TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @JohnStrandUSA

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - October 4, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Saved - October 4, 2025 at 11:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Kash Patel confirmed that Pelosi blocked Trump's offer of 10,000 National Guard troops, while her team filmed a documentary during the chaos. He also stated that 250 FBI agents acted as undercover provocateurs. We need accountability for those who orchestrated this and demand justice.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Kash Patel just confirmed what many of us have said for years. – Pelosi blocked Trump’s offer of 10,000 National Guard – Her team was filming a documentary while the chaos unfolded – 250 FBI agents were undercover provocateurs Democrats helped provoke violence, blocked the Guard, staged chaos for cameras, then framed innocent Americans. We need accountability for those who orchestrated this. We demand justice.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Some Republicans argue that Nancy Pelosi staged January 6 and the select committee covered it up. Based on what you know, what are the verifiable events in the lead ups? Speaker 1: I was DoD chief of staff on January 6. We deployed National Guard; in the Oval Office the president, president Trump at the time, authorized pursuant to law up to 10 to 20,000 National Guard. We took that authorization because the law's second part required a request from who? Nancy Pelosi and the Metropolitan Police and the mayor at the time. And what did they say? No. And remember what happened for the next two years? They say, Oh, Kash is lying. Trump’s lying. And what do we find? Letters of their declination of the National Guard refusing to have the National Guard show up. Nancy Pelosi and her team were busy filming a movie on January 6 while this so caused chaos around her was going down. If she had just look at it this way. If she had said yes to the National Guard and we had 10,000 uniformed military officers establish a secure perimeter, do you think January 6 would have gone differently? Speaker 0: It is intriguing that 02/1950 FBI plain clothed agents were inside the Capitol on January 6. Speaker 1: This is a great example of the president's initiative to solve all the answers on January 6, and it's another example of our transparency efforts. Pursuant to the president, we investigated the matter and found out why FBI agents were placed there in the first place. And it turns out, we found documentation and witnesses and whistleblowers that said we were forced to go there to do riot control. Armstrong, do you know what the FBI does not do ever? Riot control. Speaker 0: And you believe them? That's their word, not mine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some Republicans, mister director, argue that Nancy Pelosi staged January 6 and the select committee covered it up. Based on what you personally know, what are the verifiable committee events in the lead ups? Do you I know you don't speculate, you just deal with facts. Speaker 1: I'm in a unique position. Remember, I was chief of staff for the Department of Defense on January 6. We were responsible for the deployment of National Guard, and what I have was forced to testify two years ago at great personal cost has now once again, just like Russiagate, been proven true because all I do is speak the truth. On January actually, in the days before January 6, we were in the Oval Office where the president, president Trump at the time, authorized pursuant to law up to 10 to 20,000 National Guard. We took that authorization because the law's second part required a request from who? Nancy Pelosi and the Metropolitan Police and the mayor at the time. And what did they say? No. And remember what happened for the next two years? They say, Oh, Kash is lying. Trump's lying. And what do we find? Letters of their declination of the National Guard refusing to have the National Guard show up. So all I can speak to is the facts, and the facts are those plus this. Nancy Pelosi and her team were busy filming a movie on January 6 while this so caused chaos around her was going down. If she had just look at it this way. If she had said yes to the National Guard and we had 10,000 uniformed military officers establish a secure perimeter, do you think January 6 would have gone differently? Speaker 0: It is intriguing that 02/1950 FBI plain clothed agents were inside the Capitol on January 6. I've saw the president's tweet Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: To get to the bottom of it, who placed them there, what were they doing, were they inciting violence. What can you tell us, mister director? Speaker 1: This is a great example of the president's initiative to solve all the answers on January 6, and it's another example of our transparency efforts. Pursuant to the president, we investigated the matter and found out why FBI agents were placed there in the first place. And it turns out, we found documentation and witnesses and whistleblowers that said we were forced to go there to do riot control. Armstrong, do you know what the FBI does not do ever? Riot control. We don't do that. So the prior leadership sent 250 some odd men and women into a situation they're not trained for, put them in harm's way, put the individuals out there in harm's way, and also, those individuals have collectively responded or said beforehand that they were forced to go there. They didn't volunteer to do that. Speaker 0: And you believe them? That's their Speaker 1: word, not mine.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - October 2, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Saved - October 4, 2025 at 3:42 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

The DOJ tried to bury me for 8 years. I refused their plea deal. I fought every step—and won. The Supreme Court overturned it. The DOJ vacated all 5 charges. I stand here today fully exonerated. Proof that their J6 prosecutions were fraudulent from the start. https://t.co/cnnWLrmVWW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The DOJ tried to put me in for eight years. I was sentenced to almost three. But because I didn't take that plea and continue to press an appeal of all charges, I was vindicated by the Supreme Court decision in Fisher. And then I continued to press a full appeal until the DOJ vacated all five charges. So I've been completely exonerated within the legal system. The charges were rescinded as if they had never been brought because Wow. Of course, they were they were fraudulent from the beginning.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The DOJ tried to put me in for eight years. I was sentenced to almost three. But because I didn't take that plea and continue to press an appeal of all charges, I was vindicated by the Supreme Court decision in Fisher. And then I continued to press a full appeal until the DOJ vacated all five charges. So I've been completely exonerated within the legal system. The charges were rescinded as if they had never been brought because Wow. Of course, they were they were fraudulent from the beginning.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - July 23, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 12:14 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: @HouseGOP finally moving to create legitimate J6 committee It will be chaired by @RepLoudermilk—and he needs our full support @SpeakerJohnson said “there is clearly more work to be done” to expose the lies & criminal fraud of @Liz_Cheney, @AdamSchiff & co. It’s time https://t.co/jcgXAqqp4S

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - June 25, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Saved - June 25, 2025 at 5:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m shocked to learn that Penguin Random House is funding Supreme Court Justices with huge book deals, including $2M for Barrett and nearly $3M for Jackson. These justices, including Barrett, Jackson, Sotomayor, and Gorsuch, even recused themselves from a case involving their publisher, highlighting a clear conflict of interest. Beyond book deals, there are larger issues of justice-for-sale, with justices receiving gifts, luxury vacations, and private jets from billionaires. It’s clear the system is broken and in need of reform.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: A radical publisher—Penguin Random House (owned by Bertelsmann)—is bankrolling Supreme Court Justices with MASSIVE book deals (up to $2M advance for Barrett, nearly $3M total from Ketanji Brown Jackson) This is the same company that gave a $70M book deal to Obama.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

These same justices—Barrett, Jackson, Sotomayor & Gorsuch—recently RECUSED themselves in a case involving their publisher. That’s a clear conflict of interest—showing how these sweetheart deals cripple justice.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

And it’s not just book deals. The real scandals are justice-for-sale: gifts worth millions, luxury vacations, private jets—from billionaire donors.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

These judges are meant to administer justice, not cash in with publishers and billionaires. The whole system is broken, rigged at the highest levels. And it needs reform. https://www.frontpagemag.com/a-radical-company-is-paying-supreme-court-justices-millions/

A Radical Company is Paying Supreme Court Justices Millions | Frontpage Mag And that has crippled the Court. frontpagemag.com
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - May 14, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Saved - May 15, 2025 at 2:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was sentenced to 32 months in federal prison for obstruction of an official proceeding, a charge stemming from a law designed to prevent document shredding after Enron, not to target peaceful protestors. I lost years to a false charge orchestrated by Andrew Weissman and used by Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco to intimidate individuals like me before pursuing Trump. One man, @EagleEdMartin, recognized the misuse of the 1512 charge and was nominated by Trump for U.S. Attorney for D.C., but his nomination was blocked by Senator Tom Tillis because he defended people like me. This isn’t justice; it’s political warfare.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

I was sentenced to 32 months in federal prison under 18 USC §1512. The charge? Obstruction of an official proceeding. But that law was written after Enron—to stop document shredding. Not to imprison peaceful protestors. I lost years of my life to a hoax charge—engineered by Andrew Weissman and weaponized by Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco. They knew it was bogus. They used it anyway—to break people like me before going after Trump. Rot in prison first. Justice later. One man saw through it early: @EagleEdMartin. Trump nominated him to serve as U.S. Attorney for D.C. and he knew the 1512 charge was being used as a political weapon. Senator Tom Tillis personally killed his nomination. Why? Because Ed defended people like me. This isn’t justice. It’s political warfare.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes many January 6th defendants were wrongly charged with 1512, an obstruction charge, and that a bipartisan Supreme Court threw it out. As a US Attorney, the speaker wanted to investigate the use of 1512, which they attribute to Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco, but ultimately to Andrew Weissman. Weissman, connected to the Mueller investigation, allegedly advocated using 1512 to target Trump, even if it meant "making it up." The speaker claims Weissman wanted to charge Trump after first jailing hundreds of people to validate the charge. 1512 was initially created after Enron to prevent the destruction of documents related to an official proceeding. Weissman allegedly planned to expand the definition of "official proceeding" to include the electoral college count. The speaker asserts that this plan involved jailing people, securing guilty pleas, and influencing judges to support the charge before targeting Trump.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But if you're I think if you're not under the spell of the hoax, you say, wait a second. Lots of people were waved into the capital, and and maybe you could charge them with trespass, but you can't throw them in jail for three years, four year three and a half years. Right? Because of and then the supreme court, bipartisan supreme court, throws out the charge that was used. It's called the fifteen twelve charge. When I got in my office as US attorney, I said, first week, we're gonna look at the fifteen twelve. Who charged it? And, course, it was charged by Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco right across. It wasn't it wasn't the guy in my chair. He's a he was an empty suit there to just, you know, carry water as they went in. Right DOJ directly. All the way funny general. Right up right up. Of course. I mean, look. 1512 is an Andrew Weissman creation. Right? This was Andrew Weissman advocated for fifteen twelve charge Who's Andrew Weissman? In the Mueller investigation and the Mueller invest Andrew Weissman is one of these lawyers who he's at NYU right now. He goes in and out of government, and he's basically at the center. There's about six or seven of these people that are at the center of coordinating the weaponization of government against the people right now. And every time you turn around you know, I love I'll give it to you. The guy that was the prosecutor in Kosovo before Jack Smith, you know, a special prosecutor. Yeah. Forget his name right now. He he left so Jack Smith could come in. Where'd he go? One guess. NYU to Andrew Weissman's shop. Perfect. So when you watch Andrew Weissman's at Mueller, he says in Mueller, we need fifteen twelve. We can charge Trump in the watch this. We can use fifteen twelve. We're making it up, but we can get away with it if we build it out this way and just get everybody to go along. He fails at that, Mueller. You know, Barr says and and Jeff Jensen no. Barr says you can't do that. Right? You can't do we're not gonna do that. Shuts it down. And then along comes Andrew Weissman, Lisa Monaco, all these same people. They say charge the fifteen twelve. Tucker, the fifteen twelve charge. Right? Viewers may not track it well enough, but fifteen twelve was an addition to the law about twenty years ago after Enron because Arthur Andersen, the accounting firm, was destroying documents. Enron was the target of the investigation. Arthur Andersen was destroying documents, wasn't the target, and there was no law to say, if you knew there was an investigation, you shouldn't destroy documents. So they passed this law. Okay. Fifteen twelve. It said, if you know there's an official proceeding, you're not allowed to destroy documents. Okay. Right. You got it? Okay. That's it. All these years later, Weissman is saying, we'll we'll use, you know, obstruction of official proceeding. We'll expand official proceeding. We'll call it oh, yeah. We'll call it the electoral college count, and we'll go after everybody. But first, before we go for Trump, let's drag a couple of hundred people into jail. We'll make them plead guilty. We'll try them with a bad jury. We'll make the judges roll along, and we'll make sure we put them in one after another. We'll say, see, fifteen twelve. It's a good charge. Judges went for it. Everybody went for it, and then we'll get Trump. And one judge said no. Then it went up to the Supreme Court, and the bipartisan Supreme Court said, hell no, and threw it all out. So we watched American citizens rotting in jail for years for walking through the Capitol in 1512.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - May 7, 2025 at 2:28 AM
Saved - May 7, 2025 at 8:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to remind @SenThomTillis about the incident where USCP cuffed a protester and then uncuffed him for a fist-bump, highlighting what I see as a Fedsurrection. I believe January 6 is a coverup, and I'm committed to exposing the truth. I also want to clarify that the individual was not a confidential informant, but the confusion points to the government's tactics. The blurred lines between informants, agitators, and civilians are crucial to understanding the January 6 situation.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Just a reminder for sanctimonious @SenThomTillis USCP cuffed an FBI informant (CHS), brought him to the side, and happily uncuffed him to share a celebratory fist-bump—Fedsurrection accomplished. We all know J6 is a coverup, and we’re going to expose everything…and everyone.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Correction: the individual uncuffed by USCP was not a CHS (confidential human source), but a protester. That said — the confusion itself is revealing. The government’s entrapment tactics and blurred lines between informants, agitators, and civilians remain central to the J6 coverup.

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - May 7, 2025 at 5:13 PM
Saved - May 7, 2025 at 8:20 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: A Colorado U.S. postal worker has pled guilty to trying to rig the 2024 election, according to prosecutors Vicki Stuart admitted to forgery and identify theft in an attempt to steal ballots and cast votes in the names of other Americans We MUST secure our elections https://t.co/T4YWoqZsw5

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - March 24, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Saved - March 25, 2025 at 12:43 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Honestly I don’t know how the Trump DOJ has failed to get Tina Peters bonded out of jail by now, at least temporarily to prevent her from DYING IN PRISON… but I can assure President @realDonaldTrump that if she dies in that jail, America will never forgive him. GET HER OUT NOW https://t.co/j8tX4Ewn7k

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Tina Peters backing up the elections data before they wiped the systems gave the public a rare opportunity to analyze before and after the tampering — and it shows clear and deliberate manipulation of the voting systems. -Audit trail deleted -System logs deleted -Voting files replaced with new files Now we know why the Democrat Judge in her case refused nearly all of her witnesses and excluded virtually all of her defenses, then sentenced her to 9 years in prison — because if this became a nationwide story the entire house of cards with Dominion could fall. @realtinapeters

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 24, 2025 at 4:29 PM
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 9:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm excited to share that Jeremy Brown is being released today from Atlanta FCI, thanks to a Habeus Corpus petition challenging the search warrant. This marks another victory for those advocating for January 6th hostages. While I'm thrilled for Jeremy, I remain concerned about the others still imprisoned despite President Trump's pardons. We need to keep the pressure on to bring our heroes home.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Jeremy Brown is being released today from Atlanta FCI, his attorney is on site H/T @ProudArmymom66 Habeus Corpus was filed, challenging “constitutionally infirm search warrant” - @dbongino can’t reign in the FBI fast enough Another J6 hostage victory! 🇺🇸 https://t.co/UJA6P7vLhh

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Honestly, how in the hell is Jeremy Brown STILL a political hostage? Set him free NOW! @PamBondi https://t.co/HWRVRvZAZZ

@RogerJStoneJr - Roger Stone

How much longer must we wait for justice in the case of Jeremy Brown? His full and unconditional presidential pardon most certainly addresses any charge that arose from the illegal search of his home after he refused to become an informant for the FBI on January 6th https://t.co/296uY0TuwF

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Jeremy Brown is being released from prison today, with outstanding Habeus Corpus petition filed — seems like @PamBondi is aware of these lingering issues But several other hostages are still held in defiance of President Trump’s full and unconditional pardons—keep the pressure on! BRING OUR HEROES HOME 🇺🇸

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 24, 2025 at 4:15 AM
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 3:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m baffled that Jeremy Brown is still a political hostage. He deserves to be set free immediately. Justice for him is long overdue, especially since he was targeted after refusing to inform on others. As a J6er, I believe in upholding the rule of law, which is essential to our constitutional republic. While rebellion against tyranny is a moral duty, it’s crucial to distinguish it from aggression. True patriots know that liberty comes with responsibility and respect for others.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Honestly, how in the hell is Jeremy Brown STILL a political hostage? Set him free NOW! @PamBondi https://t.co/HWRVRvZAZZ

@RogerJStoneJr - Roger Stone

How much longer must we wait for justice in the case of Jeremy Brown? His full and unconditional presidential pardon most certainly addresses any charge that arose from the illegal search of his home after he refused to become an informant for the FBI on January 6th

@HanneBlaze64 - Joe Hanneman 🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING🚨 An attorney for pardoned #Jan6 defendant and #OathKeeper Jeremy Brown files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in Atlanta federal court, demanding his release under presidential pardon.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Unite and hold the line, J6 🇺🇸

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

I just want to say, as a J6er, that legitimate rule of law is the bedrock of our constitutional republic. Rebellion against tyranny is obedience to God—but this should not be confused with belligerence. True patriots understand that liberty requires responsibility & respect 🇺🇸

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 18, 2025 at 4:03 AM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 4:38 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Just your daily reminder that this Gold Star mom is still rotting in prison as a political hostage. This is a horrible injustice. FREE TINA PETERS! https://t.co/eLEggo7Y5b

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Tina Peters backing up the elections data before they wiped the systems gave the public a rare opportunity to analyze before and after the tampering — and it shows clear and deliberate manipulation of the voting systems. -Audit trail deleted -System logs deleted -Voting files replaced with new files Now we know why the Democrat Judge in her case refused nearly all of her witnesses and excluded virtually all of her defenses, then sentenced her to 9 years in prison — because if this became a nationwide story the entire house of cards with Dominion could fall. @realtinapeters

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 9:10 PM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 10:26 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

J6 wasn’t a protest—it was a setup. The government has admitted its involvement. They used FBI provocateurs, improper security, and had a pre-planned narrative ready. This was America’s Reichstag Fire—used to justify a crackdown on conservatives. https://t.co/FR9EpP8DvK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The government's involvement in January 6th is undeniable, with proven entrapment tactics. To put it simply, January 6th was our American Reichstag fire moment. Anyone familiar with the history of the Nazi campaign in Germany understands the implications of that statement. January 6th served the purposes of a deeply corrupt Biden regime.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government has admitted and proved for the whole world to see without dispute that they were involved. They had entrapment elements in place. And so, like I said, you can generally see January 6 for what it is. If you wanna just distill it down in a single sentence, January 6 was our American Reichstag fire moment. And any student of history that generally understands the Nazi campaign in Germany knows what that means. That's right. But that is what January 6 was functioning, as for a very, very corrupt Biden regime.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 9, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Saved - February 9, 2025 at 4:32 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: “What we’ve learned is that the left’s mammoth power structure…it wasn’t organic. It was funded by taxpayer dollars. And that is why they are screaming now, because President Trump is cutting off the slush fund to the organizations that hate and hurt America.” https://t.co/v9MPxXtB0D

Video Transcript AI Summary
USAID has been a slush fund for left-wing projects globally, including gender surgeries, DEI policies, and climate initiatives. Billions of dollars funded NGOs, which infiltrated corporations and the public sector. This fueled resettlement of illegal immigrants, promoted equity policies, and advanced radical gender agendas. This massive left-wing power structure, including the media, wasn't organic; it was taxpayer-funded. The outcry against President Trump's cuts to USAID funding stems from this. He's cutting off the funding to organizations that harm America.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. The USAID was a slush fund, first of all, for left wing projects around the globe, like gender surgeries around the world, diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, crazy Green New Deal climate scams, and every other lunatic left wing project that is bankrupting this country. But even beyond that, it was funding an army of left wing activists, these NGOs, nongovernmental organizations, NGOs. They get billions and billions of dollars, and they use that money to then infiltrate corporate America, to then infiltrate the public sector, to then resettle, for example, at taxpayer expense, millions of illegal aliens into this country, to drive racist equity policies, to drive radical left gender policies. And so what we've learned is that the left's this mammoth left wing power structure plus left wing media Yeah. Wasn't organic. It wasn't created naturally. It was funded by taxpayer dollars. Unbelievable. Is why they are screaming and screeching so loud now is because president Trump is cutting off the slush fund to the organizations that hate and hurt America. And any
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 7, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Saved - February 7, 2025 at 10:26 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Stephen Miller goes SCORCHED EARTH on Democrat complaints that @elonmusk is ‘unelected’ “The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy. USAID is unelected! The FBI that persecuted President Trump for 8 years is unelected!” He’s exactly right. https://t.co/7OinXcGxLU

Video Transcript AI Summary
The term "unelected" used by Democrats is misleading. Donald Trump was elected in a landslide, and his staff, including the national security adviser and chief of staff, serve at his pleasure. They are implementing the agenda chosen by the American people. The real unelected power lies within the bureaucracy, such as USAID, the FBI, and the CIA, which have acted against Trump. President Trump is working to restore democracy by asserting control over the federal bureaucracy. He is the only individual elected by the entire nation to carry out the agenda that reflects the voters' wishes, while other officials are elected at local or state levels. Ultimately, the president is in charge of the federal executive branch.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the Democrat use of the term unelected is really quite remarkable here. Donald Trump was elected in an overwhelming landslide. These are Donald Trump staffers. In the sense, like, saying that Mike Walls, the national security adviser, is unelected or Susie Wiles, the chief of staff, is unelected or Donald Trump's communications team is unelected. This is presidential staff that serves at the pleasure and for the president just as I do. I am a staffer for the president of The United States. He is elected. He is the one that American people have chosen to implement his agenda. This is the agenda the American people voted for that he is asking his staff, his subordinates, his employees to implement. The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy. USAID is unelected. The FBI that persecuted president Trump for eight years is unelected. The CIA and those who have laundered intelligence to try to change the foreign policy of The United States are unelected. President Trump is restoring democracy by controlling the federal bureaucracy. There is one man in the country who is elected by the whole American people to implement an agenda they support. That is the president. Every other officer in this country Yep. Members of congress and senators are elected at the state or local level. Let me ask you something. I have to continue. One man in charge of the federal executive branch, and that's the president. I understood.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 6, 2025 at 3:38 AM
Saved - February 6, 2025 at 10:58 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: New from prison by election fraud whistleblower @realtinapeters “Supremacy Clause of US Constitution Art6cl.2+Privileges/Immunities Clause of 14th A, 1cl.2 CO court has no jurisdiction & federal court should overturn my conviction. TRUMP DOJ CAN INVESTIGATE+INTERVENE” https://t.co/SgiBrwP5K3

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 6, 2025 at 2:38 PM
Saved - February 6, 2025 at 3:11 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: FBI agents “terrified” at impending accountability “These Gestapo-like operatives are now…annoyed that they’re being asked to explain their behavior…and involvement in the J6 setup.” Just wait until you see the FBI behavior @WeAreJ6alliance is about to expose…APPALLING https://t.co/P3h2NQ7rW0

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 6, 2025 at 4:01 AM
Saved - February 6, 2025 at 10:38 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

🚨SOUND THE ALARM: President @realDonaldTrump + @PamBondi can investigate the fraudulent lawfare targeting Tina Peters and have a federal court overturns her conviction based on constitutional violations; the “supremacy clause” ~ RETWEET THIS The Trump DOJ MUST intervene! https://t.co/2GbOgaxIjq

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: New from prison by election fraud whistleblower @realtinapeters “Supremacy Clause of US Constitution Art6cl.2+Privileges/Immunities Clause of 14th A, 1cl.2 CO court has no jurisdiction & federal court should overturn my conviction. TRUMP DOJ CAN INVESTIGATE+INTERVENE” https://t.co/SgiBrwP5K3

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 5, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 5:05 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

We are extremely grateful for Julie’s intrepid and meticulous reporting on all J6 issues, and especially the malfeasance of the D.C. judges. We Are Dedicated to bringing true accountability to these rogue actors. Legitimate justice must be restored. @WeAreJ6alliance

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

By systematically violating the rights of Americans and defying their oath of office, the DC federal court system has rendered itself illegitimate. Not only did the Supreme Court overturn how 17 DC judges ruled on 1512c2--meaning hundreds of J6ers were wrongfully prosecuted with at least 100 sent to prison--the DC circuit also reversed several DC judges on two J6 sentencing practices. And if the most common misdemeanor and the seditious conspiracy convictions ever make it to SCOTUS, DC judges will be reversed on those counts, too. Further, these judges acted as nothing more than a rubber stamp for the DOJ for four years; refusing to move even high-profile trials out of DC, creating no-bond rules just for J6ers, hastening jury selection especially before the president took office, helping the DOJ withhold discovery and Brady materials, and imposing excessive sentences including "terror" enhancements among other misconduct. The 4 judges responsible for the presidential immunity order were harshly condemned by the Supreme Court when it reversed that order last July. These DC judges are rogue, reckless, partisan, and heretofore unaccountable. Now they are going to do whatever they can to retaliate against the president for undoing their lawless J6 handiwork. As I said--an illegitimate court. And the Trump administration should treat it accordingly.

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - December 3, 2024 at 3:09 PM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 3:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared an exclusive video showing a violent FBI raid on Bobby DeGregoris and his family, who were innocent during the January 6 protests. The raid was terrifying, with his wife and kids dragged into harsh conditions while armed agents stormed their home. I believe this represents pure evil and a misuse of power. I urge everyone to unite against the J6 witch hunt and support Bobby and his family. Please retweet and share their story to help bring attention to this injustice.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

EXCLUSIVE: Shocking video of violent FBI raid on Bobby DeGregoris & his family. He was totally innocent on J6—a truly peaceful protester. These fascist government stormtroopers drag his wife and kids into subzero conditions, terrorizing them with assault rifles. PURE EVIL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Is everyone clear in the picture? Ma'am, is anyone else inside? Can we get someone up here to stay with the family?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Once it's clear that the individuals you guys are clear in the picture. Ma'am, is anyone else in there? Go. Can we get somebody up here to stay with the family?

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

OMG: Bobby DeGregoris is a husband & father of 4 kids. On J6, he hurt nobody & damaged nothing—a truly innocent protester exercising his 1A rights. But Merrick Garland’s DOJ lied, terrorized his family with a violent FBI raid, & destroyed him—all to serve J6 fraud. IT MUST END.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Americans, I urge you to get involved and help us unite to end the J6 witch hunt, once and for all. ReTweet & share these J6 stories! Please help Bobby & his family here: 🙏🏼👇🏼 https://www.givesendgo.com/FreeJ6Patriot

J6 Patriot Legal Defense Fund In the early morning hours of January 25, over twenty armed FBI agents raided the family home of our beloved J6 Patriot, Bobby. The agents threatened to shoo... givesendgo.com
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 5, 2025 at 12:27 AM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 3:43 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

OMG: Shocking photos of a violent FBI raid executed against a peaceful J6er, terrorizing his young children The insane part? He had already surrendered to agents—but they assaulted his family at home anyway! THIS is the evil being purged from the FBI—and Democrats defend it? https://t.co/xzsW5ig0gc

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

EXCLUSIVE: Shocking video of violent FBI raid on Bobby DeGregoris & his family. He was totally innocent on J6—a truly peaceful protester. These fascist government stormtroopers drag his wife and kids into subzero conditions, terrorizing them with assault rifles. PURE EVIL https://t.co/NkdzZe11DD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Is everyone clear in the picture? Ma'am, is anyone else inside? Can we get someone up here to stay with the family?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Once it's clear that the individuals you guys are clear in the picture. Ma'am, is anyone else in there? Go. Can we get somebody up here to stay with the family?
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Saved - February 4, 2025 at 10:13 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Dear President @realDonaldTrump, Why is patriot whistleblower Tina Peters still in prison? This is outrageous!

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Tina Peters, a MAGA political prisoner, just requested help from President @realDonaldTrump She seeks to expose a CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION by corrupt Colorado officials prosecuting her for official acts covered by the Supremacy Clause. This outrage must end! https://t.co/A6Q2cEDvTB

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 1, 2025 at 4:20 AM
Saved - February 1, 2025 at 4:52 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

FACT: The crime of insurrection in the U.S. is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2383 FACT: Nobody was charged with insurrection on J6. FACT: Smearing J6ers as insurrectionists is an obviously false defamatory act. Who’s ready for defamation lawsuits? 🙋🏻‍♂️

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 29, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Saved - January 30, 2025 at 5:55 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Judge admits the FBI fabricated a “militia” to entrap defendants into the now infamous “Whitmer Fednapping hoax” but then still upholds the clearly fraudulent convictions? This is outrageous—if we allow judges to condone government corruption, we are not a serious country. https://t.co/NpvYigtKxv

@NotRadix - Radix Verum ☦︎

Paging conservative and libertarian media and influencers: a judge just admitted what we have been saying. The FBI created a fake national three percent militia, mobilizing assets across the entire country to frame 14 innocent men as the dry run for J6. Can you please help raise awareness for these men? Five of them are suffering in prison right now for this shameless hoax.

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Saved - January 28, 2025 at 9:54 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Italy 🇮🇹 follows President Trump’s lead, to withdraw from W.H.O. Founder of America’s Frontline Doctors @DrSimoneGold just replied to @JohnRich explaining how the W.H.O. has been hijacked by the CCP to coverup their crimes against humanity. MAGA is healing the world. https://t.co/SXChRWWgpf

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Saved - January 28, 2025 at 9:24 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

The DOJ has vacated all of my J6 convictions—I’m now fully, legally exonerated. I refused the plea deal, fought all charges, and maintained my innocence from start to finish. This isn’t just my victory—it’s a victory for everyone who has faced weaponized government abuse. https://t.co/EHiy13jUcK

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Saved - January 28, 2025 at 4:22 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

OMG: Jeremy Brown is an Army Special Forces veteran—he did nothing wrong on J6 and never entered the Capitol. But Biden’s DOJ lied, assaulted him with an unlawful FBI raid, and he is STILL a hostage—the DOJ is refusing to obey President Trump’s pardon. ENOUGH! FREE HIM NOW!

@RogerJStoneJr - Roger Stone

The continued incarceration of Green Beret Master Sergeant Jeremy Brown, because he refused to be an informant for the FBI on January 6 is a travesty of justice https://stonezone.com/prosecutors-use-unconstitutional-double-jeopardy-tactics-to-keep-jan-6er-jeremy-brown-behind-bars/

THE INCARCERATION OF PARDONED J6R JEREMY BROWN IS A TRAVESTY - StoneZone Jeremy Brown, a retired US Army Special Forces Master Sergeant, is being denied his freedom due to the decision by rogue federal agents to keep him in prison in direct opposition to President Donald Trump’s blanket pardon of Jan. 6 patriots. The feds are hoping to exploit a technicality, as their unlawful raids eventually resulted […] stonezone.com
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 27, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Saved - January 28, 2025 at 12:28 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: President Trump addresses Congress and says American decline is over—the “Golden Age has officially begun” He’s putting a freeze on Foreign Aid—because “we’re tired of giving money to nations that hate us” Wow, can we get an AMEN? https://t.co/05zua56oSx

Video Transcript AI Summary
In just one week, over 350 executive actions were taken, including signing 300. The era of American decline is over, and a new golden age has begun. On day one, every cabinet member was directed to use their powers to combat inflation and reduce living costs. A federal hiring freeze, regulation freeze, and foreign aid freeze were imposed, reflecting a shift in priorities. The creation of a new department focused on Government Efficiency aims to enhance effectiveness. Additionally, the termination of the costly Green New Deal was announced, highlighting a commitment to eliminate wasteful spending.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a single week, I've taken over 350 executive actions. We've signed 300 and whoever heard of that 1. And as I said in my inaugural address, the American decline is over. It's over. The golden age of America has officially begun. And I think that's a good thing for us to talk about. The golden age and the American dream. I think it's a good thing because people haven't been talking that way for a long period of time. On day 1, I directed every member of my cabinet to marshal all powers at their disposal to defeat inflation and bring down the cost of daily life. And we're gonna do that. You're gonna see it starting to happen brought everything up. It's gonna bring everything down. I imposed a federal hiring freeze, a federal regulation freeze, a foreign aid freeze, a foreign aid freeze. A foreign aid freeze. Isn't that nice? We get tired of giving massive amounts of money to countries that hate us, don't we? And I created the new department of Government Efficiency, and I think it's gonna be very meaningful. I terminated the ridiculous and incredibly wasteful green new scam. Great 1 of the great scams in history.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 26, 2025 at 5:45 PM
Saved - January 27, 2025 at 5:27 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: VP JD Vance stands firm against Legacy Media lies about J6, DESTROYS the false narrative about violence: “Two separate issues” 1. They reviewed every case—and all were tainted by weaponized civil rights abuses 2. Many allegations were dishonest! https://t.co/6MBTsfDCZ5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two weeks ago on Fox News, you mentioned that those who protested peacefully on January 6th should be pardoned, while those who committed violence should not. You also noted that there are gray areas in these cases, particularly regarding the Department of Justice's handling of prosecutions, which you believe involved double standards and denial of constitutional rights. Regarding specific cases of violence against police officers, you clarified that while such violence is not justified, the focus should be on the unfair prosecution by the DOJ. You argue that the pardon power is not reserved for perfect individuals, and the decision to pardon was about rectifying perceived injustices in the legal process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2 weeks ago, you were on Fox News and you said if you protested peacefully on January 6th and had Merrick Garland's Department of Justice treat you like a gang member, you should be pardoned. If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn't be pardoned. Did you counsel the president against these blanket pardons for 1500 people Well, Speaker 1: Margaret, I noticed Speaker 0: including those who committed violence. Speaker 1: Margaret, I noticed that you cut off the thing that I said immediately after that. The full quote is that, of course, there are gray areas. And here's the nature of the gray area. Merrick Garland's Department of Justice denied constitutional protections in the prosecutions. There were double standards in how sentences were applied to the j 6 protesters versus other groups. What the president said consistently on the campaign Case by case basis. Speaker 0: Look at Speaker 1: a case by case basis This Speaker 0: is blank. Speaker 1: And that's exactly what we did. We looked at 1600 cases, and the thing that came out of it, Margaret, is that there was a massive denial of due process of liberty, and a lot of people were denied their constitutional rights. The president believes that. I believe that, and I think he made the right decision. Speaker 0: Daniel Rodriguez used an electroshock weapon against a policeman who was dragged out of the defensive line by plunging it into the officer's neck. He was imprisoned sentenced to 12 years 7 months. He got a pardon. Ronald Maccabee hit a cop while wearing reinforced brass knuckle gloves and he held one down on the ground as other rioters assailed the officer for over 20 seconds causing a concussion. If you stand with law enforcement, how can you call these people unjustly imprisoned? Speaker 1: Margaret, you're separating there's an important issue here. There's what the people actually did on January 6th, and we're not saying that everybody did everything perfectly. And then what did Merrick Garland's Department of Justice do in unjustly prosecuting well over a 1000 Americans in a way that was politically motivated? Speaker 0: Like that against a police officer ever justified? Speaker 1: Violence against a police officer is not justified, but that doesn't mean that you should have Merrick Garland's weaponized Department of Justice expose you to incredibly unfair process, to denial of constitutional rights, and frankly, to a double standard that was not applied to many people, including, of course, the Black Lives Matter Rioters who killed over 2 dozen people and never had the weight of a weaponized Department of Justice come against them. The pardon power is not just for people who are angels or people who are perfect. And, of course, we love our law enforcement and want people to be peaceful with everybody, but especially with our good cops. That's a separate issue from what Merrick Garland's Department of Justice did. We rectified a wrong, and I stand by it.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 27, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Saved - January 27, 2025 at 5:07 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

HUGE: “We need a national reckoning with the truth of J6” and the catastrophic harms suffered by victims of weaponized government “We’re talking historic civil damages” @CharlieKirk11 says the DOJ and FBI “has blood on its hands”—and he’s right. SHAME! https://t.co/7FOAoGleW5

Video Transcript AI Summary
We acknowledge the tragic losses of some January 6th offenders who took their own lives after facing severe consequences. The Department of Justice, FBI, and the January 6th committee bear responsibility for this. Restorative justice is crucial. We are uniting January 6th defenders and advocates globally to demand accountability for the government's actions and the harm caused. Our goal is to pursue historic civil damages and collaborate with the incoming Trump administration to ensure justice is served. We must hold government officials accountable for upholding the Constitution and not violating civil rights. Strong laws exist that need enforcement, and we require a reckoning with these institutions. Additionally, I spent time in solitary confinement but have since received a full pardon from the president.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We know that these are some of the January 6th offenders who've taken their lives after they lost everything over the protest. They're up on screen right now. The Department of Justice, FBI, and Media, and the entire January 6th committee has blood on its hands. John, your reaction. Speaker 1: Restorative justice is essential. We're gathering j 6 defenders and as well as the entire country and the world as advocates to the movement for restorative justice. Please join us at we arej6.com. And what that means is we need a national reckoning with the truth of what happened, with the weaponized government, with the corruption of the DOJ and the prosecutors, and with the harms and and catastrophe inflicted on these these folks. So we need to make them whole. We're talking historic civil damages. We wanna work in cooperation with the incoming Trump administration to make sure this happens in the right fashion. And, also, that there is serious accountability. As Julie Kelly mentioned, we must hold these government officials to account and make sure that as a prosecutor and as a judge, that you are upholding the constitution and you are not willfully, participating in a collusion to violate civil rights. Title 18 code 242, under cover of law, violating civil rights rights. There is strong law in place that must be enforced, and we need a reckoning with these institutions. Speaker 0: Really quick. Recount for our audience. You were in solitary confinement in federal prison. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: And now you have a full pardon from the president of Speaker 1: the Speaker 0: United States.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 27, 2025 at 4:34 AM
Saved - January 27, 2025 at 2:51 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

What happened to me and 1,600 other Americans needs to be fully examined and shared with the entire nation—and yes, with a loudspeaker. It is nothing short of a national horror story. We MUST define + deliver Restorative Justice @WeAreJ6alliance 🇺🇸

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

@BrandonStraka What happened to John Strand needs to be shouted from a loudspeaker. It’s the definition of third world hellhole gulag.

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 27, 2025 at 7:13 AM
Saved - January 27, 2025 at 2:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am demanding the immediate release of Daniel Ball, who was pardoned by President Trump on January 20, 2025, but was re-arrested under questionable circumstances. The government claims he had a 22 rifle during the J6 raid, despite the pardon covering all related actions. Daniel has suffered severe abuse while incarcerated, including being beaten and tortured, and now faces the threat of being sent back to a dangerous facility. His life is at risk, and I urge everyone to spread the word and advocate for his release.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

OMG: RePost + DEMAND THE RELEASE OF THIS J6 HOSTAGE Daniel Ball received a pardon from President Trump on January 20, 2025. His paperwork was processed and on paper he was released. Moments later while still in possession of the BOP, Daniel was arrested again. Daniel was taken back to his cell in the DC Gulag, not understanding what was happening. The government has charged Daniel with having a 22 rifle and some ammo that did not fit the 22 during the J6 raid of his home. **The PARDON includes ALL actions related to J6, the raid of his home is very obviously part of the J6 charge.** The government doesn’t want to let Daniel free because they tortured Daniel and there is physical evidence of that. While in FCC Petersburg, VA Daniel was chained to his cell door, he was beaten by two guards. He was beaten so badly his teeth went through his face. He was chained to his cell for hours; fearful the guards would make good on their promise to come back and rape him. Now the government is trying to send Daniel back to FCC Petersburg, in an obvious attempt to scare him into silence. Daniel’s life is in danger, WE NEED HIM RELEASED IMMEDIATELY RePost and tell these guys👇🏼 cc: @RepCloudTX @KenPaxtonTX H/T: @JustTheTweets17 JUSTICE: @WeAreJ6alliance 🇺🇸

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 26, 2025 at 6:14 PM
Saved - January 27, 2025 at 4:54 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: @LindseyGrahamSC is pretending he doesn’t know that many allegations of violence by J6 protesters were false or dishonest and manipulated, and predicated on government entrapment and violent (even DEADLY) police misconduct. He does know—and he’s a scoundrel. VOTE HIM OUT https://t.co/gm2sj8bKyG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pardoning individuals involved in the January 6th Capitol violence was a mistake, as it may suggest that such actions are acceptable. This could lead to increased violence and undermines law enforcement. While Trump has generally supported law enforcement, his decision to issue these pardons disappointed many in that community. He had previously indicated he would do so, which was not surprising. The broader issue of pardoning those who commit violent acts or destroy property, regardless of political affiliation, raises concerns about the abuse of presidential pardon power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you believe that president Trump was wrong to issue these blanket pardons to the January 6th sentence? Speaker 1: The legal authority to do it, but I fear that you will get more violence. Pardoning the people who went into the capitol and beat up a police officer violently, I think was a mistake because it seems to suggest that's an okay thing to do. Kamala Harris wanted to raise bail money for people burning down Minneapolis. You know, Biden pardoned half his family going out the door. I think most Americans, if this continues to see this as an abuse of the pardon power, that we'll revisit, the pardon power of the president if this continues. But as to pardoning violent people who beat up cops, I think that's a mistake. Speaker 0: So you think it was a mistake by president Trump to issue these blanket pardons. What message does it convey to law enforcement? And if you convey that directly to mister Trump There's Speaker 1: really been no better support of law enforcement in general. And there are a lot of people who supported president Trump. Law enforcement didn't like this, but he said it during the campaign. He's not tricking people. You know, Biden promised not to pardon his family. He did. Trump said, I'm gonna pardon these people. So, the fact that he did it, is no surprise, but I'll be consistent here. I don't like the idea of bailing people out of jail or pardoning people who burned down cities and beat up cops whether you're a republican or a democrat.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 26, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Saved - January 26, 2025 at 7:36 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Election fraud whistleblower Tina Peters has been transferred to Larimer County jail Why is she being moved to a local jail instead of state prison on a 9-year sentence? @jaredpolis needs to hear it from you—this weaponized government abuse is unacceptable. FREE TINA! https://t.co/0Ek8Yx8kjh

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 26, 2025 at 2:46 AM
Saved - January 26, 2025 at 3:48 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

I’m not sure if you realize how enormous and impossible this victory over evil truly is… Everyone one of my many attorneys, every member of my family, every person who cared for me told me to take the plea deal. “You can’t beat a rigged system” I trusted God—and I beat it all.

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: The DOJ has now vacated all J6 charges against me. I refused a plea deal, pled not guilty, and maintained my innocence through appeal. I could not in good conscience take a plea and admit wrongdoing to something I knew was a lie. I am now exonerated of all charges. https://t.co/Z6dDQ3fXUu

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 25, 2025 at 7:19 AM
Saved - January 25, 2025 at 1:07 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Capital police officer who testified that he was “beaten and tased” by Jan 6 protestors was actually working as an undercover plant who was seen holding a confederate flag and instigating violence inside the Capital. The fraudulent J6 narrative has completely crumbled. https://t.co/GNco6Jhvw1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recently, some police officers testified about their trauma during the January 6th events. One officer described being outnumbered and attacked while protecting the Capitol. However, it turns out he wasn't in uniform or acting as a Capitol Police officer; he was an FBI informant carrying a Confederate flag. This revelation challenges the narrative surrounding the events, suggesting it was not as strong or truthful as presented. There's a call to release FBI files to uncover the real story and identify those truly responsible.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know how all those cops went up in front of the American people a few days ago for the January 6th commission talking about how traumatized they were? Remember this guy? Speaker 1: Because I was among the vastly outnumbered group of law enforcement officers protecting the capital and the people inside it. I was grabbed, beaten, tased, all while being called a traitor to my country. Speaker 0: Yeah. That guy. Well, that guy was actually not in uniform, and he was not there as a capitol police officer. He was there as an FBI plant. The dude was there carrying a confederate flag. You can't make this shit up. It's him, and he thought he was gonna get away with it. Once again, unraveling of the narrative because the narrative wasn't strong because it wasn't true. So we can try again, try try again, but guess what guys, release the FBI files and you will see who's really guilty.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 24, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Saved - January 24, 2025 at 10:13 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: President Trump’s new D.C. US Attorney @EagleEdMartin formally declares a D.C. judge is in open defiance of a presidential order This level of overt rebellion is not only unacceptable, it is untenable for a constitutional republic These judges MUST be held accountable https://t.co/Gswredok9F

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: DC US Attorney Ed Martin filed a motion telling Judge Amit Mehta the sentence commutations for the Oath Keepers includes supervised release and Mehta’s order requiring permission from him before commuted Oath Keepers can visit DC violates the president’s order. https://t.co/KHNfYAM4eb

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 24, 2025 at 6:17 AM
Saved - January 24, 2025 at 2:36 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Chip Roy DESTROYS the hypocrisy of Democrats complaining about President Trump’s blanket pardon of J6 protesters BLM burned cities and killed people—but got a free pass Biden/Garland weaponized the DOJ and tainted the judicial system—so Trump was right to wipe it all away. https://t.co/EFP8ZfsYHN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president decided to address the injustices faced by 1,500 individuals affected by politicized prosecutions, many of whom had endured significant hardships over the past four years. This includes cases where even innocent bystanders, like two grandmothers, were arrested for merely being present at the Capitol. The president's actions aim to restore fairness to the justice system, particularly for those protesting against the killing of unborn children. Critics argue that this undermines safety, but the president believes reversing these politicized prosecutions enhances security. He highlights the disparity in sentencing, noting that a career criminal received only 27 months for burning down a police station, contrasting it with the treatment of those unjustly prosecuted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The president came in and made a judgment that these 1500 people of varying forms, some sentenced, some not, some had taken plea deals, some not, had had 48 months of their life turned upside down by a department of justice who wanted to try to make a example out of them, and the president of the United States said enough. And you know what? I agree. Because at the end of the day, 48 months later, many of them having been in jail for all or a lot of that time, many of them who had their doors broken down, many of them had FBI raids. I had 2 grandmas driving from Austin, Texas out into the Hill Country just a few months ago who were arrested and jailed overnight because they were physically present here at the capitol. Not even inside to the best of my knowledge. I think they might have just crossed one of the bike lines. 3 years later, you arrest 2 grandmothers, Put them in jail? Does anybody see what happens when you politicize the justice system? The scales of justice become something that you can't look at as blindfolded? And, again, why am I talking about this? Because today, the president righted the wrongs of those 21 individuals who were literally protesting the in their view, and I share that view, the murdering of the unborn children. I think that stuff matters. I think it matters a lot. Because had Joe Biden, had mayor Garland not politicized the Department of Justice, then maybe 20 or 30 cases of individuals who had done something that were particularly egregious, that were prosecuted, maybe those wouldn't have been pardoned. I don't know. I haven't studied every case. But when you're looking at 1500 cases and all the people who are being abused, I think the president did the right thing and, again, differentiated between those with the commuted sentences. But meanwhile, what the president is doing besides, I think, trying to restore balance to the justice system is he's keeping his promises to secure our country. One of my colleagues over there said the first thing the president did was make us less safe. Are you serious? Are you serious? You think you think reversing politicized political prosecutions 4 years later is making us less safe? May I remind my Democrat colleagues that the individual who burned down a police station, a career criminal, got 27 months. That's the idea of justice of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. Let's put aside the $2,000,000,000 of damage nationwide in the wake of the Floyd riots. Let's put aside all the other damage that flew flowed from that. Meanwhile, what is the president doing? Making our nation much more safe.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 22, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Saved - January 22, 2025 at 9:49 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Thom Tillis’ and Lisa Murkowski’s political careers are over. We will not stop working until they are fired from government in humiliation. HISTORIC DISGRACE

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

You are a disgrace of a human being. You are a coward and you are so dead wrong on these issues. You do not stand for law and order. If you did, you would categorically object to the due process violations 1500 American citizens experienced at the behest of a corrupt Biden administration DOJ. The egregious conduct of the government and how they handled these defendants and how they stripped them of their due process and human dignity is in question. That will Trump whatever crimes they committed because in this country, every defendant has the right to constitutionally protected due process. The fact that you have done no research about any of what has occurred means you are a complete total embarrassment to your constituents. Did you know that the conviction rate for J6 cases is 100%? Did you know that four people committed suicide because they couldn’t handle the psychological torture from the government after they committed misdemeanors. Did you know that police officers lied at these people’s trials? Did you know that prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence? No, of course you didn’t because you are lazy DC swamp creature who wants to be invited to the right cocktail parties. Your constituents should know that you won’t stand up for your basic due process rights, why would they vote for you ever again? If when your government tries to frame you and strip you of your constitutionally protected right to a fair and speedy trial, the Republican, you elected, who pays lip service to liberty, and freedom injustice for all is a fraud who will do nothing but virtue signal. And we’re going to make sure everybody knows that.

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 21, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 2:55 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: J6 patriot @BrandonStraka gives a tearful thank you to President Trump for keeping his promise Trump resisted pressure from cowardly RINO politicians, using pardons to exonerate innocent protesters entrapped by weaponized government. VINDICATION 🇺🇸 https://t.co/KNNUYp1Ghk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden's Department of Justice has caused significant suffering, and justice feels delayed for many. I want to express my gratitude to President Trump for keeping his promise to pardon the January 6th defendants on his first day in office, despite pushback from some Republicans. This act will alleviate a lot of pain and is a crucial first step toward healing and justice for those whose lives have been devastated by the actions of the current administration.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Brutality of what Joe pie Biden's Department of Justice has done. For them, justice is coming too late, and no pardon is going to help them. But I will say from the bottom of my heart, I wanna say thank you to president Trump because, I know I've been told that so many people, republicans, were giving him pushback and telling him not to to pardon the January 6th defendants. But on his 1st day in office, he kept his promise. And he went in and he pardoned all of us. And I I know that this is going to relieve a lot of people's pain. It's the first step, I think, towards bringing a little bit of healing and a little bit of justice for so many people whose lives have been absolutely destroyed by Joe Biden and his department of justice.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 21, 2025 at 12:45 AM
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 1:18 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: President Trump JUST SIGNED FULL PARDONS OF 1500 J6 PATRIOTS IT'S OFFICIAL -- WE HAVE DEFEATED THE FEDSURRECTION

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 21, 2025 at 12:42 AM
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 12:51 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

I, John Strand, of Naples, Florida have just received word that I have received a FULL pardon of exoneration. I have wept tears of joy. Thank you @realDonaldTrump for hearing us. Thank you for having our back. God bless America. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/XBu5GdEEWn

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 19, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 10:18 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: These J6 hostages, our nation’s “patriot first-responders”, have been wrongfully imprisoned for 4 years of hell on earth. A most shameful stain on America. Tomorrow, we set them free, and we begin to revive the American commitment to liberty and justice FOR ALL 🗽 https://t.co/YztJg0l69f

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 20, 2025 at 1:54 PM
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 9:24 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

So now it’s official: • Mark Milley is literally a traitor who caused the J6 violence • Fauci is Dr. Evil, guilty of mass genocide • Liz Cheney violated 1512, the very 20-year felony she supported being used to put ME & hundreds of others in prison SCANDAL OF THE CENTURY

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 18, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Saved - January 19, 2025 at 3:51 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

The Government during the Biden Administration betrayed the public’s trust, weaponized the Department of Justice to target their political opponents, arrested peaceful protesters, and completely abused their positions of power. They should be held accountable. https://t.co/si4OCe9eJZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trust in the government is at an all-time low, particularly regarding institutions like the FBI. The Whitmer Fednapping Hoax and other scandals illustrate a pattern of government involvement and corruption, culminating in the events of January 6th, which I view as a pivotal moment in our history. There is substantial evidence suggesting government entrapment. It's a troubling situation, but with President Trump elected, we have a chance for change. It's crucial to get his cabinet approved, especially Kash Patel, and to pursue restorative justice for those affected by January 6th. I'm eager to discuss this further tonight.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government has never lacked more trust than it has at this moment in time and deservedly so. We have no reason to trust, our institutions, the government at large, the FBI particularly, the the the Whitmer Fednapping Hoax has been well documented and was a blueprint for what then happened on January 6th, and many other scandals just in the last few years. You know, you run out of memory to track all of these things. But today is the 4 year anniversary of the January 6th event. I call it our American Reichstag fire moment, where with all of the evidence we have of government involvement, entrapment and corruption, it's very clear that our government is not trustworthy and is an enemy of the people. It's a very concerning situation. Thank God we elected president Trump, but there is much work to be done getting his entire cabinet, installed and and approved and specifically with Kash Patel, that'll be key. And, restorative justice for the victims harmed January 6th, which is something I'm really excited to share with you guys tonight.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 17, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Saved - January 18, 2025 at 11:39 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Tina Peters, a MAGA political prisoner, just requested help from President @realDonaldTrump She seeks to expose a CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION by corrupt Colorado officials prosecuting her for official acts covered by the Supremacy Clause. This outrage must end! https://t.co/A6Q2cEDvTB

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 16, 2025 at 5:26 AM
Saved - January 16, 2025 at 3:49 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Hey @SenThomTillis 👋🏼 I’m one of those “J6 insurrectionists” accused of violence against police officers—I was thrown in prison for 3 years, my life DESTROYED but turns out, J6 was a dirty entrapment fraud—I was innocent + vindicated by the Supreme Court So you can GO TO HELL

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 15, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Saved - January 16, 2025 at 1:57 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: @SenBlumenthal gaslights the nation by telling Pam Bondi she “has to” agree with his assertions about the 2020 election & “J6 insurrectionists” This is a sitting senator grandstanding on malicious lies. 2020 was rigged—and J6 was entrapment coverup! https://t.co/xSJepE0s5k

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am deeply troubled by your responses today. You need to acknowledge that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election. You avoided answering that question when asked by Senator Durbin. Additionally, you should clearly state that those involved in the January 6th insurrection who committed violence should not be pardoned. I don’t have to say what you want me to say. I speak the truth and won’t say anything just to gain confirmation. I will answer questions to the best of my ability.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have to say also, really troubled. Deeply disturbed by some of your responses and non responses to the questions that you've been asked today. You have to be able to say that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election. You dodged that question when you were asked directly by senator Durbin. You have to be able to say that January 6th insurrectionists who committed violence shouldn't be pardoned. Speaker 1: You said that I have to sit up here and say these things. No, I don't. I sit up here and speak the truth. I'm not gonna sit up here and say anything that I need to say to get confirmed by this body. I don't have to say anything. I will answer the questions to the best of my ability.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 15, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Saved - January 15, 2025 at 10:10 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

Let’s try this again: EVERY J6 CASE MUST BE NULLIFIED Why? Very simple—because in every case, the government violated Constitutional rights. There is no exception to this, and no valid argument against it. Either the Constitution stands, or it dies. https://t.co/Lcdo8wGj31

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

January 6 defendants shouldn’t just receive pardons. We need to be exonerated. We need restitution. We deserve an apology from the government. Lives were ruined and lost—all under fraudulent and manufactured pretenses. It’s time that justice truly prevails. https://t.co/9Tf5IzAaRn

Video Transcript AI Summary
I advocate daily for true justice regarding January 6th. We need to shift the narrative to focus on exoneration for the innocent and significant restitution for those affected. This is not just about pardons; it's about doing what is right and addressing the constitutional violations committed by the DOJ under Merrick Garland and Matthew Graves. Our nation must confront the reality of January 6th and the institutional problems that arose from it. This is a critical issue that requires our attention.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I advocate publicly on a daily basis for true justice for j six. We we can and we will shift the narrative about this event and what justice actually means, not just pardons, but exoneration for the innocent and significant restitution to make these people whole because they deserve it, and it's the right thing to do. But also because our nation must have a reckoning with the reality of what j six was and the constitutional implications of the egregious violations, committed by the Merrick Garland and Matthew Graves, DOJ. And there's real institutional problems, that we have to address, so it's really critical issue.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 11:47 PM
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 4:21 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Fiery Italian-American from California @TheRomanRules GOES OFF Tony Roman has “an offer you can’t refuse” for Hollywood Actors, in the wake of terrible fires resulting from Democrat rule “If you want to call yourselves Americans—then ACT LIKE IT!”🔥 https://t.co/EAwbFARZvC

Video Transcript AI Summary
My name is Tony Roman, and I have a message for Hollywood celebrities who blindly support the Democrat party and its agenda. Your actions have contributed to the chaos in Los Angeles. I’m offering you a chance to redeem yourselves by publicly renouncing your support for Democrat politicians and demanding the arrest of Gavin Newsom, Karen Bass, and the LA County fire chief. Additionally, endorse the America First Antiwoke Movement and commit to voting for conservative candidates. In return, we will donate meals in your name to those affected by the fires. If you refuse, we will continue our fight against woke tyranny. If you want to call yourselves Americans, act like it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Tony Roman, and I have a message for all of you Hollywood leftist so called celebrities who, like zombies, worship and support the Democrat party and their Marxist agenda. Your woke mental disorder, along with your reckless endorsements and voting record, and the sheeple drones who blindly follow you have resulted in the destruction we're all witnessing in Los Angeles. The Southern California neighborhoods in flames are emblematic of your treason. But on behalf of many of my fellow Americans, I'm going to give you a chance to partially redeem yourselves, an opportunity to finally be on the right side of history by helping us take back this country from our anti American enemies. And while you're lounging comfortably in your $1,000 a night hotels ordering gourmet room service, it's also an opportunity for you fake do gooders to help those truly in need. Tony, make them an offer they can't refuse. Alright. Here it is. I want you to look in the mirror in fucking shame and then step forward and publicly and unconditionally renounce your support for all Democrat politicians and their leftist agenda and specifically demand the arrest of the tiny tyrant, Gavin Pelosi, that evil bitch, Karen Bass, and the pretend LA County fire chief who in vintage America couldn't get hired washing dirty fire trucks. Also, announce your endorsement of the Patriot America First Antiwoke Movement and pledge that from this day forward, you will only vote for proven, uncompromising conservatives. If you do this, we at Basilicos Pasta Yvino, along with our fellow Christian and Patriot supporters, will donate meals in your name to those affected by the fire and are far less fortunate than you who could use some good home cooking Italian comfort food right now. Do this, and we might forgive you. If not, especially now, we promise to continue waging war in the spirit of 17/76 against woke tyranny and all of you in Hollywood who attack our patriot principles, beliefs, traditional values, our cherished American way of life. We've done it before here at the constitutional battleground, and we'll fucking do it again. So do the right thing. If you wanna call yourselves Americans, act like it.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 12:06 AM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

.@GlennBeck asks what they did to me in prison. The more you learn about the shocking abuse of innocent J6 protesters by the Biden DOJ, the more you realize how dangerous our weaponized government has become. This travesty of justice MUST END https://t.co/oHVY3KkGPI

Video Transcript AI Summary
I received paperwork from the BOP indicating that some rules were altered to psychologically torture me and isolate me from my family and attorneys. This was influenced by the Department of Justice, particularly the FBI and the Assistant US Attorney's Office, linked to my federal prosecutor, Jason Manning. In prison, a security officer intimidated me, asserting his control and dismissing my constitutional rights. I expressed my intention to abide by the rules while advocating for the truth about January 6th and my innocence. Despite my compliance, I was entrapped into breaking a rule regarding phone communication, which I was never informed about. After submitting my contacts, I was falsely accused of breaking the rules and subjected to four months of severe isolation abuse.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have paperwork from the BOP that that acknowledges that the reason that some of their rules were rearranged in order to clearly torture me psychologically and in horrendous physical conditions and in super isolation, meaning totally cut off from all contact with my family and attorneys for an extended period of time. That was happening because of the fascist fingers of the Department of Justice, specifically the FBI and the AUSA, Assistant US Attorney's Office, which I believe traces back to Mr. Jason Manning, the actual federal prosecutor who prosecuted me at trial and put me into that prison in the first place. Speaker 1: So what rules did they rearrange for you? What happened to you? Speaker 0: In prison, I was pulled aside in this office with no one in it with a gentleman who worked for the security division of the prison who basically said, do you know who I am? Because I know who you are and I'm watching you. I said, I don't know who you are. I'm not surprised that you know who I am because that's become pretty well known at this point. And he said, well, let me break this down for you. I know you are all big on constitutional rights and talking a big first amendment game and this and that, but this is my kingdom and I rule here. So you better get that straight real fast. And clear intimidation, but I Speaker 1: wanna I'm sorry, the constitution applies to prisoners as well, sir, but go ahead. Speaker 0: Oh, it's supposed to. But, you know, the our founding fathers called the constitution a parchment barrier. And, there's a reason they use that terminology. It it's only gonna hold so far as the men holding that parchment have the integrity to understand what it means and how it's supposed to be applied. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. So So he threatens you basically, he threatens you. Speaker 0: Oh, absolutely. Well, I told him, I said, sir, I am not looking to cause trouble. I know you're in charge here and I wanna abide by whatever your rules are. Please just explain them to me, but I do have a first amendment and I plan to continue exercising it. I don't have a bone to pick at this point with the prison. I wasn't there to complain about prison. I was there to continue highlighting the fraud of January 6th, the corruption of the DC court system, and the fact that I'm innocent and so are many other j sixers who I need to continue to advocate for. And I'll do that from prison, it doesn't matter, I'm here to do a job. So I explained to him that me being in prison from my point of view was a deployment in service of my country as a political prisoner. And he was maybe agnostic on that, but basically said, I'm in charge. But he seemed to indicate like, okay, we can manage that. But he wasn't honest with me. And I was basically entrapped into supposedly breaking their rules about some technicality about the phone system, even though they broke their own rules by failing to give me the written rule book that explains all of these details, and then later said, Well, you broke this rule from page such and such in the rule book. And I said, What rule book? And they said, Didn't we give you that on day 1 because the policy stipulates we must do that? Nope, No rule book. I had no idea about this rule. The rule you told me was you have to submit the people you want to talk to on the prison communication systems controlled and monitored. Of course, I understood that. Submit those people and if we approve it, then you can talk to them. Well, I did that. I talked to them, and then they said you broke the rules. You're going in the hole. And then long story short, they disappeared me for 4 straight months of horrific isolation abuse.
View Full Interactive Feed