TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @KarluskaP
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Dan The Man! @DanScavino https://t.co/MG7e11221M
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: All your great videos from Air Force One. But tell the American people, from your perspective, you got a view none of us did, what is it that we didn't get to see about that trip that you got to experience when it relates to president Trump?
Speaker 1: It's actually very surreal because a lot of people said that president Trump couldn't get this done. Couldn't get it done. MAGA knew deep down that if anybody could get this deal done with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Marco Rubio and that great team that it would be president Trump. And we're on the plane going out. We all knew this was a historical moment. There was a great sense of pride on the plane, know, checking in on the president up in his office. You know, just he does so much reading and consuming of information. He knew how real the moment was too. Then when we entered out into the Middle East and you had the f sixteens escorting the plane in, which has happened before, but it was just it was a great feeling that the president of The United States, the leader of the free world, Donald j Trump, was there on a mission that he wanted to complete, you know, that he talked about and talked about and talked about. And everybody said, no. No. No. And he ended the war. And it it's absolutely incredible. You know, millions of lives saved amongst all these wars being ended. 20 hostages coming home. Just think about it. If if president Trump was not in office, this would still be going on.
Speaker 0: It was historic for sure. There's no doubt about it. You were announced last weekend as the head of PPO, presidential personnel. So for the American people, maybe give them a sense of what this job actually entails, what you do, and why it is so important to the American people, so important to national security, and really the future of the country.
Speaker 1: It it was an honor for the president to ask me to take this, additional job on. PPO is responsible, for vetting, interviewing, and bringing in candidates, political appointees to all of these agencies throughout the government. And something that we really wanna keep an eye on, which has been done, is, you know, bringing people with the values of the president that want to complete his agenda, making America great again, America first policies. I work very closely with all of the cabinet members, or I will be working very closely. So the communication you have with the cabinet members is very important in staffing up their agencies with political appointees. PPO also oversees ambassador appointments all around the world. So we have those to fulfill. We're also responsible for US Marshals and fulfilling those obligations all around the country. Work very closely with the DOJ on that front. So as I said, I'm learning every day that passes. I'm a quick learner, and I've hit the ground running.
Speaker 0: As it relates to The Middle East, since we just talked about that, obviously, people are really excited about what happened there, and they wanna see more forward progress. Do you come in on that? What is it that you're gonna be able to do from this office to help implement phase two?
Speaker 1: It's a great question and and things that actually came up yesterday in a couple of meetings. So that's my learning process. But we will need to fulfill, special envoys that are that are gonna be out there as well as oversight of the rebuilding of Gaza, and there'll be commissions that will be created in which we'll assist in. And with that, I would work with secretary of state Marco Rubio, Steve Witkoff, who is just such a great, great, great man. Love the guy. As well as, you know, Jared is very involved in getting this done as well. So it's really a team effort, and I'm willing to put forth the office with anything we can assist with in in getting the job done and fulfilling obligations out there to to support their mission in in completing each phase.
Speaker 0: Well, something else that this administration has been very successful at doing is a crime crackdown. What else are you involved with from PPO that can help, you know, facilitate more of this crime crackdown all across the country? I imagine you guys have a role in that too.
Speaker 1: We do. We do with fulfilling judgeships, within districts. US marshals, like I mentioned earlier, the US marshals are absolutely, incredible in what they do. And it's just getting leadership in each district, within each community, county, and state, throughout the country. So we'll fulfill all of that. And we'll we'll work with all entities. It is a team effort, and you see it every day. It's an atmosphere of where everybody wants to work together. I tell you behind the scenes in these cabinet meetings and in these meetings that take place in the Oval, everybody's on the same page marching in unison to deliver the president's, you know, agenda and and his goals in making Washington DC safe again, in making Memphis safe again, Chicago. How can these guys like Chicago how could they not want to make Chicago safe again? I'll understand it for the life of me. How these people do not want to work with this administration. And I'm talking Pritzker, and I'm talking Newsome. How and why?
Speaker 0: Yeah. And it's it's sad because it's hurting the residents of their cities and states. So, Dan, as we sit here in Washington DC right now, the government is still shut down. What do you make of the priorities of the Democrat party?
Speaker 1: It makes absolutely zero sense. There are more issues and problems in in this world, and they decide to fight to give illegal immigrants health insurance, and they're keeping the entire government closed down. And and I joke and I say, what? The government's closed down? For the past two weeks, this White House and other agencies were getting things done. We're marching forward. Look what just happened in The Middle East. You wouldn't even known the government was closed down. To close down the government, they are losing on this, the likes of which I was gonna say they've never lost before, but they've lost a lot before. So, they're just not on message. They don't know what they're doing. Zero leadership. Zero leadership. I I think they're truly embarrassing themselves. Absolutely embarrassing themselves.
Speaker 0: I know we talked very early on in this administration about the difference between president Trump the first term, because you were here for the entirety of that, and the second term. How is he day to day now? Where do you see him overall? And I feel like the sky's the limit for this president and this administration.
Speaker 1: The differences are absolutely incredible. We're not being attacked every day or investigated every day. The head games they played, they wanted to silence us. They ultimately wanted to put us all away for life. Then when he announced for the presidency, and we went full steam ahead. We worked in courtrooms behind the scenes. We're putting out truth social posts. We're campaigning. We're turning his press conferences in at the conclusion of a court hearing. Butler, Pennsylvania, we talked about last time, changed everything. Literally changed everything. It was from that point forward where I knew that he would be the forty seventh president of The United States. And then he just brought on a great team of people when we won the presidency. I mean, it is all surreal. I don't have time to even sit back and think about it and think about what we've been through and what we've done and what we've achieved. There will never be a president Trump ever, ever, ever again. He's changing history for the better. He's fighting every day for your children, your grandchildren, your great grandchildren, my family. That's why I do what I do. We could go out tomorrow and make millions of dollars. I I instead take a government salary to fight for the American people every day, and that's everybody in this administration. All for president Trump because they adore and they love the guy, and they love the American people. They're patriots, And that's why we're here. We're on a mission. We're on a mission to deliver for everybody out there. And we're gonna continue this mission. And we're gonna fight hard each and every day no matter what hit pieces come our way, no matter who tries to take us down, we're gonna fight, fight, fight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All your great videos from Air Force One. But tell the American people, from your perspective, you got a view none of us did, what is it that we didn't get to see about that trip that you got to experience when it relates to president Trump?
Speaker 1: It's actually very surreal because a lot of people said that president Trump couldn't get this done. Couldn't get it done. MAGA knew deep down that if anybody could get this deal done with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Marco Rubio and that great team that it would be president Trump. And we're on the plane going out. We all knew this was a historical moment.
There was a great sense of pride on the plane, know, checking in on the president up in his office. You know, just he does so much reading and consuming of information. He knew how real the moment was too. Then when we entered out into the Middle East and you had the f sixteens escorting the plane in, which has happened before, but it was just it was a great feeling that the president of The United States, the leader of the free world, Donald j Trump, was there on a mission that he wanted to complete, you know, that he talked about and talked about and talked about. And everybody said, no.
No. No. And he ended the war. And it it's absolutely incredible. You know, millions of lives saved amongst all these wars being ended.
20 hostages coming home. Just think about it. If if president Trump was not in office, this would still be going on.
Speaker 0: It was historic for sure. There's no doubt about it. You were announced last weekend as the head of PPO, presidential personnel. So for the American people, maybe give them a sense of what this job actually entails, what you do, and why it is so important to the American people, so important to national security, and really the future of the country.
Speaker 1: It it was an honor for the president to ask me to take this, additional job on. PPO is responsible, for vetting, interviewing, and bringing in candidates, political appointees to all of these agencies throughout the government. And something that we really wanna keep an eye on, which has been done, is, you know, bringing people with the values of the president that want to complete his agenda, making America great again, America first policies. I work very closely with all of the cabinet members, or I will be working very closely. So the communication you have with the cabinet members is very important in staffing up their agencies with political appointees.
PPO also oversees ambassador appointments all around the world. So we have those to fulfill. We're also responsible for US Marshals and fulfilling those obligations all around the country. Work very closely with the DOJ on that front. So as I said, I'm learning every day that passes.
I'm a quick learner, and I've hit the ground running.
Speaker 0: As it relates to The Middle East, since we just talked about that, obviously, people are really excited about what happened there, and they wanna see more forward progress. Do you come in on that? What is it that you're gonna be able to do from this office to help implement phase two?
Speaker 1: It's a great question and and things that actually came up yesterday in a couple of meetings. So that's my learning process. But we will need to fulfill, special envoys that are that are gonna be out there as well as oversight of the rebuilding of Gaza, and there'll be commissions that will be created in which we'll assist in. And with that, I would work with secretary of state Marco Rubio, Steve Witkoff, who is just such a great, great, great man. Love the guy.
As well as, you know, Jared is very involved in getting this done as well. So it's really a team effort, and I'm willing to put forth the office with anything we can assist with in in getting the job done and fulfilling obligations out there to to support their mission in in completing each phase.
Speaker 0: Well, something else that this administration has been very successful at doing is a crime crackdown. What else are you involved with from PPO that can help, you know, facilitate more of this crime crackdown all across the country? I imagine you guys have a role in that too.
Speaker 1: We do. We do with fulfilling judgeships, within districts. US marshals, like I mentioned earlier, the US marshals are absolutely, incredible in what they do. And it's just getting leadership in each district, within each community, county, and state, throughout the country. So we'll fulfill all of that.
And we'll we'll work with all entities. It is a team effort, and you see it every day. It's an atmosphere of where everybody wants to work together. I tell you behind the scenes in these cabinet meetings and in these meetings that take place in the Oval, everybody's on the same page marching in unison to deliver the president's, you know, agenda and and his goals in making Washington DC safe again, in making Memphis safe again, Chicago. How can these guys like Chicago how could they not want to make Chicago safe again?
I'll understand it for the life of me. How these people do not want to work with this administration. And I'm talking Pritzker, and I'm talking Newsome. How and why?
Speaker 0: Yeah. And it's it's sad because it's hurting the residents of their cities and states. So, Dan, as we sit here in Washington DC right now, the government is still shut down. What do you make of the priorities of the Democrat party?
Speaker 1: It makes absolutely zero sense. There are more issues and problems in in this world, and they decide to fight to give illegal immigrants health insurance, and they're keeping the entire government closed down. And and I joke and I say, what? The government's closed down? For the past two weeks, this White House and other agencies were getting things done.
We're marching forward. Look what just happened in The Middle East. You wouldn't even known the government was closed down. To close down the government, they are losing on this, the likes of which I was gonna say they've never lost before, but they've lost a lot before. So, they're just not on message.
They don't know what they're doing. Zero leadership. Zero leadership. I I think they're truly embarrassing themselves. Absolutely embarrassing themselves.
Speaker 0: I know we talked very early on in this administration about the difference between president Trump the first term, because you were here for the entirety of that, and the second term. How is he day to day now? Where do you see him overall? And I feel like the sky's the limit for this president and this administration.
Speaker 1: The differences are absolutely incredible. We're not being attacked every day or investigated every day. The head games they played, they wanted to silence us. They ultimately wanted to put us all away for life. Then when he announced for the presidency, and we went full steam ahead.
We worked in courtrooms behind the scenes. We're putting out truth social posts. We're campaigning. We're turning his press conferences in at the conclusion of a court hearing. Butler, Pennsylvania, we talked about last time, changed everything.
Literally changed everything. It was from that point forward where I knew that he would be the forty seventh president of The United States. And then he just brought on a great team of people when we won the presidency. I mean, it is all surreal. I don't have time to even sit back and think about it and think about what we've been through and what we've done and what we've achieved.
There will never be a president Trump ever, ever, ever again. He's changing history for the better. He's fighting every day for your children, your grandchildren, your great grandchildren, my family. That's why I do what I do. We could go out tomorrow and make millions of dollars.
I I instead take a government salary to fight for the American people every day, and that's everybody in this administration. All for president Trump because they adore and they love the guy, and they love the American people. They're patriots, And that's why we're here. We're on a mission. We're on a mission to deliver for everybody out there.
And we're gonna continue this mission. And we're gonna fight hard each and every day no matter what hit pieces come our way, no matter who tries to take us down, we're gonna fight, fight, fight.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Video Transcript AI Summary
Endocannabinoid system is essential, acting like a conductor that keeps all body systems in harmony. As we age, the system weakens, contributing to pain, inflammation, cognitive decline, and other aging ailments doctors treat with dangerous and addictive pharmaceuticals. Lifestyle changes can help, but 'the system can be restored faster using hemp derived CBD.' When restored, 'pain subsides, sleep is improved, and stress is reduced.' And 'disease progression can slow down and years are added to your life as well as years spent in good health.' 'Twenty percent of seniors are already using CBD today for pain, arthritis, cancer symptoms, sleep disorders, Alzheimer's, and many other ailments of aging.' Doctors are not equipped to provide guidance, and 'there are no FDA standards for what is already in the market today.' PwC estimates 'annual cost savings for The US, nearly $64,000,000,000 a year' if cannabis is fully integrated. The '2018 farm bill' championed by president Trump was the first step. Now educate doctors on the endocannabinoid system, provide Medicare coverage for CBD, and give millions of seniors the support they deserve. 'You will deliver the most important senior health initiative of the century, cementing your legacy and transforming aging care.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can revolutionize senior health care. We've all heard about the major systems in our bodies, like the digestive, respiratory, nervous, and cardiovascular systems. But there's one essential system discovered in the nineties that you probably never heard of. It makes all of the other systems work smoothly with each other, like a conductor ensuring the different sections of an orchestra all play a beautiful symphony together. This system is called the endocannabinoid system.
It has been acknowledged and studied by scientists extensively with support from the National Institutes of Health. As we age, the system weakens. As a result, the different systems in our body stop working together smoothly. That's one of the reasons older adults struggle with pain, inflammation, cognitive decline, and other ailments of aging for which doctors often prescribe dangerous and addictive pharmaceuticals. They also recommend lifestyle remedies such as exercise, good diet, and stress management.
And while all these improve the system, it is only fractionally and over a long time. But here's the game changer. The system can be restored faster using hemp derived CBD. When the system is restored, pain subsides, sleep is improved, and stress is reduced. When the system is restored, disease progression can slow down and years are added to your life as well as years spent in good health.
And twenty percent of seniors are already using CBD today for pain, arthritis, cancer symptoms, sleep disorders, Alzheimer's, and many other ailments of aging. But doctors are not equipped to provide guidance. And there are no FDA standards for what is already in the market today. Imagine if that were the case for other medications. Older adults are suffering needlessly.
Hemp derived CBD can help them feel better, live longer, and improve their quality of life significantly.
Speaker 1: A PricewaterhouseCoopers report estimates annual cost savings for The US, nearly $64,000,000,000 a year if cannabis is fully integrated into the health care system.
Speaker 0: The groundbreaking 2018 farm bill championed by president Trump was the first step. Now it's time to educate doctors on the endocannabinoid system, provide Medicare coverage for CBD, and give millions of seniors the support they deserve. You will deliver the most important senior health initiative of the century, cementing your legacy and transforming aging care. Millions everywhere. We'll thank you.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
CHARLIE Kirk's suspected killer was spotted kissing his transgender partner just two weeks before the assassination, The Sun can reveal. Tyler Robinson, 22, had reportedly been living with his unidentified lover at a home in Utah. https://t.co/0fxHyu8vyH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker recalls a couple about two weeks ago who were holding hands and drove off in a Dodge. The man wore all black, a mask, freckles, and a mushroom-shaped haircut. The roommate may have been transiting and getting ready for an operation to turn into a woman, with a doctor’s appointment mentioned. They were kissing as they came out, and the witness heard snippets of their conversation while riding by on a bike. They had not seen them together before, noting that random guys don’t hold hands or kiss. The area had police tape, a ton of police cars, a sniper on a hill, SWAT trucks, helicopters, and a drone. The witness asked if a killing happened; police wouldn’t tell. The witness called grandma and learned the shooter who killed Kirk lived nearby; for Charlie Kirk, the witness had watched his videos.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With him. Were they holding hands? Yeah. They were. So yeah.
They I mean, they drove off in his car, the the Dodge The time you saw them or this week? It was about the time I saw them. So long ago was that? I would say about two weeks ago. And did they so they looked like they were a couple?
Yeah. Yeah. And he was dressed all in black? Yeah. Definitely.
Mhmm. And you thought he was weird? Yeah. I I definitely. Yeah.
What was weird about him? Just the way he walked and just the way I've seen him. I've never seen really anybody dressed all in black with a mask on, and I thought that was just quite weird. For those who've never seen the roommate, describe describe that person for us. He so he did have freckles on his face.
For the haircut, he did have it was a weird haircut. Can't quite it was kind of a mushroom shaped one. Yeah. He was I would say he didn't come out much, but definitely a few other, like, just a little bit at a at a time. There's some published reports out there that this individual, the roommate, may have been transiting.
Did that correlate with what you saw? Yeah. Definitely. Okay. So he was he was going to have an operation to be to turn into a woman.
Yeah. Yeah. And I think he's getting ready for that. So does it what way do you think that? I remember them talking about a doctor's appointment.
It was about about two weeks ago, I would say. And they were kissing? Yeah. Do you know where where did you see them kissing? Just coming out.
I was riding with my bike, so I didn't see the whole thing. But, yeah, they were I saw them. And when did you hear them talking about a doctor's appointment? I would say about the same time that they came out. So that one time.
Yeah. And where were you standing for that? I was just riding by here. So And you're able to hear snippets of their conversation? Yeah.
Yep. But you were sure that they were a couple, you have only seen them together once? Mhmm. Yeah. Yeah.
I mean, the way I mean, random guys don't hold hands and definitely don't kiss. So I would have tried to stop him if I knew it was him like before. I definitely I definitely do not like the fact that he was living close to me. It was covered with police tape, a ton of police cars. We had a guy sitting up on the hill with a sniper and SWAT trucks and definitely a few helicopters and a drone as well.
What was going through your mind when you stepped in car? Like, I what is going on? And I asked the police officer. I'm like, is there did a killing happen here? They're like, I can't tell you.
And so I I called my grandma. I found out that the guy that shot Kirk was at was lived right close to me. So for Charlie Kirk, I knew him over the years. Like, I didn't know him personally, but I've watched his videos before. And so
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Dammmmmmmmmn this is getting good 🍿 https://t.co/5lqgGKNMMJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ed Martin, director of the DOJ weaponization working group, says they are investigating "weaponization of government," including Adam Schiff and Leticia James for mortgage fraud, and the January 6 probe. He describes "a decade of dirty tricks" from the Russia hoax to indictments and the Hunter Biden laptop, and notes Tulsi Gabbard declassified what happened and sent a criminal referral to DOJ. He cites "the Russia hoax" with a birthday of 12/08/2016 and says Obama administration told media to help spread it, while stating the DOJ is "spinning like a top" under AG Bondi's charge. He mentions Bill Pulte's referral about "mortgage fraud" involving Schiff and James, with references to grand jury, subpoenas, and witnesses. He accuses the DOJ of targeting "Catholics who went to mass, parents who went to school boards" and calls January 6 a hoax; he notes pardons via "auto pen" are under scrutiny and that "Pam Bondi has let us loose."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Authorized leaks of classified information to damage president Trump during his first term. The whistleblower, a longtime Democrat staffer on the House Intelligence Committee, said Schiff was upset because he expected to be the CIA director in a Hillary Clinton presidency. In a statement to Fox News, a spokesperson for Schiff said this, Kash Patel's latest smear against senator Schiff is absolutely and categorically false and is the latest in a series of defamatory attacks from the president and his allies meant to distract from their plummeting poll numbers and the Epstein files scandal. Joining me now in this Sunday morning futures exclusive is the director of the DOJ weaponization working group, Ed Martin. He is investigating the weaponization of government, including Adam Schiff, New York attorney general Leticia James for mortgage fraud, and the January 6 probe among others.
Ed Martin, great to have you this morning. Thanks very much for being here.
Speaker 1: Oh, always a pleasure, Maria.
Speaker 0: And, Ed, it has really truly been a decade of dirty tricks, and that's being kind about it against Donald Trump, beginning with the Russia hoax, to the impeachments, to the indictments, to to the the Hunter Biden laptop. Assess for us the last ten years in your view, and you have criminal referrals right now on Adam Schiff, Leticia James, among others. What is the status?
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, thanks for asking about the the last ten years. I mean, you know, when Donald Trump came into office as president, he signed an executive order saying, go and find out how government was weaponized against the citizens. When attorney general Bondi came into office, she put a memo, put more specifics to it, and said, get to the bottom of this. She gave a specific, specific list and a and a broad charge. And I have to tell you, for you you for your viewers, we have attorney general Bondi has that that department of justice spinning like a top.
We've got more stuff going on. A lot of it we can't talk about because of the nature of it, but it's going like crazy. And one of them was we were in a group. We're still in it working on the Russia hoax. And Tulsi Gabbard declassified what happened, and she sent it over to us, to DOJ, as a criminal referral, and that's ongoing now.
But what that was and, Maria, you're one of the earliest I think you might be the only person, the only journalist who said early on, this is a Russia hoax. And and and, you know, Brett had president Trump on an interview on that flight to Alaska. And in the interview, president Trump said the Russia hoax was meant to destroy the relationship with Russia, make it impossible to get things under control, get a reset like Hillary said she wanted. So what we have in the Department of Justice now is a weaponization working group and and the and the backing of our leadership to go and find this stuff. And so the Russia hoax we know now the we know the birthday of the Russia hoax.
It's 12/08/2016 where the Obama administration, including Obama, said, don't put the truth out. Lie. And ask the media to help us, and the Washington Post and others jumped right in. And then we had the Russia hoax that went on for ten years. And every time they get in trouble, meaning the deep state and others, they throw another hoax out.
And all we're doing at DOJ and all we're doing across the government is saying, get the truth out, and then, by the way, let's hold people accountable. And that's exactly what's going on. So when Bill Pulte sends a criminal referral over to to us, and he says, Leticia James and Adam Schiff and by the way, both their lawyers have come out and talked publicly about that criminal referral. So you can talk to them about the specifics, Cause I'm gonna tell you what we're gonna do is we're gonna follow the facts. Every American has a more that has a mortgage or has other documents they sign has to follow the law.
We're gonna go to the very bottom of the facts. And if somebody did something wrong, we're not only gonna hold them accountable, we're also gonna look at everything else that they've been doing. Because when you're a liar, you lie not just on one thing. When you're a cheater, you cheat not just on one thing. When you're doing corruption, you generally don't just do it on one thing.
So we have that's our that's our our our what we're asked to do as prosecutors, and that's what we're doing.
Speaker 0: Well, we are all waiting for accountability here. Adam Schiff went on Sunday morning programs and said there was collusion in plain sight. And he was the chairman of the intelligence committee, so he had to know better that there was no evidence of any collusion in plain sight. So are you saying that this criminal referral is about something completely different, about mortgage fraud? Are you looking to get him on something other than Russia collusion?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm saying that there's a a referral from the from Bill Pulte for about a mortgage fraud, about Adam Schiff. That's publicly discussed. His own lawyers have been out there. Now there's more on Adam Schiff. And all we're gonna do again is get to the facts of this and use all the tools that we have in our system.
What what we've discovered, and I know you wanna ask me about some of this in the weaponization, is that Joe Biden's justice department actively targeted American citizens. Catholics who went to mass, parents who went to school boards, people who were involved in the Russia. You know, I hear from Carter Page every now and then. Carter Page, it was destroyed by the Russia hoax, and we're sitting around and pretending it's okay to say that, you know, there was a secret meeting on 12/09/2016 in the Situation Room where they plotted the Russia hoax, and then we're gonna say, oh, that was really bad. No.
It wasn't really bad. It needs to be held accountable in every way we can.
Speaker 0: Well, you went to Leticia James' home this week. You were in New York.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Look. I'm a prosecutor, and and when I do these cases, I I I was in New York for I was in Newark, actually, New Jersey for some meetings, and I I went over to New York for another meeting, and I went by there. The the one of the referrals is about that property that she has. It's a very prominent neighborhood in Brooklyn, and they're and I wanted to lay eyes on it.
I think most people, if, you know, if you're if you're prosecuting something, you you're careful. I didn't go there and announce it. I some woman came storming up and and shooting video and and talking to me, but I wanted to see the property. And and there there's a number of other aspects of these cases where you gotta get a sense of what is act actually at stake.
Speaker 0: Do you have a grand jury in these cases?
Speaker 1: Let me say when you get a criminal referral, one of the tools you have is a grand jury, and I'll leave it to you to infer what I mean. But these referrals are criminal referrals significant enough that that they would warrant using all the tools, and the tools include subpoenas and witnesses, and that's the that is in our system, that is the I'm not like Jack Smith. Jack Smith liked to talk about how he did things and what he did and brag about it. Leticia James did, by the way, as a Yeah. As a prosecutor.
She liked to come out and hold press conferences. I'll just tell you when you get a criminal referral, and her her own lawyer made the comments publicly, you can infer what you need to.
Speaker 0: Well, let's talk about January 6 because you are also investigating January 6, which was also part of this ten years of scandals. What have you learned?
Speaker 1: Well, again, attorney general Pam Bondi let us loose on this, and there's a group of us working on January 6. What we've learned is that the federal government, the department of justice, but other aspects targeted these citizens. They they basically turned government on to make the hoax work. So I'm not talking about somebody that pushes a cop. That's a that's a charge you can look at in charge.
I'm talking about that the FBI and others were putting American citizens on terrorism watch lists. They were auditing their IRS tax returns. They were targeting the American people. They were taking massive amounts of resources and moving them from fighting, you know, child trafficking and fighting, real corruption and saying we have to move everybody to look at the capital siege. It was a political hoax that was driven by Garland, Lisa Monaco, and others.
And what, again, attorney general Bonney has said is get to the bottom of it. Some of it may not be illegal, but it's it's some of the worst. You know, in in in in federal prosecutor world, we think about the the importance of that role. This guy named Robert Jackson, who is the the prosecutor guy. And what you see is Lisa Monaco's justice department acting in ways we've never seen before.
This is and when we show all that and we're writing reports regularly on it, it's not one aspect. It the federal court system was was was used in a way the the the the jails were used in a way to punish people. It it that was it's foreign. They didn't do this to the terrorists after nine eleven, and they were doing it to American citizens. So that's a fulsome investigation on January 6, and it will make the clear the hoax, which is really the twenty twenty election hoax.
We were told we couldn't talk about it because of January 6, and the whole thing is falling apart, Maria, and it's gonna get to the bottom, and the players are always the same. It's always the same. The same people on 12/09/2016 in the Situation Room in Obama's White House are playing the same game all these years.
Speaker 0: That's unbelievable. Real quick. What about the January 6 committee? Did they destroy evidence? Is there criminality there?
Speaker 1: Of course. Of we're all in that too. And trust me, a lot of the a lot of people did not get a pardon that were involved in the select committee, and they ought to be keeping an eye on on their mailbox because there's a lot to be asked about.
Speaker 0: And and the pardons that were given out were done by an auto pen. Are they legitimate?
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I'm the pardon attorney, so I have I I mean that too. I can tell you we're investigating how the pardons were granted. It was not like anything in the history of America with Joe Biden not Joe Biden, his staffers did, not just with the auto pen, but with faking him out on the memos. More to come, Maria. I'm telling you, Pam Bondi has let us loose.
And when this comes out, it'll take the whole of these people's hoaxes down. And we're doing it bit by bit, and it's fantastic. It's a great privilege.
Speaker 0: Unbelievable. Ed
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Flashback Friday https://t.co/K50iloPGtJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
As secretary of state, the speaker was deeply involved in getting rid of a Ukrainian prosecutor, along with the rest of the Obama administration. Everyone from Obama to the secretary of state to the vice president was working on it because they believed Ukraine needed to get rid of the prosecutor to survive and win the revolution. The speaker then recounts telling someone they were not getting a billion dollars. The person responded that the speaker lacked the authority, but the speaker stated the president authorized the message. The speaker told them the money would be withheld if the prosecutor was not fired within six hours, and the prosecutor ultimately was fired.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I will tell you because as secretary of state, was deeply involved in this. All of us in the administration were trying to get rid of that prosecutor. From Obama to the secretary of state to the vice president, all of us were working on that, the ambassador. And and we knew if Ukraine was gonna survive and win the revolution in the end, by then, they had to get rid of that prosecutor, and they did.
Speaker 1: Or we're not gonna give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You're not the president. The president said I said, call him. I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting the billion dollars.
I said, you're not getting the billion. I'm gonna be leaving here. I think it was, what, six hours. I looked at I said, leave him in six hours. If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money.
Oh, son of a bitch. You got fired.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
President Trump takes questions before leaving for Bedminster https://t.co/4XZRvPaAn4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to have a great relationship with South Korea and is open to talks with Brazil. Nuclear submarines were deployed due to a threat from a former Russian president, done for the safety of the people. The speaker hopes Hillary Clinton will be investigated for election fraud.
The speaker defends firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, alleging incorrect numbers before the election favoring Kamala, followed by a large reduction after. The speaker is seeking someone "honest" for an open spot on the Federal Reserve Board, considering both short and long-term candidates.
The US has a $40 billion deficit with Switzerland. The speaker is donating to build a ballroom at the White House and will release donor names later. Steve Witkoff had a meeting focused on getting food to people. India may no longer be buying oil from Russia. The speaker is considering a tariff dividend to the people but also wants to pay off debt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have a great relationship. Talk, sir,
Speaker 1: and when do you repair this? Yeah.
Speaker 0: We have a great relationship with South Korea.
Speaker 2: Are you saying that you're lying? Are you ready?
Speaker 3: Are you open to negotiate with Brazil? Your Brazilian president, Rula, said he'd like to call you. He requested overtake it. Would you call to him now?
Speaker 0: Are you He can talk to me anytime he wants.
Speaker 3: So are you open the tariff side?
Speaker 0: Yeah. He can talk to me anytime he wants.
Speaker 3: What is what is on the table for Brazil?
Speaker 0: Well, we'll see what happens. But I love the people of Brazil.
Speaker 2: What what I want to to do is I love people
Speaker 0: love the people of Brazil.
Speaker 2: So why do you Marines?
Speaker 0: They don't go to Russia. Because the people running Brazil did the wrong thing.
Speaker 2: Whatever the hell you're doing. I say that was right.
Speaker 1: Because Seven years seven years from the time that you learned that people were being stolen from Mar A Lago to the time that you picked that that you took from Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I don't I don't understand your question.
Speaker 1: Are the submarines being deployed? The nuclear Say it? Where are being deployed? Nuclear submarines. Oh,
Speaker 0: yeah. Well, we had to do that. We just have to be careful. And a threat was made, and we didn't think it was appropriate. So I have to be very careful.
So I do that president. On the basis of safety for our people.
Speaker 1: President
Speaker 0: A threat was made by a former president of Russia, and we're gonna protect our people. President Trump
Speaker 2: Hillary Clinton finally be investigated for election fraud.
Speaker 0: Hillary Clinton? I hope so. I don't know whether or not that'll happen, but I hope so. Mister president, why don't you fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics? Because I think her numbers were wrong.
Just like I thought her numbers were wrong before the election. Days before the election, she came out with these beautiful numbers for Kamala. I guess, Biden slash Kamala. And she came out with these beautiful numbers trying to get somebody else elected. Then right after the election, I think on the fifteenth, November 15, she had an 8 or $900,000 massive reduction.
Said she made a mistake. No. That woman that woman's number Do have any evidence
Speaker 1: that she takes?
Speaker 2: That that governor is Say it? That governor is set to resign.
Speaker 0: Yeah. The, one of the governors, as you know, the Federal Reserve has just announced she's resigning. I understand it was over the fact that she disagreed with somebody from her party. She disagreed with Too Late. You know who Too Late is?
Yeah. She disagreed with Too Late on the interest rate. So we'll see what happens. But I we just found out that I have a open spot on the Federal Reserve Board. I'm very happy about that, John.
Speaker 1: And what did McBride say to you that made you really mad?
Speaker 0: Well, you just have to read what he said. He was talking about nuclear. When you talk about nuclear, we have to be prepared, and we're totally prepared.
Speaker 1: Mister Cabrera, sir. On the monthly job support, going forward, why should anyone press the numbers? Well, that's You're right.
Speaker 0: No. You're right. Why should anybody trust numbers? You go back to election, election day. Look what happened two or three days before with massive wonderful job numbers trying to get him elected or her elected, trying to get whoever the hell was running.
Because you go back and they came out with numbers that were very favorable to Kamala. Okay? They're trying to get him elect trying to get her elected. And then on the November 15 or thereabouts, they had an eight or nine hundred thousand overstatement reduction right after the election. It didn't work because you know who won, John?
I won. But here's
Speaker 1: the thing. Workers have had issues with these numbers.
Speaker 0: I've issues with the numbers for a long time. But today, we're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony just like they were before the election and there were other times. So you know what I did? I fired her.
And you know what? I did the right thing.
Speaker 1: If any government official if any government official going forward is presenting data or information you don't like, should they fear for their job?
Speaker 0: I've always had a problem with these numbers. You know, I was thinking about it this morning. Before the numbers that came out, I said, who is the person that does these numbers? And then they gave me stats about before the election. I had a similar problem.
I mean, she gave out numbers that were so good for the Democrats. It was, like, unbelievable. And then right after the election, she corrected those numbers with, I think, almost 900,000 corrections. I think nobody had ever seen anything like it. Well, today she did the same thing with the 253,000, whatever the number was.
No. No. We need people that we can trust. I mean, your question your question is a very good one. We need people we can trust.
Speaker 2: And what about I mean, what about you like to switch
Speaker 1: to you planned on a place
Speaker 0: to list. I've got about three very good I have a lot of good candidates. I will say everybody wants it. I've had more phone calls, but I have three people that I've And
Speaker 1: if you have a background in labor
Speaker 0: You know, I could do a long term thing or I could do a temporary. It's a fourteen year term.
Speaker 1: Right. But do you put someone in who actually has labor statistics experience?
Speaker 0: I put somebody in I put somebody in who's gonna be honest. So he's taking long That's all we want. I have a choice. I can have four months. I could do a short term or I could do a fourteen year deal.
So we'll we'll see. We have a lot of people we've got a lot of good people around.
Speaker 2: Can I ask you a question? Switzerland. That was a shock to Paris rate with Switzerland. It was pretty it was higher than other European
Speaker 0: Well, the problem with Switzerland, we have a we have a 40 we have a $40,000,000,000 deficit with Switzerland. And I spoke yesterday to Switzerland, but we have a $40,000,000,000 deficit with Switzerland. That's a big deficit.
Speaker 1: Question on the construction. Can I ask you a question on the construction? You say you're raising $200,000,000. You're donating a bunch. Others are as Are you blocking foreigners from donating money to build that condition?
Speaker 0: Honestly, I never even thought of it, but it doesn't matter. I'm putting up my money, but it doesn't even matter. They've wanted a ballroom at the White House Right. And it's been very popular, know, when we put it out yesterday.
Speaker 1: Out that a crown prince or some European No.
Speaker 0: I'm not looking I'm not looking for that. You know, you have very strong restrictions as to who can donate, and we go by the restrictions. But did it get you've got a lot of I mean, it's not
Speaker 4: that much money. It's funny. The name of the donors?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I'll do that. I didn't I didn't even start yet, by the way. But when I do, I'll release it. How many
Speaker 1: donors do you think
Speaker 5: it's it's gonna gonna take take to to get get the the $2,200 100,000,000? Million?
Speaker 0: Maybe one. Me. But You would cut that check yourself? Yeah. I would.
Yeah.
Speaker 2: Okay. Did you talk to Steve Witkoff today on his journey to Gaza? Did you talk to
Speaker 0: Steve Witkoff? I did. I spoke to Steve Witkoff. He had a great meeting with a lot of people, and the primary meeting was on food. And he had he also had some other conversations that I'll tell you about later.
But he had a a meeting on getting the people fed, and that's what we want. And I'll see you later on. Well, understand India no longer is going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step.
We'll see what happens. Okay?
Speaker 2: On
Speaker 4: tariffs, obviously, the treasury is making it so much ready right now. Some Republicans have been pushing for tariff checks to
Speaker 0: go out. They basically have move
Speaker 4: the money back. Any any Now there
Speaker 0: are a lot of people that would like to see us do sort of a dividend to the people of our country. It's something I consider. How much would be I'd also want I wanna pay off debt, but there's a possibility I'd do a dividend. Uh-oh. Can I ask what the I'm
Speaker 4: I'm sorry? It's crazy. A trade a terrorist, obviously, this
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
WHAT! https://t.co/2jPFdJ30P2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bishop Mary Ann Buddy, who prayed for President Trump to have mercy on illegal migrants, leads the Episcopal Migration Ministries (EMM). During the Biden administration, EMM received $53 million in government funds for immigrant resettlement in 2023 alone. The 2024 figures are not yet available, suggesting potentially consecutive payments. The speaker implies that Buddy's sermon was motivated by financial interests, suggesting she was praying for her own bank account.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember her, bishop Mary Ann Buddy, who gave a sermon at the Washington National Cathedral the day after the inauguration and in her prayer urged president Trump to, quote, have mercy on various groups, specifically illegal migrants. Well, it turns out that bishop Mary Ann Buddy's Episcopal Migration Ministries, EMM, during the Biden administration received $53,000,000 from government programs for immigrant resettlement, and that is just 2023. The 2024 numbers haven't even been released yet. So my guess is she probably received back to back payments. And now it all makes sense why she said this in her sermon.
I ask you to have mercy, mister president, on those in our communities whose children fear that their parents will be taken away. He wasn't praying for them. She was praying for her. Bank account, you always have to follow the money.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Hey democrats remember this https://t.co/UNU9hYiAMK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker authorized airstrikes in Iraq to protect American personnel and initiated strikes against ISIL targets in Syria. The United States launched an operation against a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and authorized limited military action in Libya.
The speaker questions whether criticism of these actions is directed at the actions themselves or at the person who authorized them, claiming Obama did the same thing without similar backlash. Military operations are what the armed forces and their equipment are for. The speaker accuses liberals of being disingenuous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I authorized two operations in Iraq, targeted airstrikes to protect our American personnel. Last night, on my orders, America's armed forces began strikes against ISIL targets in Syria. Today, at my direction, The United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Speaker 1: They did what?
Speaker 0: Today, I authorized the armed forces of the United States to begin a limited military action in Libya.
Speaker 1: Because in Libya bullshit. I ain't never heard of Libya.
Speaker 0: Were national security. They can take the diplomatic
Speaker 1: So at the end of the day, the question all it comes down to is, is y'all really mad at the strikes, or is y'all just mad at the person who did it? Because Obama did the same goddamn thing, but we didn't hear nobody talking about he bombed the country and shit. He didn't bomb no fucking body. These are military operations that go on throughout our country. This is why we have a military, the armed forces, the marines, and all this shit.
It have all these this equipment that's worth billions of dollars. This is this is what this is for, to do stuff like this. Operations. Where do you think they came up with the game Call of Duty, nigga? Like, y'all liberal think y'all slick, though.
But best believe, though, I'm on y'all last all day, though.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Dammmmmmmmn https://t.co/X077c5GBwE
Video Transcript AI Summary
The G7 is celebrating its 50th anniversary and relies on US leadership. Discussions will focus on trade and other issues with a talented group of people.
The G7 used to be the G8, but Barack Obama and Trudeau didn't want Russia included, which was a mistake because the war wouldn't be happening if Russia were still involved, or if Trump were president.
Regarding a deal with Canada, there are different concepts about tariffs. A tariff approach is simple, easy, and quick. A deal is achievable if both parties agree.
Iran wants to talk, but should have done so sooner. Iran is not winning the war and should talk immediately before it's too late.
Regarding US military involvement, there will be no comment. Putin shouldn't have a seat at the G7 at this point, but it was a mistake to exclude him. If he were a member, there would be no war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As well, Tony fiftieth, and, and this is, the fiftieth birthday, if you will, of the g seven. This marks the fiftieth birthday of the g seven, and, the g seven is nothing without US leadership. And so and your personal leadership leadership in The United States, many issues, geopolitics, economic, technology, and working hand in hand with The United States, Canada and The United States, and the other g seven partners with your leadership. I'm very much looking forward to the meeting and grateful to have you here.
Speaker 1: Very much, Mark. I appreciate it, and we've developed a very good relationship, and we're gonna be talking about trade and many other things. And, we have a whole group of people, some traders and some other people. I see my top economy people. But we have a very talented group of people, and you do too, and I know they've worked together very well.
I look forward to that. The g seven used to be the g eight. Barack Obama and, a person named Trudeau didn't wanna have Russia in. Then I would say that that was a mistake because I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in. And you wouldn't have a war right now if Trump were president, four years ago.
But it didn't work out that way, but it used to be the g eight. And now it's, I guess, what's that, nine years ago, eight years ago, it switched over. They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a very big mistake even though I wasn't in politics and I was very loud about it. It was a mistake in that you spend so much time talking about Russia, and he's no longer at the table. So it makes life more complicated, but you wouldn't have had the war.
And other than that, I think we're gonna accomplish a lot, and I expect to and I think our primary focus will be trade and trade with Canada, and I'm sure we can work something out. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Yeah. So much. Thank you
Speaker 2: very much. Mister president mister president, also Mister president, I'm heading up a deal with Canada. How close are you saying? Well, mister president, what what is holding up a deal with Canada from your perspective? Perspective?
Speaker 1: It's not so much holding up. I think we have different concepts. I have a tariff concept, and Mark has a different concept, which is something that some people like. But, we're gonna see if we can get to the bottom of it today. I'm a I'm a tariff person.
I've always been a tariff. Simple. It's easy. It's precise. And it just goes very quickly.
And I think Mark has a a more complex idea, but also very good. So we're gonna look at both, and we're gonna see what we're gonna come out with something hopefully.
Speaker 2: Mister president, do you find that a deal is achievable within days, within weeks? Is there that kind of runway?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's achievable. Both parties have to agree. Yeah. Sure.
Speaker 2: Mister president, I'm calling Iran. President. Have you seen it? Have you heard any signals or seen any messages from intermediaries that Iran wishes to deescalate the conflict? Yeah.
What have you what have you heard what have you heard from the Iranians?
Speaker 1: They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before. I I had sixty days and they had sixty days. And on the sixty first day, I said, we don't have a deal. They have to make a deal. And it's painful for both parties, but I'd say Iran is not winning this war.
And they should talk, and they should talk immediately before it's too late.
Speaker 2: And what would you say, in your opinion, what would it take for The US to get involved in this conflict militarily?
Speaker 1: I don't wanna talk about that.
Speaker 2: And you mentioned Putin. Do you think that he should have a seat at the g seven today that it should be the g 8?
Speaker 1: I'm not saying he should at this point because too much water's gone over the dam maybe. But, it was a big mistake. Obama didn't want him, and the, head of your country, the proud head of your country didn't want him. This was a big mistake. You wouldn't have that war.
You know, you have your enemy at the table even I don't even consider if he wasn't an really an enemy at that time. There was no concept. If I were president, this war would have never happened. But likewise, if he were a member of the what was called the g eight at that time, it was always the g eight, you wouldn't have a war right now. Why not?
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
He had to be sharp because he was extracting eyeballs https://t.co/nMeb8RpL8d
Video Transcript AI Summary
David Crossing states that the person in question worked as an eyeball extractor and claimed he needed rest to be sharp for work. David received text messages from him, including one where he said he made choices that others don't know about and that he didn't have much time to live. David called the police because of the text. He doesn't want to share the text because he sent it to him and a friend.
David says he loves him, that he's still his best friend, and hopes he doesn't kill anyone else. He hopes he surrenders himself for the sake of his family and doesn't want him to give up on life or kill himself. David is concerned he may have already done that. David doesn't want him to be remembered as just a crazy right-winger gone nuts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. Because he was on call for work, and he wanted he'd always say, yeah. I need rest for work, so I'm sharp because he was extracting eyeballs. So he gotta be sharp for that.
Speaker 1: Remember him walking out of the house. Nope.
Speaker 2: Well,
Speaker 0: depends on the shift. No. Because he is working all kinds of hours. Didn't seem odd. No.
Speaker 1: Did he give you any
Speaker 0: emotional message said that he loves you
Speaker 1: besides the text messages or something like that that seemed awful?
Speaker 0: Well, he said that he made some choices, and he said, you guys don't know anything about it, but
Speaker 1: yeah. Another big ass.
Speaker 0: That's why he said he didn't have much time to live.
Speaker 1: Another big ass. Do you mind if I take a picture of the text message?
Speaker 0: Nah. Every I kinda
Speaker 1: Knock out his number.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, the thing is I I kinda keep that private because I read it to people and I don't know. I just I just gotta get going. I have to.
Speaker 1: Is this phone still ringing when you called? No.
Speaker 0: It's
Speaker 1: Go straight to voicemail?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Just voicemail. I couldn't I can't he won't he doesn't want me involved. Yeah. So he's not gonna call me.
He's not gonna receive calls from me.
Speaker 1: Can we at least see the picture?
Speaker 0: Well, they weren't taking pictures. I I don't know why I'm so he sent it to me and a friend. So it wasn't just me and I don't know if my what if my friend would think about me sharing that with everybody. I mean, I read it out loud just so you guys could get a context of what I feel when I read it. Yeah.
And
Speaker 1: Well, you read it to to us. We were in here yesterday.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I know. But I gotta get really get going.
Speaker 1: Do have a message for him in in case he's watching? He watches. Do you wanna send him a message?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Tell him I love him. He's still my best friend and I hope he doesn't kill anybody else. And I hope he surrenders himself for the sake of his family. Must be disappointed?
Well, yeah. But, you know, I don't want to see him killed. And, you know, if I I'll still visit him in prison, I guess. I'm sorry. Can you tell us what else you're gonna do?
But he you know, I just don't want him to give up on life or kill himself.
Speaker 1: Are you concerned he may have already done that?
Speaker 0: Sure. Sure.
Speaker 2: He said in recent days he made choices that you don't know about. What tell us about those conversations, please.
Speaker 0: Those weren't that's what the text. Was a text?
Speaker 2: Yeah. He didn't so he didn't do anything in your interaction performing the days before this happened that made you wonder.
Speaker 0: Oh, that made me call the police. That made me call the police.
Speaker 2: The text did. Yeah. But but any conversations you had in the last few days prior to this? Nothing seems
Speaker 0: Well, like we said, we had our separate lives. He I mean, I worked and he worked and he was here and sometimes he go down, we'd hang out, but we we would never wasn't you know, sometimes politics would be on the TV, but he would never really was never really anything that was in-depth conversation about just comments. You know?
Speaker 1: And And just for the record, your name is David Crossing?
Speaker 0: Yeah, with a C. With a C. Because I. This Minnesota and you guys don't know Carlson? Carlson.
Carlson. O M. C A R L S O M. Norwegian, Swedish, Swedish. Yeah.
But yeah. Thank you.
Speaker 1: We don't wanna take more of your time, so thank you so much.
Speaker 0: No problem.
Speaker 1: Thanks for dictating.
Speaker 0: I just wanted you guys to just not say crazy right winger gone nuts and and, you know, that was all he is. You know? That's it just bothers me. That's his legacy. But I knew I knew him all my life.
Who's that guy? Are you doing it? Are you killing me? Smurf.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Dave.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Walz: lawmaker shooting was politically motivated https://t.co/OjeUpg9719
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were shot and killed in what appears to be a politically motivated assassination. State Senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were also shot multiple times and are currently receiving care after surgery. The speaker stated that Hortman served the people of Minnesota with grace, compassion, humor, and a sense of service and was a fixture and a giant in Minnesota. The speaker emphasized that peaceful discourse is the foundation of democracy and differences should not be settled with violence. They stated that Minnesota proved it’s possible to compromise even in politically charged times. The speaker called on everyone to stand against all forms of political violence and said this tragedy should serve as a reminder that democracy is the way to settle differences peacefully. The speaker assured that those responsible will be held accountable and they are committed to ensuring this never repeats itself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: State patrol colonel Christina Bogolyevich, Champlain Park police chief Schneider, and Brooklyn Parks police chief Mark Bruley, as well as the mayor of Brooklyn Park. We're here today because an unspeakable tragedy has unfolded in Minnesota. My good friend and colleague, speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, were shot and killed early this morning in what appears to be a politically motivated assassination. Our state lost a great leader, and I lost the dearest of friends. Speaker Hortman was someone who served the people of Minnesota with grace, compassion, humor, and a sense of service.
She was a formidable public servant, a fixture and a giant in Minnesota. She woke up every day determined to make this state a better place. She is irreplaceable and we've been missed by so many. Minnesota's thoughts and prayers are with her family, her loved ones, her children, and her parents. My prayers also go out to state senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette, who were each shot multiple times.
The Hoffmans are out of surgery at this time and receiving care, and we are cautiously optimistic they will survive this assassination attempt. This was an act of targeted political violence. Peaceful discourse is the foundation of our democracy. We don't settle our differences with violence or at gunpoint. In the state of Minnesota and as recently as last week, in the most closely divided state legislature in the country, we sat down, we worked things out, we debated, we shook hands and compromised, and we served the state of Minnesota together.
We proved that it's possible even in these politically charged times to find compromise and adhere to the principles of democracy and civil discourse. We must all, Minnesota and across the country, stand against all forms of political violence. At this precipice moment we're on, this tragic act here in Minnesota should serve as a reminder to all of us, The democracy and the debates in the halls of congress, in state houses, in school boards is a way to settle our differences peacefully and move society to a better place. We're collaborating with all local, state, and federal agencies on a full investigation. We're committed to keeping Minnesotans informed as the situation continues.
I assure you that those held, those responsible for this will be held accountable, and each and every one of us are committed to making sure that a tragedy like this never repeats itself in Minnesota or across this country. I'd now like to turn it over to my
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Dammmmmn Elise Stefanik, the next governor of New York! https://t.co/jDwzV6pYna
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about Executive Order 1, which Speaker 0 claims continues sanctuary state policies. Speaker 0 defines the policy as preventing state officers from disclosing information to federal immigration authorities for civil immigration enforcement.
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about Saqir A Khan, who allegedly raped a 15-year-old girl, and Sebastian Zapita Khalil, who allegedly burned a woman alive on the subway after ICE's detainer order was rejected. Speaker 0 also brings up Raymond Rojas Basilio, who allegedly molested an 11-year-old, and Wilson Castillo Diaz, who allegedly committed a crime in Nassau County.
Speaker 0 asserts these individuals were shielded due to sanctuary state policies. Speaker 1 states that New York cooperates with ICE in criminal prosecutions. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of prioritizing illegals over victims and failing to advocate for law-abiding New Yorkers. Speaker 1 disputes Speaker 0's representation of the facts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In office, you signed executive order one. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: It is. Believe it is.
Speaker 0: And you extended this executive order not once, not twice, but three times, most recently January 16 this year. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: If that's what your facts show, I signed countless executive orders.
Speaker 0: I would assume you'd know it's executive order one. And this is a continuation of your predecessor's sanctuary state policies, correct, is included in that.
Speaker 1: I wanna be sure we are defining sanctuary state property.
Speaker 0: I'll define it for you. It is the policy of the state that state officers or employees shall not disclose information to federal immigration authorities for the purpose of federal civil immigration enforcement. It goes on to say, law enforcement officers may not use resources, equipment, or personnel for the purpose of detecting and apprehending any individual suspected or wanted for violating a civil immigration office. Law enforcement officers have no authority in the state of New York to take any policy action solely because the person is an undocumented alien. That's a quote in your executive orders that you extended.
Now do you know who Saqir A Khan is?
Speaker 1: I wanna get back to the part.
Speaker 0: I'm asking a question. Do you know who Saqir A Khan is?
Speaker 1: I wanna make sure you understand that this simply says that we will cooperate with ICE. No. It does
Speaker 0: not say that. I read what it says, and let me talk to you about the results. Do you know who Saqir Aqan is? You should as the governor of New York State. Do you know?
Speaker 1: Refresh my recollection.
Speaker 0: He was an illegal migrant in New York. And do you know what crime he committed in addition to being here illegally?
Speaker 1: No. I do not.
Speaker 0: You do not. This was widely reported. He found a 15 year old girl, threatened her with a metal pole, told her to get into the back seat of his car, he took her clothes off, and he violently raped her in Albany, New York. Do you know who Sebastian Zapita Khalil is?
Speaker 1: I'm sure you'll tell me. There's many cases whether they're These
Speaker 0: are high profile cases. New Yorkers know about them, and you don't. So let's talk about Sebastian Zapita Khalil. Do you know who that is?
Speaker 1: I don't have the specific details at my disposal. No.
Speaker 0: Well, this is an illegal migrant in New York because of your sanctuary state policies. Do you know what crime he committed?
Speaker 1: I'm not familiar at this moment.
Speaker 0: I bet you're gonna be familiar when I remind you. He found a sleeping woman on the subway, lit her on fire, and burned her alive. This is in Kathy Hochul's New York. And as I'm sure you are aware, and I'll remind you, that ICE issued an order to detain this violent criminal, but that was rejected by New York officials due to sanctuary state laws. Now, do you know who Raymond Rojas Basilio is?
Speaker 1: I just wanna say this. These crimes are horrific. I can endeavor
Speaker 0: Because of your sanctuary state policies.
Speaker 1: In all of these cases, we would work with ICE to
Speaker 0: remove them. In this case. Are walking on the streets because of your policies and your executive order that you signed three times. Now, Raymond Rojas Basilio, do you know who that is?
Speaker 1: I'm telling you this. I will explain what the policies of New York. We cooperate with I know you're just trying
Speaker 0: to You do not Specifically, ICE was told not to detain this individual, and he burned a woman alive on the New York subways in Kathy Hochul's New York. So I will keep on going. What about Raymond Rojas Basilio? Do you know who that is?
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you our overall policy, which will address all this.
Speaker 0: I'll tell you who that is. He is an illegal who molested an 11 year old in our state because, again, of your sanctuary state policies. This illegal was shielded from federal immigration enforcement and able to commit this heinous crime. And what about Wilson Castillo Diaz? Do you know who that is?
Speaker 1: I'm telling you this. We do cooperate fully with ICE in criminal prosecute. Our sanctuary
Speaker 0: You're not advocating for these victims. Only deal with civil rights. Who was raped
Speaker 1: Civil rights.
Speaker 0: On Long Island in Nassau County. You are not advocating on behalf of these victims. You are shielding illegals. Even in your opening statement, you prioritize putting illegals
Speaker 1: That is not
Speaker 0: Rapes of young girls, beatings of NYPD cops by illegals who are here under Kathy Hochul's failed policies, burning New Yorkers alive. This is Kathy Hochul's New York. It's one of many the many reasons why you're hemorrhaging support from hardworking
Speaker 1: horrific crimes and they're heartbreaking.
Speaker 0: Crimes that are committed on your watch. You sign this executive order on your day in office. You sign it again and again this January. We deserve a governor who stands up for law abiding New Yorkers, doesn't put illegals but actually puts New Yorkers
Speaker 1: I appreciate after the viral moment, I suggest you No.
Speaker 0: No. No. I'm standing up for New Yorkers. No. Rather than addressing the illegals in New York, you are prioritizing your far left sanctuary state policies which you put in place with executive orders.
Instead of advocating We cooperate. Victims
Speaker 1: of five year old was with us.
Speaker 0: You did not they were released because of sanctuary state policies in
Speaker 1: New York state.
Speaker 0: No amount of words is going to clean up your failed record and these horrific crimes committed in sanctuary state that you created. And with that, I
Speaker 1: Your representation, the facts.
Speaker 0: Absolutely
Speaker 1: false.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
These are some of the most brutal jokes Gutfeld has ever told and I’m loving every second! 😂 https://t.co/vB6fItKyCG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump will be the forty-seventh president of the United States, causing Joe Biden to ask who was number 46. The election sent shockwaves across democratic strongholds.
Bill Clinton is distraught. Hunter Biden was shocked. Jimmy Carter said, You kept me alive for this. Jerry Nadler will no longer be giving a courtesy flush. Doug Amoff is hitting on the ugly nannies. Ilhan Omar told her brother, not tonight. The View threw a shoe. Nancy Pelosi's eyebrows moved to Canada. Randy Weingarten has yet to come out of her toadstool. Admiral Rachel Levine is taking a leave of absence to spend more time with her testicles. Hillary Clinton considered killing herself. Taylor Swift cried all night. Mark Cuban paused his transition into Rachel Maddow. James Carville could barely unhinge his jaw to eat his morning mouse. Barack Obama vowed to move back to Kenya. Michelle changed her name back to Mike.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know. Know. I know. Know. It's okay.
It's alright. I get it. Totally get it. Totally get it. You're welcome.
I did it. Happy Wednesday, everyone. Well, I don't know if you've heard, but Donald Trump will be the forty seventh president of The United States. Causing Joe Biden to ask who was number 46. The election was such a blowout.
It sent shockwaves across democratic strongholds all over. Bill Clinton is so distraught, he's flying his erection at half mast. Hunter Biden was so shocked, he dropped both of his hookers. Jimmy Carter heard the news and said, You kept me alive for this. Jerry Nadler was so angry, he announced that he'll no longer be giving a courtesy flush.
Doug Amoff is so upset, he's now hitting on the ugly nannies. After the election, Ilhan Omar was in such a state, she told her brother, not tonight. I have a headache. Wow. This morning, the views stomped their feet so hard, they threw a shoe.
Nancy Pelosi was so enraged by Trump's victory, her eyebrows moved to Canada. The news was so bad, Randy Weingarten has yet to come out of her toadstool. Admiral Rachel Levine is so defeated, she's announced she's taking a leave of absence to spend more time with her testicles. Hillary Clinton was so depressed, she actually considered killing herself for a change. Taylor Swift cried all night, which dropped her from a six to a four.
Mark Cuban's so despondent, he paused his transition into Rachel Maddow. James Carville is so miserable, he could barely unhinge his jaw to eat his morning mouse. The outcome left Barack Obama so bitter, he vowed to move back to Kenya. And finally, Michelle was so embarrassed, she changed her name back to Mike.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Another view of the Mexican tail ship crashing into the Brooklyn Bridge https://t.co/XVmwRYxFaI
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Yes cry more 🤣 https://t.co/3vdT5vADlJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims Donald Trump was expected to receive a red carpet welcome, but instead, the Saudis rolled out a purple carpet for him. The speaker states that purple is the color of royalty. The speaker concludes that this symbolizes Trump is still winning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can expect a full red carpet welcome, Conte. It's false. Yeah. Literally, the red carpet is expected to be rolled out for Donald Trump. Wrong.
President Trump actually didn't get the red carpet today. Instead, the Saudi's rolled out the purple carpet for him. The symbolism here is crazy as purple is the color of royalty. What this actually symbolizes for Trump is that he's still fucking winning. Go cry about it.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
I’m waiting for them to blame the earthquake on Trump https://t.co/sBvnojjXRY
Video Transcript AI Summary
A US Geological Survey report indicates an earthquake epicenter struck south of Knoxville, Tennessee, near the Georgia state line. Tremors were felt as far away as Charlotte, North Carolina, and Atlanta. No widespread damage has been reported.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of Tennessee this morning. The US Geological Survey says the epicenter hit just South of Knoxville near the Georgia state line. Tremors were felt as far away as Charlotte, North Carolina and Atlanta. Thankfully, no widespread damage has been reported. Pretty scary stuff.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Dammmmn 🎤🖐️ https://t.co/8Y2jSvqtab
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump inherited a crisis of racial discrimination via DEI policies, including in air traffic control and law enforcement, where hiring was allegedly based on race and sex rather than merit. Trump ended race and sex-based hiring across the federal government and intends to enforce civil rights laws, penalizing companies violating them. The administration is investigating universities for violating the Supreme Court's ruling against affirmative action and for sex-based discrimination under Title IX, threatening to withhold federal funds.
The administration considers changing a child's gender without parental consent to be child abuse and opposes taxpayer-funded chemical castrations and sexual mutilations of children. HHS has removed pro-sex change science. Male prisoners will not be allowed in women's prisons. The administration aims to remove critical race theory from schools, promoting patriotism and civic values.
Trump is fighting wasteful spending, the trade crisis, illegal immigration, and the economic crisis by reopening American energy, defeating inflation, and pursuing tax and deregulation reform. He aims to restore peace globally, reversing the economic, border, public safety, and cultural catastrophes he inherited.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Caroline. Great to be up here with you and great to see so many familiar faces I've had a chance to get to know over a number of years as we gather this morning to continue our celebration of president Trump's unprecedented and historic first a hundred days in office, what are without doubt the greatest a hundred days to begin any American presidency in the history of this nation. This week, you've heard about the historic actions president Trump has taken to secure our homeland, to secure our sovereignty, to secure our economy and our supply chains and our industrial base. Today, you're also going to hear from me about what president what president Trump has done to secure our values, our culture, and our way of life from the unwavering assault from the radical left and the communist and the Democrat Party. One of the most significant crisis that president Trump inherited upon taking office was the wave of racial discrimination, so called diversity, equity, and inclusion policies that have taken over both public sector and private sector entities all across The United States Of America.
Perhaps the most dramatic example of this is that our air traffic controllers were being hired and promoted based on race and gender, not their ability to conduct our nation's air traffic. I would estimate that probably 90% of Americans would agree with the statement that airline safety should be based on your ability to keep airline safety jobs should be based on your ability to keep planes landing and taking off and flying safely, not on what demographic box you check. President Trump has ended across the entire federal government all hiring, recruiting, retention, promotion, and training based on race and sex. This includes in our law enforcement agencies. So, again, we took office even in sensitive law enforcement national security and intelligence agencies.
We were hiring individuals not in their ability to carry a weapon, not in their ability to keep Americans safe, not in their ability to conduct sensitive intelligence operations, but based upon race and sex. And obviously, that is unacceptable. It's gonna be merit based across the whole federal government. But this wasn't just the federal government. This was the private sector, and this was also, of course, our entire university and education system.
So president Trump's Department of Justice, working with other departments and agencies, have made clear that this administration is going to fully enforce title six, title seven, and title nine of our federal civil rights code. Discrimination based on race and sex is prohibited by law. And this administration will vigorously enforce that. And companies, small or large, that violate plain text of federal statutes will face appropriate financial and other penalties. This administration is not going to let our society devolve into communist woke DEI strangulation.
We are going to have a system of merit, which is not just a social and cultural issue, it's an economic issue. When you hire, retain, and recruit based on merit, as president Trump has directed, you advance innovation, you advance growth, you advance investment, you advance job creation, you create the best and safest product for all Americans. When a when a citizen goes to say a hospital in a medical emergency, they don't care what race or sex their doctor or their nurses, they want the best treatment they can get in that emergency. When they're flying a plane or when they are on an aircraft, they want that pilot to be the best pilot, the safest pilot, not caring what that pilot's race or sex is. This applies across the whole government.
In particular, looking at our university system. This administration has opened investigations into universities across the country for violating and we talk a lot about Supreme Court rulings. Universities across this country are in plain and direct violation of the Supreme Court's ruling that affirmative action as in racial quotas and set asides are illegal. Students must be admitted to universities on a color blind basis. But we have demonstrated through clear evidence that our university system, including our medical schools, and perhaps particularly our medical schools, are engaging in race based discrimination, racial set asides, racial quota schemes, and other efforts to invade to to evade the supreme court's ruling, and again, the plain text of federal statute.
So universities are on notice, and universities are already facing the financial consequences of their noncompliance of federal law. The the clearest example that we're all familiar with, of course, being Harvard, which is engaged in repeat, systemic, and sustained violations of federal civil rights law. Another area of civil rights law that we talk about a lot, of course, is title nine, sex based discrimination. And this administration ended the Biden administration's policy and the Democrat party's policy of allowing men into women's sports, men into women's spaces. We are using every single legal and financial tool we have at president Trump's direction to make it clear that schools and universities are and will lose federal funds as you've seen in Maine if you allow men to invade women's sports and women's spaces.
And this applies to our whole K through 12 system. The Department of Justice is also coordinating with state and local law enforcement to fight child abuse in our school systems. It is child abuse to change a child's gender, particularly if you do not inform the parents. In other words, if a five year old or a six year old goes to school or a seven year old goes to school and the teacher tries to turn the boy into a girl or the girl into a boy, that is child abuse. And this administration is treating that as child abuse and is a gross violation of parental rights.
This also includes the administration's message to our hospital systems that they cannot and will not be allowed to use taxpayer dollars to perform chemical castrations and sexual mutilations of children. Castration surgeries, castration drugs, sterilization treatments of children are barbaric. They violate all sound medical ethics. They are completely unwarranted. They harm children for life irreversibly.
It is child torture. It is child abuse. It is medical malpractice. And so the Department of Health and Human Services under the leadership of Bobby Kennedy, as well as the Department of Justice and other departments of this government are making clear to our medical providers and our hospital systems that you cannot use taxpayer dollars to perform these barbaric procedures on America's children. And HHS has systematically updated all and eliminated all of the junk, fake science that was produced under the Biden administration promoting sex changes on children, promoting the idea of sterilizing children.
That's been cleaned out, that's been removed, and new guidance is being issued to doctors and hospitals advising them that they cannot perform these horrifying procedures, these irreversible procedures on our nation's children. We are also making clear in our prison system, male prisoners will not be allowed into women's prisons. The Biden administration promoted prison rape by putting men into female prisons. That is obviously insane, cruel, and unacceptable. And even though the Democrat party and Hakim Jeffries and the Democrat media continue to fight to put men into women's prisons, this administration will not allow that.
Just and will not allow men as well in our k to 12 system into women's private spaces and restrooms. We've seen horrifying example after example of young girls being sexually assaulted because school districts have allowed men into women's and girls private spaces. This administration, president Trump, is at the forefront of protecting women and protecting girls. And nowhere is that clear than when we are talking about fighting a radical gender ideology. This administration is also fighting to get critical race theory out of our school districts.
Children will be taught to love America. Children will be taught to be patriots. Children will be taught civic values for schools that want federal taxpayer funding. So as we close the Department of Education and we provide funding to states, we are going to make sure that these funds are not being used to promote communist ideology. For any nation to be successful, it cannot teach its children to hate themselves and to hate their country.
So these are a few of the areas in which President Trump has fought the cancerous communist woke culture that was destroying this country. We were led to believe that men were women, that women were men, the racial discrimination was good, that merit was bad, and that safety and physical security mattered less than the feelings of liberal ideologues. The president has also fought to return the Department of Justice to its core mission of protecting public safety and locking up violent criminals instead of using the Department of Justice to target conservatives, to target Christians, to target people of faith. The last administration cruelly and shamefully used the power of the Justice Department to go after law abiding Americans, in particular Trump supporters, conservatives, and Christians. That persecution has ended.
The Department of Justice and the FBI are back in the business of going after bad guys, of going after gangs, of going after criminals, and keeping Americans safe. Let me just conclude before taking questions by noting that when you look at the sweep of the first one hundred days, every single crisis that has afflicted America for years, sometimes decades, sometimes generations, this president has fought head on. He has taken on every entrenched power structure and system all across this government, this swamp, this town. That includes of course the Doge efforts to slash corrupt, wasteful government spending, graft and corruption, and to stop billions of taxpayer dollars from going to radical left NGOs. These are left wing nonprofits that are used to advance illegal immigration, to advance open borders, to advance gender ideology, and to advance all of this insanity that has been turning our country in the wrong direction for so many years.
President Trump took head on the trade crisis afflicting this country with the destruction of our manufacturing and industrial base, the shameful betrayal of the American worker by Joe Biden and the globalist that sent all of our supply chains overseas. He took head on the catastrophe of mass unlimited illegal immigration that was turning us into a failed third world state and achieved the lowest level of illegal immigration in recorded history without even a close second. He took on the economic crisis afflicting this country by reopening American energy, by defeating inflation, by lowering gas prices, by ending the onslaught and reversing the onslaught of federal regulation by reopening coal, shale, oil, natural gas, and fighting now for the largest tax cut and reform, and the largest deregulation reform, and the largest energy reform in American history. These are just some of the things that have ushered in the new golden age along with his fight to restore the peace that we had for four years under the previous administration before Joe Biden sunk this planet into bloodshed and war in The Middle East, in Europe, and rising tensions in Asia. President Trump in every area of conflict around the globe has been fighting to restore peace, security, stability, harmony.
So he inherited an economic catastrophe, a border catastrophe, a public safety catastrophe, and a cultural catastrophe. In every case, he has reversed those catastrophes and brought America into the new golden age. So I thank you for your time and I look forward to any questions you have.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Cry More https://t.co/taiSKwu8jE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Owens is stepping down from CBS, stating he wasn't allowed to run the show as he always had. This follows Trump suing CBS for $20 billion, claiming a deceptively edited interview with Kamala Harris, which CBS denies. Trump has also called for CBS to lose its broadcast license.
Ben Smith of Semaphore reports Owens quit after Sherry Redstone, owner of Paramount Global, reviewed a list of planned "60 Minutes" stories about Trump, following his complaints about a segment on Ukraine. Redstone is trying to sell Paramount Global to Skydance Media, owned by David Ellison, requiring FCC approval. It's believed Trump could use this as leverage. Owens' departure is seen as a "flare," highlighting top-down pressure on "60 Minutes" regarding Trump coverage. Smith questions if Ellison will allow the news organization to be neutered and believes ignoring the situation will lead to problems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over the past months, it has become clear that I would not be allowed to run the show as I have always run it. So having defended this show and what we stand for from every angle, over time, with everything I could, I am stepping aside so the show can move forward. Owen's departure comes months after President Trump sued CBS for $20,000,000,000. After an October interview with then Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump claims the interview was deceptively edited. The network has denied that claim.
Trump has also called for CBS to lose its broadcast license. Joining us now, editor in chief for Semaphore, Ben Smith. You have a lot going on there, Ben. But let's talk about this first. I think this news at least hit the media community like a meteor.
That was message that Bill Owens was sending about what's happening at CBS. So what's happening at CBS?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, though, this was, you know, the latest in a series of, you know, essentially capitulations by media companies to pressure from from president Trump. What's different from the environment in which we've operated for most of our careers, in which, by the way, there have been our share of media scandals and screw ups and firings and quitting, is that the way it is happening now is there's pressure on the owners of media companies, whether it's Jeff Bezos at the Washington Post, Patrick Soon Chung in Los Angeles, feeling pressure on their other interests to not annoy president Trump and changing their editorial policies, their content as a result. We reported last night that, my colleague Max Tani reported that, you know, Owens quit after Sherry Redstone, the owner of the company, requested and looked at a list of stories about president Trump that the the that see that sixty Minutes was planning to broadcast. This came after Trump complained about a sixty Minutes program about Ukraine.
And and Mhmm. You know, and in sixty Minutes, it is is, you know, the the definitive television news magazine of an earlier era, and a huge symbolic moment. But but Sherry Redstone's trying to sell this company requires federal approval for the deal, and these are the kind of deals that media owners are making right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So, Ben, you've gotten there to the heart of the matter, which is that Paramount Global, where Sherry Redstone is the chairwoman, is trying to sell to Skydance Media owned by Larry Ellison, Ellison need FCC approved for that. Donald Trump could theoretically and likely use that as leverage to try to stop this that sale going forward. So now that top down pressure coming from Sherry Redstone and Paramount down to sixty minutes about the kinds of stories and the tone of the stories they're doing about Donald Trump. One way I heard it described was that this was Bill Owens just sending up a a flare
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: And really kind of falling on a grenade and and giving up the the job that he's held, so well for so many years to put pressure and to make a public spectacle of what's going on at his company and others. So do you think this changes anything about the deal that's coming perhaps for Paramount and about the way that sixty minutes does its job?
Speaker 1: You know, I I wonder I mean, the I think the real question is what David Ellison, who runs Skydance, is gonna do. You know, the I mean, the the purchaser has a lot of leverage here. And, you know, I think there is an illusion that they can they can that that they can let the people they're buying it from sort of neuter the news organization, take take the heat, take the money, and move on. And I think, you know, what you see is you buy a company. I mean, I think and you saw this at with with with CNN's parent company, that if you try to ignore a huge mess and highly politicized scandal in your news division, you're gonna have a tough few years.
And I and I I think it's remarkably naive that they think that they're just gonna acquire this company, take the entertainment assets, have fun, and this whole thing will blow over. I think that's all I
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
The Dem Trap https://t.co/0Y2CTHV9v2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that people who attack Teslas are often arrested due to the cars' cameras, yet Democrats continue to incite vandalism and violence. They argue that Democrats create false narratives, like calling Musk "Hitler," to manipulate their constituents into action, then abandon them when they face consequences.
The speaker cites Senator Van Hollen's trip to El Salvador to assist a Maryland dad as an example of Democrats being caught in their own traps after the man was revealed to be an abuser. They also point to students tearing down hostage posters and activists blocking traffic as examples of people whose futures are jeopardized by their actions.
The speaker asserts that the left uses lies to sway public opinion, leading people to do things like send death threats or defend violent gang members. They believe this pattern of creating new lies to replace debunked ones is a recurring strategy that will eventually be recognized by voters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you notice something that's comically sad? Every person who attacks Tesla has been arrested because the cars have cameras. That's why when I walk past one, I make sure to flex my butt. True, these idiots have been caught more times on camera than my house guests when they use the bathroom. But you think the Dems, having seen that repeated outcome, might have stopped egging their constituents on a crusade of vandalism and violence?
You think maybe they should have considered what happens to people who don't have the expense of lawyers like they do after they follow their advice? Each vandalized Tesla dashes another confused man's dream of one day moving out of a Newark Airport's men's room. No, not one single dem who called Musk Hitler to galvanize the mob has spoken out on behalf of those arrested. They led these lemmings off the cliff and then pretend they didn't exist. They're just useful idiots, like the children that work in my handbag factory.
It's the tiny hands that make this stitching. It's a reoccurring trap. The Dems create a fiction, say it's true even though they know it's not. They let the mob do their job, then they cut them loose like their name was Chris Wallace. The latest fiction, The Maryland Dad.
But the Dems even suckered themselves on this. Do you think Van Hollen would have flown to El Salvador had he known he was rescuing an abuser with a history of violence? Well, maybe. I mean, he did vote against the Lake and Riley Act. But now he flew thousands of miles to save a dirt bag.
If their security did a cavity search, they'd find his head. Thank you. Good butt joke. But my guess is he figured this virtue signal would put him on the media's map, so he booked a flight. Mid air, the news breaks and suddenly he's in a trap of his party's making.
Can't you just see him after he saw the news on his phone, bawling his eyes out and banging on the cockpit door? Please, you gotta turn this thing around. I left my wallet in the at Dole's. Or Dulles. Dulles.
So, just like a dumb keying a car, he looks like a fool. What's next for him? Well, what's next for those students caught on video tearing down hostage posters, screaming on behalf of Hamas, good luck getting a job, besides a prime time slot on MSNBC. Or what if the activists arrested for blocking traffic or trashing art museums? Their future is as bright as Stevie Wonder's career as an NHL goalie.
No, it's because he's black. Now see, I didn't see that coming. So, once these misguided dopes are led to this place, who leads them out? No one. They were used.
A means to an end, like when I dated a Kardashian. And how many libs were told Trump was Hitler, Musk imitated a Nazi, or that Doge was stealing their benefits, and then sent death threats that got him picked up? The list goes on. But all of these narratives they use have one thing in common. Each one is the new thing, not the real thing.
It's the novelty of a new lie to replace the debunked old one. After their previous hoax gets fact checked, they move to the next one before you can figure out that you were bamboozled in the first place. It's how we ended up getting something like Queers for Palestine, which is as absurd as boners for Rosie O'Donnell. Rather than focusing on real solutions to real problems, the left creates lies to sway public opinion. And some indeed get swayed, enough to shoot a president, trash your car, defend violent gang members from other countries.
The Dems act as the Marionette, riling constituents into a frenzy against the evil they were told existed. They've set these traps for years, entangling the vulnerable into a web of deceit. But their reign of lies will come to an end once voters realize they're being led down the path towards their own self destruction, fighting a mirage that wasn't there. And left among the rubble, a fool like Van Hollen, trying to book a flight back from El Salvador with nothing in his hand but his own dick. And, a tiny bag of peanuts.
Let's welcome Here we go. Tonight's guest. You can catch him at Fox
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Sound familiar? https://t.co/2a3KZB9FMI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss a dangerous and divided world, citing threats from Iran, Russia, and China, as well as changing security and commercial relationships with the United States. One speaker mentions having obtained top secret security clearance within three weeks to be informed and make decisions. He then points out that another speaker has refused the opportunity to obtain top secret security clearance for 950 days.
The other speaker explains that while he previously held top secret clearance as a minister, he refused the recent offer because it would have gagged him under security law, preventing him from speaking freely about foreign interference without fear of prosecution. He claims Canada has experienced Chinese interference in two elections. He says that refusing the clearance allowed him to speak freely about issues such as a candidate who allegedly threatened a political opponent, and a quarter billion dollar loan obtained in China. The first speaker responds that robust debate has occurred despite the situation, and observes that China is not the only country accused of foreign interference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're in a dangerous and divided world. We talked earlier about the challenges in The Middle East, the threats from Iran, threats from Russia, Russia's aggression in Ukraine. We have the threats from China, which I raised. We have The United States, which is fundamentally changing its security relationships, its commercial relationships. We have all this.
And in the context of that, everyone on this stage, Mr. Blanchet, Mr. Singh, myself, we have our top secret security clearance. We have our top secret security clearance. I got mine within three weeks.
It wasn't hard, but I felt it was important that I had it so I could be in a position to be informed about that dangerous world and take decisions at. And, Mr. Polyev, it is now nine fifty days, if my numbers are right, since you've had the opportunity to get your top secret security clearance, and you've refused.
Speaker 1: Why? Well, first of all, I have got my security clearance when I was a minister. I got top secret clearance at the time, so there's no problem getting that. But when the government made this recent offer, they said that if I got the secret security clearance briefings, that I would be gagged under the security law, and I could be prosecuted if I spoke freely about matters of foreign interference. Now, given that Canada has experienced Chinese interference by Beijing, the government of China, in two consecutive elections, I needed to do my job to speak freely without fear of prosecution.
And that was not something I would be allowed to do. Even Thomas Mulcair, the former leader of the NDP, said that when he was the leader of the opposition, he never would have accepted the kind of gag order that your government and Mr. Trudeau's government was attempting to impose on me. It's good that I made that decision because it has allowed me to speak freely about things like the case where one of your candidates, sir, actually said that he wanted to send a political opponent to China under a bounty threatening his life or imprisonment, and you refused to get rid of him. Now, it might have something to do with the fact that you went to China not long ago to get a quarter billion dollar loan for your company.
But the reality of it is, you refused to stand up for a Canadian who was being threatened by a foreign government, and I was able to speak freely on that matter because I refused the gag order that the Liberal government attempted to impose on Well,
Speaker 0: there's a couple of interesting things. I think people at home have seen a robust debate here, and it's been a robust campaign. And it has not stopped Mr. Blaschke or Mr. Singh at times during his campaign by making challenges with respect to these issues.
So one can address it. I will observe, as someone with a top secret security clearance, that China is not the only country that is accused of foreign interference.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Maddow just loves protests- I remember in middle of a cold December people marching in NYC to save the Mueller report 🤣 https://t.co/rxlTJnoRgE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Scholars of authoritarianism say resistance is never just one thing; it's everything together. On immigration, the U.S. sees resistance, strategic refusal, and sounding the alarm happening at once, reinforcing each other. It's in the courts, communities, civic/political life, the press, and the streets.
Examples include protests outside the El Salvador consulate in Saint Paul, clergy-led rallies in Santa Rosa and Denver, protests against a detention facility in Grand Rapids, and protests at ICE headquarters in New Orleans. Students protested treatment of immigrants at Kennesaw State and the University of Delaware.
When a legal permanent resident, Mohsen Madawi, was arrested in Vermont, his community filmed it, posted it on social media, alerted the press, and had lawyers prepared with legal motions. A judge ordered him kept in Vermont. Vermonters protested at the prison where he is held, displaying Palestinian flags. Vermont's legislature wants to terminate its contract to keep immigration detainees. In Raleigh, North Carolina, the Trump administration told two dozen Afghan Christians, legally in the U.S., that they must return to Afghanistan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just wanna note that the courts are not riding alone here. This stuff does not happen in a vacuum. You ask scholars of authoritarianism and and dictatorship, and they will tell you that it's never just one thing that works in terms of resistance. It's everything together. And in our country, specifically on this issue at the sort of sharp end of the stick here on immigration, we really are seeing all kinds of resistance and strategic refusal and sounding the alarm all happening all at once, and it is mutually reinforcing.
When you start seeing it come from all directions, it feeds on itself. It gains momentum. It gets bigger. And right now, it is everywhere. It is in the courts.
It is also in communities. It is in civic life. It is in political life. It is in the press, and it is in the streets. And I mean that all very specifically and literally.
This is Saint Paul, Minnesota yesterday outside the consulate of El Salvador in Saint Paul. People in the streets lining both sides of the road demanding that the Trump administration follow the court's orders and bring back Kilmar Arbrego Garcia and bring back these men who they have shipped to that foreign prison. This was Santa Rosa, California yesterday. Local clergy leading a rally in support of immigrants and against what Trump is doing. This was Denver, Colorado yesterday.
Again, local clergy leading a protest, a rally in support of immigrants and against the Trump administration's treatment of immigrants. This was Grand Rapids, Michigan yesterday. Local people protesting against Trump administration plans to open an immigration prison, a so called detention facility in their community. This was New Orleans yesterday. People protesting at ICE headquarters in New Orleans, Louisiana.
These students yesterday protesting against how they're going against immigrants and international students at Kennesaw State, in Cobb County, Georgia, and in Newark, Delaware at the University of Delaware. When the Trump administration took a young man who's a legal permanent resident named Mohsen Madawi in Vermont this week, the community where he lives, where he is absolutely integrated into that community, they sprung into action. They were worried that Trump's agents were gonna come for him. His friends and supporters had created a text group called Mossan Just in Case to prepare a support plan, a network, a communication in case it happened. They were with him when the arrest happened.
They made sure to film it, to make sure that it was posted on social media, that they alerted the press. They had prepared for the worst with lawyers who had prepped in advance legal motions to stop him being removed from Vermont and flown to one of these immigration dungeons, for lack lack of a better word, a thousand miles away in Louisiana or somewhere. And because they had those prepped in time, those motions worked. A judge was able to order him kept in Vermont while he was still in Vermont before they had time to spirit him off elsewhere. Vermonters have since been protesting at the prison where he is being held in their state.
Mister Madawi is Palestinian. He was born and raised in the West Bank. They brought Palestinian flags to show their support for him. And they banged drums and yelled as loud as they could in the hopes that he could hear them inside the prison. Now in Vermont, the Democratic leadership and the state legislature says they want to terminate their state's contract with the federal government to keep immigration prisoners, immigration so called detainees in the state's prisons, in their own facilities.
That's Vermont. In Raleigh, North Carolina, the Trump administration has just sent notice to two dozen Christians who fled Afghanistan when the Taliban took that country back over. They are legally here in this country. They were given legal permission to stay here for obvious reasons. For not obvious reasons, Donald Trump is now taking that away and telling these Afghan Christians that they have to return immediately to the tender mercies of the Taliban right now, this week.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Dramatic reading of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow's classic poem, "The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere" by cdavid cottrill. https://t.co/jE9xuFauah
Video Transcript AI Summary
Paul Revere instructed a friend to signal with lanterns from the North Church tower: one if the British marched by land, two if by sea. Revere waited on the Charlestown shore, watching the tower. His friend climbed the tower, startling pigeons, and looked out over the town.
Revere, impatient, watched the belfry. A glimmer, then a gleam of light appeared, followed by a second lamp. He rode, his steed striking sparks, carrying the nation's fate. He passed through Medford, Lexington, and Concord, alerting the countryside.
At midnight in Medford, he heard a cock crow and a dog bark. At one in Lexington, the meeting house windows seemed aghast at coming bloodshed. At two in Concord, he heard birds and felt the morning breeze. Someone at the bridge would soon fall, killed by a British musket ball. The British regulars fired and fled, farmers returning fire. Revere's cry of alarm echoed through every Middlesex village and farm, a message that will echo forever.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Paul Revere's ride. Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. Awesome. Listen, my children, and you shall hear of the midnight ride of Paul Revere on the April 18 in '75. Hardly a man is now alive who remembers that famous day and year.
He said to his friend, if the British march by land or sea from the town tonight, hang a lantern aloft in the belfry arch of the North Church Tower as a signal light. One if by land and two if by sea, and I on the opposite shore will be ready to ride and spread the alarm through every Middlesex village and farm for the country folk to be up and to arm. Then he said good night, and with muffled oar, silently rode to the Charlestown shore. Just as the moon rose over the bay, where swinging wide at her moorings lay the Somerset, the British man of war, a phantom ship with each mast and spar across the moon like a prison bar and a huge black hulk that was magnified by its own reflection in the tide. Meanwhile, his friend through Allian Street wanders and watches with eager ears till in the silence around him hears the muster of men at the barrack door, the sound of arms and the tramp of feet and the measured tread of the grenadiers marching down to their boats on the shore.
Then he climbed the tower of the old North Church. By the wooden stairs with stealthy tread to the belfry chamber overhead and startled the pigeons from their perch on the somber rafters that round him made masses and moving shapes of shade. By the trembling ladder, steep and tall, to the highest window in the wall, where he paused to listen and looked down a moment on the roofs of the town and the moonlight flowing over all. Beneath in the churchyard lay the dead in their night encampment in the hill, wrapped in silence so deep and still that he could hear like a sentinel's tread the watchful night wind as it went creeping along from tent to tent and seeming to whisper, all is well. A moment only he feels the spell of the place and the hour and the secret dread of the lonely belfry and the dead.
For suddenly, all his thoughts are bent on a shadowy something far away, where the river widens to meet the bay, a line of black that bends and floats on the rising tide like a bridge of boats. Meanwhile, impatient to mountain ride, booted and spurred with a heavy stride, on the opposite shore walked Paul Revere. Now he patted his horse's side. Now he gazed at the landscape far and near. Then impetuous stamped the earth and turned and tightened his saddle's girth.
But mostly he watched with eager search the belfry tower of the old North Church as it rose above the graves on the hill, lonely and spectral and somber and still and low. As he looks, on the belfry's height, a glimmer and then a gleam of light. He springs to the saddle, the bridle he turns, but lingers and gazes till full on his sight, a second lamp of the belfry burns. A hurry of hoofs in a village street, a shape in the moonlight, a bulk in the dark, and beneath from the pebbles in passing a spark struck out by a steed flying fearless in fleet, that was all, and yet through the gloom and the light, the fate of a nation was riding that night. The spark struck out by that steed and his flight, kindled in the land into flame with its heat.
He has left the village a mount of the steep, and beneath him tranquil and broad and deep is the mystic, meeting the ocean tides. And under the alders that skirt its edge, now soft on the sand, now loud on the ledge, is heard the tramp of his steed as he rides. It was twelve by the village clock when he crossed the bridge into Medford Town. He heard the crowing of the cock and the barking of the farmer's dog and felt the damp of the river fog that rises after the sun goes down. It was won by the village clock when he galloped into Lexington.
He saw the gilded weathercock swim in the moonlight as he passed and the meeting house windows black and bare gaze at him with a spectral glare as if they already stood aghast at the bloody work they would look upon. It was two by the village clock when he came to the bridge in Concord Town. He heard the bleeding of the flock and the twitter of the birds among the trees and felt the breath of the morning breeze blowing over the meadow brown. And one was safe and asleep in his bed, who at the bridge would be first to fall, who that day would be lying dead, pierced by a British musket ball. You know the rest in the books you have read how the British regulars fired and fled, how the farmers gave them ball for ball from behind each fence and farmyard wall chasing the redcoats down the lane, then crossing the fields to emerge again under the trees at the turn of the road and only pausing to fire and load.
So through the night, wrote Paul Revere. And so through the night went his cry of alarm to every Middlesex village and farm, a cry of defiance and not of fear a voice in the darkness a knock at the door and a word that shall echo forevermore for born on the night wind of the past through all our history to the last in the hour of darkness and peril and need the people will waken and listen to hear the hurrying hoofbeats of that steed and the midnight message of Paul Revere.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Yea ok 👌 https://t.co/veADrd1Bwf
Video Transcript AI Summary
After meeting with Kilmar, President Bukele tweeted a photo of them at a table with two glasses that looked like margaritas. According to the speaker, when he first sat down with Kilmar, there were only glasses of water and coffee on the table. During their conversation, a government official placed two additional glasses with ice and a salted or sugared rim on the table. The glass in front of Kilmar had slightly less liquid, seemingly to imply he had taken a sip.
The speaker claims neither he nor Kilmar touched the drinks. He suggests examining the initial video or picture from the meeting, which shows no glasses on the table. He says that if someone had sipped from the glasses, there would be a visible gap in the salt or sugar, but no such gap exists. The speaker believes this incident demonstrates the lengths President Bukele will go to deceive people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump was asked at the White House today about what I would call Margaritagate. I don't know if you guys have been following this, but president Bukele, you know, after I met with Kilmar, did this tweet showing us at a table with these two glasses. So, here's what happened. When I first sat down with Kilmar, we just had glasses of water on the table. I think maybe some coffee.
And as we were talking, one of the government people came over and deposited two other glasses on the table with ice and I don't know if it was salt or sugar around the top, but they look like margaritas. And if you look at the one they put in front of Kilmar, it actually had a little less liquid than the one in me, made in front of me. To try to make it look, I assume, like, he drank out of it. Let me just be very clear. Neither of us touched the drinks that were in front of us.
And if you wanna play a little Sherlock Holmes, I'll tell you how you can know that. So if you look at the video or the picture I sent out from the beginning of our meeting, you'll see there are no glasses on the table. So you'll see in later videos they are on the table. But they made a little mistake for some people to be careful, right? If you sip out of one of those glasses, some of whatever it was, salt or sugar.
Would disappear. You would see a gap. There's no gap. Nobody drank any. There's no gap.
Margaritas or sugar water or whatever it is. But this is a lesson into the lengths that president Bukele will do to deceive people about what's going on.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Logan Act Now! https://t.co/buWCle90Wb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Chris Van Hollen was stopped by soldiers three kilometers outside of Secot and told he could not proceed further. The soldiers claimed they had orders. Van Hollen inquired about the condition of Abrego Garcia.
Francie Hakes called Van Hollen's actions "appalling" and "revolting," accusing him of grandstanding and crocodile tears for a gang member. Hakes questioned why Van Hollen doesn't show the same emotion for victims like Rachel Morin and Laken Riley.
Van Hollen had two goals in El Salvador: to meet with Abrego Garcia and to urge El Salvador not to cooperate with the Trump administration on deportations. Hakes stated that Van Hollen appealed directly to the vice president of El Salvador. Hakes claims Van Hollen is committing a federal crime under the Logan Act by attempting to negotiate with a foreign government, as only the President conducts foreign policy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Soya, Chris Newsome. About three kilometers outside of Secot, we were pulled over, by soldiers. You could see the rest of the traffic was allowed to go by. We were pulled over by soldiers and told that we were not allowed to proceed any farther. When I asked why, we're told that they had orders not to allow us to go any further.
When I asked them if they knew anything about the condition of mister Obrego Garcia, they said no. And so much later in the afternoon, I was actually getting ready to catch a plane out of San Salvador back here later yesterday evening. And all of a sudden, I got word.
Speaker 1: Alright. Senator Chris Van Hollen giving a play by play of his trip to El Salvador. We'll continue to monitor what he has to say. See if you hear from the wife of Kilmar Arbrego Garcia as well and bring that to you. But he said a lot in that short amount of time that we joined Chris Van Hollen in his press conference.
I wanna break it down now with former federal prosecutor and former national coordinator for the child exploitation prevention and interdiction network, Francie Hakes, joins us now. Francie, thanks for being here. I have several questions I wanna get to you get with you to today, but I just wanna get your reaction from what you just heard from senator Van Hollen.
Speaker 2: Well, appalling, revolting, come to mind, Will. I mean, talk about a grandstander. These crocodile tears, the emotion, his conversation about his risk, making himself seem like a superhero on behalf of the gang banging wife beating member of MS thirteen, an illegal alien, is absolutely shocking. I believe, if I'm not mistaken, Van Hollen walked out of president Trump's address to congress earlier this year when he was talking about Lake and Riley. Where is his emotion and his willingness to take risk and his concern for constitutional due process for young women like Rachel Morin and Laken Riley.
I don't hear it, Will. This is a disgusting display, and he ought to be ashamed of himself.
Speaker 1: He said he had two goals in going to El Salvador. One was to meet with Abrego Garcia. Two, to urge El Salvador to not cooperate with the Trump administration on their deportation proceedings. I will turn to you as a former federal prosecutor, Francie. He said he made that appeal directly to the vice president of El Salvador.
It is not usual. Is it appropriate for United States Senator to get involved antagonistically to the policies of the administration in foreign policy? Many have pointed out the Logan Act is designed just to avoid that type of thing. What is Chris Van Hollen doing here attempting to negotiate with a foreign government?
Speaker 2: Well, what he's doing here, Will, is committing a federal crime. As you know, and I know that you're a lawyer, as you know it under the Logan Act, there is really just one entity that conducts the foreign policy of this country, and that is the president of The United States and his designees. And I can promise you that Chris Van Hollen is not one of his designees. And I remember during the Trump administration and when they first came in and Mike Flynn, there was talk in the Oval Office back in 2017 of charging people with Logan Act violations if they could figure out a way to do it when Obama and Biden were still in the White House. So I don't understand what he thinks he's doing.
He has absolutely zero authority, but it sounds like the president of El Salvador is well aware that Van Holland has no authority to speak to The United States, and he shouldn't do it. And
Speaker 0: maybe
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Enjoy Tom Homan schooling Morning Joe- yes with Joe Biden did was illegal https://t.co/IELDogb4Eg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that those in the U.S. without a deportation order should self-deport to avoid reentry bars. Doing so allows future legal entry through citizen petitions, work visas, or student visas. The speaker claims that illegal entry benefits criminal cartels and creates a humanitarian crisis, diverting resources from border security and leading to increased fentanyl smuggling, sex trafficking, and terrorist entries.
The CBP One app and ICE offices are presented as resources for self-deportation. The speaker maintains that the U.S. treats everyone humanely and enforces existing laws, including the Alien Enemies Act, to secure the border. They assert that the majority of Americans want illegal aliens removed humanely.
The speaker accuses the Biden administration of violating the parole statute by not conducting case-by-case analyses for those paroled into the country, specifically citing the CHNV program. They claim the administration manipulated border numbers by creating separate categories for entries through the CHNV program and CBP One app. The speaker concludes that the Trump administration achieved the most secure border in history by detaining those without proper documentation and reducing illegal crossings by 95%. They commit to following the law and Supreme Court rulings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Those who are in United States who who don't have an order deportation yet. Because if we have to go through the process of of of going through the court's getting order deportation and we have to find you and remove you, then you have a bar from reentering. So we want people if you're in the country, go home. Do things the right way. Then you don't have that bar placed against you.
So if you have a US citizen child, he can petition for you. If you wanna come in on a work visa or visitor's visa or come in some sort of, you know, some sort of other status, status, as a a student. Coming to the country the right way, that leaves that ability open for you. But if if you get formally reported, there's automatic bars that it gets you as well. People take advantage of it.
And president Trump has has has said before, you know, people we you know, depending on the the the situation, depending on what job series it is, he's looking at ways to bring people back in The United States the right way. What I like about that is when they come in the right way, they're not giving their life savings to the criminal cartel to come across a river or go through a desert, less aliens would die. And Borguteau will be 100% vigilant online rather than dealing with the the humanitarian crisis that the Biden administration created where Borg chose off the line, you know, taking care of this humanitarian crisis, know, whether it's preparing food, making hospital runs, and everything. And when you take Borg choices off the line during a a a illegal crisis like that, that's when the fentanyl comes across killed a quarter million Americans. That's when sex trafficking women and children were six hundred percent.
That's when a a record number of people on terrorist watch list comes across an unguarded border. So doing things your right way keeps Borbitur on the job vigilant a % of the time and let people come in through right way through the port of entry. That's what president Trump's aiming for.
Speaker 1: So so so so walk me through the process if you will. So if you're an illegal immigrant and you're in America, let's say you have a child that was born here, and you're very scared rightfully by a lot of things that you're seeing on television. What what what what are the steps that you take to to voluntarily self deport and then go back to your home country and then apply to come here legally?
Speaker 0: You go to CBP home app. You apply through the CBP home app. Most have access on most just about all of them have, you know, cell phones. They came across the border with cell phones. They they know the CBP and one app because many millions came across at the border, and and hundreds of thousands came through the CBP one app.
So you just go through the CBP one app. You can't you go to an ICE office and and and and and turn yourself to an ICE office. That brain is just made to go home. There's a lot of ways to self remove, and the government is is willing to help you. But if you're in the country legally, you should be concerned.
It's not okay to be in the country legally. It's not okay to enter this country legally. It is a crime. So make it right. Turn yourself in either through the CBP one home map or go to an ICE office, immigration custom force in office, and make arrangement for your attorney.
That way, you can put your affairs in order and go home the right way. And, you know, you can, you know, certainly take advantage of the the numerous ways to come back to this country legally. But it's not okay to enter this country legally. It is a crime. And so if you're in the country legally, you should not be safe and secure and comfortable being in the country legally.
Like, you and I would not be, you know, relaxed to be in another country legally. If you're in the country, you make it right. You know? Give yourself some opportunities in the future to come to the greatest nation on Earth.
Speaker 1: And and if they do that, if they if if if they go to the app or they go to to to ICE officials, are you are you guaranteeing that if if if they wanna self deport and do it the right way as you say, that they will be treated humanely and be allowed to go back to their homeland in a humane manner?
Speaker 0: We treat all people humanely. I know there's you got a lot of bad stories out of States. But I've been doing this. I've been I've well, I've been doing this since 1984. With this that we do things humanely.
We're the most giving nation in the world. We
Speaker 1: more Than any country that's ever existed. We are city, like Reagan said, that shines brightly on the hill for all the world to see. I think, though, people are seeing some of the situations, especially with what's happened with people being pulled off the streets and sent down to maximum security prison in El Salvador without any due process. I
Speaker 0: But, you know, you know, Joe, what what people are looking at people
Speaker 1: are into If if if you if you want me to finish, then I I'll I'll sir, I'll I'll let you finish. I that strikes a lot of Americans as being un American and that even people like myself that's been talking about the need for strong borders for thirty years. You know? But I think a lot of conservatives, and I can read you quotes from a lot of conservatives here, who say they want gang members out. They want violent members out, but there's a right way to do it, and there's a wrong way to do it.
And a lot of people believe that what we've seen over the past three months is the wrong way to do it. I'm sorry. Go ahead.
Speaker 0: No. Look. The American people voted for this. American people voted for Donald Trump. This is number one issue.
Vast majority of Americans want illegal amnesty removed from this country, and it's done humanely. However, we gotta remember this. There are millions of people standing in line, taking their tests, doing their background investigation, paying their fees to be the part of the greatest nation on earth. They're sitting in the back seat. Well, 10,500,000 illegal AMs came to this border, entered this country illegally, which is a violation of law.
There's right way and right way to come to this country legally. The people who came across, they call them asylum seekers, but you and I both know. If you look at the immigration court data, nine out of ten of those so called asylum seekers will end up with the order removal. They overwhelm the system on purpose. Why?
Because they know it's gonna take five, seven, nine years to have a hearing, which they will lose, but now they have US citizen kids. Now they own equities. Now there may be democratic administration in power which award amnesty. They're playing the long game, but we're enforcing laws as enacted by congress, which you remember what we're not making this up. We're enforcing laws on the books, including the Alien Enemies Act, which is act Right.
Created by congress. We're simply using laws on the books to make this country safe again.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well and and, you know, it's it's interesting. One of the arguments you made, I would make all the time when I was in congress, I would have people, whether they were from Pakistan or Lithuania, wherever they were from, they would come to The United States or they'd wanna come to The United States, and they would stand in line, and it would be a very long line. And I always thought it was unfair that they stood and waited in line while other people were able to just come across the border. So, again, I think we agree on that point.
What what again, what I'm asking you though is whether the administration can do this in a way that is consistent with The United States constitution and with what nine members of the United States Supreme Court said, which is you cannot remove somebody that is here even illegally if they are in America without giving them notice and without giving them due process before a judge. Is that something that you've been instructed to do moving forward because nine members of the Supreme Court say that everybody deserves that opportunity in America?
Speaker 0: We are using the laws on the books, the existing laws to secure this border and to remove people here illegally with a priority on public safety threats and national security threats. We're not making this up. We're following the law unlike last administration who ignored the law, who actually violated violated law of bringing a hundred thousand people, giving them pro status, a misuse of the pro statute as you're well aware. There wasn't a case by case analysis of of hundreds of thousand they probed in this country illegally. But now all of a sudden, they want a vetting process for deportation.
There's no vetting process for the hundreds of thousand, actually millions of people they released in the country. No vetting process at all. But now they expect the vetting process for those who've seen an immigration judgement order removed, and all of sudden, they want even a more of a vetting process for those deported. It's it's it's just it's ridiculous how how how they how they the the left has changed the story from the from releasing millions into United States to now now they got a court order to deport them. Now we got coup do after accept giving extra vetting.
The vetting they didn't get when they came in. It's it's just ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Well well, again, I I don't know that it's
Speaker 0: But we will follow we will follow the law. We'll use the laws on the books to enforce the We're gonna use the existing laws, Joe.
Speaker 1: Okay. So, yeah, I was just gonna say, I I don't think it's ridiculous if the Supreme Court says what they say, but my follow-up question was gonna be what you just said. Do you commit to following the law, following what the Supreme Court says? And we've heard the president of The United States say several times in the Oval Office that he will follow the law and what the court say. Do you do you agree with that?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir. We will.
Speaker 1: Okay. Let me ask you. You had said just just circle back, just a fact check here. You had said that the Biden administration, it will come work illegally to get to get illegal immigrants in America. Did did did they violate a court order doing that?
When you say illegally, what do you mean by that?
Speaker 0: I think they violated the pro statute. The pro statute says you can pro somebody on a case by case basis based on the the the the the intricacies of each case, the specifics of each case. They didn't do that. President Biden stood at this stage and said, I'm bringing 30,000 a month in to CHNV, Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti, Venezuela. I bring in 30,000 a month in.
Where's the where's the case by case analysis on that? It's required under the pro statute. He just and they brought him in. And matter of fact, a lot of Venezuelans he brought into the CHNV, they weren't even in Venezuela. They're living in Ecuador.
So there wasn't a case by case analysis. These people are really escaping fear and persecution from their homeland. They're coming to United States for a better life, and I get that. But it's not it's not it's not asylum. They're not escaping fear and persecution of their homeland, especially if they're not homeland.
Speaker 1: But I'm I'm not aware. Did they defy any court orders on on that issue?
Speaker 0: The fifth the fifth the the fifth district court said not only they're ignoring the law, they they believe they're actually violating law. They weren't doing a case by case analysis on a parole. They they you know, the administration said, oh, we got the border numbers down. No. They didn't.
They created CHNV bucket. They created the CBP one app. The same illegal aliens sell to the border. They put in three different buckets. They put a CHNV program, then they create a CBP one app.
They legal pathways, which they weren't. So they simply say, okay. We'll put thousands in the CHNV. We'll put thousands in CBP one app. Then we can say the borders numbers are down because we're only gonna count those entering between the ports of entry.
It was a shell game. Right. And then I think what you see in the Trump administration, Trump president Trump was able to do in seven weeks what the Biden administration couldn't or wouldn't do in four years, actually had the most secure border in my lifetime. Right now, the data shows right now, as you and I are talking, we have the most secure border in the history of this nation today because of of president Trump.
Speaker 1: And you're saying that that can be done following the law, and you will follow whatever the supreme court rules on in the coming weeks and months. Right?
Speaker 0: You know, one of the biggest things, Joe, for following law of securing the border, we ended up catching a leash. You know the statue says, if you come to our border with a pro without proper documentation, you shall be detained. Not maybe, not think about it. And that's what we did. We ended up catching release.
So, like, we and and and look at the success on border. A border and when border crossings are down 95% let me end with this. Because I've been doing this since 1984. When 95% less people are coming across that border illegally, how many women aren't being sexually assaulted? How many children aren't dying?
How many pounds of fentanylizing coming across the two Americans?
Speaker 1: I agree with you. I I I agree with you, mister Holman, as far as as far as how how the border was in chaos and has been in chaos for way too long. I I agree with all of that. My question to you was whether the Trump administration and whether you can and will do it. I'll just finish again with a with a question.
You whether you'll do it following judicial orders, following, as you said, the law, and following whatever Supreme Court decisions are handed down in the coming weeks and months?
Speaker 0: We will follow the law.
Speaker 1: Alright. Border czar Tom Homan, thank you so much. I hope that you and your family have a blessed Easter weekend, and let us, let us hope, that in the coming weeks and months, we can figure out a way to move forward and keep our borders
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Remembering Lou Dobbs https://t.co/Icemc6gCDt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker announces the passing of Lou Dobbs, a frequent guest on "Red Eye" and the first episode of "The Gutfeld Show," then introduces a skit featuring Dobbs.
In the skit, the speaker asks Dobbs if he has to go to work or can go with him. Dobbs tells him he'll be fine and to ignore anyone who gives him trouble. The speaker says someone is constantly following him in the halls. Dobbs tells him to ignore the person. The speaker repeatedly almost forgets items, and Dobbs keeps handing them to him: peanut butter, something else, Uncle Steven, and "his brother." Dobbs tells him to remember to have fun.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our great friend, Lou Dobbs passed away. He was on Red Eye all the time. He was also on the first episode of the Gutfelt Show, which was a weekly show. So, let's just take a fun look back at one of our favorite skits. Well, here we are.
I don't know, Lou. Do I have to go to work? Can't I just go to work with you? You're going to be fine. And if he gives you any trouble, just ignore him.
He's constantly following me in the halls.
Speaker 1: In the halls?
Speaker 0: In the halls. Well, ignore him. Alright. I'll try. Thanks, Lou.
Have fun. I'm gonna try. Greg? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Did you forget something?
Speaker 0: Oh, thanks. Peanut butter? Exactly. Awesome. Thanks.
Greg. Yep. This? Oh. Thanks, Lou.
Almost forgot. Thanks. Greg. Oh. And this?
Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Thanks. Jeez.
I almost forgot. Uncle Steven. And this? Hi. Yeah.
Yeah. Okay. Anything else? His brother. Thanks, Lou.
Remember to have fun. Next.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Maddow giddy about mass protests Saturday https://t.co/cUCnghCTBd
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are over 1,300 protests planned in all 50 states, expected to be the largest single day of protest since Donald Trump took office. Indivisible cofounder Ezra Levin says the response has been incredible, spurred by the Wisconsin election, Cory Booker's speech, and Donald Trump's global attack on economies.
Levin notes there are over a hundred events in California, more than 60 in New York, and more than 50 in Washington, but also multiple events in states like Montana and Alaska. These events are organized by normal, everyday people who have seen institutions fail and are now doing their part.
The overarching theme is "hands off," encompassing various issues. People are coming to this for different reasons, such as "hands off the Department of Education," "hands off our Social Security," and "hands off our trans kids." The idea is that people can come together and say no.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Feels like it. Right? That said, may I suggest that you, go to bed kinda early? Hydrate. Eat your Wheaties in the morning.
Maybe put off the Friday night cocktail to make it a Saturday night cocktail this week, if at all. I'm only saying that because tomorrow is going to be very busy. Saturday is going to be very busy. I said at the top of the show, there are more than 1,200 protests planned for tomorrow in all 50 states. I stand corrected.
It is more than 1,300 protests planned in more than in in in all 50 states. It's expected to be the largest single day of protest since Donald Trump took office. Joining us now is Ezra Levin. He's cofounder of Indivisible, which is one of the groups that is promoting these events tomorrow. Ezra, thanks very much for joining us tonight.
You were here just a couple of three weeks ago talking about the earliest idea for April 5 being sort of a hub for events all over the country and in Washington. How has the organizing gone? What the what has the response been compared to what you expected?
Speaker 1: Gosh, Rachel, it's been incredible. Can I just say it has been incredible? We we knew when we announced three weeks ago on the show that this was gonna be the week where we saw an election in Wisconsin. We were cautiously optimistic about that election in Wisconsin for the supreme court. We didn't know we were gonna kick Elon Musk's butt all across the state, but we were cautiously optimistic.
We also didn't know that Cory Booker was gonna give this incredible speech inspiring all of us and telling us that he was taking a stand in response to pushes from his own constituents. We also didn't know that Donald Trump was gonna launch a global attack on the economies of not just not our economy, but the global economy, this confluence of events, this this sense that they are overreaching so much and there is a possibility to fight back and win is leading to this just incredible response. As you said, more than 1,300 events every single state. Yes. You know, there are over a hundred events in California.
There are more than 60 in the state of New York, more than 50 in Washington, but it's not just blue states, Rachel. We see 17 events across the state of Montana, fourteen across Alaska. This is everywhere. We're not just talking about one event in every state. We're talking about multiple, sometimes dozens of events, and these are normal everyday people who are saying, hey.
I've had enough. I've seen institutions fall. I've seen the universities. I've seen businesses. I've seen law firms not stand up, not support our liberal democracy.
So what am I gonna do as an individual? Well, I'm gonna do my part. I'm gonna show up. That's what tomorrow is about. And it's gosh, Rachel, it is inspiring to see so many people hop on board this train.
Speaker 0: The theme under which this is sort of loosely organized is hands off. I've seen people use all sorts of different types of phrasing around the different types of protests that they're gonna be part of. And it seems like it's it's lots of different groups who are organizing. And in some cases, it's no groups. It's just individual people who are coming out with their friends and neighbors.
But it seems like the hands off messaging is the most overarching phrase that we're gonna hear tomorrow and the most overarching idea. Right?
Speaker 1: One of the beautiful things about this is it's, meeting people where they are. We are all coming to this for a different reason. We can say, hands off the Department of Education. Hands off our Social Security. Hands off our Medicaid.
Hands off our trans kids. Hands off our communities. Hands off our civil rights. Hands off our democracy. Different things are bringing different people to this fight.
That's good. That's okay. We can all come together and say no, and that's what we're gonna see tomorrow.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Popular front. Very, very, very, very, very big tent. If for some reason you don't like what Donald Trump is doing to the country, there's a very large tent that is open to you, and people are gonna be
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Truck hits multiple pedestrians in Boston https://t.co/uFRoT03gux
Video Transcript AI Summary
Multiple pedestrians were struck by a box truck in Downtown Boston. The Boston PD is investigating whether the incident was accidental or intentional and is advising people to avoid the area.
The call came in at 12:48 PM for a motor vehicle accident with pedestrians struck in downtown Boston outside Tufts Hospital in Chinatown. A truck appeared to have struck a nearby building as well. Boston Fire and EMS are assisting in rescue efforts.
The scene is described as very active with broken glass everywhere. The total number of victims is unknown, but at least two are critical. Homicide and fatal accident teams are responding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So far and what we are now learning. Multiple pedestrians were stuck, struck in what appeared to be a box truck by a box truck in Downtown Boston. The Boston PD press office has put out additional details. When asked if this appears to be accidental or intentional, the response was it's currently under investigation. They also are telling people to avoid the area.
I wanna bring former Boston Police Commissioner Ed Davis by phone. Ed, I just wanna work through some more details here. The call came in about 12:48PM. Officers responded to a radio call for a motor vehicle accident. Pedestrian struck at this intersection downtown Boston right outside Tufts Hospital, in Chinatown.
Upon arrival, officers observed a truck that appeared to have struck a nearby building as well as an unknown number of pedestrians. Boston Fire and EMS are on the scene assisting in rescue efforts. Some of our video did show some of the pedestrians being carried off in stretchers. You can see broken glass from the storefronts all over the ground there. They're describing this as a very active scene.
They still don't have a total number of victims yet. At least two are critical and the homicide teams are on-site and the fatal accident teams are also there responding. So Ed, give us your thoughts as we're waiting on more information.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Lord have mercy https://t.co/H0Hjv5dWsC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 stated they are not a fan of tariffs but hope they work. Speaker 0 asked for the senator's comment about tariffs. Speaker 1 mentioned their hearing is not what it used to be.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here in Kentucky or talk to him about it being a bad policy at all?
Speaker 1: My hearing is not what it used to be.
Speaker 0: Tariffs, senator. Your comment is about tariffs. Tariffs. Comment about tariffs.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. I'm not a fan of tariffs. I hope it works.
Speaker 0: Hacked or what that looks like here in Kentucky or
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
President Donald Trump attends a Kennedy Center board meeting and tour in Washington, D.C..- President Trump mentions a lot of rooms without windows were built in the basement that will never be used. Seems kind of odd doesn’t it? https://t.co/5UCjUpzLf1
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addressed the Kennedy Center's disrepair and mismanagement, citing $250 million spent on unused underground rooms and a $30,000 cost for Lee Greenwood to sing at the board meeting. The speaker criticized the painted columns and the waste of money, stating the situation is emblematic of the country's problems, such as open borders and men in women's sports.
The speaker wants to improve the Kennedy Center and is planning a meeting with the Speaker. The speaker mentioned working with the DC mayor to remove tents and address crime. The speaker recommended that people come see shows, including Broadway hits.
The speaker is speaking with President Putin to save soldiers surrounded by Russian forces and is trying to broker a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine, claiming the conflict is "Joe Biden's deal," referencing $350 billion given to Ukraine. The speaker also addressed reports of 18 Secret Service agents protecting Hunter Biden in South Africa, a country the speaker says is on a watch list, and promised to look into it. Finally, the speaker acknowledged a terrible event at a Catholic church and said they would look into it as well.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So thank you very much. We're here to have our first board meeting. Kennedy Center and it's in tremendous disrepair as is a lot of the rest of our country, most of it because of bad management. This is a shame what I've watched and witnessed. They spent a fortune, $250,000,000, and they built these rooms that nobody's gonna use, rooms underground.
Underground. And I've often wondered what are the big cubes that they have outside that block the view. The cubes with the door in them, so that people can get down to rooms that nobody's gonna use. And it's a shame. It's a shame.
The other thing is that I have a little problem with some people that work here. We had Lee Greenwood wanted to sing a little song today. And because of the cost in the union structure, for him to sing a song just for the board, just a board meeting, it was gonna cost $30,000. That doesn't sound too good. They wanted $30,000 to move a piano.
So you can't have that. So we're gonna we're gonna fix it up. But it's really emblematic of our country. But the Kennedy Center, if you look at the columns outside, you look at I mean, they're supposed to be covered by something, whether it's marble or whatever, granite. They were never covered.
They were painted. But, bring it into more modern times, a lot of money has been given to it, and the money has not been properly spent. They built rooms underground with no windows, no nothing, that will not be used ever. You're not gonna have people use them. Such a waste of money, such a terrible waste, but we'll make it we'll bring it back.
We'll make it great again. But it is so much like what I'm witnessing in other places. We have open borders. We have men playing in women's sports. It's all the same thing.
It's all the same mentality and thinking. So I'm very disappointed when I look around. The bottom line, it has tremendous potential, and we'll work with congress. As you know, it's a very public, a very public facility, and we'll do what has to be done. We'll be having a meeting with the speaker in the not too distant future.
I think it's important to save this structure in this building. I think maybe we close-up of the work that's been done and built because it was done terribly. It was done terribly. The concept was very bad.
Speaker 1: Mister president, how is it so important to come here today to the Kennedy Center? You have so much on your
Speaker 0: This represents a very important part of DC and actually our country. And I think it's important to make sure that our country is in good shape and is represented well. When people look at this, I've been hearing for a long time, that they come here and they're very disappointed. When they come here, I want them to be excited. We're bringing a big move on to Washington DC.
We're gonna stop the crime. We actually worked with the mayor. We took down a lot of tents. They were all over the place in front of the state department, and, they did a good job with that. I was very happy with what the mayor did.
She was able to get him out quickly at my direction and at the direction of the administration. But we're cleaning up Washington DC. This is a big part of Washington DC. Mister president, for Americans visiting Washington,
Speaker 1: perhaps they're thinking about seeing a show at the Kennedy Center Yeah. Would you tell them? Did they have been here before and they wanna come check it out?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I'd say come here and see a show. I was never a big fan of I never liked Hamilton very much, and, I I never liked it. But, we are gonna have some really good shows. I would say this, come here and watch it and you'll see over a period of time it'll improve very greatly physically.
And, we're gonna get some very good shows. The thing that does well are Broadway hits. And we have some beauty. I guess we have Les Mis coming and we have some others, but, the Broadway hits have done very well. So I'm gonna spend some time.
Speaker 1: We have a good board.
Speaker 0: In the meantime, we're running the country and we're running it well. We have, tremendous things to report. Tomorrow, I'm speaking with president Putin of Russia to save some soldiers who are in deep trouble. They're captured. Essentially, they're surrounded by Russian soldiers.
So I give it to you a lot of different I give you a lot of different things in one news conference, but it's a big deal. They're surrounded by, Russian soldiers. And I believe it was if it wasn't for me, they would be, they wouldn't be here any longer. I was able to get them not to do anything at this moment. But it's a bad situation in Russia, and it's a bad situation in Ukraine.
What's happening in Ukraine is not good, but we're gonna see if we can work a peace agreement, a ceasefire and peace, and I think we'll be able to do it. I'm speaking to president Putin tomorrow morning. Yes. No. Not at all.
No. Not really the opposite.
Speaker 1: I think it was appreciated.
Speaker 0: And we have to understand and you have to understand that if I see somebody doing something bad that's gonna cause a lot of death. The only reason I'm involved, and this is Russia and Ukraine, but a lot of people, it's humanity. I'm involved for humanity. A lot of people are being killed over there, and, we had to get Ukraine to do the right thing. It was not an easy situation.
You got to see a little glimpse at the Oval Office. But I think they're doing the right thing right now, and we're trying to get a peace agreement done. We wanna get a cease fire and then a peace agreement.
Speaker 1: Who you with? So
Speaker 0: we're gonna see how it all works out. This was Joe Biden's deal. This isn't Trump's deal. This is Joe Biden's deal. He gave $350,000,000,000 to Ukraine, and he shouldn't have done it.
It wasn't secured. Europe gave a hundred billion dollars, and it was in the form of a loan. They get their money back. And they should they should actually have much more in it than us. But Joe Biden was grossly incompetent, and it's a shame what they did.
March. We could have rebuilt our entire navy for that kind of money. Mister president, sir, happened? Sir, there were 18 Secret Service agents protecting Hunter Biden in South Africa this weekend.
Speaker 1: Who's paying for that?
Speaker 0: Would you plan to rebuild the Secret Service protection? Well, we have done that with many. I would say if there are 18 with Hunter Biden, that will be something I'll look at this afternoon. Okay? Sir?
I just heard about it for the first time. So you have 18 Secret Service going. Where is he?
Speaker 1: Exactly. In South Africa.
Speaker 0: In South Africa. And South Africa, you know, is on a watch list. You know that. Because what they're doing to people is brutal. And I've stopped having money go to South Africa.
You know that. Billions of dollars. So he's in South Africa. That's very interesting. Alright.
I'm gonna take a look
Speaker 1: at that. Thank you very
Speaker 0: Well, we're gonna take a look. I love Wichita. You know, I got big votes there. We won that state by a lot. We'll take
Speaker 1: a look at that.
Speaker 0: When did this happen?
Speaker 1: Terrible. Yeah.
Speaker 0: I think it's a terrible thing. And this was a Catholic church.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The same Catholic Okay. I'm gonna take a look at it. Okay?
Speaker 0: Thank you very much, everybody.
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
OMGAWD 🤣https://t.co/P9KX7vVepW
Video Transcript AI Summary
People must unite because everyone dies. It's time to help and give the greatest gift of all to the world. We're down and out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Must come together as one. A day at all people die even. Oh, it's time to lend a hand to life. The greatest gift of all. World.
We're down and out,
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Vice President JD Vance was encountered by protesters in Vermont following a tense exchange with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the White House. https://t.co/kFVavMU6Me
Video Transcript AI Summary
Following the Oval Office incident with President Zelensky, my family and I faced protests upon our arrival in Vermont for a ski vacation. We were met by protesters holding anti-Vance, pro-Ukraine signs. Even at the resort, more protesters gathered, which led us to relocate to an undisclosed location. Governor Phil Scott has asked Vermonters to be respectful, acknowledging that we are there on a family trip with our young children. We appreciate his consideration. We will provide updates as they become available. We wish everyone safe travels, especially my young children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On hell for vice president JD Vance and his family following yesterday's fiasco there in the Oval Office with Ukrainian president Zelensky. There's some new video now we have showing the vice president being greeted by protesters holding anti Vance pro Ukraine signs as he wakes his as he makes his way there, to Vermont for a ski resort vacation. More protesters met the Vance family outside of the resort, and the family ultimately had to move to an undisclosed location. Vermont governor Phil Scott welcoming the vice president yesterday saying that I hope Vermonters remember the vice president is here on a family trip with his young children. And while we may not always agree, we should be respectful.
And we will, of course, continue to follow this very closely and bring you updates as they come. We wish the vice president safe travels and particularly his young children.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
I sped up to the end of this windbags 17 minutes to get to his announcement at the end! Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) announces that he would be running for NYC Mayor. New York do better! https://t.co/NfUhQdhAQg
Video Transcript AI Summary
New York City is the greatest city in the world, but it's currently facing a crisis. We feel it in the streets, the subways, the empty storefronts, and the random violence. This isn't an act of God, but a result of poor political leadership.
However, New Yorkers know how to handle a crisis: we lead, we act, we do. Throughout my career in public service, I've seen government make a positive difference. As governor, we achieved historic progressive accomplishments: raising the minimum wage, enacting tough gun laws, passing marriage equality, creating paid family leave, and enshrining Roe v Wade into state law.
New York City is the heart of the American dream. I believe we can turn the city around, and I can help. That's why I'm announcing my candidacy for mayor of New York City. I love New York, and I want it to thrive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Andrew Cuomo. Let me start by telling you what you already know. New York City is the greatest city in the world. There is no other place like it. And as in life, we have had times when we are at our shining best.
And there are times when we struggle and endure great hardship. But we also know that we can handle a crisis because we have. We recently did it together through COVID. And we know that the first step towards solving a problem is having the strength, having the courage to recognize it. And we know that today our New York City is in trouble.
You feel it when you walk down the street and try not to make eye contact with a mentally ill homeless person or when the anxiety rises up in your chest as you're walking down into the subway. You see it in the empty storefronts, the graffiti, the grime, the migrant influx, the random violence. The city just feels threatening, out of control, and in crisis. These conditions exist not as an act of God, but rather as an act of our political leaders or more precisely, the lack of intelligent action by many of our political leaders. But New Yorkers know the simple answer of what to do when there's a crisis in leadership.
You lead, you act, you do. I had the honor to serve the public in every level of government. In my twenties, with my father when he was governor, with mayor David Dinkins on homelessness, with president Bill Clinton as secretary of housing and urban development where we worked with cities all across the nation, and as New York state attorney general, and as your governor. I know government can make a positive difference because we did. Was it easy?
No. But together, we achieved historic progressive accomplishments. We did things they said couldn't be done. We changed lives by setting the highest minimum wage in the nation, a 66% increase. We saved lives by enacting the toughest gun violence protection laws in America.
We created new families by leading the nation in passing marriage equality, which established a new civil right for the LGBTQ community and set a new standard for the country. We created the best paid family leave program, enshrined Roe v Wade into state law three years before Trump's Supreme Court ended a woman's right to control her own body, enacted the most aggressive green economy program in the country, and highest minority business participation. We showed that government can in three words, New York City. And that, my friends, is what makes this city unique. The place, the space that is the heart of the American dream and an international phenomenon.
That is New York at its best. As the great Eby White said, New York is to the nation what the white church spire is to the village, the visible symbol of aspiration and faith, the white plume saying the way is up. I am not saying this is going to be easy. It won't be easy, but I know we can turn the city around. And I believe I can help.
And that is why I announced my candidacy today for mayor of New York City. I am a lifelong New Yorker, and I love New York. And I want New York to not only survive, But for new
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Mark Levin- radical judges, and Congress do not have the right to bankrupt the country-it’s all about power https://t.co/QvDzQ0YmAk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Under Article I, Congress is said to have the power of the purse, but is this power unlimited? Much of what's happening today has no connection to the Constitution. The framers never envisioned our massive bureaucracy, an idea pushed by progressives and the Democrat party.
Congress can't even complete a budget on time and we're now paying a trillion dollars to finance the debt. The framers wouldn't want the President to ignore this. The left claims the executive has no role because they are cultural Marxists and economic socialists.
Congress doesn't have the power to bankrupt America or fund fraud, yet judges block Trump from preventing waste. We have a post-constitutional America where efforts are made to wrap the Constitution around unconstitutional institutions. This is because the ruling class wants power, exactly what the Constitution was designed to prevent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You'll hear it said all the time that under Article I of the Constitution Congress has the power of the purse, only Congress. Congress lays taxes. Congress determines borrowing amounts. Congress determines spending amounts. And so I have some questions for you.
Is that an unlimited power? Is that a power that's unchecked? Can Congress do whatever it wants when it comes to spending and borrowing and taxing? Well of course they have to vote on it. Of course the President has to sign it.
Of course the President has a veto power. Of course you have elections and people come and go. That's not my question. As a constitutional matter, can Congress do whatever it wants with the power of the purse? Let me give you an example.
If Congress passes a massive bill, they pass these omnibus bills all the time where the members don't even know what's in it, Which raises a serious question in the first place: Is that legitimate? Our representatives are spending money and they don't even know what they're spending money on? And then they delegate the power through these massive trillion dollar spending bills to a bureaucracy that's not even in the Constitution? That doesn't represent us? We don't know who these people are.
And they put that bureaucracy that's legislating and making determinations about spending in the executive branch? I thought the determinations about the power of the purse remained in Congress, not by an unelected bureaucracy that's not in the Constitution, that is established in the executive branch. So, my first premise is this: Much of what you see going on in society today has no connection to the Constitution whatsoever. Nothing. Zero.
The framers never contemplated anything like our massive bureaucracy. The American Marxists, that is, the progressives of old, they're the ones who came up with the idea, established it. Their party, the Democrat party, pushed it hard, funded it, created it. So this whole thing that exists right now has no constitutional basis whatsoever. So the lawyers out there will say, But the Supreme Court ruled.
I don't care what the Supreme Court ruled. I'm not talking about the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court in many ways has to make things work. I'm talking about what does your constitution provide? Your constitution.
Not some supreme court in the nineteen forties and so forth. Your constitution. It provides none of this. Now the power of the purse, they gave it to Congress, not on elected judges and not the executive. The legislature makes spending determinations.
But does it? What's an omnibus bill? It's a massive spending bill, the particulars of which nobody knows. And then it goes to the bureaucracy, again, which has no place in our constitutional construct. So you have people who are mid level bureaucrats, lower level bureaucrats, maybe manager bureaucrats, making decisions about hundreds of billions of dollars and where that money's supposed to go.
Is that what the framers had in mind? Of course it's not what they had in mind. That's not anything close to any kind of a constitutional construct that they or anybody else was contemplating. Okay. Next question.
Does Congress have the power to bankrupt the country? Under the spending clause? What Mark? I'm very serious about this. Congress enters in charge of the spending bills, borrowing, taxing.
Does Congress have the power to bankrupt our country? What do you think the framers would say? Of course not. We set up a limited government with checks and balances. Limited.
Article one gives Congress what powers it actually has. All this spending that President Trump, Elon Musk and the team is finding, the framers would be shaking their head. What the hell does this have to do with the federal government? What the hell does this have to do with the American people? What the hell does this have to do with the constitutional system?
Nothing. Zero. None of this is contemplated. Not because those are the old days and these are the modern days. No.
In fact what's happening in our government is pretty primitive. Nobody really knows what the hell is going on. And so, you have Trump comes in and he says, Well, I want to know what's going on. I want to know what's going on in the executive branch. Whether they put the bureaucracy here, I've got to take a look at it.
They're spending money left and right. I've gotta take a look at it. If I don't look at it, nobody else is, including our vaulted congress that has the power of the purse. Half a trillion dollars a year, up to half a trillion dollars a year, says the GAO, is wasted. Waste, fraud and abuse.
I'm the president. I'm in charge of making sure the money is spent wisely. No? Well, the answer is yes. Does Congress have the right to fund fraud?
Under the power of the purse? Fraud, Mark? Of course not. Okay. So the executive has the power to find out if there's fraud then, right?
Right. Then what are these federal judges doing trying to stop him? What about waste, fraud and abuse? Does Congress have the power under the power of the purse to spend money in ways that are incredibly wasteful and abusive? Where friends of the Democrat party are being larded up with billions of dollars with their so called nonprofit organizations, nongovernmental organizations, some kind of ideological objective or whatever?
Does Congress have that power? Should it? Should it? We never ask about the power of Congress. Look at Congress over the last decades.
Congress can't even get a budget done on time. Ever. Congress can't ever balance the budget. Ever. Congress can't get the debt under control.
Ever. We're now paying a trillion dollars, soon to be $1,200,000,000,000, to finance the debt. Now again, the framers of the constitution would never have imagined such irresponsibility. But do you think the framers of your constitution would say it's the job of the president just to ignore it all and just keep rubber stamping it, rubber stamping it? So why do the Democrats, the left, their media and academia, why do these phony constitutional law professors say that basically Donald Trump, the executive, has no role despite the fact it's all in the executive branch?
Because they're Marxists slash socialists. They're cultural Marxists, economic socialists. This is what they want. This is what they've created. You see, America, if you begin going down and through the process of actually looking at what's taking place, you're destroying the whole idea of omnibus spending bill, where we the people have no idea what the money is spending on.
So on the spending Congress on the front end, the omnibus bill on the spending end, Donald Trump is saying, Well I want to take a look. And so they're fighting him. They're fighting them with their judges. They're fighting them in the media. They're fighting them in Congress.
And then they tell you we have a constitutional crisis. What Congress is doing is A constitutional. There's nothing in the Constitution that gives them the power to bankrupt the country. There's nothing in the Constitution that gives them this ubiquitous spending, borrowing and taxing power to spend, borrow whatever they want on whatever they want and tax any way they want. Now, you can't write in a governing document all the little details and specifics.
It's not a mortgage. It's not a contract to purchase a car or something like that. This is a governing document. And they said early on, If the people aren't virtuous and the representatives aren't virtuous, this won't last. But no constitutional republic, especially ours, is required to go along with this.
In other words, you've got this massive bureaucracy, this fourth branch of government that has no constitutional basis whatsoever. Again, regardless of what the Supreme Court says, it has none. What's the Supreme Court? Nine really smart lawyers in black robes. Okay.
Some of us don't have black robes, but we know what we're talking about. Then these omnibus spending bills. Just trillions of dollars out the door, 7,000,000,000,000 or we have the inflation reduction act, which had nothing to do with inflation, everything to do with climate change. They didn't even spend all the money. They're pushing it out the door near the end.
Tens of billions of dollars at a time. Half a trillion dollars waste, fraud and abuse, abuse, the GAO says. And Trump's just supposed to, don't look. Rubber stamp it. No.
Congress does not have the power to bankrupt America. Congress does not have the power to fund fraud. And if in these massive omnibus bills they're funding massive amounts of waste, fraud and abuse up to a half a trillion dollars a year, I doubt that's a legitimate constitutional power Congress has as well. And so Congress's responsibilities need to be exposed and what Congress does needs to be exposed as well. Now these judges, very very interesting, who are trying to prevent Donald Trump from preventing waste, fraud, and abuse.
I just went back and I counted before the program how many of these cases had been brought. 94. 90 four cases. And I just took a random look. They're not all Democrat judges but the vast majority are.
The vast majority are. Some of them are Republican appointed judges, with a caveat. Some of them were appointed by Republicans, like in the case of Seattle by Reagan, as part of a deal where you picked a liberal Democrat judge in order to get two more conservative judges through. And those deals at the federal district court level have been made for more than one hundred years probably. So when they say it's a Reagan judge and so forth, you've got to take a look.
But I took a look at some of these judges who are right in the middle of this. And it's no accident that the petitioners who are bringing these cases are bringing them mostly in Washington, D. C, Seattle, Washington, Boston, Massachusetts, New York, Manhattan, places heavy, heavy concentration of Democrats and where you're most likely to get a judge who's been appointed by Clinton, Obama, or Biden. And some of these judges, the key judges right now, were appointed by Biden and Obama. We have Judge Abelson.
Now he's blocking the anti DEI efforts of the administration. He was just appointed by Biden in the last two years or so. We have judge Alakam appointed by Biden. Judge Alakam is blocking the freezing of federal funding, where Trump said, you know, I wanna take a look at this. He said, no, you can't.
We have judge Ali, perhaps the most radical of the bunch. He has ordered Trump to actually spend money on foreign aid. When Trump says, no, I don't wanna spend that money. I'm gonna look at it. John Roberts in the court stepped in and said, not so fast, judge Ali.
We're gonna take a look at this. He was appointed by Biden. We have judge Vargas, appointed by Biden, blocks access to Treasury Department payment systems. We have judge Boardman, appointed by Biden, blocked access to, personnel records. Doesn't the president have a right to know who's working for his government and if they're actually working for his government?
We have judge Amy Berman Jackson. She is a huge radical in Washington, appointed by Obama. She's forced the reinstatement of a so called watchdog fired by Trump. You see how they're micromanaging? The executive branch, which is trying to manage this massive bureaucracy that's not even in the Constitution?
Oh, by the way, none of these judges are either. They're created by a judiciary act. They're created by Congress. So the one person who is created by the Constitution, Donald Trump and the presidency, we're told, has no say, has no power. Nation's gone bankrupt.
The debt's gone through the ceiling. The value of the currency's going down. He just needs to watch. Leave it to the unelected judges. Leave it to the unelected bureaucrats.
And leave it leave it to Congress. That's using the power of the purse to destroy the country. We a judge John McConnell, I believe, out of Boston, appointed by Obama. He blocked the president's freeze on grants and loans. We a judge Kucharis, appointed by Obama, blocked a freeze of the government Trump's grant and loans.
We have Judge Hirson, appointed by Biden. He's blocked the transgender order from the administration. We have Judge Engelmeyer, appointed by Obama, blocked access to payroll systems, to payment systems, so they can figure out if there's fraud going on. We have Judge Kelly, appointed by Biden. She blocked cuts to personnel grants.
They're running the executive branch. These judges are micromanaging the executive branch. Now where do they get that power? They have no such power. None whatsoever.
Zero. They don't have the power to trump the legitimate actions of a president of The United States. They don't have the power to run the human resources departments in the federal government to decide what's on their websites, to decide whether the president can fire or offer people early retirement. They don't have the power to do any of these things. And yet they're doing them.
So first, we establish Congress does not have the power to bankrupt America, and it doesn't have the power to fund fraudulent activities, in addition to the fact that they don't even know what the hell they're funding out of these omnibus bills. The president does have the power to see what's being spent. He does have the power to determine whether fraud is taking place and waste and abuse. And he's not required to rubber stamp it. And now we've established that judges do not have the power to micromanage the executive branch, the bureaucracy, all the decisions that an elected president elected in the entirety of The United States gets to make because the bureaucracy is not in the Constitution.
The bureaucrats aren't elected. These judges aren't in the Constitution. They're created by Congress. And they don't have the power to micromanage the executive branch either. So what do we have here?
You ready for this? I'm sorry to upset you. We have a post constitutional America. What's being done now is an effort to wrap the Constitution around activities, institutions that are taking place that are not in the Constitution. The Constitution was never amended to do any of these things.
So we're taking the Constitution, the Supreme Court will no doubt, and try and figure out how to wrap it around all these things that are taking place and then try to assort and assign who has what authority and who does not. That's what's taking place. And this has been going on since the early American Marxists aka progressives, the late eighteen hundred's. Woodrow Wilson to Franklin Roosevelt to Lyndon Johnson and on and on and on. And the reason they're so furious on the left and the Democrat Party and the media about efforts to look at what's taking place and to stop what's taking place and on and on and on.
The reason why they're attacking Donald Trump and calling him unconstitutional, which is really quite ironic, preposterous, is because this scam has been going on for a long time. You're paying for it. Your children and grandchildren and generations yet born, they're going to pay for it in a humongous way Because they're not going to be able to dig out. So why is this being done? Anybody know?
Why are the Democrats doing this? Why is the ruling class in Washington doing this with several Republicans? Why do the media support this? Why? Power.
Power. And power. They want the power in Washington. They want the power in the ruling class. The Democrat party wants the power in the party.
The party is more important than the country. It's about power. Exactly what the Constitution was constructed to prevent. We'll be right back.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Damn Stephen Miller coming in hot 🔥@StephenM https://t.co/bcZOrTI5iQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was honored to witness President Trump stand up for American interests, defending us from being fleeced and taken for granted. Zelensky's impertinence and disrespect towards the U.S. were shocking. He should be thanking us. The only reason Zelensky has power is because of the United States. Americans have suffered economically funding this war, depleting our resources and negatively affecting our ability to project power elsewhere.
Instead of gratitude, Zelensky lectured us, demanding more and pushing for a never-ending war with Russia. No American wants their children dying for Zelensky. President Trump rightly insisted on being a partner for peace, asserting American interests and defending the American people from a potential World War III. He showed the world what strong American leadership looks like.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Steven Miller. Steven, did you have any clue that Zelensky was gonna come in hot like this?
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody had any idea that Zelensky would be so impertinent, so disrespectful, so insulting to The United States Of America. Look. This is one of the great moments in the history of American diplomacy. The way that president Trump and J. D.
Vance stood up for American interest in the world stage, the way that president Trump defended Americans after years of being fleeced and abused and taken advantage of and taken for granted, millions of American hearts swelled with overflowing pride today to watch president Trump put Zelensky in his place. The only reason that Zelensky has a country, that Zelensky is in power, is because of The United States. Americans have suffered economically funding this war now for years. American security has been degraded. Our stockpiles depleted.
Our ability to project power in other regions of the world negatively affected to protect and defend Ukraine. Americans probably don't even know the true extent of just how much military support on multiple levels and fronts America has provided to Ukraine. And then this man shows up in the Oval Office and lectures us, says we have to do more, says we're not as good as Europe, says that we need to provide them a forever war guarantee, fight Russia till the end of time. No American watching that today says they wanna send their sons and daughters to die on behalf of Zelensky. And president Trump was clear and firm and principled, saying either you're our partner for peace in ending this war or we can't work with you.
And Zelensky, for the first time since this has begun, finally met a Western leader willing to assert their own interests, the interests of their own country, and not bow down to and venerate this man as a messianic figure. Americans have watched with horror as Zelensky has been treated as a messiah. Our hearts all break for the suffering and loss and death. But you know what will be even worse? World War three.
And today, president Trump said we are not going to let this escalate into World War three. He defended the Oval Office. He defended the White House. And most importantly, he defended the American people. And I was honored and proud to be there to witness this moment in history.
Speaker 0: You know, what was so confusing is that Zelenskyy doesn't have a second option. It's not like there's other great nations that he can just turn to to sponsor this proxy war. He doesn't even have Europeans willing to step up and help him out to the level that we are. So to me, this was a kamikaze mission. It was almost like he was unbalanced to come in here and explode like that.
Any normal, rational person would have come in, been gracious, shown some gratitude, where do I sign, let's move forward, and let's get this deal done. The fact that he didn't do that kind of scares me.
Speaker 1: He he couldn't even say thank you. No. He just couldn't say thank you. Thank you, America. That's like diplomacy one by That's
Speaker 0: what they tell you to say on the plane. You're about to meet the president. He loves to hear thank you. The American people need to hear that. Say that right away.
Speaker 1: But, I mean, it was it was not just that though. There were many remarkable and disturbing things that Zelenskyy said. He repeatedly rejected president Trump's statement that we should pursue a ceasefire. Right. How could you reject a ceasefire?
And and, you know, he kept saying Europe's doing so much more than us. Well, then what do you need us for? If he's saying Europe's so great, then why are you coming and begging and pleading to us for money and protection and guarantees? President Trump is a peacemaker. He will fight for peace.
He had peace for four years under his previous term. And today, we saw what it's like to have a strong leader in the White House, and the whole world saw what it's like to have a strong leader for America.
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I think they're gonna patch things up. Maybe I'm too optimistic, but I think
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Full interview with the unapologetic tracksuit grifter https://t.co/8ZvbhMI03E
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm thankful for the continued support from the American people, President Trump, and Congress during this full-scale invasion. We are strategic partners, and I respect President Trump's desire to end the war, which we want even more. We need to be on the same side to stop Putin, pressuring him alongside Europe. Peace isn't just the absence of war; it's about justice and human rights.
I respect President Trump and the American people, and I'm open to discussing sensitive matters outside the media. Signing the minerals deal is a first step to security guarantees, but it's not enough. We need to show our people that America stands with us, not Russia. I want to find a way to peace through diplomacy with the United States, Europe, and Russia at the table.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are pleased to welcome back to special report Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky. Mister president, thank you for the time today, especially on this day to continue to do this interview. President Trump said after your meeting that you disrespected him and the vice president and all of America in the Oval Office. Do you think you did, and do you think you owe an apology to president Trump?
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. First of all, thank you for invitation, for this dialogue, and good evening to all your country, to all Americans. I'm very thankful to to Americans for all your support. You did a lot. I'm thankful to president Trump and to congress by partisan support, and I was always very thankful from all our people.
You helped us a lot from the very beginning during three years of full scale innovation. You helped us to survive. And and it anyway, we are strategic partners. And even in such tough dialogue, and I think it's we have to be very honest, and we have to be very direct to understand each other because it's very for us, very necessary to president Trump. And I'm I'm I'm with all the respect that he wants to finish this war, but not nobody wants to finish more than we because we in Ukraine, we are in this war.
We are in this battle and battle for for freedom for our lives. So so I'm just telling that, I think, that we have to be on the same side, and I hope that the president on our side together with us, and and that is very important to stop Putin. And I heard from president Trump a lot of times that he will stop the war, and I hope he will, and and we need to pressure him with Europe, with all the partners. And I think this dialogue had to be a little bit earlier to understand where we are. Like, you know, I don't remember exactly, but like president Reagan said that peace is not just an absent the war.
Yes. We are speaking about just and lasting peace, about freedom, about justice, about human rights. And that's why I said that I think so, that ceasefire, and you know Putin, he broken 25 times, Ceasefire during all these years, 10
Speaker 0: So I'm not hearing from you, mister president, a thought that you owe the president an apology.
Speaker 1: No. I respect president, and I respect American people. And if, I don't know if I think that we have to be very open and very honest, and I'm not sure that we did something bad. I think maybe sometimes some some some things we have to discuss out of out of media with all respect to democracy and to a free media, but there are things that where we have to understand the position of Ukraine and Ukrainians. And I think that is the most important thing.
Yes. We are partners. You know? We are very close partners. We have to be fair.
We have to be we have to be very free.
Speaker 0: I'm told that you were told multiple times from lawmakers on Capitol Hill and the White House to make today about the minerals deal and the economic deal, and then get it signed and let negotiations play out over security guarantees step by step. Is that true?
Speaker 1: I said that we have to sign this document, and we are ready for this. And this will be the step first step to security guarantees, but it's not enough. I think so. Maybe I don't know something. I don't know some details.
That's why I wanted to share it with the president, my thoughts, and to hear him again because he has a plan how to stop Putin. And maybe, as I said, maybe it's out of big conversations, but we have to share it. You know? This is so sensitive. You know?
Just cease fire without security guarantee. This is so sensitive for our people. I'm I'm speaking like a president of a people who are in this struggle three years, and they just want to hear that America on our side and that America will stay with us, not with Russians, with us. That's it. But I'm sure that it will be this is the first step to security guarantees.
Europeans, we don't need to lose them. They are good allies for The United States. United States is the most or the biggest of support and of peace, but we don't need to lose Europe, and they also want to know next steps. We have to be very open to understand how to stop the war.
Speaker 0: Right. But do you think the public spat in the Oval Office in front of the media served Ukrainians well today?
Speaker 1: I I think this kind of this kind of spat is is I mean, this, we have I mean, this is is not good for both sides anyway. And, I will I we're open, but I can't, you know, change our Ukrainian attitude to Russian. And I don't want they kill us for us. You know? This is very, clear that Americans are the best of our friends.
Europeans are the best of our friends, and Putin with Russian their enemies. And it doesn't mean that we don't want peace. We just want to recognize the reality, the real situation.
Speaker 0: President Trump is convinced that you will never sign a deal with Vladimir Putin. Is he right?
Speaker 1: No. I think so. What I think, Ukraine wants peace, and we will have. We will have anyway diplomacy. We will have negotiations.
I only said that I think so. It's about just and lasting peace. It's meant that we have be we have to be very strong at the table of negotiations. And at these negotiations, Ukraine and Russia like sides of this war have to be and United States and Europe. That what I said.
So we are ready for peace, but we have to be in strong position. What does it mean? Just to know that our army is strong, that our partners with us, and that we have security guarantees. Am I not right?
Speaker 0: Leaving the White House today, president Trump said this.
Speaker 2: He's looking to go on and fight, fight, fight. He wants to come back right now, but I can't do that.
Speaker 0: What do you make of that? Do you wanna continue fighting? Do you want peace? And if he had the opportunity to go back to the White House right now, would you do it?
Speaker 1: No. First of all, we want peace. That's why I'm in The United States. That's why I visited president Trump. And thanks for invitation again.
The deal on minerals is the first step to security guarantees. It's meant for the peace, closer to peace. That's why I'm here. And I have we have tough situation to understand it is to be in Ukraine. You you saw it, Brett.
You were swans. Thank you again. So I think that's very important to understand what's going on. But I I respect my soldiers and our people, our civilians who work and support our warriors. I can't say just stop.
Nobody will stop because everybody afraid that Putin will come back tomorrow. We want just and lasting peace. It's true. We want security guarantees. We raised this topic about NATO the quickest way, but not all the countries are on this side.
I said, okay. If not NATO, nobody is pushing. If not NATO, let's build NATO in Ukraine. That's my position. Europeans are ready ought to have contingents on our territory, boots on the ground.
United States thinks maybe to help, maybe USA backstop have to be just to guarantee that they are with Europeans. Look at your Europe. It's strong. It became stronger, but they also want to have allies like The United States. That's what I said.
I just want to understand what the peace. It's not my question, Brad. This is the question from all our people.
Speaker 0: You mentioned when I traveled to the front lines with you last year Yeah. To see the situation, to mark the anniversary of the war, and this is what you told me back then.
Speaker 1: Will Ukrainians survive without congress support? Of course, but not all of us. It will be a tragedy for all of us, not only for Ukraine, not only for Ukrainians, for all Europe.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So the question today is, can Ukraine win this war or hold off Russia without continued US support?
Speaker 1: It will be difficult for us. That's why I'm I'm here. That's why we speak about the future negotiations. It will be difficult without your support, but we can't lose our values, our people. We can't lose our freedom.
So a lot of people Russians came to our territory. You know it. Russians came to our houses, and everybody know, everybody saw it, video, images, lot of things. They killed so many people. Just to forget it, just to say that Putin is a great guy, no, without us.
We don't want it. That's why that's why we speak about, you know, everybody remembered how it was the first days of the war, how they came. Nobody wants in Ukraine. Yes. Of course.
Nobody will forget it, but nobody wants to have again new wave of occupation. That's why when we say, no, NATO, what security guarantees can we have? I'm not pushing. We are not pressuring. We're just asking.
We are just sharing very clear messages to our friends, to Americans. Right. If you are if you stay with us, thank you so much. But let's do let's do the infrastructure of security guarantees. Let's just share with our people.
Just with our people that America stay with us. That's great. We count on it. But just to share it and to say it, that's all.
Speaker 0: How does the war end? How do you get to a deal? You're at a a place right now where there is no deal. How do you get it back on track?
Speaker 1: I think that Europe is ready for contingence and to help us with financing of big army, such big as we have now. This is our army as a part of security guarantees. Now we want to just to find the place for our biggest strategic partner for The United States or United States will propose the where and how United States will give us security guarantees, what kind of and what part of volume of security guarantees. And when we will be ready with this, we will come to diplomacy. To diplomacy, yes, with Russians, Europeans, United States, and we, for a WAS.
I think this is real way because with weapon, it's too long. It's not enough. We don't have enough weapon to push them out, and we don't see now. For now, we don't see really big, volume of new support from The United States, but with all respect again. So for today, we'll be ready with security guarantee.
Really, when I say NATO, it's not about that we I mean, this we are focusing on this war. It's about very understandable infrastructure of security guarantees. And you see that no NATO countries for today, no NATO countries been under attacks.
Speaker 0: Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican from South Carolina, he has been a big proponent of you and of Ukraine, said this today after the meeting.
Speaker 3: I have never been more proud of the president. I was very proud of JD Vance standing up for our country. We want to be helpful. What I saw in the Oval Office was disrespectful, and I don't know if we can ever do business with Zelensky again. He either needs to resign and send somebody over that we can do business with, or he needs to change.
Speaker 0: So he says you need to continue, consider resigning. Is that on the table?
Speaker 1: I I don't know if he will be happy after my words. This decision can do only people of Ukraine.
Speaker 0: You're not gonna step down to do a peace deal?
Speaker 1: No. No. I I was
Speaker 0: I was
Speaker 1: I I was was all always ready. I I'm not I'm not sure that is a good idea for, for I mean, this such proposals. But, but, anyway, I always said, if United States will support NATO, so I think that is enough for Ukraine. So I think we I did all I all I had to do. And if somebody is not, I mean, this happy with me, okay.
Okay. But between us, yes, Americans vote for American president. Each European country vote for their president and only Ukraine. And with all respect to Lindsey, if I can say Lindsey, we know each other. Yes.
And only Ukrainians.
Speaker 0: Democrats have had
Speaker 1: for their president.
Speaker 0: Democrats have had the opposite reaction to the Oval Office meeting. Democratic senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut posted this. What just happened in the Oval Office was a planned ambush designed to help a brutal Russian dictator and hurt America's security. Trump has become Putin's lapdog, and America's global power is hemorrhaging as America sides with dictators over democracy. What an embarrassment.
Do you think the confrontation in the Oval Office today was preplanned, like senator Murphy suggests?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 0: You don't know? You think maybe?
Speaker 1: I don't know. No. No. No. I don't I mean, this I don't know about it.
I'm I think no. I think I think it was just really tough situation because we've been very open, very direct.
Speaker 0: What set you off? What made you mad? Because they said your tenor and tone sets
Speaker 1: It's not about mad. It's not Brad, you you see, how how to say? When you are in The United States. And for example, president or vice president or somebody or senators, it doesn't matter. Big politicians.
Yes? When they, for example, say that Ukraine is almost destroyed, that our soldiers run away, that they are not heroes, that Ukraine lost million of civilians, that his president is dictator. You know? What is the reaction? It's not about me.
The reaction is that where is our friendship between Ukraine and United States. That's it this is filling, and that's why I do not want to lose our great partners at The United States. And I I just said that it's not the first time. I said it by phone, and we had some other conversations, and we had in Munich meetings, and they said I said, please please be correct. Just I want to be very polite.
I I mean this, be correct with this number. When you say about the number, each person is important. When you say about a million of losses, we don't have any million of losses. When you speak about the territories, maybe some territories and etcetera, it's not just territories, it's houses. It's people lives.
You know? Their their their fathers, mothers, their relatives, grandfathers, died or this I mean, during this war. Nobody want to forgive Putin. It's not funny, you know, or or fairy tale. This is real life.
That's what I said. And when you said it, a lot of times, to my big friends, we've been here, today in our dialogue. And then they again begin to repeat the same things. I think it's not I mean this I I that's why I said it's it's not good way between partners, good partners and friends. That's it.
And I think that if, Jordan is asking questions to president with all respect to vice president, I mean, this he has his interview. This is Shouldn't this our diet.
Speaker 0: Shouldn't this dynamic, if you're going to be like this, be behind closed doors? Not Of course. Enough. So do you regret that? Are you regretting that that happened today?
Regretting?
Speaker 1: Yes. I think it was not good. Think it was not good because we had a lot of different dialogues. I'm not I'm always open to media, but there are very sensitive things. I just want to be honest, and I just want our partners to understand the situation correctly, and and I want to understand everything correctly.
That's that's about us.
Speaker 2: What
Speaker 1: Not to lose our friendship.
Speaker 0: A couple more things.
Speaker 2: What
Speaker 0: are the next steps in your mind? Here we are today. Yeah. What are the next steps?
Speaker 1: I think I think so. I think so. United States wanted this deal very much. And we've been not against this deal, but we wanted to understand what parts in security guarantees will take this deal and what next steps. Just again to understand for our people.
During the war, what you don't like, even sometimes hate, surprises. It's understandable. Many terrible things this war brought to us. So we don't we don't want any surprises. Yes.
That's why we want to be very fair with our partners. And I think this deal, it was prepared by teams. It was not simple during weeks. And now it's ready. I think that they have to sign.
The countries have to sign. The ministers have to sign. That's it. I don't know when they will do it. It depends on the American side exactly.
Speaker 0: The minerals deal did not have security guarantees listed in it.
Speaker 1: It's a part.
Speaker 0: The security guarantees?
Speaker 1: Is this is the part in the infrastructure of security guarantees because, for example, president Trump shared that I think so that if we will be there in some productions and etcetera in mineral that Putin will never, come on this territory where we are. And I said to him, don't trust Putin. Why? I said, because it's not I mean this, I we respect and we believe in strongest of The United States, but I said to him that we had more than two more than, 20 companies, American companies, big companies on the territory of Ukraine. And we had offices even on temporary occupied territories.
For Putin, it doesn't matter. It's American, Euro, European company, or Ukraine. It doesn't matter. He just came and occupied it. That's what I said.
I think this is great idea how to strengthen Ukraine and how to make business between two countries, how to make additional jobs for two countries, but it's not just these will not save
Speaker 0: us. I read what the Democratic senator said that Yeah. Trump has become Putin's lapdog. Do you agree with that president Trump is too close to Vladimir Putin in your mind?
Speaker 1: We spoke about it. And, I think today, very openly, president Trump, he said that I want to be in the middle. Otherwise, I will not put these guys at the table.
Speaker 0: And is he right?
Speaker 1: I want really I want to be very honest. I want really him to be more at our side. I will explain why. Because it's not just that the war began somewhere between our countries. The war began when Russia brought this war to our country, and they are not right.
And they are not right. They didn't respect our territorial integrity. They brought the war on our territory to our family. Sorry. For repeating to our houses.
And they're not right. And, of course, all the Ukrainians want to hear strong position of The United States on our side. From one side, it's understandable. From another side, he wants to find some way of dialogue with Putin, but he always said as I remember, he always said that peace through strength. And that's why I think that he's strong.
United States strong. Two parties together in this question. Two parties always together against Russia. You're very strong to to do strong steps against Putin.
Speaker 0: Americans are worried about where the money has gone. Yeah. Will there be a very rigorous accounting of where the money has gone? It seems like there is some question about whether there's corruption or sold military equipment. No.
Speaker 1: It's it's can't be so. 100 billions we have got during three years.
Speaker 0: Hundred and eighty three from The US.
Speaker 1: Now on on the paper, in the documents, yes. But we have in fact, because 67 came like a weapon. It came through the border. It's checked and it's fixed by ever everybody and we can we go we shared it not once with with the American side and one point five. It was direct financial support to the budget.
Again, it's very open. It digitalized. It's open, free, and please. If if somebody want to check it again, we are very, open with this.
Speaker 0: Last last thing, mister president. Yeah. Do you think your relationship with Donald Trump, president Trump after today can be salvaged?
Speaker 1: It can be. Yes. Of course. Because it's relations more than to president. It's the historical relations, strong relations between our people.
And that's why I always began with to thank your people from our people. And this is the most important. And of course, thankful to president and of course to congress, but first of all to your people. Your people help to save our people. People, the first.
Human rights, the first. This is very, important and we are thankful and sorry for this. I mean this. We wanted very much to have all its strong relations, and I very count that we will have it.
Speaker 0: Mister president, we're honored that you kept this interview. Thank you very much for the time.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Thank you.
Speaker 0: When we come back, we'll bring in our panel.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Holy Shit https://t.co/XvS7BqYTs6
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm aligned with the USA and the world, and I want this conflict resolved. It's tough to deal with the hatred involved, but I want to see a deal done in Europe. I can be tough, but that won't get us a deal.
For four years, tough talk didn't stop Putin. Diplomacy is the path. During Obama, Trump and Biden's terms, nobody stopped Putin from occupying parts of Ukraine. We signed ceasefire and gas contracts, but he broke them. What kind of diplomacy are we talking about?
It is disrespectful to come into the Oval Office and litigate this in front of the American media. Everyone has problems during war. You are gambling with World War Three and disrespecting a country that has backed you. Have you said thank you? You are running low on soldiers. We gave you $350 billion and military equipment. Without us, this war would have been over in two weeks. If you can get a ceasefire right now, I tell you you take it so the bullets stop flying and you meant stop getting.
I gave you javelins. Obama gave sheets.
He didn't break deals with me. If Russia breaks a ceasefire, what if a bomb drops on your head right now?
I've empowered you to be a tough guy, and I don't think you'd be a tough guy without The United States. You're either gonna make a deal, or we're out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You want me to say, really terrible things about Putin and then say, hi, Vladimir. How are we doing on the deal? That doesn't work that way. I'm not aligned with Putin. I'm not aligned with anybody.
I'm aligned with The United States Of America and for the good of the world. I'm aligned with the world, and I wanna get this thing over with. You see the hatred he's got for Putin. It's very tough for me to make a deal with that kind of hate. He's got tremendous hatred.
And I understand that, but I can tell you the other side isn't exactly in love with, you know, him either. So it's not a question of alignment. I have to I'm in aligned with the world. I wanna get the thing set. I'm aligned with Europe.
I wanna see if we can get this thing done. You want me to be tough? I could be tougher than any human being you've ever seen. I'd be so tough, but you're never gonna get a deal that way. So that's the way it goes.
Alright. One more question. Hey.
Speaker 1: I I will respond to this. So look, For four years in The United States Of America, we had a president who stood up at press conferences and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden of thumping our chest and pretending that the president of The United States' words mattered more than the president of The United States' actions. What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy.
That's what president Trump is doing. Can I ask you?
Speaker 2: Sure. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So he occupied it our parts big parts of Ukraine, parts of East and Crimea.
So he occupied it on 2014. So during a lot of years so I'm not speaking about just Biden, but those time was Obama, then president Obama, then president Trump, then president Biden, now president Trump, and god bless. Now president Trump will stop him. But during 2014, nobody stopped him. He just occupied and took.
He killed people. You know what the contact
Speaker 0: 2015.
Speaker 1: 20 14. 20 14.
Speaker 0: 20 14. Yeah. Yeah. So I was I was not here.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But That's exactly right. Yes. But during 2014 till 2022, you know, the well, the situation the same, that people are been dying on the contact line. Nobody stopped him.
You know, that we had conversations with him, a lot of conversation, my bilateral conversation, And we signed with him, me, like a new president in 2019. I signed with him the deal. I signed with him Macron and Merkel. We signed cease fire. Seas fire.
All of them told me that he will never go. We signed him with gas contract. Gas contract. Yes, but after that he broke the ceasefire. He killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners.
We signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy, JD, you are speaking about? What what do what do you what do you mean?
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's gonna end the destruction of your country. Yes. But if you Mister president mister president, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring it into this conflict.
Have been to Ukraine
Speaker 2: that you say what problems we have?
Speaker 1: I have been to Come once. I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister president. Are do you disagree that you've had problems? What? Bringing people into your military?
We
Speaker 0: have problems. And do
Speaker 1: you think that it's respectful to
Speaker 0: come to the Oval
Speaker 1: Office of The United States Of America and attack the administration that is trying to trying to prevent the destruction of your country? A lot
Speaker 2: of a lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning. Sure. First of all, during the war, everybody has problems. Even you, but you have nice ocean and don't feel now.
But you will feel it in the future. God bless.
Speaker 0: You don't know that.
Speaker 2: God bless. You're not
Speaker 0: You gotta Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel.
Speaker 2: I'm not telling you
Speaker 0: Because you're no position to dictate that.
Speaker 1: Remember this.
Speaker 0: I'm not dictating. In no position to dictate what we're gonna feel. We're gonna feel very good.
Speaker 2: Feel influence.
Speaker 0: We're gonna feel very good very strong.
Speaker 2: You will feel influence.
Speaker 0: You're right now not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position he's happy to be right about. The very beginning of the war You're not in a good position. I was You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards.
Cards. Right now, you don't you see the mister president. You're playing serious You're gambling with the lives of millions of people.
Speaker 2: You think
Speaker 0: You're gambling with World War three. You're gambling with World War three. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have.
Speaker 1: Have you said thank you once
Speaker 2: in this entire meeting?
Speaker 1: No. In this entire meeting that
Speaker 0: you said thank you. Even today.
Speaker 1: You went to Pennsylvania and campaign for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for The United States Of America and the president who's trying to save your country.
Speaker 2: Please, you're saying that if you will speak very loudly about the war you
Speaker 0: He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country's in big trouble.
Speaker 2: Can I help?
Speaker 0: Wait a minute. No. No. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.
I know. You're not winning. I know. You're not winning this.
Speaker 2: I
Speaker 0: You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of
Speaker 2: Mister president, we are staying in our country, staying strong from the very beginning of the war. We've been alone, and we are thankful. I said thanks
Speaker 0: You haven't allowed. In this cabinet. You haven't allowed. We gave you, through this stupid president, three hundred and fifty billion dollars. You will.
We gave you military equipment. You will. And you met a brave, but they had to use our military
Speaker 2: Well, in August,
Speaker 0: if you didn't have our military equipment You invited me this our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.
Speaker 2: In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days. This is something
Speaker 0: Maybe less.
Speaker 2: In two weeks. Of course. Yes.
Speaker 0: It's gonna be a very hard thing to do business like this.
Speaker 2: I can
Speaker 0: tell you.
Speaker 1: Just say thank you.
Speaker 2: I said a lot of times
Speaker 1: to say to American people. Except that there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong.
Speaker 0: But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on.
Speaker 1: I understand.
Speaker 0: I think it's very important. That's why I kept this going so long. You have to be thankful. You don't have the cards. Thankful.
You're buried there. You're you're people are dying. I'm telling you You're running low on soldiers. Don't listen. You're running low on soldiers.
It would be a damn good thing. And then you then you tell us, I don't wanna cease fire. I don't wanna cease fire. I wanna go and I wanted this. Look.
If you can get a cease fire right now, I tell you you take it so the bullets stop flying and you meant stop
Speaker 2: getting Of course, we want stop the war.
Speaker 0: I said
Speaker 2: to you
Speaker 0: I want
Speaker 2: a ceasefire. With guarantees.
Speaker 0: Because you get a ceasefire faster than any greater.
Speaker 2: Ask our people about ceasefire. What they think? That wasn't for you.
Speaker 0: What That wasn't with me. That was with a a guy named Biden who was not a smart person.
Speaker 2: But this is your
Speaker 0: that was with Obama.
Speaker 2: It was your president.
Speaker 0: Excuse me. That was with Obama who gave you sheets, and I gave you javelins. Yes. I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets.
In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets and Trump gave javelins. You gotta be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have cards. With us, you have the cards. But without us, you don't have any cards.
Speaker 3: One more question to my the vice president. I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: He Gonna be a tough deal to make because the attitudes have to change.
Speaker 3: What if Russia breaks cease fire? What if Russia breaks these talks? What do you do then? I understand that it's a heated conversation
Speaker 0: right now.
Speaker 2: What are
Speaker 0: you saying?
Speaker 1: She's asking what if Russia breaks the cease fire?
Speaker 0: What if they what if anything? What if a bomb drops on your head right now? Okay? What if they broke it? I don't know.
They broke it with Biden because Biden, they didn't respect him. They didn't respect Obama. They respect me. Let me tell you, Putin went through a hell of a lot with me. He went through a phony witch hunt where they used him and Russia.
Russia, Russia, Russia. You ever hear of that deal? That was a phony that was a phony Hunter Biden, Joe Biden scam. Hillary Clinton, shifty Adam Schiff. It was a Democrat scam, and he had to go through that.
And he did go through it. We didn't end up in a war. And he went through it. He was accused of all that stuff. He had nothing to do with it.
It came out of Hunter Biden's bathroom. It came out of Hunter Biden's bedroom. It was disgusting. And then they said, oh, oh, the laptop from hell was made by Russia, the 51 agents. The whole thing was a scam, and he had to put up with that.
He was being accused of all that stuff. All I can say is this, he might have broken deals with Obama and Bush, and he might have broken them with Biden. He did, maybe. Maybe he didn't. I don't know what happened, but he didn't break him with me.
He wants to make a deal. I don't know if he can make a deal. The problem is I've empowered you to be a tough guy, And I don't think you'd be a tough guy without The United States. And your people are very brave. But you're either gonna make a deal or we're out.
And if we're out, you'll fight it out. I don't think it's gonna be pretty, but you'll fight it out.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
It’s 5:45 am Good Morning White House! 🇺🇸 https://t.co/996ItGWenm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good morning! As the Earth greets you, we acknowledge your brilliance above us. We, too, are ready to shine. Good morning, Star shine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, star shine. The earth says hello. You twinkle above us. We twinkle to go. Good morning, Star shine.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Never Forget What They Did! https://t.co/jHBk3nXdu4
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016, a political party in the U.S. allegedly hired a former foreign intelligence asset to create damaging media about their opponent, using campaign funds illegally. They then reportedly involved the FBI to mislead a federal court for unlawful surveillance of the presidential candidate. Even after the candidate was elected, they continued this surveillance with funding from the Hillary and DNC campaign. This scenario, resembling a fictional plot, was part of the Russiagate controversy, where the party sought intelligence from a supposed Russian expert to link their opponent to Russia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Imagine in 2016 in the United States of America, a political party would go overseas and hire a former foreign intelligence asset and pay them illegally through campaign funded finance dollars to come up with a hit job in the media about their political opponent. Take it one step further. What if that same party, after paying for it, went to the FBI, had the FBI lie to a federal court just to illegally surveil their political opponent for the presidency of the United States. And then after he was elected anyway, they continued the unlawful surveillance warrants with the funding from the Hillary and DNC campaign. I mean, that is like a it's it's not even fiction.
It's it it doesn't exist in in any sci fi writer's mind that you can have that reality occur in the United States of America, but that was Russiagate. And the reason it was Russia is because they went specifically to steal and said, we know you're a Russian expert, whatever that means, and we know you can get us intel and tie it to Donald Trump. So it was an easy sell.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Feds uncover $200 million smuggling operation tied to China https://t.co/mjTgWfVr9N
Video Transcript AI Summary
A scheme involving counterfeit seals allowed criminals in the U.S. and China to evade customs inspections. They learned the unique serial numbers of legitimate seals, created duplicates in China, and sent them to accomplices in the U.S. When shipments arrived at ports, corrupt truck drivers transported the containers to off-site warehouses instead of secondary inspection sites. There, they removed contraband, replaced the seals with counterfeit ones, and presented them for inspection as if they were legitimate. Law enforcement intercepted around 50 counterfeit seals linked to shipments, seizing approximately $130 million worth of contraband, including chemicals and counterfeit merchandise. The defendants face serious federal charges, including smuggling and conspiracy, with potential substantial prison sentences if convicted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Until they arrive in the United States and clear the customs and border patrol inspection process, and the seals are key to that security process. Members of this scheme in the United States and China evaded this security system by learning in advance the unique serial numbers assigned to these seals that would be associated with their illegal shipments. And they created duplicate fake seals in order to circumvent the inspection process. They would create those duplicate fake seals in China, and they would send them from China to their criminal partners here in the United States. When the shipments arrived at the port here in Long Beach and Los Angeles, US Customs and Border Protection would direct as part of their normal process that some of those containers go to secondary inspection.
Those secondary inspection sites are a short distance from the port. Instead of taking the containers from the port to those secondary instructions inspection sites, members of the scheme, including the corrupt corrupt truck drivers, would instead take the contraband shipments to off site warehouses. At those warehouses, according to the indictment, members of the conspiracy would open up and cut those seals, take out the contraband contained in those shipping containers, and ultimately put a new counterfeit seal on the containers and then pass them to CBP for inspection. Members of the scheme would then have the containers now smuggled with the illegal goods inspected by CBP, and they presented them just like they had come straight from the pork complex. The truck drivers involved in the scheme were often paid 10 times the normal rate and sometimes much more to illegally transport the containers to a warehouse before inspection.
During the investigation, law enforcement identified that Chinese co conspirators were sending these seals into the United States, these counterfeit seals, and they were able to intercept around 50 counterfeit seals. Law enforcement then linked those counterfeit seals to inbound shipments, intercepted those shipments, and removed the contraband inside. Items of contraband include chemicals, such as r 22, tens of 1,000,000 of dollars in counterfeit merchandise, unapproved food, and other types of drugs that pose consumer risk. During this investigation into the smuggling, federal authorities seized roughly a $130,000,000 worth of contraband. And we conservatively estimate that the defendants who are charged here and their criminal partners in China smuggled more than $200,000,000 worth of goods into the United States.
We have charged the defendants here with serious federal crimes. That includes smuggling, taking off a counterfeit using counterfeit seals, and conspiracy. If convicted, they face substantial federal prison sentences. The 7 smuggling charges covers, contain a penalty of
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Well, this is a nice surprise! https://t.co/lEoTAuxTwo
Video Transcript AI Summary
I pledge to uphold the duties of the office I am about to enter, without any reservations or intent to evade responsibility. I commit to faithfully discharging these duties. So help me God. Congratulations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Invasion. Without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. And that I will well and faithfully discharge. And that I will well and faithfully discharge. The duties of the office on which I'm about to enter.
The duties on the office of which I am about to enter. So help me god. So help me god. Congratulations. Alright.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
President Trump and First Lady Melania shake hands and take pictures with the Los Angeles fire department https://t.co/GNTD2Uxdnb
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
The late-night losers are learning the hard way that there are many people in their audience that support Trump go figure- meanwhile, @greggutfeld has had the winning formula from day one that’s why he is the king of late night! https://t.co/mYHZO2FQYC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to The Tonight Show! Today, Donald Trump was sworn in as the 47th president of the United States, with the ceremony moved indoors due to freezing temperatures. The inauguration parade was canceled, leaving Eric Trump disappointed about SpongeBob's absence. Trump was sworn in on two Bibles—one from Abraham Lincoln and another that looked like a Cheesecake Factory menu. During his address, he announced ambitious goals, including planting a flag on Mars. The Bidens and Trumps posed for a photo together, showcasing a range of emotions. Melania's outfit drew attention, and Trump humorously hoped it was cake. Biden left a letter for Trump in the Oval Office, humorously including $5. After the ceremony, Biden departed Washington, marking the end of his term as the oldest president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: -Thank you very much. Enjoy yourself. Thank you. Welcome to The Tonight Show. Thank you very much.
After this, we're gonna play Who Wore It Better,
Speaker 1: Me, Melania, or the Hamburglar?
Speaker 0: Well, guys, enjoy yourself. Yeah. Guys, today, Donald Trump was sworn in
Speaker 1: as the 47th president of the United States. Yeah. We're all united. That's great to know. Yeah, America's rolling the dice with the 2nd Trump presidency.
It's like we somehow survived the 1st Squid Game and then signed back up for a second. They're like, You won, kind of. Yeah, today was Trump's inauguration, but the ceremony was moved inside because of freezing temperatures. Democrats were like, It doesn't bother us. We've been numb since November.
Because of the weather, they also canceled the inauguration parade. When you heard that, Eric Trump was like, Wait. So you're telling me SpongeBob won't be here? This afternoon, Trump was sworn in on 2 Bibles Abraham Lincoln's and his own personal Bible. Yeah, you could tell which was which because one was 200 years old, The other was a menu from The Cheesecake Factory.
Speaker 0: Turn your hymnal to the bottom of page 2. Jalapeno poppers wrapped in bacon.
Speaker 1: During his address, Trump laid out some pretty bold objectives. He said, First things first, we're gonna plant a flag on Mars and return Elon Musk to his home planet. And that's what we're gonna do. First things first
Speaker 0: By the end of today!
Speaker 1: Oh, and before the inauguration ceremony, the Bidens and the Trumps posed for a photo together outside the White House. Take a look. Yeah. They posed in order from most happy to least happy.
Speaker 0: A
Speaker 1: lot of people were talking about Melania's outfit. Can we see another photo? People weren't sure if she was there for the inauguration or to kill Indiana Jones. All day long, Trump kept cutting into the hat hoping it was cake. Even more surprising, Mitch McConnell wore the exact same thing, which is just odd.
He didn't They should have called each other. Speaking of Melania, when Trump walked into the Capitol rotunda for his swearing in, he shared a sweet moment with his wife. Watch this.
Speaker 0: -Woah! -Isn't that cool? Isn't that cool that's not just
Speaker 1: a hat? It's Melania's very own border wall. It's It makes sense. Melania didn't want to ruin his makeup. So some more inauguration news.
I read that former President Biden followed tradition by leaving a letter in the Oval Office for Trump. And out of habit, Biden put $5 inside.
Speaker 0: Get yourself an ice cream cone.
Speaker 1: And I thought this was nice. Biden designated the letter classified so Trump would take it home. Yeah. Biden spent a minute writing it and 10 minutes licking it closed.
Speaker 0: Oil can. Oil can.
Speaker 1: Well, after Trump was sworn in, Biden departed Washington. Yep. He finished his term as the oldest president ever to hold office. Now if you missed it, here's how Biden left the White House for the last time. And now we're watching to see Joe Biden leave the White House.
And there he
Speaker 0: goes. Bye bye.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Snoop Dogg singing don’t stop believing for a Trump crypto inauguration party was not on my bingo card 🤣 https://t.co/onSH8w5hKO
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Epic Tucker Carlson Speech- Dad’s Home And He’s Pissed! https://t.co/XVGYP2oPoO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Thank you for the warm welcome. Speaking at a political rally is a first for me, and I'm honored to follow Bobby Kennedy. As we approach the election, I believe Donald Trump will win, which is a remarkable outcome given the relentless attacks against him over the years. This victory symbolizes a triumph of the human spirit and a rejection of the narrative that only misfits support Trump. The real majority is made up of hardworking Americans who love their country. The Democratic Party has lost its moral authority, and we can no longer tolerate their actions. It's time to restore justice and hold accountable those who have undermined our values. The atmosphere is shifting, and I believe we are on the brink of a significant change. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. Wow. This is a Thank you. Wow. This is a trip.
Thank you.
Speaker 1: I I can't believe I'm here. Oh, yeah. I have never I have never in my life spoken at a political rally. I've covered a million of them for over 30 years, and I've never spoken at one, never thought I would. And I'm so thrilled.
I'm honored to be here. I really am. And I am. It's totally without shame and entirely with gratitude I'm standing here, and I can't believe I just spoke after Bobby Kennedy. So cool.
So here we are at an enormous Donald Trump rally less than 2 weeks before the presidential election. I'm following Bobby Kennedy junior, and somewhere in a half empty union hall in a cold state is Dick Cheney's creepy little daughter campaigning with Kamala Harris. And I have to say that is a thrilling trade as far as I'm concerned. I never thought I would live to see the day when Bobby Kennedy would be one of the most beloved figures in a, you know, room full of Republicans, and mister Burns from the Simpsons and his criminal daughter would be Democrats. It it's just absolutely wonderful.
So here's my perspective. I I I think Donald Trump's gonna win, which is amazing. And, that's why I'm here. I'm not here because he's gonna win. I'm here because I'm so thrilled by what I've watched over the past 9 years.
This is the end of a redemption arc. I've I've really never seen anybody treated like Donald Trump was treated ever. Anybody ever. Attack him. I watched this all up close.
Defame him. Indite him. Arrest him. Let him get shot in the face, and he's gonna win anyway. Oh, it is a triumph.
It's it's a triumph. The phrase triumph of the human spirit has been turned into a cliche by the people who write movie posters, but it doesn't make it any less real. Donald Trump's victory will be a triumph of the human spirit. It will be a triumph of Americans over the machine that seeks to oppress them. It'll be a middle finger wagging in the face of the worst people in the English speaking world who are leaders.
It will be a moral victory, the size of which I never thought I would live to see. And it's essential. It is so important that that happens for a couple of reasons, and here's what they are. The first is to to dissolve for all time for the world to see the primary lie about Donald Trump, which is that only freaks and misfits like him. That's a lie, and they've been telling that lie since the second he came down that escalator 9 years ago.
If you like that, there's something wrong with you. You're the only person you know who likes that. You're a freak. Be ashamed. Do not talk about Donald Trump in public.
Don't wear wear his dangerous little red hat. And if you're in the media, how dare you speak to him? And that was a lie from day 1. It was a big lie. It was January 6th is an insurrection.
What? It's the kind of lie that they tell relentlessly. They punish anyone who contradicts the lie because it is so preposterous, it can only be upheld through force. And in the last 3 months, we have seen that lie dissolve like the wicked witch of the west under a bucket of water. Look around.
Is this a room full of freaks and misfits? No, it's not. This is a room full of people who love their country enough to obey its laws, who sincerely believe in its founding precepts, who pay their taxes, who go to work. The ever shrinking percentage of Americans who work a 40 hour week, who expect nothing from the system, and who have given their lives for the system, who are born in this country and plan to die here. And they're the most mistreated group in this nation, and they're also the biggest group in this nation.
They're not some weird subculture of MAGA. They're America itself. And the only people who are denying that are the freaks and the misfits who it turns out are themselves a tiny bizarre minority, a cult, who have controlled the rest of us through fear and aggression, and that has ended. And it has ended thanks to the heroic stand that a couple of individuals have taken. 1st among them, Elon Musk.
Elon Musk, who single handedly saved the first amendment to the constitution, which let me remind you, it's not just a feature of America. It's the basis of America. It's the first amendment for a reason. It's what separates the free from the enslaved. Slaves are not allowed to say what they think.
Free men have god given right to do so and will. And this is the only country on Earth in which that is guaranteed. And without Elon Musk, it wouldn't be because he stands alone as the owner of a media platform that is still open. There's only one and it's x. It's foreign born Elon Musk.
And then for him to come out and by the way, just for the record, I've taken not a dollar from Elon Musk. Okay? It's not a paid advertisement. It's just an observation, and this is heartfelt gratitude. And when you see the richest man on planet Earth stand up there in a t shirt, start jumping around on stage.
He's also one of the biggest federal contractors. People say, oh, he's got fu money. No, it's just the opposite. There is no such thing as fu money. The more money you have, the more vested you are.
There's only a few poverty, actually, is the truth. And Elon Musk has more to lose in any living American by taking the position that he did and he did it anyway. And so what's the message? If the person who's created the most, not just piles of cash, he's not Larry Fink. He's not worshiping money like our finance class.
He's building things. And if that guy is for Donald Trump and not only not ashamed if he's jumping around on a t shirt, I can see his belly button. He's so excited. Then maybe I'm not alone. Maybe I'm not the freak.
Maybe it's the maybe what you're really watching is the tyranny of MSNBC, a channel with virtually no viewers. A channel on which almost every single person has a personal life so grotesquely weird. If you knew the details, you'd call for their arrest. That's just true. And those people, the unhappiest people in this nation are defining the terms of the conversation?
I don't think so. How'd they get away with that? The same way they got away with calling January 6th an insurrection for 3 years, by repeating it and by attacking anyone who disagreed. But it's an illusion. It's the wizard of us.
And once you pull back the curtain, the only thing back there is Joe Scarborough. You're like, wait a second. Why am I taking orders from this guy? He's a freak. I'm a normal person.
And that realization has settled on this country, on the whole country, and you feel it. People are not afraid anymore at all. I've got a bunch of kids. I texted it. I'm gonna go speak in a Trump rally.
My kids, you go. I said, do you know any do you have a lot of friends who are voting for Carmela or whatever her name is? No. Of course not. That's embarrassing.
It has flipped. The story the country tells itself about reality has flipped. None of the normal people are supporting the democratic machine. Tim Walz is supporting the democratic machine, a man you would never allow to babysit your own children. That's the archetype.
It's the party of weirdos, of envy, of hate, of resentment, of bitterness, of weakness, of a total lack of creativity. It's a party of conformity. It's a party of the machine where it doesn't matter who the candidate is because individuals are immaterial. All that matters is the collective. That's the Soviet model.
And opposing them is the rest of the country slowly waking up to the fact that these people have no moral authority whatsoever. They have no legitimacy in a democracy where the government must rule by the consent of the government. They have no consent. And the way that they've treated this country over the past 4 years is the most shocking thing I've ever seen in 55 years. To allow millions of people, mostly young men with no skills and no English into our country illegally and then fly them around at our expense and give them phones and put them on welfare programs that no American citizen can get, it is the most insulting.
Yeah, boo. But it's worse than boo. That's the biggest crime in the history of the United States of America. And it takes incredible it takes incredible stones. It incredible gall for the people who did that to stand up there on a stage and give you a lecture about how you're immoral.
It's too much. And so that's the second important thing about the selection. Okay? The first is every person in this room needs to understand you are not in a despised minority. You are in an incredibly gentle and tolerant majority who put up with this crap for way too long as they insulted not only you, but the memory of your ancestors who died for this country.
They tore down statues to their memory. People have never built anything in their lives. They went out of their way to humiliate you and spit on you and the graves of your ancestors. And that's not an exaggeration. They did that.
And then this country is so nice. It's so polite. It's so thoughtful and empathetic and sweet. It's the kind of country that loves dogs and gives directions to strangers that we put up with it for 4 years, but we can't anymore. We just can't.
And we can't for two reasons. The first reason that we can't put up with it for 1 more minute is because it's just not justice. It's not. It's not justice. It's unfair.
You cannot reward the most parasitic, useless, violent, nasty, aggressive people in your country. You can't make them the richest. You just can't. It's just wrong. In a fair, decent country, the people who work the hardest, who have the highest level of talent, who are the most creative for the most decent to their neighbors, who give the biggest tips to waitresses, those people should be successful.
Those people should be revered. It shouldn't be Larry Fink. Are you joking? Kamala Harris shouldn't have a job. She has no skills.
How did we wind up with a system where Kamala Harris, you couldn't change the tire on your truck much less drive it? How did she wind up at the top of the pyramid? And then once she's there, she lectures you like you did something. It's too much. You can't allow that.
It's an offense against the truth, against reality, and against justice itself. And the second reason you can't allow it is very familiar to anyone who has children, which is if you allow it, you will encourage more of it. If you allow people to get away with things that are completely over the top and outrageous, If you allow your 2 year old to smear the contents of his diapers on the wall of your living room and you do nothing about it, if you allow your 14 year old to light a joint at the breakfast table, If you allow your hormone addled 15 year old daughter to, like, slam the door of her bedroom and give you the finger, you're gonna get more of it. And those kids are gonna wind up in rehab. It's not good for you, and it's not good for them.
No. There has to be a point at which dad comes home. Yeah. That's right. Dad comes home.
And he's pissed. Dad is pissed. He's not vengeful. He loves his children. Disobedient as they may be, he loves them.
Because there's children, they live in his house. But he's very disappointed in their behavior, and he's gonna have to let them know. He's gonna have to get to your room right now and think about what you did. And when dad gets home, you know what he says? You've been a bad girl.
You've been a bad little girl and you're getting a vigorous spanking right now. And no, it's not gonna hurt me more than it hurts you. No, it's not. I'm not gonna lie. This is gonna hurt you a lot more than it hurts me.
And you earned this. You're getting a vigorous spanking because you've been a bad girl. And it has to be this way. It has to be this way because it's true. And you're only gonna get better when you take responsibility for what you did.
That's not set in the spirit of hate. It's not set in the spirit of vengeance or bigotry. Far from it. It's set in the spirit of justice, which is the purest and best thing there is. And without it, things fall apart.
The Democratic Party machine and notice I'm not beating up on Kamala Harris who's just a hapless victim who happened to be there in the right color, so they grabbed her. Tim Walz, they needed some, you know, whatever whatever Tim Walz is. They needed a weak man because it is the party of weak men and unhappy women. One of which leads to the other, by the way, where you find weak men, you will inevitably find unhappy women. Sorry.
And they make them on purpose. They weaken the men to drive the women insane to have the most consistent voting block ever in the history of politics. Unhappy women made unhappy by weak men. But it could be anybody. It could be anybody.
Kamala Harris is just a stand in. She's a cardboard cutout. Is I mean, I'm you know, she is a soul God created her. I'm not attacking her true humanity, but there's nothing there. It doesn't matter.
If it wasn't Kamala Harris, it would be, I don't know, Pete Buttigieg or what who are these people? It doesn't matter. They're the cutouts. They work for the machine. They're totally dispensable.
They're replaceable. And they need to have limits set for them. And so on election day, and I've sincerely believe Donald Trump's gonna win. And if I thought he was gonna lose, I'd be here anyway, by the way. I would.
In fact, I would have been here earlier if I thought he was gonna lose, just to make the point. I mean it. I don't like people who jump on the winning train. Okay? I think Donald Trump's gonna win.
And not only do I think Donald Trump's gonna win, I think that the vibe shift has been so profound. I mean, the numbers suggest he's gonna win. He's ahead in all 7 battleground states. But much more important
Speaker 0: and the
Speaker 1: early voting seems to be favoring him. But more important even than the conventional political markers is what you smell around you, and it's the return of freedom. It's the return of the country you grew up in where you could say things like I like that guy. Maybe like the other person. That's fine.
That was not allowed for 9 years, and it's allowed now. And I think and it's because of what they did, by the way. They deserve this. But I think the vibe is so strong right now. I don't think you can get away with pretending something else happened.
I don't think we can have another 2020 at this point. I just don't. I don't. Where they hid relevant facts from you, they prevented you from knowing about their candidate and then claim victory. Or 37,000,000,000 votes or whatever the claim he got.
That's rigging the election. Period. If you end if the government prevents people from knowing critical information about a candidate, they have rigged the election and they did that, period. Oh, you're not allowed to say that. I'm not allowed to say it because it's a 100% true.
And every person who hears it knows it's true including the people who did it. I don't think they can do that again. I don't. And I don't think no matter what they pull 2 weeks now, 13 days from now. I don't think they can get away with standing up and being like on MSNBC.
No. Actually, Kamala Harris is a historically popular, it turns out. Woman who's never had a job who can't even pronounce her own first name consistently. That's how false she is. Some woman who grew up in Montreal, Canada is lecturing me about America.
Okay. I don't think they can do that because I don't think people are gonna sit back and take it. I don't. It's enough. It's enough.
That's the point at which you say no. I'm sorry. I put up with this crap for a long time. I indulge your little fantasy. It's like when your teenage girl becomes a vegetarian, you're like, okay.
That's, you know, well, okay. It's fine. No. I totally understand. You're like, it's a phase.
But if that phase goes on for 9 years and includes destroying your major cities and allowing your country to be invaded by millions of foreigners who have identities you don't know, and its purpose in this country is unclear by the way. Why shouldn't we feel threatened by that? If they go out of their way to crush families, to make it impossible for your kids to buy a house and getting involved in the sex lives of your children, which they are, if they do all of that, they need to lose. And at the end of all of it, when they tell you they have won, no. You can look them straight in the face and say, I'm sorry.
Dad's home, and he's pissed. Thank you.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
OMG he’s outside of De Niro’s house 😂 https://t.co/cc8lWaaVgt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bobby, it's been over 20 years since you made a good movie. I want a cameo in "Meet the Fockers Sick." Together, we can make movies great again. I just want to have a nice conversation with you. Since you're not home, I'm leaving you a party gift: my new favorite fight, fight, fight, along with a cameo from me. There's no better Christmas gift than a merry Christmas from Donald Trump. Hello, sir! What’s that? Film him? I’m not supposed to? That’s okay; you can call the police if you want. I’m just leaving a little gift right here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bobby, your favorite president slash Time Magazine person of the year. I want to talk to you. You haven't made a good movie in over 20 years. I want a small cameo in Meet the Fockers Sick. Together, we can make movies great again.
Believe me, Bobby. Believe me. Okay. I just wanna talk to you. Just a little nice little conversation.
Right? That's right. Okay. So I guess Bobby wasn't home, but I'm gonna leave him with a little party gift, my new favorite fight, fight, fight. It's a great Christmas gift along with a cameo from yours truly.
No better gift for Christmas than a merry Christmas from Donald Trump. Hello, sir. What's that? Film him. Film him.
I'm not supposed to what? Okay. That's okay. That's okay. You can call the police if you want.
Okay? That's right. We're gonna leave a little gift right here.