reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @JKernerOT
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Pfizer vice president, claimed there was no pandemic or public health emergency, asserting that respiratory illness rates did not increase until after the WHO declared a pandemic. He criticized the use of PCR tests, stating they were designed to yield false positives and misled the public about the severity of the situation. In response, another participant supported Yeadon's views, asserting that over 7 million people did not die from COVID-19 and referenced a link to studies claiming the pandemic was falsely inflated.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president at Pfizer: "There wasn't a pandemic. There wasn't a public health emergency. There was nothing unusual happening." "There is nowhere in the world that you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory death anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic." "They called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic because they were lying to you." "Our governments created the impression of a pandemic by misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says—PCR." "The increased number of cases everywhere was a pandemic of a roll-out of a rubbish test." "It's not a mistake. They knew it was rubbish... They designed it to produce positives where there was no illness." "They just lied to you. Nothing was happening. If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence. They called the pandemic, and then the data started arriving, which was fraudulent."
Video Transcript AI Summary
"there wasn't a pandemic, there wasn't a public health emergency, there was nothing unusual happening."
"In order for an emergency to be declared, which I think he did in 2020, March, whatever it was, He has to have some evidence of that."
"There is nowhere in the world you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic."
"They called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic."
"They were lying to you."
"Then they created the we, all our governments, created the impression of a pandemic by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR."
"It's not a mistake. They they knew it was rubbish."
"It's as simple as that."
"If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In many interviews, I've been keen to tell people that there wasn't a pandemic, there wasn't a public health emergency, there was nothing unusual happening. Sometimes I'll refer to the numbers of people, you know, going into hospital or dying of things, But I've got something that I think is more useful. In order for an emergency to be declared like a fire or like a shark approaching a public beach, you know, holiday beach, would you agree with me, ladies and gentlemen, that before you would call out the fire engines, you'd probably be smelling smoke somewhere, someone would be, or a fire or a fire smoke alarm will go off. Before you would call shark alerts and get everybody off the beach, you'd think someone would have seen a fin, yeah? Or or someone in a helicopter said, hey, I can see some sharks approaching the beach.
What I'm telling you is before an emergency is cold, there is already an event at some level that someone is able to see, to detect, and warn you about, and you think, oh, that was really good that they warned us. In the case of the pandemic, that nice man at the WHO Tedros, clever he may be, but he's not a fortune teller. He doesn't have foresights. He hasn't got long range binoculars. He's not got a time machine.
In order to declare a pandemic, which I think he did in 2020, March, whatever it was, He has to have some evidence of that. There's a little problem, ladies and gentlemen. Not just me, but Denis Rancourt, Denis Rancourt in Canada, and many other researchers have looked for signs of illness, respiratory illness, which surely would be growing somewhere in a small way, in order that the WHO from their Siemens exhaustive position could aggregate all that data and go, oh my word, it looks like there's something that like a pandemic beginning. There is nowhere in the world you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic. Ladies and gentlemen, they called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic, because they were lying to you.
They were lying to you. Then they created the we, all our governments, created the impression of a pandemic by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR. There's literally what we had is a pandemic of rollout of the test. It's as simple as that. Increased number of cases everywhere was a panoramic of a rollout of a rubbish test.
It's not a mistake. They they knew it was rubbish. They designed it to be rubbish. They designed it to produce positives where there was no illness. And then when people died, they said, oh, they had COVID.
They literally did that. And then I'm afraid medical procedures in care homes and hospitals led to people being killed. But this is old news. You've heard all this before. I just wanted to tell you, you can't have an emergency without some sign of that emergency emerging somewhere.
You need that information in order as a leader to say, I'm afraid, folks, I've got bad news. There's an emergency coming. Baton down the hatches. For these pandemics, they just lied to you. Nothing was happening.
If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence. They called the pandemic, and then the data started arriving, which was fraudulent. So it's as simple as that.
@JKernerOT - J Kerner
Dr. Yeadon was 100% right. 7+ million people worldwide and 1.1 million Americans did NOT die from covid. Millions of people were NOT hospitalized because of covid. This link contains irrefutable proof, hundreds of fully cited and documented studies and reports. “A Falsely Inflated Pandemic” https://open.substack.com/pub/keihatsu/p/a-falsely-inflated-pandemic?r=2kx8r6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
A Falsely Inflated 'Pandemic'
Falsely Inflated Covid Hospitalizations and Deaths
keihatsu.substack.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a claim that General Milley admitted to treason by communicating with China and suggests this is why Biden pardoned him on his last day in office. In response, one participant argues that preemptive pardons are not legitimate, stating that a pardon should only apply after formal charges are made. They assert that any preemptive pardons issued by Biden should be disregarded, as they lack legal validity. Another participant joins the discussion but does not add further commentary.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Flashback! Gen. Milley Admits To Treason By Back-Channeling Messages to China. This Is Why He Was PardonedBy Biden on His Last Day In Office. Live Coverage Here https://t.co/CtC9YWf3Vx https://t.co/eAm4gsBsbx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Chinese leaders mistakenly believed the U.S. intended to attack. I assured General Lee that there would be no war between great powers and emphasized that if tensions rose, communication would occur. I made it clear that the U.S. would not attack, aiming to convey President Trump's intent to prevent escalation.
In a different segment, a new collectible coin commemorating the fight against the deep state and the election of Donald Trump is introduced. This coin, limited to 4,000 pieces, celebrates the anticipated inauguration of Trump as the 47th president on January 20, 2025. Purchasing this coin supports ongoing efforts against globalist influences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Chinese thought wrongly that the United States is gonna attack them. I am certain, guaranteed certain, that president Trump had no intent to attack. And it was my task to make sure I communicated that. And the purpose was to deescalate You
Speaker 1: shared all that earlier. I understand.
Speaker 0: And as part of that
Speaker 1: to say, did you or did you not ask tell him that if we were going to attack, you would let him know?
Speaker 0: As part of that conversation, I said, general Lee, there's not gonna be a war. There's not gonna be attack between great powers. And if there was, the tensions would build up. There'd be calls going back and forth from all kinds of senior officials. I said, hell, general Lee, I'll probably give you a call, but we're not going to attack you.
Trust me. We're not going to attack you. These are 2 great powers, and I am doing my best to transmit the president's intent, president Trump's intent to ensure that the American people are protected from an incident that could escalate.
Speaker 1: I understand your intent, but I think you articulating that that you would tell him, you would give him a call, I think is worthy of your resignation. I just think that's against our country, that you would give our number one adversary that information and tell him that.
Speaker 2: We put out 5 previous collectible info wars coins, and they're all amazing and people love them. And folks are buying them on the collectible market. In many cases, three times what we sold them for. But I gotta say this new one is my favorite by far because it lets me remember and savor the victory against the deep state and the corporate media, how they tried to kill Trump twice, and how we got him elected. It is the battle for the republic, 2024 commemorative coin on one side, and the other side commemorates the 47th president of the United States, Donald Trump, getting inaugurated on January 20, 2025.
There are only 4,000 of this coin, and there'll never be more made again, and they fund this operation in the ongoing fight against the globalist. Ladies and gentlemen, get your piece of history and help fund the info war as we continue to win major battles against the globalist because we won a huge battle, but the war goes on and we're close to winning. Get your coin now at the oxstonestore.com.
@JKernerOT - J Kerner
I believe preemptive “pardons” aren’t legal pardons at all - and therefore must be ignored and disallowed. A pardon by definition means the excusing of an offense without punishment or penalty. Until an individual has been officially charged with a crime or offense, he or she cannot be given a blanket preemptive pardon that covers any offense they might have committed. Anyone preemptively pardoned by Biden BEFORE they were charged with specific crimes and offenses must be allowed to be charged. All of Biden’s preemptive “pardons” are legal BS and must be set aside.
@VRVeteran - AI4Christ.Studio
@JKernerOT @RealAlexJones https://t.co/LlyBq7jVg1
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there's undeniable evidence that Democrats are committing election fraud and treason. In 14 states without ID requirements for voting, it's clear they aim to allow illegal votes. Most of these states are Democrat-controlled, holding 197 electoral votes. Since Biden took office, Democrats have allegedly opened borders to millions of illegals, relying on them to vote illegally. Additionally, we've spent over $400 billion on benefits for these individuals to secure their votes. Numerous voting machine "glitches" have also favored Democrats. We must out-vote this rigged system by supporting Trump-Vance and removing Democrats from office.
@JKernerOT - J Kerner
Irrefutable proof that Democrats have been committing and intend to commit elections fraud (and treason) - and how we can defeat this fraud: (1) 14 states do NOT require any ID to vote to verify citizenship or identity. Not requiring ID to vote is 100% proof that these states intend to allow legal and illegal non-citizens, dead people and unregistered people to vote - illegally. 13 of these 14 states are controlled by Democrats. (What the hell’s wrong with Nevada?) Those 13 states total 197 electoral college votes - 270 votes are needed to win the presidency. And those states commit elections fraud also to keep Democrats in office in state legislatures and Congress. (2) Democrats intentionally opened our borders wide to an invasion by 20-25 million illegals since the puppet Biden-Harris regime was installed in Jan 2021. Coupled with not requiring ID, Democrats count on millions of these illegals to vote - illegally. (3) Democrats have forced our nation to pay over $400 BILLION in benefits to illegals since Jan 2021 (free housing, free healthcare, money, etc). Why? To buy their votes and firmly entrench them into society to dilute our nation. (4) Non-citizens - legal and illegal - are being issued driver’s licenses, benefits and even social security numbers. They are then being automatically registered to vote by Democrat-controlled states when these non-citizens get entered into the system. (5) So far during this election period, there have been numerous “glitches” with computer voting machines. ALL such “glitches” have occurred in Democrat-run precincts. ALL such “glitches” go in the favor of Harris-Walz (of course!) These “glitches” include misspelling Trump’s name (causing machines to reject those votes), not allowing people to select Trump-Vance, automatically changing votes for Trump-Vance to Harris-Walz, duplicating one vote for Harris-Walz over and over to result in multiple votes from one person, machines “breaking down” in Republican areas, and others. How can any real American not see all these things occurring right before our eyes? How can any real American continue voting for Democrats, who are in bed with the globalist cartel, pushing globalist agendas while selling out the US? We can out-vote this rigged election. Vote for Trump-Vance, and vote out as many Democrats as possible from all public offices. Out-voting Democrats overcomes their illegal votes, and makes Democrat cheating so blatant and obvious that action must be taken against them. Too much cheating backfires as it becomes obvious t everyone.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Michael McDowell's presentation highlights the existence of the genetic bioweapons industry. Dr. Leonard Horowitz's research suggests that AIDS and Ebola are lab-engineered viruses, which remains unchallenged. Dr. Francis Boyle claims that SARS-CoV-2 is an offensive biological warfare agent created in a lab.
@JKernerOT - J Kerner
Must-watch presentation by Dr. Michael McDowell: “The genetic bioweapons industry exists. [Dr. Leonard Horowitz proved] that AIDS and Ebola are manufactured viruses, engineered in a laboratory. This has NEVER been refuted. “The genetics bioweapons industry is the most covert industry on planet earth. “Dr. Francis Boyle sates, “SARS-CoV-2 is an offensive biological warfare agent, made in a lab.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the existence of a genetic bioweapons industry and its connection to the COVID-19 pandemic. They mention various experts and sources that suggest the virus was engineered in a lab and combined with an HIV virus. The speaker also criticizes the pharmaceutical industry's influence on governments, media, and the medical field. They highlight the increase in deaths after the start of the vaccination campaign and express concern about the potential dangers of the vaccines. The speaker encourages Christians to stand against this perceived evil and predicts the eventual downfall of those involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Such a bio weapons industry when, a gentleman by the name of doctor Leonard Horowitz published a book called Emerging Viruses in 1996. Emerging Viruses, AIDS and Ebola, Natural or Intentional? That was the title of the book. And in this academic treatise, and he's a virologist and a vaccinologist, he proved that AIDS and Ebola are manufactured, viruses, engineered in a laboratory. His academic treaties have stood the test of time.
It has never been refuted. And and we know that, the way academic stand and fall is on being presented and refuted. This has never been refuted. And the genetic bioweapons industry is the most covert industry on planet Earth, but it exists. I would like to go further by saying that, William Cohen, the former US Secretary State in 1997, Cohen referred to the concept of an ethnic bioweapon as a possible risk.
In 1998, some biological weapon experts considered such a genetic weapon plausible. And you know when they say that, it means they've already produced it and they're they're stockpiling it and waiting to use it. And that research was being done on how certain substances can influence human genes. That was 1998. 10 years later in 2008, the US government congressional committee, sat under the under under the title, under the label, genetics and other human modification technologies.
A new kind of arms race people, a new kind of arms race is happening. And and somebody's and and in that committee said, there are attempts to manipulate human genetics in ways that would horrify us. And so that was 2,008. Let me go a little further and go beyond William Cohen, and we wanna introduce you to somebody called doctor Francis Boyle. Very, very significant gentleman.
I think we have a a photo of doctor Boyle that we could put up. Doctor Francis Boyle is an international law expert. He's also an an expert on, genetic bio weapons. And he was a gentleman who framed the anti terrorism act. It's called the bio weapons anti terrorism act or BWATA.
It was framed in 1989, signed into law in 1990 by by President George W Bush, with unanimous approval from the US Senate and the US Congress. And so, if there is a genetic bioweapons anti terrorism act, it means, obviously, there must be a genetic bioweapons industry. Correct. And, I want you to know, people, that on this earth, 22 nations on planet Earth have what we call BSL 4 labs. BSL 4 lab means biosafety level 4.
Biosafety level 4 is the highest level of biosafety. And in these labs, they make pathogens, deadly pathogens. I I also want you to know that 16 nations on planet Earth stockpile genetic bio weapons. 16 nations stockpile. They have them in the armory.
There's a new arms race going on. And I wanna give you a quote from doctor Francis Boyle. Doctor Francis Boyle, the framer of the framer of the anti terrorism act says this, international law expert, bio weapons expert, SARS COVID 2 is an offensive biological warfare agent made in a lab and engineered with gain of function properties. He said that in February 2020. I have I have quoted this in my in a documentary I did.
It's on YouTube called Watch 1, What of the Night, Part 1, where I I spell this out very clearly. Wow. And he's he has come to the conclusion, and this is gonna shock you. Amen. Put on your seat belts.
This is gonna shock you. Yes. Come to the conclusion that SARS COVID 2 is a tripartite chimera. And it is composed of 1, SARS, the original SARS, but and he says SARS, is already weaponized. And then that SARS virus was enhanced by gain of function properties.
And step 3, they were all then, genetically recombined with an HIV virus. That's the virus that causes AIDS. So a tripartite chimera. If you think I am kidding, I have some notes here that I could refer to. And, the I call them smoking gun 1, 2, and 3.
Francis Boyle quoting from an article called antiviral research, February 10, 2020, written by 3 French scientists and 1 Canadian scientist from Montreal, said the Wuhan the the Wuhan coronavirus genetic analysis may provide a gain of function to 2019 novel coronavirus. So the Wuhan coronavirus genetic analysis may provide a gain of function to 2019 novel coronavirus for efficient spreading in human population compared to other beta coronaviruses. He says that is a smoking gun. It was genetically engineered for efficient spreading in human population. Wow.
Alright. That's recorded. Gain of function, if you don't know what gain of function means, gain of function means genetically engineered to be more lethal, more virulent, more infectious, and to mutate or adapt more readily with slight increases in immune selection pressure from the population. It's also called accelerated viral evolution. And, I saw doctor Gil refer to that in his campaign about, and he used it the the the the colloquial balance just so viruses don't just so jump from animal to human.
Smoking gun number 2, UNC. And that's the University of North Carolina. Don't be surprised. The University of North Carolina Labs at Chapel Hill. Brought a team together to do an experiment.
And part of the North Carolina University team was, they were joined by a gentleman from China called doctor Zheng Li Shi. Doctor Zheng Li Shi. He was from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. And in fact, Wuhan gave a grant to University of North Carolina, so that scientists could be involved in this in this experiment. They imported, SARS cells, SARS viruses from Fort from the Fort Detrick Labs.
And for those of you who know geopolitics and COVID geopolitics, very necessary for any bible prophecy teacher or any pastor in this state or no. Even Fort Detrick, the Fort Detrick Labs are the US's the US's main BSL 4 labs, where they research, stockpile, and test genetic bioweapons. And so so this team, given a grant, by China, we're working on on on increasing the pathogenicity of the SARS samples that they got from Fort Detrick. Smoking gun number 3, research at the Australian Animal Health Lab was funded by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology along with the the the other two I mentioned, the Wuhan Institute and the Academy of Sciences from China, and the experimental goal was to coalesce the initial weaponized SARS virus, enhance it with gain of function properties, and then coalesce it genetically to an HIV virus. Amen.
Therefore, forming the tripartite chimera. And so I'm I'm listening to you where these experiments took place. Let me go all those further. Smoking gun number 4. Indian scientists did an analysis on the SARS CoV 2 virus, and they said that they've definitely found elements of the HIV virus in the genomic sequencing.
So this was confirmed by a team from India. And, let me mention to you that, HIV is a retrovirus. Retroviruses use mRNA to inject their stuff into the cell. And, when the n, mRNA is injected into the cell, there is something called retro integration that takes place. And that means that the the mRNA is converted back into DNA, and then it it coalesces with the the chromosomal DNA of the host.
So so retroviruses like HIV carry out enzyme called reverse transcriptase, which changes mRNA back into DNA, so it can coalesce with the with the the the genes in your nucleus. This means that when they said it's an mRNA vaccine, and they said it will it will it will only go to the ribosomes and form proteins. That's not true. Even if it will be reconverted to the to DNA and affect your human genome. Wow.
Wow. So Francis Boyle says this, the most dangerous biological weapon ever released on the public is SARS Co V 2. Wow. Now let me go to smoking gun, which number 5? Smoking gun 5?
5. Smoking gun number 5. Fauci's emails. Wow. Fauci's email say this?
Well, first of all, we must note Fauci's vacillations. When when he was called when recently, he was called to testify to the US Congressional Committee, and this is all on video record. He said, no. US taxpayers did not fund the Wuhan Laboratory. Then he said, yes.
US taxpayers did fund the the the laboratory, but it was a sub grant. Then he said, we funded it, but there was no gain of function research. Then he said, we did fund it. There was gain of function research, but it was but it was a sound scientific decision. Jeez.
Then he said, it would have been negligent not to found it. So he kept he kept fascinating back and forth, and I said, this is all on record. Let me go further to another one of Fauci's emails. This is from doctor Christian Right. Doctor Christian Anderson in an email, a a secret email that was unearthing when Fauci's emails were exposed.
He said the unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome. So no one has to look so one has to look really closely at the sequence to see that some features look engineered. Wow. Smoking gun number 6. Further, this is the same guy, doctor Christian Anderson, writing in an email to doctor Fauci.
Further, I should mention that after discussions with Eddie, Bob, and Mike, call, his fellow virologists, we all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. This is what doctor Gil was referring to. The way our virus normally evolves, this virus didn't look like that. So the phone number 1, the virus looked engineered, and it was in it looked inconsistent with evolutionary theory. Wow.
So, beloved, this this states very clearly Charles Leiber was the is the head of biology and the head of chemical biology at Harvard University. He was. And this guy used to train graduate Chinese students. Yes. That's him up on the screen.
Used to train train graduate Chinese students in his lab. He's a micro biologist of the highest note, and he has received about $15,000,000 in defense contracts from the United States government to do just that. Create create genetic bioweapons. 2 of his 2 of his students Wow. Were arrested at the Logan International Airport in December 2019, smuggling 21 vials of sensitive biological material to Wuhan, China.
He was. Amen. Charles Leiber himself was arrested by the FBI on January 28, 2020 for espionage with China. He was their consultant, and and actually was a hands on builder of the BSL 4 Lab in Wuhan, China. China has won Biluk's BSL 4 Lab.
It was built by Charles Liver through his consultancy. He was paid a 150,000,000 US dollars to do that, and had a salary of 50,000 US a month from China. Amen? And so it has become very clear that SARS COVID 2 is not a kung fu virus or a Chinese virus. As some people say, it was it was due to Anglo Asian complicity.
Even Liva's involvement actually goes much deeper than I mentioned in, but that's not with this paper. I will skip, at this point. I have I have talked extensively about vaccine types and, mass, mass vaccination at the time of, a pandemic. But I'm just gonna hit on one thing quickly before I I go to my final point. Take your time.
Yes. I want you to understand that, the vaccine types that are on the market, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson and Johnson are all genetic vaccines. They are mRNA and viral vector vaccines that will affect your human genome. They are not normal. Amen.
The normal vaccines that I got when I was a child and my children got when I was an adult, amen, are are attenuated or inactivated virus vaccines, and these vaccines are new technology never before been deployed in the human population. They are tools of gene therapy or Frankenstein Frankenstein technology, as some people call it, even a mystery concoction. Even and they are not normal. Therefore, don't and I hear doctors on television conflating the 2 types of vaccines. There are tools of gene therapy.
If SARS CoV 2 is a bioweapon, then the code of the spike protein for SARS SARS CoV 2 injected into you, you're having a bioweapon injected into you. And the spike protein, I won't go into the the the scientific details right now, but the spike protein is pathogenic, and it will just it will damage you. Doctor Sukhirvad Bagby said it's a thrombogen the vaccine is a thrombogenic vaccine, And he warns of neural venal thrombosis, and he warns of the decimation of the human population. Mass, vaccination at the time of high at a time of high infectious pressure, that means at the time, thank you. At the time when the when the the the there is the pandemic is at site.
That that causes it few words of phenomenon known to all virologists. I heard a virologist on television, TV 6 news last night mentioned this, and, called viral immune escape. And in a nutshell, viral immune escape is this, when you put a virus under pressure through a mass vaccination program, the the vaccine induced antibodies will stand up against the COVID 19 virus and and fight it. And so the virus is on the run. Once the virus gets on the run remember this virus is a is a virus that is especially, it has gained a function properties.
Yes. You put it under pressure, it changes. Right. It shifts. It changes its cloak.
It looks different. Wow. Amen? It becomes a variant. Wow.
And and the variant cannot be stopped by the vaccine induced antibodies. Vaccine induced antibodies also shut down your innate immune system. So the vaccinated have vaccine induced antibodies that cannot stop a variant, and then it's they also shut down your innate immune system so variants can come straight through and infect those who are vaccinated. That is viral immune escape. And that says that the vaccinated are defenseless against variants.
Jesus. This is no longer a pandemic of COVID 19, SARS COVID 2. This is a pandemic of variants. Go ahead. Amen?
And there is something called recombination. Listen to me carefully. Why aren't our virologists telling us this? Amen. Recombination means that a vaccinated host can be infected by more than one variant at one time.
Oh, big deal. Delta variant is in Trinidad. You heard that? Mhmm. Amen.
Well, doctor Peter McCullough says, they don't have enough letters in the Greek alphabet to name the variants. Mhmm. In fact, there are over a 100 variants already floating around all over the globe. Come on. Some some put in at a 185.
If a vaccinated host is infected, co infected by more than one variant, the variants when they get inside, they will party, and they mix, and they change DNA, and they they come off and they they they mix their DNA, the recombinant DNA technology takes place, and it produces a super variant. Yeah. Amen? And if super variants are produced, nothing can stop them. And already, they are saying that the I think the latest variant that come out is is is vaccine resistant.
Well, this is just the beginning. Doctor, doctor Gert Vanden Bosch warns, he said, if we do not immediately stop mass vaccination campaigns all around the world, the world will experience an international catastrophe of mass mortality. I didn't say that. He did. The vaccinated are a threat to us all.
However, amen, we must we we must treat the vaccinated kindly. That's right. Amen? With with with great empathy. Amen?
With prayer. Amen? And and and and and with humanity and love. Amen. Thank you, my brother.
Amen. So so no discrimination against the vaccinated. That's right. Amen. So yes.
Yes. Amen. So let me just close by saying this. Let let me mention also antibody dependent enhancement, which is an autoimmune situation that help that also, surface surfaces during mass vaccination. And I'm gonna just piggyback and, do a kind of, add on to some of the things that Bishop Gill said.
I'm gonna this section is called follow the money, and it's gonna be quick. Follow the money, I think. The pharmaceutical industry benefited from a law. The resurgence of a law called the DTC law, direct to consumer law, that was put that that became very prevalent in 1997. It allowed pharmaceutical companies to to to advertise prescription drugs directly through mass media to the to the customers and consumers.
This changed the game because it it meant that the pharmaceutical industry could pour bill 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of dollars into the media. And, therefore, they effectively own the media and control the media. Oh my The pharmaceutical industries also, control the WHO, as doctor Gil mentioned. In fact, 60 to 7% of the funding of the World Health Organization comes from the pharmaceutical industries. But that's not all.
The pharmaceutical industries also contain the control the US legislature. The medical research, journals, medical research journals, you can't publish nothing unless they approve. Even the scientific journals, the medical schools where doctors are trained are controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. And now they have come home to us even even onto our own shores, where they have co opted control of national governments, public health authorities, medic the medical fraternity, the media, the business sector, and I'm sorry to say, the ecclesiastical leaders as well. Jesus.
So I want you to know that, the elected, the elite, and the ecclesiastics have have have struck hands together. Jesus. And they have decided they're gonna vaccinate the entire world, and that's what we are that's what we are suffering from. Amen. So so so we we Trinidad and Tobago, we are not following the real science.
This is the real science. Mhmm. Amen? And this real science is being suppressed and censored. That's right.
Amen? We are effectively following the dictates of the pharmaceutical companies. Yeah. Amen? In other words, we're not following we're not following the science.
We follow any money. That's right. Amen. And and and and I am shocked to see I I see giants in the church who have fallen because they'll be you know, it it is a it is a it is a it is a funny thing for the the state to control the medical apparatus of a nation. Wow.
Yeah. If the state dictates to the medical apparatus what to do, if they dictate to the business owners what to do, if they dictate to the churches what to do, are we still in a democracy? Are we still in a democracy? Have we crossed crossed the line? And this is my last submission.
Let me close with this. This is the death graph. By the way, Francis Boyle calls BSL4 Labs, death factories. Yes. Because that were death science.
13,000 US scientists work in that field. 13,000. Here's a death graph. I wanna use as my pivotal date. A day that the prime minister will remember very well.
Tuesday, 6th April, 2021. That was the day on which doctor Keith Christopher Rowley, was supposed to be vaccinated, but he came down, so sad with COVID 9 COVID 19 infection. But April 6, 2021 is also the day that the the public mass vaccination campaign in Trinidad and Tobago was implemented. It started. I wanna use that as a central point.
Go ahead. If I go back to March 2020, between March 2020 April 6, 2021, 145 people died in Trinidad and Tobago. 145. Tickets of Yes. And, then using April 6, 2021 again as a as a as a key point, from April 6, 2021 to August 13th, that's yesterday, because I only have figures up to yesterday, to August 13, 2021, that's 4 months, 1,022 people have died.
Jesus. 10/22. 10/22 people have died, in 4 months as opposed to 145 people. So when the vaccine public vaccination campaign started, a death spike began. And in in in in a few months, 1,022 people died.
14% of people died before the vaccine. 86% of the people died after the vaccine. Wow. And Gerd van den Bosch, in his model, he predicts that this is what would happen, and it's happening in 90% of the countries all over the world. That's true.
That that it means that the vaccines are causing the death spike. Come on. Let me say it again. The vaccines are causing the death spike. The the the vaccinated are the spike.
Amen? Which is why our public health authorities cannot release the data and the statistics to show the deaths of the vaccinated. One doctor tried and I haven't I haven't seen her since. On your screen, that graph, you see you you see that spike at the end of the graph? At at on where am I where I'm sitting on the right hand side of the graph and maybe opposite for you?
A spike the bottom of that spike the bottom of that hill is April 6th April 6, 2021. From that point on, the spike just keeps going up. Up. That graph has never been shown on a COVID briefing. What they do is they present segmented compartmentalized graphs of different facets, but they never show you.
This this is this is the master graph. This linear graph of deaths is the master graph. It's still rising, people, since the vaccination roll out. I close by saying this. Amen.
Noah and his family resisted the whole world. Amen. Amen? In standing against the evil of their day. Come on.
Amen. Daniel. Daniel. And Meshach, Shadrach, and Abednego. Amen.
Stood against an empire and won. Come on, somebody. Esther changed the command of a king by her faith and her prayer. Amen. So I wanna encourage all you Christians out there.
Yes. You think you are fighting a Goliath? Amen. Well, David defeated Goliath. In my bible, David defeated Goliath.
Amen. Don't worry about the size of your opponent. What bother about the size of your god. Oh, hallelujah. God is God will prevail.
Yes. I optimistically submit to you, prophetically submit to you that this this house this international house of cards will crumble. There's gonna be an international scandal, and all those who are aiding and abetting it will find themselves in trouble. There is still time there is still time for you to change your stance. Hallelujah.
God bless you. Love you and the love of the Lord. Hallelujah.
reSee.it AI Summary
The CIA's origins and global activities are explored in a thought-provoking video. Despite operating in the name of the U.S., the CIA's actions have generated hatred and terrorism against the country. The organization's conviction that they know best and their belief in the ends justifying the means make them dangerous. Their coups, involvement in drug operations, and constitutional violations have caused more harm than benefit to the U.S.
@JKernerOT - J Kerner
Brilliant video about the origins of the CIA and its 70-year global crime spree. The CIA has generated enormous hatred and terrorism against the U.S. because of their international (and domestic) crimes and operations. The CIA very quickly became a corrupt, treasonous and criminal organization, while truly believing it operates in and for the best interests of the U.S. That’s what makes them and groups like them so dangerous and destructive: their total conviction that they are 100% right and only THEY ‘know what’s best for people and America.’ They don’t view their actions as corrupt or criminal; they actually believe the ends justify their corrupt and criminal means. Unfortunately, their many engineered coups, their international drug operations (they’ve been partners in the Asian and South American cocaine pipelines for decades) and their nonstop violations of our Constitution have caused far more harm to the U.S. than benefit.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the past, spy agencies were only active during times of war and would be dissolved afterwards. However, after World War II, the United States established the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), which marked the birth of modern intelligence. The OSS engaged in various unconventional operations to demoralize and confuse the enemy. When the war ended, President Truman dissolved the OSS to prevent the creation of an American Gestapo. But it was too late, as the intelligence community had already gained immense power. The CIA was formed to combat the Soviet Union during the Cold War, but it soon became involved in illegal and unethical activities. The Church Committee exposed these abuses, leading to some oversight regulations. However, the events of 9/11 prompted a resurgence of unchecked power and secrecy within the intelligence community. The balance between security and democracy remains a challenge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the old days, spy agencies were a war thing. When the US was at war, it would set up an international spy operation to best wage that war. And then when the war was over, they would pare down or totally get rid of the spy agency. The thinking here was that a spy agency took
Speaker 1: up a lot of
Speaker 0: resources and threatened civil liberties. A lot of power concentrated into a bunch of unelected people. Worth it during war, not worth it during peace. But then the biggest war of them all came to America's Pacific doorstep, and it changed everything.
Speaker 2: And so Roosevelt now has a license more of a license to do what he wants. And one of the first things he does is consult with a man named Bill Donovan.
Speaker 0: Wild Bill, a corporate Wall Street lawyer who was obsessed with the power of intelligence.
Speaker 2: Donovan had very strong opinions and he said, you need a wartime intelligence because you're going to war.
Speaker 0: While Bill Donovan would be in charge of the Office of Strategic Services or OSS, a centralized intelligence agency that would be given immense power to do whatever it took to keep our people safe and to keep our team on top. This was the birth of modern intelligence, a euphemism for spying and lying and cheating and deceiving and sneaking and breaking, coercing, dividing, and conquering. No idea was too crazy for the OSS during this time. Like, one OSS psychologist had this idea that Hitler could be demoralized if they just showed him a vast quantity of porn. Paramilitary operations.
Strapping explosives to a bunch of bats and letting them loose over Tokyo. Guys skiing into Nazi occupied Norway. Making fake companies, recruiting off Wall Street from all of his old colleagues, bringing in bankers and movie directors, fake radio stations, anything to demoralize, divide, or confuse the enemy.
Speaker 2: The OSS is the first intelligence agency that the United States ever has.
Speaker 0: Oh, and one of Wild Bill's favorite things to do was to have parties at his house.
Speaker 3: Hi. Hi.
Speaker 4: Are we the first ones here?
Speaker 5: It's a big night.
Speaker 0: To plan and plot his operations with his friends in Georgetown, a neighborhood in Washington DC that is strikingly beautiful. Here is Bill Donovan's house. It's now worth $17,000,000 It's beautiful. And this is where he would have a drink and chat with other Washington power brokers. He would recruit new agents from American high society, earning the agency the nickname, oh, so social.
Pretty clever. Okay. But remember that spy agencies like this were a war thing only. And the war ended in 1945. And the OSS got dissolved.
Speaker 6: The forces of Germany have surrendered to the United Nations.
Speaker 2: What do we do with the OSS now that we're at peace? And Truman says, we don't want to risk having an American gestapo.
Speaker 0: A political police.
Speaker 2: His meaning, especially in the context of having just defeated the Nazis, was, you know, that's what led our enemy astray. They had a secret intelligence agency, the Gestapo, which wound up enforcing political norms and enforcing tyranny, And we don't wanna we don't wanna risk that.
Speaker 0: Here's Harry Truman doing the right thing and signing a piece of paper that says that the OSS can no longer exist. I mean, Truman was freaked out. He's, like, this was really great to help us win the war, but this is way too much power in the hands of unelected officials holding secret information. But it was kinda too late. Putting the genie back in the bottle would prove to be an impossible task.
Is it significant that all these guys live 4 blocks from each other in Georgetown?
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's very significant because they're the product of this wartime culture.
Speaker 4: This is one party that just has to turn out right.
Speaker 5: Here is target number 1 for the Reds. And who's in the bull's eye? You are.
Speaker 0: So there was a brief moment after World War 2 when the Cold War didn't exist. We were at peace. But then, almost immediately, tension started to rise between these 2 great empires that had been allies to defeat the Nazis but were now skeptical of each other. And senators were suddenly declaring that it was impossible to know where war begins and where it ends.
Speaker 6: The Soviet Union and its agents have destroyed the independence and democratic character of a whole series of nations in Eastern and Central Europe.
Speaker 0: And this is when all the intel people that had run the OSS, many of them who lived in Georgetown by the way, start calling for the resurrection of the OSS, a centralized intelligence agency that we can use to fight this new global war with the Soviet Union. But no, say a bunch of other lawmakers, the constitution wasn't designed for us to put so much power in the hands of men who are doing secret things. Doing this will result in a police state run by power grabbing bureaucrats. Too much power to military leaders and their insatiable appetite for more money, for more men, and more power, whatever the cost to democracy.
Speaker 2: Truman's mind changed. And what changed Truman's mind was the growing confrontation with the with the Soviet Union.
Speaker 0: And soon, the papers were signed and a new agency was formed, the Central Intelligence Agency, the CIA.
Speaker 2: When Truman signs the National Security Act, he says we have to be careful that we don't have an American gestapo. So that thought is still on his mind.
Speaker 0: The CIA was the big shiny new weapon of the United States in the Cold War, and their mission was to, quote, gain and distribute intelligence and To perform, quote, other functions and duties related to intelligence affecting national security. What does that mean?
Speaker 2: Everybody knew what that language meant. Everybody knew that that was, and we just weren't gonna talk about it because we didn't wanna write it down on paper.
Speaker 0: Like, what do they do with this vague mandate of national security? Oh, boy.
Speaker 2: They they go to town. It's a sass.
Speaker 3: You must learn the ingredients in your chocolate cake. Chocolate cake. It's so clean, but so soft and smooth.
Speaker 2: Operation paperclip, 1945 to 1959. Americans wanted to get those Nazi rocket scientists on their side so that they could develop their own rocket capacity. James Angleton, for example, protects a general under Hitler.
Speaker 0: CIA gets involved
Speaker 2: in the Italian Italian elections, 1948. 8. On the Italian democracy and make sure that US allies win.
Speaker 0: Operation Asia acts, coup in Iran 1950 3.
Speaker 2: The CIA and the Mi 6 organized a coup to overthrow the democratically elected government.
Speaker 3: Now that we encourage the Shah to take that action, I will not deny.
Speaker 0: CIA coup, Guatemala, 1950 Bananas.
Speaker 3: Of course, bananas.
Speaker 2: Again, democratically elected government reformists wanted to engage in land reform, and the CIA overthrows it really at the behest of the United Fruit Company.
Speaker 0: CIA is now helping American corporations.
Speaker 2: The the influence of American corporations on the CIA actions is unmistakable. Allen Dulles was on the board of directors. Howard Hunt, Bert O'Neil, David Phillips, CIA coup in Congo, early 19 sixties, CIA coup in Chile, 1973. The assassination operation against general Schneider in 1970 is coordinated with Kissinger's office.
Speaker 7: Thank you. Nice to see you all.
Speaker 0: Mind Control Experiments, MK Ultra.
Speaker 2: In 1950, the CIA launches a massive program to develop means of controlling people's minds. Some 40 US academic institutions were involved in this kind of research.
Speaker 0: People without their permission.
Speaker 2: And we developed a truth serum, dosing somebody with LSD 60 times in a week. NSA's Operation Shamrock. Electronic surveillance 1945 to 1975. The first warrantless wiretapping.
Speaker 0: God, be it pigs. Nightmare.
Speaker 2: There were hundreds of CIA assassination plots. Operation Phoenix. Eventually, Bill Colby, who was later director, admitted that they had killed 20,000 people.
Speaker 0: Operation Mockingbird and COINTELPRO. Operation Chaos, Watergate, Jim Critchfield, Frank Weisner, James Engleton, Roosevelt, John Fossef Willis,
Speaker 2: CIA coup in Indonesia coup in groups CIA involvement in Guatemalan civil war. It was a CIA crime spree for 20 years. There's no other way to describe it.
Speaker 0: So by the 19 seventies, the CIA is this powerful, well funded machine of intelligence that is doing a lot of secret things all around the world. They start blackmailing lawmakers to scare them away from investigating them and reining them in.
Speaker 2: These agencies had harmful personal information on lots of people. When I was doing my Angleton book, a guy told me one day when he went to meet Angleton, Angleton quoted back to him what he had said to his wife in bed the night before. And so they had this capacity, and people knew that they had this capacity. You know, the Kennedys knew that J. Edgar Hoover had information about his affairs with various women.
This kind of knowledge that they had, Angleton and Hoover were masters at using that kind of those kind of secrets as leverage. Kennedy had this thing hanging over his head, and he knew Hoover, you know, had that on him. And so, you know, he couldn't fire Hoover. Yeah.
Speaker 0: And so much of this power is concentrated among just a few people, many of them not elected, and many of them living right here along these streets in this neighborhood of Georgetown, living in fancy homes, having fancy cocktail parties, and kind of running the Western world. It's exactly the nightmare of the founders of the country and the nightmare of president Truman.
Speaker 2: And 1 month after the assassination of president Kennedy, Harry Truman publishes an article in the Washington Post and says the CIA should be abolished. Wow. And he says it has cast a shadow on the historical reputation of the United States.
Speaker 0: The man who signed the piece of paper that created the CIA comes out and says he regrets it. Eventually, Americans start to get savvy to the fact that their government is sort of going off the rails. As this war in Vietnam drags on, more and more Americans stand up and say enough, demanding accountability for a national security apparatus that had gotten out of control. And what does the government do in response? They start spying on the protesters.
Speaker 2: Operation Chaos was the CIA spying on the anti war movement. Johnson calls in Dick Hounds and says, what's going on? There's communists have to be behind this. And so they start infiltrating the anti war American it's not controlled by them. It's not funded by them.
It's pretty much an American thing, you know. But that doesn't change anything and they chaos continues to grow. And eventually, by 1970, there's 30 officers working on it, hundreds of agents. And, you know, the ostensible purpose of chaos to detect a foreign hand. I mean, chaos was in existence for 7 years.
Every time they were asked to report on it, they came back and said, it's not foreign controlled and it's not foreign funded, which was obvious to anybody who was involved in the anti war movement. There were a lot of people inside the CIA saying, you know, we're spying on our wives and kids, basically. You know? They're going to the demonstrations, and we're reading the reports at night. We shouldn't be doing this.
Speaker 4: Are we trying to exterminate an entire people? What are what have we become as a nation?
Speaker 0: Americans were waking up to the fact that these unelected men were wielding way too much power and spying not only on the entire world but on Americans themselves.
Speaker 5: We have been victimized by excessive secrecy, not only with respect to the failure of the congress in the past exercise proper surveillance over intelligence activities, but also excessive secrecy has created this kind of mischief within the executive branch.
Speaker 0: Senator Frank Church helped lead the charge of taking all of these secrets and excesses and thrusting them onto the national stage and shining a light on them.
Speaker 5: There has never been a full public accounting of FBI domestic intelligence operations.
Speaker 0: The American people are learning for the first time just how bad this was. 800 witnesses, 10,000 documents. Their secrets were shared. CIA, FBI, NSA, assassination plots.
Speaker 5: Does this pistol, fire the dart? Yes, it does, mister chairman. When it fires, it fires silently? Almost silent. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Spying on Americans.
Speaker 8: A wholly comprehensive listing of everything those people thought or did on any subject you can imagine they're having a concern with.
Speaker 0: Targeting people like Martin Luther King Junior and other civil rights or feminist activists.
Speaker 8: Bureau agents were told to attack the new left by disinformation and misinformation.
Speaker 0: Anti war protesters were spied on, intimidated.
Speaker 8: Cointelpro is the name for the effort by the bureau to destroy people and to destroy organizations or as they use the words disrupt and neutralize. The bureau went so far as to mail anonymous letters to doctor King and his wife. King, there is only one thing left for you to do. You know what it is. You have just 34 days in which to do it.
You are
Speaker 9: done. That was taken by doctor King to mean a suggestion for suicide, was it not?
Speaker 8: That's our understanding. Senator.
Speaker 0: The CIA's LSD mind control experiments were also detailed to the public.
Speaker 2: One of the first things they come across is the MK Ultra papers.
Speaker 0: And so were the FBI and CIA's attempts to infiltrate the free press, planting journalists within our newspapers. We would later learn in some investigative reporting that that this infiltration of the free press was much more widespread than Church even discovered.
Speaker 2: He reported that up to 400 journalists had been paid by the CIA under Operation Mockingbird. And there's there's no doubt that it was a massive effort and and and and effective.
Speaker 0: The church committee made a few things clear. Number 1, that indeed a group of unelected government employees used immense power and resources of the United States government to pursue programs that were illegal, unethical, and generally out of line with American values and norms. And they did it in secret, outside of any set of accountability, partly because the US Congress wanted to give them money and turn a blind eye.
Speaker 9: I can recall members of congress who, recoiled from responsibility of knowing what was happening. Members of congress who said, don't tell me. I don't wanna know. I think that is an indictment of the congress, just as severe as any indictment which is labeled against any of the intelligence community.
Speaker 2: When Dulles wanted to get approval for the CIA budget, all he had to do was take a top line number to the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and he would say, this is what we want for this year. And the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee would say, okay, that's what you've got, and please don't tell us anything about what you're doing with it. And so there was no internal challenge to this world of CIA people.
Speaker 0: But here's the other thing that is so crucial here, which is that when you listen to these hearings, you see people who thought they were doing the right thing, who thought that they were doing what they needed to to protect the country during a very scary time.
Speaker 1: After a 30 year period, all of a sudden you woke up one morning and here was this creature that had been created that no one along the line had ever
Speaker 3: really contemplated. Each of these steps that I
Speaker 1: think initially were innocent honest honest steps.
Speaker 0: Many of these agents were earnest patriots, but they were operating in a system free of accountability and transparency.
Speaker 10: Even within the deep state, there are people who are doing things for altruistic and good reasons, and then there are people who are doing things for their own selfish or bad reasons. And, you know, exactly sort of impossible to to delineate.
Speaker 1: I got sucked in when I should have known better and where many other more intelligent, sophisticated people got sucked in in other areas.
Speaker 0: So after the church committee, all kinds of new oversight regulations come in. There's new committees formed. There's new regulations. And suddenly, the intelligence community now finally has some kind of oversight. The deep state was reined in.
Now they did fight back. Church was undermined and intimidated by these agencies.
Speaker 2: CIA people, I mean, they hated Frank Church. Jim Angleton would go around and say Frank Church was a KGB agent. Dick Helms raged against him. Kissinger, they couldn't believe that US intelligence was being opened up. On the other hand, Americans were like, oh my god.
This is what was being done in our name?
Speaker 0: But overall, this is a story of American democracy doing what it's supposed to do, rein in the worst impulses of humans with power and in the process avoiding disaster, at least for a few decades.
Speaker 11: One of you is about to be elected the leader of the single most powerful nation in the world. Have you formed any guiding principles for exercising this enormous power?
Speaker 3: When it
Speaker 4: comes to foreign policy, that'll be my guiding question. Is it in our nation's interests? Peace in the Middle East is in our nation's interests. Having a hemisphere that is, free for trade. Have some very, very sketchy details reaching us here at Sky Central 40.3.
To the house,
Speaker 0: and a new call to give power to professional spies and bureaucrats to keep us safe by doing secret things.
Speaker 4: And by passing the Patriot Act, we will make America safer while safeguarding our civil liberties and privacy.
Speaker 0: And then, of course, new agencies, all with variations on the same name.
Speaker 2: 911 is kind of like a Pearl Harbor. There's this desire. You know, we've been attacked. Anything goes. We have to strike back.
This is an existential struggle. And that same ethos of the early Cold War, anything goes, that returns big time after 911. And the CIA seeks or asserts without being checked all sorts of powers that they hadn't asserted before. They implement the torture program. They massively expand the warrantless wiretapping, the kind of things that we had seen Angleton do in chaos.
Those exact same techniques are revived and expanded after 911, you know, on a very large scale.
Speaker 0: Taxpayers funneling money into 1,000,000 of new top secret jobs. 22 capital buildings worth of new office space that spring up all around this area where I live to house all these new secrets. And inside them, waterfalls of new programs, so many weirdly named programs that no one leader could ever hear about, let alone regulate all of them.
Speaker 4: There's not a whole lot of effective oversight on something that has grown so big and so bushy.
Speaker 0: And none of which should be known to the public. That is until someone who's worried that history is repeating itself decides to spill the beans.
Speaker 7: Our breaking news this evening is the identity of the man who sent the Obama administration into defend and explain mode this week. His name is Edward Snowden. He's an American former CIA employee and computer technician. Today, he came out as the leaker of classified NSA documents that spell out a secret
Speaker 0: And we all kind of wonder, what if we actually need this now? What if we need all these dark windows and top secret PowerPoint decks where they design how they're gonna spy on us? What if our safety relies on what happens inside of all these buildings? So we keep funding them. But in doing so, we must at least acknowledge what we're doing here.
We are trading a portion of our freedom in exchange for a sense of security. And in the process, we're creating and feeding kind of a new branch of our government power, one that operates outside of this elegant triangle that the founders constructed to trip up the corrupting forces that run the risk of always possessing men with secret power.
Speaker 10: Most everybody agrees that there's over classification. There's way too much information that's that's classified, but information is power. And the fewer people that have it, the more power the people that do have it have.
Speaker 0: And the result is that when the most powerful man in the world arrives to the most powerful house in the world, promising to reign all of this in, to reign in the excesses, he actually finds that he can't. He's not able to change much of it. Instead, he sits there and watches much of the things that he critiqued grow under his watch. The thing that he's supposed to control, he finds he doesn't have that much control over.
Speaker 5: These targeted strikes against Al Qaeda terrorists are indeed ethical and just.
Speaker 0: Secrets keep us safe, but secrets also degrade this delicate thing that we have called democracy and accountability. That is until we save ourselves from their everlasting seductive poll.
Speaker 5: The United States must not adopt the tactics of the enemy. Means are as important as ends. Crisis makes it tempting to ignore the wise restraints that make men free.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Great Reset is criticized for its alleged connection to communist, socialist, and fascist ideologies, which some believe would harm global freedom and prosperity. It is seen by some as a potential threat to the remaining free society in the Western world.
@JKernerOT - J Kerner
“My conclusion is that the Great Reset builds on ideological, communist, socialist and fascist ideas, which if implemented would destroy the freedom and prosperity of the great majority of people of this planet. “The great reset seems to be a neo-Marxist, communist attempt to overthrow - a recipe to destroy - the existing free society of the Western world, or what little is left of it.” - Thorsten Polleit, ‘TheGreat Reset: Getting to the Truth’
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the Great Reset, stating that it is based on communist, socialist, and fascist ideas that would destroy freedom and prosperity. They explain that there are two ways people interact: voluntary action or coercion and violence. They argue that liberalism and capitalism promote voluntary cooperation, while Marxism and socialism rely on coercion and violence. The speaker highlights the different elements of the Great Reset, such as stakeholder capitalism, environmental and social governance, and transhumanism. They also discuss the potential dangers of central bank digital currency and the need to resist and reverse the Great Reset through sound economics and a new enlightenment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the next 30 minutes, I will attempt to unearth the political and economic fundamentals that characterize the great reset. Based on these insights, I will set out to present an assessment of the economic consequences of the Great Reset if put into practice. My conclusion will be that the Great Reset builds on ideological communist, socialist and fascist ideas, which if implemented, would destroy the freedom and prosperity, and presumably even the lives, of the great majority of the people of this planet. It may perhaps sound over simplistic and even exaggerated to you, but to me, the Great Reset seems to be a Neo Marxist, Communist attempt to overthrow, a recipe to destroy the existing free society of the Western world or what little is left of it. This conclusion basically rests on a rather simple insight, namely that there are only 2 ways in which people interact with each other.
The first way is voluntary action. Example, I offer you an apple for $1 and you accept my offer or not, just as you wish. The second way is coercion and violence. I force you to do something you don't want to do of your own accord. And if you disobey me, I punish you.
Or you threaten me with violence if I refuse to give you what you want from me. Voluntary action or coercion and violence are the general principles of human interaction. There is no third option, no middle ground between them. Tertium nondator. Chapter 1, voluntary cooperation.
Liberalism is the logical and consistent form. Liberalism and its logical and consistent form, namely libertarianism, stand for the path of voluntary cooperation. Libertarianism is based on the principle of non aggression. It forbids uninvited physical aggression, whether threatened or carried out, against people and their property. The system of free markets or capitalism is the economic form compatible with liberalism understood in this way.
Capitalism is an economic system in which the means of production are privately owned. Unconditional respect for property applies. People use money for the purpose of economic accounting and trading, making possible an advanced degree of the division of labor nationally and internationally. Markets are free. Everyone is free to offer his or her goods and everyone is free to demand the goods he or she wishes to consume.
In real capitalism, which is compatible with libertarianism, there is no such thing as a state as we know it today. All goods are offered in the free marketplace. This includes the goods law and security, roads, education, money and credit, etcetera. Chapter 2, coercion and violence. Now to the other way of interpersonal relationships, coercion and violence.
Coercion and violence have many forms and are the basic principles of many social theories. An example of this is Marxism. Marxism is the political economic theory founded by Karl Marx, used to allegedly justify a demand for social transformation. According to Marxism, social development is determined by the material factors of production, tools, factories, etcetera. The progress of material production technology causes an increasing division of labor and creates material wealth.
Marx's central criticism is that the workers create wealth, but it is concentrated in the hands of a few capitalists. According to the Marxists, this basic contradiction can only be eliminated by a revolutionary uprising, by coercion and violence in the truest sense of the word. Marxism demands that the working class expropriate the owners of the means of production and convert the means of production into common property. Communism is built on the doctrine of Marxism, and thus its foundation is also coercion and violence. It strives for a classless society, a society without rulers.
After the necessary collapse of capitalism, which Marxists reckon with, and the violent overthrow of the prevailing property structure, the face of socialism follows. Socialism refers to the economic and social order in which ownership of the means of production is nationalized. In other words, in which the owners have been expropriated by the use of force and violence. In socialism, a small group of people, or in extreme cases, only one person, a dictator, determines how the means of productions are to be used, that is, what is to be produced, when and in what quantity. And it is also determined centrally who receives what from the goods produced and when.
From the communist point of view, socialism is supposed to be only a transitional stage stage, at the end of which stands the classless, the the the stateless, communist society in which everything belongs to everyone. As Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, better known as Lenin, put it in 1917, quote, the working class must break up, smash the ready made state machinery and not confine itself merely to laying hold of it, Quote ends. In real life, however, socialists have never broken up the ready made state machinery. The reason is obvious, as Joseph Stalin noted, quote, the state is a machine in the hands of the ruling class for the suppression for suppressing the resistance of its class opponents, quote ends. Another, a more subtle strategy to get to socialism is democratic socialism and it too builds on coercion and violence.
Democratic socialism pretends to formally maintain ownership of the means of production. However, at the same time, it demands that the owners no longer have a 100% claim on the profits they make with their property. Part of it must be paid to the states through taxes and those who resist will be punished, thrown in jail, even be killed. Through parliamentary majorities, democratic socialism ensures that the conditions that lead to socialism are gradually created, like increasing taxes, laws restricting restricting private property, spreading socialist doctrines, etcetera. Democratic Socialism differs only in degree, but not categorically, from Marxist socialism.
Democratic socialism typically makes use of interventionism. Interventionism represents the idea that there is a viable middle ground between capitalism and socialism. The good of both can be harnessed and the bad of both can be eliminated. This idea calls for the state to intervene in the economic and social system as deemed necessary to achieve politically desirable results. From an economic point of view, however, it can be said that interventionism is bound to fail.
Ludwig von Mises made this unmistakably clear in his 1929 critique of interventionism, that interventionism doesn't deliver on its promises and that if interventionism is pursued further and further to its logical end, it will lead to socialism and even end in a totalitarian system. One outcome of interventionism is fascism. Fascism can be described as a mass movement with charismatic leaders, and its modern form goes back to the Italian politician, Benito Mussolini. It is characterized by putting the interest of the community before those of the individual. We may speak of anti individualism and giving the rulers the power to eliminate all competition.
Moreover, economic and social life is unconditionally aligned with the goals of fascism. It goes without saying that fascism, in whatever form, is also built on coercion and violence, not on voluntary action. Another outcome of interventionism is cultural Marxism. Cultural Marxism is a neologism from the 90 from the early 19 nineties that first appeared in the US. It is basically a process of intellectual infiltration through which social and political revolution is brought about.
The origins of cultural Marxism can be traced back to the Italian Marxist theorist, Antonio Gramsci. He believed that Marxism could not be established in the West, unlike in the East, through violent revolution, as in Russia. He argued that a different approach was needed, namely overthrowing the bourgeois system of morals and values. Once marriage, family, property, law, borders, nation and Christian faith were relativized and discredited, the ground was prepared for a Marxist revolution. In recent years, another concept, also based on coercion and violence, has emerged, usually referred, to as political globalism.
Behind political globalism lies the view that the fate of humanity should not be left to the free market system, but should be shaped and controlled by an authority, a central political body, whether economic and financial crises, climate, terrorism or epidemics. According to the political globalists, the community of states, ideally a world government that wields all the power it desires, should fix things. Chapter 3. And that to me of the great reset. Political globalism brings us directly to the idea of the great reset.
The great reset is promoted in particular by the World Economic Forum. It is not a detailed or explicitly formulated theory or strategy, Rather, it is a conglomeration of the rolling fascinating visions of the future, scary threat scenarios, and far reaching economic and social transformation fantasies and phantasmas, The economic consequences of which generally remain obscure. Let us take a closer look at the most important building blocks of the make up that make up the great reset. Number 1, stakeholder capitalism. This means that the owners of companies should no longer serve only their own interests, but above all, the interests of third parties.
Number 2. Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance, ESG. Capital investors are urged to invest in companies that bear the ESG label and a good ESG label is awarded only to those companies that adhere to politically prescribed criteria. Number 3, vokism. This is a psychological notion of creating conflicts between people, of destroying the peaceful cohesion of people, of instilling guilt and inferiority complexes into them, for example, that they are only doing well because others are doing badly in return, that it is good and right to desire less.
Number 4, climate catastrophism. According to this theory, the Earth and its inhabitants will die if capitalism is not abolished. States must be put in the driving seat and restrain, rein in and suspend the system of free markets, constrain even end individual freedom. Number 5, transhumanism. The idea of expanding the possibilities of human beings through modern technologies, more precisely hacking what constitutes human beings computerizing the spiritual being.
Number 6, 4th Industrial Revolution, the technology driven and politically promoted upheaval of production and society through new technologies, artificial intelligence, robotics, genetics, machine to machine communication, smart contracts internet of things, internet of bodies augmented reality virtual reality and mixed reality, the metaverse and especially the introduction of digital central bank currency. I will get to that in a moment. Number 7, lock downs. The shutdown of economic and social activity is also part of the great resetters' toolbox to achieve their goals. And finally, number 8: Private public owner private public partnership.
The state joins forces with big companies to achieve certain goals, as far as, say, climate, health, money and credit are concerned. All big companies, big business, big tech, big pharma, big banking, use the state for their purposes. State and big companies enter into a symbiosis. Of central importance for spreading the idea of the Great Reset is that it represents that its representatives point out and dramatize problems, such as climate change, environmental pollution, epidemics, income equality, etcetera, and label them as existential threats to humanity. The possible solutions that the great resetters recommend to cope with the problems raised, invariably recommend state interventionism.
Chapter 4, theoretical interpretation. How can the great reset, or rather its building blocks, be theoretically interpreted in terms of the history of ideas? It is obvious that the idea that capitalism is evil is of Marx's provenance. That capitalism is the cause of the grievances that the Great Reset proponents abhor. The posting of threatening scenarios also has clear reminiscences of Marxist of the Marxist impoverishment theory.
As a reminder, to encourage support for socialism, capitalism, people were instilled with fear that capitalism would impoverish large numbers of people, leave them to starve and that only very few would profit from it. Whoever did not want that would have to end capitalism and help socialism, communism to break through. It doesn't take much to realize that this is deeply anti anti capitalist, hostile to capitalism, and state guidance and control is supposed to override what is left of the free market system. The great reset uses interventionism. It does not openly call for a communist revolution.
It does not envisage nationalizing private property in the course of a violent takeover. Nevertheless, implementing the great reset agenda will foreseeably lead to a de facto force change in ownership structures, a de facto expropriation of many owners of private property. Consider, for example, that moving away from fossil fuels will dramatically reduce the income and wealth of many people. Real incomes decline and people become impoverished. For example, many people can no longer afford property in the form of apartments or houses.
They have to sell them. This allows large banks and investment firms, which typically have favorable financing costs, to buy up land, houses and apartments and offer them for rent. Former apartment owners become rental slaves. Or small and medium sized enterprises run into problems when the purchasing power of their customers dwindles. They don't have the financial strength to survive virus and climate lockdowns.
They go under or they get bought out by big companies. Vokism can be understood as directly aligning with Marxism or cultural Marxism. It aims not only to destroy existing social relationships, to bring about unrest and conflict, but also to demoralize and discourage people, because, as we know, this weakens people's resistance to developments that they would not tolerate without demoralization and discouragement. This way the state can relatively easy restrict and abrogate the freedoms of citizens and entrepreneurs. Above all, wokeism also also ensures that people inwardly say goodbye to the achievement principle, capitalism, that the pursuit of a better material life, the free market system, competition, and striving to be better than others are discredited.
Vokism even relies, usually not overtly, on the polylogism with which Marxists sought to invalidate, defame, and discredit their opponents. For example, the claim that there are more than 2 biological sexes, or that logic is an expression of white supremacy, that there is not just one logic. The Great Reset not only has Marxist, socialist, communists, but also unmistakably fascist elements. Quite obvious, for example, is the harnessing of corporations to achieve political goals, for example, the CO2 reduction of food conversion, away from meat consumption to artificial food, including insects. Today's much vaunted public private partnership is, at its core, an expression of the fascist concept.
Private companies become an extension of the state and its interests. This way, the state gains a huge expansion of its financial and personal capacities. The corporate sector becomes a branch of the government, a regime of governmentality is established, that is, the corporate sector as a semi state functioning on behalf and as part of the state itself. Seen in this slide, the great reset fully caters to the idea of political globalism, according to which the people of this world should not shape their destinies in a free market system, but rather their way of life should henceforth be directed and controlled by a central world authority, a technocratic world elite, a World Council of the Enlightened. Against this backdrop, it is not difficult to see that the great reset contains elements that indirectly or directly promote or can evoke totalitarian structures.
Perhaps the most obvious technical tool for this is the issuance of Central Bank Digital Currency. Chapter 5, Central Bank Digital Currency. That central banks are working to issue central bank digital currency is not surprising, in light of what has been said so far. The great resetters predict and advocate that basically all transactions of daily life will be digitally mapped, all the way to the Internet of bodies, to storing everyone's brain activity on the Internet. Having everything take place on the Internet also includes adapting money transactions, money transactions, to digital needs and possibilities.
In particular, programmable money is of great interest to the great reset promoters. 1 could, of course, use conventional fiat money produced by commercial banks for this purpose and in tokenized form. However, central bank digital currency is being advocated because there are tremendous opportunities for control and power associated with the issuing central banks and the special interest groups that seek to harness them for their own purposes. Here are just a few of the consequences of Central Bank Digital Currency. Number 1, digital Central Bank money displaces cash.
Consumers and producers thus completely lose their financial privacy and become transparent. Number 2, Once digital central bank money has become sufficiently widespread, the central bank can literally increase the money supply in the economy at the push of a button. The possibility of abuse with inflation, which is put into the hands of the state and its central bank, is virtually maximized. Number 3. The allocation of central bank digital currency is based on the principle of arbitrariness.
The central bank decides who gets how much money and when and who gets none. Some are favored by the policy. Others are disadvantaged. With digital central bank money, the overthrow of income and wealth relationships can be achieved more easily than ever using monetary means. And number 4, central bank digital currency can be combined with social credit scores.
With social credit scores, as in China, behavior that conforms to the system is favored, while criticism or even resistance to the system is punished. For example, payment options with Central Bank Digital Money are restricted if a politically prescribed maximum amount of meat is consumed, or maximum travel distances are exceeded, or politically undesirable books are purchased. It is not difficult to imagine what will happen if digital Central Bank money is even linked to a digital vaccination passport and a digital ID. It would it would be total control of a kind never before seen in history. The world would become a digital prison, or a digital gulag, as Michael Rechtenwald put it, compared to which George Orwell's 1984 would seem like a gentle spring breeze.
Chapter 6. Where the Great Reset Leads Us. An economic analysis reveals that the Great Reset cannot create a better, more just and prosperous world. It amounts to a state directed command economy based on coercion and violence that will predictably produce scarcity, poverty, starvation and even tyranny. Digital Central Bank Currencies would create a world of total control.
Policymakers' efforts to hide the costs of the transition to the Great Reset from the general population, such as output and employment losses, will foreseeably cause huge increases in credit finance government spending. Central banks will buy up the swelling tide of government bonds and put new money into circulation. The result will be ever rising goods price inflation and the destruction of civil society, especially if and when digital central bank currencies become the dominant kind of money. The fanatical effort to end fossil fuel use accompanied by a restriction of politically deliberate increases in the price of in the price of food will foreseeably not only pave the way towards poverty for many people, it will also pose a serious threat to the survival of a large part of humanity. Chapter 7.
Stopping and Reversing the Great Reset. Is it possible to stop the advance of of the great reset to reverse the progress already made? Yes. That is quite possible. The destiny of mankind on this planet is not predetermined as the Marxists would have us believe.
Rather, it is man made action in the world that decisively determine his future. And since human action is in the last consequence indisputably determined by ideas or theories, ideas and theories are, in the end, the battlefield on which the great reset must be resisted, if one wants to stop and reverse it. Ludwig von Mises formulated formulated this impressively, quote, only ideas can overcome ideas and it is only the ideas of capitalism and of liberalism that can overcome socialism. Only by a battle of ideas can a decision be reached. Human society is an issue of the mind.
Social cooperation must first be conceived, then willed, then realized in action. It is ideas that make history, not the material productive forces, those nebulous and mystical schemata of the materialist conception of history, quote, ends. Presumably, however, it is not enough to teach people about sound economics to cut off the water from the great reset. Rather, a new enlightenment is also necessary. What do I mean by a new enlightenment?
It was the philosopher of the enlightenment and Konigsberg native, Emanueck Hunt, who lived from 17/24 to 18/05 18/04, who gave people the idea of reasonable autonomy. By autonomy, kant means the ability to lead one's life in a self determined manner according to rules one sets for oneself, And according to Kant, a reasonable person is one who sets the rules they follow for themselves and does so only after giving himself an account of their general acceptability. Kant's ideal of enlightenment shows that everyone is called to think for themselves and that everyone has to overcome their cowardice and take the courage to think for themselves. They are not obliged to follow expert opinions, authorities and self appointed priests of opinion. Rather, the rule is sapere aude, dare to use your own mind.
But unfortunately, man's lack of courage and and not infrequently so, his laziness to think for himself, caused him to remain in the stage of pre enlightenment or even to fall back into it, the latest coronavirus crisis is certainly a point in case of anti enlightenment. Fortunately, one result of enlightened thinking can be understood quite easily, very easily. No one has the right to rule over others can justify such a claim logically, And the human form of interaction associated with enlightenment is voluntary action, not violence and coercion. The world of states, as we know it today, rests precisely on coercion and violence, not on voluntary action. There is no blessing in that and accepting and tolerating the state as we know it today has bad, actually, destructive consequences.
The state as we know it today is becoming ever larger and more powerful, relentlessly expanding, destroying civil and entrepreneurial liberties, and even a minimal state will sooner or later become a maximal state, as Hans Herman Hoppe pointedly puts it. Seen in this slide, the great reset is nothing more than a concrete manifestation of the action logical insight. Special interest groups harness the power of the state for their ideological purposes and the state gains powerful supporters by granting privileges. It is the state that enables something like the great reset, which is anti economics, anti human, anti moral and anti enlightenment. But once it has been made clear that the state, as we know it today, is based on coercion and violence and that the great reset is ultimately only a concrete manifestation of escalating state tyranny.
No enlightened person can give their consent to this development. Rather, they are urged to stop and reverse it with the help of sound economics and by no means less important, a new enlightenment. Thank you very much for your attention.
reSee.it AI Summary
Flooding nations with illegals is a globalist operation to weaken and dilute them. The Democrat party, owned by globalists, installed the puppet Biden regime to push their agendas. Trump's removal was necessary as he obstructed these globalist plans. Democrats practice extreme censorship, ignoring 1A. Illegals provide millions of votes, securing their power for a totalitarian regime.
@JKernerOT - J Kerner
Flooding the nation with tens of millions of illegals is a globalist operation they euphemistically call “migration.” This is being done in many European nations as well as in the US. The idea is to dilute nations, to weaken them and make it easier to bring them into one-world-government, gilded-cage feudalism known as the new world order. Globalists own the entire Democrat party. That’s why the puppet Biden regime was installed - to push globalist agendas like migration, the fraudulent “climate crisis,” deadly mRNA products and digital currencies. That’s why Trump had to be removed from office. He was an obstacle to these globalist agendas. This is also why Democrats ignore 1A and practice extreme censorship unconstitutionally. And millions of illegals give Democrats millions of illegal votes now and millions of legal votes later - keeping them in power so they can solidify their totalitarian regime.