TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @KLVeritas
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
“We’re in the fight of our lives here. The world has to be alerted to the dangers of this pact.” Dr Francis Boyle https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/united-nations-pact-future-digital-ids-vaccine-passports-censorship/
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Don’t do it! The Hummingbird Trial Novavax is offering parents up to $3,000 to enroll their children in the vaccine maker’s Phase 2/3 COVID-19 vaccine trial for infants and children ages 6 months to 11 years. The offer also includes a stuffed animal for each child. https://t.co/TlgQGZNWCF
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
“Children ages 5-11 who received two doses of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine had heightened levels of a type of antibody suggestive of an altered immune system response one year after vaccination, a new peer-reviewed study revealed. The team of German researchers, led by Dr. Robin Kobbe with the Institute for Infection Research and Vaccine Development at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany, looked at blood samples of 14 healthy children the day the children received dose one of Pfizer’s shot, one month afterward and one year after the children received dose two. A year after the second dose, they found increased levels of IgG4 antibodies in the children’s blood, suggesting that their immune system switched its type of immune system response.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
The researchers wrote in their report published July 30 in The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, “IgG4 responses should gain more attention in health and disease, especially in the context of mRNA vaccination.” “Understanding the unusual mechanism triggering IgG4 production is crucial,” they added, “as more mRNA vaccines are currently under development and could hit the global market soon.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Are we paying enough attention to this?! Digital identity will be sold as a safe, secure and convenient way to prove who you are online for work, education and personal use. BUT there is a massive and real potential for abuse through surveillance (vaccine passport, CBDC, carbon tracking, etc). Now take in consideration the new EU vaccine card program. Sky is the limit (for surveillance and control) “If you think, ‘what are the tools of the New World?‘ — Everybody should have a digital ID; everybody should have a bank account; everybody should have a smartphone. Then, anything can be done. Everything else is built on that” Nandan Nilekani, IMF Spring Meetings, April 14, 2023 The potential abuse of digital id technology is massive. Currently there is also a global initiative of developing CBDC worldwide. If these two technologies are combined the potential for abuse is even higher and very concerning. Sometimes shiny and new is not always the best. #DigitalID #CBDC #UseCash
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
One of the provisions passed in the new amendments to IHR has to do with control of misinformation and disinformation. Annex 1 63. At the national level Assessment and notification. Each State Party shall develop, strengthen and maintain the core capacities: (a) to assess all reports of urgent events within 48 hours; and (b) to notify WHO immediately through the National IHR Focal Point when the assessment indicates the event is notifiable pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 6 and Annex 2 and to inform WHO as required pursuant to Article 7 and paragraph 2 of Article 9. Public health prevention, preparedness and response. Each State Party shall develop, strengthen and maintain the core capacities for: ... i) risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation; This talk “Celebrating 50 years of immunization progress" by Director General at the WHA77 is quite interesting especially considering the new policy on "addressing misinformation and disinformation" "You know the serious challenge that's posed by anti-vaxxers and I think we need to strategize to really push back because vaccines work. Vaccines affect adults and we have science, evidence on our side. I think it's time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers. I think they used COVID as an opportunity and you know all the havoc they're creating." I wonder what he has in store next for those who disagree..
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
The strategy for the United States going forward is for the individual States to pass legislation to REJECT the WHO Amendments to IHR based on the illegality of the process and violation of Article 55. While Tedros celebrates, it is time for THE WORLD TO REJECT the Amendments to IHR! THERE WAS NO VOTE!!! Countries agreed by consensus, many were not in the room and the ones that were there were highly encouraged to keep quiet. “Countries agreed by consensus to amend the International Health Regulations, which were last changed in 2005, such as by defining the term “pandemic emergency” and helping developing countries to gain better access to financing and medical products, WHO said.” Countries agreed to complete negotiations on the pandemic accord with the year, “at the latest,” WHO said. It’s not over! Reject the WHO!
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
This is why I do not use chain pharmacies unless I absolutely have to
@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA
The U.S Gov't paid off retail pharmacy chains to not fill valid ivermectin prescriptions? Now why would they want to do that? Let us count the reasons... https://www.amazon.com/War-Ivermectin-Medicine-Millions-Pandemic/dp/151077386X/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pharmacies-paid-reject-ivermectin-push-covid-shots/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20240521
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
How many people are aware of Pact for the Future and September meeting called Summit of the Future? What will they discuss? What is global governance? Why is it important for the sustainable goals? What is the role of the WHO towards these goals? Are we paying attention? “The Summit of the Future is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to enhance cooperation on critical challenges and address gaps in global governance, reaffirm existing commitments including to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the United Nations Charter, and move towards a reinvigorated multilateral system that is better positioned to positively impact people’s lives. Building on the SDG Summit in 2023, Member States will consider ways to lay the foundations for more effective global cooperation that can deal with today’s challenges as well as new threats in the future.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Have we had enough yet? https://www.un.org/en/common-agenda/summit-of-the-future
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
“A senior Health Canada official says pharma giant Pfizer made a conscious decision to not advise regulators that its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine contained a DNA sequence from the Simian Virus 40 (SV40). This information appears among multiple emails between staff from key drug regulators, including Health Canada (HC), the U.S. Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The information was obtained through an access-to-information request. On Aug. 23, 2023, Dr. Dean Smith, a senior scientific evaluator in HC’s Vaccine Quality Division, wrote an email to a colleague at the FDA about SV40. Health Canada had obtained confirmation two weeks earlier from Pfizer that SV40 DNA sequences were present in its COVID-19 vaccine. “I understand that there have been internal discussions at CBER [Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research] regarding the presents [sic] of an SV40 enhancer/promoter sequence, noting that its presence is unrelated to the purpose of the Pfizer’s plasmid as a transcription template for their mRNA COVID-19 vaccine,” wrote Dr. Smith. “Pfizer has communicated to us recently, that they apparently chose not to mention this information to EMA, FDA or HC at the time of their initial or subsequent submissions.”
@NChartierET - Noé Chartier
Pfizer ‘Chose Not to’ Tell Regulators About SV40 Sequence In Covid Shots: Health Canada Official "Pfizer has communicated to us recently, that they apparently chose not to mention this information to EMA, FDA or HC..." https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/pfizer-chose-not-to-tell-regulators-about-sv40-sequence-in-covid-shots-health-canada-official-5635787
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
“Young people who received multiple COVID-19 jabs were significantly more likely to die than those who skipped the shots, according to data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics(ONS). The data include deaths by vaccination status from April 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, when the COVID-19 shot campaign was in full effect. When The Exposé analyzed the data, they revealed the disturbing finding that those with the most COVID-19 shots fared the worst: “Our analysis focused on mortality rates per 100,000 person-years from January to May 2023 among residents in England aged 18 to 39, and what we found is truly shocking. “Initial observations of the data prove that individuals in this age bracket who had received four doses of a COVID-19 vaccine exhibited higher mortality rates compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.” Mortality rate 318% higher among quadruple-jabbed youth
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/multiple-covid-shots-higher-mortality-rates-cola/
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Lipid nano particle mRNA platform should be suspended indefinitely “Evidence is provided that adding 100% of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine [as with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines] in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis, while non-modified mRNA vaccines induced opposite results, thus suggesting that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could aid cancer development. Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100% m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
The WHO Power Grab #NotNowNotEver Must read. Link in comments. “The response to Covid was the greatest mistake in the history of the public-health profession, but the officials responsible for it are determined to do even worse. With the support of the Biden administration, the World Health Organization (WHO) is seeking unprecedented powers to impose its policies on the United States and the rest of the world during the next pandemic.” “The WHO hopes to begin this power grab in May at its annual assembly in Geneva, where members will vote on proposed changes in international health regulations and a new treaty governing pandemics. Pamela Hamamoto, the State Department official representing the U.S. in negotiations, has already declared that America is committed to signing a pandemic treaty that will “build a stronger global health architecture,” which is precisely what we don’t need. “
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
“Until the WHO acknowledges its pandemic blunders and holds China accountable, the U.S. should suspend any further financial contributions to the agency. It certainly shouldn’t enter into any agreement that gives the organization new powers and more money whenever its director declares a “potential public health emergency of international concern.” That would create the sort of perverse incentive that the economist Friedrich Hayek recognized decades before Covid. “‘Emergencies’ have always been the pretext,” Hayek wrote in 1979, “on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded—and once they are suspended it is not difficult for anyone who has assumed emergency powers to see to it that the emergency will persist.” If the U.S. and other countries endorse the WHO’s power grab at the meeting in May, there will be many more emergencies in our future.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-whos-power-grab
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
France: any criticism of mRNA platform punishable with up to 3 years imprisonment and 45,000 euros. “Article 4 is central to the new law, which was first deleted but then reinstated. This creates a new criminal offense and criminalizes the “ request to stop or refrain from therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment” as well as “the request to use practices that are presented as therapeutic or prophylactic ”. This means that any resistance to mRNA treatment (and other corporate medical methods) can be criminalized in the future.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Today a law was passed in France qualifying any opposition to mRNA-LNP injections as a "sectarian aberration". It carries a penalty of up to 3 years' imprisonment and 45,000 euros. “It will not tolerate any criticism of the therapeutic treatments which will be recommended or made obligatory by the state. Any person who dares to openly criticize these therapies will be liable to fines and imprisonment.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Must watch video that explains in great detail why we must #ExitTheWHO Currently the WHO is negotiating two binding documents, the Pandemic Agreement also known as Accord, Treaty and Ca ++ and the amendments to International Health Regulations IHR. These two documents will be voted on in Geneva in May of 2024 by the World Health Assembly. These two documents will allow a supranational entity (WHO) the ability to nullify and void, for indefinite amounts of time, the existing constitutional laws and civil rights protections of the member state nations upon proclamation of a public health emergency of international concerns PHEIC. Some of the key proposals include: 1. The ability of the WHO to assume total control of public health emergency of international concern that they conclude is of global significance. This is not limited to contagious diseases but any concept that might impact health on a global scale including the climate change 2. The WHO Director General would be making decisions and issuing directives on border closures, travel restrictions, potential treatments, diagnostics, exams, digital passports, etc 3. The WHO would become the authority on what is considered disinformation, misinformation or malinformation And much, much more... Stay informed!
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
“A fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine may not be as effective as expected, according to a recent peer-reviewed study. The retrospective population-based observational study published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation used national health data from the Austrian epidemiological reporting system, individual all-cause mortality data from Statistics Austria, and the national COVID-19 vaccine registry. Researchers calculated COVID-19 deaths and SARS-CoV-2 infections from Nov. 1 to Dec. 31, 2022, in 3,986,312 individuals, comparing the outcomes of 281,291 who received four vaccine doses with 1,545,242 individuals who received three vaccine doses to determine relative efficacy. During the initial study period, researchers recorded 69 COVID-19 deaths, 89,056 SARS-CoV-2 infections, and an overall case fatality rate of 0.08 percent. Relative vaccine efficacy for four doses was negative 24 percent compared with those who received three vaccine doses. Additionally, researchers found more COVID-19 deaths among individuals who received four vaccine doses than among those who received fewer vaccine doses or no vaccinations.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
UNESCO unveils the plan to CENSOR the free speech around the world. They will create “INTERNET OF TRUST” by targeting what it calls “misinformation,” “disinformation,” “hate speech,” and “conspiracy theories.” The "Internet for Trust" Conference, organized by UNESCO, addresses the regulation of platforms, an important topic for democracies, lives and agencies around the world. In its 59-page report, the UN Educational, Cultural, and Scientific Organization (UNESCO) outlines a series of “concrete measures which must be implemented by all stakeholders: governments, regulatory authorities, civil society, and the platforms themselves.” This approach includes the imposition of global policies, through institutions such as governments and businesses, designed to stop the spread of various forms of speech while promoting objectives such as “cultural diversity” and “gender equality.” Examples of expression flagged to be stopped or restricted include concerns about elections, public health measures, and advocacy that could constitute “incitement to discrimination.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
The curtain has been pulled back… Booster uptake for adults 18%, children 7% “the bigger problem is the quality of the new Covid boosters. Past boosters have offered weak, fast-waning protection against infection. And there’s little evidence that they prevent transmission. The CDC is still arguing that they prevent spread of the virus, but some respected infectious disease experts call this incorrect. Some experts also argue there’s no evidence that giving young people multiple boosters does anything to lower their odds of infecting grandma or grandpa”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
“Erasing a ruling erases case precedent,” Flores said. “When the next mandates come, and they will, it’s back to square one.” The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday threw out three cases challenging the Biden administration’s now-defunct COVID-19 vaccine mandate for executive branch employees and military service members. The lower courts had reached conflicting decisions about the mandates in the three cases. However, before the Supreme Court heard them, the mandates were rescinded. Rather than deciding the cases on their merits, the Supreme Court remanded the cases back to the lower courts with instructions to dismiss the cases as “moot.” In this instance, “moot” refers to a case involving an issue (COVID-19 vaccine mandates) that did exist, but was resolved by some means other than the court ruling in favor of one side or the other. Once a case is declared moot, the lower court’s decision can no longer be used to set a precedent for future cases — which in this case opens the door for future vaccine mandates, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) staff attorney Ray Flores told The Defender.
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
FRAMESHIFTING is a process which occurs when one or two mRNA bases are skipped. mRNA bases are translated in sets of threes, so skipping a base would affect all the sequences downstream, leading to new proteins being formed. This raises huge concern about the autoimmune response to these unknown and unintended proteins. “There may be around a 1 in 10 chance that Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccines will not generate spike proteins but something else, a new Cambridge study finds, raising concerns about autoimmune response among experts. The study authors found that 8 percent of the time, Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are mistranslated, leading to the formation of unintended proteins. This mistranslation is primarily driven by Pfizer's modification to their mRNA bases. “Our work presents both a concern and a solution for this new type of medicine,” said leading author Anne Willis in the study’s press release. One can think of mRNA vaccines as a set of instructions used to make spike proteins. Once the vaccine enters the cell, ribosomes interpret the mRNA instructions to make proteins, like spike proteins. If the instructions are misinterpreted, errors in the final protein may be produced. Some errors are minor, like misspelling one word in a text, while others are more detrimental.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Around 70 percent of people who died in Japan after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine lost their lives in the first 10 days following the jab, according to a recent study. The peer-reviewed Japanese study, published in the Cureus journal on Dec. 7, looked at the association between Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination and deaths within 10 days of vaccination. The risk period was defined as within 10 days of vaccination, with vaccination day being Day 1, and the control period defined as 11 to 180 days after vaccination. The analysis was divided into two groups: Group 1 representing individuals aged 65 and above and Group 2, which included people aged 64 and below. The researcher identified 1,311 deaths in Group 1, which included 662 males and 649 females. In Group 2, the team identified 247 deaths—155 males and 92 females. “The percentage of reported cases that experienced death within 10 days after vaccination was 71 percent in Group 1 and 70 percent in Group 2,” said the study results.
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
The proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty and Amendments to the International Health Regulations will set the Member States under the governance of an unelected supranational body in all things health-related. WHO's claim that it will not affect the sovereignty of the Member States countries is false. Two articles in particular, articles 1 and 13A touch on the new binding relationship between the Member States and the WHO: In Article 1 current proposed amendments, remove the term "non-binding" and in Article 13A insert the phrase that Member States will “undertake to follow WHO’s recommendations” and recognize WHO, not as an organization under the control of countries, but as the “coordinating authority”. In the Article 18, WHO will have the authority once Director General declares public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) to: -require medical examinations; -review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis; -require vaccination or other prophylaxis; -place suspect persons under public health observation; -implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons; -implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons; -implement tracing of contacts of suspect or affected persons; -refuse entry of suspect and affected persons; -refuse entry of unaffected persons to affected areas -implement exit screening and/or restrictions on persons from affected areas. Reading the above, one can deduce that yes WHO will affect some of the essential governmental functions concerning the citizens of the Member States. Asking countries to lockdown, restrict travel, institute digital vaccine passports, and then demand that its citizens undergo testing, required treatments, and experimental new products, imo interferes with the sovereign functions of that government. Also, let's not forget that the WHO will also require the Member States to censor its citizens by making them "counter misinformation and disinformation". Below is the video from WHO on the need for the pandemic treaty, imo this is full-on propaganda. Equity seems to be the keyword here. And the propaganda slogans: "We have to do this for humanity" "No one is safe until everyone is safe" "We have no future but the shared future" Please read the treaty and the amendments to IHR for yourself. They can be found on the WHO website (at least the ones they have allowed us to see).
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
It is important to hear it in their own words. The statement "All member states will retain their sovereignty to set their own domestic health policies. The Accord or the Amendments to International Health Regulations will cede the sovereignty to WHO is simply bogus and I said before fake news" is misinformation because the treaty and the amendments to IHR will absolutely cede the sovereignty of our nation's health policies to the WHO. The proposed Amendments would allow the WHO Director-General to assume the authority to direct healthcare around the world whenever he declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Among the new provisions in the proposed IHR amendments are the following: -Vaccine passports -The potential to enforce certain medical treatments and ban others -A requirement for biological surveillance (such as PCR tests) to be performed on humans and animals in search of pandemic pathogens -The requirement to monitor social media and allow only the WHO’s narrative on public health to be transmitted -The ability to commandeer medical supplies within one country for use by another -The requirement to share genetic sequences of pathogens, even though this could result in the proliferation of biological weapons, is banned by existing treaties such as Resolution 1540 (2004) of the UN Security Council and the Biological Weapons Convention (1972). The current amendments draft to IHRs include no specific criteria for the Director General of WHO to declare a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC). A declaration could even be made without the consent of the involved nations. And there are no provisions that make WHO officials accountable for their actions. Equally concerning, a PHEIC declaration can be issued for merely the potential for a public health emergency, and the emergency powers can be extended beyond the end of the emergency.
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Japanese researchers said they found evidence of long-term heart damage in people who received COVID-19 vaccines — including in asymptomatic patients — even though vaccine-induced myocarditis was thought to be rare, transient and limited to subjects experiencing heart symptoms. Regardless of age or sex, patients who received their second vaccination up to 180 days before imaging showed a 47% higher uptake in heart tissues of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), an imaging agent, than unvaccinated subjects. FDG is identical to glucose, a sugar that is the body’s main energy source, but it contains fluorine-18, a radioactive form of fluorine that allows imaging of organs and tissues where FDG accumulates. Stressed or damaged cells, a hallmark of myocarditis, take up more glucose than healthy cells. Researchers led by Takehiro Nakahara at Keio University School of Medicine used a retrospective study design to compare positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans between patients undergoing imaging before COVID-19 vaccines were available (from Nov. 1, 2020, to Feb. 16, 2021) to scans on other subjects after the vaccine rollout (Feb. 17, 2021, to March 31, 2022).
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
These TED talks are quite informative. It's always good to know what Bill Gates's future plans for us are. In this TED talk he proposes the Global Epidemic Response and Mobilization GERM team that would be made up of people from all over the world who have a wide range of expertise: epidemiology, genetics, data systems, diplomacy, rapid response, logistics, computer modeling, communications, and more. When they aren’t actively working in the field, most of them would call individual countries’ public health agencies home base, though some would sit in the WHO’s regional offices and at its headquarters in Geneva. By investing in disease monitoring, research and development as well as improved health systems, Gates believes we can “create a world where everyone has a chance to live a healthy and productive life, a life free from the fear of the next pandemic.” According to the Gates Notes: This is how a GERM response would work: The team’s disease monitoring experts would look for potential outbreaks. Once it spots one, GERM should have the ability to declare an outbreak and work with national governments and the World Bank to raise money for the response very quickly. Product-development experts would advise governments and companies on the highest-priority drugs and vaccines. People who understand computer modeling would coordinate the work of modelers around the world. And the team would help create and coordinate responses, such as how and when to implement border closures and recommend mask use. But GERM’s response to an active outbreak is only one part of their work. The team’s most important job is helping to run outbreak response exercises that test whether the world is ready for the next major outbreak. Militaries regularly run war games to evaluate their readiness—we should do the same with disease threats. In most countries, these exercises can be run by local public health and military leaders, with GERM acting as an advisor and reviewer. For some low-income countries, the world should invest in building this capacity and lend resources as needed. The GERM team would also be responsible for developing a checklist for pandemic preparedness, similar to the ones that airplane pilots follow before every takeoff and many surgeons now use during an operation. A checklist sounds like such an obvious tool, but very few places had a plan like this in place when COVID hit. A GERM-developed checklist could be used anywhere and help make sure that governments are ready with an efficient and effective response. But GERM’s impact won’t be limited to stopping pandemics. The group will improve overall health around the world, especially in the poorest countries. Emerging diseases will always be their top priority, but when there isn’t an active pandemic threat, the team will keep their skills sharp by helping out with deadly diseases like polio and malaria.
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
"Dr" Bill Gates on how to prevent the next pandemic https://t.co/qlFxOm0Csh
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
WHO’s relationship with Bill Gates Less than 20% of the funds raised annually by the WHO come from its Member States, and nearly 80% come from PRIVATE, INDIVIDUAL DONORS (private-public partnerships), most notably the Gates Foundation and its associated global vaccination organization, GAVI. This is known as "philanthro-capitalism". Investors such as Bill Gates demand significant returns on their investments and are heavily involved in the administration of the WHO's so-called "public health solutions". We must #ExitTheWHO
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
VAERS needs a reform! The BMJ has found that the FDA and CDC essentially maintain two separate VAERS databases: a public facing database, containing only initial reports; and a private, back end system containing all updates and corrections—such as a formal diagnosis, recovery, or death. In December last year Nair explained the situation at a meeting with advocates. He said, “There’s two parts to VAERS, the front end system and the back end . . . Anything derived from medical records by law” can’t be posted on the public facing system. The CDC has told The BMJ that “protecting patient confidentiality is a priority.” Interestingly, the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), which collects reports on drugs, does maintain a publicly accessible database that gets updated, as does the agency’s Medical Device Reporting system—raising the question of why VAERS can’t do the same. Neither the CDC nor the FDA provided an explanation. An FDA spokesperson told The BMJ that “patients can submit formal requests under FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] to obtain the full record of their report.”
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Say NO to the WHO! As the President of @GlobalHProject, I cannot stress enough the importance of watching this 6-minute video to understand the severe conflict of interest that the WHO has concerning their donors. By understanding who owns them, you will understand the dangers inherent in this attempt to consolidate global power into the hands of the very few. Today less than 20% of the funds raised annually by the WHO come from its Member States, and nearly 80% come from PRIVATE, INDIVIDUAL DONORS (private-public partnerships), most notably the Gates Foundation and its associated global vaccination organization, GAVI. Through this emerging and sophisticated investment system known as "philanthro-capitalism", investors such as The Gates Foundation demand significant returns on their investments and are heavily involved in the administration of the WHO's so-called "public health solutions". "We need stronger financing...our analyst estimate we need 31 billion dollars," says Director General of the WHO. With the new Pandemic Agreement and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), WHO would get to further exert its global power on the Member States requesting additional funds. "The nation members “shall” raise financial resources to implement the treaty and commit not less than 5% of national health budgets to be devoted to health emergencies." We must ask our legislators to #ExitTheWHO Danger is at our doorsteps, exit now.
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Today's remarks from the WHO Director-General are quite ironic, I will leave the video we made as my rebuttal. You decide! https://t.co/yiNjpO1Yxn
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
People who received hydroxychloroquine were less likely to die than those who did not, according to a new study. Just 0.8% of patients at a facility in France who received HCQ and an antibiotic died, compared to 4.8% of patients who did not receive the drug combination, French researchers reported on Nov. 1. "This study represents the largest single-center study evaluating HCQ-AZ in the treatment of COVID-19. Similarly, to other large observational studies, it concludes that HCQ would have saved lives," Dr. Didier Raoult, with Aix-Marseille Universite in Marseille, and his co-authors wrote. Researchers examined records from 30,423 patients with COVID-19 who were treated at another institution in Marseille, IHU Méditerranée Infection. They included all adults who tested positive for COVID-19 and who were treated in the hospital as an inpatient or an outpatient between March 2, 2020, and Dec. 31, 2021. The study set ended up with 30,202 patients because treatment information was not available for the 221 others.
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Full article https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/hydroxychloroquine-associated-with-lower-covid-19-mortality-study-5521868
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
"We are here today because we are all concerned about the World Health Organization's strong pressure to extend its powers, its structural and its financial capacities, with a permanent effect over the sovereignty of the countries and over the self-determination of the people." This is probably the most important nine and a half minutes. Take time, sit down, and watch this. It is that important.
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Swiss Attorney Philipp Kruse discusses what happens once the Pandemic Agreement and Amendments to IHR have been adopted by the Member States. "There is no mechanism foreseen that will allow the people or the Member States to challenge the assessment of WHO...There is simply NO STOP BUTTON for none of the Member States, and not, of course not for us citizens"
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
As the President of @GlobalHProject I cannot stress enough the importance of this video. It’s probably one of the most important things you will watch. It explains the danger all our countries are in because of the WHO attempt at power grab. Watch! https://t.co/dfWdw1PSLa
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
It is time to turn our backs on WHO, WEF, UN, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, Club of Rome, IMF, Trilateral Commission, Rockefeller Foundation... (I started with UN, WHO, and WEF while responding to Elon, and then others added a few more, now it's your turn to add, let's keep this list growing)
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Last week Dr. Ryan Cole, long time friend and colleague, had his hearing with Washington State Medical Commission regarding charges that alleged that he made numerous false and misleading statements related to COVID-19 and treated patients with COVID-19 or for seeking to prevent getting COVID-19 in a manner that was beneath the standard of care. What many people don’t know is? He never imagined himself to be in this place. He is a scientist nerd, knowledge seeker, curious mind, but most importantly a true teacher and healer. From the beginning he followed the science that led him to realize that narrative coming from the various agencies and officials was false. His only crime was that he wanted to warn others, about the role of early treatment, dangers of lockdowns, safety measures and ultimately the experimental products. He thought differently than “the science” crowd. He always stood up for truth. And now we are here at this moment in time where he must defend himself. Some little known facts about Ryan are that he is a musician, carpenter, farmer, artist, scholar and most importantly great father and husband. A well known fact is that he loves shoes, like another of his friends that shall remain nameless. Some of us are very lucky to call him a friend. He is always the first one to answer the call when we need him. His biggest gift is his empathy and love for others. Please help us raise money for his legal fund. His fight is our fight. This is a fight against global medical tyranny. Let’s stand together with Dr. Cole for humanity. His favorite quotes that exemplify the man he is. “Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest.” Mark Twain “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.” Thomas Jefferson And in words of Dr. Ryan Cole “The cells don’t lie” https://givebutter.com/8NRZcZ
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Evil grows in the darkness! @thecoastguy Neil's take on what happened in Canadian parliament. Such a well thought observation about the state of the world affairs, arrogance of the rulling class and to some extent complacency of the world. "Unforgivable" disregard for the holliest of days. And afterwards shifting of the blame and so far no consequences. The silence from the leaders across the world is deafening and yes "Unforgivable". 1984 The ministry of truth...The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink. Remember the words of George Orwell like a prophet he needs to be listened to. “And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the LIE passed into history and became TRUTH. ‘Who controls the past’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past. And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory.” Neil " I say these are dangerous days and the Big Brother really is watching" Heed the warning...
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
Thread… In June of 2023, WHO and European Commission announced a landmark digital health partnership to establish a system that will help facilitate global travel and protect citizens across the world from an ongoing and future health threats. This is one of the first building blocks known as Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN) that will, according to WHO, develop a wide range of digital products to deliver better health for all, and in opinions of critics a path for surveillance. (1/ )
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
In the words of WHO Director General “Building on the EU’s highly successful digital certification network, WHO aims to offer all WHO Member States access to an open-source digital health tool, which is based on the principles of equity, innovation, transparency and data protection and privacy. New digital health products in development aim to help people everywhere receive quality health services quickly and more effectively”.
@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley
The EU Digital COVID-19 Certificate, used across 80 countries, has been viewed by WHO as a success story and its implementation is a crucial first step in building the WHO Global Digital Health Certification Network. https://t.co/Ppbnsq0Tdd
