reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @JohnBeaudoinSr

JohnBeaudoinSr
Posted - September 12, 2024 at 4:18 PM
Saved - January 10, 2026 at 8:01 PM

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr., The Real CdC, The Last Boomer

CT Memo Vol. I Sudden Kidney Failure and Hospital Homicides From official government records Facts found no where else in the world - 2 signals SummaLogicaLLC dot com Corroborated by Phinance Technologies @DowdEdward in total excess kidney failure USA ~153,000 dead

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents Connecticut memoranda series, volume one, describing a notice sent to Connecticut state officials (Attorney General and others) by certified mail and hand delivery through the governor’s office and Department of Public Health channels. The notice centers on acute renal failure (AKI) and argues it aligns with hospital homicide concerns. The speaker says the cover letter urges officials to seek personal legal counsel because if the state attorney represents the state, a conflict arises when citizens are harmed by state officials. The document allegedly provides detailed factual information drawn from official Connecticut records, intended to undermine any future “ignorance of fact” defense and to show that thousands have died from AKI and related conditions. Key claims and content: - The memorandum warns that described AKI deaths and related pulmonary embolism and thrombocytopenia are occurring in hospitals, and officials have a duty to act; failure to act after being informed could render officials criminally liable. The notice asserts sovereign and qualified immunity do not apply to criminal acts. - It asserts there are no statutes of limitations for most homicide crimes, and that inaction in the face of an imminent danger constitutes a legal duty to act. An inaction with knowledge of harm is framed as a criminal act. - Named recipients copied on the notice include Ned Lamont (Governor), Susan Bysiewicz (Lieutenant Governor), Eric Russell (State Treasurer), Sean Scanlon (Comptroller), William Tong (Attorney General), Manisha Juthani (Commissioner, Department of Public Health), A Orifice (Chief of Staff, DPH), and H Sultan (Special Counsel, DPH). The speaker claims these packages were signed for. - The memorandum is titled: “Memorandum notice of required action to thwart hospital homicides and acute renal failure deaths that are currently occurring and were occurring for the last three years, three and a half. Evidence compels immediate investigation and correction of injurious federal and state health protocols and mandates.” It cites a death-records study and a climate-related health data study obtained with approval to examine regional effects of temperature and humidity on heart disease. - It describes a data-driven investigation process with collaborators, including using discrete cosine transforms and discrete Fourier transforms to analyze signal-to-noise ratios in death data to determine seasonality and age-related patterns. The speaker reports that AKI deaths in CT rose substantially in 2020–2022, and notes a divergence from COVID death trends (AKI rising as COVID declines). - The speaker presents comparative state tallies for excess AKI deaths since 2015: Connecticut 1,721; Massachusetts 3,493; Minnesota 2,412. They claim thousands of AKI deaths across states, with CT showing a large increase in 2022 (and 2023) and assert that AKI was not adequately addressed by public health authorities. - The speaker discusses a pattern showing AKI deaths rising after December 2020, with a December 2020 inflection coinciding with a program (NCTAP). They claim hospital protocols and NIH COVID-19 treatments (remdesivir, baricitinib, ventilators) may have contributed to AKI and multi-organ failure, describing a two-signal theory: one signal linked to hospital protocols and the other to gene-based vaccines. - Graphs are described showing AKI versus COVID trends, with AKI not consistently correlated with COVID, and an observed spike in AKI deaths in CT beginning in 2020, peaking in 2022. The speaker notes a reduction in the proportion of AKI deaths that also test positive for COVID after March 2022, while AKI deaths continue to rise, suggesting a vaccine-related signal. - The speaker cites NIH COVID-19 treatment guidelines (final update dated 02/29/2024) and notes a planned website shutdown (08/16/2024), arguing a lack of updated protocols. They allege data manipulation or suppression by public health authorities. - In the recommended actions, the speaker proposes an investigation plan: verify CT data, investigate younger age groups first (examples: 94 deaths, ages 25–44; 184 deaths, ages 45–54 in CT 2020–2023), obtain entire hospital records (without notice) including vaccination status and treatment timelines, determine whether vaccination influenced treatment pathways, interview families, review DNR decisions, and publish results so the public can decide on consent to vaccines and NIH protocols. - The conclusion asserts an AKI epidemic in Connecticut that allegedly claims more life years than COVID and rivals other major past diseases in impact. It states there is no statute of limitations for murder, and that qualified and sovereign immunities do not shield officials from criminal charges. It calls for immediate investigation and potential prosecution of officials who knowingly refuse to investigate AKI deaths tied to NIH/CDC/FD&C protocols, framing this as a public health and civil liberty issue. The speaker closes by inviting questions and urging action to ensure accountability, expressing a desire to be involved in cleaning up public health governance.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Here we go. So the Connecticut memoranda series volume one. I'm going to review the document that was sent to officials of the state of Connecticut. That is the attorney general. It was sent certified mail and a few other people in that department. It was hand delivered to an attorney for the Department of Public Health in Connecticut. She took it in hand. It was given to the governor's office through the mail room by the official policy of the state capital of Connecticut. He signed for it and stamped it and made sure that the governor would get it. Alright, let's go. There is a cover letter. I will go through a little bit of that named recipients, then the document title and so forth. And this mostly has to do with acute renal failure, where that is in line with hospital homicides. So I recommend to them in the cover letter for the individually named people as officials of the state of Connecticut. I tell them to seek personal legal counsel. If they give it to the state attorney, the state attorney is then conflicted between representing the individual and representing the state. As an attorney represents the state, they are supposed to be representing the people, like the people of Connecticut, the citizen. Well, if the citizens are being harmed by the state officials, that's a pretty big conflict. I also say notice, that is knowledge that I'm imparting upon them with the detailed factual information gleaned from official Connecticut state records. That knowledge that I give them through this document raises, that's r a z e s, that means destroys levels, the future defense of ignorance of fact. So if in the future they say, well, we didn't know that it was harming people. Oh, we didn't know all these people were dying from acute renal failure and pulmonary embolism and thrombocytopenia. We didn't know. Well, now they know. In the second volume two, it's even bigger because I say these people died from the vaccine in hours, days, minutes, and I name the people. So this notice raises, it destroys the ignorance of fact defense for the future. I also tell them sovereign and qualified immunity do not apply to criminal acts. Those are used to protect people that work for government from civil litigation. If they make a mistake in the course of doing their job, they won't be personally sued because they have qualified immunity as a servant to the public in their official capacity. Statute of limitations. There are no statutes of limitations for most homicide crimes of which this is one. If they don't act on information and belief the public is in imminent danger of harm, then they're guilty. And that's the next one is legal duty to act. They took the job, they have that duty. It's like a lifeguard who takes a job and then watches a kid drown. Once you know, you must perform your legal duty for the safety of the public, else be criminally liable. It's all basically setting them up so that they have the knowledge and they are compelled to do their job. I mean, all they have to do is do their job for the safety of the public. That's what it's all about. An inaction concurrent with a legal duty to act as a criminal act. The named recipients are Ned Lamont, governor of Connecticut Susan Dyshevich, lieutenant governor of Connecticut Eric Russell, Connecticut treasurer Sean Scanlon, Comptroller William Tong, AG Manisha Jutani, Commissioner Department of Public Health A Orifice, Chief of Staff of the Department of Public Health and H Sultan, Special Counsel for the Department of Public Health. They were all copied on this and received it. I actually have a sub stack that I wrote, and it has the return receipts such that these packages were signed for. They got them. Alright. The title is memorandum notice of required action to thwart hospital homicides and acute renal failure deaths that are currently occurring and were occurring for the last three years, three and a half. Evidence compels immediate investigation and correction of injurious federal and state health protocols and mandates. I obtained the death records of Connecticut. I submitted an application to do a study on the regional effects of temperature and humidity on heart disease. That is the effects of climate change on heart disease. They approved the study and gave me the records. I ran it through my process. I currently am engaged with somebody who is very, very good at math. I asked him to run discrete cosine transforms and discrete Fourier transforms to determine the signal to noise ratio of the data streams, that is how many people died every every day of a specific disease or all cause or COVID or pneumonia to determine if it's highly seasonal, then it's sinusoidal. That means more people die in the winter than the summer. More older people die in the winter than the summer. Younger people, that's not the case. So in the younger people, it would be a low signal to noise ratio. In the older people, it would be a high signal to noise ratio. And the same for pneumonia and respiratory diseases, more in the winter than the summer. So I am actually looking at climate change versus heart disease. There isn't that great of a signal for anybody 65 for anything to do with the heart. Not more people die in the winter than the summer. So the study is being done. The application for the data was truthful. And ancillary or other significant findings are what this is. Volume one, two, three, and four are incidental findings. So in defense of others, I have a duty to inform the Connecticut state officials, which I'm doing through this notification in this document. The purpose of the memo is to notify them of an epidemic of acute kidney injury or acute renal failure or sudden kidney failure. So once notified, the Connecticut state officials have a legal duty to investigate the causes of these deaths, and it's a massive number of deaths. Question. This is the question I present to them. Whether a Connecticut state official, knowing that thousands died in a kidney failure epidemic since 2020, is criminally negligent if he does not immediately and earnestly investigate to determine the cause and prevent additional deaths. So will they be criminally negligent if they don't investigate and more people die? And all they have to do is look at the data that I've shown them, look at the hospital records, and they'll know. Acute kidney injury is up a hundred percent. It's the greatest loss of life years in a hundred years. More than COVID, more than h one n one or smallpox, polio, more than all of them in the last hundred years. This is the biggest, and nobody's looking at it, which is why I'm doing this video. Within the document, I I put the three states, not just Connecticut. So the three states for which I have all of the death records since 2015. Connecticut is one thousand seven hundred and twenty one excess sudden kidney failure deaths. That's a lot. That's a lot of people, and it's a lot younger people in COVID. And if you notice Massachusetts is thirty four ninety three, that's almost 3,500. Minnesota is twenty four twelve, twenty four hundred. Thousands and thousands of people in every state are dying from acute kidney injury, and everybody's ignoring it. All the celebrity doctors and all the scientists, they go on talking about all these things where there's 10 here and five there. We're looking at thousands of people in every state dying from acute renal failure. It's a wildly out of control epidemic. N one seven, by the way, is sudden kidney failure. Keep that in mind as we go through here. But you see how much it went up. It was bouncing along at five hundred, five hundred, five hundred, five hundred, five hundred, then six twenty five in 2020. It went up a mere hundred. It was almost thirteen hundred in Connecticut in 2022. That's massive. If you have this much of a signal, you gotta wonder what is the public health department even doing? Why do they even exist if they miss something that's killing thousands of extra people in their state? They don't even look at it, and it's not COVID. If you look on the right in this graph, that's COVID. That's what they purport COVID to be. I don't think eighty percent of these were really died from COVID, but COVID was around in 2020 and less in '21, less in '22, and less in '23. So as COVID's going down, acute renal failure was going up. Does that make any sense? If COVID was causing this, it would be positively correlated. Instead, it's inversely correlated. So it's not COVID. It's not COVID causing this. The Connecticut Department of Public Health makes no mention of the acute kidney injury epidemic. This is a snapshot from their website. There's nothing there. They don't have anything about kidney. It's a mass casualty event, once in a century event in a 100. They make no mention of it. In fact, I wonder if they even know about it. The Connecticut Department of Public Health's mission is to monitor public health. And yet, are they ignorant of this, or are they just trying to hide it from the public? I don't know. It's it's an inexcusable failure. I would have hoped that in the last two months since I sent this document to them, somebody would have called me and said, hey. Can you explain this to us? Or, wow, we gotta go to the press and tell them acute kidney failure is one of the biggest things that's ever happened in Connecticut since World War two in the past hundred years. So I I write this is a quote from the document. Early remediation likely would have saved thousands of Connecticut lives as young as 25 years old. And in that twenty five to forty four range that you see, that that's just the twenty five to forty four age range that you see in this graph. Yeah. It may not seem like a lot of people, but this is just Connecticut. There are 3,600,000 population. Imagine killing sixty three people, excess, more than normal, in the age group of 25 to 44. If a couple of school buses go off a bridge and all everybody dies, that's big news. But when they can spread these deaths across a few years and hide them where they're actually causing them from man made interventions, then, you know, they just wanna hide it. They don't wanna address it. I don't wanna get caught up being too negative and blaming, but they haven't done anything. It's been two months since I gave them this document. They hope I'll just go away, and nobody will call them. Anybody who sees this, anybody in Connecticut at any time, if you ever watch this, you have a duty as a citizen to call them up or to send them a letter and say, what the hell are you doing? What show me the investigation that's ongoing. These are all official records from Connecticut. Here's another quote. The pattern of acute kidney injury seems man caused, like from policy changes. Cms.gov NCTIP payout program and coercion of doctors by hospital administrators and medical certification boards to use the deadly NIH COVID nineteen treatment protocols. You see the top graph, sudden kidney failure. The bottom graph is COVID, and these are smoothed with fifty one day rolling average curve smoothing. So something could have happened another twenty five days earlier if it was stark. You you'll see it twenty five days later in the graph. But for the most part, the the curve smoothing really helps visualize what happened. And you see on November 2, that red line, you see where it says November 2? I think you can see my mouse, so I'll do this. It jumps above the the gray dash lines, which I put in for bands. You see this is normal, and there was a blip in early twenty twenty. Right? That's the first COVID wave right there. A lot of old people died also with kidney failure. You say, well, it's it's COVID. Well, not really. That takes another explanation that I'll I'll save for another day. But that doesn't explain when COVID went down. Look at what happened over here in the 2122. It's extremely out of control. Not only that, but see how the, the troughs, the baselines return within the the guardrails, and they're in the low point. Even in the 2020, look how deep into this band. So after the first wave of COVID, look how low it goes right here. The troughs never go back in that band. They're they're just touching it up here, and then there there are no troughs here. There's a massive amount of deaths, and this lines up. See, COVID, there's your little COVID, and then here's your second one. So it is seasonal. And then look at this pump. The third wave of COVID, as small as it is, is consistent with this pump. But the troughs are a second signal, and this is what nobody else has found out. All all the big doctors and scientists out there with their, evidence based medicine peer review research, randomized control trial, blah blah blah. It's basically a box. They they were put in a box thirty years ago with EVM, and they can't see outside the box because, you know, science didn't exist before thirty years ago in EBM. We didn't get where we were thirty years ago, through a couple hundred years with just the plain old scientific method. No. ABM's much better, and they don't realize that it's just a control mechanism, and they're all robots stamping out the same thing over and over using inferential statistical methods, which I I ranted in my substack yesterday. I won't get into that now. What else? The families will never give up. We support you. You know, somebody lost a family member and knows that this is all true. They did dastardly things in hospitals, and I say they. You know, they're good people that work in hospitals. They're also not so good people. And nothing has changed over time. My mother was an x-ray technician. She worked in a hospital. Some people were good, some people were not good. Some people cared for patients. For some people, it was just the job, and to have a patient is an annoyance. They might have to take their break a little later, and so they're angry at the patient for even walking through the doors. It's just the way people are. So for those who see it as just a job, they have no qualms about killing people with certain drugs, just doing what they're told, and try to go on with their day. People die. So what? That goes on in hospitals. So let's see. 300% of normal, in '22, only the third summer. So in the third summer, notice this little brown line right here. The graph is tuned to this very high COVID peak. But if the if that peak wasn't there, this would be a big gap in the summer. You can see the space, the white space. It went to zero. It went to zero. It didn't go to zero. Why did COVID not return in the summer to zero? In the third summer. One, two, three. That's negative efficacy. That's just terrible. Next slide. This is complicated. What we have here is, because I have record level source data, I can do sorts on different things, and one of them is I want to know people who died with acute renal failure. What percentage of them died with COVID also resident on the death record? And for these first three waves, the percentage of people who died with acute renal failure was almost fifty percent. Half of the acute renal failure deaths also had COVID on their death records. They entered a hospital. They got a positive COVID test. They were given a treatment. And I'm just gonna say it. The treatment's probably what killed their kidneys and killed them. And so on those death records is also the fact that they had COVID. Fifty percent. And then boom, like a switch. After March 2022, it's at most thirteen percent. And these are I don't even know what these are, like, five percent. All of a sudden, COVID had nothing to do with the acute renal failure deaths. But if you remember the other graph look at look at this graph. Acute renal failure is still going up from from this point on. It's higher. Okay. Acute renal failure is higher, but none of them have anything to do with COVID. It's a second signal. It's the vaccine. Multi organ failure with the vaccine. Micro clotting, impairing the servicing of the kidneys, which need blood supply to survive, or or something else to do with the vaccine. So this shows right here. You have one, it has something to do with COVID, like you go to the hospital for COVID and you get treated and they kill you. And then the other one, all of a sudden, it's got nothing to do with COVID, but it's still getting higher. And what you would say is that really the vaccine began in here. And if you were to go back to the other graph, you see in '21, the troughs are not returning to zero in the summer. This is acute renal failure, not COVID up top. The troughs are not returning to zero. It is a steady progressive upswing that coincides with the uptake of the vaccine. More people vaccinated. More people vaccinated. More people vaccinated. And so even in the summertime, that's two separate signals. One is sinusoidal and follows the winter seasonal respiratory virus, COVID, if you wanna call it that, and I believe it's a real disease. I don't wanna argue with with the other people, the novirus people. I I don't care. Something is going on in the winter where people get sick, they get nervous because it's difficult to breathe, and you get scared when you can't breathe, and you seek help. You go to the hospital, and these people were killed. But you see that the bump and the bump and the bump. And even this bump, that is seasonal. It's a completely separate signal from the troughs, the bottoms of these lines that are also going up. Nobody's taking the vaccine anymore, so then it's going down, but people are still struggling and dying. Alright. I hope I got the understanding of this graph out there. The percentage having to do with COVID of of the acute renal failure deaths. It's on, then it's off. Alright? But the way it manifests in reality is slowly going up starting in 2021. So this is from paragraph six of the Connecticut memorandum series volume two. Very likely to be hospital protocol caused acute kidney injury involved death up until early twenty twenty two. Tested positive in hospital, immediately administered remdesivir, then prepped for mechanical ventilation by administration of immunomodulator. Sometimes that was baricitinib, also called Olumiant, an antianxiety medication, an opioid pain medication, fentanyl, general anesthetic, a sedative. So this is like midazolam, lorazepam, dexmedetomidine, propofol, and fentanyl. That was the classic one. There are variations of the opioid that was used and variations on the others too. Alright. Here's another quote. There must be a reason why the correlation practically stopped. Now remember the last slide. The correlation. Right? It practically stopped. Multi organ failure often includes acute kidney injury, and multi organ failure is a known effect of COVID vaccination. The two signals are likely from one, hospital protocols, and two, gene drug vaccine adverse events. That's what I was saying before. There are two signals. So theories, however, are not evidence. The issue cannot move to what is causing this massive epidemic of AKI until state officials from Connecticut and other states dutifully recognize the epidemic. Yes. It's there. It exists. It's so stark. Nobody can miss it. It's worse than a hundred years. And begin an immediate investigation. They should be immediately investigating this. And what I'm saying here is they have all the records. They can immediately investigate this. Also, this is from the COVID nineteen treatment guidelines. This notice comes up when I bring up the web page, the final update. Final update of NIH COVID nineteen treatment guidelines was on 02/29/2024. So they're already calling it the final update. I don't know if you realize what's going on here. They're telling you in February 29, they're not gonna change anything about COVID treatment. Does that mean they're declaring the disease won't ever change, won't ever mutate, won't ever change its its causes of symptoms, and that how they're going to treat it is never gonna change because it's over. It's the final update. We're not gonna do our job anymore on this. And they say PDFs of the guidelines can be downloaded until 08/16/2024 when the website will be shut down. They're gonna shut down the website. This government malfeasance in killing the people. People don't think through what what are the duties, what is it in reaction to, what are the laws that enable them to do this to us. They're not saying we're treating this disease based on what the disease shows us in society, and we can react to it in weeks, which my system, by the way, can do if I had access to their servers for what people are going to the doctor for and what people are dying from, it's an early warning system, my system, that can show what people are dying from and find any anomalies. You just write some code, call it AI if you want. It's not really AI. If you hit certain thresholds of anomalous, call it standard deviations above norm, then it would trigger, oh, look at this. B cell lymphocytic leukemia in these three ZIP codes was 400% of normal for the last three weeks. Oh, boy. You got a problem. You know, that that's the type of thing my system can find and what they should have been doing for the last thirty years in computers. Okay. What does it say? Since remdesivir was recommended by the NIH on 04/21/2020, there appears to be very little change to the recommended COVID nineteen treatment program, nor does there appear to be any studies of these treatment protocols in more than four years. Final update, February 29. They're shutting the site down. August 16. Why? And why didn't they change the protocols from 04/21/2020? They did some little study where they looked at remdesivir. They actually use Massachusetts and some in Connecticut. The remdesivir study that was done, when you look at Massachusetts, it looks nothing like Minnesota because the first wave in Massachusetts had kidney injury in it. But Massachusetts was the site for the biggest remdesivir trial. What a coincidence. And Minnesota that had a first wave of COVID didn't have any any excess at all in acute renal failure. And here's what I show. I'm ahead of my graphs. So as you look at this, I call this prevalence of cause on the right. So on the left, each waveform is Minnesota, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. So within this red box, there is no raw data. This is raw data, by the way, with a fifty one day rolling average curve smoothing. There is no signal. You see that there's nothing here. This is acute renal failure. But Massachusetts has a big spike of acute renal failure in the first wave of COVID in 2020. This is the 2020. And Connecticut has a little, but substantial. It's substantial. It's it's a lot more than normal. It's there. Now what I call prevalence of cause, what is it? And I look at this every day. I take it. I do the fifty one day curve smoothing, and then I compare every day. 01/01/2015 through 12/31/2023, every single day. And I say, was the all cause that day? How many people died from all causes? Number of total people who died in the state. And I just divide the two, and that's the prevalence of cause. What is the prevalence of an acute renal failure death on that day in Minnesota or Massachusetts or Connecticut? And the reason I do that is because in this wave right here in Massachusetts, all cause was eight thousand eight hundred excess people died. A lot of really old people died, and what happened is the old people died with a lot of things. They have ongoing things. Old people have thrombus related issues. They have kidney related issues, liver cancers. And so when you wipe out eighty eight hundred of them in nine weeks, more than normal, it makes everything go high. But does it go high as a percentage of overall deaths? And that's why I do the division. I I divide the two, and it's the prevalence of cause. I haven't seen any of the scientists do this, but it really shows what's actually happening. And when you do that, you see in Minnesota, it's even less, slightly, but there's no signal. Still. And when you divide by the total deaths, I just told you the eighty eight hundred deaths. Massachusetts' big wave over here, nearly disappears. I have to squint to look at it. There's something there. It was a few more than normal of acute renal failure, but you can actually say it was that eighty eight hundred. That's what did it. So I hope this is being understood, because when you go down to Connecticut and you see this substantial spike right here on the left with the raw data, and you go to the right and look at prevalence of cause, there's nothing there. So, yeah, there's nothing there. When you divide by all cause death, you see the prevalence of cause. So what you're looking at is COVID didn't cause this. The acute renal failure deaths, COVID was around for almost a full year in Connecticut, almost a full year before it departed what would be considered normal based on these bands. Okay. AKI was not a major issue in 2020 until December. Don't forget, here's that December line. And and that's the 11/02/2020, that's when the NCTAP program kicked in. If you incentivize something, you'll get more of it. They incentivized behavior, they got the behavior they incentivized, and they killed people in hospitals with whether it's remdesivir, baricitinib, or the rest of the cocktail and ventilators. Excess acute kidney injury in 2020 was nearly all because so many people died in that first wave. I told you about that. And prevalence of cause, I explained that. Moving on. Okay. Paragraph eight of the Connecticut Memorandum series volume two. Extrapolation of the three states. If I were to take those three states, and I showed you the tables, the thirty five hundred excess deaths in Massachusetts, twenty four hundred in Minnesota, seventeen twenty one in Connecticut, and you divide by the percentage of which is I think it's four point nine percent of The United States, it comes out to a hundred and fifty five thousand excess, more than normal fatalities of acute kidney injury twenty to twenty three. It's the biggest epidemic. And I say that with confidence because I have all the ages, and I can do an analysis by age, and I'm talking life years lost. If you look at the average age of death being 75.8 throughout those years or close to it, you take the difference between the the victims and the average age of death, how many years of life did they lose? A 25 year old loses fifty years of life. An 81 year old, I just assigned the value of one. They lost one year of life. And as you do this and you look at COVID and you look at smallpox and everything else, there's nothing greater than acute kidney injury or acute renal failure, sudden kidney failure. There's nothing greater in a hundred years except for World War two. That's it. More facts. Let's see. So in paragraph nine, note when the dash line and the dash line is this is fiscal year. So this is the fiscal year of 07/01/2020 through 06/30/2021, and there's a reason why I do that. I show both calendar and fiscal in my graphs, and I have hundreds, probably over a thousand graphs of this. In another document, you can see them all. So the dashed line clearly depicts that the acute kidney injury epidemic began in December 2020 right here. Right? Here's December. The gap starts widening. And as the gap widens between the gray lines, are 2015 through 2019, as this gap widens, that means there's more and more and more happening than normal. If it goes up and stays parallel, that means it was only an event when it went up. When it's parallel, it's not more than the other one. But this gap widens the entire time. Please now note that data is not just numbers. Yeah. I gotta say this again. I don't like graphs because graphs are people. Every pixel on here represents a person. And, you know, people lost a lot of family members, whether it's children, parents, brothers, sisters, friends. I like to say that more often. I'm surprised I got to this point. I'm gonna read some questions again, see what's going on. Made it very clear. Good. The EBM is a farce. Good. So there's no direct questions. I'll move on. And again, this is from a document that was given to the officials of the state of Connecticut, and I can prove that they all got it two months ago. So paragraph 10, approximately twelve hundred hospital homicide cases are documented at the website COVID nineteen Humanity Betrayal Memory Project. They're a great group. They are involved in some lawsuits. They've documented hospital homicides to a degree that nobody else in the world has. It's a great resource. If you lost somebody, please go register it at their website. Please now note that data is not just numbers. I've said that in the last one. So these are true accounts of criminal conduct. The NIH treatment protocols killed these people. Omission of investigation constitutes deliberate indifference to life. That's a mens rea standard used mostly in the federal level. States have things like criminal negligence, but the the original, like, common law terms are you got purposeful, knowing, reckless, and negligent. Those are four different levels of mens rea or the criminal mind. Deaths that flow from omission of investigation and remedial action constitutes murder. Investigation is the primary mission of the Connecticut Department of Public Health agents. Omission of their primary mission is willful in light of a legal duty to act. And a legal duty to act, I've explained before, is if you take a job to do something and the public relies on you to do it, and your purposeful omission of that conduct or you purposely don't wanna do it, then you're responsible for what happens, not just in a negligent way, but in a purposeful criminal way, such as a lifeguard that watches a boy drown and says, that was kind of fun to watch, and he just wanted to see him drown. He had a legal duty to save that boy. He was trained, and he took that spot as a lifeguard away from somebody else. The same goes for people at the Department of Public Health. They're alerted to imminent danger of harm to society. They have a legal duty to investigate. Okay. Arguments and analysis is another section after the the facts. You remember I was I was numbering the paragraphs. I was telling you paragraph number 10. Those are called enumerated paragraphs. Those are factual allegations. They have facts in them. And now I'm describing what happened in those facts, and I'm applying some law to it and some analysis. So Connecticut state agents have a legal duty to act on the factual information provided herein. You are like lifeguards. You took the job. People are drowning in front of your eyes. If you do nothing, then you are criminally liable for their unnatural deaths. And a homicide is an unnatural death. It doesn't mean it's a murder or even manslaughter. Homicide just is the unnatural killing of a human by another human. Homicide. Hominid, you know, people. The public relies on you to investigate and alert them of epidemics of death and maim. That is your contract with the people. Breach of this social contract is criminal. Any reasonable person would believe that an investigation is immediately required for the safety of the public. Connecticut's own vital records were compiled, graphed, and served to you in a concise manner. I did all the work. I'm showing them all these deaths. I can name every one of those 1,721 people. They have all their names. They have a legal duty to do a modicum of the work that I did to save the people of Connecticut from harm. More argument and analysis. You've been notified, it's an important word, of the epidemic of acute kidney injury. You are in a knowing state of mind. To be convicted of murder, you must have a requisite mental state at the time of the action or inaction inaction, remember, omission of conduct, that caused an unnatural loss of life. The mental states that rise through second degree murder are knowing and reckless. So purposeful is a first degree murder standard. You intended to kill that person with deliberation and premeditation. Knowing and reckless, still murder, but not first degree, and they're also not negligent. And don't confuse criminal negligence. Criminal negligence is reckless. It's confusing the way some states write that. Criminal negligence and deliberate indifference. Those those are two other terms states use, deliberate indifference. I believe the Fed uses that a lot in cases. But these are all mental states, and it's murder. It's not manslaughter. K? There's there's a difference. The average person does not have a legal duty to investigate an epidemic, but they do. They took the job. Your mere inaction to investigate while in a knowing state of mind that people are dying at epidemic rates from acute kidney injury is enough for conviction. If you do not immediately and earnestly investigate these acute kidney injury deaths, it is equivalent to a boy drowning while you as a lifeguard make some popcorn and sit in the lifeguard chair watching him go under and die. These are quotes from the document that I gave them. If you do nothing, then you are betting that National Institutes of Health hospital protocols and COVID gene drug vaccines are not causal in the deaths of a million people in The United States. Or you are betting there will never be an administration that comes into power that will investigate and prosecute deliberate indifference murder with a depraved heart. The recommendation section below provides you a simple investigation procedure. Again, just do your job. I mean, that's all I'm asking. All I'm asking is do your job. I mean, this is just so easy to me for them to do. I'm one guy. They have how many thousand I don't know how many thousands of people work there. Don't know what they do, but they're not doing public health. Alright. A, under the investigation and planning recommendations, immediately verify the Connecticut data herein provided. You will learn that there is indeed a century level epidemic of AKI death in Connecticut and every other state in the country. I'm trying to get somebody from England to take a look at theirs. They had the midazolam culling or kill off or whatever you wanna call it, murder. So I'm wondering if they use different protocols, maybe it manifested in different causes of death that were in excess. I'd really like to know that. I just don't have time to investigate. Anyway, so let's say b, begin investigating the younger groups. It will be easier and faster to find anomalies in younger age groups. Ninety four deaths in Connecticut from 2020 through 2023 involving acute kidney injury in ages 25 to 44. A hundred and eighty four involved deaths in the period in the forty five to fifty four age group. You see what I'm saying? If you go into an investigation, you go and look at all of them, it's like, wow. There's like a few thousand people for me to look at, and they had other causes of death. Well, yeah, that's old people. If you look at younger people and there are fewer causes of death, they died from fewer things because younger people are generally healthy. You can have a guy or maybe three investigators. You can go through these hundred and eighty four and ninety four deaths pretty quickly. And you can very quickly determine from a forensic investigation of their medical files, which the state would have access to. From those medical files, you you have their vital signs every hour while they're in the hospital. You have the blood labs every day. What were their creatinine levels? What were their liver enzymes? You have the medications they got, whether oral or intravenous, to the minute when they got them. It's in the notes. It would not take a week or two to determine what caused acute kidney failure. So I write, obtain entire hospital file without notice so that it cannot be tampered with. They're the state. They can say, give it to me now. We have a court order, We don't need a court order. We have the administrative license to to do so. Alright. Under that, like I was saying, build a timeline, vital signs, diagnosis and orders, blood labs, imaging, medicaments, procedures. Were they vaccinated? How many times was it written in the file that they were vaccinated? If you don't know why I wrote that, I'll do number three and then I'll explain. Was there a different course of treatment for the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated? We need to know that. I mean, we know it. Some of us know it. Some of us know it, especially the families who lived through it know it. When certain hospitals and certain people found out that somebody was not vaccinated, they got the full treatment that very few people are gonna survive. They killed the unvaccinated, and they drove up COVID death numbers by doing so. Sorry. It's not just how I feel. When you speak to people and you get the data, that's a fact. Problem is I need the official data from medical files, and that takes a lot. For me, it's almost impossible. For the for any state government, it's a week's worth of work. They're hiding all of it. So d, interview family members. What was said, what was heard, what they thought they were signing? Was there a DNR, do not resuscitate? Who requested it? Was it coerced? And then publish the results, inform the people. Then the people will individually decide whether to consent under natural law and individual liberties to radical experimental gene therapy drugs and NIH recommended COVID nineteen protocols. When the people get informed, they're not gonna take these things. The problem is they've kept us from being informed. Conclusions. Well, I think it's pretty obvious there's an epidemic of acute kidney injury in Connecticut. The AKI epidemic claimed more life years and affected more families than did the disease named COVID. Also, than polio, more than smallpox, more than h one n one, more than Hong Kong flu, or anything else except for World War two. There is not a statute of limitations for murder. Qualified and sovereign immunities do not avail to criminal charges. Officials have a legal duty to immediately investigate and prevent further injury and death. Inaction and failure to investigate could possibly lead to murder charges. Many, for the rest of their lives, will pursue criminal prosecution of officials who knowingly refuse to investigate acute kidney injury, a result of NIH, FDA, and CDC. The righteous way to proceed is to uncover truth in order to protect life and liberty. I'm going to stop sharing now. Anybody has any questions, please type them in the Rumble search bar. Did you see what I was trying to do with the document? Do you understand that it lasts forever? And even if it's twenty years from now, when somebody does a full analysis, they'll be able to look back through the records and find that they were informed, they were alerted, they did know. I've put them in the knowing state of mind, which is so important for criminal prosecution. Nothing's gonna get done unless people feel personally that their safety or their their life or their their freedom is threatened. Individuals who think that they have the protection of the government will continue to kill, maim, injure, disturb the public. They don't care. You know what they care about? If they're gonna go to jail. They're gonna stop doing what they're doing as soon as laws are enforced. And I just hope that, you know, whether it's Cash Patel or Robert f Kennedy junior, whoever becomes AG, I don't have a law degree, but I'm pretty smart and I can work hard. Please invite me there, and I wanna clean this up. Nope. Nothing's gonna change if people are allowed to continue to kill a million Americans as they have. They're gonna kill another million if they can. It needs to stop.
JohnBeaudoinSr
Posted - November 30, 2024 at 8:19 PM
Saved - December 1, 2024 at 1:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I express my concern for Alexis Lorenze's health as she deals with thrombocytopenia purpura and skin necrosis. I note the rising excess deaths related to D69.5 in California from 2022 to 2024, emphasizing that this trend is not linked to Covid. I question why there has been a significant increase in these deaths since 2022, despite no excess in 2020 and 2021. I urge state officials to investigate this alarming trend and wonder if public health is prioritizing the people or pharmaceutical interests.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

1/ God bless Alexis Lorenze. I hope she can heal from thrombocytopenia purpura and necrosis of skin tissue. I'm not sure of the diagnosis. That's just what it looks like to me. California D69.5 Secondary Thrombocytopenia All Ages Annual bar graph

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

2/ California All Ages Excess deaths involving D69.5 Secondary Thrombocytopenia It's only 2022 -2024. Remember that 2024 is no complete yet. It will get bigger. It's NOT Covid. Didn't happen in excess 2020-2021

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

3/ California All Ages D69.5 Thrombocytopenia PoC Adjustment for All-Cause excess deaths. Prevalence-of-Cause, D69.5 as % of All-Cause deaths 2020 and 2021 are NOT in excess. So WHAT is causing this, Governor, AG, Health Commissioner? Don't you have a legal duty to investigate? https://t.co/ss6RzURUV9

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

4/ California All-Cause deaths by year Quick reminder when the glut of purported Covid deaths were. https://t.co/IQoWtr0KQl

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

5/ California All ages All-Cause EXCESS deaths 2020 and 2021 had the MOST EXCESS deaths. But NOT D69.5 Thrombocytopenia in excess.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

6/ Source table from which California D69.5 graphs were formed. If anyone wants to verify the information, please go to CDC Wonder and do so. https://t.co/sYVFnJvzuh

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

7/ END Cali D69.5 Thrombocytopenia thread Baseline is reasonably in a range, then all of a sudden there is a 60% increase for 3 years in a row beginning 2022. These are NOT all old people Does CA public health work for The People or for pharma? Will they investigate earnestly?

JohnBeaudoinSr
Posted - November 29, 2024 at 6:37 AM
Saved - November 29, 2024 at 3:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I analyzed the data on acute kidney injury and excess deaths in Ohio, noting a significant discrepancy between overall excess deaths and those attributed to COVID-related acute kidney injury. In 2020, there were about 16,600 excess deaths, but only 625 were linked to AKI. I questioned the narrative that COVID caused this, suggesting that incentives for certain treatments may have contributed to the rise in deaths. I acknowledged my own mistakes in the analysis and emphasized the importance of accurate data interpretation.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

1/ Ohio N17 Acute Kidney Injury involved deaths by year Similar to all the states. Why is that? Ohio had about 16,600 excess deaths in 2020. If Covid caused AKI, why only 625 excess? (see next post) https://t.co/4JqZ8IzhO6

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

2/ Ohio Excess N17 Acute Renal Failure EXCESS by year I'll show all cause & all-cause excess at the end. It's insane to think Covid the disease did this. It did happen with the second wave of covid after CMS put a bounty on the heads of patients. Incentive to use killer drugs

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

3/ Ohio N17 AKI as a percentage of all-cause deaths https://t.co/zRb21Arc2Z

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

4/ Ohio All-Cause deaths by year Look at 2020 and 2021. Does ARF/AKI excess match this excess pattern of All-Cause excess? NO, it does not. It's NOT covid disease. It's coincident with covid at the end of 2020 when CMS put a bounty on people. A SPIFF payoff for certain drugs https://t.co/WUTDPOOvjh

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

5/ Ohio All-Cause Excess deaths by year Wow. Looks like the vx was a big success ... if you want the greatest excess death including greater than covid disease. https://t.co/nY55RuB8jC

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

The data if anyone wants to find the errors. I'm not perfect. I make mistakes every once in a great while. I made a mistake earlier tonight that really bothered me. But it's deleted and the fixed graphs are posted. Hey, @MendenhallFirm Do you understand the gravity of this? https://t.co/GCC0JFNIsb

JohnBeaudoinSr
Posted - November 11, 2024 at 2:54 AM
Saved - November 11, 2024 at 7:24 PM

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC

Because people still ignore the greatest loss of life in 100 years in USA except for WW2, here it is again. This is NOT from Covid. This is from NIH Covid treatment recommendations. The government killed ONE MILLION Americans This is more than 15% of those MILLION. https://t.co/lFyGNqVpgu

JohnBeaudoinSr
Posted - May 15, 2024 at 6:29 PM
Saved - May 15, 2024 at 7:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Defendants' fraudulent conduct is blamed for the existence of C19 vaccine mandates and the negative consequences that followed. The Amended Complaint highlights the need for a simple clerical task to avoid unnecessary work and potential deaths. The importance of protecting lives outweighs the privacy rights of the deceased. The disclosure of vaccination information is crucial to resolve vaccine controversies and allow the plaintiff to attend law school.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

1/ From the First Amended Complaint of Beaudoin v Baker et al (the MA govrnr, pub hlth commissioner, Chief ME, 4 MEs) "This Am. Compl. would not have been filed but for Defendants’ fraudulent conduct. C19 vaccine mandates would not exist but for Defendants’ fraudulent conduct. Fear and societal devolution fostering crime, overdoses, and suicides would not have happened but for Defendants’ fraudulent conduct. Beaudoin would be graduating law school in two (2) months but for Defendants’ fraudulent conduct. Any reasonable person knows that reversal of the fraud will redress the injury in fact."

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

2/ The Amended complaint is at the bottom of this webpage https://viaveravita.com/covid-19-vaccine-lawsuit-filings

COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuit filings – Via Vera Vita viaveravita.com

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

3/ @hippydippygirl said this thread was important. So now I have to post more important stuff. LOL. I thought I was done for today. I just migrated my old website and was checking to see if it works. Here's another quote "It would only take fifteen (15) minutes to look up the vaccination records of a few of the C19 vaccine-killed children listed in Beaudoin’s First Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) and EXHIBIT F. Hundreds of hours of work from all parties and the Court could have been avoided by fifteen (15) minutes of clerical work. Instead, it is seven (7) months later with perhaps thousands more dead in Massachusetts from C19 vaccines because Defendants refused fifteen (15) minutes of work. This is a prime example of “deliberate indifference.”

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

4/ "What kind of society do we live in if Commonwealth agents can violate felony statutes with impunity resulting in the deaths of healthy children agonizingly and painfully over days or months? The compelling governmental interest weighed on balance should be to protect the lives of citizens rather than protect the privacy right of the dead to keep hidden their vaccination information. Most of the dead would want their vaccination status known so that others may be saved from such battery, maim, and death. The Commonwealth stands on the graves of children seeking to obscure their own criminality under the auspices of privacy rights of the dead."

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

5/ "Regardless of whether C19 vaccines are “safe and effective” or neither safe nor effective, let the data be known to either win the minds of fence-sitters to vaccinate or to save the lives of babies in utero, children, pregnant mothers, and all who do not deserve to die after being lied to by our governments about what is “safe and effective.”"

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

6/ "Vaccination information of the dead is the key to all vaccine controversy. Let it be known to end this controversy for all and so that Beaudoin may attend law school."

JohnBeaudoinSr
Posted - December 26, 2023 at 7:02 AM
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 11:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: The author thanks David Freiheit for mentioning their video and announces the preorder availability of their book. Post 2: The author presents graphs showing a decrease in respiratory and pneumonia cases, as well as the disappearance of the flu in 2021. They suggest that flu cases were misreported as COVID-19 deaths for financial gain. Post 3: The author shares graphs indicating higher death rates among younger individuals in the third wave of COVID-19, questioning the efficacy of vaccines. Post 4: The author discusses the increase in deaths due to acute respiratory failure (ARF) in 2021 and 2022, suggesting a correlation with the Nov 2 CMS payment. Post 5: The author highlights a specific point on a graph related to the timing of financial incentives. Post 6: The author provides a clearer view of the correlation between the start of financial incentives and ARF excess deaths. Post 7: The author presents data from Minnesota, showing a divergence in 2020 after the introduction of financial incentives. Post 8: The author emphasizes the irrefutability of the visualized data, indicating a rise in deaths after the start of financial incentives. Post 9: The author expresses fatigue and shares a teaser about the CDC Memorandum, emphasizing that each number represents a person who died. Post 10: The author presents another page from the CDC Memorandum, highlighting excess deaths associated with cardiac issues and the COVID-19 vaccine. Post 11: The author shares a page from the CDC Memorandum discussing the potential risk of cancer associated with the COVID-19 vaccine and calls for action against those responsible.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

1/ Thanks much David Freiheit, THE VIVA FREI, for the callout in this video. I will add a few graphs from my book and memorandum, which are on preorder at the site listed on my profile and will ship in 2 weeks or so.

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

Going down the rabbit-hole of how Covid made the flu “disappear”… https://t.co/df4Tf3hleF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the disappearance of the flu during the COVID-19 pandemic and questions why it was not reported in statistics. They explore various explanations, including the idea that COVID-19 was more contagious and therefore outcompeted the flu. They also mention a study from Harvard suggesting that social distancing and mask-wearing measures effectively eradicated the flu. The speaker raises concerns about the inconsistency in the effectiveness of these measures against COVID-19. They also mention financial incentives for hospitals to diagnose COVID-19 cases, which may have led to misdiagnosis or overreporting. The speaker concludes that corruption and control may be behind these inconsistencies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, peeps. This is gonna be a little Blair Witch esque vlog. I was having a discussion with a family member, and we started talking about COVID, the pandemic, because what else are you gonna talk about during Christmas? Oh, 3 years into this pandemic, and I dropped a a statistic that I then had to immediately go fact check myself on. I'm talking and I say, do you not find it odd that the flu basically disappeared during COVID? And then I was immediately challenged. That's not true. And I was like, I'm gonna go fact check myself just to make sure. And lo and behold, I went down a rabbit hole. My wife has been saying that I've gotta think about something else. But For those of you who are not afflicted with OCD or ADHD or whatever obsessive compulsive disorder it is, I had gone down a rabbit hole of this piece of information that I knew that I knew that I've never really stopped to think about in thorough detail. For those of you who don't know, The flu which killed, I don't know, close to, I wanna say, 60,000 people in the US in 2017 to 2018 was It was apparently, like, the worst flu season, worldwide. In 2018, the flu season was so bad in Canada that they were canceling elective surgeries at hospitals because hospitals were overwhelmed. But I think it was 2016 to 2017 or 2017 to 2018 that was a wildly, virulent strain of the flu that killed tens of thousands of people, and I think the number is close to 60,000. You then fast forward to 2020 to 2021. The number was not even reported in a statistica, statistics about the flu deaths for that year. Like, it goes oddly enough from 2018 to 2019, 2019 to 2020, then 2021 to 2022. It skips the 2020 to 2021 year. And even more suspicious, in 2021 to 2022, they reported, like, 5,000 flu deaths in America, which is, like, a quarter of what it was during a typical flu season. And you read articles, and they do not hide the Fact that they are trying to convince the general population, the general public, that the flu all but disappeared during COVID. From Scientific American, Flu has disappeared for more than a year. Mask wearing, social distancing, and other steps to stop COVID nineteen have also curtailed influenza. That would seem to suggest that it also curtailed COVID nineteen. Oh, and then by the way, in pure gaslighting fashion, barely 8 months later, the fact checkers say, Fact check. Influenza virus is still active, hasn't, quote, disappeared, end quote. Can you believe the gaslighting? They are trying to make us think that we are going crazy. So I was not misremembering. It was in fact a correct memory, a correct understanding. The flu disappeared during COVID. Then I immediately began thinking, Don't wanna go down the conspiratorial rabbit hole. How could that be? And I began listening to people's explanations. I remember at the time, originally, when I had heard this statistic, the flu disappeared, and I questioned it back in the day. His name is ZDoggMD. He had an explanation that during, you know, a pandemic where you have competing respiratory viruses, obviously, that which is more contagious is gonna be the one that wins out. So, hence, in the battle between COVID and influenza, COVID was more contagious. Therefore, COVID, you know, defeated influenza, eradicating it effectively. Speaker 1: Now let's go back to SARS CoV 2. In this case, SARS completely supplanted influenza and, you know, RSV and these other upper airway, You know, infections that happen the same time a year. So could it be that it's a mix of everything? So We've shut down schools. We we've we've closed air travel. We've social distanced. We've masked. But then we've also got a large percentage of the population that is Infected or has been infected with SARS CoV 2 fired up interferon response and suppressed the rest off the circulating respiratory viruses, preventing this twindemic that we were talking about. Speaker 0: Other people pause it. And I mean, like, other people, experts, studies. I read a a a a summary of a study out of Harvard, which was hypothesizing that the reason influenza didn't spread and why we had virtually none of it, virtually none, since the outbreak of the COVID pandemic was because of social distancing, face masking, hygiene measures that were imposed on society as a whole, It basically eradicated, influenza. That's how effective it was. From a publication in Harvard School of Public Health A sharp drop in flu cases during COVID 19 pandemic. Precautions taken to fight the COVID nineteen pandemic, including wearing masks and distancing, are likely the major reason for a steep decline in flu cases in the US according to experts. Experts. Okay. Then how did it not work on COVID? I mean, the the you have to make that make sense. That's a square peg in a circle hole or whatever the expression is. Okay. The social distancing, hygiene, face masking measures were so effective, it eradicated influenza. And in 1 season, we magically made it drop to virtually 0, and yet it had no impact whatsoever on preventing the spread of COVID, or maybe it did maybe it would have been 10 times worse had we not done this, but it had very little impact seemingly. And according to a New York Times article, the face masks did nothing. Did we learn a lesson? So the measures worked for influenza, but not for COVID. You gotta make that make sense. Some people are saying, well, influenza spreads through bigger droplets, I don't know, closer contact. COVID was a much more contagious virus, and therefore, even these social distancing face masking measures, which worked on influenza, didn't work on COVID. Okay. Then why in the name of God's green earth Would we continue with these measures if, though effective against influenza, interesting enough, not effective against COVID, we continue with these measures? It makes no sense. It cannot make sense. And these are all just perfectly logical questions to be asked in the light of these statistics, which we are being told is the case. I go to the the Harvard study. Their biggest concern was not how to explain away the fact that influenza dropped to basically 0 because of these very effective measures which didn't work on COVID. Their concern was, let's just bypass that altogether. Let's just jump over that and worry about what's coming with future influenza, seasons because people hadn't been exposed to influenza for the last couple of years. Kistler, the Sperd also discussed how lower flu prevalence this year creates uncertainties about how the virus will evolve in the future. Quote, we have no idea how obliterating the flu for an entire year affects its evolution, end quote. He said, quote, we don't know if it's going to be easier to predict next year's flu strain because it hasn't been spreading as much or if it's going to be a lot harder because it's gone through this really tight evolutionary bottleneck, end quote. That's the concern. Not trying to explain away how all of this could possibly make sense. The most logical conclusion, and it's the one that, I think our viva barneslaw.locals.com community, the above average community there, hypothesizes and can offer some good evidence for. My bottom line conclusion is the only one that makes sense, I think, is that, basically, either they weren't testing for the flu during COVID and only testing for COVID And or they were just lumping all flu cases as COVID, lumping all flu infections, hospitalizations, deaths as COVID. Why would they be doing that? Showing the money. Well, there was this, unfortunate reality of financial incentives or at least financial compensation for COVID during a pandemic public health crisis. Hospitals were being compensated bonuses, premiums, amounts for COVID hospitalizations, for putting people on respirators. From an AP fact check, in thinking they were debunking another claim, this is what they actually admit. Hospital COVID payments tied to patient and treatment, not deaths. Oh, please do go on, AP. AP's assessment, false. Hospital industry officials and public health Experts confirm the federal government provides hospitals with enhanced payments for treating COVID 19 patients, but the payments are only currently applicable to those on Medicare. The enhanced payments, which are slated to end in May, also aren't contingent on a patient's death, but on the treatment or services provided to the patients, they said. They were being offered a financial compensation for these COVID infections. Whether or not that would influence people to reflexively or even, dare I say, potentially inaccurately, label a a, influenza hospitalization as a COVID because, look, they're in there for Respiratory. Anyhow, it's sort of a a, you know, a symptom determined, diagnosis. In any event, why not? We're gonna get a little bit of a financial incentive. Well, you read of one fact check-in particular, which is shocked and outraged at the idea that there might have been some indirect subconscious incentivizing to, overstate COVID hospitalizations, COVID deaths because of this financial incentive. They said no no one would ever do that. It it was fact checked false. No hospitals are not lying about COVID infections and COVID deaths for monetary gain. You notice how they impute intention and they impute causality so as to jump over just bypass The observation itself, which was whether or not hospitals were in fact being financially incentivized for COVID diagnosis, COVID deaths, respiratory, treatments, etcetera. From factcheck .org, the most reliable of fact checkers, and, yes, I'm being sarcastic, hospital payments and the COVID nineteen death count posted on April 21, 2020. My, we really didn't have much information at the time now, did we? Or hospitals inflating the number of COVID 19 cases and deaths so they can be paid more. Numerous readers have asked us about such claims, some of which imply that hospitals are making money by simply listing patients as having the disease when in fact the payments referenced are for treating patients. And while some of the posts imply that fraud may be afoot, multiple experts told us that such theories of hospitals deliberately miscoding patients as COVID 19 patients are not supported by the evidence. Quote, there's an implication here that hospitals are over reporting their COVID patients because they have an economic advantage in doing so, which is really an outrageous claim, end quote. Gerald Kaminski, senior fellow at the UCLA Center For Health Policy Research, told us. And he said any suggestion that patients may be put on ventilators of a financial gain, Not medical need, quote, is basically saying physicians are violating their Hippocratic oath. It would be like providing heart surgery on someone who doesn't need it, end quote. One fact check that I read said doctors wouldn't falsely diagnose them with COVID because that would violate their Hippocratic Oath. To which I immediately think, If I can find a doctor who's gonna lop off the healthy breasts of a young girl in the name of gender affirming care, I'll find an unscrupulous doctor that's to misdiagnose someone with COVID if it means that they're gonna get whatever 1,000 of dollars, bonus compensation, because of the health care system and the way it's been When you financially incentivize something, you don't have to coerce. It just becomes part of the system. And just to add something here as I edit while I walk back from the Cornfield, financial motivation is not the only type of relevant motivation. You can have fear as a, very important motivating factor here because I've interviewed people who have confirmed that at the time, what about they were slapping patients on ventilators for whatever extra financial gain they might get? They were doing it even if it wasn't necessarily in the best Medical interest of the patient because they were scared of getting the virus. And they thought by putting them on respirators, it would somehow protect the people, the nurses, the doctors, other patients, because their air will be recirculated into their own body and they wouldn't be spreading their COVID germs around there. Fear is a very, very good motivator, almost as good as financial motivation. Alright. Back to the video. When I had on John Beaudoin senior, just recently who was explaining to me that the spike in renal failure reports of renal failure, in fact, didn't coincide with the authorization to prescribe Remdesivir. It coincided with the financial incentivizing to diagnose with Remdesivir, as a as a treatment. That's when you notice a spike in renal. So the financial aspect of it, it creates the ecosystem. It creates the environment for it. And so this fact check which says Doctors would not be so unscrupulous to misdiagnose, etcetera, etcetera, because that would violate their Hippocratic Oath. Well, things are going fast in the pandemic. Someone comes into the hospital with certain symptoms. It's the logical thing to do, and it certainly explains how influenza diagnoses, infections, deaths Basically went to 0. This is what we call an orgy of evidence. No many orgies I had as a homicide cop or How many? None. This was all arranged. So one heck of a rabbit hole to go down and, at the end of the day, money corrupts everything. And at the end of the day, there are things that cannot and do not make sense, and people are very willing just to forgive and forget and move on. That's behind us. The wholesale corruption of the healthcare system, the health authority system, governments, everything, Wholesale corruption for financial gain, for narrative control, for compliance control. If the masks and the social distancing did not work for COVID, then why continue to implement it? Make sense of that without reflexively thinking control subordination of a population. But try to make sense of any of this. It can't make sense unless you adopt a nefarious financially motivated, modus operandi. That was my rabbit hole thought process of this very question. It's weird and can be very difficult to make sense of without Going into dark places. Alright. Well, this is a beautiful, it's a beautiful forest. I mean, this is beautiful weather. You know what to do if you like this stuff. Like, share, subscribe, hit the notification Join our viva barneslaw.locals.comcommunity, where you can partake in this aggregate wealth of knowledge, a community that knows its stuff that keeps others in check, that share knowledge and information with other members of the community so that we can all, as a whole, get much smarter, understand what's going on, and react better to the world around Go. Merry Christmas, and I'll see you before New Year's, but happy New Year's. The first sign of corruption in a society that is still alive is that the end justifies the means. George Bernanos. I can't say I understand this, but it sounds deep.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

2/ As for the flu conversation, here is Figure 19.12 from page 254 of "THE REAL CdC - PUBLIC HEALTH CRIMES 2020-2022" Respiratory "J" codes went down 2020 to 2021 and 2022. So did Pneumonia unspecified (notice the numbers) So did Viral pneumonia. So did covid Bacterial pneumonia went UP (or you can say it was flat) WHY? Why did MORE people die as a percentage of overall deaths and more in total number die from bacterial pneumonia in the years of the vx??? Now for flu. The numbers in 2020 occurred mostly BEFORE covid hit in March. That is, Jan, Feb comprise most of the 2020 flu numbers. But look at 2021. POOF - GONE. Where'd flu go. That "Long Live Freedom" guy was absolutely right. Do NOT stop investigating at flu though. Massachusetts purported 5,579 covid deaths in 2021. Look at 2021 for flu codes. Combine the two codes. It's 421. So ... yeah ... they stole flu to make up covid deaths to get money. But that's 421 is LESS THAN TEN PERCENT of 5,579.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

3/ Before moving on to renal failure timing, here's Figure 19.8 from my book. The 85+ age group is what a disease should look like. It's a damped harmonic style where the amplitude of each wave is diminishing until gone. But look at all the ages younger than 55. After being vx'd, people under 55 died MORE in the third wave of cvid than the first or second waves of cvid. That seems to me to be negative efficacy. No matter what it is, you cannot explain it. Those young people were exposed to covid in TWO FULL SEASONS before succumbing in the THIRD WAVE. WHY?????

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

4/ I don't know if I'm supposed to do this, but this is an actual page out of my book. See the ARF deaths and how they grow over time. I earlier explain the differences among seasonal externalities, linearly increasing externalities, and steady-state externalities. Now look at the utter MASSIVE numbers of deaths. Some were greater in 2020 BEFORE remdesivir. People who died in excess had some ARF issues as well. BUT, those were culled and not available to die in 2021 and 2022. But MORE ... MANY MORE died in 2021 and 2022 after the Nov 2 CMS dot gov payment NCTAP kicked in. And as the waveform shows, the system is a combination of seasonal externality and linearly increasing externality. There are TWO externalities derived from the graphs. I know it's confusing without the context of several pages of explanation. And the book is more about people than graphs. This is only one page.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

5/ This is not from my book. This is from page F-2 of EXHIBIT F from "The CDC Memorandum" that will ship in a few weeks. Also on preorder at TheRealCdC dot com Notice the dashed line in the really lower right corner of the graph. There is an arrow pointing at it. That's when the money kicked in.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

6/ Here's a better view. Begin money = begin ARF excess deaths https://t.co/PtoPJ6qSvL

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

7/ If you think it's only MA, guess again. This is in all states. But I only have record-level source data from MA and MN. Sooooo .... here's Minnesota. Notice the lower LEFT graph. See the arrow. Notice that dashed line 2020 pulls away from the gray plots 2015-2019 a couple weeks after the money kicks in from CMS dot gov Page F-7 from EXHIBIT F of "The CDC Memorandum"

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

8/ Here's a better view. For all the trolls, this is just data visualized for regular people to see and understand. This is irrefutable. Trolls have no where to go with this stuff. They're boxed in. It's just true official state data visualized. Notice the arrow. Notice the rise AFTER the money kicked in.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

9/ I'm tired and it's 2:32 AM. So here's one more teaser unrelated to Viva's video, but it's very telling. The CDC Memorandum has about 400 graphs of all types of data up through the first half of 2023. This NOT JUST DATA. Every number you see is a PERSON who DIED and had a family and friends. See the FOUR 25-44 aged people in 2022. They had kids and were kids. They're gone. It stared in 2021 and did NOT show excess in 2020, the year of massive numbers of covid deaths in Massachusetts. Look through the age groups. Look at the fiscal year bar graph at the bottom. How many got killed by the jabs. We KNOW sudden blood loss anemia NON-TRAUMATIC is associated with the jabs. The thrombocytopenia graphs show the same thing. Oh heck I'll just post another page after this one and then I'll go to bed.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

10/ Page B-7 of The CDC Memorandum See, no excess in 2020 despite HUGE covid deaths numbers. Oh, but it's only 66 excess people in 2021 and 2022 combined. Yes, but this is ONE ICD-10 code. There are 3,000 excess cardiac arrest deaths, 500 excess PE deaths, 400 cardiac arrhythmia deaths, and many others. Easily 4,500 excess deaths in MA alone from causes associated with the jab and timed to the jab. People gotta wake up and ensure this never happens again. NO MRNA JABS EVER. They cannot correct them. And other jabs are bad, too. They all SUK.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

11/ Page E-5 from The CDC Memorandum If they didn't get you with the acute issues of clotting and bleeding, then there's still a chance you'll end up with cancer. So sorry to write it like that. People gotta get angry. Raise hell. Throw all the murderers out and then prosecute them. You can read this for yourself. Both calendar year and fiscal year graphs here to show 2023 increasing still. END of THREAD - gnite

JohnBeaudoinSr
Posted - March 19, 2023 at 3:10 AM
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 11:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a series of posts, the author discusses the link between strokes and COVID-19 vaccines. They present data from Massachusetts, highlighting cases of strokes in individuals of various age groups, including children. The author questions the CDC's denial of a connection between strokes and vaccines, citing a report by six doctors from Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital. They also criticize the CDC's handling of the VAERS system and accuse them of negligence. The author concludes by calling for an end to COVID-19 vaccinations based on the information presented.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

1/ STROKES - phone video from Feb 23, 2023 Some new format slides to see a lot on each slide and compare to what happened with All-Cause and Covid on the same slide in portrait orientation. STROKES STROKES STROKES MANY MANY STROKES

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the prevalence of strokes and heart issues. They mention that strokes are difficult to track due to the various codes used to classify them. The speaker shares graphs showing that strokes occur more frequently in women, accounting for about 65% of cases. In contrast, heart issues seem to affect more men and boys. The speaker expresses concern about the underreporting of deaths and misclassification of COVID-related deaths. They also mention the lack of proper monitoring and inputting of data into the reporting system. The video concludes with a thank you and a blessing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, all. Strokes day. I wanted to write an article and all that but a lot of people are dying. I just don't have time. The presentation is done, I just need to present it. So why don't I just say let's do a video. Down below, I'm going to put in a lot of graphs there regarding strokes. Strokes are extremely difficult to find not because they're not happening. They're happening a lot but there are so many different ICD ten codes it for them. I had to manually go through tens of hours creating all these graphs from individual codes. So the ones that were high, I'll put down below. The fact is, they are happening. They're happening quite a bit. 65, 35 women, men. So about 65% of them are women. With the heart stuff, it seems to be just the opposite. More men and boys. A lot of people are dying and they're hiding all of it. Not only do they not report to bears but they're calling some of them COVID deaths when they clearly are not COVID deaths. And they're saying bears should be monitored, but they're not inputting them into bears. Thank you for listening. God bless you all.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

2/ CDC is dancing with a Limited Hangout again. They're admitting a "rare" and "over 65" issue with the kill_shots and STROKES. TRUTH = In MA alone, a quick look shows 12yo girl, 17yo girl, 30yo woman and hundreds of elderly. Just a sampling in one state https://nypost.com/2023/01/14/cdc-investigating-pfizer-covid-vaccine-for-stroke-risk/

CDC investigating whether Pfizer COVID vaccine increases stroke risk for people over 65 The CDC is investigating whether the Bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine creates an increased risk of ischemic stroke in people 65 and older. nypost.com

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

3/ To see the full presentation on strokes from vexine that I mentioned in the video above, go to this link for Jonathan Couey's podcast Gigaohm Biological. https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1752664257

Twitch Twitch is the world's leading video platform and community for gamers. twitch.tv

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

4/ After seeing the MA data, you can decide for yourself if there's no link. Are you really going to trust the CDC (GUMMINT) to tell you the truth? Hell no. They've been lying from the beginning. Here is a new format of graphs. See how All-Cause and Covid went down 2020 to 2021 https://t.co/GZfQfbbqVv

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

5/ Top of each block is accumulated deaths over each year. Bottom of each block is daily deaths smoothed. Look at that 9-week pandemic in 2020 black. What's up with 2021 and 2022? Did someone spray stroke around ? https://t.co/HOwir1HdMK

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

6/ Age groups for those who want to see how many kids and middle age people are dying from strokes and stroke-related brain and neuro issues. https://t.co/bcZsIFgBoM

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

7/ More codes of age groups. All-Cause and covid on each page to compare. https://t.co/PXhm7DRDqf

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

8/ Last group of graphs. I'll post some of the story of individuals again. It'll be interesting how many trolls show up to try to dispute these. There are no statistics. This is just data. Trolls who push the kill_shot have a tough time without p-values and RCT peer review. https://t.co/eRRGHHtlMj

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

9/ Diane was 62yo and died of an intracranial hemorrhage with thrombocytopenia. Below is Brianna. Brianna got her shots 2 wks after Diane died shortly after getting her [Diane's] shots. Brianna died from an ischemic stroke. https://t.co/s1xumvadw9

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

10/ Eden was 17yo. She was injected a few weeks after Brianna died. Eden had a CVST type of stroke. https://t.co/SbnLx97vAM

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

11/ Remember that these are all in MA and weeks from each other with massive headaches hours after the jabs and death in a few days. Below is the Brief Report by 6 doctors from Harvard Med and Beth Israel Deaconess Hosp. IT'S IN THE TITLE. READ THE TITLE. THEY'RE TELLING YOU https://t.co/lm0Im1Fthn

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

12/ This Brief Report about Brianna's case is TELLING YOU that CLOTS IN VEINS are LINKED TO SEVERAL C19 VEXINES. Only 24 HOURS after Dose1. And I heard from someone who knows that it was way before 24 hours. But CDC found no link? This is the Abstract. Let's look further. https://t.co/iiLcNCean3

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

13/ Brianna had tested positive for ASYMPTOMATIC COVID-19 ... MONTHS earlier. The Brief Report says 3 months. They know darned well it was 4.5 months. But what's the difference anyway. She reacted in hours to the vexine. Would they really blame covid for her death? https://t.co/bqVh4TyGR7

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

14/ YES. The fraudulent LIARS in MASSACHUSETTS did indeed blame "COVID-19" for Brianna's death. And the CDC finds no connection between stroke and the vexines. But wait, there's more. https://t.co/G4P6xXiQsR

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

15/ Damage to the lining of her blood vessels and inflammation. Clots and T-cell attacks on her own blood vessels. WHY? What went into her blood vessels in her brain that caused T-cells to attack and clots to occur? You know what. "A NUMBER OF CASE REPORTS" = CVST; that's... https://t.co/De5VXAPMS5

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

16/ Looking above, CVST type of stroke is what 17yo Eden died from only 5 weeks after Brianna. And in the green text above "THROMBOCYTOPENIA IS FREQUENT" from these vexines. FREQUENT FREQUENT. Remember what Diane62 died from only 2wks before Brianna was injected?

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

17/ Diane died from a hemorrhagic stroke in the setting of THROMBOCYTOPENIA. You know, that one that's FREQUENT from these faux vexines.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

18/ And .... there's more. They wrote in the original draft version that they're unaware of other strokes in VAERS and suggested continued monitoring of VAERS. Then in the final version they trimmed that to "VAERS produced no similar cases" and said this was EXTREMELY RARE 🤬🤬 https://t.co/bA0tXy0POL

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

19/ Why did they write "EXTREMELY RARE" in the Summary? Well, because everyone just reads the summary. Who would have known that they wrote other things in each paragraph above? Such as: FREQUENT A NUMBER OF CASE REPORTS PREVIOUSLY ASSOCIATED WITH C19 VEXINE EXTREMELY RARE???

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

20/ Note that they know about VAERS, they recommend monitoring VAERS, they said they found nothing in VAERS, BUT THEY DIDN'T ENTER THIS CASE IN VAERS. A family member waited 6 weeks for the doctors to enter it, and then did it herself because she was disgusted with the docs.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

21/ 3 strokes 3 months 1 state If halted after Diane's death, Brianna would be alive today If halted after Diane & Brianna, Eden17 would be alive today. If halted after those 3, then Holly42, Dan37, Charles48, Abby20, Cassidy7, Preston15 ... and Amaya12 would be alive today.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

22/ Amaya was 12yo and died from a stroke in August 2022. VAERS Report 12yo F Injected 8/3 Died 8/29 (death certificate, but VAERS says 8/30) Cause "... cerebellar tonsillar and bilateral uncal herniation" https://t.co/0aYmlEHPaq

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

23/ From the death certificate Amaya 12yo Female Cause "... cerebellar tonsillar and bilateral uncal herniation ..." They're still killing people today. Why did a "vigilance" system take 6months to get this entered? Why are they still saying there is no connection to strokes? https://t.co/75grk4VaGC

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

24/ I found that females to males are bout 65/35 in strokes. The opposite appears to be true regarding arrhythmia and other heart deaths. More males than females. Ian was 11yo. He died 12/3/2022 after getting the booster. Because ZERO healthy kids died from covid in MA.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

25/ This thread is enough to stop the kill_shots. This is based on real death certificates in ONE state of MASSACHUSETTS. Notice was given to MA in US District Court in August 2022. MA has not acted on this information at all. Now, it is criminally negligent homicide!!! END

JohnBeaudoinSr
Posted - December 24, 2023 at 3:17 PM
Saved - December 24, 2023 at 4:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The population of Australia is 26 million, while the combined populations of Massachusetts and Minnesota are 12.4 million. I have created a database tracking system to analyze deaths and would be willing to collaborate with Australia to provide insights. I can deliver initial results in less than a month, and I am offering my services for free.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

The population of Australia is 26M The combined populations of Massachusetts and Minnesota are 12.4 million (nearly half of Australia). I am one man and I’ve built a database tracking system to determine trends and anomalies in causes, ages, and seasonality of deaths. I’m happy to work with Australia to get answers. It will take less than a man-month for early results. I’ll do it for free.

@9NewsSyd - 9News Sydney

#EXCLUSIVE: Thousands of Australians die from a sudden cardiac arrest each year, and in many cases the causes are unknown. Scientists are trying to close that gap, by building the world’s largest registry to find patterns and prevent deaths. @GabyRogers #9News https://t.co/LR6pbumddR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists in Australia are building the world's largest registry to find patterns and prevent sudden cardiac deaths. Each year, 25,000 Australians experience a cardiac arrest, and in 30-40% of cases, the cause is unknown. The registry, called the codex registry, will record every cardiac arrest case across all ages, using information from ambulance and forensics. Initially starting in Victoria, the hope is to expand the registry nationwide. This initiative aims to provide answers and potentially identify genetic conditions that may increase the risk of cardiac arrest. The story features Jessica Maris, who lost her husband to a sudden cardiac arrest and discovered that their son may have inherited a genetic condition.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thousands of Australians die from a sudden cardiac arrest each year and in many cases the cause is unknown. Scientists are trying to close that gap by building the world's world's largest registry to find patterns and prevent deaths. Speaker 1: The pain of losing her husband Brian is still very raw for Jessica Maris. Little did they know these would be his last Words. Speaker 2: Just as I was getting AV from the bassinet, Brian reached out to me and and he took my hand and and he said I love you. Ahead, and I said I love you too. Speaker 1: The super fit a grade cyclist was only 31. Jess was feeding her baby daughter at the time Of his sudden death. Speaker 2: Ron didn't wake up. You don't expect something like this to happen in your home? Speaker 1: Each year, 25,000 Australians experience a cardiac arrest in the community. And disturbingly, in about 30 to 40% of cases, doctors Can't explain the cause. Speaker 3: 90% of those 25,000 will not survive. If you're young, it's more likely that no answers will be found. Australian scientists Speaker 1: with the support of the Heart Foundation are trying to bridge that gap using information from ambulance and forensics To set up a database recording each cardiac arrest across all ages. Speaker 3: This registry, the codex registry, is going to really be the largest Just in the world that has complete details on every case. Speaker 1: The work will initially begin in Victoria, but with more funding there are hopes The registry will be rolled out nationally. Jess was told Brian may have had a genetic condition, Brugada Syndrome, Causing fast irregular heartbeats, which their son has inherited. Speaker 2: Now we can do the right things to try keep him safe. My wish Is that it doesn't take losing a loved one to be able to find out that your family is at a greater risk of a cardiac arrest. Speaker 1: Gabriella Rogers, 9 Speaker 2: news.
JohnBeaudoinSr
Posted - August 9, 2023 at 6:18 PM
Saved - August 9, 2023 at 7:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In August 2022, EXHIBIT F was compiled and filed in the US District Court of MA. The case is still pending. Dr. Welton and Dr. Janice Grivetti are defendants in the lawsuit. They are being sued in their individual and official capacities. The state attorney from the AG's office is defending them. A 30-year-old woman was allegedly murdered by a RICO enterprise promoting gene therapy drugs. For more details, visit Vera Vita DOT COM.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

1/ This thread is EXHIBIT F compiled ONE YEAR ago in August 2022 and filed in US District Ct, District of MA on Aug 23, 2022. Amended January 2023. Action is pending still. https://t.co/NIuXvoCIKY

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

2/ https://t.co/mKMoMf8poc

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

3/ https://t.co/lEy4WUVR1I

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

4/ https://t.co/gHY9vqEa7q

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

5/ https://t.co/489tprYc9e

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

6/ https://t.co/XsQZCXjo5J

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

7/ https://t.co/RPgBoQKXdV

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

8/ Dr Welton is a defendant being sued in this case. 1:22-cv-11356-NMG Beaudoin v Baker et al (he's an "et al") https://t.co/mFF6FgXOvF

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

9/ Dr. Janice Grivetti is also a defendant in this lawsuit They are being sued in their individual and official capacities and have waived their right to separate counsel for their individual capacity. The state attorney from the AG's office is defending them. https://t.co/vEdJuizEv0

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

10/ https://t.co/xfvEtpL6wh

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

11/ https://t.co/JncA1KwiDz

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

12/ https://t.co/7NO8kAbKk9

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

13/ This 30yo woman was murdered by the fascistic RICO enterprise pushing gene therapy drugs masquerading as vx's. https://t.co/EAaMYDaciB

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

14/ https://t.co/sTlGIUOSzV

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

15/ https://t.co/q3qllnWhvY

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

16/ https://t.co/MoTQrb3EcN

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

17/ https://t.co/lI2My7PeDU

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

18/ https://t.co/y10l5VSQBk

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

19/ https://t.co/RUcUeNfnEq

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

20/ https://t.co/FnKJ5cm0YS

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

21/ https://t.co/jOTCIGUzk4

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

22/ https://t.co/WaQEDYmc5I

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

23/ https://t.co/CA0ORKqnhH

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

24/ https://t.co/qgYrGYKPlh

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

25/ https://t.co/Dg7lqxb4w6

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

26/ https://t.co/4xUEEjgFJJ

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

27/ https://t.co/gA5cfnFmeq

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

28/ https://t.co/yPJqSF9kQM

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

29/ https://t.co/3gvQsJ1Z7B

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

30/ https://t.co/Kmeg735Zad

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

31/ https://t.co/vY5aMV39O0

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

32/ https://t.co/gl9TIYt0iq

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

33/ https://t.co/XSSSG8xnqi

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

34/ https://t.co/PJ9WJ7G4s0

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

35/ https://t.co/6JBUfU8FmI

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

36/ https://t.co/dsfquf8EwR

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

37/ https://t.co/at6ZplNGYw

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

38/ https://t.co/hkBdK8GsCf

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

39/ https://t.co/kpKT4OJa3A

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

40/ https://t.co/uRdHOJ2xRz

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

41/ https://t.co/FlgsStX2JS

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

42/ https://t.co/HULuDO6tk6

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

43/ https://t.co/PGRflOVXr6

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

44/ https://t.co/8nuuIBTxqF

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

45/ https://t.co/oM9d89XY8M

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

46/ https://t.co/2eP8vW8jdC

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

47/ https://t.co/cmbG41LsSn

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

48/ https://t.co/zsesI7ip5k

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

49/ https://t.co/mvHp79ddjw

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

50/ https://t.co/Uq21qycZqQ

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

51/ https://t.co/oVan4nWpYm

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

52/ https://t.co/89p6bD2Y0G

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

53/ https://t.co/nN3CupkBYQ

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

54/ https://t.co/IWXh8Y8uyA

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

55/ https://t.co/oQ9wHTYWEP

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

56/ https://t.co/nKt94olLHg

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

57/ https://t.co/fL2lrZw3t9

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

58/ https://t.co/iouNyncMKk

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

59/ https://t.co/J76vvj3zd5

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

60/ https://t.co/oig2GW9bNK

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

61/ https://t.co/JejJPqlmwQ

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

62/ https://t.co/JVcxhO2sk6

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

63/ https://t.co/G1ROBbvFIF

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

64/ https://t.co/QZKIcJE5ab

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

65/ https://t.co/40TbLEus1F

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

66/ https://t.co/CapBvYniNV

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

67/ https://t.co/fgvvxhP9NL

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

68/ https://t.co/MePDvTJjwC

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

69/ https://t.co/yDAhdYNjGl

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

70/ https://t.co/Thm2lNhefo

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

71/ https://t.co/XUTUHH83gk

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

72/ https://t.co/oNKnHutdOC

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

73/ https://t.co/d5cZrCVrw8

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

74/ https://t.co/7EPVtBPHXl

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

75/ https://t.co/Gg5Vnl2fqG

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

76/ https://t.co/hGO4q0FrcQ

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

77/ https://t.co/zLvFNlPVb1

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

78/ https://t.co/RqUo38Y44Y

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

79/ https://t.co/Pd8RDl6ng8

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

80/ https://t.co/ntjXWzlU4H

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

https://t.co/YLREa87JV4

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

82/ https://t.co/2pQysOlGTe

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

83/ https://t.co/D5kflOPRf9

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

84/ https://t.co/Z69If4gCxZ

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

85/ https://t.co/gUk7qyyKCn

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

86/ https://t.co/LIFCwWZQbU

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

87/ https://t.co/Rm24IJpXTj

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

88/ https://t.co/BJVUEr7mPj

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

89/ https://t.co/suY1tKLUjN

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

90/ https://t.co/moblQEue4b

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

91/ I have something else to do now. The rest of 123 pages of EXHIBIT F have to wait But if I don't finish later, you can view or DOWNLOAD EXHIBIT F from my website listed under my profile Via Vera Vita DOT COM If a troll hadn't attacked me, I'd not have posted this thread 😉

View Full Interactive Feed