reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @JoahSantos

Saved - January 30, 2024 at 7:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The history of Israeli Likud, a party known for territorial maximalism, is often overlooked. The Israeli government has not officially acknowledged the Nakba, despite evidence that not all land was purchased and some Palestinians were forced to flee. The creation of the Irgun by Menachem Begin, a more radical group than Haganah, further complicated the situation. Begin later formed the Likud party, which Netanyahu belongs to. It is important to remove radical leaders for the sake of peace between both peoples. Watch the full history here: [link to video].

@JoahSantos - Joah

The history of Israeli Likud many want silenced. (Likud - The party of territorial maximalism.) The Nakba is acknowledged by nearly all historians, except the Israeli Government. They prefer the story that all land was purchased or Palestinians fled, while 7% of land was purchased and some Palestinians fled, it is far from the full story. Israel has refused to officially acknowledge the Nakba although many Israelis and Israeli organizations like Zochrot and ADRID have been working to convince the government. The issue is Haganah was already very brutal, the Revisionist Zionists (also called Political Zionism) led by Menachem Begin, created the Irgun, an even more radical group. A group that believes in taking all land including on both sides of the Jordan. Expanding all the war to Iraq. Menachem Begin to expand the mission created the Likud party, Netanyahu's party, the party of territorial maximalism. I understand the rights of Jews which have been given land by Britain but also the land that was given to Palestine. Radical leaders must be removed so both people can live in peace. Below is a short video 👇 Watch the full history here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGVgjS98OsU&ab_channel=Vox

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1931, there were over 850,000 Palestinian Arabs in Palestine. Jewish immigration increased due to the rise of Hitler, leading to a proposal to divide the land into two states: one for Jews and one for Arabs. However, this plan disregarded the hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs who had lived there for generations. By the end of 1947, Zionist paramilitary forces, particularly the Haganah, implemented a brutal plan called Plan Dalit or Plan B. This involved destroying Arab villages through fires, explosions, and mines. As a result, around 750,000 Palestinians were forcibly expelled and more than 500 villages were destroyed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The borders of Palestine have been changed forcefully over time. In 1931, there were more than 850,000 Palestinian Arabs in the region. But with the rise of Hitler, Jewish flight from Europe became even more urgent. And Palestine started to see the biggest wave of Jewish immigration yet. A UN special committee proposed the land be divided into 2 states, a Jewish state and an Arab state. Within this proposed area were 100 of 1000 of Palestinian Arabs who had lived there for generations. By the end of 1947, Zionists had several well developed paramilitary forces. The largest one known as the Haganah. The Haganah adopted what was called Plan Dalit or Plan B. A set of brutal instructions called for the destruction of Arab villages by setting fire to, blowing up, and planting mines. Plan d became the blueprint for carrying out the ethnic cleansing of historic Palestine to make room for a new state. Roughly 750,000 Palestinians had been forcefully expelled and more than 500 villages destroyed.
Saved - November 12, 2023 at 6:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Numerous reports from reputable sources, including Israeli organizations, the UN, and Amnesty International, have labeled Israel as an apartheid state. This designation has been supported by UN committees, special rapporteurs, and human rights groups. Public opinion surveys in Canada and the US also indicate a significant number of people view Israel as practicing apartheid. Notable figures, such as former Mossad head Tamir Pardo and Israeli author Yuval Noah Harari, have made similar claims. Churches and political organizations have also condemned Israeli apartheid. The Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa conducted a report in 2009 that concluded Israel's practices in the occupied Palestinian territories constitute apartheid. It is important to acknowledge and address this evidence.

@JoahSantos - Joah

the APARTHEID DENIERS refuse to look at any of this evidence. Report after report after report from Israeli organizations, UN, Amnesty International, and hundreds of reputable sources have called Israel and Apartheid state, that is not a democracy! UNITED NATIONS - Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People (2023) - In August 2023 - UN Special Rapporteur Michael Lynk (2022) - In March 2022 - Five UN Special Rapporteurs (2022) - In April 2022 - UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese (2022) - In October 2022 - UN Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices (2022) - UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) - In 2017 - UN Special Rapporteur John Dugard (2007) - In 2007, the UN Human Rights Council INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS - Amnesty International – On February 1, 2022 - Human Rights Watch (HRW) - In April 2021 PALESTINIAN CIVIL SOCIETY - Al-Haq and seven Palestinian, international and regional human rights organizations - In November 2019 -Palestinian and global civil society (Almost 200 Palestinian organizations, 450+ total) - In September 2020 - Over 100 Palestinian organizations - In January 2021 - Al Mezan Center for Human Rights - In November 2021 - Al-Haq and six other Palestinian organizations - In January 2022 - Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association and the International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School - In February 2022 ISRAELI HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS - Joint statements by prominent Israeli human rights groups:17 Israeli NGOs - In July 2023 - 20+ Israeli human rights groups - In December 2022 - 4 Israeli human rights groups - In December 2022 - 13 Israeli human rights groups - In February 2022 - B’Tselem - In January 2021 - Yesh Din - In June 2020 - Gisha Access - Physicians for Human Rights Israel - Israeli group PHRI's August 2021 - Breaking the Silence - Israeli rights group Breaking the - Silence participated in a June 2021 Peace Now Israel - Israeli rights group Peace Now Israel participated in a June 2021 - Adalah - The Legal Centre for Minority Rights in Israel - HaMoked - Center for the Defence of the Individual - Combatants for Peace welcomed Amnesty's report on Apartheid in February 2022 PUBLIC OPINION - Canadians -An August 2023 survey of Canadian public opinion found that "apartheid" is the top choice for how they view Israel -Americans - A March-April 2023 survey of American public opinion found that nearly one-third (31%) of Americans who provided an opinion said that they view Israel as "a state with segregation similar to apartheid." - Middle East Scholars - An August-September 2021 survey of Middle East scholars found that 65% would describe the current reality in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, as “a one-state reality akin to Apartheid.” OTHER NOTABLE FIGURES AND ORGANIZATIONS: - Tamir Pardo, former head of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency (2011-2016) - said in September 2023 that Israel was enforcing an apartheid regime in the West Bank: “There is an apartheid state here ... In a territory where two people are judged under two legal systems, that is an apartheid state.” - Amos Goldberg, leading professor of the Holocaust at Hebrew University in Jerusalem - wrote in August 2023: “Accusing Israel of apartheid is not anti-Semitic. It describes reality.” - 1,000 academics in Israel, the US, Canada, and more in a joint letter signed by more than 1,000 academics stated that "there cannot be democracy for Jews in Israel as long as Palestinians live under a regime of apartheid, as Israeli legal experts have described it," and urged American Jewish leaders to "support human rights organizations which defend Palestinians and provide real-time information on the lived reality of occupation and apartheid." Signatories include a wide range of academics in Jewish studies and other mainstream figures. - Israel's Law Professors Forum - representing 120+ Israeli law professors, wrote in March 2023 that changes to Israel's governance of the occupied West Bank transferring control over 'civil' matters outside of the military "validates claims that Israel practices apartheid, which is prohibited under international law." - Ban Ki-moon, former secretary-general of the United Nations - wrote in June 2021 that Israel’s “structural domination and oppression” of the Palestinian people “arguably constitutes apartheid.” In June 2022, he said: “I’m just thinking that, as many people are saying, that this may constitute apartheid.” - Juan Manuel Santos, former President of Colombia - wrote in May 2022: "The fact that patriotic Israelis and respected international figures are using the term 'apartheid' reinforces the need for an objective debate about the evidence, grounded in the international legal framework that defines this crime." - Daniel Levy, former Israeli negotiator - in a speech to the United Nations Security Council in August 2022, described "the increasingly weighty body of scholarly, legal and public opinion that has designated Israel to be perpetuating apartheid," and said that "it must be a wake-up call" to the international community about the failure to hold Israel accountable. - Yuval Noah Harari, Israeli author of the bestselling book Sapiens - while not using the "apartheid" word itself, very explicitly described the political reality in Israel a way identical to that of apartheid: "In short, the ruling powers in Israel moved from a two-state solution to a three-class solution. They foresee one country between the sea and the Jordan, where three types of people will live: Jews, who will enjoy all the rights; Type A Arabs, who will have some of the rights. And Type B Arabs, who will have almost no rights. This is the reality today, and judging by the votes at the ballot box, it seems that most Jews in Israel prefer that this is how it will remain." CHURCHES - Presbyterian Church (USA) - The Presbyterian Church in the United States, which has more than 1 million members, adopted a resolution in July 2022 to "recognize that the government of Israel’s laws, policies, and practices regarding the Palestinian people fulfill the international legal definition of apartheid," and urging churches members and bodies to "seek appropriate ways to bring an end to Israeli apartheid." - United Church of Christ (UCC) - The UCC, a mainline church in the United States, voted 83% in July 2021 for a policy to "reject Israel’s apartheid system of laws and legal procedures." - Church of Sweden - In November 2021, the Church of Sweden's main decision-making body passed a resolution instructing the church's central board to “raise the issue of scrutinizing the implementation of international law in Israel and Palestine [for example, by bringing this issue up with ecumenical organizations like the World Council of Churches], also from the perspective of the United Nations convention on apartheid and the definitions of apartheid in the Rome Statute.” Some added ones but cant post them all: - UK Labour Party conference - In September 2021 - Michael Benyair, former Israeli attorney general - wrote in December 2021 that Israel's regime extends beyond the West Bank: "The apartheid regime is in all areas controlled by Israel, between the sea & the Jordan River. The distinction… between democratic Israel & the West Bank that it controls is wrong.” - David Grossman, prominent Israeli author - said in December 2021 of the West Bank: “Maybe it should no longer be called an ‘occupation,’ but there are much harsher names, like ‘apartheid,’ for example." - Amos Schocken, publisher of the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz - wrote in December 2021: "The product of Zionism, the State of Israel, is not a Jewish and democratic state but instead has become an apartheid state, plain and simple." - Jon Allen, former Canadian Ambassador to Israel (2006-2010) - said in a speech in August 2022: "Whether Israel can legitimately be accused of carrying out apartheid in the West Bank – and I believe its actions fit within the international legal definition – it is clear that Palestinians’ rights are severely restricted as compared to their Israeli neighbours." - Jagmeet Singh, leader of the New Democratic Party (NDP) - in August 2022, Singh circulated an email to supporters in which he called on the Liberal government to "respond to reports from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Israeli human rights NGOs and the United Nations [specifically on the findings of apartheid] and accept their recommendations to states." - Heather McPherson, NDP foreign affairs critic - In a parliamentary committee in March 2022, McPherson asked the Foreign Affairs Minister: "I know you will be aware of a report that Amnesty International brought forward recently on the state of the situation in Israel and Palestine ... Will you provide a rationale for why you reject what the Amnesty report claims over four years? It's a very robust report over four years. Will you be providing any sort of acknowledgement of why that is the case or why you are rejecting it?" - Elizabeth May, Green Party of Canada co-leader - Tweeted on November 29, 2022: "I stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people living under conditions worse than apartheid." - Jonathan Pedneault, Green Party of Canada co-leader - In a Green Party of Canada leadership debate on November 9, 2022, Pedneault said that "Both Amnesty and Human Rights Watch call the situation in the occupied territories as apartheid, and I stand by that conclusion." - Anglican Church of Canada and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada - Adopted a “Resolution on Peace and Justice in Palestine and Israel” in June/July 2023 which commits the church bodies to “examine, discuss, and address emerging realities, including the implications of the recent reports by B’Tselem, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International [on Israeli apartheid], and for its governing bodies to respond appropriately.” - Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) - The General Assembly of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) in the US and Canada adopted a motion in support of Palestinian rights which affirms “that many of the laws, policies and practices of the State of Israel meet the definition of apartheid as defined in international law.” The denomination has almost 20 congregations across Canada. Political or notable individual supporters of the Together Against Apartheid campaign by Independent Jewish Voices Canada Leah Gazan (NDP MP) Niki Ashton (NDP MP) Matthew Green (NDP MP) Gord Johns (NDP MP) Peter Julian (NDP MP) Rima Berns-McGowan (Former Ontario NDP MPP) Libby Davies (former NDP MP) Paul Manly (former Green MP) Alex Neve (Former Secretary General, Amnesty International Canada) David Viveash (Former Canadian Representative to the Palestinian Authority, 2006-08) Avi Lewis (Filmmaker and activist) Leilani Farha (former UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Housing) Judy Reb Black Lives Matter Canada Canadian Federation of Students Ontario Canadian Friends Service Committee (Quakers) Coalition of Canadian Palestinian Organizations Palestinian Canadian Congress Palestinian Youth Movement United Jewish People's Order Centre international de solidarité ouvriére Fédération nationale des enseignantes et des enseignants du Québec United Network for Justice and Peace in Palestine and Israel Mennonite Church Canada Palestine-Israel Network Canadian Foreign Policy Institute Canadians United Against Hate Canadian Friends of Sabeel Labour for Palestine Faculty for Palestine Just Peace Advocates Socialist Project Student Christian Movement of Canada UofT Law Union Centre justice et foi IfNotNow Toronto BACKGROUND - NOTABLE ANALYSES Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa - In 2009, the Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa commissioned a report with the title: "Occupation, Colonialism, Apartheid? A re-assessment of Israel's practices in the occupied Palestinian territories under international law." The report concludes that the "State of Israel exercises control in the OPT with the purpose of maintaining a system of domination by Jews over Palestinians and that this system constitutes a breach of the prohibition of apartheid". People need to call this what it is. @MarioNawfal @elonmusk @ShaykhSulaiman @jacksonhinklle Tag all Apartheid Deniers in the comments, they must open their eyes and really look at the evidence!

Saved - November 2, 2023 at 2:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Growing tensions and misguided actions against Jews worldwide are concerning. Those responsible for harming individuals, like the woman in the video, should be arrested. I witnessed an Israeli man belittling a Palestinian, with no consequences. Criticizing Israel is often labeled as antisemitic, hindering change. External pressure, as seen in historical examples, may be necessary for peace. I'm fighting for peace, regardless of criticism.

@JoahSantos - Joah

I fear for this woman and many other Jews around the world because of the growing tensions and the actions of misguided lunatics. The people that did this to this woman should be arrested! I literally sat on a space while an Israeli man told a Palestinian man that he is “left overs”, “crumbs”, “nothing” while people laughed and did not remove him as he continued to do it. He wasn’t even in Gaza or West Bank, he was born outside of that region. I have seen many people booted off a stage for attacking people in that way, but for some reason not when it’s towards a Palestinian. Although I was booted off for saying that there are different versions of what led to conflict, in the 1940s and even though Ilan Pappe, an Israeli historian, agrees with me. I was booted but not the man calling a Palestinian “crumbs”. The Palestinian said nothing in return. It is so normalized that no one had a reaction to this. It was absolutely vile to witness. Is this somehow excepted while the poor woman in the video is not? Are these people not equal? When all people begin to be treated as equal, this can stop as has stopped throughout history. “The savages want to see us dead”, is a very old story that has repeated itself throughout history. Just think of American history, “the natives want to terrorize us and scalp us” sound familiar? The thing is, no one sees the natives as the terrorist now in hindsight. This is one of the several reasons I believe this is a colonization and not an occupation. If I criticize China on what they are doing to the Weegers, I’m not called anti-Asian, no one fears losing their job for calling for peace. Yet, with Israel it has been so normalized that if an outsider criticizes them it’s antisemitic, if an insiders does it like Noam Chomsky or Albert Einstein, some how they are self hating Jews, as was said in that space. Can you not see how history has shaped this false narrative and made it impossible to affect change in the region? You criticize Russia, yet are you not deemed a hater of Russians? You hate Trump, are you anti-American or a self-hating American? Throughout history, oppressed people which are typically dehumanized ,when they stop being oppressed, peace is reached. This is what happened in America, South Africa, India and many places around the world. Jews before this conflict live in peace in Germany. When your world is punishment for your religion or race, it is hard to see the punishment you inflict in return. It’s hard to see the terror that is being inflicted. Peace will never come from within Israel or Palestine because they are both guilty of this regardless of how much or how little one has done to the other. Only external pressure can create this. Like Lincoln in the free slave movement. Only when the cost of advancing becomes greater then the cost of peace. I write this as I tear up, I am fighting for peace of both people regardless of how nieve I may be or not. It might not be the way you wish I did it, but it's how I'm going to do it and I hope it works.

Saved - October 31, 2023 at 6:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Germany and Israel both established states for one specific group, leading to camps, forced displacement, and killings. The Zionist movement, founded by Theodor Herzl, aimed to create a Jewish homeland in various locations. Presently, using "It's a Jewish State" supports a supremacist agenda. We must not allow Zionists to exploit Judaism as a shield for their ambitions. Let's learn from the atrocities witnessed in Russia and ensure that only criminals are pursued.

@JoahSantos - Joah

Germany rounded up people and put them into camps, took their homes, and killed some of them. They made a state for only one type of people. An Aryan race. A supremacist movement. Israel rounded up people and put them into camps, took their homes, and killed some of them. They made a state for only one type of people. A supremacist movement. That is why when you repeat "It's a Jewish State" you are repeating the rhetoric of a supremacist movement created by Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, which wanted to move the Jews to a homeland in Uganda, Argentina, or Palestine. You are allowing Zionists to use the Jewish faith as a human shield for their ambitions and it is dangerous. You can see the horrific scenes I have seen in Russia. No one should be hunted down except for criminals.

Saved - October 30, 2023 at 2:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Many on X believe they're smarter than Einstein, who criticized Zionism. He supported Jews but warned Zionists could harm Palestinians, foreseeing parallels with Germany's treatment of Jews. A man of foresight.

@JoahSantos - Joah

Many people on X think they are smarter than Einstein. He has outright called the Zionist "criminal people". Albert Einstein was very supportive of the Jewish people but fiercely against the Zionist movement. He also stated during his lifetime that zionists would do to the Palestinian people what Germany did to the Jews. A man of great foresight.

Saved - October 25, 2023 at 12:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The USA's proxy war against Iran is seen as an effort to protect the petrodollar. Similar situations have occurred in Venezuela, Iraq, Libya, and the BRIICS countries. In each case, moves away from the petrodollar were met with intervention or destabilization. The recent decision by the USA to veto a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza conflict suggests a desire to maintain the petrodollar. Middle Eastern nations are also expressing openness to trading without the dollar. This pattern points to a potential future conflict to weaken Iran and protect the petrodollar.

@JoahSantos - Joah

ISRAEL - USA's proxy war against IRAN to save the petrodollar once again. _____ VENEZUELA -------- 2002 - Venezuela annouces it will no longer accept Dollars for oil. 2002 - US funds coup agains leader 2002 - All plans for PetroEuro were benched _____ IRAQ ----- 2003 - Saddam announces he will move away from the PetroDollar 2003 - A report of WMDs is given to USA by the Israeli Likud party government of Israel, which is the current government. It was proven to be fake intel and confirmed to be fake by prominent government officials in Israel. 2003 - USA invades IRAQ, replaces leader and country benches PetroEuro plans. _______ LIBYA ------- 2009 - Libya annouced a new currency back by their own gold which would need to be used for oil purchases. Many other African countries wanted to join. To be launched in 2011. 2011 - NATO & USA led militia and drone strikes kill Gaddafi, PetroDollar is preserved. WikiLeaks confirms years later in Clinton's emails that the purpose of killing Gaddafi was to stop the new gold back Libyan currency for oil. ________ BRIICS -------- 2010 - BRIICS meet to speak about creating a new natural reserve backed currency. Syria would be crucial for this plan due to pipeline plans. Closest pipelines from middle east to EU and Americas. 2011 - A decade long war erupts in Syria. The side overthrowing the government supported by USA. 2014 - Putin secures Crimea, warm water port needed to deliever LNG to Maritime Silk Road from Syria. Syria is the place to load oil from pipelines connected to several Middle Eastern Countries. 2020 - Crimea will not work as warm water port without easten Ukraine. 2020 - 40+ countries join BRIICS+ even without a global currency being ready. -------- Middle East | Israel & Gaza | Lebanon | Iran -------- Yesterdays decision by the USA to b the only country to veto a ceasefire, shows they do not want a pause in the war. IRAN has already said they don't want to use the Dollar for oil any more, and we keep hearing how Hamas was funded by IRAN and the attack was planned by them as well, with zero proof of this. Lebanon is constantly thrown into destabilization, it happens to be the strip of land between Syria and Israel if an attack was needed, Lebanon would be in the way. Again Syria being key to BRIICS+. Several Middle Eastern nations — Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Algeria and Bahrain have all said they are open to trading without the dollar. My fear, USA wants to protect the PetroDollar and will need Israel to expand its capacity. More advanced US weapons will be going to Israel. Proxy war or direct war will happen to weaken IRAN, 3rd largest oil reserve. Just my theory for a decade that puzzle pieces keep falling into place. Thoughts?

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2000, Saddam Hussein announced that Iraq would sell oil in euros instead of dollars, leading to the US invasion in 2003. Similarly, Venezuela's plan to sell oil for euros in 2002 resulted in a failed coup backed by the US. Despite having the largest oil reserves, Venezuela is now one of the poorest economies. Libya, with the largest oil reserves in Africa, also faced consequences when Muammar Gaddafi suggested selling oil for gold instead of dollars. NATO intervened in Libya, leading to Gaddafi's execution. These countries wanted to break away from using the dollar for oil payments, but faced the wrath of America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In October 2000, the president of Iraq Saddam Hussein announced they would no longer the world, it had become the world's 5th largest oil producer. So when Hussein decided to start selling oil in euros instead of dollars, the US wasn't too happy. By February 2003, he longer sold over 3,000,000,000 barrels of oil for €26,000,000,000. A month later, the US invaded Iraq. Speaker 1: My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations long To disarm Iraq. To free its people. And to defend the world from grave danger. Speaker 0: Long they overthrew Saddam. And by June, just 4 months later, the country was back to selling oil in dollars. Years later, a number of US officials started to let the truth seep out. Former head of US operations in Iraq, general John Abazaid, said, what, of course, it's about oil. We can't really deny that. Former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan wrote in his memoir that, quote, I'm saddened that it's politically long inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows. The Iraq war is largely about oil, end quote. Venezuela 2002. Coincidentally, Venezuela also has large oil reserves. In fact, they have the largest proven oil reserves in the world. But longer Chavez, a die hard anti American leader, was about to make the same grave mistake that Saddam Hussein made. He planned to start selling oil for euros instead of the mighty American dollar. Well, love, we can't have that now, can we? So in 2002, the US backed a coup against Chavez, which ultimately failed, but it crippled the country and its economy. Empires are built on oil. Long yet despite having the largest oil reserves in the world, today, Venezuela is one of the poorest economies in the world. Libya 2009. Eerily similar to Venezuela and Iraq. Libya has the largest oil reserves in Africa, and they weren't doing that bad. They did a great job managing all those oil revenues, building up a 143 ton gold reserve according to WikiLeaks. They had the highest GDP per capita in Africa and Libya was on track to become the most influential country in Africa. And also similar to Venezuela and Iraq, Muammar Gaddafi, the leader of Libya, suggested all Muslim and African countries buy oil from Libya using a new currency backed buy their giant gold reserves instead of US dollars. In other words, they wanted to sell oil in exchange for gold instead of US dollars, lo and other major African governments were ready to support. But I think we can all guess what happened next. NATO led a military coalition into Libya in the name of freedom, of course. And on August 20, 2011, Muammar Gaddafi was executed by Libyan militias less bet by US drone strikes. Years later, it was discovered in Hillary Clinton's emails that NATO really wanted to overthrow Gaddafi's government, mainly because of this plan for an African gold backed currency, supported by Libya's oil reserves. This was Libya before, and this is Libya today. To break away from using the dollar as payment for their oil, and each of them face the consequences of America's wrath.
Saved - October 23, 2023 at 2:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US Dept of Justice claims that Zionist terrorists played a significant role in the creation of Israel. A report with references is available on ojp.gov. Israelis and Palestinians should unite against manipulators spreading lies and endangering lives. Stand together and expose the decades-long manipulation. No evidence supports claims of breached fences, beheaded babies, or delayed military response.

@JoahSantos - Joah

🔴RED HANDED🔴 Can the US Dept of Justice show the state of Israel was created by terroristic Zionists? YES! BESIDES KILLING BRITS AND OTHERS, THE REPORT CONCLUDED THE ZIONIST TERRORISTS PLAYED A SIGNIFICANT PART IN THE CREATION OF THE JEWISH STATE. A BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCE NOTES ARE PROVIDED on ojp . gov #Israelis_Palestinians_Unite - Stop allowing these manipulators to place your life in danger. The fence could not be breached by a tractor and no one saw it. The military does not take 7 hours to respond. 40 Babies were not beheaded and all the other lies you are told. Stand together against the people who are manipulating you and have been for decades.

View Full Interactive Feed