reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @KashPatel_News

KashPatel_News
Posted - February 1, 2025 at 12:19 AM
Saved - February 1, 2025 at 1:30 AM

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

BOMBSHELL: As many as 40% of the noncitizens present in Maine may have voted in the 2024 elections OR had voted cast in their names. This figure is based on data from Maine’s CVR (Central Voter Registration) & MaineCare. We need an IMMEDIATE audit of Maine’s voter rolls. https://t.co/RJK1wdh9aj

KashPatel_News
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 11:56 PM
Saved - January 30, 2025 at 6:51 AM

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

🚨 BREAKING: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has REVOKED General Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance. Hegseth is now planning on DEMOTING the General. Hegseth also ordered the removal of all Pentagon portraits of Milley. The man is a traitor to our Country. https://t.co/SuM2IrFGAd

KashPatel_News
Posted - January 12, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Saved - January 13, 2025 at 11:03 PM

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

FEC fined the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC over the Trump-Russia dossier research. "Not only did the Hillary Clinton campaign lie, they broke federal election law," said Kash Patel on Thursday's "Wake Up America." Hillary we’ve not forgotten. https://t.co/XVNES0SHdG

Video Transcript AI Summary
CNN reported that the FEC has fined Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC over the Trump-Russia dossier research. This follows months of anticipation. You mentioned on Truth Social that the Democrats lied and now face consequences. This is just the beginning. The Durham investigation is intensifying, with increasing evidence being revealed. The timing of the FEC's announcement suggests a connection to Durham's findings. It's clear that the Clinton campaign not only lied but also violated federal election law, which led to the probable cause finding and the decision to pay the fine. They want to suppress the story.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is the headline on CNN's masthead yesterday. FEC fines, Hillary Clinton campaign, and DNC over Trump Russia dossier research. We've been waiting for that for months months, and then you put this out on truth social. You said that Hillary and the Dems lied. Now they have to pay up. This is just the beginning, folks. What did you mean by that? Speaker 1: I love great to be with you, and I love that we're using Truth Social, Rob. Of course. Basically, I think this is the time when the Durham investigation has been heating up. His pleadings have been going in increasing numbers, outlining the amount of discovery and evidence he's about to turn over. And the FEC, usually, you you you lead with these civil, settlements, when you know as the defendant other trouble might be afoot. So I think there's no such thing as a coincidence in government for the FEC to time this out. To come out now is a precursor to what Durham's doing. And look, like you said, we all now know, not only the Hillary Clinton campaign and them lie, they broke federal election law. Right. That's why they agreed there was a finding of probable cause, and that's why they're paying the fine because they want the story to go away.
KashPatel_News
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Saved - January 13, 2025 at 10:37 PM

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

These are just SOME is the crimes Hillary committed during the Obama administration. https://t.co/NdllkAEVSL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nothing I sent or received was marked classified. I did not email classified material. However, there were classified emails sent. I never sent or received classified information at the time. I used my personal email for convenience, not realizing it would be an issue. I chose to turn over 55,000 pages of work-related emails, but 1,000 work-related emails were not returned. Claims about deleting emails after a subpoena are false. While my lawyers did not read every email individually, we went through a thorough process to identify work-related emails. Although there are potential violations regarding classified information handling, no reasonable prosecutor would bring a case. Regarding Donald Trump, there is enough evidence that any other person would likely have been indicted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nothing, and I will underscore nothing that I was sent, or that I sent was marked classified. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material. Was that true? Speaker 2: There was classified material emailed. Speaker 0: I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true? Speaker 2: That's not true. 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. When I got to work Speaker 0: as secretary of state, I opted for convenience to use my personal as secretary of state, I opted for convenience to use my personal email account because I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of 2. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said she used just one device. Was that true? Speaker 2: She used multiple devices during the 4 years, of her term as secretary of state. Speaker 0: I didn't have to turn over anything. I chose to turn over 55,000 pages of my email, but we turned over everything that was work related. Every single thing. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were returned to the state department. Was that true? Speaker 2: No. We found work related emails, 1,000 that were not returned. Speaker 0: What? Like with a cloth or something? I'll doubt. Speaker 3: You get a subpoena, and after getting the subpoena, you delete 33 1,000 emails, and then you acid wash them. Speaker 0: Everything he just said is absolutely false. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work related emails from her personal account. Was that Speaker 2: true? The email software was removed. That didn't remove the email content. The effect was that millions of email fragments ended up in the server's unused or Slack space. This helped us recover work related emails that were not among the 30,000 that were produced to state. Speaker 0: We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work related emails and deliver them to the state department. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the email content individually? Speaker 2: No. Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such Speaker 0: a case. Did Donald Trump obstruct justice as you read the incidences as Mueller lays them out? Well, I think there's enough there that any other person who had, engaged in those acts, would certainly, have been indicted.
KashPatel_News
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 3:41 AM
Saved - January 13, 2025 at 7:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe they think we've forgotten what happened to Rudi Giuliani, an American hero. They bankrupted him simply for calling out the 2020 election as a scam. He was there for NYC during 9/11, helping to rebuild the city and making it safer than ever. Despite what the mainstream media says, New Yorkers will always love him. Those responsible for ruining his life are despicable, and we remember who they are.

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

Do they think we forgot what they did to an American Hero in Rudi Giuliani? They bankrupted and destroyed an American Hero’s life because he called the 2020 election for what it was, a scam against the American people. He was there during 9/11 for NYC and helped rebuild the soul of the City. He eliminated crime and the city was the safest it ever was. Regardless of the lies presented by MSM, New Yorkers still and always will love him! Those who ruined his life are pure scum and we haven’t forgotten who these people are.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a walking tour showcasing Rudolph Giuliani, former mayor of New York City, highlighting his popularity. People are seen expressing their admiration, with some calling him the best mayor ever. There are moments of applause as they pass by, emphasizing the positive reception he receives from the public. The atmosphere is lively, with conversations about the support he has in the city. The tour captures the essence of Giuliani's legacy and the affection many still hold for him, despite the controversies surrounding him. The participants reflect on the warmth and appreciation shown by those they encounter.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. This is a walking tour of Rudolph Giuliani, former mayor of New York City. So the public can see if Maria decides to post it how well loved loved he is instead of all the Twitter channels. Yeah. Where are you? Look at that. Oh, yeah. I don't wanna get hit. Speaker 1: You have a good day, Tiffany. Speaker 0: More people. Nice. In the same way. Speaker 1: To see Speaker 0: you. That was a nice Speaker 1: picture. Oh, Speaker 0: wait. We got another one, mister Speaker 1: this. You know, this is the best mayor ever. Speaker 0: That's mayor ever. Speaker 1: Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian. Grace in Italian Speaker 0: picture. About a block away, they were even clapping for them when we went by. I'm so sorry I didn't get that on video. Actually, maybe I should shut up. You take this and then have them edit it into something you can use. Awesome. Thank Speaker 1: you. Speaker 0: The clouds are all surrounding him. We should The cows are all surrounding him. Alright. This is great. We're good. Thank you. Thank you. New York ever had. We don't need advertising. Speaker 1: Well, you know? We're not running. We'll see if we get a cab here. That's
KashPatel_News
Posted - January 7, 2025 at 5:04 AM
Saved - January 8, 2025 at 11:40 AM

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

And here’s why the Trump campaign was denied to forensically examine Dominion machines. “2 TECH employees completely independent of each other discovered votes recorded by Dominion STORED ON USB DRIVES would change between the polls closed at night and reopened in the morning.” https://t.co/jJ58FDcMte

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two Clark County Technical employees reported that the vote counts recorded by machines and stored on USB drives changed overnight after polls closed. Votes seemed to appear and disappear during this time. Attempts to verify the integrity of the voting machines were met with limitations; only a superficial visual inspection of the USB drives was permitted, while a forensic examination was denied.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Two Clark County Technical employees came forward completely independent of each other and explained that they discovered that the number of votes recorded by voting machines and stored on USB drives would change between the time the polls were closed at night and when they were reopened the next morning. In other words, votes were literally appearing and disappearing in the dead of night. When we attempted to verify the integrity of these voting machines, we were allowed only a useless visual inspection of the outside of a USB drive. We were denied a forensic examination. Finally, our
KashPatel_News
Posted - December 31, 2024 at 2:46 AM
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 3:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the Senate races in swing states were rigged based on the discrepancies between Trump’s vote counts and the Senate results. In states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, there were significantly fewer votes for Republican Senate candidates despite Trump winning by large margins. I find it hard to believe that over 600,000 voters would support Trump but then choose a liberal senator. Additionally, there were attempts to manipulate the vote count in Pennsylvania, including a commissioner suggesting illegal actions to count non-citizen votes, and Democrat commissioners disregarding court rulings.

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

This is how I know the senate races were rigged in the swing states: PA: Trump +120,266 votes PA: Senate +15,059 votes PA: -105,207 less votes for R senate MI: Trump +80,103 votes MI: Senate -19,006 votes MI: -99,109 less votes for R senate WI: Trump +29,397 votes WI: Senate -28,781 votes WI:-58,178 less votes for R senate AZ: Trump +187,382 votes AZ: Senate -80,574 votes AZ: -267,956 LESS VOTES FOR R SENATE NV: Trump +46,008 votes NV: Senate -24,059 votes NV: -70,067 less votes for R senate If you believe 600,517 voters in five swing states decided to vote for Trump but then vote for a very liberal senator I have a bridge to sell you, because you will believe anything. Could it be anymore obvious?!

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

They attempted to steal PA with the county board commissioner being taped saying she would gladly break the law and count non-citizen votes. They cut the lead to 10-15K weeks after the election but couldn’t steal it. My guess is they didn’t anticipate Trump winning PA by so much. The others they planned accordingly to steal.

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

Democrat Commissioners violate the rule of law and ignore Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling https://www.foxnews.com/video/6364793592112

Democrat Commissioners violate the rule of law and ignore Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling | Fox News Video Democrat Commissioners Diane Marseglia and Bob Harvie vote to count illegal ballots, against Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling, in an attempt to aid former Senator Bob Casey. CREDIT: Bucks Co Board of Elections foxnews.com
View Full Interactive Feed