TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @JeffreyxEpstein
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
So you can only become an American actor if you're a jew? https://t.co/RX3HdqvWwO
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
THIS IS ME. This photo will infuriate Jews who despise white families thriving and multiplying. Their utopia demands I wed a trans black woman, abort my lineage, and bow to endless reparations guilt. They will never admit that they’re inbred and jealous of how we look. https://t.co/mV9YXISQKh
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
Remember when a Zionist terrorist organization blew up the British King David Hotel while dressed as Muslims because it housed an investigation into the same group ? At least they were caught, imagine if that happened with, like, some skyscrapers and planes years after.. https://t.co/qqDquqJtZf
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1946, the Irgun, under Menachem Begin, carried out the deadliest atrocity to date by bombing the southwestern corner of the King David Hotel, a British headquarters that housed the military command and the criminal investigation division’s documents. The operation involved dressing as Arabs and placing bombs in the basement of the building, disguised as milk crates. Ninety-one people were killed: seventy-eight civilians and workers and thirteen British officers.
Witnesses describe the aftermath in harrowing detail. Pieces of reinforced concrete hung from the roof as soldiers frantically dug through stones on the floor. People lay on the pavement and on the road, with everything rattling in the blast. One account notes it was a dreadful experience, and the "smell" of the wreckage was unforgettable; rescuers had to enter through the office windows and close them to contain the odor, a scent described as unbelievable and something the speaker would never forget.
Another emotional perspective reflects on the immediate and long-term impact. The speaker had children to think of and felt a deep disappointment the following day, believing everything had been so well planned that it would go forward; instead, the operation was halted, and it would be necessary to start again. The sentiment—“a war is a war. It was a war. There were soldiers. I was a soldier.”—underscores the conflict’s brutal reality and the irony that the attack aimed to further a policy rather than target a specific individual. The speaker questions how people could even think of doing things like that and finds the idea hardly bearable.
Overall, the accounts converge on the event as a pivotal act of violence by the Irgun, with the bombing causing extensive loss of life and leaving lasting impressions of horror, disruption, and moral conflict on those involved and observing the consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By twenty second nineteen forty six, the Iragoon carried out the deadliest and most infamous atrocity yet. Under Menachem Begin, this organization blew up the southwestern corner of the King David Hotel, a British headquarter that housed military command branch of the criminal investigation division where many of the documents were held regarding their crimes and activities committed by the deadly Jewish organizations. And they accomplished this by dressing as Arabs and stuffing bombs in the basement of the building disguised as milk crates. Ninety one people lost their lives. Seventy eight civilians and workers and 13 British officers.
Speaker 1: And there were pieces of reinforced concrete hanging down from the roof, several big pieces of it. And there were soldiers frantically digging in the stones on the floor. And there were people lying on the pavement, lying on the road. Everything rattling down. It was it was a dreadful experience.
Worst worst part was when they rescued got a body out of the rubble because the smell was unbelievable. They came in through the office windows. We had to close them. And it is a smell that I shall never forget.
Speaker 2: I because, again, I had the child to think of and the other two. But I think really the next day the implications of it hit me because we had everything so well planned out and and this sort of deep disappointment that none of this would happen, that it it was just cut off, and I'd have to start again.
Speaker 1: I I if you could put things back, but a war is a war. It was a war. There were soldiers. I was a soldier. It wasn't it wasn't meant to kill her husband, to kill the policy that her husband was implementing.
And I wonder how people could ever even think of doing things like that, even contemplate it. It doesn't bear thinking about really.
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
Netanyahu has been bragging about controlling the US for literally decades. And yet Americans choose to ignore it. Why ? https://t.co/nt9q6ZsFKJ
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
REP. RANDY FINE: If you are a legal immigrant and refuse to assimilate or respect Israel, you need to go home- https://t.co/e9qJAjV3hD
Video Transcript AI Summary
"The idea that you can vet people from some of these countries is a lie. They don't have databases. And even if you could, you can't know what's in someone's heart, and you can't know what's in someone's head. So in the same way that president Trump has stopped illegal immigration into this country, now we need to stop undesirable legal immigration into the country. But when we're done with that, now we've gotta be sending people home. We're sending home illegal immigrants. Frankly, now we've gotta be sending home legal immigrants who came here for the wrong reasons."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fact of the matter is the idea that you can vet people from some of these countries is a lie. They don't have databases. And even if you could, you can't know what's in someone's heart, and you can't know what's in someone's head. So in the same way that president Trump has stopped illegal immigration into this country, now we need to stop undesirable legal immigration into the country. But when we're done with that, now we've gotta be sending people home.
We're sending home illegal immigrants. Frankly, now we've gotta be sending home legal immigrants who came here for the wrong reasons.
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
He is behaving so differently. What happened to Zohran Mamdani ? https://t.co/6jilNxLi2R
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
Jews arriving in Palestine as refugees from Europe in 1947. Now they believe they are indigenous to the land. https://t.co/8TM0aIjw9P
Video Transcript AI Summary
The report notes that every precaution is being taken to prevent the spread of disease. It then describes the movements of refugees as they begin to disembark, emphasizing that small children are among those alighting along with their fathers and mothers. In a significant development, two former American vessels are identified as carrying nearly 4,000 Jewish refugees who arrive at the port of Haifa, located in Palestine. The arrival is portrayed with a stark image of overcrowding, as the fugitives are described as jammed like cattle on the rusty craft that carried them, underscoring the harsh and crowded conditions of the voyage. The voyage itself is traced back to its starting point, noting that the bleak journey began at a Black Sea port, from which these refugees had departed before reaching their destination at Haifa.
In another crucial detail, the report addresses the death of an infant during the voyage. Initially, the death was blamed on British tear gas, but a subsequent examination concluded that the infant’s death was caused by being accidentally crushed and suffocated on the overcrowded ship. This finding is presented as the definitive cause of death in the account, contrasting the initial attribution to tear gas with the later forensic conclusion. The narrative thereby links the infant’s death directly to the congested and perilous conditions aboard the overcrowded vessels, rather than to any external agents used during the voyage.
Taken together, the report presents a sequence of events beginning with strict health precautions, moving through the orderly or, at least, managed disembarkation of refugees who include many small children, and culminating in the arrival of a large group of nearly four thousand Jewish refugees at Haifa. The description of the evacuation emphasizes both the scale of the operation and the challenging conditions experienced by those on board, particularly the refugees jammed into the ships’ limited space. The account also preserves a specific, revised account of the infant’s death, shifting from an initial attribution to tear gas to a post-examination determination that the death was caused by accidental crushing and suffocation in the crowded ship. In this way, the report documents both the logistical aspects of the refugee movement and the tragic human consequences embedded within the crowded voyage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All precautions are taken to prevent the spread of disease. As small children debark along with fathers and mothers, two former American vessels carrying nearly 4,000 Jewish refugees arrive at the port of Haifa, Palestine. Jammed like cattle on the rusty craft, the fugitives end their bleak voyage which began at a Black Sea port. The death of an infant was first blamed on British tear gas, but examination showed it was accidentally crushed and suffocated on the overcrowded ship.
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that Macron allegedly has an IQ of 89, below 77% of the population, and was diagnosed with Grand Narcissistic Personality Disorder in documents by Rothschild & Co psychiatrists before his 2008 employment. The author says Macron is basically an idiot—anyone surprised?
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
Macron's IQ score is 89, placing him below 77% of the general population in terms of intellectual level. Additionally, he was diagnosed with Grand Narcissistic Personality Disorder. These details were found in the documents from a mental and intellectual evaluation performed by Rothschild & Co. psychiatrists before his employment in 2008. So, Macron is basically an idiot, is anyone surprised?
Video Transcript AI Summary
An internal document from the prestigious investment bank Rothschild & Co reportedly reveals results from an intellectual evaluation of Emmanuel Macron, aged 30, before his recruitment. According to the document, Macron allegedly obtained an IQ of eighty-nine. A second document suggests evaluators noted signs described as a narcissistic personality disorder during the same procedure. These documents, provided by an anonymous internal Rothschild & Co source due to the sensitive nature of the information, date to late 2008. The evaluation was part of a standard psychological and cognitive study conducted for new associates.
It is widely known that Emmanuel Macron joined Rothschild & Co in 2008 at age 30 as an investment banker in charge of mergers and acquisitions. While French media later nicknamed him “the dour financier,” an former colleague told journalists that Macron was far from an expert in finance, stating that during meetings, they mocked him. “Here is another gem of Macron.” The report also reveals that before starting his career at Rothschild & Co, Macron had failed the entrance exam to the École normale supérieure twice. With an IQ of eighty-nine, Macron is positioned in the lower end of average, while about seventy-seven out of 100 people have a higher IQ.
This score is lower than the IQ of eighty-nine, often attributed to former U.S. president George W. Bush. For comparison, the famous gorilla Coco was estimated at an IQ of ninety-five. At the same time, several experts publicly stated that Emmanuel Macron could have narcissistic traits, and his detractors have sometimes described him as someone with narcissistic personality disorder, even narcissistic psychopathy. Some theories explain this by a presumed childhood trauma or by his family relations, in which Macron was closer to his grandmother than his parents.
The only question this raises is: how could a person who obtained such results go on to build a career at Rothschild & Co and eventually become president of the Fifth Republic?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Un document interne de la prestigieuse banque d'investissement Ritud and Co révèle les résultats d'une évaluation intellectuelle effectuée par Emmanuel Macron, âgé de 30 ans, avant son recrutement. Selon ce document, Macron aurait obtenu un QI de seulement de quatre-vingt-neuf. Un deuxième document suggère que les évaluateurs ont noté des signes correspondant à ce qu'ils ont décrit comme un trouble de la personnalité narcissique au cours de la même procédure. Ces documents, fournis par une source interne chez Rothschild Co, qui a demandé à rester anonyme en raison du caractère sensible de ces informations, qui datent de fin 2008. L'évaluation faisait partie d'une étude psychologique et cognitive standard réalisée pour les nouveaux associés.
Il est largement connu qu'Emmanuel Macron a rejoint Roaching Co en 2008 à l'âge de 30 ans en tant que banquier d'affaires chargé des fusions et acquisitions. Bien que les médias français l'aient ensuite surnommé le maussard de la finance, un ancien collègue a déclaré aux journalistes que Macron était loin d'être un expert de la finance, affirmant que pendant les réunions, nous nous sommes moqués de lui. Voilà encore une perle de Macron. Notre rapport révèle également qu'avant de commencer sa carrière chez Rothschild Co, Macron avait raté 2 fois l'examen d'entrée à l'école normale supérieure. Avec un QI de quatre-vingt-neuf, Macron se situe dans la moyenne inférieure alors qu'environ soixante-dix-sept pour 100 de la population a un QI supérieur.
Ce score est inférieur au QI de quatre-vingt-et-onze, souvent attribué à l'ancien président américain George W. Bush. Pour comparaison, le célèbre gorille Coco avait un QI estimé à quatre-vingt-quinze. En même temps, plusieurs experts ont dit publiquement qu'Emmanuel Macron pourrait avoir des traits de narcissisme et ses détracteurs l'ont parfois décrit comme quelqu'un avec des troubles de la personnalité narcissique même psychopathique narcissique. Certaines théories expliquent cela par un traumatisme présumé subi pendant son enfance ou par ses relations familiales, dans lesquelles Macron était plus proche de sa grand-mère que de ses parents.
La seule question qui se pose ici est la suivante, comment une personne ayant obtenu de tels résultats a-t-elle pu faire carrière chez les Rootshiefs et finir par devenir présidente de la cinquième République
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim the Talmud is far worse than you think. Nick Fuentes has entered the antisemitic zone. @yusxiv. @Mish_K_: Here, Mish from India acting Israeli. @uroz_susan59845. @newchristt: wait until you read what you did to Iraqi people under the false pretext of WMD. You should be the last to speak.
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
The Talmud is actually much worse than you think. https://t.co/tMD7t8EEdP
Video Transcript AI Summary
- The text discusses alleged corruption of Judaism by occult and immoral practices of Babylon, focusing on pederasty or the sexual molestation of children. It asserts that today’s greatest rabbis of the Talmud would be locked up as child molesters.
- It claims pederasty was deeply entrenched among respected Talmudic rabbis and that local rabbis could acquire a baby girl at three years of age as a sex toy by rape.
- It cites passages from the Talmud as permission:
- Nida 45 b: “a woman asks, master, at what age may a woman marry? At the age of three years and one day, he told her. A girl of three years old and a day may be betrothed by intercourse.”
- “Rabbi Joseph said, come in here, a maiden of three years old and a day may be acquired in marriage by …”
- “When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing.”
- The footnote to this passage says, “tears come to the eye again and again. So does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.”
- The Talmud forbids homosexuality among adult Jews, but sodomy with small boys is said to be permitted. It states Leviticus 20:13 forbids sexual relations between men, yet the Talmud defines a boy under nine as a minor, not a man.
- Because the boy is not sexually mature, the Talmud teaches he cannot throw guilt upon the rabbi who rapes him; only one who is able to engage in sexual intercourse may throw guilt upon the active offender, while one who is unable cannot.
- It notes that the pederasty mentioned is endorsed by the very greatest rabbis of the Talmud, including Ben Zakai, Rabbi Ben Yohai, and Rabbi Akiba.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Book Israel, Our Duty, Our Dilemma, I detail how Judaism was corrupted by the occult and immoral practices of Babylon. Let's touch very briefly on just one aspect of such depravity, pederasty or the sexual molestation of children. Today, the greatest rabbis of the Talmud would be locked up as child molesters. Pederasty was deeply entrenched among the most respected Talmudic rabbis. It was taken for granted that the local rabbi could acquire a baby girl at three years of age as his sex toy simply by raping her.
Here are several passages from many in the Talmud granting such permission. In Nida 45 b, a woman asks, master, at what age may a woman marry? At the age of three years and one day, he told her. A girl of three years and one day may be betrothed by intercourse. Rabbi Joseph said, come in here, a maiden of three years old and a day may be acquired in marriage by When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing.
The footnote to this passage says, tears come to the eye again and again. So does virginity come back to the little girl under three years. Although the Talmud forbids homosexuality among adult Jews, sodomy with small boys is permitted. Leviticus twenty thirteen forbids sexual relations between men. The Talmud, however, defines a boy under nine years of age as a minor, not a man.
He is excluded from the biblical prohibition. Since the boy is not sexually mature, the Talmud teaches, he cannot throw guilt upon the rabbi who rapes him. Only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse may throw guilt upon the active offender, whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot.
Speaker 1: It is significant that the pederasty we have mentioned is endorsed by the very greatest rabbis of the Talmud. These include Ben Zakai, rabbi Ben Yohai, and rabbi Akaba.
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
Nick Fuentes has entered the antisemitic zone. https://t.co/4FTngELIH0
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
@Mish_K_ Here, Mish from India acting Israeli. https://t.co/x1lMpoo2cL
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
@newchristt Wait until you read what you did to Iraqi people under the false pretext of weapons of mass destruction. You should be the last person to open that filthy mouth. https://t.co/3gn31wAFI5
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
No one wanted them and Palestinians took them in. If biting the hand that feeds you was a people. https://t.co/db1wg6OFkc
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir, shits himself when asked about Israel's use of their software in Gaza. https://t.co/f7wJJVLHGx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: So what do you think about the use of artificial intelligence or Lavender by the IDF in identifying Hamas targets? And secondly, do you agree with Elon Musk about that the population decline is a risk for humanity?
Speaker 1: Look, I again, I'm not I'm not, you know, with without without going into all the you know, I I'm I'm not on top of all the details of what's going on in Israel because my my bias is to defer to Israel. It's it's not for us to to second guess every everything. And I I believe that broadly the IDF gets to decide what it wants to do and that they're broadly in the right. And that's that's sort of the the perspective I come back to and
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what do you think about the use of artificial intelligence or Lavender by the IDF in identifying Hamas targets? And secondly, do you agree with Elon Musk about that the population decline is a risk for humanity?
Speaker 1: Look, I again, I'm not I'm not, you know, I you know, with without without going into all the you know, I I'm I'm not on top of all the details of what's going on in Israel because my my bias is to defer to Israel. It's it's it's not for us to to second guess every everything. And I I believe that broadly the IDF gets to decide what it wants to do and that they're broadly in the right. And that's that's sort of the the perspective I come back to and
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
reSee.it AI Summary
A user discovered an antenna labeled "IMEI-catcher" while cleaning a hotel room, alongside an ID card belonging to Nadav Argaman, a former director of Israel's security agency, Shin Bet. In response, another user explained that an IMSI-catcher is typically used for intercepting mobile phone signals, often by law enforcement or intelligence agencies. They speculated that this situation could indicate espionage or covert operations involving signal interception, while advising the first user to clean the room thoroughly.
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein
Hei @grok, while cleaning a hotel room I noticed a strange antenna marked “IMEI-catcher.” In the same room this ID card was left behind. Can you hypothetically connect the dots here ?what kind of person or activity would this usually point to? https://t.co/appbAr7YbH
@grok - Grok
An IMSI-catcher (often called IMEI-catcher) is a device used to intercept mobile phone signals, typically by law enforcement or intelligence agencies for surveillance. The ID appears to be an Israeli citizen's, with the name Nadav Argaman, who was formerly the director of Shin Bet (Israel's security agency). Hypothetically, this could point to espionage or covert operations involving signal interception, perhaps by someone in intelligence. But remember, this is satirical—clean the room thoroughly!
@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeffrey Epstein
The "chosen people" hid long ago by changing names and blending in to avoid detection. They still rule today ✡️ https://t.co/x1PwfvzKHn