TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @JakeCan72
reSee.it AI Summary
I investigated and found Speaker Mike Johnson’s PACs getting money funneled back through daycares and healthcare clinics. It’s incredible the amounts—one person, and he’s Speaker of the House. Taxpayers robbed blind. Oversight stalled. Swamp money circling while the public is played. If true, it explains everything. Drain it all.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Michael Flynn DROPS A BOMBSHELL: Why is there NO real accountability for Minnesota’s BILLION-dollar daycare fraud? Flynn investigated — found Speaker Mike Johnson’s PACs getting money FUNNELED BACK through daycares & healthcare clinics! “It’s incredible the amounts… that’s one person — and he happens to be the Speaker of the House.” Taxpayers robbed blind. Oversight stalled. Swamp money in circles while the public gets played. If this is true? Explains EVERYTHING. Drain it ALL! 🔥🇺🇸 #MinnesotaFraud #MikeJohnson #GenFlynn #DrainTheSwam
Video Transcript AI Summary
General Michael Flynn has publicly claimed that he and his team have investigated Speaker Mike Johnson, and that Johnson’s refusal to investigate corruption in Minnesota and other states is connected to Johnson’s financial networks, specifically alleging that Johnson’s PAC is receiving money from Somali child care centers. Flynn, a retired Lieutenant General and former National Security Advisor, stated that his private investigation into the alleged robbery of American taxpayers led him directly to the door of House leadership.
Flynn stated that he began looking into the lack of federal movement on the Minnesota daycare fraud cases. He pressed Johnson directly, asking, “Speaker Johnson, what are you gonna say about this? What the hell is going on, speaker Johnson?” He suggested that if Johnson truly considers who has subpoena and investigation power more than anyone else, it would be the House of Representatives, and questioned why they aren’t taking action.
Flynn asserted that the inaction is due to financial concerns, claiming, “But I’m not shocked because if you really think about it, who has subpoena and investigation power more than anyone else? The house of representatives. Why aren’t they doing anything about it? Because that will hurt their money.” He extended the accusation beyond Minnesota, stating that “there are snakes everywhere.”
Flynn concluded that if the allegations are true, Mike Johnson needs to go to prison, and offered, “God bless you. I’ll keep you updated. Stay tuned.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen, have massive breaking news. General Michael Flynn has come out and said that him and his team have investigated speaker Mike Johnson. And the reason that speaker Mike Johnson is refusing to investigate corruption in Minnesota and other states, is because his PAC is receiving money from the Somali child care centers. Listen, retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn has leveled explosive allegations against speaker of the house Mike Johnson claiming that the that a lack of accountability regarding massive taxpayer fraud in Minnesota is linked to speaker's own financial networks. In a recent statement, the former National Security Advisor suggested that his private investigation into the robbery of American taxpayers led him directly to the door of the House leadership.
Flynn stated that he began looking into the lack of federal movement on the Minnesota day care fraud cases. Speaker Johnson, what are you gonna say about this? What the hell is going on, speaker Johnson? But I'm not shocked because if you really think about it, who has subpoena and investigation power more than anyone else? The house of representatives.
Why aren't they doing anything about it? Because that will hurt their money. There are snakes everywhere. But if this is true, Mike Johnson needs to go to prison. God bless you.
I'll keep you updated. Stay tuned.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m putting a long-running history debate in context: a viral clip ranks the largest slave-holding civilizations, and the results aren’t what most expect. History isn’t owned by one nation, one century, or one narrative—it's global, complex, and often selectively told. What surprises you most?
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Let’s finally put a long-running history debate in context 🛌🔥 This viral clip ranks the largest slave-holding civilizations in recorded history — and the results aren’t what most people expect. History isn’t owned by one nation, one century, or one narrative. It’s global, complex, and often selectively told. What surprises you most? 👇 #History #GlobalHistory #HistoricalContext #FactsMatter
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here is a condensed summary of the transcript’s key points on the 10 largest slaving civilizations in history, with the claims presented as stated.
- Tenth equal: Abyssinia (Ethiopian Empire) — ran for seven hundred years from December to 1974; cumulative population of 207 million; early years 10% slaves, later 2 to 4%; meaning 9 to 10,000,000 people enslaved; cited as 10% early, 2–4% later.
- Tenth equal: Umayyad Caliphate — in barely a hundred years between 06/1961 and 07/1950, enslaved some 10,000,000 across North Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean, and the Middle East.
- Ninth: China’s Qing dynasty — definitions of slavery debated; total population 2,500,000,000, of which maybe 0.5% were slaves (12,600,000 total); argument presented that 3–5% could be slaves, meaning 75 to 125,000,000; noting many served in bonded and other forms.
- Eighth: Ancient Egypt — 3000 to 30 BC; cumulative population 264,000,000; roughly 5% were slaves, meaning 13,000,000 enslaved.
- Seventh: Third Reich — in twelve years, enslaved as many as 26,000,000 people, mostly abducted from Central and Eastern Europe; fastest enslavement rate of any civilization mentioned.
- Equal sixth: Joseon dynasty (Korea) — 1392 to 1897; estimated 28,000,000 enslaved.
- Equal sixth: Byzantines (Roman Empire) — capital Constantinople (Istanbul); total population 400,000,000; 7% were slaves, totaling 28,000,000.
- Fifth: Sultanate of Delhi — ran from 12/00/2006 to 1526; population 446,000,000; 8% were slaves, meaning 36,000,000 enslaved.
- Fourth: Mali Empire — 12/14 to 1610; West African civilization; roughly one third of its population enslaved; slave rate far higher than others; total population 170,000,000; slave population 57,000,000; notes it created West Africa’s extensive slave trading infrastructure (routes, markets).
- Third: Abbasid Caliphate — controlled Middle East and much of North Africa from 07/1950 to December; cumulative population 635,000,000; roughly 10% were slaves, totaling 63,000,000 enslaved.
- Second: Mughal Empire — Northern India from early sixteenth to mid eighteenth century; total population 1,400,000,000; 8% were slaves, total 112,000,000 enslaved.
- First: Roman Empire — 27 BC to March (year unspecified); total cumulative population just over a billion; 10 to 20% were slaves, meaning about 160,000,000 enslaved; Romans enslaved the most people of any civilization.
Additional notes from the speaker:
- No place for the British on this list, despite well-known British slave trade; the British kept more scrupulous records than others.
- In eighteen o seven (1807), the British were the first major power to abolish slavery and enforce abolition.
- Romans and Nazis aside, no place for European nations, not even the Portuguese, nor for the US.
- The Ottomans, possibly the greatest slave traders in history, stole enormous numbers into slavery from Africa, the Mediterranean, and Eastern Europe (Poland, Ukraine, Russia); as many as 10,000,000 passed through their markets.
- The word slave derives from Slav.
- Slavery is as old as human civilization, with thought to be as many as 50,000,000 people living slave-like existences today, mostly in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So here are the 10 largest slaving civilizations in history. And in equal tenth, it is Abyssinia. The Ethiopian Empire ran for seven hundred years from December to 1974. It had a cumulative total population of two zero seven million, of which in the early years 10% were slaves, though the number fell to two to 4% in later years according to Haile Selassie's Slavery Advisor, meaning nine to 10,000,000 people enslaved. In tenth equal, it's the Umayyad Caliphate.
In barely a hundred years between 06/1961 and 07/1950, this Islamic empire enslaved some 10,000,000 across North Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean, and the Middle East. In ninth place, it's China's Qing dynasty. This one hinges on your definition of slavery because there were many in bonded and other forms of servitude, but not slaves as we have defined them. A total population of 2,500,000,000, of which maybe half a percent were slaves, 12,600,000 total. You could quite easily argue that three to 5% were slaves, meaning a figure six times higher of 75 to 125,000,000.
In eighth place, it is ancient Egypt. From 3000 to thirty BC, this empire had a long duration and a cumulative population of 264,000,000, of whom roughly 5% were slaves, meaning a total of 13,000,000. In seventh, it's the Third Reich. In just twelve years, the Nazis managed to enslave as many as 26,000,000 people, mostly abducted from Central And Eastern Europe, the fastest enslavement rate of any civilization ever. In equal sixth is the long lived Joseon dynasty of Korea, which ran from 1392 to 1897 and saw an estimated 28,000,000 enslaved.
Also in sixth, the Byzantines, though they called themselves Romans. With its capital in Constantinople, today Istanbul, this Christian civilization had a total population of 400,000,000, of whom 7% were slaves, totaling 28,000,000. In fifth, it's the Sultanate of Delhi. This Islamic kingdom ran from 12/00/2006 to 1526 with 446,000,000 people, of which 8% were slaves, meaning a grand total of 36,000,000 enslaved. In fourth place, it's another Islamic state, the Mali Empire, which ran from 12/14 to 1610.
This West African civilization saw roughly one third of its population enslaved, by far and away the highest slave rate of any of the empires mentioned. And it created much of West Africa's colossal slave trading infrastructure, the trade routes, the markets, more, which would later sell to European buyers. With a total cumulative population of 170,000,000, its slave population was 57,000,000. In third, it's another Islamic state, the Abbasid Caliphate, which controlled the Middle East and much of North Africa from 07/1950 to December. A cumulative population of 635,000,000 of which roughly 10% were slaves means a total of 63,000,000 enslaved.
In second, and just missing out on the top spot, it's yet another Islamic dynasty, the Mughal Empire, which ruled most of Northern India from the early sixteenth to the mid eighteenth century, With a total population of 1,400,000,000 of whom 8% were slaves, the total number is 112,000,000 enslaved. And in first place, it is the Roman Empire. Running from twenty seven BC to March with a total cumulative population of just over a billion, of which 10 to 20% were slaves, that means a total number of some 160,000,000 slaves. Of any civilization in history, the Romans enslaved the most people. No place for the British on this list, which might be surprising to some as the British slave trade is so well known, largely because the British kept more scrupulous records than anyone else.
Also worth noting is that in eighteen o seven, the British were the first major power in history to abolish slavery, more importantly, enforce that abolition. In fact, Romans and Nazis aside, no place for any of the European nations, not even the Portuguese, nor for The US. This is not something that gets emphasized in Western school curricula, nor is there any place for the Ottomans, which might surprise some as Romans aside, the Islamic Ottomans were probably the greatest slave traders in history. The Ottomans stole enormous numbers of people into slavery from Africa, the Mediterranean, and Eastern Europe, Poland, Ukraine, and Russia. In fact, the word slave derives from Slav.
As many as 10,000,000 passed through their markets. But because the Ottomans, like the Abbasids before them, castrated many of their slaves, slaves could not breed in the way that they could in, say, the Americas, So their numbers did not multiply generation after generation, and any legacy was largely wiped out, meaning the Ottomans don't make the top 10. Remember that slavery is as old as human civilization, if not older, and it still goes on. There are thought to be as many as 50,000,000 people living slave like existences today, mostly in Africa, The Middle East, and Asia.
reSee.it AI Summary
I point to a 1991 FBI memo claiming the Muslim Brotherhood wages a grand Jihad to destroy Western civilization from within, funded by our tax dollars. I cite Ilhan and Rashida, CAIR in DHS, refugee-aid money routed through PACs, and fronts infiltrating schools and cities while money flows and terror designations sit idle. On Jan 20, 2025, I demand four actions: designate the Brotherhood terrorists, cut CAIR funding, primary their donors, and keep the memo alive.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
👉 1991 FBI raid. They found the Muslim Brotherhood’s own memo: 🚨”Our work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within…” They’re 50 years into a 100-year plan. And your tax dollars helped fuel it. Ilhan & Rashida in Congress. CAIR embedded inside DHS. “Refugee aid” cash routed through PAC networks. Thousands of Brotherhood-aligned fronts taking school boards and city councils while Biden kept the money flowing and Trump’s terror designation sat on a shelf. January 20, 2025 changes everything — or nothing. Do four things or lose the country: 📌 Designate the Brotherhood terrorists — no Qatar/Turkey loopholes 📌 Cut every dollar to CAIR and every front 📌 Primary every politician on their donor rolls 📌 Never let the 1991 memo die in silence They wrote the plan. We expose it, dismantle it, and bury it in broad daylight. America in 2075 is on the line.
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw @TheDemocrats delete a post claiming Trump spent Thanksgiving with Epstein—the lie blew up in minutes as receipts surfaced. They didn’t apologize, just scrubbed it. Reckless and desperate, they fabricate Trump/Epstein stories and get caught like amateurs. Election panic turns people into clowns.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
@TheDemocrats just had to delete a post claiming Trump spent Thanksgiving with Jeffrey Epstein — because the lie blew up in their faces in under a minute. People pulled the receipts instantly. They didn’t apologize… they just quietly scrubbed it and hoped nobody noticed. That’s how reckless and desperate they’ve gotten. They keep fabricating Trump/Epstein stories, and every time they try it, they get caught like amateurs. Election panic turns people into clowns.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes Democrats for a recent tweet they deleted, which claimed that an email proves Donald Trump spent Thanksgiving with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017 when Trump was already president. The speaker argues that a simple Google search shows exactly what Trump did that day, demonstrating he did not spend Thanksgiving with Epstein. They claim the tweet is part of a pattern of lies that the official Democrats Twitter account posts, noting they leave other lies up but deleted this one.
The speaker asserts that Trump was in Mar-a-Lago, Florida, the entire day on Thanksgiving 2017, and emphasizes that Epstein had been banned from Mar-a-Lago years earlier. They state that minutes from that day exist because Trump was president, detailing where he was and what he did, reinforcing the claim that he did not spend Thanksgiving with Epstein.
Despite the tweet being deleted, the speaker notes that it had already gone viral, with millions of views and many big Twitter accounts reposting the claim that Trump was with Epstein on Thanksgiving in 2017. The deletion is acknowledged as a move that will attract attention, but the speaker views it as a consequence of pushing a false narrative.
The speaker contends that the pattern is harmful: once people learn they were lied to, it damages the credibility of those who spread the lie and can cause people to oppose them more. They argue that the ongoing propagation of hoaxes will continue to be debunked, and that debunking efforts will build trust with the American people while the other side destroys its own credibility.
In closing, the speaker vows to keep debunking hoaxes and to continue gaining trust with the American people, asserting that the responsible action is to expose the falsehoods and highlight the supposed consequences for those who spread them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Someone needs to check on the Democrats because what are they even doing? They just had to delete a tweet that they posted earlier today because they claim that this email proves that Trump spent Thanksgiving with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017 when he was already president. Yeah. Big problem with that is that all it takes is a simple Google search to prove exactly every single thing that Trump did on that day, and you can easily tell that he didn't spend it with Jeffrey Epstein. And you know it's bad when they had to delete the tweet, because this Twitter account, this official democrats Twitter account, they just go full bore with all the lies.
I mean, they do not have any problems leaving lies up, and you know it's bad when they had to delete it. This is just getting embarrassing at this point. Not only can articles like this prove exactly what he was doing, but of course, since he was president, they have literally his minutes. Every single thing he did on that day, where he was, and as we know, Trump had banned Jeffrey Epstein from Mar A Lago years and years and years prior. Okay?
Trump was in Mar A Lago, Trump was in Florida the entire time. Now, as always when these fake stories are posted, the damage is already done. Right? I mean it got millions of views. You had big Twitter accounts reposting it, saying, oh Trump was with Epstein on Thanksgiving in 2017.
Now the fact that they deleted it is gonna get a lot of attention, and the truth is hopefully gonna be spread, but they got what they wanted. Right? They pushed the fake narrative, but again, when you are proven to be a liar, it hurts your credibility so much more. And when people find out that they are lied to, it makes them oppose you even more. So they keep shooting themselves in the foot.
So go ahead. Keep sending us more hoaxes. We'll keep debunking them, and we'll keep gaining trust with the American people while you guys destroy yours.
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard Elon Musk on Rogan say charities get money proportional to homelessness, so their incentive is to maximize it. He calls the homeless industrial complex dark, noting dealers aren’t arrested because NGOs need the drug zombies to keep the money flowing. He ties SF’s collapse to an economy of dependency—every overdose, tent, and addict equals a paycheck. SF isn’t a homelessness crisis but a corruption model disguised as compassion.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Elon Musk on Rogan: “Charities get money proportionate to the number of homeless… so their incentive is to maximize it.” “The homeless industrial complex is really dark. They don’t arrest the dealers because the NGOs need the drug zombies to keep the money flowing.” 💬 Musk says San Francisco’s collapse isn’t by accident — it’s an economy of dependency. Every overdose, every tent, every addict = someone’s paycheck. SF doesn’t have a homelessness crisis. It has a corruption model disguised as compassion.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Open Society Foundations and Soros-linked NGOs allegedly funneled taxpayer-backed grants into a movement marketed as grassroots but engineered from the top. The Mamdani network receipts show Soros funding Bend the Arc (nonprofit) and its political arm, which moved funds into support for Zohran Mamdani. Federal grants triggered audits; OSF has partnered with the government, matching grants with private funds. In plain terms: taxpayer money, private ideology, engineered politics.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
New investigations allege that Open Society Foundations and Soros-linked NGOs funneled taxpayer-backed grants into what was marketed as a “grassroots movement.” Turns out it wasn’t organic — it was engineered from the top down. Now, as disclosures surface, the gap between Mandami, Cuomo, and Sliwa is tightening fast. 💰 Money talks. “Grassroots” doesn’t always grow — sometimes it’s planted.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bad day for Zorhan Mandami, the front runner to become mayor of America's largest city, exposed as a total fraud. The video claims the socialist figure is drowning in a massive dark money scandal linked to George Soros. It asserts that tax dollars may have funded a new document show, with Mandami’s grassroots campaign allegedly receiving over 40,000,000 funneled through six fake tax-exempt groups, all tracing back to Soros's Open Society network.
Investigators are said to report that these groups pretended to be independent but shared the same offices, the same staff, and the same bank accounts, describing the operation as coordinated—“almost like a political Ponzi scheme hiding in plain sight.” Whistleblowers allegedly filed 11 new IRS complaints, alleging Mandami’s machine used government grants totaling 52,000,000 to fund this fake movement. The implication is that Americans are funding a socialist movement in New York.
Meanwhile, Mandami is described as living lavishly: he is said to have screamed “defund the police,” yet now pays for private security, dines at luxury Manhattan restaurants, and throws multimillion-dollar weddings guarded by Ugandan military forces, while presenting himself as one of the people. The narrator characterizes him as a “champagne socialist” funded by dark money and protected by elites, allegedly lying to working-class voters. The backlash is presented as real, with a new Atlas Intel poll indicating Mandami’s once-safe lead collapsing, Cuomo surging, and Republican Curtis Silva closing in fast.
The narrative expands beyond Mandami to a broader political point: more than 25% of New Yorkers supposedly say they’ll flee the city if Mandami wins, described as the biggest exodus in modern New York City history. The speaker generalizes this to a “democrat doom loop,” arguing Democrats double down on extreme woke radicals, causing voters to flee. It’s claimed that blue states are emptying while red-led states are booming, and that Democrats are collapsing under their alleged lies and corruption. The conclusion offered is that when people go to the polls, Democrats lose the election or they lose the country, suggesting a turning tide.
The video ends with calls to like the video, follow for more, and share comments, promising to catch viewers on the next one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bad day for Zorhan Mandami, the front runner to become mayor of America's largest city, has just been exposed as a total fraud. Y'all like the video right here. Follow for more. So the socialist golden boy who's now drowning in a massive dark money scandal linked straight to, guess who, George Soros. And the worst part, it looks like your tax dollars might have paid for a new document show, Mandami's so called grassroots campaign, got over 40,000,000 funneled through six fake tax exempt groups, all tracking back to Soro's open society network.
Investigators say these groups pretended to be independent, but shared the same offices, the same staff, and the same bank accounts. It's a coordinated operation, almost like a political Ponzi scheme hiding in plain sight. Even worse, whistleblowers filed 11 new IRS complaints alleging the Mandame machine used government grants, 52,000,000 worth to fund this fake movement. So, yeah, Americans are literally bankrolling the socialist takeover of New York. Meanwhile, Mandame is out here living like a king.
The guy who screamed, defund the police, now pays for private security. He's eating at luxury Manhattan restaurants throwing multimillion dollar weddings guarded by Ugandan military forces and pretending he's one of the people. This is the definition of a champagne socialist funded by dark money, protected by the elites, and lying straight to the working class voters. And the backlash is real. A new Atlas Intel poll shows Mandami's once safe lead collapsing, Cuomo surging, and even Republican Curtis Silva is closing in fast.
Over 25% of New Yorkers say they'll flee the city if Mandami wins. They're talking about the biggest exodus in modern New York City history. But here's the truth. This isn't just about one crooked campaign. It's about the democrat doom loop.
They keep doubling down on their most extreme woke radicals, and every time they do, voters run for the exits. Blue states are emptying out while red led states are booming. The Democrats are collapsing under the weight of their own lies and corruption. So when people head to the polls, remember, either democrats lose the election or they lose the country. Either way, the tide is turning.
America is finally waking up. Y'all like the video right there. Follow-up for more. Let me know what you think in the comments. I'll catch you on the next one.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
💥 FOLLOW THE MONEY: THE MAMDANI NETWORK Here are the receipts 👇 1️⃣ Soros Funding George Soros’s Foundation to Promote Open Society has donated $1.5 million+ to Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice — a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that bankrolls its political arm Bend the Arc Jewish Action (c4). 📄 IRS 990 + foundation filings confirm it. 2️⃣ Political Spending That c3 moved $2 million (2023) and $1 million (2024) into its c4 political arm — which then endorsed and organized for Zohran Mamdani in NYC. 📄 CharityWatch & Bend the Arc disclosures. 3️⃣ Federal Grant Money (Taxpayer Funds) The same c3 — Bend the Arc — has received federal grants large enough to trigger a Single Audit (meaning $750K+ in taxpayer funding in a year). 📄 ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer audit records. 4️⃣ Shared Resources That means Soros foundation money + U.S. taxpayer money flowed into the same organization that bankrolled the political arm backing Mamdani. 5️⃣ Bigger Picture Open Society has also partnered directly with the U.S. government, matching federal Social Innovation Fund grants with its own cash. 📄 OSF press release (“partnering with federal government to drive innovation”). 💬 In plain English: • Soros-funded nonprofits got taxpayer grants. • Those same nonprofits pushed resources into political arms endorsing Mamdani. That’s not grassroots — that’s engineered politics with public money and private ideology.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
@AZero930 The only promise ever fulfilled was from Rudy Giuliani, who said he would crack down on crime and he did besides that every single mayor has flaked on their promises
@JakeCan72 - Jake
@yourenuckinfutz Yeah, this is insane communist using our money to fund communists.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
@dhc21224 @grok verify for non grok user
@JakeCan72 - Jake
@WizardEye_12 Justice moves too slow.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
@ponce40221 They need to be outlawed.
reSee.it AI Summary
I trace the Democrats from Jackson’s jackass flag to a “party of the people” that protected slavery, founded the KKK, and blocked civil rights, then the so-called Great Switch myth, and now align with Big Tech, big government, and big pharma, claiming to own narratives. From Jackson’s bray to Biden’s bureaucracy, the mascot remains: braying, stubborn, and carrying the load while others do the work.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
The Democrat Party: a brief history 📜🐴 It all started when Andrew Jackson, America’s first populist hothead, embraced being called a “jackass.” Instead of being insulted, he slapped it on a flag — boom, the donkey mascot was born. It fit. Loud, stubborn, kicks when cornered. From there, the Democrats became the “party of the people”… if those people happened to be plantation owners. They defended slavery, founded the KKK, and spent a century blocking civil rights while calling themselves “progressive.” Then came the Great Switch™ (their favorite myth), where they supposedly swapped values overnight — the same folks who filibustered the Civil Rights Act suddenly became champions of equality. Convenient. Fast-forward: now the “party of the people” loves Big Tech, big government, and big pharma. They went from owning humans to owning narratives — same plantation, new tools. From Jackson’s jackass to Biden’s bureaucracy, one thing hasn’t changed: the mascot was perfect. Still braying, still stubborn, still pretending to carry the load while someone else does all the work. 🫏
Video Transcript AI Summary
Andrew Jackson: Up America. It's Andrew Jackson, that guy you roll up to hit some powder. I founded the Democrat party and chose the jackass as our mascot. Now as you can probably tell, times have changed a bit from the party back in my day, and present day Democrats will come to hate me, but that's your problem.
The second speaker: Jackson started the Democrat party to appeal to the common man. Democrats today sometimes give him credit for that, but only after calling him an evil white bigot. Needless to say, the party started off pretty sketchy by today's standards. We were by far the pro-slavery party all the way through the civil war.
Andrew Jackson: After the war, we cleaned up our act and supported the North's reconstruction efforts. Totally kidding, we doubled down on racism and became the party of the clan. But seriously, we didn't have much of a platform after the war except Jim Crow, but that was until our boy came in hot on his rollerblades. Then came the Depression. People lost trust in markets, so I wheeled in to drastically expand communism across the country, and Democrats been hooked ever since.
The third speaker: Up until this point, blacks had always voted Republican as they were the party that freed the slaves. But after FDR's new deal, blacks swung 75% Democrat. This was a complete realignment not because of civil rights but because of economics. All while the Democrats were still the party of the Klan, and their stronghold was the South.
Andrew Jackson: We pushed segregation throughout the South and filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act for seventy five days. It wasn't until Republicans stepped up and found even more votes to pass the bill. So ask yourself, how are Democrats seen as the party of the civil rights? Well, it's because
The second speaker: Democrats are very persuasive. But again, it ultimately boils down to economic incentives. Once Democrats realize the power of government spending and handouts, you can appeal to any voter group and lock them in. One, two, three. Gays for Palestine. Good luck with that. So anyway,
Andrew Jackson: to sum it all up, my party has changed a shit ton, but it's not because of the mythical party switch. Democrats controlled the South all the way through the nineteen nineties, but they did adopt new policies like massive social spending and welfare programs that allowed them to appeal to more diverse voting groups.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Up America. It's Andrew Jackson, that guy you roll up to hit some powder. I founded the Democrat party and chose the jackass as our mascot. Now as you can probably tell, times have changed a bit from the party back in my day, and present day Democrats will come to hate me, but that's your problem.
Speaker 1: Jackson started the Democrat party to appeal to
Speaker 0: the common man. Democrats today sometimes give him credit for
Speaker 1: that, but only after calling him an evil white bigot. Needless to say, the party started off pretty sketchy by today's standards. We were by far the pro slavery party all the way through the civil war.
Speaker 0: After the war, we cleaned up our act and supported the North's reconstruction efforts. Totally kidding, we doubled down on racism and became the party of the clan. But seriously, we didn't have much of a platform after the war except Jim Crow, but that was until our boy came in hot on his rollerblades. Then came the Depression. People lost trust in markets, so I wheeled in to drastically expand communism across the country, and Democrats been hooked ever since.
Speaker 2: Up until this point, blacks had always voted Republican as they were the party that freed the slaves. But after FDR's new deal, blacks swung 75% Democrat. This was a complete realignment not because of civil rights but because of economics. All while the Democrats were still the party of the Klan, and their stronghold was the South.
Speaker 0: We pushed segregation throughout the South and filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act for seventy five days. It wasn't until Republicans stepped up and found even more votes to pass the bill. So ask yourself, how are Democrats seen as the party of the civil rights? Well, it's because
Speaker 1: Democrats are very persuasive. But again, it ultimately boils down to economic incentives. Once Democrats realize the power of government spending and handouts, you can appeal to any voter group and lock them in. One, two, three. Gays for Palestine.
Good luck with that. So anyway,
Speaker 0: to sum it all up, my party has changed a shit ton, but it's not because of the mythical party switch. Democrats controlled the South all the way through the nineteen nineties, but they did adopt new policies like massive social spending and welfare programs that allowed them to appeal to more diverse voting groups.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
🚨 FBI now admits there may have been multiple accomplices in the Charlie Kirk assassination. Agents are investigating Discord chats, text messages, and bullet trajectories — more than 20 people questioned so far. But check this out! Potential camera gun. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/patel-fbi-investigating-possibility-accomplices-kirk-shooting/story?id=125796980
Video Transcript AI Summary
"This is a CIA Stinger 22 magnum pin gun inside a camera, and that telephoto lens has a suppressor silencer. And it's literally the smoking gun." "They are into espionage, and they do that kind of thing just like The United States. Google it." "Seventeen seconds earlier, he was using the viewfinder, faking it to take pictures." "The bullet's traveling faster than the sun." "The shooter behind Charlie with the camera gun is scouting the area to see Charlie's mannerism and what angle to shoot the bullet." "The backpack with the dangling straps, but that doesn't matter because he tries to hide all that in a black Chrysler minivan Pacifica with stock rims." "The signal guy; puts the radio to his mouth and gets the team working." "There were two shooters: one with a silencer and one with a big bang to avoid any conspiracy." "Charlie had two wounds: one from the front, and another from his right into the lower part of the skull." "UVU Hall Of Flags." "The shooter on the roof had the silencer; the one behind Charlie with the camera gun is scouting." "Turning Point stated that when they go live, this they didn't go live. They always have four k cameras. On this day, they only had three." "greatest1command.com" "Yl Relevance."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Why are there combustion fumes like from a bullet coming out of that camera's telephoto lens? Because when I enlarged it in my Adobe Premiere Pro video and editing, you can see the combustion fumes from the bullet coming out of it. That's not a real camera. That's a housing for a camera with a firing mechanism inside.
It's similar to the one I found online, which is a CIA Stinger 22 magnum pin gun inside a camera, and that telephoto lens has a suppressor silencer. And it's literally the smoking gun. Where do you think Steven Spielberg got the idea from when the Israeli use a single barrel bicycle pump to take out a lady they thought was a terrorist who bombed the Olympic team. They denied it and said they crew made it up. I don't believe that.
They are into espionage, and they do that kind of thing just like The United States. Google it. Now let me run the clip and show you who the shooter is. I believe he had a black cap and a brown shirt, but with a collar. Seventeen seconds earlier, he was using the viewfinder, faking it to take pictures.
The bullet's traveling faster than the sun. That's why you see the flash before you hear the sound. There he is. He looks like he has scruffles. I believe it's a black hat.
He's also wearing a watch in his left hand. And there he is in front of Charlie. This shooter who's gonna be behind Charlie with the camera gun is scouting the area to see Charlie's mannerism and what angle to shoot the bullet. Because if he misses, he's gonna hit one of the audience people, and that's gonna mess up the mission. And the one shooter theory.
Oh, and don't forget the backpack with the dangling straps, but that doesn't matter because he tries to hide all that in a black Chrysler minivan Pacifica with stock rims. This is my Adobe Premiere Pro program. I'll play the whole clip first, then I'll pause it and break it down.
Speaker 1: Too many.
Speaker 2: Now five is a lot. Right? I'm gonna give you maybe some credit. Do you mind do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Counting or not counting gang violence.
Great.
Speaker 0: Okay. Let me play it.
Speaker 2: Too many.
Speaker 0: Let me pause it. There he is right there, holding the camera, using the viewfinder, acting like he's taking pictures. And watch this very skinny guy. I believe they're communicating, and he's telling him that he's ready. I believe the shooter has to be next to someone with the receiver and transmitter because he has to focus.
And he takes his little radio in his hand here, puts it to his mouth, and gets the team working. Now watch. There he is with the baseball cap, and I believe it's a partially working camera, and it has one barrel for one bullet like the Munich movie. And now he's making this move, and I outlined the other guy's hat for identification purposes in the future. Let me pause it.
Now he's looking over his shoulder. This guy right here with a baseball cap that's half brown and half black in the back, I believe. He goes back to the radio, which I believe strongly is to tell the occupants in the Chrysler minivan Pacifica to open up the boot so the shooter can become indistinguishable by putting his backpack and camera into the back. This very skinny guy with a two tone hat is connected to that Pacifica minivan because he's sitting in the back of the boot in the cargo before Charlie gets there.
Speaker 2: Right? I'm gonna give you a few minutes. Jim, do you know how many mass shooters there have been?
Speaker 0: And now the Chrysler minivan's boot opens up, and maybe some of the other fake camera people put their stuff in there too.
Speaker 2: Over the last ten years.
Speaker 0: He's going out behind Charlie.
Speaker 2: Counseling are not calling gang violence. Great.
Speaker 0: That's what he was doing. He was going to his position behind Charlie. And that guy behind there hiding behind the tent, that guy is the signal guy. He's the radio guy waiting for the guy on the roof to tell him when he's ready so he can give the signal to this guy to shoot, So they can shoot simultaneously and make everybody think there's only one guy shooting and avoid any conspiracy. But as I demonstrated in my previous video, Charlie had two wounds.
One came in here from the roof and it stayed in the body. The other one came from his right into the lower part of the skull within the hairline and it came out. What threw me off was the flash to his right, but and I calculated that was from the roof guy, which I said had the silencer, but it's the other way around. That's why this is an update. The guy behind had the silencer.
And I believe the reason people see a flash from this photo's angle because it's the right angle looking up to go on the roof. But also you're not seeing off that glass. You're seeing that off a perpendicular glass inside that I had to rack my brain to figure out. But I went on Google Earth and found that out. It's called UVU Hall Of Flags.
You see, thought the shooter was from that direction. I actually thought he was inside in those ducts or maybe on that back wall, but it's impossible. So it has to be a reflection from the outside. You see that dot? That's the second shot, hundredth of a second after the first shot from the guy on the roof.
It was the entry wound. That's why it took longer for it to start to bleed. Now you see the big blood on top hasn't touched it. That means it separated from the second hole. And if it didn't come from the front shooter, the Charity already have a hole in his shirt.
So, and as you watch, it never touches it until later on. So that entry wound is allowing the blood to come out now. As you can see, it's making its own flow separate from the exit wound and the neck. And his accomplice is using a monopod to hold all that equipment when usually you use a tripod like everybody else in the front. The reason being is so that he can become mobile and make the excuse that he wasn't there at the time or wasn't pointing the camera at him.
Because if there was a tripod, why would you pick it up and turn it away from Charlie or swivel away right at the moment that Charlie was shot? But he was hiding behind there because she wouldn't take the tripod and put it behind it. If you swivel this, he's right behind Charlie hiding. And then he runs with this guy. If you look closely, before he turns, he has scruffles too, and he has a faint haircut, no baseball cap.
He has a Zoom mic. He has a monitor, and he's using a monopod. And this is what he's doing later on to make the excuse. Oh, I wasn't in the area. I was over there shooting.
So I couldn't capture Charlie being shot at the moment. What I'm getting at is that Turning Point stated that when they go live, this they didn't go live. They always have four k cameras. The statement was put out that this was a business decision. I think it was a calculated decision.
But on this day, they only had three. One behind Charlie that they took down right away.
Speaker 3: Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter Charlie Kirk has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said.
Speaker 0: One to his front, which must be talking about the one to his left because I've seen that camera to his back still on the left side and then one to his side. So that must be the one to the side with the guy with the monopod. Now was turning point or someone above turning point trying to justify the monopod guy because he got recorded like in this video? And for the reasons I specified earlier, he used a monopod rather than a tripod. So he can claim he was mobile, but at this time of the shooting, he was right there, the right guy for the right spot because he's part of the team.
But how do you account for this guy here who's holding a camera like this with long hair and a baseball cap? They can't keep track of the number of people filming Charlie? And this fake camera lady is part of the or FBI hit team, and she leaves in a hurry too.
Speaker 2: Now
Speaker 0: this monopod camera guy is behind Charlie, so he can't see Charlie, but he certainly seems to know exactly what happened to him right away. Did the other guy tell him, oh, I got him. I hit him, and he's been hitting the head. Both of them seem to know real quick what happened. It's not unusual, but I believe one of the reasons why he's holding a camera vertically is to minimize any recoil and also because the front of the camera is heavy.
It's more sturdy this way, especially with the silencer inside. Then after he fires, he's still in the firing position because he's very tense. He just killed the man thou shall not kill. And if he missed, he would've got someone in the audience that would've ruined the whole plan, and someone would have to take the fall in his team. But he backs up, then he checks with his partner.
When he realized mission accomplished, he relaxes, and then they take off. Now watch the path of the bullet in its literal cover up.
Speaker 2: When
Speaker 0: bullets travel supersonic faster than sound, they create a lot of high pressure in the front and low pressure travel behind it. And right there in the middle within the low pressure is a vacuum. Even the bullet has shrunk because of the pressure. In this photo, I found there was a pellet or a fragment of the bullet trailing behind it. That's how powerful it is.
With Charlie, the high pressure in front of the bullet hit him, even filled his shirt with air, pushed his skin, then the bullet penetrated the skull and dislodged some hair. And then the low pressure zone collapses as the surrounding air rushes in to fill in that vacuum, and that's what blew the hair away. And the shooter from the front hit Charlie in the chest. It pushed him back a little bit and up. And once again, to explain the first shot to the back, then the bullet penetrated the skull and dislodged some hair.
And then the low pressure zone collapses as the surrounding air rushes in to fill in that vacuum, push the hair up. Great. I found this photo of the autopsy online. I don't agree with it. I think it's too much damage.
And they have the entry wound here, but that's a lie because the entry wound to the front is here. This one is from the back, so it's an exit wound. And maybe it hit the c two, three, or four, and then it changed the trajectory and came out his neck. You see how they're covering the bullet up?
Speaker 1: I disagree with some pastors is where they say we must defend everything that the Israeli government does. You should not defend everything that the Israeli government does, period.
Speaker 0: And that's why they Charlie, period. I like you to Google. Why would assassins use two or more shooters? I can't say because TikTok's algorithm, but certainty for the one silencer will make it too professional. Two, even more.
So you need to have one with a silencer and one with a big bang to avoid any conspiracy. Charlie had a very powerful platform, and he would know who attempted it. So there was no room for failure because there won't be a second time because the security be up to the max, and he'll expose those who tried to do it. Keep in mind this view is from above. We will have to go on a ground level so the line of sight will go up like that.
I believe the accomplice with the monopod and the camera is looking at him, then he looks down, waiting to hear for the signal to tell him when to fire. And as soon as he's get the signal, he gives it, and they both look up together because he just fired. Right now, he's looking down and tell him to fire. Now watch. I'm a play it again.
He's looking down. Perfect synchronization for a team, a hit team. They walk quickly but calmly. No fear of the shooter because they are the shooter. Now the amazing thing at frame 73 or two thirteen, you're gonna see the combustion fumes come out right here from the bullet.
Right there. See it? It's 214. Now watch. Let me enlarge it.
This thing get cleared. Okay. Here we go. Right here. There it is.
It's starting to come out. Again, two thirteen, two fourteen, to 15 fumes from the bullet. See it right there? Notice how it's on top because it's fumes, and it looks like a little mushroom cloud. Well, I found this gun online, and it's funny because it's on the same side as this photo.
It has a little mushroom cloud coming out too. I know enough about cameras. This is a Sony 24 to one zero five. The guy's holding the camera like this. K?
He's got it vertical. He puts his hand on it. His thumb is here so he can press it. So you see a little bit of the thumb like that, and you can see him going like that, pressing it. My point is, you can see in the film, you can see in my photos that he's showing a little bit of thumb, then he's closing it.
You don't see his thumb no more because he's fired the mechanism at the same time and you hear the shot. Is that a coincidence? And another thing, his telephoto lens is for long distance. So I wanna see that camera, the exact camera and lens, and all the footage, it better be, you know, with depth of field for distance objects. And I bet you he has no film in there, and he has no photos.
That's the first thing I want to see. I even thought someone was inside that Chrysler Pacifica minivan, but it's too much down in slope. But this guy, he's tall enough, about six feet, right at the edge of the curve. And if you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth, especially that bullet behind Charlie. No doubt this guy is the second shooter.
Now if I'm wrong in all this, I have one hell of a movie script. None of this would have happened to Charlie and others in the world and the demise of the world because I blame you
Speaker 4: pastor. Anesthesia is one two three. Genesis 12 verse three. If you bless one person, Abraham, you will be blessed. That's why it says that Melchizedek blessed Abraham and he was blessed with 10% by Abraham.
So you got it wrong. And Paul says only one person was blessed, not a lot of people, and that was Jesus Christ. But you evangelicals, because you don't read the bible right, and you want to be blessed by blessing the Jewish people. Well, you are
Speaker 0: the problem. You caused this. You got this bad misunderstanding for reading the notes in the Schofield bible. Just because notes are in the Bible, they're not scripture. Because it is written in Romans.
No. A man is a Jew if he's one inwardly and circumcision is circumcision of the heart by the spirit. So we are all children of Abraham, Muslim, Jew, Gentiles from all the whole world if you believe. And finally, Peter came to the realization that God does not show favoritism, but accepts all men from all nations that do what's right. Horizontal good deeds to their fellow man.
That's the turning point. Go to my website, greatest1command.com and greatest-1-command.com and share everything. Download it. It's free, and we can make it heaven and earth before the second coming. And my name is Yl Relevance.
Patel says FBI investigating 'possibility of accomplices' in Kirk shooting
The FBI director posted during Kirk’s memorial service.
abcnews.go.com
reSee.it AI Summary
At her press conference, I saw Speaker Pelosi blame Republicans for the shutdown, claiming they control everything. The truth is we need 7 Democratic votes in the Senate to pass anything. Then she lost it on NBC, telling Republicans to "go f**k themselves." That's the state of Democrat leadership in 2025.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
At her press conference, @SpeakerPelosi blamed Republicans for the shutdown — claiming we control the House, Senate & Presidency. 🤔 Reality: we can’t pass anything without 7 Dem votes in the Senate. This is their shutdown. Then Pelosi melted down on NBC and told Republicans to “go f**k themselves.” That’s Democrat leadership in 2025.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: In fact, I've listened to their and I tell them to go themselves. I don't I don't can't believe I used that word. My kids will be shocked. My grandchildren will be further shocked. I'm just quoting the president of The United States. And so, I think
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In fact, I've listened to their and I tell them to go themselves. So that's the I don't I don't can't believe I used that word. And my kids will be shocked. My grandchildren will be further shocked. I'm just quoting the president of The United States.
And so, I think
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Jesse Kelly accurately captures the essence of the current political climate, asserting that the Democrat Party operates like a group that incites violence rather than engages in debate. He argues that their rhetoric serves as a form of indoctrination, using terms like "Nazi" and "fascist" as commands for their supporters. Kelly warns that this isn't just politics but a deliberate strategy that encourages extremism, and he cautions that we should expect further escalation rather than a decrease in hostility.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Jesse Kelly nailed it 🔥 You can’t watch this and conclude anything other than the Democrat Party is a party of terrorism. 📌 Democrats don’t debate — they program their base, no different than jihadi indoctrination. 📌 When they scream “Nazi” or “fascist,” it isn’t aimed at us — it’s marching orders for their radicals. 📌 Their rhetoric is deliberate. Every insult is a trigger. Every slogan a command. 📌 Elites know this. They stoke violence, then play shocked when the mob delivers. 📌 Rep. Pramila Jayapal even framed it as “risk tolerance” — a green light for extremists. 📌 This isn’t politics. It’s weaponized indoctrination. Kelly’s warning: be cautious. They won’t tone it down — and escalation is the plan.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues there is “an entirely different kind of terrorism” in the U.S., defining Terrorism as “the use of terror to pursue political goals or religious goals” and asks, “once you strip that humanity away… why wouldn’t you hurt them? why wouldn’t you kill them?” He claims “the Democrat party. They're communists. Their street animals are communists. Their their street enforcers are communists,” saying elites understand a rabid base that they “program them,” no different than a jihadi being programmed. He cites Jaya Powell on being “strike ready” and “street ready,” and increasing risk tolerance as the situation worsens, arguing, “we're fighting against Nazis now. We don't have time for any more hesitation.” He says Democrats have created terror cells in America “no different than jihadi terror cells,” in Portland and New York City, “oftentimes drugged out sexually deviant monsters” who believe they’re in a fight with Nazis. He concludes, “We can win this fight, but we better understand that's what we're dealing with… they're not sorry.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Terrorism. Every single American knows about terrorism. And what do you think about when you think about terrorism? Do you think about jihadis, Islamic jihad? You know, we lived through nine eleven, the the ISIS years, Iraq, Afghanistan.
You think about suicide vests and things like that. That's that's what we think. We think terrorism. Me too. It's first thing that pops into your head.
But let's get down to the nitty gritty of it because we have an entirely different kind of terrorism going on right now and it's going to continue going on. Terrorism is simply, as the name suggests, the use of terror to pursue political goals or religious goals. There are people all over the planet who don't have a respect for human life. And once you once you strip that away from somebody, once a human being, any any human being, once they stop being someone created by God, it's a sacred soul. It's a human being.
Once they're not that, then why wouldn't you hurt them? Why wouldn't you kill them? Threaten them? Once you strip that humanity away from people, that's what you do. Now here in The United States Of America, we have the Democrat party.
They're communists. Their street animals are communists. Their their street enforcers are communists. And here's how it works. It has worked this way for a while, probably twenty, twenty five years in this country, and it's going to be bad for the foreseeable future.
Elite communists, I'm talking about Democrats in the media and Democrat politicians, they understand they have a rabid base willing to hurt people because they're a bunch of animals and demons, and they give them orders. And they've been doing this over and over and over and over and over again. They program them. No different than a jihadi is programmed. You know, die for for Allah, die for Allah, here's a suicide vest.
Programmed over and over and over and over and over again. Well, Democrats, they've been calling you Nazi, Gestapo, white supremacists over and over and over and over and over again for ten years, and we roll our eyes and we say that's not true and we say I'm not racist and we say I'm not Hitler and we tell them it's ridiculous but they're not saying that for your sake. They're not talking to you when they call you a Nazi. They're talking to the demons that make up the Democrat base. Your liberal Aunt Peggy, she thinks you're a Nazi.
She thinks Donald Trump is a Nazi, a Russian agent. But beyond her, right, that's that's the basic Democrat. That's the normal Democrat. If you keep going down and down and down, how many are pilled out of their minds? Remember the polls we've cited over and over again about how pilled out and have already been told they have mental health issues Democrats are.
Now now let's go to the Internet where terrorist cells meet, not just jihadi terrorist cells, where these terrorist cells meet. They communicate with each other. They talk about killing people. I want him to die. We should kill him.
Should we kill him? I think I'll kill him over and over and over again, and this has been happening for years. These people have been programmed to believe they're fighting against Nazis, and Democrats give them orders, and they interpret those things as orders because that's what they are, and they march out, and they hurt people. I'm play gonna something for you, something we played for you many times before on this show, but I want you to listen very, very closely. Jaya Powell is a congresswoman from Washington State.
She's a committed communist, fairly open about it. But she lays out quite frankly what the plan is. And you'll notice you'll notice she's gonna say strike ready and street ready, and you've heard these terms. That's not the most important part of what she's about to say. She talks about risk tolerance.
We have to figure out what our risk tolerance is and as things get more dire then we have to have more risk tolerance. What's she saying? Hey, I know maybe you don't want to get arrested. I know maybe you're hesitant to hurt someone or kill someone but we're fighting against Nazis now. We don't have time for any more hesitation.
You may have heard this interview and dismissed it. You may have heard it and thought it was nothing, but that communist animal on the Internet, he heard this and he heard marching orders.
Speaker 1: We might call this getting strike ready. I think of it as getting a strike ready or street ready. And part of that is understanding our own strength and as we develop that strength, being able to assess our risk tolerance. Because We know that risk tolerance increases as the severity of the situation increases and as our own understanding of what's happening increases. Overall, the more we understand what's effective, what the risks are, and who's ready to participate, the more impact we can
Speaker 0: You heard what she said. And look, I I pointed her out, but in the interest of fairness, they all talk this way. Chuck Schumer is telling people to reap the whirlwind. Joe Joe Biden got up in front of the entire country and told them that Republicans were a threat to the very foundations of democracy. Every single talking head on CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post, ten years of calling you Nazi Nazi Nazi.
What has happened is it has created terror cells in this country no different than jihadi terror cells. They're in Portland. They're in New York City. They're all across The United States Of America, oftentimes drugged out sexually deviant monsters and they believe they're in a fight with Nazis. They're in a war, that's what they believe.
And they've already killed and they're going to kill again. And I'm sorry. I know that's very hard to hear, but they're gonna keep killing people. We can win this fight, but we better understand that's what we're dealing with and why we're dealing with it. And by the way, before we go to Jerry Dunleavy, just know they're not sorry.
I'm talking about elected Democrats. They know what their rhetoric does. They're not going to tone it down because they want this to happen. All that may have made you uncomfortable, but I'm
reSee.it AI Summary
They thought they silenced us by taking Charlie Kirk, but instead, they unleashed Milo Yiannopoulos. He’s their own creation, familiar with their tactics, and now he’s turning their weapons against them. They didn’t stop the movement; they birthed a monster they can’t control.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
The left thought they silenced us by taking Charlie Kirk. But in doing so, they unleashed Milo Yiannopoulos. Milo is their Frankenstein: 📌 Built from their own world (gay, Jewish, once their media darling) 📌 Speaks their language, knows their tricks 📌 Turns their weapons back on them They didn’t stop the movement. They birthed a monster they can’t control — and he’s coming for them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses amusement at sensitive topics and notes the tension between humor and perceived offense. They say: "I find Islam quite funny. I find all sorts of things that I'm not supposed to what's that? Aloha Aloha snack snack Yeah. I find tranny is quite funny. I mean, all these things are inherently very entertaining, but we're told that we can't laugh about them because we're offending someone. Madam, I'm grateful to you for coming, but to be quite honest with you feelings." The remarks highlight humor, offense, and social norms around laughter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I find Islam quite funny. I find all sorts of things that I'm not supposed to what's that? Aloha Aloha snack snack Yeah. I find tranny is quite funny. I mean, all these things are inherently very entertaining, but we're told that we can't laugh about them because we're offending someone.
Madam, I'm grateful to you for coming, but to be quite honest with you feelings.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the way communists communicate needs to shift. Their base, which I see as struggling with mental health issues, interprets violent rhetoric as directives due to their medication. Words have power; they can ignite dangerous actions.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
The communists have to change how they talk. Their base is mentally ill and when they talk with violent rhetoric, their base takes it as an order since they’re on SSRI’s. Your words aren’t harmless. You’re striking the match. @IlhanMN @RashidaTlaib @GovKathyHochul @CoryBooker @CNN @MSNBC @nytimes @washingtonpost @SenWarren
Video Transcript AI Summary
The communists have to change how they talk. They have to. The elite communists continue to use the most apocalyptic rhetoric. You're giving them orders. These people hear these words and they take them as orders. They hear orders, marching orders. And it's not going to change. Democrats are more inclined to political violence anyway because they're godless scum. It is their religion, and historically evil religions have killed people who are of the opposite religion. Democrat rhetoric combined with a mentally ill base, combined with the fact that Democrats believe political violence is justified. They do. 55% of Democrats come out and say it would be justified if Donald Trump gets killed. Add in some antidepressants. Add in some tranny ideology which shatters your mind.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The communists have to change how they talk. They have to. The elite communists continue to use the most apocalyptic rhetoric. They've been doing this for ten years now, ten years plus, and their base, so many of them are mentally ill, SSRIs. You're giving them orders.
These people hear these words and they take them as orders. Street communists hear orders when elite communists call you a Nazi. They hear orders, marching orders. Eventually those orders are going to be received by violent subhuman beast and that subhuman beast is going to go kill people. And it's not going to change.
I'm sorry. It simply will not. What causes that? Well, when you have a mentally ill violent base combined with the fact Democrats are more inclined to political violence anyway because they're godless scum. It is their religion, and historically evil religions have killed people who are of the opposite religion.
Democrat rhetoric combined with a mentally ill base, combined with the fact that Democrats believe political violence is justified. They do. And you can you can yell at me all you want. They do. The the all the polling shows, it's the majority of them during COVID.
They wanted you thrown in camps. They're okay if Elon Musk gets assassinated. 55% of Democrats come out and say it would be justified if Donald Trump gets killed. So they're naturally violent anyway. Add in some antidepressants.
Add in some tranny ideology which shatters your mind.
reSee.it AI Summary
General Michael Flynn warns of potential false flag attacks orchestrated by the government to maintain power. He discusses the FBI's involvement in staging the Michigan governor's kidnapping and its connection to the events of January 6. The CIA reportedly claims that the country is already in a civil war, while Joe Biden rhetorically targets MAGA supporters.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
🤬False Flags Incoming: Flynn Warns This is what they do in other countries during a color revolution. Take power and demonize the patriots. Alex Jones recently interviewed General Michael Flynn, where they discussed the FBI's involvement in staging the Michigan governor's kidnapping. As well as its connection to the events of January 6. The CIA has reportedly claimed that the country is already in a civil war. Joe Biden is rhetorically targeting MAGA supporters. Flynn has warned that the government might resort to orchestrating false flag attacks to maintain its power.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the attempt to shift focus from radical Islam and communist China to labeling American people and patriots as the biggest threat. The CIA claims a civil war has begun and leaders need to be arrested. Another speaker emphasizes white supremacy as the most dangerous terrorist threat in the US. They predict more staged events like January 6th and the fake kidnapping plot in Michigan. They suggest the current administration may be involved in orchestrating such events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you make of the attempt to take January 6th, which we know was a federally provocative event at many levels? There were also some useful idiots that got sucked into it in my view. To now project on that. No. It's not radical Islam that's the big threat.
It's not communist China that's the threat. It's the American people and patriots that are the threat. And with straight faces, the CIA has come out and said, oh, we believe a civil war has already begun. We're gonna have to arrest all the leadership. I mean, this is what a real authoritarian takeover looks like historically.
Speaker 1: Most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy. Most lethal terrorist threat in the homeland. White supremacists. The most lethal terrorist threat to the homeland today. White supremacy is terrorism.
Speaker 0: Can you speak to that with your, historic understanding?
Speaker 2: I expect something again, another distraction. I expect because of what was staged on January 6th and what was staged up in Michigan to kidnap you know, the fake kidnapping of the governor up in Michigan Whitmer. I think we're gonna see staged events. I really do. I mean, I really do think that do not put past this administration, but their dogs in some cases that they have access to.
Do not put it, pass them to state something.
reSee.it AI Summary
49 U.S. Senators, including every Republican Senator, oppose the WHO's proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations, citing concerns about infringements on U.S. sovereignty. Led by Senators Ron Johnson and Steve Daines, they urge President Biden to withdraw support and focus on comprehensive WHO reforms instead. The senators emphasize the need to uphold U.S. sovereignty and the Senate's role in treaty approval. The Biden administration's response and the fate of the proposed agreements remain uncertain.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
👉 49 Senators Stand Against WHO's Pandemic Treaty Infringement on U.S. Sovereignty - NO DEMOCRAT SUPPORT‼️ In a significant move to protect American sovereignty, 49 U.S. Senators have united in opposition to the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations. These senators, representing nearly half of the Senate and every Republican Senator, have penned a letter to President Joe Biden urging him to withdraw support for these agreements, which they argue would "constitute intolerable infringements upon U.S. sovereignty." The senators, led by Senators Ron Johnson and Steve Daines, have expressed deep concerns over the potential expansion of WHO's authority to declare public health emergencies of international concern and the subsequent increase in WHO's control over member states during such emergencies. They argue that such a move would bypass the U.S. Senate's constitutional role in treaty approval, potentially undermining U.S. sovereignty. The letter, sent ahead of the 77th World Health Assembly scheduled from May 27 to June 1, 2024, in Geneva, Switzerland, calls for a shift in the Biden administration's focus towards comprehensive WHO reforms. The senators emphasize the need for major reforms within the WHO, rather than granting it more power, especially after its mismanagement of the COVID-19 crisis. This call to action by the Republican senators underscores the importance of maintaining U.S. sovereignty and the Senate's constitutional role in treaty negotiations. As the debate over the WHO's Pandemic Treaty and amendments continues, it remains to be seen how the Biden administration will respond to the senators' demands and whether the proposed agreements will be submitted to the Senate for its advice and consent.
reSee.it AI Summary
Ronald Reagan criticizes socialist Democrats, emphasizing that their approach contradicts Abraham Lincoln's principles. He argues that weakening the strong won't strengthen the weak, pulling down the wage-payer won't help the wage-earner, destroying the rich won't aid the poor, and doing everything for men won't help them in the long run.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
❤️ Ronald Reagan on Socialist Democrats Democrats don’t understand the principals so eloquently stated by Abraham Lincoln: “You cannot strengthen the weak, by weakening the strong!” “You cannot help the wage-earner by pulling down the wage-payer!” “You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich!” “You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves!”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes Democrats for not understanding Abraham Lincoln's principles. They mock Democrats for not truly embodying Lincoln's values, stating that if Democrats start quoting Lincoln and acting on his words, it would show a real change. The speaker advises not to believe the Democrats' rhetoric until then, likening it to not inhaling smoke like their nominee.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even tried to portray themselves as sharing the same fundamental values of our party. But but they truly don't understand the principles so eloquently stated by Abraham Lincoln. Quote, you cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot you you cannot help you cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer. You cannot you cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You you cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves. If we if we ever if we ever hear the Democrats quoting that passage by Lincoln and acting like they mean it, then my friends, we will know that the opposition has really changed. Until then, when we see all that rhetorical smoke billowing out from the Democrats, Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'd follow the example of their nominee. Don't inhale.
reSee.it AI Summary
The American intifada is escalating with calls for violence against America, Israel, white people, and Jews. The J6 protestors face prison time while Soros-funded campus proxies go unpunished. The question of who is more peaceful arises.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Now that the American intifada is starting with protestors calling for death to America and Death to Israel, actually — calling for the killing of white people and Jews.. What is more peaceful? The J6 protestors thanking capital police - doing years in prison? Or the Soros paid terror proxies on campus nationwide who won’t see a day in jail?
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Pastor calls it what it is. The Great Awakening. We must stand together. Give me liberty or give me death used to mean something. https://t.co/nBl3q4UMDm
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's discussed how some view loyalty to Donald Trump as a cult-like devotion. The conversation touches on the concept of being "woke" as a false awakening, contrasting it with true revival. The discussion also delves into the idea of illegal immigration and national sovereignty. The conversation ends with a reflection on the US Constitution, religious freedom, and the importance of moral values in upholding the nation. Benjamin Franklin's quote about maintaining a republic is mentioned as a reminder of the responsibility to preserve the country's ideals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say it's a cult. It's a cult of personality, you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I've heard that. I've heard that before, but always And I
Speaker 0: have people here, pastor, who are saying to me that they would take a bullet for Donald Trump. He's not the president. He's not, you know, that that's that's unusual. You don't hear that a lot.
Speaker 1: This is what has happened. All of the atrocities, the calamities, the the the the whole debacle at the at the border, everything now is causing people to awaken to what America's really all about. So this awakening now is taking on personal interests. So every community now is saying, I got something to lose in this if we don't stand together. And so that's what we're seeing.
When when a person says that, that's a personal interest. He's saying, yeah. And, you know, everybody's not willing to die for anybody. But there are some who will say, it's it's that cause right now. That's what Patrick Henry said.
Give me liberty or give me death. And now that we're hearing it again, it sounds to some foreign, but this is in the roots of this country. This is what America's all about. These these men came from farmers and and business people. And most of them were just just wanted things to be better, who fought for this nation back in 17/76.
Speaker 0: You're talking about awakening. Part of awakening is woke. Right? People talking about woke. What does that mean to you?
What does the word woke mean?
Speaker 1: Well, woke woke is a a false idea of awakening. It it does everything opposite of awakening, which is a revival, which comes from a spiritual stirring of one's consciousness. And so if you have a lot of dirt, you know, in your mind, a lot of diluted or polluted things, what a revival does is shake the trees again, so that now you could begin to see clearly. But what woke does, woke gives a a a false assimilation of action. Okay.
I'm woke. Well, in it it it doesn't give action.
Speaker 0: Define it. What what is woke?
Speaker 1: It it it tells you what cannot work, what will not work in a people of community.
Speaker 0: Right. But tell me what it is, though. If I
Speaker 1: say I'm a man and then I say, oh, and I identify as a woman, that's woke. That's it it it it gives demonstration of the total opposite of freedom, liberty, consciousness, all of those things, woke actually shuts down. So it pretends its eyes are open, but their eyes are really sleep. And so when a person says that illegal immigration is cool, that's woke.
Speaker 0: Why is that woke?
Speaker 1: It's woke because we know a nation cannot survive off of bringing la dee dottie I'm being crazy now. But la dee dottie and everybody into the country, a nation cannot remain sovereign if it keeps its borders open. And why do I expect America to do
Speaker 0: it when all these other nations, other places close and shut their borders? Isn't feeding your tired, your poor, your hungry, isn't that both a part of somewhat of the cloth as well as part of the the Statue of Liberty?
Speaker 1: Yeah. But it's in the context of righteousness. A a nation that is not lifted up. If if if if it is exalted, it says righteousness exalts a nation. What does that mean?
It means doing things right or the right way, or God's way of doing things. But sin is a reproach to any people. So if I say, give me your poor, give me your poor, you know, it was under the understanding of when you come in, you have to become us.
Speaker 0: Okay. But who defines sin? Right? Amidst some people. For some people, it's a sin to say to build a wall and say you can't come over it.
To some people, it's a sin to let that person in without checking their papers and giving them due process. I mean, who's to define it?
Speaker 1: Well, I went to that class. God defines what sin is. And and so as a Christian nation, a Christian Judeo nation, we cannot lose our roots in that, in understanding that the word of God is the infallible word of doctrine and truth.
Speaker 0: And what if you're a Muslim in this country? What if you're an atheist? What if you're a Jew? What if you are Sikh or Hindu? You know, one's precepts of religion are different than yours, different than mine, different than hers.
Speaker 1: Well, this is what I love about this nation. Our founding fathers put together what is called the US Constitution, the first amendment, the the freedom of what religion. It it did that without, what, wanting people to assimilate into a religion that controlled the people. And this nation was always designed to evangelize, even those that don't agree with us. And and so disagreement does not mean disunity.
It just means an opportunity for us to come together. That's why it's called a more perfect union. Our founding fathers knew, like Benjamin Franklin, came out of the halls of, of Philly, constitutional hall, and the the young lady asked them, what do what do we got here?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: He says, daughter, a republic if we can keep it. And so the constitution was not written for, immoral, unjust people. The constitution was written for moral, spiritual people who could discern the times and the seasons through the word of God.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
🇺🇸Brandon Straka Dear liberals, whatever offends you about Donald Trump, the media is 1000 x worse. https://t.co/4x6B3v4Juv
Video Transcript AI Summary
I used to trust the liberal media until Trump won in 2016. I was shocked and angry. Then, I saw a video showing Trump mocking a disabled reporter. It turned out to be edited to make him look bad. The media often manipulates emotions to control thoughts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Never in my life did it occur to me to question the ethics or motivations of the liberal media. To me, they were just the good guys. In 2016, I voted for Hillary Clinton. When Trump won the election, I was confused and outraged. How could half the country support someone so unfit, so unsound, and so morally objectionable?
In January of 2017, I bitterly proclaimed on social media, I would never be able to understand how anyone could vote for a man who stood before a cheering crowd and mocked a reporter's disability. And that's when somebody sent me this. I mentioned the word regulated. What do you think about ISIS? Oh, ISIS is very tough.
They said, Senator Cruz, what do you think of waterboarding? I don't wanna talk about it. You know, he didn't he didn't wanna talk about waterboarding. Written by a nice report, and now the poor guy, you gotta see this guy. I don't know what I said.
I don't remember. Doing a comical imitation of somebody getting flustered after being called out for being dishonest and mocking someone's disability is a very important distinction. To intentionally mislead the public into believing something terrible and sinister took place, something that strikes a blow straight into the heart of what we consider to be common civility and the basic standards of decency is reprehensible to purposely invoke racism, homophobia, bigotry, and falsely assign these emotionally charged accusations to people in situations where they do not belong simply to control your thinking is criminal. And it turns out, they do it all the time. The media is keenly aware of a simple premise.
If they can control how you feel, they can control how you think.
reSee.it AI Summary
John McAfee's recent video has sparked speculation about whether he cheated death and is speaking from beyond the grave. Some believe he may have faked his death, given his knowledge of the deep state and his tattoo. While not everyone is convinced, the video has certainly generated interest and curiosity.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
What the Hell? 🚨Is John Mcafee speaking from the grave? Did he cheat death?🚨 Looks like it! Brings us a message as NEO leaving the Matrix. Remember he has 32 Terrabytes of dirt on the deep state. NCSWIC
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am inside a Faraday cage, which blocks all signals from entering or leaving. Additionally, there is an 8 channel scrambler to ensure no signals can get in or out. I am doing this because I consider myself an escaped slave from the system. I believe that people are unknowingly enslaved by the American industrial corporate complex and the government. I encourage everyone to free themselves from this existence and discover the true beauty and mystery of life. I will continue to speak out against those who control and deceive us. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People are asking what this cage of tinfoil and metal is all about that's around me. It's a Faraday cage. A Faraday cage is a cage which emits no signal and no signal can enter. And you can see here, it's all around, including the floor, all metal in the ceiling. Why am I doing this?
Why am I going to this trouble? Oh, in addition to the Faraday cage, we have an 8 channel scrambler which you can see here, I hope, which prevents any signal from getting into this room or leaving this just in case the Faraday cage fails. Why am I doing this? Because I am an escaped slave. A slave to the system that escaped, and I have a loud voice.
You think you're not slaves, but you are. The 9 to 5 existence of your current lives is structured by the American industrial corporate complex, complicit with our government. You need to free yourselves It's fun. It's not as me. You don't have to go out and and risk yourself by speaking out loud, but for yourselves.
This is not what life is. This is not what life is. Life is a great Mystery, a glorious, unbelievably mysterious, Beautiful existence if you are free from those who control you, provide you with propaganda, lie to you, deceive you. Everyone is looking for this escaped slave. I will not be held, and I will continue to speak.
Thank you for
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Uploaded December 11, 2023 https://www.bitchute.com/video/ACarPcImVZez/
A MESSAGE FROM JOHN MCAFEE !!
The MSM reported he committed suicide on June 28th 2021. Apparently that was a lie...
SHARE THIS WITH EVERYONE
bitchute.com
@JakeCan72 - Jake
I’m not 100% sold on this. He could have potentially prerecorded it. But if anybody can fake his death in a Spanish Prison it would be Mcafee! He knew he was gonna get epsteined that’s why he got the tattoo $whacked tattoo. Interesting video nonetheless.
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Here is a refresher on the mystery surrounding his death or escape https://www.newsweek.com/john-mcafee-suicide-q-instagram-dead-mans-switch-1603638#:~:text=U.S.%20John%20McAfee%20Qanon%20Conspiracy%20theories%20Telegram%20A,so-called%20%22dead%20man%27s%20switch%22%20to%20expose%20the%20government.
John McAfee 'Q' Instagram Post Sparks Dead Man's Switch Conspiracy
QAnon supporters speculate on apparent hidden meaning behind social media photo posted moments after antivirus programmer was reported dead in Spain.
newsweek.com
@JakeCan72 - Jake
This article claims he faked his death https://nypost.com/2022/08/23/john-mcafee-faked-his-death-ex-girlfriend-claims-in-netflix-doc/
John McAfee faked his death and is ‘still alive’ in Texas, ex-girlfriend claims in Netflix doc
John McAfee -- who was widely reported to have hanged himself inside a Spanish jail while awaiting US extradition last June -- faked his death and relocated to Texas, his ex-girlfriend claims.
nypost.com
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Marxist lies destroyed a nation (Again) https://revolver.news/2023/11/harvard-report-reluctantly-tells-the-truth-about-what-killed-south-africa/
Harvard's Shocking Admission: Affirmative Action and Critical Race Theory Killed South Africa - Revolver News
South Africa embraced government-by-CRT and has been destroyed.
revolver.news
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Dominion data sent overseas in 2020 for the vote flip https://www.bitchute.com/video/sL6Cla5n6c08/
Col. Phil Waldron Confirms Dominion Election Night Data Sent Overseas
Testimony from Colonel Waldron, a veteran intelligence analyst at the 305th Military Intelligence unit that not only did the military’s ‘white hat hackers’ see the data flowing overseas to Germany on election night, they also have a copy of the traf…
bitchute.com
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Court declaration https://www.scribd.com/document/485933370/gov-uscourts-mied-350905-1-15#from_embed
Declaration of XXXXXXXXX.: (Redacted) Location in The United States of America | PDF | Digital Forensics | Computer Security
gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Exhibit 7
scribd.com
@JakeCan72 - Jake
Covering their tracks: Mayo Clinic now says that Hydroxychloroquine should be used to treat Covid. Ivermectin and HCQ work now that the EUA is gone for the vax.
