reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @KateHydeNY
@KateHydeNY - Kate Hyde
James O’Keefe taking off his clear glasses to reveal he’s James O’Keefe. https://t.co/Nc6Fol4tAt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript captures a tangled back-and-forth about identity between two speakers. The exchange centers on claims and refusals regarding whether each participant is James O’Keeffe or James O’Keefe, revealing a mix of misdirection and confusion.
At the start, one speaker asserts a startling claim: “Well, the thing is is that I actually am James O’Keeffe.” The other participant responds with uncertainty and a challenge: “Are you? Yeah. No.” This initial volley sets up a core tension: one person asserts a definitive, singular identity, while the other vacillates between affirmation and negation, throwing the claim into doubt.
The dialogue then escalates into a negation-heavy push-pull. The respondent counters with, “You’re not. No. I’m not. I’m not James O’Keefe. Are you not?” In this moment, the accused or challenged party is forced to confront the possibility that the other person might not actually be who they claim to be, intensifying the ambiguity around the identities in question.
A reversal occurs as the other participant seemingly reclaims the certainty of their own identity: “I am.” This line signals a shift from denial to assertion, reestablishing a firm self-identification. The follow-up, “Really? Yes. And you you don’t know that,” adds a layer of assurance coupled with a hint of misperception: the speaker insists on their identity while suggesting the other person is unaware of this truth.
Overall, the excerpt depicts a rapid swing between certainty and doubt about who each person truly is. The tension hinges on two overlapping claims of being James O’Keeffe and James O’Keefe, with frequent interruptions between affirmation and denial. The exchange culminates in a blunt assertion of self-identity—“I am”—and a companion reminder of the other party’s possible lack of awareness about that truth, encapsulating the core dynamic of identity verification and misrecognition that runs through the dialogue.
The fragment offers a compact glimpse into a scenario where personal identity is contested and negotiated in real time, marked by alternating declarations and refusals that keep the true identification unresolved within this short exchange.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, yeah. Well, the thing is is that I actually am James O'Keeffe. Are you? Yeah. No.
You're not. No. I'm not. I'm not James O'Keefe. Are you not?
I am. Really? Yes. And you you don't know that
@KateHydeNY - Kate Hyde
Kamala is incapable of answering a question and after 3 minutes of nonsense Oprah had to save her. https://t.co/ZnbWeUDtZD
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a former prosecutor and attorney general of a border state, emphasizes the importance of border security, citing experience prosecuting transnational criminal organizations involved in trafficking. The speaker claims a bipartisan border security bill, which would have added 1500 border agents, stemmed the flow of fentanyl, and provided resources to prosecute criminal organizations, was blocked by Donald Trump. According to the speaker, Trump preferred to campaign on the issue rather than solve it, prioritizing personal political gain over border security. The speaker pledges to reintroduce and sign the bill into law upon becoming president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is, when you become president, what would be your, specific steps? Yeah.
Speaker 1: Of course.
Speaker 0: What would be specific steps to strengthening the border?
Speaker 1: So it's a wonderful and important question. I you know my background was as a prosecutor, and I was also the elected attorney general for 2 terms of a border state. So this is not a theoretical, issue for me. This is something I've actually worked on.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: I have prosecuted transnational criminal organizations for the trafficking of guns, drugs, and human beings. I take very seriously the importance of having a secure border and ensuring the safety of the American people. Sadly, where we are now can be traced most recently back to the fact that when the United States Congress, members of the Congress, including some of the most conservative Republicans, came up with a border security bill, and here's what that border security bill would have done. It would have put 1500 more border agents at the border. Let me tell you, those border agents are working around the clock.
It would have just been about giving them some support and relief, which is probably why the border agents actually endorsed the bill. It would have allowed us to stem the flow of Fentanyl. And I'm looking at people from all over the country here, so I don't need to tell the folks who are watching this what Fentanyl has done to families, to to kids in our country, and the need to take seriously stemming the flow coming into our country and addressing that extraordinary and and tragic issue in terms of its effect. The bill would have allowed us to have more resources to prosecute transnational criminal organizations. And it would have been part of the solution.
And Donald Trump called up those folks and said, don't put that bill on the floor for a vote. He blocked the bill. And you know why? Why? Because he'd prefer to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem.
And he has put his political personal political security before border security. Because understand, even in the intervening months, what that bill would have done to give support to folks who care about this issue. And this again gets to the point about what does leadership really look like? And is it about you or is it about the people? Is it about running on problems or fixing problems?
My work and my career has always been about saying, let's fix problems. Let's address the needs because we know it's within our capacity to do that.
Speaker 2: So to answer Justin's question,
Speaker 3: now that that bill has gone and hasn't passed, will you reintroduce that?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. And when I am elected president of the United States, I will make sure that bill gets to my desk, and I will sign it into law. Thank you, Justice. Thank you, John.
Speaker 3: Listen to this. I I I'm a