TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Jim_Jordan

Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 23, 2025 at 1:05 PM
Saved - September 23, 2025 at 7:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m excited to share that Google has committed to allowing all creators previously banned from YouTube for political speech violations to return. YouTube has acknowledged that the Biden Administration's pressure to censor was "unacceptable and wrong." They are rolling back censorship policies related to political speech, including COVID and elections, and promise not to use third-party fact-checkers in the future. This is a significant victory for free speech and accountability in Big Tech, and we will continue to advocate for these principles.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

🚨BREAKING: Due to our oversight efforts, GOOGLE commits to offer ALL creators previously kicked off YouTube due to political speech violations to return to the platform. BUT THAT’S NOT ALL. Thread: https://t.co/60SsoCK2Yk

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

YouTube also: -Admits the Biden Admin censorship pressure was “unacceptable and wrong” -Confirms that the Biden Admin wanted Americans censored for speech that did not violate YouTube’s policies -Details when YouTube began rolling back its censorship policies on political speech after @JudiciaryGOP began its investigation -States that public debate should NEVER come at the expense of relying on “authorities” -Promises to NEVER use third-party “fact-checkers” -Warns that Europe’s censorship laws target AMERICAN companies and threaten AMERICAN speech

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Over the past few years, we have uncovered massive scandals relating to Big Tech censorship. https://t.co/aUgWllkPUv

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE 🧵 Thread:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

During the Biden-Harris years, under White House pressure, YouTube changed its policies to censor political debate on COVID and elections. TODAY, YouTube admits that the censorship pressure from Biden Admin was “unacceptable and wrong.” https://t.co/dGfJK0T0oD

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Now, to make amends to the American people, and because of our work, YouTube is rolling back its censorship policies on political speech, including topics such as COVID and elections. https://t.co/ni42Ze9dR4

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

What does that mean? Whether you were an established YouTube presence with a massive following like @dbongino or just were starting out to express political views there, YOU will have an opportunity to come back onto the platform if you were censored for engaging in political speech.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

This is another victory in the fight against censorship. In Aug 2024, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote the Committee a letter admitting: 1. Biden Admin “pressured” Facebook to censor Americans. 2. Facebook censored Americans. 3. Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story. https://t.co/m2KqiWbY1A

@JudiciaryGOP - House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Mark Zuckerberg just admitted three things: 1. Biden-Harris Admin "pressured" Facebook to censor Americans. 2. Facebook censored Americans. 3. Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story. Big win for free speech.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Even as Meta admitted the Biden-Harris censorship was wrong, others in Big Tech were reluctant to go on the record. Now Google is acknowledging, for the first time, that it too faced censorship pressure from the Biden White House and that pressure was “unacceptable and wrong.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But that’s not all. YouTube is making changes to its platform to prevent future censorship. YouTube is committing to the American people that it will NEVER use outside so-called “fact-checkers” to censor speech. No more telling Americans what to believe and not believe. https://t.co/MFIk0NIAiV

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

YouTube also is trying out Community Notes. @elonmusk was ahead of the curve. Meta followed suit. And now YouTube. https://t.co/1IHDqOKREY

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And YouTube confirms that Europe is targeting American speech and innovation. Here it admits that European social-media laws place a “disproportionate regulatory burden on American companies.” https://t.co/bbuVnVseqJ

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

YouTube warns that Europe could force companies to remove LAWFUL social-media content and could risk freedom of expression “within and OUTSIDE of the EU.” That’s right. Europe wants to censor your online speech even if you aren’t in Europe! https://t.co/aRBvErnQ61

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Google and YouTube credit @JudiciaryGOP for bringing transparency of and accountability for Big Tech’s censorship. We will continue to hold Big Tech accountable. https://t.co/lJiEalQZeE

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

All the above are MASSIVE wins for the American people, the First Amendment, and freedom. We won’t stop fighting to protect free speech.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - June 27, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Saved - June 27, 2025 at 6:18 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Today’s decision is a huge victory for the separation of powers and the American people. Rogue district court judges should not be able to unilaterally delay President Trump’s agenda that 77 million Americans voted for this past November.

@washingtonpost - The Washington Post

Breaking news: In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court finds nationwide injunctions for birthright citizenship likely exceeded the authority Congress has given the courts. https://wapo.st/3TgKjpg

Jim_Jordan
Posted - May 15, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Saved - May 15, 2025 at 8:42 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Did Pfizer executives conspire to delay COVID-19 vaccine testing to influence the 2020 election? Based on our oversight, it sure looks like it.

@JudiciaryGOP - House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

🚨 HUGE 🚨 New Information Suggests Senior Pfizer Executives Conspired to Delay COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Testing to Influence 2020 Election. One exec was so scared about this being investigated that he asked to be relocated to Canada! MASSIVE SCANDAL uncovered by @Jim_Jordan. https://t.co/pZKLAz1Wmx

Jim_Jordan
Posted - May 6, 2025 at 12:14 AM
Saved - May 6, 2025 at 1:20 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Gang members that Joe Biden let into the country are now attacking police officers. President Trump wants them out. But Democrats are fighting it. Why? https://nypost.com/2025/05/05/us-news/migrant-tren-de-aragua-punks-brawl-with-nypd-cops-in-wild-times-square-melee/

Exclusive | Migrant Tren de Aragua-linked punks brawl with NYPD cops in wild Times Square melee Two of New York's Finest tried to stop a migrant robbery crew from ripping off two youngsters in Times Square -- and were jumped by the rowdy mob. nypost.com
Jim_Jordan
Posted - May 5, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Saved - May 6, 2025 at 12:56 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

"Judge Boasberg Keeps Getting Assigned Trump Cases. Lawmakers Want to Know Why." https://townhall.com/tipsheet/rebeccadowns/2025/05/05/jim-jordan-letter-on-judge-boasberg-n2656554#google_vignette

Judge Boasberg Keeps Getting Assigned Trump Cases. Lawmakers Want to Know Why.   townhall.com
Jim_Jordan
Posted - March 21, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 10:36 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

.@repdarrellissa has a bill that would stop radical judges from imposing nationwide injunctions on President Trump’s agenda — which 77 million Americans voted for. We passed that bill out of the Judiciary Committee. Let’s make sure we get it to the President’s desk to sign!

Jim_Jordan
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 10:53 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

https://t.co/N8CfdR3IR3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Jim Jordan discussed the possibility of impeaching Judge Boesburg, stating that all options are on the table. Jordan believes Boesburg's decision to halt deportation flights and his history with the FISA court raise concerns about political bias. He cited the judge's involvement in the "Trump Russia baloney" and the sentencing of Kevin Klein Smith. Jordan argued the president has constitutional authority over deportation and is following the law. He criticized the number of injunctions against President Trump's policies, noting the House Judiciary Committee passed legislation to limit the scope of such injunctions. Hearings are planned to investigate the injunctions and Boesburg's decision. Jordan also mentioned the Comey FBI's use of the Steele dossier to obtain warrants and spy on the Trump campaign, questioning Boesburg's role in that process. Finally, Jordan expressed his support for Vivek Ramaswamy in the Ohio gubernatorial race.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Welcome back to the arena. President Trump and the White House towing the line, stressing that they won't defy a court order while continuing to attack the judge overseeing the dispute over deportation flights with, of course, president Trump calling for his impeachment. I'm joined now by the chair of the house judiciary committee, republican Jim Jordan. Mister chairman, thanks very much for being here. Speaker 1: Good to be with you, Casey. Speaker 0: So just wanna start, with a simple question. Do you believe as president Trump does that judge Boesburg should be impeached? Speaker 1: Well, normally, as as chief justice Roberts has pointed out, the remedy for bad decisions is the appellate court. But it seems to me you may have something a little different here. This judge's decision was so ridiculous, it seems to be political. And then when you add to it the history of judge Boesburg, his his work with the FISA court back in the whole Trump Russia baloney, that whole, you know, fake collusion thing that they talked about, the Democrats talked about forever. And then, of course, his sentencing of Kevin Klein Smith, the guy who lied to the FISA court, altered the document back during that same time frame. I think you might have here a judge who's acting in a political fashion. That is a different question. And so for us, Republicans, and I think folks on the judiciary committee, all options are still on the table. We're gonna do some research. We're gonna dig into this, and we're gonna find out. And then I think when you really step back, Casey, and look at how stupid the decision was by this judge, mean, basically said wait. Not basically. He did say, turn the plane around, bring back gang members, hardened criminals who've done all kinds of bad things who are here illegally, turn the plane around and bring those bad guys back to the country. I think just on its face, is ridiculous. And so it sure looks like the judge is acting in a political fashion. Speaker 0: I yeah. I I completely understand the argument that people are making about whether the planes should whether these people should have been deported or not. I I wanna get a little bit more clarity on what you're saying. What specifically has judge Boesburg done that you believe is an impeachable offense under the constitutional description of high crimes and misdemeanors? Speaker 1: All I'm saying is if you're acting in a political fashion and not just, you know, following the law, ruling on the on the law and I would argue that, frankly, just his ruling in and of itself remember, the constitution is pretty clear. Article two, section one, very first sentence says, power in the executive branch shall be vested in a president of The United States. The president has the authority here. Second, he followed Speaker 0: the statute. A major body of law that shows he would probably like to Speaker 1: predatory incursion, and that's that's that he followed the statute. And then third, the president told the country he was gonna do this. It's not like it's a surprise to anyone, let alone this judge. He campaigned on it and said he was gonna do it. So I think when you put all that together, that's what makes this decision look so political on the part of judge Bozeman. Speaker 0: But mister chairman and we actually showed how many times the president said exactly that he would use this law when he was on the campaign trail. We showed our viewers some of that yesterday. So I do take that point. But given all these arguments, if you think that this is and there is an enormous body of law out there, some of it built during the Bush administration, which I know, you know, you you were here in Washington during a lot of this, that suggests that the president actually might win this case on the merits in the longer term under the normal process. So if you're the White House, why not put that appeal through? Why not use the process that's available to you right then? Speaker 1: Well, they they're in fact, maybe the appeal process, I know we got all kinds of cases. I think 15 different cases now where there there have been some federal district judge who's done some kind of injunction, ruled against president Trump in in just eight weeks of him being in in office. So those are all gonna get challenged. You go through the appellate process. That may in fact happen in this particular case too. Sure. All I'm saying is this judge looks different than some of the other things we have seen. And the pace that were 15, I think in the Biden administration, it was like 13 in the entire four years. There have been 15 of these in eight weeks. So, again, that's a concern. It's why two weeks ago, the judiciary committee, we passed legislation which said when a federal district judge in Timbuktu, California issues an injunction, it should only apply to the parties of the case in that respective jurisdiction, not apply nationwide in some of these other cases that we're dealing with. We think that's that's that's good. We pass it through the committee. We'll try to look to pass it on the house floor and move it through the process. Speaker 0: Sir, let me ask you about something you said partway through your first answer, which is this question. You are in charge of the house judiciary committee. Do you plan to hold hearings that may look at the impeachment of judge Boesburg or other federal judges? Speaker 1: We're gonna we're gonna hold hearings on this entire issue. The 15 injunctions that have been done in an eight week time frame, judge Boesburg decision, we plan on holding hearings, hearing from experts, talking about this whole this whole Would Speaker 0: you hold Speaker 1: the impeachment? Again, everything is on the table. We're we're considering all options. That's why we passed legislation. There may be a legislative another legislative remedy we wanna look at, but we do think it's important for us to gather information, get input on this issue. We're looking just having a hearing in one of our subcom we're not ruling out anything. I never do that. Speaker 0: Do you think it'd be politically risky to hold impeachment hearings for judges considering the incredibly narrow house majority? Speaker 1: Look. I'm not saying we're gonna go there. All I'm saying is I think this is a concern. Judge Boesburg has raised concerns with us, Republicans on the judiciary committee, Republicans in general over the years. When you go back and look at the whole FISA situation, remember what happened there where the Comey FBI took took dossier that was paid for by the Clinton campaign hiring the law firm Perkins Coie, who hired Fusion GPS, who hired a foreigner, Christopher Steele, who wrote this bogus document full of all kinds of falsehoods. They the Comey FBI took that document to the court, they got warrants to go spy on the other party's presidential campaign. And judge Boesburg was a part of letting that happen. And then one of the guys who lied to the court, Kevin Klein Smith, got a slap on the wrist for actually altering a document in front of that secret court. And now he comes out with this decision, and we're not supposed to look at that? Of course, we're gonna look at that. You'd be crazy not to. So we're gonna look at that, but all options are on the table, legislative and anything else, and that is the approach we're taking as we begin to hear from experts in hearings we plan to have over the next several weeks. Speaker 0: Have you spoken with president Trump about this? Speaker 1: I've not. I mean, I I talk to him on a very regular basis, but I've not spoken to him about this particular issue. Do you come up. I'm gonna see him later later this week. Speaker 0: Okay. Good to know. Do you think that part of why he called for the impeachment of this particular judge is personal, is to do with what you just outlined? Speaker 1: I I don't know. I think it's probably because president Trump is doing exactly what he told the voters he was gonna do, and you got a judge who says turn the plane around, bring the bad guys back to America. Maybe the dumbest thing I've ever heard. And, frankly, when the American people hear this, they're like, what is this judge doing? The president runs the executive branch. He's the one who put his name on a ballot, got elected. He's entitled to make these kind of decisions and not have some judge jump into the executive branch function and say that he can't do it. And particularly when the people we're talking about are really bad guys who did really bad things and aren't citizens of this country, that's the bottom line. So when you got a judge who does this, it makes you wonder, is this judge operating in a political fashion? And then when you look at the history of this guy, you say, sure looks like he is. Speaker 0: Alright. Congressman, I wanna, mister chairman, I wanna ask you about, something else a little bit closer to home, for you because there is a Republican primary in the gubernatorial race in your home state of Ohio. President Trump endorsed Vivek Ramaswamy. Do you support Vivek Ramaswamy for this post? Speaker 1: Yeah. I like Vivek. I think he'll be a great governor of our state. There's some other good guys who are talking about running, but Vivek's the guy I think who's gonna win this thing, and I really like his energy. I like his conservative his conservative philosophy. I like the fact he's talking about getting rid of the income tax in our state. So I think if it makes a great candidate, it'll be a great governor when he wins when he wins the election here in our great state. Speaker 0: So we should consider that a formal Alright. Congressman I Speaker 1: like the bank. I really do. Speaker 0: Okay. Congressman Jim Jordan, mister chairman, thanks very much for being with us today. Hope you'll come back. Speaker 1: You bet.
Jim_Jordan
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 2:11 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

https://t.co/Ru9DsxBJcU

Video Transcript AI Summary
One of the 8,376 Department of Treasury employees launched an investigation into me the day I released one of the Twitter files. Months later, while I was testifying, some of those same employees made an unannounced visit to my home, even though they owed me money. A judge ruled that political appointees can't access certain information, but thousands of government employees can. USAID is involved in censorship efforts, too, using information operations to manipulate the media. They train NGOs to flag misinformation and strategically leak intelligence to control the news process. The values of Western civilization, like free speech, are worth fighting for. I have lived in countries where speaking your mind can send you to prison, and now I'm seeing that happen in the West. If we can't settle our disputes with debate, the alternative is frightening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Taybeh, do you have any idea how many people work at the United States Department of Treasury? Oh, I don't. I'm sorry. 108,376. And part of the Department of Treasury, of course, is internal revenue service. Is that right? Yes. It is. Yeah. Big park, frankly. Big park. Thousands of people work there too. And on 12/24/2022, '1 of those 8,376 employees at the Department of Treasury decided they were gonna start an investigation into you. Is that right? Yes. That's my understanding. And that just happened to coincide with the day you did one of the Twitter files, One of them Portland. I think it might maybe in the second one if I'm second or third. But one of those important Twitter files. Is that right? Yes. It was. It was And then a few months later, you're sitting in that same seat testifying in front of this committee. And the very time you're testifying, another one, there's a 8,376 people knocked on your door, unannounced visit to your home, which, by the way, they've discontinued because of this issue and a bunch of other crazy things they were doing. Is that right? That's right, mister chairman. And just for the record, they actually owed you money. Right? You didn't do anything wrong. Is that is that accurate? They did. They owed me quite a lot of money. Yeah. Okay. I just wanna make that clear. But, obviously, a way to intimidate someone who is focusing on this issue we're discussing today. Right? Yes. We just got an we just got an order from a judge. The judge in the Southern District Of New York said that no political appoint appointees or special government employees can have access to information. A 8,376 people can have access to information, but the people the president of The United States selects. The guy was elected by 77,000,000 people. He can't preliminary enjoining the a preliminary injunction against the defendants during dependency of this from granting any political appointees, special government employees, from any access to that information. I just I don't know about you, mister Selenberg. I find that kinda troubling. 8,000 people can do it, at least one of them, Christmas Eve. We got a federal government employees working hard on Christmas Eve, probably remotely working, going after mister Taibbi, but the president of The United States can't have people go in and look and see if we can save some money for the taxpayers. He can't do that according to this judge. You think that makes sense, mister Scelberger? Speaker 1: It doesn't. I mean, my understanding is that the president controls executive branch and Speaker 0: the executive branch. Article two, section one, very first sentence. Executive power shall be vested in the present not the. In a president of The United States Of America. First sentence. Yep. Yeah. But this judge says, no. No. No. We gotta trust the bureau. This is the fundamental issue. You trust the unelected bureaucrats, I think what mister Tiffany and mister McClintock, or do you trust the guy who was elected by the people? And that's that that's where I would rather put our trust in the people who they put in office to do these kind of things. Now you mentioned earlier, mister I'm gonna jump around here and try to get to all of you. Mister Schellenberger, you mentioned that USAID, which has been in the news of late, spending, taxpayer money and all kinds of stupid things, is also involved in the censorship effort. And I want you to just elaborate on that a little bit because this is going on as we speak. I want you to elaborate on that for the committee, if you would. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I think it's important to understand that USAID viewed this very holistically. And it's important that if you look at the Hunter Biden laptop case, which is an extremely important case to understand because the FBI was weaponized, then it weaponized the Aspen Institute to brainwash the entire media, it wasn't just that they censored it. It was that they changed the perception of the laptop. They they they they created the perception that it was something other than what it obviously was. And that's what these guys are trying to do. These are called information operations. And USAID has been in the process of taking over so called independent investigative journalism around the world, and at the same time then, training NGOs how to demand censorship. For example, mister Aaron's organization has been working to train organizations to so called flag misinformation behind the scenes. By the way, it's one thing to criticize somebody publicly, which we should all be engaged in. Yeah. Speaker 0: But this Speaker 1: thing where you're skulking around You do that all the time. Secretly yeah. That's that's what that's what OpenDemocracy is. This thing of going out and, like, secretly flagging information behind the scenes and demanding censorship, that is such a that's completely an abomination. That is not what I was talking about. Speaker 0: Clear. You you're saying USAID, your investigation is now engaged in this prebunking kind of concept and and and process that they did with the laptop story in the fall of twenty twenty. Speaker 1: And it's the exact same approach as well, where often what they're doing, for example, with USAID, OCCRP, is that they're they're leaking intelligence Speaker 0: from the Speaker 1: intelligence agencies, in a very and not like WikiLeaks where they just dumped it, I think, probably too much without without the proper redactions. But they're strategically leaking it and then manipulating places like The Guardian and The New York Times to publish certain stories and control the whole investigative news process. Speaker 0: And we saw this from from Yolrof's testimony. He testified during these weekly meetings that they communicable. Federal law enforcement communicated to us there was gonna be hack and leak operations before the presidential election, likely in in October. We had these so that what's gonna happen, when it's gonna happen, and then they said here who it's gonna involve, that the rumors that the hacker leak operation would involve Hunter Biden. So they set them all up. And then to say them, they'd set them all up because they had the laptop and they knew what was coming. And when it happens, everyone buys into what the 51 former intel officials say. That's right. Mister Zuppramanian, I wanna give you the last word. RFK, I just want you to I appreciate the historical perspective you brought when you testified last congress, but one of the statements that stuck with this last congress was actually a statement made by RFK Junior When he said, when you look at history, it is never the good guys who were for censorship. And that's what we're trying to keep in mind and stop it from both sides, from all sides. We just don't we want the first amendment. I'll give you the last thirty seconds here to respond. Absolutely. Speaker 2: I mean, as as you mentioned earlier, and when I was here the last time, I think it was a throwaway comment to a representative. It was not even part of my testimony. I don't think so. And I said, the values of Western civilization are worth fighting for, going back to the enlightenment and the reformation. That is what gave us free speech. That's what distinguishes us from the rest of the world. And the first amendment in America distinguishes America from the rest of the world. I come from India originally. I live in Canada. I'm from Canada. But I've lived in India. I've lived in The Middle East. I've lived in places where just speaking your mind can send you to prison. You cannot criticize anything that goes against the government or certain religions for that matter. And when I came to the West, it was, you know, refreshing to finally be able to express myself. And, unfortunately, unfortunately, what I left behind has come to me in Canada, has followed me to Canada. And I'm seeing that happening in The United States. And it's very worrying because it's happened so quickly, and I don't know where this is gonna lead us to. Speaker 1: Yeah. If we if Speaker 0: we can't settle our disputes with debate, the alternative is frightening, and we never wanna get there. So I appreciate all of you. I appreciate the the from both sides. I mean, we we we wanna embrace the first minute.
Jim_Jordan
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 2:11 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

https://t.co/stgBjanO9o

Video Transcript AI Summary
If you interfere with legitimate law enforcement operations, like sending criminals back to their countries, you should be prosecuted. The Democrats are attacking Elon Musk for exposing wasteful spending instead of addressing the spending itself. We've become the party of common sense, while they're the party of crazy, defending things like trans topics in Ireland and Sesame Street in Iraq. They're trying to stop President Trump and Elon Musk from getting the access they need, but we'll fight it out in court. Kash Patel is the reason we know the Trump-Russia investigation was bogus, and we need him running the FBI. Todd Blanche is also slated to be the deputy attorney general. Tulsi Gabbard is right on FISA and understands the need to protect Americans' liberty and privacy. Under the Democrats, it looks like they're spying on Americans and censoring them, which is frightening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister chairman, thanks very much for being here. Speaker 1: Good to be with you, Maria. Speaker 0: What are the ramifications for somebody within the FBI who may have leaked that ICE, memo detailing what their operations were and and and allowing those, trendy or gang members to actually get away. Speaker 1: No. If you're interfering with legitimate law enforcement activity where they are going out and sending criminals back, repatriating criminals, you're interfering with that operation, that that should be prosecuted. I think I think, Tom Homan is exactly right. And my guess is Pam Bondi and soon to be Todd Blanch running our justice department will look into this. And if it happened, they will prosecute the individual who's tipping off the bad guys about the good guys coming to take them back, send them back to their country. So, yeah, this is this is as wrong as it gets. And I think Tom Homan is and he spelled it out because you're jeopardizing the safety of law enforcement officials by leaking that information to the bad guys. You Speaker 0: know, I I don't understand how your colleagues on the left can defend any of this, really. I mean, everything that president Trump and and you and your colleagues are doing, it seemed to me to be such common sense. A house judiciary subcommittee had a hearing on reining in the administrative state yesterday. One of the witnesses went after Democrat congressman Jamie Raskin for focusing on Elon Musk instead of focusing at the topic, on the topic of hand. Watch this. Speaker 2: Right. Mister Raskin, your words earlier really, really worried me, and I will tell you why. When you say we are here and we should be here to talk about mister Elon Musk and all the unconstitutional things that he's doing, and you said we shouldn't be here to talk about regulation or anything like that. Because where I come from, the overregulation causes us to be where we are. My continent, Africa, is the poorest region in the world today because it happens to be the most overregulated region in the world. So if you don't see the value of over overregulation, if you need and want to wait until this country becomes like most African countries, I don't know. I love this country, and I don't want to see go down there. Speaker 0: Wow. Mister chair chairman, tell us more about that hearing yesterday. Speaker 1: No. She was good, and you're right. She's right. The Democrats spent all their time attacking Elon Elon Musk. I said, you know, instead of instead of, dealing with the stupid spending, they attacked the guy who exposed the stupid spending. I mean, that that's literally Speaker 2: what's going on. And, what Speaker 1: I think president Trump Price says it best, and you said it, Maria. We're now the party of common sense. They're the party of crazy. Remember when Sarah Huckabee Sanders gave her response to the State of the Union a couple years ago? She said the divide in America today is normal versus crazy. And it is too. It is crazy to defend the spending that Elon Musk and his team are exposing. Because it's too you just went through the list last hour of all the, you know, trans opera or transcomic in Ireland, Sesame Street in Iraq. I mean, big bird and Bert and Ernie in Baghdad is more important than stop it. I mean, this is crazy stuff. So they're the party they're the party who wants to defund the police. They're the party who wants to tip-off off the bad guys when the good guys are coming to deport them. They're the party who defends the USAID spending. That's crazy. And if they wanna keep doing that, God bless them. But I think we'll keep winning elections like we did on November 5. Speaker 0: But are are are you gonna be able to get the access that you need? Is Elon Musk and president Trump gonna be able to get the access that they need in order to continue this work? You know that they're trying to stop him from looking at the treasury documents that he needs to see. Speaker 1: Yeah. You know why we will because, again, it's common sense, and the American people are like, what? Wait a minute. He's exposing all this and you're gonna stop him? Then we're gonna have to fight it out in court. I get that. But the one decision that we got about the treasury department I mean, first over remember, there are there are over a 8,000 official employees in the treasury department. They can have access to all this information, but the president of The United States elected by 77,000,000 people makes Elon Musk a federal employee and he can't and the other political appointees at the treasury department can't. There's a question that maybe even the secretary of the Treasury, according to this judge's decision, that secretary Bessette may not even be able to get access. That is crazy. Yeah. This is stupid. So we're gonna have to fight this out in court. But in the end, I think we win because, again, we're on the side of common sense. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, look. President Trump needs his team on the ground, and your colleagues on the left have also been obstructing some of these committees, hearings. I don't understand how it's possible that you've got 53 Republicans and 47 Democrats, and yet the Democrats are running the table on these confirmation hearings. The senate judiciary committee set to vote on Kash Patel's nomination for FBI director today, but a group of more than 680,000 law enforcement personnel have sent a letter urging senators to confirm Patel as quickly as possible. Democrat senator Dick Durbin claims he's now learned Patel has been secretly overseeing the removal of several FBI personnel. Patel's team said this is secondhand gossip, mister chairman. What can you tell us about Kash Patel? Speaker 1: Kash Patel is the reason we knew that the Trump rush out that whole investigation Adam Schiff and the Democrats did. The he's the guy that put it all together and why we know that that was baloney. Remember, Kash is the one with the memo that Devin put together. Devin Nunes, then chairman of the intel committee here in the house, put the memo together that told us that it was the Clinton campaign who hired the law firm Perkins Coie, who hired Fusion GPS, who hired a foreigner, Christopher Steele, who put together a fake false document called the dossier, then then then the Comey FBI took that false document to the secret court, the FISA court, to get warrants to spy on president Trump's campaign. And but for Kash Patel, we don't learn that. And that's what that's what launched this whole investigation that we've been doing for years now and figuring out how political our justice department had become, particularly under Biden and Merrick Garland when he was attorney general and all the political things they did to president Trump and to all kinds of people across the country. So it started with Cash. That is exactly the kind of guy Yeah. We need running the FBI. Speaker 0: Well, I know that. And I and I spoke with him back then and Devin Nunes. And Sure did. You know, I I mean, from everything you everything you just described, it sounds to me like Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians to stop her opponent. I mean, it it actually sounds to me like she charged Trump with exactly what she was actually doing. Mhmm. Kash Patel served as chief of staff in the Department of Defense. He was deputy assistant to president Trump. He was the chief of staff at the DOD after being deputy director of national intelligence and the intelligence community. He's got a long resume of intelligence and defense activity, and yet they're trying to come up with any reason to stop him because they know he knows Speaker 1: what they did. Mhmm. Yeah. But he's gonna make it. He's I think he's gonna get confirmed. Today, Todd Blanche is gonna he's slated to be deputy attorney generals in front of the, Senate Judiciary Committee. I think he's gonna do well. I think he's gonna get confirmed. He's exactly the kind of guy we need helping Pam Bondi running the justice department. So I am very encouraged by the people who are now at justice who are going to apply the standard that's supposed to always apply in our country, equal treatment under the law. Not political prosecutions, equal treatment under the law. That's what they're gonna do, and I can't wait for them to get there and really get moving. Speaker 0: Is is there an issue with Howard Lutnick? How come we haven't seen him confirmed? And what are the prospects for Tulsi Gabbard? Speaker 1: No. No. I think, I think Howard will be fine. I think Tulsi will be fine. Tulsi, we need Tulsi because Tulsi is right on FISA. Tulsi is the one who understands that that the the the FISA court we we I wanna spy on the foreigners. We all do. We wanna figure out what's going on there. But when it comes to Americans, we gotta have the reforms in place that protect Americans' liberty, protect Americans' rights, protect Americans' privacy, and she understands that. We need her in that key position. Speaker 0: I mean, what should we be more worried about? Getting spied on by China or getting spied on by the US government? Speaker 1: Well, when Democrats are charged, in charge, it it sure looks like they're, they're looking into Americans, which is which is frightening. They were certainly trying to censor Americans, and we have a hearing on that today, at 10:00 when we're bringing back in some of the original guys, those those journals who were part of the Twitter files, which again, we need to thank Elon Musk for purchasing Twitter and showing us that big government was pressuring big tech to censor Americans, particularly conservative Americans, and thank goodness that's all changed. Speaker 0: Thanks for putting a spotlight on that. What were there, like a thousand people in Biden's government and Biden's administration who were pressuring social media to cancel all of us? Speaker 1: Yeah. And you don't have to take my word for it. Mark Zuckerberg wrote us a letter. Speaker 0: That's right. Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg wrote us a letter, and he said the Biden administration pressured us to censor. We did it. We're sorry. We won't do it again, and thank goodness for that. And they've changed their policy now where they fully embrace the First Amendment. Speaker 0: Mister chairman, thanks very much for being here. We so appreciate. Speaker 1: We'll be Speaker 0: watching your work.
Jim_Jordan
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 2:02 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

https://t.co/Akdg36bie7

Video Transcript AI Summary
What a difference a few years makes! Platforms have shifted dramatically. Despite past censorship pressures, Fox and Newsmax are thriving. The Biden administration, which once pushed for censorship, now seems to embrace the First Amendment. Remember when the administration tried to remove a tweet by RFK Jr. about Hank Aaron? That exposed the "censorship industrial complex." Today, many entities involved in censorship are out of business. Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter and the release of the Twitter Files were pivotal. Journalists like Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger, who revealed these truths, faced attacks. As we move forward, we must address global censorship efforts, such as Europe's Digital Services Act, which could impact Americans.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What a difference a few years make. Four years ago, president Trump was banned from all platforms, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube. Today, he has his own platform. He's back on all the others, and, of course, he's president of The United States. Four Years ago, Democrat members of Congress sent a letter to telecommunication companies pressuring them to kick Fox and Newsmax off of a cable network. Today, both are still on. Both are doing fine. Fox has more viewers than MSNBC and CNN combined. Four years ago, the White House was actively pressuring big tech to censor Americans. You don't have to take my word for it. Mark Zuckerberg wrote the committee a letter, told us it was going on. He said the Biden administration pressured us to censor. We did it. We're sorry. We ain't gonna do it anymore. Today, they've changed their policies, got rid of the independent fact checkers, and actually embraced the first amendment. Imagine that. And maybe the best example of what they were doing happened on the third day of the administration, example we've highlighted many times in this committee in the last congress. Third day of the Biden administration, there was an email sent from Clark Humphrey to Twitter. Email said, wanted to flag the below tweet, and we hope you can get moving on the process for having it removed ASAP. Take down this tweet as soon as possible. And who was the tweet by? Who did the tweet? The guy who's gonna be named Secretary of Health and Human Services there sometime this week, Robert f Kennedy, who just happened to be the guy who was gonna run against the very people trying to take down the take down the tweet. What did tweet say? Hank Aaron's tragic death is part of a wave of suspicious death among elderly closely following administration of the vaccine. He received the vaccine on January 5 to inspire other black Americans to get the vaccine. There is not one thing in that two sentence tweet that's not true. Absolutely true. But the Biden administration was pressuring to take it down. That's when we the the term actually is mister Selenberg's term, the censorship industrial complex. That's what it is right there, front and center, and it's much broader than that. By the way, the guy who authored this tweet is gonna be voted by the United States Senate to be the next secretary of health and human services. We had him as a witness in front of this committee two years ago. And when RFK Junior came in to testify, Democrats made a motion to go to executive session. Executive session kicked everyone out so that no one could hear what RFK Jr. Was gonna testify to in a hearing on censorship. You can't make this stuff up. Two years ago, we learned that 51 former intel officials lied to the country when they said the Hunter Biden laptop story had all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. Today, all 51 of those people have lost their security clearance. A few years ago, GARM, the misnamed Global Alliance for Responsible Media, was coordinating an effort with major advertisers to limit ads on conservative platforms and websites. Today, GARM is out of business. Climate Action one hundred, a few years ago, coordinated an effort to a financial institution to pressure companies to produce oil and gas. Emissions and production. Today, Climate Action one hundred, out of business. Few years ago, the Stanford Internet Observatory was working. Today, they're out of business. In ZAM was doing the same thing a few years ago. Today, they've stopped operation. What a difference a few years can make. And so much of this change started in October of twenty twenty two when Elon Musk purchased Twitter. I think he said something like, I didn't spend $44,000,000,000 to buy Twitter. I spent $44,000,000,000 to save the First Amendment. And, of course, that effort began with the Twitter files. And two of the Twitter files authors are with us today as witnesses. Matt Taibbi wrote the very first Twitter file, and I think 11 or 12 others. Over the time that all that information was coming out. Mister Shellenberger was also an author. And as I said earlier, he's the guy who gave coined the term the censorship industrial complex. Big government working with big universities, working with other government agencies, the White House working in all this, pressuring big tech to censor Americans' speech. Both Democrats, both award winning journalists, both Democrats at the time when they testified last congress, both award winning journalists, both testified multiple times in front of this con this committee last congress. And what was their reward for coming forward and defending the First Amendment? They were attacked. They were referred to in this committee as so called journalists, even though they won all kinds of awards and are best selling authors. They were asked to disclose their sources in a hearing by Democrats in in front of this committee, and they were named personally in a letter by the FTC chair, Lina Khan, when miss Khan asked Elon Musk who were the journalists you were talking to. And, of course, maybe most importantly, we all remember that at the very moment mister Taibi was testifying in front of this committee, the IRS was knocking on his door. Just one big coincidence. Very time, very time he's talking to this committee, testifying in front of this committee, the IRS was knocking on his door. Miss Supermonya was targeted for covering the trucker blockade in Canada. She also testified last year in front of this committee, and she warned us. She's ahead of her time. She warned us about what was coming in Europe and around the world with the censorship efforts we're seeing in other Western nations. One of the things she said when she testified almost two years ago, She said, what is under threat is a core value of Western civilization. Never forget that. Powerful statement, and that's what's at stake here. So I appreciate the work you've all done, what we've been able to uncover, Appreciate the work of the president and mister Musk and what he's what he started with the Twitter files, and then what we were able to do with all these other platforms and the dramatic change we have seen. But I am nervous about what's happening in Europe because it's the Digital Services Act they are using to pressure tech companies to censor globally, which impacts Americans as well. And this is something the committee is gonna look into as we move forward. But I wanna thank you all for being here today. And with that, I would recognize the ranking member.
Jim_Jordan
Posted - February 14, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 1:51 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

https://t.co/tnxNF1fpDz

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's an exciting time with President Trump focused on fulfilling his promises. We need a Justice Department that applies the law equally, unlike the political approach under Biden and Garland. The focus should be on traditional crime, not spying on Americans. We're seeing changes with Pam Bondi and others, targeting sanctuary cities that defy federal law. We've curbed big tech censorship, but foreign countries are now pressuring tech companies to censor Americans. We're considering visa restrictions for those involved. Investigations are needed into the sweetheart deal for Hunter Biden, the January 6th pipe bombs, and more. The goal is transparency and accountability, answering the questions the American people deserve to have answered.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister chairman, just exciting moment. We're brimming. We're brimming with excitement. It's it's it's, really it it it's really, an unbelievable timeline that we're living in. Speaker 1: You've Speaker 0: been on the show for years, mister chairman. It's, like, saying that this might be what happens if we get Trump elected. You've you've gotta be whistling Dixie this morning. Speaker 1: Well, yeah. It is it is an exciting time, and you we've never seen a president with this kind of focus intensity, just this kind of effort to just do what he told the voters he was gonna do, whether it's Elon Musk working for the president on this Doge effort and and identifying all the ridiculous spending or or the things you're talking about. But but this is a great great idea. How about these the the leaders of these cities? Instead of being sanctuary cities, you actually have a mayor who's going to stop the crazy crime that takes place in all our major urban areas. He's gonna focus on on on on helping the citizens with their better education system and everything else. How about people like that? I think that's what president Trump wants versus, oh, we're gonna be a sanctuary city. We're gonna not comply with federal law enforcement who are executing the law. We're gonna make an we're gonna be a, you know, try to stop them and prevent them from doing their job. I think I think that's the kind of focus that people want. And frankly, people in those cities want and president Trump is trying to trying to help make that come about. Speaker 0: Yes. So okay. Something that we haven't gotten to on the show just yet is the news that president Trump has fired now all Joe Biden federal prosecutors. These are some of the people who've been a major thorn in your paw leading the judiciary committee. Your take on this, I'd see it's gotta be welcome, but we well, I don't think we've ever seen action like this, before, certainly not in Trump's first term. Speaker 1: Well, this is this is real basic. We want a justice department that actually gets back to the fundamental principle, equal treatment under the law. We don't want a justice department like we had under the Biden Garland, administration where they're political. And we know Jack Smith was totally political. We know what was going on with some of the political prosecutions of folks on on January who who were here on January 6, who may have inadvertently stepped across some line and then they get prosecute. So we we know that kind of attitude out there. And what I think president Trump and the people of the justice department are doing is saying, no. We're gonna focus on equal treatment under the law, applying the law the way it's supposed to be applied, not politics, and that is welcome. And, frankly, that's what the American people voted for because they saw how political that place had become, and and the lawfare activity against the guy who was our nominee for president, who got 77,000,000 votes and is now president of The United States against president Trump. And so, I think it's welcomed by the, by the people and a good thing for following our constitution. Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, Bambandi, very much like a wrecking ball. Did you hear the reports that she tore down a portrait of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris? Speaker 1: I did. Speaker 0: And what was it? Merrick Garland. Right? Yeah. That she personally did. That there's now multiple credible reports that she did it herself and stacked them in the trash. Speaker 1: The, the, the other thing you said, the the first day on the job, she issues the memorandum. On the second page of that memorandum, she's talking about this committee to look at the weaponization of government and particularly the justice department. And she goes bullet point by bullet point, and it's all things we had been focused on and investigating over the last congress. And it was so refreshing. In fact, I told Pam that. I said, this is so good that memorandum you put out and the intensity and focus you are bringing to equal treatment under the law, again, is exactly what the American people wanted. Speaker 0: So the criticism of this is gonna be, oh, you can't take away all the prosecutors. What will happen? Who will prosecute the crime? They've been doing the same thing with the FBI, right, with the, sort of the elimination of those individuals who, as you mentioned, January 6, were going after innocent Americans. You like, what's the counterbalance to that? Right? Because that's that's the Speaker 1: that's the that's the problem Speaker 0: right now. Speaker 1: Yeah. They have they take the FBI for an example, Vinny. The about $12,000,000,000 budget at the FBI. More than half of that money is spent on counterintelligence, intelligence, surveillance. I mean, basically, you know, looking and surveilling the American people. More than half of the budget, half the personnel. I think the American people would kinda like an FBI that's probably focused more on traditional crime that, you know, organized crime, gang activity, money laundering, all the stuff that we typically think the FBI's child exploitation, everything else, focus on stopping that stuff versus spying on the American people. So, that's, I think, the kind of focus you're gonna see from Kash Patel when he gets confirmed and heads the FBI. That's what we want, and that's what I think American people want. So that that's that's what that's the change that I think needs to take place and is going to take place under Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche who will be deputy attorney general, and, of course, Kash Patel at the FBI. Speaker 0: We oh, I think that the the the changes the changes, shook quite a few people. We weren't expecting that Leticia James gets, sued by the justice department on, like, day three. We weren't expecting that. And, it's, like, refreshing actually because sanctuary states are illegal. I mean, they should be illegal. Right? Like, you you don't have a right to just defy federal law. You can just do that. You just Yep. Choose. You're not gonna, there's no first amendment here. Right? And it's like, we're Oregon. Like, that's not how it works, actually. Speaker 1: Yeah. And and this and the situation that I think both Tom Homan and Pam Bondi have talked about where it looks like sometimes their people are tipping off, the the bad gas, the the people with a criminal background who Tom Homan is coming in to rightfully repatriate out of the country repatriate back to their their their their home country, and they're getting tipped off in it. And I think Tom Homan said, it looks like it may have been an FBI agent who did that. Well, you can't do that. That's that that's like helping the bad guys when and and and endangering law enforcement, members potentially. So, yeah, that when you when you're doing those kind of things, I think criminal prosecution should be something that's definitely, definitely in in play. Speaker 0: And we wanna be treason, like, you're acting against federal law enforcement and you're helping out the criminals. You're not Speaker 1: supposed to you're not supposed to help the bad guys. And if you do, you're probably in trouble, and we should probably prosecute peoples who do those things. Speaker 0: Alright. Let's talk about your let's talk about your potential prosecutions. Let's talk about your potential investigations. What do we have coming up on the judiciary committee? A target rich environment, I think we'd call it. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, one thing on the censorship front, we think we've met we've had a huge impact there in stopping, big government and big tech and other federal government agencies and universities all working together, what Michael Shellenberger called the censorship industrial complex. We think we've really scaled that back into protecting the first amendment. But right now what's happening is in foreign countries, they're using their laws to pressure tech companies to censor Americans. And so we're gonna see if there's a way we can put some pressure on these foreign countries to, one example would be if you're you're involved in in in any way, censoring Americans, you shouldn't be able to get a visa and come to the country. If you're someone of these foreign dignitaries who likes to come to The United States, everyone likes to come here. So that's a that's a piece of legislation one of our members has that we'll look at passing. And then on the oversight thing, we still think there's a look back that needs to happen with David Weiss, who was gonna give the sweetheart deal to Hunter Biden. We still think we don't have answers on, you know, who planted the pipe bombs on January 6, who leaked the Dobbs opinion, who put cocaine at the White House for goodness sake. I think the American people like to know those things, and they'd also like to know about what the Garland justice department was doing when they said, if you're a pro life Catholic, you're an extremist, or if you're a mom and dad at a school board meeting, we're gonna investigate you. So we're gonna look back at all that stuff and get answers for the American people. Speaker 0: I'd love to get an answer on something that cross our timeline. Some of your colleagues, Tom Tillis in the senate was actually, in front of an ad. I couldn't believe it when I saw it. He was in front of an ad that had an x over Elon Musk, and he said we must eliminate Elon Musk. We'll pull up the ad here and we'll pop it up on screen because it was I thought there's no way. Here it is. Speaker 1: There's no way. Speaker 0: It's like it's gotta be a meme. Right? But no. It's real. And here's, your colleague, Republican in the senate saying, this is allegedly we're looking into who's funding this, but, like, help eliminate Elon Musk with a crossover his face and a USAID logo on the bottom. And this is being of course, you can't just advertise somebody has to approve these advertisements. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Who's approving these advertisements exactly? It looks like an open threat against a member of the administration. This is insane. Speaker 1: Yeah. Again, Democrats, Democrats will will attack the guy who's exposing the stupid spending instead of trying to stop the stupid spending. It makes no sense to me. And they're they're over the last, what, two weeks, it's been one one theme, one message from the Democrats, go after Elon Musk. Even though the president told us as as we've said before, told us that when he when he was running for the job, I'm gonna have Elon Musk head up this this Doge, group who's gonna go through agency by agency in the federal government, identify stupid things we're spending taxpayer money on. And when he identifies those things, the Democrats says, oh, we gotta get rid of Elon Musk. What? That makes no sense. It's I I think, again, we're the party of common sense as the president, always says. I think the American people see this as good common sense governance and are not gonna be supportive of the left who continues to attack, Elon Musk. I think he's doing the Lord's work. I know he did when he bought remember when he said when he bought Twitter? He said, like, I didn't spend $44,000,000,000 to buy Twitter. I spent $44,000,000,000 to save the first amendment and free speech for goodness sake, and he's been an integral part of the effort to protect the First Amendment. And now he's gonna try to protect us from having these bureaucrats who think they're smarter than you and I and all your viewers and listeners think they're smarter than the rest of us, protect us from the stupid things they wanna spend our money on. Speaker 0: So it'd be nice it'd be nice to close down the government caves. Didn't know that, didn't know the feds on tricycles in limestone caves was how, retirements were processed. Did did you know that, congressman? Speaker 1: I did not. I did not know that. Speaker 0: Is that exciting exciting thing you learned this week? Speaker 1: I did yeah. I didn't know we were spending money for what some trans comic can perform opera or whatever in Ireland. I didn't know we were spending money to put Bert and Ernie and Big Bert on Baghdad TV. And you're like, what the heck? Heck? Speaker 0: It's true. What the heck? It's crazy. It's true. Speaker 1: But oh, no. No. No. It's not that. That's not the problem. The problem is Elon Musk. That that that that makes no sense. No sense to to the folks I get the privilege of representing in the Fourth District Of Ohio. They're on the Elon Musk's side. Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. I mean, it's it just but just as since we named Robert, if you if you would please allow us, here's a photo of the special special tricycles. These are tricycles that the feds drive around. They ride around on them all day. We pay them salaries and then, massive retirement pensions to ride around on tricycles all day inside of the caverns of an old limestone man to handle retirement paperwork by hand and store them in boxes. Speaker 1: This Speaker 0: is what we pay for in the era of AI. Speaker 1: Go figure. Go figure. Yeah. Speaker 0: In conclusion, we did hear, from somebody I know that you're very close with, James Comer and Anaplena Luna, this past week. They both been on the program, and then we covered live their announcement of sort of a massive declassification operation. I'm sure you're in favor of that. You've often been on the show talking about it. Can you give us kind of an update? Is this even something that is feasible? We've you've held up the black line paper before. You've been, like, you've come on the program and held out, like, these just black ink blots. And, like, what what's to give us any hope that that we'll be able to punch past that? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think I think the main hope is is in the White House. President Trump has indicated he wants the American people to have transparency and understand what what happened with some of these situation with with with the the tragic assassination of of, JFK, and and other issues. So, yeah, let's let's get the facts out there. Our government has information. We're gonna work with with, in the in the justice department. We're gonna work with, Pam and, Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and and and Todd Blanch, the deputy attorney general, and Cash, to get information on on things, as I said before, that we want that we think the American people still have questions about. So we wanna get those answers. And, the same with, with chairman Comer and representative, Ana Paulina Luna, they wanna get answers to the American people. So the more folks the more you can focus in on it. I mean, we're seeing this with Elon Musk. There have been organizations who've highlighted the stupid spending in the past. Citizens against government waste has done good work over, you know, the last forty years highlighting the pork book and all the stupid spending. But when you have an intense focus and it was an element of the campaign and a presidential race, that's when you can really highlight it and you get the media attention and the focus of the American people. That's when you can make a difference. So any effort that adds to the the attention and and focus on an issue helps us get the answers, and that's what chairman Comer and representative Anna Paulino Luna are up to. Speaker 0: Don't understand it. I I'd say it probably wants to show. Why does our federal government spend so much time and resources protecting pederists? I don't get it, mister I don't. I said this is Jeffrey Epstein. He's already been he was found guilty of these things, yet we spend all of these resources protecting the client list and everybody who was involved. That doesn't make any sense to me. I'm just I'm just a dumb Midwesterner, you know. I guess I don't. Speaker 1: You got common sense. Common sense. That's what you are from the nook ass. Speaker 0: Too many questions. Yeah. That's right. Everybody needs, obviously, if you're not already following Jim Jordan, you're crazy. Okay? You're living in one of the limestone caves where the government does its retirement. And you're also by following Jim Jordan, who has more followers than us on x, very humbling, 6,000,000 followers on x, you're missing out on the man who actually saved Facebook from itself, and it's something that we haven't gotten a chance to thank you for live. Thank you. Mark Zuckerberg specifically citing your, investigation into Facebook and censorship, saying this is why we've decided to destroy all of our censorship policies because of Jim Jordan. And so thank you, mister chairman. Speaker 1: Thank you. Thanks for all the good work you do. Speaker 0: Alright. Godspeed.
Jim_Jordan
Posted - February 19, 2025 at 2:04 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 1:51 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

https://t.co/iDvDtVS55C

Jim_Jordan
Posted - February 7, 2025 at 1:44 AM
Saved - February 7, 2025 at 1:02 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Why was Fani Willis's office coordinating with the sham January 6th Committee? We want answers.

@JudiciaryGOP - House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

#BREAKING: @Jim_Jordan & @RepLoudermilk Demand Information from Fulton County DA Fani Willis's Employees About Coordination with the January 6 Committee Read the letter to Michael Hill here: https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2025-02-06%20JDJ%20BL%20to%20Hill%20-%20FCDAO.pdf Read the letter to Trina Swanson-Lucas here: https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2025-02-06%20JDJ%20BL%20to%20Swanson-Lucas%20-%20FCDAO.pdf Read the letter to Donald Wakeford here: https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2025-02-06%20JDJ%20BL%20to%20Wakeford%20-%20FCDAO.pdf Read the letter to Will Wooten here: https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2025-02-06%20JDJ%20BL%20to%20Wooten%20-%20FCDAO.pdf

Jim_Jordan
Posted - January 21, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Saved - January 22, 2025 at 5:42 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Clapper. Brennan. Hayden. All pushed the fake Russia story on Hunter Biden’s laptop. Now President Trump has revoked their security clearances. Good!

Jim_Jordan
Posted - December 17, 2024 at 8:17 PM
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 9:36 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

MUST READ: @RepLoudermilk releases a report on the failures and politicization of the January 6th Committee. It was all a sham. Read it here: https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/6/d/6dae7b82-7683-4f56-a177-ba98695e600d/145DD5A70E967DEEC1F511764D3E6FA1.final-interim-report.pdf https://t.co/nAQw22Vt2D

Jim_Jordan
Posted - December 13, 2024 at 4:02 PM
Saved - December 13, 2024 at 4:36 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

26 Confidential Human Sources were at the rally in D.C. on January 6. 17 entered the restricted area. 4 entered the Capitol. 3 were specifically deployed by the FBI to be at the rally. 2 were paid by the FBI. 0 were arrested.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - December 11, 2024 at 8:07 PM
Saved - December 11, 2024 at 8:48 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Chris Wray’s FBI: -Censored Americans -Labeled pro-life Catholics as extremists -Spied on your private finances -Spied on Congressional members and staff -Retaliated against whistleblowers   Americans deserve better.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - December 6, 2024 at 1:30 AM
Saved - December 6, 2024 at 1:30 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Jim Jordan gives Fani Willis deadline to hand over documents in Trump investigation probe https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/jim-jordan-fani-willis-deadline-documents-trump-investigation-probe

Jim Jordan gives Fani Willis deadline to hand over documents in Trump investigation probe Republican Rep. Jim Jordan has given District Attorney Fani Willis a deadline to give him information as part of an investigation into whether she colluded with the Biden Administration's Department of Justice. fox5atlanta.com
Jim_Jordan
Posted - November 26, 2024 at 11:24 PM
Saved - November 27, 2024 at 3:51 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Jack Smith’s weaponized case against President Trump FAILED. But Jack Smith is not above the law. We still want ALL documents and communications from his office. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jordan-demands-smith-retain-all-records-related-trump-prosecutions-special-counsels-office-winds-down.amp

Jim_Jordan
Posted - October 30, 2024 at 4:38 PM
Saved - October 30, 2024 at 6:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed how the FBI confirmed Hunter Biden's laptop was real in late 2019 and worked with Big Tech to censor the New York Post's story about the Biden family's corruption before the 2020 election. The FBI warned Big Tech about a potential Russian disinformation campaign, aligning with the laptop's contents. Despite knowing the story was true, Big Tech censored it, influenced by the FBI's guidance. Internal communications revealed that they anticipated scrutiny over their actions, and this marked the beginning of increased censorship under the Biden administration.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

HOW THE FBI “PREBUNKED” A TRUE STORY ABOUT THE BIDEN FAMILY’S CORRUPTION BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION The FBI knew Hunter Biden’s laptop was real & worked for MONTHS to prime Big Tech to censor the @nypost story. Here’s how the FBI "prebunked" the biggest story of the election. 🧵 https://t.co/fmy0D4eouZ

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In late 2019, the FBI obtained and secretly confirmed that the Hunter Biden laptop was real. The laptop had damning material showing the Biden family’s corrupt influence-peddling scheme. https://t.co/c24QgLrVyk

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Just a few months later, while in possession of Hunter’s laptop, the FBI started meeting with Big Tech to warn about potential Russian disinformation ahead of the election. In total, the FBI and Big Tech met over 30 times in 2020 before the Biden family corruption story came out.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

FBI warned Big Tech to watch for: WHO: Russians. WHAT: Hack-and-Leak operation. WHEN: October surprise. WHY: To reveal “links between the Biden family and Ukraine, including Burisma.” Internal Facebook emails a MONTH before @nypost story came out show Big Tech got specific warnings:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The FBI spent months establishing the who, what, when, & why behind a potential foreign hack-and-leak operation. And it just so happened to match the damning contents about Biden family corruption on Hunter Biden’s laptop—which the FBI had since late 2019. Quite the coincidence!

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But it wasn’t a coincidence. @JudiciaryGOP & @Weaponization obtained testimony from key FBI witnesses that the FBI officials who knew the FBI had Hunter Biden’s laptop were the same ones meeting with Big Tech when Big Tech was warned of a “hack-and-leak” involving the Bidens. https://t.co/85Kg1jU5mi

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Then, when the @nypost Biden family corruption story came out, Big Tech did what the FBI primed them to do – they censored it. Facebook demoted it for a week right before the election, and Twitter prevented anyone from sharing the link to the story. https://t.co/ImifjyHmZb

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Shocking internal notes from a Microsoft employee from the day the @nypost story came out confirm that the FBI “tipped” Big Tech off about “this Burisma story” a “week” earlier. This was election interference, plain and simple. https://t.co/Kf877xrkNV

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Big Tech knew this work with the FBI would affect the 2020 election. In an internal chat, Facebook employees joked that when they get called to testify about "why we influenced the 2020 election," they could “say we have been meeting for YEARS with the US gov’t to plan for it.” https://t.co/ULdS6JBKmW

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And Facebook’s communications team didn’t fear that the press would criticize them for censoring a true story on the Biden family’s influence peddling. Why? As they joked about internally the night the story broke: “The Press is only as good to you as you are bad to Trump” https://t.co/EKWYAj4RuK

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Internal Facebook messages obtained by @JudiciaryGOP & @Weaponization show that Big Tech employees knew their “trusted secret squirrel partners”—in the US gov’t—would give them cover for censoring the story even though they wouldn’t be able to prove that the laptop was hacked. https://t.co/mNv0Mye6vE

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Right on cue, just five days after the @nypost story was published, 51 former intelligence community members, organized by @SecBlinken and the Biden campaign, lied to the American people, incorrectly calling the story Russian disinformation. https://t.co/pWpQd8rkZ5

@JudiciaryGOP - House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

#BREAKING: Testimony Reveals Secretary Blinken and the Biden Campaign Were Behind the Infamous Public Statement from Former Intel Officials on the Hunter Biden Laptop @Jim_Jordan and @RepMikeTurner reveal HUGE news here: https://t.co/bX3fpqJKPo

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Big Tech censored the most important story of the 2020 election because the FBI spent months priming them to. Today, Big Tech executives, like Mark Zuckerberg @finkd, now admit that it was wrong to censor the @nypost story, and point the finger at the FBI. https://t.co/m2KqiWcvR8

@JudiciaryGOP - House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Mark Zuckerberg just admitted three things: 1. Biden-Harris Admin "pressured" Facebook to censor Americans. 2. Facebook censored Americans. 3. Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story. Big win for free speech. https://x.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/1828201780544504064/photo/1

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But Big Tech knew better at the time. Even though the story was obviously not Russian disinformation, Big Tech continued to censor it because they knew that’s what the Biden-Harris Administration would want.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

As Facebook’s senior leadership debated about censoring the @nypost story, Nick Clegg, VP of Global Affairs, explained why they had to continue to censor: “Our calls on this [decision] could colour the way an incoming Biden administration views us more than almost anything else” https://t.co/rUUm1Ho3zq

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

This was just the beginning of Big Tech’s censorship at the Biden-Harris Administration’s behest. A few months later, Facebook, YouTube, and Amazon began caving to the Biden-Harris White House’s pressure to censor American speech, including true information and jokes. https://t.co/FJDJ5Pk4OZ

@JudiciaryGOP - House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

NEW 800 page report exposes the Biden White House censorship regime. Features internal emails and texts from Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon, and YouTube employees. Read these damning discoveries from @Weaponization here: https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/Censorship-Industrial-Complex-WH-Report_Appendix.pdf

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

To learn more about the FBI’s interference in the 2020 election and what might be next, click the link below to read our latest report. https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/FBI-Election-Interference-Report-FINAL-w-appendix--10-30-24.pdf

Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 30, 2024 at 1:58 PM
Saved - September 30, 2024 at 7:29 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The FBI: Won’t tell us why they released the Trump bounty letter. Won’t brief us on Iran hacking President Trump’s campaign. Is slow walking the IG’s report on whether confidential sources were present on January 6. Is still retaliating against Marcus Allen.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 26, 2024 at 2:29 PM
Saved - September 26, 2024 at 11:11 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

https://t.co/emf5pqFD9r

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that Iran poses a real threat, citing their desire to assassinate President Trump and their involvement in attacks on Israel. They claim Iran hacked President Trump's campaign and leaked a 271-page dossier on VP candidate JD Vance to the Harris campaign, which then appeared in the press. The speaker questions when the FBI knew about this and whether President Trump received a defensive briefing. They contrast this with the left's focus on President Trump, arguing that Iran did not attack Israel and Russia was not in Ukraine when Trump was in office. The speaker believes there would be a special counsel if the situation were reversed and Iran had hacked the Harris campaign.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. Of course, you wouldn't say that, but the the democrats would go crazy, and there'd be all kinds of things said about you then after those statements. But they talked about threats. How about the real threats? The real threat of Iran who said they want to assassinate president Trump. Iran who's behind the attacks on our best friend, the state of Israel. Iran, who hacked president Trump's campaign, got a 271 page dossier on vice presidential candidate, JD Vance, that they put together when they were vetting who was gonna be the VP and leaked it to the Harris campaign, and then it winds up in the press? How about that real threat? And we were trying to get answers from the FBI. We haven't got any yet. When did they get it? When did they know about this? Did they give president Trump a defensive briefing? This is Iran for goodness sake. That's a real threat versus all this talk from the left about president Trump. Pres when president Trump was in office, Iran wasn't behind attacks on Israel. Didn't happen. Russia wasn't in Ukraine. I mean, that is a real threat, and they're and they're going after president. Makes no sense. I wanna know how that got hacked. Because if it'd been reversed, Sean, if it would have been, oh, Iran hacks the Harris campaign and gave a 271 page dossier on Tim Walz to the Trump campaign, and it wound up in the press, Oh, my good. There'd only be a special counsel. So that's the real threat, and they can say all they want, but I think the American people see through it all.
Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 26, 2024 at 8:52 PM
Saved - September 26, 2024 at 10:03 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

“@JudiciaryGOP wants to hear from FBI analyst who told Twitter Hunter Biden laptop was ‘real’” https://nypost.com/2024/09/26/us-news/house-judiciary-wants-to-hear-from-fbi-analyst-who-told-twitter-hunter-biden-laptop-was-real/

Exclusive | House Judiciary panel wants to hear from FBI analyst who told Twitter Hunter Biden laptop was ‘real’ The House Judiciary Committee is seeking testimony from a FBI analyst who confirmed to Twitter content moderators that first son Hunter Biden's "laptop from hell" was genuine -- on the same day that The Post's bombshell report on the hard drive's contents was censored by the social media giant. nypost.com
Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 25, 2024 at 12:57 AM
Saved - September 25, 2024 at 12:08 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Under “Border Czar” Kamala Harris we have: -Thousands of missing alien children -Venezuelan prison gangs thriving in multiple cities -Migrants flooding small towns across the country It's intentional.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 20, 2024 at 5:37 PM
Saved - September 21, 2024 at 12:57 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Iran steals Trump campaign data. Provides it to the Harris campaign. That story disappears. Why isn’t the media covering it like the Russia “collusion” scandal?

@JudiciaryGOP - House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

#BREAKING: @Jim_Jordan Launches Inquiry into Iran Hacking Trump Campaign to support the Biden and Harris campaigns Demands an unclassified briefing from the FBI on the hack. According to reporting, Iran emailed the illegally obtained information to at least three advisers on the Democratic presidential campaign and emailed stolen information, including at least three major media outlets—Politico, the Washington Post, and the New York Times. The Committee is requesting the briefing to address questions including: -What material did Iran obtain from President Trump's campaign? -To whom at the Biden for President or the Harris for President campaigns did the hackers send information and materials? -On what date did the FBI learn there had been a hack and exfiltration of nonpublic information from President Trump's campaign? -On what date(s) did Iran provide the stolen documents to the Biden for President campaign or the Harris for President campaign? -On what date did the FBI first inform President Trump's campaign it had been hacked? -Did the FBI use any Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act authorities to surveil President Trump's campaign?

Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 9, 2024 at 7:50 PM
Saved - September 10, 2024 at 12:44 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Illegal aliens have taken over towns as big as New York City and as small as Springfield, Ohio. Don’t think it can’t happen where you live too.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 9, 2024 at 6:07 PM
Saved - September 9, 2024 at 10:26 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Thousands of Haitian migrants have taken over Springfield, Ohio. -Depleting government resources. -Straining hospitals and schools. -Reportedly eating random birds and pets. “Border Czar” Kamala Harris doesn’t care.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - July 9, 2024 at 3:00 PM
Saved - July 9, 2024 at 3:14 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

New document obtained by @JudiciaryGOP: When Matthew Colangelo applied to work for Letitia James, guess who he listed as references. -DNC Chair Tom Perez -Now Biden White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients It’s always been a political hit job. https://t.co/YEmaU58ZJF

Jim_Jordan
Posted - June 21, 2024 at 12:41 PM
Saved - June 21, 2024 at 3:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Amazon censored books critical of Big Pharma and children's books due to pressure from the Biden administration. Internal emails revealed that Amazon created a "Do Not Promote" class for anti-vax books. The Biden White House's pressure led to the censorship of children's books. Parents' books and books reviewing scientific papers were also targeted. Amazon's censorship campaign extended beyond these 43 books. This government pressure constitutes unconstitutional censorship. The investigation will continue to address the Biden administration's censorship regime.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE AMAZON FILES PART 3 – AMAZON’S CENSORED BOOKS LIST We knew that @Amazon censored books because of pressure from the Biden @WhiteHouse. Now we know which books: --Children’s Books --Books for Parents --Books critical of Big Pharma 🧵 Thread:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

.@JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization obtained internal Amazon documents showing that the urgent “impetus” for Amazon censoring books in March 2021 was “criticism from the Biden administration.” To censor the books, Amazon created a “new [Do Not Promote] class for anti-vax books.” https://t.co/gM0VMYJ1qy

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Internal emails reveal that Amazon initially added 43 books to its newly created “Do Not Promote” class of allegedly anti-vaccine books. These pro-censorship changes were being made “due to criticism from the Biden people.” https://t.co/495klI0Djz

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In response to a subpoena from @JudiciaryGOP, @Amazon revealed the 43 book titles it censored because of the Biden White House’s pressure. Whether you love or hate the books on this list, no bookstore should be censoring books because of government pressure. https://t.co/64PGF1fxJU

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The Biden White House’s pressure led Amazon to censor CHILDREN’S BOOKS. That’s right. Picture books. For children.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Before COVID, a children’s book author dared to draft a book for unvaccinated children facing discrimination, “especially in California or New York.” The author said the book “promotes love, understanding, and kindness to everyone.” Biden and Amazon preach "tolerance." Right? https://t.co/9ZoCZqKeDv

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The children’s book said the vaccinated & unvaccinated can be friends. Instead of censoring it, Amazon should have sent the book to Fauci, @GavinNewsom, and @JoeBiden. Remember when they said everyone had to comply with their made-up rules and vax mandates or lose their jobs? https://t.co/32rkxBaqnm

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Top-selling books for parents also were targeted. There is nothing the Biden Admin and the elites hate more than parents making their own decisions about their children’s education, health, and values. https://t.co/YghMICFqlx

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And if these efforts weren’t enough to effectively deamplify opposing viewpoints, Amazon also censored books reviewing scientific papers. The book also had the audacity to address whether Big Pharma’s funding of research has the potential to create conflicts of interest. https://t.co/U1UiJYwpLP

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Under the guise of combatting “anti-vaccine” misinformation, Amazon censored everything from picture books for children to books criticizing Big Pharma.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

These 43 books are only the tip of the iceberg. Amazon, YouTube, and Facebook each caved to the Biden White House’s censorship campaign. https://t.co/Zw2juwoNow

@JudiciaryGOP - House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

NEW 800 page report exposes the Biden White House censorship regime. Features internal emails and texts from Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon, and YouTube employees. Read these damning discoveries from @Weaponization here: https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/Censorship-Industrial-Complex-WH-Report_Appendix.pdf

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Don’t let the Biden Admin tell you that their censorship campaign was about concerns of misinformation going viral on social media. They were going after BOOKS too. This is—and always has been—about suppressing disfavored views, not purported challenges of new technologies.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

This is unconstitutional government censorship, full stop. Whether you agree with this speech or not, free speech is free speech and the Biden Admin pressured private companies to censor constitutionally protected speech.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

.@JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization will continue this critical investigative work to further inform legislative solutions to dismantle the Biden Administration’s censorship regime.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - June 5, 2024 at 6:13 PM
Saved - June 5, 2024 at 9:00 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Today, we sent a criminal referral to the Department of Justice regarding Hunter Biden and James Biden lying to Congress. Read it here: https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-jordan-and-smith-refer-hunter-and-james-biden-for-criminal-prosecution-as-part-of-impeachment-inquiry-of-president-biden%EF%BF%BC/

Comer, Jordan, and Smith Refer Hunter and James Biden for Criminal Prosecution as Part of Impeachment Inquiry of President Biden - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov
Jim_Jordan
Posted - May 1, 2024 at 7:31 PM
Saved - May 3, 2024 at 7:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Facebook executives reveal in leaked documents that the Biden White House pressured them to censor the lab leak theory. Facebook felt they were being scapegoated and had been censoring content in response to tense conversations with the administration. The company finally stopped removing content about the lab leak theory in late May 2021. These documents highlight the chilling effect of government coercion on free expression. The First Amendment is crucial for protecting our liberties.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE FACEBOOK FILES PART 6 THE BIDEN WHITE HOUSE CENSORSHIP OF THE LAB LEAK THEORY 🧵 Thread:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

On July 16, 2021, Mark Zuckerberg texted Sheryl Sandberg, Nick Clegg, and Joel Kaplan. Three of the highest ranking executives at Facebook. Could Facebook tell the world that “the [Biden] WH put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory?" https://t.co/B1Wno3ayTW

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Earlier that day, Joe Biden had told the world that Facebook was “killing people,” and the company was livid.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Nick Clegg described the Biden White House as “highly cynical and dishonest.” https://t.co/5WHqqtr21P

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Sheryl Sandberg said they were being scapegoated because the White House was failing to meet its vaccination numbers. https://t.co/ZV4OE8gjMr

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Facebook felt that they had been combatting alleged misinformation—aka censoring Americans—all year! https://t.co/HQxQKrwX5z

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Since February 2021, the company had been censoring the “Wuhan lab leak theory” “in response to … tense conversations with the new [Biden] Administration.” https://t.co/lB9wg7tlDe

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In late May 2021, Facebook finally stopped removing content about the lab leak theory, though still demoted it.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

When Facebook employees informed Mark Zuckerberg of the reversal and why they censored the lab leak theory in the first place, Zuckerberg warned that this is what happens when the company “compromises [its] standards due to pressure from an administration.” https://t.co/qZAUfqrPxp

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Other documents confirm this. In July 2021, Clegg asked why Facebook had been censoring the lab leak theory of COVID-19’s origins. The answer could not have been clearer: “Because we were under pressure from the administration . . . We shouldn’t have done it.” https://t.co/InrXBDXYVL

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

These documents show the CHILLING EFFECT government coercion has on free expression. Facebook knew the White House wanted them to censor, but they didn’t exactly know what or how much.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The First Amendment is first for a reason. Without it, we cannot enjoy our other liberties. More to come…

Jim_Jordan
Posted - March 27, 2024 at 4:25 PM
Saved - March 28, 2024 at 3:33 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

-Venezuelan gang member released into the country by Joe Biden's DHS -Now accused of carrying out a drive-by shooting -All in "sanctuary city" Chicago https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/03/26/bidens-dhs-released-venezuelan-gang-member-into-u-s-now-accused-of-drive-by-shooting/

Biden's DHS Freed Gang Member into U.S., Now Accused of Drive-By Shooting A gang member, released into the U.S. by Biden's DHS), is now accused of carrying out a drive-by shooting in Chicago, Illinois. breitbart.com
Jim_Jordan
Posted - March 4, 2024 at 5:28 PM
Saved - March 5, 2024 at 1:20 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

On day one of Biden’s presidency he: -Revoked Trump’s immigration enforcement orders -Terminated the national emergency declaration used to fund the border wall -Deferred the removal of certain illegal aliens Now, we’re experiencing a border crisis like never before.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - February 5, 2024 at 10:44 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 12:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Internal documents subpoenaed by JudiciaryGOP and Weaponization reveal that Amazon bowed down to pressure from the Biden White House to censor books. Emails show that the White House ran keyword searches and contacted Amazon when it didn't like the search results. Initially, Amazon hesitated to intervene due to potential backlash, but eventually enabled "Do Not Promote" for books expressing views against vaccine effectiveness. Amazon also explored ways to reduce the visibility of disliked books. This raises concerns about censorship and the influence of the White House on private companies.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE AMAZON FILES – “feeling pressure from the White House” Internal docs subpoenaed by @JudiciaryGOP & @Weaponization indicate that @amazon bowed down to Biden White House pressure to censor BOOKS. 🧵 Thread:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Never-before-released internal emails subpoenaed by @JudiciaryGOP reveal that the Biden White House pressured Amazon to censor books that expressed views the White House did not approve of. “Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Andy Slavitt—the senior Biden White House official who demanded that Facebook censor a meme and true information—was pressuring Amazon at the same time. https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-bowed-to-white-house-pressure-removed-covid-posts-2df436b7

WSJ News Exclusive | Facebook Bowed to White House Pressure, Removed Covid Posts Internal Meta emails say pressure from Washington was behind a decision to take down posts attributing pandemic to man-made virus wsj.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

On March 2, 2021, Slavitt fired off an email demanding to know who he and his White House colleagues could talk to at the company about “the high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation of [sic] Amazon?” https://t.co/aWSMp3aSOc

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

How did the Biden White House conclude that there was “propaganda and misinformation” in books sold in Amazon’s bookstore? The White House ran keyword searches for controversial topics, such as “vaccine,” and emailed Amazon when it didn’t like how the search results appeared: https://t.co/FmVYPJQR6n

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Initially, Amazon decided to hold off on “doing a manual intervention” to censor books. Why? Not out of any commitment to free speech, but because doing so would be “too visible” to the American public and likely to spur criticism from conservative media. https://t.co/166wXiPsha

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Why was the Biden White House so upset with Amazon? Because Amazon believed “retailers are different than social media communities” & provided their “customers with access to a variety of viewpoints.” For the Biden Admin, letting Americans think for themselves was unacceptable. https://t.co/tKjBTesZoU

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

A week later, on March 9, 2021, Amazon met with the White House. Internal Amazon documents reveal Amazon’s “top talking points” going into the meeting. One of the key questions was whether the Biden White House wanted books banned or just buried deep in the search results: https://t.co/wnWj9eCyJf

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

So how did Amazon’s meeting with the Biden White House go?

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

On March 2, 2021, Amazon determined internally that it would “not be doing a manual intervention today.” The online bookstore set a meeting with senior Biden White House officials for March 9, 2021.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

What was the purpose of this meeting with the Biden White House? To see if “the Admin is asking us to remove books, or are they more concerned about search results/order (or both)?” https://t.co/I8qd3WCeY4

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Why did Amazon agree to take this meeting? Because they were “feeling pressure from the White House” https://t.co/n7Xe0D5lhH

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

After the White House spent a week berating Amazon, what did the online bookstore do? Starting March 9—the same day as its meeting with the White House—Amazon enabled “Do Not Promote” for books that expressed the view that vaccines were not effective. https://t.co/8YEXjAL8BD

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And that wasn’t all. Amazon also considered other ways “to reduce the visibility” of certain books that the Biden White House disliked. https://t.co/q9JC1LYb5m

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

That’s right. Amazon caved to the pressure from the Biden White House to censor speech. @JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization are investigating. https://t.co/P1hlB3c5WO

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE 🧵 Thread:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

To be continued…

Jim_Jordan
Posted - January 17, 2024 at 8:30 PM
Saved - January 18, 2024 at 12:32 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

We now know the federal government flagged terms like “MAGA” and “TRUMP,” to financial institutions if Americans completed transactions using those terms. What was also flagged? If you bought a religious text, like a BIBLE, or shopped at Bass Pro Shop. https://t.co/jjRaVNItWz

Jim_Jordan
Posted - December 4, 2023 at 6:58 PM
Saved - December 4, 2023 at 8:09 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

We now know Hunter Biden’s business entity, Owasco PC, made direct monthly payments to Joe Biden. How long until the White House changes its story again?

@HouseGOP - House Republicans

"The President was never in business with his son." - White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre in July. Sure seems like Joe Biden and Hunter Biden were in business together. What were they being paid for? https://t.co/wKXCI9SPQQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House was asked if the president still stands by his statement that he has never been involved in his son's affairs or spoken to him about it. The response was that the president has never been in business with his son, and there is nothing more to add.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Curious if the White House and the president still stand behind his comment that he's never been involved and has never even, spoken to his son about Speaker 1: his? So I've been I've been asked this question a 1000000 times. The answer is not going to change. The answer remains the same. The president. He was never in business with his son. I just don't have anything else to add.
Jim_Jordan
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 7:26 PM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 7:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Big Tech, including YouTube and Facebook, succumbed to pressure from the Biden White House to censor Americans' speech. The White House demanded the removal of true information, jokes, memes, and opinions. YouTube's compliance led to increased pressure on Facebook. Even memes were not spared from censorship. The Biden administration praised Google's censorship while criticizing Facebook. Facebook's attempts to reason based on free expression were futile. The White House insisted on more censorship, leveraging other policy priorities. The companies feared repercussions. This appeasement resulted in the suppression of true speech and jokes. The investigation into the White House's role in censorship continues, with deposition subpoenas issued to key officials. Stay tuned for updates.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE YOUTUBE FILES PART 2. To appease the Biden White House, Big Tech gave into the federal government’s relentless pressure campaign to censor Americans’ speech, including true information. YouTube capitulated first; Facebook caved next. 🧵 Thread: https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-biden-admin-praised-youtubes-censorship-used-it-to-pressure-facebook-to-intensify-suppression-of-vaccine-stories

EXCLUSIVE: Biden Admin Praised YouTube’s Censorship, Used It To Pressure Facebook To Intensify Suppression Of Vaccine Stories | The Daily Wire dailywire.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

.@JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization obtained internal Google & Facebook docs revealing which Big Tech companies buckled first under pressure from the Biden White House to censor Americans’ posts, including true statements, jokes, memes, and opinions.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And once YouTube (Google) relented to censoring more content, the Biden White House used that as leverage to further increase the pressure on Facebook to do the same.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Remember how the Biden White House was “outraged” that Facebook didn’t censor a meme?

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

What did the Biden White House want removed? A meme. That’s right, even memes weren’t spared from the Biden White House’s censorship efforts.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In that same April 2021 “hour long call,” Biden White House Senior Advisor Andy Slavitt warned Nick Clegg, Facebook’s President for Global Affairs, that “YT has made significant advances to remove content leading to vaccine hesitancy whilst [Facebook has] lagged behind.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

That’s right. The Biden Admin praised Google for censoring Americans while criticizing Facebook. In an internal Facebook email obtained by @JudiciaryGOP & @Weaponization, Clegg described his call with the Biden White House regarding censorship.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The email reveals that Nick Clegg—former UK Deputy Prime Minister—tried to reason with the Biden White House that, under America’s First Amendment, “removing content like that would represent a significant incursion into traditional boundaries of free expression in the US.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But the Biden White House was unmoved, and the response to Facebook was clear: you need to be like Google and YouTube and censor more.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In response to the White House’s demands, Clegg asked his colleagues at Facebook to check whether the content is available on YouTube because the White House’s “assumption is that [YouTube] would never accept something like this.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But why did Facebook and Google/YouTube relent to the White House’s pressure? Because the companies had other policy priorities that they feared the White House could use as leverage against them.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Facebook executives warned that they had “bigger fish to fry.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Meanwhile, the Google/YouTube Gov’t Affairs team cautioned that they were “seek[ing] to work closely with [the Biden] administration on multiple policy fronts.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And so the gatekeepers of the modern town square relented—they censored Americans’ true speech and even jokes—all to appease the censors in the Biden White House.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

While the Biden @WhiteHouse is trying to obstruct our investigation and hide its role in censoring Americans, the investigation by the @JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization continues to make progress.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Yesterday, we issued deposition subpoenas to two senior Biden White House officials, Rob Flaherty and Andy Slavitt, who were central to communicating the Biden White House’s censorship demands. https://nypost.com/2023/11/30/news/jim-jordan-subpoenas-former-wh-censorship-chief-rob-flaherty-ahead-of-landmark-supreme-court-case/

Jim Jordan subpoenas ex-White House censorship chief Rob Flaherty over ‘constitutionally protected’ expression Jordan says the deposition will focus on the "White House’s demands to censor true information, memes, satire, and other constitutionally protected forms of expression." nypost.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Stay tuned...

Jim_Jordan
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 1:44 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 2:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Internal documents reveal that the Biden White House pressured YouTube to censor Americans, as previously seen with Facebook and Twitter. The Biden administration sought to crack down on vaccine misinformation and control content on YouTube. Google's government affairs team had discussions with the White House staff to address their concerns. Legislation has been introduced to hold government bureaucrats accountable for censorship. Further investigations are underway to inform legislative solutions. Stay tuned for updates.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE YOUTUBE FILES PART 1. BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURED YOUTUBE TO CENSOR AMERICANS. Internal docs from Google (YouTube’s parent company) obtained by @JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization show that the Biden White House wanted Americans censored. 🧵 Thread: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/white-house-worked-youtube-censor-covid-19-vaccine-misinformation-house-judiciary-committee

White House worked with YouTube to censor COVID-19 & vaccine 'misinformation': House Judiciary Committee The White House worked with YouTube in 2021 to target alleged COVID-19 and vaccination misinformation, the House Judiciary Committee alleged, citing documents. foxbusiness.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Almost one year ago today, @mtaibbi published the first edition of the Twitter Files, followed by other journalists including @shellenberger, @bariweiss, @lhfang, & @AlexBerenson. https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394?s=20

@mtaibbi - Matt Taibbi

1. Thread: THE TWITTER FILES

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

After issuing subpoenas to Big Tech, @JudiciaryGOP released the Facebook Files this summer revealing: -The Biden White House wanted true information censored. -Facebook changed its policies because of pressure from the Biden Admin. https://x.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1684595375875760128?s=20

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE FACEBOOK FILES, PART 1: SMOKING-GUN DOCS PROVE FACEBOOK CENSORED AMERICANS BECAUSE OF BIDEN WHITE HOUSE PRESSURE 🧵 Thread:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

“Facebook removed content related to Covid-19 in response to pressure from the Biden administration, including posts claiming the virus was man-made, according to internal company communications viewed by The Wall Street Journal.” https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-bowed-to-white-house-pressure-removed-covid-posts-2df436b7

WSJ News Exclusive | Facebook Bowed to White House Pressure, Removed Covid Posts Internal Meta emails say pressure from Washington was behind a decision to take down posts attributing pandemic to man-made virus wsj.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Now, here’s the first edition of the YouTube Files. We knew the Biden White House was pushing Facebook and Twitter to censor more. Now we know the White House was repeatedly pressuring Google to censor content on YouTube.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

On April 12, 2021, Rob Flaherty—Biden’s Director of Digital Strategy—emailed Google wanting to know how Google could better “crack down on vaccine misinformation” and to discuss “ways the White House (and our COVID experts) can partner in your product work.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Privately, Google understood what this request meant as internal docs obtained by @JudiciaryGOP reveal: “Rob’s questions were very YT focused” & he “dug in on our decision making for borderline content,” which YT says is content that doesn’t “violate our Community Guidelines”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

A week later, on April 21, 2021, one of the Google Gov’t Affairs team members, who had been on recent calls with the Biden White House, specifically Rob Flaherty, explained plainly what Flaherty wanted: “Really he’s interested in what we’re seeing that is NOT coming down.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

YouTube’s Gov’t Affairs team then emailed the YouTube Product team, warning the Biden “White House is very interested in our work on borderline content,” and the Product team should brief the White House “to prevent anything from potentially spiraling out of control.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Another week later, YouTube’s Gov’t Affairs team emailed the YouTube Product team to update them on the situation. The Google and YouTube Gov’t Affairs teams were having “conversations with the White House staff on YouTube’s policies.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Both Google & YouTube’s Gov’t Affairs teams wanted the YouTube Product Team to meet with the White House staff, who were “familiar with many of [YouTube’s] policies and efforts” removing content, because the WH “staff continue[d] to have questions on the raise/reduce efforts.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The company needed this meeting ASAP because: 1) there was “significant attention coming from the [White House] staff on this issue”; and 2) Google was seeking “to work closely with [the Biden] administration on multiple policy fronts” and needed to appease them.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

.@SenRandPaul and Republicans in the House introduced legislation that would provide victims of government censorship with a remedy—the ability to sue the government bureaucrats responsible for causing your constitutionally protected speech to be removed. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/chairman-jordan-senator-paul-fight-protect-americans-first-amendment-rights

Chairman Jordan, Senator Paul Fight to Protect Americans’ First Amendment Rights Against Government Censorship WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) and U.S. judiciary.house.gov

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

.@JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization will continue this critical investigative work to further inform legislative solutions to the vast government censorship enterprise.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Tune in today for the @Weaponization hearing marking the one-year anniversary since the first #TwitterFiles report. Stay tuned... https://judiciary.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/hearing-weaponization-federal-government-4

Hearing on the Weaponization of the Federal Government judiciary.house.gov
Jim_Jordan
Posted - November 6, 2023 at 11:42 PM
Saved - November 7, 2023 at 12:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A bombshell report reveals how various entities, including @DHSgov, @CISAgov, The GEC (@StateDept), and @Stanford, collaborated to censor Americans before the 2020 election. The Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), created at the request of CISA, played a key role. EIP stakeholders submitted misinformation reports, which were analyzed and shared with Big Tech for potential censorship. Conservatives, such as @realDonaldTrump and @seanhannity, were specifically targeted. True information, jokes, and political opinions were censored. @JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization obtained these documents after threats of contempt. The public deserves to know if they were targeted. The report and data are available for review. Stay tuned for more.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

BOMBSHELL REPORT ON THE CENSORSHIP-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX HUNDREDS of secret reports show how @DHSgov’s @CISAgov, The GEC (@StateDept), @Stanford and others worked together to censor AMERICANS before the 2020 election, including true information, jokes, and opinions. 🧵 THREAD:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The federal government, disinformation “experts” at universities, Big Tech, and others worked together through the Election Integrity Partnership to monitor & censor Americans’ speech.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

According to one EIP member, the EIP was created “at the request of CISA.” The head of the EIP also said that EIP was created after “working on some monitoring ideas with CISA.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Here’s how it worked: -EIP “stakeholders” (including the federal gov’t) would submit misinformation reports -EIP would “analyze” the report and find similar content across platforms -EIP would submit the report to Big Tech, often with a recommendation on how to censor

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

.@JudiciaryGOP & @Weaponization obtained these nonpublic documents and information from @Stanford only after the threat of contempt. You can read all the details in the report here: https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/EIP_Jira_Ticket_Staff_Report_11-6-23_Clean.pdf

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Who was targeted? Americans of all political stripes, but especially conservatives: @realDonaldTrump@SenThomTillis@newtgingrich@GovMikeHuckabee@mtgreenee@seanhannity@MZHemingway@pnjaban@charliekirk11@RealCandaceO@JackPosobiec@bennyjohnson@TomFitton@TheBabylonBee

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And it didn’t stop there, here are some more accounts that were targeted: @NEWSMAX@michellemalkin@seanmdav@RubinReport@paulsperry_@tracybeanz @ChanelRion @JamesOKeefeIII

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

What speech was targeted for censorship? -True information -Jokes -Political opinions Here are a few examples:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Here are a few more examples:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Who did we miss? Did you have a social media post that was targeted by the EIP? It’s clear why @Stanford tried only produced these after @JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization threatened contempt.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The American people deserve to know if they were targeted by their own government and so-called “disinformation” experts. The Committee is making the data from these reports publicly available here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSbP06KE51ds51-Ha6MXkuyoWuCLW168Wz9CMBbhe1BV1IVLxG660eDBUpaVw_Hs5KdhvTvOLS7BUit/pubhtml?widget=true&headers=false

Page Not Found Web word processing, presentations and spreadsheets docs.google.com
Jim_Jordan
Posted - October 31, 2023 at 4:08 PM
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 7:27 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Joe Biden’s DHS would rather police your speech than secure the southern border.

Jim_Jordan
Posted - October 23, 2023 at 11:26 PM
Saved - October 24, 2023 at 6:37 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Notice the difference between when Trump was in charge vs. when Biden’s in charge? https://t.co/KTXlcdXIy0

Jim_Jordan
Posted - October 20, 2023 at 3:33 PM
Saved - October 20, 2023 at 6:40 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

https://t.co/dsuLYkZvtw

Video Transcript AI Summary
I rise to nominate Jim Jordan for Speaker of the House. Jim is an effective legislator who has passed more bills through the House in just 3 years than the entire Democrat leadership team in their 28 years in Congress. He has played a key role in drafting bills like the REINS Act and HR 2, the strongest border security bill. Democrats are attacking Jim because they don't want the American people to remember that they voted against securing our border. Jim is known for empowering every member of the judiciary committee and trusting their judgment. He is straightforward, honest, and reliable. Jim is the right person to be our next Speaker of the House.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Speaker, I rise to nominate Jim Jordan for the Speaker of the House. Now, I've listened to the speeches this week, And I can already tell you what my friends on the other side will say using their poll tested phrases. But let me correct the record. Jim Jordan is an effective legislator. To legislate is about more than the name on the bill. It's about reaching compromise and working long Now it's behind the scenes to get the job done. The House will come to order. When you are the Chairman of a Committee, you are responsible for dozens of bills passing the House and being signed into law. So let me tell you a few facts that don't come out of the polls. As the leader of the Judiciary Committee, Jim has passed more bills through the House in just 3 years than the entire Democrat leadership team that has their collective 28 years in Congress. I guess that's good enough to be caucus chair. Jim Jordan, on the other hand, has a hand in drafting bills like the REINS Act To curb unaccountable bureaucrats. He helped negotiate and pass HR 2, the strongest border security bill This House has ever passed. And many of you know because you were in the room Watching Jim find compromise. Watching Jim listen to your positions And finding a bill that can pass. And let's put this in reality: We've had large majorities, but we never could pass a border security bill. That takes leadership. Now, they're going to get upset by it. Why? Because every single Democrat Voted against securing our border. Democrats are attacking Jim because they don't want the American people to remember that they voted against securing and keeping a wide open border. They may not want the American public to know the number of people we catch on the terrorist watch list. They may not want people to know What the future holds in the security for our nation, based upon their policies. Name me one bill Democrats passed that would secure our border. I'm waiting. You can't because they haven't. Mister Speaker, the truth is, if we measure lawmakers by how many bills have their name on it, We are using the wrong measuring stick. Some of my members I know with the most bills to their name are the most selfish. Jim Jordan, on the other hand, is one of the most selfless members I've known. I've known Jim a long time, so I want to do something I actually called the freshman members on his committee and asked them, What do you think of your Chairman? Here's just a few. I quote, Jim empowers every member of judiciary To pursue what interests them. I quote by another, he lets each of us take the lead on the issues that are important to us, even letting freshman and junior members take important roles. Another one. He trusts our judgment on how we handle issues and witnesses, and always seeks our input on key issues. Another. As a freshman, he had me lead off a hearing that related to my subject matter expertise, And he goes out of his way to highlight members' successes. He is straightforward, honest And reliable. That is who Jim Jordan is. And that's what being a Speaker is all about. Now, some of you might not know this, but Jim and I Have a long history. We create it because we take our jobs serious. I first met Jim as a candidate. I traveled to Ohio. I remember pulling up For breakfast at a Bob Evans in Ohio, there was Jim having a meeting listening to constituents. I traveled with them throughout the day from rotary to farm bureau, to just listening to people that had concerns. And I watched them, the same Jim Jordan I see today. He was a leader, A listener and a fighter. We were actually elected To Congress that same year, we became close friends. It was a small class, there was only 13 of it as one of the smallest Republican classes in modern history. Over time, we took different routes. Jim actually ran against me for leader in 2018. It was a hard fought battle. But I never once questioned his skills or commitment to this conference or this country. After the race, I became leader and we had an opening for the ranking member on House Oversight. Jim didn't even apply for the job. I walked into steering. Didn't tell steering. I walked into the other room and I picked up the phone and I called Jim. I said, I know you're not running for the job. But I believe in what Jim Collins says in the book Good to Great. You put the right people in the right seats on the bus. And Jim, you and I may have challenged one another. But you were the right person for that seat. And it was right when you took that job. It was right again when I asked Jim to step up and join the intel committee when Democrats put politics over people and turn the intel committee into an impeachment committee. It was right again when we asked Jim to step up and be the right person to lead judiciary committee as chairman. And Jim is the right person to take that seat behind me to be our next Speaker of the House. Mister Speaker, we have an important job to do. The American people expect us to focus on the most pressing issues. We've watched what the Democrat majority has done and brought us inflation like we haven't seen since the seventies. We've watched what the Democrats have done by opening up our border, bringing Fentanyl killing Americans each and every day. And now, we have a war in Israel. This country is too great for small visions. Trust me, being Speaker is not an easy job, especially in this conference. But I've seen Jim spend his entire career Fighting for freedom. No matter what. No matter the odds. And I know he is ready for the job. And so it is my honor to say as a member of the Republican Conference, I am directed by the vote of that conference to present for the election to the office of Speaker of the House of Representatives, the name of my friend, the honorable Jim Jordan, a representative from the state of Ohio. I yield back.
Jim_Jordan
Posted - October 4, 2023 at 3:34 PM
Saved - October 4, 2023 at 8:31 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 13, 2023 at 5:53 PM
Saved - September 14, 2023 at 1:29 AM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Burisma wanted Hunter Biden to pressure D.C. for policy changes in Ukraine. Paid him to do it. And Joe Biden, in charge of policy in Ukraine, did just that.

Video Transcript AI Summary
During my visit to Kyiv, I planned to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. However, I had made it clear to Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk that they needed to take action against the state prosecutor, which they failed to do. As a result, I informed them that they wouldn't receive the money. They argued that I lacked authority, so I told them to call the president. I reiterated that they wouldn't get the $1 billion and that I would be leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor wasn't fired by then, they wouldn't receive the funds.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I guess the 12th, 13th time to Kyiv and I was supposed to announce that there is another $1,000,000,000 loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor and they didn't. So they said they had it, they were walking out to press conference and said, no, I said, I'm not going to we're not going to give you the $1,000,000,000. They said, you have no authority, you're not the president. The president said, I said, call him. I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting $1,000,000,000. I said, you're not getting $1,000,000,000, I'm going to be leaving here, I think it was about 6 hours, I look at it, I said, we're leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch.
Jim_Jordan
Posted - September 5, 2023 at 10:17 PM
Saved - September 6, 2023 at 12:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden White House relied on foreign activists and a misleading report to pressure Facebook into censoring Americans. The report claimed that a small group was responsible for most anti-vaccine content, but Facebook knew the number was much lower. Despite this, the White House repeated the false stat and demanded widespread censorship. Facebook complied, censoring accounts and even demoting affiliated ones. The Biden administration's censorship demands continued, causing strain between Facebook and the White House. This reveals a concerning censorship regime where false information is used to suppress critics and control the narrative. The committee is investigating the role of CCDH and its communication with the government and Big Tech.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE FACEBOOK FILES PART 5. BIDEN WHITE HOUSE RELIED ON FOREIGN “DISINFO” ACTIVISTS TO PRESSURE FACEBOOK TO CENSOR AMERICANS. Internal FB docs recently obtained by @JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization show the Biden Admin and foreign activists wanted Americans censored. 🧵 Thread:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The UK-based Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) claimed that @RobertKennedyJr & 11 others were responsible for 65% “of anti‑vaccine content circulating on social media.” But CCDH’s absurd claim about the so-called “Disinformation Dozen” was itself disinformation.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

First, that 65% stat? CCDH was off by quite a bit. Facebook knew the actual number was closer to 0.05%. Second, despite attacking @RobertKennedyJr and the others as the so-called “Disinformation Dozen,” a lot of their accounts were “completely benign” according to Facebook.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

As Facebook admitted internally, a lot of these accounts were just Americans expressing “vaccine hesitancy,” which is often “not misinfo,” even under Facebook’s policies.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But that didn’t stop the Biden White House from repeating the fake stat every chance they got. Jen Psaki repeated the CCDH’s disinformation almost verbatim to the country. Watch: https://www.c-span.org/video/?513448-1/white-house-daily-briefing

White House Press Secretary Holds Briefing U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy joined Press Secretary Jen Psaki for the White House briefing to announce a new campaign against COVID-19 misinformation. "Today we live in a world where misinformation poses an imminent and insidious threat to our nation's health," said the surgeon general. "Simply put, health misinformation has cost us lives." Other topics included the White House's response to protests in Cuba, spending bill negotiations, and combating ransomware attacks. c-span.org

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The CCDH published its report on March 24, 2021. By April 2021, Facebook employees were preparing a draft memo to Mark Zuckerberg about “pressure from … the White House” to remove the Disinfo Dozen even though they did “not believe we currently have a clear path for removal.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Facebook was stunned that the Biden White House seemed to actually believe the CCDH’s obviously false stat and was relying on these foreign activists’ “data” to “guide major governmental policy decisions.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

To be clear, the Biden White House didn’t just want Facebook to censor the Disinformation Dozen’s Facebook posts. They wanted EVERYTHING censored—across all social media platforms. Remember when Jen Psaki said this:

@townhallcom - Townhall.com

PSAKI: If you're banned on one social media platform, you should be banned on other social media platforms.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Facebook and other platforms should measure and share the impact of misinformation, along with the audience it reaches. They should work with the public to create strong enforcement strategies that apply across all their properties. Transparency about rules is important, so people shouldn't be banned from one platform while allowed on others for spreading misinformation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Providing for Facebook or other platforms to measure and publicly share the impact of misinformation on their platform and the audience it's reaching. Also with the public, with all of you to create robust enforcement strategies that bridge their properties and provide transparency about rules. You shouldn't be banned from 1 platform and not others if you for providing misinformation out there.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Facebook understood what that meant. If Twitter or YouTube censored you, the Biden White House wanted Facebook to censor you too.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The Biden White House wanted this type of censorship even though Facebook’s policy was to “only do cross-platform disables for child safety and dangerous organization violations.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The Biden White House’s censorship demands didn’t stop there. They also wanted Facebook to remove all URL links to off-platform websites, which would “remove significant amounts of benign content posted by regular users, such as . . . person experiences or government criticism.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Facebook got the message loud and clear. Right after Jen Psaki repeated CCDH’s false stats from the White House podium, Facebook Leadership asked for an update ASAP on how much Facebook was censoring the Disinformation Dozen:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The answer? Facebook had been censoring the Disinformation Dozen since March 2021, including removing the Instagram account of @RobertKennedyJr and ultimately taking “aggressive action” against 11 of the 12 by July.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

That 12th account? His only crime was posting “about internet censorship.” Ironic. Facebook said it was “watching his profile closely.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In fact, Facebook continued to “monitor” all of the so-called Disinformation Dozen accounts, trying to find a way to censor more. The problem? The “majority” of the accounts in question were not spreading misinformation.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Besides removing certain accounts, Facebook also secretly demoted affiliated accounts by varying degrees to expire at different times, such as @ChildrensHD founded by @RobertKennedyJr.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In late July 2021, Facebook’s President of Global Affairs, Nick Clegg, had a meeting with the Surgeon General’s Office. In the days leading up, Facebook knew the Biden Admin would be asking about the CCDH’s misleading “Disinformation Dozen” statistics.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Following the meeting, Nick Clegg had to report back to the Surgeon General’s Office—did Facebook censor the Disinformation Dozen to try to get the Biden Admin to back off? The answer: Yes, but “nothing will be persuasive to that crew.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Was Facebook’s censorship of the Disinformation Dozen enough? Of course not. You can never satisfy the Biden censorship regime. President Biden himself helped ensure that CCDH’s disinformation had “unrelenting staying power.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

By August, things hadn’t improved. CCDH’s false Disinfo Dozen stat was “routinely cited in the press” and contributed to FB having a “tough relationship with” the Biden White House. So Facebook “tailored” solutions around the White House’s concerns rather than real problems.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And that’s how the censorship regime works: Foreign activists at the CCDH feed false info to the Biden White House. The Biden Admin then uses the full weight of the federal govt to coerce Facebook to censor Americans, Biden’s critics and political opponents, and the truth.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The Committee has already demanded documents from Facebook and the Biden White House. Last week, we issued a subpoena to CCDH to determine its role in the censorship regime. CCDH has admitted that it communicates with the Executive Branch and Big Tech about content moderation.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2023/08/30/theres-a-new-player-in-the-governments-censorship-game-n2627758

There's a New Player in the Government's Censorship Game   townhall.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Who else has the left-wing CCDH attacked? @realDailyWire@realchrisfrufo@libsoftiktok@JackPosobiec@Timcast@BreitbartNews@NEWSMAX@townhallcom@theMRC@RepMTG @WashTimes

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

CCDH’s deadline to respond to the Committee’s subpoena is September 29 at 9 a.m. To be continued...

Jim_Jordan
Posted - August 29, 2023 at 5:42 PM
Saved - August 29, 2023 at 9:35 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The National Archives admitted that it’s in possession of nearly 5,400 emails and documents that potentially show Joe Biden used a fake name during his vice presidency. Why?

National Archives has 5,400 Biden emails in which he uses fake names to dish government info to Hunter, others as VP: suit The National Archives and Records Administration has admitted that it is in possession of nearly 5,400 emails, electronic records and documents that potentially show President Biden using a pseudonym during his vice presidency. nypost.com
Jim_Jordan
Posted - August 25, 2023 at 6:03 PM
Saved - August 26, 2023 at 4:50 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Alternate headline: “DOJ sues @elonmusk for hiring too many Americans.” Weaponization of government!

DOJ files lawsuit accusing SpaceX of hiring discrimination against refugees, asylum recipients The Department of Justice has filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against SpaceX alleging that the company unlawfully excluded refugees and asylum recipients in its hiring decisions. foxbusiness.com
Jim_Jordan
Posted - August 9, 2023 at 6:49 PM
Saved - August 10, 2023 at 3:00 PM

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

-They spied on parents speaking up at school board meetings. -They raided President Trump’s home. -They targeted traditional Catholics. Joe Biden’s Justice Department.

Opinion | The FBI and ‘Radical’ Catholics New evidence suggests the bureau probe was wider than director Christopher Wray said. wsj.com
Jim_Jordan
Posted - August 7, 2023 at 2:11 PM
Saved - August 7, 2023 at 10:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Internal FB docs reveal that an FBI Special Agent lied about the FBIs role in suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story. Agent Chan, the conduit between the FBI and Big Tech, was present in the meeting with Facebook. The FBI deliberately withheld critical information about the laptop from social media companies. The FBI met with Twitter before Facebook, confirming the laptop's authenticity. The FBI's response to whether the laptop was real changed from "yes" to "no comment." Twitter and Facebook then censored the story, misleading the public. The Biden campaign orchestrated the discrediting of the story as Russian disinformation. Agent Chan's inconsistent statements and secret follow-up call with Facebook were exposed. The FBI had the laptop since 2019. The Biden DOJ is obstructing the investigation. A federal court granted an injunction against government censorship, which the Biden Administration is appealing. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear the case soon. Freedom of speech is at stake.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE FACEBOOK FILES PART 4. FBI LIED ABOUT MEETING WITH BIG TECH REGARDING NY POST’S HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP STORY Internal FB docs reveal that an FBI Special Agent made false statements in testimony about the FBI’s role in the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story 🧵 Thread:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan is the main conduit between the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force and Big Tech. Agent Chan was in the meeting between the FBI and Facebook on Oct. 14, 2020—the day the @nypost published its story on the Hunter Biden laptop.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Laura Dehmlow is the current Section Chief of the Foreign Influence Task Force. On Oct. 14, when Facebook asked if the laptop was real, she responded “no comment” even though the FBI had the laptop and knew it was real.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In July, @JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization interviewed Laura Dehmlow. Her testimony was shocking, revealing that the FBI deliberately withheld critical information from social media companies about Hunter Biden’s laptop the day that the @nypost story broke.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In her interview, we learned, for the first time, that the FBI met with Twitter on October 14 before meeting with Facebook the same day.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

When Twitter asked if the laptop was real, an FBI agent said “yes.” But a second FBI agent—a lawyer—jumped in, cut him off, and said, “no further comment.” Read the transcript for yourself:

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But it gets better. Dehmlow revealed that the FBI then had emergency internal deliberations to decide how to answer that same question going forward. Someone at the FBI—the FBI refuses to say who—ordered that the FBI would say “no comment” going forward.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Later that same day—October 14—Facebook met with the FBI, including Chan and Dehmlow. Facebook asked the same question: is the laptop real? Now having its story straight, the FBI responded, “no comment.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Did Dehmlow know that the FBI had the laptop and it was real? Yes. Did other key members of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force know? Yes. The FBI knew the laptop was real and yet decided it would say “no comment.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

We know what happened next. Twitter and Facebook censored the @nypost story. The Biden campaign secretly set in motion the events that led to the 51 former intel officials discrediting the story as Russian disinformation.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

So, just weeks before the 2020 election, most Americans either did not hear about the story or were misled to believe that it was the product of Russian disinformation. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/republicans-hunter-biden-laptop-former-intelligence-officials/

Republicans say Biden campaign exploited former intel officials to discredit Hunter Biden laptop allegations Just before the last 2020 presidential debate, 51 of the former officials signed a letter saying the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop had the "earmarks" of a Russian operation. cbsnews.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Fast forward to November 2022. Elvis Chan is being deposed as one of the key figures in the government’s censorship regime. He is obligated to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. You can watch the whole deposition here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbwgFl-7jkc

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Chan first testified about the October 14 Facebook-FITF meeting where Dehmlow said “no comment” when Facebook asked if the Hunter Biden laptop was real.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Chan was then asked if the FBI had any meetings with companies, other than the Facebook meeting, about the Hunter Biden story? Chan responds that he is “confident” that he was not part of any meetings with Big Tech about Hunter Biden.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Chan was asked again if, other than the October 14 Facebook-FITF meeting, he was “aware of any communications between anyone at Facebook and anyone at the FBI related to the Hunter Biden laptop story?” He answered: “No.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

COMPLETELY FALSE. The Committee has recently obtained an internal Facebook document PROVING that Agent Chan had a secret “follow up” call with Facebook about the Hunter Biden laptop story on October 15, just one day after the @nypost story and the first Facebook meeting!

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Those weren’t Agent Chan’s only inconsistent statements. Agent Chan also claimed in the deposition that he had “no internal knowledge of [the FBI’s] investigation” involving Hunter Biden’s laptop.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But the Facebook employee, an ex-FBI agent, wrote—the day after the story broke—that “Chan advised that he was up to speed on the current state of the matter within the FBI.” Chan also told FB that “there was no current evidence to suggest any foreign connection...of the leaks.”

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Of course, there was “no evidence” of “any foreign connection.” The laptop was real, and the FBI knew it. The FBI had the laptop since December 2019. https://nypost.com/2023/06/22/fbi-verified-authenticity-of-hunter-bidens-abandoned-laptop-in-november-2019-irs-whistleblower-gary-shapley/

FBI ‘verified’ authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in November 2019: IRS whistleblower IRS supervisory agent Gary Shapley told Congress that Hunter Biden's laptop was "verified" in November 2019 and an expert assessed "it was not manipulated in any way." nypost.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Is there any wonder why the Biden DOJ has so far stonewalled the Committee’s efforts to interview Agent Chan?

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Our investigation remains ongoing and we will continue to update the public with our findings as we prepare and consider legislation to fight the censorship-industrial complex and protect the First Amendment.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Read about our latest efforts here: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rand-paul-moves-make-easier-americans-sue-biden-admin-collusion-big-tech https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/bill-sue-offiicals-censorship-social-media

Rand Paul moves to protect Americans' First Amendment rights from Biden admin collusion with Big Tech Kentucky GOP Sen. Rand Paul plans to introduce a bill to empower Americans to sue the Biden administration over First Amendment rights violations. foxnews.com
GOP lawmakers introduce bill allowing federal officials to be sued for censorship Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) and Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC) introduced legislation that would allow citizens to hold officials accountable if they attempt to censor online speech, the latest push from conservatives to protect free speech online. washingtonexaminer.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And that federal case against the Biden Administration? That’s still ongoing. On July 4, a federal court granted an injunction prohibiting the Biden Administration from continuing to censor Americans.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

That injunction would stop the government from censoring Americans. Biden’s DOJ is APPEALING the decision.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral argument this Thursday. The freedom of speech is at stake. Too be continued...

Jim_Jordan
Posted - August 3, 2023 at 3:00 PM
Saved - August 4, 2023 at 10:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Newly subpoenaed meeting notes reveal the Biden administration's efforts to control speech on Facebook. They pressured the platform to regulate COVID-19 narratives and questioned its content decisions. The White House even wanted Facebook to kick people off the site. They also sought to manipulate the algorithm to favor certain news sources. This censorship-industrial complex raises concerns about freedom of expression. Facebook admitted to reducing content, even if it contained true information. The Biden administration's desire for content control is evident.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

THE FACEBOOK FILES PART 3. Newly subpoenaed internal notes of meetings between Facebook executives and Biden Admin officials reveal more about the lengths the Biden White House wanted to go to control true speech on Facebook. 🧵 Thread: https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-facebook-files-reveal-lengths-wh-willing-go-try-control-covid-narrative-social-media

New Facebook Files reveal lengths WH was willing to go to try to control COVID narrative on social media Biden administration officials had several conversations with Facebook employees about possibly getting special access to tools that could target users over posts about COVID-19. foxnews.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

In 2021, the White House wanted to control what narratives and true content was posted on Facebook surrounding #COVID19. President Biden went so far to say that Facebook was “killing people” for allowing certain statements to be published on the site. https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/16/politics/biden-facebook-covid-19/index.html

Biden says platforms like Facebook are 'killing people' with Covid misinformation | CNN Politics President Joe Biden said Friday social media platforms like Facebook are “killing people” with misinformation surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic as the White House ramps up its rhetoric around false information on social media regarding the pandemic. cnn.com

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Rob Flaherty, President Biden’s then-Director of Digital Strategy, repeatedly put pressure on Facebook to explain its content decisions. “We have to explain to President, Ron, people, why there is misinfo on the internet…” https://t.co/zUZYbKHfA9

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

For example, Flaherty questioned whether Facebook was doing enough to reduce traffic from sites like the @nypost. “I’m curious – NY Post churning out articles every day... What is supposed to happen to that from Policy perspective. Does that article get a reduction, labels?” https://t.co/zC8QFWcckZ

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But that wasn’t enough for the Biden White House. Flaherty wanted Facebook to go a step further. He wanted Facebook to kick people off its site. https://t.co/zh2ccl9C1d

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

The Biden White House’s effort to censor opposing viewpoints only grew. So, they upped the pressure. Flaherty demanded that Facebook “play ball” and work with the Biden White House on censorship. He called it his “dream.” https://t.co/J0Z2AhDx8m

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But that’s not all. The Biden White House wanted to control what you saw on Facebook. They questioned whether Facebook could change its algorithm so users saw more posts from the New York Times and less from the @realDailyWire and @TomiLahren. https://t.co/oZUDDv6324

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Why did they do that? Because they didn’t think you were smart enough to decide for yourself. President Biden’s head of strategic communications and public engagement for the #COVID19 response, Courtney Rowe, mocked Real America’s ability to determine what's true and what isn’t. https://t.co/NS3PJBM7M5

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Facebook knew it had to act. One employee tried to explain to the White House that if the company couldn’t “remove” content, it could at least “contain it.” https://t.co/unlGNYpSAd

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

But Flaherty continued to press for more content moderation and CONTROL on so-called “bad” content. Read ⤵️ https://t.co/OpmcIktt0K

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

And of course, Facebook caved. The company ADMITTED to the White House that it reduced content of certain posts – even if the posts didn’t violate the company’s terms and contained TRUE information.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

Just read this from a Facebook employee. https://t.co/IXMKmzAEvE

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

These newly subpoenaed meeting notes continue to show the Biden White House’s desire to direct and control content on Facebook. More evidence of the censorship-industrial complex.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

To be continued…

View Full Interactive Feed