TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @JamesMelville

JamesMelville
Posted - October 15, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 11:48 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œImagine a government that totally destroys the country (which is criminal behaviour) and then criminalises complaining about it. And the point of that surveillance is not to keep you safe but to punish you for noticing what they are doing to your country.โ€ ~ Tucker Carlson https://t.co/J8a3de9WIZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that when a government criminalizes dissent and punishes people for criticizing it, it becomes a tyranny rather than a legitimate government. They claim that this kind of surveillance state is aimed not at safety but at punishing citizens for noticing government actions, and that this behavior marks a fundamental breach of human rights. The speaker rejects the idea that this is a right-wing issue, insisting it is a basic observation about rights and freedom. They compare the situation to a surveillance-heavy regime and suggest that even countries widely recognized as tyrannies have not reached the level of control described, while also noting that their own country has become a surveillance state. The point is that the purpose of surveillance is punitive rather than protective, and the speaker asserts that no privacy equates to no freedom. In a personal anecdote, the speaker describes going to a tobacco shop to buy cigarettes and finding none available. A Pakistani shopkeeper shows them a cabinet with cigarettes that have disturbing imagery on the packaging, which further unsettles the speaker. The price of a deck of 20 cigarettes is cited as $60, and the speaker expresses disbelief and frustration about being lectured on smoking while other controversial issues, such as fentanyl, are perceived as being allowed or facilitated by the government. The speaker emphasizes that although smoking is unhealthy, it should be a matter of individual choice, not public moralizing or coercive regulation. The speaker reflects on the broader implications of being forced to do things for oneโ€™s โ€œown good,โ€ questioning whether such coercion is truly protective or a prelude to obedience. They warn that if the state insists on injecting people with untested compounds or uses force to compel compliance, individuals may become trained to obey even when they disagree, leading to a loss of personal autonomy and freedom. A central assertion is that, at a fundamental level, such a government does not align with the countryโ€™s true nature or the rights of its citizens. The speaker urges resistance to what they describe as government overreach, insisting that the governmentโ€™s actions are not legitimate and that the people have no obligation to tolerate it. They declare, โ€œThey are the criminals. You are not the criminals,โ€ and emphasize that the country belongs to the people, not to those who wield power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't like what the government's doing? Shut up racists when you go to jail. They send people to jail. UK, send people to jail every day. And not for standing in Hyde Park and screaming, but for writing it on Facebook. So imagine a government that totally destroys the country, which is criminal behavior, and then criminalizes complaining about it. That's not a legitimate government, that's a tyranny. That's a tyranny. And if that were happening in some widely recognized tyrannical country, East Germany 1975, where everyone's under surveillance. By the way, I don't think East Germany 1975, which was famously the most surveilled nation in the history of the world, I don't think they had seat belt cameras. I don't. No, they didn't. That was too far even for Eric Honiker. He's like, know, that's old fascist for me, I can't do it. So these countries have become, including my own, have become surveillance states. And the point of that surveillance is not to keep you safe, it's to punish you for noticing what they're doing to your country, actually. That's not the behavior of a legitimate government. And if you think that's like a right wing point, you've bought the lies. That's not a right wing point. That's a simple observation about human rights. No privacy, no freedom. Not to mention the endless hectoring. No, it's not your country. I went to buy a pack of cigarettes today. I quit smoking ten years ago, I thought, you know, you can kinda judge a country by its cigarettes. I couldn't find them. I went to this tobacco store. I said, this tobacco store, you don't have any cigarettes? Oh, that's a really nice Pakistani guy. He's like shaking his head like, I know it's crazy. Opens up this cabinet, and I said, what? That's like, what the hell is on your cigarettes? Like, I don't even wanna smoke them looking at that. I was like, you're making me not wanna smoke, mister tobacco store guy. And he goes, I know. I know. And every pack had like a rotted tongue on it or something. And again, I don't smoke cigarettes anymore. But I'm an adult man who pays his taxes. If I wanted to, I should be allowed to. Right? You can certainly you can do fentanyl here with the government's help. But you can't smoke a Marlboro without being lectured? It's I did ask how much they cost. It was $60 for a deck of 20. And I said to the guy, I literally, I don't wanna smoke, and I've never said that in my life. And I know everyone's like, well, smoking's bad. Yeah. Of course, smoking's bad. Lots of things are bad. But it's not really anyone's business, is it? I guess wearing a seat belt's a good idea. I mean, I don't, but my kids say it's a good idea. But when they're forcing you to do things for your own good, over time you question like, is this really for my own good or are they just softening me up to obey? So when it really comes down to it, when they want to inject me with some creepy compound that hasn't been tested, that they'll be able to like shoot me with a rubber bullet if I decline. And I'll be so trained to be obedient that I'll kind of put up with it. And I won't do what I should do, it's just stage like don't want to say that, I'm gonna get arrested. I shouldn't put up with that. Because that is not a free country, that's a tyranny, and you have absolutely no obligation under the most basic precepts of human rights and natural law to put up with that for one second. Period. They are the criminals. You are not the criminals. They don't care about your country, which belongs to you. So when they tell you it's not your
JamesMelville
Posted - April 10, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Saved - April 10, 2025 at 11:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I traveled to Rome to discuss climate change, bringing my Bentley along. While I advocate for carbon footprint restrictions, some might see a contradiction in my actions, as I enjoy the luxury of being chauffeured in a car flown in from the UK.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

King Charles went to Rome to express his concerns about climate change. He had his Bentley transported over for it. https://t.co/GydoAffywd

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Carbon footprint restrictions and taxes for all of us, but not for him. But he really cares about the climate whilst being chauffeured in his Bentley in Italy - flown across from the UK.

JamesMelville
Posted - April 4, 2025 at 9:10 AM
Saved - April 4, 2025 at 12:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that the foundation of a wind turbine can weigh between 600 and 1,000 tons. The blades are made from balsa wood, which is sourced from deforestation in the Amazon. Wind turbines are constructed using various materials, including concrete, steel, and rare earth elements. They typically last up to 25 years, but by 2050, an estimated 43 million tons of blade waste could accumulate. This raises concerns about their environmental sustainability.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Wind turbine construction: The base of a wind turbine, or foundation, can weigh between 600 and 1,000 tons. Wind turbine blades are built with balsa wood which is obtained by deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. Wind turbines contain concrete, carbon fiber, steel, cast iron, copper, aluminum, boron, chromium, cobalt, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, and rare earth elements.ย  They have an operational lifespan of up to 25 years. It is estimated that globally, around 43 million tons of wind turbine blade waste could pile up by 2050. The diametric opposite of environmentally sustainable.

JamesMelville
Posted - March 4, 2025 at 11:00 AM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 12:25 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

A timely reminder of what Julian Assange said back in 2011: "The goal is an endless war, not a successful war." https://t.co/BIjM2IzXKM

Video Transcript AI Summary
The real objective in Afghanistan isn't conquest. It's about creating a system to funnel money from the U.S. and European taxpayers, cycle it through Afghanistan, and ultimately channel it back to a global security network. The aim is to perpetuate an endless conflict, not to achieve victory or resolution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries, countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security army. That is the goal. IE, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.
JamesMelville
Posted - November 25, 2024 at 1:19 AM
Saved - November 25, 2024 at 6:43 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

This is not environmentalism. This is corporatism land grabbing. The vast majority of solar panels (often used on prime farmland) will reduce farm food supply, blot the beautiful countryside, end up in landfill after 25 years or risk being damaged by adverse weather conditions. https://t.co/cYctwOQqsq

JamesMelville
Posted - November 21, 2024 at 8:20 PM
Saved - November 22, 2024 at 12:49 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

BlackRock and JPMorgan are backing a $15 billion investor fund to rebuild Ukraine. Follow the money. https://qz.com/blackrock-jpmorgan-private-investors-ukraine-fund-1851334929

BlackRock and JPMorgan are backing a $15 billion investor fund to rebuild Ukraine It would cost almost half-a-trillion dollars to reconstruct Ukraine qz.com
JamesMelville
Posted - November 11, 2024 at 10:18 PM
Saved - November 11, 2024 at 10:45 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

This is absolutely outrageous from former Labour political advisor John McTernan: โ€œWe can do to the farmers what Thatcher did to the miners. Itโ€™s an industry we could do without. We donโ€™t need small farmers.โ€ https://t.co/xnGvOJ868S

Video Transcript AI Summary
Privileged farmers are a concern, and I believe we could manage without them, similar to how Margaret Thatcher dealt with the miners. So, you would essentially push them out of business? Yes, if people are upset enough to protest and spray slurry, we don't need small farmers. Just to clarify, you were a former labor special adviser, right? Yes, emphasis on "former." Let's move on to Ed Miliband.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Privileged, status for their for their farms, and I think that may or may not be right. I'm personally in favor of doing to to, you know, farming while they go on the streets. We can do to them what Margaret Thatcher did to the miners. Speaker 1: So just to be clear, Johnny, you would, what, beat them up? Speaker 0: No. Close them. I mean, clutter that this industry we could do without. Speaker 1: So okay. Alright. So this got weird. So you would do to do to farmers what Margaret Thatcher did to minors, which was an you know, she was very heavy handed police tactics followed by what? Pushing them out of business. Speaker 0: If people want if people if if people are so upset that they wanna go on the streets and spray slurry on them, then, we don't need, the small farmers. Speaker 1: Right. Okay, John. I'm not sure I'll submit it. If you were just to clarify, you were a former labor special adviser, possibly emphasis on the word former there. But, just to go on, Ed Miliband,
JamesMelville
Posted - November 10, 2024 at 9:22 PM
Saved - November 11, 2024 at 8:57 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

And there it isโ€ฆ https://t.co/LhLS7KOMd8

JamesMelville
Posted - November 7, 2024 at 7:55 AM
Saved - November 7, 2024 at 4:18 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Tulsi Gabbard pull no punches in her assessment of 'autocratic' Justin Trudeau. https://t.co/M84v47ZRwa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Opposing the president or his policies makes you an enemy of the state, as seen in Canada, where the government is using authoritarian measures against peaceful protests. The execution of emergency powers, freezing of bank accounts, and other oppressive actions highlight a fear of the people. Leaders are afraid of a free society and the truth, preferring despotism over liberty. This fear stems from the understanding that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed. When a government becomes destructive, it is the people's right to alter or abolish it and establish a new one.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Basically, what they're telling us is you are an enemy of the state if you dare to oppose or even question the president, his administration, or his policies. Shut up, step back, fall in line, or we're coming after you. This isn't some theory. This is reality. And this is a reality we're seeing play out in Canada as we speak. We have the autocratic leader in Canada who's resorted to genuinely authoritarian and tyrannical means to suppress a peaceful mass protest against the power elite there. Everything that we see happening up north, everything from the execution of emergency powers to the freezing of bank accounts, the seizure of children from parents, the destruction of livelihoods and small businesses, all of these things could happen here. So the question I ask myself in confronting all this is, what are they so afraid of? Who are they afraid of? You know the answer. It's simple. They're afraid of us. They're afraid of a free people. They're afraid of a free society. I've gotta believe that Thomas Jefferson was thinking about these cowardly fearful leaders when he said they prefer the calm of despotism to the boisterous sea of liberty. They're afraid of the freedom that empowers each and every one of us to seek the truth, to speak freely, to question their decisions and their authority. They're afraid of losing power, knowing full well the intent of our founders when they wrote in the Declaration of Independence that governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, and that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it's the right of the people to alter or abolish it and institute a new government.
JamesMelville
Posted - October 29, 2024 at 8:31 AM
Saved - October 30, 2024 at 1:57 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Robert F. Kennedy Jr highlights how industrial-owned mega-corporate agriculture is not only giving us unhealthy food, itโ€™s wiping out generational family farms and enabling mega corporations, China and Bill Gates to take control of farmland. https://t.co/XUTgPnyOFj

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm in Sherwood, Connecticut, discussing concerns about Gates and China buying up American farmland. My experience with factory farms in North Carolina highlights this issue. Smithfield Foods, the largest pork producer, partnered with a state senator to pass laws that made it illegal to sue factory farms. They drastically reduced pork prices, driving out 28,000 independent farmers. Those who remained had to sign contracts with Smithfield, losing control over their operations. This model spread to Iowa, giving Smithfield control over 80% of U.S. hog production, which is now owned by China. This shift threatens the vision of American democracy rooted in independent family farms, as industrial agriculture compromises food quality and landscapes. If you support my presidential campaign, visit kennedy24.com to donate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. Here I am in, Sherwood, Connecticut on Sherwood Island. Here's a little wood check hall. Shirley Troubadour asked a question about why Gates and China are being allowed to buy up all the farmland in our country. And I'm gonna tell you something that I had an experience with. I spent many years, about 20 years suing the factory farms, the big hog farms and big, chicken producers like Tyson and Beau Pilgrim and Frank Purdue. But Smithfield Foods was the biggest pork producer and Smithfield came to the state of, North Carolina. They built a slaughterhouse that could process 30,000 pigs a day. And then they had a partner named, Wendell Murphy, who is in the state senate and he passed 28 laws in the North Carolina state senate making it illegal to sue a factory farm. He left and went into partnership with Smithfield, created a way to raise pigs instead of raising them on farms to raise them in warehouses called Murphy 1100. And they they dropped the price of pork from 60ยข a pound to 2ยข a pound. It put out of business all 28,000 independent hog farmers in the state of North Carolina and factories. All of them either owned by Smithfield or contract to Smithfield. The only farmers who can stay in business or farmers who sign that contract with Smithfield to to mortgage their homes, to put those big hog sheds, the Murphy 1100 on their property. And then they lose all control. They become surfs on their own land. Smithfield dictates all there's farming practices. It gives them the food. It tell it delivers the piglets, picks up the the grown animals and brings them to slaughter. They put out of business, 28,000 farmers and a control now of 80% of the hog production in North Carolina because they dropped the price in North Carolina, Iowa had to adopt the same system, had to, cave in to Smithfield. They ended up taking control of 80% of them hog production in our country. Then they sold themselves to China. So now China owns all that hog production in America and it controls our landscapes. And that's the end of Thomas Jefferson's vision of an American democracy rooted in tens of thousands of independent freeholds. Each one owned by family farmers, each with a stake in our system of government. And that's why all of this industrial agriculture not only gives us up standard food, but they're also taking control of our landscapes and that is a huge threat to American democracy. I hope you guys have a good day. If you like this video and you wanna help me become president of the United States, go to kennedy24.com and donate now.
JamesMelville
Posted - October 17, 2024 at 9:01 PM
Saved - October 18, 2024 at 2:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2019, I introduced the Zero Leisure Plan in El Salvador, requiring prisoners to tend to animals, grow and cook their own food, and participate in community service by cleaning streets and renovating schools and hospitals.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

El Salvador ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ป The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, launched the Zero Leisure Plan in 2019, so that all prisoners have to tend to animals & grow, harvest and cook their own food in prisons, clean up streets & renovate schools/hospitals.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Article: https://valuetainment.com/el-salvador-prison-work-program-works-to-rehabilitate-inmates/

El Salvador Prison Work Program Aims to Rehabilitate Inmates Nayib Bukele established the "Zero Leisure" program after becoming President of El Salvador, providing savings to the government while rehabilitating inmates. valuetainment.com
JamesMelville
Posted - September 21, 2024 at 7:11 AM
Saved - September 22, 2024 at 10:11 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

"In five years, scientists predict we will have the first ice-free Arctic summer." John Kerry back in 2009. https://t.co/yvAkSZ5mJr

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 5 years, scientists predict the first ice-free Arctic summer. This will expose more ocean to sunlight. Because the ocean is dark, it will consume more heat from the sunlight. This accelerates melting and warming, as opposed to the ice and snow which used to reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 5 years, scientists predict we will have the 1st ice free Arctic summer that exposes more ocean to sunlight. Ocean is dark, it consumes more of the heat from the sunlight which then accelerates the rate of of the of the melting and warming rather than the ice sheet and the snow that used to reflect it back up into the atmosphere.
JamesMelville
Posted - September 18, 2024 at 7:53 AM
Saved - September 18, 2024 at 6:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Balsa wood is essential for wind turbine blades, but its sourcing from the Amazon rainforest raises serious concerns. The destruction of this vital ecosystem is harming indigenous communities in Ecuador, challenging the narrative that wind energy is an environmentally friendly solution. This situation highlights a troubling contradiction: while aiming to promote renewable energy, we are causing significant harm to both people and the planet.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Balsa wood is used as a key component in wind turbine blades. The Amazon rainforest โ€“ the lungs of the Earth, is being plundered to supply balsa wood for wind turbines - with a devastating impact on the indigenous peoples of the Ecuadorian Amazon. How is this โ€˜saving the planetโ€™?

Video Transcript AI Summary
**Spanish:** Esto reciรฉn empieza y ya encontraron un campamento de tala de balsa. **English:** This has only just begun, and they have already found a balsa logging camp.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Esto no ha hecho mรกs que empezar y ya hemos encontrado uno de estos campamentos de tala de balsa y esta

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œA green paradox: Deforesting the Amazon for wind energy in the Global North. A shift to wind energy is leaving a trail of destruction in Ecuador, with a brutal impact on indigenous communities and fragile ecosystems.โ€ https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/democraciaabierta/deforesting-the-amazon-for-wind-energy-in-the-global-north-a-green-paradox

A green paradox: Deforesting the Amazon for wind energy in the Global North A shift to wind energy is leaving a trail of destruction in Ecuador, with a brutal impact on Indigenous communities and fragile ecosystems opendemocracy.net
JamesMelville
Posted - September 13, 2024 at 2:35 PM
Saved - September 13, 2024 at 2:59 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œBlackRock and JPMorgan are backing a $15 billion investor fund to rebuild Ukraine.โ€ https://qz.com/blackrock-jpmorgan-private-investors-ukraine-fund-1851334929

BlackRock and JPMorgan are backing a $15 billion investor fund to rebuild Ukraine It would cost almost half-a-trillion dollars to reconstruct Ukraine qz.com

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

As always, follow the money. ๐Ÿ’ฐ

JamesMelville
Posted - September 7, 2024 at 4:25 PM
Saved - September 8, 2024 at 3:51 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

The WEF: โ€œThe Netherlands is building a neighbourhood where every car must be shared. There'll be one vehicle for every three homes, and no space for privately owned cars." This is bonkers. It goes against basic human nature. https://t.co/GSxBYzFyCY

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Meanwhile our establishment โ€˜elitesโ€™ fly off to climate summits in private jets and tell us plebs to lower our carbon footprints.

JamesMelville
Posted - September 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM
Saved - September 4, 2024 at 6:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reflect on Tony Blair's comments about the UKโ€™s post-Brexit migration, noting a shift from European singles to families from Asia and Africa. I also consider his failure to acknowledge the conflicts in the Middle East that led to these migrations, which he played a role in. Lastly, I share a piece of his 1983 election campaign literature.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Tony Blair discusses the UK post-Brexit migration boom. โ€œWeโ€™ve swapped out single people coming from Europe for families from Asia and Africa. How has this helped us?โ€ https://t.co/Ef8MJaZxzJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brexit has resulted in higher levels of immigration than before. The change involves a shift from single individuals from Europe working in sectors like hospitality to families from Asia and Africa. The speaker questions how this shift has been beneficial.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And by the way, if you do end up trying to do this, as what we've done with Brexit, what's the result? We've now got higher levels of immigration than ever before, and we've swapped out, usually single people coming from Europe, as I say, to work in things like the hospitality sector for families from Asia and Africa. I mean, how how has this how has this helped us? So

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

He conveniently overlooks the destabilisation and conflicts in the Middle East that caused huge displacements and subsequent migrations of peopleโ€ฆof which he significantly contributed towards.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

As a historical footnoteโ€ฆHere is Tony Blair's election campaign literature from Sedgefield in 1983โ€ฆ https://t.co/YlUpoDzVHH

JamesMelville
Posted - August 31, 2024 at 8:17 AM
Saved - August 31, 2024 at 1:18 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Robert F. Kennedy Jr discusses how industrial-owned agriculture is not only giving us unhealthy food, itโ€™s wiping out generational family farms and allowing China and Bill Gates to take control of farmland. https://t.co/zlRF5P06or

Video Transcript AI Summary
Smithfield Foods built a slaughterhouse in North Carolina capable of processing 30,000 pigs daily. Wendell Murphy, a state senator, passed 28 laws making it illegal to sue factory farms and partnered with Smithfield to create warehouses called Murphy 1100 to raise pigs. This dropped pork prices from 60ยข to 2ยข a pound, putting 28,000 independent hog farmers out of business. Farmers who signed contracts with Smithfield mortgaged their homes to build hog sheds and lost control, becoming "surfs" on their own land. Smithfield dictated farming practices and controlled 80% of hog production in North Carolina. Iowa adopted the same system, leading Smithfield to control 80% of US hog production. Smithfield then sold itself to China. This industrial agriculture threatens American democracy by taking control of landscapes and undermining independent family farms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. Here I am in, Sherwood, Connecticut on Sherwood Island. Here's a little wood check hall. Shirley Troubadour asked a question about why Gates and China are being allowed to buy up all the farmland in our country. And I'm gonna tell you something that I had an experience with. I spent many years, about 20 years suing the factory farms, the big hog farms and big, chicken producers like Tyson and Beau Pilgrim and Frank Purdue. But Smithfield Foods was the biggest pork producer and Smithfield came to the state of, North Carolina. They built a slaughterhouse that could process 30,000 pigs a day. And then they had a partner named, Wendell Murphy, who is in the state senate and he passed 28 laws in the North Carolina state senate making it illegal to sue a factory farm. He left and went into partnership with Smithfield, created a way to raise pigs instead of raising them on farms to raise them in warehouses called Murphy 1100. And they they dropped the price of pork from 60ยข a pound to 2ยข a pound. It put out of business all 28,000 independent hog farmers in the state of North Carolina and factories. All of them either owned by Smithfield or contract to Smithfield. The only farmers who can stay in business or farmers who sign that contract with Smithfield to to mortgage their homes, to put those big hog sheds, the Murphy 1100 on their property. And then they lose all control. They become surfs on their own land. Smithfield dictates all there's farming practices. It gives them the food. It tell it delivers the piglets, picks up the the grown animals and brings them to slaughter. They put out of business, 28,000 farmers and a control now of 80% of the hog production in North Carolina because they dropped the price in North Carolina, Iowa had to adopt the same system, had to, cave in to Smithfield. They ended up taking control of 80% of them hog production in our country. Then they sold themselves to China. So now China owns all that hog production in America and it controls our landscapes. And that's the end of Thomas Jefferson's vision of an American democracy rooted in tens of thousands of independent freeholds. Each one owned by family farmers, each with a stake in our system of government. And that's why all of this industrial agriculture not only gives us up standard food, but they're also taking control of our landscapes and that is a huge threat to American democracy. I hope you guys have a good day. If you like this video and you wanna help me become president of the United States, go to kennedy24.com and donate now.
JamesMelville
Posted - August 28, 2024 at 7:24 AM
Saved - August 29, 2024 at 2:15 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

2010: Channel 4 News feature on Swine Flu: โ€œOne of the greatest medical scandals of the century. The Council of Europeโ€™s health chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organising a campaign of panic and unduly influencing World Health Organisation decisions.โ€ https://t.co/RM7cWY19x3

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Council of Europe health chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a panic campaign and unduly influencing World Health Organization (WHO) decisions regarding swine flu. This official seeks an investigation into the WHO's decision to lower the threshold for declaring a pandemic, which triggered pre-prepared government contracts for drugs and vaccines. The investigation aims to determine if pharmaceutical companies influenced WHO decisions and if there were inappropriate ties between key WHO advisors and drug companies. Questions are being raised about whether the perceived danger of swine flu was exaggerated by pharmaceutical companies to increase profits. Governments are now burdened with bills for millions of unwanted vaccine doses.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Greatest medical scandals of the century according to a leading health expert in Brussels. The Council of Europe Health's chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a campaign of panic and unduly influencing World Health Organization decisions. And with European countries now burdened with bills for millions of unwanted doses of the swine flu vaccine, he wants an investigation. Our science correspondent, Tom Clark, has this report. Flu viruses can spread in Speaker 1: 64,000 people dead, tens of thousands hospitalized, a country crippled by a virus. The predictions for the impact of swine flu on Britain were grim. The government's response, spending 100 of 1,000,000 of pounds on antiviral drugs and vaccines, adverts, and leaflets. But 10 months into the pandemic, only 355 Britons have died. And, globally, the virus hasn't lived up to our fears. Were governments misled into preparing for the worst? Politicians in Brussels are now asking for an investigation into the role pharmaceutical companies played in influencing political decisions that led to a swine flu spending spree. Speaker 2: There must be a process to to get more transparency how the decisions in the in the WHO have a function and who is influencing the decisions of the WHO, and what is the role of pharmaceutical industry there. I'm very suspicious about the processes which are behind this, pandemic. Speaker 1: The Council of Europe committee want the investigation to focus on the World Health Organization's decision to lower the threshold required for a pandemic to be formally declared. Speaker 3: The world is now at the start of the 2,009 influenza pandemic. Speaker 1: When this happened in June last year, governments had to activate huge pre prepared contracts for drugs and vaccines with manufacturers. They also want to probe ties between key WHO advisors and drug companies. Speaker 3: Who is deciding what the risk is? Is it the pharmaceutical companies who want to sell drugs? Or is it someone making a decision based on perceived danger? In this case, it appears that the danger was vastly exaggerated. And was it exaggerated by the pharmaceutical companies in order to make money? Speaker 1: Our government, like many others, is now paying the price for being prepared. Sighting commercial confidential
JamesMelville
Posted - August 24, 2024 at 8:46 AM
Saved - August 24, 2024 at 2:23 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

This is wrong on so many levels. https://t.co/Sv5ld349b1

JamesMelville
Posted - August 22, 2024 at 6:53 PM
Saved - August 23, 2024 at 7:42 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Mohammed Qahtani won the Toastmasters World Championship of Public Speaking. Itโ€™s easy to see why. Please watch his speech. Words have power. Words can unite or divide. Words can spit venom or can mend a broken soul. Words absolutely matter. https://t.co/UqbhEJuxKk

JamesMelville
Posted - August 21, 2024 at 6:00 AM
Saved - August 22, 2024 at 12:12 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Jeffrey Sachs (American economist, public policy analyst, professor at Columbia University) gives Piers Morgan an absolute schooling on geopolitics (and the US governmentโ€™s nefarious role within this). https://t.co/OUxIqg07Ga

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues the US has a history of interventionism, citing the bombing of Belgrade to create Kosovo and establish a NATO base, as well as interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya. They claim the US orchestrated the overthrow of Yanukovych in Ukraine in 2014, despite an EU-brokered agreement for early elections. The speaker states that the Minsk II agreement, intended to bring peace through negotiations between Ukraine and ethnic Russians, was unanimously approved by the UN Security Council but was disregarded by the US government and Ukraine, with Angela Merkel admitting it was a ploy to buy time for Ukraine to strengthen its military. The speaker expresses distrust of the US government and advocates for a transparent agreement between all parties, including guarantees against further expansion by NATO and military action by Russia.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You seem very reliant on accepting Putin's worldview rather than perhaps the stark reality of the barbarism with which he's executed this war. Speaker 1: Yeah. May maybe because I know too much about the United States. Because the first war in Europe after World War 2 was the US bombing of Belgrade for 78 days to change borders of a European state. The idea was to break Serbia to create Kosovo as an enclave and then to install Bonda Steel, which is the largest NATO base in the Balkans, in the Southwest Balkans. So the US started this under Clinton, that we will break the borders. We will illegally bomb another country. We didn't have any UN authority. This was a NATO mission to do that. Then I know the United States went to war repeatedly, illegally, in what it did in Afghanistan and then what it did in Iraq, and then what it did in Syria, which was the Obama administration, especially Obama and Hillary Clinton tasking the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad. And then what it did with NATO illegally bombing Libya to topple more more Gaddafi, and then what it did in Kiev in February 2014. I happened to see some of that with my own eyes. The US overthrew Yanukovych together with right wing Ukrainian military forces. We overthrew a president. And what's interesting, by the way, is we overthrew Yanukovych the day after the European Union representatives had reached an agreement with Yanukovych to have early elections, a government of national unity, and a stand down of both sides. That was agreed. The next thing that happens is the opposition, quote unquote, says, we don't agree. They stormed the government buildings, and they deposed Yanukovych. And within hours, the United States says, yes. We support the new government. It didn't say, oh, we had an agreement. That's unconstitutional what you did. So we overthrew a government contrary to a promise that the European Union had made. And by the way, Russia, the United States, and the EU were parties to that agreement, and the United States an hour afterwards backed the coup. Okay. So everyone's got a little bit to answer for. In 2015, the, Russians did not say, we want the Donbas back. They said peace should come through negotiations, and negotiations between the ethnic Russians in the east of Ukraine and this new regime in Kyiv led to the Minsk two agreement. The Minsk two agreement was voted by the UN Security Council unanimously. It was signed by the government of Ukraine. It was guaranteed explicitly by Germany and France. And you know what? And it's been explained to me in person. It was laughed at inside the US government. This is after the UN Security Council unanimously accepted it. The Ukrainian said, we don't wanna give autonomy to the region. Oh, but that's part of the treaty. The US told them, don't worry about it. Angela Merkel explained in in a notorious interview after the 2022 escalation, she said, oh, you know, we knew that Minsk 2 was just a a a holding pattern to give Ukraine time to build its strength. No. Minsk 2 was a UN Security Council unanimously adopted treaty that was supposed to end the war. So when it comes to who's trustworthy, who to believe, and so forth, I guess my problem, Pierce, is I know the United States government. I know it very well. I don't trust them for a moment. I want these two sides actually to sit down in front of the whole world and say these are the terms, then the world can judge because we could get on paper clearly for both sides of the world. We're not gonna overthrow governments anymore, the United States needs to say. We accept this agreement, the United States needs to say. Russia needs to say. We're not stepping one foot farther than whatever the boundary is actually reached, and NATO's not going to enlarge. And let's put it for the whole world to see. You know, once in a while, treaties actually hold.
JamesMelville
Posted - August 14, 2024 at 8:03 AM
Saved - August 15, 2024 at 6:02 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

2010: Channel 4 News: Swine Flu: โ€œOne of the greatest medical scandals of the centuryโ€ฆ.The Council of Europeโ€™s health chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organising a campaign of panic and unduly influencing World Health Organisation decisions.โ€ https://t.co/NIpjbsw8xJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Council of Europe health chief accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a panic campaign and unduly influencing World Health Organization (WHO) decisions regarding swine flu. European countries are burdened with bills for millions of unwanted vaccine doses, prompting calls for an investigation. The predictions for the impact of swine flu included 64,000 deaths, tens of thousands hospitalized, and a country crippled by the virus. The government spent hundreds of millions of pounds on antiviral drugs and vaccines. However, 10 months into the pandemic, only 355 Britons died, and globally, the virus hasn't lived up to fears. Politicians in Brussels are requesting an investigation into the role pharmaceutical companies played in influencing political decisions that led to a swine flu spending spree. The Council of Europe Committee wants the investigation to focus on the WHO's decision to lower the threshold required for a pandemic declaration and probe ties between key WHO advisors and drug companies. Some suspect the danger was vastly exaggerated by pharmaceutical companies to make money.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Greatest medical scandals of the century according to a leading health expert in Brussels. The Council of Europe Health's chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a campaign of panic and unduly influencing World Health Organization decisions. And with European countries now burdened with bills for millions of unwanted doses of the swine flu vaccine, he wants an investigation. Our science correspondent, Tom Clark, has this report. Speaker 1: Flu viruses can spread 64,000 people dead, tens of 1,000 hospitalized, a country crippled by a virus. The predictions for the impact of swine flu on Britain were grim. The government's response, spending 100 of 1,000,000 of pounds on antiviral drugs and vaccines, adverts, and leaflets. But 10 months into the pandemic, only 355 Britons have died. And, globally, the virus hasn't lived up to our fears. Were governments misled into preparing for the worst? Politicians in Brussels are now asking for an investigation into the role pharmaceutical companies played in influencing political decisions that led to a swine flu spending spree. Speaker 2: There must be a process to to get more transparency how the in the WHO have a function and who is influencing the decisions of the WHO and what is the role of the pharmaceutical industry there. I'm very suspicious about the processes which are behind this, pandemic. Speaker 1: The Council of Europe Committee want the investigation to focus on the World Health Organization's decision to lower the threshold required for a pandemic to be formally declared. Speaker 0: The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic. Speaker 1: When this happened in June last year, governments had to activate huge pre prepared contracts for drugs and vaccines with manufacturers. They also want to probe ties between key WHO advisors and drug companies. Speaker 3: Who is deciding what the risk is? Is it the pharmaceutical companies who want to sell drugs? Or is it someone making a decision based on the perceived danger? In this case, it appears that the danger was vastly exaggerated. And was it exaggerated by the pharmaceutical companies in order to make money? Speaker 1: Our government, like many others, is now paying the price for being prepared. Citing commercial confidential
JamesMelville
Posted - August 14, 2024 at 6:48 AM
Saved - August 15, 2024 at 2:20 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œBankers own the earth.โ€ Nothing ever changes. https://t.co/Uczo5rMfrZ

JamesMelville
Posted - August 10, 2024 at 1:54 PM
Saved - August 10, 2024 at 2:15 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

2020: Jacinda Ardern, then Prime Minister of New Zealand: "We will continue to be your single source of truthโ€ฆRemember, unless you hear it from us it is not the truth." https://t.co/xSspaKNnMl

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to address the rumors circulating on social media about COVID-19. Trust the official information we provide daily and visit covid19.govt.nz for updates. Disregard any other sources. Prepare, but don't panic. Only trust information from us and the ministry of health. Stay informed and calm.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've been watching for some days and this is not unique to New Zealand that in the midst of what is a global issue as you would expect, there are a number of rumors that circulate. I am present on social media. I see it myself. I cannot go around and individually dismiss every single rumor I see on social media as tempted as I might be. So instead, I want to send a clear message to the New Zealand public. We will share with you the most up to date information daily. You can trust us as a source of that information. You can also trust the director general of health and the ministry of health. For that information, do feel free to visit at any time to clarify any rumor you may hear, covid19.govt.nz. Otherwise, dismiss anything else. We will continue to be your single source of truth. We will provide information frequently. We will share everything we can. Everything you are else you see, a grain of salt. So I continue to share the message. New Zealanders must prepare, but do not panic. Prepare. And and when you see those messages, remember that unless you hear it from us, it is not the truth. And I really ask people, just visit, covid19.govt.nz. It has all of the up to date information, And we will continue to provide everything you need to know.
JamesMelville
Posted - August 9, 2024 at 6:54 AM
Saved - August 9, 2024 at 1:30 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Digital ID and central bank digital currencies: Governments will sell it as โ€œfor your safetyโ€ or โ€œfor your convenienceโ€. But actually itโ€™s for their control, surveillance and transfer of wealth to corporations. A giant virtue scam to seize control at our own expense. https://t.co/WZCcGSBmvT

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a push towards digitalization for safety and convenience, but we must unite against losing freedoms. Central bank digital currencies are advancing globally. Localism is key - use cash, support local farmers, and keep money circulating within communities to empower local economies. Embrace localism over globalism for a more nuanced debate. By taking control of our local economy, we retain power and autonomy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think there's a mission creep towards all things digitalization under the auspice again of safety and also convenience. I think we need to find ways to stop the division and unite everyone against the people who are putting this mission creep in place to lose even more freedoms in the future, and that is largely linked around digitalization. I think one other aspect to this, all around the world, central bank digital currencies are either in pilot scheme or executive order stage in the States or they are floating under the radar. Our previous Chancellor, now unelected Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, is clearly a big fan, as is his frat boy pen pal best mate, Justin Trudeau. These individuals are pushing it in this direction. Now I understand that there is a need for digitalization because the world moves on, but what we shouldn't be losing is some of the assets that we still need, such as cash. Cash is vital. As a farmer's son, I understand the values of a circular economy, but to answer Alan's question, what we can do is localism. Too long, it's been the debate has been about nationalism versus globalism. Nationalists have been framed as bigots and racists and all of that stuff that probably I was saying a few years ago, but it was nonsense. But what we should be doing is moving the debate on a little bit further, and having a really structured nuanced debate about localism and the values of localism versus the bastardization of globalism. And I say this as someone who used to be a big fan of globalism. One way we can do that is circular economies, use cash as much as possible, get it in the communities, find your local farmer, start trading with them direct, rather than going to the supermarket and letting money fritter away out of the economy. The more that we can put money back into the economy time and time again from a localized point of view, the more that we and other people and our businesses and our small and medium enterprises start taking control of our local economy. We have the control and power to do that. They can't take that away from us.
JamesMelville
Posted - August 7, 2024 at 3:33 PM
Saved - August 8, 2024 at 12:09 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œI think there are two ways in which people are controlled. First of all frighten people and secondly, demoralise themโ€ฆAn educated, healthy and confident nation is harder to govern.โ€ ~ Tony Benn https://t.co/xqjf4rjUwG

Video Transcript AI Summary
People are controlled by fear and demoralization. Educated, healthy, and confident individuals are harder to govern. Some may not want people to be educated, healthy, and confident because they would become uncontrollable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are 2 ways in which people are controlled. First of all, frighten people, and secondly, demoralize them. An educated, healthy, and confident nation is harder to govern. And I think there's an element in the thinking of some people. We don't want people to be educated, healthy, and confident because they would get out of control.
JamesMelville
Posted - August 7, 2024 at 7:04 AM
Saved - August 7, 2024 at 10:15 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Digital ID: They will sell it to the public as โ€œfor your own goodโ€ or โ€œfor your safetyโ€ or โ€œfor your convenienceโ€. But actually itโ€™s for their control, surveillance and greed. https://t.co/37rOFtlpUF

JamesMelville
Posted - August 6, 2024 at 8:38 AM
Saved - August 6, 2024 at 9:03 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œIf you donโ€™t read the newspaper, youโ€™re uninformed. If you do read it, youโ€™re misinformed. We don't care who it hurts. We don't care who we destroy. We don't care if it's true. Just say it, sell it.โ€ ~ Denzel Washington ๐ŸŽฏ https://t.co/zg76Q9ISu9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Reading the newspaper makes you misinformed, not reading it leaves you uninformed. The long-term effect of too much information is the obsession with being first rather than being truthful. Society prioritizes speed over accuracy, leading to spreading false information without regard for consequences. The speaker emphasizes the importance of telling the truth over being the first to report. Practicing spreading misinformation leads to proficiency in deceit.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you do read it, you're misinformed. Speaker 1: No. What do you do? Speaker 0: That's a great question. Speaker 1: Picking up Speaker 0: What is the long term effect of too much information? One of the effects is the need to be first, not even to be true anymore. So what a responsibility you all have to be to tell the truth, not just to be first, but to tell the truth. We live in a society now where it's just first. Who cares? Get it out there. We don't care who it hurts. We don't care who we destroy. We don't care if it's true. Just say it. Sell it. Anything you practice, you'll get good at, Include including BS. Speaker 1: Hold on. You told me why I'm laughing. Okay.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 31, 2024 at 12:47 PM
Saved - July 31, 2024 at 9:05 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œI think there are two ways in which people are controlled. First of all frighten people and secondly, demoralise themโ€ฆAn educated, healthy and confident nation is harder to govern.โ€ ~ Tony Benn https://t.co/VmGX7AGLSc

Video Transcript AI Summary
People are controlled by instilling fear and demoralizing them. Educated, healthy, and confident individuals are harder to govern, which some may view as a threat to control.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are 2 ways in which people are controlled. First of all, frighten people, and secondly, demoralize them. An educated, healthy, and confident nation is harder to govern. And I think there's an element in the thinking of some people. We don't want people to be educated, healthy, and confident because they would get out of control.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 31, 2024 at 6:43 AM
Saved - July 31, 2024 at 12:36 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

The reason why so many people across Europe are protesting and voting for change isnโ€™t because they are โ€œfar-rightโ€ or โ€œconspiracy theoristsโ€ - itโ€™s because they are fed up of being lied to and controlled by governments, patronised by unelected technocratic institutions, disingenuously messaged by corporate media and fleeced by greedy corporations. Infrastructures and public services are rotting, the cost of living crisis continues, public assets are being destroyed and sold off to the highest bidder, freedoms are being reduced and yet, all of this is wrapped around the biggest transfer of wealth to the super-rich and mega corporations in history. And we are paying them to do all of this through record levels of taxation while governments regularly spend our money on the wrong things. Governments appear to have forgotten that they serve us. We donโ€™t serve them. The concerns and voices of millions of people have been ignored for far too long and quite understandably, they have had enough of political uniparty corporatism and are now making their voices heard through mass protests and at elections. Itโ€™s not far-right. Itโ€™s fed up.

JamesMelville
Posted - July 26, 2024 at 8:46 AM
Saved - July 26, 2024 at 2:18 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Scotland ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ Since 2000, an estimated 17 million trees have been cut down in Scotland to make way for wind farms. https://t.co/ttYZldJWC5

JamesMelville
Posted - July 25, 2024 at 12:51 PM
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 9:21 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œCorrupt corporate giants are oppressing small independent farmers. The objective isnโ€™t to get farmers to behave in an organic, responsible, ecologically apposite manner. No. Far from it. Itโ€™s in order to bankrupt farmers so that their land can be grabbed.โ€ ~ Russell Brand https://t.co/tnqMKGH2nK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Dutch farmer protests are not anti-environmental, but a response to economic pressures and land grabs by corporations like Bill Gates and Monsanto. Farmers use fertilizers out of necessity, not choice. The Great Reset uses a green agenda to bankrupt farmers and seize their land. While supporting a green agenda, it is important for people to stand in solidarity with farmers, allowing them time to transition to more sustainable practices without globalist interference. Together, we can make decisions that benefit both farmers and the environment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may be portraying the Dutch farmer protests as an anti environmentalist movement peopled by selfish farmers. Vandana Shiva with her experience in how corrupt centralized agricultural, monocultural giants are oppressing independent farmers all over the world. This is connected to the land grab of Bill Gates. This is connected to corruption of companies like Monsanto. This whole fertilizer situation is a scam. They present it as a green ideology. Oh, we can't keep using these fertilizers and anyone who lives in the rural area will know that when those fertilizers get used, you think, oh, God, this is a bit dodgy. But the reason that farmers are using those fertilizers is because it's necessary economically because of the pressure they are under financially because of often because of government enforced imperatives and the objective isn't to get the farmers to behave in an organic, responsible, ecologically, apposite manner. No. Far from it. It's in order to bankrupt to the farmers so that their land can be grabbed. My mind was blown by that. This shows you how the Great Reset operates. It uses a green agenda. And just so you know, I agree with the green agenda. I think that the planet should be treated with love and respect that we should see ourselves as in harmony with it. But when regulations are passed down from a globalist level and it affects the lives of ordinary farmers, it's the duty of all of us to support them, to stand in solidarity, to give them time to make those transitions, to say to the farming and agricultural community, we'll support you by buying your products if you make these concessions and changes, which we'll agree between us. It doesn't need to be mediated by technocratic globalist bodies. We, the people, can make these decisions together.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 25, 2024 at 7:53 AM
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 9:12 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œClimate change wreaking havoc on our planet.โ€ ~ Prince Harry. A bit rich coming from someone who is a regular traveller on private jets. The hypocrisy is astonishing. https://t.co/1UXykrpDFP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many feel overwhelmed by disasters and devastation. This year and decade have been painful, with a pandemic and climate change causing widespread suffering. Lies and disinformation are being used to harm many, while democracy and freedom are under attack globally, from Ukraine to the United States.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many of us feel battered, helpless in the face of the seemingly endless stream of disasters and devastation? I understand. This has been a painful year in a painful decade. We're living through a pandemic that continues to ravage communities in every corner of the globe. Climate change wreaking havoc on our planet with the most vulnerable suffering most of all the few weaponizing lies and disinformation at the expense of the many And from the horrific war in Ukraine to the rolling back of constitutional rights here in the United States, we are witnessing a global assault on democracy and freedom.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 23, 2024 at 7:48 AM
Saved - July 23, 2024 at 3:22 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Digital ID & central bank digital currencies: โ–ช๏ธWhat they say: โ€œItโ€™s for your safety and convenience.โ€ โ–ช๏ธWhat they actually mean: โ€œItโ€™s for our surveillance and control.โ€ https://t.co/KT2Yubr4FK

Video Transcript AI Summary
In China, the government controls citizens' spending through a social credit system linked to bank accounts. Programmable money is being tested in countries like Sweden and Canada. This technology could soon track and limit individual carbon usage, with penalties for exceeding limits including fines automatically deducted from bank accounts.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A little bit far fetched, and you might be thinking that this kind of authoritarian control over your money is not gonna be anything that we'll see in the future. Unfortunately, this is already implemented in the world. In China, the government is already able to program what its citizens can and cannot spend their money on. Over the last few years, they've limited millions of people's ability to buy things like train tickets, passports, and luxury goods. They're able to do this because of China's intense social credit system that links each person's identity and actions to their bank account, allowing the government to see and to control everything a citizen does with their money. And it seems like the west is paying attention. Nations like Sweden, South Africa, and Canada, trials of programmable central bank currencies are already underway. In fact, almost half of the world's nations are at some stage of implementing this kind of programmable money. Meaning no matter where in the world you live, this technology is likely only a few years away. Okay. So how does programmable money tie in with a personal carbon limit? Well, it all comes down to whether or not you've gone over your monthly usage. And if you have, there are 2 possible case scenarios for that. The most openly talked about penalty for a person going over their individual carbon limit is that they'd simply get charged for doing so, just the same as what happens to large companies today. Taking too many car trips this month or bought a little bit too much meat. In that case, you'd simply get a bill at the end of each month from your government so you can pay the price of being a naughty citizen. As your entire carbon usage would be tracked by a government CBDC, there would be no way to hide how much carbon you've used. And since they now also hold the keys to your money, they won't even need to send you a bill for your excess usage potentially. They'll just automatically pull your fine from your bank account.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 23, 2024 at 9:55 AM
Saved - July 23, 2024 at 3:10 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

BBC News: 2001. โ€œThirty-five deaths in the Lynmouth flood disaster came only days after RAF rain-making experiments over southern England, it has emerged. Ninety million tonnes of water swept down the narrow valley into Lynmouth on 15 August, 1952, destroying whole buildings.โ€ https://t.co/mnwtKdyDac

JamesMelville
Posted - July 23, 2024 at 7:51 AM
Saved - July 23, 2024 at 10:01 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Digital ID is being sold for our โ€œsafety, convenience and securityโ€. In reality, itโ€™s a giant con-trick to hoodwink and sleepwalk people into surveillance, government control and loss of freedoms and human dignity. Everyone needs to wake up to this before itโ€™s too late. https://t.co/lr2Njesanv

JamesMelville
Posted - July 20, 2024 at 6:46 AM
Saved - July 21, 2024 at 10:55 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œThere are currently 42 cloud seeding projects across the American West. They anticipate 200 more cloud seeders in the future and the federal government has committed $2.6million to seeding.โ€ ~ Good Morning America / ABC Network (2023) https://t.co/cQt4Wt7cJJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 42 cloud seeding projects in the American West using planes and ground-based devices to enhance precipitation. Researchers at the University of Colorado are developing AI for cloud seeding drones. Despite a successful winter with above-average snowfall, experts emphasize that conservation is key. Studies show no environmental impact from silver iodide used in cloud seeding. The federal government has allocated $2.6 million for seeding, with plans for 200 more ground cloud seeders in the future.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are currently 42 cloud seeding projects across the American West, like this one in Utah where they take planes like this with flares attached. They fly right into the storm and send microscopic particles into the cloud. Particles that act like magnets for water droplets, bonding together until they are heavy enough to fall to the ground as rain or snow. At the University of Colorado, researchers are working on artificial intelligence to deploy cloud seeding drones. And it's not just cloud seeding from the sky. There are hundreds of those things. That shack you see in the foreground is a ground based cloud seater. The little flame coming out is sending tiny silver iodide particles up into the sky. When a storm comes through, they go up to 2,000 feet above our head into the storm, up those mountains, and make more snow than it naturally would. While cloud seeding has been helping get every last drop out of some of the driest years on record, this past winter, mother nature came through. The southern rockies, which feed the Colorado River, got more than 4 times their average snow, but experts say it's still not enough. As much as cloud seeding is a boost or a help, it's not a solution. The main solution is Conservation. Cloud seeding is most successful in wet years, so this was a huge winter for them. They actually stopped early because mother nature was given up so much. Now studies have shown that the environmental impacts from the silver iodide on the current scale, there are no impacts, to snow or rain also downstream. So it doesn't impact, you know, the other weather. They do anticipate at least 200 more ground cloud cedars in the future, and the federal government has committed $2,600,000 to seeding. Back to you, Gio and Eva.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 20, 2024 at 6:09 AM
Saved - July 20, 2024 at 9:43 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œBill Gates is backing the first high-altitude experiment of one radical climate change solution. Creating a massive chemical cloud that can cool the earth. Itโ€™s called solar geoengineering and itโ€™s highly controversial.โ€ ~ CNBC https://t.co/NRpz4TW17R

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gates supports a high-altitude experiment for solar geoengineering to combat climate change. This method involves planes releasing light-reflecting particles into the stratosphere to create a cooling effect similar to a volcanic eruption. The controversial idea aims to cool the Earth by blocking sunlight from reaching the surface.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gates is backing the 1st high altitude experiment of one radical climate change solution, creating a massive chemical cloud that could cool the Earth. It's called solar geoengineering, and it's highly controversial. Speaker 1: How long will it be that countries keep experiencing these climate impacts before someone gets desperate and says, hey, we need to cool the planet with solar geoengineering? Speaker 0: It would look something like this. Thousands of planes would fly very high and use nozzles to inject millions of tons of light reflecting particles into the stratosphere. It would create a thin chemical cloud of those particles around the whole planet, blocking some sunlight from reaching the surface. It would mimic a giant volcanic eruption, which we know cools the Earth.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 19, 2024 at 9:42 AM
Saved - July 19, 2024 at 12:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see the news cycle as increasingly questionable, where fact and fiction blur, and misinformation is rampant. Our leaders and media often misrepresent the truth, masking greed as virtue. This manipulation leads to a massive asset grab, threatening our freedoms and wealth under the guise of safety. Anyone who questions this narrative faces ridicule, a tactic to suppress dissent. I believe we can change this dynamic by supporting local farmers through initiatives like @NoFarmsNoFoods, emphasizing the importance of local action in a global context.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Almost everything in our news cycle is questionable now. The lines between fact and fiction have become blurred. What our leaders and mainstream media peddle as the truth is often misinformation. And what is really the truth is smeared as misinformation. In an era of rolling news and social media, the bamboozle has captured us. In particular, our โ€˜elitesโ€™ masquerading their greed as virtue. The modern world is a simulacrum, where reality has been replaced by false messaging and imagery, to such an extent that one cannot distinguish between the real and the unreal. And as a result of this, everyone squabbles through the prism of their own confirmation biases to claim what they consider to be their own truths, when actually they are blindsided by their own false superiority of sanctimony and virtue. We are ruled by a nefarious group of individuals that have an unquenchable thirst for power, control and money, and they donโ€™t care what they have to do to get it. And that includes tricking people into thinking they are the virtuous good guys who are here to keep us all safe. And tragically, millions of people are completely duped by this. What we have witnessed over the Covid response, the war in Ukraine, the Net Zero agenda on climate change and many other current issues is a movement of faux-virtue that has been carefully crafted by corrupt politicians, messengers within legacy media outlets, greedy corporations, messiah delusional billionaires and undemocratic technocrats to create the impression that they are the virtuous ones who are our friends. These people are not our friends. Their primary objective is to hoodwink us into believing and complying to their virtue, but in reality being tricked into giving away more freedoms, power, wealth and assets to these virtue vultures. The reality of all of this is that we are sleepwalking towards the biggest asset grab in the history of the planet. They are trying to destroy farms, land, businesses, freedoms, housing, individual wealth, travel and own them or sell them off to the highest bidder. And at the same time, they are trying to ring-fence society into the entrapment of being controlled by data โ€“ either through health passports or the slow mission creep towards central banking digital currencies (CBDCs). Itโ€™s a giant asset grab of what we own and control. They frame all of this being in our best interests. But itโ€™s the biggest swindle ever. This gargantuan virtue con-trick also comes with a huge slice of authoritarianism. Anyone who sees through it, questions it, stands up to it or shows opposition to it are immediately ridiculed and ostracised by the group-think mob: Question the Covid response? โ€œCovidiotโ€ Question the wars? โ€œPutin apologistโ€ โ€œAntisemiteโ€ Question net zero? โ€œClimate change denierโ€ This is gutter politics designed to shut down and undermine any opposition or questioning. But not questioning the narrative is a huge form of denial. Because any government, technocrat or organisation that advocates medical discrimination, suppression of civil liberties and a transfer of wealth and public assets to the rich while the rest of society endures a cost of living crisis is not your friend. Donโ€™t be fooled by their virtue. Itโ€™s a giant con. In reality, they are indulging in a massive asset grab. They are treating the world as feudal overlords indulging in their own personal fiefdoms while us plebs are left to feed off the crumbs from their table โ€“ but all under the guise of โ€œitโ€™s for our own goodโ€ or โ€œsafetyโ€ while pretending to be humanistic and empathetic convincingly, along with glib charm, is the primary weapon that power hungry sociopaths use along with dogmatic zealotry. Fake virtue peddled by governments, rulers and authorities for mass compliance and social control is oldest trick in the authoritarian playbook. Donโ€™t be fooled by it. Donโ€™t sleepwalk towards it. Because when totalitarianism arrives, it will come cloaked in virtue.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Governments and mega corporations have accumulated too much power and wealth. But, we can change whatโ€™s going on around us. Think globally, act locally. Thatโ€™s why I founded @NoFarmsNoFoods (with a steering group of farmers). Farming is global, but we can support farmers locally. https://t.co/j3UTdK4V0k

JamesMelville
Posted - July 18, 2024 at 8:38 AM
Saved - July 18, 2024 at 10:52 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Balsa wood is used as a key component in the construction of wind turbine blades. The Amazon rainforest โ€“ the lungs of the Earth, is plundered & stripped to supply balsa wood for wind turbines - with a devastating impact on the indigenous peoples of the Ecuadorian Amazon. https://t.co/KHfRrg51p9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hemos encontrado un campamento de tala de balsa. This is just the beginning.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Esto no ha hecho mรกs que empezar y ya hemos encontrado uno de estos campamentos de tala de balsa y esta
JamesMelville
Posted - July 17, 2024 at 6:51 AM
Saved - July 17, 2024 at 11:30 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Local residents opposed to a 2,500-acre solar farm are "shell-shocked" after the plan was approved by Ed Miliband. The scheme takes some of the most productive land in the UK out of use, while ignoring alternative sites such as commercial roof space. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clmydgke2mko.amp

Villagers 'shell-shocked' after Sunnica solar farm approved - BBC News Not everyone agrees with Energy Security Secretary Ed Miliband's decision to give the scheme the go-ahead. bbc.co.uk
JamesMelville
Posted - July 17, 2024 at 7:56 AM
Saved - July 17, 2024 at 5:37 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

These people do not have your best interests at heart. As George Carlin said, โ€œIt's a big club, and you ainโ€™t in it. You and I are not in the big club. The table is tilted folks. The game is rigged.โ€ https://t.co/1Y0Y2Dwgk4

JamesMelville
Posted - July 16, 2024 at 6:11 AM
Saved - July 16, 2024 at 4:34 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Net zero is a corporate asset grab that that masquerades as environmentalism to dupe people into facilitating their greed. A giant swindle designed to create yet another huge transfer of wealth facilitated by governments to line the pockets of the super-rich. https://t.co/d7iWyczuiz

JamesMelville
Posted - July 16, 2024 at 6:12 AM
Saved - July 16, 2024 at 7:34 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

An estimated 500 million people were pushed into poverty during the pandemic, but the wealth of the worldโ€™s billionaires rose by $3.78 trillion - the biggest wealth transfer in history. And thatโ€™s ultimately what this shitshow is about - governments facilitating corporate greed. https://t.co/3JOSJqpeRt

JamesMelville
Posted - July 15, 2024 at 11:52 AM
Saved - July 16, 2024 at 3:43 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œWhat is a central bank digital currency (CBDC) for? What problem is it going to solve?โ€ โ€œLookโ€ฆumโ€ฆ.to keep trackโ€ฆumโ€ฆerโ€ฆโ€ https://t.co/CtA4NBerSk

Video Transcript AI Summary
The purpose of CBDC is to align with how people buy, save, and work with goods in a modern economy. It aims to address challenges before moving forward.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the CBDC for? Why what what what what problem is it going to solve? Look. What's it for? It's it's to keep track with the reality of how we all, we all purchase and and save and and do our, work with our goods. And, this is about being a a modern, economy that recognizes how, citizens, you know, want to do, business, but but that it throws up a number of challenges that you'd want to overcome before you decided to proceed.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 15, 2024 at 11:52 AM
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 3:13 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Digital ID and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs): โ–ช๏ธWhat they say: โ€œItโ€™s for your safety and convenience.โ€ โ–ช๏ธWhat they mean: โ€œItโ€™s for our surveillance and control.โ€ https://t.co/KT2Yubr4FK

Video Transcript AI Summary
In China, the government controls citizens' spending through a social credit system linked to their bank accounts. Programmable central bank currencies are being tested in countries like Sweden and Canada. Nearly half of the world's nations are exploring this technology. Programmable money could lead to personal carbon limits, with penalties for exceeding them. Individuals could be charged for surpassing their carbon allowance, automatically deducted from their bank accounts. This system could track and control all financial transactions based on carbon usage.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A little bit far fetched, and you might be thinking that this kind of authoritarian control over your money is not gonna be anything that we'll see in the future. Unfortunately, this is already implemented in the world. In China, the government is already able to program what its citizens can and cannot spend their money on. Over the last few years, they've limited millions of people's ability to buy things like train tickets, passports, and luxury goods. They're able to do this because of China's intense social credit system that links each person's identity and actions to their bank account, allowing the government to see and to control everything a citizen does with their money. And it seems like the west is paying attention. Nations like Sweden, South Africa, and Canada, trials of programmable central bank currencies are already underway. In fact, almost half of the world's nations are at some stage of implementing this kind of programmable money. Meaning no matter where in the world you live, this technology is likely only a few years away. Okay. So how does programmable money tie in with a personal carbon limit? Well, it all comes down to whether or not you've gone over your monthly usage. And if you have, there are 2 possible case scenarios for that. The most openly talked about penalty for a person going over their individual carbon limit is that they'd simply get charged for doing so, just the same as what happens to large companies today. Taking too many car trips this month or bought a little bit too much meat. In that case, you'd simply get a bill at the end of each month from your government so you can pay the price of being a naughty citizen. As your entire carbon usage would be tracked by a government CBDC, there would be no way to hide how much carbon you've used. And since they now also hold the keys to your money, they won't even need to send you a bill for your excess usage potentially. They'll just automatically pull your fine from your bank account.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 15, 2024 at 7:16 AM
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 2:31 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Follow the money. ๐Ÿ’ฐ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ https://t.co/gsjjgBYHt6

JamesMelville
Posted - July 12, 2024 at 8:03 AM
Saved - July 13, 2024 at 11:07 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

โ€œCorrupt corporate giants are oppressing small independent farmers. The objective isnโ€™t to get farmers to behave in an organic, responsible, ecologically apposite manner. No. Far from it. Itโ€™s in order to bankrupt farmers so that their land can be grabbed.โ€ ~ Russell Brand https://t.co/4bSJo43sqA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Dutch farmer protests are not anti-environmental, but a response to oppressive agricultural practices by companies like Monsanto and Bill Gates. Farmers use fertilizers due to financial pressure, not by choice. The Great Reset exploits green agendas to bankrupt farmers and seize their land. Support for farmers should come from the community, not globalist bodies, to make sustainable transitions together.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may be portraying the Dutch farmer protests as an anti environmentalist movement peopled by selfish farmers. Vandana Shiva, with her experience in how corrupt centralized agricultural monocultural giants are oppressing independent farmers all over the world. This is connected to the land grab of Bill Gates. This is connected to corruption of companies like Monsanto. This whole fertilizer situation is a scam. They present it as a green ideology. Oh, we can't keep using these fertilizers and anyone who lives in the rural area will know that when those fertilizers get used, you think, oh, god. This is a bit dodgy. But the reason that farmers are using those fertilizers is because it's necessarily economically because of the pressure they are under financially because of often because of government enforced imperatives, and the objective isn't to get the farmers to behave in an organic, responsible, ecologically, apposite manner. No. Far from it. It's in order to bankrupt the farmers so that their land can be grabbed. My mind was blown by that. This shows you how the Great Reset operates. It uses a green agenda. And just so you know, I agree with the green agenda. I think that the planet should be treated with love and respect, but we should see ourselves as in harmony with it. But when regulations are passed down from a globalist level and it affects the lives of ordinary farmers, it's the duty of all of us to support them, to stand in solidarity, to give them time to make those transitions, to say to the farming and agricultural community, we'll support you by buying your products if you make these concessions and changes, which we agree between us. It doesn't need to be mediated by technocratic globalist bodies. We, the people, can make these decisions together.
JamesMelville
Posted - July 9, 2024 at 3:30 PM
Saved - July 9, 2024 at 9:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Labour government's expansion of wind turbines fails to address the environmental consequences of balsa wood demand, causing deforestation in the Amazon and harm to indigenous communities in Ecuador.

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

As the Labour government announces a huge expansion of wind turbines, there has been no mention that demand for balsa wood (used to make wind turbine blades) is causing enormous deforestation in the Amazon and causing environmental destruction in Ecuador. https://t.co/KcF8Hxxwpg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hemos encontrado un campamento de tala de balsa. This is just the beginning. We have found a balsa logging camp. This is just the beginning.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Esto no ha hecho mรกs que empezar y ya hemos encontrado uno de estos campamentos de tala de balsa y esta

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Deforesting the Amazon for wind energy. The increase in wind power demand has triggered a huge demand for balsa wood (a component in wind turbine blade construction) and in the process, destroying trees, indigenous communities and ecosystems in the Amazon. https://t.co/6CcTWe24Qp

JamesMelville
Posted - July 4, 2024 at 1:57 PM
Saved - July 5, 2024 at 3:00 AM

@JamesMelville - James Melville ๐Ÿšœ

Hereโ€™s Paul Newman dropping a whole heap of inconvenient truth ๐Ÿ’ฃ ๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿ’ฃ back in 1983โ€ฆ https://t.co/J86bEDSoE7

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a deep-seated distrust of Russians, evident in our reactions to incidents like the Korean airliner being shot down. When Israel shot down a Libyan plane, there was little international outcry. This double standard is driven by the need to portray the Soviets as enemies to justify increased military spending. Despite our missile deployments, the Soviet response with cruise missiles near our coast raises questions about true national security implications.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other thing I'd like to address, you know, the whole psychology of this is you don't trust the Russians. You don't do this. That has been so built up in our psyche. And and someone mentioned the, the Korean airliner. Alright. The Korean airliner was shot down. There was a lot of hue and cry and moral outrage, and and we got the we got it in the United Nations and so forth. In 1978 or 79, the Israelis shot down a Libyan civilian aircraft because it had violated Israeli airspace. President Nixon sent a wire to Gaddafi and to Sadat as apologizing for this incident. There was no talk about it going into the United Nations. The International Pilots Associations had their meeting. There was a 102, nations that voted to condemn Israel and the and 4 that voted not to, and the American representative abstained. Why? Because there was we couldn't create an enemy there. But when the Soviets shoot down an airliner, the same situation, we rise in moral outrage against this act. What is the difference? Because it's it's insistent. We must insist that the Soviets have gotta be created as an enemy. Otherwise, if they're not really a big enough enemy, how are we gonna get appropriations for more arms? Now and I'd like to get into the other area. I'm sorry if this is a speech and you don't like them, but people keep talking about national security, and we gotta be tough and we gotta be strong. Okay. We're tough and we're strong, and we've released all these missiles now, the intermediate range missile, the Pershing 2, and we're gonna have more Tritons 2 in And what was the Soviet response? The Soviet response is to put cruise missile into attack submarines and put more of them off our coast. Now if someone's gonna tell me that that increases our national security, well, I don't know. It's a whole ballgame that I don't understand. If
View Full Interactive Feed