstein was working for foreign governments who were trying to get compromising material on US leaders in politics and academia and industry, and and not just US, but Western. And I think what was going on in the world at that time was the Iraq war. And you had countries who really, really, really wanted The United States to be deeply involved in the Iraq war.
And one of the thing one of the tools that I believe they utilized was getting Epstein to get this compromise. He was a bad guy, certainly a weird guy, but I he the notion that he was acting alone and not at the behest of foreign interests is false.
Speaker 0: Sure seems like these posts and all this stuff is one of those things that you could say aged very well like fine wine. And it just seems to be that there seems to be all these different connections, and that all these connections seem to lead back to the same exact place, the same exact group of people, and the same exact issue. By the way, maybe that's why we still don't have the Epstein files. But, hey, I'm just a conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 3: Like it's all inside my mind.
reSee.it AI Summary
I've noticed a trend among influencers promoting Israel, allegedly earning $7k per post and gaining endorsements in the Republican/Conservative space. This seems to align with what Bibi Netanyahu referred to as Hasbara 2.0, which feels disconnected from an America First approach. If you've been following these influencers, it all starts to make sense. Some responses to my observations confirm this perspective, with others calling out the situation as Israeli propaganda.
@Iwendtster - Ian
EVERY INFLUENCER WHO HAS BEEN POSTING FOR ISRAEL. (SO FAR) Allegedly taking $7k per post along with other endorsements and opportunities within the Republican/Conservative space. This is the Influencer front that Bibi Netanyahu talked about. Hasbara 2.0 NOT America First. https://t.co/4ZOUu5iAwJ
@Iwendtster - Ian
If you have been following any of them it makes complete sense https://t.co/ety4n3CfXK
@Iwendtster - Ian
@digtalsoldier Of course it is
@Iwendtster - Ian
@Eliz040748 Your bet is retarded and in fact, Israeli propaganda lol
@Iwendtster - Ian
@JanetC669308 Yep
@Iwendtster - Ian
@Donnie49752 Correct
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a claim that Candace Owens has evidence regarding TPUSA, emphasizing the importance of truth. A participant raises questions about the circumstances surrounding Charlie Kirk's alleged murder, suggesting that Israel had both the means and motive to silence him due to his increasing criticism of Israeli policies. They argue that Kirk's critical stance intensified after he rejected attempts to intimidate him and accept a bribe from his sponsors, revealing their true nature and further solidifying his opposition to Israel.
@Iwendtster - Ian
CANDACE OWENS IS NOT LYING ABOUT TPUSA. I HAVE PROOF RIGHT HERE. I know having this info and sharing it comes with a potential price… But the truth matters more than anything else… Your move @TPUSA @RealCandaceO @IanCarrollShow @RyanMattaMedia https://t.co/9ebaBNW6AP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Candace ain't lying, guys. I know it for a fact. None of us really know. 'they're literally telling us to look at the wall that is purple and say and we say it's purple and they say, no. No. No. Look closer. It's it's yellow.' 'How do we best honor Charlie's death and legacy than figuring out who the hell killed him and why and how?' 'There is absolutely something going on in that organization. There was something going on prior to his assassination. There's absolutely something going on right now, and they do not want us to know.' 'This is a real source. This is a real text message.' 'We fight to figure out what the hell it is they don't want us to know.' I hope that helps.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bet you didn't see this. Yeah. So Candace ain't lying, guys. I know it for a fact. And so listen, to everybody who is falling into this trap of, you know, attacking anybody and everybody that's asking questions about this and calling them conspiracy theorists, which is really funny because it's coming from people who are typically conspiracy theorists, typically people that ask all the questions.
But if you are doing that, right, why? Why are you doing that? We all know that these narratives they're spinning out that they're putting out don't make any sense. They don't make any sense at all. And we all know that there is like, we don't know who killed him, why it was done, or how it was done.
None of us really know. Like, if you're actually believing what these people are telling us, you're cooked. Okay? Because none of this makes sense. I mean, they're literally telling us to look at the wall that is purple and say and we say it's purple and they say, no.
No. No. Look closer. It's it's yellow. What are you talking about?
What are you talking about? Okay. So if you're one of those people, why are you like, why do you not wanna get to the bottom of it? How do we best honor Charlie's death and legacy than figuring out who the hell killed him and why and how? And the fact that stuff like this is out and stuff like what Candace is saying is out and stuff like what Carroll and all these other people that are digging into this and figuring out what's going on.
Because by the way, this is a real source. Okay? This is this is a real text message. You know? Believe it if you if you want.
Like, I don't care. It's real. There is absolutely something going on in that organization. There was something going on prior to his assassination. There's absolutely something going on right now, and they do not want us to know.
And how do we best honor Charlie? We fight to figure out what the hell it is they don't want us to know. I hope that helps.
@SeriousStuff42 - Johannes Miertschischk
Israel not only had the means but also a clear motive to silence Charlie Kirk forever❕️ Just asking questions: When a murder has been committed, the first step is to examine the crime scene and to interview witnesses. In Charlie Kirk's case, the crime scene was hastily dismantled. Why? The members of his security team are key witnesses and possible accomplices. Were they interrogated and investigated? The second step in a murder investigation is the question of motive. What motives were considered by investigators? We now know that in the months before his murder, Charlie Kirk had become increasingly critical of Israel's role in the world and had provided his powerful platform to influential Israel critics such as Tucker Carlson and Dave Smith. He had publicly called Jeffrey Epstein a creation of the Mossad. His Jewish sponsors responded with a carrot and stick approach, attempting to intimidate him and simultaneously offering him a huge sum of money to bring him back into line. Charlie Kirk was not intimidated and indignantly rejected the bribe attempt. His Jewish sponsors thus achieved the opposite of their intended outcome. Through this approach, they revealed to Charlie Kirk their true, thoroughly depraved nature. His critical attitude toward Israel deepened, and his determination to take a public stand against Israeli policies grew stronger. Israel not only had the means but also a clear motive to silence Charlie Kirk forever.
@Iwendtster - Ian
CANDACE OWENS IS NOT LYING ABOUT TPUSA. I HAVE PROOF RIGHT HERE. I know having this info and sharing it comes with a potential price… But the truth matters more than anything else… Your move @TPUSA @RealCandaceO @IanCarrollShow @RyanMattaMedia https://t.co/9ebaBNW6AP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker asserts 'Candace ain't lying, guys. I know it for a fact.' They warn against attacking anyone who asks questions and labeling them conspiracy theorists, noting those questions are often raised by 'typically conspiracy theorists.' They claim 'these narratives they're spinning out... don't make any sense' and that 'None of us really know. Like, if you're actually believing what these people are telling us, you're cooked.' They describe a contradiction: 'look at the wall that is purple... it's purple' and 'Look closer. It's yellow.' They ask, 'What are you talking about?' and argue the way to honor Charlie is by figuring out 'who the hell killed him and why and how.' They state 'There is absolutely something going on in that organization' before and after the assassination and that 'they do not want us to know.' To honor Charlie, 'we fight to figure out what the hell it is they don't want us to know.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bet you didn't see this. Yeah. So Candace ain't lying, guys. I know it for a fact. And so listen, to everybody who is falling into this trap of, you know, attacking anybody and everybody that's asking questions about this and calling them conspiracy theorists, which is really funny because it's coming from people who are typically conspiracy theorists, typically people that ask all the questions.
But if you are doing that, right, why? Why are you doing that? We all know that these narratives they're spinning out that they're putting out don't make any sense. They don't make any sense at all. And we all know that there is like, we don't know who killed him, why it was done, or how it was done.
None of us really know. Like, if you're actually believing what these people are telling us, you're cooked. Okay? Because none of this makes sense. I mean, they're literally telling us to look at the wall that is purple and say and we say it's purple and they say, no.
No. No. Look closer. It's it's yellow. What are you talking about?
What are you talking about? Okay. So if you're one of those people, why are you like, why do you not wanna get to the bottom of it? How do we best honor Charlie's death and legacy than figuring out who the hell killed him and why and how? And the fact that stuff like this is out and stuff like what Candace is saying is out and stuff like what Carroll and all these other people that are digging into this and figuring out what's going on.
Because by the way, this is a real source. Okay? This is this is a real text message. You know? Believe it if you if you want.
Like, I don't care. It's real. There is absolutely something going on in that organization. There was something going on prior to his assassination. There's absolutely something going on right now, and they do not want us to know.
And how do we best honor Charlie? We fight to figure out what the hell it is they don't want us to know. I hope that helps.
@Iwendtster - Ian
I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT THEY ARE LYING ABOUT CANDACE OWENS. Why is there what seems to be a coordinated effort to damage/discredit the relationship between Charlie and @RealCandaceO ? OR IS THERE? Idk… I’m just a conspiracy theorist. 🤷🏼♂️ https://t.co/qfmAJdUj7R
Video Transcript AI Summary
At a Turning Point women's conference clip (02/2024), Candace Owens is told, "The Daily Wire has sent somebody secretly to record you, an intern... to catch you in a bad moment, in a bad light," and urged to have Ariana "stand up" and "come out into the lights." The clip says Candace was "handpicked" by Charlie Kirk to speak at the event, and notes she was fired from the Daily Wire, "which is run by Ben Shapiro in March 2024." An anonymous text is cited as confirming this. The speaker asks, "Why are they trying to kill the relationship between Candace and Charlie?" and cites Ian Carroll, who "doesn't have a dishonest bone in his body." A Turning Point USA board member is pressed, "You're on the board... When's the last time you saw Candace Owens? In person? 2015. 2016." The speaker argues Candace is "flying pretty freaking close to the sun" and "not invited" anymore, calling it "organizational" and "deep" and a distraction from what's really going on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bet you didn't see this.
Speaker 1: But as I was headed in here, I got a a frantic call from somebody. They did. They called me and they said, Candace, something very weird is happening. The Daily Wire has sent somebody secretly to record you, an an intern, a PR intern, to secretly record you, to catch you in a bad moment, in a bad light. And to be fair, it is never the fault of a person when their employer is sending them to do something that isn't good, but I would really love it if Ariana stood up.
Okay. Maybe that's a little too intimidating for you too, but apparently, she got an email at 10PM, hopped on a plane, is pretending to be a student. And so I do just wanna say to Ben Shapiro, enough. Come out into the lights. Really.
Come on. Let's do this debate. Stop sending interns to do your dirty work.
Speaker 0: So that clip is from a women's conference in 02/2024, specifically a Turning Point women's conference. And the guests, including Candace Owens, were handpicked by Charlie. Okay? Handpicked. So Charlie handpicked Candace to speak at this event.
Coincidentally, this was in June 2024. Candice Owens was fired from the Daily Wire, which is run by Ben Shapiro in March 2024. Okay? And so I can literally back this up as well because I got a crazy text this morning from an anonymous source, and you can believe me if you want. I don't really care.
Hopefully, I'll be able to say who it was eventually, but right now, I can't. But they confirmed this to be the absolute truth. This is what the text said. Day. Now why is this important?
Well, it's important because there's a lot of people right now that are trying to say that Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were not actually that good of friends. That they had a falling out, that she hasn't spoken at any of the events, she hasn't been involved. Right? Specifically, because last night on her show, she said that she was. Check this out.
Speaker 1: I just don't even get this. How could you say that I have not spoken at a Turning Point USA conference in years when I literally went on tour with Turning Point USA on college campuses last year? Like, I that's that's just incredible.
Speaker 0: Let me first start off by saying, I I don't know Candace. I don't I didn't know Charlie personally, but I know a lot of people that were very close to them. A few people that were very, very close to them. Now here's the thing. If I'm wrong, I'll be the first to admit it.
But the thing is I don't think I am based on everything that I'm seeing, based on everything I just showed you, and based on the fact that the people that I I I don't know Charlie or Candice, like I said, but I know people that are very close to them, specifically like an Ian Carroll. Okay? Ian Carroll is a good friend of mine. He ran Candice's show for a a while while she was on maternity leave. Ian Carroll doesn't have a dishonest bone in his body.
I would I would probably trust Ian Carroll with my kids. Okay? So when you when I see all these people coming at Candace and saying and again, I don't know Candace, but all these people that are saying, oh, they don't have they don't have a relationship. They had a falling out. None of this is actually true.
And then I have people like my friend Ian who are saying that's absolutely not true. That's absolutely false. And then on top of that, I have this person who I also trust sending me a text message and saying this is absolute garbage, and anybody that's trying to say they didn't have a relationship is insane. I'm gonna side with those people. And so the question that you guys should be asking, the question we should all be asking is this.
Why are they trying to kill the relationship between Candace and Charlie? And it's kind of obvious. Candace is flying pretty freaking close to the sun right now. Candace is on to everything. Candace is basically dismantling this entire thing single handedly.
And then the next question you should ask yourself is why is a board member of Turning Point USA the one who's trying to push this narrative?
Speaker 2: You're on the board of Turning Point? Yeah. Okay. When's the last time you saw Candace Owens? In person?
Yeah. 2015. 2016. Okay. Yeah.
No. When's the last time she was at a Turning Point event? Not in many years. Okay. So let's see.
You you without even being biased. There's a there's a bet there's Candace a even involved. There's a no No at all? Question proof that Candace Owens is nothing has nothing to do. She would be in in a perfect world if if they didn't have this, what I already know, was a is a very quiet breakup where she got too rabbit hole for him.
Dang. She's She would be the logical heir to the TP USA throne, but she's not And now she's not even invited. Correct. So this is this is So Their divide is Wait minute. Not invited meaning meaning She's not even there.
Yeah. She's not she's not there. One of the names that You I don't think she'll be at the funeral? No. No.
No. That means that the funeral heir to the CTB. Speak She at the events anymore. Mean
Speaker 0: Man, I will just tell you guys this. I don't have any skin in this game at all, but I'm pretty good at, you know, seeing things for what they are, I guess. And I'll just say this, I think this is organizational. I think this is deep. I think it's way deeper than we think.
And I think all this other stuff that's come out about Tyler and the letter and all that, I think it's a distraction. I think it's an absolutely I I think it's ridiculous on purpose. I think that they knew that it would get everybody talking about it. It would distract everybody from what's really going on, and I think what's really going on is internal. But, hey, I'm just a conspiracy theorist.