reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Lisahudsonchow7
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
Yes! The puppets are a big reason we are where we are…They have been getting rich off of our backs. https://t.co/alifUqC81F
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
When did Donald Trump become a racist? 🔥🔥🔥🔥 He nailed it! https://t.co/gje9Q5CNeI
Video Transcript AI Summary
When did Trump become a racist? Only when they told you so? Was he a problem when he was with the Clintons? People are upset about the ad he took out against the Central Park 5, but back then, all the news pointed to their guilt. Plus, he was a registered Democrat at the time, and the DA, police chief, and mayor were all Democrats too.
Where's the outrage for corporations buying sweets at the DNC or abortion mobiles near the convention? Biden was racist, and some say he was only VP to balance the ticket. Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater girl who said, "bring them to heel" about us. Is racism only a problem with bad PR? An apology doesn't undo decades of racist policies. But Trump passed the First Step Act with Kim K. advocating for black people more than some black people are. When do we hold everyone accountable?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was Oprah dumb when she was hanging out with that racist? Was Whoopi Goldberg dumb when she was hanging out with that racist? So when did he become a racist? When they told you he was. Was he a racist?
Was he a problem for Hillary Clinton when he stood up at Chelsea Clinton's wedding? When he was golfing with Bill Clinton for years? Make it make sense. Oh, and again, this is not me advocating for Donald Trump, but I need to give you an example that you cannot you cannot argue. People are upset because Donald Trump's a racist because he took out an $85,000 ad in the newspapers against the exonerated five, formerly known as the Central Park 5.
Right? That's a problem. That's problematic because he said they needed to get the death penalty. You know what everybody leaves out of that conversation? Two things.
The first is all we had was the information that was being presented to us on the news. At the time. And at the time, all that information said that we got them. We got these kids. They ain't saying nothing about rounding them up or how they rounded them up or this, that, and third.
They sat up there and they present go look at a forget me. Go look at Ava DuVernay's Netflix movie. Go look at all the documentaries made about these guys. Now here's the gag. At the time when Donald Trump did that, he was a registered Democrat.
Not only that, he was a private citizen. Not only that, the district attorney, the assistant district attorney, the chief of police, the mayor, all of them happened to be Democrats. But that didn't stop anybody from dealing with the fact that they paraded them brothers up on that stage at the DNC in 2024, like, oh, Donald Trump's the problem. Oh, so but I didn't hear any of them issue an apology for what they did to railroad those boys for a decade and some change. How does that make sense?
Matter of fact, one of the assistant prosecutor is still a huge donator a a huge donor to the Democratic National Convention Democratic National Committee. So I'm trying to understand how that makes sense. And then, by the way, where's all your smoke for these corporations that were buying million dollar sweets at the DNC. You care about black life so much. Why were you okay with them having abortion mobiles a block away from the Democratic National Convention?
If if we're gonna talk about preserving life, if we're gonna talk about racism, we're gonna talk about systemic things. You have to talk about it regardless of who you like or who has the best PR or who says the things you don't like. That's my issue. Y'all know for a fact Joe Biden was a racist. Always been a racist.
And the only reason he was vice president under Obama is because they wanted to balance the ticket. So if you put a Negro in there, let's make sure we put somebody who was mentored by Strom Thurman, who eulogized Robert Byrd, who was an exalted Cyclops in the Klan. Oh, you mean the guy who who said that Barack Obama was a what what was the word? Oh, the first mainstream clean, articulate black person? Excuse me?
That was okay? Oh, you you can't get a Dunkin' Donut unless you got unless you got a little Indian in you. He said that. You're okay with that. You're okay with Hillary Clinton being a Goldwater girl, who was a car carrying racist and segregationist, who also said, we need to bring them to heel.
Them meaning you and me. Because we were teenagers at the time when she said that, and she was the first lady. So is racism a problem, or is racism with the right amount of PR a problem? When is it just, hey, this is wrong, and it needs to be wrong? Oh, but he apologized for it.
Yeah. But his apology don't do nothing for the thirty plus years of racist policies that have affected us. But then again, when you got somebody creating a First Step Act, getting these people out for nonviolent drug offenses, you got Kim Kardashian. And I can't stand Kim Kardashian neither. You got her advocating for more black people than I see black people are advocating for black people.
Not making a bunch of noise on the senate floor. Not pontificating on somebody's podcast. Literally taking their time, money, energy, and efforts and putting it out there. So I'm trying to understand when is it enough that we hold everybody accountable, not the people they just tell you to like.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared how a road in WNC, initially carved out by coal miners for volunteers delivering supplies to Chimney Rock, has been blocked by FEMA with a costly new gate and surveillance measures. This $280,000 could have helped storm victims instead. I questioned the motives behind this decision, recalling Governor Cooper's comments suggesting residents shouldn't rebuild but sell their land. It feels unjust for him to dictate their choices, especially with potential lithium resources at stake. The whole situation seems dishonest.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
A road was carved out in WNC by the West Virginia Coal Miners so the VOLUNTEERS could get supplies up to the people in Chimney Rock and beyond. FEMA came in and put up a big metal gate and told the volunteers they could no longer use that road. Someone tore down the gate so now FEMA is getting a contract for $280,000 to put another gate, cameras, and guards to make sure no one “trespasses.” $280,00 that could be used on the victims of this storm… Now tell me why they would to this? I remember Governor Cooper saying in an interview that the people in Chimney Rock shouldn’t rebuild. They just needed to sell their land. Who is he to tell them they shouldn’t rebuild? It’s their land. BUT THEN … there the small matter of the lithium. The people who own the land are in the way…The entire situation reeks of dishonesty.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bema compound has a significant presence of armed agents, raising questions about their intentions. Recently, access to a road connecting Lake Lure to Chimney Rock and Batcave was restricted after West Virginia coal miners helped create it for supply transport. Initially, the road facilitated essential deliveries, and footage was captured to showcase its construction. However, gates have now been installed, and FEMA plans to spend $280,000 on security measures, including cameras and guards, to prevent access. Despite these efforts, there remains a commitment to maintain connections with privately run supply stations, as the focus appears to be on controlling the area and managing the population in the valley. The underlying motive seems to involve clearing out the less affluent from the land.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There in Chandler. And the thing about the Bema compound is it's not just pencil busters. They got a lot of agents. They got a lot of armed agents, and it's like, well, why do you have all this? Now we know that they went and sealed off the road at the West Virginia coal miners that cut from Lake Lure.
You'd be able to go from Lake Lure to Chimney Rock up to Batcave because we were staged at Lake Lure when we first got here. And so we were sending supplies all the way around the mountain up to Batcave. Well, those West Virginia coal miners made us a road so we could hop skip up through chimney rock, and we were one of the first people taking loads up to it. We got from the new road, and I filmed everything going up so people could see what a good job they did. Well, now they shut the road.
They put gates up. They're saying you can't use this road. Someone went down and torn the gates out, and now FEMA's getting a contract for, like, $280,000 to put cameras, more secure gates, and guards, and they're literally gonna do everything they can to cut us off from the people who are running privately ran supply stations like what we're doing. They'll have a hard time cutting us off because they still want some sense of normality over all the people that are safe up in these mountains around us. They just wanted the valley wiped out.
They wanted the eyesore, the poor, they want this land. Everywhere we're used
reSee.it AI Summary
I see that only 102 deaths are confirmed, but there are 431 names reported. Thousands are likely buried in the mud, yet they seem overlooked. We urgently need military assistance to support those still affected by this disaster.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
….But there are only 102 confirmed dead, right? There are 431 names on this list, and these are just the ones that have been reported. We know there are 1,000’s of people buried in the mud but I guess they don’t matter? We need the military in there to help the ones that have been left in this disaster.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Soldier, keep marching forward with your head down until the work is complete. Stay focused as you await the brighter days ahead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Soldier, keep on marching on. Head down till the work is done. Waiting on that more than sun.
reSee.it AI Summary
Hawley wasn't letting them off the hook; they were trying to act clueless, but he had all the answers. I can imagine them squirming as he pressed them hard! Meanwhile, Americans are struggling with debt while these people rake in absurd amounts of money. This monopoly needs to end.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
Hawley was not giving them any room to lie. They were trying to play dumb but he was suppling the answers. 😂 I bet they were squirming in their seats because he put their feet to the fire! While Americans are currently drowning in debt, they are making a ridiculous about amour of money. This is truly a monopoly. It has to stop.
Video Transcript AI Summary
What's your profit margin? About 50%. Is it higher than 2.5% for Walmart? They negotiate based on volume, so they likely get a better deal than small businesses. Small businesses stick with Visa and Mastercard for convenience, despite being charged more. The interchange fees cost Missouri businesses $1.5 billion annually, suggesting monopolistic behavior. With 80% market control, why wouldn’t businesses switch? You’re making significant profits while consumers owe over $1.17 trillion on credit cards, with average interest rates around 29%. Despite these profits and market dominance, you claim you can't survive with competition. How is that possible?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's your profit margin, Mr. Patrick?
Speaker 1: It's circa 50%.
Speaker 0: Mister Sheedy? Slightly higher. Higher than 50% profit margin?
Speaker 2: Slightly higher than Mastercard. Yes.
Speaker 0: Yeah, that's incredible. 50% profit margin. I mean, that's absolutely unbelievable. What's the answer to the Walmart question, by the way, that Senator Welch posed to you? What's Walmart's interchange fee that you negotiate with them?
Speaker 1: I don't have it with me today.
Speaker 0: You don't have any idea whatsoever? Is it higher or lower than 2.5 percent?
Speaker 1: Walmart negotiates their rates based on the business that they do with us.
Speaker 0: Meaning they're big. They're really big. There's organic. So they get a better deal than Mr. Callahan or most small businesses in Missouri.
Is that what you're telling me? Yes, Senator, we have volume discounts that we offer to some merchants. I suspect Walmart is one of them. And I
Speaker 2: don't believe that it's commercially unreasonable to get an arrangement where, in exchange for more volume, a merchant can qualify for lower rates.
Speaker 0: Well, I'm sure it's not commercially unreasonable for Walmart or certainly it's in their financial interest and in yours, but I doubt it's in Mr. Callahan's financial interest. And my question to you, Mr. Callahan, is when you've got Walmart and other major competitors getting charged much less than you are, why in the world would you stick with these guys? I mean, why why is it that small businesses continue to use Visa and Mastercard when they're getting you're getting charged so much more?
Speaker 2: It's in my in my opinion, it's a matter of convenience for the customer, and customers matter to our business.
Speaker 0: Maybe is it because that Visa and Mastercard are effectively monopolies? They control 80% of the market?
Speaker 2: Certainly part of
Speaker 0: the 80% of the market? I'm just having a hard time understanding, mister Sheedy and mister Patrick, you have a business model, you're making over 50% profit margin. You are able to give the shaft to small businesses, estimated cost to Missouri businesses from these fees is $1,500,000,000 that's with a B, $1,000,000,000 a year, a year. Why aren't all of these businesses running away from this model? Because they don't have a choice because you control so much of the market.
This is classic classic monopolistic behavior and yet your testimony here today is you don't want any competition, You have 80% of the market, but you don't want any more competition. I just I'm having a hard time finding that position defensible, let alone sympathetic. I mean, it's unbelievable the amount of money that you're making. It's unbelievable what you're charging small businesses and consumers. And yet your testimony is, please, please, please, please, please, we can't possibly have any competition.
I mean, let's talk about what you're doing to consumers who hold your cards. Last year, as I understand it, there were 726,000,000 Visa and Mastercard issued, Mastercard credit cards issued in United States. That's about 2 for every one person in the United States of America. Do either of you know how much debt is owed on your networks, miss Kirkpatrick?
Speaker 1: We're not the bank, so we don't have visibility into that information. We also don't generate revenue from interchange.
Speaker 0: Okay. You have no idea. Mister Shady, do you know? I don't know. Well, let me help you out.
Let's have a look. It's $1,170,000,000,000 $1,170,000,000,000 is what consumers now owe on your credit card networks. Either you know what the average interest rate is on your networks, mister Patrick.
Speaker 1: Oh, senator, we're not the bank. We don't set the interchange. I know. We don't set
Speaker 0: the rates. From it and you know. Do you do you know what it is? This is your business model.
Speaker 1: We don't we don't collect revenue
Speaker 0: from interest rates. Do you do you know? I don't, senator. I mean, do either of you read the newspaper? Forbes Magazine just estimated last week that the average average credit card APR in your networks is 28.75 percent, average.
29%, let's call it. 29%. It's nearly doubled in the last 4 years. That is astounding. Absolutely astounding.
And you just testified a second ago that you've got more than 50% profit margin. And yet your testimony here today is you can't possibly survive if there's any competition. How can that be true? How can that be true? You've got debt like we've never seen before in American history.
Your profit margins are as higher higher than they've ever been. You have 80% of the relevant market in the credit card interchange fees that we're talking about, and yet you you couldn't survive if there's any competition. What am I what am I missing?
reSee.it AI Summary
It's heartbreaking to see people losing so much, especially when DPS took her son and placed him in a foster home two hours away. This situation is deeply disturbing, and I can't help but wonder what really happens to children in DPS. When will enough be enough?
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
I guess it’s just not enough that people have lost so much if not everything. DPS showed up at her home and removed her son. He has been placed into a foster home 2 hours away from her. This entire story is so very disturbing and sad. Y’all do know what happens to children in DPS, right? I just need to know…. When is enough … enough?
Video Transcript AI Summary
DPS took my son, and now he's in foster care nearly two hours away. I received a notice that he will remain in state custody until December for a preliminary hearing. I requested an attorney but was denied because the Social Security benefits he receives were counted as my income, even though I don’t get those funds. I’m struggling to manage my responsibilities, including caring for my mother and visiting my son. The pressure is overwhelming, and despite my clean drug tests, they keep adding more requirements. My son is suffering too; he was only allowed to take one stuffed animal when he left. It broke my heart to see him plead not to go.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then all of a sudden, DPS shows up, and then your son is gone.
Speaker 1: They closed my case. And then a few days later, I get knocks on my door.
Speaker 0: And so if Helene wasn't wasn't bad enough Yeah. They gotta hit you when you're already vulnerable and on the edge.
Speaker 1: That I'm here by myself doing what I can myself for for 2 other human beings. He's in foster care an hour at least an estimated an hour and 45 minutes away.
Speaker 0: And right before I pulled in here, you just got a piece of mail.
Speaker 1: I did.
Speaker 0: And and the gist of that document basically says that the judge just has decided it's in the best interest of Benjie to stay in the state's custody until December 3rd where you're gonna Minimum. Minimum. Where you're gonna have a preliminary hearing.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: Now at the first preliminary hearing, you were not accompanied by an attorney. No. You were alone.
Speaker 1: I was alone.
Speaker 0: And did you ask for an attorney?
Speaker 1: I did.
Speaker 0: And you were denied?
Speaker 1: I filled out the paperwork. It was given back to the judge, and the judge or the the the circuit or the clerk's office 2 days later called me back and said that the judge, judge Bowers, denied my request.
Speaker 0: And that's because they counted the Social Security your son receives
Speaker 1: That follows my son?
Speaker 0: As income for you, which then disqualified your ability to retain state appointed, defense. And the craziest part is you're not receiving those funds, protective services is.
Speaker 1: They go to the foster family, plus I have to pay child support on top, plus I have to have a place for him to live, plus I have to have transportation to visit him 4 months consecutively before I lose my my parental life.
Speaker 0: So the the income that you would have been using to create a rehabilitated home from this situation is now taken away. So they moved them 2 hours away Yes. Knowing that you have car troubles, knowing that you don't have the money for a lawyer. They won't give you a lawyer, and they want you, when you're taking care of your mother, to now stop everything you're doing, get a full time job, and then somehow be able to take care of your mother and drive 2 hours for visitation.
Speaker 1: Buses and do this and do that?
Speaker 0: Do you think it's possible to to do all the programs they want you to do and take care of your mother and go get a full time job and be able to maintain that job?
Speaker 1: If it's doable, it'll be a it'll be probably the hardest thing I ever do in my life is having to take care of mom and and still take care of myself so that I'm good.
Speaker 0: That's Do you think they really are understanding the situation that they're putting you in as a mom.
Speaker 1: They don't give a shit. They don't care. And you've
Speaker 0: had they want. You've had clean drug test, and and they they want more and more and more. It seems like when they make one line and they say, hey. Come to this line, and we'll give you your son back.
Speaker 1: Step to this one.
Speaker 0: And then the next one.
Speaker 1: And then you gotta take 20 more steps. Here's your new one.
Speaker 0: It's never good enough, is it?
Speaker 1: It's gonna go past.
Speaker 0: It's gonna go past that Dodge Ram up there pretty soon.
Speaker 1: Past that. You know?
Speaker 0: I mean, on the other side of the mountain.
Speaker 1: It it's gonna go down to the state line. It it will.
Speaker 0: And then by then, you know what they do? They've alienated you so far and drugged you through the mud so far that now they say, well, you have no established ties. And, constitutionally, we have no obligation to reunite families with no established ties.
Speaker 1: When you're singled out, you're alone, you're you're alienated. Who who's who who in the right mind would allow a child to go back to somebody like that? But they've designed it that way. It
Speaker 0: feels like a boot on the back of your neck, doesn't it?
Speaker 1: On the back of your neck, in your nose, in your jaw, in your chest, in your
Speaker 0: And does that make it hard to to do the right thing every day? Does it make it more difficult for you to do the right things for yourself and as a mother and for for everyone that needs you? Does it make it any easier or harder on you, all this pressure and weight that they put on you?
Speaker 1: Pressure and the weight make you want to crumble. I mean, for 8 years now, that's all I've had to be is strong. And I crumbled one time, once.
Speaker 0: After a horrible disaster.
Speaker 1: After a disaster. And they're making me pay for that now. And I understand I'm human. I will make mistakes. I did make mistakes.
I don't believe I need to pay to this degree, period. End of story. You don't need to traumatize my son more who's already been through enough. Because of his birthday, he should be in the 1st grade because wherever his birthday falls. They did bump him up to 2nd grade, because he is he's amazing, genius level.
Speaker 0: He is.
Speaker 1: He's amazing.
Speaker 0: He sounds amazing.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't let him take any of his toys. Anything they let him take one stuffed animal. 1. That was it. He couldn't take his Legos.
Couldn't take any of the food he likes to eat. That was probably the hardest thing I've ever had to do was put him in that truck.
Speaker 0: What do you think he was feeling in that moment? I know these are hard questions.
Speaker 1: You could tell he wanted to just crawl right down that truck, right back into my arms. He just kept pleading with me. Please, mama. Please, mama. I don't wanna.
Please come with me.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated that Kellogg’s sells a dangerous version of their products in the U.S. while offering a safer one elsewhere. It makes me question the link between these ingredients and the rise in ADHD among children. I believe it’s time to boycott Kellogg’s and other processed food companies.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
So Kellogg’s sell Americans one product with dangerous ingredients for us to ingest but sells a different version to other countries which is a much safer product. Do you ever wonder why there’s so many children with ADHD? Look at the ingredients. Do a little research on what it does to our bodies. It’s time to boycott Kellogg’s and so many other food companies that make processed foods.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Texas should take action by banning Kellogg and similar companies from public institutions due to their sale of less safe cereal versions in the U.S. Kellogg offers a safer version without harmful additives in other countries but chooses to sell a more profitable, inferior product here. Over 450,000 signatures have been gathered for a petition urging Kellogg to provide safer options for American families. Despite this, Kellogg refuses to change, citing consumer preference for colorful products. California has already passed a bill banning certain artificial food dyes in public schools, and Texas should follow suit as a first step toward improving public health. There is a clear path to eliminate harmful ingredients from our food, and Texas can lead the way in this effort. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And our great state of Texas should take a stand by banning Kellogg and other anti American companies from our public institutions like schools and the military. Earlier this year, I filed a shareholder activist letter against Kellogg for selling a less safe inferior version of their cereals to American families. Very few Americans know that Kellogg sells a safer version of their cereals without artificial food dyes or carcinogenic preservatives in other countries. They use more chemicals in the US version because it is more profitable and because we allow them to. We have collected over 450,000 US signatures for what is now the largest food petition in US history, asking Kellogg to serve Americans the safest and best version of products that they already make.
Kellogg declined to meet with us and effectively told us that American children prefer the brighter colors, and they will continue selling the more toxic version as long as it is, quote, compliant with applicable relevant laws, which is why I'm here today. We need your help to stop this madness. After reviewing the conclusive evidence 6 weeks ago, California was the 1st state to pass a bill banning all foods containing any of 6 artificial food dyes from public schools, including Froot Loops. As an easy first step to improve our health, I believe Texas should follow suit. I am optimistic for the first time in 20 years, and I believe that Texas can be a thought leader in removing harmful ingredients from our foods.
We can reverse this great American poisoning and I believe we already have a playbook on how to do it. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I wonder why other countries can conduct thorough studies on the impact of certain treatments on children, while in America, doctors seem to prioritize harmful drugs and surgeries. It feels like they're ruining lives, and this needs to change. We really are in a messed up situation.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
Well said. 🔥🔥 How is it that other countries seem to be able to do real studies and get to the bottom of what this is really doing to the children? On the other hand, America’s doctors are doing everything in their power to ruin a child’s life. They push these drugs and surgeries which should be a crime against our children. This has to stop. We live in one messed up country!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Miriam Grossman, a child, adolescent, and adult psychiatrist, states that sex is established at conception and recognized at birth, not assigned. She argues that the claim that sex is assigned at birth lacks scientific basis and misleads people into thinking that male and female are arbitrary designations.
Grossman notes that Dr. McNamara claims social and medical interventions are the only evidence-based treatment and are life-saving, warning of suicides without them. However, Grossman points out that a growing number of countries have banned such care without a resulting wave of suicides. Finland, Sweden, and Norway have placed strict limitations on medical interventions for minors, with Sweden citing a case of osteoporosis and spinal fractures from puberty blockers.
The UK called the evidence very low. The National Academy of Medicine in France warned of undesirable complications from these therapies. Doctors in New Zealand and Australia have published similar statements. Finland's gender expert, Dr. Rita Caltiella, called the promotion of the idea that these interventions are life-saving "purposeful disinformation." Grossman concludes that these countries and Florida have decided that children don't need their development interrupted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Miriam Grossman. I'm a board certified child adolescent and adult psychiatrist, author, and senior fellow at Do No Harm. I have been taking care of patients for 45 years. First, I'm struck by her use of the phrase, sex assigned at birth. Sex is not assigned at birth.
Sex is established at conception, and it's recognized at birth, if not earlier. Doctor McNamara claims that her views are science based, but to claim that sex is assigned at birth is without any scientific basis whatsoever. Its language misleads people, especially children, into thinking that male and female are arbitrary designations and can change. That is simply not true. Doctor McNamara claims that social and medical interventions are the only evidence based treatment and that scientific evidence shows it is life saving.
Without it, she's warning us kids will commit suicide. Well, a growing number of countries have effectively banned the care to which she's referring. And thank God, there's been no wave of suicides or other mental health catastrophes. 3 years ago, Finland placed strict limitations on medical interventions for minors. Sweden did the same thing after a 14 year old girl was found to have osteoporosis and spinal fractures from puberty blockers.
An investigation concluded, quote, the risks of anti puberty, evidence very low. They They've also placed severe restrictions on the care that doctor McNamara calls life saving. Norway also analyzed the data and has made similar changes in policy. The National Academy of Medicine in France warned, quote, great medical caution must be taken in children adolescents given the vulnerability of this population and the many undesirable even serious complications the therapies cause. Doctors in New Zealand and Australia have published similar statements.
Is doctor McNamara suggesting that all these countries are rejecting evidence based treatment and placing their kids at risk of suicide? Regarding that point of view, Finland's gender expert, doctor Rita Caltiella, said, quote, it's purposeful, this disinformation, the spreading of which is irresponsible. All 7 countries and Florida too, of course, concluded that kids don't need their development interrupted. The girls don't need their periods stopped and their voices lowered, and the boys don't need to grow breasts. My name is Miriam Grossman.
I am a board certified child adolescent and adult psychiatrist, author, and senior fellow at Do No Harm. I have been taking care of patients for 45 years. 1st, I'm struck by her use of the phrase, sex assigned at birth. Sex is not assigned at birth. Sex is established at conception, and it's recognized at birth, if not earlier.
Doctor McNamara claims that her views are science based, but to claim that sex is assigned at birth is without any scientific basis whatsoever. Its language misleads people, especially children, into thinking that male and female are arbitrary designations and can change. That is simply not true. Doctor McNamara claims that social and medical interventions are the only evidence based treatment and that scientific evidence shows it is life saving. Without it, she's warning us kids will commit suicide.
Well, a growing number of countries have effectively banned the care to which she's referring. And thank god, there's been no wave of suicides or other mental health catastrophes. 3 years ago, Finland placed strict limitations on medical interventions for minors. Sweden did the same fractures from puberty blockers. An investigation concluded, quote, the risks of anti puberty, and hormone treatment for those under 18 currently outweigh the possible benefits.
The UK conducted a review and called the evidence very low. They've also placed severe restrictions on the care that doctor McNamara calls life saving. Norway also analyzed the data and has made similar changes in policy. The National Academy of Medicine in France warned, quote, great medical caution must be taken in children and adolescents given the vulnerability of this population and the many undesirable even serious complications the therapies cause. Doctors in New Zealand and Australia have published similar statements.
Is doctor McNamara suggesting that all these countries are rejecting evidence based treatment and placing their kids at risk of suicide? Regarding that point of view, Finland's gender expert, doctor Rita Cautiela, said, quote, it's purposeful disinformation, the spreading of which is irresponsible. All 7 countries and Florida too, of course, concluded that kids don't need their development interrupted. The girls don't need their periods stopped, and their voices
reSee.it AI Summary
I wonder what could incentivize farmers and homeowners in NC to sell their land to Piedmont Lithium, especially since they sit on valuable lithium. Could a disaster, like an unusual hurricane, push them to sell? It reminds me of Lahaina, where it felt like their land was taken. What do you think?
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
Here’s a hypothetical … If the farmers and homeowners in NC wouldn’t sell their land to Piedmont Lithium, I wonder what could be done to incentivize them to sell? These people are sitting on lithium which is worth billions. Maybe a flood from a hurricane that didn’t seen like a normal hurricane? Do you think losing everything they own would make them sell? It still looks a lot like Lahaina to me. They wanted it, and they took it. Thoughts?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion highlights lithium mining in Chile, part of the "lithium triangle," where nearly a third of the world's lithium is produced. One plant can power about 50,000 electric vehicles annually, with potential to reach 75,000. The Salar de Atacama boasts the best lithium brines globally, containing approximately 2,000 parts per million of lithium, making it the most cost-effective production location.
Lithium is extracted through brine mining, where salty water is evaporated in ponds, concentrating the lithium. Despite high demand and limitless resources, Chile is losing market share to Australia and Argentina. Experts emphasize the need for Chile to quickly increase production before other countries surpass them or new battery technology emerges. Chile's president has announced a state-led plan for lithium industry development. Separately, it is mentioned that Piedmont Lithium has bought homes in North Carolina for a project.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What does this mean? This is North Carolina here. What what does this mean? Edmont Lithium has bought local homes to make room for their project. Did did North Carolina have some kind of lithium mine or something?
Hey,
Speaker 1: guys. Number 20, 21, and I think number 9's in the back there. Go My cows are mad right now because they want to move into the other field. But I'm making them wait till the rain lets up in the afternoon because I have to, refence a certain set
Speaker 2: This is what lithium mining looks like in Chile. Here in the Salar de Atacama, in a region of the world known as the lithium triangle, nearly 1 third of the world's lithium is produced from brines. So from this plant here, how many electric vehicles are you powering?
Speaker 3: Today, about 50,000. And we should be able to get up to 75,000 EVs every single year.
Speaker 2: With demand for electric vehicles and the lithium ion batteries that power them at an all time high, Chile's vast salt flats have become a vital national resource. They contain the largest and some of the highest quality lithium reserves in the world.
Speaker 3: This the Salar de Atacama represents the best lithium brines in the world because it has about 2,000 parts per million of lithium concentrated in it. This is also the most cost effective place to produce lithium in the world.
Speaker 2: In the brine mining process, extremely salty water from an underground reservoir is pumped to the surface and evaporated in large, extravagantly colored ponds, leaving high concentrations of lithium behind.
Speaker 1: The demand for it is skyrocketing. The price of it is skyrocketing. And the capacity that Chile has to exploit this resources is almost limitless.
Speaker 2: But Chile is actually losing market share to Australia, where lithium is mined from hard rock, and Argentina, where the country is welcoming international investment. Many say that Chile must act fast to ramp production before other countries beat them to it or new battery tech is developed.
Speaker 4: It's not clear how big a window of opportunity Chile has to take advantage of this white gold.
Speaker 2: Now Chile's president, Gabriel Borics, has announced the long awaited state led plan for the development of the country's lithium industry.
Speaker 4: Chile has to take advantage of this white gold. To take advantage of this white gold.
Speaker 2: News in Hawaii right now at least a 1000 people are still missing as the deadly wildfires.
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe this! A man was rescuing people from the mountain, but the fire chief warned him he'd be arrested if he went back. He had to abandon someone up there. Why are they refusing help and supplies? The victims are without water, food, or electricity! What is happening?
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
This is crazy! This man was rescuing people off of the mountain. He was told by the fire chief that if he went back they would arrest him. He had to leave the man alone on the mountain. Listen! What is going on? Why are they turning help and supplies away? These victims have no water, food, or electricity. WHY?
Video Transcript AI Summary
A pilot, Sinem, and his son flew to Black Mountain to assist with rescue efforts. Sinem landed near an older couple needing help, leaving his son on the mountainside due to unstable conditions. After rescuing one person, Sinem coordinated with a rescue team leader, but the Lake Lure fire chief shut down the operation, ordering Sinem to leave and threatening arrest if he returned for his copilot.
Sinem initially complied, apologizing to the stranded woman, but was upset about leaving her husband behind. As he left to retrieve his son, the initial rescue team leader offered a designated landing spot if he returned with the victim. Sinem believes a flight restriction was implemented shortly after the confrontation with the fire chief, suspecting it wasn't coincidental. He regrets not continuing rescues until facing arrest. The Lake Lure fire official's name is being withheld pending their response.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna go back out and and try to help today? And his his response was, there's so many messages. I I don't think we can't not go help.
Speaker 1: Sinem and his son were headed up to Black Mountain. Flight tracking shows no flight restrictions in place Saturday or Sunday morning when Sittem flew through the Lake Lure gap, but that was all about to change. The Sittem spotted an older couple waving for help then landed in what's left of their driveway. Hey.
Speaker 2: I want you to, let me get in. You step out and go out. Help her in. Put her bag in the back. Get her strapped in.
I'm a take her down. Come back. I'll take him. I'll come back, and then I'll get you. Okay?
Speaker 0: I originally left my son, copilot, on the side of the mountain. It was it it was kind of unstable, so I didn't want to put more weight in the helicopter to lift back off. So I left my son with the other victim, and and I was just gonna take one person down at the time. And and you could hear me in the video talking through with the victims and with my son what we're gonna do.
Speaker 1: 3 minutes away, Sidham spotted a group of rescuers just down the river. He landed and found someone in charge.
Speaker 0: I told him, my background experience, law enforcement, firefighting, pilot. He immediately started helping with coordination. He gave me radio frequencies to coordinate with them on, set up a landing area for me to come back with the other victim. And in the middle of the whole conversation and then blocking the road off, I was greeted by the, at that time I didn't know, but Lake Lure fire chief or assistant chief maybe. And he shut down the whole operation.
So at that point there was I felt like the conversation wasn't going any further. And again, he asked me to leave and I said, hey, I have no problem getting out of your area. If that's what you want us to do, we'll leave no issue. At that point, I asked him, you know, what was the reason I had to leave them there? And he said, again, you're interfering with my operation.
I I just need you to get out of the area. I said, sir, I I don't know where you were trained at, but I know how my training is, and I'm not gonna leave personnel behind. I'm I'm going back to get my copilot. He said, if you turn around and go back up the mountain, you're gonna be arrested. I said, well, sir, I'm I'm going back to get my copilot.
I don't know what to tell you. And he said, I'm I'm letting you know. And at that point, he waited for 2 law enforcement officers to come over and told me that again, if I go back up the mountain, I would be arrested.
Speaker 1: He flew the 3 minute trip back, picked up his son, and left the woman's husband behind.
Speaker 0: Sure he was flooded with emotions and and trying to rescue other people and I I just felt that it was best at the time to leave. So I did follow his instructions and I had a conversation with the female victim before I left, apologizing and explaining. She she was standing there. She heard the whole conversation. And, they were both very, very surprised, very upset.
The husband, as I was leaving off of the side of the mountain at that point, separated from his wife, he was he was upset. I can only imagine.
Speaker 1: Cinnamon is nearly 1400 flight hours, turned his chopper around, and headed back to South Carolina, passing people waving for help along the way.
Speaker 0: As I was actually leaving to go back to get my son, the original chief or or captain that I spoke to, his crew and and himself, they they came back over and said, hey, man. We we can't tell you to go get the victim. We can't even ask you to go get the victim, but we can tell you if you come back with the victim, we'll have you a designated landing spot and they they won't we'll make sure they don't come over here.
Speaker 1: So there was no flight restriction when you went in?
Speaker 0: No. No flight restriction when I went in. It went in place 20 or 30 minutes after the confrontation with mister
Speaker 1: You feel like that was coincidental or do you think that that was because of what happened?
Speaker 0: I don't think it can be coincidental when there has not been one in place the day before doing rescue operations, the night of, the morning of that took place after our altercation. I think there would have never been a TFR put in place had we not had that conversation. If I had to do it over again, I would have stopped and I would have rescued as many people until they decided they were gonna arrest me.
Speaker 1: Well, for now, we've chosen not to name that Lake Lure fire official because communications in and out of that town are still difficult. We wanna include his side in this story, and if and when he responds to our messages, we will include that. The good news is I saw a video of a coast guard helicopter landing in Lake Lure this morning, so hopefully some of those mountain rescues are underway today. From page 1, Jodi Barr.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
BOOM! She is telling the truth! https://t.co/vVt8DRfImD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris likely chose ABC for the debate. Haitian migrants are eating animals, and the media is manipulating people. When migrants arrive and costs rise, there should be no complaints. People advocate for a woman's right to choose but can't define what a woman is. Most voters are already decided, and Kamala supporters may be upset in November.
Kamala Harris should be in the debates and spin room to provide the absolute truth. A black woman will give you the exact truth. The speaker sometimes intentionally calls Kamala Harris "Camilla."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think it's pretty damn obvious why Kamilla Harris insisted upon having the debate on ABC. And for the record, the migrants, the Haitian migrants are in fact eating the animals. So let's not pretend that Trump is saying some crazy ass. The media is manipulating your ass, and you're falling for it. When the migrants land on your front doorstep, don't complain.
When groceries and rent get so high that you can't afford to shelter or feed your family, don't complain. Don't say this is what you wanted. You wanna fight for a woman's right to choose, but you can't even define what the a woman is. At this point, everybody is prince decided. I don't think there's many undecided voters out there.
So let's take this thing to the because I got a feeling there's gonna be a lot of pissed off Kamala supporters come November.
Speaker 1: Tell us how you really feel. They need to have her on the on the debates day too. You need to have her in the spin room after 1 of the Yes. We we go into the system. Right?
Right? Soon as this is over so we can get the absolute truth. And it's like I said, a a black woman especially is gonna give you the exact truth. And when she called her Camilla, because you know we we that's We do that stuff on tech. I'll do it by purpose too.
Purpose. I'm not
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
Ohhh this is perfect! Listen to the music with it! ♥️🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/P4yOhlPyfQ
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
This is what I’d like to know… If the conservatives did the same thing to Zelensky, as seen below when he visited, what would have happened to the protestors? Would the reaction from the WH and liberal Congress be different? Thoughts? https://t.co/wja4lPRsKa
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pro-Palestinian protesters disrupted Prime Minister Netanyahu's stay at the Watergate Hotel by releasing maggots and crickets in the conference room and setting off the fire alarm to prevent him from sleeping. They were seen shouting obscenities at Jews behind a gate. Netanyahu was not greeted by Biden upon his arrival in the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So overnight, the pro Palestinian protesters that were outside the Watergate Hotel where prime minister Netanyahu was staying went into the conference room, let off maggots and crickets into the building. They also activated the fire alarm so Netanyahu wouldn't get any sleep. They basically, disrupted this entire trip, and I know that they were dropping off 20 bus loads of pro Palestinian protesters. Some of them were on video screaming obscenities to the Jews behind the gate. Absolutely disgusting what they've done, and he's supposed to speak at 2 o'clock today.
He was not met by Biden when he arrived in the country.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
Why so many US Marshals? This is very interesting. Thoughts? https://t.co/GwMOFAMbMj
Video Transcript AI Summary
DC received a message about 6,000 US Marshals heading to DC, with the White House being fenced up. The speaker, a former law enforcement officer, mentioned wiley arrests and a significant event occurring. They were packing gear and might not return for a week. The FBI removed their video on YouTube about 3 shooters. New York officers were sworn in DC. The speaker was a former US Marshal and stated that the situation would become public soon.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So here's what he just sent me. This is DC. Hey, buddy. Just giving you a heads up.
Please
Speaker 1: have everyone say a prayer for me. There are over 6,000 US Marshals that have been pulled out and are heading to DC. Everything is being fenced up, the White House too. This is like a major, major, major thing. They never ever call out the US Marshals.
They're not they're not calling out the Secret Service. They're calling out the US Marshals of which he has won. It's big. Cover it's big. Cover us in prayer.
I said, is this something I can tell everyone and are you being called us specifically? Yes. You can tell everyone I'm packing now with lots of gear. I won't be back until possibly next week sometime depending on what takes place, but this is a major move and a lot of wiley arrests will be happening. It's big.
K. He said I did a show Monday night on YouTube about being 3 shooters, and I have the evidence for it and was showing it, and the FBI removed my stuff, absolutely removed it. I had a lot of people mad at me because the video got removed, but nothing I can do about it. Said also, New York officers were sworn in today in DC, which I've seen a picture of that. It's big, whatever's taking place.
Says I was a police officer and then went into work in drug enforcement with ATF and the DEA and was sworn in years ago as US marshal. They just pull you back whenever they need you. Said, nope. You can say anything you want. It's about to be very public.
Alright. So looks like 6000 US Marshals, according to DC, are headed to Washington DC. Big big stuff happening. Okay? And that that's all I know.
You know, I I don't, yeah, that's that's all I know. That's what he said.
reSee.it AI Summary
The left's assumption that black people lack the ability to obtain an ID is offensive. The real issue is that they don't want IDs because it facilitates cheating. Wesley Hunt rightly emphasizes that every American should take personal responsibility to get an ID, regardless of race or appearance. Our country needs to regain its focus on personal responsibility and stop feeling entitled. It's time for everyone to do their part.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
If I were a black person, I would be so offended. The left acts like black people don’t have enough sense to get an ID. But the truth is they don’t want them to have an ID because it makes cheating so much easier. As Wesley Hunt said it is every Americans personal responsibility to get an ID. It doesn’t matter what you look like or what color you are it’s still personal responsibility. This is something our country has lost sight of. Stop acting entitled! Do your part!!
Video Transcript AI Summary
My colleagues claim that common sense voting laws, like requiring a government ID, are racist. I have multiple government IDs, showing personal responsibility. I have a global entry card, military ID, Texas driver's license, license to carry, congressional card, and passport. Obtaining these IDs is not impossible, it's personal responsibility. I fought for this country as a helicopter pilot to protect free and fair elections. Having a government ID is not racist, it's American.
Translation: My colleagues argue that basic voting laws, such as needing a government ID, are discriminatory. I have various government IDs, demonstrating personal responsibility. I possess a global entry card, military ID, Texas driver's license, license to carry, congressional card, and passport. Acquiring these IDs is not impossible, it's about personal responsibility. I served as a helicopter pilot to defend free and fair elections. Having a government ID is not discriminatory, it's American.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My colleagues on the left like to say that common sense voting laws including requiring a government issued ID are racist, discriminatory, and burdensome. Do you know what my father had back in the forties fifties before it was even cool? A government issue ID. And continuing in his footsteps, I too have multiple government issued IDs and while that might be shocking to many people in this country, you may ask how's that happen. It's very simple.
It's personal responsibility for all Americans in this country regardless of what you look like. Sitting with me today is my global entry card, my military ID card, my Texas driver's license, my Texas license to carry, because that's how we roll on Texas, my congressional card, and of course, the good old fashioned American passport. What sorcery is this? What am I? The the the black Houdini?
How was I able to pull off the impossible and attain not 1, not 2, not 3, but 6 government issue IDs? Personal responsibility in this country. I fought for this country as in a passenger helicopter pilot to protect free and fair elections and having a government issued ID isn't racist. It's American.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
This is awesome! Here’s how a President encourages a nation. No division. Just a positive message for any and everyone. https://t.co/r4LD3xGe6n
Video Transcript AI Summary
My message is that change is necessary now. America must show its strength and resilience. Don't let others discourage you; use it as motivation. Fight for what you believe in and for those who support you. Carry yourself with pride and demand the best from yourself. When faced with obstacles, keep pushing forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My message is that things have to change, and they have to change right now. It is time to show the whole world that America is back, bigger and better and stronger than ever before. The more people tell you it's not possible, that it can't be done, the more you should be absolutely determined to prove them wrong. Treat the word impossible as nothing more than motivation. Never stop fighting for what you believe in and for the people who care about you.
Carry yourself with dignity and pride. Demand the best from yourself. The more that a broken system tells you that you're wrong, the more certain you should be that you must keep pushing ahead.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
MTG schooling the left! 🔥🔥 BOOM! Steve Bannon might be going to prison but you won’t shut down the war room posse! The media is our enemy BUT WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED! Remember! There’s more of us than there are of you. https://t.co/DABVM0A2d7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bannon's imprisonment won't silence him or his supporters. The movement will only grow stronger, with the left being blamed for it. Democrats and the media are seen as part of the problem, fueling resentment and opposition. The crowd's size and energy reflect this sentiment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is where Bannon's combination of traits. This is where it has led him and us. 4 months is not a long time. Moreover, his insidious influence, that cannot be locked up.
Speaker 1: Well, let me address the left for a minute, the nasty media that's watching this right now. Let me address all the Democrats. For your information, just because Steve Bannon is going to prison for 4 months does not mean you're going to silence him. It does not mean you're going to shut down the war room posse, and you don't have any control or power over any of this group. What you just did is you multiplied it by 10, 000.
Speaker 0: This is not a concert. This is not a rap artist. I'm not a country artist. I'm not a rock show. Look at the crowd here.
I gotta tell you, any Democratic contender, even the DNC has to be looking at this video and thinking, oh, boy. Oh, boy.
Speaker 1: This whole movement is going to grow, and you're responsible for it. So if you hate all of us, you hate Steve Bannon, you hate the people that look down on the people that watch the war room, and you think that they're beneath you because you think they're you're better than them and you think your horrible stupid networks are better than them. Let me tell you something. What you did is you just put the message out there all across America that you are part of the problem. You're part of the 2 tier justice system.
You are the dictatorship. You're the authoritarian regime that the American people want to tear down and completely rid our country up. They hate you, and putting c Bannon in jail is going to make more of them hate you.
reSee.it AI Summary
Seven people from CBS, who work for Steven Colbert, breached the Capitol last night. They were arrested for banging on senators' closed doors and spent the night in jail. They were charged with unlawful entry, the same charge as many Jan 6 protesters. It remains to be seen if they will face the same consequences. The justice system's handling of this case will be interesting to watch.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
Did y’all hear about this??🔥🔥Seven people from CBS, who work for Steven Colbert, breached the capital last night! They were banging on the some of the senators closed doors, until they were arrested! They had the experience of spending the night in jail. 😂 They were charged with unlawful entry which just so happens to be the SAME charge as many of the Jan 6 protesters! 😳 It’s going to be interesting to see if they are thrown in prison for 4 years without a trial like the people arrested on Jan 6th! I don’t think they will stay that long because they are liberals. We are all too familiar with our two tiered justice system! This is definitely a story I want to follow! 🩷😂
Video Transcript AI Summary
Several employees of Stephen Colbert's show were arrested for breaching Capitol Hill security while filming a skit. They were seen roaming the building without authorization and spent the night in jail. Congressional sources revealed their identities and roles on the show. There are ongoing investigations into how they gained access and if any congressmen were involved. The Capitol Police confirmed the arrests and charged them with unlawful entry. Further inquiries are needed to determine the extent of the breach and potential consequences for those involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: News alert breaking right now. Word of a major breach of security on Capitol Hill. At least 7 people who work for the comedian Stephen Colbert were arrested and jailed last night for breaching the Capitol building. Uh-huh. Here's what we know right now.
Capitol police were called around 8:30 PM Thursday night for a disturbance at the Longworth House office building. These individuals who we've confirmed work for the late show were seen roaming the building while it was closed to visitors. A what? Capitol police say they did not have congressional IDs and were not authorized to be walking around without an escort. They were booked, and they spent the night in jail.
Congressional sources tell us they were filming a skit on the January 6th hearings and were banging on the doors of offices. People like congressman Kevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Republicans, you know the deal. 1 of the individuals, Robert Smigel, was pictured when he was in the capitol yesterday. Woah. Smigel's a comedian who's appeared on the Colbert show several times as you can see here.
The name of the others who were on Capitol Hill from the show are Jake Plunkett, Allison Martinez, Tyrone Dean, Steven Romand, Nicoletta Green, Brendan Hurley, Josh Comers, and David Feldman. Oh my god. I wanna point out these were not low level people working for Colbert. We can confirm that Jake Plunkett is a senior producer and director at the show.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. Alright.
Speaker 0: Josh Comers is a writer. Allison Martinez is an associate producer. Who let them into the capitol without authorization? Well, according to a congressional source, it was the democrats. Congressman Adam Schiff and Jake Auchincloss.
Congressman Rodney Davis sits on the committee of house administration and oversees Capitol Police. So, congressman, is there an official investigation of this taking place right now? Yes. Definitely.
Speaker 1: Well, this is so new, Jesse. We just found out about the arrest today, and I'm going to make sure that when we get back to Washington next week, we're going to ask the questions that need to be asked. We'll ask the security officials why these arrests had to be made. What were they doing without an escort at a time when, you know, the January 6th select committee on the 50th anniversary of Watergate, made it look like my colleague Barry Loudermilk somehow took kids with gift bags to do reconnaissance missions. And let me put it to you this way too, Jesse.
The only people arrested by Capitol Police for touring the house office buildings are the people who work for Stephen Colbert.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's ironic, isn't it? And, we've reached out to the Capitol Police, and they've confirmed this with us. They said it's an ongoing criminal investigation, and, US attorneys are involved. They are charged with unlawful entry, which if I'm not mistaken, that is the exact same charge my behavior, the drinking Oh my god.
As many of the January 6th protesters were charged with. Is that right?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Certainly seems to be, Jesse.
Speaker 0: So what happens with Adam Schiff now and this other congressman Auchincloss? Are they complicit in this breach of Capitol Hill Security?
Speaker 1: That's why we've gotta get more information. That's why we need an investigation. We need to make sure that we understand who in their offices brought these individuals in. It's my Yes.
Speaker 0: That's awesome.
Speaker 1: It's my understanding that these individuals were brought in by someone associated with Adam Schiff's office. They were over in the capitol building or the canon building, trying to be around where the credential media were supposed to be stationed in the midst of the January 6th hearing yesterday. Hello there. The credential media were the ones I'm hearing that had them had them escorted out the first time yesterday, and then they came back. And it's my understanding they were offered a way back into the house office buildings by a staffer who worked for the other member of congress.
Then they were they were they were actually seen, they were actually seen banging on the doors of people like Kevin McCarthy's office, Jim Jordan's office. What were they doing? Why were they there? And frankly, I I'm interested in asking the capitol police. Spicy meat.
Yeah, boy. What did they do to make sure they got arrested, and what's going to be the final adjudication?
Speaker 0: Well, that's an important question. We might have to have hearings. We might have to have, our own committee to investigate this sort of CBS News breach of the Capitol. Obviously, they were way too
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
AOC: When’s the last time you heard anyone say the government does too much for you? All of the time because y’all always have an agenda, and it’s never one that’s good for us! Chip Roy is on fire! He knows the truth about the government! BOOM! 💥💥 https://t.co/aNFfXrd3BT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions when anyone has said the government does too much for them in the country. They express dissatisfaction with government interference in people's lives, high national debt, open borders exploited by cartels, ineffective security agencies, unfair IRS audits, and unjust imprisonments. The speaker criticizes the desire for more government control, taxes, spending, and bureaucracy by their colleagues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ask you to think about the last time a person said has said in this country that the government does too much for them. When was the last time anyone has heard or seen that?
Speaker 1: I'll say it right here. I don't want the government doing most of the things that the government is doing to interfere with the ability of the American people to carry out their lives. When was the last time you had a bureaucrat show up and you said, oh, joy. I'm really glad there's a bureaucrat here. When was the last time you were thankful for $32,000,000,000,000 in debt?
A $100,000 almost for every man, woman, and child in America. Anybody thankful for 32,000,000,000,000 dollars in debt? Anybody? Anybody thankful for a border that's wide open being exploited by cartels while Fentanyl comes in and cares or kills our children? Department Homeland Security that doesn't actually secure the homeland?
Everybody thankful for an FBI that went after Scott Smith and labeled him a domestic terrorist for daring to defend his daughter in a school board meeting because she was assaulted in a bathroom? Anybody thankful for the IRS knocking on your door, auditing the poor and the minorities 3 to 5 times more? People thankful for that? Are you thankful for the EPA or the Department of Interior that set a man to prison because he had some ponds on his ranch in Montana? We have a government that is weaponized against the American people and is undermining our liberties, and they want more of it.
My colleagues on the other side of the aisle want more, more government. They want more taxes. They want more spending. They want more bureaucrats knocking on your door.
reSee.it AI Summary
This woman, who has paid taxes for 52 years, is frustrated by the lack of assistance she's receiving. The residents of Chicago are angry with the mayor, and some believe this will have negative consequences for the Democrats.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
This woman is on fire! She has paid taxes for 52 years in the same building and is sick of not getting any help! “We need that money.” Isn’t it great how the democrats are ensuring that Chicago goes RED? 😂. These residents are hot with the mayor, as they should be! This is going to blow up in the democrats faces!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urges the council to vote against giving $51 million to migrants from opioid settlement funds. They advocate for the money to be used in their neighborhood for issues like violence, addiction, and homelessness. The speaker emphasizes the long-standing tax contributions of their community and the urgent need for support. They call on the council to prioritize local needs over external aid.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now the first $51,000,000 that this council gave to the migrants came from the opioid settlement funds. I am here on behalf of the Jones family, on behalf of the 37th Ward, on behalf of Black Chicago, on behalf of the entire city, to ask you all to vote no and put that money back in a opioid settlement fund. We need that money in my neighborhood. We need that on my block. That woman should not be at Cook County Jail because she's grieving over a random act of violence that caused her to lose her child in front of her face when the city of Chicago has 1,000,000 upon 1,000,000 upon 1,000,000 of dollars to give to people who ain't paid a dime into the tax base.
We've been in my building for 52 years. We about to pay some more taxes. The Jones family has been in their building for 45 years, paying taxes every year on time. So I'm asking y'all to use our tax money for our people. We need it.
We got people leaning. We got people rocking. We got overdosing. We got, pass out lines. You live on the west side, mayor Johnson.
You know exactly what I'm talking about. We need the money for us.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
Please help this man learn how to pronounce Hamas! Oh my word. Listen to him! This is the person who represents America. I am embarrassed for him! Wow! https://t.co/3tvvLIgeNI
Video Transcript AI Summary
I warned Israelis not to attack Haifa. Look at our recent response when Israel was attacked.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I made it clear to Israelis, don't move on Haifa. It's just not I mean, anyway, I I I just look what we did recently when Israel was attacked.
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
If this isn’t a circus, I don’t know what is! 🤡 This is the president who was going to act presidential! 👿 https://t.co/q0vCv8cl7z
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have your back at the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your president, my entire administration has your back. Are we top this at the White House?