TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @JacquiDeevoy1

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 10:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it incredibly frustrating when people refuse to acknowledge solid evidence simply because it contradicts their beliefs. I experienced this firsthand with journalist Isabel Oakeshott, who dismissed the involuntary euthanasia happening in UK care homes despite my attempts to share my film on the topic. It's disheartening to see such willful ignorance in journalism. Additionally, I’m curious about the missing messages from the leaked WhatsApp conversations, particularly those from April 2020 regarding Hancock's Midazolam order.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

There’s none so blind as those who will not see. You can place 100% solid evidence in front of certain people and, because it doesn’t fit their own narrative or world view, they simply refuse to accept it. Extreme types won’t even look at it. When I told journalist Isabel Oakeshott about the involuntary euthanasia of the vulnerable in UK care homes and hospitals, she told me she simply didn’t believe it. I sent her a link to my film ‘A Good Death?’ I doubt if she watched it. She reiterated her refusal to look at evidence in subsequent interviews. Refusing to look at evidence because you don’t want to let go of a preconceived notion is NOT journalism. It’s not even common sense. It’s frustrating to deal with these people and sad that they can’t see how utterly and wilfully ignorant they are.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is significant pressure on social media regarding midazolam theories, with some suggesting a systematic policy aimed at euthanizing the elderly. These claims imply a calculated effort to reduce the elderly population rather than simply providing comfort to those nearing death. I find these ideas irrational and will not entertain them further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As the peddling, the midazolam theories. So I'm under a lot of pressure on Twitter, from people that I don't think have a particularly rational view, of some aspects of the pandemic response. And some of those individuals seem to be suggesting that there was a systematic attempt to a systematic policy of euthanizing old people in this country in a way that isn't just about easing their final moments because they were about to die anyway, but it was in some way calculated to diminish the elderly population, I'm never going to believe that. And the more that they push it, the less inclined I am to look into it.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

And where are the missing messages from the “leaked” WhatsApp conversations? Messages from April 2020 when Hancock was putting in that extra Midazolam order.

Saved - February 8, 2024 at 10:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
My dad's DNR had no signature or boxes ticked. I informed his GP in June 2021 that there should be no DNR, and she confirmed there wasn't one. However, on the day he died, a paramedic believed my dad had a DNR and made a "best interests" decision. After a dose of an unfamiliar drug, my dad, who was not ill or receiving palliative care, died in a terrifying and undignified manner.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I still have a copy of my dad’s DNR. There’s no signature and no boxes ticked. In June 2021, I emailed my dad’s GP to tell her that under no circumstances should there be a DNR on him. The GP assured me that there wasn’t one in place. The day he died, while I was driving to be with him, one of the paramedics asked a step-relative who’d turned up whether my dad had a DNR in place. The step-relative said yes. According to my dad’s carer, the paramedic seemed pleased and proceeded to make a ‘best interests’ decision. It would appear that he believed that it was in my dad’s best interests to be dead. Half an hour later, after a hefty dose of a drug my dad had never had before, my dad (who had no known illness and who wasn’t at the end of his life or having palliative care), aged 78, died a most terrifying and undignified death.

@biologyphenom - Dave

🆕Scottish COVID inquiry|23 Nov 2023 🚨🚨Gillian discovered AFTER her grans death there was a DNR in place. A concerned Lord Brailsford-'was it signed?' 'it was in block capitals..with my name...it is NOT my signature at all' Full statement-https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf https://t.co/AWf6qfg0pl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that they discovered a do not resuscitate (DNR) order in their grandmother's file after her death. They had heard rumors about it but had never seen it until they provided a statement to the inquiry team. The speaker's name was on the DNR order, but it was not their signature. The care home had discussed the possibility of a DNR notice with the speaker, but the speaker had explicitly stated that they did not want to authorize it. The DNR order was incomplete because the section asking if the patient was aware of it was left blank.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, you subsequently ascertain that there was a do not resuscitate notice in relation to your grant. Speaker 1: That's great. Speaker 0: Can you just explain how you you came by that information? Speaker 1: We had heard that there was a possibility that there was a do not resuscitate order. After my grandmother had died, we'd heard From the solicitors that there was talk that there was a do not resuscitate order in my grant's file, but nobody had ever seen it. And so we didn't know the full facts of it. But when I actually sat with the inquiry team to give this statement, my solicitor produced the do not resuscitate order, and it had my name on it, And it was dated on the 2nd November. And it sorry, I've got a copy of it, but it's Can you block capital letters with my name? Speaker 0: So in other words, not your normal signature? Speaker 1: Not my signature at all. Speaker 0: Was the possibility of a DNR notice ever discussed with you by the care home? Speaker 1: Yes, it was. Speaker 0: And could The Care Home have understood from the discussion that they had with you that you might be authorizing a DNR notice for your grandmother? Speaker 1: Absolutely not. My exact words Then we're categorically, I do not want to put a do not resuscitate order in place. Speaker 0: You tell us in the in paragraph 65, which to the lengthy paragraph about this, that the DNR is incomplete. How is it incomplete beyond the point that you've just clarified with his lordship about your signature? Speaker 1: There's a section in it that, asks if the patient is aware of the do not resuscitate order Being in place, and there's a box to tick yes or no, and neither box is ticked.
Saved - January 24, 2024 at 5:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A support group member shared a photo of her mother in the hospital. Her mother was falsely diagnosed with Covid, taken off essential meds, and put on the 'Covid Death Pathway'. The daughter noticed serious bruising on her mother's neck and right side. Sadly, the elderly woman was euthanized with Midazolam, morphine, and nil by mouth, following the guideline. Rest in peace.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

The newest member of my support group shared this photo of her mother parked in the foyer of the hospital where she’d been admitted in 2021 with low blood pressure. Once there, she was falsely diagnosed with Covid, taken off all essential meds and put on the ‘Covid Death Pathway’ - originally #NG163 later renamed NG191. Her daughter observed serious bruising, starting at her mum’s neck and all down her right side. No one could tell her what had caused this. This kind, funny elderly woman was euthanised with Midazolam, morphine and nil by mouth - just as the killer guideline directs - shortly after this photo was taken. May she rest in peace.

Saved - December 16, 2023 at 1:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been pitching this story to English newspapers for three years. Shoutout to the whistleblower nurse and the Scottish Daily Express. Still waiting for editors to run it, but they're all on holiday. #Midazolam #NG163

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

The story I’ve been pitching to the English newspapers for almost three years. Well done to this whistleblower nurse and to the Scottish Daily Express. @MaajidNawaz @ng16322 @davidicke @ickonic @KateShemirani @CamillaTominey @thecoastguy @ROVE598473 @thelucyjohnston #Midazolam #NG163 https://scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/uk-news/death-protocol-covid-whistleblower-lesley-31222669

The bombshell: Covid whistleblower says medical blunder cost thousands of lives At the start of the pandemic, new treatment guidelines for seriously ill Covid patients were drawn up quickly and rolled out across the UK. They were based on end-of-life care for those with terminal conditions and some now believe the use of so-called 'silence me' drugs led to many avoidable deaths scottishdailyexpress.co.uk

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I’ve asked some of the editors I deal with whether they’re ready to run it yet. Again.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

Only replies I’ve had so far are out of office ones. They all seem to be on holiday.

Saved - November 9, 2023 at 8:52 PM

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I’m not saying a word…. https://t.co/tIHh6AslXJ

Saved - November 3, 2023 at 10:25 AM

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

Now you know the truth - that people were being euthanised through the plandemic, how many of you have started to wonder about relatives who died suddenly and unexpectedly in NHS facilities over the last three years? Was there a chance they could have been euthanised too?

Saved - October 24, 2023 at 3:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In recent years, the public has become aware of the euthanization of thousands in care homes and hospitals. It's crucial to note that this tragedy extends beyond the elderly. In my support group, 12 members have lost loved ones under NICE guideline #NG163, with victims as young as 17. Source: unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/jacqui-deevoy-its-not-just-the-elderly-being-euthanised/

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I’m glad it’s slowly coming to the public’s attention that thousands of people have been euthanised in care homes and hospitals over the last three and a half years but I’d like to point out that it’s not just the elderly who were killed. In my support group, there are now 12 members whose loved ones were murdered under NICE guideline #NG163 who were under the age of 70. The youngest was 17. https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/jacqui-deevoy-its-not-just-the-elderly-being-euthanised/

Jacqui Deevoy: "It’s Not Just The Elderly Being Euthanised" In an article published by Ickonic Media - https://www.ickonic.com/news-articles/r/its-not-just-the-elderly-being-euthanised - last week, journalist, filmmaker and UNN presenter  Jacqui Deevoy tells us… “It’s Not Just The Elderly Being Euthanised” Hundreds of thousands of people died during the last two and half unitynewsnetwork.co.uk
Saved - October 23, 2023 at 2:07 PM

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

BIG NEWS: I’m currently in discussions with an ex student nurse who says she has witnessed many murders in hospitals. She’s ready to whistleblow and put her face and name to her story. This could change everything. As soon as I’ve interviewed her, I’ll say more.

Saved - October 19, 2023 at 1:57 PM

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

The truth right here. I’m amazed there are some people who still can’t see this!

Saved - September 21, 2023 at 1:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Former health secretary Matt Hancock implemented the controversial NG163 Covid protocol despite doctors' warnings. Nine doctors and two professors expressed concerns about the risks and lack of evidence-based dosages. The guideline lacked advice on monitoring patients and weaning them off powerful medications. Nurses were instructed to administer drugs regardless of respiratory depression fears. The combination of benzodiazepines and opioids raised concerns about potentially lethal effects. Many healthcare professionals followed orders, but their obedience may not protect them legally.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I’ve sent this to 30 mainstream newspaper editors. Reckon they’ll publish it? Hancock’s deadly Covid protocol was slammed by doctors in 2020… but he implemented it anyway By Jacqui Deevoy When former health secretary Matt Hancock first came up with NG163 (the Covid protocol reminiscent of the abolished Liverpool Care Pathway that was used to treat the elderly and those presenting with respiratory issues in hospitals and care homes) in early 2020, he was quickly presented with the advice of nine doctors and two professors, all of whom were familiar with end of life care procedure. After studying it, they said they were “concerned that uncritical use of NG163 may create unintended risks for people with suspected or actual COVID-19 infection” and suggested that it shouldn’t be implemented. The new guideline replaced NG31, which detailed how to deal with people dying of cancer. The doctors pointed out that, with regards to the old guideline, the evidence base was so poor that specific dosages were not recommended. They seemed confused by the fact that dosages recommended in NG163 were so specific. In a letter, published on April 20th 2020, the eminent experts, led by Professor Emeritus Sam H. Ahmedzai, point out that “while NG163 states ‘Note that symptoms can change, and patients can deteriorate rapidly in a few hours or less’, there is no counterpoint that most patients without the preconditions above will eventually recover.” They also state that, while there was plenty of detail on dosing up Covid patients with powerful medications, there’s no advice on monitoring the patients nor on weaning them off the drugs. Could that be because there was never any intention of weaning them off? Another major concern of the panel was the fact that NG163 states: “Sedation and opioid use should not be withheld because of a fear of causing respiratory depression.” This is probably the most frightening line ever to be written into a NICE guideline as it’s telling nurses not to be put off giving the prescribed drugs due to a fear that the patient’s breathing will dramatically slow down. They’re being told to disregard any concerns and administer the drugs anyway. Doctors prescribing the meds - and many of the nurses giving them - KNOW that using Midazolam and morphine together will slow down breathing (to the point of death if it’s administered continuously via a syringe driver) but this very clear instruction is telling them not to worry about that! How many medics administered this killer cocktail of ‘end of life drugs’ to patients, not all of whom were presenting with respiratory symptoms - or, in some cases, appearing to have nothing more than a positive result from a non-diagnostic, not fit-for-purpose PCR test - knowing it was going to kill them? Some doctors and nurses have since admitted wondering about the potentially lethal effect of this combination of benzodiazepines and opioids and knew that the doses they were giving were way too high (something else that was a point of concern in the letter), but very few spoke out and the vast majority just continued to follow orders. Sadly, as we know from the Nuremberg Trials, the excuse of “just following orders” does not stand up in court. (And, whether they knew the dangers of what they were doing or not, court is where many of these obedient ‘angels of death’ will end up.) (More to follow in comments below.)

Saved - September 20, 2023 at 10:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A heart valve operation was postponed due to Covid restrictions. Tablets given to the patient were actually morphine, forcibly administered. The patient's condition deteriorated, and he attempted suicide. He later died, with hospital-acquired frailty contributing to his death. Legal action was considered but deemed challenging.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

Another tragic story received today… “My father-in-law, aged 76, was admitted to Preston hospital for a heart valve operation, which was postponed due to Covid restrictions. The hospital said they would keep him there until a transfer to a second hospital was possible where a heart specialist would undertake the op. They kept him for three weeks. During this time we began receiving the frantic phone calls and text messages. He said the tablets given to him that he was told were ‘water tablets’ were actually 270 Morphine Sulphate Logo (Actavis), which he described as having a crescent moon logo on them. He was holding them in his mouth and then spitting them into his sock later, but the staff noticed and forced him to swallow the pills. He was sending us desperate texts asking us to get him out of there. He understood exactly what they were doing to him. Each time we rang the hospital, they assured us all was well. They wouldn’t allow visits due to Covid so we had to take their word for it. He was eventually transferred to the second hospital where the surgeon declined the op due to the patient’s emaciated state. The surgeon later held a meeting with us where he expressed his utter disbelief at the physical condition of my father in law, having seen him just weeks prior to arrange the op. The doctor also said he couldn’t understand how he had been sent to him in such terrible condition and that he was a ‘different man’ to the one he had spoken to a few weeks before. My father-in-law was then returned to the first hospital, but there were no more phone calls and text messages from him. He was too weak to make contact. When we were called one morning and told there had been an ‘incident’ overnight, we were naturally very worried. We were told we couldn’t visit but my wife and I went to the hospital and barged in. We needed to see how he was and see for ourselves what physical state he was in. We managed to get to his ward. He told us he’d tried to kill himself the previous night by throwing himself out of the bed head-first onto the floor. He said 'you should have come three weeks ago… it's too late now' - words that will haunt me for ever. We then saw a nurse talking into a walkie-talkie, calling security. We didn’t want to be physically ejected from the hospital so we decided to leave peacefully. Before leaving, we demanded his release into our care by the next morning. The following morning however, at 9:20am we were informed by telephone that after an ‘episode’, he had become unresponsive and died. No further details were given then, and none are known to this day, although the doctor who informed us of his passing admitted ‘mistakes have been made’ and was very apologetic. According to the death certificate, his (hospital-acquired) frailty contributed to his death. That’s all we know or were ever allowed to know. I cannot say definitively that the drugs killed him, but they were definitely forcibly administered when not required and when he didn’t want them. I have the full and unexpurgated version of this story, including times, dates, names and greater detail. My intention was to take legal action and I did actually take advice from a barrister. He said that my claim was valid but, in his experience, the NHS would put up an exhausting and dirty fight for which we are ill-equipped to endure.”

Saved - September 18, 2023 at 8:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Investigative journalist Jacqui Deevoy reveals shocking evidence of euthanasia in UK hospitals and care homes. Despite pitching stories to mainstream editors for years, her claims were largely ignored. However, a recent GB News report shed light on the issue. Deevoy presents extensive evidence, including medical records, drug charts, and testimonies from insiders. She highlights the reintroduction of the Liverpool Care Pathway under a different name, NG163. Assisted suicide remains illegal in the UK, yet thousands are euthanized annually. Deevoy's documentary, "A Good Death," has raised awareness, but mainstream media has been slow to cover the story. The truth must be shared with the public.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

1/2 This morning, I sent this email to 30 mainstream editors and news-desks. I’ll let you know how they respond. “Dear all, As you may remember, for the last three years, I’ve been investigating the euthanasia that’s been blatantly carried out in U.K. care homes and hospitals.  I’ve pitched stories to you on this subject regularly during this time. Most of you have ignored those pitches.  In 2021, I met with Sam Greenhill (news editor at the Daily Mail and cc’ed here) and Stephen Adams (the then medical editor at the Mail on Sunday). Both wanted to run the story but later changed their minds. They decided there wasn’t enough evidence. At the time, I had 16 people willing to speak out. Two years down the line, I have 87, most with incontrovertible evidence - evidence that includes medical records, drug charts and recorded phone calls.  On Saturday, the story finally hit the mainstream. Neil Oliver of GB News finally (after much encouragement from myself and the man who originally came to me with the story) presented a show focusing on this shocking topic. Here’s a link to it:  https://youtube.com/watch?v=o3nsZiiT4YU… For your reference, here’s the pitch I sentto 28 editors in 2021 and updated to include a higher number of case studies and information about a documentary I made: ‘Euthanasia is being used as a medical protocol in UK hospitals and care homes’   Extensive research reveals that the Liverpool Care Pathway, which was abolished in 2014 after being deemed inhumane, was brought back in at the start of the pandemic in early 2020 (NICE guideline NG163) and has since been used in hospitals and care homes across the UK.   Evidence includes the following:   ·      A House Of Commons document (a Hansard script) detailing a conversation between Health Secretary Matt Hancock and Conservative MP Dr. Luke Evans, during which they discuss the use of certain medications - namely the benzodiazepine Midazolam and the opioid morphine- to give Covid patients a “good death”. A good death is medical terminology for euthanasia. (‘Euthanasia means ‘a good death’ in Greek.) ·      A video of the above conversation. ·      Confirmation of Hancock ordering two years’ worth of a sedative called Midazolam from Accord, a French supplier. The order was made in March 2020. It was claimed at the time that the drug was for the treatment of Covid patients. Midazolam suppresses the respiratory system. Covid is a respiratory disease. Midazolam is used as an execution drug in the US. A two-year supply was ordered and was used within nine months.  ·      Quotes from doctors, medical researchers, pathologists and pharmacists confirming what Midazolam is, what it's for and how it should and shouldn’t be used. Evidence from the BNF that benzodiazepines and opioids should never be used concomitantly. ·      Paperwork and links showing the LCP protocol was reintroduced in early 2020. This time around, it wasn’t called the Liverpool Care Pathway - it was called NG163 - but the protocol was identical: the use of a cocktail of drugs (a benzodiazepine and an opioid, usually Midazolam and morphine), along with a withdrawal of food and water and necessary medications, leading to the hastened and untimely death of the patient. ·      Documents (medical records and drug charts) showing the dosage of Midazolam and morphine given to Covid patients and showing how breathlessness in patients is to be managed using these drugs.  ·      Information from anonymous insiders - including lawyers, doctors, care workers and nurses, who’ve seen this abominable practice happening first hand.  ·      A video made by Manchester mayoral candidate Michael Elston, outlining what he knows to be happening with regards to the killing and culling of the elderly using Midazolam.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

2/2 ·      87 case studies who are willing to speak to the Press about their loved ones’ deaths being hastened in hospitals and care homes. One case is historic and occurred whilst the LCP was still in place; the rest have happened in the last three years; three are ‘near miss’ stories - one, when a woman who had nothing wrong with her was put on end of life treatment only to be rescued by her niece at the last minute; a woman who rescued her sister and a man who survived the LCP 13 years ago.   Many people believe it’s acceptable for the sick and elderly to be given a pharmaceutical “helping hand” when they’re in - what’s deemed to be - the final stages of their lives. Few seem to realise that euthanasia (in any form – voluntary or involuntary) is illegal in the UK. If a person is found to be involved in euthanasia, they risk a life sentence. Those found guilty and charged with “assisted suicide” can get 14 years in prison. The problem my case studies have is that NONE of their loved ones were terminally ill and many of them were under 70.    The normalisation of euthanasia has been occurring for years. In 2020, the then health secretary Matt Hancock started to push for the legalisation of assisted suicide. In the last three years, the Assisted Dying bill has been debated in parliament many times. In the meantime, thousands are being euthanised every day. It’s been reported that around 130,000 people are euthanised in hospitals, hospices and care homes every year. Many medics know this is happening but turn a blind eye.  In 2021, due to the papers refusing to run any stories on this subject, I made a documentary: ‘A Good Death?’ It’s been seen by millions since it premiered and has woken up many people to what went on behind the locked doors of hospitals and care homes during the pandemic. Here’s a direct link to the film: https://www.ickonic.com/Watch/1163 In recent months, one broadsheet editor has approached me, wanting to hear more, but they’re moving very slowly and haven’t published anything yet.  If you’re interested in being the first paper to break this story, I’d be happy to help you. (As some of you will know, I’ve been a freelance journalist for 38 years and have written hundreds of articles for the national newspapers.) Since I first sent this pitch, I’ve written many articles for non-mainstream news outlets and have been interviewed for internet radio and TV shows on at least 50 occasions.  I hope now that, in the light of the GB News report, you’re interested in my work and that you’ll see how important it is to get this story out there. Your readers need to know the truth. Looking forward to hearing from you. Regards, Jacqui Deevoy

Saved - September 17, 2023 at 4:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Neil Oliver's recent program on Midazolam deserves praise. He spoke with Emma, a victim's daughter, and MP Andrew Bridgen, who listened to families affected by NICE guideline NG163. Dr. Kendrick's response was dismissive, but Neil showed empathy and handled the situation well. The program shed light on the government protocol's role in the untimely deaths of thousands. #Midazolam #NG163

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

Well done to Neil Oliver @thecoastguy for finally doing a programme on Midazolam! A good half an hour was spent talking to Emma, the daughter of a victim (who happened to be sitting next to me at the meeting in Parliament in June) and Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen, the only MP who’s actually listened to the families of people killed by NICE guideline NG163, the government protocol that led to the untimely deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people in hospitals and care homes over the last three years. Dr. Kendrick didn’t do so well - dismissing certain facts as “ridiculous” and laughing inappropriately. Neil looked quite upset by what he was hearing - as any empathetic person would be - but he did well all things considered. @thecoastguy @ABridgen @ng16322 #ng163 #midazolam #euthanasia

@ng16322 - NG16322

#midazolam The elderly were not at END OF LIFE! Crine infections, chest infections, Gout & given midazolam + an opioid It's mass involuntary euthanasia, the NHS Knew, NG163 @GBNEWS @thecoastguy @ABridgen @MaajidNawaz @BingaBong2022 HEROES @jacquideevoy1 #Nuremberg2 #NHS #NG163

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2014, the livable care pathway was abolished due to its harmful nature. In April 2020, Matt Hancock and the NHS authorized NGINICE guideline 163, which some believe caused the accelerated or induced death of patients through the prescription of midazolam and morphine. A gathering was held in June where bereaved relatives shared their distressing experiences of their loved ones' end-of-life care in hospitals. The government was unresponsive to inquiries about the number of elderly and vulnerable individuals moved from hospitals to care homes during the first wave of COVID-19 and the subsequent deaths within specific time frames. Emma will now share her father's story, adding to the numerous accounts of similar experiences over the past year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2014 to get rid of the livable care pathway as being, harmful and and unsuitable. And in April 2020, Matt Hancock and the NHS authorized NGINICE guideline 163, which since then, relatives who've lost their parents and loved ones have come to me and said they believe those guidelines, the prescription of midazolam and morphine, a respiratory suppressant, to people who were already suffering, depressed respiration that it accelerated or caused their death. I held an event in June where 70 bereaved relatives came, and a lot of them had a chance to give very harrowing accounts of their experiences of the relative's end of life in hospital. And, the government didn't seem to want to talk about it. I I wrote the government reasonably I thought some reasonable questions. One of them was how many elderly, vulnerable people were moved out of hospital into care homes to make way for the expected first wave of COVID patients in early 2020 and how many of those had sadly died within 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 56 days, etcetera of a COVID nineteen, b, other causes, and the government wrote back and said they don't hold that data. So they have they're telling me they have no idea who they moved out of hospital and what happened to them. Which seems extraordinary. And very extraordinary. And Emma's here to tell her story about her father. And, unfortunately, you know, I I've heard far too many of these stories over the last, 12 months. Emma, if I can come to you, what is the story that you would like to
Saved - September 13, 2023 at 1:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Support independent filmmaking and inspire change by helping fund "Playing God." We appreciate your unwavering support. Trailblazer Films is crowdfunding to bring this groundbreaking film to life. The editing is underway, and fresh clips will be released soon. Your contribution empowers independent filmmakers. Donate as little as £1 to make a lasting impact and shape the future of this cinematic masterpiece. Follow our journey and learn more at crowdfunder.co.uk/playinggodfinalphase.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

*********************************************** Help Fund Playing God, Support Independent Filmmaking and Inspire Change! ************************************************ A huge thank you for your unwavering support for Playing God. It’s very much appreciated. Here at Trailblazer Films (that’s me, Naeem Mahmood, Ash Mahmood and Phil Graham), we’re continuing to crowdfund. The editing is well underway, the film is looking amazing and we’ll be releasing fresh clips soon! We still need your help to bring this groundbreaking film to life. Donate to our project and you’ll not only be contributing to the cinematic masterpiece that is Playing God, but you’ll also be empowering all those involved in independent filmmaking. You can donate as little as £1. Every penny helps! So join us on our journey, follow the progress of a documentary that’s destined to change history, help shape the future of the film and assist us in making a lasting impact. For more info, head this way: https://crowdfunder.co.uk/p/playing-god-final-phase

Saved - August 11, 2023 at 6:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In April 2020, Jeremy Hunt questioned Matt Hancock about guidance for doctors facing tough decisions during the pandemic. Hancock assured that no guidance was necessary, but a guideline (NG163) had already been in place since early April. Surprisingly, NG163 instructed the use of Midazolam and morphine, despite their contraindication. This raised concerns about doctors' freedom to put patients on end-of-life care without facing criminal charges. It also suggests that the government knew the NHS wouldn't be overwhelmed due to NG163's prescribed treatment.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

Here we have Jeremy Hunt on 17th April 2020 asking the then health secretary Matt Hancock whether any guidance was going to put in place with regards to doctors who might have to “play God” during the pandemic. Hancock replies: “The good news, Jeremy, is that no guidance is needed.” At this point, a guideline was already in place - #NG163 - and had been since 3rd April 2020. In addition, 22,000 packs of Midazolam had been ordered on 27th April 2020. (NG163 instructed medics to use Midazolam with morphine to ‘treat’ respiratory symptoms, despite the fact that the BNF states that these two drugs should never be used concomitantly.) Does this mean that doctors and clinicians were given free rein to put any patient on end of life ‘care’ with no criminal charges brought against them at a later date should patients die as a result of their decisions? And does this conversation prove that the government knew there was never any risk of the NHS being overwhelmed due to the ‘treatment’ prescribed by NG163? @ABridgen @MaajidNawaz @ng16322

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sir Robert Francis wrote a letter expressing concerns about doctors having to make difficult choices between patients due to limited resources. The lack of a national framework puts doctors at risk of facing criminal action for not providing necessary care. However, the good news is that the need for issuing guidance has been avoided because the NHS has managed to maintain capacity greater than demand. This is a result of the collective effort of many individuals. Therefore, there is no need for the guidance mentioned in Sir Robert's letter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just had a a brief, question about a letter that sir Robert Francis has written to me, which he's also copied you on. Now this is about the concerns of doctors essentially worried about having to play god if they had to make a choice between 2 patients, and there was only 1 intensive care bed or 1 ventilator available. And luckily, at the moment, The capacity seems to be holding up, and and long may that last. But his concern was that there isn't a national framework which allows doctors to make those choices so they could be subject to criminal action at a later date for not giving someone the care that they clinically needed. Now professor Powers told the select committee a few weeks back that national guidance would be issued. As I understand it, it hasn't yet been issued. Could you just give us an update on that? Speaker 1: Well, the good news, Gerry, is that, is that we don't need to issue the guidance. So in a way, this the the the horrific nature of the choices that, outlined in that letter, sir, from sir Robert, and the, deeply unpleasant situation that it puts, doctors and clinicians in, is yet another reason why it has been so important to ensure NHS capacity is always greater than demand. And it's one of the things that in this crisis, of course, I'm very happy to answer questions on PPE and testing, but you know, the really big thing that, that and the overwhelming of our NHS, which was expected by many people at the start of this crisis, we have avoided through a huge amount of effort from a huge number of people, And that means that we don't have to put out guidance, that like the that which was called for in Speaker 0: Sir Robert's letter. Thank you. So
Saved - August 7, 2023 at 5:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A man defied doctors who predicted his 75-year-old uncle's imminent death due to sepsis. Refusing to administer end-of-life drugs, he cited his mother's euthanasia experience. Nurses left, and his uncle, now recovered, enjoys life. This incident raises concerns about deliberate killings in the NHS. Videos documenting the story: [link1] [link2].

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I’m talking to a man who was told last October that his 75-year-old uncle - in hospital after being abused by his carers - was “end of life” and had three days to live. The doctors said he had sepsis and that he was definitely going to die. The man - his uncle’s next of kin - managed to get his uncle home. They’d handed him a big pack of EOL drugs on departure from the hospital and told him he had to administer them to his uncle at home. Nurses came to his home to check whether he was giving the morphine, Midazolam and two other drugs to his uncle and the man told them in no uncertain terms that he had absolutely no intention of giving his uncle those drugs as he knew what they did (his own mum had been euthanised with the same drugs in hospital in 2021) and, after telling him his uncle would “die in pain” without the meds, the nurses left. He never heard from them again. His uncle is now fully recovered and living life to the full. To me, this is solid evidence that the NHS were deliberately killing - or trying to kill - people. @ng16322 @MaajidNawaz @CartlandDavid @davidicke @garethicke @KateShemirani

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the drugs used in palliative care, including midazolam, morphine, and another drug called Lebom. They mention that these drugs were sent to the Ministry of Time in September of the previous year. The speaker suggests that these drugs are causing deaths in octopus, particularly when midazolam and morphine are mixed together. They also mention that the nursing pencil website advises against mixing midazolam and morphine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you can see I'm not boxating you. There's the midazolam, 0 milligram per milliliter. There's the morphine, 1 milliliters. There's the Lebom, whatever that is. That's the third drug I did The palliative care. Let me turn them around. Turn them over, actually. And then there's a forklift that I give And then we've got the midazolam. Now, all these were sent home to the Ministry of Time in September last year. So it is these drugs that are causing the deaths in octopus. Especially midazolam, and the morphine mixed. Now the the nursing pencil website clearly states that midaziram and mopane should not be mixed

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I’ve asked him to make a couple of new videos . Here’s the first one. https://t.co/6cJ7E1gM44

Video Transcript AI Summary
On the 21st of Q2, 2023, the patient was in the hospital. From the 14th to the 9th of September 2022, the patient received supportive care. Although it didn't explicitly mention end-of-life cases, the hospital's supportive care package is essentially an end-of-life care plan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now this debtors dated 21st of Q2, that's when he was in hospital, 2023. Yet, 14th to 9th 2022, the patient is on supportive care. It didn't say end of life cases supportive. But if you look at the hospital version of supportive care package, it's basically the end of life care plan,

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

Here’s the second one. https://t.co/CGBzBkoFKC

Saved - April 20, 2023 at 12:53 PM

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

@VanessaGray158 @IsabelOakeshott Only three years too late. I’ve been trying get this information into the public domain since 2020. No one was interested. So I made this film with @ickonic - I hope @ABridgen has watched it. https://rumble.com/v1dq083-a-good-death-documentary-about-involuntary-euthanasia-with-midazolam.html

A Good Death? The Midazolam Murders (A Documentary from Ickonic.com) Each year, tens of thousands of elderly and terminally ill patients are quietly euthanised in NHS facilities. In hospitals, care homes and hospices, behind closed doors, their deaths are hastened in w rumble.com
View Full Interactive Feed