reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Jo_Bond
@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond❤️
Dr Peter McCullough explains to Maria Zeee why he believes that mRNA Covid 19 Vaccines cause Neurodegeneration, Viral Reactivation and Cancer in some people! @P_McCulloughMD @zeee_media #CourageousDiscourse #McCulloughFnd Please consider supporting the McCullough Foundation: http://www.mcculloughfnd.org
Video Transcript AI Summary
People around the world are reporting increased intolerance, impatience, and slower thinking. Some struggle with simple equations. There is a need for more studies to understand this phenomenon. Certain neurologic syndromes have been linked to vaccines, such as viral reactivation. Examples include a former US Senator who had lethal neuroinvasive varicella zoster reactivation, a pop singer with Ramsay Hunt syndrome affecting his facial nerve, and a man in Greece who developed an invasive basilar cancer in the temporal area after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. These cases are well-documented and published in peer-reviewed literature. It is the first known case of COVID-19 vaccine-induced fatal cancer with a neuroinvasive syndrome.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I ask this because a lot of people around the world and I I know it's happening from every country because I have people across my channels, you know, that are everywhere. And they say that they are seeing, you know, people are becoming more intolerant, more impatient, at the same time, a lot slower in their thinking process. They seem to struggle with, you know, simple equations even. And I wonder, you know, and I've interviewed Doctor. Seneff as well on this particular paper you referenced.
I wonder whether this could be the explanation at a more widespread level and Hopefully we'll have some more studies to that effect.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's hard to know. I can tell you there are some neurologic syndromes that I'm very confident are as direct The vaccines and they're largely ones where it's viral reactivation. So for instance, A former US Senator Dianne Feinstein had neuroinvasive varicella zoster reactivation or Shingles that, affected the, the facial nerve and invaded the brain and was lethal for her. Justin Bieber, A popular pop singer has Ramsay Hunt syndrome and that damages again the facial nerve And, and he, in his eye, in his mouth and he can't sing or perform. He's now 2 years.
He cannot, You know, he cannot perform. And then lastly, another neuroinvasive syndrome. This is really disturbing. 1st author is Karyagokoulos and colleagues. I'm Also an author on that paper, a man in Greece took, the COVID nineteen vaccine shots primary series And developed an invasive basilar cancer in the temporal area.
It, destroyed his facial nerve and the trigeminal nerve And went right into the brain and was lethal. So this is well documented. This is published now in the peer reviewed literature. It's searchable in the National Library of Medicine. That's probably the first case of, of, of certainly COVID nineteen vaccine induced fatal cancer and it's interesting That it was a neuroinvasive syndrome.
McCullough Foundation
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH Fighting for medical freedom through scientific data and analysis.
mcculloughfnd.org
@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond❤️
Check out this trailer for the compelling interview between Dr Peter McCullough and Brian Rose, host of London Real TV! @P_McCulloughMD @BrianBRose @LondonRealTV #McCulloughFnd #CourageousDiscourse Support! http://www.mcculloughfnd.org
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fauci, Birx, and Giroir focused solely on masking, social distancing, and vaccines, disregarding other treatment options. The biopharmaceutical complex aimed for global mass vaccination, suppressing any obstacles. Fear was used to ensure compliance. Autopsies revealed deaths after vaccination, with 73.9% dying due to the vaccine. The complex concealed this information to prevent its spread. Over half a million Americans died from the vaccine, with 1,100 dying on the same day they received it. The complex's objective is mass vaccination, while the WHO seeks global control. The world must awaken to the truth and reject this plan to halt their agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, Brett Giroir, they never thought of treating the virus. The only thing they could think of was masking social distancing and waiting for a vaccine. This biopharmaceutical complex had a single objective, and that was worldwide mass vaccination. Anything that got in its way was crushed. We just need to scare the living daylights out of them.
That was the plan to get everybody to comply. Fear drove irrational behavior. You know, autopsies were coming in, all these people had taken the vaccine, it was well documented, and they died. Our top line results were that 73.9% of everybody who died hide after the vaccine. In fact, the vaccine was the cause of death.
I think the biopharmaceutical complex said, wait a minute, we can't let this message get out. We're talking about over half a 1000000 Americans dying of the vaccine. Do you know 1100 people die, Americans died of the vaccine on the same day they took the shot. Some people just die in the vaccine center for a few minutes or a few hours afterwards. It's that acute.
So I can tell you this biopharmaceutical complex, they have an objective for mass vaccination. Just get ready for it. The WHO is on a runaway mission to control the world. It's almost like a bad movie. What's going to stop them from doing it.
The only thing that's going to stop them is the whole world waking up to the truth. And if the whole world wakes up and says no more, this whole plan dies.
McCullough Foundation
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH Fighting for medical freedom through scientific data and analysis.
mcculloughfnd.org
@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond❤️
Dr Peter McCullough explains to Grant Stinchfield why some people, who take the mRNA vaccines, have no side effects whatsoever! @P_McCulloughMD @stinchfield1776 @RealAmVoice #CourageousDiscourse #McCulloughFnd Support! http://www.mcculloughfnd.org
Video Transcript AI Summary
Young athletes have experienced cardiac side effects from the shots. However, some people who get the shots have no side effects at all. A study from Denmark found that about a third of the shots have no side effects, while another 70% have mild side effects. The remaining 4.2% of shots in a high-risk batch have more severe side effects. Each vial of the vaccine can vary in its contents, so it's a matter of luck whether someone gets a high-risk injection or not. There is no quality control over the batches, including the amount of messenger RNA or any impurities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We started to see young athletes' cardiac side effects on on on that front. Yet how do you explain and I'm gonna play devil's advocate here, doc. How do you explain when you have so many people that got it and have no side effects whatsoever?
Speaker 1: That was what Joe Rogan asked me a long time ago, How come everybody doesn't get sick from the shots? It turns out a paper by Schmeling and colleagues from Denmark showed about a third of the shots, there's no side effects whatsoever, none. There's a third of batches, as if nothing's in it, Doctor. Another 70% or so, there's some mild side effects, and then 4.2% of the doses in this high risk batch, that's where the side effects are. So it turns out from vial to vial, it's not the same.
So it's really luck of the draw. Some people, very unluckily so, are getting high risk injections And there's no quality control over these batches how much messenger RNA is in it, or impurities, or other problems.
McCullough Foundation
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH Fighting for medical freedom through scientific data and analysis.
mcculloughfnd.org
@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond❤️
Dr Peter McCullough testified in the European Parliament in Strasbourg which was chaired by Christine Anderson. Watch below! @P_McCulloughMD@AndersonAfDMdEP@EU_Commission@EUparliament #CourageousDiscourse #McCulloughFnd http://www.mcculloughfnd.org
McCullough Foundation
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH Fighting for medical freedom through scientific data and analysis.
mcculloughfnd.org
reSee.it AI Summary
Belgian psychologist Prof. Mattias Desmet testified at the European Parliament, warning about the blind nature of totalitarian systems. Even those who support it eventually become victims. CourageousDiscourse. McCulloughFnd. mcculloughfnd.org.
@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond❤️
Prof. Mattias Desmet, Belgian Psychologist, testified at the hearing in the European Parliament in Strasbourg concerning the World Health Organisation. " ... the totalitarian system is a blind system. Even the people who go along with it, even the people who buy into the system in the end fall prey to it." - Professor Mattias Desmet. @P_McCulloughMD @DesmetMattias @EU_Commission #CourageousDiscourse #McCulloughFnd http://mcculloughfnd.org
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Matthias Smit, a professor of clinical psychology, discusses the effects of the World Health Organization's new policies on information control and people's decision-making. He explains that the emergence of a technocratic totalitarian system is happening in a different way than a classical dictatorship, with a diabolic pact between the elite and the people. He emphasizes the importance of speaking out against propaganda and the need for everyone to realize the dangers of a totalitarian system. Dr. Smit urges people to cultivate the art of truthful speech and to address the problems in society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: De volgende spreker, ik ben professor dokter, Matthias Smit. Hij is een professor van clinical psychologie in het departement van psychology en educatieve wetenschappers van de universiteit in België. Hij werkte bij de psycho-analisten in private practice. Destijds is het aantal verschillende boeken, inclusief de internationale bestseller, de psychologie van totalitairinisme. Verder meer hij is een van de founders van het enkel geval archief.
In tweeduizend achttien heeft hij de verbindende ruimte ontvangen, Vicanalytics heeft een studieprijs van de associatie voor Psychonolytics Psychotherapie. En in tweeduizend negentien kreeg hij de WIM Brace Park prijs van de Nederlandse dosering van Psychotherapie. Sinds de gebeurtenissen van de coronacrisis van de coronacrisis in tweeduizend twintig, hij werd bekend als de wereldsleer expert op de theorie theorie van massformatie. Hij was in feite aan numerus podcast en talkshows, inclusief taka callcenter. Matthias Desmet verklaart de effecten van de WHO's nieuwe provincies.
Informatie control and sensitiveship on people's individual decision making entire facts, democratie as a entire facts on democratie als een rol. Info Themic is het woord hier. Dank je, Matthias.
Speaker 1: Dank je voor het introduceren, Amy. Dr. Hudmar Mark. Mijn collega, dokter Becolum, vroeg je je niet om te bidden naar de valse narratives in de coronacrisis en de grote last drie jaar Ik probeerde te uitleggen waarom zoveel mensen dood valse bidden door al deze valse nare dingen. Waarom ben ik gerespecteerd?
Het was duidelijk dat ze een valse nare zo dat was de focus op mijn werk beschrijft wat er allemaal in ons society is. Het is een proces van massformatie, dat is een psychologische groep van Mation, wat happening in het begin stages van de emergence van totalitair in staat. TotalItalië in staat, weet je, of niet, of niet, of niet, zo heet klassikale dictatorship. Veel mensen denken dat, tot wat het daar in staat is een classicale dictatorship, maar het is iets anders. En een klassieke detectorship, een kleine regime, precies controle over de society, userly through demonstratie van het agressie potentieel.
Maar de emergency van het tegenovergestelde gebeurt op een compleet andere manier. En we weten de beste historical die speaking de beste exemplaren van de topatiënt staat of de Sovjet-Unie in de eerste vijfentwintig of twintig century en nazi-Duitsland. Wat je met Nauwethink, is een compleet different krans van autoritairinisme. Op de ene hand anders dan op de andere kant heel simpel. Ik heb me gevraagd over de geconfronteerd met de emergency van Dus zo heet 'Falf it Glove totalitairium'.
Technocradic totalitairium is, maar een kind of totalitairium is, wat juist laat. Bij technische experts, die geloven dat ze de enige manier om te managen is de Russische knowledge. Dus wat we gaan doen, denk ik, als de replacement van een democratisch model bij een technocrathic model technocrathic model which in the end will be adventure setting als de vers recente communisten tot dat ik terrorisme of de eerste halve potentie of sensory zo Wat gebeurt er in de begin stages van een totalitairingssysteem uit een psychologische level? Is de emergency van wat Hanna arrant in een very awkwardivouay. De diabolic pakt tussen de elite en de mensen.
Een substantieel deel van de elite de leiders van de samenleving en het substantiële deel van de bevolking. We komen van een soort narrative een bepaalde theologie, een bepaalde theorie, die komt zo fanatiek uit, dat ze geloven dat het hun Judy om te imposend weefselsite op een heel landloze manier. Transcressing al normaal ethical bounteries. En dit is dit proces gebeurd. Niet alleen in het eerste deel van de twintig Century, Maar we hebben het gezien, we hebben het een slowly emerging door de laatste, laten we zeggen, de laatste twee centurious.
Het begin van de Franse revolutie, we zien hebben we een nieuwe elite emergen. Een nieuwe elite die de Seest Control Society of die om het beeld van de Society te implementeren. Niet in een nummer twee als de oudheid en de dood, maar in een veel korte cover twee door indoctrination propaganda, onmiddellijk de after-friends revolutie, toen is de religieuze wereld, was very geplaagd door onze contemporely materialist view man in de wereld de elite konden imposets willen niet meer dan nummer twee en they gaan een solution to that de financiële oplossing door het spel te verbeteren, zonder de bevolking, weet je dat ze wat Elite wilde doen. Het was op dat moment dat moderne propaganda werd geboren en door de laatste twee centuries propaganda werd meer en meer en meer en meer en belangrijk. Politici leiders us norma propaganda manipulation of population het rond de laatste twee century's en nu weer living, ik drink in een publieke ruimte, die constant sexueerd is.
Bij propaganda en dat is hetzelfde en dat is iets extreem belangrijks. Of ik wil een meer denken aan de emoties van propaganda en de wet van de centuri's. Ik denk dat de pandemie traditie en de amendement aan de internationale hulpverlening is die hier hebben. Of gewoon één een enorme stap voorwaarts op het niveau van het gebruik van propaganda om de bevolking te verbinden, om de plaatsing te accepteren. Van een democratisysteem, door een technocratisysteem.
Dus dat is het ene deel van een verhaal. Het andere deel van een verhaal is dat de psychologische staat van de bevolking verandert door de laatste paar centuries. De bevolking werd meer en meer adembesten om een filosofie-auteur te gebruiken, betekent dat veel meer mensen beginnen filoloni werden geconfronteerd met gebrek aan mening maken en experienced zo'n grote, freeflooding inside the frustration and negression. Wat betekent Een groot deel van de bevolking, God in deze staat, die het extreem sensitief maakt voor indoctrinatie propaganda. En dat is de combinatie van de twee, de combinatie van government of een elite, wat gelooft dat propaganda als de enige manier om controle over de samenleving te houden.
En aan de andere kant van de bevolking, dat is in een staat, en dat is extreem waardevol, twintig procent propaganda, wat geverized to totalitairium is. To this pack between an elite, hoe manipulatieve population en een bepaalde deel van de bevolking, de zogenaamde maneschijn van de crowd, die een blinde gelovige propaganda dat leidt tot een doodmixer, die heet 'tot het RIVM' is. Dus ik denk dat het heel belangrijk is om te realiseren. Voor iedereen, dat het totale systeem een blind systeem is. Zelfs de mensen die lang met het gaat, zelfs de mensen die naar het systeem gaan en aan het einde vallen, bidden we het.
Niemand is veilig voor een totaalitaire systeem. En aan het einde is er slechts één weg, denk ik. Slechts één weg om de uitdagingen van het totale systeem te stoppen. En het is door iedereen die realiseert dat iets in Rome gaat. Dus stop, stop, stop, ga ik er nog lang naartoe en toe begint te spreken.
Iedereen die er iets mee voelt, en er zijn veel mensen. Ik geloof. En totaal iets zoals zeventig procent van de mensen voelt dat iets verkeerd is met de narratives dat nu steeds controle van de samenleving Wel, het is tijd om te spreken. Het is tijd om te vertellen dat je voelt dat er iets is, want anders We zullen naar een staat gaan en we zullen niemand kunnen stoppen met het systeem veel meer stoppen. Simpelweg omdat het niet alleen een elite is dat kroeven of onevenly, dat de mismanagers de wereld.
Het is veel meer dan dat. Het is de mens die op de beweging is. Het is een blinde, sulfide systeem, of dat niemand in controle is. Dus dat is altijd mijn hoofd boodschap en dat je het niet begrijpt. Het is belangrijk dat we speak out in public space, dat we de kunst leren van wat er één heet TruthSpeech was.
Dat we uit de Optimizer zaten te cultivate. Dat en op deze manier, dat we alleen een echte remedie hebben voor de problemen die we fascineren in onze samenleving. Dank je wel.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. David E. Martin, an American Biological Threat Consultant, recently addressed the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France. During the hearing, he discussed the World Health Organization. Dr. Martin highlighted the manipulation by criminal racketeers who controlled the narrative on terms like vaccine, face mask, health, and social distancing. These terms were redefined to suit their agenda. For more information, visit McCulloughFnd.org.
@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond❤️
Dr. David E. Martin, American Biological Threat Consultant spoke at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France. At the hearing to discuss the World Health Organization. "The same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured and did all agency capture to make sure that you were told that you would use terms that they tell you to use. Vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition." - Dr David E. Martin. @P_McCulloughMD @DrDMartinWorld @EU_Commission #CourageousDiscourse #McCulloughFnd http://mcculloughfnd.org
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. David E. Martin, Founder and Chairman of AMCHEM International, criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) in his speech at the European Parliament. He accuses the WHO of being a criminal cartel driven by business interests rather than serving public health. He highlights the organization's history of fraud and manipulation, including the funding and planning of harmful medical experiments. Dr. Martin argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was orchestrated by the WHO and other entities for profit and control. He calls for the recognition of these crimes and the dismantling of the WHO as a criminal organization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wonderful. Thank you. Our next speaker and we're really honored that he also made his way from the United States of America to be with us already for a lecture tour through Europe and now here with us in the European Parliament in Strasbourg, Doctor. David E. Martin.
He is the Founder and Chairman of AMCHEM International, Rasa Energy and is a Betten Fellow of the University of Virginia. His experience includes founding the 1st medical device clinical trial center at UVA while on the medical school faculty in radiology and orthopedic surgery. His work with global investigation of biological and chemical weapons was done through his company, Mosaic Technologies, in which he led numerous Defense to civilian technology transfer programs with the world's largest companies and countries. His work includes publications and academic appointments in medicine, Law and Economics. His firm, AMCHEM, was responsible for leading investigation and supporting prosecution of some of the largest financial frauds in the U.
S. History as a contractor for the U. S. Treasury. David E.
Martin will summarize the most critical points of WHO as an organization that is not serving the health of the people but is driven by the business interest of its sponsors?
Speaker 1: Which means that if we just listened to my colleague, Matthias, the best thing in the world would be To leave it to you, the people. Now it's up to you to share what clearly, based on the The cavernous emptiness we see in all of these spaces is only going to be heard if you share it. So it feels very appropriate that I should be the one with the quietest voice. But let's let that lion roar, shall we? I'm done talking about COVID, and I'm done talking about SARS CoV-two and I'm done for a very simple reason.
For 110 years, We The People of the World have been lied to. We're a group, a very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided To subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves While impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity. And I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite. When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity.
And that's not my words. Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna When they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cartel.
We are acting as though there is some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer That somehow or another, the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit. Well, I'm going to tell you since its Formation in the 1940s, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent. And I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation. This is actually provable By their own words, in their own hand.
And they use a 4 step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans. They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they Create the rationale for the thing that they're going to do and then they deploy and profit from it. And in violation A 15 US code section 19, which for those of you listening, coincidentally started with the Clayton Act In the same year that the World Health Organization in the United States, 1913, the same year the World Health Organization's progenitors also started. So I find it fascinating Tonight, we passed the Clayton Act in 1913 and we set in motion 110 years ago the criminal conspiracy which we now call the World Health Organization. 110 years later.
And in violation of TFEU or TFEU I don't know how to say it the TFEU The treaty allegedly for the functioning of the European Union, which I think needs to now be called the treaty for the dysfunctional European cabal. Article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions that this was never a public health anything. It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behaviour of a population. Period. That's what it was.
That's what it always was. And we can come up with every theoretical argument we want to make About things. But the problem, even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something, is falsifiable for the data From Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe, Life insurance companies paid $30,000,000,000 less in claims. Now if there's a medical professional or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate that we could develop a virus, cunningly, that could find out your bank account, Your insurance policy statements and whether you're paid up on your premiums that's a big ask. It turns out that the data is unambiguous.
We did not have a pandemic. We had genocide. And we need to call it what it is. Next slide. When I say we planned it, Let's make sure we understand exactly the not so fine print of the fine print.
And I want to call your attention first To the right hand column of the slide. This is the 2011 data that the World Health Organization, the Wellcome Trust, PATH, and the Gates Foundation did On their wonderful worldwide program for malaria vaccine for children under the age of 6 months of age. And in their clinical trial, it's helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the Vaccine group. And then cunningly used the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28 children. Elect.
Now the reason I said murdered and the reason why I use that term is because it's exactly what it was. Because it turns out that this control group was not a saline injection. It was not some sort of innocuous innocent thing. It was actually a cocktail Tale of other known pathogenic disease carrying injections. The control group was known to kill people, And the experimental control group was actually theoretically maybe going to kill people.
And what we did was we actually went ahead and murdered them all. And cunningly, under Article 5, Section 13, which I've put on this slide, I want you to understand why I said, At its formation in 1947, when the WHO was funded and founded, it was funded and Founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language. Section 13 of Article 5 ends with the following statement. Immunity from personal arrest or detention blah, blah, blah. Immunity from legal process of every kind.
Now, if you didn't intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself Permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution and it's It's worse even investigation for prosecution of every kind. People sit there and pretend well that's like diplomatic immunity. Do you realize this isn't even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity? This is a criminal organization And who set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit. And when I say they knew they were going to commit, I mean they knew it because their 1st director general, none other than Doctor.
Rene Hassan, who happened to be In the hospitality of the Germans in Dachau in 1940 earlier in 1947 mysteriously With the largest of the Rockefeller Foundation, was nominated to become the 1st director general of the WHO. And within 5 short years, Rene Sand decided to authorize the real purpose of the WHO in writing By then Director General Doctor. Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population control as its primary objective. Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room? This is not public health.
This is the advancement The same genocidal program that began with the Carnegie Foundation's funding of the Eugenics office at Cold Spring Labs in the United States In 1913, under the philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie. Election. People, stop fooling yourself. We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing, But we're not going to the route. This was an organised crime racketeering entity set up To give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it controls who lives, who dies and who gets elect.
Any chance at life. And if you think that I am somehow inflating numbers, let me be unambiguous. Under every treatment of tax provision, if I were to tell you that there is an 88% Controlling interest of any organization, you might conclude that that actually aggregates into a controlling interest. And it turns out that if we look at the foundation donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those come from a single organization, the Gates Foundation. That constitutes A violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitiveness law in the United States.
This is absolutely not only not an independent, charitably funded donation, but more importantly, Under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic, this constitutes directed donations which specifically are forbidden And do not have any place anywhere in the charter of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations. When I say this is a crime, I mean it's a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime and now The crime of racketeering leading to murder and global terrorism. Next Slide. A. I told you that the second thing after they plan it is they fund it.
And why don't we use the criminals' language in their own words? Because it's the best way to say it. When they actually planned the release of the use of a biologically modified Chimera associated with the model derived from coronavirus, they actually said the following: To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding for the needful medical countermeasures Such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. Now let me pause for just one moment and remind you that the crisis that they were speaking of Was a crisis of diminishing funding. There was no health crisis.
This was a crisis of their coffers were starting to run dry. That's the crisis. And let's read on. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.
Investors will respond if they see profit At the end of the process. That is officially the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal That by that time was the decade of vaccines put in motion in 2011 by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board of the World Health Organization And it was the funding base for Peter Daszak's partnership with the chimeric production of pathogens both in North Carolina And in Wuhan. So don't tell me that we have to do an investigation into where this came from. The criminals have admitted to it In their own words. And now we get the fun one that no one in Congress is willing to address, which is The elephant in the room.
On October 21, 2014, despite the multiple conversations between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci Achoo, we've been told that Rand Paul has done everything he can to put Fauci on the ropes. He has had in his possession the letter that you see on the left. And it is the letter conveniently on NIAID letterhead sent to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill which unambiguously states that during the gain of function The moratorium, which by the way, if we use the word moratorium, feels like that means you're supposed to stop. Why don't we go ahead and look at 2 pieces of this letter? 1st, The 2nd bullet under Project 1, which by the way was not part of the original grant.
This was To look at the novel functions of the virus pathogenesis in vivo. You know what that means? In living systems. The grant was supposed to be clinical simulations and models but this grant was modified with this letter letter to say we were going to authorize gain of function research during the moratorium in living systems. And then we love the last paragraph of this letter Which conveniently says as your grant is currently funded this pause is voluntary.
How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium? And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line or continue to conduct The applicable gain of function research until the end of the currently active budget period. But here comes the problem. You know who is supplying the budget? An indefinite term, unlimited amount Contract from DARPA and from NIH.
Isn't it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that Needs to stop when the money runs out, when you find out that there is no point where the money runs out because there is no end To the thing that has no end. And lest you think that I'm making an allegation, which I'm not, I'm making an accusation. Let's be clear. And there's a big difference. I'm not alleging anything.
They actually went to the trouble of telling us that it was going to be the Wuhan Virus that was going to get us. As you see on the right hand side of the screen, published in 2016, March 14th of 2016, the SARS like Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 and I quote is poised For human emergence. Does that sound like we're just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little Haywire in December of 2019 or does it feel like we were told look at Wuhan and look at coronavirus And look at what we've been doing to manipulate coronavirus in Wuhan and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. And lo and behold, we're going to go ahead and tell you that we're ready to release it In 2016. Next slide.
We're almost done. And then they created it. Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use of the term biological warfare. I do that Because I am credentialed to do that. I happen to be for the United States government in the early part of 2000s in the latter part of 90s, A person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of biological and chemical weapons.
I'm acutely familiar with the definition Of what a biological warfare agent is in the 18 US code, the criminal code of violations of biological and chemical weapons. And so my assessment is in fact professional and right. And the reason for that is I'm the one credentialed to make that determination For the United States government for many years. That's why I say it. But let's pretend for the moment that I'm just a nut job.
Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. So why don't we look at what the criminals said themselves, shall we? In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation, elect. Ralph Barrick, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into millions and billions of people's arms, That Ralph Barrick was sponsored to present the following and let's go ahead and use his words presentation. Synthetic Coronaviruses, biohacking, bio warfare enabling technologies.
Does that sound like a public health distribution program? Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else? Or does biological warfare enabling technology sound like not countermeasures or pandemic preparedness? It sounds to me like biological warfare enabling technologies. And the reason why I have that hunch Is what followed was he received next to his NIAID grants non competitive DARPA grants in matching funds For over $140,000,000 of aggregate funding going into his and his related programs on synthetic Biological warfare enabling technologies.
So do I have a problem calling the injection a biological warfare enabling technology? Absolutely not. Because that's what they called it. And we know that they knew they called it that On September 18, 2019. Because on September 18, 2019, the racketeering, co conspiring cabal of interlocking Directorates also known as the World Health Organization said that they were going to conduct an expert experience for the world There was going to be a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen.
The lethality in that statement is the problem. They didn't say we're gonna maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around. They said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent. And the stated reason In September 2020, the progress indicator is that the world would accept a universal vaccine. Not we'll look at other options of treatment.
Not we'll have a look at what might be early intervention as Doctor. McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances. Not that we Stated on September 18, 2019, we were intending to kill. And we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion no one would have accepted. And that's published by the Criminal Racketeers.
Next slide. And there's only 2 to go if you're following. Deploy and profit from it. We were told investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. And lo and behold, guess what they saw?
Profit at the end of the process. 2022 $100,000,000,000 For Pfizer of public funds. Moderna, After lying to the Congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID, where Anthony Fauci and the entire team at NIH said that they had no financial interest in their recommendation. They receive a back payment royalty of $400,000,000 for the first payment of the royalty. Elect $400,000,000.
More than any institute of health has ever received in a single payment for a single invention In the history of American medical research. And lo and behold, what do we receive after that? A request from the World Health Organization to Ban its budget by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from it donate to it and guess what they just did? They laundered the money right back. That's what they did.
Next and now you get the final slide. Elect. This is not a public health crime. This is actually not a constitutional crime. This is a criminal act done by a criminal institution established to enable criminal behavior Since its foundation in 1947.
That is what this is. And we should not be debating the merits of elect. Or liberty or anything else as irrational as that would be if we stood at a bank robbery and debated the merits of printing dollar bills. The problem is not the dollar bills, it's the bank robber. And the problem here is not health and it's not public health and it's not the suppression of information and the suppression of Dissident views and the absolute unconscionable treatment of physicians around the world and academicians around the world who spoke out against this.
That's not the crime. The crime is that we had criminal racketeers who conspired and developed a quote emergency The same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured, and did all agency capture to make sure that you were told That you would use terms that they tell you to use vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition. So we just use them. Criminal racketeers price fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and fixed prices In direct collusion in violation of both European Union standards and in violation of both the Sherman and the Clayton Act in the United States. These were crimes.
It was organized crime and we should treat it as such. Criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath And this resulted in the death and destruction of liberty and most importantly, of the integrity of well meaning people who sit here today doing everything they can within their power To try to treat the calamities created by this catastrophe. I will not for a moment denigrate the multiple contributions Some amazing academic and medical professionals who've tried desperately to step into the gap and stop the corrupt Outcomes of these crimes, but I will without doubt say the following. Until we treat this As a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering And murder. Until we have that conversation, we're having the wrong conversation.
Because we are not here to debate the merits of a modified Agreement for a criminal racketeering organization. We are here to end the criminal organization itself. This is my The call to every single person on this planet. Don't just limit the power of the WHO. Elect.
@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond❤️
Dr. Peter McCullough explains Spike Protein Detoxification! #McCulloughReport #AmericaOutloud #CourageousDiscourse #McCulloughFnd @P_McCulloughMD
SARS-CoV-2 Base Spike Protein Detoxification...
In the case of vaccine-induced thrombotic injury, the spike protein has been found within the blood clot itself. Thus, there is a strong rationale for considering residual SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as a treatment target in post-COVID-19 and vaccine injury syndromes. The spike protein participates directly in pathophysiology, incites inflammation, and propels thrombosis...
americaoutloud.news
@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond Loves RNZ ❤️
Masking during Covid 19 was not only ineffective, it was also detrimental to people's health! Source: 2030 Unmasked - Preparing For What's Coming After! #CourageousDiscourse #McCulloughFnd #StopTheMandates @P_McCulloughMD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Masks are being used to push a false narrative about the virus, leading to compliance and control. While masks have a place in certain situations, such as around those with compromised immune systems, wearing them in everyday settings like grocery stores is unnecessary. Wearing a mask can escalate compliance and reinforce fear, leading to the Nocebo Effect where beliefs and fears become symptoms. Masks also incite fear and stress, which can weaken the immune system. Studies show that masks are ineffective in stopping the spread of the virus, and wearing them incorrectly can actually increase the risk of getting sick. Masks also hinder social development in children. Ultimately, masks are a gateway to compliance with vaccines and more control over individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Or control by pushing a false narrative about a virus? With our compliance. And that starts with a simple face mask. Masks absolutely have a place in society. If you have or are around those with a compromised immune system, then take every precaution.
Studies show proper PPE can reduce the spread of disease in these situations. However, blindly drawing a conclusion that if masks are smart to wear in an Operating room, therefore, we should always wear them in a grocery store, is a different story and that inaccurate assumption is being used against society. If you feel sick with anything, stay home for a few days until you feel better. Otherwise, if you're healthy, don't wear a mask. If a store requires you to wear 1 to enter, shop somewhere else.
In psychology, masks are a part of what's called the escalation of commitment principle, Where once you comply with one small thing, you're 82% more likely to comply with the next more drastic thing. The masks are the small thing. When you walk around the grocery store, seeing everyone else wearing a mask reinstills the virus on your mind. Your subconscious doesn't understand language. It understands actions and emotions.
When you constantly do a ritual of putting on some kind of mask, you are telling your subconscious, I'm the kind of person who wears this, so I must believe that the virus is a real threat. Putting on a mask is not only unconditional compliance to do what you're told, it helps you to fool yourself Self into believing a lie. This creates what is called the Nocebo Effect. You're likely familiar with the Placebo Effect, but there's also a lesser discussed, just as powerful Nocebo Effect. Proven over and over, this is where our beliefs and fears become symptoms and side effects.
During 1 study, a series of healthy people took a fake pill They were lied to and told it was a type of chemotherapy. As a result of nothing more than their belief, within 6 days, 30% of the applicants who took the fake pill started physically losing their hair. What you choose to believe is incredibly powerful. In early 2020, a collectivism campaign declared you need to wear a mask for the safety of others. This deceitful campaign was untruthful as true agenda was aiming for compliance of the population by weaponizing empathy.
Mask incite fear. Fear creates stress. Stress raises Cortisol levels in your blood, which reduces your immune system making you more likely to get sick from anything else, which would then falsely be tested as COVID. More tests means more cases in the headlines, which gives justification for additional mandated home isolation and forcing an untested Substance to be injected into your bloodstream from the same people who would profit off of you if you were to get sick from that substance they created. The more cases in the headlines will prolong and double down wearing mask while the true virus of fear continues to spread.
If you want to stop the spread of the virus, Do your part. Turn off the news and take off your mask. The real thing your mask is covering up is the fraudulent banking system.
Speaker 1: Right now, people should not be worn. There's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make People feel a little bit better.
Speaker 0: Just prior to the so called pandemic, the CDC stated that masks don't slow the spread of any virus. The Surgeon General says masks are ineffective and there has been study after study after study after study After study, after study showing that masks don't do anything to stop the spread of the virus. Breathing in microscopic plastic particles all day from the n ninety five mask is causing lung and immune problems throughout the country, which are getting falsely counted as COVID. The cloth masks are even worse. Selling someone a cloth mask as a means to be safe from a virus, any virus, is like selling them on a sweater and telling them that it's bulletproof.
Not only are cloth masks completely useless in stopping a virus, the moisture from your breath Built up on the cloth and attracts bacteria and viruses in the air. And it has been proven that wearing a cloth mask makes you actually more likely to get sick than if you weren't wearing a mask at all. To understand how ineffective mask are more clearly, the virus is significantly smaller than a molecule of visible vapor.
Speaker 2: As you can See that vape, which has aerosols the same size as COVID nineteen or larger goes through And around a surgical mask. Now if we take a cup mask and have a good look at it, notice it goes right Through the mask easily and goes in every direction, a high efficiency filter material straight through and around. It has no effect On the spread of aerosols, they go everywhere.
Speaker 0: The mask can't filter smoke or vapor from blowing everywhere, so they certainly won't Stop a virus a 100 times smaller from going right into someone's face. It's like putting up a chain link fence to try and keep out a mosquito. Even the better n 95 masks say it doesn't work directly on the box. Those who realize that COVID is one of the biggest scams on the global human population are the people who are not wearing a mask. Polls have shown that the majority of those who don't wear a mask are not getting tested.
So it doesn't take much thought to figure out where all of these positive tests are coming from. Masks are useless at protecting you from a threatening virus and even more useless during a fake pandemic. Covering your face also removes People's ability to have a sense of independence of who they are. Forcing a child's face to be covered with a mask assist in them being transported undetected an unidentified to anyone. And wearing masks prevents the developing brains of children from seeing any facial cues to subconsciously learn social behaviors.
Since everyone is dehumanized, this makes the children an estimated 45% more prone to violence as they are 55% less likely to develop emotions like empathy. But the biggest problem with a mask is that most people are simply wearing them wrong. If you're wearing your mask willingly without question, then you are using it to cover your eyes. If you're wearing it reluctantly, without keeping your voice, then you're mistaking it for a muzzle. The masks are a gateway to your compliance with the vaccine, and eventually so much more than just forcibly tracking everywhere you go.
@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond Loves RNZ ❤️
Dr. Peter McCullough's paper was pulled from The Lancet's preprint server! It showed a 73.9% death rate from C19 Vax! Please sign & share petition against Medical Censorship! BELOW! https://tinyurl.com/yhxtmufm #CourageousDiscourse #McCulloughFnd http://mcculloughfnd.org @P_McCulloughMD
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a recent study, researchers examined autopsy reports of deaths that appeared to be linked to the COVID-19 vaccine. Using a rigorous analysis, they found that 73.9% of the cases showed that the vaccine either directly caused or significantly contributed to the deaths. Most of these deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the last vaccine dose, with cardiovascular issues being the main cause. The study was conducted by a team of doctors and experts in pathology, who reviewed 44 papers and 325 autopsies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He has been involved in a recent study that was put on a pre preprint server. It disappeared later. We'll talk about that. But the study is looking at autopsy reports of basically deaths that look like they came from the vaccine and they did a rigorous analysis. Doctor McCullough, what did you find?
Speaker 1: This was an important study. Let me give you some context. I was contacted by a graduate student at the University of Michigan School of Public Health, where I'm a alumni. And we had an approved project through the School of Public Health to do an examination, a systemic review of all the autopsies That had been published in a peer reviewed literature. So we used the stem standard was called PRISMA methodology, where we searched for every paper possibly sorted through hundreds and hundreds of manuscripts because deaths can be reported as different, clinical syndromes are coming out after the vaccine.
We arrived at 44 papers, 3 25 autopsies. Then we took each one of the autopsy results out and we put it as a single line item, with all the clinical description. And then we submitted that to adjudication, a blind adjudication. Three doctors who were expert in looking at pathologic specimens, all had bonafide evidence, in the autopsy, lab. And, and then we came to, you know, an agreement on the cases.
And we found that 73.9% of all the cases. It was either the vaccine as the direct cause of death or it significantly contributed to the death. The deaths occurred within a week or two after taking the last shot. And, far more than 50% the single cause Was a cardiovascular cause of death.
Sign the Petition
Scientific censorship (in all its myriad forms) is a threat to free-speech, free-thought and for our ability to apply the scientific method to understand our world.
Two of the greatest tools that humanity has developed (telecommunications and the scientific method) are now being manipulated to suppress "inconvenient" data and shape a narrative that does not serve our quest for objective
change.org
McCullough Foundation
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH Fighting for medical freedom through scientific data and analysis.
mcculloughfnd.org