reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @LarryBrockMP

Saved - March 18, 2026 at 5:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Twice the courts ruled the Liberal government's use of the Emergencies Act unlawful, saying the threshold wasn't met. On the very last possible day, the government is appealing to the Supreme Court with the same arguments rejected twice. The Act was meant as a last resort, not a tool to bypass the law or Charter rights. Conservatives will stand for public safety, freedom, accountability, and the rule of law.

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

Twice, the courts ruled the Liberal government’s use of the Emergencies Act was unlawful. Twice, they said the threshold wasn’t met. Now, on the very LAST possible day, the government is appealing to the Supreme Court, advancing the same arguments already rejected… not once, but TWICE. The Emergencies Act was meant to be a last resort—not a tool to bypass the law or override Canadians’ Charter rights. Conservatives will always stand for public safety—but also for freedom, accountability, and the rule of law. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-ottawa-appeals-emergencies-act-case-to-the-supreme-court/

Saved - July 5, 2024 at 5:48 PM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

More $60 Million ArriveScam Debacles Likely   New report says more government contracting waste & abuse is likely.   The RCMP raided the home of top ArriveScam contractor GC Strategies, paid nearly $20 million.   RCMP is investigating Trudeau's ArriveScam. https://t.co/u7KHdNYacN

Saved - February 29, 2024 at 1:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Trudeau government allowed security breaches at Canada's top infectious disease laboratory. Dr. Xiangguo Qiu intentionally shared scientific information with China, potentially endangering public health. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) found that Qiu used the lab to assist China in improving its capability to fight highly-pathogenic pathogens. CSIS accused Qiu of being associated with Chinese talent programs that incentivize economic espionage and theft of intellectual property, posing a serious threat to research institutions.

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

Now we know what the Trudeau government was desperately trying to hide. They allowed these security breaches at our top level lab 👇 “Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, one of the scientists who was fired from Canada's top infectious disease laboratory, "intentionally" shared scientific information with China — potentially putting people's health in jeopardy — says an assessment by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). “CSIS wrote Qiu was using the level 4 lab in Canada “as a base to assist China to improve its capability to fight highly-pathogenic pathogens.” “Qiu provided Beijing "with the Ebola genetic sequence, which opened a door of convenience for China," wrote CSIS. “CSIS accused Qiu of being associated with multiple "talent programs" administered and funded by various Chinese entities. “Those programs are set up to "boost China's national technological capabilities and may pose a serious threat to research institutions, including government research facilities, by incentivizing economic espionage and theft of intellectual property," said CSIS in the report.“

Saved - February 26, 2024 at 10:00 PM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

QUESTIONS FOR RCMP COMMISSIONER In Trudeau's SNC affair, there is a charge under the Criminal Code that relates to his interference – it’s called Obstruction of Justice. If Justin Trudeau is not above the law, why wasn't he criminally charged for his actions by the RCMP? https://t.co/tz4oJE38zf

Video Transcript AI Summary
I will be questioning the RCMP commissioner tomorrow about why they chose not to investigate Justin Trudeau's actions in the SNC Lavalin scandal. Trudeau pressured Jody Wilson Raybould to offer a deal to SNC Lavalin, but she stood firm. I will ask why Trudeau wasn't charged with obstruction of justice. Stay tuned for updates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, friends. I'm standing outside RCMP headquarters. Tomorrow at the ethics committee, we'll be hearing from the RCMP commissioner as to why they decided not to pursue a criminal investigation in relation to the SNC Lavalin affair. We all know the facts. Justin Trudeau, over the course of 4 months, pressured Jody Wilson Raybould, our country's first indigenous attorney general and minister of justice, to offer a deferred prosecution agreement to SNC Lavalin, a Quebec headquartered company which was facing bribery and fraud charges. Johnny Wilson Raybald maintained prosecutorial independence and refused to cave to the relentless pressure by Justin Trudeau. There is a charge under the criminal code that relates to Justin Trudeau's interference. It's called obstruction of justice. The prime minister is not above the law. Why wasn't the prime minister criminally charged for his actions? I'll be asking this and putting many more questions to the RCMP commissioner. Stay tuned.
Saved - February 8, 2024 at 1:38 PM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

Trudeau's top IT bureaucrat refuses to take responsibility for deleting 1700 emails capturing ArriveCan funding and shady contracting details. But nothing to see here, folks! The Trudeau government doesn't consider such destruction of evidence as criminal. Wow! https://t.co/AyPq60FdBI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks if Mindon is part of the investigation, to which Speaker 1 responds that allegations have been received and the review is ongoing. Speaker 0 then mentions that Mindon has 4 years' worth of relevant emails that have been corrupted, but Speaker 2 questions the validity of this statement. Speaker 0 emphasizes the seriousness of deleting emails and asks when the president and the auditor general were informed. Speaker 1 states that the allegations were received on December 11th, but there is no evidence of deletion. Speaker 0 asks if the auditor general was notified, and Speaker 1 confirms informing them of the allegations. The Treasury Board Secretariat and RCMP were not informed due to lack of evidence of criminality. The conversation ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now on the issue of deleting emails, Mindon. And Mindon, just to clarify, has never been the subject of this particular project, Helios investigation, is that correct? Speaker 1: As was, published Speaker 0: He's not part of the investigation? Speaker 1: If I could answer. Speaker 0: So I'm asking you, is he part of the investigation or not? Speaker 1: On December 11th, I received allegations as has been made public relating to mister Doan. Speaker 0: Is he still subject of an investigation? Speaker 1: That review is ongoing. Speaker 0: That review of whether or not he's gonna be the subject of an investigation is underway, so that's a possibility. Speaker 1: The review of the allegations we received. Speaker 0: So that's a possibility. Speaker 2: Correct. Speaker 0: Correct? Now Mindone, confirmed this and through, ATIPS, delivered to CBSA has confirmed that Mindon, has 4 years' worth of highly relevant, sensitive emails, between the years of 2018 to 2022, which not only captures the pandemic and the ArriveCam scandal, but as well as the Baller AI investigations have just mysteriously been corrupted. He's not taking responsibility for deliberately deleting that. The approximate amount of those emails is roughly 7 gigabytes or 1700 emails. You would agree with me, sir, that emails are supposed Speaker 2: to be Sorry, Mr. Brock. This is Gerard and I don't believe any of us has You've seen this statement of fact. Do you have a copy that you can share with us? Speaker 0: Mindon, at the time, was the Vice President of the CBSA. Say, you'd agree with me, sir, that deleting emails is an extremely serious offense. Speaker 1: It would be a breach of the code of conduct to Right. Delete emails. Speaker 0: And it's incumbent on an IT professional, as Mindong was, to protect work emails dealing with official matters, correct? Speaker 1: It is part of our responsibilities. Speaker 0: And the level of seriousness increases dependent on the position that a public servant holds. In this case, a low level administrative data entry individual is vastly different in terms of the serious scale than the Vice President of the CBSA when you reference deleting emails. Would you agree with that? When was the president, Aaron O'Gorman, informed about mister Doan's deleted emails? Speaker 2: We have not concluded that there were any deleted emails. Speaker 0: When was she informed, sir? Speaker 1: She was informed of the allegations when I received them. Speaker 0: Of the deleted emails? Speaker 1: The allegations as I received them. When was it? December 11th is when I received them. I can't recall exactly which Speaker 0: when was the auditor general notified of 4 years' worth of deleted relevant emails? Speaker 1: Again, one point of clarification. I have no evidence that there has been deletion at this point. We are looking into the matter. Can you Speaker 0: answer the question, mister Lafleur? When was the auditor general notified of 4 years' worth of a vice president's deleted email account? When was she notified and by Speaker 1: whom? So I can say that during our various engagements with the Office of the Auditor General, we have provided them with all of the information that we had available. Speaker 0: Did you inform the Auditor General yourself, sir, or someone under your control that the Auditor General received evidence of 4 years' worth of deleted emails by Mindon Vice President. Yes or no? Speaker 1: Again, I'm not or what you're referencing. I did meet with the OAG. Speaker 0: The chair, can we get some clarity please? My questions are very direct. Speaker 1: Mr. Leclerc, if you ask me Speaker 2: to just respond and just a direct answer please, if it's a yes or no, please a direct yes or no, otherwise, direct answer so we can move on. Speaker 0: Did you notify the auditor general of 4 years' worth of deleted emails? Speaker 1: I notified the auditor general that I had received allegations to that And Speaker 0: when did you when did you notify her? In December, Speaker 1: after Speaker 0: I received the December of 23? 23. Okay. Was the Treasury Board Secretariat informed? No. Did you inform the RCMP of potentially 4 years' worth of highly confidential relevant emails. Speaker 1: We are required to report potential criminality. I have no evidence of that at this time. Speaker 0: Thank you. Wow. No evidence of potentially deliberately deleting emails and that is not criminality to you. Speaker 2: Mister Brock, that is our time. Wow.
Saved - December 17, 2023 at 3:41 PM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

“Liberals have always been prone to being corrupted by power, but the Trudeau Liberals are unique for being corrupted by their own virtue. They truly believe they are “not like other men,” they are incapable of conceiving of themselves doing wrong.” 👉https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-do-the-liberals-even-understand-what-a-conflict-of-interest-is-does-a/

Opinion: Do the Liberals even understand what a conflict of interest is? Does a fish know it’s wet? Speaker Greg Fergus’s testimonial video for a partisan chum is just one example of the party’s vast unawareness of proper conduct theglobeandmail.com
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 10:39 PM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

Three investigations are taking place on Trudeau’s $1 billion green slush fund: one by the Auditor General, two by the Ethics Commissioner. Is the RCMP next?

@MikeBarrettON - Michael Barrett

Is it time to call in the Mounties? Only Liberals think stuffing taxpayer money in the pockets of well-connected insiders is something to brag about. Their billion dollar green slush fund is in crisis and multiple investigations are underway. Canadians want the missing millions back.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The NDP Liberal government's $1 billion green fund is facing corruption allegations. The CEO and board chair resigned in disgrace, while the auditor general and ethics commissioner are investigating Liberal appointees. Whistleblowers claim that $150 million was embezzled by insiders. The opposition demands answers on where the missing millions went and who benefited. The Minister of Innovation defends the government's investment in clean technology and fighting climate change. However, the opposition criticizes the Liberals for funneling money to their friends while Canadians struggle, and questions if the RCMP will be involved in the investigations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The NDP Liberal government's $1,000,000,000 green or greed slash fund is in a crisis of corruption. The CEO resigned in disgrace. The liberal appointed board chair resigned in disgrace. The auditor general is investigating. The conflict of interest ethics commissioner is investigating to Liberal appointees. And this week, we heard from whistleblowers that $150,000,000 was embezzled by Liberal insiders. Canadians wanna know, where did the missing millions go and who got rich? The honorable minister of innovation. Speaker 1: Mister speaker, for Canadians watching at home, they're saying the conservative ideology in full display, mister speaker. These folks are so against climate change, mister speaker, that they'll go after Anyone and any organization that wants to fight climate change, even an organization that was voted 20 years ago by parliament, mister speaker, not But they won't attack the integrity of one of the most respected audit firm in this country, mister speaker. On this side of the house, we'll get to the bottom of this, but we'll keep investing in clean technology. We'll keep investing to fight climate change. We'll keep investing in Canadians. Speaker 0: The honorable The honorable member of Leads Grenfell tells us that it's real leaks. Only Liberals would think shoveling 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars into the pockets of their Friends is doing anything to flight to fight climate change. They're under multiple investigation, and it's their appointees that are being investigated. It's absolutely despicable. Canadians are lined up at food banks in record numbers, and liberal liberal grifters and embezzlers are jamming their pockets full of Canadians' tax dollars. Canadians wanna know who got rich and where did the missing millions go. But, mister Speaker, with an auditor general investigation and 2 ethics commissioner's investigation, is the RCMP next?
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 2:12 AM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

What Canadians call CORRUPTION, Trudeau’s friends call the 'NORMAL COURSE OF BUSINESS.' Liberal insiders funneled nearly 60 million tax dollars into their own companies.

@RickPerkinsMP - Rick Perkins

Slush Fund Corruption @JustinTrudeau’s former Chair of his $1 Billion Green Slush Fund says that funneling nearly $60 million in taxpayer money to companies owned by directors on the slush fund board is, "normal course of business" Call in the RCMP.

Saved - December 14, 2023 at 8:38 PM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

New Liberal Life Hack Your company received $10 million in one year from the Trudeau government, but you don't want to answer any questions? No problem: just walk away from the committee! That's exactly what the former Chair of Trudeau's $1 Billion Green Slush Fund did today.👇

@MikeBarrettON - Michael Barrett

Sudden Goodbye After revealing her company received $10 million in 1 year from this Liberal government, Trudeau's former Chair of his $1 Billion Green Slush Fund tried a new obstruction tactic…just walking away from committee. https://t.co/iO2kYapM0V

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am the chair of the governance committee for a major Canadian company and I take my responsibility in governance very seriously.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I, take responsibility in governance very seriously. I am chair of the governance committee of a major company in Canada. I I
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 4:33 PM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

“Canadians are sick of their politicians learning, instead of leading. Fergus has been around politics for 40 years. He knows how the institution works, he knows the rules, and he knows the expectations. He also knows what the honourable thing is to do.” 👉https://nationalpost.com/opinion/tasha-kheiriddin-speaker-greg-fergus-knew-better-he-should-resign

Tasha Kheiriddin: Speaker Greg Fergus knew better, he should resign Politics demands more than good character, it demands good judgment nationalpost.com
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 4:35 AM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

MUST WATCH Whistleblower testimony reveals corruption, government cover-up, and conflict of interests at Trudeau’s $1 Billion Green Slush Fund. This is 8 years of Trudeau.

@MikeBarrettON - Michael Barrett

EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY Whistleblower from Trudeau's $1 Billion Green Slush Fund testifies: $150 million in taxpayer money misappropriated. Habitual conflicts of interest violations by Liberal appointed board members. Coordinated effort by government to coverup. WATCH https://t.co/ppXsGNqLzK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the SDTC board executives and senior management for mismanaging taxpayer money and allowing a toxic workplace culture. They also blame the federal government for lacking oversight and covering up the truth. A comprehensive presentation was submitted to the Privy Council Office, revealing mismanagement, noncompliance, conflict of interest breaches, and a toxic culture. Independent investigations found that various funds and COVID payments were improperly distributed, totaling around $120 million. The report also exposes a lack of HR processes and policies. Despite these findings, no one has faced consequences, and the implicated individuals' names were protected. The speaker calls for the suspension of SDTC, a new board and management team, and an end to the abuse. They claim to have evidence supporting their testimony.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The SDTC board executives and senior management must be held accountable for their gross mismanagement of taxpayer money and the gross misconduct that's been perpetrated by the toxic senior management team that has victimized countless employees. And the federal government must also be held accountable for its embarrassing lack of oversight that's allowed these problems to persist, and its egregious coverup of the truth that occurred this fall. At the beginning of this year, a comprehensive 3 45 page presentation was created and submitted to the Privy Council Office at the request of the Office of the Auditor General of Canada, who we originally went to. This package contained documents that outline gross mismanagement across every aspect of SDTC's operations and governance. It highlighted noncompliance with the SCTC Act and contribution agreement across all of the organization's funding streams and serious breaches of the conflict of interest policies by the executives and board. The package also included evidence of the toxic workplace culture that was created by CEO Leah Lawrence and her friend and still current VP, Zoi Kallbach, who've been allowed to continue abusing and harassing employees by a passive senior management team and board that protects and hides the abuse. All of this information underwent review by PCO and was then forwarded to ISED, who subsequently engaged RCGT to conduct an independent fact finding exercise to validate this information. Here are the findings for everyone. The seed fund, ecosystem fund and scale fund were all found to be ineligible due to multiple violations of the contribution agreement, significant deviations from the due diligence process, and conflict of interest breaches by board members and executives. This finding encompasses nearly 200 companies that all received over $80,000,000, all of which was improperly funded using taxpayer money. The 2 COVID payments in 2020 and 2021 were also given to the full portfolio of companies and totaled almost 40,000,000, and were also deemed to be ineligible, as the use of these funds was not effectively tracked. And several board members in that instance also violated conflict of interest by approving almost $4,000,000 to themselves to over a dozen companies where they all hold significant ownership or executive positions. The report also revealed that SDTC lacked HR processes or policies, and issues were never even reported to the board. And conveniently, the RCGT investigators couldn't even find a single record of any complaint ever being made in the history of the organization. This is a staggering legible of incompetence, willful ignorance, and corruption that has resulted in SDTC improperly distributing almost $150,000,000 in taxpayer dollars just in the past few years, and abusing dozens of people that have only tried to talk about the truth. The organization deserved to be suspended. The organization also deserved a new board, executive, and senior management team, but that never happened. Not a single one of the individuals responsible for these issues has faced a single consequence. No executive or board member was terminated or even given the slightest handcuffs. And every single person that was directly implicated even had their names redacted and protected by ISED in the RCGT report. Even more shocking is the fact that Despite these findings, ISED continues to allow these individuals to manage taxpayer dollars and allows them to continue perpetuating the abuse against employees who've been desperately seeking protection from their own government for over a year. That cannot stand. SDTC's board and executive continues to insist that the issues are just minor inconsistencies, while I said and the minister continue to claim that no findings warrant serious action. These are false narratives, and I'm here to provide documented proof of all of the lies that continue to be perpetuated by both SDTC and ISED. I believe that my testimony can provide an in-depth overview of the key issues at SDTC because I worked on the financial due diligence and compliance of projects at SDTC for the key 2 year period that coincides with the most serious findings in the RCG two report. I'm also intimately aware of exactly how ISED understood the issues, and the clear that the total bureaucracy had laid out. The minister and PCO have been aware of this file for more than they are telling to the public. And there are even documented evidence that They even engaged with everyone at ISED to make sure there were edits to the briefings before they were officially sent to them. All of this is backed up by documents, transcripts and recordings, some of which we've already submitted to this committee. Thank you, and I welcome all your questions.
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 9:56 PM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

With a single stroke of a pen, the Liberal insiders make more money than an average Canadian family makes through hard work in a whole year. Enough! https://t.co/FdyE1CRFXh

Saved - October 23, 2023 at 9:52 PM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

WATCH: Cover-up coalition doesn’t let the RCMP Commissioner say one word on Trudeau’s involvement in the SNC affair. Liberals, NDP and Bloc voted to shut him down. Shameful! https://t.co/URzmnEPjl4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The meeting was abruptly adjourned after the motion was made by Madame Fortier. The motion was not up for debate, so a vote was taken. The majority voted in favor of adjourning the meeting, despite the presence of the RCMP commissioner and staff sergeant. The speaker expressed disappointment in the Liberal members who voted to shut down the meeting, accusing them of protecting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The speaker criticized the use of cabinet confidence to withhold information from the RCMP, hindering their investigation into obstruction of justice charges. The speaker concluded by stating that after 8 years of Trudeau's leadership, transparency and accountability are lacking in our democratic institutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I move to adjourn the meeting. Speaker 1: So Madame Fortier had the floor. She moved the motion. The motion is not debatable, So we're going to have to we're going to have to go to the vote. And I assume that there's no I assume that there's no agreement on this? Speaker 0: Certainly there's no agreement to shut down a meeting when we have the commissioner Chair, sorry, Chair. That's right. Chair. Speaker 1: Okay. We're dealing with this right now so I've made my ruling we are going to go to the vote because it's a non debatable, motion. Go ahead Madam Speaker 0: Yes. Miss Danoff. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Mister Callaway. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Madam Fortier. We Ms. Carried. Yes. Mr. Barrett? No. Mr. Guilm? No. Mr. Kirk. No. Mr. Vandeau. Mr. DeTale. Speaker 1: Yes. Unbelievable. Speaker 0: Lease 7, knees. Speaker 1: Okay. Thank you. The vote has passed. With Apologies to the commissioner and the staff sergeant, this meeting is adjourned. Speaker 0: I'll stop. So we're here In so we're here in the, the standing committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics. We literally have The commissioner for the RCMP in the room. We have a staff sergeant from the RCMP in the room. And we have these liberals right there. The vice the Liberal Vice Chair Mona Forte just moved to adjourn the committee. These Liberals, voted to shut it down. Mike Callaway, Parm Banes, Hand them off, hickertallity, George. That's abs absolutely unacceptable. Look at them. They're very proud to come The corruption of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. And so when we have when we have the commissioner of the RCMP Here to answer questions. And we have the cover up coalition do what they do, and they adjourn the meeting before the commissioner even read his statement. And so I can tell you that, we came here to work, meeting notice was given, and they, they are walking out of the room. They're running with their tail between their legs because they because they're trying to protect, a prime minister who who refused to release information that the RCMP had requested hiding behind cabinet confidence. Now the perfect the the purpose of cabinet confidence, of course, is so that Ministers are free to discuss decisions, and the details of the discussions aren't released to the media. But what they've used The cabinet confidence provisions for, in this case, is to conceal information from the RCMP to prevent Them from being able to fully investigate the obstruction of justice Charges that they were, that they were looking at at the time. And so it's it's shocking to find ourselves in a room where in Just moments ago, these Liberals shut down the hearing. And so we had the commissioner of the RCMP. He was right there Just a moment ago, and, and that's what transparency and accountability looks like After 8 years of Justin Trudeau, I can tell you for our democratic institutions, this prime minister is just not worth the cost, and we're gonna have more to say about this.
Saved - October 13, 2023 at 3:58 AM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

WATCH: Right after my first round of questioning, the NDP-Liberal government voted to shut down the Auditor General's testimony on the $54 million ArriveCan App boondoggle. The costly coalition voted for a cover-up.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses allegations of criminal activity, including identity theft, fraudulent resumes, contractual theft, fraudulent billing, price fixing, and collusion involving senior bureaucrats and three contractors. The RCMP is investigating the matter. The meeting is adjourned after a motion to do so is passed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you go deep dive into the particular story it goes beyond misconduct it goes into criminality. And that's why the RCMP is investigating it. There are allegations regarding identity theft fraudulent forged resumes. Contractual theft Fraudulent billing price fixing collusion all with senior bureaucrats with the government of Canada. And the 3 contractors in question, GC Strategies, Dalley Dalleyan Enterprises, And core dex, at the heart Speaker 1: of the article Mister Brodner, that is your time, but you'll have another opportunity Thank you. To pick that up again. Thank you. Miss Khalid, you have the floor for 5 minutes now, please. Speaker 2: Thank you very much, mister Chair, Speaker 3: and I'll start by thanking, miss Hogan, our our auditor general, for her time today and, and for for being so forthcoming with, Speaker 4: with all of the questions, we realize it's a consistent week. So, at this time, mister chair, I move that Speaker 3: the committee do now adjourn. Speaker 1: I have a I have a a motion to adjourn the meeting. It's not debatable. I'll ask the, the clerk for, roll call please. Speaker 3: Mister Macron. Speaker 1: Mister Brock we're having about. Speaker 3: Yes. So I'm calling mister Marcouli. Speaker 1: Sorry. It's my colleague. Speaker 3: Oh, sorry. Speaker 1: No. No. Speaker 3: Mister Nader? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 3: Mister Brock? No. Madam Saint Claire Regany? No. Mister Desjallet? Yes. Mister Blois? Yes. Miss Bradford? Yes. Miss Khalid? Yes. Miss madam Shanahan? Yes. Miss Yip? Yes. 6 CA's, 4 nays. Speaker 1: Thank you. I adjourn the meeting.
Saved - October 13, 2023 at 3:52 AM

@LarryBrockMP - Larry Brock

You won’t believe what the NDP-Liberal government did this time. They voted to shutdown testimony from the Auditor General on the $54 million ArriveCan App. An emergency meeting was called after we learned the RCMP is investigating contracts awarded under the ArriveCan App.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Liberal NDP Coalition government held an emergency meeting with the Auditor General of Canada to discuss the $54 million ArriveCAN app scandal. The RCMP is now investigating potential criminality related to the app's contracts. However, the government shut down the Auditor General's testimony after just 30 minutes of a scheduled 2-hour meeting. Serious allegations of fraudulent contract practices have been made, and there is concern about how an app could cost taxpayers such a large amount. The opposition party vows to expose the corruption and hold those responsible accountable. They believe the NDP liberal government is not worth the cost.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You won't believe what the Liberal NDP Coalition government just did. Breaking news. The public accounts committee called an emergency meeting with the Auditor General of Canada to update Canadians on her audit into the $54,000,000 ArriveCAN app boondoggle. This meeting was called after we learned that the RCMP is now investigating criminality into contracts awarded under the ArriveCAN app. The Liberal NDP Government shut down the Auditor General's testimony after just 30 minutes of a scheduled 2 hour meeting. The evidence we heard was damning, and the coalition partners voted to cover it up and shut it down. We now know that the government officials lied before parliamentary hearings into the $54,000,000 app. We have serious allegations of fraudulent contract practices that are a cause of grave concern. Today was the first step into a lengthy process to expose the corruption and find out how it is even possible for an app to cost taxpayers $54,000,000. This is the NDP Liberal Government at its absolute worse. They laughed in the face of taxpayers being on the hook for $54,000,000. They laughed in the face of government officials lying before a committee investigation and they laughed in the face of potential criminal contracting practises. It was a conservative motion in the House of Commons that got the Auditor General to investigate the $54,000,000 ArriveCAN app. And we will not stop until all wrongdoing and abuse of taxpayer money is exposed. Now more than ever, it's clear. The NDP liberal government is simply not worth the cost.
View Full Interactive Feed