TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Juliedonuts
@Juliedonuts - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
HOLY SHILT! π³ π¨π¨π¨Itβs FINALLY out in public and Confirmed that big pharma LIED FOR DECADES ABOUT THEIR DEADLY VACCINES!!! Share this with your friends who are in serious denial!! Ughh itβs so upsetting what they did to our babies!!! CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!! https://t.co/DyXsXMzgDz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The speaker claims that, over the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, identifying hundreds of infants and toddlers who died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis.
The speaker states that most of these deaths occurred within about two weeks after the shot, with forty percent dying within one week. The deaths are described as temporally linked to the vaccination, with the majority of fatalities occurring at ages one to one and a half, which the speaker notes as the time they receive the MMR shots.
The speaker claims that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The overall claim is that these shots are killing the babies in their sleep, described as absolutely disturbing and as part of a broader study. The speaker concludes that the shots are deadly and that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore; if parents still want them, they should be split up rather than administered as a combined dose, labeling the current approach as βthe full load of garbage.β
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. You can't make this stuff up. So for the past thirty years, the MMR shots have been killing more children, far more children than measles has. And so this is absolutely terrible. And we identified hundreds, hundreds of infants and toddlers that died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, encephalitis.
It's just it's killing some of these children. And most of them, most of these kids, they died within about two weeks. Most of them majority died within two weeks after the shot. Forty percent died within one week. So the temporality there checks out and most of these deaths occurred ages one to one and a half, right when they get the MMR shots.
Usually twenty five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. And so these shots are killing the babies in their sleep. It's absolutely disturbing and particularly what they're dying from. So all of this combined in this study, I mean, it's unequivocal that these shots are deadly. The MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore.
They should split them up if the parents still want them. Don't give this full load of garbage.
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
@RealAF_Patriot https://t.co/RUQXn12nPy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Rob was routinely beaten by his father, Carl. On a typical night, Carl would slip into Rob's bed, roll him over, swab him down, and say something like, "I'm thinking about hiring Maury Amsterdam to play Buddy Sorrell. What do you think?" The success of the Dick Van Dyke show changed things dramatically. Carl started inviting many of his famous friends to his son.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rob was routinely beaten by his father, Carl. On a typical night, Carl would slip into Rob's bed, roll him over, swab him down, and say something like, I'm thinking about hiring Maury Amsterdam to play Buddy Sorrell. What do you think? Well, the success of the Dick Van Dyke show changed things dramatically. Carl started inviting many of his famous friends to his son.
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
President Trump posted this last night. Heβs telling us who is going down. Listen closelyβ¦Oh the crimes! https://t.co/yukOKI4zYY
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false.
The Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election.
A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election.
John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report.
There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top.
Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election.
Speaker 1: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't.
Speaker 0: Gabbard got her hands on a house intel report that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born, interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns out that the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move.
John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was nothing routine about this, and it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in. Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies either. Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama.
There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again and form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt. One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump. That was the Steele dossier.
And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of any of this was ever true. There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted that they be pushed even without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherry picked the intelligence, lied about their sources, misquoted sources, didn't corroborate their claims, suppressed intelligence that ran counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings.
Rank and file CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own tradecraft standards. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump knows, that the Russians helped him win in 2016.
Speaker 2: Putin hated secretary Clinton so much that that the flip side of that coin was he had a clear preference for the person running against the person he hated so much.
Speaker 3: It was Russia in a very systematic way, in trying to interfere in the election and to try to advance the prospects of Donald Trump being elected.
Speaker 0: This was such a malicious disinformation campaign perpetrated on the American people that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House. What this report actually shows is that the Russians just wanted to create chaos and undermine Americans' faith in democracy. Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir Putin didn't care who won. He had no preference. But like most people expected Hillary to win and had a little docket of compromising dirt on her, dirt that he never released.
Now if Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn't Putin drop the dirt?
Speaker 1: There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. Then CIA director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a, quote, unquote, clear preference for Trump.
Speaker 0: Now if Clinton was on tranquilizers like the Russians believed, why didn't they leak it to help Trump win? How credible was the information about Hillary Clinton's health?
Speaker 1: All I have seen is what the intelligence committee have reported through their investigation. I think the the the underlying point there is is that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that they had. And the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election, as president Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan, everybody said they were doing in order to support Donald Trump's election, they would have released the most damning of that information.
Speaker 0: Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did. Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with Trump and that he didn't even direct his people to help Trump win, but they put it out there anyway. In a sense, Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in our country. Barack Obama, the CIA, and the FBI were the ones doing what our enemy wanted.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former president Obama in criminal behavior? We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this. For even for president Obama? Correct. The evidence that we have, found and that we have released, directly point to president Obama leading the manufacturing assessment.
There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.
Speaker 0: Even two years later after the election, Barack Obama was still pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true. And he knew it wasn't true because he helped manufacture it.
Speaker 4: They're undermining our alliances, cozying up to Russia. What happened to the Republican Party? They're cozying up to the former head of the KGB, actively blocking legislation that that would defend our elections from Russian attack. What happened?
Speaker 0: Now I don't know if it's possible to indict a former president for actions he took while in office. I'm not a lawyer, proudly. But Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe liability. Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact that Brennan committed perjury when he lied to congress.
Speaker 5: Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier?
Speaker 3: I don't. Do you know
Speaker 5: if the bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier as any as part of any court filings, applications? I have no awareness. Did the CIA rely on it? No. Why not?
Speaker 3: Because we we didn't we it wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence, information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done. It was it was not.
Speaker 0: Well, that's a lie. Whatever happens to these guys is not revenge. It's accountability. And it's time for people to pay the price.
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST POSTED THIS ON TRUTH. π€£ππ»β° https://t.co/pNsQqvf7D4
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
President Trump posted this: J6 is FEDsurrection is falling apart and Comey isnβt just going down for lying. β°β°β°ππ»ππ» https://t.co/gUz7FaCCtu
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow morning Just the News will publish a major story answering whether "FBI agents themselves believed the FBI had become biased." "Scores of FBI agents" tell leadership in an internal memo after January 6 that they believe the FBI had become politically biased against the conservative movement and for liberals. They cite "extraordinary circumstances, extraordinary details, extraordinary statements." It's rare for the FBI to speak up against leadership, but this happened on Chris Wray's watch. "'Chris Wray would tell Congress, we don't have a political bias problem,' even as agents claimed bias." The report will provide a specific number: "'How many plainclothes FBI agents were in the crowd and working the capital on the day of January 6?'" We knew there were 23 undercover informants. "'Tomorrow, we're gonna tell you a number'βa large number of plainclothes agents on the scene." "'Chris Wray would never answer that question to congress.'"
Separately, a Richmond grand jury is evaluating whether James Comey lied to Congress in September 2020 as the statute of limitations approaches next Tuesday. Today, prosecutors presented evidence. A document shows James Baker said, "I was asked by James Comey through the chief of staff to leak classified information to The New York Times in October 2016." That is what the grand jury is evaluating tonight. We'll let you know if a decision is made or if it gets kicked next week.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want to talk a little bit about accountability in FBI. Tomorrow morning you're going to wake up to a major story at Just the News. It answers a question that we've tried to pose for the last five years. Did FBI agents themselves believe the FBI had become biased? Tomorrow, you're going to see not one, not two, not five, not 10, but scores of FBI agents telling their leadership in an internal memo after January 6 that they believe the FBI had become politically biased against the conservative movement and for liberals.
And they cite extraordinary circumstances, extraordinary details, extraordinary statements. These are it's so rare for the FBI to speak up against their leadership internally, but this happened on Chris Wray's watch. Now all the while, Chris Wray was telling Congress, we don't have a political bias problem, even though his own agents were saying day in and day out, they in fact had a political bias problem. The other thing we're gonna answer for you for the first time, we're gonna be able to give you a specific number. How many plainclothes FBI agents were in the crowd and working the capital on the day of January 6?
Now we knew there were 23 undercover informants. We got you that data a few months ago. Tomorrow, we're gonna tell you an astounding number. Yes. It's a very large number of FBI agents that were on the scene when the riot was breaking out, all in plain clothes, all unable to be seen.
Chris Wray would never answer that question to congress. We're gonna answer it for you with these documents we're gonna make public. Meanwhile, on the issue of the FBI, and maybe one of the men who owns some of the legacy of that politicized FBI, James Comey, a grand jury in Richmond right now, is considering evidence about whether he lied to congress in September 2020. The statute of limitations coming up next Tuesday. Today, prosecutors presented evidence in that case.
Remember what we told you a few weeks ago. Director Comey told congress, I didn't ask anyone to leak classified information. Then we showed you a document a couple of weeks ago where James Baker, the chief counsel and top lieutenant to James Comey said, no. I was asked by James Comey through the chief of staff to leak classified information to The New York Times in October 2016. That is what the grand jury is evaluating tonight.
We'll let you know if during the show they make a decision or whether that gets kicked the next week, but we're keeping a close eye on that. And what
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
For anyone who questions βWarpspeedβ. This explains what this enemy had in store for us if it wasnβt for Donald J. Trump. Save it and watch when you can. HE SAVED US FROM FEMA CAMPS. SHARE IT. ππ»π₯
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
EVERY WORD OF THIS! π₯π₯ Itβs coming!!ππ»β° https://t.co/oLl3YE1PKM
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims there is incontrovertible evidence of a seditious conspiracy to subvert the will of the American people and overthrow the U.S. government in 2016, and that those responsible must be held accountable. The discussion references a July 28 meeting in the Oval Office and asserts that officials briefed about Hillary Clinton's plan to tie Trump to Russia collusion lies, a narrative that the speaker says dominated national discourse for five years, undermined a sitting president, sabotaged the administration, and framed a three-star general. The speaker argues the affair destroyed the country and caused a constitutional crisis, calling the actions atrocious and demanding accountability for all involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: American in their shoes. I hate to say this, but president Barack Obama, there is now incontrovertible evidence that he was the spearhead of a seditious conspiracy to subvert the will of the American people and overthrow the United States government back in 2016. We must, absolutely must, hold every one of these criminals accountable for the crimes that they committed. They are the most heinous crimes committed in American history. James, James Comey, John Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Biden was in the meeting in July 28 in the Oval Office.
They briefed Barack Obama on Hillary Clinton's plan to, quote, tie Trump to Russia collusion lies. It consumed our national discourse for five years. It undermined a sitting duly elected president. It sabotaged administration. It framed a three star general.
It destroyed and ripped this country apart. We had a constitutional crisis, the likes of which I don't think any American can fully comprehend. It is atrocious, and every single one of them must be held accountable. Yeah. And, of course
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
S A N D Y H O O K W A S A S T A G G E D E V E N T B Y T H E C I A π«₯π€«
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
S A N D Y H O O K W A S A S T A G G E D E V E N T B Y T H E C I A π«₯π€«
@TacticalNerd - π₯1776π₯
@Juliesnark1731 Pepperidge farm remembers https://t.co/nj5IaM478a
reSee.it AI Summary
I urge every American citizen to watch this crucial 24-minute video that reveals the corruption in our financial system. It's a must-see! Also, check out "The Greatest Show on Earth" by @GoodLionTV for more insights.
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
Every American Citizen MUST WATCH THIS. Itβs about 24mins long, so save it and watch when you can. It breaks down our financial system and is the most impactful and important video you will ever watch to see WHY IT IS A SCAM, CORRUPT AF AND GOING AWAY!!! SHARE IT! ππ»π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
Video Transcript AI Summary
The modern banking system creates currency faster than nature. Politicians create deficit spending, which is paid for by Treasury bonds (IOUs). Banks buy these bonds and sell them to the Federal Reserve at a profit. The Federal Reserve creates currency by writing checks on accounts with zero balance, giving the currency to banks, who then buy more bonds. The Treasury deposits this currency, and the government spends it.
When currency is deposited in banks, it is loaned out through fractional reserve lending, expanding the currency supply. 92-96% of all currency is created by the banking system, leading to inflation. Taxes are used to pay interest on bonds the Federal Reserve bought with essentially nothing. The system requires ever-increasing debt and will eventually collapse.
The Federal Reserve is a private corporation owned by banks, who profit through interest and dividends. The system funnels wealth to the government and banking sector, causing economic booms and busts and wealth disparity. The solution is to understand the system, share the knowledge, and join the conversation to design a new monetary system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They say that money doesn't grow on trees, but the truth is that the modern banking system creates currency far faster than trees can grow. Most people don't have a clue how currency is created economists and bankers make it sound so complex that people think they can't understand it but I'm going to strip our monetary system down to its essence so that you can see the scam behind the curtain and just how it world's currency, I'm gonna use The United States as our example. It all starts when some politician says, vote for me and I'll make sure the government provides you more free stuff than my opponent will but there's no such thing as a free lunch so to provide that supposedly free stuff the politicians vote for the country to spend more than its income this is called deficit spending to pay for that deficit spending the Treasury borrows currency by issuing a bond so what's a bond? If you think about it a bond is really nothing but a glorified IOU it's a pretty piece of paper with numbers print on it that says loan me a trillion dollars today and I promise over a ten year period I'm gonna pay you back that trillion dollars plus interest but what you need to understand is that treasury bonds are our national debt these glorified IOUs are to be paid back by you and I and our descendants through future taxation therefore when the government issues a bond it steals prosperity out of the future so that it can spend it today the Treasury then holds a bond auction and the world's largest banks show up and compete to buy part of our national debt and make a profit on it by earning interest you'll notice that as we move through this process the big banks are there taking a cut every step of the way this isn't by chance as you'll see shortly then through a shell game called open market operations the banks get to sell some of those bonds to the Federal Reserve at a profit To pay for the bonds the Federal Reserve opens up its big old checkbook and writes bad bogus counterfeit checks that should bounce because they're drawn on an account that always has a zero balance there isn't 1 penny in there.
To quote from the Boston Federal Reserve, When you or I write a check, there must be sufficient funds in our account to cover that check. But when the Federal Reserve writes a check, there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve writes a check, it is creating money. The Fed then hands those checks to the banks and at this point currency springs into existence. The banks then take that currency and buy more bonds at the next Treasury auction.
But what is a check? A check is also an IOU. When you write a check you're making a note that says here's my IOU for cash all you have to do is go to the bank and pick it up. Now it's very very important that you understand this process because we're going to come back later and show you the devastating effect this has on you. The Treasury issues IOUs, bonds.
The banks then buy those IOUs with currency. The Federal Reserve then writes checks, and hands them to the banks in exchange for the Treasury's IOUs, the bonds, and currency is created. So what's really happening is the Federal Reserve and the Treasury are just swapping IOUs, using the banks as middlemen and abracadabra presto currency magically springs into existence. This process repeats and repeats over and over again enriching the banks and in debting the public by raising the national debt. The end result is that there's a buildup of bonds at the Federal Reserve and currency at the Treasury.
This process is also where all paper currency comes from. The Federal Reserve and the government mistakenly call it base money because they didn't watch episode one of this series and they don't know the difference between money and currency. But I will correctly refer to it as base currency because it is not money. It is currency and as we've learned, there is a big difference. Money has to be a store of value and maintain its purchasing power over long periods of time.
We learned in episode one that earlier in our history, our paper currency was just a claim check. It was a representation for real money of intrinsic value, the gold and silver that was held on deposit at the treasury. You could walk into any bank and slap your currency, like, say, a $20 bill on the counter and redeem it for real money, a $20 gold piece. But now this base currency that's piling up back here is really nothing but a receipt or a claim check on an IOU, that bond. So it's really nothing but a supply of numbers.
The treasury then deposits the newly created currency into the various branches of the government, and the politicians say, hey, thanks for that. And the government does some deficit spending on public works, social programs, and war. The government employees, contractors, and soldiers then deposit their pay in the banks. Now this may come as a shock to you, but when you deposit your currency with the bank, you're not actually depositing it into an account to be safely held in trust for you. Instead, you're actually loaning the bank your currency, and within certain legal limits, they can do with it pretty much anything they please.
This includes gambling in the stock market and loaning it out at a profit, of course. Now this is where the machine of currency creation really gets cranking because this is where something called fractional reserve lending comes into play. Fractional reserve lending is exactly what it says. The banks are allowed to reserve only a fraction of your deposit and loan the rest out. Although reserve ratios may vary I'm going to use a 10% reserve ratio as our example.
If you deposit $100 in your account the bank can legally take $90 of it and loan it out without telling you. The bank must hold $10 of your deposit in reserve just in case you want some of it. These reserves are called vault cash. But why does your bank account still say you have $100 if the bank has stolen $90 of it? Because the bank left IOUs it created called bank credit in its place.
Now I know this sounds crazy, but here it is in black and white from the Fed. Commercial banks create checkbook money when they grant a loan simply by adding new deposit dollars in accounts on their books in exchange for a borrower's IOU. These are nothing but numbers that the banks type into their computers. And even though these bank credit IOU numbers are very different from base currency numbers because they only exist in computers, they are still currency. So now there is $190 in existence.
Now the reason people take out loans from the banks is to buy something. They're going to buy a house or a car or something like that. So the borrower takes the $90 the bank loaned to him from your account and he pays the seller of the item. But then the seller deposits that currency into his account and his bank loans out 90% of that and leaves bank credit numbers in its place. So now there's $271 in existence.
This process repeats and repeats until under a 10% reserve ratio. An initial deposit of just $100 can create up to $1,000 of bank credit all backed by $100 of vault cash, just 10%. But as I said, reserve ratios vary wildly. On some deposits it's 10% on others it's 3% and on some forms of deposits reserve requirements are zero the result is that the expansion of the currency supply by the banks is far greater than even this example would lead you to believe so once again when currency is deposited in the banks the banks get to lend it out and then it gets redeposited and relent redeposited and relent redeposited and relent over and over again creating bank credit all the way this is where the vast majority of our currency supply comes from in fact 92 to 96% of all currency in existence is created not by the government but here in the banking system now massive amounts of currency spewing into society may at first sound like a fun idea that is until you remember one of the most important hidden secrets of money from episode one that the prices of everyday goods and services act as a sponge on expanding currency supply.
The more currency we have, the more prices rise. This is where inflation comes from. The true definition of inflation is an expansion of the currency supply. Rising prices are merely the symptom. So our entire currency supply is nothing but a couple of bucks whipped up in this hocus pocus scam where the treasury and the Federal Reserve swap glorified IOUs and a bunch of numbers that the banks just type into their computers.
That's it. That's our entire currency supply. It's nothing but a supply of numbers. Some of them printed, most of them typed, and there is nothing else. But if you thought that was crazy, get ready to enter the twilight zone of modern economics.
We work for some of that currency supply. True wealth is your time, but we trade away moments of our lives hour by hour, day by day, and year by year for numbers that somebody printed on pieces of paper or just typed into a computer. Now those numbers represent our blood, sweat, tears, labor, ideas, and talent. We are what gives the currency its value. But here comes the really cool joke.
We work hard so that we can save some of that currency, so that we can pay the tax collector in The United States, it's known as the IRS. They then turn it over to the treasury so that the treasury can pay the principal plus interest on that bond that the Federal Reserve bought with a check drawn on an account that has nothing in it. Now let's do a recap on this section because this is where the system begins to rob you and I on a massive scale. Much of our taxes are not used for schools, roads, and public services but to pay interest on bonds that the Federal Reserve bought with a check drawn on an account that has nothing in it. The Federal Reserve is committing fraud But here's one of the biggest secrets of them all.
Before the establishment of the Federal Reserve there was no need for personal income tax. The Federal Reserve was created in 1913 and that very same year the Constitution was amended to allow income tax. Do you really think this was just a coincidence? Ask yourself how much income tax you've paid over your lifetime. Much of it has been silently siphoned away into the hands of those who own the system.
Yes, this system has owners. Who they are is an even bigger secret that we'll get to shortly, but we need to understand the mumbo jumbo of the so called debt ceiling. It's all based on a huge paradox. There was interest due on that bond and there was interest due on every one of those loans that the banks made. That means that there is interest due on every dollar in existence.
Let me ask you something. If you borrow the very first dollar into existence and that's the only dollar that exists on the planet, but you promise to pay it back plus another dollar's worth of interest, where do you get the second dollar to pay the interest? The answer is that you have to borrow that one into existence and promise to pay it back with interest as well. So now there are $2 in existence, but you owe 4, and so on and so on. The result is there's never enough currency to pay the debt.
There is always more debt in the system than there is currency in existence to pay the debt. Therefore, the whole system is impossible. It is finite. It will come to an end one day. What would happen if the government stopped borrowing to do deficit spending?
Are the payments on those treasury bonds going to stop? What would happen if the public stopped borrowing and going deeper into debt? Are your house and car payments going to stop? No. There is a payment due every month interest on every dollar in existence and those payments do not stop.
If we stop borrowing then no new currency is created to replace the currency that we used to make those payments. Whether you're making a payment on a loan or paying tax to make a payment on a bond, the portion of the payment that goes to pay off the principal extinguishes that portion of the debt. But the debt also extinguishes the currency. Currency and debt are like matter and antimatter. When they meet, they annihilate each other.
If we just pay off the principal only on all the loans and bonds that exist, the entire currency supply just vanishes. So if we don't go deeper into debt every year, look what happens. The whole thing goes into a deflationary collapse under the weight of those payments. Politicians and pundits alike talk about balancing the budget, paying down the debt, and living within our means. They don't understand that that is deflationary.
It is impossible to do under our current monetary system without collapsing the whole economy. This is why any talk of a debt ceiling is not only ridiculous, it's delusional. The system is designed to require ever increasing levels of debt just to continue and that's why politicians will always kick the can down the road and raise this so called debt ceiling over and over again until the whole system finally collapses under its own weight in other words they don't want it to collapse on their watch. The founding fathers of The United States knew the dangers of central banking and fought to free themselves from this very thing. The Revolutionary War started out as a tax revolt but now we must pay tax just to have a monetary system.
Having just suffered through the hyperinflation of the continental dollar which was printed into oblivion to finance the Revolutionary War they understood the dangers of fiat currency and debt based monetary systems so to protect future generations from institutional theft and out of control government they wrote into the constitution that only gold and silver can be money for the simple fact that you can't print them. Our current system is not only unconstitutional but it robs us of the liberty and prosperity our forefathers fought and died for. We are all feeling the effects of ignoring the constitution right now by forcing more currency into circulation our purchasing power is diluted inflation is a slow and insidious stealth tax that is simply the result of this debt based monetary system. This system empowers and benefits those who create the currency and receive it first as they get to spend it into circulation before it has an effect on the economy. They're stealing purchasing power from you and transferring it to the banks and the government every hour of every day because of this false monetary system.
And it's not like the people at the top don't know this. To quote the Federal Reserve, the decrease in purchasing power incurred by the holders of money due to inflation imparts gains to the issuers of money. This is a fraud. It is a pyramid scheme. It is a Ponzi scheme.
It's a scam, and it's a lie. Our entire monetary system is nothing but a form of legalized theft. But here's the biggest con job of them all. The Federal Reserve is not federal. It has stockholders.
There is no federal agency that has stockholders. What's a stockholder? A share of stock represents a percentage of ownership in a corporation. So the stockholders are the owners of that corporation. Therefore, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation with owners.
And you can see it for yourself if you go to the Federal Reserve's website and it will say the stockholders receive an annual dividend of 6%. Now we know that the stock in the Federal Reserve was originally issued to the largest banks in The United States, but because of mergers and acquisitions through the years, you can't actually trace who owns the stock in the Federal Reserve. That's a very closely guarded secret. My guess would be that the owners are those primary dealers, the banks that get to make a profit by selling part of our national debt, those bonds, to the Federal Reserve who buys them with a check for nothing. Then we pay tax to pay the principal and the interest on those bonds so that the Federal Reserve can pay the banks a 6% dividend.
Don't be alarmed if you don't quite comprehend the deception of this system at first glance. Very few people do. It is purposely complex. The economist John Maynard Keynes once wrote, by this means government may secretly and unobserved confiscate the wealth of the people and not one man in a million will detect the theft. I believe that presented correctly anyone can understand this system regardless of how complex it is.
So let's do a recap and break it down even more. The way the system works is that step one, The government creates glorified IOUs. These bonds increase our national debt and put the public on the hook to pay it back. Step two: IOUs are swapped to create currency. The Treasury sells the bonds to the banks.
The banks then turn around and sell our national debt at a profit to the Federal Reserve which they probably own. The Federal Reserve then opens its checkbook that doesn't have a penny in it and buys those IOUs with IOUs that it writes checks on a checking account that has a zero balance. Then they give those checks to the banks and currency just springs into existence and then the whole process repeats. This results in a buildup of bonds at the Fed Reserve and currency at the Treasury which is really just a supply of numbers. The Treasury then deposits the numbers in the various branches of the government and we get to step three: the government spends the numbers on promises, public works, social programs and war then the government employees contractors and soldiers deposit their pay into the banks and we get to step four where the banks multiply the numbers by magically inventing more IOUs through fractional reserve lending where they steal a portion of everyone's deposit and lend it out.
That currency gets redeposited and then a portion is stolen again and the process repeats over and over magnifying the currency supply exponentially. Then we work for some of those numbers which brings us to step five where our numbers are taxed. We pay tax to the IRS who then turns our numbers over to the Treasury so the Treasury can pay the principal plus the interest on bonds that were purchased by the Federal Reserve with a check from nothing. Then we get to step six: the debt ceiling delusion. The system is designed to require ever increasing levels of debt and will eventually collapse under its own weight because politicians always kick the can down the road.
They don't want it to collapse on their watch. And finally, step seven, the secret owners take their cut. The world's largest banks own the Federal Reserve. Those banks make a profit selling our national debt to the Fed, they make a profit when the Fed pays them interest on the reserves held at the Fed, and the Fed pays them a 6% dividend on their ownership of the Fed. This system is fundamentally evil.
It funnels wealth from the working population to the government and the banking sector. It is the cause of the artificial booms and busts of modern economies and it causes great disparity of wealth between the rich and the working class. And it is only possible because we no longer use real money, we use currency. But worst of all, it is a form of enslavement. Bond is the root word of bondage.
Whenever a government issues a bond, it is a promise to make us pay tax in the future. Nobody asked you if you wanted to pay tax today for the prosperity we all enjoyed in the last century nobody is asking our children if they want to work hard in the future to pay for the prosperity we're enjoying now George Washington once wrote to James Madison no generation has the right to contract debts greater than can be paid off during the course of its own existence by stealing prosperity from tomorrow so we can spend it today we enslave ourselves and future generations now this all sounds pretty bad but there is great hope for you are the greatest threat to this false monetary system this system relies on the public being ignorant of its workings please share this knowledge with everyone you know because an informed public that fully understands the system can build a better future for generations to come. And now I leave you with this quote widely attributed to a former director of the Bank of England. The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented.
Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money and control credit, and with the flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. But if you want to continue as the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and to control credit this is the Federal Reserve in Washington DC it's located on Constitution Street and that is just as much of a joke as the New York Fed being located on Liberty Street. Both of them are unconstitutional, both of them limit our liberty and they transfer wealth away from us every second of every day to the Federal Reserve, to the government, and to the banking sector.
You are now among the one in a million who can detect the theft of your prosperity. So the big question is, what can you do about it? One, watch this video until you can describe and teach it to others. Those who understand this system can make preparations for its unavoidable collapse and protect themselves. History shows that those who don't will probably be wiped out.
Two, share this video with everyone, especially those you care about. All it takes is a mouse click or two to get this message in front of millions. Post this video on Facebook, tweet it, email it to loved ones. Please share it wherever you can. Three, join the conversation.
The current world monetary system is based on a three hundred year old design meant to enrich a few at the expense of the many. There must be a better way. At hiddensecretsofmoney.com, we've created an open source platform for the design and development of a new world monetary system. We're calling on every economist, every student, every college, every bright mind, and anyone who cares to join the discussion. In educating ourselves and each other, we can prevent the further loss of our freedoms and maybe, just maybe, win some of them back.
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
H/T @GoodLionTV for the video out of his amazing film βThe Greatest Show on Earthβ GO WATCH THAT TOO!!
reSee.it AI Summary
@Juliesnark1731 expressed frustration with Twitter's refusal to let them post a thread about childhood shots, perceiving it as censorship. @csharpner responded to @Juliesnark1731.
@Juliesnark1731 - πΊπΈπ© JULIE DONUTS πΊπΈπ©
So I had an entire thread I was going to post about childhood shots and twitter wonβt let me post it. Thatβs all you need to know about them. JUST WOW TWITTER. What a disgrace to mankind. We cannot speak about it. CENSORSHIP is how they keep the lies going. They took me down and
@csharpner - CSharpner - Biden Guilty of $5M Bribe - TREASON!
@Juliesnark1731
