TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @KatKanada_TM
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Lauren Southern opens up about being pressured by federal agents to work for them. She warn that there are many such cases. She was not the only one. @Lauren_Southern @we_unify https://t.co/RlCFnDOPJY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts a long-standing pattern of interactions with federal agents, noting that jokes about agents reading their chats stopped being funny for a period. They describe being pressured to work for these agencies for months, a pressure that left no paper trail and was deliberately concealed. Each time agents visited their home, they were asked to shut off their phone and told not to tell anyone about what was happening.
The speaker explains that the only reason they can discuss the situation now is that they made a deliberate, fear-driven decision to do so. They recall sweating and nearly vomiting, and they went so far as to clip a DJI microphone to their bra before every visit, anxious that the device would beep or reveal what was being discussed. This precaution reflects the level of fear and the stakes involved in the interactions.
They claim to have later confronted Parliament about the surveillance and pressure campaigns they faced, actions taken after they recorded evidence of these activities. The speaker asserts a broader possibility: there exists a very real world in which they did none of that—where they would still be online today as an independent influencer while privately secretly acting on behalf of Canadian intelligence agencies—because they were made to believe they would go to jail. They emphasize that they are not the only person affected by this dynamic, suggesting a wider pattern or network behind these experiences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have made so many jokes over the years about federal agents reading my chats, and suddenly none of them were funny anymore for a while. And they pressured me to work for them for months, and they left no paper trail. Trail. They were very deliberate about that. Every time they came to my door, they would have me shut off my phone and told me you cannot tell a soul about what is going on.
The only reason I can talk about this today is because I made a very deliberate decision that I was terrified to do. I was sweating, almost puking, and I clipped a DJI mic to my bra before every time they came to my house, terrified that it was going to beep or go off at some point when they were talking to me. And then I later confronted the parliament about these surveillance and pressure campaigns against me after recording evidence of them. There is a very real world in which I did none of that, in which you'd still see me online today as an independent influencer while privately secretly acting on behalf of Canadian intelligence agencies because they truly made me believe I was going to go to jail. And I guarantee you, I am not the only one.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Gilmore says she is "genuinely scared" because her post ended up on the front page of a website that was created to document those laughing at Kirk's murder. https://t.co/7XGOWudgbj
@KatKanada_TM - 🅾️ Kat Kanada
Didn’t you cheer that on when Trudeau did it to peaceful truckers, @kinsellawarren? 🤡 https://t.co/tIp4vmpzIy
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada 🍁
CBC is so mad about Rebel News being able to ask questions at the debate. Here's David Cochrane crying to the Director of the Debates Commission for seven straight minutes about it. Gargantuan temper tantrum. 😂 https://t.co/ZeThT4JRTu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The debate commission accredited Rebel Media despite not considering them professional journalists, due to fear of losing another court injunction. Rebel Media received five passes to ask questions, setting a new standard. The commission was unaware Rebel News had filed as a third-party advertising group, raising money for partisan political activities, which is not typical for journalistic organizations. The commission was advised they couldn't win a case against Rebel Media, even with this new information. Measures will be taken to ensure fairness for all media organizations in the future. The commission believes the public will judge them on the debates themselves, not the press availability afterward. The commission aims to present debates that reach a lot of people and communities that are often disenfranchised.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This this was the controversy before the debate. Yes. There was a controversy after the debate.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: What did you think of what we saw in the question and answer session?
Speaker 1: Well, you know, justice to tell you, we we tried to actually we we denied the accreditation to rebel media both in 02/2019 Mhmm. And 02/2021 because we didn't consider them to be actually to do professional journalism. Right. But they went to court, and we lost the two injunctions, and we had to let them in. So this time, we decided we could not risk another defeat in court.
With the precedents that were out there, we couldn't win. So we accredited the number of of rebel media, and they they went they they went to the microphones and asked questions. They put themselves, I guess, you know, strategically to do that, and that's what happened.
Speaker 0: But you gave so maybe inside baseball so so people at home understand. Each media organization that was accredited was told they were gonna get one pass to ask a question. Yeah. Rebel was given five because, through whatever reasoning, they've convinced you that they have a bunch of divisions that qualify for admission, and they were given five passes. And then after the fact, other media organizations were told they could have up to five questions.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Correct?
Speaker 0: Yeah. How is it you've let rebels set the standard there on the number of questions? Like, you can let them all in. I understand you have the court precedent working against you there, but one question per organization. Like, CBC, we could argue we have a bunch of divisions provincially, and the Sun Media could argue the same thing.
But we were all initially told one, and then you gave Rebel five, and somehow they became the standard for everybody else.
Speaker 1: Well, it's because we were we we were afraid that we would lose that battle in court. And the last time we lost that battle, we had to accredit 11 rebel reporters. So we thought with five, it's a, you know, it's it's a it's a number we can live with.
Speaker 0: Okay. So I I I know the past presidents, but, like, this is a filing with Elections Canada from this election where Rebel News has filed as a third party Yeah. Advertising group. They are raising money in their own documents for partisan political activities. That's not what a journalistic organization does.
Right? So I appreciate that you've lost in the past, but if they are raising money to run ads to influence the outcome of an election, surely a judge would look at that and say, this isn't a journalistic organization.
Speaker 1: Perhaps. We didn't get there.
Speaker 0: But why not? Like, I understand you lost before. This is a a material change in their conduct. They have this truck going around Yeah. With a video wall, promoting conspiracy theories and allegations, mostly against Mark Carney.
Let's face it. Like, we're showing it there on you can see this on the screen. You know, there that is one of the few things we can show on TV that appears on the side of that. I I mean, this this looks like evidence in a court battle. I mean, you are entrusted with this authority.
Why not
Speaker 1: fight what you believe We showed them in the last lawsuit doing an ad political advocacy, and they did not convince the judge. So for us, this agreement this this argument was not going to be more effective this time.
Speaker 0: You argued that they were raising money as a third party advertising last year.
Speaker 1: Advocacy against political candidates.
Speaker 0: But registering as a as a third party in an election campaign is an official step to become an actor in that election campaign that goes well beyond the world of journalism. Right?
Speaker 1: Well, I wasn't aware of that.
Speaker 0: Well, the I mean, journalists have found this. I mean, the commission has staff. Right? The commission like, I I just wonder how you could not be aware of this or why you weren't aware of this. You have a legal team.
Like, were you advised not to fight it, or did you just decide not to fight it?
Speaker 1: No. No. We were advised that we couldn't win that case. Right. I went to court.
Speaker 0: But you didn't have like, do you think would this have changed your thought process? I wonder.
Speaker 1: Perhaps we had to analyze it. I I just learned about this today.
Speaker 0: So we had issues last time with some of the questions that were asked after the 2021 debate, and you saw what happened last night. We have no idea what's gonna happen tonight. I I mean, are we gonna see a replay and a repeat of this? Because, you know, I know it is first come, first serve at the mic. The rest of us are on the air or, you know, working, filing stories and can't just line up in the microphones to get at at the front of the line, which is what has happened.
I mean, the minute the doors open here, a lot of these media organizations went in, set up, they are right there ready to go. What are we gonna see tonight? Will it will there be more control on this?
Speaker 1: And there will be measures taken to try to be more fair for all the media organizations. We have, like, 60 different organizations, not just political journalists who actually cover utility campaigns. So we're going to make adjustments to hopefully make it well, you'll you'll learn them soon enough.
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, I think people what do you mean learn them soon enough? I mean, the moment after the film,
Speaker 1: like No. We're working on this. It'll be ready for the for the scrappers.
Speaker 0: Will they be able to do what they did? Like, know, Rebel News got as many questions as I think CBC Radio Canada, Press Canadian, and CTV or Global combined last night. There were almost 50% of the questions, and some of them ventured into territory that really are not issues in this election campaign, were not issues in that debate. And I'm not saying reporters should be restricted in terms of what they ask, but, you know, if the debate commission is gonna organize these things, it it it it didn't seem to have control on that last night, sir.
Speaker 1: Well, we were learning from the what happened last night, and you'll see, hopefully, a fair representation tonight.
Speaker 0: But didn't the same thing happen in 2021? Like, I remember vividly at the museum in Gatineau Yeah. That it the same sort of thing happened with people stacking the microphones, and the questions is going in a totally different direction.
Speaker 1: Well, there's only so much we can do to control free speech, you know.
Speaker 0: I understand that. And can I understand that? But, you know, lifeguards gotta look after the pool. Right? And and, you know, the debate commission was set up for this, and and people are now calling for it to be completely scrapped because of what we saw last night.
I I just wonder if you think there's a loss of public trust in in the function of this organization.
Speaker 1: I think the public will judge us on the debates themselves.
Speaker 0: Which I will say was very good last night. It was very well done. The actual two hour event was.
Speaker 1: I think we'll be judged on that. That's the main criteria for us, to present debates that actually reach a lot of people. Have an we have unprecedented reach, broadcast partners. Mhmm. We're reaching people in communities that are often disenfranchised.
I think that's a very important exercise. This is peripheral to the main event. And, you know, like I say, we'll work on it and try to make it
Speaker 0: Well, it it is it peripheral or is it part of the main event? I mean, you do the accreditation. You let the people in. You set the ground rules. I mean, it is all part and parcel of what's happened here.
Speaker 1: It is. But for most people, the press the press availability availability availabilities, excuse me, after is not the most important thing.
Speaker 0: Fair.
Speaker 1: So we bank on that.
Speaker 0: Okay. Michelle Cormier, I I appreciate you I I do appreciate you showing up and taking the questions. I I very much do, sir. And thank you for that.
Speaker 1: The least I can do with this journalist.
Speaker 0: I I know you appreciate the importance of doing that. Totally. Alright. Alright. Thank you, sir.
So Michelle
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada 🍁
Some journo is having a full-blown meltdown about Rebel News being at the debates. He is so unhinged that Ezra Levant has to remind him to control his emotions. Wow. https://t.co/14DIwNW6jS
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual questions a reporter about third-party advertising spending in the election, specifically referencing Rebel News and Ford Canada, both allegedly owned by Ezra Levant. The reporter denies any spending and accuses the individual of lying and not doing their homework.
The individual insists that Rebel News Network Limited is registered with Elections Canada under Ezra Levant's name and accuses the reporter of using third-party advertising trucks. The reporter claims the truck is for Canada, a separate entity.
Accusations of lying and emotional outbursts are exchanged, with the reporter telling the individual to control their emotions and calling them "tantrum boy." The individual defends their facts and questions the reporter's journalistic integrity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. Also, if it was up to someone conservative, you would tell for him to do that. Don't
Speaker 1: know. Voice doesn't work. They're arguing with the Ryan Turnbull story, I believe.
Speaker 2: Honestly, I I have respect for this sort
Speaker 1: of No. I I know. I think that's what they're arguing about is the Ryan Turnbull story.
Speaker 2: Your little chattering glass, you third party advertisers that you work for?
Speaker 0: Rebel News? Yeah.
Speaker 2: Rebel News, owned by Ezra Levant, is a different company?
Speaker 1: Is he learning that Camback's? He is not.
Speaker 2: Well, I wanna make sure the guy's filming it with the phone here and get the audio. So Can you hear me okay? I have a lavalier mic. Unseating properly? Do you wanna put a lavalier mic on and then I can hear?
Speaker 0: You want you have
Speaker 2: one set up? You got the levels ready for me? Yeah. Absolutely. Because you're clearly not doing any actual journalism.
Why when will you guys started gaming the rules and threatening to sue because you didn't get your way? I assumed the rules were out the window. No. It's right here in front
Speaker 3: of the white. You follow the rules.
Speaker 2: Was that like when it was in black and white saying you should only have one reporter credited that everyone might have a chance to ask questions. But instead, you wanted to take, what was it, two minute long questions so that Polyam only got asked three questions. He usually allows four because things move a little bit quicker at his press conference. You guys are so verbose, I'll say. Most of us didn't get a question.
And what I really don't enjoy is that everyone else here was being respectful, following the rules, just being considerate to everyone else. And what you guys decided to do was to take advantage, threaten to sue so that you could try to get more than everyone else. And now Why are lying? Nobody likes CBC and the
Speaker 3: radio cabinet had four questions, and we had four questions. Why are you lying? We the same number as the CBC. So
Speaker 2: that you can that's why they got the four questions because the commission
Speaker 3: You're making that up. You're lying again.
Speaker 2: When did the CBC get fourth question? Yesterday. Yes. After they had already
Speaker 1: And they
Speaker 3: had it the same same in 2021, '20 sue. You're lying again.
Speaker 2: I'm not.
Speaker 3: Is your correspondent said
Speaker 2: Don't you have a third party advertising truck to go take care of You're lying to How much did you how much have you spent on third party advertising this election? Between Rebel News and Ford Canada, companies
Speaker 3: you own both of, how
Speaker 2: much money have you spent to influence this election? I'm assuming in favor of the conservatives. How much have you spent? See, like, you're a journalist. You must
Speaker 3: be on it. Zero.
Speaker 2: So Rebel News Limited, you sent out
Speaker 3: You're you're a liar. This is you haven't done your homework. You're making
Speaker 2: things You can go to elections Canada right now. Every third party is registered. Search rebel news for Canada, and you will see Clear As Day as the Levant as the owner of both of those companies. Can we get some He has third party advertising trucks driving around this venue right now.
Speaker 3: That's not a Rebel News ad on there. You're lying. Why are you lying? It's by
Speaker 2: you. Oh, so sorry. Sorry. The truck is for Canada, which is owned by
Speaker 3: you, which
Speaker 2: is separate
Speaker 3: from rebel news,
Speaker 2: which is also owned by you.
Speaker 3: You're preaching. Control your you gotta control your emotions.
Speaker 2: One by one.
Speaker 3: Control your emotions.
Speaker 2: So, Ev, I'm honestly not saying.
Speaker 3: You're out of control. You're
Speaker 2: out quietly doesn't make your things any less normal.
Speaker 3: You're completely out of control emotionally.
Speaker 2: Fact. Fact.
Speaker 3: And your facts are completely wrong. You're an embarrassment. What's your name? What's your name? You're you're suddenly shy.
Speaker 2: No. I'm googling.
Speaker 3: You're googling your name? What the hell is we are? What's up, Sky?
Speaker 2: Stuart Benson, Hill Times.
Speaker 3: Stuart Benson, well, you're a disgrace to the Hill Times, and your facts are wrong.
Speaker 2: You're a disgrace journalism, buddy. Actually, here's the thing. I can do the job for of one of one of me can do the same job you clearly need five reporters to do. So am I in the space, or is it all of the people you needed to do the job I do by myself?
Speaker 3: You just gotta control your emotions. You're you're just out of control.
Speaker 2: Rebel News Network Limited, March twenty seventh, registered with elections Canada. Name of applicant, Ezra Levant. Mailing address address, Edmonton, Alberta. T 5 J 0 4. I wonder where that would have been.
504. I wonder what that postal code.
Speaker 3: Well, you've certainly got a tiger by the time.
Speaker 2: Let's go check out Canada. Wonder who they are. Am I not am I talking too loud now or
Speaker 3: should No. You're just I don't know about You don't understand. You don't even understand what you're looking at.
Speaker 0: What work are you doing? We're With nothing in front of you. Oh.
Speaker 2: Oh. Yes. Yes. The really exceptional work you're doing.
Speaker 3: Is she telling you you're out of control emotionally? Tantrum boy. I'll call you tantrum boy.
@KatKanada_TM - 🅾️ Kat Kanada
People need to hear this every day. Carney will destroy Canada with Net Zero policies. Anything he says now about Canadian energy is just lies to get elected. He nearly bankrupted the UK with his bankster policies. He will destroy Canada as well. https://t.co/CgrWYdUc68
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Carney is a prime advocate of net zero and has planned the destruction of the fossil fuel industry. He also supports a post-national view of Canada, defining it as an oppressive, patriarchal, white supremacist, colonial settler state. This does not bode well for Canada's economy, which Carney believes can be replaced by hydrogen, solar, and wind power. This replacement is argued to doom Canadians to starve and freeze. While Canada congratulates itself on its righteousness, its diet will become thinner as the U.S. experiences explosive economic growth while Canada descends toward poverty and irrelevance. Unlike Justin Trudeau, who is influenced by the World Economic Forum, Carney is a leader of that movement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of the currently wretched but still dangerously powerful liberals. One Mark Carney is one of the world's prime advocates of the insane inanities of net zero. He is a man who has planned in writing, not least in his best selling book values, the complete destruction of the fossil fuel industry. Bye bye, Alberta. If that's not bad enough, and it is.
He's also simultaneously an advocate of the same post national view of Canada defined by Trudeau junior and his moralistic minions. What are we? According to such good thinkers, nothing. But if anything, the oppressive patriarchal white supremacist identity less colonial settler state defined by the progressive ideologues in the think tanks and elite dining rooms in Eastern Canada and the protest encampments on the campuses of Canadian universities. None of this fills the MAGA crowd with admiration in case it needs to be said.
None of it bodes well either for the economy of Canada. Doomed to replacement according to Carney by the hydrogen, solar, and wind power that either does not exist, that would be hydrogen, or that would doom Canadians to starve and freeze in the dark if it ever came to replace the reliable grid and transportation we also desperately depend on when it's 40 bloody below. We may win arguing so expensively and incompetently with the Americans continue to congratulate ourselves on our comparative righteousness. That diet will become even thinner gruel, however, in a future characterized by their explosive economic growth and our rapid descent toward comparative poverty and irrelevance, green though that pathway may be argued, however falsely to be. Carney, to put it bluntly, is not a man like Justin Trudeau, a second raider under the mere influence of the World Economic Forum, that Malthusian fear mongering cabal of authoritarian elitists drunk on the fumes of their own self righteous delusions.
He is, by contrast, a veritable leader of that movement.
@KatKanada_TM - 🅾️ Kat Kanada
Any time Libs back Carney, show them this. Truss says he was "disastrous" for the UK. She attributes the country heading for bankruptcy to his tenure as Bank of England Governor. https://t.co/DrPwptFMJ4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England, oversaw excessive money printing that harmed the British economy. His endorsement of Rachel Reeves' economic policies has led to disastrous outcomes, pushing the country towards bankruptcy. It is advised not to support Carney or his net-zero policies, which have proven detrimental not only to the UK but also to other nations. His management of the Bank of England is viewed as flawed, and his approach to net-zero has had negative repercussions globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanted to get your thoughts on Mark Carney and your relationship with him, while you were prime minister of The United Kingdom, and any advice you have to Canadians who think he might make a good prime minister.
Speaker 1: Well, Mark Carney was governor of the Bank of England. And under his tenure, too much money was printed, which did damage to the British economy and put our economy off track. He, at the last election, endorsed Rachel Reeves' economic policy. She's now become chancellor. It's been a disaster for Britain.
The country is heading for bankruptcy. So I would strongly recommend not backing Mark Carney or his policies on net 0, which have been disastrous for Britain, would be disastrous for Canada.
Speaker 0: Do you trust his judgment overall outside of ideological considerations?
Speaker 1: Well, I believe that he made major mistakes in the management of the Bank of England. He has pushed net 0, which has been a disaster, not just for The UK, but for many countries across the world.
Speaker 0: Thanks for your time, prime minister. I appreciate it.
@KatKanada_TM - 🅾️ Kat Kanada
Canadian female college student realizes the newcomers are handsy towards women. Says it’s an increasing problem and says she doesn’t feel safe going out anymore If only someone warned Canada this would happen. ☠️😂 https://t.co/nKhGYGp4yR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many Canadian women in university feel uncomfortable discussing their experiences, but it's important to speak out. While there are certainly creepy men, the issue extends beyond race. In bars, I've noticed an increase in predatory behavior from certain groups, particularly newcomers, which makes many women feel unsafe. It's frustrating that women who have been groped often feel silenced, as if they can't express their discomfort without being accused of racism. I've personally confronted men and left bars due to feeling unsafe, and I'm sure many other women share these feelings. It's crucial to bring awareness to this issue, and I hope to create more content around it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thing I know a lot of Canadian women don't wanna say that are in university right now, but I'm gonna be the one to say it because I'm a tough ass bitch. And listen, I'm gonna give it to the feminist. I'm not gonna sit here and say there's not a lot of creepy ass men out there, and there are men that, like, actively do stuff against women. That is not okay. At the beginning of university, I used to go to bars and it was diverse, like, regular Canada, you know, just how like, all types of people and it was great.
Over time, I noticed there was a lot more newcomers, especially more Punjabi kind of guys, which was fine. Like, I honestly had no problem with it. But as my career went on in university, it increasingly became more of a problem with these men, specifically, were always groping and touching women and, like, coming in these circles and just dancing in a way that made a lot of people feel really uncomfortable. Like, it was not about race. Like, there were all races feeling uncomfortable by this.
Like, there was this was just a genuine human thing. But the other thing that I've noticed is we're just seeing a lot more of this, like, predatory behavior from this these newcomer groups of people, and I think it's just so terrible how they can hide behind something like racism and women who have been, like, actually groped in a bar are not allowed to come out and say this or say that we feel uncomfortable by this. And, like, now that people are talking and speaking out, I genuinely think that people need to hear this perspective because I know there's a lot of other women that feel this way. So I hope that I'm speaking for a lot of women right now when I say this because I'm shaking. Like, I don't like calling people out or men, but it needs to be fucking set.
K. This video is getting long, but I know people who personally know me know that I've literally looked at men and said, get the fuck off of me. Like, I have had to leave the bar so many times, and I don't even feel safe going to bars anymore because of this problem, and it genuinely pisses me off. And I know there's a lot of fucking other women out there, so I I hope this maybe reaches people. I'd probably love to make more content because it is a real thing.
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Halton Regional Police Service has arrested four Indian nationals on student visas for their involvement in several vehicle break-ins in Oakville, Ontario.
@KatKanada_TM - 🅾️ Kat Kanada
Halton Regional Police Service has arrested four individuals, all Indian nationals on student visas, in connection with multiple vehicle break-ins in Oakville, Ontario. MORE: [🔗 in 🧵]
@KatKanada_TM - 🅾️ Kat Kanada
Four Indian nationals on student visas charged for breaking into cars, theft
Halton Police arrested four individuals, all Indian nationals on student visas, in connection with multiple vehicle break-ins in Oakville.
thecountersignal.com
@KatKanada_TM - 🅾️ Kat Kanada
POILIEVRE: “I’m against any of these agendas. I’m never going to do what the UN tells me to do. I’m banning my members from being involved in the WEF. Man: “ESG, DEI?” POILIEVRE: “It’s all garbage!” https://t.co/i6aZHbZARG
Video Transcript AI Summary
You've raised concerns about building houses and managing healthcare with increased migration. Regarding Agenda 2030, it's essential to ask Bernie about his involvement with the WAF, as he has been accused of lying about it. There are questions about past leaders signing onto these agendas, but I firmly oppose them. I believe in free enterprise where businesses succeed based on their products, not lobbying. Workers should keep more of their wages, and government should minimize interference. While I appreciate your support, I understand the skepticism surrounding voting. Ultimately, the election will present two stark choices, and it's crucial to consider the implications of each.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you've done, you know, it will
Speaker 1: be basically on a growing recommendation for the Spanish well that's
Speaker 0: basically caused a lot of years of this kind of hardship. And I'm just kinda curious how how do you plan on building so many houses when we don't have the tradespeople? And we have we don't have the health care that can handle 1,000,000 more of migration. And, like, agenda like, agenda 2030, like, all these agendas Yeah. Kind of
Speaker 1: So I'll go through
Speaker 2: it 1 by 1. So the the agenda 2030, first thing is you gotta ask some actually Bernie about that because he's part of the WAF.
Speaker 1: And And and
Speaker 0: he Can Andrew Jeff one?
Speaker 2: I didn't interrupt you. So so Bernie went to the WAF, and then he lied about it. That was the worst part. You know, I knew that he was part of the WAF, but he should just gone back to it. And then he got caught lying.
So if you look up this article by True North, where they caught him lying, and he lied to the people about his involvement. What else is he lying?
Speaker 1: So that's the
Speaker 0: Did Harper sign us into that, though?
Speaker 2: He On
Speaker 1: his way out? He wasn't forced to go. He went
Speaker 2: by No.
Speaker 1: No. No.
Speaker 0: He signed us into agenda 2030 and Mulberry signed us into agenda 21.
Speaker 2: Where Bernier was was went to the WF on his own.
Speaker 0: Like, I'm gonna vote for you. I'm I'm a PTC supporter. I'm gonna vote for you.
Speaker 1: I get it.
Speaker 0: I wanna give you enough rope that you can do what you need to do. And if you don't, then throw away people. That's that's my
Speaker 2: my honest opinion. So I I'm against any of these agendas. I'm never gonna do what the UN tells me to do. I'm not banning my members for being involved in the world economics. We're going to have to put people on.
We're gonna get rid of the mandates, ban
Speaker 1: a big industry.
Speaker 2: They're trying to make interest groups like, corporate corporate executives and insiders filthy rich, and they don't care about any of the causes that they talk about. They don't care about those causes. They're a bunch
Speaker 0: of businesses and police.
Speaker 2: K? So I'm not gonna buy into that garbage. I'm going to get back to the good free enterprise economics where businesses get ahead by having the best product, not by having the best lobbyists. Workers keep more of their wages. Government gets out of people's hair, off their back, and out of their way.
Speaker 0: No one disagrees with any of those things. Like, as you can see.
Speaker 1: This is what and
Speaker 2: I'm the only
Speaker 1: one that
Speaker 0: can do that. You implement them. That's the last
Speaker 2: time you're here. I gotta win.
Speaker 0: I'm I'll vote for you. I'll give you I'll give you a try.
Speaker 2: I gotta win.
Speaker 0: But it's one of those things. I'm it's a pessimistic vote.
Speaker 2: The day after the day after the election, you're gonna have 1 or 2 people be prime minister. You're You're gonna have the guy who admires the basic Chinese Communist dictatorship where you're gonna have the
Speaker 0: Yeah. The I get that.
Speaker 1: It's it's 2 two options.
Speaker 0: Pretty good with that. Oh, I
Speaker 2: get that. That's pretty
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Yesterday Trudeau had the nerve to say the Liberals will always stand up for Canadians' Charter rights. Would be a shame if everyone would comment with the below picture under everything he posts today. 😂 https://t.co/vXlLGEVpqy
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Pierre Poilievre jokes that if Trudeau read 1984, he would think it’s an instruction manual. 😂😂😂👏🏽 https://t.co/n8GTBFEd3L
Video Transcript AI Summary
An impending law could potentially subject individuals to house arrest or peace bonds based on mere suspicion of future unacceptable behavior. The speaker suggests that someone, upon reading 1984, might interpret it as an instruction manual rather than a cautionary tale.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And save on the Internet. But if you would then act before another law which could put you under house arrest or a peace bond under suspicion of something unacceptable, you might say, in the future. You know, this guy, if he read, if he had read 1984, he would have thought it was an instruction man and not a warning.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Tamara and Chris for "Hold the line": 2 years of prosecution This thug migrant for "I'll put you 6 feet deep": zero days of prosecution. Trudeau's Canada. https://t.co/LK28rumaVD
@joe_warmington - Joe Warmington
Yes. The persecution of @ChrisBarber1975 @LichTamara — that is still going a year in and two and a half years from their arrest — is a show trial and they are political prisoners. No other mischief case has ever taken this long. The ride is the punishment. Cruel! https://t.co/UVDJNXnWpm
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
FOREIGN CONFLICTS EXPLODING ALL OVER CANADA 🚨 Turns out that after Trudeau declared Canada has NO national identity & that each group should protect its own cultures, those groups devolved into warring tribes. This is our strength apparently. ☠️ https://t.co/zgcR4Ht6sG
Video Transcript AI Summary
I disagree with the protest that disrespects a country's flag. It is absolutely wrong and unacceptable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't agree with this protest. In the sense are fairs earnings on a country's flag. It is absolutely wrong, absolutely wrong, not accept.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
If you criticize mass immigration, they will call you a bigot and a phobe, but when this masked mob is chanting for Canadian citizens to “go back home” coupled w/ calling them slurs, ZERO outrage. The West is on a path of suicidal empathy. https://t.co/nibpRpCmI5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker contrasts two groups at a march: one without masks, carrying Canadian and Israeli flags, and another with Palestinian flags, covering their faces. The first group seems positive despite Hamas flags, while the second group appears more secretive. The speaker, a Jewish person from Toronto, finds the first group relatable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna show you the contrast. There's a stylistic contrast. Look up here for example. The these are marchers who have finished the march, and they're going home. I don't see any masks.
Well, maybe 1 in a 100 wears a COVID mask. You see men, women, and children, babies even. I see Canadian flags. I see a lot of Israeli flags. I see no terrorist flags.
And I think the tone the mood, if I can read it just with my eyes, is, a little bit sober, given that you have Hamas flags in this Jewish neighborhood. But I would call it fairly positive. I I don't know if I can use the word friendly. Maybe I'm just I find them relatable because I'm a Jewish person from Toronto too. But then look over here.
Look at those carrying the Palestinian flags. I don't American flag is they're saying. And the chief characteristic of them is they're covering their face. And I don't think it's for COVID.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
PETERSON: When people read the history of nazi Germany, they always think they’d be Schindler. They never think they’d be the perpetrator. They think “I wouldn’t have done that.” Did you watch people during the pandemic??? ☠️ https://t.co/rSWvg93AhC
Video Transcript AI Summary
When people read about Nazi Germany, they often see themselves as heroes like Schindler or Anne Frank's savior. But I see it differently. During the pandemic, 30% of Canadians were eager to report on others, finding joy in feeling morally superior by wearing masks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People read the history of Nazi Germany. They always think they're Schindler. They always think that they're the person who would have saved Anne Frank in the Netherlands. I never read history as a perpetrator. I wouldn't have done that.
It's like, did you watch people during the pandemic? In Canada, 30% of my neighbors were thrilled that they had the opportunity to inform on their on the people around them. Thrilled. They would have worn those goddamn masks for the rest of their life if the payoff would have been. They could feel moral morally superior and inform.
reSee.it AI Summary
Science is deeply intertwined with metaphysical beliefs and requires a commitment to truth. Disconnecting it from its philosophical foundation threatens its survival. Lying scientists are malevolent. Understanding the Philosophy of Science is crucial. Do you know what the "Ph" in PhD stands for?
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
With the death of God, science DIES. Science is a religious practice. You presuppose metaphysical claims to do science. The universities grew out of the monasteries. Science as a widespread enterprise grew out of the monasteries. We're losing the scientific enterprise right now because we've unmoored it from its metaphysical substrate. And it can't survive. If you're gonna be a scientist, you have to put the truth above all else. You have to believe in the truth to be a scientist. Lying scientists are atheist & malevolent. — Jordan Peterson (Just look at the "scientists" pushing the trans cult.)
Video Transcript AI Summary
When God dies, unexpected things die too, like science. Science relies on religious beliefs in truth, understanding, and good. The scientific revolution emerged from religious roots in monasteries, not in opposition to them. Unmooring science from its metaphysical foundation threatens its survival. Scientists must prioritize truth. Dawkins, an atheist, embodies Christian values in his pursuit of truth. The collapse of the scientific enterprise's reliability and validity is a concern.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With the death of God, many other things die, things you don't expect. And one of the things that dies when God dies is science, and no one expected that. How so? Because science as a practice is a religious practice. It it's predicated on religious axioms.
Is it? Well, you have to believe that there's such a thing as truth. You have to believe that the truth is understandable. You have to believe that understanding the truth is good. You have to believe that there is such a thing as good.
Right? So imagine, to be a scientist, you have to imagine that, first of all, that the world is comprehensible to the human intellect, But more that if you investigate the mysteries of the material world, that that will be beneficial. Right? Those aren't scientific claims. Those are metaphysical claims, and that metaphysical claim is nested in a story.
You know, and the the enlightenment types, they've portrayed the scientific revolution as something contrary to the religious substrate, and that's not accurate. That's a French revolution. That's a Luciferian intellect history. It's not true. The universities grew out of the monasteries.
That's where the universities came from, and science as a widespread enterprise got its start in the universities. And they grow out of the monasteries. That's not questionable. Like, if you go to Harvard or if you go to Oxford and Cambridge, it's just starkly evident. The layout of the unit of the colleges is a monastic layout.
So the idea that there is some fundamental contradiction between religious belief and the scientific enterprise, it's it's there's nothing about that that's true. And part of the reason that we're loo part of the really reason that we're losing the scientific enterprise right now is because we've unmoored it from its metaphysical substrate, and it can't survive. If you're gonna be a scientist, you have to put the truth above all else. Scientists are very rare. You have to believe in the truth to be a scientist.
I think Dawkins believes in the truth, by the way. So he's an atheist, but a very he's much less of an atheist than he thinks. That's my impression. Lying scientists are atheistic or just malevolent. Dawkins is a truthful scientist, and insofar as he's pursuing the truth, and insofar as he believes that pursuing the truth will set you free, then he's walking down a path that's Christian to its core.
Now I know he doesn't like that idea, but he also doesn't like the fact that the scientific enterprise seems to be collapsing in terms of its, what would you call, reliability and validity everywhere. So
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
So many of you don't understand the Philosophy of Science in the comments and it shows. Very sad.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Jordan Peterson goes full fire-breathing, fact-spitting dragon mode on his left-wing, Big Pharma-loving, vaccine-promoting guest. I have chills! 🤩 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/eEzdugxro6
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion revolves around the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly in relation to transmission, myocarditis rates, and the influence of pharmaceutical companies. The speakers debate whether vaccines reduce transmission and the risks associated with myocarditis. They also question the motives of pharmaceutical companies and their impact on public health. Ultimately, they express differing views on the role of vaccines in preventing illness and the influence of pharmaceutical companies.
Translation: The conversation focuses on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, safety, transmission, and myocarditis risks, as well as the pharmaceutical industry's influence on public health. Speakers debate vaccine impact on transmission and myocarditis rates, and discuss pharmaceutical companies' motives and health outcomes. They share conflicting opinions on vaccines' ability to prevent illness and the pharmaceutical industry's role.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the other obviously glaring possibility is that injecting billions of people with a vaccine that was not tested by any stretch of the imagination with the thoroughness that it should have before it was forced upon people also might be a contributing factor. Partly we because we know that it led to a rise in myocarditis among young men and we also know that there was Absolutely, no reason whatsoever to ever recommend that that vaccine was delivered to young children whose risk of death at COVID was so close to 0 that it might as well have been 0.
Speaker 1: When you're talking about a disease, the risk of death isn't the only thing that you worry about for the disease.
Speaker 0: But you're gonna talk about transmission? Well well Because that was another thing that the
Speaker 1: We can talk about transmission.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But it didn't do anything
Speaker 1: to transmission. Absolutely did because it decreased the transmission getting affected. It didn't destroy it didn't get rid of transmission, but it reduced transmission. A
Speaker 0: claim that it would get rid
Speaker 1: of transmission. Only if you take one reading of one single quote, I think that Oh, we have a very good one. Where he said, no. Come on. Biden one time on the news says, if you get the vaccine, you won't transition
Speaker 0: so silly.
Speaker 1: Which was it? No.
Speaker 0: Do you know that our prime minister in Canada deprived Canadians of the right to travel for 6 months because the unvaccinated that were going to transmit COVID with more likelihood than the than the vaccinated. So this wasn't one bloody statement. This was my 3rd government
Speaker 1: bank statement. What I'm saying is there wasn't a statement given that if you get vaccinated, there is a 0% chance of transmitting the disease. The idea is that vaccines were supposed to help because it reduces it reduces your hospitalization, reduces death, and it reduces transmission, hopefully, by making it so that people don't get sick or don't get sick for as long. All three of those things, the vaccines did exceedingly well. They, they were tested.
The myocarditis rates are, like, 7 out of a 100000 injections, and the myocarditis is generally acute. And it's generally not as bad as even getting the coronavirus itself, which will lead you also to having
Speaker 0: a vaccine. Side effect than side effects that have caused other vaccines to be taken off the market before. That So
Speaker 1: put it 7 out of 100000 rate of acute myocarditis or pericarditis is not a worst, side effect that any other vaccine. I think that is a completely acceptable given that the disease itself is more likely to cause myocarditis or pericarditis? Yes.
Speaker 0: I don't think the data suggests to support that presupposition anymore. The latest peer reviewed study show that that's simply not true, especially among young men. I told you at the beginning of this conversation that the progressive leftists were on the side of the pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 1: It's not about being on the side of the pharmaceutical companies. It's about Really? 1 really.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. But I see so what I see what I see as the unholy part of that alliance with the pharmaceutical companies is that it dovetails with the radical utopians willingness to use power to impose their utopian vision. Well,
Speaker 1: then what do you
Speaker 0: make that happen? Would you explain it? Because the leftist should have been the ones that were most skeptical about the bloody pharmaceutical companies, and they jumped on the vaccine bandwagon in exactly No. I don't think that. Just wrong.
Speaker 1: I think
Speaker 0: they're absolutely right. So you don't think that the pharmaceutical companies who dominate the advertising landscape with 75% of the funding are corrupt.
Speaker 1: I don't corrupt is a very broad
Speaker 0: No. No. No. It's
Speaker 1: not Do you think that do you think that pharmaceutical do you think
Speaker 0: with tinge of malevolence Do you think willing to extract money out of people by putting their health on the line? Do you don't believe that?
Speaker 1: Do you think that we get effective drugs from pharmaceutical companies? Not particularly. Not particularly. I think that effective drugs from pharmaceutical companies? Not particularly.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Latest buzzword just dropped from the Devil’s den in Davos. Farming, fishing and making money is now called “Ecocide.” So basically if you want to live, you’re committing a crime if these people get their way. 🤡🤡🤡☠️ https://t.co/6hTQMlEsVe
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ecocide is the mass damage and destruction of nature, which our organization aims to have recognized as a serious crime. Currently, society tends to undervalue harm to nature compared to harm to people and property. Unlike genocide, which involves specific intent, ecocide is driven by profit and activities like farming and fishing. However, there is a lack of awareness and conscience regarding the negative consequences and collateral damage caused by these actions. The goal is to bring attention to the environmental impact of human activities and establish legal consequences for ecocide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, ecocide as a word is becoming more it's becoming better known around the world, and the concept is generally mass damage and destruction of nature. But legally speaking, what our organization and other collaborators aim to do is to have this recognized legally as a serious crime. Because one of the issues that sort of pervades all of this discussion is that we have a kind of cultural, very grained habit of not taking damage to nature as seriously as we take damage to people and property. And that's I mean, If you're campaigning for human rights, at least you know mass murder, torture, all of these things are serious crimes. But there's no equivalent in the environmental space.
And so and and, you know, unlike an international crime like genocide that involves a specific intent, With Ecocide, what we see is actually what people are trying to do, what businesses are trying to do, is make money, is, you know, is farm, is Fish is do all of these things that are, you know, producing energy and so on, as well. But what's what's missing is the awareness and the conscience around the side effects, around the collateral damage that happens with that.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
The dying MSM media doesn’t want you to know about the German farmer uprising. Once again, it’s up to us to share the footage. 🫡🫡🫡 https://t.co/TNx7RVLDyD
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Hey, @cafreeland and @JustinTrudeau. Is this what you call progress? Because to the rest of us, this looks like a country that you BROKE! https://t.co/GwSHKto67M
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
The Covid vaccine is so safe and effective that Health Canada had to pay influencers to push it. Those influencers kept the paid part a secret from their followers and subscribers. https://thecountersignal.com/health-canada-paid-social-media-influencers-to-encourage-covid-vaccination/
Health Canada paid social media influencers to encourage COVID vaccination
Health Canada paid social media influencers to tell people to get COVID vaccinated — some of whom didn’t indicate they were paid to do so.
thecountersignal.com
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Petition calling to boot Trudeau smashes record by becoming the MOST SIGNED petition in parliamentary history! How do you like them apples!🍎🍎🍎 🔥🔥🔥 https://thecountersignal.com/petition-calling-to-boot-trudeau-becomes-most-signed-in-parliamentary-history/
Petition calling to boot Trudeau becomes most signed in parliamentary history
A petition calling for a no confidence vote in the Trudeau government is now the most signed e-petition in parliamentary history.
thecountersignal.com
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
This is what a cult ritual looks like. 😳🤣🤡 https://t.co/sPb5w23SY9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Minister LaGrange thanked everyone for attending and introduced Dr. Henshaw. Dr. Henshaw mentioned that during the past 18 months, there were eight times more children hospitalized for anxiety disorders than for COVID. They were asked if this increase was due to the lockdown or health measures and how it compared to previous years. They requested more data on this matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for coming today. And I will now turn the podium over to minister LaGrange.
Speaker 1: Pardon me. Thank you, Doctor. Henshaw and good morning to everyone. Thank you. Good morning, Doctor.
Henshaw. You said In your comments that 8 times more children were hospitalized for anxiety disorders than for COVID during these past 18 months, Was this as a result of the lockdown or health measures and how does this differ from previous pre COVID years? Do you have any hard Now, please, on now.
Speaker 0: Thank you for the question.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Leftists are still melting down over Tucker's visit to Canada for a speaking event with Danielle Smith. 🤣🤣🤣 I go through their meltdowns in this latest video. 🤪 LINK 🔗 https://youtu.be/1tLkDWq-uPE?si=f4YC0kLu-azUnaDP https://t.co/eHmqHKe8e3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The premier's decision to share a stage with an individual who lacks credibility is concerning. It reflects poorly on Alberta's reputation globally and shows a lack of judgment on her part.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He is not a credible figure. The fact that our premier believes it's appropriate to normalize the things this person would say by appearing on a stage with him, it demonstrates a profound lack of judgment on her part. It damages Alberta's reputation on an international level.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
We need to continue to petition @X to take away the ability to turn off comments from gov't officials' accounts w/the grey check. You chose to be a public servant, you must HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC. Can't handle it? Don't become a public servant. Agree?
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
ARSON: Two more Canadian churches burn to the ground. The radicals are burning churches and Trudeau is not calling it a hate crime. Trudeau picks and chooses which religious groups he cares about. https://thecountersignal.com/arson-two-more-canadian-churches-burn-to-the-ground/
ARSON: Two more Canadian churches burn to the ground
Two churches near the town of Barrhead Alberta were intentionally set on fire Thursday night, according to the RCMP.
thecountersignal.com
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
JOE ROGAN: Trudeau cat eat sh*t! Canada needs a 100% overhaul of government. They’re sliding down that dangerous road of communism. 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 https://t.co/6nWrz7BzwX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss their concerns about the current state of Canada. They criticize the government's actions, such as labeling truckers as racist and misogynist and closing down bank accounts of those who donated to the trucker movement. They also mention the ban on accessing news outlets from outside of Canada and the potential impact on creators on social media platforms. They express worry that their podcast may not be available in Canada due to their criticism of the government. Overall, they feel that Canada is sliding towards communism and becoming like a dictatorship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You live in the fucking frozen communist shithole of Canada.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's cold.
Speaker 0: You get real cold water.
Speaker 1: When's the last time you've been up there? Right.
Speaker 0: I don't go up there anymore.
Speaker 1: You refused. Right?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I just fucking what they've done up there, what they did with the trucker rally and what what Trudeau's doing with guns and what they're trying to clamp down on censorship on the Internet. That guy can eat shit. Like, that that place needs up 100% in overall government. Like, they're they're sliding down that dangerous road of communism that scares the shit out of me.
Speaker 1: Up. Yeah. I, it's funny because even though I'm in Canada, it seems like the political the prevalence of political information and media is so much up. Lesser than what goes on in the States because it's just far more interesting. But even the alternatives that I'm aware of on the political, You know, side of things that are trying to, you know, get Trudeau out and replace him.
Not much better from my understanding.
Speaker 0: What they do with the truckers, like, for example, up. Like, the way Trudeau just openly labeled them as racist and misogynist. Mhmm. And then when people were donating to this, trucker movement when they were trying to, you know, have this protest. They they closed down people's bank accounts who donated.
Up. I mean, that is third world country shit. Yeah. The fact that they think they can do that in Canada is insane.
Speaker 1: Have you seen the, up. The ban of news in Canada to where if you're located in Canada, you can't access news outlets now because up. The news outlets or the social media platforms featuring the news outlets refused to pay Canada their own fee, essentially. So if I'm in Canada and I go on Instagram and try to go to a, you know, a news page that's outside of Canadian media, up. It'll literally say, can't view unavailable in Canada.
Yeah. It's crazy.
Speaker 0: It's nuts. That's like China. Up. I mean, it's literally like what they do in foreign countries that are run by dictators.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, dude. The the bills it seems like every couple weeks, there's some new up. Gong show of a bill that everyone says is gonna, you know, wipe out creators off social media or force you to make Canadian content only, which is, up. This super nebulous thing that you have no idea.
Am I only gonna be be able to talk about, like, maple syrup and beavers and shit? Or, like, what's it gonna be? Up. You don't know. So that's, a concern as somebody on YouTube, especially.
So
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But, Yeah.
Speaker 0: I've heard concerning things that my podcast, at one point in time, might not even be available in Canada because of this. Yeah. Like, that that's a concern that this could be up used in that manner to stop people from accessing podcast especially if I'm openly critical up of that shithole communist government.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. You definitely won't be on there.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Britain has arrested six times more people for something they posted on social media than Russia. Let that sink in and heed this warning, Canada. Do not be dumb & silent led like sheep to the slaughter. https://t.co/yTUpUZQSfx
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Russia, 400 people were arrested for social media posts last year. Surprisingly, in Britain, the number was much higher at 3,300. One example of an arrest in Britain was the case of Chelsea Russell, who posted rap lyrics containing the n-word on Instagram as a tribute to her deceased friend. She was found guilty, given community service, a fine, and a curfew for a year. This incident highlights the strict consequences for online speech in Britain in 2018.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In Russia last year, 400 people were arrested for things that they said on social media. 400 people in Russia. Obviously, this country is very different. How many people do you think were arrested in Britain for things they said on social media last year? Go on.
Take a guess. I have no idea. 3,300. Really? Arrested for what they said on social media?
Really? What sort of things get you arrested? Well, one example I Given my show is, there was a young woman from Liverpool, called Chelsea Russell. Her friend was killed in a car crash, 19 year old woman. And And she posted the lyrics of his favorite song on her Instagram, the lyrics.
And there was a rap song. So the lyrics contained several instances of the n word. Okay. She was arrested, prosecuted, found guilty, given 500 hours of community service and a fine, tagged. And for a year, she was under 8 p.
M. To 8 a. M. Curfew. My goodness.
In Britain. In Britain. In 2018.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
This makes me feel sick to my stomach. 😳 ⬇️⬇️⬇️ "Brazil to include COVID shots in national vaccine schedule for babies and kids" https://thecountersignal.com/brazil-to-include-covid-shots-in-national-vaccine-schedule-for-babies-and-kids/
Brazil to include COVID shots in national vaccine schedule for babies and kids
Starting in 2024, Brazilian children under five years of age may be subject to mandatory COVID-19 vaccines.
thecountersignal.com
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Conservative MP Damien Kurek just said what every Conservative in the HoC is thinking (even though they’re not allowed to say it) He refused to apologize for calling Trudeau a liar and received a standing ovation. Oh, and he also dropped this 👑 https://t.co/Z99ifaoshU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 accuses the prime minister of bullying senators and lying about the independence of the senate. Speaker 1 interrupts, asking Speaker 0 to retract a word. Speaker 0 refuses and Speaker 1 asks them to apologize. Speaker 0 again refuses. Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 to leave, and they eventually comply.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister speaker, I know for a fact that farmers are asking that minister to ax the carbon tax. That PM promised that the senate would be independent, but the actions this past week proved that that is a complete farce. We know he bullied his senators. The PM himself was on the phone over the weekend telling them they had to gut bill c234. The prime minister lied and his minions continue to lie
Speaker 1: act act Order. Order. Act Order. Order. The honorable member who got here the same time I did knows act full well that you can't use that word.
I would say the honorable member should retract that and apologize. The honorable member, Battle River Crowfoot. Mister speaker, I will not apologize about Crowfoot. Act I'm act I'm asking the honorable member to apologize for the 2nd time and retract that word. Act The honorable member knows full well you cannot use that word in this chamber.
So this is the last, this is the last Opportunity. The only member of Battle River Crowfoot, will you be retracting that? It's the truth. No.
Speaker 0: It's the truth.
Speaker 1: Act It's
Speaker 0: not. I will not apologize to the prime minister, mister speaker.
Speaker 1: Mister Keurig, would you mind leaving us today? Act act act act So let me fill let me fill this. I have to name you for the disregarding authority of the chair. Pursuant to the authority granted by me, standing order 11, act I ordered you to withdraw from the house from any participation by video conference for the remainder of this sitting day, but he did, he did leave.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Climate alarmist & socialist Guilbeault gets interrupted during a press conference. Person yells "China is one of the highest per capita carbon emissions in the world" & "you're a climate criminal!" Guilbeault says he'll "accept history's judgement."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Today, I am at Réseau, a community organization for gay and bisexual men in Montreal's Laurier Sainte-Marie district. We have an important announcement. Please keep your message brief out of respect for those present. I agree with you, we have done more than any other government on this issue. I apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Aujourd'hui, je suis ici chez Réseau, un organisme communautaire pour les hommes gays et bisexuels de Montréal dans la circonscription de Laurier Sainte-Marie. D'accord, comment tu justifies le Comment tu justifies le Comment tu justifies le Vous laissez une minute Comment tu justifies le Bay du Nord Parce qu'on a une annonce importante, vous avez pu faire vous avez pu faire votre message par respect pour les gens qui sont ici, par respect pour les gens qui sont ici. Oui, je suis d'accord avec vous, je suis d'accord avec vous. On en a fait plus qu'aucun autre gouvernement sur cette question-là maintenant pour pour les gens qui sont ici, pour les respects, Désolé.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
UK police arrest Tommy Robinson for covering an antisemitism rally in London. Meanwhile, Hamas sympathizing protests went on unimpeded for weeks! How much longer do we allow this double standard to go on? Sickening. [@TRobinsonNewEra] https://t.co/kRVCw0GljP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 tells Speaker 1 that they need to leave immediately. Speaker 1 asks if they can reply, but Speaker 0 reiterates that they must leave within 24 hours. Speaker 1 argues that the press has the right to report and protest without intimidation. Speaker 0 instructs Speaker 1 to go to Hayborne Train Station. Speaker 1 questions if their presence is causing alarm, and accuses the officers of following orders from Sadiq Khan and Mark Rowley, whom they claim are apologists for Hamas and Jihad. Speaker 0 clarifies that Speaker 1 is not a journalist and presents them with a dispersal notice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're trying to She needs to now leave immediately. Okay.
Speaker 1: Can I reply to that quickly?
Speaker 0: It's now 24 hours. She must leave the locality.
Speaker 1: Officer, can I reply to that, please?
Speaker 0: So Always you need to go right down King Street to the way Hayborne Train Station. And the grounds of this is your presence is likely
Speaker 1: This was a Metropolitan Police Force yesterday. The right of the press to freely report and protest is no less important than the rights of the protest itself. They should be able to do so without facing intimidation and aggression, officer. Yeah. Officers spoke with the journalists in their team following the incident.
I'm a member of the press. I'm at work. Yeah. I'm not is anyone here cause alarm and distress by my presence here? Ladies, everyone's Jewish here.
There's no one who's
Speaker 0: causing alarm and distress.
Speaker 1: No one has come up to you and said anything about me. You are working under the orders of Sadiq Khan and Mark Rowley. Mark Rowley is an apologist for Hamas. There are apologies for Jihad, and the republic are fed up with your I
Speaker 0: wanted to police. Police. Police. I understand why.
Speaker 1: So I'm here to do my job.
Speaker 0: So so you just do your job? I heard that I heard that about 90
Speaker 1: I'm at work. Do you think a member of the press should be arrested for doing their job? No. I'm glad the journalists are saying that.
Speaker 0: Steve, this is not a journalist, Steve. This is your dispersal notice.
Speaker 1: You do not. The
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
PIERRE POILIEVRE. *Repeal censorship laws *NO Digital ID *Ban all ministers from any involvement in the WEF *Let parents decide what to teach their kids about sexuality/gender *Rebuild our military *Fight for our veterans 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/yw6GE7cd9F
Video Transcript AI Summary
We will unite for freedom by repealing censorship law C-11, bringing back our news, and eliminating mandatory digital ID. We'll also ban my ministers from involvement in the World Economic Forum, assert parental rights in teaching sexuality and gender, and redirect funds from foreign dictatorships and multinational organizations to rebuild our military and support our troops. Above all, we'll provide opportunities and dignity to our brave veterans who fought for our freedom. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we're gonna replace divide and conquer with unite for freedom. Bring home our freedom. Right. Uniting for freedom means that we will repeal the censorship law, c eleven. Uniting for freedom means we'll repeal the law that's taken your news off of Uniting for freedom means no mandatory digital ID.
Uniting for freedom means banning all of my ministers Cheers from any involvement in the World Economic Forum. Uniting for freedom means telling Justin to Justin Trudeau to butt out and let parents decide what to teach their kids about sexuality and Gender. And uniting for freedom means pulling back the money that we're sending abroad to foreign dictatorships, terrorists, and multinational organizations, and putting that money into rebuilding our military and supporting our troops. And most of all it means giving opportunities and dignity to the brave men and women who are Veterans in this country who protected our freedom and stand up stood up for us. They fought for us.
We'll fight for them. Thank you.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
A partially redacted contract between Health Canada and Pfizer has been uncovered, showing that authorities had no idea what the long term effects of the mRNA vaccine would be, but they told Canadians it was safe to take anyway. https://thecountersignal.com/health-canadas-contract-with-pfizer-exposes-their-liberal-use-of-the-word-safe/
Health Canada’s contract with Pfizer exposes their liberal use of the word “safe”
The uncovered COVID contract between Health Canada and Pfizer has proven that authorities were loose with their use of the word "safe."
thecountersignal.com
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Machine gun earrings lady Essra Karam: “I have no problem saying I support Hamas. And you guys are white supremacist idiots.” 🤡🤡☠️ https://t.co/mz9wZhJUFi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1, a 22-year-old Palestinian named Esther Karam, proudly supports Hamas and criticizes those she perceives as white supremacists. She questions the use of terms like "terrorist" and asks if people are aware of the suffering Palestinians have endured for 75 years. Speaker 0 mentions that several governments recognize Hamas as terrorists and discusses recent events in Gaza. Speaker 1 accuses white reporters of bias and questions the motives behind their reporting. The conversation becomes heated, with Speaker 1 bringing up race and religion. Speaker 0 expresses confusion and Speaker 1 ends by expressing her support for Palestine and making a hateful remark.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are those machine gun earrings that you're hearing?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Machine gun earrings. My name is Esther Karam. Okay. K.
I'm 22 years old. I'm a Palestinian. I have no fucking problem saying I support Hamas because they are the true fighters of Palestine, and they're gonna bring back Palestine because you guys are I'm white supremacist idiots that need to wake the up.
Speaker 0: Sorry. Who who are the white supremacist idiots? You are. Me. Okay.
Jeez.
Speaker 1: Using terms like, terrorist for have you even have you even seen what has been happening in the past 70 months?
Speaker 0: Ma'am, several governments recognize Hamas as terrorists.
Speaker 1: The evidence of what has been happening in for 75 years. Have you seen it?
Speaker 0: Well, we're talking current events right now. We're talking about the terrorist attack last week Okay. And what's happening in Gaza right now.
Speaker 1: Years of all I know this. Forget 75 years. This year this year, did you look into how many Palestinians were murdered?
Speaker 0: By whom?
Speaker 1: Did you look into how many times our mass Our mosques have been desecrated. Did you look into how many times our prisoners have been 12 year old boys have been arrested.
Speaker 0: But, ma'am, it's well documented That Hamas uses mosques, hospitals, and schools to hide their arsenal.
Speaker 1: By who?
Speaker 0: Well, it's a matter of fact.
Speaker 1: Did you ask the Gazan people if that's Ask what they've seen and that's what they heard, or is that just white reporters being fucking assholes?
Speaker 0: What what is
Speaker 1: am the race car.
Speaker 0: Oh, no. You played it. You said, what do white reporters? You brought race into this. What does race have to do with this?
Speaker 1: What does race have? So do you think this is a religion? Is that is that you you think the issue is is religion. Right?
Speaker 0: I'm not even bringing religion into this. I never said the word Muslim. You did several times.
Speaker 1: Okay. Racism. Oh my god. I don't know what I'm doing here.
Speaker 0: I really
Speaker 1: don't. I don't know why I'm talking to you.
Speaker 0: Well, you came to me, ma'am.
Speaker 1: I gave you my information. Esther Karam, pro Palestinian pro Hamas, free free Palestine from the river to the sea. I hope they all burn him out.
Speaker 0: Wow. That sounds very hateful.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
A man who grew up as a member of Hamas TORCHES Hamas. "You kidnap students. You torture your political rivals. The suffering of Palestinians is the outcome of your selfish political interests. If Israel didn't exist, you'd have no one to blame!" Wow!
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am Musaab Hassan Youssef, speaking on behalf of Dayuan Watch. I question the legitimacy of the Palestinian Authority, as they were not elected or appointed by the Palestinian people. They show no concern for the well-being of their own people, evidenced by their violation of human rights and mistreatment of Palestinian students and political rivals. The suffering of the Palestinian people is a result of their selfish political interests. They use this platform to mislead the international community and blame Israel for the problems they create. They must take responsibility for their actions and stop fueling conflict for their own benefit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Shukran Said Rais. I take the floor on behalf of Dayuan Watch. My name is Musaab Hassan Youssef. I grew up in Ramallah as a member of Hamas. I address the words to the Palestinian Authority, which claims to be the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.
I Ask, where does your legitimacy come from? The Palestinian people did not elect you, and they did not appoint you to represent them. You are self Appointed. Your accountability is not to your own people. This is evidenced by your own total violation for their human rights.
In fact, the Palestinian individual and their human development is the least of your concerns. You kidnap Palestinian students From campus and torture them in your jails. You torture your political rivals. The suffering of the Palestinian people is the Outcome of your selfish political interest, you are the greatest enemy of the Palestinian people. If Israel did not exist, You would have no one to to blame.
Take responsibility for the outcome of your own actions. You fan the flames of conflict to maintain your abuse of power. Finally, you use this platform to mislead the international Not community to mislead the Palestinian society to believe that Israel is responsible for the problems you create.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
He hates any Jew and any Christian for the sake of Allah. “I hate you for the sake of Allah. If we’re at war, I will chop your head off.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to trust you, but you won't have a conversation with me because I'm a good citizen. I won't believe anything you say because you're higher.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are higher. I wanna trust you. I don't hate you. So the point is you won't have a conversation with me because I'm a good citizen. I won't be anything you say because you're
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Zahar: “The entire planet will be under our law; there will be no more Jews or Christian traitors.” Tell me again, how this is just about land?
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
A man just slammed Trudeau right to his face: “I’m not shaking your hand, you’re a piece of . You f’d up the entire country! Can anybody afford a home? You’re charging people Carbon taxes while you have NINE V8s idling!”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker engages in a heated conversation, expressing frustration about the state of the country and the affordability of homes. They mention putting a freight on pollution and sending it to Saudi Freight Girls, but the other person suggests sending it to Ukraine instead. The speaker accuses the other person of listening to Putin's propaganda and insults them. The conversation ends with more insults.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Criminal. We're gonna start getting lucky, bro. We're gonna fuck you. Hey. Pleasure to see you as well.
Hey there. How are you doing? Shaking How did I mess up this country? Can anybody afford a home What? We're doing we're doing We're not stopping no part.
We're putting a freight on pollution. Right. And we're returning it to Saudi Freight Girls. Think so. You're sending it over to Ukraine.
Right? No. No. Yeah. Yeah.
You sent to the guy that you were with that slaughtered his own country. You've been listening to Putin, have you? Putin. No. No.
Well, definitely, don't listen to to to your propaganda, You got propaganda, bro. Fucking piece of shit, man. I'm not gonna bitch? Fucking piece of shit, man. Fucking dumbass.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
The man who called people who didn’t want to submit to an experimental injection “racists”, invited a literal nazi to parliament.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
TORONTO: Trudeau and Zelensky are met with angry protesters. “Get the hell out of our country, you two bastards!” I wonder if the little man thought he’d be welcomed as a hero.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
WEF agenda contributor Yuval Noah Harari claims “human rights are just a story that we’ve invented.” Did he seriously say this?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Legal systems worldwide are founded on the concept of human rights. However, human rights are merely a narrative, akin to the notions of God and heaven, that we have created.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most legal systems today in the world are based on a belief in human rights. But what are human rights? Human rights, just like God and heaven, are just a story that we have invented.
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
Never forget that Trudeau ordered RCMP to shoot independent reporters for covering the Freedom Convoy. What a pathetic cowering, lying little weasel Trudeau is. What a stain on Canada!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that the police force was the source of violence during the protest. They witnessed aggression, harassment, and threats from the police. They express sadness when protesters showed love and peace, but were met with broken windows and truckers losing everything. The speaker is emotional about innocent people being treated as criminals for fighting for basic freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just want to say that if people think that the protester was violent, The only violence I saw coming from was the police force. Yeah. Since they entering the place On Friday, I just saw violence. I saw aggression, harassment. I saw threat.
I saw so much bad things happen that day, but that that was not from the protester. When I saw them with flower, peace, saying to them, we love you, Samuel, if you are against us, That break my heart. When I saw window being broke and Trucker that lost everything. Their life, their business. Sorry.
I'm emotional about that. Being dragged out of their vehicle as criminal when they just fight for adding back the basic freedom, That is not
@KatKanada_TM - Kat Kanada
The Canadian gov’t admitted they have a $105.3 million contract with the WEF for the Known Traveler Digital ID. Did you know this? FULL DOCUMENT HERE: https://t.ly/GXqEK
