reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Knob_oddy_rtrns

Knob_oddy_rtrns
Posted - February 21, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 9:17 AM

@Knob_oddy_rtrns - Knob Oddy 🏴‍☠️☦️

In this clip, the officer suggests police thought I had guns in my house Unfortunately for them, I have OIA'd all info and it proves the opposite Also proof that Detective Libby was asked to be called prior to cops arriving, which they didn't do I wonder who she wanted to attend? https://t.co/e7fRayfUUP

Video Transcript AI Summary
I came to your house expecting to find a gun because you're a license holder. We're required to wear weapons when dealing with guns as a police protocol. I find this unacceptable because I haven't broken any laws and you barged into my house without a warrant, fully armed. This was a warrantless search under section 18 of the search and study act. We did this because we expected you to have a firearm. If you had cooperated, it would have been easier. I did cooperate, and I have it on video. You put my hands behind my back because you were getting angry and aggressive. I was angry because I have four officers at my house not obeying the law. Just explain it to me, so we can move on.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With me. Speaker 1: Why did you come to find a gun here? Why did you expect a gun in my house? Speaker 0: You're a license holder. Speaker 1: Yes. But I've registered my firearms, and I have none here. Speaker 0: So we're giving you this extension notice, and it's just police protocol for us to wear a weapon when we're coming to deal with guns, and that's all. I'm not saying you're gonna do any extubing, but it's what we have to wear. Okay? Speaker 1: It's not acceptable, mate. I've broken no laws. You've come and busted in my house without a warrant, with arms, fully armed. Speaker 0: Warrantless search under section 18 of the search and study. Speaker 1: And was this a warrantless search? Speaker 0: Yes. It was. Speaker 1: Why did you need to do that when I'd invite invite you willingly in my house if Speaker 0: you Which is expected you had a firearm in the house. If you stood there and cooperated around, it would have been a lot easier. Speaker 1: I did. I've got it on video. I stood there and cooperated. You put your hands my hands behind my Speaker 0: back. Right. It's because you were getting a bit angry and aggressive. Well, do Speaker 1: you know why? Because I have four officers at my house not obeying the law. Speaker 0: Just explain it to me so we're not gonna get over it again.
Knob_oddy_rtrns
Posted - February 20, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 2:49 AM

@Knob_oddy_rtrns - Knob Oddy 🏴‍☠️☦️

Following on from @SimonRAnderson video, with security camera footage showing police entering my home on the 6/9/24 A few seconds to realize cops turned my phone off, and I've cut a few seconds out which showed my children Police enter with no warrant https://t.co/L3NH2PI6YT

Video Transcript AI Summary
I would volunteer and suspend my license to volunteer in the city. I have a broken door, but the way you've treated me makes me feel worse than a criminal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. I would volunteer and suspend my license, and I would volunteer in the city. I have a broken door. The way you've treated me, it's like I'm worse than a criminal.
Knob_oddy_rtrns
Posted - February 19, 2025 at 11:06 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 2:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated after a female officer not only ignored my rights to free thought and expression but also slandered me, implying I might harm my wife. It’s absurd since I’ve never hurt a woman. Additionally, they claim recording police is anti-government, but I see it as just evidence.

@Knob_oddy_rtrns - Knob Oddy 🏴‍☠️☦️

Not content after disregarding my human rights to free thought and expression, the female officer then slanders me to colleagues and suggests I'm about to beat my wife because she opened the door to police.... Considering I have never hurt a woman (physically) this is absurd https://t.co/D56aA9LAoG

@Knob_oddy_rtrns - Knob Oddy 🏴‍☠️☦️

Although redacted, in my FSA and OT OIAs, they suggest exercising your right to record police is an "anti police/government security measure" I'd just call it evidence

Knob_oddy_rtrns
Posted - February 20, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 1:50 AM

@Knob_oddy_rtrns - Knob Oddy 🏴‍☠️☦️

Here is a masculine role model getting into a cat fight with my darling wife, who was obviously not happy with armed police storming in without a warrant or imminent threat. Not even a call out. A police initiated witch hunt, with no regard for the safety of my family https://t.co/ZYiJ2flbXO

Video Transcript AI Summary
I broke the law, and you've been posting concerning things. Are you going to let me talk? You won't let me talk. It's in the notes. Do you want me to explain? There's been concerning behavior with no explanation at my house. I'm just telling you what's happened. We've had no explanation of the concerning things. There was a leak of flames. I tried to get in my house before it's clear. That's my supervisor; don't talk to her like that.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've given it to you. So I've broken the law. You've been posting concerning things for the past as well. What that mean? Are you gonna let me talk? Don't know. They're gonna let me talk. Told what they're doing. It's because you won't let me talk. You bring I'll put it in it's in the notes. Yes. Do you want me to explain it to you? Yes, please. He's been concerning. I have had no explanation in my house. You're just gonna No. No. No. No. I'm just telling you what's happened. We've had no explanation of the concerning things that you busted it. A leak of flames. I tried to get in my house before it's clear. It's my supervisor. Don't talk to her like that.
View Full Interactive Feed