TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @KennyCarmody

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

🚨 THREAD: EXPOSING THE VACCINE COVER-UP: Hidden DNA Contamination in COVID Shots — A Massive, Ignored Oncogenic Threat What you’re about to read will shake the very foundation of the COVID vaccine narrative. Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) — a genomics expert with deep roots in the Human Genome Project — has exposed alarming DNA contamination in Pfizer & Moderna vaccines. “.. so when I see what they're doing with these vaccines, several red flags emerged, and I began speaking about it. Now, probably what I've been asked to speak about here is what we found in the Pfizer vaccines, which are plasmids. Pfizer and Moderna both have their expression vectors still in the vaccines.” Here’s the truth you haven’t been told 🧵

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

2️⃣ What did we find? “Pfizer and Moderna both have their expression vectors still in the vaccines… plasmid DNA contamination.” @Kevin_McKernan published a paper that kicked off global replication — including studies in 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇺🇸 — confirming residual DNA in every vial tested. 👇 🔬 David Speicher @DJSpeicher (Canada): Tested 30+ vials — found DNA in all of them 🔬 Philip Buckhaults @P_J_Buckhaults (South Carolina): Replicated findings, gave powerful testimony 🔬 Dr. Sin Lee: Confirmed with Sanger sequencing 🔬 Brigitte König (Germany): Peer-reviewed replication 🔬 Ulrich Kammerer’s lab: Showed plasmid DNA persists in cell lines for several cycles 🔬 Even high school interns at FDA found contamination 6–470x over legal limit “This DNA isn’t gone in 48 hours. Some of it contains SV40 elements. And it’s easy to detect — which makes you wonder how it passed through regulation for 13 billion doses.”

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

3️⃣ Why does DNA in the vax matter? “There is a limit… it used to be 1,000-fold lower.” The original DNA limit was 10 picograms per dose. But regulators raised it drastically — especially after liability shields were granted under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Problem is: ❌ That limit was based on naked DNA ❌ Naked DNA degrades fast — half-life: 5–10 minutes 🧬 But now it’s encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) “That means this DNA isn’t breaking down. It’s being delivered directly into cells.” So even the current limits are obsolete, and the actual levels found? 🚨 100 nanograms to 1 microgram per dose 🚨 That’s 10–100x over the limit — and the limit no longer even applies ⸻ “So how did this happen?” Pfizer’s clinical trial used a different product than what got mass-injected. During trials: ✅ They purified the RNA with PCR — cutting plasmid contamination But scaling up? ❌ They skipped that step ❌ Used cheaper plasmid purification straight from E. coli ⚠️ Possibly leaving behind endotoxin (LPS) — which can cause septic-like reactions Remember people collapsing in vax centers? “That is likely LPS — though not yet measured directly.” What has been measured is the plasmid DNA. And it’s everywhere. Published, peer-reviewed, replicated worldwide. “This is not a conspiracy theory. BMJ has published on this. Pfizer switched products — and regulators knew.” The EMA even requested a small trial (n=250) after the change. That data? 🚫 Never delivered. This is called bait-and-switch — and in vaccine manufacturing: “The process is the product. You change the process, you run new trials. They didn’t.”

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

4️⃣ So what happens when we actually sequence these vaccines? “We put the DNA into commercial annotation software — it highlights every functional part of the plasmid.” And here’s what we found: 🧬 Antibiotic resistance genes — always present to grow in E. coli 🧬 Promoters to activate those genes — like SV40 components Here’s the kicker: “The software automatically annotates these parts. Somebody at Pfizer had to go in and manually delete those annotations before submitting to regulators.” So yes — the DNA sequence was submitted. But… “The sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and promoter — even if they don’t know what it does.” This wasn’t an accident. It was: 🚨 Intentional removal 🚨 Deception of the FDA 🚨 Violation of regulatory guidelines The FDA only caught it years later when independent labs raised the alarm. ⸻ Why hide SV40? “SV40 contaminated the polio vaccines decades ago. When you give SV40 to cell lines or tissues, you get cancer. There’s no question about that.” The debate isn’t about if it’s carcinogenic — it’s about epidemiology and confounders. But in the lab? 🧬 SV40 is one of the most oncogenic viruses ever studied. And while the full virus isn’t in these shots, Kevin explains: “We have carcinogenic components of SV40 in these vaccines. These sequences are very functional, and they have consequences.” ⸻ So how did regulators respond? “Yes, it’s there. We weren’t informed. But it’s probably too small to matter.” Probably? 🚫 They didn’t measure it 🚫 They don’t know ✅ We do And again — they assume it’s harmless because: “They didn’t consider lipid nanoparticles. Their metric is invalid.”

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

5️⃣Initial Public Regulatory Response admitted the DNA is there, but downplayed it with three claims: http://1.It’s too small in length to matter http://2.It’s too small in quantity to matter http://3.It’s not functional But here’s the reality: ➡️ They never actually measured it ➡️ Their quantity assumptions ignore lipid nanoparticles ➡️ And new papers show the amount exceeds FDA limits ➡️ Plus, there’s clear evidence the DNA is functional All three claims are false, and the literature proves it. @Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

6️⃣Let’s talk about what’s actually in the DNA that’s in these shots. “That DNA sequence is known as the SV40 promoter in the enhancer region.” But it’s not just that: 🧬 SV40 enhancer 🧬 SV40 origin of replication 🧬 SV40 poly-A signal Those are the three big ones. There are a few others, but they’re of “less significance,” per Kevin. Now here’s what makes this deeply concerning: “SV40 enhancers are used in gene therapy plasmids. These are nuclear targeting sequences. Transcription factors bind to that DNA and drag it — and everything it’s attached to — into the nucleus.” So when someone says: “It doesn’t matter because it’ll never get to the nucleus…” 🚨 That’s false. Kevin says plainly: “There’s a nuclear targeting sequence built in that guarantees it will get to the nucleus.” And even if that didn’t exist? “LNPs go to dividing cells. When cells divide, the nuclear membrane dissolves. There is no barrier to the DNA.” So either way, this is designed to get into the nucleus. “When someone tells you otherwise — that it can’t reach the nucleus — they’re running a smokescreen. They’re either lying to you or lying to themselves. This isn’t hard biology — it’s in any high school textbook.” ⸻ This DNA wasn’t random. “This was pulled directly from Pfizer’s gene therapy department. In fact, Pfizer admits this in one of their own papers.” They were trying to scale up fast, so they grabbed plasmids they were already using… for gene therapy. And what does the SV40 enhancer do? “It binds to the P53 gene — your genome’s guardian. P53 is a tumor suppressor. You don’t want anything interfering with it.” But this plasmid does — and… “The spike protein also inhibits P53. That’s two pathways of concern for oncogenic impact.” 📚 Literature from: •Zhang et al. •Welteke-Elders Group •Znikel et al. All point to the same thing: “This SV40 sequence is a hypermutability element. It induces mutations in DNA near it. The paper says, ‘potential tumorigenic activity.’” ⸻ So when you hear: “This DNA doesn’t do anything…” You can say: ❌ “No — it has published function. ❌ It binds tumor suppressor genes ❌ It alters DNA near it ❌ And it’s designed to go straight to the nucleus.” There’s a reason they didn’t disclose this. “They didn’t want you to know. And yes — this DNA lines up with some of their future business interests.”

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

7️⃣Let’s talk about integration risk — and how the DNA in these vaccines doesn’t follow the FDA’s own rules. “These FDA guidelines were based on injecting naked DNA…” But that’s not what’s happening here. Let’s break this down: 🔬 The original FDA limit for residual DNA in vaccines was 10 picograms — based on genomic DNA, which is big (~3 billion base pairs). Later, that limit got bumped up to 10 nanograms — again, assuming big chunks of DNA. But… “When DNA is small — say ~200 base pairs — 10 nanograms equals 500 billion copies of DNA.” 🧠 Why does this matter? “The smaller the DNA fragment, the more copies you get — and the more active chemical ends it has.” That means: ✅ More 5’ phosphates ✅ More 3’ hydroxyls ✅ More chances for that DNA to integrate into your genome “When you chop big DNA into small pieces, it becomes genomic buckshot.” You go from a few long strands… to a storm of integration-prone fragments. ⸻ This is basic chemistry — and the FDA knows this. “Their own literature says: If DNA gets to viral sizes (like plasmids), the safety threshold needs to drop to attograms — or femtograms.” That’s millions of times lower than what they allowed here. But what do we have in these vials? “Very small, broken-up plasmid DNA — packed inside lipid nanoparticles — and targeted into human cells.” ⸻ So what happens when you do that? “There’s a litany of literature showing high rates of spontaneous integration when you transfect cells this way.” Cited studies show: ➡️ 7–10% of cells got integration events ➡️ And that’s likely an undercount “That paper had to detect integration via a reporter gene. But if the DNA integrated without the reporter, it wouldn’t be seen.” So the true rate could be even higher. And remember: “These aren’t isolated ‘oops’ events. These are systemic, chemically favored, and expected given the way this vaccine was constructed.” ⸻ So when someone says: “It’s just trace DNA, it won’t do anything…” You can reply: ❌ “It’s not genomic DNA. ❌ It’s not naked. ❌ It’s not inert.” It’s plasmid-sized, broken DNA It’s wrapped in LNPs It’s designed for intracellular delivery And the FDA’s own documents say that’s precisely when the limits should be lowest — not ignored.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

8️⃣ And you don’t need to look at these papers to know this. You can look at Moderna’s own patents to know this. •They speak to the fact that this DNA is such an integration risk •That they need to invent new methods to remove the DNA •And they do do a better job than Pfizer •They pull the DNA out much more effectively than the Pfizer vaccine •Approximately tenfold So you don’t need to look to our papers on this or our claims. The manufacturers of these vaccines have patents that speak to this being an oncogenic risk. @Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

9️⃣ We also have papers from Strayer et al. that demonstrate sp40 plasmids like this are known to integrate. That's why they use them in gene therapy. Lots of literature from this particular laboratory on sp40 plasmids and integration frequency. So it does lend us to be concerned that this residual DNA can find its way into the nucleus and alter the genome. @Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

🔟 SV40 Origin, Cytosolic DNA & Nucleic Acid Persistence: Why Contaminated DNA in Vaccines Raises New Oncogenic Concerns Now, I didn’t put up a paper from Quan et al. It’s another one I want to put on the record here. •Quan et al. will demonstrate that the sin of getting this DNA into the cell •Isn’t necessarily an integration event •Once you load the cell with cytosolic DNA, you can trigger the C-gas-sting pathway, which is oncogenic in and of itself So, really the damage is done on transfection. •Whether it integrates into the genome is somewhat irrelevant •Because this plasmid DNA can replicate epizomally •Meaning it doesn’t need to be in the chromosome to replicate •Because it has an SV40 origin of replication •That’s a mammalian origin of replication •That should never be in a vaccine You never want a vaccine that you’re growing in E. coli to also have the capacity to replicate in the host that you’re going to inject it into — mammalians, mammalian cell lines like humans. That is a very reckless and dangerous thing to do. •Moderna didn’t do it •There is evidence that Pfizer is at fault here •Pfizer did leave this origin of replication behind •That is only done because they were lazy and careless about this ⸻ Why do we care about this so much? •There are all of these papers that have rolled out demonstrating nucleic acid persistence •I say nucleic acid, because we don’t know from these papers whether they’re measuring DNA or RNA •They used a method known as RT-PCR, which amplifies both Many of these papers were published before this DNA contamination was known •So they assumed it was RNA, because they were looking at the spike sequence If they went back and tortured that with perhaps primers that looked at the plasmid backbone (that’s not supposed to be in the vaccine), I’m curious what they would find. ⸻ Examples: •Krausen paper – found in heart tissues, 30 days out •Rolchin paper – 60 days •Placenta – 2 to 10 days •Castro-Hughes paper – found plasmid in plasma, 28 days later •Hanna paper – found in breast milk, about 5 days •This paper is under-measuring •PCR assay is horribly insensitive •Only has ~400,000 copy LOD (Limit of Detection) •Should be down to ~10 copies If they had a more sensitive assay, •They likely would have found this out to 10–15 days in breast milk ⸻ Anyway, there’s a tremendous dose getting through breast milk. •If you add up what’s in that paper and the number of feedings a child has, •This is not an insignificant amount, as those authors suggest •They did not consider how much milk a baby drinks over the course of three days •That would add up to a substantial and sizable dose that child was getting in that feeding Credit: @Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣1️⃣ Spike Protein Persistence Now, very recently, we're also seeing spike protein persistence in these two papers, okay? There's the Patterson paper that found this, had these reversed here. The Yale study actually found it 709 days out and the Patterson study found it 245 days out. But this is protein that is not going away in 48 hours. It is there almost years later. Why is that? Proteins don't do that. Most proteins have a turnover rate that's in weeks, not years. So this implies something is regenerating the spike protein in your body, or it is evading destruction for long periods of time in certain wet reservoirs in the human body. So this leads people to believe perhaps this mRNA is lasting longer, or there's plasmids in there still generating spike, and we don't know the answer yet. - @Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣2️⃣ Okay, so now here's the real kicker that I haven't presented on much lately, because this is very recent work. 🚨The kicker here is that we're now finding these sequences not just in the vaccine, but we're finding it in people. And we don't know if it's integrated, but it's there. And these are studies that weren't looking for it, and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. All right, so there's at least five peer-reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing of people who were vaccinated and unvaccinated. 🚨- @Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣3️⃣ RNAseq Datasets Still Detecting Vaccine Plasmid DNA Despite Suppression Methods Now Found in the Blood Supply I’ve shared these before, but for reference, here are the actual papers with their proper titles. Chakrabarty went through the Ryan et al. and ODEX datasets, and when you map those reads against the vaccine plasmids, you get a strong spike signal, which isn’t surprising — we expect the RNA to linger. But what is surprising is that you also get DNA reads, even though RNAseq protocols are designed to suppress DNA. These methods typically use DNase enzymes and RNA purification steps that eliminate or suppress DNA, yet it’s still showing up. That tells us it must be there in much higher concentrations — because if they didn’t use DNase, we’d likely see even more of it. The ODEX dataset is particularly revealing. In the upper right panel (IGB screenshot), the entire plasmid backbone is covered — all regions, including SV40 promoters. That DNA clearly made it into patients. The Novel study showed a lighter read density — so less contamination, but still detectable plasmid fragments. Same goes for the Lee et al. dataset. It’s not in every patient, since some of the samples were taken 14+ days out, but in samples closer to vaccination, we consistently see it — even with suppression steps in place. One study — in mice — wasn’t even looking at DNA. It was studying re-adenylation of the mRNA — how the poly-A tail might be regenerated in vivo, which may help explain why the mRNA sticks around so long. But even in that unrelated study, we find vaccine DNA contamination coming through. This stuff is littered across the short read archive. And that’s despite protocols trying to wash it out. The signal is still there. - @Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣4️⃣ So why do we care about this? Well, there have been several people and several data sources that have been demonstrating a rise in cancer. There's @JohnBeaudoinSr work where he FOIA-ed the death records of all of the people in Massachusetts. He's done this in many states now. And you can go through those death records and count up how many more neoplasms are we finding. And there is a clear rise in certain types of ICD-10 codes that dictate that this is, in fact, a phenomenon. We have an increased rate of cancer. There's no doubt about that from his literature, from his data. There's others who have looked at this from an excess mortality standpoint. @EthicalSkeptic has done this. His analysis does require some important adjustments in that there is a pull-forward effect that he adjusts for, which is during the COVID pandemic, a lot of elderly passed away. And that creates a bit of a shift in the data when that happens. But once that's adjusted for, you can see that there is a clear rise in cancer rates that is persisting even to this day. David Wiseman found this in the CDC data as well. But there are other forms of analysis you can look at from economic indicators. What we're also seeing from Edward Dowd and Ethical Skeptic is that the cancer treatments are up. If you look at the drug sales for cancer rates, this kind of confirms the epidemiological data when you see it in the drug treatment sales moving at the same rate. And the inflection time point of when that has occurred is concordant with when the vaccine programs rolled out. So cancer is up. The mechanism for this is still in question, but we don't need contaminants in these vaccines that are linked to it. .. - @Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣5️⃣ What Did Pfizer Know, and When Did They Know It and Why is this happening? One of the more delayed — and camouflaged — effects of these vaccines is cancer. It’s not as immediate as myocarditis or clots, but it’s showing up. And it’s not just speculation. The signals are there. The science is there. The fraud is there. Let’s start with what Pfizer knew. Very early on, during their own trials, Pfizer saw the signals. They had the data. And they acted — not by alerting the public or regulators — but by buying up cancer treatment companies. $43 billion went into acquiring Seagen. Another $2.26 billion went into Trillium Therapeutics, which just so happens to focus on blood cancers involving CD147, a receptor known to be involved in COVID-19. That’s not coincidence. That’s a hedge. They saw what was coming. And they moved to profit from it. Meanwhile, the product that hit the market was not what was tested in trials. That’s a bait-and-switch. The clinical formulation was different. That alone nullifies every claim of efficacy. It’s scientific fraud. The trial data cannot be trusted because it doesn’t match the commercial product. Now let’s talk DNA contamination. Ten out of eleven studies — peer-reviewed or in preprint — are finding residual plasmid DNA in the vaccine vials. The only ones that didn’t have financial conflicts of interest. We now have five separate peer-reviewed studies that weren’t even looking for this DNA — they were sequencing blood or tissues — and still found it. Others went in afterward, dug through the data, and uncovered vaccine plasmid sequences floating in people’s blood. Let that sink in. We have SV40 promoter sequences in people now. These are oncogenic, and they weren’t disclosed. We’re also seeing injection site neoplasms — cancers forming right at the site of vaccine administration. This is not coincidence anymore. This is a real, repeatable signal. We’re giving this to pregnant women. It’s on the childhood schedule. And these shots are liability-free and often mandated. This may be the largest carcinogenic exposure event in human history. Now, we’re also seeing another mechanism come into view — amyloidogenic peptides. These are sequences in the spike protein that are known to form amyloids or prions — misfolded proteins that can cause other proteins to misfold in a chain reaction. This could explain the bizarre fibrin-rich clots we’re seeing — long, rubbery, calamari-like structures that don’t behave like normal thrombi. We think these prion-like sequences might be driving clotting cascades, contributing to the cardiovascular crisis we’re now observing. These aren’t easy to detect. You need specialized equipment and expertise — unlike DNA, which you can find with a PCR machine in a parking lot. But it’s there. It’s all there. And it’s time we stop pretending it isn’t. @Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣6️⃣ The Truth About These Clots Is Out, and It’s Worse Than You Think Whole Genome Sequencing of Fibrin Clots Kevin McCarran has been doing some work, not me, different Kevin, on this. And I’ve been collaborating with him in that I’ve been sequencing some of these clots to prove that they’re not a fictitious Twitter phenomenon. They’re, in fact, real human DNA in these clots. And there’s something that we’re noticing in that DNA, is that it has a signature of being a neutrophil extracellular trap. It is a type of reaction that happens in sepsis. And your immune system sees foreign entities. It begins to clot around them. And it tends to take some free-circulating DNA into those clotting structures and leave a particular signature in that DNA that we can see. This sequencing has been very informative in that we’re beginning to see sequences of the patient’s genome that might be predisposing them to this. Billions of these shots were given, 5 billion people perhaps. We don’t have 5 billion people that are clotted. But a subset of those people are having a bad reaction. We’re trying to figure out who. It may be that they have genetic predispositions in some of the clotting cascade that make them more at risk of this than other people. And we’re beginning to see this. Right now, it’s just two clots that we’ve looked at. So we don’t have statistical significance that this is, in fact, a causative mutation. But we are finding what are known as high-impact variants inside of genes involved in fibrin formation and fibrin clotting. That is a bit spooky to the least. So you can see more about that on this particular substack. And be sure to look at the links in there that point to Kevin McCarran’s work. He’ll go through demonstrating that some of these clots are binding thioflavin, which is a marker for an amyloid. And so there may be an amyloidogenesis issue that we have. That pathology is going to have to be looked at very carefully because that may be what’s behind some of these clotting problems that we’re seeing in the field. So anyway, thank you for your time. I know this isn’t pleasant information to hear, but it’s real. It’s out there. And it is being heavily suppressed. So it’s important that communities like yours can hear this. And the citations are in here for your reference if you have any questions. Feel free to contact me. Thank you. . -@Kevin_McKernan

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

For the last 14 months, I've been confined to a world that's shrunk to the size of my bedroom, unable to walk far or venture out. My life has become a series of small, cautious steps just to keep my body from seizing up entirely. Life? That's a distant memory, even as a passenger; the road is no longer my path to explore. I'm haunted by my vaccine injury which causes episodes that mimic ischemic strokes—sudden, terrifying. My esophagus and larynx spasm, hypercranial tension, sinus swelling, occipital and trigeminal neuralgia stealing my breath away, forcing me to lie down and focus every ounce of my being on calming my body. This ordeal repeats 3-4 times daily, a relentless cycle. And that’s just a small portion of the symptomatic. Cant work anymore. Can’t do groceries, can’t go for walks longer than a quarter mile mostly less, can’t help my family and friends, can’t drive a car, I pretty much can’t do anything more. Eating is a battle due to the swallowing issues and massive muscular decline in my jaw and face muscles. Breathing is also a big issues due to my paralysed diaphragm. 2024 has been a brutal chapter, isolating me from both my life and society, all because of a vaccine injury. Yet, the story isn't over; we press on. Before this confinement, my life was a globe-trotting adventure, with over 100 countries stamped in my passport. Now, stepping outside my front door feels like a small victory, a moment to be grateful for. As we approach Christmas, I wish you warmth, joy, and the company of loved ones. May God be with you. In the depths of despair, there's always a flicker of light, a whisper of hope. I pray that 2025 brings an end to our suffering or ushers in a brighter future. It seems only God can save us now, as doctors, government, friends, and even family have drifted away, their concern fading. I understand their distance; being a burden is a role no one aspires to play. Miss the Good Old Days 2019. Used to run and walk miles and miles in nature. Ah, the Good Old Days of 2019, when I could lose myself in nature, running and walking for miles on end, free and invigorated. Then came July 21st, 2021, the day of my vaccination and everything changed. Since then, over three years have passed in what I call Doctor Misery, witnessing a relentless decline in my physical and neurological well-being. It's been a long, arduous battle from that day to this, December 22nd, 2024, and I know the struggle will persist. Sadly, there's been little to no help or support along this journey. Yet, what truly matters is that our stories are being shared, our voices heard. Peace be with you!

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

I can not say how much I thank all of your for your kind, thoughtful and caring comments on here. Give me a bit time I will respond to every one of you. It means the world to me hearing people care and fight for all of those who are suffering and in need of help. This makes my Christmas feel a bit warmer. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. 🙏❤️ Merry Christmas to all of you and may god bless you.🙏