TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @LetsGoBrando45
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Simon of Trent is a real historic event, and that European nations have expelled the “satanic Jews” and burned their Talmud endlessly through time. It’s a historic revolving door. This is 100% the truth. We need to address the truth, collectively, so we can move forward.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Just a friendly reminder, Simon of Trent is a real historical event, and European nations have been kicking the satanic jews out, and burning their Talmud endlessly through time. It’s a historic revolving door. This is 100% the truth. 🎯 We need to address the truth, collectively, so we can move forward.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
jews are the UNCHOSEN people. This is theologically correct, if you follow the Bible. 🎯 If you live by Judeo-Christian values, I understand that the Bible is not for you. I’m talking to Christians. 👍 https://t.co/VQaTD84csq
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's a pretty known fact that the Jews are God's chosen people, that the Jewish homeland is Israel, that the Jews believe in the Old Testament, and that the Old Testament is about Jews. However, almost none of these facts are true. "Nowhere in the Bible does it call the Jews God's chosen people." "The Jews don't really believe in the Old Testament, and only maybe 5% of the people in the Old Testament can even be considered Jewish." "the expression anti Semite literally means against Shem or his descendants. However, being anti Jewish isn't the same as being anti Semitic." "Shem is the son of Noah, the guy who built the ark when Mesopotamia flooded." "Except Abraham has never been a Jew nor will he ever be a Jew."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a pretty known fact that the Jews are God's chosen people, that the Jewish homeland is Israel, that the Jews believe in the Old Testament, and that the Old Testament is about Jews. However, almost none of these facts are true. Nowhere in the Bible does it call the Jews God's chosen people. Modern day Israel isn't really the homeland of the Jews. The Jews don't really believe in the Old Testament, and only maybe 5% of the people in the Old Testament can even be considered Jewish.
So now that you've branded me an anti Semite, we can begin. So the expression anti Semite literally means against Shem or his descendants. However, being anti Jewish isn't the same as being anti Semitic. So let me explain. The Semites are the descendants of a man named Shem who would father some of the world's most renowned empires and dynasties such as the Assyrian and Babylonian empires and even the Persians can call themselves Semites.
So why is it when you say something against the Jews you are considered anti Semitic? Because just like stealing your religion, your homes, your money, and businesses, some Jews also love stealing names, inheritance, and land. So Shem is the son of Noah, the guy who built the ark when Mesopotamia flooded. The Sumerian Kingdom would be destroyed by the flood and the Semites would descend from the Caucasian Mountains established the Acadian Empire. Shem would have children and one of his descendants would be named Eber.
He would be the father of the Hebrew people and the Semites would be called by his name. Eber's line would eventually give birth to a man named Abram or a Jew named Abraham. Except Abraham has never been a Jew nor will he ever be a Jew. And to call Abraham one is just plain ignorant. So let's go through it.
So according to the Bible, Abraham was a Hebrew and not a Jew, God promised to be the father of many nations. Not one single Jewish nation, but many nations. And that through him, all the families of the world would be blessed. Abraham would pass this blessing onto his younger son Isaac and not his eldest son Ishmael. Isaac would have twin sons named Esa and Jacob.
Again, the Abrahamic blessing would be passed down to the younger brother Jacob who would then be renamed to Israel. Israel would then have 12 sons. His sons would each become their own tribes and eventually become their own nations. One of his sons would be named Judah, who would be the father of the Jewish people, and all Jews are related to him. Even though all Jews are Israelites, majority of Israelites are not Jews.
Obviously, Israel would have to pass the Abrahamic blessing to Judah in order for them to be the chosen people. Israel would want his favorite son, Joseph, to inherit the Abrahamic blessing. However, Judah, the father of the Jews, would be jealous and conspire with his brothers to have Joseph killed. In the end, Judah sold Joseph into slavery for silver, much like Judah sold Jesus to the Jews. So the Bible portrays Judah as a jealous villain and Joseph as the chosen son.
While in slavery, Joseph would rise to become the prime minister of Egypt and father two sons named Ephraim and Manasseh. In the end, Israel would adopt Joseph's sons and pass the Abrahamic blessing onto them, making them the chosen people and dividing Joseph into two tribes, making 13 tribes of Israel. As for the father of the Jews, his two eldest sons would die and Judah would end up bowing down to Joseph. So now that you understand that the Jews were never intended to bless the world nor were they ever considered the chosen people, we can move on to our second point. So is the Jewish homeland Israel?
And the answer is yes and not at all. Israel was originally called the Land Of Canaan named after Noah's grandson Canaan. The Land Of Canaan was conquered by the Israelites after they left Egypt with Moses found in the book of Exodus. The Bible says God commanded the Israelites to punish the Canaanites for their sexual immorality, which led to child sacrifice, which would eventually lead to cannibalism. The word cannibal actually comes from the words Canaan and the god Baal.
Baal was the god of Canaan and the priests were known for eating the children after they were sacrificed to him. Hence why we call them Canaan balls. So now that you understand what kind of people were living in Canaan, try not to feel so bad when you read that God ordered us to exterminate them. The borders of the Jewish homeland were established by Joshua who was one of the descendants of Joseph and not from Judah. So if we were to restore the Jews to their original land according to the Bible, the Jewish homeland would look less like this and more like that.
So like the story of Joseph and Judah, their children likewise wouldn't get along either. After becoming nations, there would be a civil war. The Jews would rule the Southern Kingdom Of Judea while Joseph's sons would rule the Northern Kingdom keeping the name Israel. They would have different religions, believe in different gods, and while Judah stayed in Judea, Joseph would ally him with the Phoenicians and establish colonies and trade posts all over the Mediterranean. The kingdom of Israel would be corrupted by foreign ideologies and like the Canaanites would fall into materialism, sexual morality, and child sacrifice, which would lead to them being conquered by the Assyrian Empire.
Some of the Israelites would be taken into captivity into the lands of Assyria and Midea, while some of the Israelites and Phoenicians would flee to their colonies and trade posts, fulfilling the promise made to Abraham that the world would be blessed through him as he would be the father of many nations. So the sons of Joseph would become fruitful and multiply among the nations forgetting who they are which shouldn't surprise us considering their names literally mean fruitful and forgetful. Just like the Northern Kingdom, the Jews would fall into sexual immorality and start sacrificing their children. They would be conquered and enslaved by the Babylonians, then freed and reestablished by the Persians, conquered again by the Greeks, and later occupied by the Romans. While under Roman rule, the Jews would launch the greatest revolution in Roman history known as the great revolt, which would fail causing Judea, Jerusalem, and the Jewish temple to be destroyed, ironically fulfilling everything Jesus and the Christian said would happen.
The Jews not being satisfied with losing their temple and homeland would stab the Romans in the back by launching two more rebellions, killing over half a million Greeks and Romans. God would bless the chosen people with two more humiliating defeats along with the banishment from the land causing Judea to be renamed to Syria Palestinia. So the reason the Jews have been able to take Palestine really rests on the fact that they stole the name Israel and have convinced the Christian West that they are the chosen people and that they alone are Israel. But once putting things into perspective, we see that just isn't true. Which brings us to our third point.
Do the Jews believe in the old testament? The answer is kind of and not really. While waving around the old testament as if they believe in it, the Jews actually have secondary books that they consider just as important. The main book being called the Talmud. To explain the Talmud, we have to understand some basic Jewish Roman history going back to emperor Claudius who like emperor Tiberius tried to ban the Jews from Rome after branding them aggressive troublemakers.
Sadly, emperor Claudius didn't understand how to play the game of thrones and ended up mysteriously being killed. His successor, emperor Nero, would lift the Jewish band which shouldn't surprise us considering the Talmud says he was a Jewish convert. Nero and his Jews would engage in some of the most barbaric acts known to man. Just to give you an idea of how crazy this pro Jewish Roman emperor was, Nero burned down Rome and blamed it on the Christians causing them to be tortured and killed in the worst ways imaginable. He murdered his entire family, then kicked his pregnant wife and unborn child to death, and then castrated a young boy named Sporus and forced him to dress like the wife who he had just murdered.
With the coming of Jesus, the Jews would divide into two main groups. Those who believe that Jesus is the Messiah, while the other group of Jews rejected this claim believing that their Messiah would come wielding a sword to destroy the Romans and set up a Jewish empire, which is what led the Jews to revolt against Rome in the first place. That and they just didn't wanna pay taxes. After their failed rebellions, the Jews would retreat to Babylon creating the religion we know today as Judaism, making Christianity older by about two hundred years. The Jews would argue and say that Talmud is the oral law that was passed down orally without any mistakes since the time of Moses before finally being written down between two hundred and four hundred years after Jesus.
This would place the Jews in first place above the Muslims for the longest most successful game of broken telephone ever played. The Talmud speaks of its love for Christians by calling the mother of Jesus a whore and calling Jesus a bastard sorcerer who is in hell boiling in human shit. Which brings us to our last point. Is the old testament about Jews? The answer is no, not really.
Because the Jews have stolen the name Israel, you would never guess that the majority of the people in the Bible are not Jewish. The apostle Paul for instance, even though everyone calls him a Jew, Paul quickly separates himself from the Jews and says, I am an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin. The Bible also says that God sent Paul to preach among the Israelites. And funny enough, Paul's ministry wasn't in Judea, but he was sent to preach to the Galatians in Asia Minor, the Greeks in Greece, and the Romans in Rome. The Bible is constantly separating the kingdom of Israel from the kingdom of Judah as it is constantly separating Joseph from Judah.
The entire Jewish deception and hijacking of the Bible depends on them stealing the terms Semites, Hebrews, and Israelites. For example, Moses, the man who wrote the first five books known as the Torah, did not come from the tribe of Judah nor was he part of the Kingdom Of Judea, yet somehow he is a Jew. The reality here is the majority of the people in the old testament are not Jewish. The bible is a book that tells the history of many nations and peoples like the Semites, Hebrews, Israelites, Egyptians, Phoenicians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Armenians, Persian, Greeks, Romans, and many others. It's not only about Jews.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
This man is half Ashkenazi jew. 🎯 Every accusation is a confession. If you don’t believe me, don’t worry, you will. 👍 https://t.co/bjw2GTISA4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a deliberate strategy to corrode public trust by raising questions, spreading dirt, and planting conspiracy theories, thereby causing citizens to doubt the credibility of leaders, mainstream media, political institutions, and even each other and the concept of truth. The aim is to overwhelm citizens with suspicion until a sense of shared reality dissolves, enabling whoever orchestrates the tactic to prevail. A country's public square with enough raw sewage. You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing that citizens no longer know what to believe. Once they lose trust in their leaders, the mainstream media, in political institutions, in each other, in the possibility of truth. The game's won. This is presented as a win for the manipulators.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A country's public square with enough raw sewage. You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing that citizens no longer know what to believe. Once they lose trust in their leaders, the mainstream media, in political institutions, in each other, in the possibility of truth. The game's won.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Ladies & Gentlemen‼️ I present to you, THE TALMUD. Right from the filthy mouth of their rabbis. This needs to be removed from our countries, as we have done many, many times historically. 🎯 https://t.co/cA1jsgZZNK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Before she was three, and she saw blood.
Then he had another relation with her after she was three, and again, Umaq Saddam.
Now if we say that the hymen gets ruptured, and it regrows if it got ruptured before she was three, and it grows back right away, So we understand what happened.
He saw Dam when he had a relation with her under three. Sulim.
She sees Dam again after three. What is it from? Sulim.
Under three, there's no Haiman or it's not ruptured.
If a man has a relation with a girl under three and she sees dam, that's the Nafkamina.
If it doesn't rupture before she's three years old and she had dam after the relation, is a rahiyah that this is dam nidah.
Because before three, it's not halachically an act of cohabitation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before she was three, and she saw blood. Then he had another relation with her after she was three, and again, Umaq Saddam. Now if we say that the hymen gets ruptured, and it regrows if it got ruptured before she was three, and it grows back right away, So we understand what happened. He saw Dam when he had a relation with her under three. Sulim.
She sees Dam again after three. What is it from? Sulim. Under three, there's no Haiman or it's not ruptured. It only happens Allah Akhagimul.
So really what we're focusing in is not the fact that he had a relation with her after she was three. If a man has a relation with a girl under three and she sees dam, that's the Nafkamina. If it doesn't rupture before she's three years old and she had dam after the relation, is a rahiyah that this is dam nidah. Because before three, it's not halachically an act of cohabitation. But nevertheless, before three, is a damned sulim or is it damned nida?
Speaker 1: Is damned sulim or is that damned nida?
Speaker 0: Nothing. And neither to her. And if it's damned nida, then she's nida and he's
Speaker 1: She will be it will be gone soon both times.
Speaker 0: Correct. Correct. Today, we have a doctor here. I'm watching them at CS. The fact that it grows back, it means that something changes.
Some there's some change after three. It means it grows back before three. It doesn't go back after Everything grows very fast. But but but after three, Baha'u'll doesn't grow back. Is there a dollar?
One second, doctor Dani, afterward, the Toyota is saying that a man has a relation with a girl, God forbid, after three God forbid, after three Once she's three full three years old, then her B'Sulim will never grow back. She will lose her B'Sulim. If a man has a relation with a girl under three, it's gonna either it never ruptured or it was gonna grow back. Now she's three years old, someone had a relation with her, that's it, it's ruptured. If a man has a relation with a girl under three, It's as if someone takes a finger and pokes it in the eye.
It's like when you put a finger in the eye. As long as the finger is in the eye, the eye tears, and it tears and it tears again. After sulim, that's the shot that Tearing meaning here, they'll be bleeding. And if a man has a relation to act with a girl under three, she's going to bleed, but then it's going to grow back. And if he has a relation with her again, when she's over three, she's going to bleed again.
Sulaim Maiz Al Oslo, Ittaqa gets ruptured. Dam of Bia with a girl under three will make her bleed. It's not Dami, it's Dam Sulaim. And then since she was not three years old, Va'asu, Dib Sulaim will come back, Dib Sulaim will regrow because
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
This jew is one of THE BEST at waking up the goyim. 🔥🔥🔥 Thank you 🙏 to all the jews doing the work of our Lord & Saviour. Christ is King. 🙏 https://t.co/Ye2aZCTVNL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hitler’s moves, described here as rules before the Narenberg Laws, were: 'Rule number one, no more pornography. No more homosexuality.' 'None of that garbage. Not allowed.' The second rule: 'Second rule, you're not allowed to charge interest. No more interest.' He blames Jews for economic woes: 'the people that had the money, that lent the money out were Jews' and 'the high interest that the Jews charged people was so high, it ruined and destroyed the economy in Germany.' He claims 'Jews destroyed Russia' and 'Communism is by Jews.' He describes hyperinflation: 'Go to the store to buy to buy bread.' 'You had to take a whole horse carriage full of money. By the time you arrive at the store, it wasn't enough.' But after he passed this law, within six years, Germany became the leading wealthiest economy in the world. 'They called it a financial miracle.' 'This is happening again.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who knows the first two laws that Hitler implemented? Who knows the first two laws? Before the Narenberg laws. Before that, we're talking about years before it. Hitler first comes into power.
What's the first two laws? Okay. I'll save you the time. Rule number one, no more pornography. No more homosexuality.
None of that garbage. Not allowed. Berlin in the thirties, in the twenties, was the Sodom and Gomorrah of the day. Homosexuality, pornography, all the bestiality, all the garbage of the world, that was the capital of the world. He outlawed it.
They are no longer allowed, closed all the bars, all the gay clubs, all the production, which were all run by Jewish people, unfortunately. Second rule, you're not allowed to charge interest. No more interest. Now you would think, why? What does he care about interest?
Well, because all the people that had the money, that lent the money out were Jews. He said no more interest. Why? Because of the high interest that the Jews charged people was so high, it ruined and destroyed the economy in Germany. They destroyed just like they destroyed Russia a few years before that through their communism over there, Jews destroyed Russia.
Not not Goyim. Jews destroyed. Communism is by Jews. Well, don't let anybody confuse you. You look at history, Karl Marx, all the other Hashaim, they're all Jews.
Wicked, but nonetheless Jews. They destroyed Russia. And he wrote in chapter two of Mein Kampf, they destroyed Russia. Now they wanted they're destroying Germany. Go to the store to buy to buy bread.
You had to take a whole horse carriage full of money. By the time you arrive at the store, it wasn't enough. Why? Because the inflation rate was so high. The bread became so much more valuable and your money went down.
And at that time, the great depression was happening around the entire world. Everyone was in a financial collapse. America was in financial collapse. England was in financial collapse. Germany collapsed worse than everybody else.
But after he passed this law, within six years, Germany became the leading wealthiest economy in the world. They called it a financial miracle. Why? They were the only ones that were bold enough to stop interest. This is one of the biggest reasons of why he hated Jews, because they destroyed the economy because of their greed.
This is happening again.
reSee.it AI Summary
I wonder where LGBTQ ideology originates. It seems to stem from a common source, one that repeatedly leads to conflict and rejection in various countries. This raises questions about the foundations of gender ideology as well.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Where does LGBTQ 🏳️⚧️⚧️🏳️🌈 ideology come from anyways? 🙋♂️ https://t.co/YmJrYwONr5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Magnus Hirschfield, an atheist Jew, was the first homosexual and transsexual advocate of the twentieth century and also performed the first sex reassignment surgery. Carl m Bayer, a Zionist Jew born in Germany, was the first female to male transgender surgery. Back in The United States, all the major lobbying organizations for transgenderism and child gender confusion is done by, you guessed it, God's not so chosen people. National Center for Transgender Equality founded by Mara Keisling, a Jew. Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund founded by Jillian Weiss and Michael Silverman, both Jews. GLSEN or Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network directed by Eliza Byrd, a Jew. TSER, Trans Student Educational Resources founded by Eli Ehrlich, and Sylvia Rivera Law Project, a legal aid organization that advocates trans rights founded by trans activist Dean Spade, both of which are Jews.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Magnus Hirschfield, an atheist Jew, was the first homosexual and transsexual advocate of the twentieth century and also performed the first sex reassignment surgery. Carl m Bayer, a Zionist Jew born in Germany, was the first female to male transgender surgery. Back in The United States, all the major lobbying organizations for transgenderism and child gender confusion is done by, you guessed it, God's not so chosen people. National Center for Transgender Equality founded by Mara Keisling, a Jew. Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund founded by Jillian Weiss and Michael Silverman, both Jews.
GLSEN or Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network directed by Eliza Byrd, a Jew. TSER, Trans Student Educational Resources founded by Eli Ehrlich, and Sylvia Rivera Law Project, a legal aid organization that advocates trans rights founded by trans activist Dean Spade, both of which are Jews.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
It all comes from the same place. It’s the book that gets them kicked out of our countries over and over again. https://t.co/NLWbirtMGi
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
@Isjusmecharlie This is the truth.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
This jew really helped wake me up. 👍 No hyperbole intended. https://t.co/dO8rdDhfwo
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Hitler claims in his book that the Jews are communists."
"They made the Russian revolution."
"They killed their 30,000,000 Russians, all the intelligent ones, in a cruel and horrific way."
"And that's their plan for the entire world. The next country in line is Germany."
"If we don't defeat them now, they will eliminate us, and they will slaughter another 20,000,000, all the intelligent people."
"The Russian revolution was made by the Jews."
"The Russian army was built by Trotsky, who was an incredible genius and antisemite like no other."
"Who founded the KGB? Jews."
"The Jews destroyed religion and faith."
"Out of nine large German newspapers, seven were owned by Jews."
"Now you understand why they don't teach it in schools?"
"Because who writes the curriculum? Those same leftists."
"They spread in Germany the heresy in God."
"I feel like the messenger of God to exterminate the Jews because they don't believe in him."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hitler really hate the Jews. What did he want from them? How did they bother him? But it's all written here in Mein Kampf. This book was published only recently.
It just got approved to be translated to Hebrew. It was forbidden all these years. But there's an earlier translation. It was made by Yad Vashem. They were allowed to.
Hitler claims in his book that the Jews are communists. They made the Russian revolution. They killed their 30,000,000 Russians, all the intelligent ones, in a cruel and horrific way. And that's their plan for the entire world. The next country in line is Germany.
They founded the German communist and socialist parties, it's true. If we don't defeat them now, they will eliminate us, and they will slaughter another 20,000,000, all the intelligent people. And that's how they want from country to country. So eventually, the only intelligent ones remaining would be the Jews. And he repeats it many times.
Make no mistake. And he is right. The Russian revolution was made by the Jews. The Russian army was built by Trotsky, who was an incredible genius and antisemite like no other. He created the Jewish division of the communist party, which members informed on their father, mother, brother, and son, whoever owns a or even a Hebrew learning book.
I'm not even talking about Teflon or Mikvah. He destroyed everything also by the Jews, but for sure by the Russians. In the first picture of the Russian government, out of 13 members, six were Jews. Who founded the KGB? Jews.
So everything is clearly written. He didn't hate the Jews because they had peals. He didn't hate them for observing mitzvah because they are communists, and he writes it clearly. The Jews destroyed religion and faith. They spread in Germany the heresy in God.
That's how he writes. I feel like the messenger of God to exterminate the Jews because they don't believe in him. He writes this right here. Now you understand why they don't teach it in schools? Because who writes the curriculum?
Those same leftists. Of course, they do not write that Hitler wanted to kill the Jews because they are the forefathers of the left and the forefathers of Marxism, communism, and Leninism. But that's what he writes. They destroyed all the values, poisoned literature and theater. Who did it?
Torah observing Jews poisoned the German theater? Out of nine large German newspapers, seven were owned by Jews. So do you understand why it's forbidden here to teach about him? And what he says?
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Global jewry conspired to destroy Germany 🇩🇪 before WW2. The facts are undeniable. 👇 You’re trained not to believe them. ✅ https://t.co/K4a8ll4O5J
Video Transcript AI Summary
- "Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war without mercy against her."
- "A worldwide Jewish boycott of German goods began."
- "20,000 Jews protested at New York City Hall."
- "Samuel Untermeyer, speaking on behalf of international jury, declared war on Germany with an economic boycott."
- "The front page of the March 24 London Daily Express carried the headline Judea declares war on Germany."
- "Jewish leaders were quoted as calling for a holy war against the German people."
- "In August 1933, Samuel Untermeyer talked about a planned annihilation and extermination of Jews underway and also about a war that must be waged against Germany to stop it."
- "In a hysterical radio broadcast, Untermeo called for the Jews to destroy Germany in a sacred war denouncing the Germans as cruel, savage beasts and ingrates."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1932, Bernard Lacache, president of the World Jewish League said, Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war without mercy against her. In March 1933, before the Germans had enacted any anti Jewish laws and before any hostilities against the Jews had taken place, worldwide Jewish leaders officially issued a declaration of war against Germany. A worldwide Jewish boycott of German goods began. 20,000 Jews protested at New York City Hall.
Rallies and boycotts were directed against German goods. Samuel Untermeyer, speaking on behalf of international jury, declared war on Germany with an economic boycott. The front page of the March 24 London Daily Express carried the headline Judea declares war on Germany. Jewish leaders were quoted as calling for a holy war against the German people. The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchants his business, and the beggar his humble hut in order to join the holy war against Hitler's people.
The Express said that Germany was now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry. In London, New York, Paris, and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade. In August 1933, Samuel Untermeyer talked about a planned annihilation and extermination of Jews underway and also about a war that must be waged against Germany to stop it. In a hysterical radio broadcast, Untermeo called for the Jews to destroy Germany in a sacred war denouncing the Germans as cruel, savage beasts and ingrates. Untermeo claimed that the Germans were annihilating the Jews by locking them up in vile concentration camps, starving and torturing them, murdering and beating them without
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
You’re going to want to watch this. 👍 https://t.co/aVpOJi1Qsv
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Ukraine is not a sovereign state. It does not have internationally recognized sovereign borders." "It's still part of Russia. It has been since the tenth century." "Ukraine has been the center of the globalists for decades and decades." "CIA, they've been working this in the Ukraine for seventy years, building up a resistance to everybody and everything because they needed to bring the Soviet Union down, but they also want the resources that are in the Ukraine." "With so much rapid information passing by us like bullets on a raging battlefield, it gets difficult to understand where we are, where we're going, and what's true." "The affirmative task we have now is is to actually create a new world order." "Every prime minister of Israel has been a Khazar Ashkenazi Jew with no connection to Semite people at all." "The Khazarian mafia today."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukraine is not a sovereign state. It does not have internationally recognized sovereign borders. It's still part of Russia. It has been since the tenth century. We think we're a sovereign nation.
We're not. The Ukrainians think they're a sovereign nation. They are not. Ukraine has been the center of the globalists for decades and decades and decades. CIA, they've been working this in the Ukraine for seventy years, building up a resistance to everybody and everything because they needed to bring the Soviet Union down, but they also want the resources that are in the Ukraine.
That's what this is all about.
Speaker 1: With so much rapid information passing by us like bullets on a raging battlefield, it gets difficult to understand where we are, where we're going, and what's true. To better understand today's political landscape of confusion, it's imperative to learn how we got here. We all know there's a plan for the elite of this world to puppeteer representatives of power into creating a new world order.
Speaker 2: And now is the time when things are shifting. We're gonna there's gonna be a new world order out there. And we've gotta lead it. We've gotta unite the rest of the free world in doing it.
Speaker 3: We have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders.
Speaker 1: There's a need for a new world order, but it has different characteristics.
Speaker 4: Never before has a new world order had to be assembled from so many different perceptions.
Speaker 2: The affirmative task we have now is is to actually create a new world order.
Speaker 1: Yet, like any really good movie, the dark forces have to contend against the good guys. Darkness to light, it appears that this is the theme of our time. Pick up a Bhagavad Gita, a Bible, or any ancient spiritual text, and you'll find that evil has existed since the beginning of time. But how far back do we have to go in order to make sense of everything happening today? With a possible World War three looming, we have to understand the core of today's threat didn't start by Russia simply being power hungry.
It started a few thousand years ago when Russia was Kyivon Rus' and its leader, Vladimir the Great, and his father before him defeated the Kabbalistic oligarch known as the Khazars. The Khazar kingdom was by far the largest of any nation in Europe with approximately 1,000,000 square miles. Today, this can be found on a map as contemporary Ukraine. Coincidence? Nothing is.
Look around, and you'll quickly see every political figure that is in support of Ukraine and that demonizes Russia are actually showing their true colors. They are making it known that America has been infiltrated by traitors, pedophiles, murderers, and thieves. And lucky for us, no coincidence that Russia's Vladimir the Great has got her back again. Now that you've glimpsed the bigger picture, let's connect all the little dots as we explore the rise and fall of the Khazars. Let's go back in time two thousand plus years when an incredibly evil society emerged in Khazaria.
Only the Jewish encyclopedia claims the Khazars had invaded Eastern Europe from their homeland in Asia via the land route between the North End of the Caspian Sea and the South End of the Ural Mountains. We know the Khazars were not Semites and came from an Asiatic Mongolian region. Eventually, the Khazars were driven out of Asia by the nations they were continually at war with. Because of this, the Khazars invaded Eastern Europe. In Far Eastern Europe, the very warlike Khazars did not find it difficult to subdue and conquer 25 peaceful agricultural nations, occupying approximately 1,000,000 square miles.
And in a short period, the Khazars established the largest and most powerful kingdom in Europe and probably the wealthiest also. January to May. Tribes that eventually comprised of the Khazar Empire were not an ethnic union, but combination of many unrelated tribes including Turkic, Asian, Iranian, and perhaps Eastern European herders, nomads, and other wandering steppe people. There were Slavic people including Khazids and Turkic peoples like Ogaric and Bulgars, and Asian tribes like the Avars and nomads who stemmed from Mongolia and South Siberia. These mixed groups with Turkic leaders led to the formation of the Khazars.
By the year May, the kingdom of Khazars was well established South of Russia or modern day Ukraine. Khazars lived on the shores of the Caspian Sea with their primitive capital in the northern tip where the Volga Rivers formed a delta. The Khazars fought under the banners of Attila the Hun, who was the leader of the Hunnic Empire from April to April. Attila was known to the Romans for his brutality and a penchant for sacking and pillaging Roman cities. It is here where Khazarian warriors would participate in what they'd eventually become known for, raping and pillaging the land after taking it over.
Between May, Khazarians developed into a nation ruled by an evil king who had an oligarch serving as his court who practiced ancient Babylonian black arts. During this time, Khazarians became known to surround countries as thieves, murderers, road bandits, and for assuming the identities of those travelers they murdered as a normal occupational practice. This was known as their way of life. Any country could order an army from the Khazars as a service, but only under one condition. The Khazarian warriors would be able to rape and pillage after the war was fought.
This is why in an effort to halt the wrath of the Khazarian warriors, the Persian king Khobad constructed a line of forts through the mountain pass to the Caucasus to guard against the invasion of the Khazars and other warlike tribes. That is also why the Wall Of Durban had begun construction to guard against the savage Khazars. With the Khazars' streak of power, the Turkic Khaganate was formed, and the western portion included parts of the future Khazarian empire. The Khazars dominated the Caucasian Crimean Goths and later occupied the Gothic capital, Doros. And eventually, the Khazarian Empire was formed.
It is important to note that the Rothschilds claimed to be Jewish, but are in fact Khazars from Mongolian Eastern Europe. Like Eisenhower, the Rothschilds have Asatic Mongolian genes and not genes of Judaic people. The Rothschilds are like 95% of the Jews today and have Khazar genes, and they're now known as Ashkenazi Jews. But Georgia and Ukraine are 800 to a thousand miles north of Palestine. Fact.
Every prime minister of Israel has been a Khazar Ashkenazi Jew with no connection to Semite people at all. An ultimatum was delivered by Russia and other surrounding nations impacted by the Khazar murders and robberies that they must reject paganism and choose between Judaism, Christianity, or Islam as their official state religion. The Khazarian king chose Judaism, but despite his promise, the oligarchs kept practicing ancient pagan Babylonian black magic or secret satanism. The king melded these practices with Judaism and created a secret satanic hybrid religion derived from Babylonian Talmudism written by hired rabbis. The deep dark secret of the occult ceremonies was that they were all based on ancient ball worship, also known as worship of the owl.
It involves child sacrifice with bleed outs, blood drinking, and eating of children's guards. So these evil practices continue, and all these are part of the Khazarian mafia today. In September to December, Russian conquests were made into the Khazar kingdom and eventually drove most of them out. The Russian prince, Suyatoslav, made war upon the Khazars. The Russians created the gradual fall of the Khazars.
So in a matter of a decade, the Russians removed most Khazar presence. Unfortunately, the Khazarian leaders had a well developed spy network and were able to escape across Europe, taking their vast fortune in gold and silver. They infiltrated Europe and Slavic nations and perhaps back into Asia, infecting many nations and city states, including as far as Venice, Spain, and most of Central Europe. In secret, they continued their satanic child blood and sacrifice rituals, all for their trusted ball to give them the whole world and all its riches. Ever since, the Khazars have plotted eternal revenge against the Russians and the surrounding nations that invaded Khazaria and drove them out of power.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Bro annihilates Christian Zionism using scripture and common sense. Judeo-Christian is a lie. It makes zero sense THEOLOGICALLY. ❌ It makes perfect sense POLITICALLY. ✅ We need to get this right. https://t.co/uSgkYgxoqm
Video Transcript AI Summary
"If Christianity were about defending a flag, Jesus would have picked up a sword, but he didn't. He picked up a cross."
"a movement that's supposed to follow that man, a man that said my kingdom is not of this world, has decided that protecting a modern nation state called Israel is the center of Christian duty."
"Christianity does not require allegiance to the state of Israel."
"The new Israel, the church, is defined not by soil but by spirit, not by war but by witness, and it is made up of anyone, anyone from anywhere who walks in faith."
"The gospel doesn't ask you to bless a nation. It does ask you to bless the peacemakers, to comfort the mourners, to defend the innocent, and reject violence stressed as virtue."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Christianity were about defending a flag, Jesus would have picked up a sword, but he didn't. He picked up a cross. And yet somehow a movement that's supposed to follow that man, a man that said my kingdom is not of this world, has decided that protecting a modern nation state called Israel is the center of Christian duty. That blessing it, defending it, and justifying it at all cost is some holy assignment carved into the marrow of the gospel. But I'll say it plainly, Christianity does not require allegiance to the state of Israel.
That's not heresy, that's scripture. In the bible, Israel was not a place first, was a person. It was Jacob wrestling with God by a river until dawn, scarred by truth and renamed by grace. Israel meant one who struggles with God and it became the name of a people, not a flag, not a government, not a modern nation carved out in 1948 by colonial politics and American guilt. The word carried spiritual identity.
It meant those called into covenant with God. It had nothing to do with missiles or borders or UN resolutions. When the modern state was named Israel it was not a return to biblical obedience. It was a calculated decision, an intentional conflation of nationalism with theology. It was branding and a powerful one because it worked.
Because now when people hear Israel they imagine sacred continuity. They imagine divine appointment. They imagine the old testament alive and well in 2025 and they are wrong. The Israel of the Hebrew scriptures was not a western backed nuclear power. It was a wandering tribe, a nation in exile.
A people constantly called back to justice, humility, and mercy and often condemned for chasing empire. The prophets didn't worship Israel. They rebuked it over and over and over again for war, for greed, for turning their back on the poor and the foreigner. You know the same things modern Israel does with American funding now. The idea that Christians are commanded to bless the state of Israel is not in the gospels.
It is not in the epistles. It is not in the teachings of Jesus Christ. It's in the talking points of televangelists and the foreign policy of end time scrifters. The gospel does not preach that God's blessings is tied to the modern border of Tel Aviv or the Iron Dome. Jesus never said, blessed are those who back lacud.
Paul never wrote that all who oppose military action are cursed. The early church wasn't fundraising for defense systems or declaring settlements on stolen land as prophetic fulfillment. And yes, the Old Testament speaks of Israel as God's chosen people. And yes, land was part of that covenant. But in Christian theology, the story shifts.
The covenant widens and the veil tears. And the new Israel, the church, is defined not by soil but by spirit, not by war but by witness, and it is made up of anyone, anyone from anywhere who walks in faith. Jew, Gentile, Arab, Roman, enslaved, free, all in one Christ Jesus. The New Testament doesn't tell Christians to defend a country. It tells them to defend the poor, to defend the outcast, to walk with the wounded, to make peace not justifications for war, to see the face of God not in a flag but in the suffering child behind the rubble.
And yet today American Christians fly Israeli flags next to crosses as if those things belong together. They equate criticism of the Israeli government with blasphemy. They pretend that military aid is a sacrament and that genocide is somehow covered under the blood of covenant promise. And Christ weeps at that lie because if the gospel means anything it means you do not get to use God as a shield for political violence. You do not get to bomb refugee camps and quote Jeremiah.
You do not get to drop white phosphorus and call it fulfillment. That's not Christianity. That's idolatry. This doesn't mean you have to hate Israel. It doesn't mean you can't believe in its right to exist but it does mean that if you are a follower of Christ your loyalty cannot be to any nation.
Not even one with a biblical name. Your loyalty is to justice, to truth, to love that doesn't end at a checkpoint or a drone feed. Jesus didn't die so the modern church could become a lobby group. He didn't rise so we could bless bombs. He didn't preach love for the least of these so we could side with whoever has better tanks.
And if your church is preaching that blessing Israel is the key to God's favor then you're not in church. You're in a cult, praying to a carved up God who only speaks Hebrew and votes Republican. The gospel doesn't ask you to bless a nation. It does ask you to bless the peacemakers, to comfort the mourners, to defend the innocent, and reject violence stressed as virtue. There is no divine nation.
There is only divine love. And if you think that love stops at a border fence or a flagpole or the edge of a crater where children used to live then you don't know Christ at all. Defiance till death.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
There is no such thing as “The Star of David.” Take it off‼️ It’s a satanic trick just like Judeo-Christian is. 🎯 https://t.co/RYTWvRjAF5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Christians should never wear the Star of David, a symbol the speaker says represents Israel and the false religion of Judaism, and Christians have been deceived into wearing it to show support for Israel; this is 100% wrong. The speaker claims there is no Old Testament example of King David discussing or wearing the Star of David, and that the idea it might be Solomon’s seal is false and not found in the Bible. The Star of David, they say, is found in the Kabbalah—Jewish mysticism and esoteric teachings that are contrary to the word of God. The Bible only shows a star used when Israel rejected God and worshiped other gods (Acts 7:43). Therefore, the coronation of Israel using a star is 100% appropriate, while a believer in Christ wearing it is 100% sinful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christians should never wear the Star of David. Here's why. The Star of David is a six pointed star used to represent the nation of Israel and the false religion of Judaism. Now, unfortunately, Christians have been deceived into thinking that it's appropriate to wear such a star as a means of religious affiliation and support for the Old Testament nation of Israel. But this is a 100% wrong.
And in fact, you can forge the Old Testament, you'll never find an example of King David ever talking about or even wearing the Star of David. And in fact, the assertion that it's possibly the seal Solomon is also false and is not found in the Bible. The Star of David is actually found in the Kabbalah, which is a collection of Jewish mysticism and esoteric teachings that are completely contrary to the word of God. Now the only time in the Bible that you'll find the children of Israel representing themselves using a star is when they would reject the God of the Bible and worship false gods. Acts seven forty three says, yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch and the star of your god Remphan, figures which you made to worship them, and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.
Therefore, for the coronation of Israel to represent themselves using a star is a 100% appropriate since they openly reject, blaspheme, and hate the Lord Jesus Christ just as their fathers did. However, for a believer in Christ to wear the Star of David is a 100% sinful since it represents a public rejection of the God of the Bible, which is Jesus.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Raping your children is morally permissible for jews. 🎯 It tells them so in their satanic talmud which was written by the PHARISEES. https://t.co/CNMt9s8uU6
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
If you want to truly understand why the jewish president of Ukraine 🇺🇦 is openly stating he wants to make the country “BIG ISRAEL 🇮🇱”, you have to watch this. 👇👇👇 https://t.co/khsNCXIfuA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine is allegedly not a sovereign state with internationally recognized borders, but still part of Russia. Ukraine has been a center for globalists, with the CIA allegedly working there for decades to build resistance and exploit resources.
There is a plan for the elite to create a new world order, but a new world order needs different characteristics. The core of today's threat started thousands of years ago when Russia was Kyivon Rus' and defeated the Khazars, whose kingdom was in contemporary Ukraine. Political figures supporting Ukraine and demonizing Russia are allegedly showing their true colors, revealing America's infiltration by traitors.
The Khazars, from an Asiatic Mongolian region, invaded Eastern Europe and established a powerful kingdom. They were known for raiding, pillaging, and offering their warriors for hire with the condition of being able to rape and pillage after battles. The Rothschilds are allegedly Khazars, not Semitic Jews, and are now known as Ashkenazi Jews.
The Khazarian king chose Judaism under pressure but secretly practiced Babylonian black magic, creating a satanic hybrid religion involving child sacrifice. Russian conquests drove out the Khazars, who escaped with their wealth and infiltrated Europe, continuing their rituals and plotting revenge against Russia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukraine is not a sovereign state. It does not have internationally recognized sovereign borders. It's still part of Russia. It has been since the century. We think we're a sovereign nation.
We're not. The Ukrainians think they're a sovereign nation. They are not. Ukraine has been the center of the globalists for decades and decades and decades. CIA, they've been working this in the Ukraine for seventy years, building up a resistance to everybody and everything because they needed to bring the Soviet Union down, but they also want the resources that are in the Ukraine.
That's what this is all about.
Speaker 1: With so much rapid information passing by us like bullets on a raging battlefield, it gets difficult to understand where we are, where we're going, and what's true. To better understand today's political landscape of confusion, it's imperative to learn how we got here. We all know there's a plan for the elite of this world to puppete er representatives of power into creating a new world order.
Speaker 2: And now is the time when things are shifting. We're gonna there's gonna be a new world order out there. And we've gotta lead it, and we've gotta unite the rest of the free world in doing it.
Speaker 3: We have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders.
Speaker 1: There's a need for a new world order, but it has different characteristics.
Speaker 4: Never before has a new world order had to be assembled from so many different perceptions.
Speaker 2: The affirmative task we have now is is to actually create a new world order.
Speaker 1: Yet, like any really good movie, the dark forces have to contend against the good guys. Darkness to light. It appears that this is the theme of our time. Pick up a Bhagavad Gita, a Bible, or any ancient spiritual text, and you'll find that evil has existed since the beginning of time. But how far back do we have to go in order to make sense of everything happening today?
With a possible World War three looming, we have to understand the core of today's threat didn't start by Russia simply being power hungry. It started a few thousand years ago when Russia was Kyivon Rus' and its leader, Vladimir the Great, and his father before him defeated the Kabbalistic oligarch known as the Khazars. The Khazar kingdom was by far the largest of any nation in Europe with approximately 1,000,000 square miles. Today, this can be found on a map as contemporary Ukraine. Coincidence?
Nothing is. Look around, and you'll quickly see every political figure that is in support of Ukraine and that demonizes Russia are actually showing their true colors. They are making it known that America has been infiltrated by traitors, pedophiles, murderers, and thieves. And lucky for us, no coincidence that Russia's Vladimir the Great has got her back again. Now that you've glimpsed the bigger picture, let's connect all the little dots as we explore the rise and fall of the Khazars.
Let's go back in time, two thousand plus years, when an incredibly evil society emerged in Khazaria. Only the Jewish encyclopedia claims the Khazars had invaded Eastern Europe from their homeland in Asia via the land route between the North End of the Caspian Sea and the South End of the Ural Mountains. We know the Khazars were not Semites and came from an Asiatic Mongolian region. Eventually, the Khazars were driven out of Asia by the nations they were continually at war with. Because of this, the Khazars invaded Eastern Europe.
In Far Eastern Europe, the very warlike Khazars did not find it difficult to subdue and conquer 25 peaceful agricultural nations, occupying approximately 1,000,000 square miles. And in a short period, the Khazars established the largest and most powerful kingdom in Europe and probably the wealthiest also. January to May. Tribes that eventually comprised of the Khazar Empire were not an ethnic union, a combination of many unrelated tribes including Turkic, Asian, Iranian, and perhaps Eastern European herders, nomads, and other wandering steppe people. There were Slavic people, including Khazids and Turkic peoples like Olgaard and Bulgars, and Asian tribes like the Avars and nomads who stemmed from Mongolia and South Siberia.
These mixed groups with Turkic leaders led to the formation of the Khazars. By the year May, the kingdom of the Khazars was well established South of Russia or modern day Ukraine. Khazars lived on the shores of the Caspian Sea with their primitive capital on the northern tip where the Volga Rivers formed a delta. The Khazars fought under the banners of Attila the Hun, who was the leader of the Hunnic Empire from April to April. Attila was known to the Romans for his brutality and a penchant for sacking and pillaging Roman cities.
It is here where Khazarian warriors would participate in what they'd eventually become known for, raping and pillaging the land after taking it over. Between May, the Khazarians developed into a nation ruled by an evil king who had an oligarch serving as his court who practiced ancient Babylonian black arts. During this time, Khazarians became known to surround countries as thieves, murderers, road bandits, and for assuming the identities of those travelers they murdered as a normal occupational practice, this was known as their way of life. Any country could order an army from the Khazars as a service, but only under one condition. The Khazarian warriors would be able to rape and pillage after the war was fought.
This is why in an effort to halt the wrath of the Khazarian warriors, the Persian king Khobad constructed a line of forts through the mountain pass to the Caucasus to guard against the invasion of the Khazars and other warlike tribes. That is also why the Wall Of Durban had begun construction to guard against the savage Khazars. With the Khazars' streak of power, the Turkic Khaganate was formed, and the western portion included parts of the future Khazarian empire. The Khazars dominated the Caucasian Crimean Goths and later occupied the Gothic capital, Doros. And eventually, the Khazarian Empire was formed.
It is important to note that the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish, but are in fact Khazars from Mongolian Eastern Europe. Like Eisenhower, the Rothschilds have Asiatic Mongolian genes and not genes of Judaic people. The Rothschilds are like 95% of the Jews today and have Khazar genes, and they're now known as Ashkenazi Jews. But Georgia and Ukraine are 800 to a thousand miles north of Palestine. Fact.
Every prime minister of Israel has been a Khazar Ashkenazi Jew with no connection to Semite people at all. An ultimatum was delivered by Russia and other surrounding nations impacted by the Khazar murders and robberies that they must reject paganism and choose between Judaism, Christianity, or Islam as their official state religion. The Khazarian king chose Judaism, but despite his promise, the oligarchs kept practicing ancient pagan Babylonian black magic or secret satanism. The king melded these practices with Judaism and created a secret satanic hybrid religion derived from Babylonian Talmudism written by hired rabbis. The deep dark secret of the occult ceremonies was that they were all based on ancient ball worship, also known as worship of the owl.
It involves child sacrifice with bleed outs, blood drinking, and eating of children's hearts. So these evil practices continue, and all these are part of the Khazarian mafia today. In September to December, Russian conquests were made into the Khazar kingdom and eventually drove most of them out. The Russian prince, Suyatoslav, made war upon the Khazars. The Russians created the gradual fall of the Khazars.
So in a matter of a decade, the Russians removed most Khazar presence. Presence. Unfortunately, the Khazarian leaders had a well developed spy network and were able to escape across Europe, taking their vast fortune in gold and silver. They infiltrated Europe and Slavic nations and perhaps back into Asia, infecting many nations and city states, including as far as Venice, Spain, and most of Central Europe. In secret, they continued their satanic child blood and sacrifice rituals, all for their trusted ball to give them the whole world and all its riches.
Ever since, the Khazars have plotted eternal revenge against the Russians and the surrounding nations that invaded Khazaria and drove them out of power.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
“We love killing and raping Palestinian women and children.” An instant anti-Christ classic. Are you seeing clearly yet? 🙋♂️ https://t.co/kyLRMXDnGO
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Opinions on Israel 🇮🇱 vary amongst jews. https://t.co/CkTieaC5XQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel uses vengeance and Zionism as justification for its actions, which creates antisemitism by claiming to act in the name of Jews. The idea that Israel represents all Jews is antisemitic, echoing the dual loyalty trope. Christian Zionism, fueled by antisemitism, wants Jews in Israel to provoke Armageddon. Critics of Israel, especially Palestinians, are often canceled.
Corporate media exhibits bias in reporting on Israel-Palestine, avoiding terms like "genocide" and downplaying Israeli violence while amplifying claims against Palestinians. The speaker urges listeners to consider the suffering of Palestinian children in the context of the Holocaust. Israel was founded on ethnic cleansing, not as a haven for Holocaust survivors, and early Zionists acknowledged its colonial nature.
Israeli society disdained Holocaust survivors, weaponized the Holocaust, and mistreated Mizrahi Jews. Zionism requires antisemitism to justify itself and uses it to strengthen Israel. The conflict is about power, land, and Western interests, not religion. Jewish anti-Zionism has a long history, and Jews were active in international struggles for justice. A new solution is needed for Palestine, where Jews, Muslims, and Christians can coexist. Zionism, not a free Palestine, is the biggest threat to Jewish safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's literally nothing that Israel won't do in the name of vengeance and in the name of continuing Zionism. For some people, the takeaway is as long as they're not literally putting people in ovens, as long as they're not doing exactly what the Nazis did, that somehow that's okay. It's actually not okay. Never again doesn't mean never again in the exact same way that the Nazis did it. If that's your takeaway from the Holocaust, you really need to look at yourself and do some soul searching.
I'm Jewish. I lost members of my family during the Holocaust. And the truth is Israel does not represent me. Israel does not make me safer. In fact, it puts me and all Jews in greater danger because as Israel commits these crimes against humanity and livestreams them, and in some cases gleefully livestreams them, we've seen soldiers doing this, Israel doing that and saying it's in the name of Jews, that will create antisemitism.
The idea that Israel represents all Jews is in itself an antisemitic idea. The dual loyalty trope says that all Jews are monolith and we're all loyal to Israel and we can't be trusted to be loyal to other governments regardless of where we live. That is really what Israel is leaning into. And you have anti Semites and then the government of Israel, APEC and the ADL, all making the same argument, which I think really shows you the dangers and the inherent anti Semitism of Zionism. People like to claim that anti Zionism is antisemitic.
Well, it's actually not given that you literally have more Christian Zionists in the world than you have Jewish Zionists. This particular Christian form of Zionism wants Jews to go back to Israel so we can provoke the end times, Armageddon. All Jews except a very lucky 400 who accept Christ as their Lord and Savior, burn for all of eternity. So these are the allies. All these cancel culture warriors who talk about right wingers being canceled are very silent, interestingly enough, when it comes to critics of Israel, who are probably the most canceled people of all.
If you're a Palestinian critic of Israel, you're very, very, very canceled. If you're a Jewish critic of Israel, you're less canceled, but you're still canceled. You're just canceled as a self loathing Jew as opposed to an anti Semite, which is a significant difference. I mean, I was fired by a network for saying that Israel is an apartheid state. So my being Jewish didn't really protect me.
And of course, there's a huge bias in the way that corporate media reports on Israel Palestine. They're very clear when Russia does something. Russia bombs, Russia strikes, Russia kills. When it's Israel, it's often Palestinians killed in attack, Palestinians dead after bombing. We even know that networks and outlets instruct their writers and reporters not to use certain words like genocide, not even to use the word Palestine.
In fact, the reporting by The New York Times on the alleged mass rape used by Hamas was so bad that they had to cancel a podcast that they were going to do about it because there was so little to back it up. Now on the other hand, you have countless stories and allegations of Israelis raping Palestinians. That got totally ignored. It's really fascinating that we hear time and time again about the 40 beheaded Israeli babies, even though there was no evidence of that. And we do have evidence of actually beheaded babies, children with their heads blown off.
I mean, we saw a child literally shredded. Various representatives of the Israeli government are never asked about that. They're never asked to condemn Israel's violence. They're never asked to condemn Israel's terrorism. There was a doctor who was tortured to death.
If you don't already feel disturbed by the images of Palestinians or the stories of Palestinians, the story of Hinrajab, who was left in a car to die when she was begging for help, and Israeli soldiers shot up the car and shot up the ambulance trying to rescue this girl. If that doesn't haunt you, I really urge you to imagine this happening to a Jewish child during the Holocaust. I think that Jews should understand this, if anything, more than other people because of our history of being targeted, of being otherized, of being compared to vermin, of attempted extermination, of genocide and ethnic cleansing, and of the world looking the other way. That is something that we have to remember. That happened to us.
We can't let that happen to other people. That's not justice. That's not how we honor those killed in the Holocaust. Everything that Israel tells you about its founding, about its history, and about its role today is a lie. Some people think, oh, Israel was founded for Holocaust survivors, and then it got greedy and took over too much land and and ruined its founding mission, which was to be a safe haven for Jews.
The truth is it was founded on ethnic cleansing. It was not a utopia. I think it's really eye opening to look at the actual language of early Zionists because they were calling their banks colonial trust. They were talking about how natives always resist colonists. In other words, it's not just critics of Zionism who describe Zionism as colonial.
It was the Zionists themselves. Israeli society really had a lot of disdain for Holocaust survivors. So they did something very disgusting. They both weaponized the Holocaust to justify their extermination of Palestinians, and they mistreated Holocaust survivors. In fact, they even referred to them as sapon, which means soap in Hebrew.
And that was because there was a myth that Nazis turned Jewish bodies into soap. It's not true, but that was a myth. And the important thing is that people thought that was true, and they thought it would be appropriate to call survivors by that name. Israel wanted to create a new Jew that was armed, that was working the land. They were ashamed of the Jews who were killed.
They thought that they went to their slaughter like sheep. They were ashamed of Jews who were religious, Jews who were scholars, Jews who were also cosmopolitan. They really did, ironically, internalize a lot of antisemitism. There were Zionist bombings in the Middle East that were used to scare people into emigrating out of Iraq, out of Morocco, and into Israel. That's how little they cared about Jewish people.
They bombed synagogues in order to get people to leave the Middle East and go to Israel where they would be mistreated, which is what happened to Mizrahi Jews. Some were basically put into camps. They rejected Yiddish, which was spoken by Eastern European and diaspora Jews, and they also rejected Arabic, which was spoken by Mizrahi Jews of the Middle East. Yiddish is an amazing language and it's dying out and the reason it's dying out is because Israel chose to create modern Hebrew, which no one spoke, and they had a lot of disdain for a lot of Jewish culture. So Israel has always been a racist project in many ways against Palestinians, but even against Jews themselves.
And it's been an antisemitic project as well. Not only is Judaism obviously much older than Zionism, but there was Christian Zionism from the very beginning, and that was fueled by antisemitism and the desire to get Jews out of Europe. Lord Balfour of the Balfour Declaration was a major antisemite. Zionism actually requires anti Semitism to justify its existence. So for Zionists, they don't want to defeat anti Semitism, they want to use it to strengthen the state of Israel.
It's also true to remember that this is not a conflict about religion or culture. Jews and Christians and Muslims lived in peace and harmony in many areas of the Middle East for centuries. This is about power. This is about land. This goes back to resources.
This goes back to the West wanting to have a foothold in the Middle East. This is not about religion. Jewish anti Zionism has existed since Zionism. A lot of Jews opposed Zionism because they, I would say rightly, predicted it would create antisemitism. There is a very rich, radical history of Jewish internationalism.
During the Spanish Civil War, which many people see as the dry run for World War II, among all the international brigades. So all the volunteers who left their countries to fight in a war against fascism, the most common language spoken was Yiddish, which speaks to this tradition. If we look at so many struggles like the civil rights movement in The United States, there were lots of Jews involved in that. Jewish people were overrepresented in that movement. If you look at South Africa, some of the most active anti apartheid activists were Jewish.
That's the tradition that I'm proud to be part of, not a tradition which weaponizes trauma, tragedy, and the Holocaust to kill more people. Israel is unsustainable. There's no coming back from this. Something new needs to be created. Jews can live side by side with Muslims and Christians in Palestine just as they have for centuries.
If coexistence is so impossible and if anti Semitism is so impossible to fight against, how is it that Jews live in Germany today? Germany was where antisemitism turned into the Holocaust and yet somehow Jews are able to live in Germany in safety, but we're supposed to believe that they can't live in Palestine in safety? Palestine is not the country that created Adolf Hitler. Palestine is not the country that created the Holocaust. The biggest threat to Jewish safety is not a free Palestine, it's Zionism.
It's essential to challenge the lies and propaganda of mainstream media. You won't see videos like these in the mainstream media, which is why it's so important to support the work of Double Down News on Patreon. And if I do say so myself, The Katie Halper Show.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Judaism is not compatible with humanity. https://t.co/mNVDMD5C4Q
reSee.it AI Summary
The World Court has declared Israel an illegal nation state, stating that its sovereignty should not be recognized, representing the views of 125 nations internationally.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
🚨BREAKING🚨 The World Court, which represents 125 nations internationally, has declared Israel 🇮🇱 to be an illegal nation state, and its sovereignty should not be recognized. https://t.co/UUpXUSfyUY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Court declared Israel's occupation unlawful and stipulated it must be terminated completely and rapidly. The court found the occupation violates the UN Charter, human rights, and international humanitarian law. All Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory are illegal and must be dismantled, and all Israeli settlers must be evacuated.
The court declared that the Israeli occupation eviscerates the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination, including the right to their own state. The Palestinian people are the only sovereign in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem. The international community is obligated to reaffirm and implement the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination immediately. All states and the UN are under obligation not to recognize the legality of Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a watershed moment for Palestine, for justice, and for international law. Israel's occupation has been declared unlawful by the World Court, which has stipulated that it must be terminated completely and as rapidly as as possible. The court also found that illegal Israeli occupation violates the UN Charter, human rights, and international humanitarian law. The court further unequivocally declared that all Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory are illegal and must be dismantled and that all Israeli settlers must be evacuated. The court declared that Israeli illegal occupation not only violates but eviscerates the Palestinian people's right to self determination in their own land, including the right to their own state.
This ruling couldn't be more timely or solely needed. The Palestinian people have endured unbearable suffering and injustice for decades. This ruling is a vindication of their steadfastness and perseverance. This right must not must no longer be denied or deferred. The court made clear that the Palestinian people are the only sovereign in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and that the international community is under an obligation not just to reaffirm the Palestinian people's right to self determination, but to see to it that this right is implemented immediately.
All states and the UN are are now under obligation not to recognize the legality of Israel's presence in the occupied Palestinian territory.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The Bolshevik communist jews BRUTALLY killed more than 60 MILLION people, most of which were Christians. They literally are the reason Hitler became Hitler. 🎯 They also made him look like a choir boy compared to them. Why isn’t this in our history books? 🙋♂️ https://t.co/st5iYU8wxX
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
ISIS is Mossad ✡️. No hyperbole intended. https://t.co/sz3jnIlxHO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Subversion involves foiling plots against Israel, including political ones. A question arose about what to call the Mossad in English. Unlike the CIA, there’s no straightforward way to look it up. The term "Mossad" translates to "institute," but when communicating with agencies like the CIA or British intelligence, what do they refer to themselves as? After some inquiry, the prime minister's spokesman revealed that they call it the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service, which could be abbreviated as ISIS. This naming follows a model similar to that of British intelligence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Subversion, trying to foil plots against the state of Israel, political plots, and others. You tell the story about how you try to find out what the what they call the Mossad when they deal with, publicly? I thought it was a reasonable question, but the trouble is, you can't pick up the phone book. There's no, Langley in, in Israel as you can look up, you know, CIA or in our case, the Mossad. We thought we should ask, what shall we call it in English?
You can translate the Hebrew words. As I said, Mossad is institute. But when they write a letter to their friends in the CIA or the British intelligence, what do they call themselves? It took a while. It was a matter of asking the prime minister's spokesman the best you can do because, officially, the Mossad is under the prime minister's office.
And, I think he sort of wondered why he wanna know and all that, so we explained. And he came up with, the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service. And if it were to have initials, it would be ISIS. Just simple words like that. Interestingly enough, kind of the British model
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Anne Frank’s sister says the photos of Auschwitz are fake. I brought the receipt. 👇 https://t.co/N5RhL6Fwkl
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many images depict the Russian liberation of Auschwitz, yet they often show no snow, which is puzzling since there was significant snowfall at the time. During a visit to the Russian embassy, it was clarified that the soldiers did not take photographs during the liberation. Later, when they realized the importance of documenting the event, they staged photos that do not accurately represent the actual liberation scene. This discrepancy highlights a historical inaccuracy that should be addressed. Additionally, there are growing concerns among Jewish communities in Germany and elsewhere about rising threats and anti-Semitism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And something I wanted to point out to you, you know, there are many pictures about the Russian liberating Auschwitz, and there's never any snow. And the snow was honestly that high. And so I have some connection with the Russian embassy and I was there once and I said, something puzzles me. Those photos are fakes because there's no snow. And they said, well, yes, they are not fakes.
But when the army came, they didn't have cameras. They didn't photograph. So only much later when they realized we should have pictures of it, They took pictures like you see now, but this is definitely not in Auschwitz and not the liberation of our The the There were not that many people with clothes and children and no snow.
Speaker 1: Right. Fascinating.
Speaker 0: So I think historically, we should point this out.
Speaker 1: To get it right. Yeah.
Speaker 0: To get it right.
Speaker 1: There are obviously many concerns today not least back in Germany but also here Jewish people feeling under threat again from the rising tide of
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
So, the soiled mattresses & baby high chairs behind the walls, with escape hatches to the streets, were just tunnels to expand the synagogue ✡️ space by the jews who follow the ta|mud - that explicit states it’s permissible for jews rape children? 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️ Carry on then. https://t.co/evYwPTdjrO
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the influence of gender ideology in academia, government, and media, tracing its roots back to the Jewish Talmud and historical events in Germany before WWII. I highlight the founding of the first Trans clinic by Jewish individuals in 1921 and note that the Nazis' book burnings included not just Jewish literature but also works related to pornography and transgender issues. I argue that the current push for transgender ideology is not new and has been obscured by the demonization of Nazi history. I invite readers to subscribe to support my efforts in raising awareness about these topics.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The gender ideology being pushed through academia, the government and our media is derived from the JEWISH TALMUD. Germany 🇩🇪 experienced the same gender ideological indoctrination before WWII. It was JEWS then, and it’s the JEWS today. ✅ Check the 🧵👇and tell a friend. 👍 https://t.co/873bwEKiLb
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The first Trans clinic was Jewish and was founded circa 1921. Magnus and Karl are the ✡️ clinic’s founding ‘partners’ in the photo circled in white. Check their hands. https://t.co/4E2X8Ox5To
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
There is nothing new under the sun! Here transvestites are protesting publicly, in front of the German Institute for sexual science. https://t.co/sjzDn6V7h0
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The German Nazis undertook massive book burning. The history we have been told is they were burning academic literature of the Jews. However, this is only a fraction of the truth. https://t.co/iuo2cj3vst
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
They were burning pornography, transgendered literature, and homosexual literature produced by the Jews. https://t.co/YJO2rWGavM
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Here is a close-up of the pile. Also note there are novels with hundreds of pages within the pile. This is the transgender and homosexual “academic Jewish literature.” Today, the vast majority of the pornography industry is owned by Jews, and gender fluidity literature mainly comes from Jewish academics.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The transgendered ideology being pushed down our children’s throats is nothing new. This history has been hidden from us behind the demonization of all things Nazi. Its intent is to paralyze legitimate dialogue. https://t.co/aJcqp7d0su
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
If you like this material, and other posts I make to raise awareness, please be sure to subscribe! These people ✡️ have impacted my economic means to provide for my family, through formal letters to the industry association that governed my FORMER profession. Every subscription helps me continue to do this work, and to raise awareness about THE TRUTH.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Claire Danes gets a rude AWAKENING on who really controls Western media. 🤯 This is heavy stuff, be careful with it. 🙏 https://t.co/mSSZeIfRkE
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on the Canaanites, highlighting their worship of BAAL and associated practices like child sacrifice and cannibalism. I believe God commanded the Israelites to eliminate them, but they failed to heed this warning. I also referenced a post suggesting that modern Jews are descendants of Cain, emphasizing a perceived connection between them and the Canaanites. I interpret biblical texts to argue against mixing with those I see as having a corrupt lineage, asserting that deceit is inherent in their nature.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Canaanite + BAAL = Canibal ✅ The Canaanites worshipped BAAL (Satan), and were known for unspeakable sexual immorality, child sacrifice, and cannibalism of children. God explicitly told the Israelites to destroy these people. They didn’t listen, so here we are today. 👇👇👇 This is the TRUTH. Are you connecting the dots yet? 🙋♂️🙋♂️🙋♂️
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Winner, winner, chicken dinner‼️👇
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the book "The Learned Elders of Zion," which emerged in Russia before the Bolshevik Revolution, claiming it was a Jewish-led communist takeover that resulted in millions of Christian deaths. I argue that its contents remain unchallenged, despite claims that modern copies are fake. I also reference "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," noting that the Bolshevik leadership was predominantly Jewish and that their actions led to the deaths of around 60 million people. I emphasize the ongoing struggle against this plan for a one-world government.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The book, “The Learned Elders of Zion” surfaced in Russia shortly before the Bolshevik Revolution - Which was a Jewish led communist takeover, that resulted in the death of MILLIONS of Christians. If it isn’t true, then why is it happening⁉️🙋♂️🙋♂️🙋♂️ Here is the summary of it. Its contents have never been dispelled, only the copyright reproduction of it, which is twisted to infer present day copies are fake. You’re currently experiencing a global communist takeover by the Jews. ✅
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Dear Canadians, This is the contract the Canadian government signed with Pfizer, for your “safe and effective vaccine.” Explains this. 🙋♂️🙋♂️🙋♂️ You won’t be able to reconcile it. ✅ Sincerely, The BLATANT OBVIOUS TRUTH https://t.co/HsGnx2QpBs
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered what I believe to be the epicenter of evil today, often referred to as the "GLOBALISTS" or "DEEP STATE," but I call them THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN. They disguise themselves as "ZIONISTS." My knowledge of the truth has made me a target, especially from the B'NAI BRITH society in Saskatoon. Despite their attempts to silence me, I will continue to speak out. The solution is straightforward: we must share the truth and not be afraid. Following the truth is our way forward.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
This video reveals the epicentre of evil we face today. Many call them the "GLOBALISTS" or the "DEEP STATE", they are really called THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN. Today they use the moniker "ZIONISTS." Buckle up, this is as deep as you can go down the rabbit hole in the physical, after this it's 100% spiritual. You will need a Bible & the Holy Spirit to see the FULL-TRUTH.✅ So why is THE B'NAI BRITH society gunning for me, one of you (#WeThePeople) in Saskatoon, Canada 🇨🇦❓🤔🤔🤔 It's because I know the TRUTH ✝️ about who they are, and I'm not afraid to SPEAK IT. They are the people #Jesus warned us about. My posts about THE TRUTH have been reaching millions. They want to silence me. They hate the TRUTH. ✅ I'll have to take my last breath before they take my free speech.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The way out of this is simple #WeThePeople. We need to share the Truth. ✅ https://t.co/B3pajopdLa
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
You don’t have to be afraid of these people, you just have to follow THE TRUTH✨. ✅ https://t.co/SBGX5nL1lq
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
#CNN's Lou Dobbs in 2006 on #Soros controlled “Smartmatic voting machines means our democracy is now for sale, without anyone doing a thing about it. American elections ought to be run by American companies. We believe this is a National Security issue." Catching on yet? https://t.co/9zQMrVtcVN
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Venezuelan-owned firm may take over a US voting machine company, sparking concerns about democracy. Smartmatic, owned by Venezuelans, controls Sequoia, a major voting machine manufacturer. Critics fear foreign influence on US elections. Congress and watchdog groups demand an investigation into the sale. The Treasury Department's lack of transparency raises suspicions. Concerns about national security and the integrity of American elections are at the forefront. The need for clarity and accountability is emphasized.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A firm owned by Venezuela could be allowed to take over one of this country's top voting machine firms. Venezuela of course led by Hugo Chavez working to change the views of most South American countries moves to the left. Critics of the deal say our nation's very democracy is now for sale without anyone doing a thing about it. Getty Pilgrim reports.
Speaker 1: The use of some 19,000 electronic voting machines in the city of Chicago and Cook County primary on March 21st this year is now under intense scrutiny. The US company that makes the machine, Sequoia, was bought in 2,005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen. When Chicago had problems with the machines, a dozen elections. Chicago officials are outraged.
Speaker 2: I think that American elections ought to be run by American companies and ought to be run by American citizens, not, Venezuelan nationals.
Speaker 1: Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida, but the president of the company, Jack Blaine, testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida. The majority of the workers are based in Venezuela. Watchdog groups question why US voting machines would be under the control of citizens of another country, especially a country whose own election process is highly suspect.
Speaker 3: We believe this is a national security issue. There is no way that companies belonging to non US corporations should have access to our elections.
Speaker 1: The treasury department is supposed to monitor sales of US companies to overseas investors where there is a question of national security, such as in the Dubai ports deal, the so called CFIUS review process. Some in congress are demanding an investigation.
Speaker 4: In the case of, Smartmatic, there are a number of unanswered questions. That's why I wrote to the secretary of the treasury and asked them to review the ownership. It's offshore. It's murky. No one seems to know who owns it.
Certainly, our government should know.
Speaker 1: A potential risk to the democratic process. Now we called the treasury department to ask if the sale of Sequoia in 2005 had been reviewed or not. Treasury told us they were aware of the sale, but can't confirm if it's been reviewed or not. And some in congress and voter watchdog groups also are demanding a better answer than that, Lou.
Speaker 0: Well, this treasury department, is filled with incompetence. They have stopped in over 1500 reviews, only one sale to foreign owners American assets. But a voting machine company critical to this country's election count, and they can't tell you whether or not the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States reviewed it or not?
Speaker 2: They have no answer for us. And even just
Speaker 0: These are the most arrogant, incompetent, bureaucratic idiots. I mean, the treasury department is trying to move ahead of a number of other departments in that in that category.
Speaker 1: It's incomprehensible that this would be at at in any way
Speaker 0: If we put a call into, I know John Snow is in a short tender and shortly on tenure, but perhaps somebody who works for him would have some basic sense that he owes the American people an answer.
Speaker 2: Louis, we have been trying to get the officials. They said they thought it was his company. So there are a lot
Speaker 1: of people in murky, murky territory right here, and, I think it really does deserve some examination.
Speaker 0: Great. It certainly does. We're going to continue to do so. I think we need to tip our hat to the congresswoman. She did a marvelous job in, in looking into this and, hats off to her.
At least somebody is trying to make some sense. This administration, call the White House. I I let's find out the answer so this audience knows exactly what's going on by Monday evening. I and this is ridiculous. It's
Speaker 2: We are looking into it actively, Lou.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Kitty. An outstanding report. It just burns me up.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Bill Gates is most certainly a sociopath. ✅ This short documentary breaks it down real nice. 👍 https://t.co/ptVq5Ntcvx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, comes from a wealthy background and learned about law and politics from his father. He dropped out of college to start Microsoft, but he didn't actually invent the operating system Windows. He bought an existing one and modified it. Gates has been accused of being an opportunist and trying to cheat his business partner out of his share of the company. Microsoft faced legal issues for anti-trust violations in the past. Gates transformed his public image by donating to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and became known as a philanthropist. However, the foundation has faced criticism for its investments in companies accused of unethical practices. Gates has also been involved in controversial projects like blocking out the sun and genetically modifying mosquitoes. He has been linked to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender, and their partnership in a charitable fund has raised questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That Bill Gates was born into wealth and privilege. Both his grandfather and great grandfather were banking muggles. His father, William Gates senior, was a prominent Seattle based lawyer and political lobbyist. Through his father, Bill Gates learned the ins and outs of law and politics and how to manipulate those governing forces.
Speaker 1: I'm Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft.
Speaker 0: Bill Gates dropped out of college to start Microsoft. He is credited with inventing the operating system that became Windows. However, he played no part in the invention of Windows. The fact is he bought an existing operating system from Seattle Computer Products, had it modified, then licensed it to IBM. That didn't stop him from taking all the credit.
Speaker 2: I don't see Bill Gates as this great creative person. I see him as an opportunist.
Speaker 0: While Microsoft's cofounder Paul Allen was struggling with cancer, Bill Gates seized the opportunity by attempting to cheat him out of his share of the company's fortune.
Speaker 3: They were basically talking about how they were planning to dilute my share down to almost nothing. And it was, you know, really a shocking and disheartening moment for me.
Speaker 4: And you were sick?
Speaker 3: Well, I think I was still probably in the middle of radiation therapy.
Speaker 0: Gates's business strategies came under fire in 1998 when the United States Department of Justice sued Microsoft for anti trust violations.
Speaker 5: This is take 3 of the videotape deposition of Bill Gates on September
Speaker 0: During the 18 month trial, Gates gave hours of videotaped testimony.
Speaker 2: What were the non Microsoft browsers that you were concerned about in January of 1990
Speaker 1: 6? That month.
Speaker 2: Yes, sir. And what about it? What non Microsoft browsers What is it about the word concerned that you don't understand?
Speaker 1: I'm not sure what you mean by it.
Speaker 6: The Justice Department has charged Microsoft with engaging in anti competitive and exclusionary practices designed to maintain its monopoly in personal computer operating systems.
Speaker 0: In a move to overshadow the negative press, Gates invested $100, 000, 000 to set up the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Overnight, Bill Gates transformed his public image from ruthless tech monopolizer to the world's most generous philanthropist.
Speaker 1: I'm pleased to announce that we're pledging an additional $1, 000, 000, 000 to sales.
Speaker 2: We had the chance to witness Bill Gates 2.0, the man you don't know.
Speaker 0: The rebranding campaign paid off. His net worth swiftly doubled earning Bill Gates the title of richest man in the world.
Speaker 4: You've invested $10, 000, 000, 000 in vaccinations over the last 2 decades, and you figured out the return on investment for that. It kind of stunned me. Can you walk us through the math?
Speaker 0: In a Wall Street essay, Bill Gates declared vaccines the best investment I've ever made.
Speaker 1: There's been over a 20 to 1 return. So if you just look at the economic benefits, that's a pretty strong number compared to anything else.
Speaker 0: The Gates Foundation expanded rapidly into a massive vertically integrated multinational corporation controlling every step in a supply chain that reaches from its Seattle based boardrooms to the villages of Africa and Asia.
Speaker 4: Is the world's largest private philanthropy causing harm? The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has made 1, 000, 000 of dollars each year from companies blamed for many of the same social and health problems the foundation seeks to address. The Gates Foundation has investments in 69 of the worst polluting companies in the US and Canada. Other companies in the foundation's portfolio have been accused of transgressions, including forcing thousands of people to lose their homes, supporting child labor, defrauding, and neglecting patients in need of medical care. The Gates Foundation has not provided
Speaker 0: As a top donor to both the WHO and the CDC, no 1 man has more power than Bill Gates to influence and control the health and medical freedom of all people.
Speaker 1: Normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population.
Speaker 0: This will be the new normal until a vaccine is developed.
Speaker 7: Until we find a vaccine, going back to normal means putting lives at risk.
Speaker 4: We need to produce it and to deploy it in every single corner of the world.
Speaker 8: Full vaccination of our children and pregnant women.
Speaker 0: Development of new vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. And then
Speaker 9: We've already bought the syringes. We already know where it's gonna happen. We're thinking about what that's going to be. It's all part of this plan.
Speaker 10: Our military is now being mobilized. So at the end of the year, we're gonna be able to give it to a lot of people very, very rapidly.
Speaker 0: In 1986, president Ronald Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, granting total immunity to vaccine manufacturers. After a decade of lawsuits related to vaccine injuries and deaths, vaccine makers were going bankrupt. In a move to coerce policy makers, vaccine companies threatened to stop making vaccines until they could be legally shielded from liability. To this day, when someone is injured or killed as the result of an adverse reaction, it is the US taxpayers that pay for the damages.
Speaker 11: Welcome back. Was several Indian tribal girls used as guinea pigs? The report alleges that 2 American farmer Giants untested vaccine was administered to thousands of tribal girls without proper study and paperwork.
Speaker 0: India was among the hardest hit after Bollywood celebrities were incentivized by the Gates Foundation to urge the public to submit to mass vaccinations. In 2009, tribal children were administered the HPV vaccine. Over 24, 000 girls were told they were being given wellness shots, in many cases, without the informed consent of a parent or guardian.
Speaker 12: The people that were administering these vaccines lied to the guardians of these girls and told the girls, oh, this is gonna cure cancer. You're never gonna have cancer. And these girls became severely injured. Some of them developed seizures. Some of them developed cancer.
And 7 girls died and there was no insurance, there was no assistance for them, and the Gates Foundation denied that it had been clinical trials. And it was so bad that the parliament in India created a task force. They studied it, and they kicked out the Gates Foundation.
Speaker 8: But India is a barbaric country. Things happen here in a very barbaric way. But I was surprised to find an American organization operating in broad daylight, doing things in a very, very, let's say, Indian fashion. And so the route I took was that I want the whole procedure to be investigated. The Indian parliament formed a committee, and it was to be a rather surprising move because you generally don't often have such a high level inquiry into matters affecting poor people.
And that was such an extraordinary report. I don't think Indian parliament has ever come out with such a scathing report. And the government officials came up and said, we shouldn't have authorized this. We're sorry. We're not going to allow them again.
And now they are back doing their same old tricks again.
Speaker 13: The good news is that human clinical trials can start as early as July 2020 for India's first COVID 19 indigenous vaccine that's been developed by Bharat Biotech.
Speaker 8: So you can imagine how the manipulation of the media by the media, the manipulation of public opinion by leaders of all political parties unanimously saying, we want a vaccine. And the worst thing is they are taken as philanthropists. Whereas what this actually is, is the acquisition of political and financial power. And I think the 2nd most populous country with 1, 300, 000, 000 people is going to be a good base for pharmaceutical companies to make a killing and also kill a lot of people in the process. Yes.
I just find it a pity that we haven't been able to get any benefit for the girls who suffered, you know. It's so terrifying as to what they're actually doing with the world.
Speaker 1: We're taking things that are, you know, genetically modified organisms, and we're injecting them in little kids' arms. We just shoot them right into the vein.
Speaker 0: A 2018 scientific study released in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health concluded that over 490, 000 children in India developed paralysis as a result of the gate supported oral polio vaccine that was administered between the years of 2, 021, 017. Using all the usual slight of hand, US based media and fact checkers rushed to bury the story. But thanks to the meticulous work of a team of Indian researchers and doctors, the inconvenient truth lives on the NIH dot gov website.
Speaker 8: It's my honor to introduce Bill and Melinda Gates.
Speaker 0: Without any medical training, Bill and Melinda Gates founded the Global Alliance For Vaccines and Immunization through which they fulfill their agenda to vaccinate the world. The foundation has been sued by the governments of some of the poorest and most vulnerable nations for causing serious harm through experimental vaccine programs.
Speaker 14: If you just look at health care workers around the world, they deserve to get the vaccine first. You know, here in the United States, really, it's going to be black people who really should get it first and many indigenous people.
Speaker 15: Vaccines were always taught to us that it was safe. It was it was healthy. This is things that we had to do. But given the position that I am in now as a state legislator and looking at these studies and reviewing a lot of these studies, it's very scary, and I want the African American community to open up their eyes.
Speaker 7: Of all the places that mister Gates could have gone in the world, why did he settle on Africa? It's not because he cares about people that look like me. He cares about an agenda.
Speaker 4: African bodies have been used as lab rats for many years for big pharma. They are using us for trials. They are using us for testing. But as an African, I say no more.
Speaker 2: Africans, they're tired of becoming the guinea pigs of the world. Their antennas are raised, and they are telling each other all over social media. They're on high alert right now.
Speaker 16: There is a policy of the American government. It's called the Kissinger report, which was produced in the mid seventies. And it explicitly states that, the purpose of the foreign policy in Africa was to, reduce the the population because they have a great mineral resources there. And their time, Kissinger, and those involved with the Carter administration wanted to shrink the population, make sure that the Africans do not develop and do not use the resources for themselves because we in the States, we need them. There's a a concerted effort of foreign powers to, control the population of Africa.
Speaker 17: Some children did survive the botched vaccinations last month and will recover, but 15 all under the age of 5 died from fever, vomiting, and diarrhea.
Speaker 16: Human errors contributed to the unfortunate deaths of the children.
Speaker 2: How can you believe big pharma but not believe these parents when they tell you that their children have been injured by big pharma? I don't care how big this corporate machine looks. As a parent, I can tell you these people will never stop fighting for their kids.
Speaker 0: It would take hours to list all of questionable initiatives that Bill Gates is involved in. Here's a few of the highlights. Gates is 1 of the key funders in the Stratosphere Controlled Perturbation Experiment, designed to block out the sun in an effort to control global warming by releasing massive amounts of calcium carbonate and other materials into the upper atmosphere. Critics, including environmental scientists, have called the project a global genocide experiment. Gates has invested over $1, 000, 000, 000 in Earth Now's global surveillance project.
The project will launch hundreds of satellites into space, which will allow for the 247 monitoring of all people everywhere. In partnership with MIT, Bill Gates has developed a new technology that allows vaccines to be injected under your skin along with your medical records. The quantum dot tattoo will implant an invisible certificate that can be scanned by authorities using a cell phone app and infrared light.
Speaker 1: Eventually, what we'll have to have is certificates of who's a recovered person, who's a vaccinated person. So eventually, there will be this digital immunity proof.
Speaker 0: The EPA recently approved an experimental use permit to Oxitec, a biotech company funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In an effort to fight malaria, Oxitec will soon release millions of genetically modified mosquitoes in various US states. According to the NIH website, programs are being developed to allow human immunization via mosquito bite. It was Science Magazine that coined the phrase flying
Speaker 3: syringes.
Speaker 0: Could you
Speaker 4: raise your hand, please? Did you saw once where you tested when you're about to A shocking new report from The New York Times sheds light on the connection between Microsoft founder Bill Gates and the late Jeffrey Epstein. You report these 2 men met at least 6 times.
Speaker 8: Well, I
Speaker 5: believe that there were more. This included visits to the mansion, seeing each other in Seattle, flying on Epstein's plane.
Speaker 0: When flight logs revealed that Gates had been a passenger on the Lolita Express, he claimed that he didn't know that the private jet belonged to Epstein. He also denied that he and mister Epstein were involved in any business deals. However, an expose by the New York Times revealed that not only did Bill Gates initiate a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein well after he was convicted of sex crimes, But the 2 were also involved in the process of cofounding a multibillion dollar charitable fund.
Speaker 4: Why would they ever set up a charitable trust benefiting Jeffrey Epstein?
Speaker 0: That it
Speaker 5: was all about philanthropy, that Bill Gates just wanted to find new sources of money.
Speaker 0: Why would 1 of the richest men in the world choose to partner with the world's most notorious pedophile? A deeper dive into Epstein's world revealed that the 2 men had more in common than meets the eye. Like Gates, Epstein was a billionaire philanthropist with a passion for science, health, education, and children. The Jeffrey Epstein Foundation donated 1, 000, 000 of dollars to top universities, science institutes, medical schools, early education programs, youth initiatives, and international peace accords. Bill Gates is either the most misunderstood man alive or 1 of the most convincing con men to ever live.
Is he a benevolent hero? Or a malevolent opportunist?
Speaker 6: Bill Gates.
Speaker 0: Personally, I would love to believe that 1 of the richest men in the world is is giving away his fortune for the betterment of humanity. I wanna believe that endearing smile. I wanna believe that his heart is as soft and warm as his sweaters. At the very least, I wanna believe that he's unaware of the damage he's done.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The CEO of #Pfizer believed his vaccine was so safe and effective, that he didn’t take it. Marinate on that for a few minutes. 🤔🤔🤔 https://t.co/1ciUF539oh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asked for the impossible: to develop a vaccine in 8 months instead of 10 years without cutting corners. They emphasized safety. Speaker 1 questioned Pfizer's transparency in mutating COVID viruses. Speaker 0 stressed the importance of vaccination for public health. Pfizer's CEO discussed vaccine production and effectiveness. They thanked the US government for support. The CEO highlighted the vaccine's 95.6% efficacy. The conversation ended with a call for public vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I asked them to make the impossible possible, basically. I asked them to make the impossible possible thing possible possible possible, basically. And, when we do a development of vaccine, it usually takes 10 years. So I asked them instead of 8 years to do it in 8 months.
Speaker 1: 8 months. Along with that, there were concerns, well, they must have cut corners. This can't be safe.
Speaker 0: Yes. And that was always the guiding principle. We will never cut corners.
Speaker 1: Hey there. Is this heat taken? You work for Pfizer. My question for you is why does Pfizer wanna hide from the public the fact that they're mutating the COVID viruses? We're trying to get
Speaker 0: the clock locked the door.
Speaker 1: I was trying to impress a person on a date. We're trying to lie. Look. We still don't even have a vaccine for the HIV. So and you know how long that's been going on.
So the big concern was, well, they must have cut corners.
Speaker 0: 95.6 percent.
Speaker 1: Have you taken the vaccine, sir?
Speaker 0: No. I haven't taken it yet.
Speaker 1: They were developed so quickly. What do you tell, those folks who might be saying, well, I'm gonna wait a few months before I get
Speaker 0: this one. The decision not to vaccinate will not affect only your health or your life. Unfortunately, it will affect the lives of others and likely the lives of the people you love the most. I think, trust science.
Speaker 1: I also wanna thank Albert Bourra, Pfizer's CEO and chairman, for joining me today. We've gotten to know each other over the last few months, and the plan is for a half a 1000000000 doses that we'll be sending around the world to be produced in the United States. You have not yet had, your shot. When do you plan to get it?
Speaker 0: Sooner, I can, I will? Today's announcement with the US government gets us closer to our goal.
Speaker 1: You said it was a 100% effective, then 90%, then 70%.
Speaker 0: 95.6%.
Speaker 1: Why did you keep that secret?
Speaker 0: Have a nice day. Mister president, I want to thank you for your leadership and partnership.
Speaker 1: Are you not ashamed of what you've done in the last couple of years? Do you have any apologies to the public, sir?
Speaker 0: Of course, all of this work to increase supply and distribution will mean nothing if people are not willing to show up and roll up their sleeves to to
Speaker 1: be vaccinated.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Russian news is going after the Hunter Biden pedo angle real hard on primetime. https://t.co/Z53BmcRcW3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hunter Biden is seen in compromising photos with underage individuals. This is not the first scandal involving the president's son, who has been recorded engaging in questionable activities. There are videos of him with women of questionable reputation and weighing a substance resembling crack cocaine. These controversies continue to tarnish the reputation of the US president's son.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: С раздетым Хантером Байденом, в ней жертвы которого дети. Выпиющие кадры. Рядом с раздетым Хантером Байденом несовершеннолетние. На одном фото сразу 4 ребёнка. Чтобы описать другой снимок, крайне сложно найти слова.
Это далеко не первый скандал вокруг сына президента. Он детально фиксировал на видео свои развлечения, десятки роликов с девушками лёгкого поведения. Или, например, вот, Хантер Байден дотошно взвешивает смесь, похожую на фрек с кокаином. При этом разоблачение сына президента США ведущий
reSee.it AI Summary
The Talmud holds the key to ending everything, but people are blinded by fear and follow it instead of choosing love. We need to face our fears and boldly proclaim the truth, just like Jesus did with the Talmudic Jews. #Jesus #Talmud
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
It’s ALL OVER once the goyim realize what’s in the Talmud. ✅ That’s literally the key to ending all of this. Shining the light (The Truth) in the darkness. The sad part is most people are sheep 🐑 and they follow their fear instead of CHOOSING to follow love. Facing your fear, and boldly proclaiming the TRUTH, in the face of opposition, is LOVE. Christians - Was this not the example #Jesus gave us when dealing with the Talmudic Jews of his time?
reSee.it AI Summary
The #Torah crown given to #Trump by 160+ rabbis is a significant honor from the Zionist community. There are two possibilities: either Trump is aware of the situation and playing along, or he is deceiving us as well. Share your thoughts on this matter.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
We need to let this breath publicly. This is the #Torah crown given to #Trump by 160+ rabbis. It is the highest honour that can be bestowed by the Zionist. Trump is either one of two things : 1. He’s playing them and knows exactly what’s going on. 2. He’s playing us, and knows exactly what’s going on. I’m curious to hear your thoughts, what do you think?
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to thank our Lord for his good work and everlasting kindness. I commend President Donald J. Trump for his exceptional efforts in supporting Israel and the Jewish people. May he and his family be blessed eternally. - Israel Heritage Foundation, July 10, 2023.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Give thanks to our stand for his work is good. His kindness endures forever. Resented to president Donald J. Trump for his extraordinary heroic efforts I like that very much.
To help the state of Israel I know you and the Jewish people. He and his family should be blessed, eternal, from the Israel Heritage Foundation, July 10, 2023.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Pretty sure Novak Djokovic is happy with his decision to NOT take the bioweapon. How could you not be⁉️ https://t.co/C7HYeeWtNY
reSee.it AI Summary
The Rothschilds' involvement in funding both sides of WW2 and their role in the formation of Israel is well-documented and easily verified. It raises questions about why a Jewish family would support the Holocaust and then establish a place for Jewish people shortly after. Understanding the Rothschilds' history is important in understanding current challenges.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
We know that the Rothschilds funded both sides of WW2. ✅ We also know that they helped form #Israel in 1948. Neither of these points are up for debate - Both can be easily verified. So why would a ‘Jewish’ family fund the holocaust of their own people, and then set up a place for the Jewish people shortly after?
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Here is a brief summary on the Rothschilds family. #WeThePeople need to get this‼️ it’s directly linked to what we were up against today. ✅ https://t.co/6MfqXA8kCu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Rothschilds, a powerful banking dynasty, have influenced world events through control of central banks and vast wealth. They have amassed trillions of dollars, own major corporations, and manipulate markets. The Federal Reserve, established in 1913, was influenced by wealthy individuals like the Rothschilds. Their control extends to media, governments, and the global economy. Their wealth could provide for all humanity. The Rothschilds' influence is vast and secretive, shaping world affairs for centuries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your article that the Rothschilds had purchased Jerusalem in 18/29.
Speaker 1: Rothschild have found, Israel, and Rothschild has always been the backer of Israel. Whatever Rothschild wants, he gets. It it is believed that he is the richest man in the world, and I I have little doubt of
Speaker 0: that. In 18/97, the first Zionist Congress was held in Basel, Switzerland. It was shared by Theodor Herzl. Jewish delegates from across Europe agreed that Palestine should be given to them. Prior to his death in 19 0 4, Herzl predicted that a world body will one day give Palestine to the Jews and that he will go down in history as the father of the Jewish state.
For Herzl's dream to come true, European military powers would have to be manipulated and used into taking Palestine away from the Ottomans by force. Around 250 years ago, in 17/60, mayor Amschel Rothschild created the House of Rothschild that paved the way for international banking in control of the world's resources.
Speaker 2: Money is power. Money is the only weapon that you have to defend yourself with.
Speaker 3: Mayer Amschel Bauer, born in Frankfurt, Germany in 1744, was a moneylender and a goldsmith on Jew Street whose shop had a sign out front with a red hexagram on it. Eventually, he would change his name to Rothschild, which is German for red sign. Rothschild soon learned that loaning money to governments and kings was more profitable than loaning money to private individuals. Not only were the loans bigger, but they were secured by the nation's taxes. Mayer Rothschild had 5 sons whom he trained in the skills of money creation and sent out to the major capitals of Europe to open branches
Speaker 2: One to go and open a house in Paris, one in Vienna, one in London, choose the most important sectors so that when money is to be sent from here to London, let us say, you won't have to risk life and gold. And here in Frankfurt, we'll just send a letter to Nathan in London saying, aye so and so. And that will be offset by loans from London to Frankfurt. You understand? In your day, there will be many wars in you.
A nation that have money to transport will come to the Rothschilds because it will be safe. Our 5 banking houses may cover Europe, but you will be one firm, one family, Rothschilds, who work always together. That will be your power.
Speaker 4: Just how rich and powerful is lord Evelyn Rothschild? Historically, the Rothschild family wealth was hidden in underground vaults. The Rothschilds' secret financial records were never audited and never accounted for. Their family commissioned biographies give the illusion that their family fortune has dwindled, But researchers estimate their wealth at close to $500,000,000,000,000 more than half the wealth of the entire world. Besides their many castles, palace mansions, wineries, racehorses, and exotic then bought the Associated Press, which selects and delivers the same news stories to the entire world day after day.
They have controlling interest in 3 major television networks and easily avoid media attention since they own it. Until recently, they owned and operated England's Royal Mint and continue to be the gold agent for the Bank of England, which they also direct. They control the LBMA, London Bullion Market Association, where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold worth over $11,000,000,000 are traded daily. The Rothschilds earn 1,000,000 weekly just on transaction fees alone. They also fix the world price of gold on a daily basis and profit from its ups and downs.
Over the centuries, the Rothschilds have amassed 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars worth of gold bullion in their subterranean vaults and have cornered the world's gold supply. They own controlling interest in the world's largest oil company, Royal Dutch Shell. They operate phony charities and offshore banking services where the wealth of the black nobility in the Vatican is hidden in secret accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts, and holding companies. Although Evelyn Rothschild looks like a harmless gray haired old man, make no mistake about it. Rothschild and his ancestors have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored the mass murder and impoverishment of 1,000,000.
The well hoarded by this one family alone could feed, clothe, and shelter every human being on Earth.
Speaker 0: The Rothschilds is the head of the snake. Within the city of London, there is a 1 mile square that is referred to as the city. This is the headquarters of the Jewish family, Rothschild's banking dynasty, that owns the money supply through the central banks of almost every nation on earth. In November 1910, 7 of the world's richest Jewish men held a secret meeting on Jekyll Island just off the coast of Georgia to establish a central bank, which they called the Federal Reserve Bank. These men were Nelson Aldrich and Frank Vanderlip, both representing the Rockefeller Financial Empire.
Henry Davidson, Charles Norton, and Benjamin Strong representing JP Morgan, and Paul Warburg, representing the Rothschild Banking Dynasty of Europe. There were some powerful men who made abundantly clear that they were not in favor of the Federal Reserve System. Their total wealth today would be worth nearly $11,000,000,000 These were Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Aster. Unfortunately, all of them were aboard Titanic when it sank to the depths of the sea. All 3 died that night.
By April 1912, all opposition to the Federal Reserve had been eliminated. On December 23rd, 13, after many senators and congressmen had left town for Christmas, the president Wilson signed a bill, and the privately owned federal reserve system came into being in the United States. After Woodrow Wilson had signed the Federal Reserve Act, which gave private interest control over economic power in 1913, he said, I'm a most unhappy man. I've unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit.
Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world, no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion endures of a small
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The farmers ain’t playin’‼️ They just took care of the #EuropeanUnion headquarters in #Brussels. 🔥🔥🔥😂 Anyone seeing this on the news? https://t.co/42E45eVoCO
reSee.it AI Summary
MP Colin Carrie addressed Parliament about the influence of Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum on Canadian politicians during the pandemic. The call was abruptly cut off and blamed on connection quality, but the audio was clear.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
🚨CLASSIC “The Jig is Up‼️” moment when 🇨🇦 MP Colin Carrie addresses Parliament during the “pandemic” regarding #KlausSchwab & the #WEF’s influence over Canadian politicians. They panic, cut the call 📞 off 🚫 & blame the connection quality. Listen for yourself, the call audio is crystal clear. ✅
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, a member of parliament raises concerns about outside interference in democracy. They mention Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum, who allegedly claimed that his organization has infiltrated governments, including Canada's cabinet. The member asks for transparency regarding which cabinet ministers support the WEF's agenda. However, the audio and video quality are poor, leading to interruptions and apologies from the speaker. Another member accuses the first member of promoting disinformation. Then, a third member thanks a colleague for their speech and intends to ask a specific question related to the legislation being discussed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kestia Kallotek, questions and comments, the honorable member for Oshawa.
Speaker 1: Thank you, mister speaker, and I listened to my colleague's speech. I had a constituent that wanted me to ask a question about outside interference to our democracy. Klaus Schwab is the head of the World Economic Forum, and he bragged how his subversive w w w e f, World Economic Forum, has quoted infiltrated governments around the world. He said that his organization had penetrated more than half of Canada's cabinet. I was wondering in the interest of transparency, could the member please name which cabinet ministers are on board with the WEF's agenda?
My concern is the deputy
Speaker 0: Order. Order. Order. I I know he was I know that, the member was in a a really good good question there, but the the the audio is really, really bad, and the video is really, really bad as well. And I and I and I apologize.
I don't know if if the member okay. Let's let's, let's try again. The honorable the the the honorable member for Timmons James Bay.
Speaker 1: Mister speaker, that member is promoting open disinformation. That's not debate. We have to call up disinformation.
Speaker 0: We'll get into debate again. The honorable member, questions and comments? The honorable member for Lambton Kent Middlesex. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
And I'm just thank you to my honorable colleague for her speech. I'd like to ask her specifically because you talked about how this piece of legislation does not
reSee.it AI Summary
There is evidence suggesting that Italian Health Minister Roberto Speranza may have concealed deaths and side effects related to COVID-19 vaccinations. This has led to an investigation into his actions.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
This is true. Don’t tell me nothing is happening. Get in the fight or get lost‼️ This leader is Italian Health Minister Roberto Speranza, and he is now under investigation for homicide after emails reveal that from the very start of the vaccinations, he knew the shots were killing people and gave orders to local health authorities to conceal deaths and serious side effects in order to reassure Italian citizens of their safety and to not jeopardize the vaccination campaign.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
This is totally normal. Seriously, it’s been happening everywhere for three years. Welcome to the new normal.
reSee.it AI Summary
The new 'epidemic' of Mycoplasma pneumonia, known as "white lung syndrome," is caused by the Covid-19 vaccines, according to Pfizer's own documentation. Check page 7 of their Adverse Events Report and share with others.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Guess what causes the new ‘epidemic’ of Mycoplasma pneumonia, which is also termed “white lung syndrome”? Drum roll please 🥁🥁🥁🥁…. It’s caused by the #covid19 #vaccines as revealed by #Pfizer in their own documentation. Check out page 7 of Pfizer’s Adverse Events Report and consider telling a friend.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The #EU has declared the #Covid19 Vaccines were approved illegally. Accountability is inevitable. #WeThePeople are not letting up. ✅ https://t.co/3415mHkmbl
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, John Loughlin, director of FVD International, discusses a letter written by Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Koos, and other members of the European Parliament to the European Medical Agency (EMA). The letter raises concerns about the procedures followed and the alleged harmful nature of COVID vaccines. The speakers highlight issues such as the lack of transparency in vaccine contracts, the differences between approved and administered batches, and the potential dangers of the vaccines. They also discuss the corruption and illegality surrounding the approval process and the suppression of text messages by Ursula von der Leyen. The speakers emphasize the need for accountability and the protection of citizens' safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, hello, everybody. I'm John Loughlin, director of FVD International, Forum For Democracy International. We're in the European Parliament today. I'm delighted to welcome, as my guest today, Marcel de Graaf, member of the European Parliament for Forum For Democracy, Joachim Koos, member of the European Parliament for Alternative fur Deutschland, Anvila Engel, who is a campaigner, and, chairman or or president of Virus Truth, Virus Varheit, which is a a pressure group that campaigns on, on the issue of vaccines and COVID related policies. We are discussing today the letter which, Marcel De Graaf, Joachim Koos, and other members of the European Parliament have written to the European Medical Agency.
In this letter, which is a 20 page document or so, very densely argued and which I encourage, our viewers to read. You can find it on Marcel Dehaaf's website and also there's a link to it, from FED international.com. There are a number of, arguments made in favor of this appeal to withdraw the vaccines. Some of the arguments concern procedures, procedures which were either not followed or which were deliberately violated or changed in advance. Other arguments concern, the use to which the vaccines have been put allegedly, wrongly.
There are also arguments concerning the the harmful nature of the vaccines, and even, arguments, concerning alleged, a confusion between the, batches which were used for testing and the batches which were actually used, on people. Marcel, among all these arguments, perhaps you'd like to tell our our our viewers, what you what has what has brought you to do this this letter. And what are the most important points, do you think?
Speaker 1: Yes. Well, to start with, and that's why William Engel is here, I I got I, got a copy of the letter that Wilhelm sent to, the Dutch, medical agency, with a lot of the same, arguments is that we used in that letter because I contacted Willem, and I said, well, we like to use, your letter as a as a concept, to and we had to rework it, of course, because we have a completely different leg legislation for the European Medical Agency as for the Dutch, institute that that, approves medicines. So we had to rework it, but I got this letter, and I was shocked because we already know a lot of things about these COVID vaccines. We know that they are not effective. I mean, If a vaccine is effective, then why got 4 of them or 5 or whatever, because they still, don't work after the first time, which in my time, when I was young, a vaccine would create immunity immediately.
Speaker 0: Well, you made a video about this, sir, not so long ago, you said if we if they were if they worked, you wouldn't need boosters all the time.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So that's pretty good fix. So that we knew that already. I mean and we know that the details on the contracts are not given to the public, so it's all, its secrecy and hidden SMSs and, and money going to places where we don't know it, if it's used well or not taxpayers' money. So we we already had an idea that this this whole thing was Messi and and and and, in some way, corrupted.
But then I got this letter, and it basically said, well, this this approval and the the way we got to this approval is also completely messed up And messed up in a way that really shocked me because if you approve a batch, a certain vaccine or certain medicine. Then you expect that the medicine that is approved is the medicine that is applied to patients or to citizens. And if there's a difference between that, then you are basically being vaccinated with a nonapproved
Speaker 0: with something that wasn't approved.
Speaker 1: Whatever substance. So, Well, that really shocked me, and that that was why
Speaker 2: I was
Speaker 1: so enthusiastic about the action of Filament that I said, well, We need to take this to a much higher level. We need to take this to European level because every European citizen is being exposed to something They shouldn't be at first.
Speaker 0: One of the points that struck me I mean, a number of the arguments are are rather technical. They concern, procedure and so on. But there's one detail that I think anyone can understand, and that is that the, descriptions the official descriptions of these, vaccines run to, respectively, 574 pages and 224 pages. And doctors are supposed to read these 5 well, I've thousands of pages, to decide whether or not, to administer these vaccines. Joachim.
Is that for you the most important point? That that struck me as an example of the European Union because this is, tolerated by the European Medical Authority, actually creating illegality. It's actually creating a regime of illegality. It. It's a it's a gigantic machine for generating legislation as we know the European Union.
But here it is creating objectively a system of illegality because no no doctor Has the Time to Read these 500 pages for each medicine that he prescribes. What's what's your what led you to, to to to sign this letter?
Speaker 2: I think, it's many things. As Marshall said, there are so many things which are going really wrong in a in a in a very big scale, so far, it's so, unbelievable what we find. We we look on one aspect, and then you find fort or something else, something really, so hindrances and big, big mountains. You cannot surmount them. Yeah.
You cannot go you must go outside of them and, be beyond them. And, therefore, it's so many things which are clearly stunning and and stunningly. It began at the beginning as it was in the 1st year when when when the things, went, wrong. And, it doesn't it didn't change. And I, as a member of the parliament in, in the committee of budget and budgetary control.
I was very much involved with money. It's a money issue, you know, and it went wrong so so wrong for me as a as a as a very frugal person who thinks, you must pay for all things, and now they have Yeah. Billions of billions of euros throwing to the to the, the pharmaceutical firms about money about things which are not women which are not safe and which are, say, safe for themselves, say, we cannot, we cannot say it's safe. Yeah? And that was for me, it was an an enlightenment when when the the one of the the directors of Pfizer told the committee who is was looking into it that you that you said we didn't know it.
Yeah. And and and, therefore, We have no, proof that it is safe.
Speaker 0: That's right. That's right.
Speaker 2: So so so insane, and, therefore, I was very alert, and I spoke a lot about Sissingh and about, vaccination. And and at last, I was a little bit annoyed about, our president, Metzler, Then she wrote letter after letter that we should be vaccinated again.
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes.
Speaker 2: It's it's therefore, except for me, thinking And we've wrote, to her and said it's not okay. Yeah. We should not be coerced to be vaccinated.
Speaker 0: Well, coercion is the, or at least interference is the key. I mean, I'm very interested in the procedural aspects. I was I was struck as well by the evidence you found. I I imagine you found this villain, that the European Medical Authority tried to accelerate the procedure. In other words, instead of sitting there truly and waiting for providers to come to them and show that their product is safe.
And so so the the these procedural things fascinate me, but I suspect our viewers are more interested in the substantial medical issues. Are they safe, or are they dangerous? You, Claire. They're dangerous.
Speaker 3: They're clearly dangerous, because they did not follow. And one of the procedures that was overlooked or fast tracked, and it's called a major objection, and it has a lot to do with the good manufacturing practice, that says that you have to have the procedure down to the minutiae so you know that the product is always the same wherever you produce it and whenever you produce it. That it was clearly not in order, and that probably has led to the differences between those batches. So some groups of batches have a very high incidence of, of adverse effects, but you do not know beforehand which ones. So the precautionary thing here to do is to say we have to regard all batches as unsafe.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So that's the first thing.
Speaker 0: And you
Speaker 3: cannot change it to say, well, only 4% of the batches is unsafe. So Yeah. That that's an acceptable risk.
Speaker 0: Are the different batches a differently dangerous So
Speaker 3: we're talking about vaccines, erroneously. This is a new platform. It's an mRNA platform, which technically and scientifically and also legally is considered advanced medical therapeut therapeutical products. So in in a sense, it's gene therapy. Yeah.
Now the scale it has been produced has also never been done. The adjuvants that were used has also never been done. So this is a a worldwide experiment. And if you go down to those clinical trials on which the SMPC documents are based. You clearly see that some of them read real world data.
We are the guinea pigs. There's no going, going around it. It's an experimental gene therapeutic, product that was fast tracked, by changing the rules, bending the rules, and trying to cover up those changes in the in the direct directive of 2021 on this the the 24th March. And and what you see there is on every level a little bit of tweaking the process so you get a completely unapproved, completely unsafe product on the market.
Speaker 0: That's the procedural side. Why are they that's it. Basically, you I understand. I we are we understand. But why are they dangerous?
Us. You mentioned myocarditis. You mentioned pericarditis. You mentioned heart disease, particularly affecting, young men, apparently.
Speaker 2: And even even fatalities? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So let's let's let's concentrate on the substantial
Speaker 3: Yeah. If we look at the adverse effects Yeah. And and for the record, I was trained as a pharmaceutical scientist, so This is really my field. If you look at the adverse effects, it's very broad, and we've discussed this with with immunologists, effectiologists, also with pathologists, and what they find is that it is because of the choice of the target of the antigen. So the antigen, the spike protein is divided in 2 units, and one of those units is actually toxic.
So when that distributes all around the body in every organ where it's, accumulates, and that can take months months Until your next jab, so you get this inflammation in all these organs. Yes. And that's why we see such a vast array of adverse effects. The most important one is, of course, the vascular system
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 3: Because it goes through the body, and this is one of the things that was missed because it was, unjustly categorized as a vaccine. If it's categorized as an, as a gene therapy, you have to do this distribution studies. In Japan, they did it. That's why we found out that it accumulates in every, adipose tissue. So that's bone marrow.
Well, if it's in bone marrow, that heightens the chance on all kinds of, cancers. If it's, in the arteries that hides the the chance of aneurysms, on Tias
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: On, myocardial infarct infarcts. So, we clearly see that not only the target that was chosen, but the platform that was chosen and the delivery, the lipid nanoparticle, which makes it distributable all over the body. We're all very, very ill advised.
Speaker 0: One of the points you make in the what you make in the letter to the EMA, and which I imagine comes from your, your, case against the Dutch Medical Authority. Mhmm. Is that the rules on genetically modified organisms were changed? Is are these vaccines genetically modified organisms, or are they organisms which modify genes? So Are they modified themselves, or do they then modify
Speaker 3: So both of genetics. Both of those actions or mechanisms are in play here. So this letter was only directed towards the injections that are based on the mRNA platform. Normally, When we do gene therapy, we use a viral vector. So AstraZeneca made an injection, which is also gene therapy, but this was specifically focus against mRNA.
Now the argument of the proponents was, well, there is no chance it will shed because it will not replicate. Although there is a batch that actually does the SA self amplifying mRNA, to to to mitigate the the risk concerning normal gene therapeutic, platforms. But what we see now is that it's also contaminated with DNA strands, and these DNA strands actually contain parts of other viruses, the SIMION 40 virus, which is associated, with cancer.
Speaker 0: Perhaps you could explain for us our RNA, DNA. Yeah. So I know it's very basic for you.
Speaker 3: But So so, normally, what you carry as hereditary, molecules that is basically, the program of you, your body, and and your function is is programmed in DNA. It's double trended. It's, not prone to mutation, but to get from there to a function or to a protein, we need an intermediary, and that's RNA. So the whole idea was to hijack the the the signaling system to make your body produce something that is designed in a lab. Yeah.
So the whole idea is a is a great idea, But you have to test whether it's safe. And when you look at genetically modified organisms, there is a regulation 2,000 one slash eighteen for the European Union. This was bypassed in 2020 Yeah. To make it, to make the clinical trials legal
Speaker 0: Sean.
Speaker 3: Because they don't know what ends up in the environment. They don't know the effect on our genes. But looking closer to it, there was an even more important one, the regulation 2019 slash 5, that actually bypassed parliamentary scrutiny and said, okay. All the conditions that are, proposed for, conditional marketing authorization, including the classification of these, biologicals as they're called, so these medicinal products. We hand over to a committee of experts.
Now what they did is they misused that delegation to create a pseudo, legal system, which they then tried to bypass or tried to push through parliament in 2, 2021. So it had the the approval of the European Commission and the European Parliament. In reality, there is no legal approval of any of these injections.
Speaker 0: Marcel. You used the word corrupt or corrupted just now. The procedures have been corrupted.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. Because if you have, for for decades, used certain procedures Because you really want to protect, the population and protect patients, from harmful medicines. Then you go through a to a very precise procedure with testing, its scrutiny so that you and really are 100% sure that you end up with a medicine that's safe to use for the specific category of people that you want to use it on. Now if you start changing these procedures to push through something that's experimental, Then you then you can start asking questions.
Where were all these 1,000,000 used for that were paid to fight, sir, Emma Derna? Why are all these officials, who are doing their jobs for for decades in a very decent way, certainly, open to change all these rules and to, bypass all these safety measures because that's what these procedures are for. They are safety measures. They're safe, and they're for our safety.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 1: That's why these measures are there. And then you put them aside because of some experimental stuff that you, in a in a in a very high speed want to pull through this process to inject into people that something is really, really wrong. That's why I'm using the word corrupted. Yeah. I mean, they they you corrupt the procedures In in this.
Guarantee your safety.
Speaker 0: In the word, corrupted, there is the word corrupt, and there is the allegation, is there not, that Ursula von der Leyen suppressed her text messages, with the head of Pfizer, if I'm not mistaken. Would you like to, tell us where we are on that. Have they been released, these text messages? Have they disappeared? And and and and, most specifically, is it corruption, not just corrupted.
Speaker 2: That must, a a judge, a court, must decide on that, and therefore But the political action
Speaker 0: can be made. Yeah.
Speaker 2: You are sure. But, Stefan Vivi Vivid for such, EPPO, the prosecutor office in, Luxembourg will Ko On. And with this case, because, also, if there has there a case, still open and to many cases as I as I heard? And but we didn't hear anything about the ongoing of this, this investigation. And, therefore, I am as a political and as an MVP, I am sure There will be no result Yes.
Even not not before the election next year. Yes. And when she when therefore, it's it's only for from to to to to to feel so people feel safe. All the thing all things are working. All systems are working and so on.
But they are all working together in the some sense about and and it's corruption in in the political sense. In the political sense. Really corruption. I'm sure. And it began for me, it began with the origin of SARS CoV 2.
The the origin of SARS CoV 2, I think, is the biggest Ford, the biggest, the
Speaker 0: You mean, you mean, the lab? The the lab here. The lab
Speaker 2: here. Things. Yeah. It's it's really the biggest cover up in in medical history. Yeah.
What what are they doing there? And therefore, it began with a with reports, the system, And it goes on with a corrupt, solution. It's a solution which we which we didn't need. Yeah. And if we we are going on and on and on with with such with such things which we don't need, I was never vaccinated about Vipsis, mRNA technologies, and I'm happy about that.
And I think we the solution will be most more people must see also that things are really deteriorating ratings. They are going wrong and wrong and and and and worse and worse, and then they will wake up. And then they will say, no. Never never more anymore, vaccination, and that will be a good, a good Hussarld for
Speaker 0: one of the purposes, of course, of the yeah.
Speaker 1: Vinam said something, something else which, comes close to what, Joachim Hussain. It is a conditional approval, and then you prolong the approval.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: What you see with this, all these institutions is that they cover each other.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: They're covering, 4 von der Leyen's, SMSes. They're covering for this conditional approval. Now we get this prolongation.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It was addressed by Willem in the Netherlands. How can you prolong a conditional approval. If you have all these data about adverse effects, the same question that we were asking, at the EMA, The answer to Willem is, well, you have to go to the EMA. You don't you can't ask us because we just are just doing what Europe is asking from us.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And that's why you've and that's why you've addressed this letter to the EMA.
Speaker 1: Are responsible in the Netherlands for the the safety of the Dutch people Yeah. And the EMA for the European people. So you see, they're pointing to each other, and how do you respond to it? It's and that is also part of this network of covering each other.
Speaker 0: Well, Willem, you were yourself, I believe, arrested
Speaker 3: Four times already.
Speaker 0: Four times. Tell us about that.
Speaker 3: The the Peel case, is continuing. It's What
Speaker 0: were you arrested for?
Speaker 3: For well, the alleged thing is that I have incited Yeah. People to break the law by going to a protest
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Which already is, dictatorial Yeah. On itself, if you do not allow people to call for a protest.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: It's a ridiculous case. Unbelievable. But even in Germany democracy. The In Germany, it's even worse because Michael Baldeck, which organized a lot of protests, he was in prison in the pretrial prison for 9 months, and now they have dropped the case. So they locked up an innocent guy for 9 months.
Speaker 2: Because of alleged fraud. Yeah. Not not because of, participation at an,
Speaker 3: in the rally. Yeah. And and this liberal values. And yes. But but this gaslighting, Ting because I want to allude to the point of, Marcel.
What we see here in this case of the injections and the whole COVID case, you could say, This is an usurping of power by the European Commission. By try trying to circumvent parliament, by trying to create pseudo laws, their, now usurping the power of health. The whole EU for health program, which is based on the one health ideology, is really scary. If we look to the WHO treaty, this is an exponent of what's actually happening here in this house or next door at the commission. So by trying to answer this letter that we wrote to the Dutch version of the EMA, And their answer was telling they said, well, we do not have the authority.
You have to go to Europe Yeah. Which is untrue. In all this European legislation, it clearly states that the end, result or the the the person that is ultimately responsible is the sovereign state itself, and that is a thing that is very worrisome. That with this COVID narrative, The sovereignty is taken away from the states even more.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 3: And and that's why I'm so happy that Now we have a pincher movement in that in that sense that we're doing on a national level and a European level because now they have to keep pointing towards each other, and we are starting a, a law case, a court case against them as well because we want answers.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I mean, the fact of Europe taking sovereignty away from member states. It's not new. They've been doing that for a very, very long time. New route.
But this is a further click in the ratchet, and it is, if you're to be believed, creating at the European level a regime of illegality. Absolutely. If it was, legal, at least you might, to just about find it bearable. What about, Germany? Are you going to, does it are you aware of any initiatives in Germany, to appeal against the the German Health Authority in the way that they have done for the Netherlands.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay. In Germany, I don't know what the situation is about, what my colleagues and, from the AFD Yeah. In Berlin are are doing, but I know that they are really very, outspoken and very, proactive on many cases, on many things, and they had many of the scientists there and and medical professionals and so on into house, into Bundestag, and, therefore, I'm I am very confident that they will do the same or have done it. I don't Oh, no.
It's
Speaker 0: Since Germany is obviously
Speaker 2: the situation.
Speaker 0: Germany is one of the places where the mRNA technology was developed. The Pfizer the for the BioNTech Sure.
Speaker 2: But, Yeah. In some, yeah, in some sense, it was it wasn't Germany, but I think it's mostly in, from the US. Right. And mister Malone
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Still He's still the the the original, inventor of it. And even if now the no the Nobel Prize was given to another, a pair of scientists, which is not which is not the old original inventor. But, okay, we will see. It's Germany. It's I think in Germany, we have a big problem about that.
Some people believe in the state very, very strongly, And, therefore, it's a long way to, to collect all the the the persons who are willing to oppose the system. Zafo. I hope I hope for these things that we, from the European level or from the Dutch level, can help them, yeah, to convince them, to be more outspoken, to be more, frankly and and and and confident to to oppose the the government. Psychologically.
Speaker 1: Sorry. I'm so happy that you call this this Nobel
Speaker 3: Prize
Speaker 1: winners Yes. Because that gives an sort of an illusion of, Well, we gave these doctors, the Nobel Prize for medicine, so that must be a good medicine. Yes. I tell you this. These 2 medical doctors themselves warned in 2018
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. Yes.
Speaker 1: For the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines. They warned themselves. Okay. So let's get rid of this idea that it's that Because they have the Nobel Prize, it's safe. It's not.
Speaker 0: Well, the Nobel Peace Prize, as we've known, those of us who are interested in foreign policy know that it's deeply politicized and has been for a long time. Yeah. And now we see that that's happening in the medical arena as well. Marcel de Gaf, Willem Engel Joachim Kuz. Thank you very much indeed, and thanks for watching.
Goodbye.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Deaths before the vaccine and deaths after. Unless you’re retarded, case closed. ✅ No hyperbole intended. If you don’t see it, check your head. Something is very wrong. Source: John Hopkins University - Corona Virus Resource Centre. https://t.co/YyCy0Fkb36
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
“Covid was an act of biological warfare…” - Dr. David Martin, European Parliament International Covid Summit III in Brussels on May 3, 2023. https://t.co/YKuVrB2z3o
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had on humanity. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. They discuss the history of coronavirus, including its isolation in 1965 and subsequent modifications and experiments. They highlight the unethical actions of organizations like the CDC and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who patented and manipulated the virus. They emphasize the need to end gain of function research and corporate influence in science. The speaker concludes by calling for accountability and a halt to the weaponization of nature.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Interesting location for me to be sitting today given that over a decade ago, I sat in this very chair right here in the European Union parliament, and at that time, I warned the world of what was coming. During that conversation that was hosted at the time by the Green and EFA and a number of the other parties of the European Union's various representations. We were having a conversation on whether Europe should adopt the United States policy of allowing for the patents on biologically derived materials, and at the time, I urged this body and I urged people around the world that the weaponization of nature against humanity had dire consequences. Tragically, I sit here today with that unfortunate line that I don't like to say, which I told you so, But the fact of the matter is we're here not for a reprisal on past decisions. We're here to actually once again come to the face of the human condition and ask the question, who do we want to be?
What do we want humanity to look like? And rather than seeing this as an exercise in futility, which is very easy from time to time when you're in the position I'm in, I actually see this not as an exercise in futility. I see this as one of the greatest opportunities that faces us because we now have a public conversation, which is now front and center in people's minds. When this was an esoteric conversation about biological patents, nobody cared, But when that conversation came home, then it became something people can care about. So I'm actually quite grateful for this opportunity.
I thank the members of parliament for hosting this. I thank all of the translators who I apologize in advance. I will use terminology that is probably very difficult to translate, So my apologies. I'd also like to acknowledge the fact that many of you are aware of my involvement with this in large part due to the amazing work of my wonderful wife, Kim Martin, who encouraged me at the very early days of this pandemic to get on front of the camera and talk about all the information that I had been sharing among very small groups around the world, and it was, in fact, her encouragement that put me in a place where many of you have heard what I have to say. Ironically, the world that I came from that used to be very popular, my CNBC and Bloomberg presentations, which were televised on Mainstream media around the world was an audience that I lost.
I can confidently say COVID diminished my fame, But I can also confidently say that I'd rather stand among the people with whom I'm standing today than any of the folks that were part of that previous world. So this is a much better place to be. My role today is to set the stage for this conversation in a historical context because this did not come in the last 3 years. This did not come in the last 5 or 6 years. This actually is an ongoing question that probably began here in Europe in the early stages of the mid 1900s, but certainly By 1913, 1914, this conversation started right here in Central Europe.
The pandemic that we alleged to have happen in the last few years also did not happen overnight. In fact, the very specific pandemic using coronavirus began in a very different time, and we'll try to advance the slides here with one of these things. Oh, there we go. Most of you don't know that coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965. Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious replicatable viral models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of the human condition that was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold.
But what's particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons. And you heard me correctly. That was 1965, and by the way, these slides are public domain. You're welcome to look at every single reference. Every comment that I made is based on published material, so do make sure that you look at those references.
But in 1966, the very first COV coronavirus model was used as a Transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation, and you heard the date, 1966. I hope you're getting the point of what I'm saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that's been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the 1st transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom, and in 1967, the year I was born, we did the 1st human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus.
Isn't that amazing? 56 years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that's been 56 years in engineering, and I want that to chill with all of you. Where were we when we actually allowed in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties, where were we as a human civilization when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do to take a pathogen for the United States and infect the world with it? Where was that conversation, and what should have been that conversation in 1967? That conversation wasn't had.
Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera in the 1970s, And in 1975, 1976, and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by putting it into different animals, pigs and dogs, and not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that coronavirus as an infectious agent was an industrial problem for 2 primary industries, The industries of dogs and pigs, dog breeders and pigs found that coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems, and that became the basis for Pfizer's 1st spike protein vaccine patent filed, are you ready for this, in 1990. Did you hear what I just said? 1990, Operation Warp Speed? I'm sorry. Where's the warp and the speed?
Pfizer, 1990, the very first spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. Isn't that fascinating? Isn't it fascinating that we were told that well, the spike protein is a new thing? We just found out that that's the problem. No.
As a matter of fact, we didn't just find out it was not just now the problem. We found that out in 1990 and filed the 1st patents on vaccines in 1990 in 1990 for the spike protein of coronavirus. And who would have thought Pfizer, Clearly, the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health, clearly, Pfizer, The organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber and at every chamber of every government around the world, not that Pfizer, Certainly, they wouldn't have had anything to do with this, but oh, yes, they did. And in 1990, they found out that there was a problem with vaccines. They didn't work.
You know why they didn't work? It turns out that coronavirus is a very malleable model. It transforms and it changes and it mutates over time. As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for coronavirus From 1990 until 2018, every single publication concluded that coronavirus escapes The vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective, And since 1990 to 2018, that is the published science, ladies and gentlemen. That's following the science.
Following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said it doesn't work, and there are thousands of publications to that effect, not a few 100, and not paid for by pharmaceutical companies. These are publications that are independent scientific research that shows unequivocally including efforts of the chimera modifications made by Ralph Baerck and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, all of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus. That's the science, and that science has never been disputed. But then we had an interesting development in 2002, and this data is most important because in 2002 the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented, and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. Listen to those words, Infectious replication defective.
What does that phrase actually mean? For those of you not familiar with language, Let me unpack it for you. Infectious replication defective means a weapon. It means something meant to target an individual but not have collateral damage to other individuals. That's what just replication defective means, and that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID's Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 2002, and that work, patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Seriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year.
Dave, are you suggesting that SARS 1.0 Wasn't from a wet market in Wuhan? Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory In the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, no. I'm not suggesting it. I'm telling you that's the facts. We engineered SARS.
SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It's called influenza like illness. It's called gastroenteritis. That's the naturally occurring coronavirus.
SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack Human beings, and they patented it in 2002. And in 2003, giant surprise, the CDC filed a patent on coronavirus isolated from humans in violation, once again, of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws that we have in the United States, and I'm very precise on this. United States likes to talk about its rights and everything else and the rule of law and all the nonsense that we like to talk about, but we don't ratify treaties about, I don't know, defending humans. We conspicuously avoid that. We actually have a great track record of advocating for human rights and then denying them when it comes to actually being part of the international community, which is a slightly problematic thing.
But let's get something very clear. When the CDC in April of 2003 filed a patent on SARS coronavirus isolated from humans, What did they do? They downloaded a sequence from China and filed a patent on it in the United States. Any of you familiar with biological and chemical weapons treaties knows that's a violation. That's a crime.
That's not an innocent oops. That's a crime, and the United States patent office went as far as to reject that patent application on 2 occasions until the CDC decided to bribe the patent office to override the patent examiner to ultimately issue the patent in 2007 on SARS coronavirus. But let's not let that get away from us because it turns out that the RT PCR, which was the test that we allegedly we're going to use to identify the risks associated with coronavirus was actually identified as a bioterrorism threat by me In the European Union sponsored events in 2002 and 2003, 20 years ago, That happened here in Brussels and across Europe. In 2005, This particular pathogen was specifically labeled as a bioterrorism and bioweapon platform technology described as such. That's not my terminology that I'm applying to it.
It was actually described as a bioweapons platform technology in 2005, And from 2005 onwards, it was actually a biowarfare enabling agent, its official classification from 2005 forward. I don't know if that sounds like public health to you. Does it? Biological warfare enabling technology, that feels like not public health. That feels like not medicine.
That feels like a weapon designed to take out humanity. That's what it feels like, and it feels like that because that's exactly what it is. We have been lured into believing that Ecohealth Alliance and DARPA and all of these organizations are what we should be pointing to, but we've been specifically requested to ignore the facts that over $10,000,000,000 have been funneled through black operations through the check of Anthony Fauci and a side by side ledger where NIIID has a balance sheet and next to it is a biodefense balance sheet, Equivalent dollar for dollar matching that no one in the media talks about, and it's been going on since 2005. Our gain of function moratorium, the moratorium that was supposed to freeze any efforts to do gain of function research. Conveniently in the fall of 2014, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill received a letter from NIAID saying that while the gain of function moratorium on coronavirus in vivo should be suspended because their grants had already been funded, They received an exemption.
Did you hear what I just said? A biological weapons lab facility at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill received an exemption from the gain of function moratorium so that by 2016, we could publish The journal article that said SARS coronavirus is poised for human emergence in 2016. Anne, what, you might ask? Dave, was the coronavirus poised for human emergence? It was WIV1, Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1, Poised for human emergence in 2016 at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences such that by the time we get to 2017 and 2018, the following phrase entered into common parlance among the community: there is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen, The operative word, obviously, in that phrase, the word release.
Does that sound like leak? Sound like a bat and a pangolin went into a bar in the Wuhan market and hung out and had sex, and and lo and behold, we got SARS CoV 2? No. Accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was the terminology used And 4 times in April of 2019, 7 months before the allegation of patient number 1, Four patent applications of Moderna were modified to include the term accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen as the justification for making a vaccine for a thing that did not exist. Keep going.
If you have not done so, please make sure that you make reference in every investigation to the premeditation nature of this because it was in September of 2019 that the world was informed that we were going to have an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen so that by September 2020, there would be a worldwide acceptance of a universal template. That's their words right in front of you on the screen. The intent was to get the world to accept a universal vaccine template and the intent was to use coronavirus to get there. And the last slide. This isn't advancing, so if I could have somebody to do Let's read this because we have to read this into the record everywhere I go.
Until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at the emergency threshold, that is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical countermeasures such pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine? A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
Sounds like public health. Sounds like the best of humanity. No, ladies and gentlemen. This was premeditated domestic terrorism Stated at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015, published in front of them, this is an this is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race, and it was admitted to in writing that this was a financial heist and a financial fraud. Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process.
Let me conclude by making 5 very brief recommendations. The last slide. Nature was hijacked. This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to a natural model and decide to start manipulating it. Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, and their equivalent organizations around the world.
We didn't have independent science. We had hijacked science, and unfortunately, there was no moral oversight in violation of all of the codes that we stand for. There was no independent, financially disinterested independent review board ever empaneled around coronavirus not once. Not once. Not since 1965.
We do not have a single independent IRB ever empaneled around coronavirus. So morality was suspended for medical countermeasures, and ultimately humanity was lost because we decided to allow it to happen. Our job today is to say no more gain of function research, period. No more weaponization of nature, period, and most importantly, no more corporate patronage of science for their own self interest unless they assume 100% product liability For every injury and every death that they maintain, thank you very much.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The #EU has declared the Covid Vaccines were approved illegally. LISTEN 👂…. Can you hear it? Justice is coming #WHO, #CDC, #FDA, #WEF & @BillGates. https://t.co/T5OyqoqUex
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, John Loughlin interviews Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Koos, and Willem Engel about their letter to the European Medical Agency (EMA) regarding the withdrawal of COVID vaccines. They discuss various arguments against the vaccines, including procedural violations, alleged confusion between test batches and actual batches, and the harmful nature of the vaccines. They highlight the dangers of the vaccines, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, and the potential corruption and illegality surrounding their approval. They also mention the suppression of text messages by Ursula von der Leyen and the erosion of sovereignty by the European Union. The speakers express their concerns and call for action against the vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, hello, everybody. I'm John Loughlin, director of FVD International, Forum For Democracy International. We're in the European Parliament today. I'm delighted to welcome, as my guest today, Marcel de Graaf, member of the European Parliament for Forum For Democracy, Joachim Koos, member of the European Parliament for Alternative fur Deutschland, Anvila Engel, who is a campaigner, and, chairman or or president of Virus Truth, Virus Varheit, which is a a pressure group that campaigns on, on the issue of vaccines and COVID related policies. We are discussing today the letter which, Marcel De Graaf, Joachim Koos, and other members of the European Parliament have written to the European Medical Agency.
In this letter, which is a 20 page document or so, very densely argued and which I encourage, our viewers to read. You can find it on Marcel Dehaaf's website and also as a link to it, from FED international.com. There are a number of, arguments made in favor of this appeal to withdraw the vaccines. Some of the arguments concern procedures, procedures which were either not followed or which were deliberately violated or changed in advance. Other arguments concern, the use to which the vaccines have been put allegedly, wrongly.
There are also arguments concerning the the harmful nature of the vaccines, and even, arguments, concerning alleged, a confusion between the, batches which were used for testing and the batches which were actually used, on people. Marcel, among all these arguments, perhaps you'd like to tell our our our viewers, what you what has what has brought you to do this this letter. And what are the most important points, do you think?
Speaker 1: Yes. Well, to start with, and that's why William Engel is here, I I got I, got a copy of the letter that Wilhelm sent to, the Dutch, medical agency, with a lot of the same, arguments is that we used in that letter because I contacted Willem, and I said, well, we like to use, your letter as a as a concept, to and we had to rework it, of course, because we have a completely different leg legislation for the European Medical Agency as for the Dutch, institute that that, approves medicines. So we had to rework it, but I got this letter, and I was shocked because we already know a lot of things about these COVID vaccines. We know that they are not effective. I mean, If a vaccine is effective, then why got 4 of them or 5 or whatever, because they still, don't work after the first time, which in my time, when I was young, a vaccine would create immunity immediately.
Speaker 0: Well, you made a video about this, sir, not so long ago, you said if we if they were if they worked, you wouldn't need boosters all the time.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So that's pretty good fix. So that we knew that already. I mean and we know that the details on the contracts are not given to the public, so it's all, its secrecy and hidden SMSs and, and money going to places where we don't know it, if it's used well or not taxpayers' money. So we we already had an idea that this this whole thing was Messi and and and and, in some way, corrupted.
But then I got this letter, and it basically said, well, this this approval and the the way we got to this approval is also completely messed up And messed up in a way that really shocked me because if you approve a batch, a certain vaccine or certain medicine. Then you expect that the medicine that is approved is the medicine that is applied to patients or to citizens. And if there's a difference between that, then you are basically being vaccinated with a nonapproved
Speaker 0: with something that wasn't approved.
Speaker 1: Whatever substance. So, Well, that really shocked me, and that that was why
Speaker 2: I was
Speaker 1: so enthusiastic about the action of Filament that I said, well, We need to take this to a much higher level. We need to take this to European level because every European citizen is being exposed to something They shouldn't be at first.
Speaker 0: One of the points that struck me. I mean, a number of the arguments are are rather technical. They concern, procedure and so on. But there's one detail that I think anyone can understand, and that is that the, descriptions the official descriptions of these, vaccines run to, respectively, 574 pages and 224 pages. And doctors are supposed to read these 5 well, I've thousands of pages, to decide whether or not, to administer these vaccines.
Joachim. Is that for you the most important point? That that struck me as an example of the European Union because this is, tolerated by the European Medical Authority, actually creating illegality. It's actually creating a regime of illegality. It.
It's a it's a gigantic machine for generating legislation as we know the European Union. But here it is creating objectively a system of illegality because no no doctor Has the Time to Read these 500 pages for each medicine that he prescribes. What's what's your what led you to, to to to sign this letter?
Speaker 2: I think, it's many things. As Marshall said, there are so many things which are going really wrong in a in a in a very big scale, so far, it's so, unbelievable what we find. We we look on one aspect, and then you find fort or something else, something really, so hindrances and big, big mountains. You cannot surmount them. Yeah.
You cannot go you must go outside of them and, be beyond them. And, therefore, it's so many things which are clearly stunning and and stunningly. It began at the beginning as it was in the 1st year when when when the things, went, wrong. And, it doesn't it didn't change. And I, as a member of the parliament in, in the committee of budget and budgetary control.
I was very much involved with money. It's a money issue, you know, and it went wrong so so wrong for me as a as a as a very frugal person who thinks, you must pay for all things, and now they have Yeah. Billions of billions of euros throwing to the to the, the pharmaceutical firms about money about things which are not women which are not safe and which are, say, safe for themselves, say, we cannot, we cannot say it's safe. Yeah? And that was for me, it was an an enlightenment when when the the one of the the directors of Pfizer told the committee who is was looking into it that you that you said we didn't know it.
Yeah. And and and, therefore, We have no, proof that it is safe.
Speaker 0: That's right. That's right.
Speaker 2: So so so insane, and, therefore, I was very alert, and I spoke a lot about Sissingh and about, vaccination. And and at last, I was a little bit annoyed about, our president, Metzler, Then she wrote letter after letter that we should be vaccinated again.
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes.
Speaker 2: It's it's therefore, except for me, thinking And we've wrote, to her and said it's not okay. Yeah. We should not be coerced to be vaccinated.
Speaker 0: Well, coercion is the, or at least interference is the key. I mean, I'm very interested in the procedural aspects. I was I was struck as well by the evidence you found. I I imagine you found this villain, that the European Medical Authority tried to accelerate the procedure. In other words, instead of sitting there truly and waiting for providers to come to them and show that their product is safe.
And so so the the these procedural things fascinate me, but I suspect our viewers are more interested in the substantial medical issues. Are they safe, or are they dangerous? You, Claire. They're dangerous.
Speaker 3: They're clearly dangerous, because they did not follow. And one of the procedures that was overlooked or fast tracked, and it's called a major objection, and it has a lot to do with the good manufacturing practice, that says that you have to have the procedure down to the minutiae so you know that the product is always the same wherever you produce it and whenever you produce it. That it was clearly not in order, and that probably has led to the differences between those batches. So some groups of batches have a very high incidence of, of adverse effects, but you do not know beforehand which ones. So the precautionary thing here to do is to say we have to regard all batches as unsafe.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So that's the first thing.
Speaker 0: And you
Speaker 3: cannot change it to say, well, only 4% of the batches is unsafe. So Yeah. That that's an acceptable risk.
Speaker 0: Are the different batches a differently dangerous So
Speaker 3: we're talking about vaccines, erroneously. This is a new platform. It's an mRNA platform, which technically and scientifically and also legally is considered advanced medical therapeut therapeutical products. So in in a sense, it's gene therapy. Yeah.
Now the scale it has been produced has also never been done. The adjuvants that were used has also never been done. So this is a a worldwide experiment. And if you go down to those clinical trials on which the SMPC documents are based. You clearly see that some of them read real world data.
We are the guinea pigs. There's no going, going around it. It's an experimental gene therapeutic, product that was fast tracked, by changing the rules, bending the rules, and trying to cover up those changes in the in the direct directive of 2021 on this the the 24th March. And and what you see there is on every level a little bit of tweaking the process so you get a completely unapproved, completely unsafe product on the market.
Speaker 0: That's the procedural side. Why are they that's it. Basically, you I understand. I we are we understand. But why are they dangerous?
Us. You mentioned myocarditis. You mentioned pericarditis. You mentioned heart disease, particularly affecting, young men, apparently.
Speaker 2: And even even fatalities? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So let's let's let's concentrate on the substantial
Speaker 3: Yeah. If we look at the adverse effects Yeah. And and for the record, I was trained as a pharmaceutical scientist, so This is really my field. If you look at the adverse effects, it's very broad, and we've discussed this with with immunologists, effectiologists, also with pathologists, and what they find is that it is because of the choice of the target of the antigen. So the antigen, the spike protein is divided in 2 units, and one of those units is actually toxic.
So when that distributes all around the body in every organ where it's, accumulates, and that can take months months Until your next jab, so you get this inflammation in all these organs. Yes. And that's why we see such a vast array of adverse effects. The most important one is, of course, the vascular system
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 3: Because it goes through the body, and this is one of the things that was missed because it was, unjustly categorized as a vaccine. If it's categorized as an, as a gene therapy, you have to do this distribution studies. In Japan, they did it. That's why we found out that it accumulates in every, adipose tissue. So that's bone marrow.
Well, if it's in bone marrow, that heightens the chance on all kinds of, cancers. If it's, in the arteries that hides the the chance of aneurysms, on Tias
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: On, myocardial infarct infarcts. So, we clearly see that not only the target that was chosen, but the platform that was chosen and the delivery, the lipid nanoparticle, which makes it distributable all over the body. We're all very, very ill advised.
Speaker 0: One of the points you make in the what you make in the letter to the EMA, and which I imagine comes from your, your, case against the Dutch Medical Authority. Mhmm. Is that the rules on genetically modified organisms were changed? Is are these vaccines genetically modified organisms, or are they organisms which modify genes? So Are they modified themselves, or do they then modify
Speaker 3: So both of genetics. Both of those actions or mechanisms are in play here. So this letter was only directed towards the injections that are based on the mRNA platform. Normally, When we do gene therapy, we use a viral vector. So AstraZeneca made an injection, which is also gene therapy, but this was specifically focus against mRNA.
Now the argument of the proponents was, well, there is no chance it will shed because it will not replicate. Although there is a batch that actually does the SA self amplifying mRNA, to to to mitigate the the risk concerning normal gene therapeutic, platforms. But what we see now is that it's also contaminated with DNA strands, and these DNA strands actually contain parts of other viruses, the SIMION 40 virus, which is associated, with cancer.
Speaker 0: Perhaps you could explain for us our RNA, DNA. Yeah. So I know it's very basic for you.
Speaker 3: But So so, normally, what you carry as hereditary, molecules that is basically, the program of you, your body, and and your function is is programmed in DNA. It's double trended. It's, not prone to mutation, but to get from there to a function or to a protein, we need an intermediary, and that's RNA. So the whole idea was to hijack the the the signaling system to make your body produce something that is designed in a lab. Yeah.
So the whole idea is a is a great idea, But you have to test whether it's safe. And when you look at genetically modified organisms, there is a regulation 2,000 one slash eighteen for the European Union. This was bypassed in 2020 Yeah. To make it, to make the clinical trials legal
Speaker 0: Sean.
Speaker 3: Because they don't know what ends up in the environment. They don't know the effect on our genes. But looking closer to it, there was an even more important one, the regulation 2019 slash 5, that actually bypassed parliamentary scrutiny and said, okay. All the conditions that are, proposed for, conditional marketing authorization, including the classification of these, biologicals as they're called, so these medicinal products. We hand over to a committee of experts.
Now what they did is they misused that delegation to create a pseudo, legal system, which they then tried to bypass or tried to push through parliament in 2, 2021. So it had the the approval of the European Commission and the European Parliament. In reality, there is no legal approval of any of these injections.
Speaker 0: Marcel. You used the word corrupt or corrupted just now. The procedures have been corrupted.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. Because if you have, for for decades, used certain procedures Because you really want to protect, the population and protect patients, from harmful medicines. Then you go through a to a very precise procedure with testing, its scrutiny so that you and really are 100% sure that you end up with a medicine that's safe to use for the specific category of people that you want to use it on. Now if you start changing these procedures to push through something that's experimental, Then you then you can start asking questions.
Where were all these 1,000,000 used for that were paid to fight, sir, Emma Derna? Why are all these officials, who are doing their jobs for for decades in a very decent way, certainly, open to change all these rules and to, bypass all these safety measures because that's what these procedures are for. They are safety measures. They're safe, and they're for our safety.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 1: That's why these measures are there. And then you put them aside because of some experimental stuff that you, in a in a in a very high speed want to pull through this process to inject into people that something is really, really wrong. That's why I'm using the word corrupted. Yeah. I mean, they they you corrupt the procedures In in this.
Guarantee your safety.
Speaker 0: In the word, corrupted, there is the word corrupt, and there is the allegation, is there not, that Ursula von der Leyen suppressed her text messages, with the head of Pfizer, if I'm not mistaken. Would you like to, tell us where we are on that. Have they been released, these text messages? Have they disappeared? And and and and, most specifically, is it corruption, not just corrupted.
Speaker 2: That must, a a judge, a court, must decide on that, and therefore But the political action
Speaker 0: can be made. Yeah.
Speaker 2: You are sure. But, Stefan Vivi Vivid for such, EPPO, the prosecutor office in, Luxembourg will Ko On. And with this case, because, also, if there has there a case, still open and to many cases as I as I heard? And but we didn't hear anything about the ongoing of this, this investigation. And, therefore, I am as a political and as an MVP, I am sure There will be no result Yes.
Even not not before the election next year. Yes. And when she when therefore, it's it's only for from to to to to to feel so people feel safe. All the thing all things are working. All systems are working and so on.
But they are all working together in the some sense about and and it's corruption in in the political sense. In the political sense. Really corruption. I'm sure. And it began for me, it began with the origin of SARS CoV 2.
The the origin of SARS CoV 2, I think, is the biggest Ford, the biggest, the
Speaker 0: You mean, you mean, the lab? The the lab here. The lab
Speaker 2: here. Things. Yeah. It's it's really the biggest cover up in in medical history. Yeah.
What what are they doing there? And therefore, it began with a with reports, the system, And it goes on with a corrupt, solution. It's a solution which we which we didn't need. Yeah. And if we we are going on and on and on with with such with such things which we don't need, I was never vaccinated about Vipsis, mRNA technologies, and I'm happy about that.
And I think we the solution will be most more people must see also that things are really deteriorating ratings. They are going wrong and wrong and and and and worse and worse, and then they will wake up. And then they will say, no. Never never more anymore, vaccination, and that will be a good, a good Hussarld for
Speaker 0: one of the purposes, of course, of the yeah.
Speaker 1: Vinam said something, something else which, comes close to what, Joachim Hussain. It is a conditional approval, and then you prolong the approval.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: What you see with this, all these institutions is that they cover each other.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: They're covering, 4 von der Leyen's, SMSes. They're covering for this conditional approval. Now we get this prolongation.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It was addressed by Willem in the Netherlands. How can you prolong a conditional approval. If you have all these data about adverse effects, the same question that we were asking, at the EMA, The answer to Willem is, well, you have to go to the EMA. You don't you can't ask us because we just are just doing what Europe is asking from us.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And that's why you've and that's why you've addressed this letter to the EMA.
Speaker 1: Are responsible in the Netherlands for the the safety of the Dutch people Yeah. And the EMA for the European people. So you see, they're pointing to each other and how do you respond to it? It's and that is also part of this network of covering each other.
Speaker 0: Well, Willem, you were yourself, I believe, arrested
Speaker 3: Four times already.
Speaker 0: Four times. Tell us about that.
Speaker 3: The the Peel case, is continuing. It's What
Speaker 0: were you arrested for?
Speaker 3: For well, the alleged thing is that I have incited Yeah. People to break the law by going to a protest
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Which already is, dictatorial Yeah. On itself, if you do not allow people to call for a protest.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: It's a ridiculous case. Unbelievable. But even in Germany democracy. The In Germany, it's even worse because Michael Baldeck, which organized a lot of protests, he was in prison in the pretrial prison for 9 months, and now they have dropped the case. So they locked up an innocent guy for 9 months.
Speaker 2: Because of alleged fraud. Yeah. Not not because of, participation at an,
Speaker 3: in the rally. Yeah. And and this liberal values. And yes. But but this gaslighting, Ting because I want to allude to the point of, Marcel.
What we see here in this case of the injections and the whole COVID case, you could say, This is an usurping of power by the European Commission. By try trying to circumvent parliament, by trying to create pseudo laws, their, now usurping the power of health. The whole EU for health program, which is based on the one health ideology, is really scary. If we look to the WHO treaty, this is an exponent of what's actually happening here in this house or next door at the commission. So by trying to answer this letter that we wrote to the Dutch version of the EMA, And their answer was telling they said, well, we do not have the authority.
You have to go to Europe Yeah. Which is untrue. In all this European legislation, it clearly states that the end, result or the the the person that is ultimately responsible is the sovereign state itself, and that is a thing that is very worrisome. That with this COVID narrative, The sovereignty is taken away from the states even more.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 3: And and that's why I'm so happy that Now we have a pincher movement in that in that sense that we're doing on a national level and a European level because now they have to keep pointing towards each other, and we are starting a, a law case, a court case against them as well because we want answers.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I mean, the fact of Europe taking sovereignty away from member states. It's not new. They've been doing that for a very, very long time. New route.
But this is a further click in the ratchet, and it is, if you're to be believed, creating at the European level a regime of illegality. Absolutely. If it was, legal, at least you might, to just about find it bearable. What about, Germany? Are you going to, does it are you aware of any initiatives in Germany, to appeal against the the German Health Authority in the way that they have done for the Netherlands.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay. In Germany, I don't know what the situation is about, what my colleagues and, from the AFD Yeah. In Berlin are are doing, but I know that they are really very, outspoken and very, proactive on many cases, on many things, and they had many of the scientists there and and medical professionals and so on into house, into Bundestag, and, therefore, I'm I am very confident that they will do the same or have done it. I don't Oh, no.
It's
Speaker 0: Since Germany is obviously
Speaker 2: the situation.
Speaker 0: Germany is one of the places where the mRNA technology was developed. The Pfizer the for the BioNTech Sure.
Speaker 2: But, Yeah. In some, yeah, in some sense, it was it wasn't Germany, but I think it's mostly in, from the US. Right. And mister Malone
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Still He's still the the the original, inventor of it. And even if now the no the Nobel Prize was given to another, a pair of scientists, which is not which is not the old original inventor. But, okay, we will see. It's Germany. It's I think in Germany, we have a big problem about that.
Some people believe in the state very, very strongly, And, therefore, it's a long way to, to collect all the the the persons who are willing to oppose the system. Zafo. I hope I hope for these things that we, from the European level or from the Dutch level, can help them, yeah, to convince them, to be more outspoken, to be more, frankly and and and and confident to to oppose the the government. Psychologically.
Speaker 1: Sorry. I'm so happy that you call this this Nobel
Speaker 3: Prize
Speaker 1: winners Yes. Because that gives an sort of an illusion of, Well, we gave these doctors, the Nobel Prize for medicine, so that must be a good medicine. Yes. I tell you this. These 2 medical doctors themselves warned in 2018
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. Yes.
Speaker 1: For the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines. They warned themselves. Okay. So let's get rid of this idea that it's that Because they have the Nobel Prize, it's safe. It's not.
Speaker 0: Well, the Nobel Peace Prize, as we've known, those of us who are interested in foreign policy know that it's deeply politicized and has been for a long time. Yeah. And now we see that that's happening in the medical arena as well. Marcel de Gaf, Willem Engel Joachim Kuz. Thank you very much indeed, and thanks for watching.
Goodbye.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
MUST WATCH Documentary that condenses footage from the past three years & effectively illustrates how the world was deceived by the government & media's propaganda.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the importance of COVID-19 vaccination and the consequences of not getting vaccinated. It emphasizes that the unvaccinated pose a greater risk to public health and the potential for new virus mutations. Various speakers express frustration with those who refuse to get vaccinated, citing the need for collective responsibility and protection. They argue that vaccination is necessary to prevent the spread of the virus and protect vulnerable populations. The video also mentions vaccine mandates and restrictions imposed on the unvaccinated in different countries. It concludes with examples of individuals facing job loss for refusing the vaccine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That doesn't mean you shouldn't get boosted, But the real danger isn't the people who have not been vaccinated isn't vaccinated. The vaccinated isn't vaccinated. So that's where we expect if we're going to see a problem this winter, winter, winter, winter, winter.
Speaker 1: But it's gonna take all of us to make that happen. So please don't wait. Get your COVID shot. Get your flu shot. That's why god gave you 2 arms.
That's why god gave you He's not John if you want. And let's do everything we all can to protect the Americans.
Speaker 0: The people Who are most at risk are the unvaccinated. I mean, we have 68% of our population is vaccinated. You know, that means that we have 32% of the population That's not.
Speaker 2: And if you look
Speaker 0: at the data, they are just profoundly striking of the curves of death and hospitalization of
Speaker 3: Creme, it's always a a pleasure to to speak with you. Very you have a very direct stance on Ness, explain.
Speaker 4: Well, I think that anyone who, in this in in in this time of, COVID nineteen, that anyone that does not understand the need for vaccination is, being very responsible. A, for not finding out what it's about and then b, for not doing something about it if they if they find that It's a problem. So, we need to take all the precautions we can in order to not be, vulnerable To to the virus and, anyone who has not made the effort to educate themselves on on this issue really, is irresponsible, And, they should not be allowed to play. Be allowed to play. Be allowed to play.
Be allowed to play.
Speaker 5: A 100,000,000 adults in the United States are now fully vaccinated, which is good, but, unfortunately, more than 1 in 4 say they are not planning to get the vaccine ever. 26% of Americans are planning to skip the shot altogether, which is crazy to me. I get that people are skeptical of politicians or celebrities telling them what
Speaker 2: to do, but we should
Speaker 5: Listen to doctors. These are men and women who've been on the front lines of this thing, risking their lives to save ours, and they're frustrated. And who could blame them? If we don't get more people vaccinated, we could see new mutations of this virus, virus, virus, virus, people
Speaker 6: that live in the in the house. There's still people that don't believe in masks. There's still people out there
Speaker 7: that say, well, we don't have to
Speaker 6: do social distancing and all this kind of stuff. There is misinformation out there. And my point of it was basically look there's no one that knows more about a bias than I do because I studied this issue for 50 years. And the same is also with the virus that people out there that are experts that study this year after year after year and that they Experience, like, the voucher that has been at this, you know, probably for his entire life. I mean, why would you not believe someone like that?
So and there's so many other scientists out there and experts in this subject. So I believe them, and I follow them Very carefully. And, of course, sometimes, things are happening that are unexpected, so then you have to make the adjustments and all that. But I think people should know There is a virus here. It kills people, and the only way we prevent it is is to get vaccinated, to wear masks, to do social distancing, Washing your hands all the time and not just to think about, well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here.
No. Screw your freedom. Screw your freedom. Screw your freedom.
Speaker 8: Jennifer Aniston is not playing around when it comes to being vaccinated. In a new interview for In style's September cover story, the actress said she's ended a few relationships in the past year over anti vaccine stances and opinions. Aniston noted that they were among that quote large group of people who are anti vaxxers, or just don't listen to the vaxx. And while Aniston says people are entitled to their own opinion, the actress noted she feels there should be a moral and professional obligation attached. It's a real shame.
I've just lost a few people in my weekly routine who have refused Or did not disclose whether or not they had been vaccinated, and it was unfortunate. She added, I feel it's your moral and professional obligation to inform Since we're not all potted up and being tested every single day, it's tricky because everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but a lot of opinions don't feel based in anything except fear or propaganda.
Speaker 9: As far as I remember, when I went to school, you had to get a measles vaccine. You had to get a mom's vaccine. You had to get It was a ton of them you got.
Speaker 10: Yes, Julio. Too.
Speaker 11: In order to go to school, you have to have certain vaccines.
Speaker 9: When are we gonna stop putting with the idiots in this country and just say you now it's mandatory to get vaccinated. Them. Their freedom. I want my freedom to live. It's really funny when these radio the radio guys are the best.
Like, 4 of them died. 4 of them, we were, like, ranting on the air, they will not Get vaccinated.
Speaker 12: It felt like the last few years in America, this it's been so obvious the divisions that have been there politically and stuff. But but right now, we're in this moment of people who will take a vaccine and this anti vaxxer movement. Like, how do we What would you say to people who were anti taking a vaccine? What would how would you approach that situation? What would you talk
Speaker 13: It depends on why they're not taking it. I I I I've talked to so many people who aren't taking it because they think they're being injected With a tracking device. Are you kidding me? Do you realize you're walking around with a computer in your hand? You think they're you they've been tracking you since You were 10.
And you think they're gonna inject something in your blood to track you? Seriously? Is that why you're not getting a vaccine? I don't understand that. And when you look that 90% of the people that are dying are not vaccinated, Do the math.
This isn't hard. This is this is this is not chess. It's checkers. You know? This is easy to figure out.
And I have I've had people in families where 1 family member has the vaccination and another one doesn't. They say, how do we resolve that? And that's difficult.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 13: I just try and say to people, look, it's more than about you. Maybe you get the vaccine for other people and not for yourself. You get it so you don't make other people ill. But I I do support getting the vaccination. I've got I've gotten the vaccination.
I support everybody getting the vaccination, and, I hope people do. So do we.
Speaker 14: Manny and I have had this discussion over and over and over again because, You know, both of his parents died from COVID, and so he takes it almost very personally when he has patients come in. And he asked them, are you vaccinated? And they say, No. I'm not because I don't know what's in the vaccine. And he says to them, you know, you're asking me for a court cortisone shot to relieve your pain.
You don't know what's in the cortisone shot, but you Want to be relieved of pain. Yeah. Right? Yes. Yes.
Right. Yes. And and and that's something that you're doing for yourself, Yet you can't be selfless to protect someone else. And I I do find that it's a very selfish thing because, public health is a collaborative effort. You have to be your brother's and your sister's keeper.
So I really struggle with the things that I thing. They never ask what's in the polio vaccine. No. What's in the smallpox? Why does the flu vaccine eat it?
Speaker 11: Do? People do ask what's in the vaccines, and doctors will tell you what's in it. I get agitated because there are 7 year olds who can't get the vaccine. Yeah.
Speaker 15: Yes. Yeah.
Speaker 11: There are people who cannot get the vaccine, and y'all are fooling around. Well, you know, it's my rights. Okay. But I don't care Mhmm. When it comes to killing little Yeah.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 8: Matt Damon is speaking up about COVID nineteen vaccine hesitancy in the US. In a new interview with Yahoo While promoting his upcoming Focus Features prime drama, Stillwater, the actor shared why vaccine hesitancy and achieving herd immunity are personally important to him. Saying, I have a couple of friends who are immunocompromised, and they can't get the vaccine, so they have no choice but to rely on the rest of us to do our part To get to herd immunity, so I look at it that way. According to the Center For Disease Control, as of July 21st, only 48.8 of Americans are fully vaccinated. Damon noted that while people technically have the right to choose whether to take the vaccine, for him, the answer on whether to get vaccinated is very clear, saying, I fall heavily on the side of trusting science more than something you read on Facebook.
Speaker 16: I'm just and I wash my hands. I do everything. I wear a mask. Anyways, they put me in a, like, a waiting area, and it's like a glass Glass office, maybe? Yeah.
It's a tiny desk and a phone, and and you're in and they shut me in there. And they said, someone someone's gonna call you. Yeah. And they left, and I said, oh, man. This is bizarre and sad.
So I texted my assistant and said, please take a photo of me in this Room. And so this is me in the this is true. This is really me in the waiting area,
Speaker 1: if you can see this.
Speaker 16: You can't write this. You can't make it up.
Speaker 5: You're only there for, like, an hour and a half. Right?
Speaker 16: That's Oh,
Speaker 5: yeah. All in.
Speaker 16: So then I call I call my wife. I, you know, I go, that you know, we gotta isolate, and it's right before Christmas. I go, man, this is gonna be crazy.
Speaker 6: What are
Speaker 16: we gonna do? And so, you know, but so they went to, they went upstate with the girls, you know, and I just kinda sat and just isolate, and you get you know, just I did what do you know? I just ordered delivery. They dropped outside the door, you know, whatever. And then, and then I said, you should have the girls testing.
You guys again. They tested, my girls tested positive as well. And they're they're fine. Everyone's fine. They had the sniffles.
Frannie had sniffles for, like, 2 days. Winnie had no no symptoms at all. But that meant I could go home and spend the holidays with the kids, so I did.
Speaker 5: It's a Christmas miracle!
Speaker 16: But anyways, it was, I want to just tell everyone, please, Out there, get vaxxed. If you can, get vaxxed, get boosted because, man, this thing, it's a banger. It's a real thing. I mean, I if I didn't have that, I I know it just felt like I would be real, real, real, real, real sick. So I wanna thank all of my doctors who give me the Vax and boosters are all the nursing, doctors, and workers
Speaker 17: Here in the United States, president Biden is formally announcing today that civilian federal employees must be or face regular testing and follow social distancing guidelines. Google and Facebook have also announce vaccine mandates for workers, and more than 600 universities have announced mandates for students and employees. New York governor Andrew Cuomo announced Wednesday all state hospital employees must be vaccinated with no testing options for the unvaccinated.
Speaker 18: The court has upheld, and department of justice just did a memo that says an employer can mandate An employee get vaccinated. We're taking the first, major step down this road. We're saying in state hospitals where the state is the employer. Employer. The frontline workers must be vaccinated, period.
Period. Period.
Speaker 19: In Germany, the government there is preparing to tighten restrictions on people who've chosen not to be vaccinated against the virus.
Speaker 20: Yeah. Those who refuse the jab could be limited to meeting just one person outside their household and barred from non essential travel.
Speaker 19: So is that a move we should be considering introducing here? Or is it an infringement on basic human
Speaker 20: Joining us now business owner, True Powell. He says very good morning to you both. Professor Ashton, Do you think that vaccine passports are enough and they are being introduced in some places? Or what do you think about a lockdown of the unvaccinated as Austria have done?
Speaker 21: I fear that it might come to that. But, you know, we all need to be playing our part. And at the moment, it's as though the thing's It's over, and we really need to get back to wearing masks, social distancing, and yes, passports. But So, you know, this is not about civil rights. It's about winning the battle for with this virus I'm not throwing in the towel, which is what seems to be being advocated by some of the business community.
Speaker 10: It didn't last long, But it turns out the vaccine passport may have been one of the most effective tools to prevent the spread COVID nineteen, by excluding non vaccinated people from indoor spaces, the risk to everyone likely went down. New research published Monday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal says the unvaccinated have an outsized impact on how quickly the virus spreads. The paper published by researchers in Ontario looks at the theoretical effect of mixing Vaccinated and unvaccinated people. As the 2 groups intermingle more, the risk to the vaccinated goes up And the risk to the unvaccinated goes down. The vaccinated act as a buffer to the spread of the disease.
Despite this strong evidence, according to BC's health minister, there are no plans to bring back the vaccine card that was dropped earlier in April.
Speaker 22: Of course, these public health decisions are always challenging. Right? When we Kept the vaccine card longer than anyone else. We did receive questions as to why are you keeping it longer than anyone else.
Speaker 10: Since the measures were Drop, the public has been left with the task of managing their own risk during the pandemic. While governments across the country roll back societal protections, Infectious disease doctors say the basics still apply.
Speaker 23: There are no provincial mandates. This does not mean That individual responsibility in the era of COVID is gone. This is, this is what is going to make us Survive the spring, survive the summer is if we all realize that COVID is not gone, then there's still
Speaker 24: Anti vaxxers and conspiracy theorists have been slammed for refusing to have the coronavirus vaccine when it becomes available in Australia. While the prime minister's accepted, it will be hard to make it mandatory. There are increasing calls for there to be consequences To though for those who refuse the jab, the government has warned it won't rule out strict measures for those who do not comply.
Speaker 25: TONIGHT, new misery in the metrics as the numbers trend in the wrong direction. Fuelled by the highly contagious Delta variant And unvaccinated Americans, new infections are spiking 70%. Hospitalizations climbing 36% As deaths rise 26%.
Speaker 26: This is becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated unvaccinated un Vaccinated. Unvaccinated.
Speaker 27: Tomorrow, only those who are fully vaccinated can travel anywhere in Canada. That's nearly 85 5% of the eligible population. Today, there were more than 2,500 infections and 23 deaths nationwide. As CTV's Annie Bergeron Oliver reports 10 months after Canada's 1st COVID nineteen shot, vaccine status will be the ticket to travel.
Speaker 28: Has recorded the highest COVID-nineteen positivity rate yet at 29.7%. The rise in infections has now seen the government invoke the access to public spaces. The Ministry of Health has also confirmed that the omicron buyer variant, I beg your pardon, is now the dominant variant in the country. Helen Aura
Speaker 29: While Kenyans gear up for the Christmas and New Year festivities, and with the coronavirus spreading at a record Speed, the Ministry of Health has warned that those who are still unvaccinated against COVID nineteen will be denied access to in person government services. Proof of vaccination will be required to access government services as well as in the following settings. Organized events such as weddings, funerals, receptions, parties, conferences, sports, indoor concerts, And theaters. Licensed hotels, restaurants and cafes. Pubs, bars, and lounges.
Nightclubs, casinos, and movie theaters. Game parks and game reserves, museums, supermarkets, shopping malls, and indoor markets, banking holds, and in the transport service.
Speaker 30: Each establishment or facility shall be required to nominate or designate a person responsible for verifying vaccination certificates at all Facility access points. Any person who has received his or her vaccination can access it through the Change your system through the portal at health.ge0.ke.
Speaker 29: Kenya has today recorded the highest positivity rate At a concerning 29.7%.
Speaker 31: For the unvaccinated, the message is this. The measures that have been pronounced will be food will be implemented. So if you want to have a safe Christmas and New Year, Get vaccinated before you go while you are going because you may get stuck. You may not be able to board a vehicle back, or you may not be able to I'd rather hotel you are going to because those measures will be implemented.
Speaker 2: That is on the 17th December. All The all the samples sequenced turned out to be the omicron variant. So basically now
Speaker 29: A letter from the secretary of the national assembly has indicated that Several members of parliament and staff have tested positive for COVID nineteen and have been urged to isolate. However, the letter did not specify the number. With only 3,700,000 Kenyans being fully vaccinated, Kenyans are being urged to get the COVID nineteen job as a preventive and protective measure against the virus. Helen Aoura,
Speaker 32: NTV. Well, unvaccinated Sydneysiders could be locked Out of some venues for longer than they thought, Charles Croucher is at Panthers in Penrith for us tonight. Charles, what will the rules be there?
Speaker 33: Pete Panthers will keep their no jab, no entry policy until the end of January. Now, crucially, that includes Christmas, New Years, and the entirety of the School holidays. They say they are doing this because the health of their staff and their guests are their number one priority. But that date is well beyond the Perrottet government's Plans to treat all New South Wales residents the same by December 15. And tonight, Pete, there is a real possibility that there are more Bays and restaurants and pubs and clubs weighing up whether to keep the unvaccinated locked out for longer.
Speaker 32: Charles, thank you.
Speaker 2: So December is to be declared as a month of masturbation, and it will be launched by the honorable minister on 30th November 2020. Well, that's Tuesday coming. There are areas where the mandate will cover. That will be a venue. And this venue for now includes nightclubs, beaches, sports stadium, and restaurants for indoor dining.
And these are areas that you mean that you need to be vaccinated before you can go into this this venue. Since the beginning of pandemic, we have received About 12,000,000,327 doses of vaccines of various sites, more than 7,400,000 that are supposed to come in between now and probably December. That would take us about 20,000,000 doses of vaccines that we have received in the country before the end of the year.
Speaker 34: A pretty strong message from the CDC now asking unvaccinated people to not travel at all. We are in one of The highest COVID surges of the pandemic. Right now, the US is surpassing an average of a 160,000 new cases a day. The CDC now warning, if You are unvaccinated. You should not leave home, period.
Saying with all this expected travel, anyone not protected by the shot is at high risk for contracting COVID. We have
Speaker 15: hit a wall when it comes to vaccinations in this country. We're just not going to get even where close to the vaccine levels that we need In order to prevent another surge of, of coronavirus in the development of new mutations and new variants over time, Really what we need to do is to make a decision as a society. I mean, we have laws, for example, against drunk driving. You can drink in your home or in private if you would like, but we have a law saying that if you want to get behind a wheel where you could potentially endanger other people, then that's not allowed. That's against the standards of conduct in our society.
I think at some point, we need to make similar decision about the vaccine. You can remain unvaccinated if you so choose, but if you want to be in public and potentially Could be infecting others with a dangerous and sometimes fatal disease that's highly transmissible, then There is an obligation of society. I mean, I think you could have it opt out the way that France, for example, or Italy and other countries are doing, saying that if you want to be in bars, restaurants, movie theaters, etcetera, either be vaccinated or have proof of a recent negative test. I hope that we move in that direction as a country here because at the end of the day, I don't really understand why People have the choice to be infecting, our vulnerable children or immunocompromised people or even others who have taken the responsible choice to get
Speaker 35: Suck in our 3rd major surge of COVID nineteen, political reporter Rick Albin asked governor Whitmer about our state's pandemic response. She made it clear that this that has our hospitals pushed to the brink lies at the feet of the people who refuse to get vaccinated.
Speaker 36: So I'm frustrated. I'm frustrated just like every in this state, in this country, and probably around the globe is that we are still battling this virus. We have what it takes to beat it. If more people would get vaccinated, we would all be better off. I've been in close contact with our hospital leaders.
None is suggesting that I start, you know, utilizing these blunt tools we had to before we had vaccines. But every one of them is recognizing and and alerting communities that the more unvaccinated people that are filling beds because they've got COVID, the More it undermines all of our ability to know that we can get health care if we need it. You know, I was in Pontiac, at McLaren Thanking the nurses and doctors and all the incredible people that tended to the victims of the Oxford shooting. This is a group of people that have, for 2 years, been on the frontline. They are exhausted.
They are, You know, their workforce is thin because so many have left. We can't afford to let this go unabated it. But the solution is trying to get more people vaccinated, trying to keep people out of the hospital. You get COVID to look into monoclonal antibodies, so you stay that group of people to get vaccinated, and that's who we who we really need to focus on.
Speaker 35: This morning, it's a race against time for DJ Ferguson and his family.
Speaker 26: My son's in the hospital. He's in, cardiac crisis.
Speaker 35: The 31 year old father of 2 with a 3rd baby on the way Desperately needs a heart transplant. But his mother says Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston says DJ can't receive an organ donation because he won't get a COVID vaccine. In a statement, Brigham and Women's Hospital says they require several CDC recommended vaccines, including the COVID nineteen vaccine, to create both the best chance For a successful operation and to optimize the patient's survival. Health experts tell us vaccination requirements are standard procedure, given the risks to transplant patients and the scarcity of available organs.
Speaker 36: All I remember feeling was, What are we gonna do? Where do we go now?
Speaker 35: Right now, more than 100,000 men, women, and children are on the national transplant waiting list. Tragically, 17 Americans die each day waiting for an organ transplant. Back in Boston, Tracy isn't sure what will happen next.
Speaker 26: I would want the doctors is to treat the patient, not the policy.
Speaker 37: Austria's government has approved a new lockdown, which will only apply to unvaccinated people. Starting at midnight on Sunday, the government said people who haven't been vaccinated will only be allowed to leave their homes for essential reasons, such as working, shopping, or taking a walk. The lockdown is intended to push more people to get the jab against COVID nineteen. Now Austria's decision comes just 2 days after the Netherlands announced a partial lockdown for all residents. Austria has one of the lowest vaccination rates In Western Europe, together with chancellor Alexander Schellenberg, interior minister Karl Niehammer held a press conference a short while ago.
Here's what he had
Speaker 0: to say.
Speaker 38: As of tomorrow, every citizen, every person living in Austria must be aware that they be checked by the police at any time. Among other things, we will also check if people have been or recovered and the reason for entering public spaces.
Speaker 26: Bey is one of 13 Red Cross health care workers on active duty in Alberta. Outside resources coming in to help just as some workers within the province are choosing to resign. On October 31st, all Alberta Health Services employees will be required to have 2 doses of the COVID nineteen vaccine, and not everyone is willing to comply. AHS says that out of more than 108,000 workers, 92% have now submitted proof of vaccination. But there are 1200 employees seeking an exemption to the vaccine mandate, either for medical or religious reasons.
61 workers have resigned because of the policy, including 31 clinical staff.
Speaker 39: We stand by the policy, and it will be fully implemented. This vaccine requirement is essential to ensure the safety of our people, the patients, and vulnerable
Speaker 26: Last week, with concern mounting its mandatory policy could lead to health care shortages, Quebec pushed back its deadline. In Manitoba, there are 158 health workers on unpaid leave for refusing the vaccine. And across the country, legal challenges to similar policies are before courts and human rights commissions.
Speaker 40: Well, Heather, no shot in the arm and no paycheck in your bank account. Some Large companies and private employers are requiring workers to be vaccinated, and if they're not, they're out the door. The nation's top doctors say the COVID vaccine Safe and effective, but some people are still not comfortable getting the shot. So if you're in this situation, I'm taking a look at your legal rights and if anyone out there is willing The higher
Speaker 41: you. Justice department has made it clear that it is legal to require COVID nineteen vaccines.
Speaker 40: In July, president Biden began rolling out vaccination requirements for federal employees and contractors and calling on employers to do the same.
Speaker 41: We all want our Lives you get back to normal, and fully vaccinated workplaces will will make that happen more quickly
Speaker 40: And more successfully. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, more than a third of unvaccinated workers say they would leave their job if their employer required a vaccination or testing. Some companies across the country are firing workers for refusing to comply with vaccine mandates.
Speaker 42: Any other weekday, Paula Amoroso would be on shift making sure patrons don't damage priceless works of art At a museum in Rome. Instead, she's at a protest against Italy's latest COVID nineteen restriction. To go to work, it's now required for All Italians over the age of 50 to get their COVID nineteen vaccine, something 61 year old Amarozo refuses to do.
Speaker 43: They're stealing my job, part of my life. It's disoriented me. The bills haven't started arriving yet. But when they do, What then?
Speaker 42: Italy's latest COVID nineteen restriction took effect on Tuesday, meaning around a half 1000000 Vaccinated workers over 50 are barred from going to work or receiving sick pay. For months, Italy has increased restrictions on the unvaccinated. 1st, they were barred from restaurants and other venues. Now their very livelihoods and income are at risk for refusing the jab.
Speaker 43: You were fired for not getting the jab. This is what's happening to some farm workers in the Western Cape who are now facing a bleak Christmas.
Speaker 1: And this is what we're gonna be seeing as we go into the New Year. Now these workers were given several opportunities, we understand, to be vaccinated, but they chose not to do so. So how did we get here? Here's Asha Ismail.
Speaker 44: Standing up for your rights
Speaker 43: can get you fired. This is the hard lesson these farm workers had to learn. And while COVID nineteen vaccinations are not mandatory yet, It seems some companies and industries are already taking a no vaccine, no job approach.
Speaker 45: New Zealand has announced a no jab, no job policy for most health care workers and teachers. Doctors, nurses, and other frontline health workers must be fully vaccinated by the start of December. People working in the education sector must have their 2 doses by the new year. The government says it is not leaving anything to chance As it prepares to live with COVID nineteen, infections are on a downward trend. Auckland has registered 35 new cases, down from 60 yesterday.
Speaker 7: Zimbabwe's Justice Minister, has told the government workers who do not want to be vaccinated against COVID nineteen should resign. The country has so far vaccinated 2,700,000 people against a target of inoculating at least 2 thirds of 15,000,000 population by the end of the year. President Emmerson Mnangagwa's government says that it has paid 1,000,000 for COVID-nineteen doses from China. Have a responsibility to protect the public by getting COVID nineteen shots.
reSee.it AI Summary
Canadian government recommends grade six vaccines. We used to trust vaccines, but recent doubts made us skip our daughter's schedule. No more putting anything in our children's bodies without scrutiny. Trust destroyed.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
My daughter is due for her grade six vaccine schedule as per the #Canadian government’s recommendations. We’ve never been against vaccines until recently. I’ve travelled extensively and have received many vaccines over time. Nonetheless, we have decided to forgo my daughter’s vaccine schedule. Trust is 100% destroyed. They don’t get to put anything in my children’s body anymore without an extreme amount of scrutiny.
