TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @JSExposed

@JSExposed - ✞

@AIPAC 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬. This is just a quick thread explaining AIPAC's control over Congress. How their 98% approval rating and influence allows them to control the majority of policy making in America. 🧵

@JSExposed - ✞

𝟏𝟏𝟖𝐭𝐡 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 & 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐅𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐡: This is the Religious background report of all current Congressional Representatives. You can easily find this report for yourself using the Congressional Research Service search engine on their website. I've went ahead and pulled the report for you. Source: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47470 As stated in the report, - 96% of representatives within Congress report an affiliation with a specific religion. - 58.7% of representatives are Judeo-Christian. (Protestant, Methodist, Baptist, Latter Day Saints) - 27% of representatives are Catholic. - 6.2% of representatives are Jewish. - 4.1% of representatives have faithful views not normally listed. (Eastern Orthodox, Messianic Jewish, Unitarian Universalist, Adventist) - 4% of representatives are Agnostic. I wanted to highlight the Jewish percentage, as I am going to break down to you how the✡️ish Congress distorts this percentage, but also explain how @AIPAC's greedy influence overrides even these percentages you're seeing.

@JSExposed - ✞

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧: The Protestant Christian makes up a large percentage of Congress, I just wanted to speak to the #PalestineIsraelConflict and how @AIPAC lobby's these lukewarm Christians who deal in 1 of the 7 deadly sins. Greed. These Lukewarm Judeo-Christians come from many denominations. Examples such as Protestant, Methodist, Baptist. These individuals tend to fight more for the Old Testament teachings, they also support Jews in their belief of Jesus being blasphemous (see Talmud Gitten 57a) rather than discrediting the claim. These individuals also prove to have an unwavering loyalty to the State of Israel. As a United States Representative, the only loyalty you should have is for the Nation you’re serving. Without getting into scripture or having a religious debate. I would say that these Judeo-Christians like to say that they care for the world like Jesus Christ did. But will support the Genocide of Palestinians and not say another word. Because if they do, their @AIPAC check stops coming in. We've already heard @RepThomasMassie speak with @TuckerCarlson about how all of our representatives have an @AIPAC handler, meaning they're more than likely receiving that check to say good things about Israel and support the #PalestinianGenocide. I personally believe this large percentage of Representatives within Congress need to be looked into, and publically asked their allegiance to either the Nation of Israel or The United States of America. Not in a recorded transcribed, closed door meeting. We The People need to have transparency on this topic. We already know that 26% of Congress has dual citizenship with Israel. I would personally say any Representative whether Christian or Jew should be required to only lobby and serve 1 nation, that being the United States. Regardless of dual citizenship status or not. I am not saying all Methodist, Protestant, and Baptist individuals are Judeo-Christians. I am just speaking of the importance of H.R.7484 or a bill like it. I am also just simply letting those denominations know that they have a choice to make within their own hearts. Know that Jesus will also judge your support of the State of Israel and the genocide of the Palestinian people. Jews and Judeo-Christians will refute this argument saying Jesus was a Jew, without remembering the simple fact that Christ didn’t follow Judaism, he created the Ministry of Christ, which was continued on through the Eastern Orthodox Church after the Great Schism of 1054.

@JSExposed - ✞

𝐂𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜: Catholics have had a history of Antisemitism and have called out the Jews periodically. Source: https://sullivan-county.com/news/mine/timeline.htm#google_vignette But they've also had a history of catering to the Jews and their devious lies. They've helped share the Jewish Holocaust lies and other lies, that help fabricate a story about Adolf Hitler that isn't true. They don't claim that Hitler was a devout Catholic, instead they claim the opposite and that the Catholic Church was under persecution during Hitlers Reich, do research into this and you'll see that even Wikipedia is wrong. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rescue_of_Jews_by_Catholics_during_the_Holocaust I say all of this to tell you, this 27% is more than likely is lobbied by @AIPAC and I plan to do more research into this, but given that most Catholics seem to be on the fence about JQ, I am coming to the conclusion that for now that they're America 2nd. I know my Catholic friends are going to come on here and press me on this, but I am not talking about you based individuals.

Catholic Timeline on Antisemitism Chronological listing of anti-Jewish polemics and hate from various Christian Church fathers. sullivan-county.com

Rescue of jews by catholics during the holocaust - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@JSExposed - ✞

𝐓𝐡𝐞 ✡️: Talmudic Jews simply hate the existence of Christians and the belief that Christ is the Messiah and true savior of this world. Like stated previously, they believe Christ was blasphemous with his teachings and claiming to have fulfilled many prophecies, including Isaiah’s. Which labeled him as the true Messiah as described in the Old Testament (Torah). I don't think I really need to do much explaining on this one. We know these rats care more the State of Israel and the 6.2% of them are 100% part of the 26% of Congress representatives that have dual citizenship with Israel. These individuals will NEVER be America First, and will always care more for the State of Israel and using the United States and their Military Industrial Complex, to fund and defend their nation. All while our Army and nation gets weaker and less American men sign up to fight wars for the✡️.

@JSExposed - ✞

𝐌𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐉𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐡, 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭, 𝐀𝐝𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐬t: This category also includes religions like Eastern Orthodox, Buddhist, Muslim, and Hindu. All of these religions have just 1 to 2 individuals that claim a different faith than the main ones listed above. Personally, it hurts to see such a small percentage of individuals within our Congress claiming the Eastern Orthodox Church, as this is where my heart has been falling this last year in my research. I would go out on a limb and bet that those of Eastern Orthodoxy don't take bribes from Jewish lobby's, but I will also research into these individuals and see for myself. I think overall these groups may just go against the status quo of religious guidelines. When it comes to the categorization or definition given by the United States government. Outside of the obvious rats associated with Messianic Judaism who also believe in the Torah. I would also say that these individuals are less likely to partner with @AIPAC, but I may be wrong.

@JSExposed - ✞

𝐀𝐠𝐧𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜/𝐀𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐬𝐭: With Congress being 96% Religious, based on the CRS reports and information laid out within this thread. That leaves the remaining 4% as Agnostic/Atheist, these individuals belief is that the existence of God, the divine, or the supernatural is either unknowable in principle or currently unknown in fact. I want you to stay with me on this, as I am going to walk you through what I have been thinking looking at this percentage of individuals within Congress. Agnostic/Atheist individuals only make up about 26% of Americans within the United States. While knowing that Jewish individuals make up about 2.4% of Americans within the United States, it would be good to know that of that 2.4%, 0.75% of Jewish individuals are agnostic themselves. Irony, with the whole chosen people thing, I know. But, Knowing that those Agnostic Jewish individuals still see themselves as God’s chosen people, even being unfaithful. I would assume that these individuals not only have dual citizenship with Israel, but that they’re supported and lobbied by @AIPAC. @AIPAC controls our elections by spending egregious amounts of money lobbying individuals for the support of the State of Israel. @AIPAC’s PAC has already made more than $18 million in campaign contributions in the 2023-2024 campaign cycle, according to the Federal Election Commission. Knowing that 98% of their representatives get elected. I am comfortable with assuming that this entire 4% is actually Jewish. Bringing their overall Congressional percentage to 10.2%. 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: Thanks for taking the time to read this perspective, as it's been something I have been personally thinking on these last few weeks as we move closer to #Election2024. Like said above, I plan to look more into this as I try to truly determine the loyalty of the United States Congress. Whether it's to We The People, or the State of Israel. It's almost time for them to choose.

@JSExposed - ✞

@threadreaderapp, unroll this for me. (archive)

@JSExposed - ✞

Hitler and the Nazi’s: Evil on Trial ~ Debunked When I seen @netflix was dropping this Jewish documentary trying to degrade Adolf and his GREAT visions for a better Germany. I knew I needed to save my frens from the headache. Lets dive into these Jewish lies frens. 🧵

@JSExposed - ✞

✠︎ 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: This whole series was centered around the 24 men standing trial at Nuremberg for the "crimes against peace." The trial took place on November 20, 1945. Just after the war was over. There were 24 of Nazi Germany’s "major war criminals", including Hermann Goering, Martin Bormann, Julius Streicher, and Albert Speer. Of the 22 that were ultimately tried, 12 were sentenced to death. There were many judges during the trial. An 8-chamber tribunal sat at the Nuremberg trials at the end of 1945. It consisted of two judges from the USA, Great Britain, the USSR and France. They used this case throughout the series to pull at one's heart strings and label these men as fierce, unapologetic men. Half of that was the case, as they truly believed to be innocent and the accusations being made against them were false. In this thread, I am going to break down each episode and the lies within them. It will save you 6 hours of time you can't get back, and it's nothing you don't already know. Well except the fact that they tried to label Adolf Hitler as a slave trader. LMAO, that was a new one for me. But with enough research or reading @utism_'s threads you'll see it's all bullshit man. The truth is out there, you just got the be willing to find it.

@JSExposed - ✞

✠︎ 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝟏: In the beginning of this documentary we’re introduced to the first few faces explaining the history of the Nazi’s and the rise of Hitler. Jewish Author, Christian Goeschel, known for his book “Suicide in Nazi Germany.” and Jewish Professor Benjamin Carter Hett from Hunter College. They were the host of the majority of dialogue during the 6 episode series. In Episode 1, they shine light on how much Hitler had loved his mother through his whole life, but most importantly in his youth. They briefly explained his trials as a young man, his aspirations for art and the failed attempts to join the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna. During this time Hitler was in and out of local homeless men’s shelters. Hitler at this time was living in a declined society that only benefited the 2% of wealthy individuals, mostly Jewish bankers. By 1913, a year before WW1 the whole nation of Germany had almost fallen into famine. The Rothschild banking dynasty had almost completed its slow death of the German economy and was killing the nation from the inside out. With the implementation of the Allied Blockade, Germany was constantly under threat of starvation due to its success. Hitler like many other German men, grew more and more hatred towards these Jewish British bankers who ruined his nation and now had the backing of the United States, and their military industrial machine. Hitler was living in Munich at the time and willingly enlisted into the Bavarian army at the age of 25 in 1914. He wanted vengeance for his nation and her people. They didn’t focus on those details in this documentary though, they focused on the small details like many other historians. Blame his denial from the art school as a reason for him to begin his “hateful path.” This episode was just the start of their bullshit claims, literally mentioning Hitler and the NSDAP being slave traders? Why are historians allowed to make these outlandish claims without any backing? I think it’s simple, they own Media & Hollywood. They produce whatever they want, kinda like the Bolsheviks in Russia at this time. Then inflict violence on anyone challenging against them, just like the communist that they are.

@JSExposed - ✞

✠︎ 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝟐: Within this episode, the documentary focused on their thoughts of success on the Weimar Republic. “Even if it wasn’t reachable by the majority of people.” Such a conceited comment coming from Jewish historians, which again were the only individuals successful within the Weimar Republic, when it came to professional and noble positions. They focused on Hitlers “dislike for the diverse Habsburg Army” and felt it wasn’t strong due to it’s variety of nationalities. With enough research you’d find that this myth that Hitler wanted a “White Only” army is simply that, a myth. There is no truth to these claims, but what you can find is the use of many nationalities even within Hitlers army. You had the1st Battalion of the 33rd Waffen Grenadiers, who was a part of the all-French pro-Nazi SS Charlemagne Division. There were the Vikings, recruited in 1940 from Scandinavia, the Baltic States and even the Low Countries, what would become the elite 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking. The Wallons were made up of more than 8,000 French-speaking Belgians, the 28th SS Volunteer Grenadier Division Wallonien drew its first recruits from the country’s far-right Rexist Party. There was also the Free Arabian Legion of Palestine. Organized in 1941 by the Palestinian revolutionary Amin al-Husseini, the 20,000-man Free Arabian Legion was founded to help Berlin establish Nazi-friendly regimes in the Middle East, namely in Iraq. There is plenty of other proof killing this myth, I just wanted to list an important few. This episode also talked about how the stock market crash of America in 1929, caused an international economical crisis. Really just for the bankers, because they were losing money. But as the NSDAP was gaining traction within Germany, they were starting on their path of preaching dependency on the German nation, not the International Bankers. This was the beginning of Hitlers true battle, his clash with the Rothschild Bank dynasty.

@JSExposed - ✞

✠︎ 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝟑: This episode focused on Gleichschaltung and the implementation of Hitlers policies within Nazi Germany. The Reich Citizenship Laws set course what Hitler had been speaking towards in most of his speeches leading up to taking power in 1933. It touched on the book burnings within Berlin on May 10th, 1933. But, of course didn’t mention the fact that they were burning LGBTQ propaganda and other degenerate writings within the Weimar Republic. The documentary also touched on Hitler’s youth camps and his interest in eugenics. Most will say his interest also proves his “all white” movement, but that is simply not the case. Believing in your race and that it could be the best overall in any category is nationalistic but also pride in culture. It doesn’t make you racist, it shouldn’t make you the most evil man to walk earth. More proof of Hitler not being a racist would be the Summer Olympics of Berlin in 1936. Hitler spoke highly in the lead up to the event, he looked for the best German blooded athletes to compete on the world stage and show internationally an example of Germany. The nation came in and performed well, but the highlight of the whole event was the Black American Jesse Owens who stole the light of the day. It was first reported the Hitler snubbed Mr. Owens after his amazing showing at the 1936 Summer Olympics. But Owens was acclaimed by the Berliners as enthusiastically as any German. Owens himself said that on one occasion, while in the stadium, he caught sight of Hitler: “When I passed the Chancellor, he arose, waved his hand at me, and I waved back at him.” Hitler invited all Olympic winners, including Owens, to a reception at the Reich Chancellory. Hitler personally congratulated and shook the hand of each winner, including Owens, who later confirmed this on several occasions. To his credit, Jesse Owens himself never contributed to the myth-making. He repeatedly stressed the warmth of his reception in Germany and his happiness during those days in Berlin. But he couldn’t prevent others from using him as a symbol, in life as well as in death, to slander Germany for motives of their own. Ironically, the real snub of Owens came from his own president. Even after ticker-tape parades for Owens in New York City and Cleveland, President Franklin D. Roosevelt never publicly acknowledged Owens’ achievements (gold in the 100 meter, 200 meter, 400 meter relay, and long jump). Owens was never invited to the White House and never even received a letter of congratulations from the president. Jesse mentioned all of this in his autobiography in 1972. This episode would later also touch on their feeling of Hitler breaking the Treaty of Versailles by militarizing Rhineland. The Jewish British Bankers played a role in the Treaty of Versailles and the subsequent economic sanctions on Germany, they included the demilitarization of Rhineland within the Treaty to stop Germany from ever “starting a hellish war again.” To me it was the bankers just putting the lid on their damage and as soon as a man like Hitler rose to power, they were going to blame him for his reaction to the Bankers devilish action against the nation. Hitler also would speak in the years rising to power about how the Treaty alone crippled the nation, and only set them further back. As a growing nation, forcing her to confined areas would only cause famine. Which is what happened, the Treaty led to starvation and mass unemployment. Hitler, Himmler, and Göring often met and looked towards the future and their “4 year plan” for the German Nation. These 3 men felt and knew that taking on the Rothschild Banking Dynasty would cause all out war, and they knew they needed to be war ready within four years. They were often obsessed with Germany being the most “beautiful nation on Earth” and working with German Architect Albert Speer to design a greater Germany.

@JSExposed - ✞

✠︎ 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝟒: This episode starts with explaining “The Night of Broken Glass.” They try to portray this event as if it was a day that sprung out of the blue, and like other historians of WW2 never mention the Jewish boycott (Anti-Nazi boycott of 1933) and them wishing war upon Germany in March of 1933. It’s no mystery that Hitler wanted the Jews expelled from Germany, just like many other nations before him. He saw the deceit in their politics and corruption within usury. He didn’t want to exterminate them though, he had plans of peacefully moving them out of Germany. You can verify this with the Haavara Agreement that was standing from March of 1933 the same month the Jews boycotted German goods, and lasted up until May of 1939. Source: With this agreement the Jews could sell all of their assets and property to Nazi Germany in trade of getting land and or property within Palestine. This deal was made with Sam Cohen of the Anglo-Palestine bank in London. Source: May 13th, 1939 was kind of the last ditch effort actually for the German Jews to leave Germany, this came after the "Night of Broken Glass" which happened in the fall of 1938. FDR and the Anglo-Palestine Bank worked out a deal to use the S.S. St. Louis, and dock the German Jews in Cuba. The Cuban Government backed out on their end of the deal during the venture to Cuba, and FDR didn't want the ship to dock in the United States. Why did FDR not save these Jews? It's recorded that they were all supposedly brought back and killed in concentration camps. Why did FDR after this back Churchill and his total drive of annihilation of the German people. He famously told FDR and the Military Industrial Complex "give us the weapons, we'll do the job." The rest is history. This episode also discussed the alliance between Nazi Germany and Bolshevik Russia (Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact), to me this is just another example of Hitlers peaceful heart that was forced to turn cold. He even worked on an agreement with his own enemy, the Bolshevik Jews. On August 23, 1939, the Bolsheviks and Nazi’s signed a treaty renouncing warfare between the two countries. In addition to stipulations of non-aggression, the treaty included a protocol dividing several eastern European countries between the parties. Mainly Poland which Hitler had already annexed a portion, thanks to the Munich agreement. Four days prior to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the two countries set up an economic arrangement between each other. whereby the latter received an acceptance credit of 200 million ℛ︁ℳ︁ over seven years with an effective interest rate of 4.5 percent. The credit line was to be used during the next two years for purchase of capital goods (factory equipment, installations, machinery and machine tools, ships, vehicles, and other means of transport) in Germany and was to be paid off by means of Bolshevik material shipment from 1946 onwards. The economic agreement was the first step toward improvement in relations between the Bolsheviks and Germany. On May 11, 1939, the day after the Credit Agreement, the Bolsheviks went to war against Japan in a successful four-week military campaign in the Far East. Prior to all agreements, Germany lacked natural resources, including several key raw materials needed for economic and military operations. Since the late 19th century, it had relied heavily upon Russian imports of such materials. Before World War I, Germany imported 1.5 billion Reichsmarks of raw materials and other goods per year from Russia. Such imports fell sharply after World War I. In the early 1930s, Russian imports decreased as the more isolationist Stalinist Bolshevik regime asserted power and the disarmament requirements of the Treaty of Versailles, decreased Germany's reliance on Soviet imports. As history states Germany invaded Poland on the western front, and the Bolsheviks invaded on the eastern front. In October of 1939 three German trade partners - Baltic States – Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania – signed a Pact of Defense and mutual assistance which permitted the Bolsheviks to station troops in them. German-Soviet tensions were also raised by the Soviet invasion of Finland in November 1939. Several German merchant ships were damaged. Germany and the Soviet Union continued economic, military and political negotiations throughout the last half of 1939, which resulted in a much larger German–Soviet Commercial Agreement was signed on February 11, 1940. Under that agreement, the Soviet Union became a major supplier of vital materials to Germany, including petroleum, manganese, copper, nickel, chrome, platinum, lumber and grain. They also received considerable amounts of other vital raw materials, including manganese ore, along with the transit of one million tons of soybeans from Manchuria. On January 10, 1941, the countries signed an additional agreement modifying their 1940 commercial agreement, adjusting borders, and resolving other minor disputes. During both the first period of the 1940 agreement (February 11, 1940, to February 11, 1941) and the second (February 11, 1941, until the Pact was broken), Germany received massive quantities of raw materials, including over: 1,600,000 tons of grains 900,000 tons of oil 200,000 tons of cotton 140,000 tons of manganese 200,000 tons of phosphates 20,000 tons of chrome ore 18,000 tons of rubber 100,000 tons of soybeans 500,000 tons of iron ores 300,000 tons of scrap metal and pig iron 2,000 kilograms of platinum In August 1940, Soviet imports comprised over 50% of Germany's total overseas imports, which declined at this time to 20.4 thousands of tons. The trade relations ended when Germany began Operation Barbarossa and invaded Bolshevik Russia on June 22, 1941.

@JSExposed - ✞

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐇𝐚𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐚 𝐀𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭. So in a previous post we discussed the Rothschilds buying the land of Palestine (Israel) in 1917 with the Balfour Declaration, which was the start of the ultimate Haavara Agreement between Zionists Jews and Nazi Germany. The years…

@JSExposed - ✞

🇵🇸 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐨-𝐏𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐤 (Apk, i.e Anglo-Palestine Company.) From 1933 to 1939 German Jews used this bank as a means to sell their assets and property to leave Nazi persecution. Learn some truth you weren't taught in History class. 🧵

@JSExposed - ✞

✠︎ 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝟓: In this episode they explained the attack on Bolshevik Russia the best they could, but as stated above. Their facts are all wrong, they blame Germany for the invasion of Poland which started WW2. But the Bolshevik Soviets and Nazi Germany even agreed on the annexation of Poland and several other European nations that were once German before WW1 and the Treaty of Versailles. But the Bolsheviks went against their agreement of peace, and sided with known Zionist Winston Churchill in the United Kingdom, and overseer of the Military Industrial Complex at the time Franklin D. Roosevelt. In which you know the rest. But they briefly spoke on how Hitler was the one waging war, but that is simply not the case. Hitler offered 12 peace plans throughout the entirety of his reign as Fuhrer, even during the agreement of peace with the Bolsheviks and Nazi Germany. But all fell on deaf ears, as the Zionist leading the allied charge didn’t want peace, they wanted total annihilation. They showed that in many examples. They also say Hitler pushed the war with the United States as a means to drag them into the war, but I would say they were already involved with funding it. Similar to today, with Ukraine and Israel. This episode also went over the myth of the Wannsee Conference, Despite the Wannsee Conference having assumed giant proportions in the ongoing Holocaust story, the meeting was in fact unknown until the chance discovery of a copy of the minutes in 1947. The meeting itself was also relatively brief, and only lasted an hour and a half at the most. The minutes were found in the files of Under State Secretary Martin Luther in 1947 and have since then been boosted to almost mythical status as one of the turning points in Nazi policy towards the Jews. In reality, the Wannsee Conference was actually just a planning meeting to facilitate shipping Jews out of Germany to the newly-occupied territories in Russia, Palestine, and nothing more. The evidence is listed within the study of the Wannsee Conference Minutes by Francis Dupont. Source: https://archive.org/stream/TheMythOfTheWannseeConferenceFDupontUpload/The%20Myth%20of%20the%20Wannsee%20Conference%20F%20Dupont%20Upload_djvu.txt Operation Barbosa started Sunday, June 22, 1941. If anything, this was the true attack that Hitler wanted to be remembered for. Not the Jews scapegoating him with Poland to start WW2. Source: He wanted to be remembered for taking on and annihilating Jewish Bolshevism. The attack on Russia, came after their occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina, following an ultimatum made to Romania on June 26, 1940, that threatened the use of force. Those regions, with a total area of 50,762 km2 (19,599 sq mi) and a population of 3,776,309 inhabitants, were incorporated into the Soviet Union. This action of occupation was not agreed upon within the agreements of both nations. Which upset Hitler, as he felt they were trying to take advantage of him and make a foolery of him on the international stage. Which instigated the Barbosa attack. They state in the documentary that Hitler wanted to conquer Russia and make the nation's labor workers. This accusation is so far-fetched as he didn’t have vengeance towards the Russian people, he had it towards the Bolshevik policy makers who had taken over the land and killed the Russian Tsar in 1917. Adolf Hitler: War Film by @IImpartialTruth

Internet Archive: ErrorInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon archive.org

@JSExposed - ✞

✠︎ 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐁𝐚𝐫𝐛𝐨𝐬𝐚 ϟϟ | June 22, 1941. 82 years ago today, the NSDAP launched their "true attack" of WW2, and officially took on the wasps nest that was Jewish Bolshevism. This attack to this day was the largest military scale attack, in human history.…

@JSExposed - ✞

✠︎ 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝟔: Of course they waited until the last episode of the series to really pull at your heart strings with their Jewish lies, and the distorted and fictitious holocaust. I don’t really want to spend time on all of the lies, when with enough research anyone can easily find the faults in their story. But one lie that I couldn’t help but address, and that is that Germany focused more on exterminating Jews in the midst of WW2, instead of putting up a defense, resulting in their loss in WW2. One piece of evidence already that counters this claim, even comes from the documentary directly. At the end of the Nuremberg Trials, all of those on trial had a chance to give a statement about their crimes and if they had any feeling of remorse. All of them stood in unity and stated the accusation of the extermination of Jews in concentration camps was false, and they never personally killed any Jewish individual. In fact, they doubled even and stated they just wanted them out of their country. The other piece of evidence that debunks this wholly, is the Haavara Agreement like spoken about above in Episode 4. Nazi Germany began shipping Jews out of Germany from 1933 (When Hitler took over power) to 1939 (WW2 started). If he was offering Jews to leave freely and offered passage out, why would he waste the time and energy of killing these individuals? There is plenty of evidence of the German Jews in labor camps waiting for their departure out of Germany, among other political enemies of the German Reich. Such as Bolshevik Russians, who were also Jewish. Polish individuals not willing to follow the Reich Citizen Laws, and other individuals within the German Reich that were not law abiding and were caught fighting against the Nazi Government in Germany. These camps had theaters, pools, classrooms, and more. [My brother @utism_ has worked up a really good thread on Auschwitz, you should check it out. 😉 Source: https://archive.ph/dAybL] The evidence that proves the movement of these German Jews rather than the extermination, is the overpopulation of Jewish individuals within Palestine after WW2. We also know how much the United States has helped fund the creation and continuation of the State of Israel, to even its superpower status today. As of 2024 we’ve given $3.8 Billion in foreign aid to the State of Israel for at least the last 30 years, if not longer. All while the United States has fallen into trillions of dollars in debt. In this episode they also touched on the “suicide” of Adolf Hitler. Now, I will not say what I do or do not know on this topic. I don’t have an answer nor will I debate it as I feel nobody has a true answer to this question. But I wanted to share how they displayed Uncle H, and his final moments on earth. They displayed a last supper-like layout, comparing Hitler to Christ. Was this their way of taking a stab at those who know he was a follower of Christ, rather than the agnostic man he was portrayed as? It leaves one to be curious. At this dinner, you had Adolf Hitler, Eva Braun, Dr. Joseph Goebbels, his wife, and their 6 children, and a few surrounding officers. They had their meal, then later Hitler and Eva Braun read some vows accompanied by Dr. Joseph Goebbels. Leaving the 2 finally married after Hitlers long battle against the Bolshevik Russians. Use your imagination on how they portrayed the rest. Of course, I would like to think that Hitler went out peaceful and without pain in his final moments. But, a part of me will always believe that Hitler found a way out with Dr. Goebbels. Even if it’s as far-fetched as the Holocaust. In the end of this series they talk about how the remaining Nazi’s were hanged in Nuremberg and their story was laid to rest after the trial. But, truly the Jews still know to this day, that is not the case. They fear the lighting that strikes twice, and the storm is brewing. They also admitted to carrying out Operation Paperclip. Which is when the United States recruited Wernher von Braun and 1,400 other Nazi scientists. It also ended with the hanging of the 24 men on trial at Nuremberg. This whole series was built on lies, just so they could show some rare images of the 24 men after being hung. That’s all these people wish for, death and genocide of those who speak against them. The modern example would be the State of Israel and their genocide of Palestinians. History Film by @IImpartialTruth

@JSExposed - ✞

✠︎ 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: Today people continue to wake up to these Bolshevik lies told over the years, and the real truth of WW2 and the zionist influence of the allied forces. We also know at the end of the Nuremberg Trials, the United States started a course towards the Cold War against Bolshevik Russia. I personally believe this was them covering their tracks for the fault that they had done, killing their fellow brothers at the cost of Jewish Bolshevik lies told by Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Lenin. FDR had also passed on, he was the one pushing our nation to support these Bolshevik lies, and used the Military Industrial Complex to support Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin, in their fight against Nazi Germany. So what do we do with this knowledge? We dismantle every foreign lobby within the nation first, then we secure our borders and care only for our nation. Once our $34 Trillion debt gets figured out, then and only then can we really assist other nations in their pursuit for liberty and happiness. It is the Americans duty to care about the American man, not for an Israeli, not for a Russian, not for any man or woman in any nation that isn't American. It’s that simple. Thanks for taking the time to read through my summary, rather than wasting it watching that shit hole of a documentary. I leave you with this summary and also a challenge to look into the true history of WW2 for yourself, look at where the money went, where it is now, and the causes up to it. You’ll find every answer you truly need! Follow me for more content like this, and make sure to check out the thread's I already have posted. Special Thanks: Just wanted to take this time to also thank @IImpartialTruth for his amazing content, and being a general in this fight. Also @utism_, like many others I have been radicalised by this man and he's really the only reason I start researcing this stuff on my own. If you haven't followed these guys, do it now!

@JSExposed - ✞

@threadreaderapp unroll this history for me. (archive)

@LeviMauerman - 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐇𝐚𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐚 𝐀𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭. So in a previous post we discussed the Rothschilds buying the land of Palestine (Israel) in 1917 with the Balfour Declaration, which was the start of the ultimate Haavara Agreement between Zionists Jews and Nazi Germany. The years between the Balfour Declaration and the Haavara Agreement were marked by significant developments in the Middle East and Europe. The end of World War I led to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent partitioning of the Middle East by the British and French. In Europe. Hitler and the Nazi party had gained support and was pressing on in the development of Germany after World War 1. The Haavara Agreement, enabled Jews fleeing persecution under the Nazi regime to transfer some portion of their assets to British Mandatory Palestine. Emigrants would sell their assets in Germany to pay for essential goods to be shipped to Mandatory Palestine. The agreement was controversial to both sides but for German Jews, the agreement offered a way to leave, for the Yishuv, the Jewish community in Palestine. It offered access to both immigrant labor and economic support; for the Germans it facilitated the emigration of German Jews while breaking the anti-Nazi boycott of 1933, which had mass support among European and American Jews and was thought by the German state to be a potential threat to the German economy, as the Jews boycotted anything manufactured by Germany the day after Hitler was appointed Chancellor. The Nazi Party, led by Adolf Hitler, won 288 seats in the Reichstag, making them the largest party. However, they did not have an outright majority. The Social Democratic Party (SPD) had 120 seats, and the Communist Party (KPD) had 81 seats. So, both the SPD and the KPD had more seats than the Nazi Party. However, as the political situation in Germany became increasingly supportive of Hitler and his messages, in the early 1930s, Hindenburg eventually appointed Hitler as Chancellor. On 27 February, the German parliament building – the Reichstag – caught fire. Acting as chancellor, Hitler immediately blamed the Communists of being the perpetrators of the fire and claimed the arson was part of a larger effort to overthrow the German government. Later that next month the 'Reichstag Fire Decree' was enacted by Hindenburg. The decree was used as the legal basis for the imprisonment of anyone considered to be opponents of the Nazis, and with the enactment of the decree the German Parliament felt the need to look for another option. March 24, 1933, Judea declares war on Germany. 'The Enabling Act' was introduced, it was passed with mass support by the Reichstag and Reichsrat. Once the passing of the 'Enabling Act of 1933' was in place, Hitler was given power to pass and enforce laws without the involvement of the Reichstag or Weimar President Paul von Hindenburg. Which brings us to the 'Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service'. On April 7, 1933, Under this law, civil servants who were not of "Aryan descent" were to be retired or dismissed from their positions. The only exceptions were those who had served in World War I or had family members who had fought for Germany or its allies. Personal Opinion: I think this would be when Hitler realized the Synagogue even had control of the Media and Banking. This was him removing them from those positions, so their gatekeeping ways were dissolved. Anyway Hanotea, was a citrus planting company based in Netanya and established in 1929 by long-established Jewish settlers in Palestine involved in the Benei Binyamin movement. They played a huge role in a deal worked out with the Reich Economics Ministry, the blocked German bank accounts of prospective immigrants would be unblocked and funds from them used by Hanotea to buy agricultural German goods; these goods, along with the immigrants, would then be shipped to Palestine, and the immigrants would be granted a house or citrus plantation by the company to the same value. Hanotea's director, Sam Cohen, represented the company in direct negotiation with the Reich Economics Ministry beginning in March 1933. - In May 1933 Hanotea applied for permission to transfer capital from Germany to Palestine. - This pilot arrangement appeared to be operating successfully, and so paved the way for the later Haavara Agreement. The Haavara (Transfer) Agreement, negotiated by Eliezer Hoofein, director of the Anglo-Palestine Bank, was agreed to by the Reich Economics Ministry in 1933, and continued until 1939. Under the agreement, Jews emigrating from Germany could use their assets to purchase German-manufactured goods for export, thus salvaging their personal assets during emigration. The agreement provided a substantial export market for German factories in British-ruled Palestine. Between November 1933, and 31 December 1937, 77,800,000 Reichmarks ($22,500,000), worth of goods were exported to Jewish businesses in Palestine under the program. By the time the program ended with the start of World War II, the total had risen to 105,000,000 marks (about $35,000,000, 1939 values). Emigrants with capital of £1,000, (about $5,000) could move to Palestine in spite of severe British restrictions on Jewish immigration under an immigrant investor program similar to the modern United States EB-5 visa. Under the Transfer Agreement, about 39% of an emigrant's funds were given to Jewish communal economic development projects, leaving individuals with about 43% of the funds. After the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 the program was ended. #HistoryMatters #History1933 #History #Humanity The Balfour Declaration: https://t.co/Q1w2MdHAQU

@LeviMauerman - 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐚𝐥𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Lets jump to the what the Synagogue was up to in 1917. Truthers know at this time in history thanks to the Luciferian Rothschild Dynasty, the Synagogue had full control of the finance and banking at this time in the world, but most…

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐕𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝟏𝟗𝟏𝟕 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 The Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, was a moment in world history that drastically altered the momentum of Russia and the course of the 20th century. The revolution was a culmination of years of social unrest, political turmoil, and economic instability within the Russian Empire. The event is often divided into two distinct phases: the February Revolution and the October Revolution. The February Revolution was primarily driven by the discontent of the Bolsheviks, who were protesting from the hardships of World War I, food shortages, and a general lack of trust in the Russian Orthodox government. The Bolsheviks believed Nicholas II only cared for the betterment of himself, but truly he just cared for the success of the church. The Bolsheviks mostly hated Nicholas because he was Orthodox Christian and also the Tsar, they were all about that anti-monarchist life. But at the same time centering their socialist ideology around 1 leading figure? Irony is a funny thing. On March 8, 1917, thousands of women in Petrograd (now St. Petersburg) took to the streets to protest against food shortages, high prices, and the ongoing war. This demonstration, which was initially organized by women textile workers, quickly gained momentum and turned into a massive strike that brought the city to a standstill. The women were joined by other workers and by the end of the day, over 100,000 people were participating in the demonstrations. The protests continued over the next few days, with more and more people joining in. The authorities were unable to control the situation and on March 15, Tsar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate. This paved the way for the establishment of the Provisional Government, which was led by Alexander Kerensky. He was a Russian lawyer and revolutionary who led the Russian Republic, for three months from late July to early November 1917. One of the main challenges during his short stent of leadership was the growing influence of the Bolsheviks under Lenin's leadership. Lenin was a strong advocate for the immediate transfer of power to the Soviets and the establishment of a socialist government. This was in direct opposition to Kerensky's position, as he wanted to continue Russia's participation in World War I and maintain a more moderate approach to the revolution. Kerensky's leadership was marked by his commitment to continuing Russia's participation in World War I, which was not a popular decision among the people, and of course against the wishes of the Bolsheviks. Lenin also criticized Kerensky for his inability to address the social and economic issues plaguing the country. Lenin's slogan "Peace, Land, and Bread" resonated with the people, who were tired of the war and facing food shortages. This led to tensions increasing over the months and Lenin was becoming more vocal against Kerensky. Vladimir Lenin's newspaper, Pravda, played a significant role in the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 by disseminating propaganda and rallying support for the Bolshevik cause. The paper was founded in 1912 and became a powerful tool for Lenin to spread his ideas and influence the masses. During the February Revolution, Pravda criticized the Provisional Government and called for the transfer of power to the Soviets. This helped to undermine the government's legitimacy and contributed to the growing support for the Bolsheviks. In April 1917, Lenin returned to Russia from exile. Upon his arrival, he published his April Theses in Pravda, outlining his plans for a socialist revolution and calling for an immediate end to Russian participation in World War I. Throughout the summer of 1917, Pravda continued to promote Lenin's ideas and criticize the Provisional Government. In July, the paper was temporarily shut down by the government after the failed July Days uprising. However, this only served to increase its popularity and further solidify support for the Bolsheviks. Kerensky remained in power until the October Revolution. This revolution saw the Bolsheviks create a Leninist government, led by Vladimir Lenin, to replace his government. Kerensky fled Russia and lived the remainder of his life in exile. He divided his time between Paris and New York City. Kerensky worked for the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. In the aftermath of the Tsar's abdication, a series of reforms were introduced to address the grievances of the people. Kerensky played a crucial role in the formation of that Provisional Government. Through this short time he was appointed as the Minister of Justice and later became the Minister of War and Navy. But, the October Revolution, was a pivotal event in Russia's history. It was the final transfer of power, to the Bolsheviks. It took place on October 25, 1917 (November 7, 1917, according to the Gregorian calendar). This event marked the seizure of power by the Bolshevik Party, led by Vladimir Lenin, from the Russian Provisional Government, led by Kerensky and the Russian Republic. The Bolsheviks, capitalized on the discontent and dissatisfaction with the Provisional Government. They promised an end to the war and their message resonated with the masses. On October 25, 1917, the Bolsheviks staged an armed insurrection in Petrograd, the capital of Russia at the time. One of the most renowned battles during this period was the storming of the Winter Palace, where the Bolsheviks seized power from the Provisional Government. This event was a dramatic turning point, akin to a cinematic climax, as the Red Guards and workers' militias confronted the palace's defenders. Ultimately, the palace fell, and the Bolsheviks emerged triumphant. Another significant event was the Battle of Pulkovo Heights, where the Bolsheviks faced off against the army of the Provisional Government. This confrontation was a strategic chess match between two resolute adversaries, with each side trying to outmaneuver the other. The Bolsheviks eventually claimed victory, due to their superior tactics and unwavering resolve. With the Bolsheviks successfully overthrowing the Provisional Government and seizing power. The event marked the beginning of the Soviet Union and the establishment of a socialist government in Russia. After the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918, which ended Russia's involvement in World War I. The Bolsheviks also nationalized industries, implemented agrarian reforms, and introduced a planned economy. These changes had a significant impact on the course of Russian history and the global political landscape. The October Revolution remains a controversial event, with various perspectives on its causes and consequences. Mainly for the history of the Bolsheviks and the leaders within the government. Many were of Jewish decent, and thought highly of supremacy. To the point that they clashed with religion and killed most Russian Orthodox Christians that disagreed with them along the way. The Jewish Bolsheviks were responsible for the deaths of many Russian Orthodox Christians. Some sources claim it could be in the tens of thousands, while others say it's closer to a million. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐕: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝟏𝟗𝟎𝟓 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 The Russian Revolution of 1905, also known as the 'Revolution of 1905', was a turning point in Russian history and set a new precedent at the start of the 20th century . It was a period of widespread political and social unrest, marked by numerous strikes, peasant uprisings, and military mutinies. The revolution was ignited by a combination of factors, including the nation's defeat in the Russo-Japanese War, mounting discontent among the peasantry and the working class, and the Russian Orthodox rule of the Russian Tsar, Nicholas II. During this time, the radical socialist party led by Vladimir Lenin, began to rise in prominence. They were a significant force in the 1905 Revolution, advocating for the overthrow of the Tsar and the establishment of a socialist government. They led speeches on the square speaking out to the estimated 2.7 million men on strike. Although their role in the revolution was not dominant, the events of 1905 laid the groundwork for the eventual success of the Bolsheviks in the 1917 Revolution. On October 30, 1905, Tsar Nicholas II issued the October Manifesto in response to the Russian Revolution of 1905. The manifesto promised civil liberties, a representative, elected legislative body (the State Duma), and a commitment to the rule of law. The October Manifesto was an attempt to quell the unrest and prevent further revolution by offering political reforms. Following the issuance of the October Manifesto, the Russian Constitution of 1906, also known as the Fundamental Laws, was adopted on May 6, 1906. This constitution established the State Duma as the lower house of the Russian parliament and outlined the rights and responsibilities of the Russian government, including the relationship between the Tsar and the Duma, the first elected parliament in the country's history. However, the Tsar still retained significant power, and many of the revolution's goals were not achieved. In June 1907, the Second State Duma, which was even more radical than the first, was dissolved by the Tsar. This event marked a significant turning point in the political landscape of the Russian Empire. The dissolution of the Second State Duma was a result of the growing tensions between the Tsar and the increasingly radical political factions within the Duma. The Tsar, fearing a further escalation of revolutionary sentiment, decided to dissolve the Duma and replace it with a more conservative body. This decision was an effort to preserve itself and keep the nation from sliding into outright anarchism. But ultimately led to further unrest and contributed to the eventual collapse of the Russian Empire. The 1905 Revolution is often seen as a precursor to the 1917 Revolution, which would eventually lead to the downfall of the Russian monarchy and the establishment of the Soviet Union. The Russian Revolution of 1905 left the country in a state of unrest, with the people falling into more influence by the Jewish Bolsheviks, and demanding more rights and a better "quality of life". The situation was further exacerbated by Russia's entry into World War I in 1914. The country faced military failures, food shortages, and economic instability, which were only compounded by the Tsar's decision to take personal command of the army. The imperial family's reliance on the mystic Rasputin, who meddled with the government, only served to worsen the situation. As the years passed, the Russian people fell into increasingly disillusioned thought process, thanks to the Bolshevik Jews, and their radical views against the Tsar. The Tsar's government's had quite a inability to manage the crisis. The tension reached a boiling point in 1917, the economy had fallen into turmoil, and the divide with the Jewish Bolsheviks seemed to be a never-ending war. In this time the Bolsheviks decided to take matters into their own hands and start the February Revolution. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐕𝐈𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 The aftermath of the October Revolution of 1917 in Russia was a tumultuous period marked by significant social, political, and economic changes. The Bolshevik government, led by Vladimir Lenin, sought to implement socialist policies and transform the country into a communist state. One of the most immediate consequences of the revolution was the withdrawal of Russia from World War I. The Bolsheviks signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918, which ceded large amounts of territory to the Central Powers but allowed Russia to focus on internal affairs. The Russian Civil War (1917-1922) broke out shortly after the October Revolution, as various factions, including monarchists, liberals, and non-Bolshevik socialists, opposed the new government. The Red Army, led by Leon Trotsky, ultimately emerged victorious, but the war resulted in millions of deaths and widespread destruction. During the civil war, the Bolsheviks implemented a series of radical economic policies, including the nationalization of industry, the seizure of private property, and the introduction of a planned economy. These measures aimed to create a socialist society but also led to economic chaos and widespread famine. The Bolsheviks also sought to consolidate their power through political repression. In 1918, the government established the Cheka, a secret police force responsible for suppressing opposition and enforcing the party's policies. The Cheka was notorious for its use of terror and violence, and its actions contributed to the creation of a climate of fear in the country. Lenin passed away on January 21, 1924, at the age of 53 due to a series of strokes. The first stroke occurred in May 1922, and he suffered two more in December of that year. These strokes progressively robbed him of his faculties, ultimately leading to his death. Some sources suggest that the cause of death might have been a sexually transmitted disease, such as syphilis, which was not uncommon in those times. Lenin's death was a significant event in Russian history, and his legacy continues to be a topic of discussion and debate. After Lenin's death in 1924, a power struggle ensued within the Communist Party, with various factions vying for control. Eventually, Joseph Stalin emerged as the new leader of the Soviet Union. Stalin had been a close associate of Lenin and was able to consolidate his power through a series of political maneuvers and purges. Conclusion: In conclusion, the rise of the Bolsheviks and their eventual seizure of power in the 1917 Revolution was a pivotal moment in Russian and world history. The split between the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, which occurred in 1903, laid the foundation for the ideological and strategic differences that would define the two factions in the years to come. The 1905 Revolution, while ultimately unsuccessful in overthrowing the Tsarist regime, provided valuable lessons and experience for the revolutionaries, particularly the Bolsheviks. The Revolution of 1917, which occurred in two distinct phases - the February Revolution and the October Revolution - saw the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, seize power from the Provisional Government. The aftermath of the revolution was marked by significant social, political, and economic changes, as the Bolsheviks sought to implement their vision of a socialist state. The Russian Civil War, which followed the revolution, saw the Bolsheviks emerge victorious, but at a great cost in terms of lives and destruction. The legacy of the 1917 Revolution and the role of the Bolsheviks in shaping the course of Russian history remains a topic of debate and discussion. The events of this period had a profound impact on the world, and continue to be studied and analyzed by historians and scholars. The rise of the Bolsheviks and their eventual seizure of power in the 1917 Revolution was a pivotal moment in Russian and world history. The split between the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, which occurred in 1903, laid the foundation for the ideological and strategic differences that would define the two factions in the years to come. The 1905 Revolution, while ultimately unsuccessful in overthrowing the Tsarist regime, provided valuable lessons and experience for the revolutionaries, particularly the Bolsheviks. The Revolution of 1917, which occurred in two distinct phases - the February Revolution and the October Revolution - saw the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, seize power from the Provisional Government. The aftermath of the revolution was marked by significant social, political, and economic changes, as the Bolsheviks sought to implement their vision of a socialist state. The Russian Civil War, which followed the revolution, saw the Bolsheviks emerge victorious, but at a great cost in terms of lives and destruction. The legacy of the 1917 Revolution and the role of the Bolsheviks in shaping the course of Russian history remains a topic of debate and discussion. The events of this period had a profound impact on the world, and continue to be studied and analyzed by historians and scholars. Thank you for anyone who read all about the Rise of the Bolsheviks and for anyone who followed me along the way. I plan to bring more historical pieces like this my page, so if its something you, follow along fren! #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐕𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝟏𝟗𝟏𝟕 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 The Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, was a moment in world history that drastically altered the momentum of Russia and the course of the 20th century. The revolution was a culmination of years of social unrest, political turmoil, and economic instability within the Russian Empire. The event is often divided into two distinct phases: the February Revolution and the October Revolution. The February Revolution was primarily driven by the discontent of the Bolsheviks, who were protesting from the hardships of World War I, food shortages, and a general lack of trust in the Russian Orthodox government. The Bolsheviks believed Nicholas II only cared for the betterment of himself, but truly he just cared for the success of the church. The Bolsheviks mostly hated Nicholas because he was Orthodox Christian and also the Tsar, they were all about that anti-monarchist life. But at the same time centering their socialist ideology around 1 leading figure? Irony is a funny thing. On March 8, 1917, thousands of women in Petrograd (now St. Petersburg) took to the streets to protest against food shortages, high prices, and the ongoing war. This demonstration, which was initially organized by women textile workers, quickly gained momentum and turned into a massive strike that brought the city to a standstill. The women were joined by other workers and by the end of the day, over 100,000 people were participating in the demonstrations. The protests continued over the next few days, with more and more people joining in. The authorities were unable to control the situation and on March 15, Tsar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate. This paved the way for the establishment of the Provisional Government, which was led by Alexander Kerensky. He was a Russian lawyer and revolutionary who led the Russian Republic, for three months from late July to early November 1917. One of the main challenges during his short stent of leadership was the growing influence of the Bolsheviks under Lenin's leadership. Lenin was a strong advocate for the immediate transfer of power to the Soviets and the establishment of a socialist government. This was in direct opposition to Kerensky's position, as he wanted to continue Russia's participation in World War I and maintain a more moderate approach to the revolution. Kerensky's leadership was marked by his commitment to continuing Russia's participation in World War I, which was not a popular decision among the people, and of course against the wishes of the Bolsheviks. Lenin also criticized Kerensky for his inability to address the social and economic issues plaguing the country. Lenin's slogan "Peace, Land, and Bread" resonated with the people, who were tired of the war and facing food shortages. This led to tensions increasing over the months and Lenin was becoming more vocal against Kerensky. Vladimir Lenin's newspaper, Pravda, played a significant role in the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 by disseminating propaganda and rallying support for the Bolshevik cause. The paper was founded in 1912 and became a powerful tool for Lenin to spread his ideas and influence the masses. During the February Revolution, Pravda criticized the Provisional Government and called for the transfer of power to the Soviets. This helped to undermine the government's legitimacy and contributed to the growing support for the Bolsheviks. In April 1917, Lenin returned to Russia from exile. Upon his arrival, he published his April Theses in Pravda, outlining his plans for a socialist revolution and calling for an immediate end to Russian participation in World War I. Throughout the summer of 1917, Pravda continued to promote Lenin's ideas and criticize the Provisional Government. In July, the paper was temporarily shut down by the government after the failed July Days uprising. However, this only served to increase its popularity and further solidify support for the Bolsheviks. Kerensky remained in power until the October Revolution. This revolution saw the Bolsheviks create a Leninist government, led by Vladimir Lenin, to replace his government. Kerensky fled Russia and lived the remainder of his life in exile. He divided his time between Paris and New York City. Kerensky worked for the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. In the aftermath of the Tsar's abdication, a series of reforms were introduced to address the grievances of the people. Kerensky played a crucial role in the formation of that Provisional Government. Through this short time he was appointed as the Minister of Justice and later became the Minister of War and Navy. But, the October Revolution, was a pivotal event in Russia's history. It was the final transfer of power, to the Bolsheviks. It took place on October 25, 1917 (November 7, 1917, according to the Gregorian calendar). This event marked the seizure of power by the Bolshevik Party, led by Vladimir Lenin, from the Russian Provisional Government, led by Kerensky and the Russian Republic. The Bolsheviks, capitalized on the discontent and dissatisfaction with the Provisional Government. They promised an end to the war and their message resonated with the masses. On October 25, 1917, the Bolsheviks staged an armed insurrection in Petrograd, the capital of Russia at the time. One of the most renowned battles during this period was the storming of the Winter Palace, where the Bolsheviks seized power from the Provisional Government. This event was a dramatic turning point, akin to a cinematic climax, as the Red Guards and workers' militias confronted the palace's defenders. Ultimately, the palace fell, and the Bolsheviks emerged triumphant. Another significant event was the Battle of Pulkovo Heights, where the Bolsheviks faced off against the army of the Provisional Government. This confrontation was a strategic chess match between two resolute adversaries, with each side trying to outmaneuver the other. The Bolsheviks eventually claimed victory, due to their superior tactics and unwavering resolve. With the Bolsheviks successfully overthrowing the Provisional Government and seizing power. The event marked the beginning of the Soviet Union and the establishment of a socialist government in Russia. After the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918, which ended Russia's involvement in World War I. The Bolsheviks also nationalized industries, implemented agrarian reforms, and introduced a planned economy. These changes had a significant impact on the course of Russian history and the global political landscape. The October Revolution remains a controversial event, with various perspectives on its causes and consequences. Mainly for the history of the Bolsheviks and the leaders within the government. Many were of Jewish decent, and thought highly of supremacy. To the point that they clashed with religion and killed most Russian Orthodox Christians that disagreed with them along the way. The Jewish Bolsheviks were responsible for the deaths of many Russian Orthodox Christians. Some sources claim it could be in the tens of thousands, while others say it's closer to a million. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐕: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝟏𝟗𝟎𝟓 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 The Russian Revolution of 1905, also known as the 'Revolution of 1905', was a turning point in Russian history and set a new precedent at the start of the 20th century . It was a period of widespread political and social unrest, marked by numerous strikes, peasant uprisings, and military mutinies. The revolution was ignited by a combination of factors, including the nation's defeat in the Russo-Japanese War, mounting discontent among the peasantry and the working class, and the Russian Orthodox rule of the Russian Tsar, Nicholas II. During this time, the radical socialist party led by Vladimir Lenin, began to rise in prominence. They were a significant force in the 1905 Revolution, advocating for the overthrow of the Tsar and the establishment of a socialist government. They led speeches on the square speaking out to the estimated 2.7 million men on strike. Although their role in the revolution was not dominant, the events of 1905 laid the groundwork for the eventual success of the Bolsheviks in the 1917 Revolution. On October 30, 1905, Tsar Nicholas II issued the October Manifesto in response to the Russian Revolution of 1905. The manifesto promised civil liberties, a representative, elected legislative body (the State Duma), and a commitment to the rule of law. The October Manifesto was an attempt to quell the unrest and prevent further revolution by offering political reforms. Following the issuance of the October Manifesto, the Russian Constitution of 1906, also known as the Fundamental Laws, was adopted on May 6, 1906. This constitution established the State Duma as the lower house of the Russian parliament and outlined the rights and responsibilities of the Russian government, including the relationship between the Tsar and the Duma, the first elected parliament in the country's history. However, the Tsar still retained significant power, and many of the revolution's goals were not achieved. In June 1907, the Second State Duma, which was even more radical than the first, was dissolved by the Tsar. This event marked a significant turning point in the political landscape of the Russian Empire. The dissolution of the Second State Duma was a result of the growing tensions between the Tsar and the increasingly radical political factions within the Duma. The Tsar, fearing a further escalation of revolutionary sentiment, decided to dissolve the Duma and replace it with a more conservative body. This decision was an effort to preserve itself and keep the nation from sliding into outright anarchism. But ultimately led to further unrest and contributed to the eventual collapse of the Russian Empire. The 1905 Revolution is often seen as a precursor to the 1917 Revolution, which would eventually lead to the downfall of the Russian monarchy and the establishment of the Soviet Union. The Russian Revolution of 1905 left the country in a state of unrest, with the people falling into more influence by the Jewish Bolsheviks, and demanding more rights and a better "quality of life". The situation was further exacerbated by Russia's entry into World War I in 1914. The country faced military failures, food shortages, and economic instability, which were only compounded by the Tsar's decision to take personal command of the army. The imperial family's reliance on the mystic Rasputin, who meddled with the government, only served to worsen the situation. As the years passed, the Russian people fell into increasingly disillusioned thought process, thanks to the Bolshevik Jews, and their radical views against the Tsar. The Tsar's government's had quite a inability to manage the crisis. The tension reached a boiling point in 1917, the economy had fallen into turmoil, and the divide with the Jewish Bolsheviks seemed to be a never-ending war. In this time the Bolsheviks decided to take matters into their own hands and start the February Revolution. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈𝐕: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐭 In 1902, after the conference of the RSDLP that was held in Brussels and London, the party faced the inevitable split into two factions. This conference brought forth officially, the Bolsheviks ("majority") and the Mensheviks ("minority"). This division was centered around two key issues, party membership and the role of the proletariat in the revolution. As we had previously spoke about in the last post. Lenin advocated for a more exclusive membership, with members being required to actively participate in one of the party's organizations. Martov, on the other hand, argued for a more inclusive membership, allowing for sympathizers and supporters to be considered members as well. Then there was the role of the proletariat in the revolution, it was another crucial point of contention. The Bolsheviks believed that the proletariat should lead the revolution, with a strong emphasis on the need for a professional revolutionary vanguard. The Mensheviks, however, believed that the proletariat should collaborate with the liberal bourgeoisie in order to achieve their goals. The split within the RSDLP in 1903 had significant effects on the Russian political landscape leading up to the 1917 Revolution. The division between the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks became increasingly pronounced as the two factions developed different strategies and ideologies. The Bolsheviks advocated for a tightly organized, disciplined party of professional revolutionaries, who would lead the working class in a revolution against the Tsarist regime. On the other hand, the Mensheviks supported a more democratic and decentralized party structure, which would allow for broader participation of the working class in the revolutionary process. The split also led to the formation of separate organizations, publications, and political strategies. The two factions competed for influence within the trade unions, the Soviets (workers' councils), and the Russian parliament (Duma). The Bolsheviks' focus on a disciplined, centralized party structure enabled them to gain a strong following among the working class and the military, which ultimately played a crucial role in their success in the 1917 Revolution. Personal Take: This division kind of sounds really similar doesn't it? What I found funny in my research was the close relationship between Lenin and Martov. Their group's ideology may have split, but they didn't. They did publicly disagree on things, but I personally think this was just a ploy the get the other Bolsheviks to divide. If they kept them divided, they could rule over them. And they did. But, through the time I researched the start of this revolution I couldn't help but think about the close resemblance to today in America. Makes you think. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈𝐕: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐭 In 1902, after the conference of the RSDLP that was held in Brussels and London, the party faced the inevitable split into two factions. This conference brought forth officially, the Bolsheviks ("majority") and the Mensheviks ("minority"). This division was centered around two key issues, party membership and the role of the proletariat in the revolution. As we had previously spoke about in the last post. Lenin advocated for a more exclusive membership, with members being required to actively participate in one of the party's organizations. Martov, on the other hand, argued for a more inclusive membership, allowing for sympathizers and supporters to be considered members as well. Then there was the role of the proletariat in the revolution, it was another crucial point of contention. The Bolsheviks believed that the proletariat should lead the revolution, with a strong emphasis on the need for a professional revolutionary vanguard. The Mensheviks, however, believed that the proletariat should collaborate with the liberal bourgeoisie in order to achieve their goals. The split within the RSDLP in 1903 had significant effects on the Russian political landscape leading up to the 1917 Revolution. The division between the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks became increasingly pronounced as the two factions developed different strategies and ideologies. The Bolsheviks advocated for a tightly organized, disciplined party of professional revolutionaries, who would lead the working class in a revolution against the Tsarist regime. On the other hand, the Mensheviks supported a more democratic and decentralized party structure, which would allow for broader participation of the working class in the revolutionary process. The split also led to the formation of separate organizations, publications, and political strategies. The two factions competed for influence within the trade unions, the Soviets (workers' councils), and the Russian parliament (Duma). The Bolsheviks' focus on a disciplined, centralized party structure enabled them to gain a strong following among the working class and the military, which ultimately played a crucial role in their success in the 1917 Revolution. Personal Take: This division kind of sounds really similar doesn't it? What I found funny in my research was the close relationship between Lenin and Martov. Their group's ideology may have split, but they didn't. They did publicly disagree on things, but I personally think this was just a ploy the get the other Bolsheviks to divide. If they kept them divided, they could rule over them. And they did. But, through the time I researched the start of this revolution I couldn't help but think about the close resemblance to today in America. Makes you think. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈𝐈𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐤𝐬 | 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝟐. 2nd Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party: The Congress, held between July 30 and August 23, 1903, initially convened in Brussels, Belgium, and later concluded in London. The group faced pressure from the Belgian police and the Russian Embassy in Belgium, eventually forcing them to leave the country. 'The Organising Committee' for the Second Congress of the RSDLP (Russian Social Democratic Labour Party) was initially elected at the Białystok Conference in March 1902, but soon after, most of its members were arrested. A new Organising Committee was formed at a conference in Pskov in November 1902, following Lenin's suggestion. The Iskra-ists held a majority on this committee. Under Lenin's guidance, the Organising Committee meticulously prepared for the Second Congress. Draft Regulations for the Congress were adopted in February 1903 at an Orel plenary session. The committee members subsequently visited local Party organizations to assist in their work and discuss the draft Regulations. After the local committees' input, the 'Organising Committee' finalized the Regulations and approved a list of local organizations entitled to representation at the Congress. The 'Organising Committee' also prepared a detailed report on its activities for the Congress. The Congress had 37 sessions and 51 delegates, with 33 supporting the Jewish-led Iskra, 5 backing the Jewish Labour Bund, and 2 economists (Marxists focused on economic demands rather than political ones). Six delegates remained neutral. During the fifteenth session, the delegates voted in favor of a dictatorship of the proletariat, which was incorporated into the party program. A significant disagreement arose during the 22nd session, where Lenin and Martov differed on the wording of the first party rule defining membership. Lenin proposed that a party member should be someone who "recognizes the party's program and supports it by material means and by personal participation in one of the party organisations." Martov's wording was slightly different: "regular personal association under the direction of one of the party organisations." The dispute centered on whether the party should have a loose membership or consist of professional revolutionaries. Georgi Plekhanov, the founder of Russian Marxism, supported Lenin. Leon Trotsky, future leader of the Petrograd Soviet, backed Martov. The congress voted 28–23 in favor of Martov, but his support included the 7 Bundists and Economists, who later left. This left Lenin's faction in the majority, leading him to call his group the Bolsheviks or majoritarians. In turn, Martov accepted the term Mensheviks or minoritarians for his faction. The Congress was evenly split between the two factions, with neither Lenin's supporters nor Martov's supporters holding a firm majority throughout the event. However, the terminology "Bolsheviks" and "Mensheviks" originated from the fact that Lenin's supporters narrowly defeated Martov's supporters on the question of party membership. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐤 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Key Players: The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was a crucial day for Communism but a pivotal event in world history, and several prominent figures played crucial roles in its unfolding. Vladimir Lenin, the leader of the Bolshevik party, was the driving force behind the revolution, providing unwavering leadership and steadfast resolve. His close friend and journalist, Julius Martov, stood by him throughout the journey, supporting his efforts. Leon Trotsky, a gifted orator and military strategist, was instrumental in organizing the Red Army and played a key role in the civil war that followed the revolution. These individuals, along with others, laid the foundation for the Bolshevik movement and set the course for the eventual transformation of Russia. The Revolution of 1917 began with the overthrow of Tsar Nicholas II in February, marking the end of centuries of feudal rule and the beginning of a new era. The October Revolution, led by Lenin, saw the Bolsheviks seize power and establish the Soviet Union. Key figures such as Joseph Stalin, Alexander Kerensky, and Fanya Kaplan played significant roles in shaping the course of the revolution. Stalin, a prominent member of the Bolshevik party, was instrumental in rallying the troops and ensuring the party's strength. Kerensky, a moderate socialist who briefly led the Russian Provisional Government after the February Revolution, attempted to maintain neutrality and keep the peace. However, his influence on the rise of the Bolsheviks was limited. Kaplan, a member of the Socialist-Revolutionaries, attempted to assassinate Lenin in 1918. While her actions had an indirect impact on the rise of the Bolsheviks, they ultimately led to increased support for the party and helped to solidify their power. The rise of the Bolsheviks and the events of 1917 had far-reaching consequences, not only for Russia but for the world as a whole. The revolution marked the beginning of a new era of global politics and brought about significant changes in the political, social, and economic landscape of Russia. #WorldHistory #History #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐤 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Introduction: The Russian Empire, in the late 19th century, was on the verge of collapse. Its people were weary of the oppressive rule of the Tsar. The winds of change were blowing, and a fire was kindled in the hearts of the downtrodden and working class. The Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) was formed in 1898 to unite revolutionary organizations into one party. However, ideological differences led to a split in the RSDLP at its second congress in 1903, with the Bolsheviks ("majority") and Mensheviks ("minority") factions emerging. The 1905 Revolution was a widespread uprising against the Tsarist regime, which ultimately failed but served as a harbinger of things to come. The February Revolution of 1917 saw the overthrow of the Tsar and the establishment of a provisional government. As the country plunged into further turmoil, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, seized power in the October Revolution of 1917. The aftermath of the revolution saw the formation of the Soviet Union and the rise of the Bolsheviks to power, with the RSDLP eventually becoming the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The historical accuracy of these events is well-documented, with numerous sources detailing the key players and events that shaped the course of the Russian Revolution. The RSDLP played a pivotal role in the revolution, with its various factions representing different ideologies and approaches to achieving their goals. The Bolshevik Revolution and the formation of the RSDLP are essential chapters in the history of Russia and the world, with their impact still felt today. The rise of the Soviet Union and the spread of communism can be traced back to these events, and their importance in shaping the course of the 20th century cannot be overstated. The Russian Empire, in the late 19th century, was on the verge of collapse. Its people were weary of the oppressive rule of the Tsar. The winds of change were blowing, and a fire was kindled in the hearts of the downtrodden and working class. The Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) was formed in 1898 to unite revolutionary organizations into one party. However, ideological differences led to a split in the RSDLP at its second congress in 1903, with the Bolsheviks ("majority") and Mensheviks ("minority") factions emerging. The 1905 Revolution was a widespread uprising against the Tsarist regime, which ultimately failed but served as a harbinger of things to come. The February Revolution of 1917 saw the overthrow of the Tsar and the establishment of a provisional government. As the country plunged into further turmoil, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, seized power in the October Revolution of 1917. The aftermath of the revolution saw the formation of the Soviet Union and the rise of the Bolsheviks to power, with the RSDLP eventually becoming the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The historical accuracy of these events is well-documented, with numerous sources detailing the key players and events that shaped the course of the Russian Revolution. The RSDLP played a pivotal role in the revolution, with its various factions representing different ideologies and approaches to achieving their goals. The Bolshevik Revolution and the formation of the RSDLP are essential chapters in the history of Russia and the world, with their impact still felt today. The rise of the Soviet Union and the spread of communism can be traced back to these events, and their importance in shaping the course of the 20th century cannot be overstated.

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈𝐈𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐤𝐬 | 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝟐. 2nd Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party: The Congress, held between July 30 and August 23, 1903, initially convened in Brussels, Belgium, and later concluded in London. The group faced pressure from the Belgian police and the Russian Embassy in Belgium, eventually forcing them to leave the country. 'The Organising Committee' for the Second Congress of the RSDLP (Russian Social Democratic Labour Party) was initially elected at the Białystok Conference in March 1902, but soon after, most of its members were arrested. A new Organising Committee was formed at a conference in Pskov in November 1902, following Lenin's suggestion. The Iskra-ists held a majority on this committee. Under Lenin's guidance, the Organising Committee meticulously prepared for the Second Congress. Draft Regulations for the Congress were adopted in February 1903 at an Orel plenary session. The committee members subsequently visited local Party organizations to assist in their work and discuss the draft Regulations. After the local committees' input, the 'Organising Committee' finalized the Regulations and approved a list of local organizations entitled to representation at the Congress. The 'Organising Committee' also prepared a detailed report on its activities for the Congress. The Congress had 37 sessions and 51 delegates, with 33 supporting the Jewish-led Iskra, 5 backing the Jewish Labour Bund, and 2 economists (Marxists focused on economic demands rather than political ones). Six delegates remained neutral. During the fifteenth session, the delegates voted in favor of a dictatorship of the proletariat, which was incorporated into the party program. A significant disagreement arose during the 22nd session, where Lenin and Martov differed on the wording of the first party rule defining membership. Lenin proposed that a party member should be someone who "recognizes the party's program and supports it by material means and by personal participation in one of the party organisations." Martov's wording was slightly different: "regular personal association under the direction of one of the party organisations." The dispute centered on whether the party should have a loose membership or consist of professional revolutionaries. Georgi Plekhanov, the founder of Russian Marxism, supported Lenin. Leon Trotsky, future leader of the Petrograd Soviet, backed Martov. The congress voted 28–23 in favor of Martov, but his support included the 7 Bundists and Economists, who later left. This left Lenin's faction in the majority, leading him to call his group the Bolsheviks or majoritarians. In turn, Martov accepted the term Mensheviks or minoritarians for his faction. The Congress was evenly split between the two factions, with neither Lenin's supporters nor Martov's supporters holding a firm majority throughout the event. However, the terminology "Bolsheviks" and "Mensheviks" originated from the fact that Lenin's supporters narrowly defeated Martov's supporters on the question of party membership. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈𝐈𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐤𝐬 1st Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party: The 'St. Petersburg League of Struggle for the Emancipation of the Working Class' and the 'General Jewish Labour Bund' were two influential organizations that played a pivotal role in shaping the course of Bolshevik history. The League of Struggle, founded in 1895, was led by the renowned Marxist Vladimir Lenin, while the Jewish Labour Bund, a Jewish socialist party, was led by Vladimir Medem. The League of Struggle aimed to unite and organize the working class in Russia, improving their living and working conditions and empowering them to fight for their rights. Julius Martov, a Jewish politician and future founder of Menshevism, was among its leaders. Martov, born to a middle-class Jewish family in Constantinople, embraced Marxism following the Russian famine of 1891–1892. He was expelled from Saint Petersburg Imperial University and exiled to Vilna, where he devoted his time to working with Jewish workers. His agitation would later contribute to the formation of the General Jewish Labour Bund. Vladimir Medem, another prominent Jewish Russian politician and ideologue of the Jewish Labour Bund, was instrumental in shaping the party's politics and ideology. Committed to the cultural and national rights of Jews in Eastern Europe, Medem was also a key figure in establishing the Medem Library in Paris, the largest European Yiddish institution. He advocated for the importance of the Yiddish language and encouraged its use among Jewish Russians. The social democratic organization, funded by the Jewish Labour Bund, was formed in 1897 around the Kiev-based Rabochaya Gazeta (Workers' Newspaper). This illegal newspaper in modern-day Ukraine disseminated socialist propaganda to French & Yiddish-speaking citizens. In 1898, representatives from these three groups convened in Minsk (now in Belarus) for six sessions. The venue was a house belonging to Rumyantsev, a railway worker. A cover story was fabricated to conceal their true purpose: celebrating Rumyantsev's wife's life. A stove was kept burning in the next room to burn secret papers if necessary. Nine delegates attended the meeting: five from the Jewish Labour Bund, four from the League of Struggle, and others representing social democrats from Moscow and Yekaterinoslav. The Congress focused on merging all social democratic groups into one party and selecting a party name. A Central Committee of three was elected: Stepan Radchenko, Boris Eidelman, and Arkadi Kremer. Peter Struve drafted the Manifesto of the new party at Radchenko's request. Unfortunately, the first Congress failed to unite the Russian Social Democracy, leading to a period of internal schisms and dissension. A wave of police repression followed, preventing the party from functioning as a cohesive body for a few months. In the time after, Lenin was able to establish Iskra. It was another Jewish owned illegal newspaper of propaganda, the staff was full of Jewish leaders and wrote under aliases to confuse the Russian police. Iskra was published in exile and then smuggled into Russia. It was managed by Lenin and his close ally Julius Martov. Lenin released "What Is To Be Done?" in 1902. outlining his view of the party's proper task and methodology: to form "the vanguard of the proletariat". He advocated a disciplined, centralized party of committed activists who would fuse the underground struggle for political freedom with the class struggle of the proletariat. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈𝐈𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐤𝐬 1st Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party: The 'St. Petersburg League of Struggle for the Emancipation of the Working Class' and the 'General Jewish Labour Bund' were two influential organizations that played a pivotal role in shaping the course of Bolshevik history. The League of Struggle, founded in 1895, was led by the renowned Marxist Vladimir Lenin, while the Jewish Labour Bund, a Jewish socialist party, was led by Vladimir Medem. The League of Struggle aimed to unite and organize the working class in Russia, improving their living and working conditions and empowering them to fight for their rights. Julius Martov, a Jewish politician and future founder of Menshevism, was among its leaders. Martov, born to a middle-class Jewish family in Constantinople, embraced Marxism following the Russian famine of 1891–1892. He was expelled from Saint Petersburg Imperial University and exiled to Vilna, where he devoted his time to working with Jewish workers. His agitation would later contribute to the formation of the General Jewish Labour Bund. Vladimir Medem, another prominent Jewish Russian politician and ideologue of the Jewish Labour Bund, was instrumental in shaping the party's politics and ideology. Committed to the cultural and national rights of Jews in Eastern Europe, Medem was also a key figure in establishing the Medem Library in Paris, the largest European Yiddish institution. He advocated for the importance of the Yiddish language and encouraged its use among Jewish Russians. The social democratic organization, funded by the Jewish Labour Bund, was formed in 1897 around the Kiev-based Rabochaya Gazeta (Workers' Newspaper). This illegal newspaper in modern-day Ukraine disseminated socialist propaganda to French & Yiddish-speaking citizens. In 1898, representatives from these three groups convened in Minsk (now in Belarus) for six sessions. The venue was a house belonging to Rumyantsev, a railway worker. A cover story was fabricated to conceal their true purpose: celebrating Rumyantsev's wife's life. A stove was kept burning in the next room to burn secret papers if necessary. Nine delegates attended the meeting: five from the Jewish Labour Bund, four from the League of Struggle, and others representing social democrats from Moscow and Yekaterinoslav. The Congress focused on merging all social democratic groups into one party and selecting a party name. A Central Committee of three was elected: Stepan Radchenko, Boris Eidelman, and Arkadi Kremer. Peter Struve drafted the Manifesto of the new party at Radchenko's request. Unfortunately, the first Congress failed to unite the Russian Social Democracy, leading to a period of internal schisms and dissension. A wave of police repression followed, preventing the party from functioning as a cohesive body for a few months. In the time after, Lenin was able to establish Iskra. It was another Jewish owned illegal newspaper of propaganda, the staff was full of Jewish leaders and wrote under aliases to confuse the Russian police. Iskra was published in exile and then smuggled into Russia. It was managed by Lenin and his close ally Julius Martov. Lenin released "What Is To Be Done?" in 1902. outlining his view of the party's proper task and methodology: to form "the vanguard of the proletariat". He advocated a disciplined, centralized party of committed activists who would fuse the underground struggle for political freedom with the class struggle of the proletariat. #History #WorldHistory #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐤 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Key Players: The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was a crucial day for Communism but a pivotal event in world history, and several prominent figures played crucial roles in its unfolding. Vladimir Lenin, the leader of the Bolshevik party, was the driving force behind the revolution, providing unwavering leadership and steadfast resolve. His close friend and journalist, Julius Martov, stood by him throughout the journey, supporting his efforts. Leon Trotsky, a gifted orator and military strategist, was instrumental in organizing the Red Army and played a key role in the civil war that followed the revolution. These individuals, along with others, laid the foundation for the Bolshevik movement and set the course for the eventual transformation of Russia. The Revolution of 1917 began with the overthrow of Tsar Nicholas II in February, marking the end of centuries of feudal rule and the beginning of a new era. The October Revolution, led by Lenin, saw the Bolsheviks seize power and establish the Soviet Union. Key figures such as Joseph Stalin, Alexander Kerensky, and Fanya Kaplan played significant roles in shaping the course of the revolution. Stalin, a prominent member of the Bolshevik party, was instrumental in rallying the troops and ensuring the party's strength. Kerensky, a moderate socialist who briefly led the Russian Provisional Government after the February Revolution, attempted to maintain neutrality and keep the peace. However, his influence on the rise of the Bolsheviks was limited. Kaplan, a member of the Socialist-Revolutionaries, attempted to assassinate Lenin in 1918. While her actions had an indirect impact on the rise of the Bolsheviks, they ultimately led to increased support for the party and helped to solidify their power. The rise of the Bolsheviks and the events of 1917 had far-reaching consequences, not only for Russia but for the world as a whole. The revolution marked the beginning of a new era of global politics and brought about significant changes in the political, social, and economic landscape of Russia. #WorldHistory #History #BolshevikRevolution

@LeviMauerman - ✞ 𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖓 ✞

𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐈. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐨𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐤 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Introduction: The Russian Empire, in the late 19th century, was on the verge of collapse. Its people were weary of the oppressive rule of the Tsar. The winds of change were blowing, and a fire was kindled in the hearts of the downtrodden and working class. The Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) was formed in 1898 to unite revolutionary organizations into one party. However, ideological differences led to a split in the RSDLP at its second congress in 1903, with the Bolsheviks ("majority") and Mensheviks ("minority") factions emerging. The 1905 Revolution was a widespread uprising against the Tsarist regime, which ultimately failed but served as a harbinger of things to come. The February Revolution of 1917 saw the overthrow of the Tsar and the establishment of a provisional government. As the country plunged into further turmoil, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, seized power in the October Revolution of 1917. The aftermath of the revolution saw the formation of the Soviet Union and the rise of the Bolsheviks to power, with the RSDLP eventually becoming the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The historical accuracy of these events is well-documented, with numerous sources detailing the key players and events that shaped the course of the Russian Revolution. The RSDLP played a pivotal role in the revolution, with its various factions representing different ideologies and approaches to achieving their goals. The Bolshevik Revolution and the formation of the RSDLP are essential chapters in the history of Russia and the world, with their impact still felt today. The rise of the Soviet Union and the spread of communism can be traced back to these events, and their importance in shaping the course of the 20th century cannot be overstated. The Russian Empire, in the late 19th century, was on the verge of collapse. Its people were weary of the oppressive rule of the Tsar. The winds of change were blowing, and a fire was kindled in the hearts of the downtrodden and working class. The Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) was formed in 1898 to unite revolutionary organizations into one party. However, ideological differences led to a split in the RSDLP at its second congress in 1903, with the Bolsheviks ("majority") and Mensheviks ("minority") factions emerging. The 1905 Revolution was a widespread uprising against the Tsarist regime, which ultimately failed but served as a harbinger of things to come. The February Revolution of 1917 saw the overthrow of the Tsar and the establishment of a provisional government. As the country plunged into further turmoil, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, seized power in the October Revolution of 1917. The aftermath of the revolution saw the formation of the Soviet Union and the rise of the Bolsheviks to power, with the RSDLP eventually becoming the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The historical accuracy of these events is well-documented, with numerous sources detailing the key players and events that shaped the course of the Russian Revolution. The RSDLP played a pivotal role in the revolution, with its various factions representing different ideologies and approaches to achieving their goals. The Bolshevik Revolution and the formation of the RSDLP are essential chapters in the history of Russia and the world, with their impact still felt today. The rise of the Soviet Union and the spread of communism can be traced back to these events, and their importance in shaping the course of the 20th century cannot be overstated.