reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @JacSarobahs
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a post highlighting the alarming testimony by Jacqueline Breger, which alleges that Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs is linked to the Sinaloa Cartel through a money laundering scheme involving fraudulent real estate transactions. Breger claims that Hobbs and her husband are implicated in accepting bribes to influence Arizona's political landscape, including election fraud. The testimony suggests a systemic infiltration of the cartel into various levels of government, with evidence gathered from a significant investigation into similar activities.
@JacSarobahs - Iam Breitbart
THIS IS WHY THEY ARE PANICKING! @MJTruthUltra Now that President Trump is targeting the Sinaola Cartel… The GAME IS OFFICIALLY ON! If you want to understand how utterly intertwined certain politicians like AZ Governor Katie Hobbs are with the Sinaola Cartel, watch this Bombshell Testimony and read my report. Jacqueline Breger’s testimony on February 23, 2023, before the Arizona Senate and House Elections Committees included specific allegations tying Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs to the SINAOLA CARTEL through a racketeering and money laundering scheme. 1. Breger claimed that the Sinaloa Cartel laundered money from drug and human trafficking through fraudulent real estate transactions in Maricopa County, Arizona. She alleged that Hobbs and her husband, Patrick Goodman, were implicated through 11 deeds of trust filed in their names between 1997 and 2021, with six concentrated between 2001 and 2005, during Hobbs’ time at Emerge Arizona, a nonprofit focused on training Democratic women for political office. - These deeds allegedly contained inconsistent signatures, suggesting forgery, and were notarized by individuals linked to the scheme, notably Dawna Rae Chavez and her daughter Brittany Rae Chavez, whom Breger described as key figures in the racketeering operation. - Breger asserted that the SINAOLA CARTEL to used these transactions to hide illicit funds, with properties serving as vehicles to transfer money to elected officials, including Hobbs, as BRIBES to secure influence over Arizona’s political system. 2. The testimony accused Hobbs of accepting bribes from the Sinaloa Cartel, facilitated through these fraudulent real estate transactions. Breger suggested that Hobbs’ involvement with Emerge Arizona was part of a scheme to recruit and bribe women in politics to advance cartel interests, including control over elections. - Specifically, Breger claimed the cartel’s money was used to influence elected officials, judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement to ensure compliance with the cartel’s objectives, such as protecting drug and human trafficking operations and rigging elections. Hobbs, as a prominent official, was named as a beneficiary of these bribes, though no direct financial transactions or bank records were presented during the testimony. 3. In Addition, Breger alleged that the Sinaloa Cartel’s influence extended to election fraud, with the goal of installing compliant officials like Hobbs. She claimed the cartel’s money laundering scheme created identities and credentials for “non-existent individuals,” potentially used for fake voter registrations to manipulate elections, including those in 2020 and 2022. - She also implicated Runbeck Election Services, a company involved in Arizona’s election processes, as part of the scheme. 4. Breger, alongside attorney John Thaler, claimed to have reviewed over 120,000 documents, uncovering a network involving not only Hobbs but also other officials like Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, Maricopa County Supervisors, judges, and the mayor of Mesa. The operation included falsified deeds, swatting of threats to the enterprise, and even murder to maintain control. - The testimony suggested that the Sinaloa Cartel’s influence was systemic, infiltrating multiple levels of Arizona’s government, with Hobbs as a central figure. - Breger presented her findings as part of an investigation by Harris/Thaler Law Corporation, claiming the evidence stemmed from a racketeering case initially investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s offices in Illinois, Idaho, and Indiana from 2006 to 2009, which led to convictions for similar real estate-based money laundering. She extended this to Arizona, alleging a continuation of the same tactics. THIS IS WHY THEY ARE PANICKING! https://rumble.com/v6xc8sy-jacqueline-bregers-testimony-arizona-governor-katie-hobbs-tied-to-the-sinao.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jacqueline Breger presented preliminary findings on activities impacting Arizona's election integrity, focusing on the 2020 and 2022 general elections. She described a racketeering investigation tied to money laundering via real estate, fake deeds of trust, forged notarizations, bribery, and infiltration of state databases. Key points: money laundered through single-family residences in Arizona since 1994; over 120,000 documents reviewed and 47 filings; a final report titled 'Report to the Governor'—a 300-page book with about 3,000 attachments. Breger claimed 'The City of Mesa is a racketeering organization' and that 'the Maricopa County database ... has absolutely no integrity whatsoever.' She alleged 25,000 falsified ballots and more than 100,000 ballots affected, with $13,000,000 in two unmarked rental cars; Runbeck Election Services implicated; figures including Katie Hobbs, Andre Fontes, Steven Richer named. Data was given to Governor Ducey in 2022 and shared with FBI and state AGs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, now?
Speaker 1: If I may sub for vice chair Kolodin? Okay.
Speaker 0: Yes,
Speaker 1: ma'am. The last pertinent person, speaking for the day, and then we do have a video at the end, which is part of my presentation that we will play at the end. The next person is Jackie Breger. I hope I said that right. And the title of her report is preliminary findings of activities impacting Arizona's election integrity would specific focus on the twenty twenty and twenty twenty two general elections.
Speaker 2: Well, good afternoon, Madam Chair. Good afternoon to everyone. My name is Jacqueline Breger.
Speaker 0: So And speak real close to the mic. Sorry, thought it's okay. The folks in Show Low can hear you.
Speaker 3: I don't
Speaker 2: know if they want to.
Speaker 0: Poor Prescott.
Speaker 2: UNIDENTIFIED Just to tell you a little bit about myself, I do have a master's degree in marketing, honors degrees in financial accounting, business statistics, economics and business strategy. So I've been a resident of Scottsdale, Arizona since 1997. And I own the Feinberger Insurance Agency, which is a farmer's insurance agency in the Valley. Since 2019, I've been a principal investigator with the Harris Thaler Law Firm. We have been investigating multistate racketeering and corruption.
John Harris Thaler is our senior attorney and he is in charge of this investigation. Mr. Thaler has been practicing law for thirty two years. His firm specializes in investigating racketeering and corruption for both the public and the private sector, and he has participated in some of the largest investigations both in The U. S.
And abroad. But with respect to the current matter at hand, in 02/2006, the U. S. Attorney's Office in Illinois, Idaho and Indiana investigated the laundering of drug cartel monies through a complex series of single family home purchases in those particular states. By 02/2009, numerous real estate agents, escrow companies and title insurers had been indicted, charged and convicted of racketeering.
And in 2014, our office was asked to review the case file. The reason for this was we were asked to determine whether monies from the sale of the properties had filtered to properties purchased in Arizona, specifically in Maricopa and Pima County. We concluded that several real estate agents convicted in Iowa had set up laundering systems in Arizona and thereafter had transferred the proceeds of sales to the Panamanian corporations. In 2018, Mr. Thaler discovered, incidental to a completely independent matter, a series of trust deeds evidencing that cash laundered through single family residences in Arizona was pervasive and ongoing.
With that, a new investigation began, with the focus being on money laundered and related racketeering activities in Maricopa County as well as in several other Arizona counties. We currently represent several parties directly damaged by these racketeering activities. The investigation originally focused on fake notarizations, fake deeds of trust, fraudulent buyers and or sellers of the real property transactions as well as other companies used in real estate transactions, such as real estate brokers, mortgage companies, title and escrow companies, real estate inspection companies, service companies and so on. Over 120,000 documents have been reviewed to date. These documents have definitely evidenced multiple racketeering enterprises, which include narcotic sales, money laundering, tax evasion, payroll theft, bankruptcy fraud, life insurance fraud, auto insurance fraud, bribing of elected and appointed officials, creating and modifying public record, falsifying professional licenses and related credentials, swatting individuals who pose a threat to these enterprises, and last but not least, election fraud.
I walked in and heard briefly that you spoke about a compromised computer system. Well, that is something I will be addressing in quite some detail. I'm going to share with you that which we've uncovered, how we uncovered it and the conclusions drawn therefrom. I'll also share with you how the racketeering enterprises inextricably are intertwined with election fraud. It is important to note that our Office has been limited in resources and in terms of authority, such as subpoena power.
As a result, the conclusions that I'm bringing here to you that we've reached to date are just the tip of the iceberg. As a result, our office stands ready to work with any of the relevant enforcement agencies. Our primary findings were first reported to Governor Ducey in 2022. Furthermore, Thaler has met with attorney generals in five states, the FBI, the IRS, The U. S.
Bankruptcy Trustee, and with several U. S. Attorney's officers. Currently, there are active and ongoing investigations in federal and state jurisdictions, and both California and New Mexico have already used our report and taken some corrective action. The final report include the election fraud and will be completed and published as a book entitled Report to the Governor.
This is going to be a book of 300 pages with approximately 3,000 attachments. Excerts from this book and other necessary documentation will be available on reporttothegovernor.com after this presentation. Our report contains 47 separate filings. I have provided you with a packet, and I do apologize that I failed to my assistant failed to number the pages. But in pages 11 to 14, show you those detail those 47 findings that we have in our report.
I am going to just mention a few of those that are very pertinent to this committee. As I mentioned, beginning in Illinois, Idaho and Iowa, in the early '80s, cash earned or otherwise collected in the sale of illegal narcotics and human trafficking activities conducted by the Sinaloan Cartel had been laundered through the purchase of single family residences. Laundering of this cartel money in Arizona through purchase and sale of the single family residence began in and about 1994 and focused on new construction, particularly in San Tan Valley, Litchfield Park, Goodyear and Avondale. Cartel monies mostly came from illicit narcotic sales, which include crystal meth, cocaine, heroin and fentanyl as well as human trafficking. In addition to purchase and sales of single family residents, cash is laundered through inflated and falsified construction invoices, falsified charitable donations, tuitions paid on fake students allegedly attending private trade schools and falsified bankruptcies.
Wells Fargo Bank bankers in Arizona and multiple additional states have engaged in opening, checking and direct deposit accounts for phantom people. Resources, including city government officials and agencies in Mesa, Arizona has also been integral in the laundering activities. Since 2010, money laundering has exceeded $7,500,000,000 In Arizona, laundered cash is used in part to bribe elected and appointed public officials and their support staff. The principal preparers of the documents necessary to effect the racketeering enterprise are Donna Rae Chawvertz, a resident of Mesa, and her daughter, Brittany Ray Chawvertz. To date, more than 10,000 falsified documents have been recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's Office.
We estimate that more than 35,000 warranty deeds and trust deeds evidencing fraudulent transactions exist in the database. The number of falsified notarizations exceeds over 15,000. Donna and Brittany participate in racketeering activities, which also include facilitating the bribes to the public officials: tax evasion, payroll theft, bankruptcy fraud, insurance fraud and extortion. The city of Mesa is a racketeering organization, as that term is defined in 18 USC section nineteen sixty one. To protect the enterprise, civil rights are systematically systemically violated to preserve racketeering activities.
Fines and outrageous cash bonds are used to collect monies which are then skimmed and redirected into the racketeering enterprises. The City of Mesa Police Department operates within it a private police department that is used to support and protect racketeering enterprises. Officers participating in this force are compensated with monies paid through the phony mortgage schemes and other related schemes. Officers operating within this private force systemically violate our Fourth Amendment rights by breaking and entering into private properties, wiretapping, computer hacking, cell phone hacking, and by using related surveillance techniques without warrant. Officers also plant evidence and hide exculpatory evidence.
Multiple State Agency databases have been infiltrated or hacked, thus allowing falsified documents to be uploaded into them and allowing legitimate documents to be removed. For example, the database for the University of Arizona and Northern Arizona have been infiltrated and hacked. It permits individuals to be given degrees who never attended or graduated from these schools and allows Phantom individuals to be awarded degrees, thus lending legitimacy to their existence. Further, state licensing databases have been infiltrated and hacked to permit individuals with fake degrees to permit phantom individuals to have state licenses issued. And these licenses, like accounting, real estate, mental health care, even law licenses, we have seen phantom attorneys registered with the State Bar.
The Maricopa County database for the Recorder's Office and for the Superior Court were designed in 2014. They were set up for outside infiltration so that falsified documents could be uploaded or legitimate documents removed. Since 2015, hundreds upon hundreds of falsified court documents have been loaded into the database. These documents include falsified default judgments, criminal restitution orders, child support orders, all of these used in swatting activities individuals posing a threat to the racketeering activities. Since 02/2004, elections within Pima County and Maricopa County have been manipulated through the infiltration of the County databases, resulting from bribes paid to executives at election service providers, including, but not limited to, principals that run back election services.
In addition to impacting local elections, bribes and infiltration were used to affect the outcome of the races during the November, including the outcome of the race for Maricopa County Recorder and the outcome of the 11/08/2022 election race for Governor, Secretary of State, and Attorney General. Public officials who have received bribes include multi state officeholders, State House and State Senate, local officeholders, county supervisors, judges in the Maricopa Supreme Court, Judges of some City Courts including two presiding Judges, Judges' Assistants, Prosecutors within certain Cities within Maricopa County, Prosecutors for Maricopa County, Peripheral Legal Specialists including Attorneys, Approved Mental Health Care Providers as in court appointed advisers and related specialists. In the Superior Court of Maricopa County and Pinal County and Pima County, at least 25% of the active judges have accepted bribes in exchange for protecting the racketeering activities. Bribe payments generally begin before the individual is even appointed to the bench. Bribes are usually paid as an incentive for the attorney to leave their private practice.
By way of example, Mesa City Prosecutor's Office routinely files charges and convicts innocent individuals who knowingly or unwittingly pose a threat to the racketeering enterprise. With respect to judges in the Mesa City Court, Judge Tatts, Judge Alisha Lawler presided over these invented cases filed by the city prosecutor, falsely convicting and sentencing the defendant. The Maricopa County Superior Court Family Division, child custody evaluators routinely accept bribes in exchange for favorable reports. Bribes are often facilitated by attorneys representing one party. But let me explain.
As I stated earlier, 2018, Mr. Thaler found trust deeds recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder Office, evidencing money laundering and tax evasion. These documents, as I mentioned, were prepared by both Brittany and Dana Chavez. Both of them are connected to the real estate agents suspected of setting up the home purchasing laundering systems in Arizona. Their principal employer was and is the Cinnaloan Kantel.
Today, we know that their participation in the creation of documents necessary for the criminal enterprise runs more than twenty five years and includes facilitating bribes to public officials. Our initial discovery included more than 100 fake trust deeds and warranty deeds in Maricopa County, where either Brittany or Donna executed the document as either buyer or Seller or as the Notary under an assumed name. At least half these documents purported to be executed by married individuals. The discovery of the falsified deeds led to the discovery of additional racketeering enterprises, including but not limited to, as I've mentioned, insurance fraud, payroll fraud and bankruptcy fraud. It also led to the discovery of the extortion schemes I've already mentioned.
Maricopa County Recorder's Office has at least five appointments made by Adrian Fontes, our county recorder, from 2017 to 2021 who are phantoms. Non existent individuals. These phantom individuals hold positions related to election services. Further, during the same period, the Office has at least 15 individuals whose appointments were falsified and thereafter kept hidden from the public during the twenty twenty election cycle. The appointment documents for all of the above individuals have forged signatures, falsified clerical signatures, which means that the tracings are from a signature stamp, and fake dates.
These falsified notarizations were made by Britney. Said falsified clerical signature and date were made by Donna Chavez. I'll be sharing examples of this in a few minutes. In addition to election fraud, manipulation of the city and county databases include falsified default judgments, restitution orders, child custody orders and so on, as I've explained. Brittany and Donna have also been able to forge signatures of judges.
Well, that summarizes the findings, at least those that pertain to you guys, of the book. But as I stated, the parameters of our investigation did not originally include Election Fraud. It's important to note that we do not represent any political candidate or political party or political action committee or any similar organization or individual. Mr. Thaler himself did not vote in 2022.
He's not donated to any party. In November 2019, Britney approached Mr. Thaler and his colleague, Attorney John J. Stanney, with a request that they obtain for her WITSEC protection. However, prior to obtaining approval, Britney was threatened in such a manner that she broke off direct communications with our office.
She has continued to surreptitiously provide evidence concerning these criminal activities. In October 2020, shortly before the November three election, Thaler was provided certain information. First was evidence that the Maricopa County Computed Database had been designed with various backdoor, allowing outsiders to infiltrate it and to change the data. Second was the identities of bribed recipients, which included elected officials. And third, on 10/26/2020, Thaler's team discovered approximately 25,000 falsified ballots being held and with a significant sum of cash in a private residence in Mesa rented to Donna Chubbitts.
I do have a declaration in your packet that you've been provided detailing that. The investigation into election fraud is not limited to the State of Arizona. However, where Arizona is concerned, a plethora of individuals are implicated in the fraud including elected and appointed officials and, as I've already mentioned, Runbeck Election Services, the service provider to Maricopa County. The Maricopa County database has absolutely no integrity whatsoever. Let me explain.
I chose to share with you my investigation of Katie Harb's by way of example. But for purposes of this exercise, I could have pretty much selected any of those individuals that are listed in your packets on page 70. I apologize that you don't have a page, but you'll see that it's near the end of the book. When our investigation leads to a name of a particular individual that we suspect to be involved in these racketeering activities, we research their deeds of trust, which are recorded with Maricopa County Recorder's Office and publicly available. If there is an unusual amount of Deeds of Trust for that individual, and if there are Deeds of Trust for the same or similar named individual, or with multiple varying middle initials, we dig further.
In the case of Caitlin Hobbs, please look at page 17 through 15 in your packet. I have shared with you 11 Deeds of Trust in the name of Kathleen M. Hobbs and Patrick T. Goodman. However, when we looked at the Deeds in your packet on page 51 to 64, these have similar names, but we've discovered that they too were compromised.
In some cases, we review Deeds of Trust filed under a spouse or a child or parent or business partner, just depending on the specific circumstances. When the writings match that of Britney and Donna, we can determine that the notarization is fraudulent and or the buyer and or the seller signatures are fake, we know the deed is fraudulent. If you look at the deeds for Kathleen M. Hobbs and Patrick D. Goodman, I have provided you with the first signed pages of the deeds, and on Page 65 is a comparison of just the signatures, the pages with some red writing on them, for the buyers of each deed.
This page will speak for itself. There's obviously some inconsistencies with the signatures for Kathleen and for Patrick. This is apparent to anyone with any naked eye, but we have verified all our findings with a qualified Forensic Document Expert, who represents the State of California. Now, let's look at the Notaries who signed these Deeds. Again, I provided you with a page of all the Notary Signatures on page 66.
Next to this, I provided you with references to pages from our reports that we have from our qualified Forensic Document Expert, where similar writings have been verified as either being that of Britney or Donna. The only other option is in some situations there are graphics or traces of other signatures where we can verify that an impostor has attempted to copy an original signature. Linda Mitchell's reports are lengthy. We have over 500 pages in reports. So, unfortunately, unless I was going to walk in here with stacks like this for each of you, I could not bring those and give you each a copy, but they will be available to you if anyone wants to email me a request.
On page 67, I've demonstrated some other writings on the Deeds, which have also matched with pages from our Forensic Reports. What I provided you on page 68 to 69 is where we delve even further. When you look at the Deeds, you will notice that there is a Title Company and a Mortgage Company. As is pretty evident, the writings on the document filed with the Corporation Commission for these entities is also that of Brittney or Donna. To summarize our findings with regards to Governor Katie Hobbs, taking into account just those documents in her name are as follows: There are nine Deeds of Trust in the name of Kathleen M.
Hobbs and Patrick T. Goodman, husband and wife, from 1997 to 2021, which essentially means that they either purchased or refinanced a home every two to three years, which is statistically not likely, not improbable, but even more so when six of the nine deeds of trust were recorded within the ten year period between 'ninety seven and 02/2007, the concentration of which is between 2001 and 02/2005, which was during Ms. Hobbs' tenure at Emerge Arizona. When researching the documents filed with the Corporation Commission for Emerge Arizona, we found that these documents evidence hand signing and hand printing that belongs to Brittany and or Donna. If one were to guess, and this is just a guess on our part, Emerge Arizona seems to have been formed as a medium to attract women interested in politics and bribe them through the proper scheme to adopt positions of power and to further the goals and objectives of the Cartel.
Most of these deeds have been fraudulently notarized, meaning that one or multiple parties' names in the transaction are either not present or do not exist at all. In some, if not all cases, it's evident by page 65 in your packet. Ms. Hobbs' and Mr. Goodman's signatures are clearly inconsistent, indicating that the majority of the deeds were created by a different individual.
Who are attempting to copy Hobbs and Goodman's signatures, particularly on the deeds where the notarizations have been found to be fake. We then research the title companies and the mortgage companies on these deeds of trust. Some of these do not or have never existed. Some do not even exist in Arizona.
Speaker 4: Ms. Berger, can I ask you to please submit one
Speaker 5: of these packets to the pages so we can get this put in the record? And then we we are gonna have to, tighten this up and keep it germane to election so we don't exceed the scope of our authority.
Speaker 2: Sure. Would you like me to finish with my conclusions of that?
Speaker 0: How much more do you have?
Speaker 2: [SPEAKER A bit. Let me finish on this example and then I will go on to more of the election fraud. Okay. So when I said we researched the Title Companies and the Mortgage Companies, some do not even exist. What can we conclude by these discoveries?
Purpose of having a fake Deed of Trust is to move cash without it being traceable. A phony mortgage company provides a phony mortgage as the one primary method about which cash is moved invisibly. There are basically only three reasons to create a fake deal of trust: If the buyer does not exist, then the mortgage serves as a means of laundering the money. If the buyer does exist, then the mortgage is used to provide the owner of the deed money that is untraceable. And when the person resides in the location of the deed, then that's even further proof that money is being provided that is untraceable.
I can take you through example after example, but in the interest of time, Since at least 02/2004, ballot counts have been tampered with. Our County's current computer database, which was built between 2014 and 2015, has been and continues to be infiltrated and hacked. Its architects specifically designed the system with multiple backdoor entry points. These points permit the uploading of falsified documents and the removal of genuine documents from the County system. We have seen Brittany access database and have an eyewitness to testify for that.
Over the past fifteen years, Brittany has used her access to load falsified judgments and so on. Beginning in 2017, the Access Points have been used to change vote totals and thereon Election results. Illegal transfers have been made and provided to Runback. And Jeff Ellison. The phony deeds used in the scheme to move money to Candidates are created by Britney.
For profit and non profit Pacts are also created by Britney and used to move money for candidates. During the 'twenty two election, Ballot Scanners, Printers at 70 precincts suffered changes to their printer settings despite being tested the night before the election. The changes in those settings were made through computer infiltration, not manually or by some never before seen error. The uncontrollable ballots were placed in Box 3 and allegedly driven to run back. Witness information provided on October 2020 confirms that more than 100,000 filled in ballots and more than $13,000,000 were identified by some of our investigators in two unmarked rental cars.
These vans were loaded with the ballots and cash at a private residence in Mesa and driven to Runbeck's office. The Runbeck company, as you know, is operated by Robert Runbeck. We have found deeds for Runbeck and Ellison. So I was going to drive home the point, but instead I will move on. We have heard the statistical improbabilities of an improbable outcome with respect to the November.
Let's look at Andre Fontes and Steven Ryker for the Maricopa County recorder. Ryker's was statistically impossible.
Speaker 0: To win Are you referring to Steven Richer? Richer, sorry. My apologies.
Speaker 2: Fontes is a Democrat and was the incumbent. Percentages for Biden, Cinema and Kelly ran up at approximately a 2.5% margin in the County against their opponents. Richer won by approximately 6,000 votes. This means that 50,000 individuals who voted for the Democratic ticket across the Board had to choose the Republican candidate for Recorder against an incumbent who never suffered in scandal. Never happened.
This was a planned loss. Hobbs would receive the Democratic nomination for governor, and Fontes would run for secretary of state to replace Hobbs. The strategy appeared to have been planned. I have shown you that both Hobbs and Fontes have what we call Britney deeds, evidencing a strong likelihood that they are bribed recipients. Now, it may seem obvious, but I do feel that it's necessary to explain nonetheless.
Given that Arizona is a border state and that drug smuggling and human trafficking is a billion dollar business, it would appear that having our elected and appointed officials ensure that the Cartel enterprise remain open for business would be paramount. The Cartel invests substantially to ensure that the right people are in key positions so as to further their objectives. The fix for 2020 and for 2022 started in 2017 with appointment to election positions of individuals being bribed through the mortgage scheme and through monies being laundered by the appointment of phantom individuals. The problems with these documents are many. If you look at your pages seventy one and seventy six, the recorded appointments from Fontes, which were notarized by a Jessica York.
First, the handwriting and handprinting of Jessica York have been identified as belonging to Brittany by our forensic document expert. Secondly, the York signatures are the same handwriting but not the same style, And that change of style exists even when the documents were allegedly signed on the same day. You can see the June 4 documents. The December 9 date and the Clerk handwriting matches Donna. The signature of the Clerk at the bottom is actually a tracing of a signature stamp.
The time between the signature and the notarization and alleged execution of the Clerk and thereafter the recorded date, evidence forgery. Normally, it's a two to three turnaround time. These took multiple months, and all were allegedly Clerk executed and recorded after the election certification. I have example after example where things do not add up. In addition to State Representatives, there are three of the five Maricopa County Supervisors have also recorded documents evidencing the acceptance of bribes.
Further, we've investigated Pacts relating to State Officeholders and dark money transactions relating to said Pacts From late twenty eighteen to 2022, a significant number of questionable Real Estate transactions were facilitated by several law firms, including partners at Perkins Coie. Mr. Thaler would be here himself presenting this information, but there have been multiple attempts on his life. Thaler was driving from Arizona to California when suddenly he lost control of his vehicle. Upon investigation, it was discovered that his tire was purposefully slashed by a straight edge knife, about four to six inches.
The cut was made at such a location on the outer side of the tire where the tire would not lose air, but instead would degrade to a point causing catastrophic failure, most likely at high speed. Again, declaration is included in your packet. The reason I mention this, and the only reason I mention this, is because a similar attempt was made on the life of Carrie Lake's daughter during her campaign. To date, six attempts have been made on Thaler's life. In Arizona, public officials accepting bribes include members of the Legislator, the executive branches of the State government, more than two dozen judges on the Maricopa County Superior Court, at least two judges in the city of Mesa Court, at least one judge in the town of Gilbert, the mayor of Mesa, five members of Mesa City Council, several police
Speaker 3: officers Point of order. This is not the appropriate place to be to be alleging.
Speaker 4: We do have a rule
Speaker 5: in this chamber that we cannot impugn the motives of other members, as as explosive as that testimony was. But that is our that is our rule.
Speaker 0: Okay. So what we're gonna do is this. I need you to wrap up in terms of impact to the election. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Even though our investment covers multiple states, Thaler and our team have interviewed over 30 witnesses in Arizona. Several individuals in the public officials list have cooperated with the investigation. The team has collected and reviewed more than 120,000 documents, as I've said. The immense data that we have collected will assist enforcement agencies investigating the election fraud. Further, the data we have collected and the connections we have found and the vast details of this entire investigation will lead enforcement agencies to those participating in the frauds and will help you restore election integrity within our beautiful state.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Ms. Thank you. And my first question is to whom have you given this data other than to us today? Ms.
Speaker 2: As we said, the report was given to Governor Doug Ducey in May 2022, so he has been made aware. As I've mentioned in my presentation, FBI, some of the other attorney generals, especially in New Mexico and California.
Speaker 3: Madam Chair, Ms. Breger, REPRESENTATIVE:] how was this given to Mr. Ducey? Was it by you personally? No.
It was not given by me personally. It was given by one of our team members.
Speaker 0: Next question. Representative Jones.
Speaker 4: Madam Chair.
Speaker 0: Yes. Ms. Brager.
Speaker 2: Brager, thank you.
Speaker 4: Brager, the Arizona Attorney General.
Speaker 2: Madam chair, mister Borre, we have not yet presented this to the Arizona attorney general. We do know that governor Ducci did share this with the attorney general at the time.
Speaker 0: How do you know that?
Speaker 3: Yeah. How do you know that?
Speaker 2: Because he shared that information with mister Thaler directly. But I personally have not given it to our Arizona attorney general yet.
Speaker 3: Madam chair, miss Brigger, was mister Thaler the one that gave this to the governor?
Speaker 2: No. Not directly because mister Thaler is not in Arizona.
Speaker 3: So how would mister Thaler how would mister Thaler know that governor Ducey shared this with the attorney general's office?
Speaker 2: Because the governor Ducey and mister Thaler were in contact.
Speaker 0: Next question. Representative Jones.
Speaker 6: Madam chair, ma'am, thank you so much for coming. You're very brave in my opinion. My my question is, and I I guess it's a question for clarity, how this is in my opinion related to the election is what you're stating is potentially many people, elected officials here, have potentially been bribed or blackmailed to get certain election results. And I think the people have the right to hear that because the people in Arizona right now crave truth.
Speaker 2: That am I understanding Yes, it you are. Absolutely. And that is exactly why I'm here today. I think that we have gone round and round and round with the concept of election integrity, but nobody is willing to actually speak the truth of how did our election get compromised And as in nuts and bolts, what happened to actually compromise our elections and compromise the integrity of our state? Madam Chair, may I
Speaker 1: yes. Madam Chair, missus Berger, what may I ask what political party are you?
Speaker 2: Oh, excuse me, madam Chair.
Speaker 1: I'm unaffiliated. Madam Chair, follow-up. Madam Chair, Mrs. Berger, how long has it taken for this information to be compiled and how many people worked on this
Speaker 2: team? Madam Chair, this information was compiled over approximately three point five, four years. And we have had approximately five to 10 people at any given time because it hasn't always been a consistent working on this investigation.