TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @LeahRain77
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Trump's national security adviser, Mike Waltz, abruptly sent home many National Security Council staffers focused on Ukraine, Iran, and North Korea. The suddenness of the decision left some officials stranded at the White House, needing Secret Service assistance to exit due to deactivated badges.
@LeahRain77 - Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️
MORE WINNING 💥💥💥💥💥💥 Trump's national security adviser Mike Waltz has sent dozens of National Security Council staffers responsible for Ukraine, Iran and North Korea home, suspending them from their jobs. The decision was so sudden that it left some officials unable to physically leave the White House complex because their badges stopped working, sources told the newspaper. As a result, Secret Service agents had to manually open the gates for those whose passes had been deactivated.
@LeahRain77 - Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️
Enjoy ⚠️9 minutes of INCONSEQUENTIAL Media claiming Biden WOULD “NEVER” Pardon his son... https://t.co/JK8d56ah3w
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Biden has committed to respecting the judicial process, stating he will not pardon his son, Hunter, if convicted. This decision highlights a stark contrast with Donald Trump's approach to legal challenges. Biden emphasizes the importance of the rule of law, asserting that no one, including family, is above it. While Biden accepts the jury's verdict, Trump continues to claim the system is rigged against him. This situation underscores the differing values between the two leaders, with Biden prioritizing legal integrity over personal loyalty. Ultimately, Biden's stance reinforces the principle that justice must be upheld, regardless of personal ties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Presidential promise to put the law before a family.
Speaker 1: I said I abide by the jury decision. I will do that, and I will not pardon him.
Speaker 0: Letting the world know that he will not wipe away the decision of 12 of his son's peers was asked directly, and he has said he wouldn't pardon, his son if he gets convicted.
Speaker 2: Let's quite see what happens if he loses.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But, I mean, but he said it.
Speaker 3: He's gonna get pardoned by his dad. There's no question about that.
Speaker 4: The president has ruled out pardoning his son.
Speaker 5: Major commitment from the president, accepting the outcome of the trial and also pledging not to pardon his son.
Speaker 6: So the challenge for him is really to continue to live up to his values when it was really personal, and he did that today.
Speaker 5: It seems like a pretty normal, straightforward answer, but it it it takes new weight when we see what Trump is saying about the outcome of his trial. We're hearing other Republicans who say they don't accept
Speaker 6: the jury's verdict here in New York.
Speaker 4: The contrast is profound. To sit there and say, well, I'm not gonna intervene in the legal process, and I wouldn't pardon my son. One side, Democrats and Joe Biden protecting the justice system, and on the other, Republicans and Trump protecting Trump.
Speaker 7: A current president of the United States has so much respect for the law that he has said he would not pardon his son. I mean, what Yeah. You know? Again, it's all about the contrast.
Speaker 3: President Biden saying I will respect whatever this jury decides versus Donald Trump after he was convicted on 34 counts, saying the entire system is rigged against him.
Speaker 8: Their latest attack has been that Joe Biden has politicized and weaponized the DOJ. Right? That was the whole argument around Donald Trump's conviction. And this week, of course, Hunter Biden was found guilty, and Joe Biden has very clearly said he would not pardon his son. He would not commit his sentence.
How stark is this difference? I mean, how can Republicans keep making this argument now that that no. Now that Joe Biden has really put it out there. Where's Hunter? And he stood there in a courtroom flanked by his family, and he's accepted his sentence.
Speaker 9: He is not pardoning, his son, which he could do. These are federal charges.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 9: He is not doing that.
Speaker 1: He is not doing it because he is living what it means
Speaker 9: to have a rule of law in this country. And then it is it isn't I mean, if you wanna know if he believes it, you you can actually see what is happening with his own son.
Speaker 10: The president, Anderson, has been really clear, that he is going to accept the outcome of the trial no matter what happens.
Speaker 11: So Joe Biden's gotten asked
Speaker 6: about, you know, talking about law and order.
Speaker 11: He's gotten asked if he would pardon his son. He has said no. On the other side, you've got Donald Trump who has said that he will pardon the January 6th insurrection. They're not even his sons. They're just sons of bitches.
Speaker 9: Washington said I am not running again because he understood the self restraint was absolutely essential to this country. So you don't have a king. He did not pardon his son. He did not order the Department of Justice to to say don't prosecute my son. So impressive.
Speaker 6: Could have, ordered, the Justice Department to halt the prosecution of Hunter Biden according to this court. Everyone understands he's a decent man.
Speaker 12: I think Joe Biden has a chance here to stand up for the rule of law, to say the rule the law is the law no matter who it is, no matter if it's Trump or Biden. And remember, part of Trumpism's dangerousness is that it tears down institutions, important institutions of our democracy. So there is an opportunity here for Biden to say, you know, the jury found him guilty. This is how it's supposed to work, period. Paragraph.
End of story.
Speaker 13: Have you ruled out a pardon for your son?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 6: As I said last week, I will accept the outcome of this case and will continue to the judicial process as Hunter considers an appeal. You know, the president said he won't touch it. He's not he said he's not gonna pardon his son, and it seems that mayor Garland let it go through. How can the justice department be weaponized against Trump when all of that is happening?
Speaker 14: But Democrats stand for the rule of law. Remember law and order. You know, and and we've been saying that Trump's not above the law. Hunter Biden's not above the law. No one is above the law.
And it is amazing to see the stark contrast between how Democrats handled today and how Republicans handled this whole thing over the last couple of weeks.
Speaker 15: For years, these conservatives have been crowing about a politicized justice department, Biden politicizing it and so on. What happened today? The justice department convicted the president's own son, his only living son. You heard the president say he would accept the outcome of the case. I know no other word for that, but presidential.
Mhmm. He even went so far as to say he wouldn't pardon his son. That's how much respect he has for the system.
Speaker 13: President has said, that he will not pardon his son. What what did you think
Speaker 16: of that?
Speaker 13: I thought it was extraordinary. I mean, it was, it was a moment of, just moral clarity on the part of, Joe Biden and couldn't have been in, you know, starker contrast to the way Donald Trump has handled his own, conviction.
Speaker 16: He could still pardon him. He said he won't do that. All of that conduct, given that it's his son, is is kind of we should pause for a moment and think about how unbelievable that is. In a 1000000 years, if the shoe were on the other and Donald Trump was facing, the prospect of his son being prosecuted by a Biden help me if I've been held over. A Biden holdover Obama holdover prosecutor, not in a 1000000, 1000000 years would that have happened.
So, you know, some of the people on the right, the people who support Donald Trump, are trying to cast this as some clever ops program. Yeah.
Speaker 17: Hunter Biden was found guilty by a jury of his peers just like Donald Trump because this is our justice system at work. The divide here is stunning, and it's a great reminder that one political party remains committed to the rule of law and the other doesn't.
Speaker 2: Joe Biden has already proven he's willing to stand up for the rule of law in a way that we could all never imagine Donald Trump
Speaker 18: to do. Pretty emphatic over the last few days that he does not plan to pardon or commute his son. But that really is him saying is I don't plan to use the powers of the office, the powers of the presidency to provide private relief for my family. In a sense, he's staking out a pretty bright line between being, as he says, a president and a dad. And that's not just an emotional expression.
He's in effect saying, I don't think that I should. I don't have a right even if it's legal, and god knows it must be tempting Yeah. To use this power in a way that is not available to so many other Americans facing similar kinds of struggles. There's a kind of old school sort of flinty core to his conception of how you are to be in the system, how you are to be as a person, a a moral person, and, ultimately, how to contend with questions of power. One of the things that anybody who spends time around Joe Biden comes to know is that he's had this long running focus on how much he is bothered by abuses of power.
Speaker 3: We'll accept the verdict no matter what it is and that he has ruled out pardoning his own son. Contrast that from what we hear from Donald Trump. And, again, we have to underline, in no uncertain terms, president Biden saying, I will accept the outcome. I will accept what the jury decides here. That's the way our legal system works.
And, no, I will not pardon my own son if he is convicted.
Speaker 9: And the contrast is so clear in terms of decency and principle and transactional, guidances in terms of how you view the world.
Speaker 19: It is still a good day for the United States that this conviction is a prime example of the way our judicial system is supposed to work. Even president Biden saying in a statement that he would respect the outcome of this case. Those words so completely contrast with what his opponent, now a convicted felon himself, continues to say about the US courts.
Speaker 2: The contrast to how Trump has behaved, how Trump has treated the rule of law. This was a a a good day for the system. Good day for, sort of a of of sort of America as an example of how the rule of law should work.
Speaker 19: President Biden told David Muir that he would absolutely accept the verdict, whatever it was, and that he would not pardon his son regardless. And today, he said the same thing in a statement. Meanwhile, you know, Donald Trump comes out and calls the justice system completely unfair. What do you think of that contrast?
Speaker 6: There's the contrast of 2 different men.
Speaker 0: Here is Joe Biden who has lost a son who served honorably in the armed forces, who now has basically said, I will sacrifice my surviving son's future. I will allow him to serve a prison term if that's what's determined because that is what the rule of law demands.
Speaker 20: President announces that he will not pardon his son. Do you think ordinary Americans give enough thought
Speaker 1: to how this system is a miracle,
Speaker 20: a gift to this country, a gift to democracy?
@LeahRain77 - Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️
LISTEN ….if he’s correct this is the money shot !!! https://t.co/VIjUFzM4V5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Supreme Court holds significant power, akin to having a loaded gun aimed at the core of the government. Any misstep could lead to drastic consequences, potentially affecting 388 members of Congress, as well as the President, Vice President, and others, all in a matter of minutes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Words, supreme court now has a loaded gun in his hand with a round in the chamber and a full magazine and is pointing it right at the head of the beast and the heart of the beast. If they so much as flinch, this supreme court could take out 388 members of the house of representatives, the senate, Joe Biden, Harris, and Pence in one fell swoop done over in minutes.
@LeahRain77 - Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️
Wow …While you’re struggling to put food on the table illegals are being given a plane ticket to anywhere and a $5,000 Visa gift card for breaking the law , and all of it paid by your tax dollars. https://t.co/Bx36kVDSXw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people are coming into the country without proper vetting, mainly young men from China, Africa, and other places. What's concerning is that these individuals are given a cell phone, a plane ticket to any location in the country, and a $5,000 Visa card. This means that while you struggle to pay bills and provide for your family during the Christmas season, the government is giving illegal immigrants $5,000 gift cards. This is the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, we see all these people coming across mostly military age men coming from China, from Africa, from all over the world. Most of them not even being vetted when they come in here. But here's what's really gonna bother you. When these folks come across and they're processed, they're being given a cell phone, A plane ticket to wherever they wanna go in this country, so probably to a community near you, and a $5,000 Visa card. So while this Christmas season, you're struggling to keep your lights on, while you're struggling to pay your rent, put Christmas presents under the tree for your kids, we have our government giving people that came into this country illegally, $5,000 gift cards.
That's the truth, folks.
@LeahRain77 - Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️
Jesse Watters asks the same question we all want to know .. WHY IS DURBIN Blocking Epstein’s Client list ? The quiet part out loud.. he’s covering for himself or others ! ? https://t.co/t1x2bqcFpc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Dick Durbin is being accused of covering up for Jeffrey Epstein, a deceased child trafficker. Senator Marsha Blackburn attempted to subpoena Epstein's flight log, but Durbin blocked it. The public wants to know who was on Epstein's jet and who visited his island, especially considering Bill Clinton's frequent trips. Durbin's office claims they didn't have enough time to schedule a vote on the subpoena, but they managed to find time to search Melania's underwear drawer. Epstein's seized surveillance videos and hard drives suggest government disinterest in combating sex trafficking. This implies Epstein had connections with intelligence agencies, and Durbin is accused of covering up the entire operation. It's hypocritical for them to claim concern for women and children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is senator Dick Durbin covering up for Jeffrey Epstein? Jeffrey Epstein's a dead child trafficker. And senator Marsha Blackburn tried subpoenaing Jeffrey Epstein's flight log earlier today, and senator Dick Durbin blocked it. Epstein's been dead for 4 years. Why can't we see who was on his jet?
Why can't we know who went to his island? We already know Bill Clinton full on Epstein's jet at least 2 dozen times. So Who's Dick Durbin protecting? I assume Durbin isn't protecting a dead pedophile because he's a pedophile and he's dead. So Durbin's protecting the associates of a dead pedophile.
Durbin's office says, well, you know, they didn't have enough time to schedule a vote on the subpoena. Okay, they'll have time tomorrow. You're the Senate whip, dick. You can make time. And they got a subpoena to go through Melania's underwear drawer.
So you should be able to subpoena the Epstein flight logs. And Epstein had surveillance videos and hard drives seized by the FBI in Palm Beach, New Mexico, Manhattan, and in the Caribbean. It's almost like the government has no interest in tackling international sexual sex trafficking. This means Epstein was intel, and Durbin is covering up for the entire op. What a bunch of animals, and how dare they pretend to care about women and kids.
@LeahRain77 - Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️
It’s like the Dam has burst on all these SOBs https://t.co/vhDpkV3C8u
Video Transcript AI Summary
Calls for John Kerry's resignation have intensified following the leaked audio of an Iranian minister suggesting that Kerry shared classified information with Iran, specifically from Israel. This revelation has sparked a firestorm, as it could potentially lead to a significant foreign policy disaster for the United States. If proven true, this act would involve disclosing secret information to a sworn enemy responsible for the deaths of numerous American military personnel. Consequently, many believe that John Kerry should step down from his position.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Or even the resignation of John Kerry. And these calls getting louder after that leaked audio of a top Iranian minister suggesting carry give Iran classified intel from one of our closest allies, Israel. The firestorm continuing all day. That would be a major foreign policy catastrophe for the country. Maybe it will reveal to be true.
Revealing secret information to one of America's most sworn enemies with the blood of thousands of American Military members on his hands. If this is true, John Kerry needs to go.