TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Jasper_Truth
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
NICOTINE DESTROYS NANOTECH! https://t.co/4hjojBOtBX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: They found thousands of microchips, nanotech, and show you in a video all the nanotechs in these shots and injections, including dental anesthetics. Then Rafa Calvin explains, "I'm now gonna do a test and an experiment, and I wanna see I'm gonna see if doctor Brian Artis's theory is correct." He takes organic tobacco leaf. He shows us. They actually boil water and for ten minutes put tobacco leaf in it and just steep the water. Then he takes the water and he drops it videoing the nanochips under the microscope. He then drops the water that has nicotine from the tobacco leaf in it. He drops it on there. And you should watch in this three minute clip, thousands of nanotech are just dissolved by the nicotine. It actually the nicotine in the water goes through the medium and literally grabs the the microchip and dissolves it, then goes to the next one, dissolves that one, goes to next one, dissolves that one. And not me. La Quinta Columnas research facility said, as showing the video of all nanotech being dissolved by nicotine, as I said, you should be looking at, they said, please share this video all around the world. There is no more important message or video that should be seen than this one for the whole world. It could single handedly protect all of humanity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And they found thousands of microchips, nanotech. And they show you in a video all the nanotechs in these shots and injections, including dental anesthetics. And then Rafa Calvin explains, I'm now gonna do a test and an experiment, and I wanna see I'm gonna see if doctor Brian Artis's theory is correct. He takes organic tobacco leaf. He shows us.
They actually boil water and for ten minutes put tobacco leaf in it and just steep the water. Then he takes the water and he drops it videoing the nanochips under the microscope. He then drops the water that has nicotine from the tobacco leaf in it. He drops it on there. And you should watch in this three minute clip, thousands of nanotech are just dissolved by the nicotine.
It actually the nicotine in the water goes through the medium and literally grabs the the microchip and dissolves it, then goes to the next one, dissolves that one, goes to next one, dissolves that one. And not me. La Quinta Columnas research facility said, as showing the video of all nanotech being dissolved by nicotine, as I said, you should be looking at, they said, please share this video all around the world. There is no more important message or video that should be seen than this one for the whole world. It could single handedly protect all of humanity.
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
Important guidance from Patriot Nurse: WHAT YOU SHOULD AVOID SAYING TO A DOCTOR. PatrioticNurse https://t.co/JjbF05mStP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Patriot Nurse discusses what you should never say to a doctor or healthcare provider and which topics require careful handling when interacting with the medical system. She frames these issues within concerns about abuse and corruption in health care, and emphasizes the power imbalance between patients and licensed professionals in the United States, where mandatory reporting creates a fear-based compliance system.
Key points she makes:
- Mandatory reporting and tattletaling: Health care providers with licenses operate under mandatory reporting, creating a system where “if you see something, say something” can pressure professionals to report patients. This contributes to a power disparity at vulnerable moments for patients. Providers are not gods, and they are human and flawed.
- Fifth Amendment-like mindset: Patients should apply a mental filter similar to exercising a fifth amendment right—do not incriminate yourself; you should not feel obligated to disclose information beyond what benefits you.
- Mental health history questions: Asking about a history of mental illness can label patients. If a patient has remitted or recovered, there may be little need to disclose, though many clinicians emphasize the need for a good history and physical. A patient has sovereignty to share information at their discretion, and real nurses protect patient confidentiality and trust.
- Firearms and weapons questions: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association advocate screenings for firearms in the home. Patriot Nurse argues these are political organizations and cautions that information about weapons in the home can trigger mandatory reporting in ways that could lead to child protective actions. She says you are not required to fill out such paperwork, you can leave it blank, strike through, or refuse; if faced with tech prompts, you can request a hard copy and refuse to answer. Do not incriminate yourself, and do not feel compelled to answer what you do not want to disclose.
- Parental dynamics and CPS risk: Interactions in the doctor’s office can influence family court involvement and CPS referrals. Family court is described as a major path for government control over children. Be cautious with statements in front of doctors about parenting, as it can lead to CPS involvement.
- Postpartum and pregnancy-related screenings: She stresses the vulnerability of pregnant and postpartum women and notes a trend to refer to pregnant women as “pregnant people.” She warns that postpartum depression screenings can lead to CPS involvement if a woman answers in a way that triggers concern. She argues honesty can be penalized and emphasizes practical support from friends and family (help with meals, chores, errands) and non-drug interventions such as nutritional and hormonal considerations. She calls CPS involvement “evil” when women seek help and are judged by skewed screening results.
- “Whatever you think is best” is dangerous: She warns against deferring decisions to clinicians, urging patients to ask questions and delay decisions if there is no immediate emergency. She stresses informed consent and the importance of thinking through options before acting, especially when a patient is ill or medicated.
- Self-advocacy and preparation: No one will care for you or your family as much as you do. The more you know, the more you can converse as an equal with healthcare providers, reducing power imbalances. She promotes her online courses (four- and seven-hour medical prep) to build knowledge, reading ability, and self-advocacy, potentially avoiding unnecessary care and enabling better conversations if care is needed.
- Caution about political biases in medicine: She references Charlie Kirk’s assassination and notes that some medical professionals, despite credentials, may hold hostile views toward conservatives; she urges care providers to align with your values when possible and to consider location and insurance limitations.
- Final encouragement: Reiterate your fifth amendment rights, stay vigilant, and share the information with others who might benefit. She signs off as Patriot Nurse, inviting viewers to use the information to shield themselves and their families from what she describes as a potentially malevolent alliance between government and health care informers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey folks, it's Patriot Nurse. What should you NEVER say to a doctor who is taking care of you? Anything you should avoid in particular when visiting a hospital or an office where medical providers are looking at you? Yes. There are definite things that you should avoid saying, and there are definite subject matters that you should broach very carefully when interacting with the medical industrial complex.
We're gonna talk about this today because there are major issues that are not getting talked about, and the potential for abuse and corruption by health care professionals is rampant, and we've seen it recently. We're gonna unpack these issues today. Let's get started. So the first thing that we have to understand before we go over these do not touch areas, these subject matters, these things that you should never say to a physician or healthcare provider. You have to understand that in The United States, most healthcare providers are under a mantle of obligation called mandatory reporting, meaning that effectively if you see something, say something.
Or if you think you might have possibly seen something potentially, then say something. That's effectively the bearing that is being put on people who have licenses as health care providers. So what this creates is effectively a fear compliance system by the government, by the state boards, local boards, to force people into tattletelling on their patients. This is something that's particularly disturbing because there's a major disparity in power with a patient coming to a healthcare provider seeking care at their most vulnerable times. There's no way that that patient can defend themselves against them for the most part.
And because of the state of affairs, health care providers with licenses after their name and, you know, nice pretty starched white coats, they are looked at in many cases as effectively emissaries of god in our culture. That a doctor would never lie. A doctor would never falsify information. A doctor would never utilize a patient's answers to enforce a political position or a point. So all of these things we know are are obviously not true, that physicians are not God, that health care providers are human beings and they are flawed, and in many cases, they are driven by the same basal instincts that really have caused a lot of people to end up on the foul end of government enforcement over the years.
So other things we're gonna discuss, this is a mandatory pre req that you understand that in the same way that you would view yourself interacting with law enforcement as having a fifth amendment right to not say anything unless you incriminate yourself. You really need to apply that same mental filter whenever you are going and interacting with healthcare professionals really in any case. Now on one hand, I recognize that the healthcare professionals who are listening to this right now, many of them are probably nodding their heads like yep, yep, yep, and then some of them are probably like Patriot nurse, how could you possibly disincentivize patients from reporting what's really on their hearts and what they're really struggling with? Listen, man. I'm here for my people.
I'm here for my followers, my subscribers, and my patients. And they have rights, particularly rights to protect them against goons and thugs who have letters after their name, who happen to be government agents and political hacks with licenses. So that's where I'm holding. I care about people having their rights protected, including rights protected from the medical industrial complex incestuously aligned with the government. So the first thing that you should be very aware of is any type of mental health questions, any type of questionnaire that would ask you if you've had a history of, for instance, mental illness, etc.
Now on one hand, if you are seeking care specifically from a licensed therapist or someone who you feel confidence is going to help you get onto a path of better mental well-being, then that definitely is a need to know place. But be aware that if you are going into the medical system and you're receiving care and you check for instance that you have a history of depression or you have a history of bipolar disorder, you have a history of x y and z, then what you're doing is labeling yourself. And in many cases, if for instance that you have seen remission or you have seen healing from these areas, there is no need to really in most cases, there's no need to tattle on yourself. Now, again, I recognize that this is flying in the face of what a lot of the medical professionals who are alongside me would say, so we need a good history and physical, we need a good assessment. You know, that good assessment is the basis.
Listen, a patient has the right to tell you what they want to tell you. You don't have a right to force people to comply with extracting out their information. A patient has the right, they have sovereignty, to give you the information about themselves that they wish, at the time that they wish, and only insofar as it benefits them. And if that patient has made the determination it doesn't benefit them, then they are not obligated to divulge sensitive parts of their past. So just a statement there of patients' rights advocates, that's what nurses do.
That's what real nurses do. Real nurses do not abuse patient confidentiality and abuse patient trust. So as we've talked about the mental health part of things, let's also segue into another one, and this is number two. This is firearms and weapons related things. Two of the organizations that I despise the most in The United States have decided to advocate that their members conduct screenings for their patients' entry assessments on whether or not firearms are in the house.
The American Academy of Pediatrics is one of them, and the American Medical Association is another. These are political hacks. These are these are political organizations masquerading as medical advocacy groups. But make no mistake, these people in particular, the American Academy of Pediatrics has really been a huge proponent of leftist policies, including gender transitioning and abusive mutilation of children. And, of course, you know, that's okay.
But asking a person how many firearms is in the house, you know, this this is something that we should really advocate for as well in their mind. The problem is this. When you've got this type of information, particularly in pediatrics admission assessments, the admission assessment is gathering information to determine A, if there is a risk, a threat to the child, but the other thing is depending on who it is who is seeing you, if they determine that there are firearms in the home and they also determine that for whatever reason the kid says that they're sad or that they don't get along with people at school or for instance that mommy and daddy discipline them in corporal punishment ways that are commensurate with scriptural tenants, I would might add, that they start to connect these things in their mind. Because remember, they're mandatory reporters. Right?
Right? If you see something, say something. If you think there's a possibility for something. So be very wary about what it is that you respond to, and in fact, there is no need to know. They do not need to know what weapons are in the house.
They do not need to know what firearms in the house. You are not required to fill paperwork out. You can leave it blank. You can skip it. You can strike through it.
You don't have to answer any of this. If they shove a tablet in your face when you go to the office or they give you one of those little says have this filled out before your visit, you still don't have to fill it out. And if they say, like like, for instance, if it gives you an error code, like, oh, like, you have to fill this out. Like, none shall pass without filling it out. If it gives you one of those error codes, then just show up early, like ten, fifteen minutes early to your appointment.
Say, listen, like, I'm having some tech issues. I'm probably gonna need a hard copy here or something else, and just refuse to answer that. You do not have to incriminate yourself. You do not have to give any information over any health care provider, really any person for any reason whatsoever that you don't feel comfortable doing. So don't do it.
The third is specifically related to issues of parental dynamics in the house. And when it comes to parental dynamics, this can be not just for, for instance, pediatric visits, but also for really any type of interaction, particularly where family court is involved. And so family court, for those of you who've had the unfortunate experience of interacting with it, family court is effectively the single biggest way where the government takes mandatory custody control and otherwise otherwise purview over children. That is the biggest method, I think, overall for the transfer of power away from parents and into the state when it comes to the raising of children is family court systems. So if you can avoid family court by not getting divorced, then that would be a good thing.
But also realize that whenever these dynamics show up, particularly in doctor's offices, it, in many cases, can end up lending itself to CPS calls. CPS is more likely to get involved in child protective services, they are more likely to get involved in homes that are broken. So just be aware of how it is that you interact and what you say in front of doctors, particularly their children involved. The fourth thing that I want to discuss is specifically postpartum related issues to women who have given birth and also in pregnancy. Now, if you'll notice here, I have specifically chosen the biologically correct, factually accurate characterization of pregnant women.
Because right now, one of the little trendy things that ACOG and the American Academy Nurse Midwives this trend right now is to call pregnant women pregnant people. Because apparently, like, a tenth of a thousandth of a percent of transgender people decide that they wanna get knocked up later with whatever percentage, you know, in it. None of this is relevant. Right? The reality is that a pregnant woman is in a specific and vulnerable position, and we should advocate for pregnant women and their rights.
Now what happens is when women get shoved into these particular the hospital model of pregnancy care and of delivery, they are put through a matrix of questions and really this gauntlet of things that they have to answer. And in particular, one of the things that you'll notice is that around the time of the third trimester and also postpartum, she will be given a question series to screen for postpartum depression. Now be very careful about this. On one hand, I think it's fair to say as a woman who has worked with other women in labor and delivery, I have also worked as a psych nurse, inpatient psychiatric, and I have also worked in postpartum care. So I've seen the whole gambit of this.
One of the things that we need to be aware of is that there are certain, for instance, contributing factors to postpartum depression in women, and they should not be ignored. They should be mitigated, and they should be worked with appropriately in a caring manner and in an empathetic manner. But what happens is when women are given these screenings, these little numbers to add up, if you answer these questions incorrectly in your doctor's office, and you happen to have some activist nurse who's looking at it, or an activist doctor or a physician who's some left ist activist who really loves to get CPS involved in things, if a woman gives the wrong answer on her postpartum depression screening form, she could potentially look at a CPS call. This is awful. This is evil.
Because when it comes right down to it, that woman is extremely vulnerable if she is experiencing postpartum depression. She's in a very vulnerable position. And what happens is honesty is penalized. And whereas a woman, for instance, let's say that she was just struggling with baby blues or she's just having a really hard time because she has no effective try because the West has said, alright, women, you've cranked out babies. Get back to work in six weeks and just, you know, shove all of your maternal hormones down.
Good luck trying to convalesce from all that. Your pelvic floor is probably gonna suck for about two years, but you'll get over it. This is what we expect women to go through with no emotional support and then wonder why they're depressed and then send a c p s call to take their children whenever they actually reach out for help. It's abominable. It's deplorable.
So if you are a woman or you know a woman, you know someone who is in her later part of pregnancy and postpartum, I would just recommend to you friends that the best thing that you could do is to reach out and actually help. And not like, oh, I'll come over and hold the baby, but make food, do laundry, fold laundry, be willing to run errands, grocery haul, anything that you can do to practically help. Because when it comes right down to it, there are things that can, pharmaceutically, mitigate postpartum depression, but so much of this is hormonal, it is nutritional, and it is a lack of tribal support. And the last thing that a woman needs who is suffering from all of the aforementioned in deficit, the last thing that she needs is some agent of government knocking on her door threatening to take her baby and her other children away. It's evil, evil things.
And it happens. Why? Because she honestly answers questions given to her by someone she trusts with letters after their name. Another thing that you should avoid saying like the plague is whatever you think is best. Oh, friends, let me tell you.
Whatever you think is best is like carte blanche for medical abuse. When you go into a hospital and I've made videos about this particular the hospital dark side. I'll put a link to that video up here. When you go into a hospital, unfortunately, because of the way things are, you really have to suspect that you are going to be on the defense, that people are going to be trying to intervene. They're gonna be trying to give you things.
They might be screwing up your medication. They might be not giving your family members the assessments that should be happening at regular intervals. They may not be bathing your family members in in the the times and and care that are indicated for them. So when it comes to delegating your thoughts and giving away your critical analysis to someone because they've got letters after their name, friend, don't do that. Don't do that.
Don't do that. When they ask, do you wanna do this or do you wanna do this? The thing that we should be thinking in our mind is, what questions do I need to be asking here? And is there any real pressing time need to finishing this decision process immediately. Delay.
Delay. Delay. I'm telling you. Delay. Delay.
Delay. Take your time. Take your breath. Because when, for instance, if you're being offered a procedure, being offered a drug, so much of your mind, particularly if you're not feeling well to begin with and if you're in the hospital because you are not well, your mind is not operating the way it needs to because you're sick, because you're not at your best. Why in the world would we expect patients to be best at advocating for themselves and determining what's in their own best interest instantaneously, particularly if they've got a whole bunch of drugs on board?
So you have to be able to give this is a big important word informed consent. And part of that informed consent is you saying, I'm gonna take a step back here. As long as there's nothing emergent that has to be decided within five minutes, let me reflect on this and get back to you. So rather than trusting someone, say whatever you think is best, reflect on it yourself, take some time, simmer down, process it, and then make the decision that's in your best interest. I know we've covered a lot of things today, but before we really wrap up, I want to drive a point home for you.
No one is going to take better care of you than you. No one is gonna take better care of you or your family than you are. No one is as vested in interest as you are. So what that means is particularly in a time and a place where we're in such dire straits from a lack of a moral compass and political division in The United States because of this lack of moral compass. When you are going into care, you really have to assume upon yourself the role of a secondary care provider for you or your family member.
This is one of the reasons why I have created the online courses, the four and the seven hour course, because that four hour course that I've made the foundations of medical prep, guys, if you invest the time and energy into taking that course, you are gonna be in such a better position, a, to read or care for yourself and to avoid having to go to see doctors and hospitals, etcetera, in the first place, but b, god forbid, should you actually need to go into care, you're gonna be able to converse on a more equal level with these people so that they're not talking down to you and you're not exactly sure, wait a what do they mean by that? What do those numbers mean? How did they get that? On what basis did they make this assessment? You're already gonna have learned this stuff.
So when you are interacting with them, you're now really narrowing that gap of a power deficit. You remember that power deficit that we talked about earlier? The more that you know and the more that you're armed with knowledge and the more that your skills are brought up to where they need to be, you are bringing that power back into yourself. You are reeling it back in. Woo.
Cast it away. Reel it back in. So by reeling that power back into yourself, you're gonna be in a place that you're not gonna be as intimidated as easily, and you're going to make better decisions because you can stop and filter through that line of thinking. One of the things that I think is the most important about the work that I've done as a course facilitator and as an educator over the years, and I'll I'll tell this to people in class, my goal is to teach you how to think. My goal is to teach you how to filter through the information that you're seeing and come to the best and most logical conclusions based on what you have learned and what you found.
So plug there for the class. If you haven't taken that class, especially the four hour one, the foundation's medical prep class, guys, for the price of that class, if it saves you one trip to the doctor, paid for itself, two, now you're at a profit. But really in the day that we live, I wanna bring this back for a moment into some of the things that we've seen from a political standpoint. Guys, it has not been that long since Charlie Kirk was assassinated, And the things that we saw in the aftermath, in the medical industry, doctors, nurses, physicians, health care providers, pharmacists, reveling his death, wishing that people who followed him, conservatives, etcetera, received the same. These people are sickos.
They happen to be educated. They happen to have letters after their name. But make no mistake, they're not magnanimous. They are not some type of give love to the world carte blanche. They happen to work in health care usually because it pays for their mortgage and pays for their golf courses and pays for everything that they need, but they are every bit the bleeding heart radicals who hate you and me.
And when you're going into care from people like this, you really have to be on your guard. And hopefully, you're aware of these persuasions and you are making your choices with who you're receiving care from accordingly, particularly when it comes to those people caring for your children, particularly when it comes to those people caring for for your older family members, but also your primary care providers and your family physicians that you see. It is very important that you find people who are aligned with you on that. And if you can't, because I recognize a lot of people who, for instance, live in rural areas or, you know people who have very limiting insurance plans, you may not be able to see the people that you like, to see the physicians healthcare providers that you like. So if you are in that situation, my advice to you hopefully that you'll have internalized after watching this video in totality.
Remember your fifth amendment the same way that you would interact with a policeman at a stop. You have a right to remain silent and you don't have to tell anyone anything that you don't want to. I am not by any means advocating shirking care for people or that people should not seek medical care when they need, but what I am advocating for is to be zealous in guarding your information and to be very much proactive and on the defense when it comes to interacting with people who are in a power advantage over you and to whom you are giving very sensitive information. So be aware of this, friends. Unfortunately, because of the times that we live in, I don't see this getting better anytime soon, but what we can do is to shield ourselves and to take care of our family members and really to self select out of the system.
That is the reason for this channel. That is the reason for the classes that I have taught over the years. That is the reason for the mechanism and the teaching the the teaching that I do in order to help people not have to jeopardize their safety and not have to put themselves, and subjugate themselves into a system that really doesn't have their best interests at heart. If you got value out of this video, friends, please share this with one person, one person who you know would benefit from it. One friend who you know, they might be in this situation.
Share it, friends. Wanna make sure that good people get this information and that they're shielded and protected from a potentially malevolent alliance between the government and health care informers who do not have their best interests at heart. Hope the video was a blessing to y'all. Have a wonderful week. For now, it's Patriot nurse.
Sign off, and I'll see y'all later. Bye.
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
DR. STANLEY PLOTKIN, GODFATHER OF VAXXINES 💉💉💉, UNDER OATH ADMITS THE TRUE HORRIFIC VACCINE INGREDIENTS! Must share for humanity to wake up to the truth! https://t.co/1yuymxADVS
Video Transcript AI Summary
Well, the polio vaccine does.
Yes, SV40.
Semien virus forty.
There's a pig virus present in one of the rotavirus vaccines, circovirus.
Calf serum is removed before the vaccine is used because you don't want to sensitize the vaccinee to cows.
Varicella vaccine was passage in guinea pig cells.
Do any vaccines contain egg protein? Yes, influenza.
Do any vaccines contain gelatin from pigs? Yes.
Do any vaccines contain MRC5 human diploid cells? Yes. Rubella, varicella, hepatitis A.
What are MRC5 cells? They are human fibroblast cell strain.
They were created by taking fetal tissue and from a particular fetus that was aborted by maternal choice.
WI38? Used to, but I don't think anything is made in those cells anymore.
Isn't it true that human DNA in vaccines is typically purposely fragmented? Yes.
This study involved 74 fetuses.
The Catholic church has issued a document on that which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact.
Are you an atheist? Yes.
When you were a child, what vaccines did you receive? Diphtheria, well, in childhood I think it was probably only Diphtheria.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do any of the vaccines on the childhood schedule contain monkey kidney cells?
Speaker 1: Well, the polio vaccine does.
Speaker 0: Are you aware of any simian monkey viruses, meaning viruses that come from primates that contaminated polio vaccines and infected individuals receiving the polio vaccine?
Speaker 1: Yes, SV40.
Speaker 0: And what does SV40 stand for?
Speaker 1: Semien virus forty.
Speaker 0: Okay. Was it the fortieth Semien virus found? Is that why it's called? You aware of any virus from any animal other than Semien or bovine that is in any vaccine?
Speaker 1: Yes. There's a pig virus present in one of the rotavirus vaccines, circovirus.
Speaker 0: Do any of vaccines in the childhood vaccine schedule contain blood serum from calves or other bovines?
Speaker 1: Calf serum is removed before the vaccine is used because you don't want to sensitize the vaccinee to cows. What is this? Vaccine excipient and media summary.
Speaker 0: Can you go to KINRIX on the first page?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: ETAP IPV. Do you see in the third line down it says calf serum? Do any vaccines on the childhood schedule contain embryonic guinea pig cell cultures?
Speaker 1: Varicella vaccine was passage in guinea pig cells.
Speaker 0: Do you know of any vaccines contain cow's milk in it? Derived
Speaker 1: from Oh, cow's could be casein, for example, could be.
Speaker 0: If there was casein in the vaccine, the child could become sensitized to that, correct?
Speaker 1: No, I'm not sure about that.
Speaker 0: You're not sure anymore about that. Do any vaccines contain egg protein? Yes, influenza. Do any vaccines contain gelatin from pigs?
Speaker 1: Yes. Do any vaccines in
Speaker 0: the childhood vaccine schedule contain human albumin?
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. What is human albumin? Human albumin is part of human serum. It's part of the blood that is liquid.
Speaker 0: None of it remains in the final product? Don't believe so. No. Because that could be problematic, right?
Speaker 1: Well, could be. I mean, if the individual is not healthy.
Speaker 0: Or if maybe some of the human blood components bind to some of the aluminum and develop antibodies, self antibodies, correct?
Speaker 1: If they develop antibodies against a serum component, that would not be good.
Speaker 0: Do any vaccines in the childhood vaccine schedule contain MRC5 human diploid cells?
Speaker 1: Yes. Rubella, varicella, hepatitis A. What are MRC5 cells? They are human fibroblast cell strain. They were created by taking fetal tissue and from a particular fetus that was aborted by maternal choice.
And the cells, the so called fibroblast cells were cultivated.
Speaker 0: Do any vaccines on the childhood vaccine schedule contain WI38 human diploid lung fibroblasts?
Speaker 1: Well, used to, but I don't think anything is made in those cells anymore.
Speaker 0: If you could turn to page three for MMR and MMRV. Do you see that within the ingredient list that lists WI38 human diploid lung fibroblasts?
Speaker 1: Yes, I do see that.
Speaker 0: Isn't it true that human DNA in vaccines is typically purposely fragmented?
Speaker 1: Yes. And I would say mostly for theoretical reasons doesn't want to put DNA into attack DNA into vaccines.
Speaker 0: Familiar with insertional mutagenesis? Yes. Do you have any study to show that injecting millions of pieces of human DNA into babies and children
Speaker 1: is safe? The only studies are all the safety studies that have been done on vaccines.
Speaker 0: Wasn't the purpose of this study to help develop a human cell line or to support the use of human cell lines in the creation of vaccines?
Speaker 1: The idea was to study the cell strains from fetuses to determine whether or not they could be used to make vaccines.
Speaker 0: This study involved 74 fetuses. Yeah, six. 76 and these fetuses were all three months or older when aborted, correct?
Speaker 1: Yes. What organs did you harvest from these fetuses? Well, I didn't personally harvest any, but a whole range of tissues were harvested by co workers. Okay.
Speaker 0: And were these pieces were then cut up into little pieces, right? Yes. And they were cultured? Yes. Okay.
Some of the pieces of the fetuses were pituitary gland that were that were chopped up into pieces too. Okay. Included the lung of the fetuses? Yes. Okay.
Included skin?
Speaker 1: Yes. Kidney? Yes. Spleen? Yes.
Heart? Yes. And tongue? I don't recall but probably yes.
Speaker 0: Are you aware that the one of the objections of vaccination by the plaintiff in this case is the inclusion of aborted fetal tissue in the development of vaccines and the fact that it's actually part of the ingredients of vaccines?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm aware of those objections. The Catholic church has actually issued a document on that which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact. And that I think it implies that I am the individual who will go to hell because of the use of aborted tissues, which Okay. I am glad to
Speaker 0: Do you know if the mother is Catholic?
Speaker 1: I have no idea. Okay. But she should consult her priest.
Speaker 0: Do you believe that someone can have a valid religious objection to refusing a vaccine? No. Do you take issue with religious beliefs? Yes. You've said that quote vaccination is always under attack by religious zealots who believe that the will of God includes death and disease?
Speaker 1: Yes. You stand by that statement? I absolutely do. Okay. Are you an atheist?
Yes.
Speaker 0: Do you accept that some people hold religious beliefs that are inherently unprovable? Yes, I'm sure they do. When you were a child, what vaccines did you receive?
Speaker 1: Diphtheria, well, in childhood I think it was probably only Diphtheria.
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
People laughed about this in 1972......hmmm if only we knew it was just preview ....😳🤨 https://t.co/lRzx3Jtk2z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Was ain't what it used to be. Things was cheaper—“You could get five cigarettes for tuppence then.” They don't make me fives anymore; people smoke more, I suppose. There were none of that then either. What? Cancer. It was all TB then. They can cure that now, couldn't they? Yeah. I suppose as soon as they can cure cancer, they'll think of something else to worry us with. My uncle Wilf used to say it was the government—“used to give us all these diseases... They put them in our food.” You can taste it in the water sometimes. That's chloride. They put that in to improve the water. It don't improve the taste. The only time the government's got any use for us is in a war. Rest of the time, we're an embarrassment to him; they only need so many of us to do the things that need doing. So they'd spray our food, put things in the water to keep us down. Well, they do it to rabbits. He used to grow all his own food. He only had a window box.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was ain't what it used to be. Mhmm. Nothing is, unless it's me getting older. Things was cheaper, though. Not cheaper.
You could get five cigarettes for tuppence then. They don't make me fives anymore, do they? Well, you never see them. People smoke more, I suppose. Yes.
People do seem to be smoking more since the cancer scare. Worry, I suppose. There were none of that then either. What? Cancer.
It was all TB then. They can cure that now, couldn't they? Yeah. I suppose as soon as they can cure cancer, they'll think of something else to worry us with. My uncle, Wilf, used to say he reckoned it was the government.
With what? Used to give us all these diseases. It's a bit tough, mum. They put them in our food. That's what he used to say.
You can taste it in the water sometimes. That's chloride. Oh, there you are. They put that in to improve the water. It don't improve the taste.
My uncle Wilf used to say the only time they've got any use for us, the only time the government's got any use for us is in a war. Rest of the time, he used to say, we're an embarrassment to him. Yeah. He used to say that they only need so many of us to do the things that need doing, and the rest they'd rather be without. So they'd spray our food, put things in the water to keep us down.
Well, they do it to rabbits. He used to grow all his own food. Everything? Well, all he could. He only had a window box.
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
His dad was an IBM executive. He stormed a live broadcast, claiming clones, CIA hospitals, and alien infiltration. Everyone called him crazy, but what if he wasn't? https://t.co/pzuyVCB8oo
Video Transcript AI Summary
An anchorman was handed copy on set from Gary, who was standing there. In 1981, someone with CIA connections warned the anchorman to stay off computers because they didn't trust people on computers. Calls from his parents led him to believe something terrible was going on, and he was forced into a mental hospital in Tallahassee. There, he learned his brother-in-law had been driven insane in the same manner someone was trying to do to him.
The control room was ordered to go to black, kill the studio mics, and put up a standby slide, but the anchorman continued to read with a gun to his back. After the statement was read, Gary Stollman placed the gun on the desk, and anchorman John Beard grabbed it. Stollman said he never intended to harm anyone, and the gun was fake. He may still face charges. He is the son of Max Stollman, a former member of the Channel Four news team. Max Stollman said he has a sick son who has been hospitalized and that he is thankful his son wasn't killed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pail order. Pardon me? What is this? Let me see what it says. Alright.
Alright. Well, let me read this. Folks, have we have someone on the set who's standing here and would like me to read to read this this this copy which was just handed to me. You wanna tell me your name or not? What is it?
Gary. And Gary, where are you from?
Speaker 1: At that point, the control room was ordered to go to black, kill the studio mics, put up a standby slide. But Horowitz continued to read, and the gunman kept the gun in his back.
Speaker 0: I was warned in 1981 by someone with connections at the CIA to stay off the computers that they didn't trust people on computers. Calls from my parents which led me to believe that something terrible was going on. I was then forced into a mental hospital in Tallahassee where I learned that my brother-in-law had been driven insane in the in the same what is it? In the same manner that someone was trying to do to me.
Speaker 1: Police who by then had entered the facilities made plans to deal with the situation. When the statement had been read, the gunman placed the gun on the desk and anchorman John Beard grabbed it. Ran to the floor. He has been identified as Gary Stollman and he said he never intended to harm anyone. Indeed, the gun proved a fake.
But Stollman may still face a variety of charges. He is the son of pharmacist Max Stollman, a former member of the Channel four news team reporting on medicine and related issues. Max Stollman said, I do have a sick son. He has been hospitalized a number of times. I am thankful he wasn't killed.
reSee.it AI Summary
A user questioned the legitimacy of Pope Francis, suggesting a significant revelation from Lionel Nation. Another user responded with a link to a video on a platform, hinting at themes related to the "Black Pope" and indicating the content is for entertainment purposes.
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
WAS P0PE FRANC!S EVER REALLY THE POPE? VAT!CAN BOMBSHELL EXPOSED! By the Legend Lionel Nation
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces Dr. Eric Thaddeus Walters to discuss Pope Francis's potential demise and what might follow, clarifying it is not Catholic bashing but a historical and governmental analysis. Walters refers to Pope Benedict XVI's biographer, Peter Seewald, noting Benedict spent more time in an "impeded see" than actively serving as Pope. Benedict hinted he might be the last Pope. Walters claims Benedict's papacy was usurped in a coup d'etat, resulting in an impostor.
Walters says Benedict did not properly abdicate, and few prelates complained for the right reasons. Gainsfine implied Benedict's actions weren't what the world thinks. Petitions were sent to the Vatican's Secretary of State to declare the Pope is truly dead. Canon law dictates a maximum of 120 cardinal electors, but there are currently more, potentially invalidating the upcoming conclave. A Sardinian cardinal was barred from voting, raising legal questions. The papacy is described as the world's only non-hereditary, elected, absolute theocratic monarchy. Walters believes Bergoglio's death was clean. Front runners for the next Pope include Turksen and Tagle, but geopolitical factors could influence the choice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The video you're about to see, the interview you're about to see, is in my humble opinion one of the most fascinating I have ever had the pleasure of being involved in and with. Not me, but my guest and my friend, Doctor. Eric Thaddeus Walters. A man of immune colossal knowledge, sobriety, And I use that in the the the serious tone regarding one of the most fascinating cases filled with intrigue, labyrinthine conspiracies. I mean, it is it is like like Mandelbrot's fractals.
You keep getting closer and closer and deeper and deeper, and there's more there. I wanna say one thing before we begin this. This is not in any way Catholic bashing. This is not about the theology, the the liturgy of of the of the of the faith. It has nothing to do with this.
This is the oldest, in essence, non hereditary monarchical theocracy in the history of the world. This isn't just some religious internecine battle among Catholics. This is bigger than anything you've seen. And the final word is, this goes to show you yet again, how, as is often the case, when something so great and so grand becomes made aware to the people, whether it's assassination theories or corruption, Americans and people think that there must be some tribunal that will jump in and correct it that says, hey. Wait a minute.
You can't do this. Wrong. Yet again, it goes to show you how so much can go wrong Unaffected, unavoided, unaltered. That is exactly what we're talking about. So my friend, I thank you for watching this.
Sit back and get ready for one of the most fascinating. And by the way, this a follow-up to a prior interview we did, and I'm going to have that link as well. For those of you who think you know about the papacy, or the Catholic church, or Benedict, or Bergoglio, or Ratzinger, get ready for this. Get ready to be mesmerized. The reaction to this gentleman was like nothing I have ever seen in my years.
Doctor. Eric Thaddeus Walters, professor, Maeste, the one and the only, joined us to give us a kind of a a bird's eye or or Vatican's eye view of Bergoglio prince, prince. Oh my god. Maybe that was a pun. Pope Francis' demise.
What happens next? And professor Walters, welcome back. And and I wanna just say a a preface. This is not Catholic bashing. This is not, you know, in fact, it's anything but.
This is an historical news review of the realities of a transition which affects the world and not necessarily just Catholics. So lest anyone thinks we're getting in the digs or talking about either the theology or the Eucharist or the liturgy or No, no, no, no, no. This is about a quasi, dare I say, governmental transition process. Would that be fair, Eric? This almost like quasi governmental?
Speaker 1: This is this is revolutionary. Oh, we'll we'll get to that. It's beyond that. It's this is the end of an epic.
Speaker 0: Okay. Tell us and just just one last word. Don't let me ask the question. I don't know anything. I am nascent regarding this.
Tell me what we should know, what insiders know, what, Romans know, what what your colleagues what the insiders know. Proceed, Okay.
Speaker 1: So once again, came up with a little outline. It's there's a lot to cover because I did I'm glad that the audience, the last time, enjoyed it. I personally went through all the comments and I was very appreciative of them and a lot of interesting follow-up, you know, questions that people had, So there's no way we're gonna be able to go through everything. So I'm trying to keep this limited to a few things. Maybe not to be salacious, but already off the a few interesting things that I actually did want to mention last time, but just we didn't have time.
So the premier biographer of Pope Benedict XVI, the German journalist, Peter and it's in English translation. I think the English translation is 'Final Conversations from twenty sixteen' and there's a lot of one liners and takeaways. So anyway, it's an interview format with Pope Benedict XVI, pretty much the last interview he ever gave, or at least published. One takeaway line is, the interviewer, the author Peter Seywald, asks him, and this is going on in the, what's called the, monastery Mater Ecclesiae in the Vatican Gardens overlooking Saint Peter's Basilica and the Sistine Chapel, which is where he spent the last ten years of his life. Also bear in mind, Benedict, you know, all the spin they put out immediately following his resignation his resignation, which was not a resignation as we mentioned last I explained last time.
Right. And the election of Dragojo. Part of the spin was, oh, you know, Benedict is frail, he's sick, he's ill. Well, for being so sick, frail, and ill, he spent more than half of his pontificate in an impeded sea. Nine years of that The impeded sea, again, he's a prisoner either of an external force or an internal force force, in this case, within the church itself.
Speaker 0: And and I'm sorry. Not to interrupt, but somebody might say s e e, the holy sea, the impeded sea, what is the s e e for Lenin and myself?
Speaker 1: Yeah, sure. It's where we get the English word seat from. There's a difference in Latin between a cathedra, from which we get the word cathedral, cathedra meaning the chair of the magister, the teacher in the classroom, or the magistrate in the courtroom, in this case the chair of Peter, meaning the Pope. Okay? So there's a difference though in Latin between a c s double e s e e, in Latin, seides, meaning a generic chair, could be any kind of a chair, and the cate bera is unique, specific, that chair to these these roles.
Okay. Okay. In any event, the interviewer Peter Sewald asks Pope Bennett the sixteenth, who was pope for ten years well, he used to pope for longer as an in an impeded sea as prisoner than he was actually doing pope, so much for that. Ten years he was in an impeded sea. And the interviewer asks him at a certain point, Are you going to be the last pope?
Pope Benedict the sixteenth respond quite frankly. He says, anything is possible. So that's one thing. The other thing is all
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Not to please. Just just impeded see when when Pope Benedict Ratzinger, the this the predecessor of Bergoglio Francis impeded see, meaning you are before transition or after before. Does that mean his his papacy was illegitimate? It was a nullity.
It was vacant. It was void. It was with an asterisk so that we understand what was his status?
Speaker 1: He was was usurped. His, his throne, usurped. Mean, to
Speaker 0: put it maybe coup. It was like a like a coup d'etat sort
Speaker 1: of It's it's it's a coup d'etat, and then you have an impostor, a usurper come in to just claim that. This, you know, like, of a Shakespearean drama or tragedy or whatever. You know?
Speaker 0: So so it would be, in essence, you have this impostor who came in and told the world I am, and nobody nobody, the the the white smoke, all of that, nobody spoke up, or did they? Everybody knew this.
Speaker 1: There were high ranking prelates at the time, both bishops and cardinals, not a lot, maybe half a dozen or so, who did publicly make statements to this point and to the effect that he was usurped, he was a coup d'etat, but nothing formally on the part of those who could have and should have done something, namely the pre-twenty 13 elected cardinals. That is cardinals created by either Pope John Paul the second or, Pope Benedict the sixteenth.
Speaker 0: And, again, not to not to I'm I'm violating my own rules here. The Pope Benedict Ratzinger did not die, did not, quote, step down. Can that be done? How is how is a papacy how is the secession or the the the terminus of a of a papacy, how is that accomplished thus allowing a vacancy and then the reelection? Is that even possible?
Can you do that without a pope being dead?
Speaker 1: Well, only unless the either the pope has to die Mhmm. Or, the pope has to properly abdicate, resign the office of being pope, which in Latin is called munus, m u n u s, munus. And Benedict did not do that.
Speaker 0: Okay. Interesting. So he and and and and and again, all of this is done, and nobody is saying, hey. Wait a minute. Wait a minute here in this thing.
If if somebody tried to do that with pope or even oh, listen to me, Paul. Trump or Biden, they would have been screaming, you can't do this. It would have been constitutional scholars. It was done. Under the radar with a tacit.
Say nothing. That's the part that blows my mind and others as well. They say, Eric, this can't be. You just you just you just don't go out there and nobody in Saint Peter's Square says, hey, hold it. Not one person, nobody on television, not not our our Cardinal Dolan.
Nobody, not did did Vigano or any of the other, heretics say who complained about this?
Speaker 1: Well, those that did complain, there were very few that did it for the correct reasons. Okay? Okay. There were others, many vegano, I think, could be placed in that category that did it for seemingly other and unproductive Okay. Counterproductive and perhaps personal interest being Okay.
Speaker 0: Grudges, axes to grind, purse animus, whatever. Okay. Yeah. Okay. Forgive me.
Proceed, sir.
Speaker 1: It's okay. Okay. So, so that's one thing. Another thing is when Benedict again did the Declaratio and in the aftermath and again repeated to the journalist Peter Sewell, who I mentioned earlier, he also mentioned, if anyone vaguely recalls when this all happened in February and March of twenty thirteen, Oh, the first Pope to resign in five hundred and ninety three years was a member. No.
Benedict said that, What I'm doing has not happened in over a thousand years. And he was referring specifically to the year 10/13 and his predecessor who did abdicate, but also for forced reasons, by the Holy Roman Emperor at the time. Was in the 10/13.
Speaker 0: Wow. And who is that, Praytell?
Speaker 1: Well, rather ironically, if not providentially, Pope Benedict eighth, at the Yeah.
Speaker 0: Cue the theremin. Wow.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Okay. And then finally, in this kind of more just a salacious part, guess, if you will, archbishop Gainsfine, whom I mentioned also last time, Pope Benedict XVI's personal secretary, now Archbishop he's done a lot of public appearances. He's very careful and measured with his words, but to his credit, this last year, 2024, he was thinking about giving a conference in a church in the North Of Italy, and he said to everyone, there's a few hundred people there, I guess, in the church, that what Benedict did is not what the world thinks.
Meaning? Implied. Wow. Preside. Yeah.
Speaker 0: This cryptic these these measured, almost like read between the lines. I think we had joked about, Jeremiah Denton, the POW, who was blinking torture when he was it it's as though he's the he is the person, the woman at the door when the police officer comes, is everything alright? And they open the door and there's a chain and she's trying to say, no. Everything's fine. Everything's fine.
So there are these signals, and and and you understood it. How many of your if if I walked around with you and talked to your colleagues and friends and those in the know, how many of you would say, oh, absolutely. Of course, that is. Of of course, that's true.
Speaker 1: A lot. Wow. The problem is everything happened so fast. Just, I mean, warp speed, you know, to wrap your head around it and to figure out what was happening in the first place, you know, again, analytically, you know, accurately, it took a little time and it kept taking time. And then, you know, there are questions posed to Prelates, it's just they avoid it, they don't want to know, nothing to see or move along kind of thing.
But now it's gotten a fever pitch in Italy.
Speaker 0: Really? Okay. Okay. That's what I wanna know. Because as you can imagine here
Speaker 1: No. It's it's fever pitch.
Speaker 0: Nobody nobody is saying, okay, wow.
Speaker 1: If you remember the Italian journalist I mentioned last time, Andrea Cionci, he's filed several petitions. He actually got he actually received in return from the Cardinal Secretary of State, Pietro Parolin, who just had, think, a heart attack a few days ago. I was very cordial thanking him for his solicitation. So there's been many petitions, etc, signed by thousands and thousands of people sent to the Secretary of State of the Vatican Holy See to address specifically all of these matters, and basically saying, You need to do what we discussed last time. You need to declare the Pope is truly dead, go into conflict with only the pre twenty thirteen cardinals, 20 seven, 20 eight.
I'll explain why there's a question mark over that number exactly in a moment. And do what you know you need to do. Again, some of the other canons I didn't we didn't go into last time also have to do with the cardinals have the obligation and duty to do this. That is, they can't just brush it under the rug. Mean, it's so
Speaker 0: And the pope is dead would be Bergoglio or No. No. Ratzinger.
Speaker 1: Ratzinger. Yeah. Bergoglio was an anti blood test. He's nothing.
Speaker 0: So so his so his death after his death and I'm I'm I'm so sorry. I'm a I'm a dunce here. But after anyway. After Ratzinger died in exile, in Elba, so to speak, after he died, you could have corrected it then by saying, alright. Let us take this, corrective measure here.
Say the pope is dead. Pick up where we left off. Even aft even after Bergoglio was already pope, could they have somehow fixed it, corrected that, that that glitch? Because they didn't. Am am I reading this right?
I mean or is that just forever?
Speaker 1: We've been stuck in this situation since 03/01/2013.
Speaker 0: '20 '20 '1, please?
Speaker 1: 2013. Wow. '21. So that's over twelve years?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And the amount of years would not be so this may actually be the longest time that I think it is the longest time such as the collision has ever occurred. But there's been several moments, you know, in the history of the Catholic church where same or similar situations have occurred, you know, several years without Pope. Again, what makes this unique is this is the first time this was actually a successful coup d'etat color revolution within the church and a usurper cognizant of very completely knowing what they were doing.
Speaker 0: Okay. So okay. So continue. I'm sorry, sir. I'm I'm interrupting.
Speaker 1: So yep. So there's been a couple since we last, did this, which was, I guess, about a little over ten days ago. There's been a couple of developments. One is that one is not really a development, there's already a number, I didn't mention it. Under again Canon Law, Apostolic Canon Law from 1983, the Apostolic Constitution from 1996, and then including a Motu Proprio in Latin, which means in my own way, but it's like an executive order on the part of the Pope.
That was under Paul VI in 1970, I forget which specific year, Adding to establishing the number of legal, licit, legitimate cardinal electors in the College of Cardinals at 120. Can't have any more than 120. You can have as little as three, because it's just a two thirds majority required to validly or legally elect the Pope, but no more than 120. And they were always very careful since then Paul VI, 1970s, all the way through Benedict XVI, to never put in more potential cardinal electors than 120 in the cardinal
Speaker 0: And today, how many are there? How many are there?
Speaker 1: There's a problem, big problem. This by itself, by itself, again according to the Canon law, will nullify the conclave which is supposed to begin in three days.
Speaker 0: How many are there now?
Speaker 1: There's a hundred and well, there's over 200 total problems.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute.
Speaker 1: Not stop. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. Several scores several scores of which are over the age of 80, and so we know they're not going to be voting.
Okay? Okay. But there's a there's a 35 of voting age. So they're 15 over the limit. Wow.
So number one, if all a 55 go into the Sistine Chapel as per church law itself, null and void, that's number one. Number two, if even just one post 2013 cardinal, meaning card meaning a cardinal created by Bibroglio, even if just one out of a hundred and eight. So he's created a total of a hundred and eight. 70 five percent of the College of Cardinals now. Even though not one of them is a legitimate legal cardinal, and they face actual sanctions on the part of the Holy See.
Like, serious prison time, if anyone does what they're supposed to be about them.
Speaker 0: Prison?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Potentially, theoretically. Serious sanctions. Serious sanctions. I mean, they could be, you know, it could be commuted.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. You know, there's
Speaker 1: something else. But they're stripped of everything. I mean, there is plagiarization. So, among other things. So, even if just one of those 100 makes bergolian cardinals, cardinals created under the K.
A. Pope Francis, anti Pope Francis, Even if just one of them sets foot in conclave, the conclave is null and void, once again. It's an illegally legitimate conclave. It can only be the pre twenty thirteen cardinals created by popes John Paul the second and Benedict the sixteenth, of which there's 27 or 28. Why 27 or 28?
Well, this is a development that happened. And this is a real this is, you know, this is like something out of a I'm not gonna use I'm doing my best to be careful and measure here. Just imagining your favorite mafia movie. Okay. Yeah.
Right. I understand. Yeah. There's there's a card Sardinian cardinal, last name Baechu, and he was created by Bergoglio anyway in the first place. Well, he took the place of the Australian Cardinal Pell, whom Bergoglio put in charge of basically the the the new entity responsible for cleaning up your IOR.
The Vatican Bank. It's usually euphemistically referred to. Okay. Cardinal Pell, the Australian who died a few years ago, also in interesting circumstances, we'll just say. Mhmm.
Yeah. He took the place of the guy before him that was in charge of this, put in charge of this by Pope Bennett the sixteenth, Archbishop Carlo Maria de Jano. Wow. Who was doing his job and doing a good job. And that's one of the reasons well, maybe we'll come back to that.
That's one of the reasons why then he was sent as the Apostolic Moon seal to The United States in Washington, D. C, basically the Vatican and Holy Seals ambassador to The United States Of America, because they were already being forced and pressured. Hope ended the sixteenth losing a lot of support and he wiggle room, you know, he couldn't it was it was it was becoming more and more confined already. Again, is all leading up to his declaration in February of twenty thirteen. Suddenly, I just lost my own thought.
Oh, so Baekhu, this guy, after Bergolio died, I think it was right probably right the day we did the previous interview Mhmm. Or in the day after he meets with the guy that just had a heart attack a few days ago, the Cardinal Secretary of State, Parolin. Parolin gives him a handwritten letter. It was typed out, but, you know. Right.
It says basic it's a it says that this cardinal Baetzhu, who had already been relieved of command, and that for a while he was also relieved of his any cardinalatial prerogatives, but then Vergoglio reinstated them. There's a lot of backroom to be able to go on here. But he was relieved of his command from, you know, investigating the transparency and financial activities of Vatican Bank, the Yor. And so the other so the last week, he says to so Parolin shows him this letter, supposedly Bergoglio had written. It says, you're not allowed to vote in conclave.
Signed f. So not even his not even his full name, Francis, just f. F. There's no date on it.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: And this this cardinal Beech, who says to Potawatim, his witness, the other people there, says, This is not legal. This is not listed. This is not valid. I'm not respecting this. Now what are gonna do?
And now suddenly, a few days ago, Farooq just had a heart attack or severe health problem. Don't know what exactly. Wow. Yeah. That's high drama here.
Speaker 0: Now let me stop for a sec. Let me stop. Okay. The work what the only according to what you're saying, the only me stop. Only a 20 eligible cardinals are able to vote.
Now you could have more who are 90, a hundred, but you up to the age of 80, you cannot vote after 80. You can remain your cardinalship or whatever the particular now Yes.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: You you can. You can stay on. You can have 500 if you want, but only the ones after 80, you stop voting. I did not know.
Speaker 1: You you, yeah, you cannot vote.
Speaker 0: 20 were there from Ratzinger excuse me, from Benedict and then JP Deuce. Right? Those two. They're with the other one. Anyone after that, any cardinal appointed theoretically by Francis doesn't count.
So the only ones who can and you can have a minimum, we say a quorum, if you will, a minimum of three and no more than 120 voting. They could be and they can't be in the room. Correct? You can only have a 20. So let's say there's 200 total.
The the the other 80 cannot be in that conclave. It can only be a 120 bona fide certified legitimate authorized cardinals
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Who can vote. And you say right now, of that 120, there's about a 35 who are attending attempting to vote.
Speaker 1: A 35. So that's over one and twelve. 15 over the limit anyway.
Speaker 0: Right. Right.
Speaker 1: And? And moreover, 108 were all created by Virgolio. Wow. This also unprecedented in history. He's the guy that's created the most cardinals in history who are not cardinals because he was not the pope.
So but anyway.
Speaker 0: So we have 27. Right? My my math. Roughly about 27 or 28, you said, who can actually vote.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And if you walked into to to the to the and by the way, if you had in that conclave any more than that 27 or 28 who were able to vote, does that nullify the validity of the conclave as well?
Speaker 1: Out of 108 Bergolian cardinals, even if one of them sets foot in the conclave with conclave is Abenizio de facto no one's word.
Speaker 0: Right. Now if somebody if I were to ask, theoretically, everybody in Rome or anybody who is conversant with the papacy rules to say, how many of you have heard this or know this? How many people would honestly say, yep. We know all about that. We're not saying anything, but Eric Thaddeus Walters is 100% correct.
How many do you think roughly would would acknowledge this?
Speaker 1: Of those who care?
Speaker 0: Yes and no. Correct.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I would say
Speaker 0: All of them.
Speaker 1: More than more than 50%. Wow. Wow. Wow. And Okay.
The the other where the other remaining percentage of whatever that would be are what you or what some might characterize as gatekeepers, whether they're in the media.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. Right. Okay. So where do we go now?
And what happens?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the con this so I'm going I I'll keep calling it an illegitimate illegal conclave because no one's done anything yet about it, begins on this Wednesday, May 7, in the morning. And so what will happen is in St. Peter's Basilica there will be a mass and then then they will well, then they and and all the cardinals will be there present for that, so that's over 200. And then if 135 go into the Sistine Chapel, Conclave null and void, but they'll do what they usually do.
They'll do the rounds of voting called scuttingi. There's a session in the morning and a session in the afternoon, and they do that for five days in a row, and if they don't come up with anyone on the fifth day, then they take another few days off to, I don't know, get in touch with the Holy Spirit or something, and then they go back into Conclave again for more rounds of voting. Now that's not happened in, I don't remember one last time, a long time. I mean, the last several elections have been done historically relatively quickly, anywhere from one to a few days and not even a full five days. So that starts on Wednesday, Wednesday morning.
But as I said, if if those 35 just one of the Bedolian Cardinals goes in, it's another illegal and illegitimate conclave. Okay? And so whoever they know and in the meantime, there could be fireworks. In other words, it could happen in the Sistine Chapel.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: You know, a proper drop down what do you call it? Down, drag out fight.
Speaker 0: Right. Knock down, drag out. Yeah. Yep.
Speaker 1: Knock down, drag out. Yeah. You know, who knows? So Now
Speaker 0: a couple of couple of questions here. First, you mentioned before somebody could be imprisoned or who because the the the first thing, Eric, people might be saying is, oh, this is just some internecine battle of Catholics. Who cares? Doesn't affect anything. It's a bunch of people in dresses and funny hats and pink shoes and red shoes.
And so what? It's bigger than that. This is not just about a Catholic church. It is about Yeah. What would you call it?
Almost like an an it's almost like ancillary to the monarchy. It's it's Yeah. To me, there's there's no explain that significance of what the papacy means.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the papacy, to put it in, those kind of, governmental political terms, is the world's only is the world's only non hereditary, elected, absolute theocratic monarchy, the king of which is the pope.
Speaker 0: Interesting. Theocratic monarchy. Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Non hereditary, although there is nepotism, for example, the Renaissance period, the border jocks.
Speaker 0: And there's monarchical. For example, one could argue that Iran, for example, people say, that's a theocracy or something. But that's not that's that's not hereditary. That's that's that's almost dare I say, a democratic theocracy there, you're voted or voted or I
Speaker 1: lost it. This
Speaker 0: is this is a different story altogether. So that's number one. Number two, what is the judicial review, if you will, process? If the pope is infallible, the pope is like the Supreme Court, our whatever the pope says is ipso facto by its very nature, correct. End of discussion.
Do you think that anyone could could actually bring this up? Has there been any kind of a civil war or anybody who told a pope you're doing something wrong or
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. Over history. Sure. Sure.
Speaker 0: Is it successful? Is there is there a tribunal that that could
Speaker 1: over overrule both? Yeah. Some sometimes it is. Sometimes it isn't. I know I I don't wanna get too lost.
And so these are these are all important, profound, deep and fascinating, time consuming questions. That's why it's so complicated, you know, to wrap one's head around one of them. Know, most recently, it was the first Vatican Council, eighteen sixty nine-eighteen seventy, when Pope Pius IX, the Church's longest reigning Pope ever, thirty three years, it was under him that Papal States collapsed into what we know today as Vatican City State. He issued what's called the dogma of papal infallibility. When the pope speaks ex cathedra from the throne, He's infallible in matters of faith and morals.
Right. And morals is an unfortunate and really inaccurate translation from the Latin morres because morres much more encompassing. It doesn't just mean ethical behavior. Means customs and traditions and all sorts of things. And if if anyone if you're any of your audience has ever heard of Lord Dalderg Acton.
Lord Acton. I think it his an institute who's his name after him.
Speaker 0: Oh, power cops, sir.
Speaker 1: He he's the guy that, at least in the modern period, coined that phrase, all power all power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: He he uttered those words to Pope Pius IX's face in December of eighteen seventy, trying to get him not to make this a dogma. Now
Speaker 0: a little background. My understanding, my pedestrian understanding is that Mussolini and the Vatican under Pius XI formed some kind of an alliance, the Lateran Treaty of 1920 And Because I find this interesting, like Mussolini, also Italy is with Libya and Because we in The United States, as you know, being from here, we're used to, we've been here, we've added on, but we don't have any serious questions as to how Arizona came about or who owns So this is almost like Harry Potter ish. What's that about Mussolini and the Vatican?
Speaker 1: So, I don't want to bore people with
Speaker 0: You cannot bore anybody. It's impossible for you to bore anybody.
Speaker 1: Okay. So the Vatican is the world's oldest, continuously still surviving nation state of any kind. It was formally established in the year July between Pope Stephen the second and the barbarian chieftain of the Merovingians at the time, a guy named Peppin or Pepin the Short, not to be confused with his relative, Pepin the Fat. So the barbarian chieftain of the Merovingians, whom the pope, the previous pope, or the pope invited to invade the Italian Peninsula to subdue two other barbarian groups, the Ostrogoths and the Lombards. Okay.
They accomplished this successfully in July, and that's when the Papal States begin, the sovereign, temporal, monarchical rulers of which are the Popes. It's also when European nobility begins because for his part, the pope grants Tuppepin and his two sons, Carloman and Charlemagne, the ancient Roman legal title of nobility, Patricius Romanorum or Patrician of the Romans. So this is when European nobility begins. If you think about the battered guy in England, all that stuff, you know, the wizards, that's going to be formally begun. Always under the pope.
Not because he's not actually not specifically because he's the successor of Peach or the Vicar of Christ, but because he's also the Bolt Viex Maximus, which we can come back to either now or a later time. That's long. Anyway, so and this lasts. So the Papal States then from that point until 1870, basically covered the central third of the Italian Peninsula. Okay?
During the so called unification of Italy in the nineteenth century, so for your American listeners, while the US Civil War was going on, was a civil war going on here, referred to as the Unification of Italy. By 1870, the Papal States had been collapsed into what we know today as 44 hectares or 110 acres of land, Vatican City State. And in fact, historians refer to this period between 1870 and 1929 coming to the Lateran Treaty as the Roman question. Wow. What do we do now with this Pope thing?
Because, you know, we got a lot of Catholics running around the world. So 1929, February eleventh, the same day Benedict made his Declaratio. 02/11/1929, the Lateran Treaty is signed between Pope Pius XI and dictator of Italy at the time, Mussolini, Benito Mussolini, establishing Vatican City State with all sorts of provisions for remunerations because of the loss of tax revenue from the Papal States Mhmm. And all sorts of other legalities and just things.
Speaker 0: See, but that's fascinating because the the one thing that we know and and one of the the interesting stories which folks, I think, forget, and I am not by any stretch of the imagination, a biblical scholar or historian. But one of the problems that Jesus posed to Pontius Pilate was, Who's this guy? We don't like somebody within the confines of our jurisdictions claiming not only allegiance with a bunch of people who can turn against this and some kind of very powerful, if not supernatural. We don't care for this. So Mussolini and others had to realize we had to do something about these folks.
We have to mollify them, contain them. It's almost like containment theory, we did with NATO and Soviet Union. So that's something interesting because if anybody thinks, put it this way, there is no, and you would agree, with all due respect to our brothers and sisters who were Jews or Lutherans or Baptists, there ain't nothing like Roman Catholics. It's an army. Also, not to be parenthetically abstruse but the Jesuits are of of which I went to to a Jesuit high school and that's all I know.
From Ignatius Loyola and admirem Doria, the admirem de Iglorium and the Society of Jesus and that is something which is another another story. Black popes and it is so if if you love I don't wanna keep saying Harry Potter, but but Byzantine mystery mysterious storylines. It doesn't get better than this. There's nothing like it. Nothing.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Truth is stranger than fiction. I find anyone.
Speaker 0: So another question, Eric. By the way, dear friend, thank you for this. You. Is there any question or any suspicions as to the cause, if you will, of the death of Bergoglio? Any anybody is is was that a clean death as we say?
I
Speaker 1: think so. Yeah. I don't think there's any funny business there. There were a lot of theories and speculations going around, you know, in the months prior.
Speaker 0: If you had to if you had to handicap, if you were a betting man, is it even possible when I see CBS Morning News or somebody saying, Who's likely to be? You don't know anything about, Oh, there seems to be an unusual number of, again, is layman, African, black, nontraditional, non European, non Italian. How is that met by more of the traditional folks? And if you had to pick who would be the next pope and you were a betting man, what's the inside skinny? What does the inside line say?
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, I don't in fact, I have a I have a friend here in Rome. He's Irish. We just he he sent me the betting, you know Yeah.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: Like, patty power, that kind of thing.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Just yesterday. The big the big front runners are two I mentioned last time. Turksen from Africa, he's from Ghana, Tagle from The Philippines, they're both Tagle is very he's the second youngest part of the period, and they're both legitimate pre 2013.
Speaker 0: Okay. Good. Good.
Speaker 1: But they're both very, you know, you the people would characterize them as being progressive, liberal, that kind of thing, among other things. I'll just leave it at that. Yeah. The other big front runners are the Secretary of State, Parolin, who just got really ill the other day. There is an American, but he's not a he's not a sitting ordinary bishop in The States.
He's actually an Curia here known. His last name is oh gosh. Let's look at my mind right now. For a couple of there were a few days where O'Malley's name of where is O'Malley in Boston? O'Malley's name and, Dolan's name were being
Speaker 0: way they're gonna pick an American. There's no way. You I mean, is that true?
Speaker 1: I have a I have a theory that could be very weird, but would still not solve the issue. But because of the geopolitics involved, I started thinking and wondering about it, and I could see where that could make sense, given what's happening on the world geopolitically now. But still, I don't think I don't really think it's
Speaker 0: There is a meme, a kind of the this memetic that's being published. And it's smoke of the rainbow color. Meaning they're laughing. The next pope is going to be another progressive. We're gonna see nuns as priests.
It's gonna be complete and total. What's what's your your take on that?
Speaker 1: Probably.
Speaker 0: Oh, no. Where is this coming from? Where is Who is behind? Oh, and one more thing. One more thing.
Did you ever hear the story? And I've heard this just maybe as a drive by. I'm hearing this that Bergoglio, Francis, every day called up the pastor or a priest a Catholic church in Gaza, which infuriated Israeli officials. There was some kind of a Have you heard about that?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. No. That's true.
Speaker 0: What's the story behind that? And how does the Oh, and and also Bergoglio's past and juntas and death squads and living Listen, J. P. Deuce, when he was a young man, this guy, he had girlfriends, he was an actor, he probably killed people. This dude was not some monastic choir boy, from what I understand, which might be kind of good.
But how much of that affected Francis? And what's the relationship between the the the papacy and Israel, Middle East, Gaza, Palestinians, as far as you know?
Speaker 1: Very tense. No. From what I understand, Israel itself forbade any diplomats or representatives from coming to Birkoglio's funeral. Wow. You know, also people in the which is obviously a whole other issue even though it is related,
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: You know, what's happening what's happening in Palestine is a little bit you Everybody thinks, oh, they're just a bunch of nutty well, I shouldn't say nutty. They're just, you know, Muslim, Arabs, Muslim, there as well. Because
Speaker 0: Christians are under attack. Christians around the world. This is serious business. I mean, not just necessarily in the quote. Middle East has become kind of a code word for Israel or Palestine or whatever you want to call it.
But Christians, Now remember, the papacy deals not exclusively with Catholics, though that is certainly a great force of interest. But the notion of Christians under attack, there's a very serious undercurrent of problems here that the pope or the papacy should or maybe have attempted to address. Have you heard anything along those lines?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, that's you know, you can bring China into the mix because this is another big issue. Just within a couple of years after Virgilio was elected, installed, he sent yeah, it's also kinda going back to how to you know, what are some of the motivations or the factors that led to all this in the first book. So we mentioned the Sanctagalan group before. Mhmm.
Yep. The Mafia. Specifically, the now deceased Cardinal McCarrick. Yep. Yep.
And Virgilio Made McCarrick, his liaison back and forth between the Vatican and the CCP to strike a new treaty with the CCP, which has never ever been made public, which is another big problem.
Speaker 0: Problem how? How because it has been made The what what's the problem per per per se?
Speaker 1: That no one knows what's involved. No one knows what it's about.
Speaker 0: But isn't that good that they're speaking? Isn't that good that they're Sure.
Speaker 1: Sure. Of course. The prob but the problem is is number one, and it's been it's it's it was renewed in 2018. So I think that's four, five, six years after the first treaty was ratified between the two, but again, not actually because it's now in void, but whatever. Mhmm.
It was renewed again in 2018, so precisely because the contents have not been made public. Imagine The United States, you know, I don't know, the president of The United States signing a treaty with China, and they just say, don't worry about it. We're not gonna publish it. We're not gonna make it public, but, we'll take care of her.
Speaker 0: But it's a It's almost like Nancy Pelosi who said we don't know what we signed until we passed the law. Now let me ask you another stupid simple question. Out of this entire is a Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, claims to be a Catholic and has always been very, very strong. Said that
Speaker 1: He was Russian Orthodox. Was Russian
Speaker 0: Now that's the question. They said that when he was in the KGB or FSB, he put his badge away. Accepted. He was very devout. The West, we say, oh no, no, no.
Even Cathcart, no, no, no, no. Don't believe that for a moment. I've never heard how a lot of people can look into the heart of somebody and determine the legitimacy of their transformation. What Eastern right? Eastern what does that mean?
Speaker 1: Orthodoxy?
Speaker 0: Yeah, compared to plain old Catholic. What does it mean?
Speaker 1: I mean, it's basically the same thing with the trappings are slightly different, the liturgy is slightly different, the language is different.
Speaker 0: Does the Pope You
Speaker 1: mean the Pope in Rome? Yeah. Well, that's it's a political. Over the centuries, theologians and historians, it's going to be using theology somehow to justify all this, and they can't. It's all political, and it goes all the way back to the fourth century when Constantine moved the capital of the Roman Empire from Rome to Byzantium, which he named Nova Roma, New Rome because it has to reflect Rome after his death, it was ever after remembered as Constantinople, the city of Constantine, now Istanbul.
And so it goes all the way back to then. It was a fight, a battle between the political, between Constantinople as the new capital and Rome. And all sorts of theological justifications, ecclesiological justifications have been attempted over several since. None of it works.
Speaker 0: Are they correct? Because we have, of course, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Eastern, Armenian. We have all of these. When I was in Jerusalem in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, which is as holy as you can get, the individuals, there was something called the status quo. It was an understanding of who ran the concession because it was not only the site of Christ's crucifixion, but his burial, his tomb, where the rock was.
And I saw people with beards and not cassocks, but vestments and hats. I'm thinking, right, who are these? I never knew the flavors and
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like to be old.
Speaker 0: Oh, it is It's like
Speaker 1: to be old.
Speaker 0: It was interesting also, you'll get a kick out of this when the Protestants said, Hey, listen, can we get in on this? They said, Excuse me? They said, No, no. And they came up with Calvary, not Gethsemane or whatever the, I don't know, but they came up with their own version of it because you have the Coptics have the concession for this. This one's got that.
And it's almost like a, I don't wanna, please, I don't mean to be, it's almost like a food court. You know, you have different
Speaker 1: people over
Speaker 0: here and really and you have people running the show and it is as a person who was a a a retired Catholic and not in any way spiritual, there was an energy in that place.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe put
Speaker 0: on from reflected from the hearts and souls and of other people, but it was something that I shan't forget. But is is it safe to say that Vladimir Putin is a Catholic?
Speaker 1: Well, he's Russian Orthodox. So in other words, the problem So the split, split, the first, there's been two schisms, ruptures within the one Holy Catholic Apostolic Church. The first was in the year October, when the Pope at the time sent his emissary ambassador, the French Cardinal Hubert or Humbert, sounds better in French, to Constantinople to issue a papal bull of excommunication against the Patriarch of Constantinople and the Emperor of Constantinople because of the issue or an issue regarding what's called the Fediocle Clause. So Catholics who practice or whatever, when you recite the Nicene Constantinopolitan Creed, become of a certain part, we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord will give our life and proceeds from the Father and the Son. Well, that was never in the original Ecumenical Council, the First Council of Constantinople in March that issued that proclamation.
It just said ex patri or from the Father, out of the Father. And the Son part was added. Now it's a logical consequence. Theologically, there's not it's a fact, I mean, in this internal aberrant of But it was then weaponized politically. It was politicized regarding the political struggle back and forth between Rome and Constantinople so that everything came to a head in October, when this Cardinal Umberg, with the papal bull ex communication, marches into Hagia Sophia on Easter Sunday while the patriarch is about to consecrate the Eucharist Wow!
The Mass, okay, And he slams on the altar the papal bull of excommunication, and the patriarch immediately it was kind of like an F me, F you moment.
Speaker 0: Yeah, right.
Speaker 1: The patriarch issues verbally, publicly in front of everyone, Hagia, Sofia, Cathedral, Istanbul, Constant over there. We call it a double excommunication. And they immediately justified. They that both sides agreed to immediately pretend like, well, that never happened. Why?
Well, because unbeknownst to Cardinal Humbert, it took him two weeks on a boat to get from Rome to Constantinople. And in the meantime, the Pope died. Here we are. Remember that? Say that
Speaker 0: Uh-oh. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The bull of excommunication he was bringing was null and void.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: On the patriarch's part, they said they never included they excommunicated the Western church, meaning the Roman Latin church, just the Cardinal Humbert, his entourage, and the pope who was dead. So, you know, they canceled each other out. But, anyway, on a grassroots level, it was too little too light. Sorry about that.
Speaker 0: There is a there's a couple of things here. Just just in terms of the the trivia and the specifics. When I was in Catholic school, we did the sign of the cross like this, to the left and to the right. Putin and Eastern will do it the other way, right to left. That's one thing, That's like sometimes a friend of mine who is a Muslim, said, What's the difference between Shia and Sunnis?
He said this or or that. Anyway, it was something with a hand. It was a kind of an inside joke. I didn't get it. That's number one.
Number two, when you talk about Protestants, because I love to ask Protestants, what is it between you and a Catholic? What's really the difference? And they can't answer the question. And a friend of mine, one time we were at a, I mean, I've told you this, we were in a a friend awake of a friend of mine in the Catholic church and my friend who's Jewish said, you know, I've never been in a church before. I said, let me show you something.
I said, you know, you can tell if you're in a Catholic church, look at the altar. You see that cross? If Jesus is on it, it's Catholic. It's a crucifix. If Jesus is off, it's Protestant because Protestants emphasize the resurrection.
Catholics not focus on but it's the the passion of Jesus and the Christ. Stations of the cross. Different emphasis. Mel Gibson's Passion of the Christ, or as my friend calls it, Good Friday the thirteenth, because it was like a snuff film in terms of the horror. This is also Mel Gibson's own mind.
He devoted maybe ten seconds to the resurrection. The focus was on the passion. Now that is an extremely crude version. But even, oh, and one more thing. I mean, Mel Gibson's father, Hutton, who's an Orthodox Catholic, hated Vatican II, loathed it.
And I think it was Ron Cali, twenty third, who removed the perfidy of the Jew or something from the Easter because they had their, quote, antisemitism was, from their point of view, it was the Jews, they were those who fomented the requirement or the demand for the crucifixion versus Pilate, who did it himself, who was told he was basically a governor. Now I just threw 50 facts at you, all of them wrong, stitched together so stupidly. But don't you find the little nuances huge in terms of what makes one sect what it is and the other is not.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Sure. You know, I would say between most Protestants I
Speaker 0: hear you. Yeah.
Speaker 1: If I hear you. Okay.
Speaker 0: Sound great?
Speaker 1: You know, the the the specifically to that, the passion of Christ, the emphasis on the crucifix, it has to do and Michelangelo actually, brilliantly, Michelangelo, captures this in the altarpiece in the Sistine Chapel, talking about the concord to elect the Pope, Last Judgment scene. Visually responding to so he's painted this just a couple of decades after Martin Luther posts his 95 Poses in 1517. So he's having to respond to the two pillars of what become referred to as the Two Pillars of Protestant sola fide sola skritura the second one sola skritura by scripture alone The previous one Sola Fide. All you have to do is say, I believe that Jesus, you're my Lord and Savior and you're saved. Well the Catholic church is responsible because that's kind of a duh, no duh position.
Yeah. That's like, and? You just keep it there, or you're going to do, you're to take the ball and run with it then. So the idea is that if one wishes to share in the Resurrection of Christ, as a disciple, one must share in the life of Christ, which includes ultimately suffering and death.
Speaker 0: Precisely. And you aren't necessarily guaranteed. You know, it's funny how sometimes Protestants will laugh that the Catholics can just go in for confession or reconciliation, whatever it's called now, And then that's it. To which I respond, well, you think that all you have to do is be saved. Catholics say, that's part of it, your life, your addition of St.
Peter. Are you worthy? They don't have the notion of purgatory. They don't recognize Mary. They don't recognize I believe that for you to understand the differences in the faith actually concretizes your faith even better because you have to know what you believe in.
You just can't say it's not like being a Yankees fan. All you gotta do is buy a ticket, show up, and know when to root. It's not like that for you to connect yourself. And if those watching, and I forgot to say this, Professor Walters here gives the most exquisite tours of the Vatican, his organization, his site, Vati Land, which we will have here, is look at what he knows. Have you ever said in your life, I don't know.
Beats that all out of me. I don't know. You've never shown. Either that or you're just making it up, which I kid, of course. I know you're not.
But your encyclopedic knowledge of this, is this part of your academia, your academic studies, your academe? Or is something else? How do you know?
Speaker 1: No. It's pretty well, I have no life.
Speaker 0: You should be a cardinal.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You'd be It's just a lifetime. Know, I take a cue from The better the teacher, the better the student. Never stop being a student. You never stop learning.
You never stop wanting to learn. You never stop humbly admitting when you're in error, inaccurate, imprecise and trying to be more so. And it's a constant process.
Speaker 0: I think, though, the thing that is the most important is that look at all of the rules. I always go back to this hypothetical of somebody from another planet who comes here and I'm saying, Listen to this man. There are scholars, just like in the Yeshivas, and there are Jewish scholars study the Talmud and the Torah, they spend their lives dissecting questions of hypotheticals. The amount of lore, doctrinal history is mind boggling in terms of just a Catholic church. And yet, just like in our case, it's amazing what you can get away with.
Think about assassinations, think about coup d'etat, stolen elections, whatever your particular affiliation is. We believe that whenever there is some type of a blatant error, that somebody rings a bell and it stopped, that there's some internal dead man switch that says, Oh no, you don't. You can't do this. Surely somebody is going to find out and complain and call the papers. They know nothing about it because they're lulled into this Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a five alarm fire in Italy. Again, Cholamchie, who might be helpful if you want, I know he'll be fine with it. He has a lot of, you know, why reinvent the wheel? He has a lot of good, in English, little mini videos. There's three in particular I can send them if you want, maybe you want to attach them to the bottom of this.
Just explaining a lot of graphics so it's very visually helpful for people because there's a lot to wrap their mind around, I realize. So that might be helpful. But there's a five alarm fire, mean, you know, everybody's kind of panicking and really worried, those who existentially care about this stuff, here in Italy, as we ramp up to Wednesday. And it's not the end of everything, but it's kinda like, can there be a comeback? And I'm gonna wait.
I was gonna I was gonna do it now, maybe like a drop of last final bomb. I'm not. Let's wait and see what happens. Okay. And then whatever does happen, I'll give you an update and Oh, please.
Where things now would stand at that
Speaker 0: point. It be important to me to ask you, are you a Catholic yourself?
Speaker 1: I was baptized the Roman Catholic.
Speaker 0: Okay. That's all. I'm just curious because it would be for me, for example, if I were to be some expert of, let's say, Jewish lore or somebody says, What are you Jewish? No. But then again, you don't have to be a woman to be a gynecologist.
That's a bad example. But I'm just curious because I have respect for I mean, if I can study the history of France and live in this country, it's the study the naked study of the of the of the history, which is so fascinating to me. What is your expertise? You you are a professor. What do you teach?
Speaker 1: Well, I've taught the courses over the fifteen years. I've taught Latin, I've taught ancient Roman history, comparative world religions, courses in the New Testament. But over the past several years, two courses in particular have become very popular. One is called The Popes of Mystery of the Catholic Church and the other is called Mystics, Saints and Studied in Medieval Catholic Theology. So I mentioned last time my CV, so if your audience didn't watch that previous interview, they can go back to the beginning where you asked me about my CV.
Right. Within all that, my Ph. D. Thesis was in something called philology, the theological aspect is called something called ecclesiology, which is the logical rational principle of this thing we call the church. The structure of the church, its governance, its formation, its grassroots, everything.
Speaker 0: And philology is almost like a love of knowledge.
Speaker 1: An intimate love of logical, rational principles communicated via words. In other words, what does a word really mean?
Speaker 0: Why is Latin important? Why would you advocate learning it? What does it do?
Speaker 1: Yeah, both Latin and Greek, but just for Latin's sake. Mean, number one, it's what every modern Romance language, but also English, which is now the ironically lingua franca of the world Mhmm. Is based is based on. It's what allows English to be, in my opinion, the premier language to communicate in in the world, phonetic alphabetized language, because it has a vast, vast vocabulary. And the study of Latin, number one, it disciplines the mind to think critically, logically, rationally.
Mhmm. Just the going about learning it. And number two, it suddenly opens up, you know, once you understand what a word really means, it completely opens up your horizon and makes you understand things in a very different light.
Speaker 0: When I went to a Jesuit high school, I took Latin and I found out a number of things. First, it was to me the ultimate FU to my friends with their Spanish and French. I don't need this. Everybody else said, that's number one. Because we we we also thought we were just different.
Right. There is a sound to it. There's something. It sounds almost everything sounds profound. And the Catalina How are we going to put up with it?
But it was an even profound the pledge of allegiance. Notice I say, vexolo. I speak classical Latin, not that churchy. What's your phrase for church Latin?
Speaker 1: What is it called? Spaghetti Latin.
Speaker 0: Spaghetti Latin. Spaghetti Latin. Yeah. And also, I know most people get who and whom and correct. This teaches you.
When you talk about plupers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, grammar.
Speaker 0: Yes, grammar. In order for you to speak and when you speak any language where the adjective comes after. You go through the sentence and then at the end, I was like, I'm making all this stuff out of the way and now I'll worry about the descriptors. The dative case and conjugation of verbs. And aside from that, I loved it.
I never, ever, ever. And you don't have to necessarily know something to open up your mind and to stretch it. I always give the analogy of somebody who's about to run will put themselves into contortions that they will never mimic or replicate during a run, but being able to So, Latin is just It's well worth the effort as far as I'm concerned. Maybe I'm biased.
Speaker 1: Right. Yeah. No, no, I 100% agree. My doctoral research was on the, what we call, well, just an analysis of one word in Latin from the first time it appears in the Latin language until the time of Constantine, the word being unitas, meaning oneness. And this is how the ecclesiology, the structure of the Church comes into play, as well as the Trinity, Trinitarian theology, all sorts of stuff.
It's useless to mow the lawn. You want to uproot the weeds. And so that's also part of my approach.
Speaker 0: Is the shape, the attitude of Rome to live in Rome based upon what you've seen? The crime, immigration, the attitude, the flavor. What's Rome like now? When in Rome?
Speaker 1: Alright. Yeah. You know, correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but Right. And it's not it's not it's not just me, a lot of friends and colleagues, peers, acquaintances. It's I you know, strangely enough, since 2013 and very recently now, I don't like the feel.
Speaker 0: Isn't it something how the derivative effects of something seemingly it's the old butterfly wings and how something seemingly disconnected can affect, can trickle down, to use a Reagan term, I guess, into effect. I feel exactly the same way. We have a thing here in New York, this notion Giuliani provided or made it popular was it's the broken windows effect where Wilson and whatever had this idea that if you have a neighborhood where there's always this one storefront with a broken window and it's never fixed, it gives people the impression people don't care about it. Whereas you go after little pieces of crime and it shows people they mean business. So little things, 100%, What about the notion of heterogeneity?
Some people are suggesting that when you have influxes, and they always focus sometimes on African, I think there might be, I don't want to use the word racist, but put it this way, other non Roman white Europeans don't catch their attention. But what happens when a culture, perhaps by virtue of dilution or I'm not gonna use words like contamination, but what happens when the Roman culture and the Italian culture and the way of life, when it is affected by influxes non Roman?
Speaker 1: There's a point where you reach, what would you call it, supersaturation, over saturation levels. And maybe it can be repaired, maybe not. So that's where we're at here.
Speaker 0: Well, Eric Thaddeus Walters, Professor Eric Thaddeus Walters, I will have everything in the description portion up to and including the link from last time. I will put your YouTube channel. And if somebody wanted to enlist your services for Vatty land to get a you are make people understand this. You're just not some dude with a little sign that says tours. Are certified.
Explain your bona fides when it comes to giving
Speaker 1: Yeah, well again, going back Yeah, when you asked me about just how do I have all this knowledge and stuff, number one, I never stopped learning and studying, doing my own research, continued research trying to publish stuff. And number two, just because of, you know, all of that, the amalgamation over time of both doing it simultaneously while, you know, a postgraduate student, and it just kind of snowballs forward and never ends. It's just that so, you know, Vatican Blue does.
Speaker 0: But you are also given some kind of a distinction, are you not? You have some type of a Yeah,
Speaker 1: Vatican Vatican Blue Guide does. So there's thousands and thousands of guides all over Italy. Here in Rome, there's at least a few thousand legitimately licensed guides because here that's a big deal, you have to if you want to do it and not have problems, have to be licensed somehow. You can be licensed by a province, meaning like a county or a city or something like that. In this case, it's the Vatican itself.
Vatican blue eyed docents. In Italian, it's called or didactic operator, but it sounds more clear and clear to
Speaker 0: So you are you are a five star
Speaker 1: I'm not the only one, but yeah.
Speaker 0: Still, you have five star platinum diamond gold. Last question. As you can tell, I'm perennial liar. I always say, last question for about five or six times. Are you ever gonna come back to the Are you permanently Or do you consider yourself a Roman, an expat?
Where do you fit into this weird world that we live in?
Speaker 1: I I think I'm a stranger in a strange land wherever I go. I mean, you know, Rome Rome Rome really is Rome really is home. Last time I was physically back, set foot in The States was eight years ago, and that was for five days. And the time before that was eleven years earlier, so I don't get back much.
Speaker 0: And you couldn't wait to get back as soon as you when you first
Speaker 1: Well, used to ask me, you know, do you what do you miss from The States? And I I said Popeyes. And then the last time I went back the last time I went back, I was I had a layover in the Detroit Internet in the Detroit Airport. And I was in the international terminal, so I started the Popeyes, let's try that up. And it was not as I remembered, so I was disappointed.
Speaker 0: Yeah, the dirty rice just kind of loses its pronoun. I also love to if ever I make I have never had the pleasure, and if Mrs. Eldon and I go there, I'm going to call you up whether you like it or not. But I would always want to say let me see Rome the way you see it. I don't want to go to.
Don't forget the beaten path.
Speaker 1: A lot know a lot of a lot of my friend. A lot of my friends meaning Roman friends, I know Rome better than most of them. Like they ask me about, you know, directions or how to do that.
Speaker 0: I also want to find out things that drive you crazy, like cheese on fish and other We'll talk about that some other day. Professor Eric Thaddeus Walters, again, I will have all of your CV, your bona fides, endless. Let us talk again after the other
Speaker 1: shoe shoe And,
Speaker 0: and again, I want to thank you for your wisdom and your genius and your absolute encyclopedic knowledge. You have made this so incredibly important. Thank you so much, my friend.
Speaker 1: Sure. Thank you. All right. Thank
Speaker 0: you, sir.
@VRightResearch1 - V Right Research
@Jasper_Truth https://www.bitchute.com/video/UWSTmTHe8BEG Library reflection #BlackPope For entertainment purposes #VRightResearchLibrary
The Black Pope
Timing is everything.
Another previously banned presentation.
Unfortunately hard to read... product of the times.
bitchute.com
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
WAS P0PE FRANC!S EVER REALLY THE POPE? VAT!CAN BOMBSHELL EXPOSED! By the Legend Lionel Nation https://t.co/Uvol1KsnZk
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker interviews Dr. Eric Thaddeus Walters about the papacy, focusing on the transition after Pope Francis's demise. This is not Catholic bashing, but a historical news review of a quasi-governmental transition.
Walters claims Pope Benedict XVI's resignation was not a resignation, but an impeded sea, a kind of imprisonment. Benedict hinted he might be the last pope. Walters alleges Bergoglio (Pope Francis) was a usurper, and a coup d'etat occurred. Some prelates knew this, but didn't act. Benedict referred to Pope Benedict VIII in 1013, who abdicated due to force. Archbishop Gänswein implied Benedict's actions weren't what the world thinks.
There's a "fever pitch" in Italy about this. Journalist Andrea Cionci filed petitions to declare Ratzinger's death and address these matters. Canon law states there can be no more than 120 cardinal electors, but there are 135. If even one post-2013 cardinal enters the conclave, it's null and void. Only 27-28 pre-2013 cardinals are eligible. The papacy is the world's only non-hereditary, elected, absolute theocratic monarchy. The speaker inquires about the relationship between the papacy, Israel, and the Palestinians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The video you're about to see, the interview you're about to see, is in my humble opinion one of the most fascinating I have ever had the pleasure of being involved in and with. Not me, but my guest and my friend, Doctor. Eric Thaddeus Walters. A man of immune colossal knowledge, sobriety, And I use that in the the the serious tone regarding one of the most fascinating cases filled with intrigue, labyrinthine conspiracies. I mean, it is it is like like Mandelbrot's fractals.
You keep getting closer and closer and deeper and deeper, and there's more there. I wanna say one thing before we begin this. This is not in any way Catholic bashing. This is not about the theology, the the liturgy of of the of the of the faith. It has nothing to do with this.
This is the oldest, in essence, non hereditary monarchical theocracy in the history of the world. This isn't just some religious internecine battle among Catholics. This is bigger than anything you've seen. And the final word is, this goes to show you yet again, how, as is often the case, when something so great and so grand becomes made aware to the people, whether it's assassination theories or corruption, Americans and people think that there must be some tribunal that will jump in and correct it that says, hey. Wait a minute.
You can't do this. Wrong. Yet again, it goes to show you how so much can go wrong Unaffected, unavoided, unaltered. That is exactly what we're talking about. So my friend, I thank you for watching this.
Sit back and get ready for one of the most fascinating. And by the way, this a follow-up to a prior interview we did, and I'm going to have that link as well. For those of you who think you know about the papacy, or the Catholic church, or Benedict, or Bergoglio, or Ratzinger, get ready for this. Get ready to be mesmerized. The reaction to this gentleman was like nothing I have ever seen in my years.
Doctor. Eric Thaddeus Walters, professor, Maeste, the one and the only, joined us to give us a kind of a a bird's eye or or Vatican's eye view of Bergoglio prince, prince. Oh my god. Maybe that was a pun. Pope Francis' demise.
What happens next? And professor Walters, welcome back. And and I wanna just say a a preface. This is not Catholic bashing. This is not, you know, in fact, it's anything but.
This is an historical news review of the realities of a transition which affects the world and not necessarily just Catholics. So lest anyone thinks we're getting in the digs or talking about either the theology or the Eucharist or the liturgy or No, no, no, no, no. This is about a quasi, dare I say, governmental transition process. Would that be fair, Eric? This almost like quasi governmental?
Speaker 1: This is this is revolutionary. Oh, we'll we'll get to that. It's beyond that. It's this is the end of an epic.
Speaker 0: Okay. Tell us and just just one last word. Don't let me ask the question. I don't know anything. I am nascent regarding this.
Tell me what we should know, what insiders know, what, Romans know, what what your colleagues what the insiders know. Proceed, Okay.
Speaker 1: So once again, came up with a little outline. It's there's a lot to cover because I did I'm glad that the audience, the last time, enjoyed it. I personally went through all the comments and I was very appreciative of them and a lot of interesting follow-up, you know, questions that people had, So there's no way we're gonna be able to go through everything. So I'm trying to keep this limited to a few things. Maybe not to be salacious, but already off the a few interesting things that I actually did want to mention last time, but just we didn't have time.
So the premier biographer of Pope Benedict XVI, the German journalist, Peter and it's in English translation. I think the English translation is 'Final Conversations from twenty sixteen' and there's a lot of one liners and takeaways. So anyway, it's an interview format with Pope Benedict XVI, pretty much the last interview he ever gave, or at least published. One takeaway line is, the interviewer, the author Peter Seywald, asks him, and this is going on in the, what's called the, monastery Mater Ecclesiae in the Vatican Gardens overlooking Saint Peter's Basilica and the Sistine Chapel, which is where he spent the last ten years of his life. Also bear in mind, Benedict, you know, all the spin they put out immediately following his resignation his resignation, which was not a resignation as we mentioned last I explained last time.
Right. And the election of Dragojo. Part of the spin was, oh, you know, Benedict is frail, he's sick, he's ill. Well, for being so sick, frail, and ill, he spent more than half of his pontificate in an impeded sea. Nine years of that The impeded sea, again, he's a prisoner either of an external force or an internal force force, in this case, within the church itself.
Speaker 0: And and I'm sorry. Not to interrupt, but somebody might say s e e, the holy sea, the impeded sea, what is the s e e for Lenin and myself?
Speaker 1: Yeah, sure. It's where we get the English word seat from. There's a difference in Latin between a cathedra, from which we get the word cathedral, cathedra meaning the chair of the magister, the teacher in the classroom, or the magistrate in the courtroom, in this case the chair of Peter, meaning the Pope. Okay? So there's a difference though in Latin between a c s double e s e e, in Latin, seides, meaning a generic chair, could be any kind of a chair, and the cate bera is unique, specific, that chair to these these roles.
Okay. Okay. In any event, the interviewer Peter Sewald asks Pope Bennett the sixteenth, who was pope for ten years well, he used to pope for longer as an in an impeded sea as prisoner than he was actually doing pope, so much for that. Ten years he was in an impeded sea. And the interviewer asks him at a certain point, Are you going to be the last pope?
Pope Benedict the sixteenth respond quite frankly. He says, anything is possible. So that's one thing. The other thing is all
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Not to please. Just just impeded see when when Pope Benedict Ratzinger, the this the predecessor of Bergoglio Francis impeded see, meaning you are before transition or after before. Does that mean his his papacy was illegitimate? It was a nullity.
It was vacant. It was void. It was with an asterisk so that we understand what was his status?
Speaker 1: He was was usurped. His, his throne, usurped. Mean, to
Speaker 0: put it maybe coup. It was like a like a coup d'etat sort
Speaker 1: of It's it's it's a coup d'etat, and then you have an impostor, a usurper come in to just claim that. This, you know, like, of a Shakespearean drama or tragedy or whatever. You know?
Speaker 0: So so it would be, in essence, you have this impostor who came in and told the world I am, and nobody nobody, the the the white smoke, all of that, nobody spoke up, or did they? Everybody knew this.
Speaker 1: There were high ranking prelates at the time, both bishops and cardinals, not a lot, maybe half a dozen or so, who did publicly make statements to this point and to the effect that he was usurped, he was a coup d'etat, but nothing formally on the part of those who could have and should have done something, namely the pre-twenty 13 elected cardinals. That is cardinals created by either Pope John Paul the second or, Pope Benedict the sixteenth.
Speaker 0: And, again, not to not to I'm I'm violating my own rules here. The Pope Benedict Ratzinger did not die, did not, quote, step down. Can that be done? How is how is a papacy how is the secession or the the the terminus of a of a papacy, how is that accomplished thus allowing a vacancy and then the reelection? Is that even possible?
Can you do that without a pope being dead?
Speaker 1: Well, only unless the either the pope has to die Mhmm. Or, the pope has to properly abdicate, resign the office of being pope, which in Latin is called munus, m u n u s, munus. And Benedict did not do that.
Speaker 0: Okay. Interesting. So he and and and and and again, all of this is done, and nobody is saying, hey. Wait a minute. Wait a minute here in this thing.
If if somebody tried to do that with pope or even oh, listen to me, Paul. Trump or Biden, they would have been screaming, you can't do this. It would have been constitutional scholars. It was done. Under the radar with a tacit.
Say nothing. That's the part that blows my mind and others as well. They say, Eric, this can't be. You just you just you just don't go out there and nobody in Saint Peter's Square says, hey, hold it. Not one person, nobody on television, not not our our Cardinal Dolan.
Nobody, not did did Vigano or any of the other, heretics say who complained about this?
Speaker 1: Well, those that did complain, there were very few that did it for the correct reasons. Okay? Okay. There were others, many vegano, I think, could be placed in that category that did it for seemingly other and unproductive Okay. Counterproductive and perhaps personal interest being Okay.
Speaker 0: Grudges, axes to grind, purse animus, whatever. Okay. Yeah. Okay. Forgive me.
Proceed, sir.
Speaker 1: It's okay. Okay. So, so that's one thing. Another thing is when Benedict again did the Declaratio and in the aftermath and again repeated to the journalist Peter Sewell, who I mentioned earlier, he also mentioned, if anyone vaguely recalls when this all happened in February and March of twenty thirteen, Oh, the first Pope to resign in five hundred and ninety three years was a member. No.
Benedict said that, What I'm doing has not happened in over a thousand years. And he was referring specifically to the year 10/13 and his predecessor who did abdicate, but also for forced reasons, by the Holy Roman Emperor at the time. Was in the 10/13.
Speaker 0: Wow. And who is that, Praytell?
Speaker 1: Well, rather ironically, if not providentially, Pope Benedict eighth, at the Yeah.
Speaker 0: Cue the theremin. Wow.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Okay. And then finally, in this kind of more just a salacious part, guess, if you will, archbishop Gainsfine, whom I mentioned also last time, Pope Benedict XVI's personal secretary, now Archbishop he's done a lot of public appearances. He's very careful and measured with his words, but to his credit, this last year, 2024, he was thinking about giving a conference in a church in the North Of Italy, and he said to everyone, there's a few hundred people there, I guess, in the church, that what Benedict did is not what the world thinks.
Meaning? Implied. Wow. Preside. Yeah.
Speaker 0: This cryptic these these measured, almost like read between the lines. I think we had joked about, Jeremiah Denton, the POW, who was blinking torture when he was it it's as though he's the he is the person, the woman at the door when the police officer comes, is everything alright? And they open the door and there's a chain and she's trying to say, no. Everything's fine. Everything's fine.
So there are these signals, and and and you understood it. How many of your if if I walked around with you and talked to your colleagues and friends and those in the know, how many of you would say, oh, absolutely. Of course, that is. Of of course, that's true.
Speaker 1: A lot.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: The problem is everything happened so fast. Just, I mean, warp speed, you know, to wrap your head around it and to figure out what was happening in the first place, you know, again, analytically, you know, accurately, it took a little time and it kept taking time. And then, you know, there are questions posed to Prelates, it's just they avoid it, they don't want to know, nothing to see or move along kind of thing. But now it's gotten a fever pitch in Italy.
Speaker 0: Really? Okay. Okay. That's what I wanna know. Because as you can imagine here
Speaker 1: No. It's it's fever pitch.
Speaker 0: Nobody nobody is saying, okay, wow.
Speaker 1: If you remember the Italian journalist I mentioned last time, Andrea Cionci, he's filed several petitions. He actually got he actually received in return from the Cardinal Secretary of State, Pietro Parolin, who just had, think, a heart attack a few days ago. I was very cordial thanking him for his solicitation. So there's been many petitions, etc, signed by thousands and thousands of people sent to the Secretary of State of the Vatican Holy See to address specifically all of these matters, and basically saying, You need to do what we discussed last time. You need to declare the Pope is truly dead, go into conflict with only the pre twenty thirteen cardinals, 20 seven, 20 eight.
I'll explain why there's a question mark over that number exactly in a moment. And do what you know you need to do. Again, some of the other canons I didn't we didn't go into last time also have to do with the cardinals have the obligation and duty to do this. That is, they can't just brush it under the rug. Mean, it's so
Speaker 0: And the pope is dead would be Bergoglio or No. No. Ratzinger.
Speaker 1: Ratzinger. Yeah. Bergoglio was an anti blood test. He's nothing.
Speaker 0: So so his so his death after his death and I'm I'm I'm so sorry. I'm a I'm a dunce here. But after anyway. After Ratzinger died in exile, in Elba, so to speak, after he died, you could have corrected it then by saying, alright. Let us take this, corrective measure here.
Say the pope is dead. Pick up where we left off. Even aft even after Bergoglio was already pope, could they have somehow fixed it, corrected that, that that glitch? Because they didn't. Am am I reading this right?
I mean or is that just forever?
Speaker 1: We've been stuck in this situation since 03/01/2013.
Speaker 0: '20 '20 '1, please?
Speaker 1: 2013. Wow. '21. So that's over twelve years?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And the amount of years would not be so this may actually be the longest time that I think it is the longest time such as the collision has ever occurred. But there's been several moments, you know, in the history of the Catholic church where same or similar situations have occurred, you know, several years without Pope. Again, what makes this unique is this is the first time this was actually a successful coup d'etat color revolution within the church and a usurper cognizant of very completely knowing what they were doing.
Speaker 0: Okay. So okay. So continue. I'm sorry, sir. I'm I'm interrupting.
Speaker 1: So yep. So there's been a couple since we last, did this, which was, I guess, about a little over ten days ago. There's been a couple of developments. One is that one is not really a development, there's already a number, I didn't mention it. Under again Canon Law, Apostolic Canon Law from 1983, the Apostolic Constitution from 1996, and then including a Motu Proprio in Latin, which means in my own way, but it's like an executive order on the part of the Pope.
That was under Paul VI in 1970, I forget which specific year, Adding to establishing the number of legal, licit, legitimate cardinal electors in the College of Cardinals at 120. Can't have any more than 120. You can have as little as three, because it's just a two thirds majority required to validly or legally elect the Pope, but no more than 120. And they were always very careful since then Paul VI, 1970s, all the way through Benedict XVI, to never put in more potential cardinal electors than 120 in the cardinal
Speaker 0: And today, how many are there? How many are there?
Speaker 1: There's a problem, big problem. This by itself, by itself, again according to the Canon law, will nullify the conclave which is supposed to begin in three days.
Speaker 0: How many are there now?
Speaker 1: There's a hundred and well, there's over 200 total problems.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute.
Speaker 1: Not stop. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. Several scores several scores of which are over the age of 80, and so we know they're not going to be voting.
Okay? Okay. But there's a there's a 35 of voting age. So they're 15 over the limit. Wow.
So number one, if all a 55 go into the Sistine Chapel as per church law itself, null and void, that's number one. Number two, if even just one post 2013 cardinal, meaning card meaning a cardinal created by Bibroglio, even if just one out of a hundred and eight. So he's created a total of a hundred and eight. 70 five percent of the College of Cardinals now. Even though not one of them is a legitimate legal cardinal, and they face actual sanctions on the part of the Holy See.
Like, serious prison time, if anyone does what they're supposed to be about them.
Speaker 0: Prison?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Potentially, theoretically. Serious sanctions. Serious sanctions. I mean, they could be, you know, it could be commuted.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. You know, there's
Speaker 1: something else. But they're stripped of everything. I mean, there is plagiarization. So, among other things. So, even if just one of those 100 makes bergolian cardinals, cardinals created under the K.
A. Pope Francis, anti Pope Francis, Even if just one of them sets foot in conclave, the conclave is null and void, once again. It's an illegally legitimate conclave. It can only be the pre twenty thirteen cardinals created by popes John Paul the second and Benedict the sixteenth, of which there's 27 or 28. Why 27 or 28?
Well, this is a development that happened. And this is a real this is, you know, this is like something out of a I'm not gonna use I'm doing my best to be careful and measure here. Just imagining your favorite mafia movie. Okay. Yeah.
Right. I understand. Yeah. There's there's a card Sardinian cardinal, last name Baechu, and he was created by Bergoglio anyway in the first place. Well, he took the place of the Australian Cardinal Pell, whom Bergoglio put in charge of basically the the the new entity responsible for cleaning up your IOR.
The Vatican Bank. It's usually euphemistically referred to. Okay. Cardinal Pell, the Australian who died a few years ago, also in interesting circumstances, we'll just say. Mhmm.
Yeah. He took the place of the guy before him that was in charge of this, put in charge of this by Pope Bennett the sixteenth, Archbishop Carlo Maria de Jano. Wow. Who was doing his job and doing a good job. And that's one of the reasons well, maybe we'll come back to that.
That's one of the reasons why then he was sent as the Apostolic Moon seal to The United States in Washington, D. C, basically the Vatican and Holy Seals ambassador to The United States Of America, because they were already being forced and pressured. Hope ended the sixteenth losing a lot of support and he wiggle room, you know, he couldn't it was it was it was becoming more and more confined already. Again, is all leading up to his declaration in February of twenty thirteen. Suddenly, I just lost my own thought.
Oh, so Baekhu, this guy, after Bergolio died, I think it was right probably right the day we did the previous interview Mhmm. Or in the day after he meets with the guy that just had a heart attack a few days ago, the Cardinal Secretary of State, Parolin. Parolin gives him a handwritten letter. It was typed out, but, you know. Right.
It says basic it's a it says that this cardinal Baetzhu, who had already been relieved of command, and that for a while he was also relieved of his any cardinalatial prerogatives, but then Vergoglio reinstated them. There's a lot of backroom to be able to go on here. But he was relieved of his command from, you know, investigating the transparency and financial activities of Vatican Bank, the Yor. And so the other so the last week, he says to so Parolin shows him this letter, supposedly Bergoglio had written. It says, you're not allowed to vote in conclave.
Signed f. So not even his not even his full name, Francis, just f. F. There's no date on it.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: And this this cardinal Beech, who says to Potawatim, his witness, the other people there, says, This is not legal. This is not listed. This is not valid. I'm not respecting this. Now what are gonna do?
And now suddenly, a few days ago, Farooq just had a heart attack or severe health problem. Don't know what exactly. Wow. Yeah. That's high drama here.
Speaker 0: Now let me stop for a sec. Let me stop. Okay. The work what the only according to what you're saying, the only me stop. Only a 20 eligible cardinals are able to vote.
Now you could have more who are 90, a hundred, but you up to the age of 80, you cannot vote after 80. You can remain your cardinalship or whatever the particular now Yes.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: You you can. You can stay on. You can have 500 if you want, but only the ones after 80, you stop voting. I did not know.
Speaker 1: You you, yeah, you cannot vote.
Speaker 0: 20 were there from Ratzinger excuse me, from Benedict and then JP Deuce. Right? Those two. They're with the other one. Anyone after that, any cardinal appointed theoretically by Francis doesn't count.
So the only ones who can and you can have a minimum, we say a quorum, if you will, a minimum of three and no more than 120 voting. They could be and they can't be in the room. Correct? You can only have a 20. So let's say there's 200 total.
The the the other 80 cannot be in that conclave. It can only be a 120 bona fide certified legitimate authorized cardinals
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Who can vote. And you say right now, of that 120, there's about a 35 who are attending attempting to vote.
Speaker 1: A 35. So that's over one and twelve. 15 over the limit anyway.
Speaker 0: Right. Right.
Speaker 1: And? And moreover, 108 were all created by Virgolio. Wow. This also unprecedented in history. He's the guy that's created the most cardinals in history who are not cardinals because he was not the pope.
So but anyway.
Speaker 0: So we have 27. Right? My my math. Roughly about 27 or 28, you said, who can actually vote.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And if you walked into to to the to the and by the way, if you had in that conclave any more than that 27 or 28 who were able to vote, does that nullify the validity of the conclave as well?
Speaker 1: Out of 108 Bergolian cardinals, even if one of them sets foot in the conclave with conclave is Abenizio de facto no one's word.
Speaker 0: Right. Now if somebody if I were to ask, theoretically, everybody in Rome or anybody who is conversant with the papacy rules to say, how many of you have heard this or know this? How many people would honestly say, yep. We know all about that. We're not saying anything, but Eric Thaddeus Walters is 100% correct.
How many do you think roughly would would acknowledge this?
Speaker 1: Of those who care?
Speaker 0: Yes and no. Correct.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I would say
Speaker 0: All of them.
Speaker 1: More than more than 50%. Wow. Wow. Wow. And Okay.
The the other where the other remaining percentage of whatever that would be are what you or what some might characterize as gatekeepers, whether they're in the media.
Speaker 0: Right. Right. Right. Okay. So where do we go now?
And what happens?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the con this so I'm going I I'll keep calling it an illegitimate illegal conclave because no one's done anything yet about it, begins on this Wednesday, May 7, in the morning. And so what will happen is in St. Peter's Basilica there will be a mass and then then they will well, then they and and all the cardinals will be there present for that, so that's over 200. And then if 135 go into the Sistine Chapel, Conclave null and void, but they'll do what they usually do.
They'll do the rounds of voting called scuttingi. There's a session in the morning and a session in the afternoon, and they do that for five days in a row, and if they don't come up with anyone on the fifth day, then they take another few days off to, I don't know, get in touch with the Holy Spirit or something, and then they go back into Conclave again for more rounds of voting. Now that's not happened in, I don't remember one last time, a long time. I mean, the last several elections have been done historically relatively quickly, anywhere from one to a few days and not even a full five days. So that starts on Wednesday, Wednesday morning.
But as I said, if if those 35 just one of the Bedolian Cardinals goes in, it's another illegal and illegitimate conclave. Okay? And so whoever they know and in the meantime, there could be fireworks. In other words, it could happen in the Sistine Chapel.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: You know, a proper drop down what do you call it? Down, drag out fight.
Speaker 0: Right. Knock down, drag out. Yeah. Yep.
Speaker 1: Knock down, drag out. Yeah. You know, who knows? So Now
Speaker 0: a couple of couple of questions here. First, you mentioned before somebody could be imprisoned or who because the the the first thing, Eric, people might be saying is, oh, this is just some internecine battle of Catholics. Who cares? Doesn't affect anything. It's a bunch of people in dresses and funny hats and pink shoes and red shoes.
And so what? It's bigger than that. This is not just about a Catholic church. It is about Yeah. What would you call it?
Almost like an an it's almost like ancillary to the monarchy. It's it's Yeah. To me, there's there's no explain that significance of what the papacy means.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the papacy, to put it in, those kind of, governmental political terms, is the world's only is the world's only non hereditary, elected, absolute theocratic monarchy, the king of which is the pope.
Speaker 0: Interesting. Theocratic monarchy. Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Non hereditary, although there is nepotism, for example, the Renaissance period, the border jocks.
Speaker 0: And there's monarchical. For example, one could argue that Iran, for example, people say, that's a theocracy or something. But that's not that's that's not hereditary. That's that's that's almost dare I say, a democratic theocracy there, you're voted or voted or I
Speaker 1: lost it. This
Speaker 0: is this is a different story altogether. So that's number one. Number two, what is the judicial review, if you will, process? If the pope is infallible, the pope is like the Supreme Court, our whatever the pope says is ipso facto by its very nature, correct. End of discussion.
Do you think that anyone could could actually bring this up? Has there been any kind of a civil war or anybody who told a pope you're doing something wrong or
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. Over history. Sure. Sure.
Speaker 0: Is it successful? Is there is there a tribunal that that could
Speaker 1: over overrule both? Yeah. Some sometimes it is. Sometimes it isn't. I know I I don't wanna get too lost.
And so these are these are all important, profound, deep and fascinating, time consuming questions. That's why it's so complicated, you know, to wrap one's head around one of them. Know, most recently, it was the first Vatican Council, eighteen sixty nine-eighteen seventy, when Pope Pius IX, the Church's longest reigning Pope ever, thirty three years, it was under him that Papal States collapsed into what we know today as Vatican City State. He issued what's called the dogma of papal infallibility. When the pope speaks ex cathedra from the throne, He's infallible in matters of faith and morals.
Right. And morals is an unfortunate and really inaccurate translation from the Latin morres because morres much more encompassing. It doesn't just mean ethical behavior. Means customs and traditions and all sorts of things. And if if anyone if you're any of your audience has ever heard of Lord Dalderg Acton.
Lord Acton. I think it his an institute who's his name after him.
Speaker 0: Oh, power cops, sir.
Speaker 1: He he's the guy that, at least in the modern period, coined that phrase, all power all power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Right. He he uttered those words to Pope Pius IX's face in December of eighteen seventy, trying to get him not to make this a dogma. Now
Speaker 0: a little background. My understanding, my pedestrian understanding is that Mussolini and the Vatican under Pius XI formed some kind of an alliance, the Lateran Treaty of 1920 And Because I find this interesting, like Mussolini, also Italy is with Libya and Because we in The United States, as you know, being from here, we're used to, we've been here, we've added on, but we don't have any serious questions as to how Arizona came about or who owns So this is almost like Harry Potter ish. What's that about Mussolini and the Vatican?
Speaker 1: So, I don't want to bore people with
Speaker 0: You cannot bore anybody. It's impossible for you to bore anybody.
Speaker 1: Okay. So the Vatican is the world's oldest, continuously still surviving nation state of any kind. It was formally established in the year July between Pope Stephen the second and the barbarian chieftain of the Merovingians at the time, a guy named Peppin or Pepin the Short, not to be confused with his relative, Pepin the Fat. So the barbarian chieftain of the Merovingians, whom the pope, the previous pope, or the pope invited to invade the Italian Peninsula to subdue two other barbarian groups, the Ostrogoths and the Lombards. Okay.
They accomplished this successfully in July, and that's when the Papal States begin, the sovereign, temporal, monarchical rulers of which are the Popes. It's also when European nobility begins because for his part, the pope grants Tuppepin and his two sons, Carloman and Charlemagne, the ancient Roman legal title of nobility, Patricius Romanorum or Patrician of the Romans. So this is when European nobility begins. If you think about the battered guy in England, all that stuff, you know, the wizards, that's going to be formally begun. Always under the pope.
Not because he's not actually not specifically because he's the successor of Peach or the Vicar of Christ, but because he's also the Bolt Viex Maximus, which we can come back to either now or a later time. That's long. Anyway, so and this lasts. So the Papal States then from that point until 1870, basically covered the central third of the Italian Peninsula. Okay?
During the so called unification of Italy in the nineteenth century, so for your American listeners, while the US Civil War was going on, was a civil war going on here, referred to as the Unification of Italy. By 1870, the Papal States had been collapsed into what we know today as 44 hectares or 110 acres of land, Vatican City State. And in fact, historians refer to this period between 1870 and 1929 coming to the Lateran Treaty as the Roman question. Wow. What do we do now with this Pope thing?
Because, you know, we got a lot of Catholics running around the world. So 1929, February eleventh, the same day Benedict made his Declaratio. 02/11/1929, the Lateran Treaty is signed between Pope Pius XI and dictator of Italy at the time, Mussolini, Benito Mussolini, establishing Vatican City State with all sorts of provisions for remunerations because of the loss of tax revenue from the Papal States Mhmm. And all sorts of other legalities and just things.
Speaker 0: See, but that's fascinating because the the one thing that we know and and one of the the interesting stories which folks, I think, forget, and I am not by any stretch of the imagination, a biblical scholar or historian. But one of the problems that Jesus posed to Pontius Pilate was, Who's this guy? We don't like somebody within the confines of our jurisdictions claiming not only allegiance with a bunch of people who can turn against this and some kind of very powerful, if not supernatural. We don't care for this. So Mussolini and others had to realize we had to do something about these folks.
We have to mollify them, contain them. It's almost like containment theory, we did with NATO and Soviet Union. So that's something interesting because if anybody thinks, put it this way, there is no, and you would agree, with all due respect to our brothers and sisters who were Jews or Lutherans or Baptists, there ain't nothing like Roman Catholics. It's an army. Also, not to be parenthetically abstruse but the Jesuits are of of which I went to to a Jesuit high school and that's all I know.
From Ignatius Loyola and admirem Doria, the admirem de Iglorium and the Society of Jesus and that is something which is another another story. Black popes and it is so if if you love I don't wanna keep saying Harry Potter, but but Byzantine mystery mysterious storylines. It doesn't get better than this. There's nothing like it. Nothing.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Truth is stranger than fiction. I find anyone.
Speaker 0: So another question, Eric. By the way, dear friend, thank you for this. You. Is there any question or any suspicions as to the cause, if you will, of the death of Bergoglio? Any anybody is is was that a clean death as we say?
I
Speaker 1: think so. Yeah. I don't think there's any funny business there. There were a lot of theories and speculations going around, you know, in the months prior.
Speaker 0: If you had to if you had to handicap, if you were a betting man, is it even possible when I see CBS Morning News or somebody saying, Who's likely to be? You don't know anything about, Oh, there seems to be an unusual number of, again, is layman, African, black, nontraditional, non European, non Italian. How is that met by more of the traditional folks? And if you had to pick who would be the next pope and you were a betting man, what's the inside skinny? What does the inside line say?
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, I don't in fact, I have a I have a friend here in Rome. He's Irish. We just he he sent me the betting, you know Yeah.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: Like, patty power, that kind of thing.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Just yesterday. The big the big front runners are two I mentioned last time. Turksen from Africa, he's from Ghana, Tagle from The Philippines, they're both Tagle is very he's the second youngest part of the period, and they're both legitimate pre 2013.
Speaker 0: Okay. Good. Good.
Speaker 1: But they're both very, you know, you the people would characterize them as being progressive, liberal, that kind of thing, among other things. I'll just leave it at that. Yeah. The other big front runners are the Secretary of State, Parolin, who just got really ill the other day. There is an American, but he's not a he's not a sitting ordinary bishop in The States.
He's actually an Curia here known. His last name is oh gosh. Let's look at my mind right now. For a couple of there were a few days where O'Malley's name of where is O'Malley in Boston? O'Malley's name and, Dolan's name were being
Speaker 0: way they're gonna pick an American. There's no way. You I mean, is that true?
Speaker 1: I have a I have a theory that could be very weird, but would still not solve the issue. But because of the geopolitics involved, I started thinking and wondering about it, and I could see where that could make sense, given what's happening on the world geopolitically now. But still, I don't think I don't really think it's
Speaker 0: There is a meme, a kind of the this memetic that's being published. And it's smoke of the rainbow color. Meaning they're laughing. The next pope is going to be another progressive. We're gonna see nuns as priests.
It's gonna be complete and total. What's what's your your take on that?
Speaker 1: Probably.
Speaker 0: Oh, no. Where is this coming from? Where is Who is behind? Oh, and one more thing. One more thing.
Did you ever hear the story? And I've heard this just maybe as a drive by. I'm hearing this that Bergoglio, Francis, every day called up the pastor or a priest a Catholic church in Gaza, which infuriated Israeli officials. There was some kind of a Have you heard about that?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. No. That's true.
Speaker 0: What's the story behind that? And how does the Oh, and and also Bergoglio's past and juntas and death squads and living Listen, J. P. Deuce, when he was a young man, this guy, he had girlfriends, he was an actor, he probably killed people. This dude was not some monastic choir boy, from what I understand, which might be kind of good.
But how much of that affected Francis? And what's the relationship between the the the papacy and Israel, Middle East, Gaza, Palestinians, as far as you know?
Speaker 1: Very tense. No. From what I understand, Israel itself forbade any diplomats or representatives from coming to Birkoglio's funeral. Wow. You know, also people in the which is obviously a whole other issue even though it is related,
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: You know, what's happening what's happening in Palestine is a little bit you Everybody thinks, oh, they're just a bunch of nutty well, I shouldn't say nutty. They're just, you know, Muslim, Arabs, Muslim, there as well. Because
Speaker 0: Christians are under attack. Christians around the world. This is serious business. I mean, not just necessarily in the quote. Middle East has become kind of a code word for Israel or Palestine or whatever you want to call it.
But Christians, Now remember, the papacy deals not exclusively with Catholics, though that is certainly a great force of interest. But the notion of Christians under attack, there's a very serious undercurrent of problems here that the pope or the papacy should or maybe have attempted to address. Have you heard anything along those lines?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, that's you know, you can bring China into the mix because this is another big issue. Just within a couple of years after Virgilio was elected, installed, he sent yeah, it's also kinda going back to how to you know, what are some of the motivations or the factors that led to all this in the first book. So we mentioned the Sanctagalan group before. Mhmm.
Yep. The Mafia. Specifically, the now deceased Cardinal McCarrick. Yep. Yep.
And Virgilio Made McCarrick, his liaison back and forth between the Vatican and the CCP to strike a new treaty with the CCP, which has never ever been made public, which is another big problem.
Speaker 0: Problem how? How because it has been made The what what's the problem per per per se?
Speaker 1: That no one knows what's involved. No one knows what it's about.
Speaker 0: But isn't that good that they're speaking? Isn't that good that they're Sure.
Speaker 1: Sure. Of course. The prob but the problem is is number one, and it's been it's it's it was renewed in 2018. So I think that's four, five, six years after the first treaty was ratified between the two, but again, not actually because it's now in void, but whatever. Mhmm.
It was renewed again in 2018, so precisely because the contents have not been made public. Imagine The United States, you know, I don't know, the president of The United States signing a treaty with China, and they just say, don't worry about it. We're not gonna publish it. We're not gonna make it public, but, we'll take care of her.
Speaker 0: But it's a It's almost like Nancy Pelosi who said we don't know what we signed until we passed the law. Now let me ask you another stupid simple question. Out of this entire is a Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, claims to be a Catholic and has always been very, very strong. Said that
Speaker 1: He was Russian Orthodox. Was Russian
Speaker 0: Now that's the question. They said that when he was in the KGB or FSB, he put his badge away. Accepted. He was very devout. The West, say, oh no, no, no.
Even Cathcart, no, no, no, Don't believe that for a moment. I've never heard how a lot of people can look into the heart of somebody and determine the legitimacy of their transformation. What Eastern right? Eastern what does that mean?
Speaker 1: Orthodoxy?
Speaker 0: Yeah, compared to plain old Catholic. What does it mean?
Speaker 1: I mean, it's basically the same thing with the trappings are slightly different, the liturgy is slightly different, the language is different.
Speaker 0: Does the Pope You
Speaker 1: mean the Pope in Rome? Yeah. Well, that's it's a political. Over the centuries, theologians and historians, it's going to be using theology somehow to justify all this, and they can't. It's all political, and it goes all the way back to the fourth century when Constantine moved the capital of the Roman Empire from Rome to Byzantium, which he named Nova Roma, New Rome because it has to reflect Rome after his death, it was ever after remembered as Constantinople, the city of Constantine, now Istanbul.
And so it goes all the way back to then. It was a fight, a battle between the political, between Constantinople as the new capital and Rome. And all sorts of theological justifications, ecclesiological justifications have been attempted over several since. None of it works.
Speaker 0: Are they correct? Because we have, of course, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Eastern, Armenian. We have all of these. When I was in Jerusalem in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, which is as holy as you can get, the individuals, there was something called the status quo. It was an understanding of who ran the concession because it was not only the site of Christ's crucifixion, but his burial, his tomb, where the rock was.
And I saw people with beards and not cassocks, but vestments and hats. I'm thinking, right, who are these? I never knew the flavors and
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like to be old.
Speaker 0: Oh, it is It's like
Speaker 1: to be old.
Speaker 0: It was interesting also, you'll get a kick out of this when the Protestants said, Hey, listen, can we get in on this? They said, Excuse me? They said, No, no. And they came up with Calvary, not Gethsemane or whatever the, I don't know, but they came up with their own version of it because you have the Coptics have the concession for this. This one's got that.
And it's almost like a, I don't wanna, please, I don't mean to be, it's almost like a food court. You know, you have different
Speaker 1: people over
Speaker 0: here and really and you have people running the show and it is as a person who was a a a retired Catholic and not in any way spiritual, there was an energy in that place.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe put
Speaker 0: on from reflected from the hearts and souls and of other people, but it was something that I shan't forget. But is is it safe to say that Vladimir Putin is a Catholic?
Speaker 1: Well, he's Russian Orthodox. So in other words, the problem So the split, split, the first, there's been two schisms, ruptures within the one Holy Catholic Apostolic Church. The first was in the year October, when the Pope at the time sent his emissary ambassador, the French Cardinal Hubert or Humbert, sounds better in French, to Constantinople to issue a papal bull of excommunication against the Patriarch of Constantinople and the Emperor of Constantinople because of the issue or an issue regarding what's called the Fediocle Clause. So Catholics who practice or whatever, when you recite the Nicene Constantinopolitan Creed, become of a certain part, we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord will give our life and proceeds from the Father and the Son. Well, that was never in the original Ecumenical Council, the First Council of Constantinople in March that issued that proclamation.
It just said ex patri or from the Father, out of the Father. And the Son part was added. Now it's a logical consequence. Theologically, there's not it's a fact, I mean, in this internal aberrant of But it was then weaponized politically. It was politicized regarding the political struggle back and forth between Rome and Constantinople so that everything came to a head in October, when this Cardinal Umberg, with the papal bull ex communication, marches into Hagia Sophia on Easter Sunday while the patriarch is about to consecrate the Eucharist Wow!
The Mass, okay, And he slams on the altar the papal bull of excommunication, and the patriarch immediately it was kind of like an F me, F you moment.
Speaker 0: Yeah, right.
Speaker 1: The patriarch issues verbally, publicly in front of everyone, Hagia, Sofia, Cathedral, Istanbul, Constant over there. We call it a double excommunication. And they immediately justified. They that both sides agreed to immediately pretend like, well, that never happened. Why?
Well, because unbeknownst to Cardinal Humbert, it took him two weeks on a boat to get from Rome to Constantinople. And in the meantime, the Pope died. Here we are. Remember that? Say that
Speaker 0: Uh-oh. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The bull of excommunication he was bringing was null and void.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: On the patriarch's part, they said they never included they excommunicated the Western church, meaning the Roman Latin church, just the Cardinal Humbert, his entourage, and the pope who was dead. So, you know, they canceled each other out. But, anyway, on a grassroots level, it was too little too light. Sorry about that.
Speaker 0: There is a there's a couple of things here. Just just in terms of the the trivia and the specifics. When I was in Catholic school, we did the sign of the cross like this, to the left and to the right. Putin and Eastern will do it the other way, right to left. That's one thing, That's like sometimes a friend of mine who is a Muslim, said, What's the difference between Shia and Sunnis?
He said this or or that. Anyway, it was something with a hand. It was a kind of an inside joke. I didn't get it. That's number one.
Number two, when you talk about Protestants, because I love to ask Protestants, what is it between you and a Catholic? What's really the difference? And they can't answer the question. And a friend of mine, one time we were at a, I mean, I've told you this, we were in a a friend awake of a friend of mine in the Catholic church and my friend who's Jewish said, you know, I've never been in a church before. I said, let me show you something.
I said, you know, you can tell if you're in a Catholic church, look at the altar. You see that cross? If Jesus is on it, it's Catholic. It's a crucifix. If Jesus is off, it's Protestant because Protestants emphasize the resurrection.
Catholics not focus on but it's the the passion of Jesus and the Christ. Stations of the cross. Different emphasis. Mel Gibson's Passion of the Christ, or as my friend calls it, Good Friday the thirteenth, because it was like a snuff film in terms of the horror. This is also Mel Gibson's own mind.
He devoted maybe ten seconds to the resurrection. The focus was on the passion. Now that is an extremely crude version. But even, oh, and one more thing. I mean, Mel Gibson's father, Hutton, who's an Orthodox Catholic, hated Vatican II, loathed it.
And I think it was Ron Cali, twenty third, who removed the perfidy of the Jew or something from the Easter because they had their, quote, antisemitism was, from their point of view, it was the Jews, they were those who fomented the requirement or the demand for the crucifixion versus Pilate, who did it himself, who was told he was basically a governor. Now I just threw 50 facts at you, all of them wrong, stitched together so stupidly. But don't you find the little nuances huge in terms of what makes one sect what it is and the other is not.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Sure. You know, I would say between most Protestants I
Speaker 0: hear you. Yeah. If I hear you. Okay. Sound great?
Speaker 1: You know, the the the specifically to that, the passion of Christ, the emphasis on the crucifix, it has to do and Michelangelo actually, brilliantly, Michelangelo, captures this in the altarpiece in the Sistine Chapel, talking about the concord to elect the Pope, Last Judgment scene. Visually responding to so he's painted this just a couple of decades after Martin Luther posts his 95 Poses in 1517. So he's having to respond to the two pillars of what become referred to as the Two Pillars of Protestant sola fide sola skritura the second one sola skritura by scripture alone The previous one Sola Fide. All you have to do is say, I believe that Jesus, you're my Lord and Savior and you're saved. Well the Catholic church is responsible because that's kind of a duh, no duh position.
Yeah. That's like, and? You just keep it there, or you're going to do, you're to take the ball and run with it then. So the idea is that if one wishes to share in the Resurrection of Christ, as a disciple, one must share in the life of Christ, which includes ultimately suffering and death.
Speaker 0: Precisely. And you aren't necessarily guaranteed. You know, it's funny how sometimes Protestants will laugh that the Catholics can just go in for confession or reconciliation, whatever it's called now, And then that's it. To which I respond, well, you think that all you have to do is be saved. Catholics say, that's part of it, your life, your addition of St.
Peter. Are you worthy? They don't have the notion of purgatory. They don't recognize Mary. They don't recognize I believe that for you to understand the differences in the faith actually concretizes your faith even better because you have to know what you believe in.
You just can't say it's not like being a Yankees fan. All you gotta do is buy a ticket, show up, and know when to root. It's not like that for you to connect yourself. And if those watching, and I forgot to say this, Professor Walters here gives the most exquisite tours of the Vatican, his organization, his site, Vati Land, which we will have here, is look at what he knows. Have you ever said in your life, I don't know.
Beats that all out of me. I don't know. You've never shown. Either that or you're just making it up, which I kid, of course. I know you're not.
But your encyclopedic knowledge of this, is this part of your academia, your academic studies, your academe? Or is something else? How do you know?
Speaker 1: No. It's pretty well, I have no life.
Speaker 0: You should be a cardinal.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You'd be It's just a lifetime. Know, I take a cue from The better the teacher, the better the student. Never stop being a student. You never stop learning.
You never stop wanting to learn. You never stop humbly admitting when you're in error, inaccurate, imprecise and trying to be more so. And it's a constant process.
Speaker 0: I think, though, the thing that is the most important is that look at all of the rules. I always go back to this hypothetical of somebody from another planet who comes here and I'm saying, Listen to this man. There are scholars, just like in the Yeshivas, and there are Jewish scholars study the Talmud and the Torah, they spend their lives dissecting questions of hypotheticals. The amount of lore, doctrinal history is mind boggling in terms of just a Catholic church. And yet, just like in our case, it's amazing what you can get away with.
Think about assassinations, think about coup d'etat, stolen elections, whatever your particular affiliation is. We believe that whenever there is some type of a blatant error, that somebody rings a bell and it stopped, that there's some internal dead man switch that says, Oh no, you don't. You can't do this. Surely somebody is going to find out and complain and call the papers. They know nothing about it because they're lulled into this Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a five alarm fire in Italy. Again, Cholamchie, who might be helpful if you want, I know he'll be fine with it. He has a lot of, you know, why reinvent the wheel? He has a lot of good, in English, little mini videos. There's three in particular I can send them if you want, maybe you want to attach them to the bottom of this.
Just explaining a lot of graphics so it's very visually helpful for people because there's a lot to wrap their mind around, I realize. So that might be helpful. But there's a five alarm fire, mean, you know, everybody's kind of panicking and really worried, those who existentially care about this stuff, here in Italy, as we ramp up to Wednesday. And it's not the end of everything, but it's kinda like, can there be a comeback? And I'm gonna wait.
I was gonna I was gonna do it now, maybe like a drop of last final bomb. I'm not. Let's wait and see what happens. Okay. And then whatever does happen, I'll give you an update and Oh, please.
Where things now would stand at that
Speaker 0: point. It be important to me to ask you, are you a Catholic yourself?
Speaker 1: I was baptized the Roman Catholic.
Speaker 0: Okay. That's all. I'm just curious because it would be for me, for example, if I were to be some expert of, let's say, Jewish lore or somebody says, What are you Jewish? No. But then again, you don't have to be a woman to be a gynecologist.
That's a bad example. But I'm just curious because I have respect for I mean, if I can study the history of France and live in this country, it's the study the naked study of the of the of the history, which is so fascinating to me. What is your expertise? You you are a professor. What do you teach?
Speaker 1: Well, I've taught the courses over the fifteen years. I've taught Latin, I've taught ancient Roman history, comparative world religions, courses in the New Testament. But over the past several years, two courses in particular have become very popular. One is called The Popes of Mystery of the Catholic Church and the other is called Mystics, Saints and Studied in Medieval Catholic Theology. So I mentioned last time my CV, so if your audience didn't watch that previous interview, they can go back to the beginning where you asked me about my CV.
Right. Within all that, my Ph. D. Thesis was in something called philology, the theological aspect is called something called ecclesiology, which is the logical rational principle of this thing we call the church. The structure of the church, its governance, its formation, its grassroots, everything.
Speaker 0: And philology is almost like a love of knowledge.
Speaker 1: An intimate love of logical, rational principles communicated via words. In other words, what does a word really mean?
Speaker 0: Why is Latin important? Why would you advocate learning it? What does it do?
Speaker 1: Yeah, both Latin and Greek, but just for Latin's sake. Mean, number one, it's what every modern Romance language, but also English, which is now the ironically lingua franca of the world
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Is based is based on. It's what allows English to be, in my opinion, the premier language to communicate in in the world, phonetic alphabetized language, because it has a vast, vast vocabulary. And the study of Latin, number one, it disciplines the mind to think critically, logically, rationally. Mhmm. Just the going about learning it.
And number two, it suddenly opens up, you know, once you understand what a word really means, it completely opens up your horizon and makes you understand things in a very different light.
Speaker 0: When I went to a Jesuit high school, I took Latin and I found out a number of things. First, it was to me the ultimate FU to my friends with their Spanish and French. I don't need this. Everybody else said, that's number one. Because we we we also thought we were just different.
Right. There is a sound to it. There's something. It sounds almost everything sounds profound. And the Catalina How are we going to put up with it?
But it was an even profound the pledge of allegiance. Notice I say, vexolo. I speak classical Latin, not that churchy. What's your phrase for church Latin?
Speaker 1: What is it called? Spaghetti Latin.
Speaker 0: Spaghetti Latin. Spaghetti Latin. Yeah. And also, I know most people get who and whom and correct. This teaches you.
When you talk about plupers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, grammar.
Speaker 0: Yes, grammar. In order for you to speak and when you speak any language where the adjective comes after. You go through the sentence and then at the end, I was like, I'm making all this stuff out of the way and now I'll worry about the descriptors. The dative case and conjugation of verbs. And aside from that, I loved it.
I never, ever, ever. And you don't have to necessarily know something to open up your mind and to stretch it. I always give the analogy of somebody who's about to run will put themselves into contortions that they will never mimic or replicate during a run, but being able to So, Latin is just It's well worth the effort as far as I'm concerned. Maybe I'm biased.
Speaker 1: Right. Yeah. No, no, I 100% agree. My doctoral research was on the, what we call, well, just an analysis of one word in Latin from the first time it appears in the Latin language until the time of Constantine, the word being unitas, meaning oneness. And this is how the ecclesiology, the structure of the Church comes into play, as well as the Trinity, Trinitarian theology, all sorts of stuff.
It's useless to mow the lawn. You want to uproot the weeds. And so that's also part of my approach.
Speaker 0: Is the shape, the attitude of Rome to live in Rome based upon what you've seen? The crime, immigration, the attitude, the flavor. What's Rome like now? When in Rome?
Speaker 1: Alright. Yeah. You know, correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but Right. And it's not it's not it's not just me, a lot of friends and colleagues, peers, acquaintances. It's I you know, strangely enough, since 2013 and very recently now, I don't like the feel.
Speaker 0: Isn't it something how the derivative effects of something seemingly it's the old butterfly wings and how something seemingly disconnected can affect, can trickle down, to use a Reagan term, I guess, into effect. I feel exactly the same way. We have a thing here in New York, this notion Giuliani provided or made it popular was it's the broken windows effect where Wilson and whatever had this idea that if you have a neighborhood where there's always this one storefront with a broken window and it's never fixed, it gives people the impression people don't care about it. Whereas you go after little pieces of crime and it shows people they mean business. So little things, 100%, What about the notion of heterogeneity?
Some people are suggesting that when you have influxes, and they always focus sometimes on African, I think there might be, I don't want to use the word racist, but put it this way, other non Roman white Europeans don't catch their attention. But what happens when a culture, perhaps by virtue of dilution or I'm not gonna use words like contamination, but what happens when the Roman culture and the Italian culture and the way of life, when it is affected by influxes non Roman?
Speaker 1: There's a point where you reach, what would you call it, supersaturation, over saturation levels. And maybe it can be repaired, maybe not. So that's where we're at here.
Speaker 0: Well, Eric Thaddeus Walters, Professor Eric Thaddeus Walters, I will have everything in the description portion up to and including the link from last time. I will put your YouTube channel. And if somebody wanted to enlist your services for Vatty land to get a you are make people understand this. You're just not some dude with a little sign that says tours. Are certified.
Explain your bona fides when it comes to giving
Speaker 1: Yeah, well again, going back Yeah, when you asked me about just how do I have all this knowledge and stuff, number one, I never stopped learning and studying, doing my own research, continued research trying to publish stuff. And number two, just because of, you know, all of that, the amalgamation over time of both doing it simultaneously while, you know, a postgraduate student, and it just kind of snowballs forward and never ends. It's just that so, you know, Vatican Blue does.
Speaker 0: But you are also given some kind of a distinction, are you not? You have some type of a Yeah,
Speaker 1: Vatican Vatican Blue Guide does. So there's thousands and thousands of guides all over Italy. Here in Rome, there's at least a few thousand legitimately licensed guides because here that's a big deal, you have to if you want to do it and not have problems, have to be licensed somehow. You can be licensed by a province, meaning like a county or a city or something like that. In this case, it's the Vatican itself.
Vatican blue eyed docents. In Italian, it's called or didactic operator, but it sounds more clear and clear to
Speaker 0: So you are you are a five star
Speaker 1: I'm not the only one, but yeah.
Speaker 0: Still, you have five star platinum diamond gold. Last question. As you can tell, I'm perennial liar. I always say, last question for about five or six times. Are you ever gonna come back to the Are you permanently Or do you consider yourself a Roman, an expat?
Where do you fit into this weird world that we live in?
Speaker 1: I I think I'm a stranger in a strange land wherever I go. I mean, you know, Rome Rome Rome really is Rome really is home. Last time I was physically back, set foot in The States was eight years ago, and that was for five days. And the time before that was eleven years earlier, so I don't get back much.
Speaker 0: And you couldn't wait to get back as soon as you when you first
Speaker 1: Well, used to ask me, you know, do you what do you miss from The States? And I I said Popeyes. And then the last time I went back the last time I went back, I was I had a layover in the Detroit Internet in the Detroit Airport. And I was in the international terminal, so I started the Popeyes, let's try that up. And it was not as I remembered, so I was disappointed.
Speaker 0: Yeah, the dirty rice just kind of loses its pronoun. I also love to if ever I make I have never had the pleasure, and if Mrs. Eldon and I go there, I'm going to call you up whether you like it or not. But I would always want to say let me see Rome the way you see it. I don't want to go to.
Don't forget the beaten path.
Speaker 1: A lot know a lot of a lot of my friend. A lot of my friends meaning Roman friends, I know Rome better than most of them. Like they ask me about, you know, directions or how to do that.
Speaker 0: I also want to find out things that drive you crazy, like cheese on fish and other We'll talk about that some other day. Professor Eric Thaddeus Walters, again, I will have all of your CV, your bona fides, endless. Let us talk again after the other
Speaker 1: shoe shoe And,
Speaker 0: and again, I want to thank you for your wisdom and your genius and your absolute encyclopedic knowledge. You have made this so incredibly important. Thank you so much, my friend.
Speaker 1: Sure. Thank you. All right. Thank
Speaker 0: you, sir.
@jasper_truth - Jasper Truth
WHEN MASKING SHEEP MEET A MAN WILLING TO STAND UP FOR WHAT IS RIGHT! Right_wing_nuclear_armed_Aussie https://t.co/v2p3tQrDpw
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are living in a time where darkness is trying to suppress consciousness and enslave people. This agenda is evident in how society is responding to COVID-19. The virus is similar to the flu, but the fear surrounding it has led to a loss of personal freedom and critical thinking. People are being manipulated by governments and institutions, reminiscent of historical tyrannies. Wearing masks is compared to the oppression faced by Jews in Nazi Germany, and it's seen as a disrespect to individual freedom. The importance of free speech and the need to breathe freely is emphasized. Ultimately, love should manifest in all forms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the truth that we're living in. And Christ represents the truth, the light. We're going back to the light right now. And right now, darkness is walking the earth, and that is part of the darkness. It's an evil agenda to shut people's
Speaker 1: consciousness down and to enslave them. There's nothing else. I don't know. That. I'll just Oh, enslave them.
It's nothing else. That. Oh, we'll have to agree to disagree on that. Yeah. No.
No. We can follow a circle together.
Speaker 0: What do you disagree about, Ben?
Speaker 1: Oh, we just you know, we're actually lost, and we By who? I'm okay. By our, you know, your profit
Speaker 0: and For what?
Speaker 1: To help just keep everyone safe.
Speaker 0: In safe from what?
Speaker 1: Escape COVID.
Speaker 0: What is COVID?
Speaker 1: I don't see the time.
Speaker 0: What kind of disease? Virus. Similar to the cold and influenza? The
Speaker 1: one that's
Speaker 0: How deadly is it? How deadly is it?
Speaker 1: Keeping my head. I don't know. I can't believe it.
Speaker 0: There's no argument. I'm asking an intelligent person. Are you educated? Are you a human? Do you have a responsibility to use the intelligence god gave you?
Speaker 1: I don't know. What is that? Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: And you're not thinking right now. You're following orders. You're not thinking for yourself. You're not in touch with your soul. Because if you were, you would take that bullshit off and you would breathe freely, which is the number one form of nutrition.
And if you don't have proper oxygen, you can't have cognitive function. If you can't think right, you're easily pushed around and controlled and manipulated as governments and religions have done. As I as I gave the example before of the communists and the people that walked before us like Mao Zedong, like Stalin.
Speaker 1: Alright. Like Adolf Hitler. Okay.
Speaker 0: That happens. Right? Too. It happens. Right?
People get murdered and killed. Genocide. Correct?
Speaker 1: Yeah. This is
Speaker 0: the first step. If you don't have a mask, you're just like the Jews in Nazi Germany
Speaker 1: Oh, you're riding on the
Speaker 0: with a star on their arm.
Speaker 1: Move it. Yeah. That's fantastic.
Speaker 0: And I'm done with it. Right? See, because I came from California. They're double masking now. They're fucking with people's heads, and I don't like this.
And This is the United States of America, and this is my free speech. And I think you showing up here is disrespecting me with the mask.
Speaker 1: We'll go okay. We'll go.
Speaker 0: Do you understand? Do you understand that? So I feel you're disrespecting me with that stupid intelligence covering up your beautiful face that god gave you. How dare you? Ever.
You can believe when you're out of your mind, are you crazy? Think about that. You're covering up your beautiful face.
Speaker 1: Well, we'll head out
Speaker 0: I can't even see your expressions.
Speaker 1: Thanks for letting us come today. We had a lot of fun. Coming. Appreciate you guys' help today. We hope everything else
Speaker 0: Just just remember, love comes in forms. All forms, girls.
reSee.it AI Summary
Hydrogen peroxide eliminates toxins and germs, and it can kill cancer and tumor tissue. It works because normal cells thrive on oxygen, while cancer cells prefer glucose. I also shared a Skunk Wash formula using 3% hydrogen peroxide, baking soda, and liquid soap.
@jasper_truth - JasperTruth
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE : IT ELIMINATES TOXINS AND GERMS, AND IT ALSO KILLS CANCER AND TUMOR TISSUE! Hydrogen Peroxide (H202) Kills Germs, Viruses(don't exist) and Cancer Cells Just By Rubbing It Into Your Body Normal cells love oxygen but cancer cells do not – they prefer glucose (sugar). Skunk Wash Formula 1 quart of 3% Hydrogen Peroxide 1/2 cup of Baking Soda (Sodium Bicarbonate) 1 teaspoon of liquid soap..? NIGHTBREED
Video Transcript AI Summary
For skincare, use simple soap without additives, preferably the cheapest option. Apricot kernels are not effective for cancer treatment as they require impractically large amounts for any benefit. Ozone and hydrogen peroxide are valuable; peroxide (H2O2) is particularly useful because it kills germs, cancer cells, and oxygenates the bloodstream. Unlike hyperbaric oxygen, ozone remains in the blood longer, providing sustained benefits. Peroxide can be applied topically to help with various health issues, including infections and toxins. While ozone requires special equipment, peroxide is inexpensive and effective. Orthodox medicine often dismisses it due to its low cost, but it offers significant benefits for patients beyond just cancer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do I put on my face? Soap and water. Sorry. Seaweed? Seaweed.
Just general seaweed. What's in seaweed? All sea products should be avoided. So the no. Yes.
Essiac. Essiac. We have tried and tried and tried to use SEAC. We have not found it to be effective at all. It's not harmful.
If you'd like to take it, I wouldn't fight it, but we haven't found it to be of much value. I'm sorry. Only on cancer patients. Pardon me? Only on sick people.
On sick people. On cancer patients. Yes. Okay. Yes.
So sorry. So what soap do you use? Do you use? What soap do we use? Always soap that has no additives.
Usually, the cheapest is best. No antiperspirone, no anti this, no anti that. Just cheap cheap and simple. Well, soap is always made from fat. Just the simplest soap you can find.
Yes. What do you think of apricot kernels? I think very little of apricot kernels. Okay? They're supposed to have Laetrile.
But in order to get, pharmaceutically effective doses of apricot seed, Laetrile, you would need to eat a pound or 2. You get much too much oils and the, flesh of this and nuts and so on. It's a no no. I'd like to talk to you about ozone and peroxide. Now, this is quite an interesting situation.
Before we give anything to a patient, it's me first. You ever hear an oncologist say that for chemo? Wonder why? It happens that either ozone or peroxide, they're more or less similar. Okay.
All of you know that water is h two o. 2 h's and one o. Right? That's water. Okay?
Okay. Now, if you add one extra o, and what have you got? Now, you have h202 and that's peroxide. Right? But the interesting thing is that while oxygen has 2 valences and is usually attached with 2, bonds, for instance, the plain oxygen, gas that we're breathing all day long, okay, has, the 2 oxygen, but they are connected double bond.
And that's a pretty solid material that doesn't break down easily. Same with water, it's a very solid material, doesn't break down easily. Now you add another o and instead of oxygen, you have ozone. Now, you have the similar situation in both cases. This additional oxygen is attached with a single bond.
Same here, single bond. And because it's attached with a single bond, it comes off easy and it's very active and it's extremely valuable. And that's what we use. We use a lot of the hydrogen peroxide And what it does, okay, so we get that o radical, yes, and it is a free radical, but it has wonderful capabilities. It does 4 things.
I don't know if I can get them all on here. Number 1, it kills germs and viruses. Okay. Very good. And number 2, it kills tumor tissue cancer.
Number 3, it oxygenates the bloodstream. Now sometimes they use hyperbaric oxygen chambers to pressure extra oxygen into the blood, but it's oxygen, it's not ozone. And the minute you get out of the chamber very quickly, you lose this extra oxygen, and it's the way it was. Not with the ozone. That extra ozone is much more capable of staying in the blood, and you still find it 72 hours later.
So this is, number 3. It also needs the blood, therefore makes it more active. And number 4, because it's a free radical, it combines with other free radicals and makes toxic free radicals into excretable compounds. Okay? So it combines with free radicals.
Therefore, this whole thing, this h 202 and also ozone, is very valuable material. We use the peroxide. We give every patient when they come a bottle of peroxide to rub on their bodies every day at least once, preferably twice. Because like every other thing you put on your skin, it's absorbed right into the bloodstream and right away this extra oxygen radical goes into the bloodstream. And it helps to kill germs and viruses, and it helps to kill tumor tissue, and it helps to oxygenate and ozonate the blood, and it helps to combine the free radicals.
Very valuable. Okay? Now, ozone can also be used, but it's a little more difficult. For ozone, you need a room ozone generator, which is very useful, but it's a little extra machine. It happens that peroxide is very cheap.
Very cheap, very effective, very useful. Guess what Orthodox doctors think of it? No good. It's too cheap. Okay?
Yeah. Why do you want to put it on your hair? You're gonna bleach it halfways. Don't try. Doesn't work.
Okay? So very, very valuable, and anything like this, which is harmless, does only good, helps the patient, and doesn't just have to be cancer. How about germs and viruses? What about chronic fatigue? What about all the other problems?
What about the free radicals? What about the toxins? Yes. Yes, I know. You can put ozone in the bloodstream.
I've had those treatments, but just for people to do at home, this is so easy.
@jasper_truth - JasperTruth
LISTEN TO HER MC DONALD'S STORY! PɪʀᴀᴛᴇPᴇᴛᴇ https://t.co/5I8FCi4Bmu
Video Transcript AI Summary
McDonald's sells around 7 million hamburgers daily, totaling over 2 billion annually. This figure is significant when considering there are only about 1 billion cows globally, with 300 million in India where cows cannot be killed. The math suggests that the meat used for these hamburgers cannot solely come from cows. It's important to be cautious about the meat being served, especially when it comes to feeding children. The source of the meat in these hamburgers is questionable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the people that still go to Mcdonald's and worse off still feed their kids Mcdonald's, let me break this down for you in a scientific way and I know you probably heard it before but it bears repeating. McDonald's sells about 7,000,000 hamburgers per day worldwide. So that's about 2 point something 1000000000 hamburgers per year. And I'm not talking about Burger King, Wendy's. I'm not talking about the steak you eat every night.
I'm not talking about all that cow meat that we throw on the barbecue all summer. I'm talking about only McDonald's. There are only 1,000,000,000 cows on this planet, and 300,000,000 of them live in India where you cannot kill cows. So where are they getting this meat from? It's not from cows because the math is not matting.
Stop feeding your children meat that you don't know what kind of meat it is. It's not cow meat.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a disturbing UN document discussing replacement migration, which highlights concerns about the demographic shifts in Europe. A 2009 interview with Dr. Rima Laibow suggested that the Covid pandemic was part of a long-term plan by the Deep State and the UN. Dutch commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek emphasized the need for Europeans to voice their concerns about becoming a minority in their own countries, arguing that this demographic change is being imposed against the will of the people. She also noted the backlash against those who speak out on this issue.
@jasper_truth - JasperTruth
DISTURBING UN DOCUMENT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION REVEALS EVERYTHING! The Forbidden Truth: The Great Replacement of White Europeans in Their Own Countries Population culling by vaccine revealed in 2009 interview This reveal-all population culling video from a 2009 interview with a doctor forecast the Covid scamdemic we are under today. Today’s events predicted 12 years ago are just too much of a coincidence A stunning interview with high profile Doctor Rima Laibow filmed in 2009 could have been made yesterday. The Covid scamdemic has been meticulously planned by the Deep State and the UN since the 1970’s and today is in full flight. Dutch political commentator and lawyer Eva Vlaardingerbroek warned that Europeans must take a stand against the huge demographic shift brought by mass migration orchestrated by their leaders or risk becoming a minority in their home countries. She said that Europeans will be attacked and accused of racism if they say, “Hey, this continent, Europe, has been predominantly White for the entirety of its history, and now suddenly within one generation, a few bureaucrats have decided against the will of the people that we should suddenly be a minority.” She added, “I think there are many ways in which you can defend yourself, of course, against this ridiculous attack, so I’m sure that they’re going say about me that I’m a terrible racist again. No, that’s not true. I don’t think that any race is superior to another. I just think that mine is also not inferior to that of others.” This speech is the reason why the Biden administration and Western elites are so desperate to control speech as mass immigration to replace Americans is also happening in the United States. NIGHTBREED
Video Transcript AI Summary
An official UN report from 2000 outlines a strategy for addressing declining populations in developed nations through mass migration. It suggests that countries like Italy and Germany would require millions of migrants by 2050 to maintain their working-age populations. This isn't merely about immigration; it's about demographic transformation and control. Current migration crises in the U.S. and Europe reflect this agenda, as governments allow large influxes of migrants, straining resources and altering social dynamics. The report indicates that such demographic shifts could dilute national identities and centralize power, leading to increased surveillance and loss of sovereignty. This orchestrated migration is seen as a means to create chaos, allowing elites to expand their control under the guise of addressing population issues. The plan outlined in the report is now being executed, revealing a broader strategy for global governance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're not gonna believe what I found. To my knowledge, I'm the first person to put this on YouTube. It's an official UN document that the global elites don't want you to talk about. The United Nations published this replacement migration report back in 2000. And guess what?
They laid out the blueprint for what we're seeing in full force today. This report proposes using migration, yes, mass immigration, as a solution to declining and aging populations in developed nations like the United States, France, Germany, and Japan. Now this isn't just about a few immigrants crossing borders. No. We're talking about a systematic overhaul of entire populations.
Look at the numbers in the report. Italy, for example, is predicted to see its population shrink by a whopping 28% by 2050 without migration. What does the UN propose to stop this replacement migration on a massive scale? For Italy, they suggest needing 12,600,000 migrants. For the entire European Union, 47,000,000 migrants by 2050.
Let that sink in. But here's the kicker. This isn't just some far off theory. We're seeing this play out right now. The southern border of the United States is being flooded with migrants and Europe is facing a migrant crisis, the likes of which we've never seen before.
All the while, politicians and global elites keep telling us that this is necessary. This report talks about maintaining the working age population. They throw around terms like support ratios and demographic trends. Let's be clear. This isn't just about immigration.
This is about transforming entire nations through demographic engineering. They're not just addressing a natural issue like aging populations. We're seeing millions pour over the border, and it's no accident. This is by design. The globalists want to tear down borders, blur cultures, and make us all part of a controlled system.
The crime rates are rising. The political divide is deepening, and the social fabric is being torn apart. I'm going to show you exactly how these plans are connected to today's migration crisis. 1st, understand that this isn't a grassroots movement of desperate people fleeing bad situations. No.
This is orchestrated, folks. The globalists are using migration as a tool to disrupt national stability and dilute the cultural and political power of sovereign nations. It's all about control. By flooding countries with mass migration, they destabilize local economies, strain social services, and ultimately weaken the political voice of the native population. This is classic divide and conquer on a global scale.
We're seeing the fallout in real time. In the United States, the Biden administration is allowing wave after wave of migrants to enter the country illegally, and the mainstream media doesn't even bat an eye. Why? Because it's part of a much larger agenda, the same one outlined in the 2000 UN report. Remember, they framed it as a solution to aging populations and low birth rates, but what they didn't emphasize is the sheer volume of migrants needed to sustain these support ratios.
Think about this. To stabilize Europe's workforce, the UN estimates 161,000,000 migrants would be needed by 2050. That's not just a number. That's a complete demographic transformation. In the US, they predict 593,000,000 migrants would be required to keep up with the demands of an aging population by maintaining the ratio of working age individuals to retirees.
We are witnessing the tip of this iceberg right now with the migrant crisis at the southern border. Look at how this affects us directly when you bring in this level of migration. It puts immense strain on public resources. Schools are overwhelmed. Health care systems buckle.
Crime rates surge, and housing becomes scarce. Meanwhile, the globalists sit back and watch as the middle class is eroded, replaced with a population that's more dependent on government handouts and less likely to push back against authoritarian policies. But it's not just about economics or social strain. There's a deeper, more sinister agenda here. By displacing native populations, the globalists aim to erase national identities.
They want a borderless world where people are easier to control, where cultural differences are flattened, and where we all fit into their technocratic vision. This isn't some wild conspiracy theory. It's happening, and the UN replacement migration report laid out the playbook decades ago. And if you think this is limited to the US and Europe, think again. The elites are pushing the same agenda in countries across the globe.
Africa, Asia, South America, they're all being set up as pawns in this global chess game. The migrant crisis is just one front in a much larger war for control over populations. This isn't some hidden document. It's been out in the open for years, and it lays out the playbook for what we're seeing unfold in real time. The text from this report outlines how countries like Japan, Italy, and Germany are facing declining populations due to below replacement fertility rates.
And what's their solution? Mass immigration. In scenario 4 of the report, the UN calculates how many migrants are needed to maintain the size of the working age population in these nations. The numbers are staggering. In Germany, for instance, the report suggests that over 24,000,000 migrants would be needed to maintain its working age population between 2,021,050.
Italy would need 19,600,000 immigrants over the same period. Folks, these are not small numbers. They're talking about replacing significant portions of national populations with foreign migrants. Now, if we connect this to the current migrant crisis, the parallels are crystal clear. Right now, Western nations, especially those in Europe and North America, are witnessing massive influxes of migrants.
We're seeing these migration flows overwhelm social services, reshape communities, and cause social unrest. But as outlined in the replacement migration report, this is exactly the kind of scenario the global elites are banking on. The UN's replacement migration agenda is essentially a demographic weapon. They're pushing for these migrant waves not just to shore up population numbers, but to dilute national identities and shift political power. In countries like the US and the UK, they're not just trying to solve aging population issues, they're reshaping the entire social and political landscape.
This is part of the broader strategy to centralize control and subjugate sovereign nations under a globalist agenda. This scenario assumes that in order to keep the potential support ratio, the ratio of working age individuals to retirees, the numbers of migrants required would be astronomically high. For example, Japan would need over 500,000,000 immigrants by 2050 to maintain its PSR. That's right, 500,000,000. The European Union would require nearly 700,000,000 immigrants.
These numbers are mind blowing and would utterly transform the cultural, social, and political structures of these nations. So what's the end game here? Look around you. This mass immigration is about engineering chaos. Governments and elites know that such drastic demographic shifts lead to tension, social fragmentation, and a loss of national cohesion.
And in the chaos, they expand their power. This is when they implement surveillance systems, digital IDs, and global governance structures. It's all connected, folks. The crisis creates the need for solutions, and those solutions are always about controlling us more. The current migrant crisis isn't a humanitarian emergency.
It's a calculated move. Governments like the US and nations across Europe are being flooded with migrants in a move that's been telegraphed by the UN for years. The replacement migration report is the road map, and what we're witnessing now is the execution of that plan. This is why we see globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum pushing for open borders, digital tracking, and increased surveillance. They're paving the way for global control where national sovereignty is eroded, and we are all just data points in a technocratic system.
And this crisis isn't just a byproduct of economic or social policies. It's by design. The UN's replacement migration report laid out the blueprint for how mass migration could be used to reshape populations and cement global control. Today, as borders crumble and migrants flood into nations by the millions, The true nature of this plan is becoming more obvious. The elites are creating the problem and their solution is more control over every aspect of our lives.
@jasper_truth - JasperTruth
THE ENTIRE BL00D SUPPLY IN THE US & THE REST OF THE WORLD IS CONTAMINATED WITH THE SP!KE PROTEIN!!! https://t.co/3Z6ZJnkjxN
Video Transcript AI Summary
The entire blood supply in America and worldwide is contaminated with spike proteins from vaccines. We need to stop accepting blood from vaccinated individuals, as unvaccinated patients receiving these transfusions are experiencing serious health issues like blood clots, heart attacks, and strokes. This was predicted three years ago, and those who spoke out were silenced. It's crucial to remove the spike protein from the blood supply and hold accountable those responsible for this situation. The current management of this issue is reckless and dangerous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. Doctor Ben Marble here. I'm gonna make a comment about the blood supply, the entire blood supply in America, and basically the whole world is contaminated with the spike protein, poison by a weapon. We need to rest all the damn evil poison pushers, and we need to quit accepting blood from people who took the poison, because we're seeing patients that get blood transfusions that are unvaccinated, and suddenly they get blood clots or have heart attacks or strokes, have bad outcomes after receiving blood that has the spike protein poison in it, which is what I told everybody was gonna happen 3 years ago, and I was banned everywhere for telling the truth. Alright.
So we gotta arrest all these damn evil poison pushers, and we need to get the spike protein out of the blood supply. This is complete mad science insanity, and all the retards are in charge, and they all need to go to fucking hell as far as I'm concerned.
@jasper_truth - JasperTruth
GOOD EXPLANATION ABOUT THE COLOR 🔵 BLUE AND THE LASER WEAPON https://t.co/PsC3IfhZhy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Blue objects reflect blue light and resist absorbing energy from blue lasers, making them laser-proof. In China, many roofs are being painted blue, sparking speculation about their knowledge of lasers and the color blue. Are they preparing for a laser-centric future? Join the discussion on why China is choosing blue roofs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know there's a hidden secret about the color blue that scientists don't want you to know? Blue objects appear blue because they reflect blue light and absorb all other colors. But here's where it gets interesting. Lasers work by focusing a lot of energy into a specific color of light. If an object doesn't absorb much energy at that color, it's less likely to heat up and burn.
So blue objects, which reflect blue light, don't absorb much energy from blue lasers. They're practically laser proof. And here's the conspiracy. Have you noticed that many roofs in China are being painted blue? It seems that Chinese residents are being told something we aren't.
Will these blue roofs prevent houses from being burned down by laser? Could it be that they know something we don't? Are they preparing for a future where lasers play a crucial role? Join the conversation. Why is China painting their roofs blue?
What do they know about lasers and the color blue? Follow for more mind blowing