TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @JasminLaine_
@JasminLaine_ - Jasmin Laine 🇨🇦
Former WEF, ESG Insider turned whistleblower @desireefixler joins us to discuss Mark Carney, Net Zero, and what his true motivation may very well be. Watch the full episode ⬇️ https://t.co/d6RLHl9u5B
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation opens with Speaker 0 arguing that there is no climate catastrophe or climate emergency. They claim that the threat narrative is pervasive, describing “tentacles” extending across the public sector, private sector, and academia. The speaker asserts that politicians, exemplified by Mark Carney, use fear mongering to secure votes, and notes that this phenomenon is seen globally, predominantly in left-leaning governments.
According to Speaker 0, the climate discourse represents self-sabotage and economic suicide. They describe economies as being strangled by a left-wing agenda, contending that such forces are shaping markets, national policy, media output, education, and financial flows. The overarching claim is that this agenda is about power and control, with fear mongering used to imply a climate catastrophe.
The transcript then shifts to a brief interlude welcoming Desiree Fixler. Desiree Fixler is thanked for joining again, with a note that much has happened since their last chat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is no climate catastrophe. There is no climate emergency. You have to understand that these tentacles run across the public sector, the private sector, and very scarily, academia. I saw how politicians like Mark Carney can use fear mongering just to lock in votes. And of course, we see this across the globe predominantly in left leaning governments.
It's nothing less than, self sabotage and economic suicide. You know, when you're looking at economies that have been strangled by this left wing agenda, these folks are shaping markets, national policy, media output, education, and financial flows. It's power and control. Again, you know, you brought it up earlier. It's fear mongering, pretending as if there is a climate catastrophe.
Desiree Fixler, thank you so much for joining us again. It's been so long since we've last chatted, and so much has happened.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told his worldview is incompatible with economic freedom, democratic accountability, and individual autonomy, making him dangerous—because he doesn’t think he’s dangerous, he thinks he’s saving you.
@JasminLaine_ - Jasmin Laine 🇨🇦
I took pictures of Mark Carneys book, “Values” and asked Chat GPT to give me a summary… “his worldview is absolutely incompatible with economic freedom, democratic accountability, and individual autonomy. That makes him dangerous—because he doesn’t think he’s dangerous. He thinks he’s saving you.”
@JasminLaine_ - Jasmin Laine 🇨🇦
WOW! What an opening statement 🫣 Liberals blame Poilievre for ‘shutting down’ Parliament. Fact check: it was the Speaker’s ruling after Trudeau’s $300M green slush fund scandal that halted business. Conservatives didn’t stop government—Liberal corruption did. https://t.co/XtFpBRHk7n
Video Transcript AI Summary
We will govern responsibly and work with politicians from all sides of the house. Where there is constructive criticism of our agenda with responsible alternative policies, we will listen. That means we are also looking to the opposition to conduct its itself responsibly. I am under no illusions about what we face with the conservatives under the leadership of Pierre Pauliev. In the last parliament, mister Pauliev's approach was far from responsible. In fact, he shut down parliament for weeks on end last fall, as I'm sure you all remember. He thought and hopefully no longer thinks a bad day for the government was a good day for the opposition, but this is not how this country runs. We need more good days for parliament. And increasingly, Canadians are of the view that a good day for parliament is when parties work together.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we will be looking to all parties and all MPs for collaboration. There's a lot of work to do this fall, and this place works best when we work together. For our part, we will govern responsibly and work with politicians from all sides of the house. We'll put politics aside and put the interests of Canadians first. Where there is constructive criticism of our agenda with responsible alternative policies, we will listen.
That means we are also looking to the opposition to conduct its itself responsibly. I am under no illusions about what we face with the conservatives under the leadership of Pierre Pauliev. In the last parliament, mister Pauliev's approach was far from responsible. In fact, he shut down parliament for weeks on end last fall, as I'm sure you all remember. He thought and hopefully no longer thinks a bad day for the government was a good day for the opposition, but this is not how this country runs.
We need more good days for parliament. And increasingly, Canadians are of the view that a good day for parliament is when parties work together.
@JasminLaine_ - Jasmin Laine 🇨🇦
This is what the Minister of families in Wab Kinew’s government (MB) had to share about Charlie Kirk. She promptly deleted it following Wabb’s statement/condolences (however genuine they were) at his press conference today. https://t.co/pjDfhBZVzD
@JasminLaine_ - Jasmin Laine 🇨🇦
ANOTHER riding was flipped to a liberal winner… People will tell you you’re funded by Russia for pointing out how unprecedented several riding flips to the liberal party are. No, this is actually VERY odd according to Canadian history. https://t.co/U3EgZ7YOPt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Judicial recounts are normal, but the number of seat flips in the 2025 election is unusual. In 2011 there was one flip, in 2015 there were zero, and in 2021 there was one. In 2025, a number of seats have flipped to the Liberal party.
This observation is not due to malicious intent or outside influence. The speaker is simply noticing a trend and a flaw. The speaker is calling on Elections Canada to improve voter education or to ensure correct postal codes on mail-in ballots. The speaker feels that the number of flips is weird.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And while there's nothing weird about judicial recounts, they happen in every election. What is weird about it is the amount of flips. As an example, in 2011, as far as I was able to find, there was one flip from conservative to NDP. Twenty fifteen, zero flips. 2021, '1 flip from block to liberal.
Twenty twenty five, we've had a number flipped to liberal. So that is incredibly odd that there are so many flips. And while there are some people out there who will say to you, you must be paid by Russia if that's what you're insinuating, that's ridiculous. No. We are human beings noticing a trend, noticing a flaw.
And if there is no malicious intent, we're at the very least calling on Elections Canada to do a better job of educating people or to do a better job in general of, I don't know, having the correct postal code on their mail and ballots. Yeah. Russia didn't tell me to say that. My brain did. So, if you're feeling kinda weird about that, I'm right here with you.
We will see how the rest of this unfolds.
@JasminLaine_ - Jasmin Laine 🇨🇦
In 2 minutes, CBC insults Pierre Poilievre, mocks him, defends Carney’s cabinet picks and reminds us how unbiased they are. Weasels… but they did just get a big payday from the Liberals, so get ready for even more of this! https://t.co/3oAf6Aw6qH
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to Speaker 0, Mr. Polyev stated he would not reflexively oppose the government, but support it when in the country's best interest, because he wants the country to succeed. However, he then spent fifteen minutes attacking ministers like Sean Fraser and Stephen Guildeaux for ruining the country.
Speaker 1 noted Mr. Polyev's approach suggests he won the election, not lost it. He will only be able to stand in defense of Canadians because of the Prime Minister's goodwill in calling an early by-election for him in Alberta, costing close to $2,000,000. Speaker 1 found it interesting that Mr. Polyev is going after Stephen Gabbeau, blaming Sean Frazier for the housing crisis, and wanting to fight the same political battles from the last campaign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And talking about how, he would not be opposing the government reflexively, that he would do things in the best interest of the country and support the government in those issues and that he says he wants, the country to succeed. He then spent the next fifteen minutes talking about all the ministers, who were there previously and the things they did to to ruin the country, naming particularly Sean Fraser and Steven Guildeaux, taking some questions about how he will approach things inside the house of commons. But but overall, you know, it started out in one tone and finished in another. That's all I'll say. Because he he he leaned into attacking the people that he thinks still represent, don't represent change, are still more of the Trudeau government, and particularly don't represent the things that he thinks Canadians want right now.
Speaker 1: Yes. Cabinet is broken, is essentially what he said. Right? It's not no longer Canada's broken. He's saying this cabinet has not changed.
A silent approach from Mr. Polyev, Rosie, that would suggest it's almost as if he won the election rather than lost the election and lost his own seat. You know, talking about how he's going to stand there in defense of Canadians, he'll only be able to stand there, actually, in the chamber behind him because of the goodwill of prime minister who's going to call an early by election for mister Polyyev so he can run-in one of his MP seats in Alberta at the cost of close to $2,000,000 to have a by election, all while he stays in Stornoway throughout this. So it's interesting that given that sequence of events and given those series of factors that it was that kind of approach and response to things there from Mr. Polyev, going after Stephen Gabbeau talking over the radical environmental agenda, blaming Sean Frazier for the housing crisis, which is Sean Frazier is in, I don't think he's 40 yet or he's just 40.
I don't think he caused the housing crisis in There's a whole bunch of layers and effects of that. But, you know, wanting to fight the same political battles we just enjoyed during the five weeks of the campaign and for the two years leading up to that. So, the pivot that people have suggested Mr. Hawley have kind of needed to made ever since Justice Trudeau left and Donald Trump came in, it's
Speaker 0: still