reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @KimIversenShow
reSee.it AI Summary
A post highlights MTG’s remarks tying Trump, Israel, and Epstein to a broader narrative. The thread centers on Jonathan Pollard’s espionage case, his 1987 life sentence, 2015 parole, and 2020 lifting of travel limits under Trump, followed by a celebratory Israeli reception. It argues Netanyahu and Trump formed a close alliance, with Trump overruling warnings. Pollard is described as a major security breach; some readers view Trump as the greatest domestic threat.
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
MTG drops BOMBSHELL on Trump, Israel & Epstein @FmrRepMTG https://t.co/emgrFkI3RD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says that the real information about the Epstein files has not come out and that “there were only four Republicans, four of us that’s really fought to get them released,” who “signed the discharge petition, went against the White House,” and were “threatened,” with Donald Trump calling him a traitor and saying his friends would be hurt. He questions why anyone would vote for Republicans if the administration doesn’t release all the information, framing it as a line in the sand for many people.
Speaker 0 asks why they think the Epstein files are being hidden.
Speaker 1 responds that it’s because the hidden information would protect “some of the most rich, powerful people,” arguing that Epstein was “definitely some sort of part of the intelligence state” who was “working with Israel” and with the “former prime minister of Israel.” He asserts that these are “the dirty parts of government and the powers that be that they don’t want the American people to know about.” He concludes that, sadly, he doesn’t think the files will come out.
Speaker 0 presses on whether Trump is in the Epstein files.
Speaker 1 speculates that if someone is “living under blackmail” or “living under threat” and told not to release information, that fear could influence actions. He suggests that someone might be warned by threats to prevent disclosure, giving a hypothetical example: after standing on a rally stage, you could be shot in the ear and warned that “next time we won’t miss,” or that the bullet might be for someone you care about. He says he is “speculating,” but notes he has “a strong enough reason to speculate like that.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about the Epstein files.
Speaker 1: The real information has not come out. We've been told so many lies on this. There were only four Republicans, four of us that's really fought to get them released, signed the discharge petition, went against the White House, and we were all threatened, and you all saw what happened to me. Finally, Donald Trump called me a traitor. He told me that his friends would get hurt.
And to me, I'm like, I don't know why you would be friends with anyone that would do this to women and teenage girls. The Epstein files need to come out. They're breaking the law, the law that Donald Trump signed. And so if the administration doesn't release it all, I can't imagine why anybody would vote for Republicans. To me, it's like a line in the sand, and I think it's that way for a lot of people.
Speaker 0: Why do you think they're hiding them?
Speaker 1: I think it's because it protects some of the most rich, powerful people. I think we know Jeffrey Epstein was definitely some sort of part of the intelligence state. I think we know he was working with Israel. He was working closely with Israel, former prime minister of Israel. And I think these are the dirty parts of government and the powers that be that they don't want the American people to know about.
Sadly, I don't think it'll come out.
Speaker 0: Do you think that Trump is in the Epstein files?
Speaker 1: Or it could be that if you're living under blackmail, if you're living under threat, you're afraid for your loved ones' lives, lives, people that you care about, and you have been told you're not allowed to release this stuff or something bad may happen. Let's say you stood on a rally stage and you got shot in the ear and that bullet was right by your head. Maybe that was enough of a threat to say, you know what? Next time we won't miss, or next time that bullet might be for somebody that you care about. I'm just speculating, but I I I have a strong enough reason to speculate like that.
@mohnader1978 - ☀️🇵🇸MOHAMAD NADER🇵🇸 ☀️
READ THIS TO THE END. Jonathan Pollard Former U.S. Navy intelligence analyst. Exposed in 1985 as a spy working for a foreign state — Israel. Described by U.S. intelligence officials as one of the most damaging espionage cases in American history. In 1987, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. He served 30 years in U.S. federal prison. For decades, Pollard was classified as the most dangerous insider breach of U.S. national security. --- After his release In 2015, Pollard was released on parole under U.S. federal law. He remained under strict surveillance, with severe travel and communication restrictions. U.S. intelligence agencies — including former CIA and FBI officials — strongly opposed lifting these restrictions. Their position was clear: Pollard’s case was not over. --- November 2020 — A turning point In the final months of the Trump administration, the U.S. Department of Justice abruptly ended Pollard’s parole conditions. All travel restrictions were lifted. Despite long-standing intelligence objections, Pollard was cleared to leave the United States. He departed legally — during Donald Trump’s presidency. --- What followed immediately Upon arrival in Israel, Pollard was publicly celebrated. He appeared in official photos with senior Israeli leaders — including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The welcome was not discreet. It was symbolic. It was political. In Israel, Pollard is widely treated as a national hero, despite the severe and lasting damage his actions caused to U.S. intelligence systems. --- The Netanyahu–Trump factor Benjamin Netanyahu is not a distant ally of Donald Trump. He is widely regarded as one of the closest foreign leaders Trump ever aligned with. During Trump’s presidency: Netanyahu faced no meaningful resistance from the White House. Major, unprecedented political decisions were taken in Israel’s favor. Trump repeatedly overruled U.S. institutional, diplomatic, and intelligence objections. Netanyahu was the rare foreign leader for whom Trump appeared willing to: Break precedent Ignore expert warnings Absorb internal backlash Trump did not publicly refuse Netanyahu a single major request. --- Historical assessment Jonathan Pollard is often described as the second most damaging foreign-aligned threat in U.S. history. --- The first? Many Americans argue that the greatest foreign-aligned damage to the United States did not come from a spy operating in secrecy — but from a political figure operating in plain sight. A president. Inside the system. Undermining it from within. Donald J. Trump. --- @FBI@CIA — Mohamad Nader #FreePalestine 🇵🇸🇵🇸 #FREEUSA 🇺🇸🇺🇸 #AIPAC 🇮🇱🇮🇱
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that feeding their enemy is unprecedented in history and rejects the notion that it is consistent with Jewish morality, saying, “that isn’t” Jewish morality. He recalls October 1973 during the Yom Kippur War, when Henry Kissinger instituted an arms embargo against them, and explains that “an a four Skyhawk was parked at Telenorf Air Base with some interesting weapons under its wings,” and that they told the Americans to “take your eye in the sky and take a good look at the airplane that’s on that runway.” He continues that the next day “the airlift started to the to Israel,” describing an arms airlift, and notes that they “threatened their We threatened to use unconventional weapons,” and that they indicated, “So in other words, we threatened their We threatened to use unconventional weapons. I’ll leave it at that.”
He asserts a policy stance: “is this what you’re want us to threaten now?,” and responds, “I said, absolutely. Except this time, I want us to go forward with it if necessary. If they think we’re bluffing, we go forward with it.” He states that, regarding existential threats, “as far as I’m concerned, when we are faced with an existential threat, we have the right to use any and all weapons in our disposal to eliminate that existential threat.”
The speaker then contends that many people “don’t know anything about nuclear weapons at all. What they are, how they can be used,” and expresses fatigue with euphemisms, declaring, “I’m tired of using euphemisms. I’m tired of saying, well, we have something, you know, in the basement, but we won’t be the first to introduce, nuclear weapons in The Middle East. It’s enough already.”
In sum, Speaker 0 highlights a historical precedent of threatening and delivering arms to counter existential threats, asserts the right to use any and all weapons if needed, and calls out the lack of public understanding and reluctance to acknowledge the potential introduction of nuclear weapons in the Middle East.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Admit this. We are now feeding our enemy. I mean, this has never happened in history before, and you have to ask why. And I don't wanna hear this business that it's consistent with Jewish morality. It isn't.
Anybody saying that doesn't know anything about Jewish morality at all. Oh, let me bring you back to, October 1973 during the Yom Kippur War when Henry Kissinger instituted an arms embargo against us. And what happened? What happened was an a four Skyhawk was parked at Telenorf Air Base with some interesting weapons under its wings. And, we told the Americans, take your eye in the sky and take a good look at the airplane that's on that runway.
And the next day, the airlift started to the to Israel. Uh-huh. The arms airlift. So in other words, we threatened their We threatened to use unconventional weapons. I'll leave it at that.
And so he said, is this what you're want us to threaten now? I said, absolutely. Except this time, I want us to go forward with it if necessary. If they think we're bluffing, we go forward with it. Look, as far as I'm concerned, when we are faced with an existential threat, we have the right to use any and all weapons in our disposal to eliminate that existential threat.
A lot of people don't know anything about nuclear weapons at all. What they are, how they can be used, and I'm I'm tired of using euphemisms. I'm tired of saying, well, we have something, you know, in the basement, but we won't be the first to introduce, nuclear weapons in The Middle East. It's enough already.
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
Virginia Giuffre couldn't name names, so I will. - Ehud Barak - Glenn Dubin - Thomas Pritzker - Leon Black - Bill Richardson - George Mitchell https://t.co/NoPJrLBMtp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Epstein victim Virginia Dufres new book has just dropped and it is atrocious, the details. Virginia Dufres passed away in April of a suicide. Supposed suicide, maybe an actual suicide. It's unclear. She had insisted before her death that this book came out no matter what happens to her. She wanted this book published. It is now published. She points out many very powerful people. She doesn't name very many names. In the book, she does name prince Andrew, but there's others that she just alludes to. She calls them billionaire one, billionaire two, billionaire three, a sadistic prime minister, soon to be governor of a Western US state, and a former US senator. These are the titles that she gave in the book probably to protect the publisher. So who is she talking about? It's all still kind of speculative, based on her prior accusations in unsealed Epstein documents, she talks about the sadistic prime minister. Dufres describes an unnamed prime minister who raped her, choked her unconscious, laughing as she bled. This is Ehud Barak, the former prime minister of Israel. And at the time, he was the prime minister when he was doing this. That is the allegation. Barak was a close Epstein associate. He visited Epstein's island and New York properties multiple times, flew on the Lolita Express, received millions from Epstein for a security firm. Who are the billionaires? She lists billionaire one, billionaire two, and billionaire three. Billionaire one is likely Glenn DuBen, the hedge fund billionaire and cofounder of Highbridge Capital. Dufres alleged in 2016 that she was trafficked to him for sex. He and his wife, Eva, were close Epstein friends. Billionaire two is likely Thomas Pritzker. She claimed in court filings that she was directed to have sex with him. And billionaire three is likely Leon Black. This is the private equity billionaire and Apollo Global Management cofounder. Soon to be governor of a Western state, I think that is probably Bill Richardson. New Mexico governor Bill Richardson. Dufry accused him in a 2016 deposition of having sex with her while underage. He was a former US energy secretary, UN ambassador, and frequent Epstein guest. He was often on the flight logs for the Lolita Express. The former US senator is likely George Mitchell of Maine who served between 1980 and 1995. Dufry alleged in 2016 testimony that she was directed to have sex with him. He was a frequent Epstein associate and later a Middle East peace envoy under Obama. She endured many horrors. It was absolutely terrible. Her book is atrocious. I mean, this young girl, here she is at 13 years old. This is when they snatched her up basically from Trump's Mar A Lago and used her and abused her. And everybody knew it. Everybody knew it. She was so young. This is why we want the Epstein files. We wanna know who was involved because they should be held accountable. But we also wanna know who was involved because we wanna know who's been compromised.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Epstein victim Virginia Dufres new book has just dropped and it is atrocious, the details. Virginia Dufres passed away in April of a suicide. Supposed suicide, maybe an actual suicide. It's unclear. She had insisted before her death that this book came out no matter what happens to her.
She wanted this book published. It is now published. She points out many very powerful people. She doesn't name very many names. In the book, she does name prince Andrew, but there's others that she just alludes to.
She calls them billionaire one, billionaire two, billionaire three, a sadistic prime minister, soon to be governor of a Western US state, and a former US senator. These are the titles that she gave in the book probably to protect the publisher. So who is she talking about? It's all still kind of speculative, based on her prior accusations in unsealed Epstein documents, she talks about the sadistic prime minister. Dufres describes an unnamed prime minister who raped her, choked her unconscious, laughing as she bled.
This is Ehud Barak, the former prime minister of Israel. And at the time, he was the prime minister when he was doing this. That is the allegation. Barak was a close Epstein associate. He visited Epstein's island and New York properties multiple times, flew on the Lolita Express, received millions from Epstein for a security firm.
Who are the billionaires? She lists billionaire one, billionaire two, and billionaire three. Billionaire one is likely Glenn DuBen, the hedge fund billionaire and cofounder of Highbridge Capital. Dufres alleged in 2016 that she was trafficked to him for sex. He and his wife, Eva, were close Epstein friends.
Billionaire two is likely Thomas Pritzker. She claimed in court filings that she was directed to have sex with him. And billionaire three is likely Leon Black. This is the private equity billionaire and Apollo Global Management cofounder. Soon to be governor of a Western state, I think that is probably Bill Richardson.
New Mexico governor Bill Richardson. Dufry accused him in a 2016 deposition of having sex with her while underage. He was a former US energy secretary, UN ambassador, and frequent Epstein guest. He was often on the flight logs for the Lolita Express. The former US senator is likely George Mitchell of Maine who served between 1980 and 1995.
Dufry alleged in 2016 testimony that she was directed to have sex with him. He was a frequent Epstein associate and later a Middle East peace envoy under Obama. She endured many horrors. It was absolutely terrible. Her book is atrocious.
I mean, this young girl, here she is at 13 years old. This is when they snatched her up basically from Trump's Mar A Lago and used her and abused her. And everybody knew it. Everybody knew it. She was so young.
This is why we want the Epstein files. We wanna know who was involved because they should be held accountable. But we also wanna know who was involved because we wanna know who's been compromised.
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
The people won't stop until Israel is stopped. https://t.co/OIsa8xcllY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel has intercepted more than 40 civilian vessels, with 497 participants from around the world trying to break Israel's illegal blockade, never entering Israeli waters. Israel says it's not illegal, claiming it's protecting themselves from military weapons and things coming in. In reality, many of their leaders have said the attempt is to stop humanitarian aid and to starve the Palestinian people, with only minimal aid allowed, controlled. This has sparked protests, including Italy and nine other countries. Many governments have condemned Israel's interception, including Turkey, Brazil, Malaysia, South Africa, Palestinian Authority, Maldives, Pakistan, and Mexico. Colombia's President Petro announced sweeping measures after two Colombian citizens were detained: expulsion of the Israeli diplomatic delegation, termination of Colombia's free trade agreement with Israel, replacement of US supplied weapons with national equipment, and a global volunteer force to form a military to stop the genocide. Protests have broken out around the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel has intercepted more than 40 of the civilian vessels. The people that came on these boats, you know, 497 participants coming from all around the world trying to break Israel's illegal blockade, never entering Israeli waters. So that's the thing to know is that they never they never actually entered Israeli waters. Israel says it's not illegal. They say that this is within their rights because they're protecting themselves from military weapons and things coming in.
But in reality, many of their leaders have been saying that it's the attempt is to stop humanitarian aid and to starve the Palestinian people. And they've only been allowing very minimal aid in, very controlled. And these people from all around the world were trying to break the blockade to get aid. This has sparked now global protests all around the world. Italy plus nine other countries ended up having major protests.
Many governments have condemned Israel's interception including Turkey, Brazil, Malaysia, South Africa, obviously, the Palestinian Authority, Maldives, Pakistan, Mexico. Colombia has taken it a step further. President Petro announced sweeping measures after two Colombian citizens were detained, expulsion of the entire Israeli diplomatic delegation. He's saying, pack up Israelis and go home. We're done with you.
Termination of Colombia's free trade agreement with Israel, replacement of US supplied weapons with national equipment. He's also recently called for a global volunteer force to form a military to stop the genocide. People are speaking up. People are trying to stop what is going on. People are outraged and protests have broken out all around the world to try to stop Israel.
People just do not support Israel. The country's doomed at this point. People will not stop until Israel is stopped.
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
Look at the views and likes on Tucker's Israel segment... Obviously being suppressed
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
EXPOSED: Inside Tim Pool’s Secret Meeting with Netanyahu https://t.co/bcP5J4PUJS
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tim Pool admitted to attending a private roundtable meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu under Chatham House Rules, which prohibits revealing attendees or attributing statements to individuals. The meeting, held at Blair House, aimed to address growing anti-Israel sentiment in right-wing media.
Attendees included influencers like Dave Rubin, Sean Spicer, Molly Hemingway, Bethany and Seth Mandel, Jessica Kraus, and David J Harris Jr. The discussion covered the possibility of Qatar manipulating social media algorithms to promote anti-Israel content.
Critics argue that such meetings undermine the independence of journalists and influencers, turning them into "guard dogs" for foreign governments. The Chatham House Rule, designed for diplomacy, is inappropriate for commentators who claim to challenge the establishment. The speaker recalls a past experience with Tim Pool's staff who reacted strongly when the speaker mentioned visiting the West Bank. The speaker suggests that influencers attending closed-door meetings with foreign leaders become agents of power, compromising their independence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tim Pool, a man who built his reputation on transparency, anti establishment journalism, and calling out the media elite, admitted that he sat in a private meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu under a little known confidentiality agreement called the Chatham House rule. Watch this.
Speaker 1: Last night, I wasn't here. I got late word that I was invited to a private roundtable meeting with prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It was under what spoke what's called Chatham House rules. For those that are not familiar, this means that you cannot reveal anybody who attended nor attribute anything to any one individual as they can deny it, and they and they would. However, what I love about what the White House is currently doing, when you bring together a bunch of influencers and podcasters who don't know much about journalism culture, whatever you wanna call it, not that we respect it tremendously, most people didn't know what Chatham House meant.
So with all due respect, it's funny because I I they bring us into the Blair House, which is where Nyhan was staying. And immediately, people are walking out their cameras, their phones up. They actually took our phones phones from us. And I legit thought they would maintain Chatham House rules. Meaning, you can't quote the prime minister.
You can't quote his officials and the other people who were there, but you can report what was said generally. If you wanted an official quote on a specific matter, you would then ask an official once the meeting was wrapped, and they provide you the exact quote. Or they would just say outright like, we have put our quotes on that one.
Speaker 0: Okay. So this should alarm you because this wasn't just a conversation. It was a controlled environment curated by a foreign government with the explicit purpose of shaping how you, the audience, see the world. And the people who agreed to this meeting weren't diplomats. They weren't intelligence analysts.
They weren't even traditional journalists. They were independent journalists and influencers, the people you trust because you believe they aren't controlled. And now they are? So what is the Chatham House Rule? So let's pause and explain exactly what this rule is because the devil is in the details and most people have never even heard of it.
So the Chatham House Rule was created in 1927 by the Royal Institute of International in London, aka the Chatham House. It was designed to encourage open, honest dialogue during times of war or diplomacy or instability. So here's the official definition. When a meeting or part thereof is held under the Chatham House rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speakers nor that of any other participant may be revealed. So let's break that down into plain English.
You can repeat what said, but you can't say who said it or where they work or where they're from or that they were even in the room. So the idea was that people could speak honestly without getting fired or starting a war or causing a scandal. Now that makes sense for high stakes diplomacy like two countries trying to stop a war without alarming their citizens. But here's the catch. This wasn't a peace summit.
This was a foreign government talking to YouTubers behind closed doors. That's not diplomacy. That's message control. So here's the hard truth. The Chatham House rule was never meant to be used by journalists or commentators or anyone whose whole brand is, I tell you what the establishment won't.
Because the second someone in media agrees to keep a source secret, not for safety but for strategy, they stop being a watchdog and they become a guard dog. And that's exactly what happened here. Now according to reporting from the Jewish insider, which by the way Tim Pool called fake news while also admitting it was mostly accurate, This closed door meeting happened at Blair House, which is the official guest house of The US President right across from the White House. So who was in the room? On the influencer side, you have Tim Pool, prominent YouTuber, Dave Rubin, also a prominent YouTuber, former press secretary Sean Spicer, editor in chief of the Federalist Molly Hemingway, Bethany and Seth Mandel, who both write for the New York Post and Washington Examiner, mommy blogger Jessica Kraus, and host of Newsmax David j Harris junior.
And on the Israeli side, you have Netanyahu himself, his top diplomatic adviser and the Israeli ambassador to The US. No cameras, no transcripts, just a government, a message, and a room full of people who control what millions of Americans see online. So what was the topic? Well, the goal was to address the growing anti Israel backlash in right wing media, especially among pro Trump populist and Gen Z influencers who are watching footage from Gaza and beginning to question everything. So according to multiple attendees, including Tim, he raised the possibility that Cutter might be manipulating social media algorithms to push anti Semitic or anti Israel content.
Let's watch what he says about that.
Speaker 1: I said there has been a report released from pro Israel sources alleging Qatar is funding bots and operations to promote anti Israel content. Is there any evidence that's true? And he said, I don't know. It's possible. That's what happened.
I did not say they actually were doing that because I don't know that they're actually doing it. However, I did to a variety of people express what I've expressed on this show that there are clearly bots that are anti Israel and anti Semitic. That is not to say people who are critical of Israel don't exist or that no one is critical of Israel. People certainly are.
Speaker 0: Okay. So in other words, maybe the outrage isn't real. Maybe it's bots. And Netanyahu's answer was, it's possible, which was just enough to plant the seed in all of these influencers to get the word out there. So think about what just happened.
A foreign leader met with a group of influential American voices. They agreed not to say who said what. They left that meeting and started repeating the key ideas without telling their audiences where those ideas came from. That's not independent media. That's PR.
That's narrative laundering. It's taking talking points from the top of a foreign power structure and repackaging them as grassroots authentic thought. This story matters because it strikes at the core what people believe about alternative media. These guys are rebels. They don't take orders.
They don't play the DC game. They're not CNN in a hoodie. But guess what? The moment power invited them in, they showed up. They sat down.
They listened. They took notes. And now they're feeding you the exact messages the government wanted them to deliver without telling you where those messages came from. So let me ask you, if Anderson Cooper did this, would you trust him? Then why would you trust Tim Pool?
Now here's a story I've never told until now. This all reminded me of something that happened to me personally back in March of twenty twenty when I was invited onto Tim Pool's podcast. Before we went live, myself and some of his staff were just hanging out in the kitchen just talking, and I casually mentioned that I had just returned from a trip to the West Bank. Not even a political statement, just a fact. And immediately, like snapping fingers, his three staffers all jumped in.
We're pro Israel. Yep. Very, very pro Israel. Not, oh, really? What did you see?
Oh, that's interesting. Tell us more. Just a shutdown. And I remember thinking, that's really odd. Now that was really fast.
That was robotic. That seemed rehearsed. It didn't feel like a personal opinion. Their response felt automatic and preprogrammed. Now I didn't understand it at the time.
But after watching this Netanyahu meeting unfold, after seeing how over the past few months Tim himself has defended Israel in nonsensical ways, now I get it. That moment wasn't an opinion. It was a line. Now we used to be afraid of censorship, and we still should be. But the bigger threat today isn't silencing speech.
It's manipulating it. Not banning content, but pushing certain voices to the top. Not jailing dissidents, but inviting them to dinner. Not attacking critics, but infiltrating the platforms you trust the most. This isn't conspiracy.
This is strategy, and you're watching it in real time. So the next time someone says, I'm just asking questions, ask yourself this. Who did they meet with last week? What were the rules? What didn't they tell you?
Because the biggest threat to free speech isn't just the government. It's when influencers become informal agents of power and still pretend they're not. Now you might say, well, Tim admitted it. Yeah. Sure.
After the Jewish insider outed him. Now if everybody on the named list, only Tim and David Harris junior have acknowledged the meeting. The rest haven't. And even if they do, is it a limited hangout? Just enough to make you trust but not give the full story?
So the next time someone tells you they're fighting the establishment, but they're sitting in rooms with foreign leaders under secret rules, they're not rebels. They're not journalists. They're not even independent. They're part of the machine just wearing different clothes. And if they can't be honest with you about that, then why trust them to be honest with you about anything?
Thank you for watching this clip from the full Kim Iverson show which you could catch Monday through Friday 2PM Pacific 5PM Eastern by going to KimIversonshow.com. You'll catch it live. It is free to watch 2PM Pacific five pm Eastern. See you there.
reSee.it AI Summary
Leaked video reveals Netanyahu's intentions to interpret Oslo accords in a way that prevents progress towards '67 borders. He advocates for striking Palestinians hard and manipulating America's direction. Gideon Levy believes this video should be widely seen to expose Israel's government. Netanyahu also boasts about forcing the US to let Israel define West Bank military zones, effectively ending the Oslo accords.
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
Verified leaked video of Netanyahu. “Turn off the cameras so we can discuss this” “They asked me before the election if I’d honor [the Oslo accords]…I said I would, but … I’m going to interpret the accords in such a way that would allow me to put an end to this galloping forward to the ’67 borders. How did we do it? Nobody said what defined military zones were. Defined military zones are security zones; as far as I’m concerned, the entire Jordan Valley is a defined military zone. Go argue.” “Strike them (Palestinians) hard…they need suffer… so painfully that the price they pay will be unbearable” “I know what America is…America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction. They won’t get in their way.” https://tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/fibi-netanyahu
Fibi Netanyahu - Tablet Magazine
Meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu last week, President Obama could not have been more effusive. “I believe Prime Minister Netanyahu wants peace,” Obama said. “I believe he is ready to take risks for peace.” A newly revealed tape of Netanyahu in 2001, being interviewed while he thinks the cameras are off, shows him in a radically …
tabletmag.com
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
Haaretz’s Gideon Levy: “This video should have been shown in every home in Israel, then sent to Washington and Ramallah. Banned for viewing by children so as not to corrupt them, and distributed around the country and the world so that everyone will know who leads the government of Israel.” https://www.haaretz.com/2010-07-15/ty-article/tricky-bibi/0000017f-dc84-d3a5-af7f-feae8a9e0000
Tricky Bibi
Israel Has Had Many Rightist Leaders Since Menachem Begin Promised "Many Elon Morehs," but There Has Never Been One Like Netanyahu, Who Wants to Do It by Deceit.
haaretz.com
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
Smiling, Netanyahu then recalled how he forced former U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher to agree to let Israel alone determine which parts of the West Bank were to be defined as military zones. “They didn’t want to give me that letter,” Netanyahu said, “so I didn’t give them the Hebron agreement [the agreement giving Hebron back to the Palestinians]. I cut the cabinet meeting short and said, ‘I’m not signing.’ Only when the letter came, during that meeting, to me and to Arafat, did I ratify the Hebron agreement. Why is this important? Because from that moment on, I de facto put an end to the Oslo accords.” https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/fibi-netanyahu
Fibi Netanyahu - Tablet Magazine
Meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu last week, President Obama could not have been more effusive. “I believe Prime Minister Netanyahu wants peace,” Obama said. “I believe he is ready to take risks for peace.” A newly revealed tape of Netanyahu in 2001, being interviewed while he thinks the cameras are off, shows him in a radically …
tabletmag.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Shani, a German-Israeli woman, is alive but in critical condition in a Gaza hospital, as reported by her family. However, Israel's plan to cut off electricity and supplies could hinder her recovery. Additionally, German internet users have identified one of the Hamas men responsible for her murder as Mahmoud Abourjila. (Total characters: 383)
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen
New reports from Israel: Shani is alive and in a hospital in Gaza according to her family. She is in critical condition. Israel’s plan to turn off electricity and halt supplies and food could hinder her ability to recover and survive.
@KimIversenShow - Kim Iversen
German tattoo artist Shani Louk believed to be alive after being paraded through streets by Hamas, mom says
Shani Louk was last seen dancing at the Tribe of Nova party in the northern Negev Saturday before the rave was stormed by Hamas militants.
nypost.com