TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @KariLake
@KariLake - Kari Lake
The Most Shadow-banned profile on Twitter?? @elonmusk why is Jonathan being censored? It is because he is exposing corruption in our Elections and in the ranks of those who run them? https://t.co/6FMAaq0C2r
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Washington DC is an absolute crime scene. Thank you, James, for exposing this massive fraud against the American people.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
They staged a riot on January 6 to frame patriotic Americans and cover-up a stolen election. Justice is coming ⚖️ https://t.co/6RZzNPevfD
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the young man who killed Charlie Kirk didn't act out of independent thought but rather from a deep-seated influence of media and educational institutions. These sources have conditioned his generation to view figures like Trump and Kirk as villains. They've been taught that opposing political speech equates to violence, and that responding with violence is justified. This pervasive brainwashing has led to tragic outcomes, reflecting a troubling mindset among many young people today.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
I don’t think the young man who killed Charlie Kirk for “spreading hate” did so because he listened to Charlie & formed his own conclusions. He & so many lost souls from his generation have been told what to think by a relentless brainwashing campaign from the media & the indoctrination factories that our schools have become, which teach people that President Trump, Charlie, & conservatives are the worst people in the world, That political speech they disagree with is violence, & that the appropriate response to that speech IS violence.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Do you accept, Carrie, that this is a it's not just a one-sided problem? The political violence and violent rhetoric is a problem on both sides of the divide, and it's incumbent on everybody in a position of authority and influence to take the lead here in trying to to just tone things down."
"There's been a few cases where it goes from from the right to the left, but there's been an exorbitant number where it's coming from the left to the right. And you can't deny that. If you add it all up, it's just more violence. I mean, president Trump was nearly assassinated. There's another attempt on his life."
"The media has to take credit for what they have caused, the chaos they've caused in our country, and they haven't done it. And until they do, they need to be turned off, canceled, muted. They're absolutely abhorrent."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you accept, Carrie, that this is a it's not just a one-sided problem? The political violence and violent rhetoric is a problem on both sides of the divide, and it's incumbent on everybody in a position of authority and influence to take the lead here in trying to to just tone things down.
Speaker 1: There's been a few cases where it goes from from the right to the left, but there's been an exorbitant number where it's coming from the left to the right. And you can't deny that. If you add it all up, it's just more violence. I mean, president Trump was nearly assassinated. There's another attempt on his life.
God knows how many they've averted. Charlie Kirk was speaking to students when he was taken out by an assassin's bullet. We've seen the case in D. C. Where leaders there were shot while at a baseball game and nearly killed.
It's typically going one way, but the bigger question I think is why are these minds, these delusional minds, what's getting into their mind and why are they, why did that young man have a hatred in his heart for Charlie Kirk and conservatives? And I think we have to look at what caused that and there is no denying that is coming from the media, that is coming from the schools, the professors, the indoctrination from k through 12, and then continued on in the higher education institutions and the media and the culture. It's a 100% negative, and it has been about president Trump, about conservatives. They've equated us to Nazis. They've equated us to Hitler.
No wonder these young kids are, you know, bloodthirsty and trying to kill people. In their minds, they've been told for their entire life that people like president Trump and Charlie Kirk and me and conservatives are the worst thing in the world. That's what's gotta stop, Pierce. That's what's got politics will be politics, and we're gonna continue to have a vigorous and rigorous debate. But it's gotta stop, and it's been coming from the media, and I know it.
I worked in the media. I saw it. I saw the bias. I saw the hatred toward the the MAGA movement. I saw the hatred toward the people who follow president Trump.
The media has to take credit for what they have caused, the chaos they've caused in our country, and they haven't done it. And until they do, they need to be turned off, canceled, muted. They're absolutely abhorrent.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
I want investigations into election fraud, prosecutions for past election crimes and serious election reform. Without that, nothing else matters.
reSee.it AI Summary
Thank you to 60 Minutes for airing my comment! I feel that both 60 Minutes America and Australia are biased. The recent interview was the most biased I've ever experienced, but I’m pushing back against the corporate media. Stay tuned for more updates!
@KariLake - Kari Lake
60 Minutes America is as biased as 60 Minutes Australia.
reSee.it AI Summary
Southern California once felt like paradise, but poor leadership has turned it into a shadow of its former self. To restore “The Golden State,” we need strong law enforcement, though it seems we'll have to achieve this without support from our leaders.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Southern California used to look like heaven on earth, but failed leadership has made it look more like a zombie apocalypse. We've got to bring “The Golden State” back, and it's going to take STRONG law enforcement actions to make that happen. Sadly, It looks they're going to have to do it without the help of California's "leaders."
Video Transcript AI Summary
ICE raided MacArthur Park in Los Angeles, described as a migrant camp with drugs, illegals, graffiti, and needles. A body was recently found in the lake. Democrats are accused of gaslighting the public by portraying the park as a playground and picnic spot. One speaker says Southern California is resembling a zombie apocalypse with drugged-out people and illegals. Despite the Democrats' outrage, the speaker believes that the people of California, including Democrat citizens, are happy to see the park cleaned up and want to bring California back through strong law enforcement actions. The speaker suggests that whatever Karen Bass is upset about, most people in Los Angeles and California are likely happy about the cleanup.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But Monday, ICE raided MacArthur Park in Los Angeles. I used to live out that way. Dems have been gaslighting the American people on this story so hard. We saw Swalwell saying that it's not a war zone. It's a playground, a picnic spot, a community spot.
In reality, MacArthur Park is a dump. It is a migrant camp. The residents living in the area hate the park. It's full of drugs. It's full of illegals in their tents.
It's full of graffiti and needles. Look at this. This some of the video that we've seen here from recently from this park. Just last week, a body was found in the lake that you just saw. Wow.
And ICE is going in there and cleaning it up, and you have democrats claiming that this is such a beautiful park. How dare you come through here?
Speaker 1: You know, it's if you've been to Southern California, I have many times is looking more and more like a zombie apocalypse between the drugged out people who are roaming the streets and the illegals that have taken over, and the people of California are welcoming this. Now the Democrats and the radicals on the left might be acting like this is terrible, but I'm telling you, the people, including Democrat citizens, are happy to see this cleaned up. We're gonna bring California back, and it's gonna take some law, you know, strong law enforcement actions like we're seeing right now.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Whatever Karen Bass is upset about, you can assume that a majority of the people in the city of Los Angeles and in Greater California are probably happy about it. Even if they voted for her, they're probably saying, man, this is kinda nice to clean all this nonsense up. Carrie, good to see you. Thanks so much.
Speaker 1: Thanks.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Arizona has the most corrupt elections in the world. And the good people of State 48 know it. It’s time for accountability & JUSTICE.
@RepAbeHamadeh - Office of Congressman Abe Hamadeh
🚨NEW🚨 Congressman Hamadeh has been made aware of disturbing and credible allegations regarding Runbeck Election Services commingling blank ballots with completed ballots during the 2024 General Election. The Congressman has asked @PamBondi to investigate. https://t.co/UQesnzvfLK
reSee.it AI Summary
I've always been vocal about fraudulent elections, even when it’s tough. Tina Peters is a strong woman who has faced punishment for her courage in exposing election fraud. We cannot let this Gold Star Mom suffer in prison for doing her job. It's crucial that we speak out on this important issue, especially when others remain silent. I urge everyone to demand Tina's release from prison now.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
I've never shied away from speaking out about fraudulent elections--while it hasn't always been easy, difficult times require strong people. Tina Peters is a strong woman--who's been punished because of it. We can't allow this Gold Star Mom to die behind bars for doing her job and exposing election fraud. Some of us were brave enough to talk about the most important issue of our time when many others would not. Tina was prosecuted for exposing that fraud. Please demand Tina's release from prison now.
@JDunlap1974 - JOSH DUNLAP
🚨🚨 BREAKING - Tina Peters, former Mesa County, Colorado, clerk jailed for exposing 2020 election fraud, is in rapidly declining health and suffering abuse in prison, yet officials are denying her compassionate release. https://t.co/HPrCjgBrzr
@KariLake - Kari Lake
.@StephenM is the greatest communicator I’ve ever seen.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe this agency is fundamentally flawed and a burden on taxpayers, posing a national security risk. While there are some talented and dedicated individuals within it, they are the exception rather than the norm.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
“From top-to-bottom this agency is a giant rot and burden to the American taxpayer—a national security risk for this nation—and irretrievably broken. While there are bright spots within the agency with personnel who are talented and dedicated public servants, this is the exception rather than the rule," said Kari Lake, the Trump Administration Senior Advisor at US Agency for Global Media.
@FoxNews - Fox News
'NOT SALVAGEABLE': The Trump administration has begun dismantling a government-funded news outlet, calling it a "giant rot." Trump's pick to lead 'Voice of America', @KariLake, even issued a scathing review of the agency she was appointed to oversee: https://trib.al/CnSIovX
SocialFlow
trib.al
@KariLake - Kari Lake
President Trump was 100% ☑️ : Open border maniacs & defund the police maniacs shouldn’t even be allowed to run. Totally anti-American.
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
You see, there are some people who surround President Trump who go out of their way to attack his most dedicated loyalists while they simultaneously prop up technocrat Democrat billionaires like Marc Andreessen @pmarca, who this weekend, headlined a fundraiser for Marxist Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego @RubenGallego. During the 2024 campaign, President Trump spoke at a rally in Arizona where he slammed Gallego. He said Ruben Gallego is a "A Biden rubber stamp." "An open borders maniac." "A Defund The Police maniac." So why is Marc Andreessen “spending half his time at Mar a Lago” and advising Team Trump when he just headlined a weekend long fundraiser for Ruben Gallego this weekend? This is very disturbing. Enemies are literally being welcome into President Trump’s inner circle while his most ardent loyalists are attacked and undermined. This is a bad sign. See video below.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes Carrie Lake will be the next senator from Arizona. Lake is running against Ruben Gallejo, who the speaker describes as horrible, an open borders maniac, and a defund the police maniac. The speaker claims Gallejo shouldn't be allowed to run against Lake because she is incredible, tough, smart, and has heart.
The speaker says Lake is running against someone who cannot carry her shoes and predicts a big victory for her. The speaker states that if they win Arizona, which they are expected to do, they will win the presidency, and Carrie Lake has to be part of that victory. The speaker adds that Lake has been a newscaster for 22 years and is solid as a rock, while her opponent is a loser.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And a very good friend of mine, the next senator from Arizona, I really believe this. Look. She's running against we don't have to do a big I was gonna bring her up. I was gonna say, come on, Carrie. Speak.
But she just spoke for half an hour. What the hell am I gonna do here? But I will tell you, she's running against a guy who's a rubber stamp for it used to be Biden. Now who the hell knows? I don't even know.
Do we know who it is? Who do who would a rubber stamp for somebody. But Ruben Gallejo is horrible. He's an open borders maniac. He's a defund the police maniac.
He shouldn't be allowed to even run-in this election against her because Carrie Lake is incredible. She's incredible. She's tough. She's smart. She's got heart, and she should be your next senator.
I hope you win this sucker because you are winning you're running against the guy that cannot carry your shoes of being nice. You know the expression? Can't carry her shoes. And you're gonna have a big victory, and we're gonna work together, and we're gonna make sure we win this state. I say this presidentially, if we win this state, which we're expected to, we're leading and all of that, we win the presidency, and we have to take Carrie Lake with us.
Go get him. Go get him, Carrie. Go get him, Karen. Very important. And honestly and and forget we all know Carrie.
She's been a newscaster for twenty two years. Everybody knows her. She's just a she's never had a problem. She's solid as a rock. This guy is a freaking loser.
He's a loser. So with that, we'll go on. But good luck, Carrie. We love you. Special.
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
Hey @elonmusk Why is @pmarca Democrat billionaire Marc Andreessen (who voted for Hillary Clinton) allowed to help advise the Trump admin and make suggestions for hires when he is attending fundraisers for OPEN BORDERS MARXISTS like Ruben Gallego? See invite below. Is anyone https://t.co/NUWMEv3erR
@KariLake - Kari Lake
MUST SEE: America, how do you feel about leasing a fancy Washington DC high-rise for a quarter of $1 billion? That’s exactly what the last administration did at the US Agency for Global Media. @KariLake exposes waste & corruption, and will work to root it out. WATCH & SHARE! ⤵️
Video Transcript AI Summary
As senior advisor at the United States Agency for Global Media, the speaker is working on behalf of the American taxpayer and President Trump's administration. The speaker claims to be horrified by what they are learning about the agency.
According to the speaker, the Biden administration signed a fifteen-year lease for a new building that will cost taxpayers nearly a quarter of a billion dollars. The speaker says the agency already had a paid-off building that could have been renovated. The new building allegedly has fancy conference rooms, four bridges to nowhere, waterfalls, Italian marble, and leather furnishings.
The speaker also alleges that contracts were changed just before the new administration arrived to make it less transparent to find out where the money is going. The speaker says they are working to cancel contracts, save money, downsize, and prevent misuse of taxpayer dollars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, America. I'm here in Washington DC as senior advisor at United States Agency for Global Media. I'm working on behalf of you and President Trump and his administration. And I have been on the job for a couple of weeks now, and I'm horrified by some of the things I'm learning about this agency. I'm sitting here on the Thirteenth Floor of a shiny, brand new, beautiful skyscraper building that is costing you, the taxpayer, a fortune.
The Biden administration folks who were running this agency before, right before they left office, signed a brand new lease for this building, a fifteen year lease that's gonna cost the taxpayer nearly a quarter of a billion dollars. Here's the here's the kicker. They already have a building that they're located in that is paid off, that they could have renovated or updated, but they chose instead to get us into a lease that's costing the taxpayer a fortune. I know that every one of you out there is working hard and parting with your tax dollars. You're expecting it to be used wisely, not misused and mismanaged.
And I can tell you that this building is a colossal waste of money. Take a look at what's in this building. Fancy conference rooms with wall to wall windows. There's 26 conference rooms at least, that's what I've counted in this building. There are four bridges to nowhere, massive waterfalls, Italian marble finishes everywhere, leather furnishings, all of this being paid for by the American taxpayer.
And it's not the only thing we've seen. We are seeing grants where they've taken the grants and they've changed the contracts just days before we got in here to make it less transparent for us to find out where the money's going and what's happening with these grantees. It was an obvious, obvious sign that they wanted to keep us from finding out anything that we could possibly go in and change and make better for the American taxpayer. I want you to know I'm hard at work here in Washington DC. I'm working to make sure that we are not being built out of our hard earned dollars and we're gonna make sure we're doing everything we can to cancel contracts that can be canceled, save money, downsize, and make sure there's no misuse of your dollars.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
How out of touch is the media? Well, this reporter asks why it's necessary to stop the flow of fentanyl through Canada when "ONLY' 43 pounds was seized there last year. Just 2 mg of fentanyl will kill a full-sized man. 43 Pounds is enough to kill almost 10 million people. https://t.co/D3crmcDqcY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Only 43 pounds of fentanyl were found last year, which is less than a carry-on suitcase. The vast majority of fentanyl is brought in through Mexico, not Canada.
Last year alone, there was a 2000% increase in illegal fentanyl. You're asking me for the president's justification for these tariffs. It's disrespectful to the families who have lost loved ones to this deadly poison. They are grateful that they finally have a president who is standing up to both Canada and Mexico, and most importantly, to China as well. The president added an additional 10% tariff on China because this deadly poison is being produced there and distributed through our neighbors. There need to be consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's just 43 pounds that were found last year. That's less than a carry that's less than a carry on suitcase. Is that a lot of fentanyl compared to, say, Mexico? The vast majority of the fentanyl is brought in through Mexico, not Canada. So what else does Canada need to do?
Speaker 1: Well, I just told you, last year alone, there was a a 2000% increase in illegal fentanyl. But it's only for asking me you're asking me for what the president's justification is for these tariffs. It's not up to you. You're not the president, Gabe. And frankly, I think it's a little bit disrespectful to the families in this country who have lost loved ones at the hands of this deadly poison.
If you talk to them, and this president has, they are grateful that they finally have a president who is standing up to both Canada and Mexico and most importantly to China as well. The president added an additional 10%, tariff on China because this deadly poison is being produced in that country. It's being distributed through our neighbors, and there needs to be consequences for that period.
reSee.it AI Summary
What I see from Elon Musk and Dogecoin is a major scandal unfolding. Real journalists should be eager to investigate, but instead, many seem to be acting as Deep State stenographers, focusing on attacking the messenger rather than exploring the corruption. Elon isn't the story; he’s revealing it.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
What @elonmusk & @DOGE are uncovering is the biggest scandal in history. Any journalist worth their salt would be salivating over covering this. But we don't have many real journalists anymore. We have Deep State stenographers. So, instead of looking into this corruption, they're targeting the messenger. Elon is NOT the story. He's the guy who handed you the story of a lifetime.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The media has reached a new low. Many are fake journalists who avoid talking about the corruption that Doge is uncovering. They'd rather attack Elon Musk. This is the biggest story ever, bigger than Watergate. Any decent journalist would be all over this.
It's disturbing to see groups like AP wanting to boycott the White House because they refuse to call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of Mexico. Now other outlets want to join them and boycott the press pool. The mainstream media keeps asking the same questions instead of asking about what we found when we dug into USAID, the Department of Education, or the Department of Defense. Instead, they're pushing a narrative by attacking Doge and Elon. I hope we start asking the questions that the American people want answered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I really came down on my speech on the media. I you know, just when you think the media can't get worse, they call it the fake news, I'm calling it fake journalists out there. We are uncovering Doge has uncovered so much fraud, waste, abuse in this government. And the media, many members of the media are trying to avoid talking about the corruption that's being uncovered and instead go after the messenger, Elon Musk. It's outrageous.
Right now what is happening, we have the biggest story. It's bigger than Watergate and every other scandal combined rolled into one. Any decent journalist would be salivating to cover this moment in history and to see what's happening with, groups like AP where they're, you know, wanting to boycott the White House now because they're they're hurt that that they're losing some of their privileges because they're refused to, call the Gulf Of America the Gulf Of America. This is the hill they wanna die on? It is the Gulf Of America.
And and and now we're seeing other outlets saying they wanna join with AP and boycott the press pool. The thing that I that I'm really disturbed about what I'm seeing in the press pool is we we get the same mainstream media asking the same type of questions rather than saying, hey, tell us more about what you found when you dug into USAID or the the Department of Education or whatever department they're in. The Department of Defense. They're going to be, you know, looking at that and taking a look and and auditing that. Instead of asking pointed questions, they're, like I said, pushing the narrative through their line of questioning, is attacking the messenger, Doge, attacking Elon.
And we need to move into questions that the American people want asked. And so I'm hoping we'll see more of that.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall the protests right after Trump's inauguration, with loud crowds and pink hats. Then came BLM and Antifa, all geared up. I’ve often wondered about their funding. It seems like taxpayer money from the Federal government might be involved. This corruption appears to run deep.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Remember right after President Trump's first inauguration, all those screaming people with printed signs & pink hats? Then we got BLM. And then Antifa, all outfitted in uniforms & riot gear. We always wondered where they got the money for that. Well, it's starting to look like they got that from us, taxpayer money from the Federal government. It's an absolute scandal. I think we've scratched the surface of this corruption.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Remember during COVID and the George Floyd protests? It seemed like money was being poured in to create outrage and destabilize the country in 2020, even though it felt artificial.
It started after President Trump's inauguration with the pink hats, then transitioned into BLM and Antifa. The funding behind all of this seemed suspicious. Recently, we discovered USAID is one source. And just wait until we get to the Department of Defense and other departments! We've only scratched the surface of where this money is coming from.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We almost talked about this, you know, especially during COVID when we had George Floyd. We had you wonder, like, how did all of these how did these protests just occur? And you you could just tell that there was money being just pumped into it to create this outrage Yeah. To create this destabilization of this country that we saw in 2020 because they they wanted to they wanted to feel like this country was just tearing itself apart over this. It really wasn't.
It didn't make any sense at all.
Speaker 1: We we started with it right after president Trump's inauguration, the pink hats. Remember all of And they had a ton of money going toward they were tipping cars, setting businesses on fire, cop cars on fire. Then it moved into the the BLM and the Antifa. You know, they just they changed the name, but they had so much money behind it. We were wondering where are they getting this money.
And now in the past couple of weeks, we found out where they're getting it. Yeah. USAID. Yeah. And wait until we get to the Department of Defense.
Wait until we get to these other departments. Yeah. I think we've just scratched the surface.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I think so.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
We're finding out the fake news is brought to you by the United States government and our tax dollars. I think Washington D.C. is a crime scene right now with what they're uncovering. https://t.co/b7H6dLvgg1
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Politico ran probably no fewer than 50 hit pieces on me over the past three and a half years. It's such a slap in the face to know that they were doing that to me with MY tax dollars. That's nothing short of election interference. https://t.co/U5kqpPgzAM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe @KatieHobbs lost 339 million dollars of taxpayer money, and this situation needs a thorough investigation. Everything from her office should be audited. She never should have held this position; it's just another unfortunate result of Arizona's flawed elections.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
The math suggests @KatieHobbs managed to "lose" 339 million dollars of taxpayer money. This needs to be investigated, & everything that comes out of her office should be audited. This woman never should have been in this office in the first place. Just another tragic consequence of Arizona’s broken elections.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I would like the executive to provide a detailed list of all supplemental needs before June 30th. We identified nearly $340 million in required supplementals, which is an emergency. For instance, $110 million is needed for developmental disabilities by April 1st to avoid running out of funds. This amount is included in the overall $340 million.
To summarize, we start with $360 million in higher revenue, but we also have $846 million in higher expenses than reported, plus the $340 million in emergency supplementals needed to keep agencies operational. This total exceeds the entire budget increase of $1.3 billion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I would love the executive to provide us a detailed list of all supplemental needed before June 30th. When we did it over the weekend, we came up with a figure of almost $340,000,000 in needed supplementals. And when you do and there's a couple of new members on this committee, new members in this in the 2 different bodies. $340,000,000 in current year supplementals is an emergency. And if we don't pass that, my understanding, let's just pick one of the agents, one section in the developmental disabilities.
My understanding is you need $110,000,000 before April 1st or that will run out of money. Are you aware of that and is that factored in? And that's just one part of that $340,000,000?
Speaker 1: So Mr. Chair, so yes, and we have some of those slides upcoming with those FY 'twenty 5 supplementals. Yes, the value for the FY 'twenty five supplementals that's factored into the FY 'twenty six amount. So, the ending cash balance would include that is as you calculated as well, 340,000,000
Speaker 0: dollars. Yes, I mean it could be a 1,000,000 higher, 1,000,000 low, but 340 is a big number. So I'm going to let you go to the next slide, but I just want to summarize for my membership for a second. So we're starting off with 360,000,000 higher revenue that you guys are showing that we're showing. We're starting off with 846,000,000 higher expenses for access than you are showing.
And now we're showing $340,000,000 in supplemental expense that needs to be done as an emergency basis to keep agencies running and we're on page 12. And so I mean that alone is more than the whole increase of your budget of $1,300,000,000
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe @KatieHobbs is more focused on opposing Trump than on leading Arizona. Her actions could worsen the border crisis and put innocent lives at risk. I see her as a radical leftist supported by a corrupt system, and I urge @RealTomHoman and the Trump administration to challenge her.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
.@KatieHobbs doesn't want to lead Arizona. She wants to lead the anti-Trump resistance & will put innocent lives at risk by exacerbating the border crisis. Hobbs is a radical leftist propped up by a corrupt system that has led her to believe she is free from the consequences of her actions. I encourage @RealTomHoman & the Trump administration to prove her wrong.
@RepAbeHamadeh - Office of Congressman Abe Hamadeh
All eyes on Arizona. @GovernorHobbs, you’re actively choosing to make our state unsafe and defying its people. https://t.co/xyMgrLjRsg
@KariLake - Kari Lake
The American People are tired of this. They want a government that works FOR them, not AGAINST them.
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
JUST IN: @ByronCohenMA, former advisor at the White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy, confirms he has left his role at the White House. In a statement provided to @OKeefeMedia, Cohen said: “I resigned from my role at the White House prior to President Trump's inauguration because I believe civil servants should be committed to carrying out the priorities of democratically elected and appointed leaders. I trust that other scientific advisors can support the incoming administration on important science and technology issues facing our country.”
reSee.it AI Summary
During Trump's term, the media reacted hysterically to mean tweets, yet barely noticed Biden's attempt to amend the Constitution on social media. The mainstream media's claims of “Saving Democracy” seem hollow as they prioritize power for those unworthy of it. At Voice of America, we focus on reporting the news, not the narrative.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Mean tweets during President Trump's first term sent the media into hysteria, but the press hardly raised an eyebrow when Biden tried to unilaterally amend the Constitution (on social media!) on his way out the door. Despite their posturing, the mainstream media don't care about “Saving Democracy” or preserving norms. They work to preserve power for people who have no business holding it in the first place. At Voice of America, we will report the news, not the narrative.
@POTUS46Archive - President Biden
Today I'm affirming what I have long believed and what three-fourths of the states have ratified: The 28th Amendment is the law of the land, guaranteeing all Americans equal rights and protections under the law regardless of their sex. https://t.co/oZtS6Q89zG
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Here's my message to Arizona: ⤵️ https://t.co/0RB3Ha17Ct
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hi, Arizona. Carrie Lake here. After 30 years in news, I left a lucrative contract because I couldn't compromise my values. I was troubled by the COVID narrative and found courage in the Bible to walk away. To my surprise, Arizonans encouraged me to run for office, and this journey has been incredible. Despite facing attacks and challenges, your support has been unwavering. I’m grateful for our shared love for Arizona and America. With President Trump and a Republican Congress, I believe we can secure our borders, strengthen our economy, and ensure fair elections. Truth will always matter to me, and I will continue fighting for our state. I leave you with a Bible verse that inspires me: "For we brought nothing into this world, and it is for certain we can carry nothing out." Thank you, and God bless America and State 48.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, Arizona. Carrie Lake here. The 30 years you trusted me to bring the news into your homes, to tell you the truth. About 3 years ago, I walked away from a 7 figure contract in the fake news because I couldn't lie to you. What good is money if it comes at the cost of your soul?
I was sickened spreading the government's COVID narrative. And I was at my desk one day and opened the Bible, and an old Bible verse gave me the courage I needed, the courage to walk away. I thought that would end my time in the public eye. But to my surprise and my eternal gratitude, the people of Arizona rose up and requested that I run for political office. This journey that we've taken together over the past few years has been once in a lifetime.
It hasn't been easy, but I wouldn't trade it for the world. They threw everything at us. Fake news, 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars in the most vile attacks, and through it all, you never wavered. And I can't thank you enough for that. It was a movement of love for family, for Arizona, and for America.
And I am grateful to all of you who shared it with me. Arizona is a special place, and I'm thankful that President Trump and a Republican majority in both chambers of Congress will be in office to help protect us. As I watch his cabinet forming, I take great comfort in knowing that America will be made great again. And that's good because that's what the American people deserve. You deserve a secure border, a prosperous economy, safe streets, and free and fair elections.
And I know more than anything that this administration will fight to deliver that for you. As for me, well, I can say for certain that truth will never stop mattering to me. You will never stop mattering to me. These memories that we've made together will never go away. They will grow sweeter over time, and I will never stop fighting for the state I love.
I entered this fight with the Bible verse, and I will leave it with you as well. It's first Timothy chapter 6 verse 7. For we brought nothing into this world, and it is for certain we can carry nothing out. It's an amazing Bible verse. It really inspired me, and I hope it inspires you.
Thank you for everything. I love all of you. God bless America. And God bless State 48.
reSee.it AI Summary
I appreciate the support I've received in Arizona, but I recognize the corrupt system working against me. For the sake of my family, I won't run for office again. Instead, I plan to go to Washington, D.C., restore @VOANews, and assist President Trump in making America great again.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
We know the movement that we have in Arizona, and I will never take that for granted. But there is a corrupt machine here that is hellbent on making sure I never hold office. So, I won't put my family (and myself) through the torture of running again. I will go to Washington, D.C., return @VOANews to its glory days, and help President Trump Make America Great Again.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 REPORT: Kari Lake issues statement on her future in politics - Az Central "I don't want to run again." https://t.co/bWhpGVDjvP
reSee.it AI Summary
This pardon marks a low point in Biden's political journey, seen as a last-ditch effort to protect himself and his family from the fallout of long-standing corruption. Trump's victory reflects the public's frustration with politicians who prioritize their own interests over the people's.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
This pardon is a fitting conclusion to @JoeBiden's sad political career, a desperate act of self-preservation to shield himself & his family from the consequences of a lifetime of political & personal corruption. President Trump won because the American people are tired of public servants like Biden only serving themselves.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Hand count audit of Cochise County election skipped 57 percent of the required ballots https://archive.is/2024.11.19-190617/https://www.myheraldreview.com/news/cochise_county/hand-count-audit-of-cochise-county-election-skipped-57-percent-of-the-required-ballots/article_333f0e0a-a692-11ef-ba72-d76c2ad10e7e.html
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Can Arizona PLEASE get some unbiased election officials?! I have great confidence that @azjustinheap will restore faith in our elections!
@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit
BREAKING: Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer’s Deposition Transcript Shows Desire to “Make Life Hell for Kari Lake,” Calls Himself “Anti-MAGA” in Text Messages – Now He’s Counting The Votes in Lake’s Senate Race! https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/breaking-maricopa-county-recorder-stephen-richers-deposition-transcript/
BREAKING: Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer's Deposition Transcript Shows Desire to "Make Life Hell for Kari Lake," Calls Himself "Anti-MAGA" in Text Messages - Now He's Counting The Votes in Lake's Senate Race! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson
The Gateway Pundit has obtained damning excerpts from Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer’s June 21, 2024, deposition transcript in his defamation lawsuit against Kari Lake and her husband, showing that Richer contemplated running for Senate to “make life hell for Kari Lake” and admitted that he is “anti-MAGA” shortly after the rigged 2022 election where 60% of voting machines failed on election day in Maricopa County.
thegatewaypundit.com
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Do not believe the mainstream media when they “call” these elections.
reSee.it AI Summary
I have no apologies for Ruben Gallego. I'm not the one who abandoned my wife just days before she gave birth and then demanded she cover my attorney fees. The media claims his records are insignificant, but I believe they reveal a lot about his character. He blindsided his first wife, leaving her to deliver their baby alone. It's telling how the media defends someone who behaves that way.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
I have nothing to apologize to Ruben Gallego for. I'm not the one who walked out on my wife when she was just days before giving birth & then demanded she pay his Attorney fees. The media is telling me his records were a nothing burger. I think they said a lot about Ruben's character. Ruben blindsided his first wife. She had no idea the divorce was coming. He walked out the door & let her deliver that baby alone. It says so much about our media that they will defend a man for acting like that.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was asked about the unsealing of Ruben Gallego's divorce files and whether she should apologize for her previous statements. She stated she has no reason to apologize and that Gallego should apologize for his behavior.
She claims a reporter from out of state investigated why the divorce records were sealed after Gallego discussed the divorce himself. The judge agreed they should be unsealed because he is running for public office.
She expressed dismay that the media considers it a "nothing burger" that Gallego allegedly served his pregnant wife divorce papers right before Christmas, leaving her to deliver the baby alone. She believes this reveals a massive character flaw and accuses the media of being too close to the Democrats and failing to cover the story adequately. She urges the media to engage in soul-searching.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Name and who you're with?
Speaker 1: Ron Hanson with the Arizona Republic. Carrie, yesterday, the divorce files that you had wanted unsealed for some period of time, were released. The reaction seemed to be generally this was con confirming a story that was known years ago. You, have said that this was going to be very revelatory about Ruben Gallego. They are asking for an apology.
Your reflections on that case and how you've discussed it previously.
Speaker 0: I I'm not sure why I why I should apologize. I didn't walk out on anybody. I didn't leave, my spouse in a in a vulnerable state. I I don't know what the I think, actually, he probably should apologize for his behavior. And it's unfortunate that, you know, nobody's really been covering this.
It's It's unfortunate. I I found out that the person responsible for trying to get these records was a reporter from probably 25100, 3,000 miles away. Not one of you guys dug into that. He was the first one to start talking about his divorce. And when a reporter said, I would like to fact check what he said, and went to look for the divorce records, which almost in every case are public, he found out they were sealed.
And so that reporter started digging and said I'd like to find out why these are sealed. And the judge agreed because he's running for public office, they should not be sealed. And, I had so many really strange messages from many of you yesterday that came into our campaign office. There's nothing here. You said that.
This is a nothing burger. What's the big deal? What's the big deal? A man walks out on his wife, serves her divorce papers, broadsides her. She has no idea this is coming.
You know, I I just imagine, you know, my that happened to my daughter if she was pregnant, and we're days away from expecting our grandbaby. And and she calls me, and I think she's gonna be calling me about some cute little outfit she might have found. And she's crying, and says that her husband is leaving her. She's just a few days away from giving birth, serves her with divorce papers right before Christmas. I'm sorry that you guys don't think that's a big deal.
I think that's a pretty big deal. Yes. It tells me a lot about the character of that man. She had no idea it was coming. Hit her like a ton of bricks.
She had to go in and deliver that baby alone. And you and the media think it's no big deal. You haven't even covered it. If I had something that revealed such a massive character flaw like that, you guys would be all over it. It's really it's really sad.
It's it's despicable. The media is so in bed with the Democrats right now. It's really shocking. I think I think there's a time for soul searching. The time is now, guys.
reSee.it AI Summary
Ruben Gallego has voted twice to let men compete against women in sports, taking away opportunities from girls. I won't stand by as the radical left erases women. The @RileyGaines Stand with Women Scorecard shows Arizonans my stance on this important issue.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Ruben Gallego has voted not once, but TWICE to allow men to compete against women in sports. Gallego rips trophies from the hands of girls, hands them to men, & calls it ‘progress.’ I refuse to let the radical left erase women in our society. Thanks to the @RileyGaines Stand with Women Scorecard, Arizonans can see for themselves where I stand on this issue. https://www.iwv.org/2024/09/what-they-are-saying-iwv-introduces-riley-gaines-stand-with-women-scorecard/
WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: IWV Introduces The Riley Gaines Stand With Women Scorecard | IWV
In response to The Riley Gaines Stand with Women Scorecard introduced last week by Independent Women’s Voice, a wave of candidates and...
iwv.org
reSee.it AI Summary
Today, my attorneys were fully exonerated, and the charges from the Arizona Bar Association were dismissed. This victory counters the politicization of the Bar, which seeks to silence those exposing government corruption. I pray for all attorneys fighting these crucial battles for our freedoms.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Today, my attorneys received a total exoneration and a full case dismissal against the spurious charges brought against them by the Arizona Bar Association. This is a complete victory against the increasingly politicized Bar, which attempts to punish and deter cases that call out our government for corruption and that work to protect our sacred vote and our liberties I pray for all of the Attorneys who are taking on the difficult cases that are so important for the survival of this country.
reSee.it AI Summary
I witnessed the chaos of summer 2020, with my family in Minneapolis terrified as their city burned and Governor Walz remained inactive while Kamala Harris supported the rioters. I was appalled by Congressman Gallego's march to defund the police, labeling them as the bad guys.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
I saw what happened in the summer of 2020. I've got family in Minneapolis. They were scared to death. Their city was on fire, their Governor Walz didn't do anything to stop it, & Kamala Harris was bailing the rioters out. I watched Congressman Gallego march to Defund The Police In Phoenix, calling the cops the bad guys. I was disgusted then, & I still am now.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions Kamala Harris's choice of Walls over Mark Kelly, expressing concerns about the impact on the Democratic ticket. They criticize Harris for supporting criminals during protests and highlight issues like inflation, high rent prices, and gas costs. The speaker believes Democratic policies are destructive, regardless of who is on the ticket, leading to fentanyl deaths, overseas conflicts, and overall harm to Americans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who did I miss? Let me ask this, and then we'll get to you. Is that okay?
Speaker 1: Gabriel Sandoval with the Associated Press. I'm interested to know, did Harris miss a chance to improve her standing with, her standing in the state by not picking, senator Mark Kelly and picking, Walls?
Speaker 0: Well, I I actually I I didn't realize that Walls was on the list. And when I saw that she picked him, I I was thinking, is she trying to tank the ticket for the for the Democrats? Because I I saw what happened, guys, in in, the summer of 2020 with Minneapolis. I've got family who lives there. They were scared to death.
City was on fire. Businesses were burning. People were suffering. He didn't do anything. And by the way, Kamala Harris was bailing out the criminals who were burning people's businesses and torching cars and attacking people.
And Ruben Gallego was actually marching in similar peaceful protests as they like as the media calls it. Peace he was marching in those protests, protesting the police, and he was doing all that. He calls the police the bad guys. Yeah. He calls the police the bad guys.
So, frankly, I don't care who you plug in. You can put Mary Poppins in there. The policies of the Democrats are destructive. Yep. This is why we have record inflation.
This is why the cost of living rent prices in some areas have doubled. That means that you guys, when you pay rent, you're gonna either get a much smaller apartment or you're gonna have to take on another new roommate. Our our mortgage rates are nearing 8%. We can't afford gas. You go to fill up your car and you can't fill it up anymore.
You can only put a little bit in because you don't have the money to do it. And we're watching fentanyl kill people. We're watching wars starting overseas. I I don't care who you put in into that ticket. Like I said, Mary Poppins herself could be there.
This is a disastrous ticket because it's a disastrous policies that are hurting the American peep.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
It was an attempted assassination Newsweak. Save America—cancel the Mainstream Media https://t.co/4NeouhL7u7
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Just a tilt of the head. God has bigger plans for President Trump. He has bigger plans for us. It’s time to come together, work together, to help save this country. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/uAC9kFuIL5
reSee.it AI Summary
A rancher on the border shared that he encounters eight to nine illegal immigrants daily on his property, including men leading young girls. This increase began when Joe Biden took office, as compared to eight to nine per year during Trump's presidency. The border was stricter under Trump.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
I talked to a rancher who has a large ranch on the border. He told me, every day, eight to nine illegal immigrants are spotted or caught on his property. What concerns him the most is when he sees grown men "leading" groups of pre-teen girls. Eight to nine illegals a day, starting right when Joe Biden was sworn into office. With President Trump, he would see eight to nine a year. That's how tight our border was under President Trump.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the current fiscal year, over 40,000 Chinese migrants have been encountered at US borders, with 175,000 "gotaways" reported. These individuals are dangerous and avoid capture, possibly with criminal backgrounds or on terrorist watch lists. The influx has increased since President Biden took office, with reports of alarming encounters on ranches near the border. Communities like Nogales are experiencing street releases of migrants from various countries, leaving them stranded. The situation is concerning for Arizona and the nation as a whole.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just 6 months into this fiscal year, there have been over 40,000 Chinese migrants encountered at the US borders compared with nearly 53,000 for all of the previous, fiscal year, last year. Meanwhile, customs and border protection sources telling Fox News approximately 175,000 so called gotaways have caused illegally so far this fiscal year. Of course, that's only the numbers we know of. The figures do not count those who have entered illegally undetected and have disappeared into the country, and we have no knowledge of what their motivations are. Joining me right now with more in the Sunny Morning Futures exclusive is Arizona Republican senate candidate, Carrie Lake.
Carrie, good to see you. Thanks very much. Your reaction to these new numbers that we're showing this morning, and what kind of a reaction are you get it? Getting when you are on the campaign trail as you run for a senate seat?
Speaker 1: Well, thanks for having me, Maria. Those are astronomical numbers of Godaways. Remember, the Godaways are the ones who don't wanna be captured. Right now, you walk into the country, you just get processed, you're here, you get your plane ticket, you get set up. These are people who are probably so dangerous that they don't want to go through that process.
They they need to sneak in. They're probably on terrorist watch list. They've got a criminal background, and they're pouring into Arizona. I just talked to a rancher who has a large ranch on the border. He said every day he gets reports from his workers on the ranch, 8 to 9 gotaways are spotted or caught on his property that his workers catch.
And he said it's most concerning when they see a couple of, you know, men in their thirties with a group of 12 year old girls. It's been shocking what they're seeing come across his ranch. And he said, Carrie, for comparison, 8 to 9 a day, it started right when Joe Biden became, when he was sworn into office. And with president Trump, he would see 8 to 9 a year. That's how tight our border was under president Trump.
And so it's very concerning. It's very concerning in communities like Nogales, where I was just about a week ago, and the people there say they're doing street releases of folks from all different countries, from Africa to, the Caribbean to China, Asia Yeah. And they are being released onto the streets with nowhere to go.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
The People of Arizona see through this malicious political prosecution of Arizona Republicans who voiced their First Amendment rights and stood up for election integrity. Full Statement ⤵️ https://t.co/NdSIkB61qI
@KariLake - Kari Lake
There’s no salvaging the Fake News. They are The Enemy of the People. These propagandists have brainwashed millions of Americans for decades. Thankfully they are collapsing under the weight of their lies. https://t.co/lmQXsFuo0R
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Barrasso expresses his support for Carrie Lake and believes she is a responsible voice for Arizona. He emphasizes the need to bring people together and win the 2024 election for the US Senate. When asked about reaching out to moderate Republicans, he states that it is going well and he is gaining support from those who previously did not support him. He also mentions the importance of securing the border and working with Republicans, Independents, and even disaffected Democrats to address the border crisis. The interviewer questions Senator Barrasso about his comments regarding Cindy McCain and recording conversations, to which he clarifies his intentions and expresses his focus on the future. The discussion then shifts to election integrity and the bipartisan border plan. Senator Barrasso highlights the need to finish building the border wall and stop catch and release policies. He criticizes President Biden's actions and attributes the border crisis to his policies. The interview concludes with Senator Barrasso urging the interviewer to move on from past elections and focus on the pressing issues at hand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Thank you guys both for sitting down, talking with me today. And I want to start with you, Senator Barrasso. A lot of people see you coming out here campaigning for Carrie Lake is kind of a sign that the establishment is giving her more of an embrace that maybe you can broaden the message and reach people, Republicans who didn't vote for Carrie in her run for Governor. What do you say to people, Republicans right now, who did not vote for Carrie Lake, 2 years ago?
What do you say to them this time around?
Speaker 1: Well, she's very forceful. She's effective. I think she's a responsible voice for the people of Arizona, and we need her in the United States Senate. I was the 1st senator, republican senator to endorse her. She was in Washington.
We had a chance to meet. I had watched her previous to that with a number of various interviews that she did. My wife and I watched her. She she's the future of our party. We need her.
I wanna do everything I can to, help bring more people together and make sure she wins this election in 2024 for the US senate. And a lot has been made,
Speaker 0: in the media, you've made a deal about trying to reach out to folks like your former opponents, Karen Taylor
Speaker 2: Ropes and
Speaker 0: Megan McCain that's been in the news a lot. I want to ask you how has that been working, reaching out to more moderate Republicans considering you did call them a lot of folks rhinos and you weren't happy with certain elements of the party. How is that message being taken right now?
Speaker 2: I think it's going well. I I really do and and we've talked about this before, you and I have. I I don't wanna, tell the world everybody I'm meeting with because I I don't want them to be dragged into a news story unnecessarily. I am gaining a lot of support with people who didn't previously support me. I had a lot of support before and I'm just adding.
It's a game of addition, they say politics is. But more important than just adding to my support, I wanna bring people together. We're so divided as a country. I do put a lot of the blame on the media for that. I I'm working in the media for a long time.
I know it's about keeping people afraid, divided, isolated. And it's done a a a lot of damage to our country. So I wanna bring people together. We're gonna have a big cleanup job to do, and it's gonna take all hands on deck. That means all Republicans.
It's gonna take Independents to come in. Even disaffected Democrats are waking up to these policies that just aren't working. I know that the people who are watching your station tonight are looking at the border crisis. They're hearing about stories like Lake and Riley who was murdered by somebody here illegally. He shouldn't have even been here.
Another story that I talked about today, murder when somebody was deported 4 times and they're still committing crimes and still coming back. We have to secure the border. It's starting to affect every single American. And so I want to work to bring Republicans together to do that, Independents, Democrats. I'm meeting with all kinds of Arizonans.
Some of them are traditional Republicans. Some of them are MAGA Republicans, and we're gonna work together. We're going to get the majority in the US Senate. And when we get that, we're gonna take all kinds of Republicans. Some are gonna be from states that are a little more, purple or even blue.
I think we might even have a win in some of the blue states with Republicans. They have to represent their constituents. And when we get together in the Senate, we are going to work together. The people of this country are going to demand it.
Speaker 0: And speaking of moderates and whatnot, you said that your one attack McCain got a lot of attention that drove a stake to the heart of the McCain machine. You said that was in jest, correct?
Speaker 2: Well That
Speaker 0: was in jest.
Speaker 2: No. This was a this was a different comment, but that comment refers to a political apparatus here in Arizona that had a grip on politics, and it was really hard for the grassroots to take any movement and get in. Mhmm. And I believe that with my victory in the primary, for the governorship, we did show the grassroots has power in this state. And the grassroots do have power.
That's how this government is supposed to be from the bottom up. And the grassroots have a lot of power. I wanna bring people in who are more establishment, traditional as well. I truly am extending an olive branch. I mean it.
If you weren't with me before, I want you with me because we gotta save our country.
Speaker 0: But with with you know, but there was a lot of attention on that one comment that you guys have said that was a joke or a jest. I do wanna ask you though, but you also, went after Cindy McCain when you run for government.
Speaker 2: How did I go after you?
Speaker 0: You had said that she was in cahoots with George Soros that, to defeat America and whatnot. I was wanting to say, is that
Speaker 2: Is that a direct quote?
Speaker 0: That was you on the Steve Bannon show, I believe.
Speaker 2: Okay. Well Is
Speaker 0: that something you really still believe about them?
Speaker 2: Cindy McCain works for the Biden administration, and I appreciate the hard work she's done in this state. And if she decides she wants to vote for me, I don't think she's actually living here right now, so I don't think she is voting. I wanna reach all people. And if Cindy McCain decides she wants to come and vote for me, I will welcome that. If she wants to support me, I will welcome that.
I wanna get Arizonans who are voting to see that our policies work. You know, a lot of times you've talked about me focusing on the past, focusing on the past. I'm looking forward. I'm looking to the future. And our future can either be very bright and be excellent for our young people and our children, or it could be very bleak.
And right now, you're focusing on the past. The the people of Arizona don't care about this.
Speaker 0: They wanna know who you are.
Speaker 2: They don't. They know who I am. I've been in their homes for 27 years.
Speaker 0: They wanna know who you are because you'd said things in the past and you're you're correcting that now or changing that now.
Speaker 2: Dennis, you need to you need to move on. We're we are bringing people together, and they know who I am. They they know I'm a fighter. They know that I care deeply about this community. I've raised my family in this community, and they know that I care about that border.
They know that I had a policy that was so good on that border that Greg Abbott is now doing that in Texas, and it's working. I wanna solve these problems. I'm not worried about, squabbles. I'm I'm moving forward. I can't go backwards.
I can only move forward, and I'm gonna move forward and help the people of the state. I'm gonna win this seat and help bring the majority back to the senate so we can solve some of these problems that we've been dealing with for a long time.
Speaker 0: Okay. Let me ask Senator Barrasso this question, too. This question was asked at the press conference, didn't seem like it was very popular question, but I didn't want to ask this. Working in the Senate, Carrie Lake, there's a lot of attention given to a recording she had taken of Jeff to what the former campaign party chair. Can you trust that, you know, she can be trusted in backroom conversations, candid conversations that she won't be recording people or anything like that.
Because the senate
Speaker 2: Dennis, this is ridiculous. The people of this country don't care about this. You would have The the senator you've been in the phone. A conversation if someone showed up at your door and said, I gotta tell you something. You can't I can't tell it on the phone.
I was nervous about it. I thought there would be a threat in it. And I have every right. I didn't break any laws. Yeah.
I have every right. And you're spending time sitting with the sitting senator. I'm asking the sitting senator
Speaker 0: about whether she can be trusted in it.
Speaker 1: I have great confidence in Carrie Lake as a senator in the United States. We'd love to have her from representing the people of Arizona as a forceful, effective, conservative voice for the country. We need her in the United States Senate. I think she'd be a great addition to the senate and make a big difference for our country moving forward getting back on track.
Speaker 2: And and the only people I record, frankly, are people that come to my door and try to bribe me. If you come into my home and try to bribe me, there's a chance I might record you. And guess who else I record? Every interaction I have with the fake news media.
Speaker 0: Sure.
Speaker 2: Because as you know, the first interaction we have I'm aware. How dishonest the fake news media is. Nobody trusts them. And so I record that. And I think not only should every politician record every interaction they have with the media, I think every American should record every interaction they have with the media because you've proven time and time again that you can't be trusted, that you can't be trusted.
Speaker 0: That me personally can't be trusted?
Speaker 2: That the news can't be trusted. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, I do want to ask, I know you don't want to go back, but there are questions.
Speaker 2: Oh, boy, Dennis, really, we have a wide open border. Where are we going back now? What what year are we going back to now, Dennis? Welcome back to the seventies. You put your bell bottoms
Speaker 0: on. Too young to have bell bottoms in the seventies. Let's go back to the election stuff. I mean, there was an opinion
Speaker 2: Dennis Dennis Dennis.
Speaker 0: There was an opinion piece today by the guy who was supposedly hired by Donald Trump to find election fraud. He wrote an opinion piece in the Republic Dennis. Said he didn't find it.
Speaker 2: Dennis, I'm not you you have I'm not going to entertain any more questions about the past election.
Speaker 0: But
Speaker 2: the election's not And election fraud because the headline
Speaker 0: is is a lot is is a lot about who you are, about your brand as a politician.
Speaker 2: It's not a brand. I wanna have honest elections that people have faith in. And and guess what, Dennis? The polling shows that Republicans don't have faith in our elections, neither do independents. And an increasing number, it's getting close to half of Democrats, think we need election reform.
And I'll end it with that.
Speaker 0: Well, senator, do you have faith in our elections?
Speaker 1: I have faith that the people certainly in my home state of Wyoming do it right. It's a state by state issue. I am against what the democrats are trying to do, and they're trying to federalize the elections where you wouldn't have to have identification. You just go up and ask for a ballot. I think we should have photo IDs, and I wanna make sure that states have the right to make sure that they have the integrity in their own state.
You wanna make it easier to vote and harder to cheat, and that's not what the Democrats seem to be trying to do right now.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And and and you said recently you didn't know who stole the election.
Speaker 2: You know, because I want to focus on the future, because I know that the media has not covered it well, have not covered our cases well. It's all in the court documents. Go look at it. But I'm not gonna sit here when we have a few minutes to talk about the issues that are facing Americans at the border with the crime soaring. And we all All you wanna do we'll have stories about what we're gonna do is focus on the past.
It's actually
Speaker 0: almost comical. No. That is not the truth because we will we will air stories about the press conference. You talked about the
Speaker 2: press release. Let me let me tell you this. I'm actively involved in cases. And as you know, I'm actively involved in a lawsuit. Yeah.
Speaker 0: I know.
Speaker 2: I anybody who's involved in a lawsuit, their attorneys would tell them not to go into specific details. And so, therefore, I'm going to do that. Okay?
Speaker 0: Well, how how how
Speaker 2: how how how how how how how how how how
Speaker 0: how Kim Yi had a 100,000 more votes than you in a rigged election? She's a Republican too.
Speaker 2: Really? We're gonna keep relitigating.
Speaker 0: No. I've not asked you that, and I am interested in your explanation.
Speaker 2: Well, Dennis, I am willing to talk about the border. That's why we we are here today. We're talking about the border and, you know, you guys have criticized me for several years now for talking about elections. I wanna talk about the 2024 election versus Ruben Gallego. By the way, if I you wanna talk about voting, Ruben Gallego wants everybody pulling across this border, wants to give them right to vote.
That's 9,000,000 people, maybe 12,000,000. I'm not sure I believe the federal government's numbers. He wants them all to be able to vote, and I don't think the American people want that. I don't want that, and the American people don't want that. If you have any more questions about
Speaker 0: the border question about the border, but I do. The Kim Yi thing is interesting because she had a 100,000 more votes than you in a rigged election. I am curious and interested, and I think people are interested in
Speaker 2: the explanation. Shows you there's so many anomalies and things that don't make any sense. There are so many things that don't make sense about the statistics involving that election. And I know that you really don't care to dig into it because of the coverage, the lack of coverage. So we'll we're gonna end it at that.
And, please let the record show that Dennis and 3 TV cannot get over past elections, just as you've accused me, Dennis. I'm actually embarrassed for you right now that you have a sitting senator here.
Speaker 0: I'm sure you are. I have a border question and a follow-up for the final question here, but go ahead and continue.
Speaker 2: I'm I'm done if you have no more questions. Okay.
Speaker 0: Okay. I do wanna get your guys' opinion about the bipartisan border plan that got killed in the senate. Is it is it a regret on your part? What was wrong with that plan?
Speaker 1: Well, I guess the best plan to deal with the border is the bill that came out of the house of representatives. The HR 2 came to the senate, and Chuck Schumer has it sitting there for 9 months. Won't bring it up hearings, won't bring it up for a vote. That's what we need to do. We need to attach that on the funding bill that is already passed because what we saw initially coming out of the Biden administration on this so called national security bill was more money for sanctuary cities, more money to make the to smooth the flow of illegal immigrants into the country rather than to stop the flood.
And my goal is to stop this flood that's now at 9,000,000. And what's your proposal?
Speaker 2: I've talked about you want me to talk about the the bill that went down? You talked about today.
Speaker 0: You talked about ending catch and release, shutting down the border. You got it you got it.
Speaker 2: I frankly don't think we need a lot of legislation. We do need, spending approved to finish president Trump's wall. And I'm not sure exactly the cost. It's I've heard it estimated between anywhere between 820,000,000,000. I think we need to get that spending approved and quickly build the border wall and allow our border patrol agents to do their job.
We need to stop allowing people in. We need to have a president who will stop catch and release. You know, the senator talked about dozens upon dozens. Was it 90? Was it 90?
Speaker 1: 94 different executive orders that Joe Biden signed in his first 100 days.
Speaker 2: Dismantle an incredibly effective border policy that president Trump had in place to keep us safe, you safe, your viewers safe. This is somebody who's on a mission to destroy our country. Why would he do that? And look at the border. Lake Riley, 22 years old, her whole life ahead of her, is dead because of Joe Biden's policies.
We've got fentanyl pouring in. So we don't have to create a whole bunch of legislation. Go back to president Trump's policies. They worked, and let's make sure we get that border wall complete.
Speaker 0: Alright. Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Thank you. I sure hope that you can get your mind off the past, Dennis, just as you accuse me. Well, I'm just saying,
Speaker 0: you still got lawsuits.
Speaker 2: I do. And and and some of them yeah. You're right. And there's more lawsuits. The, America First Legal filed an incredible lawsuit up in the out of high county.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's because people are so well come up on that. And it's whether you like it or not part of your brand. Thank you very much. Appreciate that.
Thank you, Randy.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Carrie.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 0: Yes. Appreciate
Speaker 2: it. I hope you have more sense than some people. Usually, it's the cameraman who actually get it. Usually. That's why I married 1.
Speaker 0: I'm I'm familiar with that. Yes.
reSee.it AI Summary
A man walked into the country near Sasabe, Arizona, without proper vetting. When asked who he was, he responded with a cryptic statement implying that soon people will know who he is. Concerns are raised about unvetted individuals making threats, which some attribute to the actions of Joe Biden, Ruben Gallego, and Kyrsten Sinema.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
12 miles east of Sasabe, Arizona, this man walked into our country. He said this to a journalist who asked him who he was, "If you are smart enough, you will know who I am, But you are really not smart enough to know who I am, But soon, you’re gonna know who I am.” These are the people @JoeBiden, @RubenGallego, & @KyrstenSinema are bringing into America. Unvetted people making threats.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am someone important, and soon you will realize who I am. It's quite simple. However, I must say that I am not impressed with the entitlement and arrogance displayed by some individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By the way, if you are smart enough, you would know who I am. But you are really not smart enough to know who I am. But soon, you're gonna know who I am. Very easy. Wow.
Very easy. But the entitlement the entitlement. No. Believe I'm much better than that. The entitlement, guys.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Maricopa County is the 4th-largest county in America. They run their elections like the 3rd World. While propagandists gaslight us, truthtellers work to bring this broken process into the light. This is the true story about the state of our elections. https://t.co/QVibClc6jb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the 2022 general election in Maricopa County, Arizona, which saw record-breaking turnout and a close race for governor. Controversy arose when candidate Katie Hobbs refused to debate her opponent, Carrie Lake. Issues with tabulators and printers caused delays in counting the ballots, leading to an undecided governor's race one week after election day. Despite claims of voter fraud, the election was deemed secure. Concerns were raised about the accuracy of the tabulation process due to incorrectly printed ballot images. The trial between Lake and Hobbs focused on allegations of misconduct with ballot printers and handling. The video highlights the need for transparency, hand counting at the precinct level, and restoring faith in the electoral system. Viewers are urged to take action to demand change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, Arizona. I hope you're ready for election day, because it's gonna be a hot one, and the weather looks to be on the warm side as well. Temperatures in the upper seven.
Speaker 1: Already lining up at the polls in what looks like a record breaking turnout Arizona
Speaker 2: stay tuned
Speaker 3: to 550 half. Why I later on tonight as we broadcast the results live after polls close.
Speaker 4: And for governor right now,
Speaker 5: the race is a dead heat.
Speaker 1: Both Those candidates are neck
Speaker 6: and neck. Katie Hobbs announced that she will not debate Carrie Lake.
Speaker 1: Carrie Lake is scared to sit down and have an in-depth conversation.
Speaker 7: She is the one who's afraid to take the debate stage.
Speaker 8: Why did not get on the debate stage and and debate her?
Speaker 6: This is the 2nd time this year Hobbs has avoided a direct debate involving a political opponent.
Speaker 9: Katie Hobbs' lead shrunk.
Speaker 10: The polls were close in 2020 and yet again here in 2022.
Speaker 1: We are, you know, ready for whatever challenges might come following this election.
Speaker 11: Vote center coming in We are following breaking news in Phoenix, Arizona, the capital, of Phoenix there in Maricopa County seems to be having massive trouble.
Speaker 12: One of the tabulators
Speaker 9: is Oh, nothing's
Speaker 13: We're gonna to 20 times.
Speaker 6: We've got about 20% of the locations out there where there's an issue with the tabulator.
Speaker 3: We know that Hobbs has repeatedly said that Arizona's elections are safe and secure.
Speaker 6: It's gonna go down here, number 3.
Speaker 9: But does that mean it'll take a little longer to count?
Speaker 3: 1 week after election day, the Governor's race is still undecided.
Speaker 14: There are still hundreds
Speaker 0: of thousands of ballots left to be counted.
Speaker 11: Still being counted. It usually does take this long. The difference is the Races aren't always this close. For it to happen now
Speaker 13: in this way is kind of strange. We're
Speaker 6: Craddock Secretary of State Katie Hobbs is in fact
Speaker 2: the winner.
Speaker 1: And it's a good day for democracy. We can all take a big sigh of relief but the work goes on.
Speaker 15: People know something wrong is going on and they don't quite know what or where or how they can it, but there is a feeling that something's not right.
Speaker 7: Can people be confident their vote will count?
Speaker 12: There's many areas where there's so much fraud going on. I don't know how fair the Arizona Elections Board is.
Speaker 8: I already set up the way it's gonna I go, so what more could my vote do?
Speaker 15: Elections are the people's elections. These are your votes. These are the people's votes. The very idea That citizens shouldn't know exactly what happens when they cast a ballot. That it shouldn't be transparent and open.
That is an anathema to a free society.
Speaker 10: Perhaps the biggest yet for the midterm elections in Arizona. It was here where ballots in the last election were perhaps the most scrutinized of any state in 2020.
Speaker 15: Arizona midterm was all over the media. There was a lot of controversy over the machines It's breaking down during election day on November 8th and creating long lines and lots of chaos and people couldn't vote. And so I was kind of paying attention to it, but I was also working on other cases.
Speaker 8: Things started off pretty well.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Right at 6 a. M.
Speaker 15: And then went downhill from there.
Speaker 4: So a Few hiccups
Speaker 8: to start our election day here in Arizona are really the last thing we need.
Speaker 16: The lines were outside the building, wrapped around the building. I personally in line, 3 and a half hours.
Speaker 2: The appointment is to come at 6 o'clock this morning, and my wife stayed, my son stayed. He would like to Work. I had to go teach, so I went to school. She was here till 8:30 to get her vote cast. I come back After school, it's too busy.
I take my granddaughters home. I come back and now they're telling us that we'll print and we have to go other places.
Speaker 4: Right now. Yeah.
Speaker 2: There's gotta be at least a 100 people in line. At least
Speaker 17: a 100 people in line.
Speaker 4: And they're telling you to go somewhere else. Threat.
Speaker 12: And no one's trying to to see Anyway
Speaker 2: Of course not. Not on election day. That would never happen. Right? No.
That would never happen.
Speaker 9: Any issues so far at any of the voting centers?
Speaker 8: We have one little tabulation thing that we're looking into at the Burton Bar Center, but nothing that's inhibiting people from casting their ballot and being part of this process.
Speaker 18: You got into this. Okay.
Speaker 3: Multiple Voter records found. Please raise your hand for assistance.
Speaker 19: There you go. See
Speaker 16: that? But who Glad.
Speaker 6: We've already had almost 44,000 people Show up this morning, check-in, and be available to vote. And things are going great out there.
Speaker 15: Nothing to see Care, please disperse. Nothing to see here, please.
Speaker 16: It is the most absurd thing I have seen and this is actually playing out in real life.
Speaker 17: So many ballots being rejected by the machines at an extremely high amount.
Speaker 3: So if you vote in person, in theory, if the if the everything works right, you insert your ballot into the tabulator and you are the chain of custody.
Speaker 6: First of all, we're trying to fix this problem as quickly as possible. And we also have a redundancy in place. If you can't Put the ballot in the tabulator, then you can simply place it here in where you see the number 3. And this is a Sure box where those ballots will be kept for later this evening, or we'll bring them in here to central count To tabulate them.
Speaker 4: How do you know that every ballot that was supposedly rejected by the tabulator was put in and not other ballots?
Speaker 3: You're applying, like, the concepts of a supply chain. Right? Each additional transfer, each movement of the item, makes The chain of custody makes the system more complex. The issues with the tabulators sometimes, the issues with the printers, causing people to Wait in line for many, many hours. It's almost like they're trying to drive more and more people to voting by mail And away from showing up in person.
Speaker 15: On November 14th, I got a call from somebody I know. This person asked me to get on a conference call with a bunch of other attorneys and other people, including Carrie, to give my thoughts on the viability of a of an election challenge. I gave my view that there was a case to be filed, and it was like being thrown into a mail storm.
Speaker 0: I don't
Speaker 2: No. No way.
Speaker 0: The election denying Republican who lost her November race to become Arizona's governor is now challenging her election results in The
Speaker 8: Republican Carrie Lake has filed an election related lawsuit allowing 2 of
Speaker 12: the 10 claims to proceed.
Speaker 0: Manager called Lake's lawsuit a sham.
Speaker 11: Talking to the tune of tens of thousands of votes. Witnesses on both sides of the debate will There
Speaker 15: are literally thousands of voters many of whom were complaining of problems.
Speaker 2: Is it working if This is a big issue. Know. What is
Speaker 19: against the law?
Speaker 8: Photos and videos. No.
Speaker 2: I can have a video of it. This is not working.
Speaker 15: This is not okay. Like, this is wrong. And there were election workers.
Speaker 11: The 1 tabulator that was working was consistently rejecting ballots.
Speaker 3: 1 of the printers went down for about an hour.
Speaker 9: I was an election clerk for the midterm election. On election day, we had several voters come into our site reporting that they had already visited up to 3 separate voting locations where the printers and our machines were not Working properly.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 9: No. Nothing's working in the last half hour. Nothing.
Speaker 8: Thank you.
Speaker 15: In this mail storm, you have to conduct an investigation, Figure out what happened, do an analysis of what legal claims can be brought, and we put together a core team to start Getting information, analyzing it, figuring out what's going on.
Speaker 16: We had a conference hall Set up in a hotel right near the courthouse We had volunteers and People from our organization, we had our paralegal, we had attorneys, and everybody was converged in this room and it was Okay. We've got a trial in 72 hours. We've got to get ready. So we were working pretty much around the clock.
Speaker 15: We put together 1 hell of a team including Clay Parikh, Rich Paris over there, and a host of other people who put their heart and soul into this It
Speaker 16: was like all of a sudden we woke up we had a new family and this whole family was based around this court challenge it was unique Any camera that live streams, we capture.
Speaker 13: In a secure area around Something that is so valuable is these ballots. There needs to be checks and balances that are happening right now. We have so many of the cameras that went down just before we Opening up these boxes and looking at the ballots.
Speaker 15: People have just come together to do the right thing, not for money, for personal gain because it's the right thing and it is about our children and saving the future of this country.
Speaker 16: We need these exhibits in order. Do we know who exhibit l one is attached to?
Speaker 15: I was working with Shelby Bush and her team of We The People Arizona Alliance. She has this fantastic citizen volunteer organization.
Speaker 16: My cofounder and partner, Steve Robinson, and I started looking into the elections around 2015, 'sixteen right around the time that the Democrats started screaming that There must have been cheating in the election because Trump won and there's no way he could have won.
Speaker 9: You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee. And you can have the election stolen from you.
Speaker 16: Brian is my brother. He is a handful sometimes. He's very opinionated.
Speaker 20: You know, I gotta shave my nose before you shove that damn thing in my face.
Speaker 16: But I've never seen a guy so willing to put Everything out there on the line and sacrifice himself the way Brian does.
Speaker 19: I was the only lawyer in the state of Arizona Willing to take Kary Lake's case because I know what happened in 2022 and I know what happened in 2020
Speaker 15: The system for elections is designed to Press and make it very difficult to develop evidence of fraud. Of course, they just say, well, there's no evidence of fraud. It's a baseless allegations of fraud.
Speaker 1: Baseless allegations. Baseless.
Speaker 15: Baseless claims.
Speaker 14: Baseless claims of voter fraud. Baseless claims. Baseless claims.
Speaker 21: Baseless claims. Baseless claims. Of voter fraud.
Speaker 13: Baseless claims of election fraud Baseless claims of election fraud
Speaker 4: Baseless claims of fraud.
Speaker 15: That phrase, baseless allegations of fraud, was repeated Regardless of the evidence that showed that there was actually legal voting and fraud.
Speaker 19: About 30 days ago, I started very publicly, Discussing what the Supreme Court of Arizona and the State Bar of Arizona did in 2019, They went to each of the states and they convinced each of the states that the Russians were going to interfere in our elections Pre election and post election.
Speaker 6: We're interested in finding how many Russians are planning to visit I assure that there was indeed Russian interference. In a US presidential election Communism was just
Speaker 14: Russian interference. In US election
Speaker 15: Russia's hacking of the election.
Speaker 19: It was put in office
Speaker 9: It's very clear that Russia succeeded.
Speaker 6: Are you planning in the near future to visit our great country?
Speaker 15: Indubitably not.
Speaker 19: And they convinced The state court systems to create what are known as misinformation boards. You have this taking place All lawyers are watching what's being done to doctors. I try really hard to give people the information And help them to think, not to tell them what to think.
Speaker 22: I think people who spread false information or undermine trust in vaccination at the Present time are spreading misinformation that is, dangerous and cost lives, and I think their licenses should
Speaker 19: They take your livelihood and your ability to benefit patients, which is what your oath is.
Speaker 1: But for those of you who prefer to Draft, spread misinformation, and continue to pursue an extreme agenda out of touch with this state. Take note of the results of this election.
Speaker 16: And if we look at some of these more well known attorneys across this country, they don't want to lose their law license. They're possibly facing prison Time just simply for saying, I think there might be a problem with our elections.
Speaker 23: Lake later tweeted, she sued the use of tabulators in my election, alleging they were prone to failure. The suit was dismissed for standing, she writes. On election Day, 32% of the machines failed statewide. Yesterday, an Obama judge sanctioned my lawyers for bringing this suit at
Speaker 14: Lawyers are not supposed to file groundless lawsuits. When they do, the worst that usually happens is the case gets dismissed and the losing side has to pay court costs. Now in rare instances though, when a civil action is frivolous enough or filed in sufficiently bad faith or under false premises, the court can sanction the attorneys involved. Well, today, Sydney Powell, Linwood and other lawyers who sued to get election results thrown out in Michigan faced a federal judge. By most accounts, it did not go well for them.
Speaker 2: I believe it was an intentional effort to
Speaker 19: get attorneys to self censor the Attentional effort to get attorneys to self censor to avoid potential sanctions from the bar.
Speaker 15: And I think we have to say Stand up. Do you have an understanding of where the
Speaker 19: Everything in the command ends at, where you see the EPM. To me the most important issue is the First Amendment issue because I don't believe that it is fundamentally possible To have free and fair elections when our local government officials have the power to censor our speech.
Speaker 4: It's always the first to be from Wisconsin to Michigan participating in order of 1000. I've seen enough. And if 1 man can't do his honorable duties to the oath that he took as a judge, right, then then what other? I have a master's degree in cybersecurity, and I'm also a certified ethical hacker and a certified forensics hacking investigator.
Speaker 15: Clabe worked for a voting systems testing lab, so he knows how election equipment works. He knows all about the ballots. He knows about the requirements and everything
Speaker 4: A voting systems value, it's irreplaceable because it makes the decisions on how your communities led and run as far as your government. And so it has to be protected.
Speaker 19: Our right to vote is the most precious right that we as a people have and the reason for that is it determines whether we keep all of our other rights.
Speaker 4: Governor elect Katie Hobbs asking a judge to throw The lawsuit filed by Republican challenger Carrie Lake last week. In a 19 page motion to dismiss a suit, she and her lawyers say Lake's suit Points to no evidence of election day fraud and fails to point out any actual misconduct.
Speaker 15: At the Arizona trial, in the complaint, there were Four issues. There was the tabulator rejections. There was chain of custody violations, Signature verification where signatures did not match, and there was also first amendment violations that They didn't test Any of the tabulators that were used in the vote centers, they tested 5 spares.
Speaker 17: The importance is Actually testing and using what's actually gonna be used by the voters on election day to guarantee that everything's gonna run smoothly. It should have been verified. It should have been 5. It should have been checked. It should have been tested.
Speaker 15: 260 of the 446 tabulators rejected ballots with the same error codes that arose on election day. At those vote centers, about 60% of them, there were lines out the door, hours long voting. People gave up. They have people have jobs.
Speaker 16: We watched on the news as these election officials said we've got everything under control. Everything's fine.
Speaker 8: Now, a busy day but exciting day. Yes. So this is the day we've all been looking forward to. And so hopefully, we take a moment to appreciate that.
Speaker 9: Technology issues sometimes happen and the county Is prepared with backup plans to allow voters to be able to, you know, cast their votes securely.
Speaker 8: We have 223 voting locations open. They all opened on time. Voters can use any single one of those.
Speaker 6: There was no one who came today with an with a valid ID who was turned away from the polls.
Speaker 24: So I get questions a lot about why I'm so confident in the elections process, and one of that is because of all the different layers of controls that we So that's if one of our controls, one of those preventative, or detective controls didn't work as intended. We have, other controls implemented that would catch that and still provide for the security and integrity of the process.
Speaker 15: We know in 2020 because of COVID that mail in voting became almost universal. There were floods of ballots.
Speaker 13: Many Americans are expected to vote by mail for the 1st time this November because of the pandemic. Across the country, rules vary for when you can get your ballot and when you should return it.
Speaker 18: Oh. Hey, voters. Bill the ballot here. We've all learned how to do a lot from home lately. And now my friends at Maricopa
Speaker 15: were cast by mail in 2020 and that was more than double what had done been done in any Previous election, that's tens of millions of additional ballots on a system that was not equipped to handle. It was a recipe for fraud.
Speaker 19: So when you're flooded with a 1,000,000 plus ballot affidavit envelopes, you got a signature verify them all within, you know, the span of 30 days. How do you do that?
Speaker 6: Fontes wanted to send mail in ballots to all Democratic voters in the presidential preference election. The court ended up blocking him from doing it.
Speaker 21: I would encourage, election officials to do everything that they can, to help voters and to get as many American voices involved in our democracy as possible.
Speaker 19: Fontes was then the recorder contracted with Runbeck to run the signatures through their, signature verification process.
Speaker 2: Now at 5. Claims of widespread voter fraud after the election were of course baseless, but they still created some uncertainty surrounding our ballots especially mail in ballots.
Speaker 3: So now to calm concerns, a local election technology company opened their doors today to show us the process firsthand. Here's Amy Cutler.
Speaker 9: Runback election services works with 9 different counties here in Arizona. That's 96% of all registered voters. The Focus on printing and mailing ballots, and the process starts right here with these reams of paper. Jeff Ellington is the CEO and showed us around the massive facility. And to voters that don't have faith in the process and can question the work you do, what's your response?
Speaker 20: It's it's really listening to the people that know. Right? Listen to the election officials.
Speaker 21: We're really satisfied with the partners that we have right now. They help us advance the ball, They help us provide more secure and stable elections for everyone, and at the end of the day, that's really what we're looking for.
Speaker 3: There was a, a whistleblower, an employee of Runbeck. She Bea explained that the employees, almost as a perk of employment there, were allowed to bring their ballots in and insert them into the inbound scan. Under Arizona law, you have to return your ballot to a designated, drop off location. Runbeck is not one of those.
Speaker 16: We have a case against Runbeck. We've had 11 judges recuse themselves.
Speaker 25: You can pay a third party to go distribute the ballots. You can pay a Party to pick up the ballots, there's no chain of custody there. There's no verification. This seems to me an invitation to fraud and abuse.
Speaker 3: In most jurisdictions, when you, you know, pick up the mail ballots from a drop box, you take them to the county. That's where they're processed, that's their signature verified, and that's where they're tabulated. Maricopa County uses a third party vendor for the inbound processing, which adds 4 additional Transfers of the ballot, which of course makes the the chain of custody much more complex.
Speaker 21: Each part of the system is engineered over time to make sure that it accomplishes its particular role. Right? So everything from putting our ballots together originally to sorting out all of the legal questions, setting up polling places, making sure that our folks are well trained, ballot tabulation and security, All the way through the reporting. Every little piece has to be coordinated well. We work hard to make sure that those lines of communication are wide open.
Speaker 19: In Maricopa County, the life of a ballot starts at at Runbeck, or the life of a mail in ballot starts at Runbeck. They print the ballots, they print the envelopes, they assemble the packet. They mail these packets out. When a voter votes, they'll put it in the green envelope. They'll sign the outside.
And that envelope goes, to the post office. Maricopa County is supposed to take, according to statute, they're supposed to take custody of it at that point. The way that they take custody of it is they an employee over to the post office to pick up those ballot envelopes, and they drive them over to Runbeck. So then Runbeck's next responsibility is that they scan those ballot envelopes. So they know exactly who voted based on the voter ID that they scanned from the envelope, And they have they now have a scan of the signature.
Now the scan that they take of the signature is what they use in signature verification.
Speaker 16: We were commissioned by former Senate president Karen Phan to do an overall analysis of the 2020 election and And the 2022 election and how that relates to signature verification. Some of the things we found were voter registrations that were put into the system that had no signature or they had signatures that belong to another voter. An example, you've got, you know, Gary Smith and Gary Smith has signed his name the same way for 15 years. Then a ballot affidavit envelope is voted in the 2020 election and the signature It looks nothing like Gary Smith and it's accepted and the ballot is counted. Then you fast forward to March of 2021 and now there's a new voter registration in the system that matches The ballot affidavit envelope instead of any of the previous history.
Speaker 26: Asking which signature is used for signature Verification is not just 1 from an early ballot press as an example. Instead, know that we have multiple signature samples on file, Including signatures from all the registration forms you submitted. If you're an early voter and we have not contacted you, Then the signature we have on file is or the signatures are sufficient to be able to make that determination.
Speaker 15: This is something that you all were involved in Even before Terry Lake's trial in the November 2022 election. Right?
Speaker 16: Yes. We started working with the senate. We got access to some of this information, and we started auditing What was happening in the 2020 election. And through that, we were able to determine some of the issues that That were, I guess, flaws. We call it the 7 fatal flaws of signature verification.
Speaker 19: They provided to us the 1,900,000 Envelope images with the signatures on the envelope. And they supplied us with, 5.3 1,000,000 reference images or exemplars. We set up a a couple of secured facilities, a server, And I wrote the software that, that interfaces the the user or the signature verifier with those files.
Speaker 16: If you look up here on the screen, On your left you're gonna see the actual ballot affidavit envelope and that's the signature.
Speaker 15: So that's what's mailed in?
Speaker 16: Correct. And then they scan it in and they send those images over to be signature verified by a reviewer.
Speaker 15: And so the reviewer is looking at Signatures that are on the registration record with the state.
Speaker 16: That's correct.
Speaker 15: Match and compare to see if they're a match. Or if not, then they Take an exception and move it on to curing, where they can try to identify if that's the real voter or not. Correct?
Speaker 16: Absolutely. Here's your comparative images right here so every time a voter fills out a registration form they're listed here So if we just open this up for this particular voter, we can look and see the signature on file for him.
Speaker 15: And that signature you're pointing at, That's supposedly the signature of the voter that's on the ballot envelope.
Speaker 16: That's correct. And if you notice there are no stamps here, meaning this did not go to This was passed in the 1st level. So you might say, okay. Well, yeah, but we have 4 exemplars. Right?
So Let's take a look at another exemplar. And another.
Speaker 4: Right. And this is all the same voter item.
Speaker 16: And another. The same person. Absolutely. This should be the voter. And you can notice that none of the exemplars are even close to matching the signature on this ballot affidavit envelope.
Speaker 15: If it didn't go through a curing process and it passed level one signature review, that vote counted.
Speaker 16: Yes.
Speaker 4: That's just unbelievable. Unbelievable.
Speaker 26: If you're an early voter and we have not contacted you, then the signature we have on file is or the signatures are sufficient to be able to make that determination.
Speaker 15: This is the same registration record that the signature verification workers were looking at.
Speaker 16: Alright. That is correct.
Speaker 15: So they pass this?
Speaker 16: Yes.
Speaker 19: What happens when you put a completely different version of that signature In that voter's registration record, you change the identity of that voter because that signature is Then used in future elections to verify that voters identity. In total, what we're seeing from 2020 is approximately 21% that fail secretary of state standards either either subtly or Egregiously. And and and again, the egregious mismatch is at about 9%.
Speaker 15: Well, 9% of 823,000 right there is about 72,000 votes
Speaker 2: That is correct.
Speaker 15: That are illegal.
Speaker 16: Which would alter the outcome of any election.
Speaker 15: And 9% of 1,900,000 would be 180,000?
Speaker 16: That is correct. The margin of difference, if we remove those, all races
Speaker 15: There's a lot of testing that goes in before an election. There's such things called logic and accuracy testing to make sure That the tabulators can read the ballots and if there's a problem, full stop. They fix the problem, they retest, then they move forward when it is functioning perfectly.
Speaker 6: The accuracy of these machines is tested before the election. It's done by Maricopa County. It's done by the Secretary of State's office. That's already occurred to make sure that there isn't any tampering. If those machines don't pass those tests, We can't use those machines.
Speaker 15: Maricopa certified logic and accuracy on October 11th.
Speaker 27: Equipment that will count almost 2,000,000 Maricopa County ballots Got a public run through. It's a pre election ritual called a logic and accuracy test.
Speaker 9: These machines have been tested through and through before election day.
Speaker 6: Yes, they have. These are the tabulators that folks are using today at our 2 23 vote centers across Maricopa County. And unfortunately, We've had some hiccups with some of these tabulators.
Speaker 15: Before the trial, we had sent out a number of public records requests, And one of those requests was for what are called the system log files for the tabulators, and those are the electronic log files that show every action by those tabulators.
Speaker 4: A system log file is exactly like a computer's diary. You write and record everything that happens. For example, in the tabulator. Hey. The tabulator was turned on.
It's powered up. It goes through a self check. Boom. Boom. Boom.
These are all each log entries. You slide a ballot in. It says a ballot was inserted. It was accepted. Alright.
It gets the next ballot. It's a historical record, date and time stamped, Right? Of the system as as it functions at work.
Speaker 15: And I think you were looking at the system log files and noticed a couple of things. I think one of which was They didn't test any of the tabulators that were used at the 223 vote centers. There were 446, I believe. They tested 5 spares. Right?
Speaker 17: Correct. We don't have a single date of October 11th in any of the slogs for every single tabulator on election day. If it was used on October 11th, it would show the machine starting up and being initialized on 11th.
Speaker 15: The system log file shows they didn't test any of the tabulators that day. The law Arizona law requires All deployable voting equipment for the county to be logic and accuracy tested. They didn't do that. So after we looked at the system log files and you discovered this unauthorized testing on the 14th, 17th, and 18th, Emtek video has video surveillance of all the actions, at least in most of that center. Right?
Speaker 17: Correct.
Speaker 15: And so I think you guys went to Okay. We know the date, time of this secret testing, I'll call it. Let's see if there's video.
Speaker 17: Exactly. We wanted to match the records to What was going on in the room?
Speaker 15: And I think you issued a PR request and you didn't get back the good data. The video was not
Speaker 17: They gave back footage that was all the way across the room. So when you're looking at the It's in the farthest corner. You can't see what's going on at the desk.
Speaker 8: Well, this
Speaker 15: is, I think, where Shelby came to the rescue.
Speaker 17: Exactly.
Speaker 15: Because you Record all the livestream video feed 247 and store it. Right?
Speaker 16: Yeah. We've been doing that since 2021, early 2021 just Because we can't trust what they're doing in there and it's interesting because this came from Maricopa's camera feed. They could have sent that but they didn't.
Speaker 17: They open up the machines on the 14th, 17th, and 18th, and they run 5 or 8 ballot tests On them, then they performed exactly as they did on election day, as you can see. Spitting back out the ballot. In multiple instances, we had tons of paper jams where they have to put their hand. You can even see all the other employees here All have their hand up underneath the tabulator to help pull the ballot out so that it wouldn't get stuck in the machine. Everything we witnessed on election day, we're witnessing Right here in logic and accuracy testing.
Speaker 4: They had no tabulator s log files from the 11th. So why did they not provide the five spares that were tested. So right now, we're standing at 2 major major issues with the lna testing.
Speaker 15: And then I you found on October 14th, 17th, and 18th that after that they cut the seals on those 446 tabulators. And this is from the 14th, 17th 18th, that time frame.
Speaker 17: He and the other employees are gonna go through the tabulators and take the seals off, which is breaking The law and going to remove the memory cards from the tabulators and take them back to the computer where they're going to reprogram each and every one of them.
Speaker 15: Yeah. This is the reprogramming of the memory cards that they remembered 7 months after the fact, and only after we caught them Doing this unauthorized testing, did they disclose that?
Speaker 4: When we will look through the files that y'all received, they didn't have any of the sales recorded after
Speaker 15: Could this happen? And this isn't a small matter. I mean, we're talking about these machines, how they're programmed to read the balance. And I think that we have seen the system log files. Weren't there warnings that are showing up from the 14th, 17th, and 18th?
Yes. I think it was warn was wrong MBS settings. What what what was that again?
Speaker 4: The machine behavioral settings, which which is a major thing because that's how the the hardware, the actual mechanics of the systems the ballot as it comes through.
Speaker 15: You mean how
Speaker 4: it reads the ballots? Yes. If there's an error there, you could have vote cast for 1 person go to another person. It's because the machine's just reading it as what it thinks it's supposed to be.
Speaker 15: And and I think we we looked at these log files after we saw that warning, and there wasn't any evidence in the log files that that that was fixed, was it?
Speaker 16: No. No.
Speaker 4: No. There's no evidence it was fixed. And they also have an issue with the database version being different. Files, they get loaded on these CompactFlash. Right?
These memory sticks. And when they get loaded on, that's how the machine knows to Run it for what election? Where if if the mark's here, this is who it's voted for, and that's how it records everything in the database. All those Version numbers are supposed to match. If they if they don't, there's an issue.
So how could it have been approved Software, if you get those in, it didn't match. Yeah. It didn't match. Once that security seal's put on and l and a test has been concluded, that Seal stays on until the end of the election, unless there's some continuity of operation issue and you've gotta recover from a tabulator going down or something like that. But then to remove the seals, not to put new seals on them, you just reprogram systems and you didn't even Test them.
The whole purpose of that security seal is to say, hey. I'm configured. I'm set properly. The seal's removed. How do you know how many times they've been accessed?
Speaker 3: The fact that there's no seal on it so that there's no The communities of of determining if somebody did access some bad actor unknown to Maricopa could have, and Maricopa wouldn't know it Absolutely. Because they didn't they didn't
Speaker 15: they were tracked after. Doesn't that mean that this logic and accuracy testing that they publicly announced, that they conducted on October 11th with all these observers, that that really is just Kabuki theater? Yes. Have you ever recommended a criminal investigation?
Speaker 2: He's done. Yep.
Speaker 15: Yeah. Oh, yes. Okay.
Speaker 4: Anything that we go technical is just gonna Hypothetically because that's what they always say. Old Clay just talks hypothetical because until I pull out my USB stick and actually hack one of these systems in the courtroom Let's just say in certain cases, the federal government listened to me and others they did not.
Speaker 15: On the ones that they listened to, you didn't result a conviction. Yes. There's 1 piece of discovery that you can get under Arizona election contest statutes and that is you can ask, it's not guaranteed, but you can ask to inspect the ballots. So we moved under that statute to inspect the ballots. The defendants opposed.
Again, if you're not trying to hide anything, Why are you opposing transparency? So Clay, I remember when we were in the storm in November December trying to get ready for trial and to figure out what happened. We knew that there were ballot rejections, long lines, and that there was complete chaos, but we didn't know why. And I remember a Eureka moment.
Speaker 4: Man, I saw it in the war room and I wanted to say it, but we had to wait. I was giddy. I'm telling you I was dancing around like a little girl. I was happy.
Speaker 2: We knew
Speaker 16: what he was gonna testify to because we had brought the spoiled ballots to him so he could analyze them.
Speaker 15: Clay, what did you find out? It was a major thing. We were having one
Speaker 4: of our normal Zoom calls with several teams on it, and then 1 1 person throws up A picture of valid image that they had. And to me, as somebody who's tested these systems for 9 years, it just jumped right out at me.
Speaker 15: We said we wanna do a random inspection of a select sampling of ballots. Well, the defendants came back and said, well, you have to disclose Which vote center locations you're going to inspect ballots from? And we said no. We're not gonna give you a heads up as to where we're gonna look. We could have 1 person do it, so we couldn't have an army go in there.
We designated Clay.
Speaker 4: I go to Emtek with the attorneys. We have a meeting. We walk through the warehouse. I've shown everything. I start to select the 6 sites.
We go, we mark the boxes, they collect them. So we start inspecting ballots. I run across the ballots. I asked for a ruler. And, everybody is shocked They were dismayed, and it was sort of just laughable to me, but, you know, don't laugh because it'll just look bad.
And so they gave me a ruler. They asked the other inspector For I said the ruler. It was just apparent that their expert didn't have any idea about what he was looking at. What Clay found
Speaker 15: in there was Fit to page ballots everywhere in all 6 of the sample of the vote centers.
Speaker 4: 1st off, I saw the edge of the paper, The the hash marks. And then 2, look at the difference in the margin. The machine obviously could not tabulate this in any way, shape, or form Because these time in March are what's read and set and gets the image and allows the software to start evaluating each and every boat cast. So with this margin, there's no way it could be read.
Speaker 15: A 19 inch ballot image was being printed on the ballot paper, which was 20 inches.
Speaker 4: This was just like, woah. Wait a minute.
Speaker 15: This is the problem. I remember when you told me about this. This was a stop the presses moment. Oh, yes.
Speaker 4: Yes. It definitely was. It definitely
Speaker 12: Trisha Hendrix joining us live this morning from the Maricopa County Superior in Mesa
Speaker 27: where all this is set
Speaker 12: to start at 9 AM. Tricia.
Speaker 11: Good morning, guys. Yeah. Quiet out here now, but at 9 AM, things are going to get Started and this is day 1 of the 2 day trial of Kerry Lake. Now, America County Judge Peter Thompson dismissed 8 of the 10 claims in Lake's lawsuit, but there's 2 remaining claims alleging misconduct with ballot printers And ballot handling.
Speaker 28: Right, this is CV 2022, 0 95,403, this is Lake versus Hobbs at Al. I'll take appearances at the beginning of the day. And please, beginning with plaintiff.
Speaker 4: Sir, you'll make your way in front of my clerk. She was wearing it.
Speaker 15: Scott Jared, who was the codirector of elections, we called as a witness in our case in chief. And during that testimony, I started asking him about the issue of Could a 19 inch ballot image be put on 20 inch paper? What would happen if the ballot on demand printer printed out a 19 inch image on the 20 inch paper and ran it
Speaker 26: through the documents.
Speaker 24: We do not specifically test for that because in this specific election because none of the ballots on our ballot on demand printers had a 19 inch ballot. They all had a 20 inch
Speaker 15: Four times he denied. That never could occur.
Speaker 24: Timing marks on the ballot matter, and it would need to be a 20 inch ballot to run through that tabulation equipment. But we did not specifically Testing 19 inch ballot through the 2022 tabulation equipment because there were no 19 inch ballot images installed on our ballot on panel entries.
Speaker 15: I was a little bit surprised by his testimony.
Speaker 16: Because we knew what Clay Parikh was gonna get up and say.
Speaker 15: And I actually had planned On having another Maricopa County witness testify after Scott Jarrett, but realizing he had committed himself, We did a change up in the order of witnesses and I brought Clay up to testify, to bookend it directly in contrast to what Scott Jarrett had testified to. So mister Parikh, you it's your testimony upon inspection of, these ballots That you, determined that there was a 19 inch ballot image, projected onto the 20 inch paper. Is that accurate?
Speaker 4: Yes. That is accurate.
Speaker 15: You heard mister Jared testify That there was no way that a 19 inch image was placed on 20 inch Paper in the November 2022 general election, correct? Yes. And is there any way that a 19 inch Ballot image placed on 20 inch paper in this election in Maricopa, whether it was tabulated by the, vote center tabulator or the tabulators at Emtek, that that 19 inch ballot image would be accepted by the tabulator.
Speaker 4: There's no way a 19 inches, image could on 20 inches paper could be accepted by the TAPPLA.
Speaker 16: We were getting text messages and people were Reach out there, like, oh my gosh. Did that just really happen?
Speaker 15: Maricopa County, Emtek, that center is under 24 hour video surveillance. We could see in the conference room where Maricopa's attorneys and Scott Jarrett were prepping the whole night as to what the next day's testimony would be. And so the next day they call Scott Jarrett up in their case and he all of a sudden changes his testimony. Mr. Jarrett, do you recall your testimony yesterday?
Speaker 19: Yes I do.
Speaker 15: And yesterday you testified That a 19 inch ballot image being imprinted on a 20 inch ballot did not happen in the 2022 general election. Did you recall that?
Speaker 24: Yes. I recall that there was not a 19 ballot definition in the 2022 general election.
Speaker 15: But that that wasn't my question, sir. I asked you specifically about a 19 inch ballot image being imprinted on a 20 inch piece of paper. So are you changing your testimony now with respect to that?
Speaker 24: No, I'm not. I don't know the exact measurements of a fit to fit to paper, printing. I know that it just creates a slightly smaller image of a 20 inch Image on a 20 inches paper pallet.
Speaker 15: Slightly smaller image. How come you didn't mention that yesterday?
Speaker 24: I wasn't asked about that.
Speaker 15: Well I was asking you is 19 inches smaller than 20 inches? Is it is, isn't it? Sure. Yes. So when I said, you know, asked you questions about a 19 inch ballot image Being imprinted on a 20 inch piece of paper and you deny that that happened in the 2022 general election, Did you not think it would be relevant to say, hey, by the way, you know, there was this print to print image issue that we discovered?
Speaker 9: Your honor, I I object. The council is misstating mister Jarrett's testimony from yesterday.
Speaker 15: And then he said that they had done A root cause analysis, which is what you do to investigate a problem with an electronic machine, And that they'd known about this since the day after the election. When did you learn about this fit to print issue?
Speaker 24: When we started doing the audit reconciliation of those door 3 ballots, we identified some of those ballots had then a a fit to fit to paper issue.
Speaker 15: Remind you, he had just completely the day before said it could never have occurred. And when was that?
Speaker 24: I don't remember the exact dates, but a few days After election day.
Speaker 16: The unfortunate thing is no perjury charges. And the judge actually called him credible.
Speaker 24: Begin your acts asking me to speculate about things that I have no knowledge of occurring. So I don't know if it could have been a deliberate act or not. I don't believe that occurred. None of the ballots on our Valid on demand printers had a 19 inch ballot. They all had a 20 inch ballot.
We identified some of those ballots had then a A fit to fit to paper ish.
Speaker 29: Pretty shit. Does that mean
Speaker 20: you lied in 2020 during the audit?
Speaker 2: Does that
Speaker 29: mean you lied about the
Speaker 20: 2020 election issue.
Speaker 19: Was it a lie of omission or commission?
Speaker 29: Scott, why are you running from us? You were so brazen on the Stand in there while you're running.
Speaker 5: Scott, did you know the question yesterday?
Speaker 2: Were you
Speaker 5: were you coached by legal counsel to tell the Truth today?
Speaker 29: Scott, how do you both be blind like that? Scott, Jared. What's going on?
Speaker 15: So this Misconfigured ballot that you immediately recognized, that would be one of the causes of why the tabulators were rejecting ballots on election day.
Speaker 4: This is a major cause. This would have made door 3. This is where you have to put it. And the sad thing is is once it's in door 3, if it goes back to central, It's still not being tabulated. No tabulator, whether it's at central or at a vote center, can tabulate that ballot.
Yes. They throw it into door 3.
Speaker 6: So then it comes back out and then at that time, the voter then has the voice, to you know, we can try and run it through again or they can place it down here in this door number 3.
Speaker 15: And that was a tray which would it be taken and then counted up at the central count at Maricopa County.
Speaker 8: So I pulled my ballot in, but so it didn't it Got misread, but then what was happening?
Speaker 9: Put it in there.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 9: And tonight, a Republican and a Democrat will sit and go through all of the misread Red ballots all over the county Okay. And count them, and it will get counted.
Speaker 8: Ballots that are in here will already be in effect signature verified, so We won't need to confirm identity, but we will central tabulate them. This is actually what the majority of Arizona counties do on Election Day all the time.
Speaker 4: To go on to door 3 in itself, a door that should have a security seal on it To the end, because they had so many, they would have multiple poll workers at the vote centers with a key to open them and close them because they were getting so full, And it wasn't sealed.
Speaker 15: So the central count tabulators couldn't read this ballot either. No. And so they'd have to duplicate it.
Speaker 4: That's correct. When you duplicate a ballot, the voters' intent for each vote cast on that ballot is the primary concern. And you cannot do that until you check the original ballot with the duplicated ballot to ensure that they match. And the way they run the process, that could not happen. You have to take the original ballot and compare it to the duplicated ballot.
You just can't look at it on a screen. It'd be processed and printed in a facility somewhere else and then shipped over and run through a tabulator. Without that duplication board and those bipartisan people looking
Speaker 5: at it and comparing them,
Speaker 15: how do
Speaker 19: you know it's
Speaker 15: printed properly? System Log files or other records show that they duplicated over 8,000 ballots with this type of error code?
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 15: But they only admitted to duplicating 1300. Isn't that right? That's correct. 7000 rejections every 30 minutes from 6:30 AM to 8 PM. They never Could rebut the fact that Clay found these ballot images in all 6 vote centers
Speaker 2: that
Speaker 15: we This shows that there was intentional conduct to sabotage the election by somebody. Chain of custody is one of the most important methods To provide any security for a mail in ballot.
Speaker 16: Good afternoon, mister Valenzuela. Can you please state your name for the record?
Speaker 26: Reynaldo Balancielo.
Speaker 16: Can you describe your current employment, please?
Speaker 26: I am the co elections director of Maricopa County Elections Department overseeing early voting and election services.
Speaker 19: Ray Venezuela testified that Maricopa County did not follow the procedures as specified in the EPM on Election Day because they had said they had a different process for Election Day.
Speaker 26: We do we do Part of our audit review is we do count the drop box ballot packets because they are outside of the purview, Whereas a federal post office, they don't leave chain of custody from the federal post office once we pick them up, but the ballot boxes, we do make that count. On election day? On election day, no. Because we're not doing Dropbox Hurry your process at that time is a different process for Election Day.
Speaker 19: There's no other process for Election Day spelled out in the law And Maricopa County Elections Department doesn't have the authority to change the law.
Speaker 20: So it shows, does it not, that you are turning over ballots to run back, Correct? We're turning packets over. Packets. You have no idea exactly how many you're turning over. Correct?
Speaker 26: We don't we have an estimate but we don't. We rely on that count, that certified vendor to do that.
Speaker 16: A lot of things are occurring in run back election. It is an off-site private contractor. They have provided little to no transparency to us. This is the area Where they can flood thousands upon thousands of ballots into the system with no chain of custody.
Speaker 20: And, the County does not run or operate, Runbeck.
Speaker 26: It is a certified vendor that we contract with.
Speaker 16: Runbeck Election Services is private company that proclaimed to not be subject to public records requests.
Speaker 19: They gave Runbeck The authority to count their ballots when they have no legal authority to do so.
Speaker 15: Here's where it gets interesting. Runbeck records the number of ballots that it receives from MTech. They did a tray count. And based on the standard 350 ballots per tray, they estimated that for Ballots that were received on Election Day, those forms, if you add up those forms, about 263,000. Runbeck then Scans those envelopes which include the ballot for the signature, and they count them, and they fill out a chain of custody form there.
That total was 298,000. It was around a 35,000 valid difference. Now here's what secretary Hobbs attorneys said about these 2 forms, that Maricopa would know if any ballot was inserted or rejected into the election. We simply took those forms and added them up.
Speaker 19: You can look at Steven Richard's email to the Board of Supervisors. He said, this is after the election, 1 or 2 days after the election. I can't reconcile.
Speaker 8: So we added them up. We they're not counted at the individual voting locations. They are counted When they get back to Mck Tech and then they are recounted at, Rhonebeck.
Speaker 20: I all I have is Does anybody know when those ballots leave The polling split centers, the voting centers, how many are in the bins?
Speaker 8: When the ballots leave the early ballots leave the voting centers, No. They are not counted at the voting center.
Speaker 20: So nobody knows how many are in the bins when they arrive at MC Jet.
Speaker 19: Correct?
Speaker 26: Correct.
Speaker 20: Right. According to your testimony, they contain documents that are telling you how many of it
Speaker 8: is? No. They contain chain of custody documents.
Speaker 20: And it's Your testimony that you count them at MCAT? Correct.
Speaker 19: That means Runbeck, the people who we have counting them It's telling me one thing and the number I'm getting for my people is another thing.
Speaker 3: That number Ultimately doesn't even match the number of ballot Images that they scan. Why did they scan in more ballots than they have record of receiving?
Speaker 19: Maricopa County had absolutely no idea how many ballots They gave to a corporation, a private for profit company that doesn't have our best interests at heart.
Speaker 20: Mr. Valenzuela, you had absolutely no idea that Runbeck employees were allowed to inject ballots into system. Isn't that correct?
Speaker 26: I do not. I did not.
Speaker 20: You had no idea. And isn't it true that you had no idea because you do not keep adequate documentation With regards to the number of ballots you receive on election day and give to Runbeck, yes or no? It's a simple question.
Speaker 16: Objection, your honor.
Speaker 3: The issue with inserting ballots at at Runbeck is that there's no there's no documentation of where they came from. Right? There's no chain of custody. It creates a situation where if you can insert 1 ballot, if you can insert 10 ballots, how many could you insert until somebody would notice?
Speaker 30: But you only have to answer if you have an understanding about it. If you don't have an understanding, it's perfectly fine to say I don't know. Are you aware that under Arizona law, a ballot is not not actually unlawful if it is, The term that's used sometimes is harvested or ballot collection. But if somebody who is not authorized to handle it Deposits it. Deposits it.
Or like what happened at Runbeck, if somebody brings it and inserts it into the stream But not into an a designated authorized drop box. Are you aware that under Arizona law, that is not actually an unlawful ballot?
Speaker 3: I think the the term in the law is an invalid valid.
Speaker 26: Okay.
Speaker 30: Just 1 minute, your honor. Mhmm. No more questions. Thank you very much, miss Honey.
Speaker 15: Who's putting these ballots in, or who's removing ballots and then putting other ballots in? If you have no Troll over this process. How can you trust it?
Speaker 18: Hey, voters. Fill the ballot here at the Maricopa County Elections Department, where my friends are making sure your ballot for the November election is secure and trackable. Our upgraded equipment is certified, accurate, and monitored around the clock. And before your ballot even gets here, we verify every signature to make sure your vote is really you.
Speaker 15: The comparison of signatures is one of the most Important safety checks for mail in ballots to know that the voter who cast the ballot is the one whose vote is being recorded.
Speaker 19: The signature by law is the identity of that individual. So there was a reporter working for the Gateway Pundit who used a public records request to go evaluate envelopes. He looked at approximately 300 envelopes, and he, from that, got about 30 envelopes that he questioned the signature on. And, you know, Coincidentally, that matches our experience. And he made a call to several of those, and he found a person who's willing to talk to him.
And he showed him the The, signature on the envelope, and this person said, you know, I signed my signature very consistently, and that is not my signature. And I tell you what's more, I did sign and submit an envelope, mail an envelope with a ballot for this election, And that is not the envelope that I signed and submitted.
Speaker 15: Signature verification workers are under live Dream camera in a room. People can see what they're doing.
Speaker 16: When we look at the records that the county put out about how many people they hired to do signature verification. And we looked at the video footage. There's a room here that has 12 people and there's a room here that has 23 people and their full time signature verification staff was less than 50 people and the 2022 election they supposedly Verified signatures on 1,300,000 ballot affidavit envelopes. The math doesn't add up.
Speaker 15: There were about 48 workers performing signature review that people could log on to the Maricopa County website and say, oh, yeah. They're they're doing their job And here's all the training materials that they get before they conduct signature verification. What Maricopa doesn't tell you is that For the 2022 election, for example, there were over 90 other workers who were doing it without Any cameras doing it in their office, could even be doing it at their home. We don't even know who these other signature verification workers Why would you go to the length of creating this facade of transparency and public disclosure with 48 signature verification workers under camera and everybody can see. Yet behind the scenes, you have more than 90 who are doing it at their desk or at their home.
What? Again, they created a facade. The question is why?
Speaker 19: A lot of these Ballot affidavit envelopes have such egregious mismatches that are approved by these, We call them ringers, individuals who they instruct or whatever happens to just hit enter and approve the signatures.
Speaker 15: We had whistleblowers who worked in the signature verification, department at Maricopa who testified that anywhere from 15 to 40% of the signatures did not match, yet they were being passed through.
Speaker 19: From law firms I used to work for, I know every damn thing I do on my computer. And so There's got to be data that shows how long it's taking these people to approve these signatures. Right?
Speaker 15: Chris Hansell had done a public records request and that data shows how long the, among other things, how long signature reviewers We're actually looking at the record signature on file to compare it to the ballot envelope signature to see if it matched.
Speaker 19: We got the data and the data is incredible. You know, the video supports the data, the data supports the video and it's clear People were not doing the job they were supposed to be doing. If you're doing legitimate signature verification, we found in our group that it should take more like 20, 30, 40, maybe even 45 seconds to do a legitimate signature verification according to the training that the secretary of state gave for signature But what what we saw in the logs is really well depicted in this, in this video. He is literally Clicking through these signatures as fast as the screen will update. So it takes up the screen about a second update.
He's taken a second or 2 to look at each one of these. This is the this is the image of the envelope and this is the, the exemplar or the, the reference signature. So he is supposedly doing a a legitimate evaluation between that box and that box in that amount of time. He's not the only one. About 2 thirds, maybe 3 quarters of the signature evaluation workers are evaluating signatures at that speed.
Actually, this worker is much more conscientious. She's taking her time. And so she's a good example of the opposite end of the spectrum. We got these signatures coming in in envelopes And they're going down through this giant drain of, signature verifiers that are are verifying at this speed. What we found was that people who were speed clicking through had the highest, pass rate.
The people that took their time, obviously, they're gonna find the legitimate Mismatches in signature, and that's what we find in the data. So, okay. So this this column is user 1 through 151. And then this column over here, this goes in in in order of speed of clicking. So here we got somebody who did About 5,000 evaluations.
And they did it at a at a 99.68 pass rate. And that's what we find, is the people who They have higher pass rates. So let's, scroll all the way down to the bottom, and we'll see some red numbers down there. See all the 100% is passing by here? Okay.
So remember, 1 or 0 seconds, less than 2 seconds, 300,000 signatures were evaluated at that speed. And here we have this group plus the next one, less than 3 seconds. That's 2 seconds or one second or 0 seconds. Half a 1000000 signatures passed at that speed.
Speaker 15: It is Physically impossible to compare a signature as those workers are instructed to do at a rate of less than Maricopa County commissioned the MacGregor report. That report came out 5 months after the election, And it came out not by us. This was an observation of somebody Maricopa selected when they observed 4 of the 10 printers. All of a sudden, randomly starting to print fit to page ballots that none of the technical experts Could explain how or why occurred. That's either malware or remote access.
Speaker 4: For those who don't understand printers, we're talking about Two different manufacturers. What is the probability and the chance that those 2 systems Have the same random issue. If you understand anything about technology or manufacturing, that is just it's almost impossible.
Speaker 15: The fact that that investigative team did not follow-up And get to the bottom of why that random printing of fit to page ballots occurred is, This isn't a game. It's real. That had a real measurable effect that would have changed the outcome of this election. These are people's votes. The officials that are being elected are implementing policies that affect people's lives.
Speaker 16: When people question and they say you have no evidence, you have no proof, the first thing I do is offer to show them the proof. There are just some people that I think aren't ready to see what's right in front of their face.
Speaker 4: It should not take Looking at system log files, having to do forensic audit just to ensure a component of a voting system function properly. When you look at 2 tables and you see a couple of $100,000 worth of computer systems and and machinery up there, and you're thinking, All to go and get a paper ballot that could have been printed, filled in by hand, and counted by hand.
Speaker 3: Allowing them to make up the law as they go and follow the laws that they want to and disregard the ones that they don't, it's it's devastating. Devastating in terms of the outcome but it's devastating in terms of people having confidence in the outcome of elections. But how about the minimum? How about we just follow the laws as they exist?
Speaker 19: Our right to vote is the most basic and fundamental right we have. They're taking it from us.
Speaker 15: But this is what it takes. It it is the willingness to sacrifice And to never ever quit because at the end of the day, the truth will win. We've shown the evidence, and at some point, it can no longer be denied and covered up.
Speaker 5: How much election fraud do you think is real? Here we go, Joe. You wanna go Election fraud. Yeah. That Carrie Lake stuff in Arizona that they're trying to dismiss.
It doesn't look like That's invalid.
Speaker 4: It looks like there's real fraud there.
Speaker 5: It looks like there's some real shenanigans there. At the very least, there was voting machines that weren't working properly. And it seems Very suspicious that a lot of them were in Republican areas. There's a lot of shenanigans. There's a and I think there's coordinated efforts to make sure that certain people get elected.
I don't know how far they go, but I know it's not 0.
Speaker 15: I think people in the past believed their responsibility to themselves and to their country ended with simply casting a vote. And once that was accomplished then they could go back and accept the results. That's no longer the case in our country. Your responsibility and your duty goes beyond simply casting a vote. It is to actually get involved, It is whether it's public records requests.
It's to ask questions of your representatives to demand transparency in elections.
Speaker 19: I said what the hell have I got to lose? Right? My dignity. I may lose my law license but I will have My fucking dignity.
Speaker 15: I do plan on bringing in brand new actions, And so as long as I can take a breath, I will never quit on this. And it may not come quick, And that is frustrating, and it's difficult because we're up against a machine that is bound and determined to suppress the truth, but it can't be done forever.
Speaker 7: Our current voting systems are complicated and messy, and that's by design. Imagine a small business not knowing how much money is in the cash register, Or a bank not knowing how much money is in the teller's drawer. Or sending an armored car with bags of cash To the central bank without knowing how much money is actually in the bags. It's hard to believe, but as this movie demonstrated, this is how your votes are being handled in many states Across our great nation. Banks or corporations don't put up with these kind of lazy accounting processes, and neither should the American people.
Your votes are far more precious than cash. Your vote is your future and your family's future. Currently, in many states, your votes are not reconciled and verified at the precinct level. Instead, ballots are shipped off to third party entities or counted at Centralized locations outside of public oversight. Residents of Maricopa County know all about that.
And as you also just saw in this movie, mail in ballots are not secure and they are a recipe for fraud. We must return to mail in voting being the exception And not the rule. Election day voting in small precincts with hand counting at the precinct level guarantees the most accurate accounting and transparency in our elections. We as Americans must demand in our elections. We as Americans must demand this.
Precinct level hand counting is how most of the country voted before the year 2000. For 100 of years, this system worked. Even France does it this way now because it's the most secure. Our current system, where we vote for a month and count ballots for days or weeks in backrooms, invites fraud and distrust. This needs to change.
We must restore faith in our election so that everyone, regardless of political party, has faith that their vote matters. Call your state and local officials now. Hand counting ballots at the precinct level And locally verifying the ballot count against machine tallies is the best way to stop fraud. The 2024 election is just around the corner. We must build back trust in our elections before it's too late.
The time to act is now. Your future and your children's culture and future is at stake. Demand hand counting at the precinct level. If you like this movie, please consider donating and visiting build trust again.org. Through education and proactive lawsuits, myself And others like me are working to expose the flaws and fix fraud in our systems before it's too late.
Americans deserve free and fair elections, and we won't stop until we get
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Thank God for @laralogan.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
.@RubenGallego, As a member of Congress, you voted to send money to fund terrorist organizations but voted against funding Arizona’s border wall. Do you really want to compare our priorities?
@KariLake - Kari Lake
This is a bombshell from @ChuckGrassley The FBI received 'criminal information' from over 40 confidential sources on The Biden Crime family The FBI & DOJ are obstructing these investigations claiming "misinformation.” But they can’t stop the truth from reaching the American people https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-received-criminal-information-40-confidential-sources-joe-biden-hunter-jim-grassley
FBI received 'criminal information' from over 40 confidential sources on Joe Biden, Hunter, James: Grassley
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI maintained more than 40 confidential human sources on various criminal matters related to the Biden family, including Joe Biden, dating back to his time as vice president, according to information obtained by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.
foxnews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The radical left's lockdown during COVID has left us resentful. Our kids missed out on precious moments, families struggled financially. Meanwhile, @RubenGallego enjoyed an $84,000 all-expenses-paid trip to Qatar, riding camels with Eric Swalwell, who had ties to a CCP spy.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
We will never forgive the radical left for locking this country down during COVID Our kids were robbed of some of the best moments of their lives. Families were living paycheck to paycheck Do you know what @RubenGallego did while we were suffering? He went on an $84,000 all-expenses-paid vacation to Qatar & rode camels with his friend, Eric Swalwell (The Congressman who slept with Fang Fang The CCP Spy)
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Anytime an Election Fraud Denier asks “Where’s the evidence?” Show them this video #HereIsTheEvidence
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video presents evidence of alleged widespread fraud in the 2020 US election. It highlights statistical anomalies in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, where Joe Biden received major vote spikes in the early hours of November 4th, placing him in the lead. The video also discusses eyewitness and video evidence, including a poll worker in Georgia seen handling absentee ballots after counting was supposed to stop. It raises concerns about Dominion Voting Machines being tampered with over internet connections and points out errors and missing logs in the machines. The video concludes by urging viewers to share the evidence and demand election reform.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Matter which side of the fence people have been on, they've been saying, show me the evidence. I'll believe it when I see the evidence. And people on both sides agree that something went terribly wrong in November 20 twenty. But there really has been no comprehensive place to see the evidence of widespread fraud until now. This video is pure data, so don't get mad.
You Can't be angry when a scientist confirms the gravity pulls downward at negative 9.8 meters per second squared even when that fact works against the narrative you've third. So here we go. Just before we show you some new disturbing video evidence, we'll talk about statistical anomalies in 3 states in question. In In the early hours of November 4th, 2020, Democratic candidate, Joe Biden, received several major vote spikes in Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia, 2, suddenly placing him in the lead when he had been trailing Trump by a significant margin. 8,954 individual vote updates were analyzed across nearly all updates to follow the clear statistical pattern.
However, a very small number of batches are especially questionable. The 4 most notable aberrations were 2 in Michigan, 1 in Wisconsin and 1 in Georgia. And All occurred in the same 5 hour window in the middle of the night when in some places, counting reportedly had stopped. Not only do these updates not follow generally observed patterns. But their behavior is particularly extreme.
For context, using publicly available data from The New York Times, here is a visualization of the number of votes by candidates 3th in Michigan from the beginning of the election night to 7 PM EST on November 4th. Trump is in red. Biden is in blue. Notice the sudden and improbable spike in votes to Biden at 6:30 AM, where Biden received a 141,258 votes while Trump only received 5,968. This Extreme ratio is surrounded by updates that are nearly the same in ratio.
This particular update is 23 times more votes for ten and is the most extreme update favoring Biden in all datasets across all states. The situation in Wisconsin is even more stark. A A single update to the vote count brought Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. Thirdly, a vote update in Georgia at one 34 a. M.
Eastern time on November 4th, which shows a 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and only 29,115 for Donald twelve. The extent of these 4 votes spikes in question are more than the margin of victory in all 3 states, which means the spikes were not only abnormal in regards to percentage for Joe Biden, 2, also in magnitude of the vote count. Out of roughly 9,000 updates, this election was decided by only 4 extreme updates, each with to the probability of less than 1 tenth of 1%. Meaning that had these 4 unlikely updates not happened, we would have a different president in the White House. Detractors to argue that these spikes were merely human error and not indication of fraud, and the errors have been corrected.
If the errors have been corrected, where is their evidence? Why were the The results never changed. Others have said that the spikes indicate heavily Democratic precincts. If that were the case, then California would show many spikes of that magnitude, 2, but it doesn't. Only 1 vote update in California is anomalous in percentage of Biden votes, but not enough magnitude to shift an outcome.
The The strangest anomaly visible in the data is a consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time, which is theoretically impossible. Here is Florida. These updates occurred over a week following the election. Notice all the ratios of Biden to Trump votes are a 100 10th, identical over several days. This pattern shows up in many states.
It appears that a computer algorithm is involved in the process, which is doing something called weighted race distribution. A feature of Diebold voting machines known as early as 2001 which gives value 2 votes rather than simply counting them. Here in California, we see an update of 1 vote. About 65% of that value is given to Biden, and and 32% to Trump. How can 1 vote go to more than 1 person?
It is well known and not disputed that Diebold software was found to be fifteen votes through programming in past elections. Even though Diebold is no longer used, Dominion Voting Systems acquired ES and S in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold under its new name of Premier Election Solutions. This does not exhaust all statistical data anomalies encountered in the 2020 election. But 3. Anomalies is only one factor to consider.
Next is eyewitness and video evidence. In Georgia, there's the case of a poll worker named Ruby who was seen on Instagram giving a secretive live video of her working in the back room filled with absentee ballots. 2. At 10:30 pm on November 3rd, all media and poll watchers were told to leave State Farm Arena because ballot counting was going to stop. But Ruby and her daughter and 3 others remained behind at State Farm Arena.
They pulled boxes of ballots out from under the table that was placed there in the morning and distributed them to several counting stations.
Speaker 1: Back to Fulton County, Georgia right now where our reporter Blaine Alexander apparently has some new reporting on the expectations Patience for that count.
Speaker 2: But, Rachel, we've learned that the counting continues tonight. You know, right here in State Farm arena behind me, we've learned that there are 5 people who are 2. Still inside, still working to scan those absentee ballots and try and get those numbers tabulated. Now initially, we believe we were told that everybody went home at about 10:30, 2. But I just got off the phone with the county spokesperson who tells me that indeed there are still some people in there quite literally burning the midnight oil, scanning ballot after valid in trying to get that information in.
Speaker 1: And, Blaine, specifically, you said 5 people are inside that building. That's 5 of 5 actual individuals who are working on All the absentees in Fulton County right now, just fine? Wow. Talk about having the sort of the fate of the nation in your hands.
Speaker 0: 3. You see in here in this video running the exact same stack of ballots to the machine three times. Other workers do the same. Note that a large surge in Biden votes can be observed after this tabulation at 06:34 Greenwich Mean Time, which is 1:34 AM in Georgia, Georgia. Just after the time in question, you may ask, can a ballot really be counted more than once?
Here's your answer from Coffee County, Georgia.
Speaker 3: Can you stand a ballot more than once?
Speaker 4: I've just done it. You just
Speaker 3: keep standing here.
Speaker 4: I just kept standing twenty. I just scanned the same batches that you all just voted. I never got any more until that one.
Speaker 0: 2. Ruby allegedly posted this later on social media. Of course, the mainstream media calls this misinformation, and most references to these videos have been deleted from Internet search results. Apple News, the morning of the election, sent out a push message to Apple News subscribers that elections are secure. So if it's true that election 5 is rare.
What about Raquel Rodriguez? She was recently arrested for election fraud in Texas because of overwhelming video evidence incriminating 2th that she was harvesting ballots for pay.
Speaker 5: We just have the ticket to get votes for here Biden. How many votes you think you can deliver for us?
Speaker 3: At least five 5,000.
Speaker 5: And what are we looking at as far as how much that's gonna cost?
Speaker 3: For the entire team that I'm looking at, I'm looking at 55,000.
Speaker 5: 2. So 55,000 to 5,000 votes pop the 50 is either Biden.
Speaker 3: If not more, 2. I'm not gonna over promise because remember, we're we're 16 days till election day. You can give me cash, you can do Whatever you want to do. $55,000
Speaker 5: upfront, 5,000 votes. That's right.
Speaker 0: Then there is cyber security evidence and the question of whether Dominion Voting Machines were tampered with over Internet connections. Signed affidavits under oath from cybersecurity experts indicate that Dominion Voter systems and Edison Research were using an unencrypted VPN with login credentials that were easily accessible and used by foreign adversaries to to monitor and manipulate votes. The IP addresses into the Edison Research Hope Service went in both directions. Meaning that not only were China in Iran and other countries accessing the servers. But also Edison Research was communicating back to these adversaries.
The claims that Dominion Voting Machines were not connected to the Internet 10th are completely false. Cybersecurity experts have followed the communication of the data from Dominion Voting Servers and Edison Research to foreign countries. 3. A simple web search will uncover that DominionVotingsystems.com is registered to a company in Hunan, China. 3 of the 7 board members of UBS Securities to our Chinese nationals, that company owns Staple Street Capital which in turn owns Dominion.
On top of that, the Dominion software is licensed Trump's Markmanic, which is a Venezuelan owned and controlled company. And we're all familiar with how their elections go. Furthermore, forensic audits of the machines to reveal significant errors. Although the mainstream media and politicians are saying that it's dangerous misinformation that Dominion Voting Systems are to secure. This was the very message that several left leaning news sources were claiming less than a year ago.
NBC News and PBS found out just how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast take votes. It's important to know that Georgia just spent over a100 or
Speaker 6: is about to spend over $100,000,000 on a contract with Dominion to provide image cast 2 hardware to the state in time for the 20, for the for the next primaries and for the 2020 election. And yet here these kids were who had opened it up. They said, look, you can pop the front off of it and here's a port you can get into right here that's easy. You know, all kinds of stuff that you could certainly do within 6 minutes behind a curtain, much less, if you had extra time because any of these were connected to the web as we've discovered a couple days before, time. So many of them are.
Speaker 0: Despite opposition and attacks, election security experts were able to audit Dominion Voting Machines in Antrim County, Michigan, 2, revealing unusually high error and adjudication rates. What does that mean? According to the report, Dominion Voting Systems is intentionally designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. Ballot errors are sent to adjudication which means the vote can be decided by an election worker where there is no oversight, no transparency and no audit trail.
Speaker 7: We scanned a 113,130
Speaker 8: as of moments ago. We've adjudicated Paid it a 106,000 plus a bell.
Speaker 0: Experts identified an error rate of 68.05% which is far above the Federal Election Commission guidelines of point zero zero zero eight percent or 1 in 250,000. Although vote adjudication logs are available for prior election years, suspiciously, all the logs for the 2020 cycle were missing. Moreover, all security logs prior to 11:03 PM on November 4th are also missing. If that's not enough, the election event designer log shows that the Dominion Image cast precinct cards were reprogrammed on October 23rd and again on November 5th, which violates the Help America Vote Act, which includes a 90 3 day safe harbor period that prohibits changes to election systems, registries, hardware and software updates without undergoing recertification. Even if skeptics ten.
Critics persist that these issues are inconsequential. They should be willing for forensic audits to take place for transparency. Yet they have viciously attack attempts to review logs. Why is that if there's nothing to hide? Election officials in Maricopa County, Arizona have even ignored subpoenas eighteen for release of election data and Dominion Machine Audits until after the inauguration.
Then there's the mass influx of unsolicited mail in ballots. The 2. Keyword is unsolicited. In other words, people receiving ballots they never asked for. Politicians use the coronavirus to push mass to mail in ballots and extending the time to receive those ballots till many days after the election.
There are many reports of people who voted in person also receiving multiple unsolicited solicited ballots in the mail. People who did not send in a mail in ballot denied in person voting because they were told they had voted already by mail when they 2010. This opened up chaos in the system and uncertainty as to who actually voted. Additionally, signature verification requirements were slackened in many states days adding even more uncertainty. In fact, the Pennsylvania Secretary of State unilaterally removed legislative signature requirements for mail in ballots.
More than a 1000 signed affidavits have been given by poll workers who have witnessed illegal activities, non equal treatment of Republican poll watchers, counting ballots in 2 locations with no poll watchers. Poll watchers not permitted close enough to see the counting process. Shredding ballots, garbage bags full of ballots for Trump. Entire boxes of hundreds of supposedly mail in ballots that have no folds indicating they were never actually mailed by anyone. The list goes on and on.
These affidavits are signed by witnesses under penalty of perjury, so this should not have been taken lightly. But these witnesses were never heard in court. Unfortunately, what we have covered is only the tip of the iceberg on fraud, cover ups, federal election law violations, and dishonesty on a global scale.
Speaker 9: 2. So either the secretary of state's office is recording and certifying results that have negative errors and fraudulent votes in them or someone is giving them negative information.
Speaker 0: Ten. Polls show an overwhelming percentage of the US don't trust the 2020 election was without fraud. At the end of this video, the credits will be further data scrolling blink through that you can read for yourself and pause and go back and read again. So what can you do? Firstly, find a way to download this video and share it.
Film it with your mobile phone. 2. Anything to duplicate this, post it with a hashtag, here is the evidence, hashtag every legal vote. Because guaranteed, the big Big tech and social media giants will do their best to erase it from the Internet as they've already done with much of the evidence we've already shared. And if they can't erase it, they'll Fake fact check it.
Well, guess what? We've already done the fact checking. We've gone through thousands of pages of data sworn affidavits, forensic reports, and cyber security reports. 2. Secondly, you can demand election reform from your election state and local officials.
We cannot let another election ever be this questionable ever again. This is the United States of America. People used to look to us on how to have democracy through our voting system. 2020 was a complete sham and it cannot ever happen again.
Speaker 5: 2. 2. 2. 2. 2.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
When a man flees war, he takes his family with him. When a man heads to war, he leaves his family behind. Our Nation is being infiltrated by Military-Aged Men from every corner of the globe. America is VULNERABLE. We NEED to secure our border.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Carrie Lake expresses concern over the situation at the southern border, blaming President Biden for the increase in illegal immigration. She highlights the high cost of housing these immigrants and the strain it puts on law-abiding citizens. Lake questions the narrative that these immigrants are families seeking asylum, pointing out that they are mostly military-aged men. She emphasizes the need for help from leaders and describes the border crisis as a national security risk. Lake criticizes various politicians for their lack of action and calls for a change in leadership. She encourages Arizona residents to vote for secure borders and a safer state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, Arizona. It's Carrie Lake. I'm sitting down to talk to you because of some truly horrifying footage I've been seeing coming from our wide open southern border. Since the lifting of Title 42, the Tucson border sector has become a valley of death. It experienced 167% bike in-depth.
A number that will only grow as that bumbling fool, Joe Biden, welds the doors to our border wall open. And rolls out the red welcome carpet for the invaders to come in. Just 2 days ago, in the Tucson sector, 2000 illegal immigrants from all across the globe were caught breaking into our country. Our border patrol who are truly fighting and trying their best under impossible circumstances cannot house all of these people. We literally can't afford it.
It's costing us $7,000,000 a month to put these people up and already over capacity facilities. And that price is expected to double. Left with no choice, our border patrol has been forced to release these people directly onto our streets where law abiding Arizona will suffer the responses. You deserve so much better. The Biden regime tells us that these are families seeking asylum But look at this footage.
These are military aged men from different nations. Where are the women Where are the children? Do we even know where these people are going when the border patrol is forced to release them onto our streets and masks Last month, I got an email from a border patrol agent who said that they had lost operational control completely of the Arizona border. He said they look like soldiers from other countries coming over, period. They are not here to help us.
They are here to harm us. That message scared the hell out of me, but what scares me the most is that this is not the first time I've heard it. Our border patrol, the boots on the ground know exactly how bad things are, and they're begging for help The Biden border crisis has become more than just a humanitarian crisis. It is a national security risk. I know there's no higher priority than ensuring the safety of Arizona and that there is no cause more worthy than protecting our nation's sovereignty.
But our current, sorry collection of leaders can't say the same. The resident in the White House, Joe Biden, has stolen the leftover border wall material. That we paid for and sold them at a $298,000,000 loss. The squatter in the governor's office, Katie Hobbs, just agreed to make Arizona taxpayers put a $2,100,000 bill because the Doug Ducey administration sacked up containers along the border. And in the senate, Houston cinema continues to prioritize amnesty over security.
She'll do anything to please her corporate masters who want cheap labor. Mark Kelly's head is still in orbit and his heart seems to be in Ukraine. And in Congress, Marxist Ruben Gallego is now trying to walk back his decades long career of painting border security efforts as racist and threatening ice agents with severe consequences for enforcing the law. He is truly unhinged. Rubin I know this doesn't impact you because you actually live in the swamp, and that's what you call home, but hardworking, Arizona are struggling.
You would know that if you spent more time talking to us instead of mocking us, but we won't hold our breath. Arizona, your leaders are failing you. Our country is being invaded, but we are not powerless to change this. Under President Donald J. Trump, we had the most secure border in our nation's history.
In 2024, we can have that all of these bad actors and open border globalists out and replace them with America First Patriots. We are going to secure our border. We are going to make Arizona safe again. Don't get frustrated. Don't feel helpless Get motivated.
Let's vote like our lives depend on it because they truly do.
reSee.it AI Summary
Last month, a Border Patrol Agent expressed concern over the loss of operational control on the Arizona border. They emphasized the need for security, as individuals resembling foreign soldiers pose a potential threat. The deliberate decision by Biden to not secure the border is endangering lives.
@KariLake - Kari Lake
Last month, I got an email from a Border Patrol Agent who said they had lost operational control of the Arizona border. He said “They look like soldiers from other countries. They are not here to help us, they are here to harm us. God forbid we're going to have another 9/11.” Biden’s deliberate decision NOT to secure our border is endangering our lives. https://thecentersquare.com/national/article_dd29346a-57db-11ee-aca7-071cd279c83d.html
@KariLake - Kari Lake
I agree with President Donald J. Trump. Thank you @RepGosar, @EliCraneAZ, @RepAndyBiggsAZ for working to rein in the out-of-control swamp spending and Defund the Deep State. Please continue to hold the line!
@KariLake - Kari Lake
One misdemeanor charge for the man caught on camera telling people "We need to go into the Capital." The man who texted his nephew, "I Also Orchestrated It.” This isn't normal. There's so much more to this story than they're telling us.
BREAKING: Ray Epps Hit With Single Charge for Jan 6 Role.
Ray Epps – a key January 6th figure who has bizarrely escaped justice for years despite admitting to having "orchestrated" much of it – has finally been
thenationalpulse.com
@KariLake - Kari Lake
.@JoeBiden's corrupt DOJ just sentenced a journalist to 60 days in jail. His crime? Believing the election was stolen & covering the January 6th protest. Only Banana Republics criminalize free speech. I will never stop speaking out against this tyranny.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Journalist Owen Shroyer has been sentenced to 2 months in jail for his involvement in the January 6 events. Despite not entering the Capitol or causing any harm, he is being punished. While I don't follow him closely, I believe journalists should be able to report without being imprisoned for their work. Shroyer was reporting on January 6, and it seems his reporting may have been closer to the truth than mainstream media outlets. The Department of Justice's actions against him reflect a concerning trend, reminiscent of Banana Republics. I fear we are losing our republic and becoming one ourselves. I'm doing my part to save America, but time may be running out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You spent time in the media. Let's talk about journalist, Owen Shroyer. Quite frankly, this is a name I wasn't familiar with, but he was just sentenced to 2 months in jail for January 6 offenses. I believe we have his picture here. This guy was neither at the Capitol.
And so he didn't enter the Capitol. He didn't break anything. It didn't hurt anybody. And yet he's going to jail. What can you tell us about this guy?
Speaker 1: I don't really follow him. I've seen maybe a couple clips over time, but I believe that journalists Should be able to report. And you may like what they do or dislike what they do, but they shouldn't be locked up for their reporting. And he was reporting on January 6th. Something tells me he was probably a lot closer to the truth than, you know, the MSNBC and CNN reporters.
And that scared the Department of Justice Enough that they they, sick they, you know, they sent their their attack dogs to him. And now he's gonna be sitting behind bars for 60 days For doing his job, which was reporting the news, this is the kind of stuff you see in Banana Republics. I say that a lot about many of the things that we're witnessing right now, Greg, At which I'm really of the belief that we are losing our republic and becoming a banana republic. And I don't know if there's much time To pull this back from the ledge, but I'm doing whatever I can to do my part and try to save America.