TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @LionelMedia
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
This can't be true, can it? https://t.co/OZmdGRd35Z
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the exchange, Speaker 0 questions whether the other is maintaining that there were no planes that hit the World Trade Center. Speaker 1 clarifies that this is not the claim they are making; rather, there is no significant wreckage from a large Boeing crash at any of the four events. This framing emphasizes a distinction between the presence of aircraft impact and the apparent absence of substantial debris.
Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 saw the videotape that others saw, prompting a response that encourages a frame-by-frame analysis of the South Tower. Speaker 1 asserts that what you will see is a “fake, a cartoon display,” arguing that an aluminum airplane cannot pass through a building like the South Tower as if it were thin air. In other words, Speaker 1 contends that the footage demonstrates a simulated or cartoon-like depiction rather than a real-time account of an aircraft penetrating the structure.
Following this, Speaker 0 probes whether Speaker 1 is suggesting that the news media was involved in this fabrication, indicating a belief that media sources contributed to the apparent display. Speaker 1 affirms the suggestion by stating “Yes,” and notes that there was only one so-called real-time film, adding that “we don’t really understand how they did that.” This introduces a claim of media involvement and a mystery surrounding the production of the visible footage, implying manipulation or concealment of the true events.
The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 mentioning that there are “video ex” (likely beginning to refer to video evidence or explanations) but the thought is cut off, leaving an incomplete reference to further material or evidence that would support the previous claims about the nature of the footage and the method by which it was produced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, you say, for example, that there that there were no planes that hit the the the World Trade Center. Is that is that your contention?
Speaker 1: No. What I say is that there were no air a big Boeing crashes at every all four events. There's no significant wreckage, for example.
Speaker 0: Well, did you see the videotape that the rest of us saw?
Speaker 1: Sure. And I encourage everybody to, do a a frame by frame penetration of the South Tower, and what you will see is a fake, a cartoon display. Because a plane cannot an aluminum plane cannot go through a building like the a the South Tower was as if it were thin air.
Speaker 0: You're saying right through. You're suggesting if that there's some kind of cartoon animation there, you're suggesting that the news media was a part of this. Yes, sir. Came from the news media.
Speaker 1: Yes. Well, there was only one so called real time, film, and, we don't really understand how they did that. There are video ex
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Nothing odd—just the BBC announcing the collapse of WTC 7 twenty minutes early… while it’s clearly still standing behind the reporter. Totally normal. Nothing to question. Move along, citizen. https://t.co/LnkRnt1Qz5
Video Transcript AI Summary
At 10 PM London time on September 11, corresponding to 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, the BBC reported the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building, also known as Building 7. A BBC correspondent stated the collapse was due to the building being weakened by the morning's attacks. However, Building 7 did not actually collapse until 5:20 PM New York time. The building was visible behind the reporter during the live broadcast before its reported collapse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: September 11, there was worldwide live television coverage and the coverage continued throughout the day. The interesting thing is that at 10PM London time, which is 5PM eastern standard time, they reported that the Solomon Brothers Building, Building 7 had collapsed. The only problem is Building 7 didn't collapse until 05:20PM New York time.
Speaker 1: Now, more on the latest building collapse New York. You might have heard a few moments ago, I was talking about the Salomon Brothers Building collapsing, and indeed it has. Apparently, that's only a few 100 yards away from where the World Trade Center Towers were. And it seems that this was not a result of a new attack. It was because the building had been weakened during this morning's attacks.
We'll probably find out more now about that from our correspondent Jane Stanley. Jane, what more can you tell us about the Salomon Brothers building and its collapse?
Speaker 2: Well, only really what you already know. Details are very, very sketchy. There's almost a sense downtown in New York behind me, down by the World Trade Centers of just an area completely closed off as the rescue workers try to do their job. As you can see behind me, the, trade center
Speaker 0: Building 7 is clearly visible right behind the reporter. It wasn't until 05:20 eastern time that it came down.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Bookmark this. Keep this. Remember this. Watch it often. Memorize it. Learn it. Understand it. Grasp it. Believe it. And never forget it. Ever. This is the truth. The truth that's kept from you. MSM and [SG] ghouls never want you to know the truth. They want war. And death. https://t.co/zQDXTHMCPy
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, the conflict in Ukraine began in 1990 when James Baker allegedly told Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move "one inch eastward" if he agreed to German unification. The US then supposedly cheated on this agreement, starting in 1994 under Clinton, with plans to expand NATO to Ukraine. NATO expansion began in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic.
The US bombing of Serbia in 1999 was another point of contention. In 2002, the US unilaterally withdrew from the anti-ballistic missile treaty, leading to missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia perceived as a threat. The US allegedly participated in the overthrow of Yanukovych in 2014. Putin repeatedly asked the US to stop NATO enlargement, especially after Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia joined in 2004.
In December 2021, Putin proposed a Russia-US security agreement based on no NATO enlargement, but the White House rejected negotiations, maintaining an "open door policy" for NATO. After the special military operation began, Zelensky initially signaled openness to neutrality, but the US and Britain allegedly encouraged continued fighting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990. 02/09/1990, James Baker the third, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move one inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War two. And, Gorbachev said that's very important. Yes.
NATO doesn't move, and we agreed to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a, basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power, and, Clinton was the agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic. At that point, Russia didn't much care.
There was no border other than with the Konigsberg, but other than that, there was no direct threat. Then, The US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, seventy eight straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much. But Putin became president.
They swallowed it. They complained. But, even Putin started out pro European, pro American actually asked, maybe we should join NATO when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. Then nine eleven came, then came Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah, we'll support you. We understand to root out terror.
But then came two other decisive actions. In 02/2002, The United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. This was probably the most decisive event never discussed in this context, but what it did was trigger The US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat. In February, 04/05, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine. But in 02/2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president, and in 02/2010, on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine.
That calmed things down because The US was pushing NATO, but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even wanna be a NATO. They knew that the country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian. What do we want with this? We wanna stay away from your problems. So in 02/22/2014, The United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych, a typical US regime change operation, have no doubt about it.
And the Russians did us a favor. They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my colleague at Columbia University now, between her and, The US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piot, who's a senior state department official till today, and they talked about regime change. They said, who's gonna be the next government? All of this is to say, The US then said, okay. Now NATO's really gonna enlarge, and Putin kept saying, stop.
You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been by the way, I forgot to mention in 02/2004, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovia, Slovakia, Slovenia, seven more countries in the not one inch eastward. And then okay. It's a long story, but The US kept rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems after breaking a treaty. 2019, we walked out of the intermediate nuclear force treaty.
On 12/15/2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. You can find it online. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement. I called the White House that next week after that, begging them, take the negotiations. Putin's offered something.
Avoid this war. Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war. Announce that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge.
I said, oh, you're gonna have a war over something that's not gonna happen? Why don't you announce them? And he said, no. No. Our policy is an open door.
This is Jake Sullivan. Our policy is an open door policy. Open door for NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit, by the way. You don't have your right to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world.
They turned down the negotiations, then the special military operation started, and five days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. Neutrality. And then The United States and Britain said, no way. You guys fight on.
We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die. But we got your back as we kept pushing them into the front lines. That's six hundred thousand deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Go ahead. Try to explain this. https://t.co/TxFOvPXb5S
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Brooklyn Bridge is crashing. Sales are hitting great. Something is going on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Crashing to the Brooklyn Bridge. It's totally crashing. Look. Look. The sales are hitting great.
It was. Look. Oh god. Oh my god. What is going on?
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
For the love of God. This is not coke and that is not a coke spoon. Jesus. https://t.co/Hs4qNrC2Yh
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Obama resettled 70,000 Somalis in Minnesota, mostly in the Fifth District—now flagged by the FBI as the nation’s top terror recruitment zone. It’s also Ilhan Omar’s district, and she wants to dismantle Homeland Security. Still think it’s coincidence? https://t.co/PQkJlcMs1a
Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Ilhan Omar is accused of treasonous statements made at a Minneapolis event on January 27, 2024. It is claimed she told Somalians that the US government will do what Somalians in the US tell them to do, and that she is in Congress to protect Somalia's interests from inside the US system. These statements are said to violate her oath of office to defend the US Constitution. The resolution calls for Representative Omar to be censured, present herself in the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure, and be removed from the Committee on the Budget and the Committee on Education and the Workforce. It is asserted that Representative Omar has revealed herself to be a foreign agent acting on behalf of Somalia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Follows. Recognized. Centuring representative Ilhan Omar of Somali I mean, Minnesota. Whereas elected members of congress take an oath to bear true faith and allegiance to The United States without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. Whereas representative Ilhan Omar took an oath of allegiance to The United States upon becoming a citizen declaring, I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen.
Whereas on 01/27/2024, representative Omar gave remarks at an event in Minneapolis in which she made treasonous statements. Whereas representative Omar said she has spoken to many Somalians who asked her to intercede for the Somali government by pressuring the United States government into certain actions. Whereas representative Omar assured the Somalian she spoke to, the US government will only do what Somalians in The US tell them to do. They will do what we want and nothing else. They must follow our orders and that is how we will safeguard the interest of Somalia.
Whereas representative Omar continued, for as long as I am in US Congress, Somalia will never be in danger. Its waters will not be stolen by Ethiopia or others. Sleep in comfort knowing I am here to protect the interest of Somalia from inside The US system. Whereas George Washington warned in his farewell address of 1796 to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism and further declared citizens by birth or choice of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations.
Whereas these statements by representative Omar clearly violate the oath she took as an elected member of congress to defend and protect The United States constitution. Whereas representative Omar has exhibited the treasonous tendencies George Washington warned about. And her actions must be condemned by all members of congress who adhere to the oath they took upon assuming office. And whereas by openly admitting her efforts to advance Somalia's interest using her position as a United States Representative, Representative Omar has revealed herself to be a foreign agent acting on behalf of a foreign government. Now therefore be it resolved that representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota be censured.
Representative Ilhan Omar forthwith present herself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure. Representative Ilhan Omar be censured with the public reading of this resolution by the speaker and representative Ilhan Omar be and is hereby removed from the committee of the budget and the committee on education and the workforce.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
If ever you're on Tucker's show let him make your case for you. It's a tremendously important technique that makes you look humbled and emphasizes the degree of your victimization. This is superb. https://t.co/vpzYxfSviJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alex Jones believes federal agencies are trying to destroy him because he predicted 9/11, specifying planes flying into the World Trade Centers and blaming Osama bin Laden. Jones claims he researched false flag attacks and saw preprogramming in the news. He says he knew Bin Laden was a CIA asset and that the FBI had previously tried to bomb the World Trade Center.
Jones says the CIA gave the plot of planes hitting the World Trade Center to the X-Files spin-off, The Lone Gunman. He says predictions aren't really predictions, but admissions. Jones says the UN planned to use disease acts to bring in a global system. He says Fauci and others created COVID-19 and moved it to Wuhan.
Jones says he's taking globalists at their word. He says he's listening to people he disagrees with. He says the globalists admit 99% of their plans. Jones says he's trying to get people to see what he's pointing out. He says the globalists are at the adult table, and the general public is at the kids' table. Jones says the globalists are collapsing, and a new international order is forming. He says this is a spiritual revolution. He says people must choose a side.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So I want to impose my theory on you, and you tell me what you think. So for the past fifteen years, I've been watching the feds, the FBI, the DOJ try to destroy you, and I've watched as no group of gatekeepers or whistleblower protectors or journalistic, you know, ethics guardians have defended you on First Amendment grounds, which is pretty shocking. But the question has always been, why are the feds so intent on taking you out? And here's my theory.
So the February, you go on TV, time stamped, and say they're gonna someone's gonna fly planes in the World Trade Centers. They're gonna blame Osama bin Laden. Call the Bush White House. Warn them. You basically called 911 in detail.
You're the only one who did, and we can prove that. It's not a guess. We have the tape. I've played the tape. 09:11 happens in September.
There's a nine eleven commission immediately impaneled. They go and interview a bunch of people in the US government and outside and ask, like, were there signs of this was happening? They don't interview you. You're the one guy who predicted it in public. You're the only guy who predicted it in public, and no one calls you to ask, how the hell did you know that?
Which is the obvious question. Then they set about trying to destroy you rather than, like, hailing you as a prophet or at least asking the question, how the hell did Alex Jones know in detail this was coming? Like, how did you know? They never even asked you. And then they they mobilized DOJ and FBI against you, and I I think there's a connection between those two facts.
Speaker 1: Well, there certainly is. I'd already been researching false flag attacks, not just by our government, but other governments throughout history. The Gulf Of Tonkin to get us into Vietnam in '64 that was later declassified to have been staged. And, of course, The US's liberty between Israel and the Lyndon Baines Johnson administration wanted to get us into full war with Egypt, but the ship survived, became the most decorated ship in US history because of the valiance of the crew. And operation Ajax where the CIA and Kermit Roosevelt in '53 overthrew Mohammed Mosaddegh, who was a reformist and really pro west, but he wouldn't give them all the oil.
And they use radical Islamists to overthrow him and then put the shah in and then overthrew the shah. Over and over again, there's just hundreds and hundreds of historical real case examples of that being done by our government and other governments. And I saw a lot of preprogramming in the news. Oh, someone Bin Laden's gonna get us when he gets us. We need to give up all of our rights, and it'll be a new America, and we've gotta set up this police state.
So so I saw a lot of preprogramming.
Speaker 0: And But you called the specifics you called the specifics of nine eleven. I just can't get past that. And I've asked you in public and private, how did you do that? I've never gotten really a straight answer. I doubt I will now, but the fact remains the incontrovertible fact, the provable fact that you called it, and then they began a campaign against you.
And it's not because you're a racist. You've never been a racist or an antisemite or a crazy person, actually. You've never spewed hate, but you have for, you know, thirty years said the foundations of our system are actually kind of fake and rotten, and it's but it was 09/11. That's when they decide that's when they really decided this guy has to be stopped, and and just basically eliminated the first amendment to stop you.
Speaker 1: Well well, just to be clear, it's not that I'm dodging how I knew it. That was twenty four years ago, and I I remember what I was covering and what I was doing at the time. And everybody's seen the July 25, where I went into detail, but but but actually my crew using Chad GPT scanning through all my old shows, found shows in April, and even before that in March where I get more specific, and I said the CIA is gonna fly planes into the World Trade Centers and blame it on Bin Laden.
Speaker 0: So I just think that's the most amazing fact I've ever heard in my entire life that you call that, and and we again, we can prove it because it's on tape with time stamps. And everyone's like, oh, yeah. Okay. Alex Jones is crazy. I hate her.
Okay. Whatever. And I think that's true, but you called 911, and no investigator ever called you to ask you how you called that? How you knew that? Not one.
No. No one from DOJ, Philip Zelikow of the nine eleven Commission No.
Speaker 1: You? Why? And well, I mean, obviously because certain segments of our intelligence agencies with other foreign intelligence agencies were tracking the supposed hijackers. They were being trained in US military bases. They were being given government money from our government and other governments.
They were being protected. Then two of their magic passports, all that rubble and hundreds of millions pieces of paper were found the next day to then connect them to it. It was all laid out. Then the Bin Laden family was thrown up was flown out of the country in the days after, and that was basically shut down in the news. You know, it was covered some locally here in Florida.
So I knew that Bin Laden had been CIA going back to really the Mujahideen being set up by Zbigniew Brzezinski and Jimmy Carter, then Reagan took that over. And then they kinda build that as blowback, but even recently, you've seen the USAID information and and and other documents come out in the Institute for Peace where they're directly paying massive amounts of money to Taliban, to Al Qaeda, to ISIS even in the last few years.
Speaker 0: Oh,
Speaker 1: yeah. And they use them as these proxy armies. So so that was well known in the research circles that that that Bin Laden was basically a multinational cutout used by Western intelligence agencies to destabilize areas, but also be a boogeyman. Then you see CNN in a mountain cave magically being able to find him, The US can't kill him and nobody else can. And I knew that CNN is literally the, you know, CIA broadcasting system.
For sure. Total mockingbird, thoroughbred. And there were hundreds and hundreds of points that went in, but okay, Bin Laden's work for the CIA and you got CNN interviewing him, and and and they're all scaring us saying he's about to attack us. And then I remembered how Ahmad Salam, who was an Egyptian intelligence agency operative working for the FBI and CIA, was hired to build a bomb in the early nineties to blow up the World Trade Center. But then when they said build a real bomb, he started recording them because he he sort of figured out it was a setup.
And then he had that press conference where he played it. I interviewed him a few times where where the FBI said, no. Just go ahead and let it go forward. And so you start adding all that together. They'd already tried to hit the World Trade Center before.
The World Trade Center had a lot of, issues in it with asbestos and also some of the structural issues. So they're already wanting to have a plan to get rid of it. And then you have the CIA and FBI in the Solomon Brothers Building, Building 7, the 47 story skyscraper. You have that right next door. So I looked at all of it and I thought where would the new Pearl Harbor be?
And the year before in, the project for American Century headed up by Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, Dick Cheney wrote in there that we need a new Pearl Harbor event to launch the Pax Americana, but it wasn't an American empire of freedom and liberty and justice like Trump's trying to, you know, launch. It was a globalist empire of military enforcement and tyranny. And so there was a lot of other data points that went into it. Cheney also writes in that same document, we need to look at, you know, race specific bioweapons to to have control and bring in our power, and that was actually picked up in the newspapers.
Speaker 0: I but I okay. So these are not minor issues. These this is these are like the biggest things happening in the world, the most important things happening in the world, and the end of one system ushering in of a new system, millions in the end died because of all of this, millions. And what you're on, like, cable access in Texas figuring this out. Like, where is everybody else?
I don't understand. Like, I don't where I worked at CNN at the time. I don't and we had a as you said, Peter Bergen went and interviewed Bin Laden. I'm not attacking Peter Bergen, But, like, how come you were the only one who figured this out?
Speaker 1: Yeah. By that time, I started out in '94 as a guest on Access TV and then my own show about '95, but I I was on local talk radio. I just started getting know, I've been syndicated a few years then, but I
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: But I mean, but you're right. I was on Access TV as well, and and and that's where
Speaker 0: the thing You were, like, way out on the fringe, and all the people at the very center of our business, journalism, like, they didn't see or didn't talk publicly about any of this. Like, none of this.
Speaker 1: Well, I saw Gary Hart on with another guest.
Speaker 0: Gary Hart, the former presidential candidate, senator from Colorado?
Speaker 1: I think it was the Hart Rubin Commission. Yeah. I saw him in congress with testimony earlier that year and also saw him on, I believe it was CNN or maybe it was Chris Matthews, MSNBC, but but the clip's famous, and they say the world's about to change. There's about to be big things happening. You know, big big attacks.
Speaker 0: When when was this?
Speaker 1: It was a it was in early July.
Speaker 0: Oh, it
Speaker 1: was before 09:11. Yes. And and and that's and they were very specific, so I should find that clip. You can crowdsource that. And that was the final catalyst because they were basically telling the establishment very thinly veiled what was about to go on.
So I sat back, I looked at it, and I thought years later, how did I come up with that? So I don't just say a bunch of stuff, then most of those come true. I'm very specific on predictions, almost all of them have come true. I thought that it was the spin off of the X Files, and I wasn't even an X Files fans, rarely watched it, called The Lone Gunman that it turns out had come out in the February that that I didn't even learn about because there wasn't, you know, Facebook and Twitter and X back then. So if you didn't watch those entertainment shows, you didn't know about it.
And then at six months or so after 09:11, listeners start saying, have you seen this? And I had listeners send me VHS recordings off Fox TV of this episode where a criminal group in the US government hijacks a jumbo jet in New York to fly it in the World Trade Center to blame it on a Central Asian terrorist show that they have a pretext to take it over domestically with a police state and launch wars in The Middle East.
Speaker 0: Wait. This was on the X Files?
Speaker 1: Yes. This was on the X Files. And and so later, I thought maybe I got it from that, but then we found tapes even earlier a month before that came out where I was already had put it together on the radio. But but but here's what's crazy. Then I got reached out by by some of the host of The X Files saying, hey.
Chris Carter told us that the CIA came to him with the plot of this and asked him some of the scripts that they would ask him as a favor to put this in as a TV program. And then later, I corresponded with Chris Carter via email. He talked about this in the, news, like, in in entertainment publications about, oh, Alex Jones is a really good guy. Then when they rebooted in 02/2016 again, he talked about the talk show host characters based on me. So I've I've talked to him, some of his crew, but he said, no.
I don't know why the CIA, you used to interview him, came to me and and said, here's the script for this show. So so it wasn't just Alex Jones saying that a government agency was gonna hijack a jet, fly the World Trade Center. The x files, spin off, lone gunman, one of its main episodes was about that specific story.
Speaker 0: This is just crazy. So I often get, you know, people I know say
Speaker 1: Oh, and they remote control and hijack the jet, the good guys, and keep it from crashing the World Trade Center. So why would why would the CIA come to Chris Carter and say we want you to write this, and then and then it's released months and months before 09:11? So so so I'm not the only one. It was in the collective unconsciousness. I mean, I I mean, I don't know.
But, I mean, I said two weeks before they've shot Trump in Butler, I I went on air, and I said they're gonna try to shoot him at a at a rally. I mean, that was that's obvious to see how desperate they were. All the law fair didn't work. I mean, a lot of this is just studying how they operate. But being so much of it now is John Podesta in August 2020, New York Times wrote about it, had a big war game with top Democrats.
And they said, if Trump wins, if they weren't able to steal it, in my view, then then we're gonna have civil war conditions. We're gonna have blue states secede, blue cities, and we're gonna use social issues to foment a rebellion that we're gonna basically frame as racial, George Floyd on steroids, you know, 10 o, and then we're gonna drive Trump from office. Well, they were able to steal it in my view. The evidence I think is overwhelming, they didn't use that plan. Well, they started talking about that plan again in the months before this last election, last year.
So so so much so much of what I'm able to predict isn't really prediction. They admit it. I mean, the UN said for twenty years, we're gonna use disease acts to bring in a global system, a global central magnificent currency, a global social credit score, a global, vaccine ID that'll be used as the global Internet ID, global taxation ID. That's official Bill Gates, the UN, all these big bodies preparing how they'd roll this out. You know, the Rockefeller Foundation with Operation Lockstep two thousand ten, two thousand eleven describing locking down the sports stadiums, locking in your houses six feet apart, wearing mask for fear.
I mean, that's and then Bush, George w had that in the BioShield program that passed in, what, 2,005 where they sent out kits, millions of them to everybody into the Red Cross with the six feet apart, with the mask, with all the stuff, but they didn't launch the the bioattack scare that they had, I think, locked and loaded. Then they waited till twenty twenty. So basically,
Speaker 0: you're just taking them at their word. You're just paying you're doing what I don't do enough, which is listen to people I disagree with and sincerely try to assess what they're saying.
Speaker 1: Mean Yeah. Fauci just said last week, a much worse, way higher morbidity. It's respiratory. It's common. And you got hotes.
Oh, don't worry. Trump's gonna have a big problem. It's gonna come crashing in on him. We'll see how he tries to reboot the economy. And then, you know, then you learn Fauci and all of them are involved with with Obama and Chapel Hill and North Carolina creating COVID nineteen.
It was a big scandal 02/2015, gain of function SARS, and then they move it to Wuhan at plausible deniability so they can kinda blame the Chinese that they want. I'm not saying the Chinese are good. The communist Chinese are terrible. It was kind of a joint project. And and and then then they roll it out, then they've got their so called shot.
It's mRNA. I mean, this stuff is all very well planned. And so when you see him up there lying going, no, Senator Paul, it is you that is wrong. No gain of function. Then it's in all his emails.
This is gain of function, and he has public symposiums, you know, in defense of gain of function. I mean, he's mister gain of function. If he was a superhero, he would just, know, have gain of function on his chest and and the back of his cape. And he's like, I don't know anything about that. And so, I mean, these guys just treat us like children.
And so they kept saying, we're gonna use a virus. We're gonna use a scare to bring in our local government. I mean, mean, I remember Blue Dobbs and Judicial Watch two thousand and six sued, to get North American Union documents. And in it, they're meeting up at Banff Canada, and they're like, we're gonna use collapsing migration flow from a virus to flood the West and use that crisis to bring a new Marshall Plan. We're gonna use a disease x to, you know, finally get the world to accept this global government.
So they're just scheming constantly. They have event two zero one. But in public? In public. They have a sparge, war game, 2025, '20 '20 '8, that came out a few years before 2020 in the viral release that is actually set in 2020 to 2024, and it rolls out how they're all gonna do it.
The, tweets that are in there are almost word for. They just changed the name, spars to COVID nineteen. So so it's a blueprint, and and then if they get caught, oh, it's not a viral attack plan. Oh, it's just a war game. But the war game matches the exact rollout of the attack, so they're all on script.
Speaker 0: So in a normal world that rewarded, you know, excellence and impressions, you'd be a billionaire because of your predictive powers. I mean, huge companies, governments hire people who can piece together fragments of evidence to create an accurate picture of the future. That's that's a huge business. I know a lot of people in that business. George Friedman, guys like that are really, really smart people, but you have got the best track record of all.
Speaker 1: And I think it's so
Speaker 0: telling that rather than reward you for this or call you up and be like, Alex Jones, you're like, what do you think's coming next? They're like, no. We must, like, eliminate our own First Amendment to destroy your life, which is what they've done. That that seems like a pretty clear indicator of their guilt to me.
Speaker 1: Well, what they don't want is compartmentalize good people in industry and government, not just everywhere on the world, to listen to what I'm saying, go check it out for themselves, find out everything I just said is on record. Nobody can just type anything I said, and it's it's it's from their own documents. And then people will basically put the glasses on like they live and see it for themselves. I'm not telling them what to see like the corporate media does brainwashing people and and and selling them a lie that two men can have a baby, and there's no x and y chromosomes, and communism is great, and, you know, open borders are wonderful. No.
I mean, I'm simply saying see this for yourself. I I liken it to those hidden image paintings. And and when you first can't see the hidden image, you're like, I can't see. Once you do see it, you can't unsee it. So I'm only trying to get people to go look at what I'm pointing out and find out.
I liken this whole thing to like you have the adult table with the CFR, the club of Rome, the WF, and the UN, the think tanks, the RAN Corporation, and they're at the adult table at Thanksgiving. And the general public and even a lot of the politicians are compartmentalized and naive. We're over at the kids table, and we we'd actually listen to what the adult table because that's their arrogance. They admit 99 of this in their own battle plans as if we are too lazy or stupid ever go look at it. And that's part of a confidence game they have with their own people, their own corporate intelligence operatives, their own government intelligence operatives, their own networks, where they just basically admit all this stuff out in the open.
I mean, it's like, you know, mud from the CIA on CNN saying, foggy bottom's gonna kill this guy. We're gonna kill Trump. And then Trump had called me. This is back in his first administration. I said, listen.
You need to watch out. They've got Phil Mudd and and and all these other guys on CNN, MSNBC saying they're gonna kill you. And he goes, just a moment. He goes, I'm gonna a secret service call you. In about an hour, they called me.
They go, what's going on, Alex? Trump told us to call you. And I said, you don't know about this, this, this, this, this, this. So he goes, here's our email, and I sent the secret service this. As if the secret service doesn't know they were all over TV saying we're gonna kill Trump.
So so
Speaker 0: It's possible they caught that. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And and then Trump didn't catch it. So so and and I mean, now they're everywhere. You've got this new Rutgers study out where 55% of Democrats, Liberals are are asking, do you support Trump being killed? They're like, yes.
We want him dead. We he should be assassinated. This is like this week. And came out whatever the weekend. And they asked him, so do you see yourself as part of a assassination culture?
And they said, yes. So but then if you say, oh, the Democrats are fomiting violence. I mean, the view says all the time, he's killing people. Elon's killing people. They don't say how.
He's they're stealing your Social Security. They're killing old ladies, and so we need to ready to fight and die to take this guy out. Those are quotes. And and and then they just sit back and go, oh, no. No.
No. We're not calling for violence with Crockett and all of them, but but they're not gonna do it. They want lone nuts to do it because their other wind up operatives like Crooks and the other, guy here in Florida failed. But, I mean, they are they are crazy. And and if the establishment or what's left of it's falling apart thinks killing Trump is going to help them, they're delusional because if you look at all the scenarios that come out of that, it's much worse for them.
Speaker 0: No. I agree. I absolutely agree with that. Not all sleep aids are made by pharmaceutical companies. You probably heard about Eight Sleep by now.
They developed the country's most innovative products for sleep. Almost everybody in our office uses something they make called the pod, and they love it. And there's a reason that professional athletes and lots of other smart people do too. You add the pod to your mattress like a mattress cover and it helps you get a better night's sleep and fill with vitality at the start of each day in an intimidating way almost. It's amazing.
How does it do it? Well, uses advanced technology to track your sleep and automatically adjust the temperature of your side of the bed to what's perfect for sleep. And temperature makes all the difference. It's backed by over 600,000,000 of data. They've also used those insights to create their new product Sleep Elixir to help you get quiet before you go to bed.
Fall asleep faster and stay knocked out longer. No grogginess, no weird side effects, just better deep sleep. So if you're ready to take sleep and recovery to the next level, to eightsleep.com/tucker to get $350 off your Pod four Ultra full refund for thirty days if you don't love it. It works. Before I ask you what you think the signs are pointing to now, like, are your predictions for the next five years, and then I ask you how your battles with the US government are going in its attempts to silence you.
How do you like, if you have this ability, which you do, I'm not sucking up, it's just, again, it's provable, to put together a picture, an extraordinarily accurate picture of what the future holds. Like, what does that do to you? How do you sleep, and how do you live, and, like, why haven't you totally destroyed yourself? Like, that's not those are kind of not thoughts that most people, including me, are burdened with and don't really wanna be burdened with. But, like, how do you turn off the visions of the future in your head?
Speaker 1: Well, I I mean, I appreciate you saying nice things about me, and I'm and, obviously, God gives us all different gifts, I do have some gifts. But I think a lot more people have these gifts than than than really realize it.
Speaker 0: But you can prove it. That's why I've obviously, we're friends, and I like you as a as a man, but you can prove it in a way that others can't because it's on tape. So it's not really debate. Has Alex Jones had, you know, more accurate predictions of the future than any living person in the world that I know of? We can prove that.
We don't have to argue about it. I've got the freaking tape. So, again, it's not even a compliment. It's just an observation, and I don't know why I seem to be the only person who's obsessed with this. Like, how did this guy predict this?
No. Everyone's like, oh, he's great. Okay. Maybe he's crazy, but he predicted this. So my question is, like, what does that do to you?
Speaker 1: I mean, it is stressful, the responsibility of constantly researching and and and looking at all, you know, culture, pop culture. That's where a lot of the real brainwashing's at. That's where a lot of the predictive programming and manipulation goes on. Yes. But also in so called news.
But but I I mean, I did get to where I drank way too much, ate too much, got really unhealthy because I could, you know, go home at night and and have some drinks and, you know, and eat half a key lime pie and just kinda dial out and forget about Yes. Reality. But but things have gotten so intense and so dangerous that about the last nine months, I haven't drank, and I've been exercising every day, I've lost 63 pounds, I feel great. And I've just embraced, the responsibility. Plus, we're alive right now really in the great great awakening where more and more people are piecing things together and and and and and deciding to really get informed and engaged.
And so I'm I've always said I wanna become obsolete where people really start understanding how the world really works to such an extent that there are so many other journalists and researchers and pundits, just private citizens and people in business and and academia and life and and and in, you know, the ecclesiastical circles that they really realize that this globalist system is transhumanist. It is evil. It is a spiritual battle at the end of the day, and people need to really choose a side. And and so I think choosing the side and then saying, hey, God, I I I can't do this. You know, I'm I'm weak, I'm imperfect, but you know, through you I can and and really praying and asking God to lead God and direct you and give you discernment so to really answer your question.
I'll have all this data and this research and so so that my feeble human mind can understand really what God tells me, and then it's that final little ingredient of being sure about something that that's what they're intending to do, but we have real agency. Know, good has more power than evil. They always say the devil's greatest trick was convincing the world that he didn't exist. I think that's the second biggest trick is that he doesn't exist, and he does. His biggest trick is convincing people that there is no good out there and that and that and that there's not
Speaker 0: That's right.
Speaker 1: And and that god doesn't exist. So, you know, for me, so much of it again is in the old days, the globalist, the the the western propaganda after the end of World War two, and since then, when we won World War two, had pretty much total narrative control. And so anything they were preprogramming and preparing and hyping the people for, they pretty much always got what they wanted. So it was easy to follow those trend lines out and see what the probable main scenarios were. And then things would almost always come true that I predicted because they were still in charge.
Now that the globalist are really collapsing and a new international order and system is forming coming from the grassroots up. Politics is downstream from the the grassroots. And because Trump is such a, chaos bringer to their system, which is good, but with it also comes danger, but it's it's better than living, you know, know, on our knees and then and then ending up having our soles basically taken. It's it's it's it's it's better to fight down our feet. But in my experience, people that fight on their feet live a lot longer and have better lives than people that try to live on their knees.
People live on their knees actually die on their knees a lot more often than people who die on their feet in my experience. So now is really the global revolution. It's a spiritual revolution. The information, the culture, all of that comes out of that. And so now there's so many possible futures and and so many developments because there's been so many good people that actually care and wanna stabilize civilization, thrive, and have a future and and who are not based on conquest mindsets, but but are based on renaissance concepts, the great reset versus the great awakening, that right now anything is possible because America still has a world reserve currency, still has the biggest best military, still has the best energy system for raw energy, and still has a spirit that is being rekindled that was the apple of the world's eye and really the flower of the renaissance that that that that we're now rebooting.
It's powering back up right now, and that window is closing, but we're we're acting on it right now. And if we're just not weak and and and cowards, like Trump has said, and and and if we don't become panickens but remain Americans, then really anything is possible because as Elon has said, if America falls the central pillar in western civilization and western civilization falls, it all falls. Yes. And so for me, I don't do this out of courage. I do it out of direct self preservation for myself, my family, by extension, everybody else because we're all interconnected.
And people need to understand the true urgency that the globalist said they were gonna collapse the world economy and use that for social control as Larry Fink said to control our behavior. And we're gonna build something extremely hellscapish and and and dystopic in their own admissions. I mean, all the horrible stuff we see is just the leading, you know, edge of it. And and so so to me, there's really even no choice but to fight with everything I've got.
Speaker 0: So you said this is you said two things that really struck me. One, that anything is possible right now, that this could go in in in infinite number of directions, some hellish and and some blessed, and so I think that that feels right to me. Second, you said this is a spiritual revolution. What are the signs that you see of that? What do you mean by that?
Speaker 1: Well, if you read the Bible, Old Testament, New Testament, it's all there, and then I see it happening. You know, it says that during these big times of change that that that you'll see the best out of the good people and the worst out of the bad people. And some people you thought were good are gonna really activate and show you their real cards, that they're really your servants of evil or really slaves of evil. And then you're gonna see some people you thought weren't good that are gonna be touched and make the decision to be strong for liberty that'll be some of our greatest champions.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: And that you're not gonna really see people in the middle anymore, that big middle of people passing the buck. God said you were hot nor cold. You were lukewarm. I spit you out of my mouth. And so we're we're going into really the beginning.
It's gonna get way more intense in my view. I mean, if any prediction, it's it's that people think things are wild now and tumultuous. It's it's this is gonna be seen as the calm before the storm, and so so there's gonna be nowhere to be in the middle. People are gonna have to choose the side, and those that have chosen evil, chosen the establishment, chosen the satanic world order, are are gonna get deeper and deeper into their devotion, their hysteria, their violence trying to prop it up because deep down, they're they're scared and they have a form of Stockholm syndrome where they go to the abuser and think if they prostrate themselves before it, somehow they'll be given deliverance when really they just need to repent and ask God to come in to their heart and cleanse them and and then rise them up, to be a soldier against this evil in this key time. But there'll be no room for anybody in the middle in the time we're in, and I'm I'm talking to so many people that weren't even Christian or weren't even religious or weren't even spiritual, who are saying it's it's good versus evil, and I talked to so many people I know that are professionals and they you know, Austin's full of a lot of, you know, particularly rich people and women, you know, just becoming demon possessed.
I mean, literally saying that they're demon possessed and and and I'm hearing about all over the country, all over the world.
Speaker 0: What is that? It's so noticeable, and I I'm so blessed to be surrounded by mostly by women who are just the opposite or wonderful, but I who are the rock. I mean, they're just the best. However, what you just described is just on display everywhere.
Speaker 1: Well, and and it's men too. You're about this soccer coach that just kidnapped a little kid and took him and killed him and threw him in the woods reportedly, allegedly. Yeah. I mean, it's just I mean, it's men too, but normally in history, it's men that do the really openly satanic stuff.
Speaker 0: Exactly.
Speaker 1: And and women, you know, 2% of violent crime. Now it's, know, they're it's it's it'd be because it's a crisis. And women particularly, but men as well buy into whatever they see as the power structure. That's a survival mechanism generally.
Speaker 0: It's exactly right.
Speaker 1: But when the power structure is a death cult, by increment, they get deeper and deeper. I mean, you look at these leftist and, you know, them in the hundreds of photos where they took their shot and they or they or they had their abortion or, you know, they wanna kill Trump, and you look at them.
Speaker 0: Or they're worshiping death in some way.
Speaker 1: Abs you could see it. They all look super unhealthy. They look totally insane in the eyes. They all look like Charlie Manson. And so so it's it's I've seen more and more love in people's eyes Yes.
More and more spiritual connection to God, more and more of that quiet place of just serenity in people, and then I'm seeing more and more of the satanic energy. So it's it's really a parting of the sea here.
Speaker 0: Yes. So to just linger on the first observation that you're seeing more of the serenity, the peace from God in people, that is including people in your orbit, people you know personally?
Speaker 1: Yes. But it's very paradoxical. I'm seeing just godliness, peace, understanding, and then I'm seeing confusion and hysteria. And, I mean, what we're seeing is evil writhing around trying to take us with it. It it it gets sensed that humanity's waking up and that all of its carefully laid plans to keep us in a trance, keep us asleep is is is is burning away.
Speaker 0: Do you is there any way to predict well, I'll just say my view, which is I I've been really shocked by people on both sides. There are people who seem totally seized by hysteria and rage and hate and the desire to commit violence. I never expected they would be that. And then there are other people who I'm equally shocked to see filled with the kind of serenity you're describing who are filled with love and understanding. And I just I couldn't have predicted who those people are in some cases.
Do you feel that?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. I I mean, I've always had a lot of berserker energy and and True. And, you know, in the fight, but it was always focused, and and and I and I wouldn't say it was demonic, but it was, you know, of the flesh, but also had a big connection to god. Now more and more, I'm just have serenity, focus, clarity, and I'm more effective at breaking things down, not acting like a Tasmanian devil. And so in my own life, I'm seeing more and more of that serenity just really really intense the last few weeks.
And I picked up on that being around you and your crew and, you know, folks here in in in this little hamlet we're in. And then it really does make you feel sorry for people that serve evil. I mean, they torture us and they attack us and they wanna bully us and but at the end the day, you you actually realize that's on them. It is so sad that they live like this.
Speaker 0: They're being destroyed too. They're being destroyed too. That's like one of the main insights I've had in the past five years. I come to things really slowly because I'm not a genius, but I always kind of felt hate toward the destroyers in our in any society, hate destruction. I like building and creation.
And but the destroyers always were, I felt, my enemies. In my whole life, I felt this. And then it was only in the last couple years I realized they're being destroyed also. Like, they are suffering. They're not getting out of this unscathed.
Like, they think that they're getting power or whatever they money, whatever they think they're getting, but in but they're, like, in agony.
Speaker 1: Well, lot of them are cowards too, and they think survival of fittest is being as ruthless and mean as possible is what they have to do to win. And then when you no longer hate them, I and I because I was never driven by hate as my main force. It was just the old saying, you don't fight an enemy attacking your people because you hate them. You fight them because you love the people you're defending. Exactly.
But still, I would always hear, no. No. Forgive them. Still fight them. Still expose them.
But but but but really forgive them. That removes a spiritual connection that you have with them, and you see it when Christ says, you know, be kind and pray for those that persecute, it'll it'll heap burning coals on their head. Stalkers, you know, down at the kind of a low level. I've learned like once I didn't care about a stalker and I've had plenty and you just forgive them, they just freak out and go away. When they're getting to you, they're enjoying that energy.
So you still fight them with more energy than ever, but you do it from a position of just removing a damaged collapsed, you know, poor victim of the devil, that you have responsibility to protect yourself and your family from, but you don't give them the energy of being angry back at them and and seeing them as powerful because they're not their pawns. And these people that are influenced by satanic energy, by literal spiritual forces, demons, they are the slaves. And and when they're not out doing evil and persecuting people, they don't even feel like they're alive, and and they're desperate, and they're scared, and and and they're lost, and then they get driven forward, you know, by this dark force to to like, it'll alright once you just go out and once you take these people out. You know, it's the good people that are making you feel bad. It's it's it's them.
Destroy them, then you'll have peace. And and and that's the deeper understanding I've had of how this satanic system works.
Speaker 0: It's so clearly true. And and if you ask if there's anyone that you've really, like, focused on, I I don't know, George Soros or Larry Fink. I mean, just the other day, I was talking to someone who knows Larry Fink really well, and I was saying, I think Larry Fink is like, I don't know. I've never met Larry Fink, but, boy, he's responsible for a lot of suffering from my perspective. And, you know, this person said there's no one more unhappy than Larry Fink, like, And I was just with him in a car.
He was, like, screaming at someone on the phone. This guy's made billions of dollars and personally tormented. And I know a bunch of people because I know a lot of the of the people involved in things that I think are really evil, and there's not a happy one among them. Not one.
Speaker 1: And and beyond the fact that he's got billions, he's in control of more than anybody. You know, we're always hearing Elon Musk, the richest guy in the world. Well, he's a guy that has been good at keeping the companies under his control. So he independently is the most powerful person corp corporate science communications titan. But then they spin it like, oh, he's the establishment.
No. Trump, as you know, has a very small orbit of independent billionaires that are defending him because they wanna stabilize civilization, for for everybody's good. But when you look at the international power and the largesse, it's been against Trump. More and more, they realize they're losing because the people are with Trump. And we were just talking last night.
I hope you would repeat that, because you were asking me with some folks we were talking to about what my view is basically on the geopolitical new landscape, and I laid my my view. And you said, no. I think that's dead on. And then you said, basically, if you if you feel like repeating it that that we need to sell it very clearly. You're on this team or you're on that team because it really is team ChaiCom, EU globalist, new world order.
That's that's what's left. You know, The UK don't trust them who runs it, but they're trying to come in under a US alliance. And America and the world needs to understand there's a new international system forming the old one fell, and we better decide what this new system's gonna look like and who's gonna be in charge of it because that's the way it is.
Speaker 0: So think about how you'll feel when you achieve your biggest goals of all, whether it's starting a business, paying off your mortgage, sending your kids to college, having the money to pay for it. You'll be pretty proud when you've met these essential life goals, and you should be proud. All of us are when we do that. But what do you do next? So getting to the goals is one thing, but protecting them is an entirely different thing and maybe a bigger thing.
And this is where life insurance from Policygenius comes in. Now, Policygenius makes finding and buying life insurance really easy. You probably want life insurance, but it's expensive. How do you even get it? Policygenius makes it simple, and it means that your family has the safety net it needs to cover expenses and to face the future.
Nearly half of Americans look back and wish they'd gotten life insurance earlier. It can change everything if you have it because you don't know what the future holds, honestly. So with Policygenius, you can find policies starting at just $292 per year for a million dollars of coverage, and some options are a % online. And that means no unnecessary medical exams for you, which is a win. You compare quotes from top insurers side by side.
You talk to licensed agents. You secure your families tomorrow with peace of mind today, and it makes it super easy on Policygenius. And it's all transparent. You know exactly what you're getting. So you head to Policygenius.com/Tucker, or click the link in the description to get your free quote.
That's policygenius.com/Tucker. Yeah. And you hope that the you know, questions like that are almost never resolved without big wars, unfortunately. You can't think of too many examples or really any in history where they, you know, have just sort of evolved gracefully. It's you know, a lot of people die, and that's, you know, the point.
You know, Rome falls in the fifth century, new system, or whatever. And I really hope that we can escape that, and I am very opposed to violence and war, so I, you know, I think we should all be working toward that. But it's but it's the big things that matter, and you have the rise of this superpower in the East, and that's the main factor the moment that we live in, is that the West is falling. I think it's been undermined from within by people like Larry Fink, and many many others. And but it's being replaced by this by this this threat from the East, and I I don't hate the Chinese at all.
I think they're acting in what they think is their best interest. They're not Christian. They hate Christianity. So they've got a totally different worldview, and I'm not mad at them about it. But I think we should be honest about what it is.
Right? It's not we're not gonna have, like, you know, The United States and Russia and Iran and Malaysia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, China is all sort of acting in their own spheres. That's not the way it works.
Speaker 1: And and and as you said last night, all these countries wanna be on team America.
Speaker 0: I think that's right.
Speaker 1: And and for people that don't know this, and I'm surprised, I mean, Trump knows understands that you do, but this needs to be everywhere. The the globalist went in the eighties, nineties. They made a deal with communist China. You get the manufacturing of earth minerals, but you don't expand your military into the South China Sea. Well, they started twenty years ago expanding everywhere and then it took Obama till about fourteen years ago to figure that out.
We had the Asia pivot, but but by then it was too late. They'd infiltrated congress. They were financing all this destroy America Wokeism and bragging about it. And then people like Bill Gates and others continue to be totally aligned with China.
Speaker 0: No. It's right. And the
Speaker 1: CFR saying America's over and, you know, Larry Fink making jokes about it just three or four years ago. You know, five years ago, Trump thinks he'll bring America back. He hasn't seen China. I mean, arrogant. And now that China's even double crossing the globalist and saying, don't even need you.
Xi Jinping is like, we're gonna pay people to have kids. We're not doing your one child policy more. They're breaking with the transhumanist, you know, angle, but but using the control grid, the cashless society, social credit score that the West helped them set up to now project that around the world. And so the globalist are being destroyed by their own Frankenstein monster, and then the EU's decided to ally with China. And again, The UK is at least on the surface acting like, no, they wanna be in a, you know, new, you know, anglophile alliance with the quote, you know, US empire.
And again, The US has a limited window to get everybody on board with us and then our alliance easily with, you know, the key countries in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia, Central among it, and some other alliances. And and then obviously, open economic alliance with Russia who wants an economic alliance and has more resources than any country in the world. I mean, that is the real chessboard, and that's why the left and the globalist wanna drive America and Russia apart because geographically
Speaker 0: Exactly.
Speaker 1: And also militarily, and then also scientifically, and then just raw material Of course. That is the obvious.
Speaker 0: If you're if you're if you believe Russia's their greatest enemy, if you are working full time to divide The United States from Russia, you are acting against the interests of The United States. You hate The United States. You hate the West. You wanna see it fall. They hate Russia because it's a white Christian country.
That's a fact. Why Russia? In all of this, once you take three steps back, makes perfect sense. Like, we have a lot of people in our country working actively for the destruction of the West, of Christian civilization, so that's just a fact.
Speaker 1: This stands in the
Speaker 0: way, Sorry. They don't you know, people don't like it when you say that, but they don't like it when you say it because it's absolutely true. And the farther you get from The United States, that's one of the great benefits of travel, the more obvious it is. Like, you can't don't know you're married to an alcoholic until you go on vacation without that person. You're like, oh, shit.
I'm married to an alcoholic. Like, you can't see any of this when you're in the middle of it, but when you leave, it's like, oh my gosh. So okay. I just want to go back a step. So you have made reference a couple of times to the rise in violence, the acceptance of violence, which is, of course, the, you know, the purest distillation of evil in my opinion, most obvious for sure.
And there are signs that it's you know, we're entering a violent stage. I pray that we're not, but it feels like we are. You just had a long time employee assassinated. I don't know the extent to which you wanna talk about that, but what was that? Is it a harbinger of things to come?
Speaker 1: Well, a month ago, Jamie White, a great reporter, great guy. We were working up there Sunday night till about 09:00. I left. He went home and then got shot through the carotid artery, one shot through his neck, and then out the back of it, he bled to death. By the time he got to the hospital, about fifteen minutes later, the police got to
Speaker 0: How old was he?
Speaker 1: He was, 36. Ugh. And he was on the Ukraine hit list along myself and you and a bunch of other
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 1: People and everybody getting the SWAT calls, the SWAT teams sitting in their houses, and their families, has been on that list as well.
Speaker 0: Which is basically everyone you know.
Speaker 1: Yes. And then then, of course, you know, Ukraine tortured American journalist Gonzalo Lyra to death and then celebrated that. And so and and and, of course, we have the the the would be assassin down in Mar A Lago who was a big leftist, connected all these intelligence agencies, recruiting hundreds of fighters for Ukraine, an American, then he comes back and tries to, kill Trump. So I think, I mean, you've seen, Alexander Dugan's daughter, blown up in front of him, in 2022.
Speaker 0: In Moscow by the Ukrainians. Moscow. Murdering a guy's daughter applauded by Anne Applebaum and all the rest of the ghouls in The United States effectively because they don't like Alexander Dugin's ideas, so it's okay to murder his daughter with the,
Speaker 1: you know Well, that's the new I mean, that's the
Speaker 0: Clearly the help of US intel agencies. I mean, let's stop lying about it. Right? The CID Absolutely.
Speaker 1: I mean, I said three plus years ago when the war started, I said The US is running all the targeting Of course, they are. With the weapons. That's just a fact. And with their soldiers on the ground, as I know, some of the people whose sons are there, when it all started, we're really nervous. They didn't give me details.
They're like, yeah, my sons are there, special operations. And there's been a lot
Speaker 0: of US Military Personnel fighting Russia in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. I mean, I'm on record three years ago saying that, and then two weeks ago, New York Times, the US has been running the war and been there the whole time and, oh, get a Pulitzer Prize. So that that was all known. And so, now Trump is trying to rightfully end it. I mean, that don't know, I know your audience knows, but we have Victoria Noodland, we have Soros back, we can still talk on for Reed Zarkari on CNN saying, oh, yeah, we went there with state department money and overthrew their government fifteen years ago, we did it again, and we're finally gonna break up Russia, and I'm gonna be the czar of Russia.
Five Weeks ago, they had the deputy head of the unelected EU commission say, oh, we're gonna keep this war going for decades, and we're gonna bankrupt Russia with it, and we're gonna break Russia in five parts. So they're on the news saying, we want peace. We want love. Oh, no. Ukraine will never join NATO, which is why Putin went in, and the weapons being brought in onto his border.
And then separately, Zelenskyy's always, no. Joined NATO. And and and and so, again, the West started this war. Imagine if Russia
Speaker 0: I'm I'm aware. Yep.
Speaker 1: I I know you know more better than anybody probably. No. It's just hasn't circled.
Speaker 0: I mean, you've actually Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean, any American journalist, you've been everywhere. You've you've documented it. And it it's just we are starting to fight. These crazies are dragging us in to what's really already World War three conventionally that every escalation moves us closer to nuclear war. The doomsday clock with the atomic energy scientist, you know, was the closest ever been.
And so this is really fundamental. And so any concern I have about being sued or lawfared or attacked doesn't even hit my psychological, spiritual, mental radar because the big threat is so big of what these megalomaniacs are doing.
Speaker 0: So one thing I I don't one fact I don't think has penetrated the brains of policymakers in Washington is that we just lost a war with Russia. The US was running that war. The US military, the Pentagon, State Department, CIA, running the war against Russia. It was not it was never about Ukraine. No one in Washington cares about Ukraine or the hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian men destroyed.
The fact it'll be populated by third worlders. I mean, Ukraine, we just eliminated Ukraine. Nobody cares. This was a war against Russia. They hate Russia for a lot of reasons, mostly spiritual.
But we lost. And my concern is because nobody will say that out loud that we're overstating our power. And in the same way that you sometimes see, like, divorced sixty year old guys hitting on young women and don't realize that the young women think this is, like, absurd. You're like an old man. Why you really think I'm gonna sleep with you?
But the 60 year old guy hasn't readjusted to the reality of his present condition. He still thinks he's 25. Do you see what I'm saying? And he humiliates himself. That can happen at the level of nations where, you know, you think you can affect outcomes that you actually don't have the power to bring about.
And so that's called hubris, and that's how empires get destroyed and populations vaporized. And I'm really afraid of that. Like, why can't we should know that we were not able to win a conventional war against Russia, period. So, like, what does that say about our power? And maybe we should readjust our expectations a little bit.
I don't want that to be true. By the way, I want I'm rooting for I'm American. I'm not leaving. My family's buried here. But, like, don't you think that we run the risk of thinking we're capable of things that we're not capable of doing?
Speaker 1: Well, as an example, Hillary had a lot of fraud baked in, but Trump won in such a landslide, he beat her. And then a lot of Republicans and conservatives and populists thought Trump was gonna win for sure, we'd have as big a turnout, so they were able to steal, 2020. But there was such a giant landslide this time, it it overrode, the mail in ballots, you know, the dead people, the illegal aliens voting. All of that, they ran out of bullets. But that's a perfect example of how the the Democrats were sure they were gonna win in November, and they were sure they were gonna win in November in 2016, and they didn't.
So they had this incredible hubris and this incredible arrogance, and and so many of them are actually militarily ignorant themselves. They just put on this big imperious act. And and and, of course, there's the clip of Sean Penn saying, well, I don't think nuclear weapons should be off the table. We shouldn't be afraid to use them because that gives Russian advantage. Well, it's called mutually assured destruction for a reason because anybody that uses them is insane.
So mean
Speaker 0: Well, they got in the middle of the war. This just came out the other day. The Pentagon wrote an assessment saying that they calculated that if we gave weapons to Ukraine that allowed the Ukrainian military or our military using Ukraine as a proxy to hit targets within Russia, they judged the likelihood of a nuclear exchange at 50%. Mhmm. And they did it anyway.
At that point, like, you should be in prison for the criminally insane. Well, that's right. If Russia moved You're risking nuclear war? Like, you should be locked up? I don't under like, that's the I couldn't even believe that.
I mean, I, of course, intuitively knew that.
Speaker 1: And say that again. It's not interrupting. That's important to say again for people.
Speaker 0: That the that the Pentagon under Joe Biden assessed, like, because they assess the likelihood of everything or they get you know, they guess, they sort of work out how they think things will progress. But in every scenario globally, they do this. This is what they do at the Pentagon. And they assess that if we gave certain weapons, weapons that allowed the Ukrainians to strike targets within Russia, if we did that, which we did, the chance of a nuclear exchange, nuclear holocaust that killed everybody on Earth would be 50%, and they did it anyway. So imagine the brain.
Imagine the evil. Like, you would have to be controlled by, like, supernatural forces to do so. I think there's a 50% chance every person on Earth could be killed in a nuclear exchange, but I'm doing it anyway. Like, why aren't you how are you still walking free? I'm serious.
Speaker 1: No. And and I'm glad you brought that assessment up because I I really tried to get people to focus on that, and and I agree I agree with that assessment. I mean, let's let's boil that down. Imagine if Russia had the equivalent of attackers and storm shadows in Canada, in Mexico, on our border that they can fire above the trees that can't be shot down that are nuclear capable, and Putin said this. He said, if you shoot a few missiles once it started, we'll we'll just shoot them down.
But if we see a large aerospace attack with a whole bunch of these, we have to believe it is a first strike to take out our nuclear deterrent. And so when we see a large signature of a large aerospace attack, be it cruise missiles, be it glide bombs, be it a mix of aircraft, or all of them, we will do a total commitment. And then Russia and TV said, here's the government, you know, scenario, and it showed nukes hitting all the NATO countries and submarines, you know, hitting on from there. And we're talking about world destroyed in thirty minutes, folks, for sure. Submarines off our coast, two minutes, New York's gone, you know, five minutes Dallas is gone.
This is real. What would happen if Russia was bombing DC with conventional bombs, with large heavy cruise missiles that that that They're
Speaker 0: droning the capital. As The US did through the Ukrainians, they droned the Kremlin.
Speaker 1: You were there once when you saw one blow up?
Speaker 0: I there. I was actually driving by I was over there last winter to interview Putin. I was driving by the Kremlin just, like, on the street in Downtown Moscow. There smoke coming out of the top of the of the Kremlin. And so I called the, like, the guy at the press office who I was dealing with for to set the Putin interview from the vehicle, and I was like, I think your Kremlin's on fire.
And he's like, oh, no. No. No. It's not. I was like, I'm right there.
I'm looking at it. Russians never want to admit that they have been unable to defend their capital city, so they you know, a lot of murder has taken place by the Ukrainians of Russians in an attempted murder of Americans, by the way.
Speaker 1: And just think about the provocation here.
Speaker 0: And but the Russians in every case are like, oh, that's not happening. They don't wanna admit it because for a bunch of reasons, but it would force them to repunse. But, anyway, I called up and I'm like, I I think you guys just got droned. No. No.
Didn't happen. But it did happen. I saw it. I personally saw it. So, like, there's been a ton of that stuff.
What would we do if the Russians droned the US Capitol or the White House? Like, that's so freaking crazy.
Speaker 1: I can't see that happen. Russia knows it's a provocation. The globalists want a reset. Their financial system's going down, and they're willing to roll the dice, and they think a nuclear war is survivable, as you know, as the Pentagon has said. So it it's complete madness.
Nuclear war is not survivable.
Speaker 0: That that's a fact.
Speaker 1: It's not.
Speaker 0: By the way, nuclear weapon explodes over a nuclear power plant. What happens? Anyone know?
Speaker 1: Massive meltdown that makes Fukushima look like a Exactly.
Speaker 0: And we have a lot of nuclear power plants around the world.
Speaker 1: So There's over 450 that we big that are big industrial, thousands of small ones. And when society breaks down, they all melt down different ways, much worse than Fukushima and Chernobyl combined.
Speaker 0: I agree.
Speaker 1: And it makes the whole surface of the earth, it's mainline science unlivable for hundreds of millions of years.
Speaker 0: I agree. And I know everyone's for nuclear power, and it's, like, obvious we need nuclear power. Right? I don't okay. I'm not against nuclear power in theory, but until someone can answer the question you just posed, like, what about that?
I mean Plus
Speaker 1: they're never run right. They always have scenarios where they're not gonna leak. Basically, they all win.
Speaker 0: You see all these stupid concerns. Like, the answer is nuclear. You want more AI data centers, comma, which I don't.
Speaker 1: The answer is
Speaker 0: coal. Obviously. But I don't understand why everyone this is just a sidebar, and I'll stop in one sentence, but, like, those of us who grew up in the seventies and eighties remember that all the opponents' nuclear power were, like, you know, furry armpit dumb people and, you know, all the Greenpeace people. And so you're just like, oh, shut up. Nuclear's obviously the solution.
Like, you just don't understand science. How can you be against climate change and also against nuclear power? I've said that myself, like, a hundred times on TV. But it's not about the spent fuel rods. What do we do with nuclear waste?
That's easy. Put it in Yucca Mountain. It's about what if these things are untended? What if they're, you know, the subject of a conventional or nuclear attack?
Speaker 1: And you look at all the mismanagement.
Speaker 0: Massive vulnerability. Like, why doesn't anyone mention that? Before we put nuclear power plants all over my country, which think a lot of people are psyched to do because they wanna get rich from AI, like, they should answer the question. Like, that's really freaking scary. No?
Speaker 1: Well, you have to also ask, why do they build so many in here and in, like, Japan, the plants ride on fault lines? I mean, there's a real we see a lot of ineptitude in industry and things, so you don't wanna have things that have the potential to be so dangerous. And when coal creates carbon dioxide that plants breathe, and the earth used to have a lot higher carbon dioxide than it does now, and it makes plants live longer, yields are up, it it will green the planet, all the studies show it. We're actually terraforming the earth to make it better. It's it's like God given when you actually get the real studies and talk to the real climatologist, the people they'll tell you, no, no, no.
It's great that we're bringing this old carbon back up and putting it back in the atmosphere. This is fabulous. More carbon is good. Carbon carbon dioxide, oxygen, water, and sunlight are the four ingredients of life on this planet, and the globalist created a way to tax and regulate one of the four pillars of life on this planet. It is good.
I mean, again, they're trying to convince us that cows' methane is bad. You actually look at the carbon equation, it all turns right back into the gases it came from. It's a good gas. But again, if the cows are bad, well, what else releases methane? We do.
We're the carbon that they want to reduce. They wanna teach us to hate ourselves, teach us not to have a life force, and their new religion is they will give us all these indulgences and all these flagellations and all these things we have to do to atone for how bad we are to the priest class that is the big satanic green church.
Speaker 0: So the threat of nuclear war overhangs any conflict with a country that has nuclear weapons, of course. You push someone far enough, you know, you don't know what could happen, and it could result in the extinction of humanity. So that's, like, the main fact. That's why people wanna run, not to have nukes. Right?
Obviously. So with that in mind, what do you make of the public repeated public statements by a bunch of European leaders, particularly Stormer in The UK and and the president of France, that they're ready to, like, continue the war against Russia with their own feeble armies. Like, what that seems crazy to what what is that actually about?
Speaker 1: And they've said that now they're sending their troops that if they get killed, then that's direct war with NATO. They admit that the EU population wise is collapsing. Those they brought in, most of them, 80%, never even get jobs. That all the different ministers, defense ministers, as you know, last few years have said, our business model is a twenty year war. They think they can continue that and somehow bankrupt Russia and, again, break it up into five parts.
So they've made it existential for themselves. They made it existential, for Russia. And you go back to the Pentagon assessment that was public that 50% chance that if we start bombing, and that's the West doing it, mainly The US, inside Russia, they would strike back with nukes. And then Putin clarifying, well, if we see a large launch, it could be a sneak attack with nukes, so we're gonna have to go ahead and nuke you at that point. Please don't do that.
So at least they limited, you know, to to to four or five big cruise missile attacks a day, and then, you know, maybe a hundred drones a day going into major cities and attacking their nuclear bases, their nuclear bomber bases. I mean, extreme provocation, testing the line, and not playing Russian roulette where you have a six shot revolver and you put one three fifty seven magnum casing in round in. But this is three out of six, and they're like, well, that's a safe bet. Let's roll the dice, spin the cylinder, and then click it to our head every day. It just goes the fundamental insanity that you see escalating.
I mean, if you go back to the
Speaker 0: But actual ins like, actual insanity. Not, you know, I don't know, will tariffs work or, know, whatever you could argue. But, like, risking nuclear war? I mean, that's so fucking crazy that I can hardly believe it's real.
Speaker 1: That's a good point. They say Trump saying our surrender to these one-sided trade deals, is totally true, and deindustrialized this and destroyed our morale and is a huge national security issue that he's rolling the dice there. No. No. No.
Would be rolling the
Speaker 0: dice with nuclear war? Again, I think you should be in prison for even having that that's, like, the craziest thing I can imagine.
Speaker 1: Well, remember Biden just two years ago said we can't send f sixteens in Abrams tanks because that escalates the threat ladder of the rank corporation. That's World War three, but they went ahead and did that. Then they went to the bombing inside. So I the reason I went back to that, I'm glad you raised it is, the EU is refusing to end the war. We're trying to drag us into it fully.
They're arresting their political opposition, Kalin Trojescu in Romania. They're not letting him run-in the new election.
Speaker 0: He's an amazing man. I just talked to him Amazing. Day before yesterday.
Speaker 1: And then Marie Le Pen that is super popular and had presidential poll, so they have you know, judge find her guilty of nothing and take her off the ballot. You have the state department under Biden admittedly working in Brazil, with Lula, to take Bolsonaro off the ballot because he's popular and then indict him. And they're talking about doing it in Hungary. They're talking about doing it in Poland. They said if AFD won, which they almost did, that the EU Commission might cancel that election.
So the EU has really taken off the mask, and people that don't know was set up in '56 as a steel deal, Treaty of Rome, and they got the nations over time to sign away their sovereignty to it. I remember. And an unelected commission, with Vander Leiden, you know, up there running all of this. And she even came out, as, you know, on Monday and said, well, Trump's blown up the international order. He's he's defeated the new world order.
And she said, okay, we're gonna go ahead and agree at least in principle, to what Trump is saying, and that's because the trade is completely one-sided. So again, Trump's move isn't just the perfect move. It's perfect and that it's the only moves we have left for us and for global stabilization. That's why anybody that cares about self preservation for the whole planet should be fully behind Trump's policies that are very popular around the world and are seen as sane. And again, the world, this this huge alliance of nations wants to join that team, and the good news is Trump's poll is the highest ever.
I I I I know the American people are understanding that and getting that. The concern is
Speaker 0: It is kinda crazy that his number I mean, I'm getting you know, because I live in a rich people world for part of the year. I know a lot of rich people, and boy, they're really upset. And I share their instinctive concern about any chaos. My parents got divorced. Hate chaos.
Right? Mhmm. So I get that. But but from my perspective, I'll just admit it, like, on my phone, it's like, I voted for Trump. What the hell is going on?
You know? And I get it. I'm not, you know, criticizing anyone. But then his numbers go up.
Speaker 1: Well, I'd like to It shows you
Speaker 0: that you can even I really make a big effort to, like, live in different places, know different people, not be a captive of my surroundings, not just live among rich people with, like, dumb rich people attitudes. I can really try to be bigger than that. And I always flatter myself that I succeed, but even I am, like, I guess, kind of captive to that because then I see the numbers, and I'm, people really like this. His numbers went up after the tariffs. That's correct.
Speaker 1: Right? Absolutely. Wow. Well, I'd like to talk to folks out there saying Trump is is is being a destabilizer. The globalist order was collapsing by their own corruption and mismanagement and their alliance with China being double crossed.
And so that old order was already being being collapsed by them, and and Trump's coming in very pragmatically with a a good, fair, freedom based meritocracy, competition based system. But, you know, to to to to people that wanna talk about destabilization, starting the war with Russia, total destabilization, dissolving the borders and all the human smuggling and the fentanyl. Exactly. Total destabilization, in in engaging all this overspending and and and the country basically being bankrupt if we don't grow our way out of it, total destabilization. And then wink wink, the attempted assassinations of Trump.
What do they think would have happened if Trump really would have gotten killed in Pennsylvania in July of last year or a few months later in Florida? If you look at the scenarios there, they run from bad to worse. So the real destabilization
Speaker 0: and bad for the people behind it. Like, clearly, those assassinations were not lone gunmen. Were part of a much, much larger conspiracy, obviously. Everyone knows that. But those people behind those attempted murders would have been in bigger trouble had those murders succeeded.
Attempted murder succeeded. Correct?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. And and if they somebody's able to kill Trump now, people better hope he doesn't get struck by a bolt of lightning because the bad guys will get the blame. And that's why so many people that have kind of been on the fence of the establishment, were working with the globalists just because that was the system are enthusiastically joining Trump and Elon, because they understand that this is the only game in town for people that aren't delusional. But you have that megalomania and
Speaker 0: I think that's so true.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You have that megalomania historically when elites have never lost before and are losing that they just continue to accelerate and intensify. And and and I know you've covered this. A lot of the people don't seem to know that in in August of twenty twenty, I mentioned it earlier, there was a big article in New York Times with John Podesta covering a war game they just had that if Trump was able to win, they were gonna have blue states secede and blue cities secede and then create civil unrest and civil war conditions. And then when they knew Trump was gonna win because the poll numbers were so incredible, a few months before the last election last year, Raskin, Carville, Podesta, all of them said civil war conditions.
We're gonna need to have uprisings. Carville said that. Trump's coming to kill you. We gotta rise up, Carville said, and others. And they are clearly escalating with the Tesla attacks and the swatting attacks and the calls for violence.
The 55% of, you know, liberal Democrats in a study want Trump killed. They're embracing, you know, real terrorism, real domestic terrorism, and that's building towards what I believe is in the cards because you see the democrat pundits and their operatives everywhere before the election and after it in the last seventy eight, you know, days or so saying, once he got in office, Trump and Tom Homan are going to kill migrants. And when they do, there's gonna be an uprising. And, well, Trump's not gonna go mow down people at a illegal alien demonstration. You also have them saying Trump supporters are gonna attack black people.
Well, where would black people be alone in a big numbers? A church, university. Trump supporters are gonna kill black people. And we know a lot of the globalist groups have been funding white supremacist groups and domestic terror groups and basically run them historically. So the last piece of all the preprogramming I've seen is that to have these uprisers, you need something much bigger than George Floyd, much bigger than Jesse Smallman.
And so I am predicting on the current trajectory of what they were getting before and what they said, the final piece they need for this destabilization that they'll label a race based civil war that will then crash the markets and be used kinda like the predictive programming in the movie that came out last year's civil war to have a bunch of states, the main military join them, in a military operation to remove Trump when the Trumpian figure in the movie is killed, you know, and executed inside the inside the Oval Office. And so that's their dream, that's their backup plan. You have the two camps. You have one camp is is kind of the Chuckie Schumer, completely evil, but is it particularly publicly pushing that though he had his famous whirlwind, you know, we're coming after you speech. But he's an old man.
Absolutely. So you have the Soros wing with Alexander Soros that more and more is in charge and is really making a run, at escalating domestic unrest and terrorism, leading into some triggering event, starting things are aligning for this summer. And I know that folks of the government, their patriots are aware of that, but I think that the spokespersons and others need to really get ahead of all these calls for violence and not just repudiate it, but talk about the democrat leadership and their talking heads, that are pushing. And I mean, we've seen Coburg just last week say, deep state, please, you know, do something. Stop Trump.
And so that's where we are. So so so they wanna expand war to try to take control of the agenda. They're that they've been hyping a new virus being released to try to stop Trump's reboot of our economy because they think that would stop this populous revolution. In Europe, it's arresting their political opposition and, you know, stopping elections. They they and they also have Europe trying to sue Elon Musk and billion dollar fines trying to shut him down like we saw with Brazil.
So those are different strategies. They're also doing big put options and naked shorts trying to crash the market and then blaming Trump's tariffs on that. So it's economic terrorism, the buildup of domestic terrorism, the false flags that can be used, a nuclear false flag to get us in direct war with Russia, a new viral release. Those are the things they've got set up, ready to go, and that they've said before they would use to maintain control.
Speaker 0: Everybody loves and appreciates first responders. When things go haywire, they're the ones who show up and make you safe, protect you, not just you but the entire country. Most people agree they're heroes. But what happens if they can't show up? First responders cannot be everywhere all the time.
And if there's an emergency, particularly a big emergency, there aren't enough to go around, so you have to be your own first responder. Before an ambulance arrives, before a doctor can help, it is up to you to protect yourself and your family. And if it's a medical emergency, you could be out of luck because you don't have the right medications. Most people do not have the medications they need at home. There's an answer to that.
It's called the JACE case. It's a simple but smart solution to a problem most people don't even think about. It's a set of emergency prescriptive medications curated by medical experts, you've got peace of mind knowing that no matter what happens, you are totally prepared. Even if you're a prepared kind of person with stuff stored in your cellar, you probably don't have the right medications. What if there's an infection or any kind of crisis and you don't have access to first responders, you're gonna want a JACE case, medications on hand when they matter most.
Go to JACE.com and use code Tucker at checkout for discount. Jace, j a s e, dot com. Check out code Tucker. The first thing in countries that descend into darkness that happens is speech is controlled, and there are political police who put people who speak out against the regime in jail, and that's happening in Brazil, as you know. It's happening in The UK.
It's happening in Germany.
Speaker 1: We're trying it in Canada.
Speaker 0: Well, it's definitely happening in Canada. And these were formerly free countries in Australia. And so the one place that it isn't going to happen right now is The United States because of the First Amendment. So how do you end First Amendment protections? Well, you pick off people like you, which they've been trying to do for over a decade, and, you know, I happen to be, as I've told you many times in private, I happen to be on a fishing trip when I worked at Fox the night that you were taken off the air, and I thought it was, like, one of the greatest threats to speech in The United States I'd ever seen.
I wasn't there, and Fox News, like, prevented my co my filling host from defending you, because Alex Jones is bad. Okay. That's when I realized they were in on it. But but they need to end speech in The United States. They need to shut down X.
They have to. And my guess is, and I hope I'm wrong, that there's there is, like, legitimate hate and extremism on social media, you know, to the point where it makes me uncomfortable. I'm thinking that maybe a lot of that is manufactured actually, and that if there is a mass shooting, and God forbid, but if there is a mass shooting of the people who've been targeted for hate on actual hate, that's true, on social media that that will be used as a pretext to shut it down.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. And and Has this occurred to you?
Speaker 0: Yes. Because I see people on on social media who I know for a fact, I think I know, are being funded by the very people they're attacking. It's like, what? Including one of the biggest voices. Like, I know that that's true.
And so, like, what is this? And it's clearly preparatory to some sort of event that will shut down a violent event that will be used as a pretext to shut down free speech. Am I being paranoid?
Speaker 1: No. I've I've that's that's where all the foundation's been laid. The actually, the superstructure has been built. Yeah. They're just putting the finishing touches on it.
And and so in a way, it's fortuitous that I'm here today because you were here when I was talking to my lawyer right before we started taping. We got some really big news that in Connecticut, the Supreme Court said we're not even hearing your appeal now because it was so strong. The kangaroo show trial that I was went through there a few years ago where the judge had already found me guilty wouldn't let
Speaker 0: Guilty of what? Of having an unauthorized opinion of being mean or whatever? Those are all legal under The US constitution. Like, you cannot be punished for giving your opinion. I don't care how ugly other people think it is, and and you've contested whether you even gave their opinion.
It does doesn't matter. Under our system, you're allowed to say what you think, period. Well, you're right. Especially That's what the bill of rights is.
Speaker 1: And we have the supreme court rulings, you know, with the New York Times Sullivan. Insane.
Speaker 0: And and Brandenburg versus Ohio. You have a right to your opinion.
Speaker 1: And and and what they did was with all these PR firms and massive thousands of articles sometimes a month and hundreds of TV programs a year, They built a straw man once I was censored off the Internet the last seven years. Still on my website, infowars.com, still on some talk radio, but it was the verboten thing. People had to go, you know, get underground. They could then build a straw man of things I had supposedly done I never did. And then when I wasn't defended other than than people like you, it set the president to then come after everybody else including president Trump when he was taking off everything on January 6 so people couldn't hear him saying be peaceful before during
Speaker 0: I defended black nationalists who hate whites. Obviously, don't agree with them. I am white. So are my kids. Like, I reject their program.
But they were indicted for giving their opinions, and, like, we cannot allow that. And now the ACLU is just completely captured. It's like a training organization. Nothing to do with free speech. Like, where are the people who will stand up for the foundational right that separates a free man from a slave, which is the right to say what you think?
And why were they all sound may they bask in shame for not defending you? I mean that.
Speaker 1: Well, I have a major update. It it in the last seven years of them suing me in this whole saga, we now have basically all the pieces of exactly what happened. I told you some about it last night. It would take a few minutes, but I could just give people a basic summation of what's happened.
Speaker 0: Yeah, please.
Speaker 1: But first, just an example of free speech. In Texas, there's famous cases where they take people's small children because the school secretly convinces them with grant money. They get paid for it public and private. That a little boy is really a girl, a little girl is really a boy. They then the parents find out the school's been putting them in a database, giving them a social worker, sending them to special school times with peer pressure of other kids that have been put in a cult for sterilization, transhumanism.
And then they take the person's child saying it's abuse You argue, you know, my son is really a boy, not a girl. Well, now, Colorado in the house, as you know, just passed the the bill to the senate and they allowed no debate, saying that if a parent finds out their kid is being brainwashed and says, no, my my son is a boy. My girl is a girl. That is abuse, and they're gonna officially take your child. Other states have passed laws like Oregon and Washington.
So you talk about free speech. This is beyond that. This is parental rights. This is everything. Now say parents can't argue and say to the state that has determined that that that that that your child's another sex.
And then in, places like New Jersey and other states, the hospital systems now have on the form when your child's born dozens of things, transgender, all these other names, genderqueer, all these things where the parents pick at birth what the baby's gonna be and say this. So so if the state wants to come and say they're another sex, that's okay. If parents don't like it, their kid gets taken in these areas. That's where this is going. It's already happening.
But if the parents wanna opt in, they can decide for their child. So as long as you decide that we're gonna chemically and then medically sterilize surgically this this portable person is being put into this death cult, then it's okay. The only thing you're not allowed to say is no. I say no to this designation. So that's where Alex Jones having his speech massively attack goes.
So it's a long story, but here's the summation. I didn't understand even though I know a lot of things about politics in the world. I I didn't understand how PR firms work, how law firms work, how the deep state was operating, and and they later admitted even on MSNBC that few years ago, oh, we've been successful with Alex Jones. Next, we're gonna do it with people like Tucker Carlson, and then and they mentioned you. So Hillary knows she's in trouble.
Two months before the election twenty sixteen, she does a 20 plus million dollar ad buy talking about me and twisting what I had said about that event in Connecticut, that mass shooting. And then the ad she says, Alex Jones is Trump's brain. This is the guy that Trump says is an amazing person. We'll be talking a lot. You're a great guy.
They show that clip of Trump on my show saying that. So they created a demonized version of me to attack Trump. Then that made me this huge demon of the left even more. Then for two years, articles every day, sometimes dozens a day, TV shows, programs, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, every channel, foreign news, Tokyo news, Russian news. It was just it was it was being pushed over.
Alex Jones is bullying kids, parents of dead kids, Alex Jones is sending people to pee on graves. None none of that ever even happened, much less me. And then they sue me, and then they want all this discovery, and they say, who do you work for? Who who's telling you what to do with the Republicans in all these depositions? Of course, it wasn't there.
So they hold me in default for saying I didn't give them my secret plan to get rich off these people that I barely ever even talked about. They put twenty two minutes of evidence in the Texas show trial where I was found guilty by the judge and the Connecticut show trial that were only a month apart in 2022 in the fall. So I go in, HBO's producing it, cameras, putting makeup on the judges. I I'm given 20 plus things I can't talk about. My my lawyers are sanctioned if they try to raise that.
Well, where did Alex Jones say this? Where did he do this? No evidence could be showed to counter them. They could just say whatever they wanted to. And then they have a billion and a half dollar judgment in Connecticut.
They have a $50,000,000 judgment total or $49,000,000 in Texas, because I'm already found guilty, then the judge tells them to say how guilty I am. They lie and totally exaggerate all the money I have, say I got it from these people with no evidence. And and and so I knew I was being railroaded for my speech. They said in the Connecticut trial and in the the Texas show trial and on the courthouse steps, we don't want money for mister Jones. We wanna shut him down.
They said that in court filings. So I go into bankruptcy because I'm out of money personally. Never had all this money, they said, not even a fraction of it. And so for three years, I'm in bankruptcy. And they keep going and say, we don't want money.
We want him closed. The judge keeps saying, no. You have to actually, you know, do a settlement with him or we have to sell him for wars.
Speaker 0: This is all because you said something that other people said they were offended by?
Speaker 1: Yes. But but but but
Speaker 0: How how can you I don't understand in a free country how other people being offended by what you say can have you destroyed by the state.
Speaker 1: Well well, it's more than that. They said, I sent people to their houses. I peed on graves. All the stuff that nobody did did. Why weren't
Speaker 0: you arrested? You can't pee on a grave. Why weren't
Speaker 1: you arrested for Connecticut.
Speaker 0: I Why weren't you arrested for people on the graves?
Speaker 1: Out of the people that sued me, I only said the name of one of the
Speaker 0: people ever. If you commit a crime, you should be criminally charged for it, and the state has to prove that you did it, at which point you're convicted and punished. If the state accuses you of something but doesn't charge you with it, they're fucking liars. Like, by definition, they they don't that's not on the list of options that they can just discredit you, attack your character, destroy you. No.
No. No. The state has one option. If you committed a crime, they charge you with the crime, and they prove you did the crime. It's that simple.
Speaker 1: Never got investigated for stalking or anything because I did nothing. For any crime. So so so so here's where it gets crazy. Here's what we've learned since they had the show trials.
Speaker 0: I know none of the libertarians defended you either. Where was the Reason Foundation and Cato and all these supposedly freedom minded nonprofits who are just freaking liars? Like, of them defended you that I know of.
Speaker 1: Bare minimum, they were bought off where they wanted to keep their head down. So so so so here's what we learned. The Democratic Party and the judge department, the FBI, the CIA, this has come out in court, come out in documents now. We've got it all and published it in force that could be shut down literally in days now. We're finally to the wire today with this big ruling.
But it it it's you know, the truth's out there, but they don't want you to know it. So they come after me to demonize Trump, then they run ads on Facebook and Twitter and everywhere for the two years before they sue me, 2017, '20 '18, saying I'm attacking him, saying I'm coming after him using my name to raise money. Okay? And it turns out hundreds of millions using my name. This has come out.
Saying I'm victimizing them and then never showing what I supposedly did. Just this man's hurting us. Help us. Help us. Then I was already taken off the Internet after that for other reasons that they cooked up.
They had Lester Holt get up on TV and say, Alex Jones called for people to get battle rifles and go attack Democrats. No. I talked about them the anti foot attack in your house and how they were planning to attack more people's houses, and I said, none of us are gonna be violent. But I said, everybody needs to have their battle rifle ready or their shotgun in their home if the Lev comes to kill you.
Speaker 0: Well, as someone whose house was attacked by Antifa, I agree completely.
Speaker 1: But but but then Holt never showed what I supposedly said.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: He just said straight up. Okay. So I wasn't even taken off the Internet for Sandy Hook because I wasn't even known for that. Okay? Barely ever talked about it.
Then they sue me, then they run more PR, then they raise more money off of me. And then when they didn't find anything in the in their all their discoveries, there was nothing that I did, then they have the judges both find me in default, coordinate for both trials to be held in a month and a half period in late twenty twenty two, and then right after they win, the jury's fine for all this money, come back and they say, that's not enough, your honor. We want 2,750,000,000,000.00. That's the GDP of India. People don't believe that.
Just type in Alex Jones, Sandy Hook, two point seven five trillion. And and so the judge said, no. You just
Speaker 0: get 1,500,000,000.0. In retrospect, did you ever think when when they awarded judgment against you equivalent to the GDP of India, did you ever think, like, maybe I should keep my visions to myself and not like, next time I see nine eleven coming, just shouldn't say anything because people who predict the future accurately are always punished for it.
Speaker 1: I I think that's I mean, I yeah. I mean, well, I realized was I've got something important to say, so I better say it even louder because the evil wants to shut down. But just to finish the key part,
Speaker 0: I'm telling Sorry. Sorry. No. No. No.
No. No. You're making me upset hearing this. No. No.
No.
Speaker 1: I I'm saying I haven't gotten to the big stuff. I'm just giving people the background. This is
Speaker 0: not the country I grew up in at all. Just saying that.
Speaker 1: Sorry. Well, no. No. You're right. Thank you for the platform.
No. Thank you, Tucker. And I told you all this last night. It took thirty minutes. Let me just try to condense it.
So I know they're trying to demonize me to get at Trump. I know they're trying to set the president to shut down everybody else, and once I'm demonized, they think nobody will defend me, that sets the president. They admitted all that. Then when they win the show trial, it was already fixed. These PR firms come out of New York, Connecticut and go, we've been doing this for years.
We exposed Jones. We did this. We helped get this big win, blah blah blah. Then, this undercover video comes out that is in a predator sexting trolling operation in DC, which the guy was never implicated in, but that's how he got caught up with the troll, trolling operation. This Oblivious person, CIA and FBI, it's confirmed, says, well, we investigated Alex Jones for years at the FBI, then he went on to CIA.
It's where he's currently. And he said, we couldn't find anything criminal on him, so we went to the Sandy Hook people with law firms and we developed this plan with this narrative to take him down. And, now, we're in the process of shutting him down, and the person says, well, are you still trying to put him in prison? No. We've just destroyed his name and destroyed who he is.
You know, it's all on video. It's online. Just type in FBI CIA, agent, you know, admits to running Sandy Hook, frame job of Alex Jones.
Speaker 0: We recommend you take this moment to do what we're about to do, which is enjoy an ALP. Just to kind of refresh our baseline assumptions here, is the CIA allowed to destroy people for in The United States for criticizing?
Speaker 1: No. It's illegal.
Speaker 0: Oh, it's illegal. Okay.
Speaker 1: Of course, she's yeah. I mean, begging the question, but absolutely. So so then then we have that. But then I go, wait a minute. At the trial last year, they have this FBI agent who was the chief counsel, who on the stand, they say it to hide it in Plainview, the Democrat Party Law Firm, talked to him for like a day.
And he goes, so you went and got the suit against mister Jones. Yes. I went to your your law firm, mister Koskoff, and I and I went to the families, you know, and I I organized him to do this. So they're hiding in plain view, the chief counsel of Connecticut that I didn't even pick up on at the time. Why is he on the stand?
I'm sitting there talking about how he went and set this up and did this to me. Then later, we have Oblivas talking about years ago, we criminally investigated him for a decade. We couldn't find anything, so we went into this sibling. So now that's two of them admitting it on the stand and undercover video. Now this is where it gets wild.
Then three days after Trump's in office, we've done a four year request two years ago for my FBI file. We've done it many times. They never responded back. Soon as Trump gets in, they send us a disc in the mail. I got a call from the FBI saying, hey.
You know, be sure you watch your mail. And and and they send me a disc of our foyer, and it was a 96 files, but it was just a cover sheet. It said the rest of national security. But it said, Alex Jones, top national security threat. Obama administration ordered me to be a level three terror national security threat in 02/2013.
I had Karl Seraphin on who knows how to read the code documents on the dozens of pages I got that were attached. He said probably the thousands, but a 96 other investigation packets. And and and we're talking weekly and monthly meetings out of the Boston field office, and Trump didn't learn about this his first admin. So we learned this was going on until I was sent this by the new FBI director, okay, or or the new FBI. And and it's just the cover sheets, but they have codes on it that Kyle Serafin used to run counterterrorism.
The FBI, you know, huge whistleblower, came on my show for hours and documented what it meant. Then he talked to his sources currently in DC, and they said, yeah. We're actually on this. It's bad. Okay?
So Obama illegally had me declare a national security threat, open criminal espionage investigation with huge resources. Humet attempted infiltration. That's all the codes, and that's now makes sense. People people we hire trying to set us up, trying to get us to commit crimes, all this stuff over the years, hacking into our surveillance camera systems, trying to find something dirty, all sorts of sabotage. So now, I mean, I'm living in a spy movie.
So so so we so so we get that, like, ten days in the Trump administration. Three days in, they they they they mail it. It comes to mail, like, seven days later. So now we have that. So we have Oblivas admitting it from the FBI and CIA.
We have the other lead counsel in in Connecticut admitting it on the stand, proud of it, hiding in plain view, just to because they knew it would come out. Then we get another FBI contact. They say, why don't you go look at the federal register and it look for money going to these Sandy Hook Foundations or the people that sued me. We go, look, it's $4,000,000 plus in payments to them right after they sue me, and then two payments to them during when both trials started. One Payments from whom?
From the justice department.
Speaker 0: So tax dollars?
Speaker 1: Tax dollars, over $4,000,000 from the justice department were paid to the Maine Sandy Hook Foundation that is on the board and the head of it for the people suing me that ran it.
Speaker 0: This is crazy.
Speaker 1: So so so so so now we have the justice department, and and I'm releasing those documents. I was actually planning to release them today, a a week ago before you invited me out here. So that's all gonna be out today. The documents, all of it, but but it's online. They don't hide it.
Also, millions and millions and millions more of COVID money went to them, and you know what happened to Cory Bush's husband. I'm not saying it's illegal. Should be looked into. So this so this is why this is important. This is the most open and shut, start to finish operation we've ever seen with all this money directly from the justice department, with the justice department admitting they initiated it undercover tapes with the CIA.
Then you have the FBI admitting on the stand that they initiated it. Then you have the money directly from the justice department to them directly when they're attacking me, and then it gets worse. In the last year in my bankruptcy, they had before that, they attached a US trustee, which they know to federal law, to my bankruptcy like I'm Enron. Most people don't have this happen. So there's just department lawyers and agents at my depositions giving me US code to read before the deposition when after I'm sworn in that if I say anything incorrect, they're gonna charge me with felonies.
Okay? But I still don't take the fix. I've done nothing wrong and I have accountants and it's all lies. They're alleging I've stolen hundreds of millions of dollars from these people. None of that's true.
I don't even have hundreds of millions of dollars. I've had $10,000,000 of extra laying around.
Speaker 0: But they stole money from what people?
Speaker 1: Did they just say, I harassed them. I made money off them. It's their money. It's just all made up, but I have the judge department there. So then the judge department has the US trustee in May of last year order a private security company on a Friday evening to show up with guns on their sides and say, everybody out of the building.
And I say, where's the court order? And I say, call the head of your security company. I get on the phone. He goes, hey. I'm telling the people this too.
We gotta have a court order. I'm gonna tell them
Speaker 0: They showed up at your office? They showed up at
Speaker 1: my office.
Speaker 0: With guns?
Speaker 1: Armed security. Yes. Yeah. And and so I call my lawyers. They don't even believe it's happening.
We get a hearing, and the judge blocks it. Then he has a full evidentiary hearing June 14. Fires the US trustee, removes them, removes the CRO that did it, okay, in the bankruptcy, and then appoints a new one who comes in to be all but buddy buddy. Then they he says, okay, we wanna sell it. And then that way proceeds have sold Infowars.
But then, we have buyers that are good that'll keep it going. The Sandy Hook families, really Democratic party, says, we don't want money in court filings. We want it shut down. The judge says, no. You will sell it at an auction, but cash auction.
Then they have a auctions date set. The day before they say that's canceled, it'll be private bids turned in on that Monday. And then the next day, we will tell you the winner is. Well, then it was the Bloomberg financing his Everytown group, The Onion. Everybody heard The Onion had gotten in force.
Remember that? Back in, back in November. So all that happens. So we we countersue. The judge has hearings on December, says there was never an auction that was fraudulent.
You know, you guys need to settle this, and you need to get money for mister Jones' buyers, and it needs to stop. They come back to the judge three times and say, we don't want money. We don't ever want it sold. We want it shut down. So the judge said, about a month ago, he said, okay.
I'm done. This has gone on three years. Take it to state court. The state court is judge Bellis that did the show trial with HBO, or that that's judge Gore Gamble in Texas. It's judge that's the other judge in Connecticut.
So it's it's judge Gware Gamble, just like judge Bellis running the show trial finding me guilty. She has said as soon as she gets that, she's gonna send in the constables from the county and just close the doors, lock it. Because they don't want the money that it can produce. They don't want any of that. They, you know, they want it shut down.
Can I just ask you
Speaker 0: a reality based question here? So all of this stem Sorry. This is
Speaker 1: a long story.
Speaker 0: But no. No. No. No. It's a it's a shocking story, but I just don't wanna lose the baseline
Speaker 1: never been told in in full.
Speaker 0: The baseline facts. Okay. So all of this stems from a school shooting in Connecticut. Twelve years ago. Twelve years ago.
And you suggested on air that there was something weird about this.
Speaker 1: I covered other people saying that.
Speaker 0: Correct. You did not commit the school shooting?
Speaker 1: No. Adam Lanza did.
Speaker 0: Adam Lanza did.
Speaker 1: I said for years, I believe it happened before they sued me. Right.
Speaker 0: So we spent approximately zero time and zero money as a country trying to figure out why would Adam Lanza murder all these children. We're all against murdering children. Some of us are against murdering all children, including in foreign countries and here in abortion clinics, just against murdering kids. Okay? So I'm not gonna cede the moral high ground on kids to ghouls like this.
So okay. But we have no idea why Adam lands in this. No one's trying to find out. You instead are being blamed, who are the father of four kids, for the murder of all these kids when you had literally nothing to do with the murder at all, and the actual murderer is probably brain fried in SSRIs or whatever the cause. Like, no one cares.
Speaker 1: That's right. He was on SSRIs, like, almost all of them, and exactly. And here's the finale.
Speaker 0: But, like, no one cares. It's like all these people jump up and down, including some of these parents, I assume. And, like, I understand they're upset their kids are murdered. I mean, I I have true compassion for them, but they're blaming you for it?
Speaker 1: And and and then raising money, hundreds of millions off my name, and and his mother bought the gun legally, and then Remington was bankrupted by it and paid $73,000,000 to them. Remember that. It just goes on and on. And after they sued me, this one foundation's increase went up while they were suing me and during the show trials, 375, percent. Let me give you the actual numbers.
337% to 119,000,000 just during that period, and their main fundraiser was me. Not to mention all the justice department, four plus million they got.
Speaker 0: But here's the here's Blaming you when you say the fundraiser was you. They blaming you for a mass murder that you were horrified by and didn't commit and ignoring the actual mass murderer, blaming everyone but the murderer for political reasons. So, like, they're destroying you.
Speaker 1: It's like that meme where Indiana Jones moves the idol and puts the bag of sand on there. They removed Lanza and just put me on there. And it was he's coming. He's harassing us. He made all this money off of us.
He's bullying. He's sending the stalkers. He's he's attacking. Help. Help.
Help. With just ads everywhere. Help. Help. Help us find Alex Jones.
Help. Help. Help. And and I'm and I hadn't talked about them in years and years. Only talked about one of their names.
I never even knew this FBI agent was. None of my crew said his name. My lawyer got up and said, have you ever Alex Jones ever said your name? No. Any of his crew ever said your name?
No. You ever post your picture? Ever talk about it? You know. When's the first time you heard of Alex Jones?
Two thousand sixteen. And then he goes and does all this, but but here's the finale. Here's the finale. This is what I know when you talk to Trump and others, this is important because this needs to be looked at. This is conspiracy against rights.
We're getting ready to take action on this legally. This is a violation of process. This is racketeering. I mean, cut and dry in my view, and that's what my legal experts agree as well. It's cut and dry.
Turns out Paul Weiss, the big law firm that lost its intelligence agency clearances because they targeted Trump and they admitted to it. They came to Trump a month ago and they said, give us back 50 plus percent of our business. Let us have our national security clearance. We promise to stop doing lawfare against you and your supporters, and this is an agreement, and we'll spend $40,000,000 on pro bono work that's non political. It's it's it's in the agreement.
Okay? And that's, by the way, in our legal action about to come out. They just filed that 40,000,000 of that 20 is their suit of me, and they list the lawyers. That's their pro bono work? And they've been coordinating the entire bankruptcy assault.
They came up with the fake auction on record that's come out in our depositions of them. We're we're suing them currently, but more is coming. They came up with a plan with the US trustees multiple times to have fake auctions, and and and the judge said it was a fake auction. They're the ones that sent armed security on Friday evening. I was leaving at, 07:00.
There's all these guys showing up from the security company we'd already used for eight years, but all these guys never seen. They're like, hey, man. We're told that they're they're closing the doors. They're kicking you out for good. Died at nine.
And we shouldn't have told you this, but I knew one of the guys. And but but now it's under the court. And then I get on that phone with the head of the security company, and and he goes, listen, man. He goes, I'm being I got this lady saying, I'm a just department official, Melissa Hazleton, and and her lawyer, Freeman, Melissa Hazleton and Liz Freeman, and they're telling me, we are just department officials. You must close it.
He said, no. I want a court order. So then I had to sleep up there because they tried to hire another security company the next day, and I and I knew it. And I
Speaker 0: want to steal your office from you.
Speaker 1: Listen. When they did the fake auction the next day, they came and turned the Internet off because they knew I was gonna appeal it, and the judge shut that down too. And I was out of there for a few days, there was such an outcry, and the judge ordered to let us back in the building. We've been run we've been kicked out repeatedly. Once I would
Speaker 0: Of your own building.
Speaker 1: Of our own building. So so but Paul Weiss has has been running this whole thing with Koskov and Koskov. It's basically a total deep state operation with senator Blumenthal and his son. Okay? So this is on record.
And and but but so so so here they are telling Trump, oh, yes. We'll stop doing lawfare against you and your people. And then now they're billing that in the basic fine they agreed to with Trump. You know, that's what it is, unofficial fine. They are telling Trump, we're gonna stop our attacks on your supporters and you, and now they think Trump you know, they they know he's busy that he won't learn that they've done this.
So in my view, they need serious sanctions from the White House. If this isn't about me, I'm tough. This is about this saga. Everything I've told you is even worse than I'm telling you. The the the insanity of of what they've done and and the persecution would take days because they had four court ordered that my company had to pay for.
And then if the money didn't come in, we wouldn't make it through those investigations. I'd tell listeners, hey, buy our products. We've gotta pay to be investigated. Four different investigations, forensic accountants looking for dirt. They had the IRS audit me for a year.
We got a $4,300,000 tax return back. The IRS says we never do this. Went into the bankruptcy because I'd overpaid 4,300,000.0 in five years because I tell my CPAs, you pay overpay. I know they'll because I don't want the target. So so there are three years of investigation.
I got a $4,300,000 check back and none of it was true. And then even the New York Times last year had to say, well, it turns out Jones had meager resources and never really had anything. Well, it was all lies. So it was all lies I did anything to him. It was all lies I made money off of.
It was all lies I had all this money. And the point is is now to last night, the Connecticut Supreme Court said we're not even gonna hear your appeal and which is ironclad, abusive process, all the rest of it. Texas, the the judge violated three laws cut and dry. I mean, the cap is at $5,000,000. She said, I don't care about the Texas cap.
I'm doing 45, and the change was 49. They just don't care. And it's the same in all of this lawfare, just like a judge found
Speaker 0: Trump never did anything. You never broke any laws. They would have indicted you. Like, this is all so hallucinogenic. It's so crazy.
Speaker 1: Well, imagine it's like the it's like I'm their chew toy, and they just chew on me.
Speaker 0: But your crime look. I just wanna refer you to the very first moments of this conversation when I pointed out once again for the hundredth time, you called 911 in detail before 09:11. So that is, like, just from my perspective as an outsider and someone who knows you, that's, like, the defining fact of your life. That's the first sentence of your obituary. No one did that.
Only you. That fact, I think, is responsible for everything that has come after.
Speaker 1: Well, just exactly. Well, just think of the scandal. On record, Kyle Serafin, and he showed me the conversations with high level FBI. They're said they're investigating it. He's gonna come back on the show, I think, tomorrow or Friday.
You know, famous whistleblower. He read the the the the the documents, and and and we got a lot from it, but he explained, I I mean, this is like terrorist designation. This is espionage. So I've had a full espionage counterespionage operation against me trying to find something for ten years.
Speaker 0: So where's the DOJ? Where's I mean, this is a test for the new Department of Justice, you know, brought in on the explicit promise to end the corruption, stop using our justice system, which my ancestors helped build and yours too, as a political army mobilized against domestic political opponents. That's not allowed. That's like Haiti stuff. We don't do that.
It's not a Tantan Makuta. It's the FBI. They promised to do that. So can they help you? Are they helping you?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I'll say this. Trump cut and dry had the same stuff done to him. He he's the only person on a wider scale that has had this. And you'll hear him say, it's unbelievable. It would take a long time.
It's unbelievable. I've studied the cases of you. It's it's the same kind of crap. A judge in New York finds him guilty, doesn't give him a jury trial. I mean, it it goes on and on.
So what they've done to me, wanna do to you. But if you want that string that pulls the whole sweater apart, they think because the demonization of what they said I did to kids I didn't do, that the Republicans will be scared to ever defend me.
Speaker 0: Oh, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: When in truth, it's like the Mendez brothers. When people found out what they went through, they learned that they'd all been lied to about that. Well, this is like that. This is like what the story you've heard folks from start to finish isn't that. They saw I was famous.
They saw I was big. They tied me to Trump, tried to hurt him, then they raised hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars off of me, got just department money, had show trials, put out all the stuff I didn't do on record, and and and and and and then now are not just trying to kill the second amendment using these poor dead children who have God rest their souls, but the first amendment as well. So this is outrageous, and it it's a bellwether showing that Paul Weiss, that big democrat law firm, one of the top ones, would literally tell Trump, okay, we'll stop doing political persecution. We admit to it. They they confessed to lawfare against him and his supporters, his family, and then they're still doing it to me, and they're billing the money they said that he'd pay in me.
So so it's a sick joke. They think Trump won't learn about this. And at the end of the day, I just want it to stop. And look, we've survived so much. People say, oh, they were gonna shut you down here.
They were shut you down there. It's in the news they kicked us out of the building in November. It's in the news they kicked us out in or tried to kick us out in in May of last year. There there was a bunch of other stuff that happened. My big deal is I'm not gonna give up because they've said we wanna get the name Infowars, we wanna confuse it and have Shubacabras and Bigfoot and we're gonna act like we're Alex Jones.
They they claim they own my x account. Musk had to sue, get involved, and have them back off of that. The Democrats in their filing in in bankruptcy six months ago said that the amendment against slavery was it 13 or 14? 13. Doesn't apply to me.
That's you read it in Bloomberg from the filing. They said, he is a special type of person. And so just like Prince signed away his rights to a record company for his name and his music. I never signed away my rights. So they're saying they own the name Alex Jones, in the court filing.
They said they know the name real Alex Jones. They're saying they own all my catalog of material even though it's always been free to air and it's my political views and it's open. They can't do that. I can write a book and publish it to the world and say it's free. Somebody can't sue me and get a bankruptcy letter and say they own a book I gave away copyright free.
My show is owned by the world, but what is it they don't want? It's because my older shows, going back thirty years, are ultra green. They're not evergreen where they stay the test of time. They get more important. And so the system knows that those clips are getting hundreds of millions of views, some of them, where I lay out and predict hundreds of subjects and and and what's gonna happen.
And then
Speaker 0: I explain though So that intellectual property is at stake?
Speaker 1: They are preposterously this is new law. They think off of demonized Alex Jones. They say this. They can set a precedent to not just censor you, not just take Tucker Carlson off the air, they said you're the next target, literally. I say the clips you didn't see him on CNN, MSNBC, that they will then take your identity, which under the prohibition of slavery and under the prohibition against slavery in the Texas constitution, all the others, you can't take someone's name.
You can't even take someone's tools under state law in Texas. And but, no, they are saying that they own the name Alex Jones. And they own your archive of content? Yes. And they say that they want to twist it and make fun of it.
They had the onion owner with the Everytown Bloomberg representative on They they let Bloomberg pay for it.
Speaker 0: The new onion owner is just an intel cutout. I
Speaker 1: mean Absolutely. From MSNBC. He was I'm very aware of. The censorship operator. That was his job.
Speaker 0: Who has literally no sense of humor at all. He's the most humorless drone working on behalf of entrenched power, like, in The United States, and he's running the comedy site.
Speaker 1: It's like it's like the Babylon Bee. It's also fake. And he's the MSNBC version of Brian Stelter.
Speaker 0: Oh, I'm aware. I'm aware.
Speaker 1: Oh, I know you're the but exactly. So what I'm saying is it's a constellation of operatives, corporate, media, government, justice department, the trustees, all of them, and they just, like an army, believe they're still gonna beat America.
Speaker 0: Oh, I know.
Speaker 1: And they see me as a populist firebrand folk hero, and they said that themselves, and they want to silence and destroy that person so they can then take the identity of that and turn me into Satan. So
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, Adam Lands is the guy who murdered all those children is totally forgotten.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And I almost apologize. I don't really talk about this a lot on my own show. It's just come to a head today, and I'm very honored you let me run on and on. But, I mean, folks, this is your country, your world.
This was done. What I've told you is 10 of it. Okay? I mean, this is an incredible scandal. The law firm that confessed to Trump to try to destroy him illegally with lawfare.
It said, don't worry, sir. We'll do $40,000,000 of good work nonpolitical. Half of that in a filing last week is me. They have gone and filed that half of our 40,000,000 is what we've to Alex Jones. I mean, come on.
I mean, look, don't care what happens to me. I just hope Trump takes away their national security clearance because they're not gonna stop what they're doing and those other law firms
Speaker 0: No.
Speaker 1: I know exactly who they are.
Speaker 0: I agree. And you'd love to talk to the person who negotiated that deal and see if he's aware of it.
Speaker 1: Oh, I wonder who that is in the White House. Yeah. Maybe they should be looked at a little bit.
Speaker 0: Yep. So Wonder what they got. Yep. You know, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Here's I'm just speculating here. That's why we need to investigate because because, I mean, you know this in racketeering laws they passed. If the mafia says, oh, you better hire my cousin and pay me 10 percent or something might happen to your grocery store, and then they burn your grocery store down, they start investigating, they learn how the criminal networks operate. The mob bosses say go burn it down. He just says, yeah, that guy's not paying.
And and and and that's and they all wanna mount my head on the wall. Like, you've got, you know, that great deer mounted on the wall over there. They want Alex Jones's head on the wall as a symbol to scare everybody else. I mean, they said that in the courthouses and on the courthouse steps. They said, send a message to everybody else.
These patient zero. Yeah. We're gonna take
Speaker 0: him off Shut up in Obey.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And destroy him, and we're gonna scare every one of these other Americans to keep I mean, literally, it's like in Bug's Life when the head grasshopper says, yeah, we got all this grain. Why are we gonna go beat up the ants because one little ant stood up? He goes, yeah, one little grain doesn't hurt. But he goes, but if they all stand up and he pulls it and it floods them.
He goes, if that those little puny ants outnumber us a hundred to one. And if they ever figure that out, it's over for us. That's why we're going back to kill that ant.
Speaker 0: That's exactly right.
Speaker 1: That's it. So I'm just the ant in Bug's life.
Speaker 0: You are, and but it hasn't worked, and so I wanna make a prediction because I just wanna be on tape saying this. I'll say it again even more clearly this time, I, of course, I hope I'm wrong. I pray I'm wrong. But I do think a lot of the the really crazy, bitter, ethnic hate that you see on social media is fake. It's it's people were saying it don't mean it.
I think it's like, you know, the Klansmen you'd see
Speaker 1: marching, and you're like,
Speaker 0: there are no Klansmen. Like, what? And, of course, you find out that it's all it's it's fake, and it's designed to convince people that there's, like, a lot of roiling ethnic hatred that doesn't really exist, and and that's a predicate to The Patriot Front. Exactly. It's it's Charlottesville.
That's happening online right now, and I and I know that it is. And I think that at some point, I pray I'm wrong, but there's gonna be an act of violence, ethnic inspired violence, of hate hate inspired violence, actual hate, like killing people, and I really hope I'm wrong, but I I feel like this is real, and that that event will be used to shut down free speech on social media.
Speaker 1: I 100. Because that
Speaker 0: is the threat, and they you saw it with TikTok, like, oh, we need to ban TikTok because China owns it. No. Nothing to do with China. It had everything to do with opinions that the people in charge didn't like being expressed there, and it's like, we're just gonna and and the congress went along with it. But if there's an act of violence and innocence or murdered, and I pray that doesn't happen, because I hate that above all, but it has happened, and I feel like it could happen again.
And people say, and a lot of good people will go along with it, just like they went along with the censorship of you and the destruction of your life because they were told, like, he's bad. He had something to do with murdering children. And then people just shut down. They're like, you know, I don't know. Alex Jones is sending you with murdering children.
So whatever they do to Alex Jones, like, is fine.
Speaker 1: I can't tell you how many times in front of my family people walk up and they go, you killed those kids.
Speaker 0: Exactly.
Speaker 1: And I'll always go, really? I I did. And why am I walking around? And then just like, well, you you know what you did. But but but what you said is so important.
The last ingredients is the false flag on a big illegal alien demonstration or a black church. Because the Democrats keep saying Trump's coming to kill the migrants. We gotta rise up.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Or or something else like that, but where innocents are murdered by a crazy person, a crazy person, or maybe an actual crazy person used or whatever, or maybe it just happens organically. Maybe if you stoke enough ethnic division online, it's clearly I mean, there are people who have, you know, views that are, you know, mad at other ethnicities. I mean, that's that's real. Okay?
But there are also big actors who are not real. They're doing it on purpose.
Speaker 1: And we know who they are.
Speaker 0: Yes. We do know who they are.
Speaker 1: And for strategic reasons.
Speaker 0: I'm not I don't wanna get involved in all that filth, but
Speaker 1: But let's just say we've seen the documents separately.
Speaker 0: A %, and they're stoking this stuff, and maybe it just organically inspires someone to commit murder, a mass murder. And again, I just pray as someone who hates all violence, to say it again, I pray that's not the case, but it's
Speaker 1: Well, let's just say this. The people they're mainly attacking are the ones financing them. It's the oldest trick in the book Yep. Hugalian dialectic, and so just be aware of that, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And I just don't yeah. And I think you're what and the only reason I bring that up is because I worry about it every day.
Speaker 1: I do too because that's the next big move.
Speaker 0: Free speech is the foundation of a free society. Without it, you it's not a free society. You're a slave. If you can't say what you think, you're a slave. It's really simple.
And we don't have slavery in this country. It's a free country.
Speaker 1: And when it happens, I pray it doesn't. That's the next move. So we're predicting this, so that there's enough eyes and ears on it and enough people watching so they don't pull it off. Because that's the thing. Everything I used to predict basically came true because the globalists were still in power.
They're so disorganized, have so many problems now. A lot of times when we're able to get out ahead of things, you and others and Trump and Joe Rogan, we're able and and and and Elon's with a huge voice, you know, second only to Trump, we're able to disrupt what they're doing and enough people see through it. So if it does happen, they try to stampede us into blaming whoever it is. Oh, the crooks guy, you know, he acted alone. Well, this will be some right wing Trump supporter with
Speaker 0: a MAGA hat. %.
Speaker 1: And it'll get killed by the SWAT team.
Speaker 0: He was inspired by hate online. There's for you're not allowed to have, like, legitimate opinions or your own opinions. And, you know, God can decide whether they're legitimate or not. But if you're a free man, a free person, you have a right to say what you really believe, period. And that cannot be encumbered or else you're a slave.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. And and, you know, you know, we get back to the spiritual battle here. I I just want people to know that my lawyers just told me when you I put I put you on speaker with them. They said I could be shut down within two days, two weeks. They are coming to shut down Infowars.
We've survived so much like a long boxing match. People are like, oh, yeah. Right. No. This is very, very real.
This has been very, very serious. And so, you know, for now, people can find me on exit real Alex Jones. But but that part doesn't matter. People understand more and more how things work. All of your voices are so important.
All of you sharing this interview, sharing the other great work Tucker's doing, all the courage he has and others have to really put it on the line. You know, we haven't even talked about Iran.
Speaker 0: Well, give me give me your five minute I mean, that, I should say, I think this interview is going up tonight. We're gonna try to get it up in a few hours, but that's such a dynamic situation. Steve Wittkopf, apparently, is meeting directly with the Iranians, which I think is such a a great it's a blessing. But and I hope for the best. But give us your five minute overview.
Like, what
Speaker 1: is that, and where is that going? Well, Iran's plan b for the globalist. And Iran's got its issues, and it's Shiite militias and and all that. I'm not I'm not lionizing the mullis. Oh, you're not?
But but but they've been isolated. Israel has knocked out their proxy forces in Lebanon and in Gaza and in the West Bank, And Netanyahu is extremely unpopular. He's been indicted and he he said he doesn't want an investigation in January he he doesn't want an investigation of October 7 until the war is over, but then he never you know, he's gonna have the war be over. So I'm not even against Netanyahu. I'm not against Israel.
I know most people in Israel don't war with Iran either, but he's been trying to drag us into war since 09/11. That's how long he's been around and in power off and on into this, and they have the most ballistic missiles in the world. What it four to one, five to one, six to one to even the Israeli anti missile defense system. Israel, as you know, only has three big cities. They will get blown off the map by this.
Conventionally, even if Iran doesn't have nukes and uses them, the word is they do, Israel will nuke Iran, and then all hell's gonna break loose. And in most scenarios, India and Pakistan start nuking each other. Saudi Arabia has got nukes. There's a lot of other countries that have nukes that people don't know about. You don't want even a limited nuclear war because in most big threat assessment war games, and Tucker's an expert, he can attest to it, he talks to the experts, it it breaks out.
You know, kinda like your neighbor, you know, has the black plague. Well, you you might get it. Or, you know, you know, your neighbor, you know, has has got syphilis, and God forbid you have sex with him. I mean, this is a lot worse than syphilis. This is a lot worse than TB.
This is really dangerous, and Iran does have proxy forces in Europe and The United States that Obiden let get in, and they really do have some of these sleeper cells that are here that if this does go to full war, they can cause some major problems. And different foreign intelligence agencies are famous for spoofing Iranians and and and Saudi Arabian terror attacks. They could easily stage a big false flag to get us into a war with Iran.
Speaker 0: I'm aware. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And and they're also the Russians have warned, and even before they did, I warned of attacks on nuclear power plants in Ukraine and Russia, try to blame Russia. Ukraine's done that, been caught. Ukraine and NATO tried to blame Russia for the Nord Stream pipeline. How laughable is that? Of course, I hears his information has been proven, know, that obviously it was the US government with NATO.
I mean, even Biden said, you know, we'll get rid of the pipeline if you invade. So the globalists are very reckless. Again, 50% chance the Pentagon said that they started bombing Russia, Russia would nuke. They still rolled the dice. So we need really cool heads here.
This is not like going into Iraq twice. This is not like going into Libya. This is not a cakewalk. Even for people that love to, you know, buy a bottle of bourbon and sit back and get drunk watching, you know, a a war like so many sick people do. This this this is the main threat to civilization.
And, I mean, Tucker, you really have all the connections. You travel the world. You cover these summits.
Speaker 0: I don't know any I don't know anything other than I think the people in charge of a bunch of different countries are are, like, reckless on a level that's without precedent in the modern era, and I I don't think they're serving their own people, by the way, leaders like that. It's not just like, you know, you've got a bellicose leader who's threatening war or whatever. It doesn't necessarily mean the people he rules are being served. He's putting their lives at risk. Our leaders have put our lives at risk for no good reason.
And so, you know, I'm I'm hardly expert in anything. I'm just an observer, and and it's just all so obvious. And I'm really worried about my last question to you is, you get this sense that there's like a a spirit of dullness or fantasy. Maybe it's connected to living digitally or something, But, like, smart aware people are no longer smart or aware. They're sort of sleepwalking through this incredibly dangerous moment, and they don't even acknowledge any of it.
And, what is that?
Speaker 1: Well, that was the description I was gonna use. There's like
Speaker 0: a mist that settles over all of us, and, like, we can't it's like no one is even, like, awake. What is that?
Speaker 1: Well, that's how I describe it. It's how you describe it. We're sleepwalking into Armageddon. The Bible calls it a spell.
Speaker 0: It feels that way.
Speaker 1: Medically, they would call it a trance. And and, you know, since the advent, I say that sarcastically of television, and everybody gathering around it, people are way more highly suggestible. Most people are closer to a near dream state or daydream state pretty much all the time.
Speaker 0: Feels that
Speaker 1: way. You go to a movie, see everybody kinda drooling. And and and I've never really had a lot of suspended disbelief. Even when I was a kid, was always analyzing things.
Speaker 0: Me too.
Speaker 1: And so I guess that's a gift, but also it's kinda torture. It'd be fun to just be be able to be mindless sometimes. But yeah. And and the establishment itself is all about never actually making a decision they get in trouble for, having committees, having groups, having economy policy where no one can be accountable, but then that creates a runaway train scenario, where then only the most reckless people that are the craziest kind of become the consensus because nobody else wants to challenge them. And through Trump and Elon, you know, saying, hey, we don't want war.
We don't want a meat grinder. This is too dangerous. This is crazy. We want to stabilize civilization. We want to have more kids, not less.
Every actuary shows we collapse if we don't. Those are conscious. Look at Trump, conscious, awake, sharp, Elon, conscious, aware, sharp, you know, so many others. And and then it's a system of kind of quasi zombies and zombies run by a few kleptocrat, psycho, demon possessed people that that that that don't want us waking up the zombies. So, that's why they're mad at me.
It's why they're mad at Elon. It's why they're mad at you. Is that we are trying to collectively get people to wake up because the wheel on the ship is so heavy and so big, a few of us can't turn it. But if we get more people politically engaged and aware, together we're able to turn the wheel as we're about to go over this waterfall 5,000 feet and get killed. And so, it's it's it's people that are dialed in unconscious versus people that are unconscious in the middle versus evil that is driven by a very nihilistic, destructive force.
And and that's what the transhumanism is about. I mean, I remember thirty years ago reading government white papers that were public that listeners sent me medical people that they had human animal hybrids they could grow in cows for organ harvesting, And that and of course, that's been admitted for twenty years now. But just last week, hundreds of articles, oh, we can grow humanoids for organ harvesting. Don't worry though, they don't have consciousness. We've already raised them at undisclosed laboratories, and then it's in the MIT, you know, reports that they've done it.
Or I remember thirty years ago, oh, military bases have goats that are part spider that produce body armor out of their milk, but we don't show them to you. And then later they brought them out. And then, oh, oh, we have dire wolves living in an undisclosed location where we spliced 13,000 year old DNA with a regular wolf. And my point is, the future's been here for a while. It's just not evenly distributed.
So, you've got this super advanced sectors of technology, literally an underground bases and facilities, and you've got an establishment, a very small technocracy that's even aware of those systems. Yes. And they don't wanna give the general population access to that. So to them, they want a nuclear war. They think it's survivable in their underground bases.
And Ian Fleming, former high level OSS in MI six, wrote the James Bond books, became movies. Remember the eighties, Moonraker with with Roger Moore. And remember, there's a crazy billionaire with these other billionaires with underground base in Brazil that's gonna release a bioweapon on the earth to kill everybody, but only goes for a year. He's gonna go up to space while everybody dies on earth at their space station, and then come back and repopulate the earth. And he's a eugenicist, and they only have the best specimens of the humans to do it.
They're in the movie Zardoz with Sean Connery in the seventies, and Logan's Run, and The Island, and, t h x one one three eight. And then you have Aldous Huxley who wrote Brave New World in '32. His brother, Julian Huxley, was the head of the World Eugenics Society. When that got a bad name before World War two, they changed the World Transhumanist Society. He was the director general of UNESCO, really ran the UN.
And his brother, before he died, gave that famous Berkeley speech an hour long, and I've read his book, Brave New World Revisited, that's nonfiction. Everybody should read it. And he says, no. No. No.
No. The world's not gonna be like Orwell with the SWAT teams. That's for the 1% that might resist. The real plan, the reason I could write Brave New World is this was the consensus of the elite in Europe and and England of the world we're gonna build with genetically engineered people, a subspecies that serves us, everyone taking soma, everyone's controlled, and he explains in that Berkeley speech, if you don't read the book, he gives a synopsis that this is a real plan that he saw being in place by 2020. And so you have to understand Brave New World is an instruction manual of what they wanna do.
They wanna turn humans into a commodity. That's why Obama calls it the end of history, where there are no more cycles, where everything's controlled, where 90% of the world population's reduced. And maybe if you serve them right or whatever, the 10% is here, but there's these gods on Mount Olympus or these Elysium you know, demigods that are the technocrats that control everything. Everybody is wired into their brains and the technocrats control the AI, and and then they play God. Like Rick Kurzweil said, I don't believe in God yet.
I'm gonna become one. You've all know Harare. I don't believe in god yet, but there will be one in the cloud of AI. And so I'll just say this, the best laid plans of mice and men off to go astray as the, you know, famous writer said. And these people are prideful.
They're satanic. Yes. And and and and it's all gonna end in disaster. We have to choose God. We have to choose justice.
We have to choose free will, and we have to get out of nature more, and we have to disconnect, you know, from the system's lies, and then only go into the system to basically tell the truth. And just know that if if you're fighting evil, evil's gonna come after you, but that's a blessing and that it's very rewarding. And the experiences you have in that quest are are are the greatest experiences of my life. And you find out who's real, you find out who's not real. I just see the arrogance of these lawyers, and and it's warfare.
It's lawfare. And with through the agencies that are running them. And and what they've done to me, wanna do to you. Like Trump said a thousand times, they're not trying to get me. They gotta get through me to get to you.
That is true. And so that's why I I I do wanna see action from the White House. I do wanna see the judge department take action because my case, because they felt like it's free free game on me that, you know, it's just open season. They've they've been more transparent. I mean, it's illegal in my view and lawyer to to to have the judge department fund these lawsuits.
It's illegal to have the FBI go create these. It's illegal for Obama to list me as a national security terrorist, have a dragnet for decades, then they you know, all of this concerted is the stalking. All of this concerted is the racketeering, and that's what it is by definition, conspiracy against rights. And then they're just sitting back laughing and and going, oh, Trump, forty million, you know, to help poor people. We won't be political anymore.
We're using it for Alex Jones. You know, it's just these people need to be called on this. They operate in darkness. They operate because people are too busy. They operate thinking you're never gonna figure out what they're doing.
And and more and more, they're scared. But I would have thought with all this coming out, they would back off. No. Instead, they've gotten scared because the Connecticut Supreme Court and all of them were gonna hear this. Now, they said suddenly they reversed it.
No. We're not hearing it now. Yeah. Because because they think just shut him down, shut him up. It's not gonna work when if they shut down Infowars, and I and I don't, you know, throw fights.
I'm fighting right to the end. But if they're able to do that and everybody sees that, it's only gonna make what I do that much bigger. But, again, like when they you know, the establishment tried to kill Trump. That's when the establishment went from collapsing to collapsed. So their order's over.
And I like it in closing, the Japanese soldiers, the last one, twenty seven years later, because the Japanese were losing in the Pacific. As you know, Tucker, they would dump soldiers out on islands to frustrate and harass the the allies coming in. The US, England, and the Australians and the New Zealanders that fought the Pacific War. And so the last guy, 27 later, was still on an island shooting at people and stuff thinking that, you know, he still had to fight for the emperor until he found out, oh, the war's been over twenty seven years. So the radicalized death cult left, the Jacobins are just running around like chickens with their heads cut off like zombies.
Attack. Attack. Attack. Everyone's a Nazi. Cutting women off in traffic, getting out, beating up women because they're driving a Tesla, being proud of it.
I mean, they they have been radicalized into a cult. And and that's what Klaus Schwab said. Said we're gonna collapse Western civilization by creating an angrier world. We've got to not target each other. We've got to target the policies and ideas of globalists and dismantle the policies and have a big tent to unify behind stopping nuclear war.
Speaker 0: You you know, you're you just you pray you live long enough to affect good in the world, and I I definitely pray that for you. Alex Jones, thank you.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Tucker, so much. You're the best.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Memorize this. Bookmark this. Refer it to friends. Retweet it. Let the world know. The truth. The brilliance of Jeffrey Sachs. This is the score. The real deal. The bottom line. What the radical left proxy media sockpuppets never want you to hear or know. Verity. Brutal truth. https://t.co/q2qb4d9Yl7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Putin's intention in the war was to keep NATO, meaning the United States, off Russia's border. After the Soviet Union ended in 1991, the US decided to continue NATO's eastward expansion, formally deciding in 1994 to include Ukraine and Georgia. This expansion began in 1999 and continued in 2004, upsetting Russia. In 2008, the US pushed for NATO enlargement to Ukraine and Georgia, which border Russia. Russia protested, fearing the US would react similarly if Russia placed military bases near its borders. In 2014, the US actively worked to overthrow Yanukovych in Ukraine, and later, Ukraine refused to enforce the Minsk agreement, leading to conflict in the Donbas. Putin's initial war intention was to force Zelenskyy to negotiate neutrality, but Ukraine withdrew from near agreement due to US influence, leading to a proxy war with significant Ukrainian casualties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What was Putin's intention in the war? Not the propaganda that's written about this. Oh, that they failed and he was gonna take over Ukraine. The idea was to keep NATO. And what is NATO?
It's The United States off of Russia's border. No more, no less. When the Soviet Union ended in 1991, and an agreement was made that NATO will not move one inch eastward. Now what happened after 1991, the United States decided there would be no end to eastward enlargement of NATO. And the decision was taken formally in 1994 when president Clinton signed off on NATO enlargement to the East, all the way to Ukraine and into Georgia.
So the NATO enlargement, as you know, started in 1999 with Hungary, Poland, and The Czech Republic, and Russia was extremely unhappy about it. But these were countries still far from the border. So the next round of NATO enlargement came in 02/2004 with the three Baltic states, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovenia, and Slovakia. At this point, Russia was pretty damn upset. So as everybody recalls, recalls, in 02/2007, president Putin said, stop.
Enough. And, of course, what that meant was in 02/2008, the United States jammed down Europe's throat enlargement of NATO to Ukraine and to Georgia. This is right up against Russia. And Russia protested because if Russia decided to have a military base on the Rio Grande or the Canadian border, not only would The United States freak out, we'd have war within about ten minutes. And a month later, a war broke out.
That gets Georgia destroyed. And starting in 02/2010, the US put in Aegis missile systems in Poland and then in Romania. And Russia doesn't like that. In 02/2010, Viktor Yanukovych was elected on the platform of neutrality. Russia had no territorial interests or designs in Ukraine at all.
What Russia was negotiating was a twenty five year lease for Sevastopol naval base. That's it. Not for Crimea, not for the Donbas, nothing. In 02/2014, the US worked actively to overthrow Yanukovych. Everybody knows the phone call by my Columbia University colleague, Victoria Nuland, and The US Ambassador, Peter Piatt.
Listen to it. It's fascinating.
Speaker 1: I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yatz is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience, and, you know, fuck the EU.
Speaker 0: No. Exactly. And I think we've gotta do something to make You don't get better evidence. Then came Minsk and especially Minsk too. It said there should be autonomy for the Russian speaking regions in the East Of Ukraine.
It was supported unanimously by the UN Security Council. The United States and Ukraine decided it was not to be enforced. There were many thousands of deaths in the shelling by Ukraine in the Donbas. And one of the issues on the table in December 2021, January '20 '20 '2 was, does The United States claim the right to put missile systems in Ukraine? And Blinken told Lavrov in January 2022, the United States reserves the right to put missile systems wherever it wants.
So the war started. What was Putin's intention in the war? It was to force Zelenskyy to negotiate neutrality. And that happened within seven days of the start of the invasion. Ukraine walked away unilaterally from a near agreement.
Why? Because The United States told them to. The idea was that there would be Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Georgia that would deprive Russia of any international status by blocking the Black Sea. And the American senators who are as nasty and cynical and corrupt as imaginable say this is wonderful expenditure of our money because no Americans are dying. It's the pure proxy war.
And since The US talked the negotiators away from the table, about a million Ukrainians have died or been severely wounded.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
From now until the end of memory never forget this. Never forget what Jane Fonda did. Never forget her giving aid and comfort and support to the enemy. This, ladies and gentlemen, is treason. In its purest sense. Bookmark this. Forward this. Never forget this. Ever. https://t.co/x7QUHqlwhQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the summer of 1972, Jane Fonda made multiple broadcasts over Radio Hanoi. During these broadcasts, she denounced American POWs for supposedly committing war crimes and encouraged North Vietnamese forces to resist American imperialism. These actions and statements made during the broadcasts were considered unforgivable by many Americans. According to international law, the Nuremberg principles, and the Geneva Accord, these men are war criminals. They should be tried in court and likely executed for their actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But no visitor made more headlines than the actress Jane Fonda. During two weeks in the summer of nineteen seventy two, she broadcast at least 10 times over Radio Hanoi, denouncing American POWs for having committed war crimes, urging the North Vietnamese to hold out against American imperialism. Many Americans would never forgive her for what she did and said. According
Speaker 1: to international law, these men are war criminals. That's according to law, according to the Nuremberg principles, according to the Geneva Accord and others. They should be tried in front of a court and probably executed for what they did.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
President Trump, would you please do something about this? Thank you. https://t.co/jhRMmmAZPm
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm at Reagan National Airport, and TSA is pushing facial recognition. They're telling people to insert their driver's licenses into a machine, then forcing them to undergo facial recognition, claiming there's no opt-out once the license is scanned.
I challenged this, pointing out that it's not the law and that they're misleading travelers. The manager admitted the policy doesn't make sense but insisted on it. This feels like an attempt to eliminate the use of driver's licenses and establish a national surveillance system using our faces, with airports as the focal point. I will continue to fight against this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Darren, Jeff Markley here, and I'm here at Reagan National Airport. And I just went through the security checkpoint, and they have a new system to try to make sure that you do not use your driver's license or document instead of using facial recognition. They tell you to put your driver's license into the scanning machine. And then after you put it in and you and they tell you to step in front of it to get a photo, they proceed to say, well, you can't do that. You have to have your photo taken.
And when you say, well, I'm just using my driver's license. And they say, no. No. No. You start the process by putting your your driver's license in the machine.
At that point, you have to use facial recognition. And I said, well, I'm opting out of that. They said, well, too bad. You you you have no choice. Well, this no choice strategy, is exactly what we've been saying that TSA is after, trying to eliminate the ability to use just a driver's license.
The manager, called over the manager. The manager proceeded to say, well, I know this doesn't make sense, but we have a new policy here. And once you put your driver's license in the scanning machine, you have to go through facial recognition. Even if you step out and step back, sorry, you have to use facial recognition. And and so, I said no.
That that's not that's not the law. You don't have to use facial recognition, and you're misleading people if you tell them to put your driver's license in the machine. And then you tell them because you've done that, you can no longer use your driver's license instead of facial recognition. It's insane. This is big government coming to take away your privacy, trying to set up a national surveillance system using your faces, using the airports as the key mechanism.
I will continue to fight this every step of the way.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Either this illegal alien doesn't want to leave the United States or Burger King. https://t.co/0YO63ehAPS
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. Proof of the Prince of Darkness. https://t.co/l4EaZNNDJ1
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to introduce into the record page 5055 from the committee's interview with FBI employee Roya Demlow, which took place on July 17, 2023. During this interview, there was a suggestion that when Demlow stated the laptop was real, it implied the FBI had confirmed in October 2020 that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. Demlow clarified that this interpretation would misrepresent her statement, as she does not have sufficient knowledge on that matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Straight of matters first. I wanted to introduce into the record page 50 55 from the committee's interview with FBI and folks have some administrative matters first. I wanted to introduce into the record page 5055 from the committee's interview with FBI employee, Roya Demlow, who So I wanted to introduce into the record page 5055 from the committee's interview with page 5055 from the committee's interview with which took place on July 17, 2023. In that which took place on July 17, 2023. In that we're to leave this interview and we're to suggest or imply that when you said the laptop was real, that it meant that the FBI had affirmatively determined in October 2020 that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden.
We're to leave this interview and we're to suggest or imply that when you said the laptop was real, that it meant that the FBI had affirmatively determined in October 2020 that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden, would they be representing what you said? Correct? Answer by miss Demlow. They would be representing what I said because I don't have much knowledge of that. Misrepresenting.
They would be misrepresenting what I said because I don't have much knowledge of that.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Three individual separate and geographically different fire sources all ignited simultaneously and magically. Take all the time you need. https://t.co/JJWnnuSZff
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Bookmark this. Keep this. Remember this. Watch it often. Memorize it. Learn it. Understand it. Grasp it. Believe it. And never forget it. Ever. This is the truth. The truth that's kept from you. MSM and [SG] ghouls never want you to know the truth. They want war. And death.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conflict involving Ukraine and Russia has deep historical roots, beginning with a promise made in 1990 that NATO would not expand eastward in exchange for German unification. However, NATO expansion began in 1999, which Russia initially tolerated. Tensions escalated after the U.S. withdrew from the anti-ballistic missile treaty in 2002 and engaged in regime change in Ukraine in 2014. Despite Putin's repeated requests to halt NATO's expansion, the U.S. maintained an open-door policy for NATO membership. Negotiations to prevent war were rejected, leading to the current conflict. Zelensky's call for neutrality was dismissed by the U.S. and Britain, resulting in significant Ukrainian casualties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990, February 9, 1990. James Baker the 3rd, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move 1 inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War 2. And, Gorbachev said that's very important. Yes.
NATO doesn't move, and we agreed to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power, and, Clinton was the first agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic. At that point, Russia didn't much care.
There was no border other than with the Konigsberg, but other than that, there was no direct threat. Then, the US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, 78 straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much. But Putin became president.
They swallowed it. They complained. But, even Putin started out pro European, pro American, actually, asked maybe we should join NATO when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. Then 911 came, then came, Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah. We'll support you.
We understand to root out terror. But then came 2 other decisive actions. In 2002, the United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. This was probably the most decisive event never discussed in this context. But what it did was trigger the US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat.
In 2,004, 5, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president. And in 2010, on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. That calmed things down because the US was pushing NATO, but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even wanna be a NATO. They knew that the country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian.
What do we want with this? We wanna stay away from your problems. So in February 22nd 2014, the United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych. A typical US regime change operation. Have no doubt about it.
And the Russians did us a favor. They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my colleague at Columbia University now, between her and, the US ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, who's a senior state department official till today. And they talked about regime change. They said, who's gonna be the next government? All of this is to say, the US then said, okay.
Now NATO's really gonna enlarge. And Putin kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been by the way, I forgot to mention in 2004, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, 7 more countries in the not 1 inch eastward. And then okay.
It's a long story, but the US kept rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems after breaking a treaty. 2019, we walked out of the intermediate nuclear force treaty. On December 15, 2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. You can find it online. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement.
I called the White House that next week after that, begging them, take the negotiations. Putin's offered something. Avoid this war. Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war. Announce that NATO's not gonna enlarge.
Oh, don't worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said, oh, you're gonna have a war over something that's not gonna happen? Why don't you announce them? He said, no.
No. Our policy is an open door. This is Jake Sullivan. Our policy is an open door policy, open door for NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit, by the way.
You don't have your right to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world. They turned down the negotiations. Then the special military operation started, and 5 days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. Neutrality.
And then the United States and Britain said, no way. You guys fight on. We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die, but we got your back as we kept pushing them into the front lines.
That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Remember when you were told that Tom Cruise was crazy? Tell me, what was so crazy about this? https://t.co/QKyVd5oXP0
Video Transcript AI Summary
I oppose the use of drugs and psychiatric practices like electric shock without consent, especially in children. Many are unaware of the dangers of drugs like Adderall and Ritalin, which can be abused. There’s a misconception about chemical imbalances; drugs often just mask underlying issues. While there may be some cases where these treatments seem effective, it's crucial to understand the research behind them. There’s no definitive medical test to determine Ritalin dosage. It’s important to be informed and responsible when discussing these topics, especially in a public forum like the Today Show.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here we are today, where I talk out against drugs and psychiatric abuses of electric shocking people, okay, against their will, of drugging children with them not knowing the effects of these drugs. Do you know what Adderall is? Do you know Ritalin? Do you know now that Ritalin is a street drug? Do you understand that?
Speaker 1: The difference is, this was not against your will, though. This wasn't against your will.
Speaker 0: Madam, I'm asking you a question.
Speaker 1: I understand there's abuse of all of these things.
Speaker 0: No, you see, here's the problem. You don't know the history of psychiatry. I do. All it does is mask the problem, reason why. There is no such thing as a chemical imbalance.
I'm saying that, There is no such thing as a chemical imbalance. I'm saying that drugs aren't the answer, that these drugs are very dangerous. They're mind altering antipsychotic drugs. And there are ways of doing it without that so that we don't end up in a brave new world.
Speaker 1: Yes, there are abuses. And yes, maybe they've gone too far in certain areas. Maybe there are too many kids on Ritalin. Maybe Electric Shock is Too many kids on Ritalin, Matt. I'm just saying.
But aren't there examples where it works?
Speaker 0: Matt, Matt, you don't even you're glib. You don't even know what Ritalin is. If you start talking about chemical imbalance, you have to evaluate and read the research papers on how they came up with these theories, Matt. Okay? That's what I've done.
And you go and you say, where's where's the medical test? Where's the blood test that says how much Ritalin you're supposed to get?
Speaker 1: You're it's very impressive to listen to you because, clearly, you've done the homework and and you know the subject. And you should.
Speaker 0: And you should do that also because just knowing people who are on Ritalin isn't enough. You should be a little bit more responsible in knowing
Speaker 1: I'm really prescribing Ritalin, Tom, and I'm not asking anyone else to do it. Well, you are. You're saying I know some people who seem
Speaker 0: to have been helped on it. But you're saying but it's this is a very important issue. This is a very and you know what? And you're you're here on the Today Show. Right.
And to talk about it in a way of saying, well, isn't it okay in being reasonable about it when you don't know? And I do. I think that you should be a little bit more responsible in knowing what it is Like because you you communicate to people.