TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @LangmanVince
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
OMG. Check out this Trump Deranged psychopath who's literally going batshit crazy over the ending of the Schumer Shutdown. Enjoy this one 👇😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/vh92iQFxF8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that “The capitulation of a few senate democrats is as backstabbing a betrayal as we will ever need to unite as a true democratic party and dismantle the leadership that put us in this position.” They assert that “Mom Donnie has shown us the way” and declare that “it is time to end the era of the feckless democrat too scared to unify the party and stand up to Donald Trump, to stand up to lawlessness, and in this case, to fight for Americans.” The speaker then emphasizes a contrast between Republicans’ actions and the consequences for Americans, stating “what Republicans are doing is robbing millions of Americans of their health insurance.” They add, “It is horrible what Republicans are doing, and it is equally bad that Democrats have lost their spine in standing up to it.”
The speaker frames this moment as a turning point, describing it as “the moment when we recognize that is the old Democratic party,” and proclaims that “it is time to make way for the new Democrats who are born of courage and battle for the American people, not for bowing down out of fear.” Throughout, the message centers on unity within the Democratic Party, a repudiation of perceived capitulation or timidity, and a call to replace the old leadership with a more courageous, combative strain of Democratic leadership that will actively defend Americans and confront lawlessness and opposition encountered from Republicans. The rhetoric casts the shift as essential to effectively oppose Donald Trump and to mobilize a party that stands up for the health and welfare of American citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The capitulation of a few senate democrats is as backstabbing a betrayal as we will ever need to unite as a true democratic party and dismantle the leadership that put us in this position. Mom Donnie has shown us the way. It is time to end the era of the feckless democrat too scared to unify the party and stand up to Donald Trump, to stand up to lawlessness, and in this case, to fight for Americans. And let's remember, what Republicans are doing is robbing millions of Americans of their health insurance. It is horrible what Republicans are doing, and it is equally bad that Democrats have lost their spine in standing up to it.
But this is the moment when we recognize that is the old Democratic party, and it is time to make way for the new Democrats who are born of courage and battle for the American people, not for bowing down out of fear.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Cancle Netflix! https://t.co/doCGTCJxr8
Video Transcript AI Summary
"It's not the park. It's it's me. I'm trans, Norma. And everyone at school knows and everyone at home knows." "I can just be Barney, and I can choose if and when I tell people." "I've never been happier, and that's saying something when I spent today chased by terrifying zombie mascots." "Pugsley reminded me how important it is to live your life without apology." "So I think I gotta give living here a shot." "Now that's on Netflix and it's called Dead End Paranormal Park." "season one, episode two, The Tunnel." "TV, Y7? That's telling you this is rated for seven year olds and up." "What are we doing? Parents, pay attention to what your children are watching." "Anyway, that's all I got for now. We'll see you in the next one."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not the park. It's it's me. I'm trans, Norma. And everyone at school knows and everyone at home knows. And being here, it's like a whole new place.
I can just be Barney, and I can choose if and when I tell people. I've never been happier, and that's saying something when I spent today chased by terrifying zombie mascots. Pugsley reminded me how important it is to live your life without apology. So I think I gotta give living here a shot.
Speaker 1: Now that's on Netflix and it's called Dead End Paranormal Park. So you can see Netflix series Dead End Paranormal Park, season one, episode two, The Tunnel. And see that TV, Y7? That's telling you this is rated for seven year olds and up. Now I'm not sure why a seven year old needs to be introduced to trans ideology.
Seems a bit young, but this is live on Netflix and again they're saying this is for seven year olds and above. No. Do seven year olds need to be introduced to this ideology? No, they don't. Netflix, what are we doing?
What are we doing? Parents, pay attention to what your children are watching. Seems they're sneaking things like this into shows. Also, a reminder, I have a free email newsletter where I go into more detail on many of the topics I talk about here. I also give you morning updates about what's going on.
It's a great place to get daily information from me. The link is in my profile. Just go there, click that link. You'll see the screen right here. Drop your email in, hit subscribe, and you'll be good to go.
Anyway, that's all I got for now. We'll see you in the next one.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
The conspiracy theorists were right about everything https://t.co/g4tackVtWU
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Here's a better video of exactly what that liberal POS Ryder Corral did the Charlie Kirk's memorial in Arizona. Make this Kamala Harris voting scumbag famous for all the wrong reasons! https://t.co/Gwq0nNTvGb
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Megyn Kelly destroyed that racist host Abby Phillip's and the low IQ Van Jones on her podcast today after they tried to downplay the murder of the white Ukrainian woman by a black career criminal. https://t.co/YhfCfc1FKT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Abby Phillip's segment centers on race. Charlie Kirk claims, "A white Ukrainian refugee was murdered just because she was white," and argues that "Megan Basham, no one seems to care when a white woman gets stabbed to the death." Van Jones counters, "We don't know why that man did what he did. And for Charlie Kirk to say, we know he did it because she's white, when there's no evidence of that, is just pure Amazing. Race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong." He asks, "Where is the George Floyd Policing Act? It didn't pass. You mentioned the thing about cashless bail." He adds, "It's not about cashless bail or no cashless bail. We don't know how to deal with people who are hurting in the way this man was hurting. Hurt people hurt people." "The mom would not have bailed him out, had there been cash bail." The mother was upset that the system continued turning her son back out into the community. The piece concludes that after George Floyd, "nothing changed in this country" and critiques "racial essentialism" across institutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's Abby Phillip who never misses an opportunity to make her segments or her show about race and how oppressed black people like Abby Phillip who makes millions of dollars presumably are. Here she is in SOP three.
Speaker 1: Certain people have been looking for an opportunity to find a case like this, to make a point like this. I wanna play. This is Charlie Kirk. Why he says this hasn't gotten a lot of attention.
Speaker 2: A white Ukrainian refugee was murdered just because she was white. Everybody knows that, obviously. If a random white person simply walked up to and stabbed a nice law abiding black person for no reason, it would be an apocalyptically huge national story used to impose national sweeping political changes on the whole country. Instead, Megan Basham, no one seems to care when a white woman gets stabbed to the death.
Speaker 0: Wow. He said white a lot.
Speaker 1: They've been looking for opportunities to make this some sort of, like, reciprocal George Floyd situation. And that's the part that I think he's almost giving away the game, and it it's sad to see a lot of people going along with it.
Speaker 0: And here's the follow-up. Hold your thought. From Van Jones.
Speaker 3: We don't know why that man did what he did. And for Charlie Kirk to say, we know he did it because she's white, when there's no evidence of that, is just pure Amazing. Race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong. Then he says that if something like that had happened the other way, there would be sweeping changes imposed on society.
Where is the George Floyd Policing Act? It didn't pass. You mentioned the thing about cashless bail. I think this is a big challenge that we have. Would you have felt better if there had been cash bail and the mom had come and put down a thousand dollars to let them out?
It's not about cashless bail or no cashless bail. It's about the fact that we don't know how to deal with people who are hurting in the way this man was hurting. Hurt people hurt people.
Speaker 0: Just two quick things. The mom would have gotten him out of jail, like, if if there'd been, like, bail. She we don't know that she wouldn't have gone down and bailed him out. Yes. We do.
Because the mom wanted him locked up. Van needs to do his homework. He did not do his homework before he went on that show because I I do not believe he wants to appear willfully ignorant. The mother was upset that the system continued turning her son back out into the community. She didn't know what to do with him and had run out of options.
So I believe the mother would not have bailed him out, had there been cash bail. And the business about where's the George Floyd policing like like, nothing changed in this country after George Floyd. Like, we're just gonna pretend that that wasn't some watershed moment where the left lost its ever loving mind and forced all of corporate America and sports America and educational America to bend the knee on this racial this race essentialism, which has still infested virtually every area of our lives and how we live to this day.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
This guy's firm has lost millions of dollars because of this bonehead behavior at the US Open. Justified? https://t.co/3s3yG7Zq3i
Video Transcript AI Summary
"A top chief executive has been accused of snatching a child tennis fan's hat at the US Open, with his firm now facing negative online reviews." "Polish player Kamal Mikrozak went to the crowd after the biggest win of his career." "The 29 year old defeated ninth seed Karen Kachanoff in a marathon five set thriller on Thursday, and then was filmed removing his caps and trying to hand it to a child in the crowd on Court 11." "The clip of the hat snatch has sparked fury online with fans branding the unidentified man selfish and a jerk for stealing a moment that should have belonged to a child." "Just hours later, the Polish star confirmed the boy had been located." "I'm impressed by the power of the Internet. We got it. All good now."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A top chief executive has been accused of snatching a child tennis fan's hat at the US Open, with his firm now facing negative online reviews. Viral video footage revealed the moments after Polish player Kamal Mikrozak went to the crowd after the biggest win of his career. The 29 year old defeated ninth seed Karen Kachanoff in a marathon five set thriller on Thursday, and then was filmed removing his caps and trying to hand it to a child in the crowd on Court 11. But in ugly scenes, a man standing next to the boy reached out, grabbed the cap, and stuffed it into his bag. That left the youngster looking crestfallen and asking, what are you doing?
As Meigersack walked away, unaware of what had just happened. Now there has been a rising backlash against the hat grabber, and there appeared online a lengthy statement in his defense by someone purporting to be the businessman's lawyer, yet that was later deleted with the legal official telling people he had been misrepresented. The clip of the hat snatch has sparked fury online with fans branding the unidentified man selfish and a jerk for stealing a moment that should have belonged to a child. Mike Rzak moved to put things right on Friday, taking to Instagram to appeal for help in finding the boy. After the match, I didn't record that my cap didn't get to the boy.
He wrote, thanks to Asics Dennis, I've got enough caps, so I'm prepared for that. Hey, guys. Could you help me find the kid for my match? If it's you or your parents see this, please send me a DM. Just hours later, the Polish star confirmed the boy had been located.
Sharing the same pictures of the incident on his story, he added, I'm impressed by the power of the Internet. We got it. All good now.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Hilarious 😂 https://t.co/kr9Si2C5FI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Julie, CEO of Cracker Barrel, says 'we fucked up' and that they will fix it starting with Uncle Herschel. 'You're back in the logo. Yeah.' She declares they 'went woke' and 'doubled the fuck down' on southern roots. 'How are those pancakes tasting? It's like a kid rock concert in my mouth.' She asks, 'Do you own a certain red hat? Well, guess what? 25% off.' 'How do you like them pancakes? I'll take it, but I'm still gonna call you woke.' She pleads, 'Please. Please. Please come back to Cracker Barrel.' 'I beg of you.' She states, 'I just lost this company a $100,000,000 over a logo made in Canva.' 'I thought you fuckers like that Chip and Joanna shit.' 'Lesson fucking learned. Help a sister out, please.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. I'm Julie, CEO of your favorite southern theme restaurant, and I want all of you to know that we hear you. We fucked up. So we're gonna fix it starting with uncle Herschel. Don't you dare move from that rocking chair, sir.
You're back in the logo. Yeah. You said we went woke. Fuck that. Not only did we go back to our southern roots, we doubled the fuck down.
How are those pancakes tasting? It's like a kid rock concert in my mouth. Do you own a certain red hat? Well, guess what? 25% off.
How do you like them pancakes? I'll take it, but I'm still gonna call you woke. Please. Please. Please come back to Cracker Barrel.
I beg of you. I just lost this company a $100,000,000 over a logo made in Canva. I thought you fuckers like that Chip and Joanna shit. Well, lesson fucking learned. Help a sister out, please.
reSee.it AI Summary
A user criticized a brief segment from a televised debate, calling it possibly the worst in history. In response, another user referenced Joe Biden's family issues, suggesting a pattern of in-family abuse. They shared texts from Biden's family urging Hunter Biden to address his inappropriate behavior with his niece/stepdaughter, providing further context in a second message that included additional family communications regarding the matter.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
This is quite possible the worst 31 seconds in the history of televised debates on planet Earth https://t.co/hwjdghwiIU
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are many young women, including one recently murdered, with the idea that she was murdered by an immigrant. However, many young women are raped by their in-laws, spouses, or siblings, and they can do nothing about it. Attempts are then made to arrest them when they cross state lines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. There's so many young women who have been including a young woman who just was murdered, and he he went to the funeral. The idea that she was murdered by a by by an immigrant coming in to they talk about that. But here's the deal. There's a lot of young women who'd be raped by their by their in laws, by their by their spouses, brothers and sisters, by or just it's just ridiculous, and they can do nothing about it.
And then try to arrest them when they cross state lines. Thank you.
@MisterIneffable - Mr.Ineffable
1/2: Joe Biden knows all about that in-family abuse. It’s a family trait. Exhibit A and B. I also threw in a few texts between Biden family and Hunter, urging Hunter to correct his inappropriate behavior with his Niece/stepdaughter. See 2nd tweet for the remainder of Biden family tweets.
@MisterIneffable - Mr.Ineffable
@LangmanVince 2/2 rest of Biden family texts to Hunter about his inappropriate relationship with his niece/stepdaughter. https://t.co/y2hLHktqYs
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Hey guys, the crazy Karen's on TikTok are now claiming that Kamala Harris won the 2024 election in a landslide, according to a CIA whistleblower 😂 https://t.co/NjuRfgeEwS
Video Transcript AI Summary
A former CIA agent and whistleblower is prepared to testify under oath regarding an investigation into the J. K. McNugget v. Mamala contest. The whistleblower will claim that Mamala won by a landslide. The speaker suggests that something went wrong, implicating many people, including some unexpected individuals. The speaker concludes that AmClub was correct about the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The breakingest of breaking news has happened. Yesterday, a former CIA agent and now whistleblower is ready to testify under oath that there was an investigation into the most recent contest, J. K. McNugget v. Mamala.
And it turns out that that not only did Mamala win, she won by a landslide. But obviously, something went wrong. And so many people were involved in the wrong thing. People that you would assume, but people you wouldn't assume. So deeply buried that many, many people could get in trouble.
Guys, it's happening for AmClub. You were right.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Devin Nunes tells Maria Bartiromo exactly why Biden's Gestapo DOJ raided Mar-a-Lago 👇 https://t.co/6crwKalN39
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the raid on Mar-a-Lago was an attempt to prevent Trump's reelection, possibly to find the intelligence community assessment on Russia's influence in the 2016 election. This report allegedly shows that if Putin favored anyone, it was Hillary Clinton, and that Trump and Russia did not collude. The speaker claims the report contains every piece of relevant intelligence and that Clinton and the DNC did collude.
The speaker is confident that the DOJ strike force, along with information from the Durham report and a real team of investigators, will uncover the truth. He mentions criminal referrals he and John Ratcliffe made, expressing hope that the conspirators will be held accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But that Ray Del Mar A Lago wasn't very long ago. That was an attempt. Whatever they were looking for, whatever scheme they had cooked up, whatever they were looking for, they didn't find, clearly. But that was to try to stop president Trump from being reelected. Unbelievable.
That's all it was. And so there's a lot more to do with that. I'm happy that the justice department has the strike force. And look, I'm gonna you know, as as chairman of the president's intelligence board, I'm gonna try to get out as much of this information and get it declassified as as possible.
Speaker 1: So you believe that they raided Mar A Lago because they were looking for this? They were looking for the intelligence community assessment, your report on Russia's influence campaign targeting the twenty sixteen presidential election. Is that that's why they raided Marah.
Speaker 0: It had to be one of the things that they were that they were looking for. Because, look, that report is is pretty damning. If people take the time to read it, it's, you know, 45 pages that spent you know, we had a dedicated team that spent nearly two years down at the CIA looking through this. It was blocked from getting out. And the reason that report is so important, right, that's you know, let's just, you know, dumb it down.
Simply put, we went through every single piece of intelligence that existed. And if anything, it was clear that if Putin was gonna do anything, he probably wanted Hillary Clinton to win. But in fact, if you just apply a little common sense to it, the fact was is that nobody around the world thought that president Trump was going to win in 02/2016. Same with Vladimir Putin. He didn't either.
And so when you when you go through that, that was the intelligence. Every piece of intelligence that existed is we went through it. It's in that report. And so and what do we know? What do we after all this, after all, you know, Trump and Russia in collusion, you know, the two people that didn't collude?
Trump and Russia. That's what we found out. We know that Clinton colluded. We know the DNC colluded. You had John Podesta on earlier, you know, sitting there lying on television.
He cooked that whole damn thing up. He he had to be part of the team that cooked that up for the Clinton campaign.
Speaker 1: Let me get your take on this strike force. Do you think the DOJ strike force will be able to actually give us accountability? Everything's now gonna flow through this strike force. Right?
Speaker 0: Yeah. And look. And and eventually, once they I'm assuming once they gather all this information, this you broke news this morning with John Ratcliffe saying that there was additional information in the Durham report. I've never seen that. So that will be new.
That'll be new information. I think once you compile that, then the strike force will have to work with real investigators unlike the investigators these fake investigations that have gone on. So I'm confident that between the Trump Justice Department, working with Cash Patel and Bongino over at the FBI, they'll have a real team of people that will actually look at this in its entirety, get to the bottom of it, and then at that point, there's no question. John Ratcliffe, as you know, made criminal referrals. Don't forget, I made a dozen criminal referrals as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
So, you know, those are all sitting over there somewhere. So, hopefully, the the conspirators will be held accountable.
Speaker 1: I wanna talk about this. I wanna know who should be criminally prosecuted after all of this. We've got more with Devin Nunes, chairman of the president's intelligence advisory board, right after this break. Stay with us.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Full video of an Elon Musk Deranged psychopath who keyed a neighbor's Tesla, shot it, and got arrested. FAFO! https://t.co/Y14TZCbSzM
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual is questioned on private property after loud noises and vandalism to a car are reported. The individual claims to have been walking home from the store and investigating the noise. The questioner notes the individual is on private property and asks if they always walk on strangers' properties. The questioner asks if the individual is targeting Tesla vehicles due to disliking Elon Musk. The individual admits to disliking Musk but denies vandalism. The questioner points out the individual is holding keys and questions why they aren't in a bag with groceries. The individual is asked to empty their purse and bag. The questioner finds keys with paint on them and a weapon allegedly used to damage the car. The individual attempts to flee but is apprehended and read their Miranda rights. The individual accuses the questioner of targeting a poor older lady.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's going on, man?
Speaker 1: The whole thing, I
Speaker 0: was just, you
Speaker 1: know, in the neighborhood. I'm coming from the store, and I heard this noise, and I want to see what was going on.
Speaker 0: You heard a noise. You wanted to see what was going on?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I heard some, like, loud noises coming from over here.
Speaker 0: Were you just
Speaker 1: I'm going was going home.
Speaker 0: Okay. But this isn't on your way home. This is private property. The owner actually just called us, reported vandalism to car. Somebody was keying it.
Speaker 1: Me. I mean, it's not gonna
Speaker 0: mean, I
Speaker 1: was literally just, you know, I'm just walking around the neighborhood.
Speaker 0: Okay. But you're on his property right now?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Because I just want to investigate to see what happened.
Speaker 0: You always just walk on strangers properties?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I heard something. You know, I just wanted to see what was going on.
Speaker 0: Let's take a look over
Speaker 1: here. Oh,
Speaker 0: wow. All kinds of chemo? Do you mind telling me what you're actually doing? Are you one of those Elon guys?
Speaker 1: Oh, god. I mean
Speaker 0: You don't don't really like what he's doing in the government? Thought you'd take it out on Tesla?
Speaker 1: I I mean, I'm gonna admit I don't like him. Yeah. I don't like anything that has to do with him. I mean but I do that.
Speaker 0: What are
Speaker 1: I'm holding my keys because I'm going home.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But why would you just have your keys out in your hand? Why wouldn't they be in your bag if you're carrying groceries? That doesn't make sense.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. You got them here. I didn't see it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Uh-uh. I'm gonna hold on to these here. Let me see the bags. Alright, ma'am.
I'll need you to empty out your purse. The bag on your back.
Speaker 1: A couple months anyway, but, I mean, I'm I have right to have it on. Oh,
Speaker 0: wow. So assuming that this is what you're saying, you have the right to have on you?
Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, this is America.
Speaker 0: Alright. So you've got keys with the paint all over them. A weapon that was clearly used to to shoot these holes in it. Hey. Stop it right now.
Hey. Get over here. Stop. Hands behind your back. No.
Really? Thought you're gonna outrun me?
Speaker 1: Can't run. You
Speaker 0: have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. I highly suggest you exercise that right. Let's go. Move.
Whatever. You just lost your groceries now too.
Speaker 1: Oh, are you gonna eat them? Nothing better to do than pick a freaking poor older lady? Move. Alright. Come on, man.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
The pilot walks away from this plan crash because his plane had a parachute that deployed after his engine failed! Incredible! https://t.co/tKkPkOwqIY
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
This is quite possible the worst 31 seconds in the history of televised debates on planet Earth https://t.co/hwjdghwiIU
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are many young women, including one recently murdered, with some suggesting an immigrant was responsible. However, many young women are raped by in-laws, spouses, and siblings, and are unable to do anything about it. Efforts are then made to arrest them when they cross state lines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. There's so many young women who have been including a young woman who just was murdered, and he he went to the funeral. The idea that she was murdered by a by by an immigrant coming in to they talk about that. But here's the deal. There's a lot of young women who'd be raped by their by their in laws, by their by their spouses, brothers and sisters, by or just it's just ridiculous, and they can do nothing about it.
And then try to arrest them when they cross state lines. Thank you.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Before and after video of the giant ship that crashed into the Brooklyn bridge tonight I hope those people were not on the sails when the accident happened! 🙏 https://t.co/YEVozCn1Wr
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Hey Kash Patel, it looks like we have a domestic terrorist posting videos about attack federal agents and their families on TikTok https://t.co/bObXXZ4Vpx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states it is time to track down ICE agents, find out who they work for, determine if they have families and where their households are, and then "rip them the fuck apart from their family and put them in fucking jail."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And now it's time to track down ice. Now it's time to come after ice. So let's figure out where these people are, who they work for. And on top of that, let's figure out if they have families, where their household is, and let's rip them the fuck apart from their family and put them in fucking jail.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Why did NYC put up a statue of a fat black woman who committed mortgage fraud? https://t.co/YMKtDfvg72
@DGrayTexas45 - Clyp Keeper
@LangmanVince Is this pic from when she was nearly kidnapped by the FBI before the FBI saved her? https://t.co/FMPTv39eyo
Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI stopped an alleged terror plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Thirteen suspects were arrested, including alleged members of a right-wing militia.
The FBI infiltrated and wiretapped the group after a tip that they were plotting against police and planning to attack the state capital to overthrow the government. An informant heard the suspects call Whitmer a tyrant and discuss taking her to a secret location in Wisconsin for a trial ending in execution.
In the trial, two defendants were acquitted, and two received mistrials; none were convicted. The defense argued entrapment, claiming paid FBI informants incited the conduct. A senator questioned whether any FBI agents were disciplined after the case. The special agent in charge of the Whitmer case was promoted to the Washington DC office and now leads the January 6 investigation. The lead investigator in the Whitmer case was allegedly fired for beating his wife and making derogatory political posts about President Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're gonna begin tonight with that alleged terror plot and the chilling plan. The FBI says it stopped before it could be carried out. A plan to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer and then what they were planning to do to her. 13 suspects arrested, including seven alleged members of a right wing militia group.
Speaker 1: The FBI infiltrated and wiretapped one of the groups after getting a tip that the men were allegedly plotting against police and planning to attack the state capital in an attempt to overthrow the government. With an informant listening in, they call Whitmer a tyrant. One of the suspects saying snatch and grab the governor. Just grab the expletive. They allegedly wanted to take her to a secret location in Wisconsin for a trial, a trial that would end in execution.
Recently,
Speaker 2: there was the case against individuals charged with kidnapping and murdering governor Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan. That case ended up an absolute debacle where the four people who went to trial, two of them were acquitted, two received mistrials, none of them were convicted on even a single charge and the basis of the defense was entrapment that the FBI that paid enforcements for the FBI had suggested and had incited the conduct. Let me ask you, how many FBI agents were disciplined or reprimanded after that disastrous case and the misconduct that led to every defendant being acquitted or having a mistrial on every charge?
Speaker 3: Senator, I can't comment on a personal matter. I can tell you that that case, as I understand it, is now pending a a retrial as I understand it.
Speaker 2: Well, the special agent in charge of that case has now been sent to DC, to the Washington DC office, and now leads the investigation regarding January 6. Is that correct?
Speaker 3: That doesn't sound right to me.
Speaker 2: That does not sound right. The the the name of the individual is Steven D'Antuno. He was he was run out of the FBI Detroit field office. And by the way, I will point out that the lead investigator, special agent Trac, are you aware that he was apparently fired for allegedly beating his wife after coming home from a swingers party and he'd made multiple derogatory political posts about president Trump showing political bias? Are you aware of that?
Speaker 3: I am aware of, I think, the incident you're describing, an action that was taken about it. To clarify on the first part of your question, mister Dantuano was the special agent in charge of the office, the Detroit field office, and is now the assistant director in charge of the Washington field office. I thought you were asking about the agent who was responsible
Speaker 2: for the So the guy in charge got promoted and is now in charge of the January 6 investigation.
Speaker 3: The guy in charge of the whole Detroit field office is now in charge of the whole Washington field office. That is astonishing.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Another example of our corrupt media in America. Six wealthy women got more coverage for spending about 9 minutes in space, than two brave astronauts got who were rescued by Elon Musk after being stranded in space for 9 months https://t.co/haO8totyQE
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
President Trump just released a tribute to the late, great Lou Dobbs. 🙏 https://t.co/lr5Ev97x9z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Lou Dobbs was described as one of the greatest in his industry, a real talent, and a tough person who was tough on bad people. He was a big and powerful voice who will be missed. Dobbs and his wife Debbie had a great relationship.
Dobbs was very special and instrumental in the success of MAGA, understanding it better than anybody. He was a great man and great at what he did. It is an honor to do a tribute for him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dobbs was one of the greatest ever in an industry that had a lot of great people. There was nobody like him. He was my friend, and he was a real talent, and he was a tough cookie. He was so tough, but he was tough on bad people, not on good people. He is somebody that's really gonna be missed.
He's a big voice. Lou was a really big voice, a very powerful voice. It's very devastating. I thought that he was going to, frankly, be around forever. Debbie, his wife, is unbelievable.
I'd see him together all the time, and they really had a great relationship. I thought Lou was gonna be here for a long time. Then I got a little bad news two or three days ago, and they were saying he wasn't feeling so hot. And that was that made me feel badly. And I guess I wasn't feeling so hot either a few days ago, come to think of it.
But Lou was just a very, very special guy to me. He was, somebody very instrumental in the success of MAGA. He understood MAGA better than anybody, and he will truly be missed. He was truly a great man, great at what he did, and a great person. So it's an honor to do this little tribute for him.
I would do it anywhere they wanted me to. He was very, very special, and may he rest in peace.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
How the F*ck did the rotor blades simply fall off that helicopter? https://t.co/7aITVQZXVf
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Hey Mark Kelly, If you have to tell people how great you are, you're probably not. https://t.co/4Bs80VD8Ms
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Kelly is joining TikTok to define himself and hear from others. He will share his work, life, and daily activities.
A key focus will be holding Donald Trump and Elon Musk accountable for harming government services for everyday Americans. Kelly cites his 25 years in the Navy, 39 combat missions, four NASA missions, and four years as a Senator as evidence of his commitment to service.
He claims Trump and Musk only serve themselves. Kelly urges viewers to join him in holding them accountable, defending democracy, and standing up for working-class Americans. He emphasizes the need for collective action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, TikTok. It's Mark Kelly. Now, you might not know me, and if you do, it might be as a NASA astronaut or a combat pilot or Arizona senator or more likely as Gabby Gifford's husband. Now I'm joining TikTok to make sure you know exactly who I am and what I stand for, and it's also so I can hear from you too. Now I'll be sharing what I'm working on, what my life's like, and what I'm up to from one day to the next.
And a big part of that is what I'm doing to hold Donald Trump and Elon Musk accountable. From VA care for veterans to the Department of Education, Donald Trump and Elon Musk are blowing up parts of our government, and it's the parts that everyday Americans rely on. You know, I served twenty five years in the United States Navy and flew 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm. I flew four missions as an astro NASA astronaut, twice as commander of the space shuttle. And I've been in the United States Senate now for four years.
I did all of this because I believe in service to our country. But Donald Trump and Elon Musk, they only know how to serve themselves. So I hope you'll join me in doing everything you can to hold them accountable, to defend our democracy, and to stand up for working class Americans. It's going to take all of us working together. So let's get it done.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Oh, look, Barack Obama was talking about bypassing Congress in order to tackle waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government when he was in office. Funny, I don't remember the MSM calling him a cruel dictator for this. https://t.co/ZS3WbNUtv2
Video Transcript AI Summary
I made a commitment to the American people to cut wasteful spending in Washington. We don't have to wait for Congress to act. Leaders in both parties have worked on cutting waste and making government more efficient. Since we haven't seen as much action out of Congress as we'd like, we're launching our own efforts to address this issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the commitments that I made the American people was that we would do a better job here in Washington in rooting out wasteful spending. We don't need to wait for congress in order to do something about wasteful spending that's out there. Cutting waste, making government more efficient is something that leaders in both parties have worked on. We haven't seen as much action out of congress as we'd like, and that's why we launched on our own
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Nancy Mace is great! 😂😂 https://t.co/Uw1GRjXa0e
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mayor Adams, do you hate Donald Trump more than you love your country? I respect my president and my country. The answer is no.
Mayor Johnson, do you love your country? Yes, sir. No.
Mayor Johnson, do you love your country? As a pastor's son, I love everyone and this country.
Mayor Will, do you love your country? I love my country and my city.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you all hate Donald Trump more than you love your country, mayor Adams? I respect my president. I respect my country. Yes, sir. No.
You're having the hardest time today. Mayor Johnson? I love my country. Yes, sir. No.
I love my country. Mayor Johnson? As the son of a pastor, I love everyone and this country. Mayor Will. I love my country and my city.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
This scumbag must be brought to justice! https://t.co/9FtYW7xnaM
Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI was accused of treason, illegal spying, and a criminal conspiracy to unseat a president. All of that was nonsense. I was overconfident in the procedures that the FBI and Justice had built.
The Steele reporting played a central and essential role in the decision to seek a FISA order. I don't believe the FBI concluded that Steele's reporting was bunk after talking to a sub source. As the director, you're not kept informed on the details of an investigation.
The inspector general did not find misconduct by any FBI people. He found mistakes and negligent oversight. The inspector general found significant mistakes, and that is not something to sneeze at. The American people, especially your viewers, need to realize they were given false information about the FBI. It's honest, it is not political, it is flawed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know I don't see the disconnect between the two of us, and I'm sorry that I'm missing it.
Speaker 1: Here are you and the inspector general Michael Horowitz answering the same question. Do you think this is vindication?
Speaker 0: It is. I mean, the FBI's had to wait two years while the president and his followers lied about the institution. Finally, the truth gets told.
Speaker 1: Does your report vindicate mister Comey?
Speaker 2: It doesn't vindicate anyone at the FBI who touched this, including the leadership.
Speaker 1: The IG says you should feel no vindication.
Speaker 0: Well, maybe it turns upon how we understand the word. What I mean is that the FBI was accused of treason, of illegal spying, of tapping mister Trump's wires illegally, of opening a investigation without justification, of being a criminal conspiracy to unseat defeat and then unseat a president. All of that was nonsense.
Speaker 1: Here is what you said about the FISA process and what the inspector general Horowitz said this week. Take a look.
Speaker 0: I have total confidence that the FISA process was followed and that the entire case was handled in a thoughtful responsible way by DOJ and the FBI.
Speaker 2: We identified significant inaccuracies and omissions in each of the four applications. Seven in the first application and a total of 17 by the final renewal application.
Speaker 1: 17 significant errors in the Pfizer process and you say that it was handled in a thought thoughtful and appropriate way.
Speaker 0: Yeah. He's right. I was wrong. I was overconfident in the procedures that the FBI and Justice had built over twenty years. Again, here's your version and again, here's the inspector general.
My recollection was it was part of a broader mosaic of facts that were laid before the FISA judge to obtain a FISA warrant.
Speaker 2: And we concluded that the still reporting played a central and essential role in the decision to seek a FISA order.
Speaker 1: Horowitz says it wasn't part, as you told Bret Baer, it wasn't part of a broader mosaic. He said it played an essential role in establishing probable cause. In fact, says, if it hadn't been for the Steele dossier, the FBI probably wouldn't have even submitted a FISA application that had Sure.
Speaker 0: He and I are saying different things.
Speaker 1: There's the issue of how reliable the Steele dossier in fact was. On 01/06/2017 in the Trump Tower, you brief Donald Trump, president-elect, about the Steele dossier. That same month, the FBI talks to Steele's main Russian contact, the main person on whom he based the dossier, who says according to the IG report, quote, Steele misstated or exaggerated the primary sub sources statements in multiple sections of the reporting. Director Comey, not only do you fail to go back to the president-elect or president after January 20 and tell him, oh, you know that report I briefed you on? Turns out it's bunk.
But the the FBI can goes back and renews its FISA application three more times. And by this point, the FBI knows that the the Steele reporting is not credible. Well, Did you know all of this?
Speaker 0: All of what?
Speaker 1: Everything that we're talking about here. Did you know that, in fact, the Steele report was the key for probable cause? Did you know that the FBI had talked to the Russian contact and he said what Steele said he had he had told them was not true? Did you know this? You're the FBI director.
Speaker 0: First, again, the report will speak for itself. I don't believe the FBI concluded that Steele's reporting was bunk after talking to a sub source. But, no, I didn't. As the director, you're kept informed on the details of an investigation. So, no, in general, I didn't know what they'd learned from the sub source.
I didn't know the particulars of the investigation. But this
Speaker 1: isn't some investigation, sir. This is an investigation of the campaign of the man who is the president of The United States. You And there is, I have left for last, the worst misconduct. In August of twenty sixteen, just two weeks into the investigation, the CIA tells the FBI that it actually has a relationship with Carter Page. That when he has these meetings with the Russians, he actually goes back and he tells the CIA about it.
But you never tell the FISA court that. And in fact, in 2017, an FBI lawyer doctors a document. The CIA said, oh, Carter Page, he's a source, and he puts in the application he's not a source.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I got the issue with one of the I'll answer the question, but one of the predications of your question. The inspector general did not find misconduct by any FBI people. He found mistakes and negligent and oversight. No, no,
Speaker 1: no, that's not true. In the case of Kevin Klein Smith, he has referred it for a criminal investigation.
Speaker 0: Right, but that's not been resolved. This business with the lawyer changing some email to a partner on the team.
Speaker 1: I mean, you make it sound like it's not much. No. No. It's very important. It's very Not a sore a source to not a source is a big deal.
Speaker 0: Remember how we got here. The FBI was accused of criminal misconduct. Remember, I was going to jail and lots of other people were going to jail. People on this network said it over and over and over again. The inspector general did not find misconduct by FBI personnel, did not find political bias, did not find illegal conduct.
Inspector general found significant mistakes, and that is not something to sneeze at. That's really important. But the American people, especially your viewers, need to realize they were given false information about the FBI. It's honest. It is not political.
It is flawed.
Speaker 2: It's unclear what the motivations were. On the one hand, gross incompetence, negligence. On the other hand, intentionality.
Speaker 1: Gross negligence or they intended to do it. They intended to lie to the FISA court.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
🤣🤣🤣🤣👇 https://t.co/eJRbkwYT0G
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's been two weeks since everything changed. I lost my job last night – a devastating blow after seven years as a shift lead on a project studying the wheels on the bus. Elon Musk's actions with USAID have had real consequences for me and my family. I'm unemployed, and I don't know what to tell my kids. This isn't a joke; it's affecting real people. The worst part? We may never know if the wheels on the bus go round and round, and nobody seems to care. This situation is incredibly serious and deeply upsetting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's been, what, it's been, like, two weeks? I mean, two weeks. I'm done. You wanna talk about regretting your vote? In two weeks, I went from the highest high to being unemployed.
Lost my job last night. Got a phone call. The repercussions of what Elon Musk are doing with the USAID has real percussions for real people. For the last seven years, I have been a shift lead on project bus where we studied to find out if the wheels on the bus went round around or not. And all of a sudden, Elon, who's not even elected, gets in, and I'm out of a job.
What do I tell my family? What do I tell my kids? This isn't a joke. This USAID stuff is not a joke, man. It's affecting real people.
And the worst part is, what what if we've never figured out what if we never figured out if, in fact, the wheels on the bus do go round and round? Does nobody care?
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Wow! This is the most insane close-up dashcam video of the plane crash in Philadelphia. Turn up the sound; you can literally hear and see debris hitting their car. https://t.co/xZfaUlRDUE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Michael, hello. I can't... I've blocked it. I'm calling 911.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And yep. Oh. Michael. Hello. Hello.
Hello. Hello. We can't. I've blocked it. Hello.
I'm calling 911.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Another insane dash cam video of the plane crash in Philadelphia https://t.co/34ofeuN20H
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Ok, call me crazy but that doesn't look like a plane crash. What do you think? https://t.co/4iLaCXYlUU
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Unbelievable dash cam video of the plane crash in Philadelphia! What's going on? https://t.co/axBUBEteFd
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Remember when Tucker Carlson ended Mike Pence's political career with one question? https://t.co/mGaPVqSSrU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Have you noticed the decline in every U.S. city over the past three years? The economy is struggling, suicide rates are rising, and crime is increasing. Yet, there seems to be more concern for Ukraine's military needs than for the issues facing Americans. Where is the focus on our own country's problems?
That's not my concern. I'm running for president because I believe the country is in serious trouble. Joe Biden is weak, both domestically and internationally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sorry, mister vice president. Have you I know you're running for president. You are you are distressed that the Ukrainians don't have enough American tanks. Every city in the United States has become much worse over the past 3 years. Drive around.
There's not one city that's gotten better in the United States, and it's visible. Our economy has degraded. The suicide rate has jumped. Public filth and disorder and crime have exponentially increased, and yet your concern is that the Ukrainians, a country most people can't find on a map, who've received tens of 1,000,000,000 of US tax dollars, don't have enough tanks. I think it's a fair question to ask.
Like, where's the concern for the United States in that?
Speaker 1: Well, it's not my concern. Tucker, I've heard that routine from you before, but that's not my concern. I'm running for president of the United States because I think this country's in a lot of trouble. I think Joe Biden is weak in America at home and abroad.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Hilarious 😂 👇 https://t.co/paJNgM5KGn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hello? This is an officer with ICE conducting a routine check. Are you an American citizen?
Yes, I am.
We have some questions to verify that. How many points are scored in a football game?
Six.
What’s your stance on making America great again?
We want to make America great again.
Who’s the best female artist?
Taylor Swift.
Last question: can you say Walmart?
Yes, I can say Walmart.
Alright, thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Hello? This is an officer with ICE doing a routine check. Well, I'm an American citizen. Well, we have questions that'll determine that answer.
Okay. How many points are scored in a football game? 6. We want to make America great again. Who's the best female artist?
Taylor Swift. Alright. Last question. Can you say Walmart? Sir, can you say Yes.
Yes. I know. I know. Walmart.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Is there anything worse on planet Earth than a liberal white woman? https://t.co/04hz7mr2nR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Can you stop being intolerant? You're being very intolerant and bigoted. This behavior is unacceptable. People like you can't even engage with those who disagree with you in a civil manner. It's frustrating to see such a lack of decorum.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Damn. Can you stop? Can you stop doing that? Can you stop doing that? Stop being intolerant.
Speaker 1: Stop being intolerant.
Speaker 0: Stop being intolerant. You're being very you're being very intolerant, man. Man, you're being very intolerant. Man,
Speaker 1: you're being very intolerant.
Speaker 0: Man, you're being very
Speaker 1: I
Speaker 0: Why you're you're tired of what you don't man, you're very bigoted, man. You're way too big. You're very bigoted. This is why this is why you're doing that time class on the cross. It's people like that.
People are so bigoted, my friend. You can't even you can't even act normally with with at with at least decent decorum around people who disagree with you.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
We just had the worst terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11, and the guy who is supposed to be running this country walks out of the room without answering any questions. January 20th can't come fast enough! https://t.co/XKoToSgQgo
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
This is unbelievable. The mayor of New Orleans confirmed it was a terrorist attack, and literally minutes later, at the same press conference, an FBI spokesperson stated it was not a terrorist attack. https://t.co/FbTyG3VNXt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good morning. New Orleans has been impacted by an incident currently under investigation. I have been in contact with the White House, Governor Landry, and a unified command present here. This is not classified as a terrorist event. We have discovered improvised explosive devices, and we are working to confirm whether they are viable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning. First of all, we do know that the city of New Orleans was impacted by a terrorist attack. It's all still under investigation. You'll hear more after me. However, I have been in direct contact with the White House, with governor Landry, and, of course, a unified command who is present here.
This is not a terrorist event. What it is right now is their improvised explosive devices that was found, and we are working on confirming if this is a viable device or not.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
OMG, I haven't laughed this hard in a long time 🤣🤣🤣🤣👇 https://t.co/7S46o3PCKa
Video Transcript AI Summary
Last Christmas, the song "Baby It's Cold Outside," written in the 1940s, was canceled due to claims of toxic masculinity and male aggression in its lyrics. Meanwhile, the number one song in the nation for over two months was "WAP," which won multiple awards. This raises questions about societal standards.
Comparing the two songs, "Baby It's Cold Outside" features a dialogue about staying warm, while "WAP" includes explicit and aggressive sexual content. The contrast highlights a perceived inconsistency in cultural reactions to different types of lyrics, suggesting that society may have lost its sense of balance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what really killed me was last Christmas, we canceled a song that was written in the 19 forties called Baby It's Cold Outside. People were triggered by that song. Radio stations wouldn't play it. They said it had toxic masculinity in it, and they said that the lyrics had suggestions of male sexual aggression, which is fine if you feel that way. But at the exact same time, the number one song in this nation for over 2 months was entitled wet.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making that up. Google it. Check me out on that. I'm not lying. For over 2 months, the number one song was played on the Grammys.
It also won the best hip hop song for the American Music Awards and the People's Choice Awards. And so I thought it would be fun to compare and contrast the lyrics of these two songs to see if indeed this country has lost its mind. Now, let's begin with the horribly offensive Christmas song written just after World War 2, Baby, It's Cold Outside. I really can't stay. Baby, it's cold outside.
I gotta go away. Baby, it's cold outside. This evening has been so very nice. Yeah. You fucking with some wet Bring a bucket and a mop for this wet Beat it up, n word.
Extra large, extra hard. Put this in your face. Swipe your nose like a credit card. My mother will start to worry. Beautiful.
What's your hurry? My father will be there at the door. Listen to that fireplace roar. Well, maybe just have a drink more. Spit in my mouth.
Look in my eyes. This is wet. Come take a dive. Talk your, bite your lip, ask for a car while you ride that. Dick.
My sister will be suspicious. Gosh, your lips look delicious. My brother will be there at the door, waves on a tropical shore. Well, maybe just a cigarette more. I need a deep stroke or I need a weed smoker.
Not a garden snake, I need a king cobra. I don't wanna spit, I wanna gulp, I wanna gag, I wanna choke. I want you to touch that little dangly thing that swing in the back of my throat. I submit to you that this nation has lost its mind everybody.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Tucker Carlson gave an amazing speech at President Trump's rally tonight. A must-watch! https://t.co/TuUpgoSTEd
Video Transcript AI Summary
It takes courage for those who criticize others to stand on stage and lecture about morality. Everyone here is part of a tolerant majority that has endured insults and disrespect for too long. It's unjust to reward the most destructive individuals in society while hard-working, decent people are overlooked. If we allow bad behavior to continue unchecked, it will only escalate. Just like a parent must discipline their children, society must set limits on unacceptable actions. The upcoming election represents a chance for change, and the atmosphere suggests a return to freedom of expression. People are tired of being misled and manipulated. It's time to reject the narrative that has dominated for years and assert that enough is enough. We will no longer tolerate the destruction of our communities and values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It takes incredible stones. It incredible gall for the people who did that to stand up there on a stage and give you a lecture about how you're immoral. It's too much. And so that's the second important thing about the selection. Okay.
The first is every person in this room needs to understand you are not in a despised minority. You are in an incredibly gentle and tolerant majority who put up with this crap for way too long as they insulted not only you, but the memory of your ancestors who died for this country. They tore down statues to their memory. People have never built anything in their lives. They went out of their way to humiliate you and spit on you and the graves of your ancestors.
And that's not an exaggeration. They did that. And this country is so nice. It's so polite. It's so thoughtful and empathetic and sweet.
It's the kind of country that loves dogs and gives directions to strangers that we put up with it for 4 years, but we can't anymore. We just can't. And we can't for two reasons. The first reason that we can't put up with it for one more minute is because it's just not justice. It's not.
It's not justice. It's unfair. You cannot reward the most parasitic, useless, violent, nasty, aggressive people in your country. You can't make them the richest. You just can't.
It's just wrong. In a fair, decent country, the people who work the hardest, who have the highest level of talent, who are the most creative for the most decent to their neighbors, who give the biggest tips to waitresses, those people should be successful. Those people should be revered. It shouldn't be Larry Fink. Are you joking?
Kamala Harris shouldn't have a job. She has no skills. How did we wind up with a system where Kamala Harris, you couldn't change the tire on your truck much less drive it? How did she wind up at the top of the pyramid? And then once she's there, she lectures you like you did something.
It's too much. You can't allow that. It's an offense against the truth, against reality, and against justice itself. And the second reason you can't allow it is very familiar to anyone who has children, which is if you allow it, you will encourage more of it. If you allow people to get away with things that are completely over the top and outrageous, if you allow your 2 year old to smear the contents of his diapers on the wall of your living room and you do nothing about it, if you allow your 14 year old to light a joint at the breakfast table, if you allow your hormone addled 15 year old daughter to, like, slam the door of her bedroom and give you the finger, you're gonna get more of it.
And those kids are gonna wind up in rehab. It's not good for you, and it's not good for them. No. There has to be a point at which dad comes home. Yeah.
That's right. Dad comes home. And he's pissed. Dad is pissed. He's not vengeful.
He loves his children. Disobedient as they may be, he loves them. Because there's children, they live in his house. But he's very disappointed in their behavior, and he's gonna have to let them know. He's gonna have to get to your room right now and think about what you did.
And when dad gets home, you know what he says? You've been a bad girl. You've been a bad little girl and you're getting a vigorous spanking right now. And no, it's not gonna hurt me more than it hurts you. No, it's not.
I'm not gonna lie. This is gonna hurt you a lot more than it hurts me. And you earned this. You're getting a vigorous spanking because you've been a bad girl. And it has to be this way.
It has to be this way, because it's true. And you're only gonna get better when you take responsibility for what you did. That's not set in the spirit of hate. It's not set in the spirit of vengeance or bigotry. Far from it.
It's set in the spirit of justice, which is the purest and best thing there is. And without it, things fall apart. The Democratic Party machine and notice I'm not beating up on Kamala Harris who's just a hapless victim who happened to be there in the right color, so they grabbed her. Tim Walz, they needed some, you know, whatever whatever Tim Walz is. They needed a weak man because it is the party of weak men and unhappy women, One of which leads to the other, by the way, where you find weak men, you will inevitably find unhappy women.
Sorry. And they make them on purpose. They weaken the men to drive the women insane to have the most consistent voting block ever in the history of politics. Unhappy women made unhappy by weak men. But it could be anybody.
It could be anybody. Kamala Harris is just a stand in. She's a cardboard cutout. Is I mean, I you know, I she is a soul God created her. I'm not attacking her true humanity, but there's nothing there.
It doesn't matter. If it wasn't Kamala Harris, it would be, I don't know, Pete Buttigieg or whatever. Who are these people? It doesn't matter. They're the cutouts.
They work for the machine. They're totally dispensable. They're replaceable. And they need to have limits set for them. And so on election day, and I've sincerely believed Donald Trump's gonna win.
And if I thought he was gonna lose, I'd be here anyway, by the way. I would. In fact, I would have been here earlier if I thought he was gonna lose just to make the point. I mean it. I don't like people who jump on the winning train.
Okay? I think Donald Trump's gonna win. And not only do I think Donald Trump's gonna win, I think that the vibe shift has been so profound. I mean, the numbers suggest he's gonna win. He's ahead in all 7 battleground states.
But much more important and the early voting seems to be favoring him. But more important even in the conventional political markers is what you smell around you, and it's the return of freedom. It's the return of the country you grew up in where you could say things like, I like that guy. Maybe like the other person. That's fine.
That was not allowed for 9 years, and it's allowed now. And I think and it's because of what they did, by the way. They deserve this. But I think the vibe is so strong right now. I don't think you can get away with pretending something else happened.
I think we can have another 2020 at this point. I just don't. I don't. Where they hid relevant facts from you, they prevented you from knowing about their candidate and then claim victory. But 37,000,000,000 votes or whatever they claim he got.
That's rigging the election. Period. If you end if the government prevents people from knowing critical information about a candidate, they have rigged the election. And they did that. Period.
Oh, you're not allowed to say that. I'm not allowed to say it because it's a 100% true. And every person who hears it knows it's true including the people who did it. I don't think they can do that again. I don't.
And I don't think no matter what they pull 2 weeks now, 13 days from now. I don't think they can get away with standing up and being like on MSNBC. No. Actually, Kamala Harris is a historically popular, it turns out. Woman who's never had a job who can't even pronounce her own first name consistently.
That's how false she is. Some woman who grew up in Montreal, Canada is lecturing me about America. Okay. I don't think they can do that because I don't think people are gonna sit back and take it. I don't.
It's enough. It's enough. That's the point at which you say no. I'm sorry. I put up with this crap for a long time.
I indulge your little fantasy. It's like when your teenage girl becomes a bitch, Sharon, you're like, okay. That's, you know, okay. That's fine. No.
I totally understand. You're like, it's a phase. But if that phase goes on for 9 years and includes destroying your major cities and allowing your country to be invaded by millions of foreigners who have identities you don't know and its purpose in this country is unclear by the way. Why shouldn't we feel threatened by that? If they go out of their way to crush families, to make it impossible for your kids to buy a house and getting involved in the sex lives of your children, which they are, if they do all of that, they need to lose.
And at the end of all of it, when they tell you they have won, no. You can look them straight in the face and say, I'm sorry. Dad's home, and he's pissed. Thank you.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
In honor of Kamala Harris doing an interview with Howard Stern, here are 90 seconds of Stern in blackface repeatedly using the N-word. I'm sure CNN will be outraged by Kamala doing an interview with a flaming racist https://t.co/yfHixiyIZI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 tells Speaker 1, "Ain't that right, you smelly nigga?" Speaker 0 says he has more jokes for Speaker 1's New Year's Eve party and that Whoopi wrote them. Speaker 0 asks, "What do you call a black rocket scientist?" and answers, "A nigga," attributing the joke to Whoopi. Speaker 0 says his mother worked in blackface. Speaker 0 tells Speaker 1 to give a kiss to "smelly cock raccoon." Speaker 0 calls Speaker 1 a "smelly nigga," claiming Whoopi wrote it. Speaker 1 says they don't accept that kind of language and will leave if Speaker 0 talks to them that way. Speaker 0 responds, "don't let the door hit you on your big black ass" and then calls Whoopi a "filthy nigga."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wrote everything I'm gonna say here tonight, so it's alright. Ain't that right, you smelly nigga?
Speaker 1: I didn't write that.
Speaker 0: Well, you use a smelly nigga. I got some more jokes for your New Year's Eve party there.
Speaker 1: You're not tired of this.
Speaker 0: And don't be racially offended because whoopiedum wrote them for me. Okay? Here
Speaker 1: we go.
Speaker 0: Black hole.
Speaker 1: Black hole.
Speaker 0: You're gonna love it. What do I loves most about the whoopie? Yeah.
Speaker 1: It was great timing.
Speaker 0: Hey, Robin. What does you call a black rocket scientist?
Speaker 1: I don't know, John.
Speaker 0: A nigga. Whoopie wrote it. Whoopie wrote it. Hey. Did you happen to notice this?
Speaker 1: No. What is it?
Speaker 0: My mother, mama dancing. She done work in blackface too.
Speaker 1: She must be very proud. Yeah. No. I know you really love me. Ted, you the man.
I
Speaker 0: tell you, you know, you the man. Uh-huh. What's that happen to Sherman's career? It's really over the end. I want you to give us a kiss to smelly cock raccoon.
I love it.
Speaker 1: May I say something here?
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Oh, you can say whatever you want, you smelly nigga. Whoopie wrote down.
Speaker 1: They did. You didn't know I was gonna say that. Whoopie had no chance to write it. I don't accept that kind of language. You can call her whatever you want, but you don't talk to me that way or I'll leave.
Speaker 0: Well, don't let the door hit you on your big black ass, mama, on the way out of there. Now where was I? Oh, yes. Now whoopie, you is a filthy nigga.
Speaker 1: I didn't
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
What's the first thing that comes to mind when you see this video? https://t.co/WjtwzpXxqw
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
This was the best ten minutes in the history of television 👇😂 https://t.co/jkm27iKVYz
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
@POTUS You forgot to show the part where the brain-dead fool pretending to be president walked into the wrong plane 😂😂😂😂🤡 https://t.co/h8rYErjWM9
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Same gas station: The one on the left was taken during the Trump administration. The one on the right was taken last night. Imagine what it will be in four years if that DEI candidate wins in November. https://t.co/zMBOxdE9kK
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
I hadn't seen this angle before. DEI on full display. 👇 https://t.co/Q1qpQ1ePK7
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Massive landslides caused by the 7.5 magnitude earthquake in Taiwan. Insane 👇 https://t.co/JpDpZLlH2I
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
The residents of East Palestine Ohio showing love for Crooked Joe Biden 🤣🤣🤣 F Joe Biden 👇 https://t.co/8RzqyN9XjA
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Biden voter 👇🤣 https://t.co/NS6IDuhF8V
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to highlight a concerning issue that I believe calls for us to consider leaving America. In a local grocery store, I discovered something alarming: lion chops being sold. It appears that exotic animals are being taken, butchered, and made available for purchase. This particular incident took place at Safeway, where I witnessed lion meat being sold. This raises important questions about the ethics and practices surrounding the availability of such products in our grocery stores.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm really about to show y'all why we need to move out of America. Look at this. They're selling lion chops. They're taking exotic animals and cutting them up and putting them in our local grocery stores. Look.
I'm in Safeway. They're putting lion meat in the fucking grocery stores. Lion meat.
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
This is not a 12 year old child. This is Cori Bush, a sitting member of Congress! This is exactly why our country is in decline 👇 https://t.co/XqklZo7AnW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 what percentage is considered a fair share. Speaker 1 believes that if they pay a third of their money in taxes, then the rich should also pay a third. Speaker 0 points out that the effective tax rate on the poor is lower than on the rich. Speaker 1 clarifies that they are not poor but close to that line. Speaker 0 mentions that the effective tax rate on the middle class is also lower than on the rich. The conversation ends without Speaker 1 specifying their desired fair share.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Percentage.
Speaker 1: So you're saying that 40 you're you're saying that they're paying their fair share is what you're saying.
Speaker 0: No. I'm asking what percentage is a fair share?
Speaker 1: Their fair share the same If I'm paying if a third of my money is going to taxes, then I think a third of their money should be going to taxes. Well, it does
Speaker 0: I'm trying to understand because you realize the effective tax rate on the poor is less Less than it is on the rich. Right?
Speaker 1: Okay. So first of all, I'm not the poor. I'm very close to their line, but I'm
Speaker 0: Okay. So the effective tax rate on the middle class is less than it is on the rich, What fair share would you like to
@LangmanVince - Vince Langman
Further proof that liberals are the real Natzi's in America 👇 https://t.co/hDqj7yeFOx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why someone is removing something, stating that it worsens the conflict. They argue that by removing it, it implies Jewish victims are not important. The speaker pleads for the item not to be taken off, as it won't solve anything. They mention a friend who is affected by this and express sadness. The speaker disagrees with the idea that removing the item helps the conflict, as people are already killing each other. They accuse the person of removing the item of denying Jewish victims their rights and express anger and shame towards them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Excuse me. Why are you taking this off? Why are you taking this off? Because it's causing the conflict to be worse. No.
It's not. By you taking this off, you know, it does. It shows that Jewish victims are not okay. Excuse me. Why are you taking this off?
You didn't mean to say to yourself? Mother alone, please? No. Can you not take this off? I already told you that it's not gonna work.
My friend is one of those people, and you're taking it off? That's sad, but I don't see how that helps the conflict. People are just killing each other. No. You're removing the ability for juicy be victims.
I don't think that's true. They already are, and that's the unfortunate part. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Sir, I'm sorry, but I'm not No. Both you should be ashamed of yourselves.
Conflict is good. You should be ashamed of yourself. I'm not a fan dare you do that? I'm not a fan of Hamas, but I think this makes everything worse. Those are victims of terrorist attacks, and you're ripping them off.
People didn't ask for their images to be used and, like Those people didn't ask. They didn't ask to be kidnapped. It has to be raped. Sir. And you're taking the pictures off of the innocent victims.
Doesn't help people. No. What you're doing doesn't help anyone. You're denying Jews the right to be victims. How dare you?
I'm not sure. How dare you? I'm not sure. How dare you? You should be ashamed of yourselves taking those those pictures off.