reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @JayGenXer
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw the “stolen land” narrative get hit with actual history: the claim that Native people were here “from the beginning” was corrected with the Bering Land Bridge migration 15,000–20,000 years ago, then the post noted tribes conquered and displaced one another too. “What you call stolen, I call conquered.” It argues America and Canada took, kept, defended, and built major countries—celebrating 250 years on the 4th of July, not raiding villages.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
🚨 This is what happens when the “stolen land” narrative gets hit with actual history. Native guy starts in on white people being on “stolen” land… Then this Native woman shuts it down with facts: - Native Americans weren’t here “from the beginning.” Their ancestors crossed the Bering Land Bridge from Siberia 15,000–20,000 years ago. - Once they got here, tribes conquered, displaced, and built empires over each other (Comanches pushed out the Apache and built the Comancheria — sound familiar?). - Every single piece of land on earth has changed hands through conquest. That’s how human history works. She nails it: “What you call stolen, I call conquered.” Then she drops the line that actually matters: America 🇺🇸 and Canada 🇨🇦 took it, kept it, defended it, and built the greatest Countries the world has ever seen — with more freedom, opportunity, and prosperity than any of those tribal empires ever dreamed of. On the 4th of July she’s celebrating 250 years of that progress… not raiding villages and scalping people. This is the response every “land acknowledgment” warrior needs to hear. Who’s sick of the selective history?!?? #StolenLandMyth #4thOfJuly #AmericanHistory #FactsOverFeelings #CanadaFirst
Video Transcript AI Summary
An American Indian is described enjoying his homeland while “dissenters” of pilgrims and colonizers are portrayed as enjoying his homelands.
A second speaker addresses a Native person, stating that neither the speaker nor even the speaker’s own Cherokee grandfather’s ancestors were originally from the region either. They claim Native peoples came from Asia, crossed the Bering land bridge from Siberia during the last ice age thousands of years ago (20,000 to 15,000 years ago), with evidence of people reaching South America by 14,800 years ago. They say different Indigenous groups then began conquering, displacing other groups, forming their own tribes and empires, raiding towns, taking land, and building territories, framing this as “kind of like colonizing.”
They specifically mention the Comanches sweeping down from the north in the 1700s, building a massive empire called the Comantaria across the southern plains, pushing out the Apache and other tribes, and holding it until they could not keep it anymore. The speaker argues that “building nations” works by taking and keeping territory until it can no longer be held, asserting that ancestors did this to other tribes and that stronger forces later came along.
The speaker compares this to South and Central America today, claiming Spanish is spoken there because Spaniards conquered empires already in place and made Spanish the dominant language. They assert that every group that ever held the ground took it and held it until they lost it, and that America took it, kept it, defended it, and built what they call the greatest republic the world has ever seen, with “more freedom, opportunity, and prosperity” than any tribal empires dreamed of.
They contrast “stolen” with “conquered,” and say they will celebrate 250 years on the 4th of July of what came after. They frame “progress” as no longer raiding villages, scalping people, or “eating each other,” conclude with “God bless America,” and wish “Happy 250th” and “250 more.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: American Indian enjoying his homeland while these dissenters of pilgrims and colonizers are enjoying my homelands.
Speaker 1: Alright, listen here my little native sugar tits. You and even my own Cherokee grandfather's ancestors are not originally from here either. You realize that, right? Native people came from Asia. They crossed the Bering land bridge from Siberia during the last ice age thousands of years ago. We're talking 20,000 to 15,000 years ago with evidence of people all the way down in South America by 14,800 years ago. Our ancestors were not native to this continent from the beginning. And then once they got here, different groups started conquering, displacing other groups. They formed their own little tribes and empires and they raided towns and they took land and they built territories. Kind of like colonizing. The Comanches even swept down from the north in the 1700s, and they built a massive empire called the Comantaria across the southern plains, and they pushed out Apache and other tribes. They kept it until they couldn't keep it anymore. That's how this whole building nations thing works. You can take it, you can keep it, until you can't. Your ancestors did it to other tribes, and then stronger forces came along. That's just history. That is not some special sin against one specific group. Look at South and Central America today. People speak Spanish there. Not because it was their native language. It's because the Spaniards came over, conquered the empires that were already there, and made Spanish the dominant language. Every group that ever held this ground took it and held it until they lost it. America took it, kept it, defended it, and then built the greatest republic the world has ever seen with more freedom, opportunity, and prosperity than any of those tribal empires ever dreamed of. What you call stolen, I call conquered. And on the 4th of July, I'm going to celebrate 250 years of what came after. Because at least we're not raiding villages, scalping people, and eating each other anymore. That's progress. God bless America. Happy 250th. And here's to 250 more. This was fun. Have a day.
reSee.it AI Summary
I see why the left is freaking out about “Citizen Vigilante.” The film dares to ask what happens when the government imports chaos, won’t protect citizens, and people finally push back. It reflects real failures—extortion rings, buried stats, politicians prioritizing others—so the establishment hates any hint citizens won’t stay passive.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
The left is losing their minds over this new movie “Citizen Vigilante.” Why? Because it gives people the one idea they fear most: What happens when the government deliberately imports chaos, refuses to protect its own citizens, and the average person finally decides they’ve had enough? This isn’t some random action flick. It’s a reminder that when the state fails — when extortion rings run wild in our cities, when crime stats get buried, when politicians prioritize foreigners over Canadians — people reach a breaking point. The establishment hates anything that suggests citizens might stop waiting for permission to defend themselves. They want you passive. Compliant. “Own nothing and be happy.” Movies like this terrify them because they plant the seed that maybe the people still have a spine. Canada is already living the prequel. Calgary just dropped 15 mugshots in a 49-case extortion spree. Same story everywhere. The left doesn’t hate the movie because it’s violent. They hate it because it shows what happens when good people stop playing along with their destruction of the country. #cdnpoli #CitizenVigilante #LiberalFail #CrimeWave #CanadaFirst
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims that “Citizen Vigilante” is receiving criticism from “the left,” who are “calling it graphic” and “a call for violence.” Speaker 0 says their interpretation of the movie is that it warns Western governments that “good men are not going to keep standing by” while “their women and children” are harmed by “newcomers,” as “radical activist judges” let criminals go free “systematically.” Speaker 0 further states that the film depicts a homeland being “destroyed from within” by people “openly hostile to it,” and that “their own government does absolutely nothing but punish those who speak out about it.”
Speaker 0 says the movie is “not asking for chaos,” but is telling viewers to “wake up,” because “at some point, the line gets crossed.” Speaker 0 adds that if “good men finally snap,” “nobody’s going to like what happens next,” and emphasizes that “there is no one more dangerous than the man who just wanted to be left alone,” describing this as “simply reality staring us in the face.”
Speaker 0 states that “the entire premise of the movie” is “ripped from the headlines,” and claims that “essentially every single thing” in the movie “has happened within the past month in europe in the united states.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The left is absolutely losing their mind over the new movie Citizen Vigilante. They're calling it graphic. They're calling it a call for violence. My opinion, my interpretation of the movie is it serves as a warning to Western governments around the globe that good men are not going to keep standing by while their women and children get essayed by newcomers while radical activist judges let the criminals walk free systematically. while they watch their homeland get destroyed from within by people who are openly hostile to it. And on top of that, their own government does absolutely nothing but punish those who speak out about it. They're not asking for chaos. They're saying, wake up. Because at some point, the line gets crossed. And when good men finally snap, well, nobody's going to like what happens next. There is no one more dangerous than the man who just wanted to be left alone. This is simply reality staring us in the face. The entire premise of the movie, is ripped from the headlines you can find essentially every single thing that's happened in the movie has happened within the past month in europe in the united states
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by Bill C-22. Expert after expert testified—CCLA, OpenMedia, Signal, Google, Meta—calling it the most dangerous surveillance bill in over a decade. They said it expands state control with little accountability, forces tech backdoors, long logs, encryption breaks, and secret powers. Carney is ramming it through with only three sitting days.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
🚨🚨🚨 THE ALARM BELLS NEED TO BE DEAFENING !! 🚨🚨🚨 Expert after expert just testified on Bill C-22: - Canadian Civil Liberties Association - OpenMedia - Signal - Google - Meta All saying the same thing: This is the most dangerous surveillance bill they’ve seen in over a decade. They told us it was about safety and fighting crime. What they’re actually building is more state control with zero meaningful accountability. This isn’t “modernizing lawful access.” This is the digital cage snapping shut — one rushed bill at a time. If you’re still shrugging, you’re not paying attention. Canada is building a digital surveillance apparatus so total, so invasive, and so unaccountable that it would make North Korea envious. Bill C-22 isn’t “modernizing lawful access.” It’s the state ordering every major tech company — Signal, Google, Meta, and beyond — to build permanent backdoors into their systems. It’s forcing them to log who every Canadian talks to, when, and from where — for up to a year — on every app you use to bank, access healthcare, message your family, or live your private life. It’s giving the government the power to demand encryption be broken, data deletion controls overridden, and remote access capabilities installed… all under blanket secrecy provisions so the companies can’t even tell you it happened. Expert after expert testified under oath: “This is the most dangerous surveillance bill I’ve seen in more than ten years.” “A backdoor built for the good guys is simply a vulnerability waiting for the bad guys.” “Part 2 is incompatible with the fundamental human right to privacy.” And Carney’s Public Safety Minister is ramming it through Parliament with only three sitting days of hearings. No real debate. No proper scrutiny. Just “trust us, it’s for your safety.” This is the quiet part said out loud: more state control, zero meaningful accountability. C-2. C-8. C-11. C-22. C-34. C-63. Piece by piece. Bill by bill. They are welding the digital cage shut around every Canadian. If this passes, you don’t get privacy. You get permanent surveillance with the government holding the master key — and the legal right to lie about it. This isn’t Canada anymore. This is what happens when a government stops seeing citizens as free people and starts seeing them as data to be owned and monitored. Wake up. Call your MP. Flood their phones. Scream if you have to. Before the cage door locks for good. #cdnpoli #BillC22 #SurveillanceState #DigitalCage #NorthKoreaEnvy #PrivacyIsDead #TotalControl #CanadaFirst #LiberalFail
Video Transcript AI Summary
Participants argue Bill C-22 is being rushed and contend it contains provisions that pose major risks to Canadian privacy. One view says the process is “quite rushed,” noting the committee has had only three sitting days to hear witnesses, which is not enough for legislation of that complexity.
A participant describes Bill C-22 as the “most dangerous surveillance bill” they have seen in more than 10 years in Canada, and even in other democracies. They say the Public Safety Minister should not be trusted to claim limited amendments will fix C-22, stating that nothing short of striking the majority of Part 2 would protect Canadian privacy.
Multiple speakers focus on Part 2 as the key problem. They argue Part 2 is incompatible with the fundamental human right to privacy and could ultimately make Canadians less safe, not more. Concerns include a blanket secrecy provision that would prevent them from explaining to users what changes were made or, if discovered, why they were made.
Speakers also say C-22 would let the government compel organizations to build surveillance capabilities to log who is talking to whom, when, and from where for up to a year. One participant states this would affect Canadians who rely on secure private communications to bank, access healthcare, run a business, or talk to family, emphasizing it is not a hypothetical risk.
Google is cited as having significant concerns with several elements of Part 2 as currently drafted, particularly the potential for the law—without stronger definitions—to force dismantling critical privacy protections. Examples given include breaking encryption, overriding users’ data deletion controls, and building remote access capability, which the speakers say could facilitate foreign interference and weaken global user privacy.
One speaker characterizes a “backdoor built for the good guys” as “simply a vulnerability,” waiting for bad actors. In closing, a speaker urges taking more time to receive and review all public evidence and to thoroughly reform or abandon Part 2 of C-22 before it moves forward, describing the process as under-researched given the “massive stakes.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 4: My view is that this matter has been quite rushed. Do you share that perspective?
Speaker 2: It would certainly be helpful to have more time. This committee has had three sitting days to hear from witnesses. That's not sufficient for legislation of this level of complexity.
Speaker 4: Look, this is the most dangerous surveillance bill I've seen in more than 10 years of doing this work in Canada and even in other democracies.
Speaker 0: And we look forward to working with the opposition on an appropriate language that we can live with.
Speaker 4: Do not let the Public Safety Minister convince you that limited amendments will fix C-22. They will not. Nothing short of striking the majority of Part 2 will protect Canadian privacy.
Speaker 3: The bill has a blanket secrecy provision that would essentially prevent us from being able to explain to our users that these changes had been made or if discovered why they had been made.
Speaker 6: Part 2 is really the problem with this bill and could ultimately make Canadians less safe, not more.
Speaker 1: Part 2, the way that it is currently drafted, is incompatible with the fundamental human right to privacy.
Speaker 5: Google has significant concerns with several elements of Part 2 of Bill C-22 as it is currently drafted.
Speaker 1: C-22 would let the government compel us to construct the very surveillance apparatus we have refused to build to log who is talking to whom, when and from where for up to a year.
Speaker 6: It affects every Canadian who depends on secure private communications to bank, access healthcare, run a business or simply talk to their family. And this is not a hypothetical risk.
Speaker 5: Without stronger definitions, the law could be used to force the dismantling of critical privacy of architecture, such as breaking encryption, overriding users' data deletion controls, or building remote access capability, all of which could facilitate foreign interference and weaken global user privacy.
Speaker 1: A backdoor built for the good guys is simply a vulnerability, waiting for the bad guys to find it.
Speaker 4: This is a symptom of a rushed under-research process for a bill that has massive stakes. On behalf of our community, I urge you to take the time to receive and review all public evidence and thoroughly reform or abandon Part 2 of C-22 before it moves forward.
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched EOS Positioning Systems (the GPR company) call out the “expert” who claimed she found 215 murdered Indigenous children’s remains—and said they’re removing her from their website. After 4+ years, there were zero confirmed graves or exhumed bodies, yet media and Trudeau ran mass-murder headlines anyway.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
THE KAMLOOPS “215 GRAVES” HOAX JUST GOT ROASTED BY THE COMPANY THAT MADE THE MACHINE 🔥 The GPR company (EOS Positioning Systems) calls the “expert” who claimed she found 215 murdered Indigenous children’s remains… …and tells her they’re removing her from their website. Why? Because 4+ years later: ❌ Zero bodies exhumed ❌ Zero confirmed graves ✅ The band now calls them “anomalies” ✅ Media and Trudeau ran with mass murder headlines anyway Churches burned fire🔥 Flags flew at half-mast for weeks. Billions poured into “reconciliation.” All based on soil disturbances that could be tree roots or old pipes 🤦🏻♂️ This savage phone call exposes the whole grift. Watch till the end 👇 #KamloopsHoax #215Graves #ResidentialSchools #TrudeauLies #Canada #WokeHysteria #TwoTierCanada #MediaLies
Video Transcript AI Summary
Curtis from AOS Positioning Systems calls Sarah to tell her they will be removing her from their website. Curtis says customers are questioning the product because it was listed at “600 bodies” and later at “two fifteen,” which customers view as anomalies. Curtis explains the removal is intended to protect Sarah while the results are validated in “just a couple more years,” after which they will put her back on the website.
Sarah reacts, asking what Curtis means and disputing the implication that it is their fault. Curtis says they stand by their systems and that they work, and he clarifies that the system did not come with the “white guys” who were present during Sarah’s last use of it.
Curtis explains the people Sarah refers to were archaeologists at an archaeological site, and they do not come and operate the machine for Sarah; Sarah has to operate it herself. Sarah identifies herself as an archaeologist and calls herself a conflict anthropologist. She says she remembers the word “conflict” from CBC articles and assumed it related to archaeology because the work was described as an archaeological dig.
Sarah acknowledges the article lent credibility to her work and she did not double-check. Curtis asks what conflict anthropology is, and Sarah responds with an explanation that it is “the study of hating white people.” Curtis then says he would like to read Sarah’s thesis about how much she hates white people, and Sarah agrees that she will read it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, Sarah. It's Curtis from AOS Positioning Systems. Yeah. Hi. Listen.
I'm just calling to let you know beforehand that, we will be removing you from the website. It's it's, We've just had some customers, right? Because they see you on the website and then, you know, it started at 600 bodies and it's two fifteen, and now they are just anomalies. And so the customers are asking questions like, Does your product work? Or was Sarah incompetent?
Right? It's more to protect you. And I'm sure your results will be validated in just a couple more years. But until then, as soon as they're validated, we'll put you right back up on the website. What do you mean it's our fault?
No. No. No. We stand by our systems. They work.
Didn't come with everything. No. The white guys. The system didn't come with the white guys that were there last time you used it? No.
Those old white guys weren't part of the system. Those were archaeologists at an archaeological site. No. They don't come and operate the machine for you. You have to do that yourself.
You are an archaeologist. Right, Sarah? Conflict anthropologist. I remember that word conflict because when I was reading the CBC articles, you know, I remember the word conflict, and but then, you know, it I I just assumed because we're talking about an archaeological dig that it was archaeology. My brain must have just skipped over that.
The article lent so much credibility to your work that I just didn't even think to double check. What is conflict anthropology, Sarah? The study of hating white people. Wow. Would I like to read your thesis on how much you hate white people?
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'll read it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m stunned: a Canadian whistleblower says a private Ontario charter worker is paid huge sums to fly small planes and aerially disperse millions of ticks across specific regions twice a year—early spring and early fall. This year they allegedly used deer ticks bred to survive cold. The ticks arrive in boxed batches and are dropped from single or dual-prop aircraft, weeks before the story broke.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
WAIT…. WHAT?? 😱 🚨 Canadian whistleblower drops a BOMBSHELL. A worker for a private charter company in Ontario claims they’re paid HUGE money to fly small planes and aerially disperse MILLIONS of ticks across specific regions — twice a year, early spring and early fall. This year they switched to deer ticks specifically bred to withstand cold temperatures. The company receives the ticks in boxes (each containing millions) and drops them from single or dual-prop aircraft with one pilot and one dispersal handler on board. The post was made in mid-March… weeks before the story exploded. While our government floods the country with migration, crushes the middle class, and sends billions overseas, this is happening in Ontario? WHEN will CANADIANS find this inner strength and demand answers?? #cdnpoli #Ontario #TickDispersal #Whistleblower #CanadaWakeUp #LiberalBetrayal #EnoughIsEnough
Video Transcript AI Summary
A transcript reads a quoted post from someone who said they work for a private charter company in Ontario, Canada. The person claimed the company handles booking and chartering flights across Ontario, and that they are paid to spread ticks by air. They said the tick dispersal happens twice a year—early spring and early fall—but that “this year, we’ve been hired to do it earlier.”
The post described how the company receives ticks “in boxes,” with each box containing “millions of ticks.” The person said the aircraft used are “generally single or dual prop aircraft,” with a single pilot and “one other passenger” responsible for dispersal. They claimed the work “pays a lot.”
According to the post, the ticks are dispersed in “several specific regions in Ontario,” and that the regions are “always the same… each and every year.” The person said last spring the ticks dispersed were mostly American dog ticks, while this year they are “all deer ticks,” described as “supposedly specifically bred to withstand cold temperatures.”
The transcript notes that the post was dated March 16, two weeks before Snopes said the story originated. It then states that the whistleblower’s account “sounds eerily familiar” to claims about boxes of ticks being found, and says it “begs the question” whether the person was telling the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this form post, and I'm gonna put it directly on the screen, and I'm gonna read it word for word. It says this quote, I work for a private charter company in Ontario, Canada. The company handles booking and chartering flights across Ontario mainly. We are paid to spread ticks by air. It happens twice a year, early spring and early fall.
This year, we've been hired to do it earlier. The company receives the ticks in boxes. Each box contains millions of ticks. The aircraft used are generally single or dual prop aircraft, single pilot, and one other passenger that handles the dispersal. It pays a lot, and I mean a lot.
Generally, the ticks are dispersed in several specific regions in Ontario, And it's always the same regions each and every year, thus far. Last spring, the ticks dispersed were mostly American dog ticks. This year, they are all deer ticks, supposedly specifically bred to withstand cold temperatures. End quote. So that post was from March 16, two weeks before Snopes said that this story originated.
Alright? And it's pretty interesting. Here, we have a whistleblower saying that they are paid to disperse ticks across Canada. Now this sounds eerily familiar to what we're hearing about these boxes of ticks that are being found. And it begs the question, was this person telling the truth?
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a post claiming irreversible harm from puberty blockers and gender-affirming care. It centers on Faith Groleau, who says she was fast-tracked and experimented on as a child, with complications doctors ignored, leaving her physically disabled. It argues this isn’t care but medical experimentation, cites the Cass Review, European pullbacks, and lawsuits, and accuses Canada’s Liberals of pushing this ideology. It calls to protect kids.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
💔 The irreversible damage being done to our youth is beyond sad — it’s criminal. Watch Faith Groleau, a brave detransitioner, lay it out: “I was experimented on. I was not told they were experimental. I was told it was medicine and that it would help… It gave me complications the doctors ignored. I have a body that does not work.” She was fast-tracked, cut up, and drugged as a child. Now she’s physically disabled with recurring hernias, collapsed lung issues, and a medical system that refuses to take responsibility. This isn’t “care.” This is medical experimentation on confused kids — cheered on by activists and politicians while evidence mounts that puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries cause lifelong harm, infertility, and regret. The Cass Review, European countries pulling back, and exploding lawsuits prove it. But in Canada, the Liberals keep pushing this ideology like it’s sacred. We’re sacrificing an entire generation on the altar of woke feelings. Protect the kids. Stop the mutilation. Canada First 🇨🇦 #cdnpoli #Detransition #ProtectKids #GenderIdeology #WokeFail
Video Transcript AI Summary
By age 24, after the WPATH files came out, I realized that the doctors who write the guidelines didn’t know what they were doing, and that everything that had happened to me was wrong and had nothing to do with evidence-based medicine. I was experimented on. I was not told they were experimental; I was told it was medicine and that it would help, and it did none of that. It gave me complications the doctors ignored or treated as separate illnesses. It made my already preexisting mental health worse, and my physical health continued to deteriorate because I had a collapsed lung and a large intestine up in my chest that was still ignored by the same medical system fast-tracking me for a disorder I did not have.
When I found out what was wrong, I started making appeals. I made claims to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. They decided to reject my claim and chose not to take any further action because, according to their investigation, the doctors had done nothing wrong. I appealed that decision with the health committee, and we are still awaiting their decision on that. But those are how I'm getting the answers from the doctors of why they treated me the way they did, because they wouldn’t tell me to my face whenever I asked. So that’s how the regulatory system has approached it. That’s how the doctors have approached it. And even trying to apply the disability because I have recurring hernias from the reparative surgery that was done in 2023 for the physical defect I was born with that was missed, I still have complications from that. I am physically disabled, but disability has rejected me because they don’t deem it a recurring disability. So I’ve also had to appeal that decision.
But this is what the medical system has left me with: a body that does not work, that is deteriorating, that was given drugs I was never supposed to have been given. I was approved for top surgery. Unfortunately, I did not go through with it, but there are several who do. There are several who go much, much further, and the complications are not explained. These people do not know what they’re signing up for because they are children. I was a child. I wanted help. That’s all I wanted. I did not need to be medicalized. I did not need to be cut up. I didn’t need to be drugged. I just wanted to be loved the way I was. That was all. Thank you. Excellent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By the time I was 24 and realized what had happened, the WPATH files had come out, and I realized that the doctors who write the guidelines didn't know what they were doing. And everything that had happened to me was wrong and had nothing to do with evidence based medicine. I was experimented on. I was not told they were experimental. I was told it was medicine and that it would help, and it did none of that.
It gave me complications that the doctors ignored or would treat as separate illnesses. It made my already preexisting mental health worse, And my physical health continued to deteriorate because I had a collapsed lung and a large intestine up in my chest that was still ignored by the same medical system fast tracking me for a disorder I did not have. And so when I found out everything that was wrong, I started making appeals. I made claims to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. They decided to reject my claim, and they chose not to take any further action because according to their investigation, the doctors had done nothing wrong.
So I appealed that decision with the health committee, and we are still awaiting their decision on that. But those are how I'm getting the answers from the doctors of why they treated me the way they did because they wouldn't tell me to my face whenever I asked. So that's how the regulatory system has approached it. That's how the doctors have approached it. And even trying to apply the disability because I have recurring hernias from the reparative surgery that was done in 2023 for the physical defect I was born with that was missed.
I still have complications from that. I am physically disabled, but disability has rejected me because they don't deem it a recurring disability. So I've also had to appeal that decision. But this is what the medical system has left me with. I have a body that does not work, that is deteriorating, that was given drugs I was never supposed to have been given.
I was approved for top surgery. Unfortunately, I did not go through with it, but there are several who do. There are several who go much, much further, and the complications are not explained. These people do not know what they're signing up for because they are children. I was a child.
I wanted help. That's all I wanted. I did not need to be medicalized. I did not need to be cut up. I didn't need to be drugged.
I just wanted to be loved the way I was. That was all. Thank you. Excellent.
reSee.it AI Summary
This US news broadcast shattered the Carney illusion for me. I see Mark Carney as a globalist elite and the insider who helped create the mess, now pretending to fix it. Canada is imploding, with the worst OECD growth outlook through 2030, record food bank lines, crushing costs, and few opportunities. The Liberals turned Canada into a disaster. We need a full reboot and leaders who put Canadians first—be careful who you vote for.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
This US news broadcast just destroyed the Carney illusion. Mark Carney isn’t a “man of the people” — he’s the **ultimate globalist elite**. The same insider who helped create this mess is now pretending to fix it. Meanwhile Canada is absolutely imploding: - Worst projected economic growth in the entire OECD until **2030** - Record food bank lines - Crushing costs - No real opportunities left The Liberals turned a once-great country into a heartbreaking disaster. This is exactly why we need a full reboot. Canada doesn’t need more Davos elites. We need leaders who put **Canadians first**. Be very careful who you vote for. #cdnpoli #CarneyElite #MakeCanadaGreatAgain
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: I have a message for the Canadian people. Don't vote for this guy. Real and Mark Carney is the most elite of elitists out there. This guy is not a man of the people at all. He's the ultimate elitist, and be careful because he put out a message, and he conflated, you know, hey, Trump is the biggest threat to we've had, you know, in his lifetime. Thinking about all the things that have threatened humankind in in his lifetime. So it's hyperbolic. But then he started bragging about the economy, you know, the liberal economy. I have all these charts. Mean, it's just and they're all heartbreaking if you're a Canadian.
The standard of living has imploded. You look at the investments, right, or where the jobs are. Almost all of it, public sector, little private sector, and self employment, none. There's no real business opportunities there. OECD predicts the worst economies for 2020 to 2030 at the end of all 36 countries, Canada.
I mean, careful. You're right. You've got to right. It's not bad. It's horrific. It's horrific. This country needs a reboot, right? Which means Canada's vulnerable. It's extraordinarily vulnerable. They're to a major power like America taking them on.
Sure. They I mean and we're friends. Again, this is reciprocal. This is like, hey. Okay.
You wanna protect your dairy farmers and they for whatever reason, they supersede everyone else? Negotiate with the Trump team. But this sort of saber rattling but I will say this. They do have a friend in the American media. And my emails this morning, get one from Fortune, and it says America's war in Canada.
We didn't declare war. The article, you can't find that anywhere in the article, but that's where they headline it. Maybe it makes you open an email, but again, this is the kind of stuff that's happening out there. It's really it's really this is a heartfelt message to to Canada and and and people up there. It's time to turn your country around.
I don't know. Time to make Canada great again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a message for the Canadian people. Don't vote for this guy. Real and Mark Carney is the most elite of elitists out there. This guy is not a man of the people at all. He's the ultimate elitist, and be careful because he put out a message, and he conflated, you know, hey, Trump is the biggest threat to we've had, you know, in his lifetime.
Thinking about all the things that have threatened humankind in in his lifetime. So it's hyperbolic. But then he started bragging about the economy, you know, the liberal economy. I have all these charts. Mean, it's just and they're all heartbreaking if you're a Canadian.
The standard of living has imploded. You look at the investments, right, or where the jobs are. Almost all of it, public sector, little private sector, and self employment, none. There's no real business opportunities there. OECD predicts the worst economies for 2020 to 2030 at the end of all 36 countries, Canada.
I mean, careful. You're right. You've got to right. It's not bad. It's horrific.
It's horrific. This country needs a reboot, right? Which means Canada's vulnerable. It's extraordinarily vulnerable. They're to a major power like America taking them on.
Sure. They I mean and we're friends. Again, this is reciprocal. This is like, hey. Okay.
You wanna protect your dairy farmers and they for whatever reason, they supersede everyone else? Negotiate with the Trump team. But this sort of saber rattling but I will say this. They do have a friend in the American media. And my emails this morning, get one from Fortune, and it says America's war in Canada.
We didn't declare war. The article, you can't find that anywhere in the article, but that's where they headline it. Maybe it makes you open an email, but again, this is the kind of stuff that's happening out there. It's really it's really this is a heartfelt message to to Canada and and and people up there. It's time to turn your country around.
I don't know. Time to make Canada great again.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m conveying a post arguing CTV proves democracy doesn’t exist in Canada. It says the Liberals’ manufactured majority now controls House committees, democracy is dead, Canada drifts toward communism/totalitarianism, with backroom bribes, bought MPs, and rigged rules to avoid accountability. It labels the regime desperate, corrupt, winning without the popular vote, ruling as tyrants, and urges Canadians to stand up against this “theft” of democracy.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
CTV just dropped the bombshell News 🗞️ that CONFIRMS DEMOCRACY DOESN’T EXIST IN CANADA 🇨🇦 With their **manufactured majority** now locked in, the Liberals are openly seizing total control of the House of Commons committees. This isn’t democracy anymore. This is the **brutal death** of it. Canada has officially crossed the line into something between communism and full-blown totalitarianism. Backroom bribes, bought MPs, rigged rules — they’re rigging the entire system so no one can ever hold them accountable again. This is a **desperate, corrupt regime** that lost the popular vote but stole the government anyway, and now they’re consolidating absolute power. Canadians are being ruled by tyrants who don’t give a damn about your vote. When the hell are we going to stand up and stop this outright theft of our democracy? Video says it all. #cdnpoli #LiberalCorruption #Canada
Video Transcript AI Summary
With the Liberals now holding a majority government, their next focus is on reshaping how House of Commons committees are staffed and controlled. House Leader Stephen McKinnon indicated that the Liberal side intends to change the standing orders to ensure they hold the most votes on committees. This ambition follows from the Liberals’ position after the election and their desire to influence committee decisions more decisively.
Under the current arrangement agreed after the last election, committees are formed with a balance of four Liberal members, four Conservative members, and one member from the Bloc Québécois. McKinnon’s proposed change would alter this balance on most committees to consist of seven Liberal members, four Conservative members, and one Bloc Québécois member. In other words, the Liberal side would gain a numerical edge on the majority of committees, increasing their ability to steer committee work and outcomes.
The standing orders, which govern these committee compositions and procedures, are typically established and maintained by consensus among the parties. However, the proposed modification would not be a mere courtesy adjustment; it would require a formal vote in the House. That means the Liberals would need to secure sufficient support to adopt the change, rather than relying on unanimous agreement.
McKinnon signaled that he plans to move forward with this strategy through a formal process. He intends to give notice of a motion in the coming days, signaling the party’s plan to bring the proposal to the House for consideration and a vote. The timing remains to be determined, but he indicated that notice would be set in the near term, with a vote to follow once the motion is formally tabled and debated as part of the House’s proceedings.
In summary, the Liberals are pursuing a procedural shift aimed at strengthening their control over House of Commons committees by changing standing orders to favor seven Liberal members, four Conservatives, and one Bloc Québécois member on most committees. This change would necessitate a House vote rather than unanimous consent, and McKinnon plans to provide notice of the motion within the next couple of days to advance the proposal through parliamentary channels.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With the majority government secured, the Liberals are now moving to take control of House of Commons committees. So house leader Stephen McKinnon says the Liberals are looking to change the standing orders to ensure they have the most votes on committees. And because the Liberals won a minority in last April's election, MPs had agreed to form committees with four Liberals, four Conservatives, and one member from the block Quebecois. McKinnon is now proposing that most committees have seven liberals, four conservatives, one block member. The standing orders are typically agreed upon unanimously, but this proposed change, it will require a vote in the house.
McKinnon says he intends to give notice of a motion at some point over the next couple of days.
reSee.it AI Summary
This is one of my favorite videos explaining Canada today. In the 2022 Munk Debate, Douglas Murray dismantles Canadian MSM as a government-funded “amen chorus,” a propaganda machine rather than journalism. It’s professional, articulate, and devastatingly accurate. If you’ve never seen the full clip, watch it through. Then tell me which Canadian outlet you think is the worst offender.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
This is absolutely one of my most favourite videos explaining the current times in Canada right now. From the 2022 Munk Debate in Toronto on Mainstream Media — Douglas Murray absolutely dismantles how Canadian MSM has become a government-funded “amen chorus”: completely one-sided, acting more like a propaganda machine than real journalism. Professional, articulate, and devastatingly accurate. If you’ve never seen this full clip, watch it all the way through. It hits different every single time. Then tell me — which Canadian outlet do you think is the worst offender right now? Drop it below 👇 #MunkDebate #cdnpoli
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses Canada becoming interesting in January and February due to protesters in Ottawa. The job of reporters, according to the speaker, is to go out and ask protesters why they are on the streets, why they are there with their kids, and why there is a bouncy castle in the middle of Ottawa, to discover the story. The speaker claims the Government did not want that and that the Prime Minister decided in advance that the protesters were all the modern excommunications—Nazis, white supremacists, anti-Semites, probably homophobes, misogynists, probably transphobes, etc.—and then he brings in the Emergency Powers Act. The speaker asks what the mainstream media would do at such a time, and asserts they would question it, but claims the Canadian mainstream media did not and instead acted as an Amen Chorus of the government.
Several examples are provided. A CBC host described the Freedom Convoy as a feral mob. A Toronto Star columnist said, “sorry for the language, it's a homegrown hate farm that was then jet fueled by an American right funded rat fucking operation.” The speaker notes that CBC claimed two indigenous women who were scared to go outside in Ottawa because of racist violence did not bother to mention that indigenous drummers had led the truckers in an 0 Canada rendition. The National Observer allegedly stated that many black and indigenous freedom convoy supporters were, in fact, duped by the truckers. A Globe and Mail reporter claimed, “My 13 year old son told me to tell protesters I'm not a Jew” out of fear of antisemitic violence, without mentioning that one of the convoy leaders was Jewish.
The speaker argues this demonstrably rancid and corrupt behavior is rooted in a system where in Canada, the media is funded by the government. It is stated that in 2018, election year, there was a coincidence with the government funding; the Canadian media allegedly received $595,000,000 over five years, and the Toronto Star estimated it was going to be getting $3,000,000 from the Government in the first half of the year. The government is described as able to tell banks to shut down people’s bank accounts, and able to tell the media what to do, with the media then doing the bidding of the government camp. The speaker concludes that this is not a free society’s media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How Canada has become really interesting? It became interesting in January and February year. Why? Because you had protesters in Ottawa. Really interesting when people come out in large numbers.
You know what the job of reporters is? The job of reporters is to go out and say, Why are you on the streets? What brought you here? Why are you here with your kids? Why have you got a bouncy castle in the middle of Ottawa?
That's a bit strange. Ask them questions. Just find out the story. But you know what? The Government didn't want that in Canada.
Your Prime Minister decided in advance that these people were all the modern excommunications. They were Nazis, white supremacists, anti Semites, they were probably homophobes, they were misogynists, they were probably transphobes, etc. He did all the things you do in the modern political age if you want to just defenestrate somebody who is awkward to you. And then he brings in the Emergency Powers Act. Now, at such a time, what would the mainstream media do?
It would question it. It would question it. The Canadian mainstream media did not. The Canadian mainstream media acted as an Amen Chorus of the Canadian government. I will give you a couple of examples.
Ladies and gentlemen, I could go on for hours with examples of this. You had a CBC host describing the Freedom Convoy as a feral mob. You had a Toronto Star columnist saying, sorry for the language, it's a homegrown hate farm that was then jet fueled by an American right funded rat fucking operation. Jesus, they can't even write at these papers anymore. CBC said that two indigenous women who were so scared to go outside in Ottawa because of racist violence didn't bother to mention that indigenous drummers had led the truckers in an 0 Canada rendition.
The National Observer said that the many black and indigenous freedom convoy supporters were in fact duped by the truckers. The Globe and Mail reporter said, My 13 year old son told me to tell protesters I'm not a Jew out of fear of anti Semitic violence without mentioning that one of the leaders of the convoy was himself Jewish. Now, why is this so rancid? Utterly, utterly rancid and corrupt? Because in this country, your media, your mainstream media, is funded by the government.
A totally corrupted system. In 2018, election year, coincidence. The Canadian media has given $595,000,000 over five years. The Toronto Star estimated it was going to be getting $3,000,000 from the Government in the first half of the year. It went on and on.
The government in Canada can tell the banks to shut down people's bank accounts. Oh yes, your government can do that and if you're happy with that, just think about what would happen if the shoe was on the other foot. The government can do that. But in Canada, they can also tell the media what to do. And the media does the bidding of the camp of the Canadian government.
That isn't a free society's media.
reSee.it AI Summary
I state this post isn’t a joke, satire, or parody. It exposes Canadian Mark Slapinski saying what he’d like to do to unvaccinated people. It’s appalling and must be called out—this was his true voice.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
⚠️ The Internet NEVER FORGETS! ⚠️ This video is not a joke! ❌ It isn’t satire!! ❌ It isn’t parody!! ❌ It’s Canadian Mark Slapinski saying what he’d like to do to unvaccinated people. It’s appalling and it needs to be called out! THIS was his TRUE VOICE SPEAKING OUT! https://t.co/8G60vEDnsO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a proposed solution to what he calls the anti-vaxxer problem, describing it as “the final solution to the anti vaxxer question.” He outlines a plan starting with placing stickers on the hoses of all unvaccinated people so others can identify them and know where they live. If that approach doesn’t work, he proposes moving all unvaccinated people into cattle cars and shipping them off to work camps, described as “nice, big, powerful work camps” in Northern Ontario or in Quebec.
In these work camps, unvaccinated people would be forced to work as free labor to build infrastructure, with segregation, effectively killing “multiple birds with one stone.” The aims include removing unvaccinated individuals from society and exploiting their labor and assets to fund other parts of society. He asserts that their assets could be looted to support other parts of society.
He claims a mechanism for leaving the camps: "they can leave at any time as long as they are vaccinated." He describes the idea as brilliant and the single solution to the problem of people who won’t get vaccinated, stating he has tried everything else, including talking with them and being nice. He asserts that those approaches do not work and that “the only thing that works with these dirty unvaccinated people is maximum pressure,” including labeling, stripping them of rights, and sending them to work camps.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've had a big problem with anti vaxxers, and I have a solution to the anti vaxxer question. And some might even say the final solution to the anti vaxxer question. Here's what we're gonna do. Just to start, we're gonna take little stickers, and we're gonna put them on the hoses of all the unvaccinated people just so people know who they are and where they live. And if that doesn't work, what we're gonna do is take all the unvaccinated people, put them on cattle cars, and ship them off to work camps, nice, big, powerful work camps either in Northern Ontario or in Quebec.
And here's how this is gonna work. We're gonna force them to work, free labor, get them to build this stuff, and segregate them. So it's killing multiple birds with one stone. Not only are we taking these dirty, disgusting, unvaccinated people and removing them from society, but we're also using them to work for us, and we can even loot them and use their assets to fund other parts of society. Now the way this will work is that they can leave at any time as long as they are vaccinated.
And I think it's a brilliant idea. I think it's the one thing that as a society we could do to solve the problem, to solve people just not wanting to get vaccinated. I've tried everything. I've tried talking with them. I've tried being nice to them.
I can tell you that doesn't work. The only thing that works with these dirty unvaccinated people is maximum pressure. You gotta keep that pressure on. And if it means labeling them, if it means taking them, stripping them of all their rights, and sending them to work camps, I'm all for it.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
While this focuses on Apple Products, understand that Bill C22 will apply to ALL Manufacturers of ALL DEVICES! TOTALITARIAN ?? https://t.co/CxSVlvMXQh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 outlines concerns about Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act of 2026, asserting that if it becomes law, the Government of Canada will be able to secretly order Apple to build in a capability into its infrastructure to allow Canadian law enforcement and national security authorities to track every iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, AirPod, and AirTag in real time. This capability would enable authorities to require Apple to confirm whether it provides any services to a user, and to obtain device identifiers for all devices used with those services. The process could involve going to a justice of the peace and obtaining an order without any requirement that a crime has been or will be committed, effectively mandating Apple to hand over moment-by-moment locations for all user devices.
The speaker further notes that with that secret order, Apple would be compelled to provide the moment-by-moment locations of all devices associated with a user, based on the digital ID tied to iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, AirPod, Apple TV, and AirTag. In addition, the order would require Apple to maintain location history for a full year, enabling cops to access that historical data as well. The overarching concern highlighted is whether such expansive powers—secret orders, real-time tracking, access to device identifiers and services, and a year-long location history—are desirable for Canadian police and law enforcement.
Speaker 0 interjects with a prompting remark, inviting the audience to consider the implications and framing the discussion as a best attempt to evaluate the issue. The dialogue centers on the potential reach of government surveillance powers under the proposed act, the mechanisms by which these powers could be exercised (secret orders and judiciary involvement), and the practical consequences of requiring a tech company to reveal comprehensive location data and device identifiers without demonstrating a crime or imminent wrongdoing. The core issue presented is whether granting law enforcement such pervasive, real-time, and historical access to users’ device data aligns with acceptable governance and privacy standards in Canada.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Best attempt, but take a moment and consider this.
Speaker 1: If bill c 22, the lawful access act of 2026 becomes the law, the government of Canada will be able to secretly order Apple to build in a capability into its infrastructure to allow Canadian law enforcement, national security folks to track every iPhone, every iPad, every Apple watch, every Apple AirPod, and every AirTag in real time. Then they'll be able to require Apple to confirm whether they provide you any services. Then they can go to a justice of the peace and get an order without actually believing that a crime has been or will be committed requiring Apple to hand over every device identifier for every device that you use with their services. That's the digital ID for your iPhone iPad Apple Watch AirPod Apple TV AirTag. With that information they can go back to the judge to get an order again without actually believing that a crime has been or will be committed requiring Apple to give them the moment by moment locations of all your devices.
Oh and that secret order also required Apple to keep your location history for a full year so cops can get that too. Is that a power we want Canadian police and law enforcement to have?
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m furious at CBC for spreading misinformation about the 2018 Humboldt Broncos crash that killed 16 and injured 13. In this interview, I slam mainstream media for portraying trucker Jaskirat Sidhu as the victim while ignoring the families of the real victims. Sidhu’s 70 trucking violations in 11 days, per CBC, and his deportation fight after serving time are ignored by the sympathy parade. Families deserve justice, not a narrative that glorifies a mass killer.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
ZERO FCKN TRUST TO MSM 😡 A Humboldt Broncos victim’s dad is FURIOUSLY calling out the CBC for spreading MISINFORMATION about the 2018 bus crash that KILLED 16 young players, coaches, and staff, and INJURED 13 more! In this explosive video interview, he slams the mainstream media (MSM) for being “100% focused on the KILLER” – truck driver Jaskirat Singh Sidhu – portraying HIM as the victim while ignoring the REAL victims’ families! Sidhu blew through an oversized stop sign with flashing lights, committing 70 trucking violations in just 11 days before the tragedy (straight from CBC reports, no less!). Now, as he fights deportation to India after serving time, the media’s sympathy parade is SICKENING! Why make a mass killer the hero??? Families deserve JUSTICE, not this twisted narrative! #HumboldtBroncos #CBC #Canada #Saskatchewan #Alberta #Trucking #JusticeForHumboldt #MSMFail #DeportSidhu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The two speakers discuss the media coverage surrounding a high-profile case. The second speaker says the media coverage has been absolutely unfair and biased. They’ve done many interviews and are reaching a point where they won’t do them anymore, trusting the media less. They note a preference for live interviews because edited pieces distort their message. A concrete example is CBC’s Karen Pauls: she interviewed Russ Harald, Sudhoo, and several families who forgave. The second speaker claims Harald told them Pauls didn’t include half of what he said, and that she did the same to Andrea and Shauna Nordstrom (Logan Hunter’s mother). They allege that Nordstroms were given a bit part in a story that portrayed the subject as loving and forgiving, downplaying negative aspects, making it seem like the subject was sympathetic. The second speaker claims Karen Pauls twisted the narrative, and contends that much of the media has done this. Consequently, they’ve declined numerous interviews and no longer trust mainstream media regarding this story.
The second speaker adds that there are people with no vested interest who want to express approval or forgiveness to feel good about themselves and to allow the subject to stay in the country. They contrast this with others who are deported for other offenses, such as those who steal $5,000 cars and are permanent residents who get deported. They have listened in on immigration and refugee board hearings to learn more about the process. They claim that because the case is so prominent, some people want to excuse the subject, even if it means allowing criminals or poor drivers to stay, thereby harming the system.
The first speaker asks what precedent would be set if the subject were allowed to stay in Canada. The second speaker replies that it would imply that 16 lives mean nothing and questions how many people one would have to kill to be deported, underscoring the idea that the mere possibility of killing someone is central to the debate. They insist that raising the question of whether the person killed anyone is itself “crazy.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How has been media coverage so far? Do you feel like media has been fair, balanced, or are they heavily focusing on him and his tragedy?
Speaker 1: It's absolutely been unfair and biased. We've done many, interviews, and we're getting to the point now where we won't do them. We don't trust the media. We're getting to the point where if I am gonna do media, I want it to be live because we're getting edited. So perfect example is Karen Pauls, who just did this CBC report.
She interviewed Russ Harald. She interviewed Sudhoo. She interviewed a few of the families that forgave. And of all of them, I know Russ. I've talked to Russ Harald.
And he says she didn't put in half of the things I said. She cut out what she wanted to put in. And she did the same thing to Andrea and Shauna Nordstrom, who was Logan Hunter's mom. They did an interview and they were talking, they knew, we knew they were gonna talk about Sudhoo. And we said, we're hoping that you would do this interview and show some positive and some negative because there's both.
And they gave Andrea and Shauna a bit part in a story that was loving and forgiving, and what a nice man Sidhu is. So Karen Pauls twisted the narrative. And that's been a lot of lot of media has been like that. So we really sort of decline a lot of interviews nowadays. But, yeah, it's we don't trust mainstream media when it comes to this story anymore.
For whatever reason, there's a lot of people out there with no vested interest in this story that want their voices heard. They wanna feel good about themselves to allow him to stay in the country. When there are people that steal $5,000 cars that get deported. There are people that get deported every single year. I've listened in on a bunch of immigration refugee board hearings as a guest because I wanted to learn about it.
There were literally people there that stole $5,000 cars. They are permanent residents, and they are getting deported. But for whatever reason, because ours is a massive story, people have opinions. And apparently, Jasker at Sadu is a little more special than every other person that falls under the same criteria of committing the crime, your residency status. And there are people out there that want to feel good about themselves by being forgiving.
And I can appreciate that they want to feel good about themselves, but they're doing a disservice to the rest of the country because they're allowing criminals to stay. They're allowing poor drivers to stay. They're allowing the system to keep getting worse.
Speaker 0: And what kind of precedent would that set if if you were allowed to be stay in Canada?
Speaker 1: It would say that 16 lives mean nothing. It would say that, you know, if you were to ask anybody, how many people do you have to kill to actually get deported? And the fact that you even have to ask if he kills anybody is crazy.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed to report a truck driver spotted three armed guards at a PetroChina site near Fort McMurray, armed with fully automatic AK-47s. They claimed they’re “with PetroChina” and to not ask questions. In Canada, such weapons are prohibited, and private security can’t carry them at industrial sites. PetroChina reportedly hires former PLA/Armed Police on Canadian soil. Weeks after Carney’s China deal, I question if this is the partnership he sold us and worry about national security.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
🚨 ALBERTA OUTRAGE: Can you BELIEVE this?! A truck driver delivering to a PetroChina site near Fort McMurray spots THREE ARMED GUARDS lurking in the shadows, toting FULLY AUTOMATIC AK-47s with 30-round mags! 😡 When he asks, he’s shut down: “They’re with PetroChina—don’t ask questions!” This ex-military driver knows his stuff—these weapons are PROHIBITED in Canada under the Firearms Act! Private security? HA! They can’t legally carry assault rifles like this at industrial sites. And get this: PetroChina, a Chinese state-owned giant (subsidiary of CNPC), often uses “private” security staffed by former People’s Liberation Army or Armed Police—basically, Chinese military goons on Canadian soil! Just WEEKS after PM Mark Carney’s “landmark” deal with China in January 2026, opening doors for more Chinese investment in our energy sector, including oil sands, and slashing tariffs on their EVs for our canola. Is THIS the “strategic partnership” he sold us?! Foreign agents armed to the teeth in OUR backyard?! WAKE UP, CANADA! How is this NOT a national security nightmare? Carney’s deal is already rearing its ugly head—armed Chinese guards flouting our laws! Not concerned YET?? #cdnpoli #CdnPoli #Alberta #PetroChina #MarkCarney #ChinaInvasion #GunControlHypocrisy #NationalSecurity 🇨🇦🔥
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
Carney was the architect behind Trudeau, if you haven’t seen this video… Well, BUCKLE UP! As it’s a LOT to take in and follow Draw your conclusions… #onpoli #canpoli #carney #trudeau https://t.co/Wa4km0Of82
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents a detailed, multi-faceted accusation about Mark Carney’s role in a long-running scheme tied to Canada’s net-zero push and the use of public pension funds to de-risk green-energy investment. Key points include:
- Mark Carney is portrayed as a central figure who champions net zero and founded The UK’s G Fans in 2019, with capital access claimed to total over $130 trillion. The speaker asserts that net-zero efforts began to collapse when Republican attorneys subpoenaed banks in the U.S. over anti-competition rules, causing JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and others to exit net zero.
- The strategy described is “de-risking green energy investment,” which, according to the speaker, provides guarantees to attract private investment while shifting all liability and cost onto federal funds and taxpayers. The claim is that private investors come in because the project is guaranteed by public money, with no immediate private risk.
- Bloomberg is cited as reporting in 2020 that Carney was the unofficial economic advisor to Trudeau; the speaker argues that because Carney’s role is unpaid and unofficial, it does not trigger the Conflict of Interest Act, allowing him to influence Trudeau’s policy with zero consequence.
- The three alleged key figures are Christia Freeland (Finance Minister), Justin Trudeau, and Mark Carney. From 2020 to 2025, $190 billion is claimed to have been allotted to de-risk green-energy investment. When GFANS collapses, the $130 trillion figure is said to disappear, leaving pension funds as the only source for such capital.
- The Canadian Growth Fund (CGF) is described as created for $15 (presumably a capitalization reference) to de-risk green-energy investment, with Brookfield Growth Transition Fund I/II and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Fund and PSP Pension Funds named as limited partners. PSP board appointments are described as selected by the treasurer and finance minister, with final approval by the prime minister, and payments to board members alleged to be in the six- to seven-figure range and removable by the prime minister.
- A subsidiary called CCFIM is said to manage the Canadian Growth Fund, with Brookfield’s transition fund reportedly totaling $20 billion in the final close of Transition Fund II, plus a separate UAE-linked Catalyst Transition Fund.
- The principal “smoking gun” example given is Brookfield’s initial $300 million investment from the transition fund into Entropy Inc., resulting in Brookfield taking a majority stake. This investment allegedly qualifies as a pension fund investment under PSP due to a low-risk profile. The typical Brookfield fee structure is described as 1.5% management fee, with a 5–8% hurdle, a 20% catch-up, and an 80/20 split favoring pension funds after 100% capital return, potentially allowing Carney to receive a 20% carry after a long horizon (up to 10–15 years).
- The speaker claims the Canadian Growth Fund used a 15-year de-risking contract guaranteeing $16 million per year and $200 million upfront, shifting all liability, debt, and control to taxpayers, with the completed project potentially owned by a foreign entity and profits accruing to the foreign owner.
- A broader allegation is that the UAE commitments and Catalyst Transition Fund contracts are tied to the same de-risking framework, with maximum potential payments described as $750 million to $1.2 billion.
- The conclusion presented is that pension and tax money are being leveraged to fund a system that yields net losses while enriching Carney and associated actors, creating a cycle described as a snake eating its tail. The speaker urges readers to look up information, share it, and contact Carney, PSP board members, Freeland, and others to make them aware of these alleged actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, my fellow Canadians, and welcome to the final show, the coup de grace. What I have uncovered and will describe to you this evening may very well be the final blow to Mark Carney's political career. Once you realize what he has done and what he is doing, you will realize we are in a catastrophic death spiral, and he is making a ludicrous amount of money in the process. I'm gonna preface this and tell you a little bit about Mark Carney because it's important information. I will keep this as simple as possible so it is easy to understand, and I will use analogies to simplify it further on the end so you can grasp exactly what has been going on.
So Mark Carney champion net zero. He started G Fans in The UK in 2019. The accumulated total of the capital access was over $130,000,000,000,000. His net zero actually started to collapse when Republican attorneys started to subpoena banks in The US over anti competition regulations. JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and so forth all exited net zero.
So he championed de risking green energy investment because there's no return on green energy. You'll be a decade to two decades before it's actually profitable, if ever. And this is very important because what you do is you take federal funds, taxpayer funds, you absorb all of the liability and cost to make sure that the investment succeeds, You offer this as a guarantee so the private investors will come and invest in that project. Bloomberg announced in 2020 that Carney was the unofficial economic advisor to Trudeau. Since he is unpaid and unofficial, it does not trigger the Conflict of Interest Act and he has complete influence over Trudeau's policy with zero consequence.
So the three key figures are Christia Freeland, Justin Trudeau, and Mark Carney. Christia Freeland being the Finance Minister. From 2020 to 2025, $190,000,000,000 has been allotted to de risk green energy investment. Now the problem comes when GFANS is collapsing, that $130,000,000,000,000 disappears. There's only one place that you can access that kind of capital as cash on hand, and that is a country's pension fund.
So through Trudeau, he created all the de risk policy through Freeland, who Trudeau appointed. And remember, Mark Carney is the godfather for child. The Canadian Growth Fund is created for $15 which is used to de risk green energy investment. Stick with me here because this is very important. The public service pension has very strict regulations for investing.
It is only applicable to very low risk and typically an IRR compounding return. So you can't take pension money and de risk green energy investment, and you can't use it to invest in green energy because it's typically a net loss. However, Marx's first transition fund, Brookfield Growth Transition Fund I, later renamed II, as PSP Pension Funds and Ontario Teachers Pension Funds as Limited Partners LLPs in that transition fund. Oh, that's why that's in there. And I thought, how did he get pension funds into that transition fund?
Trudeau, obviously. All the board members of the Public Service Pension and the Canadian Growth Fund are selected through a process of the treasurer and the finance minister. At the end of the day, the prime minister gets final approval. These individuals are paid between 6 and 7 figures, and the prime minister can remove them at any time without cause. Do you think you would listen to me if I can remove your 7 figure salary just like that?
Yet these management systems are considered bipartisan. They are a political tool. The PSP also created a subsidiary called the CCFIM that manages that $15,000,000,000 Canadian growth fund. Try not to lose me here. So the final close on the Brookfield Transition Fund II, which Mark managed with Teske, is $20,000,000,000, and there is another transition fund with contracts with The UAE called the catalytic transition fund for billions of dollars as well.
Because this is routed through subsidiaries, disclosure becomes obscured. Now we're gonna get to the smoking gun. This is just one example. Brookfield makes an initial investment of $300,000,000 from this transition fund into Entropy Inc. In Canada.
That is now a majority stake. And because it's not an investment in profit return, it meets the threshold for the PSP, which is your pension money. So a typical management fee at Brookfield for the entire fund is between 1.52%. What generally happens is as a 100% of the capital is returned, I say returned, but you don't actually return the funds, there's then a five to 8% hurdle after that. There's a catch up phase where Brookfield will collect 20%.
And then after that, there's an eighty twenty split to the pension fund, is the LLP, the limited partner. I should put that in the beginning. So the typical timeframe and thresholds for Mark Carney to collect on that extraordinary 20% could take up to ten to fifteen years. And now comes the magic. They used the Canadian Growth Fund to de risk the entire project on a contract for fifteen years on a guarantee for $16,000,000 a year and $200,000,000 up front.
That means all liability, all debt, and all carrying right to the finish line is taken on by the Canadian taxpayer. So we would support the project right to the end, be at a net loss as the completed project belongs to a foreign entity who collects all of the profits and reaps all of the rewards. If you didn't think that was bad enough, here is the nuke. Which means that fifteen year valuation that is down the road occurs instantaneously, jumps the hurdle, and the 20% kicks in immediately. So not only are we at a net loss, the project will be foreign owned, and we have debt for the next fifteen years, and Kearney gets paid immediately.
Do you have any idea what the 20% payout plus management fee, even after you pay the other managers and the dividends are separated, just for Mark Carney. If he is able to derisk the entire platform and he's doing it right in front of your eyes, we are derisking The UAE commitments and The UAE has the contract with the Catalyst transition fund that he also managed. Maximum dollar amount is between 750,000,000 to $1,200,000,000. If you didn't notice immediately after the budget was passed, all of these commitments start rolling in because they're all being risked. And the incredible part is this.
He took your pension money because you can't take tax money. It's not there. There's no pile of cash. Put it in a fund to attract other investors. It is a perfect circle, a snake eating its tail.
And at the end of it, there's a net loss. We don't own the product. We don't own the profits. We'll get a little bit of tax and maybe some jobs, and Mark Carney will be a billionaire. That's like me taking all the money in your bank account, holding on to it to invest, taking half your check when you get it, taking 5% to put back in this money I took from you, and then keeping the rest.
I hope you understand as this continues, this is the ratio change that the parliamentary budget officer is talking about. The debt is not only escaping the GDP, it's a contractual obligation for up to twenty years in some cases, meaning you can't escape. We are going to reach a no escape velocity, and even if you get him out of office, the damage cannot be recovered from. I have my suspicions that Christia Freeland was fully aware that this was going on, potentially has her own investments offshore, and she got the hell out as fast as she could when that last budget dropped because Trudeau's budget was Carney's budget. Trudeau, Freeland, Mark Carney, Complicit, across the board, and if any member of that PSP fund signed an LPA, that's the limited partnership agreement, with simple interest instead of compound interest, which is the standard IRR, they're gonna have a big problem.
Because I ran the numbers upside down and backwards to see how fast I could make my money if I were Mark Carney and I was influencing the policy, I would have put in simple interest annually versus compounding because your front load becomes even faster. So every time we de risk a project for ten to fifteen years, the firm like Brookfield front loads the entire contract for the full fifteen years because it's black and white and jumps straight to the finish line to get paid instantly. Think about that. Guys, I'm not talking about a little bit of money. The $6,000,000 in stocks that they talk about, they told you that on purpose.
Because when the Brookfield representative was in the house being questioned recently, who was clearly trembling, mentioned the stocks, but he also said carried interest, which means your guy Mark Carney is going to be a billionaire. Do you understand why he came to Canada? Because he spent four years building this and trying to access our pension funds because it's cash on hand. He needed it. That's what he was after the entire time, and I said it, and he literally said it in a press conference the other day and mentioned the $2,000,000,000,000.
If you think it might be a coincidence, I ran a statistical analysis on the probability of all of those policies landing and those investments occurring in that exact chronological order, and it would be the same as if you built a plane, I built a runway, and you accidentally landed on that runway and not even knew where it was. It is impossible. It was facilitated by Carney, Trudeau, and Christia Freeland, and Carney actually did it all because Trudeau is as dumb as a bag of bricks, which I've said. This is cascade payment, and I've left out about a thousand details that would just overcomplicate it all for you, but all you need to know is that it's a snake eating its tail. It's a completely false payback on our own pension funds with our tax money.
Pension, tax money. This is what's happening. Go ahead and look it up. Send this to your friends. Send this to any economist that you know.
Send it to Mark Carney. Send it to every PSP board member. Send it to Christian Freeland. I want everyone to know exactly what he's doing.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
Well isn’t that unexpected eh?? 🤣 Epstein Files got released today and guess whose name pops up on 69 Documents. You guessed it Mark Carney can’t wait for this to get swapped under the rug https://t.co/LIlyRPh4Oj
reSee.it AI Summary
I feel the Liberal elite are trampling our rights, driving a torrent of bills—C-2, C-8, C-9, C-11, C-21, C-63—aimed at silencing us, seizing assets, freezing funds, and criminalizing dissent. Their so-called safety excuses mask control, hypocrisy, and censorship. Citizens become peasants, our voice, property, and freedom at risk. Wake up, Canada; they mask power with rainbow filters and call dissenters fascists. I’m livid and frightened.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
The smug, latte-sipping, virtue-signaling Liberal elite are on an absolute RAMPAGE to gag every single Canadian who dares breathe without their permission! Bill after bill after BILL — C-2, C-8, C-9, C-11, C-21, C-63, and whatever fresh hell they’re cooking up next week — all laser-focused on one thing: SHUT. YOU. UP. and strip law-abiding citizens of everything we own while they clap like trained seals! They’re not even pretending anymore! It’s not “public safety,” it’s not “hate speech protection” — it’s a full-on Soviet-style silencing spree because heaven forbid you have an opinion that doesn’t come pre-approved by the Trudeau fan club! Your guns? Gone. Your bank account if you donated to the wrong trucker? Frozen. Your social media post that hurt a bureaucrat’s feelings? Criminal record, baby! And the best part? These are the same champagne socialists who scream “my body, my choice” while simultaneously shoving their grubby government hands into every corner of YOUR life! The hypocrisy is so thick you need a chainsaw to cut through it! We’re not citizens anymore — we’re just peasants they haven’t gotten around to muzzling yet. Wake up, Canada! They’re not coming for your “assault-style” whatever — they’re coming for YOUR VOICE, your property, your freedom, and they’ll do it with a smile and a rainbow filter while calling you the fascist! I’m not even mad anymore… okay, I’m LIVID. How much more of this authoritarian clown show are we supposed to take before we all snap?!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pierre Pauliev announces an emergency in parliament as the Liberals shut down debate on their censorship bill. He says they are censoring debate on the online screening act and that closure is being used to ram the bill through in record time. He asserts that Liberal efforts would give Trudeau’s woke bureaucrats at the CRTC power to control what Canadians see and say online, describing it as creeping totalitarianism referenced by artist Margaret Atwood. Pauliev claims conservatives are the only party fighting back against this censorship bill and that Canadians should have the freedom to decide what they see and say online. He urges listeners to immediately sign his freedom of speech petition, providing a link, and states the goal of giving people back control of their lives to make Canada “the freest country on earth.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone, Pierre Pauliev here. There's just an emergency here in parliament here. The Liberals have just announced that they're shutting down debate. They're censoring debate on their censorship bill. We just got the notice right now.
As you know, they've been trying to censor the Internet in what Canadian artist Margaret Atwood has called creeping totalitarianism. So give Trudeau's woke bureaucrats over at the CRTC the power to control what you see and say on the Internet. I'm just rushing into the House of Commons lobby right now. Conservatives are the only party fighting back. But as you can see, this closure is now being brought right before us.
Right now, you can see right here, online screening act. They're bringing in what's called closure, which shuts down debate and rams the bill through in record time. Only conservatives are fighting back against this censorship bill. We believe you should have the freedom to decide what you see and say online, but I need you to immediately sign my freedom of speech petition. The link is right before you.
Click sign immediately. Let's bring home freedom. I wanna give you back control of your life and make this the freest country on earth. It's common sense. Let's bring it home now.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
Senator Donald Plett took 15 minutes to list out Liberal CORRUPTION! Good on you SIR for ALWAYS speaking out against this tyrannical Liberal caucus! HONESTLY … you gotta LISTEN 🎧 to this!! It’s SHOCKING no one is arrested!!!! Like WTF !?!?!?! https://t.co/df17igXLXH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Look for a few minutes at the Liberal Hall Of Shame for 2015 to 02/2021. Liberal MP William Amos was caught twice on house Zoom proceedings in indecent positions. Liberal MP Yasmin Rathansi was wrongfully employing her sister with taxpayers' dollars and deliberately hiding this information from Canadians. Liberal MP Ramesh Sengha was removed from the Liberal Caucus in January 2021 after he accused multiple other Liberal MPs of supporting the calisthenia movement. Liberal MP Darshan Singh Kang had to leave the Liberal Caucus in 2015 over accusations of sexual harassment.
Liberal MP Nikola Di Laurio didn't show up for work for a year after he announced his resignation in 02/2018. Then the public found out, oh, he actually didn't resign. He still collected his salary as an MP even if he was working full time in a law firm in Montreal. To this today to this day, this situation has never been clearly explained by Trudeau and the Liberals. Liberal MP Raj Greywall admitted he racked up millions of dollars in debts, paying casino blackjack, and ended up resigning from the Liberal caucus in 2018 after the news came to light.
Following an RCMP investigation. But after suddenly announcing he had paid off his 7 figure debts, he stayed on as a member of parliament for the rest of the parliamentary session. You may recall that mister Graywald was already under investigation by the federal ethics commissioner at the time and was later found guilty of being in violation of conflict of interest. Then there was a liberal MP Marwin Tabarro. He was allowed to run against again for the liberal party in February even though detailed allegations of sexual harassment had been made against him.
After being arrested in April 2020, he remained in caucus for almost two months because the prime minister's office claimed they knew nothing about it, took a newspaper article for the liberals to kick him out of caucus. Then former Liberal MP Frank Bayless signed one of those juicy sole source contracts with the Liberal government during the COVID epidemic. He received $237,000,000. Public health agency figures disclosed that more than 90% of the 10,000 Bayless Medical Company ventilators it bought were never used in any clinic or any hospital. Sadly, these ethical lapses were even worse amongst cabinet ministers.
Let me give you a few examples. Anita Anad's husband was the recipient of one of those juicy COVID contracts. LifeLabs received tens of millions of dollars of COVID contracts. They sell test kits.
Anita Anad's husband, John Knowlton, is a director of LifeLabs. The LifeLabs division has received multiple contracts worth millions since Anad was elected to the parliament in 2019. Navdeep Baines was industry minister and, as such, promised to crack down on big telcos who overcharge Canadians for Internet and cell phone service. Guess what? He found a job at Rogers after leaving the government.
The lobbying commissioner said she was frustrated at this, but liberals will always find loopholes that means more money for them. Then there was Bill Blair, on several occasions, lied, meddled into the work of the RCMP regarding the worst mass killing in the history of Canada in Porta Peak, Nova Scotia. While he was the president of the Treasury Board, Scott Bryson tried to block approval for the contract of a navy supply ship being built at the navy shipyard in Quebec because he was lobbied to do so by New Brunswick's powerful Irving family, owners of the rival Halifax shipyard. Minister Bryson also tried to argue there was no need for him to set up a conflict of interest screen to prevent him from participating in government decisions involving two of Atlantic Canada's wealthiest families, even though he used to chair one of their investment firms and that his spouse continued to sit on the company's board of directors. Francois Philippe Champagne owned two apartments in London, England worth millions of dollars.
His mortgages were with a Chinese bank. Strange indeed for a Canadian in The UK, Canadian MP in The UK to have to go to a Chinese bank for a mortgage. Judy Foote got involved in the Frank Norman affair. I will talk about that in a bit. But what is interesting here is that she resigned for health reasons.
But suddenly, her health improved, and she was rewarded with the job of lieutenant governor in Lupinland and Labrador. Steven Gebel forgot to pay his taxes, but he never forgot to travel, especially to China. This minister is running around the globe, busy lecturing Canadians, but patting Chinese or Gulf Emirates officials on the back. Catherine McKenna and John Wilkinson, his predecessors, and environment were of the same ilk, jetting around the world to lecture the common folks that they should bicycle to work. Foreign affairs minister Melanie Jolie's office staff didn't read an email that said her department was sending a representative to a Russian embassy party.
So we had a representative at a party drinking vodka with the Russian officials just after Putin invaded Ukraine. Not reading their emails is a hallmark of Trudeau ministers and their staff. It was the excuse given by Bill Blair and Marco Mendocino and, of course, Justin Trudeau. When David LaMetti was turfed from cabinet, a lot of people wondered why. He had actually, after all, done much of Trudeau's bidding, we thought.
Well, in the last few weeks, we learned that LaMetti canceled a verdict of first degree murder against Jacques Delisle, a former judge, even if all the experts were against this decision. Lemetti and the government refused to come clean on why he did that, even though Delisle later pleaded guilty to manslaughter. You all heard senators' nonanswers to our questions on this issue. What about Dominique Leblanc, who, despite despite connection to the powerful Irving family, was appointed to be minister of fisheries, oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard. He had to consult with the Essex commissioner for weeks in order to figure out how to stick handle around this very obvious conflict of interest.
Then there was a time when minister LeBlanc flew from Moncton to Montreal and back aboard a jet owned by JD Irving Limited. Nothing to see here, folks. But when the ethics commissioner, Mario Dion, found minister LeBlanc guilty of breaking a conflict of interest act because he awarded a lucrative Arctic surf clam license to a company linked to his wife's cousin. He couldn't wiggle out of that. Speaking of Dominique Leblanc and Scott Bryson, we still don't know what their exact role was in the vice admiral Norman affair.
The Liberals tried to renege on a contract for a supply ship in order to give it back to the Irvings. When they got caught, they decided they would get the height ahead of vice admiral Norman. The prime minister even sent him to trial before the police had investigated its investigation. Scott Bryson and Judy Foote left their positions, and taxpayers ended up being invoiced for an undisclosed sum of money paid out to vice admiral Norman. That is a first class cover up.
Marco Mendocino's case was hopeless. Conflicts of interest, emails not read, bold lies in public, pure incompetence. When you are so bad that even Justin Trudeau thinks you're bad, you've hit the bottom. Someday, I will have a speech just on Marco Mendocino's scandals. I may need my unlimited time for that.
It happens that ministers organize fundraisers outside their writings, but when you represent a downtown Montreal riding, this is strange. It is even stranger if this fundraiser happens to be in New York. New York, USA. To my knowledge, that is the first, and this honor belongs to Mark Miller. Mary Anne Monsoff had to admit that she was actually not born in Afghanistan, as she had told people and led people to believe for years.
Bill Morneau is another minister who was scandal prone. He started his political career with violating the Elections Act, for which he was fined. This is, after all, the same finance minister who forgot that he had and forgot to declare his villa in France in his ethics reporting. This is the same finance minister who sponsored Bill C27, which happened to increase the value of pensions sold by the minister's own company, Morneau Shepell. When the bill was tabled in the House of Commons, the value of Morneau Shepell shares joked, and minister Morneau just happened to still be holding $21,000,000 worth of shares.
And as I already mentioned, his role in the We Charity scandal, when he quit, he pretended he was going to the OECD top position. No one knows for sure if this was true. One thing is true, and it's real. Taxpayers footed the bill for his failed campaign. I still have an order paper question on the true cost.
Still unanswered after twenty five months, it was reported in the media that this phony campaign cost at least $11,000,000. Mary Ang was found guilty by the ethics commissioner for giving contracts to her best friend. In a Trudeau government, that means you pretend to be sorry, and that has no consequences. How about Seamus O'Regan? The government spent $180,000 defending him in a defamation suit.
And do you remember Hunter Tootoo? He had to leave cabinet to deal with, sadly, addiction issues. But what was strange was when he said that Justin Trudeau had hugged him after he revealed that he had an inappropriate relationship with a staff member. Harjit Sajid was found to have lied about his role in Afghanistan. But this happy bunch knows how to organize a party sorry, a cabinet retreat.
The three affordability retreats held in Charlottetown, Vancouver, and Hamilton between 2022 and August 2023 cost 1,325,000. Hey, life is better with lobster and white wine, especially when you are discussing affordability. It's not surprising to see all those ethical lapses. After all, this is the leader of an organization who sets the tone. Justin Trudeau does not believe the rules of ethics apply to him.
So how could he insist that his officials, his MPs, and his ministers be any better? In 02/2015, we learned that Justin Trudeau was billing charities for speaking engagements, even as an MP. This was a First Colleagues, a sitting politician who charges people to hear him speak. When he got caught, he said he was sorry and wrote a check. A few weeks later, he was caught again.
He had charged the House of Commons for expenses that had also been reimbursed by the organizations to which he spoke. Again, we had the, I'm sorry, here's a check routine. This was a preview of things to come. Who can forget the thank you for your donation comment and incident where the PM's elitist and condescending attitude was on full display when he jeered at an indigenous protester before that? Before that, we had Elbowgate when Justin Trudeau pushed aside fellow MP Ruth Ellen Brasso Brasso because he was in a hurry to vote.
His time was more precious than others, and pushing aside women who get in the way is something our fake feminist prime minister does without hesitation. That was in line with Justin Trudeau's behavior in the Kokanee grope incident where he groped a female journalist. Then he said, oh my, I would not have done this had I known that the woman was a national reporter. I guess in his mind, it's more acceptable to grope a person that is not a national reporter than one that is. Now we all remember, of course, that our prime minister decided that this was indeed a lesson, not just for him, but for all of us.
We all know that some people experience things differently, he said. Now let's not forget the three, four, five, maybe more incidents where Justin Trudeau wore blackface because he thought it was funny to pretend that he was black. We don't know how many times he did that because he can't re
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look for a few minutes at the Liberal Hall Of Shame for 2015 to 02/2021. Liberal MP William Amos was caught twice on house Zoom proceedings in indecent positions. Liberal MP Yasmin Rathansi was wrongfully employing her sister with taxpayers' dollars and deliberately hiding this information from Canadians. Liberal MP Ramesh Sengha was removed from the Liberal Caucus in January 2021 after he accused multiple other Liberal MPs of supporting the calisthenia movement. Liberal MP Darshan Singh Kang had to leave the Liberal Caucus in 2015 over accusations of sexual harassment.
Liberal MP Nikola Di Laurio didn't show up for work for a year after he announced his resignation in 02/2018. Then the public found out, oh, he actually didn't resign. He still collected his salary as an MP even if he was working full time in a law firm in Montreal. To this today to this day, this situation has never been clearly explained by Trudeau and the Liberals. Liberal MP Raj Greywall admitted he racked up millions of dollars in debts, paying casino blackjack, and ended up resigning from the Liberal caucus in 2018 after the news came to light.
Following an RCMP investigation. But after suddenly announcing he had paid off his 7 figure debts, he stayed on as a member of parliament for the rest of the parliamentary session. You may recall that mister Graywald was already under investigation by the federal ethics commissioner at the time and was later found guilty of being in violation of conflict of interest. Then there was a liberal MP Marwin Tabarro. He was allowed to run against again for the liberal party in February even though detailed allegations of sexual harassment had been made against him.
After being arrested in April 2020, he remained in caucus for almost two months because the prime minister's office claimed they knew nothing about it, took a newspaper article for the liberals to kick him out of caucus. Then former Liberal MP Frank Bayless signed one of those juicy sole source contracts with the Liberal government during the COVID epidemic. He received $237,000,000. Public health agency figures disclosed that more than 90% of the 10,000 Bayless Medical Company ventilators it bought were never used in any clinic or any hospital. Sadly, these ethical lapses were even worse amongst cabinet ministers.
Let me give you a few examples. As there are many, I will go in alphabetical order. Anita Anad's husband was the recipient of one of those juicy COVID contracts. LifeLabs received tens of millions of dollars of COVID contracts. They sell test kits.
Anita Anad's husband, John Knowlton, is a director of LifeLabs. The LifeLabs division has received multiple contracts worth millions since Anad was elected to the parliament in 2019. Navdeep Baines was industry minister and, as such, promised to crack down on big telcos who overcharge Canadians for Internet and cell phone service. Guess what? He found a job at Rogers after leaving the government.
The lobbying commissioner said she was frustrated at this, but liberals will always find loopholes that means more money for them. Then there was Bill Blair, on several occasions, lied, meddled into the work of the RCMP regarding the worst mass killing in the history of Canada in Porta Peak, Nova Scotia. While he was the president of the Treasury Board, Scott Bryson tried to block approval for the contract of a navy supply ship being built at the navy shipyard in Quebec because he was lobbied to do so by New Brunswick's powerful Irving family, owners of the rival Halifax shipyard. Minister Bryson also tried to argue there was no need for him to set up a conflict of interest screen to prevent him from participating in government decisions involving two of Atlantic Canada's wealthiest families, even though he used to chair one of their investment firms and that his spouse continued to sit on the company's board of directors. Francois Philippe Champagne owned two apartments in London, England worth millions of dollars.
His mortgages were with a Chinese bank. Strange indeed for a Canadian in The UK, Canadian MP in The UK to have to go to a Chinese bank for a mortgage. Judy Foote got involved in the Frank Norman affair. I will talk about that in a bit. But what is interesting here is that she resigned for health reasons.
But suddenly, her health improved, and she was rewarded with the job of lieutenant governor in Lupinland and Labrador. Steven Gebel forgot to pay his taxes, but he never forgot to travel, especially to China. This minister is running around the globe, busy lecturing Canadians, but patting Chinese or Gulf Emirates officials on the back. Catherine McKenna and John Wilkinson, his predecessors, and environment were of the same ilk, jetting around the world to lecture the common folks that they should bicycle to work. Foreign affairs minister Melanie Jolie's office staff didn't read an email that said her department was sending a representative to a Russian embassy party.
So we had a representative at a party drinking vodka with the Russian officials just after Putin invaded Ukraine. Not reading their emails is a hallmark of Trudeau ministers and their staff. It was the excuse given by Bill Blair and Marco Mendocino and, of course, Justin Trudeau. When David LaMetti was turfed from cabinet, a lot of people wondered why. He had actually, after all, done much of Trudeau's bidding, we thought.
Well, in the last few weeks, we learned that LaMetti canceled a verdict of first degree murder against Jacques Delisle, a former judge, even if all the experts were against this decision. Lemetti and the government refused to come clean on why he did that, even though Delisle later pleaded guilty to manslaughter. You all heard senators' nonanswers to our questions on this issue. What about Dominique LeBlanc, who, despite despite connection to the powerful Irving family, was appointed to be minister of fisheries, oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard. He had to consult with the Essex commissioner for weeks in order to figure out how to stick handle around this very obvious conflict of interest.
Then there was a time when minister LeBlanc flew from Moncton to Montreal and back aboard a jet owned by JD Irving Limited. Nothing to see here, folks. But when the ethics commissioner, Mario Dion, found minister LeBlanc guilty of breaking a conflict of interest act because he awarded a lucrative Arctic surf clam license to a company linked to his wife's cousin. He couldn't wiggle out of that. Speaking of Dominique Leblanc and Scott Bryson, we still don't know what their exact role was in the vice admiral Norman affair.
The Liberals tried to renege on a contract for a supply ship in order to give it back to the Irvings. When they got caught, they decided they would get the height ahead of vice admiral Norman. The prime minister even sent him to trial before the police had investigated its investigation. Scott Bryson and Judy Foote left their positions, and taxpayers ended up being invoiced for an undisclosed sum of money paid out to vice admiral Norman. That is a first class cover up.
Marco Mendocino's case was hopeless. Conflicts of interest, emails not read, bold lies in public, pure incompetence. When you are so bad that even Justin Trudeau thinks you're bad, you've hit the bottom. Someday, I will have a speech just on Marco Mendocino's scandals. I may need my unlimited time for that.
It happens that ministers organize fundraisers outside their writings, but when you represent a downtown Montreal riding, this is strange. It is even stranger if this fundraiser happens to be in New York. New York, USA. To my knowledge, that is the first, and this honor belongs to Mark Miller. Mary Anne Monsoff had to admit that she was actually not born in Afghanistan, as she had told people and led people to believe for years.
Bill Morneau is another minister who was scandal prone. He started his political career with violating the Elections Act, for which he was fined. This is, after all, the same finance minister who forgot that he had and forgot to declare his villa in France in his ethics reporting. This is the same finance minister who sponsored Bill C27, which happened to increase the value of pensions sold by the minister's own company, Morneau Shepell. When the bill was tabled in the House of Commons, the value of Morneau Shepell shares joked, and minister Morneau just happened to still be holding $21,000,000 worth of shares.
And as I already mentioned, his role in the We Charity scandal, when he quit, he pretended he was going to the OECD top position. No one knows for sure if this was true. One thing is true, and it's real. Taxpayers footed the bill for his failed campaign. I still have an order paper question on the true cost.
Still unanswered after twenty five months, it was reported in the media that this phony campaign cost at least $11,000,000. Mary Ang was found guilty by the ethics commissioner for giving contracts to her best friend. In a Trudeau government, that means you pretend to be sorry, and that has no consequences. How about Seamus O'Regan? The government spent $180,000 defending him in a defamation suit.
And do you remember Hunter Tutu? He had to leave cabinet to deal with, sadly, addiction issues. But what was strange was when he said that Justin Trudeau had hugged him after he revealed that he had an inappropriate relationship with a staff member. Harjit Sajid was found to have lied about his role in Afghanistan. But this happy bunch knows how to organize a party sorry, a cabinet retreat.
The three affordability retreats held in Charlottetown, Vancouver, and Hamilton between 2022 and August 2023 cost 1,325,000. Hey, life is better with lobster and white wine, especially when you are discussing affordability. It's not surprising to see all those ethical lapses. After all, this is the leader of an organization who sets the tone. Justin Trudeau does not believe the rules of ethics apply to him.
So how could he insist that his officials, his MPs, and his ministers be any better? In 02/2015, we learned that Justin Trudeau was billing charities for speaking engagements, even as an MP. This was a First Colleagues, a sitting politician who charges people to hear him speak. When he got caught, he said he was sorry and wrote a check. A few weeks later, he was caught again.
He had charged the House of Commons for expenses that had also been reimbursed by the organizations to which he spoke. Again, we had the, I'm sorry, here's a check routine. This was a preview of things to come. Who can forget the thank you for your donation comment and incident where the PM's elitist and condescending attitude was on full display when he jeered at an indigenous protester before that? Before that, we had Elbowgate when Justin Trudeau pushed aside fellow MP Ruth Ellen Brasso Brasso because he was in a hurry to vote.
His time was more precious than others, and pushing aside women who get in the way is something our fake feminist prime minister does without hesitation. That was in line with Justin Trudeau's behavior in the Kokanee grope incident where he groped a female journalist. Then he said, oh my, I would not have done this had I known that the woman was a national reporter. I guess in his mind, it's more acceptable to grope a person that is not a national reporter than one that is. Now we all remember, of course, that our prime minister decided that this was indeed a lesson, not just for him, but for all of us.
We all know that some people experience things differently, he said. Now let's not forget the three, four, five, maybe more incidents where Justin Trudeau wore blackface because he thought it was funny to pretend that he was black. We don't know how many times he did that because he can't re
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
MASS GRAVES? - NOT ONE FOUND! - NOT ONE BODY - NOT AN OUNCE OF PROOF! Don’t forget Trudeau went surfing! 🏄 https://t.co/oJqvvKUaj7
Video Transcript AI Summary
They have said again and again that unmarked mass graves have been found at Canada's residential schools, which were boarding schools for Indian children that existed for about a hundred years peaking in the early twentieth century.
Last year, archaeologists detected what they said could be 200 unmarked graves at this former school in Kamloops, British Columbia.
Weeks later, a further 751 unmarked graves were detected across from the former Marivelle Residential School on the Cowices Reserve in Saskatchewan.
More than three years later, not a single body has been found in any unmarked grave at any residential school anywhere in Canada.
Turns out that, in fact, the alleged unmarked gravesite in Kamloops was in reality a 2,000 foot long, three foot deep trench that was established in 1924 as a septic field to store sewage from the school.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They have said again and again that unmarked mass graves have been found at Canada's residential schools, which were boarding schools for Indian children that existed for about a hundred years peaking in the early twentieth century. And the discovery of these unmarked mass graves was significant, Canadians were told, because Christian churches were running these residential schools.
Speaker 1: Last year, archaeologists detected what they said could be 200 unmarked graves at this former school in Kamloops, British Columbia. Weeks later, a further 751 unmarked graves were detected across from the former Marivelle Residential School on the Cowices Reserve in Saskatchewan.
Speaker 0: More than three years later, not a single body has been found in any unmarked grave at any residential school anywhere in Canada. Turns out that, in fact, the alleged unmarked gravesite in Kamloops was in reality a 2,000 foot long, three foot deep trench that was established in 1924 as a septic field to store sewage from the school.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been following the situation with the ostriches since 2021 when they developed herd immunity and became subjects for antibody research. Now, despite being healthy since January 2025, the government wants to slaughter 400 of them. This is drawing global attention.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
What’s the REAL REASON they are after the Ostriches? This issue goes all the way back to 2021 - the birds developed herd immunity and they were being studied for antibody research. Fast forward to NOW !! The birds have been healthy since January 2025, and now the government has called for 400 birds to be slaughtered. The world is watching…
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
On THIS Episode of DUMBFCKS Chris Sky goes OFF BOASTING he’s happy Charlie Kirk was mu*der And what in the DUMBFCKERY going on you say Pro Palestine is the good people?? The SAME FCKN people that burn Canadian flags saying D3ATH to Canadians ?? GFY CHRIS ! https://t.co/cc5aTpOmgi
Video Transcript AI Summary
'we are at war right now. And there's two sides.' 'the side of good, aka the side of pro Palestine, the side of release the Epstein files, the side of let's have truth, justice, and honor, and no corruption reign supreme across the world.' 'the side of pro pedophiles, pro genocide, pro corruption, pro lying.' 'If you're on the fence, you're on the side of the fucking pedophiles.' 'Epstein was a hoax' and 'Israel is the victim and they're not committing genocide in genocide in Gaza,' claiming they're paid to disseminate this bullshit. 'I'm gonna smile every fucking time.' 'That's how happy I would be.' 'And if you got a problem with that, I have a very big dick. I'll pull it out, and you can suck on it.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Listen up, everybody. Let's get one thing fucking straight. For all you people that are saying, Chris, I how dare you be smiling when another another human being got shot. Ladies and gentlemen, I don't know if you've noticed or not, but we are at war right now. And there's two sides.
There's the side of good, aka the side of pro Palestine, the side of release the Epstein files, the side of let's have truth, justice, and honor, and no corruption reign supreme across the world. And then there's the side of pro pedophiles, pro genocide, pro corruption, pro lying. It's that fucking simple. There's no I'm sitting on the fence or I'm undecided. No.
If you're on the fence, you're on the side of the fucking pedophiles. And guess what? If you're on the side of pedophiles, you're on the side of Epstein was a hoax, you're on the side of Israel is the victim and they're not committing genocide in genocide in Gaza, and you're getting paid to disseminate this bullshit, and then I see a video of you getting shot in the fucking neck or shot in the fucking face, guess what? I'm gonna smile every fucking time. I'm not gonna be the one to pull the trigger.
I'm not gonna be the one to tell somebody else to go and fucking shoot them. But guess what? If I see a video tomorrow of somebody shot fucking Anthony Fauci or Bill Gates, you think I'm gonna cry for them, or you think I'm gonna smile and say good riddance. Karma gotcha. If I find out that Benjamin Netanyahu got shot in the face tomorrow, I'll fucking hook up with some other people and make a goddamn TikTok like they did during the pandemic at the health care workers and dance for all of you.
That's how happy I would be. So for you guys to sit there and fucking judge me and say I'm a bad person because of fucking genocide and god shill like Charlie Kirk who takes money to lie to your face and tell you to support pedophiles and child rapers and murderers, and you think I'm supposed to give a fuck when that person gets shot in the face? They got exactly what the fuck they deserve. And everybody who's pro genocide, everybody who pretends the Epstein files are a hoax, everybody who's on that side, they can get shot every fucking day, and I'll smile every fucking day. I hope we're clear.
And if you got a problem with that, I have a very big dick. I'll pull it out, and you can suck on it. Thank you.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
The guy wrote a book telling how he’ll make life unaffordable! https://t.co/iBfxLL75ga
Video Transcript AI Summary
This book proves that Mark Carney isn't being honest with you. In it, he explains how he needs to make everything more expensive using carbon taxes so that you and I are forced to stop buying things. He wants Canadians to pay for his globalist net zero dreams. Carbon taxes are his core religion. Mark Carney is selling Canadians snake oil. He wants you to think that he's gonna get rid of the carbon tax, that he's just planning to hide it. That's how he thinks he can get your vote. His real plan will ensure that our Canadian economy flatlines. It's time for a common sense conservative government. If you want real change, follow me for more.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This book proves that Mark Carney isn't being honest with you. Take a look. In it, he explains how he needs to make everything more expensive using carbon taxes so that you and I are forced to stop buying things. He wants Canadians to pay for his globalist net zero dreams. Carbon taxes are his core religion.
Mark Carney is selling Canadians snake oil. He wants you to think that he's gonna get rid of the carbon tax, that he's just planning to hide it. That's how he thinks he can get your vote. Now make no mistake. His real plan will ensure that our Canadian economy flatlines.
It's time for a common sense conservative government. If you want real change, follow me for more.
@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
WTF is this DUMBFUCKERY ?? NG is the CLEANEST most EFFICIENT form of heating in Canada! And in Canada we REQUIRE heating to survive!! This ISN’T a luxury, this is a necessity of living! And we pay MORE in TAXES than we use?? WTF !?! HOW can any Dumbfuck stand behind his Carbon SCAM Tax??
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on the Trudeau regime's legacy and the actions of the NDP/Liberals. There are numerous bills and scandals that raise concerns about Canadian sovereignty, censorship, and financial mismanagement. From the $60 million ArriveScam to the $1 billion spent on immigrant hotels, the list is extensive. Issues like rising crime, healthcare collapse, and skyrocketing housing costs are alarming. I’m also troubled by the implications of Mélanie Joly’s extravagant furniture orders amidst these challenges. What else have I overlooked?
@JayGenXer - JayGenXer🇨🇦
THE LEGACY OF THE TRUDEAU REGIME AND THE NDP/LIBERALS Updated, but think I'm still missing a tad Bill C-293: Canadian sovereignty Bill C-63: Controlled speech Bill S-210: Digital identification Bill S-275: Bank of Canada reform Bill C-223: Universal basic income Bill C11 Censorship Bill C21 Disarm Law Abiding Citizens Bill C18 More Censorship - $60 Million ArriveScam - Hard Drugs called Safe drugs supplied in vending machines - $258 Million in projects to GC Strategies; - Winnipeg Labs - SNC Scandal - Aga Khan trip Scandal - $84k Jamaican Vacation - $6k/night for a single room for the Queen's Funeral - $1.3 Million on 3 'Affordability Retreats' - China Election Interference - Chinese Police Stations in Canada - Green Slush Fund Scandal - Funding Islamic groups who are protesting in support of Hamas - $1 Billion paid out for Hotels for Immigrants - Additional Bell funding - $40 Million to fire staff - A Billion Dollars to CBC to collapse their credibility - Blocking Veterans Affairs Committee investigation - $29 Billion in cost overruns on TMX - Expanding MAiD into those with Mental Illness - $2 Billion to invest in companies that don't exist - $500 Million to fund abortions in other countries - WE Scandal - CPP increase and CPP2 - Highest inflation in 30 years - Highest interest rates in 30 years - Unsustainable immigration - Forcing Untested Vaccinations - Ignoring Vaccine Injured - 11 Million Canadians requiring Food Banks - 2 Million Canadians hitting the food banks per month, every month - Tent Cities in every major city - Housing and Rent prices skyrocketing - Healthcare Collapsing - Out of-control spending by the Governor General - Overpayment of CERB payments to prisoners, people who don't qualify, people who don't live in Canada - 10k Ventilators, purchased from a Liberal Friend, that never got used because they were never needed - $300 Million for storage of Mobile Hospitals that were never used - $400 Million for Quarantine Hospitals - Illegally using the Emergencies Act against Canadians - Firing Federal workers and not paying them El based on Vaccination Status - $30 Billion in making batteries for cars, while EV Manufacturers are divesting from EV Technology - $9 Million in Cricket factory for Human consumption - Accusing India of killing citizens on Canadian Soil - Soiling relations with China - Telling Germany, Japan and Greece that we don't want their business on LNG - Violent protesters allowed to escalate without recourse - Violated Canadian Charter of Rights - Conflating "Climate Boiling" with ARSON - 2018 India Vacation Mr. Dressup - Elbow gate in HoC - 2.9% inflation - 4.75% interest rate - 25% living in poverty - Housing is unaffordable. - Canadian forces made ineffective, out of date - Rising crime rate - Failed gun bans on lawful owners - Tent cities in every city - An opioid epidemic - No progress on missing Aboriginal women - A divided country - Reduction of Canadian forestry management causing more forest fires “Climate” - 6 billion to the Philippines for gender equality and fight climate change - 5 million ice rink on Parliament Hill - 8.6 million reno on the Herington Lake cottage - 2.5 million for the additional cottage at Herington lake (rumored to be for Sophie and kids) - Safe injection sites, not so safe around children - Failed safe supply being sold for hard drugs - Legalization of hard drugs - Speaker Greg Fergus after partisan language appeared in an ad for an upcoming event in his riding - Fergus was found to have violated the act by writing a letter of support for a television channel's application to the CRTC for mandatory carriage - Freeland by-election at by-election - Anthony Rota is thrown under the bus for the HoC Hunka clap-in. PMO’s office knew who he was before. - Mary Ng $17,000 ethical contract - Mary Ng named as one of the 11 MP's who allegedly conspired with foreign actors - Failed UN Security seat campaign of over 8.6 million - 300 million on redesigning the Canadian passport (what was wrong with the old design, not WOKE enough?) - 220k on in-flight catering Indo-Pacific trip, total for the trip over 2 million - Justin Trudeau bought his buddy Tom a $9 million condo in NYC - $28,000 to Randy Boissonnault’s former company - Randy Boissonnault faking indigenous to get grants/money - Randy Boissonnault steps away from HoC to be protected from his crimes - 25% of Canadians are living below the poverty line - Steven Guilbeault $30 Billion coverup - MP Joly’s husband top recipient of future entrepreneurs program - Immigration minister Marc Miller importing terrorists - $523K Joly Rush furniture order spending spree * WHAT HAVE I MISSED??
@JayGenXer - JayGenXer🇨🇦
What does this Spell out to YOU?!? Bill C-293: Canadian sovereignty Bill C-63: Controlled speech Bill S-210: Digital identification Bill S-275: Bank of Canada reform Bill C-223: Universal basic income Bill C11 Censorship Bill C21 Disarm Law Abiding Citizens Bill C18 More Censorship
@JayGenXer - JayGenXer🇨🇦
Hey Canada, be thankful for this Bill C293 as the Liberals just care about YOU! In a not at all way! https://t.co/ClgcR9yRCZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Canadian Liberal party is promoting Bill C293 to protect citizens. To keep people safe, the bill avoids defining "pandemic" or "emergency." While admitting past surveillance issues where 33,000,000 Canadians were secretly tracked, the party claims they will improve.
Decision-making will be ceded to the WHO due to international border concerns. Businesses can be closed and used as shelters. Food production can be slowed or stopped due to health risks associated with agriculture.
The bill allows for freezing and redirecting assets, and nationalizing industries. Private property and land can be expropriated for pandemic-related causes. The promise is that people will own nothing, but be happy, safe, and healthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, hey. I'm Canadian. I wanted to tell you about some of the great work that our Liberal party has been up to lately, including Bill C293. Bill C293 is here to protect you. And we wanna do things better this time in Canada.
So let me tell you how we will be keeping you safe this time. Now, the first step is to make sure that we don't actually define what a pandemic is or what an emergency is so that we can protect you at any time. We realized that there was a surveillance problem. And even though last time, we secretly tracked 33,000,000 Canadians, this time, we're gonna do it better. We realized international borders were actually a problem.
So this time, we're gonna cede all decision making to an unelected foreign body, AKA the WHO. Now in case we need to protect people, we actually put it in here that we can close businesses at any time and use them as shelters to protect all the people. Now we determined that agriculture and eating food might be a health risk. So we put in here that at any time that we can slow or stop food production. Now you guys know fighting a pandemic costs lots of money.
So in case we need more of it, we want to be able to freeze assets, redirect them, and even nationalize industries if we have to. But because we're serious about keeping you guys healthy, we also want to be able to expropriate any kind of private property, land, and seize it for pandemic related causes. Don't worry. You're gonna own nothing. You'll be happy.
You'll be safe, and you'll be healthy.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a video where JT discusses the unvaccinated, and I don’t think it aligns with what he said at the Emergencies Act Inquiry. I believe he misled us, showing clear disdain for the unvaccinated. I'm curious about your thoughts on this video compared to his explanation.
@JayGenXer - JayGenXer
Here is the video where JT discussion about the unvaccinated, I don’t see the explanation shared at the #EmergenciesActInquiry IMO I feel #TrudeauLiedUnderOath as clearly this video is saying hatred towards all unvaccinated #TrudeauMustGo #TrudeauIsDestroyingCanada #EmergencyAct https://t.co/aUx7crBOkH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nous sortirons de la pandémie grâce à la vaccination, malgré les hésitations de certains et l'opposition extrémiste de quelques-uns. En tant que leader, nous devons choisir si nous tolérons ces opposants minoritaires ou si nous nous concentrons sur la majorité qui a été vaccinée. Ne laissons pas ces personnes nous empêcher de retrouver nos activités préférées.
We will get through this pandemic through vaccination, despite some hesitations and extremist opposition. As leaders, we must decide whether to tolerate these minority opponents or focus on the majority who have been vaccinated. Let's not let these individuals prevent us from returning to the activities we love.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On va s'en sortir de cette pandémie par la vaccination. Puis on sait, on en connaît tous des gens qui sont en train d'hésiter un petit peu. On va continuer d'essayer de les convaincre, mais mais aussi des gens qui sont farouchement opposés à la vaccination. Ils sont extrémistes. Qui ne croient pas dans la science, qui sont souvent misogynes, souvent racistes aussi.
C'est un un un petit groupe, mais qui prend de la place. Et là, il faut faire un choix en tant que leader, en tant que pays. Est-ce qu'on, est-ce qu'on tolère ces gens-là ou est-ce qu'on dit voyons la plupart des gens presque quatre-vingt pour cent des québécois ont fait ce qu'il fallait faire ou se sont fait vacciner. On veut revenir à à aux choses qu'on aime faire c'est pas ces gens-là qui vont nous bloquer.
@JayGenXer - JayGenXer
@ryangerritsen @MapleSyrupNews @JimMurp77852985 Looking to hear your opinion of this video vs the explanation we all saw by JT at the inquiry
@JayGenXer - JayGenXer
JT, taking Canada into poverty by taxing to death for what? https://t.co/DpPwob6Zae
Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada is facing a crime with its carbon emissions, accounting for only 1.5% of the world's total. Despite this, Justin Trudeau plans to impose a carbon tax on everything, including gas, food production, transportation, and heating. This has left Canadians financially strained, while countries like China emit significantly more carbon at 30.9%. Canadians must no longer remain silent and should repost this message to make their voices heard. It is important to note that the carbon tax has proven ineffective.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a crime, and it's happening right here in Canada. This is a chart of the world's carbon emissions. And look where Canada sits. 1.5% of the world's carbon emissions, and Justin Trudeau is gonna save the planet by imposing a carbon tax on everything. From the gas we put in our car To get to work, to the farmers producing our food, to the truckers taking the food to the grocery stores, and the fuel to heat our homes.
No wonder Canadians are broke. Look where China sits at 30.9% of the world's carbon emissions. Canada, 1.5%. Canadians are broke. Our economy is rock bottom.
Let's go broke trying to save the planet. It's time for Canadians to stop being silent. You need to speak up, and do your part right now by reposting this. And by the way, the The carbon tax isn't working. I mean, why would
@JayGenXer - JayGenXer
When Liberals say Pierre is using USA politics… Do you see Pierre inviting Trump to events in Canada ? Mind you, could you imagine the meltdown the left would have 🤣 https://t.co/E4Lw7aFjyU
@JayGenXer - JayGenXer
Climate scan explained in just over a minute https://t.co/iixOXMcrKs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Humans only produce 3% of the CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere. However, the Canadian government has implemented two carbon taxes to collect money from its citizens. They also aim for net zero emissions by 2050, but if CO2 levels drop below 0.0155%, all plants will die. Canada has 318 billion trees and produces 672 megatons of CO2. To capture Canada's CO2, it would require 25.7 billion trees. Each year, a hardwood tree can absorb up to 48 pounds of CO2. Therefore, Canada is already at net zero. It's important to note that this information is not typically taught in high school science classes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere. Now humans only produce 3% of that 0.04% of CO2. Yet the Canadian government has 2 carbon taxes designed to steal your money and make you poor. There's also something called net zero, where The Canadian government wants CO 2 to be removed from the atmosphere by 2050. But if we go below 0.01.5 5% of CO2, all plants will die.
Another point to add is that Canada has 318,000,000,000 trees, And Canada produces 672 megatons of c o two. To capture Canada's c o two, it takes 25 5,700,000,000 trees. A typical hardwood tree can absorb as much as 48 pounds of CO 2 each year. So the fact is Canada is already at net zero. Something your high school science class will not teach you is that
@JayGenXer - JayGenXer
What did he just explain? Might want to listen
Video Transcript AI Summary
Oil, natural gas, and coal still dominate as the main sources of global energy, providing 84% of the world's energy. Despite claims of a rapid transition away from fossil fuels, the reality is that we have made little progress in shifting to green energy. The main challenge lies in the need for a significant increase in mining to obtain the necessary materials for solar panels, wind turbines, batteries, and other components. This mining process requires a substantial amount of energy, further contributing to the challenge. Additionally, the location of new mines is a concern, as China currently holds a monopoly on critical energy materials. Attempts to build mines in the United States and elsewhere face strong opposition. Future energy demands will only increase with population growth and technological advancements, making it clear that a diverse mix of energy sources, including fossil fuels, nuclear energy, and renewables, will be necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To wake up. You're having a dream. Here's the reality. Oil, natural gas, and coal provide 84% of all the world's energy. That's down just 2 percentage points from 20 years ago, and oil still powers nearly 97% of all global transportation.
Contrary to headlines claiming that we're rapidly transitioning away from fossil fuels, It's just not happening. 2 decades and $5,000,000,000,000 of governments investing in green energy, and we've barely moved the needle. This was supposed to be easy. Why is it so hard? In a word, rocks.
To get the same amount of energy from solar and wind that we now get from fossil fuels, We're gonna have to massively increase mining by more than 1000%. This isn't speculation. This is physics. Copper, iron ore, silicon, nickel, chromium, zinc, cobalt, lithium, graphite, and rare earth metals like neodymium, we need them all. And then those metals and materials have to be turned into motors, turbine blades, solar panels, batteries and hundreds of other industrial components.
That also takes lots of energy, which requires even more mining. As a World Bank study put it, these green technologies are in fact significantly more material intensive than our current energy mix. That may be the understatement of the century. Raw materials account for 50% to 70% of the costs to manufacture both solar panels and batteries. Until now, it hasn't really mattered that much because wind and solar still account for only a few percentage points of the global energy supply.
They're an applause line for environmentalists, not a major energy player, and it's unlikely they will be in the foreseeable future. But for the sake of argument, let's say we sharply ramp up mining. Where would these new mines be located? Well, for 1, China. That country is today the single largest source of most of our critical energy materials.
United States is not only a minor player, but is dependent on imports for 100% of 17 critical minerals. Do we wanna give China more political and economic leverage? Europe has made itself dependent on Russia for 40% of its natural gas. How well has that worked out? Ironically, we have all the minerals we need right here in North America, but good luck trying to get them out of the ground.
Proposals to build mines in the United States and increasingly almost everywhere else meet fierce opposition, if not outright bans. To give just one example, in 2022, the Biden administration canceled the proposed copper nickel mine in Northern Minnesota. This was after years of delays navigating a maze of environmental regulations, and yes, the same environmentalists and green leaning politicians who tout all the benefits of electric cars are the same people who make mining the materials essential to build those cars, like copper and nickel, all but impossible. Try to square that circle. So far, we've only talked about today's energy needs.
What about tomorrow's? Future energy demand will be far greater than today's. That's been true for the entire history of civilization. The future will not only have more people, but also more innovations, and entrepreneurs have always been better at inventing new ways to use energy than to produce it. It's obvious but worth stating before the invention of automobiles, airplanes, pharmaceuticals, or computers, there was no energy needed to power them, and as more people become more prosperous, they will want the things others already have, from better medical care to vacations to cars.
In America, there are about 80 cars for every 100 citizens. In most of the world, it's about 5 per 100 citizens. Over 80% of air travels for personal purposes, so that's 2,000,000,000 barrels of oil a year. Hospitals use 250% more energy per square foot than an average commercial building. And the global information infrastructure, the cloud, already uses twice as much electricity as the entire country of Japan, the world's 3rd largest economy.
The massive data centers at the heart of the cloud alone consume almost 10 times more electricity than the world's 10,000,000 electric cars. Ecommerce has taken off and is propelling record growth in warehouses increasingly filled with energy hungry robots. America's truck freight index more than doubled in the past decade to deliver the goods to and from those warehouses. These are today's known trends. While we can't predict the future, we can predict there'll be more innovation in robotics, drones, quantum computing, biotechnology, and new industries not yet imagined.
All of it will require more energy, a lot more. Fossil fuels, nuclear energy, and, yes, renewables will be required. But if you think we could get it all from wind and solar, dream on. I'm Mark Mills, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Prager