TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @LivingDadJoke
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed a 1933 event in Chicago celebrating Jewish history, which some linked to a ritual sacrifice to Moloch. The event, coordinated by prominent Jewish organizations, featured key figures like Chaim Weizmann, who advocated for the Balfour Declaration supporting a Jewish homeland in Palestine. I explored how this event reflects spiritual and racial identities, suggesting a connection to Biblical narratives about tribes. Additionally, I highlighted concerns about power dynamics and societal corruption, emphasizing a perceived agenda to undermine Christian values and influence future generations.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
A child sacrifice to Moloch during the 1933 Chicago Soldier’s Field celebration of “3000 Years of Jewish History” Watch the video and then compare this screen-grab of the sacrifice to a historical depiction of a ritual sacrifice to Moloch and you decide it’s similar.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
The event, titled "The Romance of a People," was coordinated by the Zionist Organization of America and supported by the Jewish Agency for Palestine. Meyer Weisgal produced the event, collaborating with Rabbi Solomon Goldman and Maurice Samuel, the author of "You Gentiles." A key speaker at the event was Chaim Weizmann, the first president of Israel. Weizmann, along with Lionel Walter Rothschild, played a significant role in advocating for the Balfour Declaration. This declaration, issued by the British government, expressed support for a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine, which was then under Ottoman control.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
Lord Jacob Rothschild explaining the role his family played in the enactment of the Balfour Declaration, which sought to create a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. “My family created Israel” #Israel #Palestine #BalfourDeclaration
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the division in his family over establishing a national home in Israel. They talk about the eccentricities of Walter Rothschild and the crucial role his cousin Dorothy played in supporting Israel. The conversation also touches on the changes in Israel over the years, focusing on security, internal issues, and philanthropic projects. The speaker expresses hope for peaceful relationships with Israel's neighbors in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was better to be assimilated into English life. And although they retained their interest in Judaism and Jewish life, they didn't think it was a good thing that this national home should be established in Israel. So it was something that divided my family as with many other families.
Speaker 1: I wonder, as somebody who moves in the highest echelons of British society and is very close to Israel, whether you in your life feel a tension between concern for Israel and loyalty to Britain?
Speaker 0: No. I don't personally feel that. I mean, I've been completely committed to Israel since the early 1960s and have been there every year since. So I don't feel that conflict, but I have, of course, feel a huge loss in Great Britain.
Speaker 1: Just tell us a little bit more about Walter, the second lord Rothschild, because he was a an unusual and colorful character.
Speaker 0: He he was a deeply eccentric man. From a very early age, his passion was collecting. He read about Ring Park on a giant tortoise. He had a zebra, carriage.
Speaker 1: A carriage pulled by zebras?
Speaker 0: Yes. He collected on a massive scale birds, insects, fleas
Speaker 1: He was the butterflies. The the the largest single collection created by a single individual.
Speaker 0: I think that's true. I think certainly in Great Britain, I think probably anywhere, he was the greatest collector of all of the logical material.
Speaker 1: His his niece, Miriam, writes that that for 2 years, as one of his eccentricities, he didn't open any of the letters that were sent to him and stuffed them away into wicker baskets. And it does make you wonder what would have happened if the Balfour Declaration, the letter had been one of those letters that he'd actually, you know, stopped.
Speaker 0: That's that's true. At that stage, and it's very difficult to quite understand why, he had taken a deep interest in what was happening about the possible Duvalford declaration, so maybe those letters would have got to the top of his pile.
Speaker 1: I just wanna revisit for a moment your cousin Dorothy,
Speaker 0: who you
Speaker 1: mentioned, who at extraordinarily young age, still in her teens, played such a Yeah. Critical role as a go between and a and a facilitator for Chaim Weitzman. Can you say a little bit about that?
Speaker 0: Well, she married my cousin Jimmy, when she was 17.
Speaker 1: So this is, this is your cousin Dorothy, Dolly?
Speaker 0: Yep. Missus Jane Duralestrell.
Speaker 1: And from her teenage years onwards, she was a major supporter of Israel, wasn't she?
Speaker 0: Major supporter. I mean, she worships her husband who'd been deeply committed, son of Baron Idmore. It was due to him, I think, that she became interested. But once she became interested, she became passionately interested. After his death, she became even more committed.
She just wanted to carry out his wishes and what he cared deeply about. And then she had her own personality, a deeply good human being who was quite unselfish. She devoted herself to this place, to Israel, and to a few friends and had a wonderful life. And you can read letters from her to Weitzman and from Weitzman to her when she was only 17. And what she did, which is crucially important, was to connect up Weitzman with the British establishment.
Speaker 1: I think she also trained him in how to deal. She helped educate her, how how to
Speaker 0: And it's important at that age, but she did tell Weitzman, you know, how to, kind of integrate, how to insert himself into British establishment life, which he learned very quickly.
Speaker 1: So I'm here in the Waddesdon Manor archives where there is a treasure trove of remarkable documents from the time of the Balfour Declaration. We have the correspondence here between the teenage Dorothy and her husband James and it's really a love story. Here Dorothy is writing to James, she says, Jimmy, I thought I would not like one day to pass without giving you a piece of news you have never heard before. I love you. But of course, their correspondence wasn't just romantic correspondence.
Here we have detailed letters describing her dealings with Zionist leaders, her advice and her suggestions regarding the the conferences of the Zionist movement. And here we have a letter that the young Dorothy, still not 20, sent to Doctor Chaim Weizmann, where she's talking about the meetings that she's arranged for him. And as we've heard, she was helpful in in training and preparing him to enter into the highest echelons of British society to advance the cause of the Zionist movement. And she was an important character in your life as well. She really introduced you to Israel in
Speaker 0: some She was a crucially important character in my life. I became a trustee of the Adhanu Dev over 50 years ago.
Speaker 1: Which is the the Rothschild Philanthropic Foundation? Yes.
Speaker 0: The Stinar Foundation. And I think I first went in 1962.
Speaker 1: Can you share with us your sense of what things have been changing in Israel since that first visit?
Speaker 0: Yes. As Israel, I think, became more and more successful in all sorts of ways, industrially successful, absorption successful, technologically successful great universities. The problems with the wars that took place, being the clearest examples of security became more paramount. And so you did see a shift in Israel, from kind of the liberal Western place that it had been in the early sixties to something of a very different character. And you also have a shift, of course, between communities in Israel.
I mean, Israel is a patchwork of different immigrants from different countries. And you have the religious, you have the non religious, you have a time like Tel Aviv, which is attractive to the kind of business community to what I would call ordinary city life. And then you have Jerusalem, which remains a very religious city, and full of conflict between Arab neighbors and itself.
Speaker 1: Those internal issues within the fabric of Israeli society are one of the the main focuses of Yirhan Nadiv. Can you mention just 1 or 2 of the projects that feel to you most significant?
Speaker 0: Yes. We do a great deal of work on education, a great deal of academic work. We keep going at Ramat Hanadeep, the garden where Baron Edmond was eventually buried. Were on the point of building the new National Library of Israel. I have 2 unexpected ones, perhaps.
If you take the Orthodox community, it's important that they have employment. And we're trying to develop programs which is possible for them to undertake. Similarly, we have a problem with Arab unemployment and we set up jointly with the government employment centers to facilitate greater employment of Arabs within Israel. And so we're an active foundation trying to, help with these fish oils in Israeli life and to do some good.
Speaker 1: And and we're sitting here looking forward to the 100th anniversary of this significant letter. If I can just ask you to think about the next centennial, a 100 years time, and just maybe share some of your hopes, your aspirations about where Israel will be.
Speaker 0: What is one hope for? 1, of course, hopes for a peaceful relationship with Israel's neighbors, and that's going to be the most difficult matter of all to achieve. But even now you can see with the disarray in the Middle East and the importance of relationships that Israel is developing, not only with Jordan, but also with Egypt and indeed with Saudi Arabia, even if they're not publicized because of the Sunni Shiite war. There's hope. And I think if you take the need of Arab nations, to have intelligence help.
And if on the other hand, you take compassion and generosity coming from Israel to Palestinian territories and its less fortunate neighbors, there are grounds for optimism, and I am an optimist.
Speaker 1: Lord Rothschild, thank you very much indeed.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
By tying the ritualistic sacrifice to Moloch with a “Celebration” of Jewish history, the event vindicates information which we already know, partly from the Bible. Chiefly, that the Canaanite, Ammonite, and other tribes from which they descend were cut off from God for the worship of false-idols. “shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever” Deuteronomy 23:3 https://interactive.wttw.com/a/chicago-stories-jewish-chicago-1833-1933
Jewish History in Chicago: 1833-1933: Romance of a People - WTTW
interactive.wttw.com
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
You are at war, and your side has been chosen for you. This event, and those who orchestrated it, exemplify the indissoluble link between our spiritual battles and racial identities, aligning seamlessly with the Biblical chronology and its narratives on tribes and lineage. https://t.co/OPp3ArebqO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Signs with French, Latin, and ancient languages. Stone owl with eternal flame, 45 feet tall. Bohemian Club members feast before the cremation of care ceremony. Program with demonic imagery distributed to spectators. Men in cloaks carry a bound body, possibly for sacrifice. Owl ritual with speeches and symbolic actions. Boatman with skull face brings body across water. Occultic speeches and rituals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's just one of many signs sporting French with skulls adorned with other trappings of death. We also saw signage with Latin and other ancient languages. Here you can see the bottom of the stone owl with the altar and the eternal flame, a Aladdin lamp style urn that continually burns here around, we're told. Keep in mind the scale of the idol compared to those giant redwood trees. It's at least 45 feet tall.
This is America, and it's been going on for a 120 plus years in Northern California. This is not some new fad. We're talking about something deadly serious with its roots in ancient history. One of the Sonoma County Sheriff's deputies showed up and began asking us why we were filming. We calmly told him we were just sightseeing as members of the Bohemian Club.
The point that has to be made here though is they do have hidden cameras. After escaping the sheriff's department, Mike and I traveled high into the hills to wait until dark and the beginning of the cremation of care ceremony. Before the cremation of care, all the Bohemian club members begin a massive feast of revelry. After the feast, cult members travel from the main dining area under the trees out to the eastern side of the lake, where they congregate and prepare themselves to properly thank their deity. Again, the 3,000 plus year old, Moloch.
The occult activities are coming up. And then after the actual ritual, we're gonna give you some more of the history surrounding it. But first off, I wanted to draw your attention to the program that was given out to the spectators or the viewers. I guess an occultist would call them novices, who actually watched as the priest, and their supporters engaged in this ancient rite. Now you're looking at a little demon called PJ that was on the front of the actual program.
It's kind of an anonymous Bosch style. He's got a little broom and a dust pan, and he's sweeping something up. Now even more shocking is the figure of a human body burning in the flames. In fact, I've shown it, to people that are experts in anatomy, to actual doctors, and they say that the anatomical size is that of a baby or small child. Notice how large the cranium is in comparison to the torso, that is the ribs.
Understand, ladies and gentlemen, this is from the program itself given out to the establishment lackeys witnessing these sinister activities. Remember, in Babylon and Tyre, they would throw their children into fiery pits. Look at the size of the hands compared to the rest of the Mahdi. At long last, here it is, the cremation of care unveiled. As we sat there in the darkness, not knowing what we were about to see in the gathering crowd, suddenly across the small lake, we saw a carriage with men in black and brown cloaks, robes in front and in back bearing a bound body.
Remember, it was a hidden camera and at somewhat of an angle. Something particularly pleasing was happening for the Bohemian Grovers with whatever developed with that crowd of men in black and brown and the bound body on the back of the buggy. They drove behind big black tarps they had hanging out of the trees. There was lots of smacking on lips of an and bizarre enjoyment by the crowd. We still haven't made out exactly what was going on, but that a real sacrifice may have actually been developing according to some occult experts.
All the time in the darkness across the small lake, the men in black were doing something behind the dark curtains hanging from the redwood trees. But after about 10 more minutes of music, suddenly all around the owl activity began. Here is the main central part of the ritual.
Speaker 1: The owl is in his sleepy temple, and be ye lifted up, ye everlasting swire. For behold, here is Bohemian's shrine, and holy are the pillars of this house.
Speaker 2: Hail bohemian. With the ripple of waters, saw the birds, such music as inspires the singing souls, and we invite you into good summer's joy. Sky above its blue, moon, the soul of stars, the forest floor is deep with vibrant brick, can be gone. Take off your sorrows with the city's dust and cast the winds in the cares of life. But memory bring back the well loved names of gallant friends who knew and loved this world.
Dear, Boone's companions, although long ago, I have enjoyed us in this region. Of the world or a springtime in your heart a $10 tail. Gather ye forest folk and cast your spell over these mortons. Touch your world mind eyes today and see you today through the sorrow. It is a dream, and yet, not all a dream.
Joel Kerr and all of his works are Thus vanished Babylon and driveling Tyre. So shall they also vanish. But the wilding rose blows on the broken battlements of Tyre. It's rotten, ridged stones of that one. Return to one alone.
As you surround yourself, great nature, refuge of the weary heart, and only bomb for breasts that have been bruised. He has full hands for every favorite brow, and gentleness silence for the troubled soul. The apostles are both quiet. He healeth well, having such ministries as calm and sleep. He is ever faithful.
Other friends may fail, but seek me her in any quiet place. Smiling, you arise and give to you her kiss. So must become children. Bohemians and priests, the desperate call of heavy hearts is answered. By the power of your fellowship, no care fire awaits the courts of care.
There we go.
Speaker 0: Here you have the boatman in his face, painted up like a skull, bringing the bound body across the water. Again, we'll have enhanced video of this later. And, let's see if you can pick up all of the different occultic meanings, in the speeches you're about to hear.
Speaker 2: And all the winds make merry with thy dust. Bring fire. Faces to the marketplace. Do you not find me waiting as a whole?
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
Here we can see how simple it is. Power and the all corrupting pursuit of power, baked into text, shrouded in mystery and mysticism and used as propaganda to twist world leaders and followers alike into subservience to a group which is not at all concerned with their welfare. All for what? A dollar, a shekel, 30 pieces of silver, the same motivation it’s always been.
@OCanonist - Orthodox Canonist
🚨‼️ ‘Their’ strategy: 1. Corrupt or utterly annihilate the Christian elite caste of society (those who protect their homeland, ‘those who spill blood for their people’); 2. Attack Christianity and the Church, demoralize the Christian population, promote apostasy at all socio-economic levels, make blasphemy and sacrilege elements of mainstream discourse; 3. Corrupt the lower & middle classes with materialism, ‘worldly concerns’, vices (lust, envy, pride, anger, feminism, alphabet community values, etc); 4. Corrupt the children to guarantee that no future generation will grow up strong enough to ‘correct’ this iniquity through pious willpower and force, like the righteous Old Testament Judges, Kings and Prophets as well as the Emperors and Church Fathers of the New Testament. Significantly reduce the chance that any young boy or girl may grow up healthy enough (spiritually, mentally and physically) to oppose their plans.
reSee.it AI Summary
N M Rothschild & Sons Bank in London had previously unreported ties to the slave trade. Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the family's 19th-century leader, profited from enslaved Africans as collateral and processed their harvested cotton in his textile business. Rothschild received compensation for his mortgage on a plantation in Antigua, which included 158 enslaved people. He and his business partner loaned £15 million to the British Government, repaid by taxpayers, to compensate slave owners after abolition. Rothschild's control over the Bank of England gave him significant influence.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
N M Rothschild & Sons Bank in London was connected to the slave trade. The bank, a prominent institution in the City of London, had previously unreported ties to slavery in the British colonies. Financial Times documents revealed that Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the family's 19th-century leader, profited by using enslaved Africans as collateral in his business dealings and processed the cotton they harvested in his Manchester textile business. Rothschild and his business partner Moses Montefiore loaned £15 million to the British Government (equivalent to £1.51 billion in 2022), which was repaid by British taxpayers by 2015. This funding was used to compensate slave owners in the British Empire after slavery was abolished. Research from the University College London shows that Rothschild was a beneficiary of this compensation, receiving £2,571 for his mortgage on a plantation in Antigua, which included 158 enslaved people (worth £259,582 in 2024). Links below:
Video Transcript AI Summary
During slavery, cotton was like oil today. The rich controlled it, linking North and South. Jewish people dominated the cotton trade, sending it to England for cloth. Rothschilds and Lehman Brothers got rich from cotton. The truth must be told.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this will be like showing a vampire the cross or throwing holy water on a vampire. See, because the worst thing that a deceiver wants is for the people deceived to find the truth. Black folk picking cotton, Listen good now. Cotton was then what oil is now. The largest producer of oil in the world are the rich with rich ones, and the strategic interest of America means in order for them to rule, they have to link with where the oil is coming from and take it or maneuver to get it, but they must have oil.
In the time of slavery, it was cotton. And it's interesting that the cotton would come down the Mississippi, New Orleans to the Gulf, from Biloxi, Mississippi, and from Mobile, Alabama. And the cotton would come down and go up to New York where the brethren of the Jewish people in the South, in the North, were the masters of the needle trades. And they had their brothers also in the South taking the lint from the cotton and producing cloth through weaving. But these were Jewish people owning the land.
They were the majority. They were the merchants. They were the traders. They knew how to hook up with their brethren in the North. And they would send raw cotton to the mills in England, in Manchester, Leeds, and Bristol.
And the British would turn it into cloth and then sell it all over the world. The Rothschilds became rich from cotton. The Lehman Brothers became rich from cotton in Alabama, then moved to New York and Wall Street. I know the truth, and somebody gotta tell it or die trying.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
The first slaves imported into the American colonies were 100 white children in 1619, four months before the arrival of the first shipment of black slaves. https://t.co/1hambSz1xd
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
Prof. Tony Martin Exposes The Jewish Slave Trades Of Africans In this video Professor Tony Martin exposes the origins of slavery, the Hamitic Myth that Jews have used to justify the enslavement of Black people, but also Whites and just about anyone they could get their hands on and sell to others. This is merely one of the tentacles of Jewish supremacy and vile hatred of all non-Jews. Dr. Tony Martin was Emeritus Professor of Africana Studies at Wellesley College, Massachusetts, where he taught from 1973 to 2007. Prior to coming to Wellesley, he taught at the University of Michigan-Flint, the Cipriani Labour College, and St. Mary's College.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video explores the Jewish involvement in the African slave trade, tracing its origins before the transatlantic slave trade. It discusses the Hamitic myth, which Jewish scholars invented to justify the slave trade, and highlights Jewish ownership of slave ships through the Dutch West India Company. The video notes that Jewish organizations played a significant role in the civil rights movement but also mentions instances where they opposed affirmative action and criticized black leaders. The speaker shares their personal experience with controversy surrounding the topic, including tactics used by Jewish organizations to discredit them and suppress free speech. They discuss tactics such as labeling individuals as anti-Semitic, avoiding factual debates, and leveraging media influence. The speaker emphasizes the importance of standing on the truth, focusing on facts, and actively fighting back against these tactics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But before I describe what happened, let me spend a couple a few minutes summarizing the facts of Jewish involvement in the slave trade. What precisely was the nature of the Jewish involvement in the African slave trade? The Jewish involvement in the African slave trade begins as far as I can tell long before the actual slave trade across the Atlantic itself. The transatlantic slave trade has its immediate origins around about 14/41 when Portuguese sailors landed on the West African coast and kidnapped a few Africans, brought them back to Europe. Africans were brought back to Europe, to Portugal and to Spain as part of that particular trade for several years.
Columbus, of course, arrived in the Americas in 14/92, approximately half a century later. In 15/02, the first Africans were brought to the Caribbean. The Caribbean is where the transatlantic slave trade begins and many Americans don't know that. But for over 100 years before Africans were brought as slaves to this country, the United States of America, Africans were being brought across the Atlantic to the Caribbean, to places like Hispaniola, the island which today is shared by Haiti and a Dominican Republic and to other places as well. So it seems to me that Jewish involvement then in that transatlantic slave trade precedes by many, many years, perhaps by a 1000 years, the actual beginnings of the transatlantic slave trade.
And let me explain. It seems to me that the most important theoretical underpinning for that Transatlantic Slave Trade was what has come to be known in many quarters of the Hamitic myth. Some people call it the curse of Ham story. When the slave trade developed beginning in 14/41 and for 100 of years thereafter, people who prosecuted that trade looked around for intellectual justification, for rationalizations, for pretexts, if you want, if you will. And a variety of pretexts were advanced to justify the slave trade, to allow people to sleep well at night, for their consciousness to be clear.
One justification was that Africans were heathens, they weren't Christian, they were heathens and therefore, it was all right to enslave heathens. It would not be all right to enslave one's Christian brother, but it would be okay. It would be morally justifiable to enslave a heathen. That was one kind of rationale that was advanced to justify the slave trade. Another rationale was that Africans were less than human.
Africans were devoid of reason, could not reason, were a subspecies of creature, they weren't human. And therefore, again, whereas there might have been some moral opprobrium attached to enslaving one's fellow human beings, in the case of Africans since they weren't quite human that kind of treatment of Africans was okay. The most important however of all of these rationales that was advanced to try to justify the slave trade was the question of this Hamitic myth. That is the notion that Africans were cursed by God himself, that Africans had been cursed by God, that God had decreed in his wisdom a very long time ago that Africans would be forever the hewers of wood and the drawers of water for other races. The authority for this idea was set to reside in the book of Genesis, in the story in the book of Genesis.
Now there's a story in the book of Genesis and there's an interpretation of that story that allowed it to be used to justify African slavery and they're 2 different things. The story in Genesis is in Genesis, it's been in the bible ever since. But the sort of spin that was put on that story that enabled it to become the basis for the Hamitic myth actually comes out of the Talmud, the Jewish holy book, the Talmud, somewhere around 500 A. D. Or thereabouts, the Babylonian Talmud.
Let me just describe the difference between the story as it appears in the bible and the story as it was spun in the time rule. Period. According to the Bible, Noah, after the flood, apparently, had a vineyard someplace and he passed off the wine that was produced out of his vineyard. He got himself drunk 1 night, went into his tent, took his clothes off as people often do when they get drunk. And according to the biblical story, he had 3 sons, Ham, Shem, and Japheth.
Ham apparently entered the area where his father was lying in his drunken, naked steward and Ham, in an act of disrespect, gazed upon his father's nakedness. And apparently he went back outside and informed his 2 other brothers of his father's condition. According to the biblical story, the 2 other brothers then came in to sit inside the tent or river and out of respect for their father, they kind of backed into the tent. They would not look directly at him in his naked condition. They backed into the tent, they covered him with some kind of a garment and according to the biblical story when Noah revived when he arose from his drunken stupor and realized what had happened, he then cursed Ham's son, Canaan and all of his descendants forever and said that they would be the servants of the descendants of the other two brothers, Shimon Japhet.
Somewhere along the line, I'm not quite sure how come but somewhere along the line, somebody came up with the notion that ham was the progenitor of the African race and Shem was the progenitor of the Asian race and Japheth was the progenitor of the European race. So Noah had 3 sons of 3 different races and he cursed his African son and their descendants and said that those descendants would be the slaves, the servants of the Asian branch of the family and also the European branch of the family forever. And that's as far as the biblical story goes. The Talmud, which of course, my understanding of the Talmud, I'm more explicit in the Talmud, but my understanding is that the Talmud consists of interpretations, what they call glasses on various biblical stories. And these glasses or interpretations or spins are supposed to to give people who subscribe to the Judaic religion a sort of an authoritative guide as to how to interpret the biblical stories and whatnot.
So what the Talmud did then, the Talmud came around, the Babylonian Talmud around about 500 or so, AD and proceeded to spin this biblical story for reasons that are unknown to me. But Ham, again, was said to be the progenitor of the African race. Now interestingly enough, I read some place that early Christians also, accepted this notion of ham being some sort of progenitor of the African race. But apparently in the Christian tradition, the kind of overtly racist implications of that fact didn't develop in the same way as it developed in the Judaic tradition. According to the Tanmude, Ham was the, again, the original African and when God through Noah cursed Ham and his son Canaan and all his descendants, he was in fact cursing the African nations.
This was the unique new element of the story that the time new originated. That the curse on Ham and Canaan was was not only a curse on an individual and his family, but it was a curse on a race. So so here, this is the contribution then of the time you But God through Noah cursed the African race and the Tanius proceeded to embellish the story in the most delightful, should I say, ways. For example, the Talmud said that there was ample proof that God was in fact cursing the African race. It said for example that because Ham had gazed upon Noah's nakedness in the dark of night that, the African race was henceforth turned black so that the blackness of the African became a sort of a visible indication of that curse.
The Talmud said that because it was dark at night when Ham entered that tent and looked upon his father's nakedness, he had to open his eyes, big head to buck his eyes, as they say in America, to, to see his father in the darkness. And that's why Africans had big eyes. It's hard to say and I'm here, and I'm gonna quote all this exactly in a minute. You know, I'm not making this up. It sounds incredible, but I'm actually paraphrasing a gentleman by the name of Harold Backman, a man who works or worked until recently for the Simon Wiesenthal Centre of All Agencies.
He wrote all of this in his dissertation and it might not surprise you to discover that once people like myself began quoting what this guy, Brackmann, wrote, I'm sure you can guess what happened next and that is that Bachman denied you to have written this stuff. This stuff is in Bachman's PhD dissertation. It's called the ebb and flow of history. Anybody here can easily read it. You can get it at any library.
If they don't have it, they'll get it to you, interlibrary loans. This is called the ebb and flow of history. It's a PhD dissertation, I think in the history department at UCLA in 1977 by Harold B. Brackman, who I believe up to a couple of years ago, maybe even now is or was until recently a functionary of the Simon Wiesenthal or is it Wiesenthal Center. But despite the fact that his writings are clearly in a public record that anybody, any an undergrad student can access this stuff and check it for themselves.
Once the story got out, he quickly denied the evidence. This man actually wrote letters to the New York Times. I believe I have the actual you know, here in the Jewish onslaught, concerning all this. This man wrote letters to the New York Times. He wrote a slew of letters to black publications all over this country denying all of this stuff even though it's right there on the record.
So I'm using very good evidence here when I paraphrase what you're saying. Backman tells us that because and here it gets to be totally hilarious. Now these Jewish rabbis, the sages they call them, wise men who put together this tile mute, they actually invented. I mean, they sort of elaborated on the biblical story. It's like a jazz musician who improvises, where they improvise on the story.
They did a whole elaborate improvisation in the story and somehow, Lord knows how come, but they came up with the notion that Ham, when he went into that tent and looked upon his naked father Noah, that Ham buggered his father. He had anal intercourse with his father and because he had anal intercourse with his father, that's the reason here I'm citing black one, that's the reason why part of the curse was to give black men large, sexual organs. So all of this was part of the curse, the black skin, the big eyes, even the kinky hair too, big sexual organs, all of this. So as amazing as this may seem, this transpired a 1000 years before the beginnings of the transatlantic slave trade and when the slave trade came into being, this notion of the Hamitic curse was revived and it became both for Jews and for Christians, it became the most pervasive of all the attempts to rationalize that slave trade. Let me quote the exact words of Harald Backman lest you suspect that I'm making this up.
Unquote here from Harald Backman the dissertation I mentioned a minute ago, the ebb and flow of history. There is no denying, this is on page 24 in case anybody who has a book feels like reading along with me. I know some of you have the book on it. This is on page 34 in in in in the middle of the page. Second new paragraph.
There is no denying that the Babylonian Tanut was the first source and listen to how unequivocal he is here, was the first, the very first. In other words, this is Bachman from the Simon Wiesenthal Center acknowledging that the Tanmoud was the one, was the place that invented the story of the Hamitic curse. There is no denying that the Babylonian Talmud was the first source to read a negrophobic content into the episode. Here he is referring to the episode of Ham looking upon his father's nakedness. He goes on to suggest that these early stages some of them you know, sort of impose this homosexual sort of spin on the story.
He says, Rab Rab is one of these stages. He says, Rab maintained that Ham had unmanned Noah. So Ham according to this sage had actually castrated his father. While Samuel, Samuel is some other sage, Samuel claimed that he had buggled him as well both unmanned him and buggled him. How this arose out of the biblical story, I'll never understand.
Let me continue to quote from Brackmann here in his dissertation quote. He is discussing here various, slight slightly diverging, you know, variance of this myth. He goes on to say, quote, the more important version of the myth, that's the Hamitic myth, however, ingeniously ties in the origins of blackness and of other rare and imagined Negroid traits with Noah's curse itself. According to it, that's according to this, most popular version of the Hamitic myth. According to it, Ham is told by his outraged father that because you have abused me in the darkness of the night, your children shall be born black and ugly.
This is in a time you because you have twisted your head to cause me embarrassment, they shall have kinky hair and red eyes. So if you ever wondered what the origin of the kinky hair and the red eyes of black folk, okay, here you have it. Because your lips jested at my exposure, theirs shall swell. That's why black folks have thick lips. And because you neglected my nakedness, they, that is your children, the children of Ham and Canaan, they shall go naked with their shamefully elongated male members exposed for all to see.
So they have the origin of a whole variety of stereotypes pertaining to African people. So the Hermetic myth then is where you really have to begin, you know, in terms of a discussion of the Jewish role in the slave trade. They provided the rationale par excellence for the prosecution of that slave trade. Some years after the Babylonian time, sometime in the Middle Ages, a man who I believe they consider to be perhaps one of the greatest philosophers ever, a man by the name of Maimonides actually also contributed to that notion of Africans being sub human when in his famous book, Guide to the Perplexed, when he, Maimonides, suggested again that African people were less than human, but they were somewhere between monkeys and human beings. This is Maimonides, a man who is one of the most revered of all of these Jewish sages.
So by the time then that the slave trade came along when, you know, there was this tradition which had been floating around Europe and it was seized upon then by the slave traders, Jews, and Gentiles alike as a basic rationale. There were other other areas, you know, in which the in which the Jewish presence was very manifest. For example, although I don't know a whole lot about this aspect of it, but my understanding is that Jews were in fact very prominent in the as slave traders in the centuries prior to the beginning of the Atlantic Slave Trade. My understanding is that Jews, you know, for many years sold Muslim slaves to Christians and sold Christian slaves to Muslims and they they were sort of accepted as the slave middlemen by both sides. And this is a long time before the Atlantic Slave Trade came about.
The earliest multinational corporation involved in the Atlantic Slave Trade was something called a Dutch West India Company. And again, it often surprises people to discover that even in this early period, you know, globalization was already a very, fairly entrenched phenomenon. The slave trade was a great example of globalization. Here you have the Dutch West India Company out of Holland, of course, which went to West Africa. They had their own private army.
They established forts on the West African coast. They had their own fleet of ships and so on, they had their own administrators, sometimes they would govern areas, they had their own governors, administrators and whatnot. They were almost like It was almost like colonization via private enterprise. It was like privatized colonization. And all of this of course transpired with the sanction of European governments.
These were like surrogate governments almost, these, chartered companies that they were often called. So the Dutch West India Company in the 1600s then was the pioneer in this kind of multinational, globalized prosecution of the slave trade. And apparently, a large number of the shareholders, stockholders in this Dutch West India Company were Jews. The Jews had been chased out of Portugal and Spain. They had been chased out of all kinds of places.
They found some respite from their wanderings in Holland. They became an influential factor in Holland. And I've seen a variety of figures. This too is an area of some controversy. I've seen estimates varying from 25% to 50% concerning the stake of Jewish stockholders in the Dutch West India Company.
But suffice it to say that they were an important element in the Dutch West India Company which was the pre eminent entity carrying on the slave trade in the early period. The Dutch West India Company was responsible for importing the earliest slaves to places like Brazil, to some parts of the Caribbean, either directly or indirectly, I think to this country as well in a very early period in 17th century. In many areas in the Americas, Jews were a dominant element in the slave trade. In Brazil for example, in 17th century, Jews were a dominant element in the slave trade. They owned a large number of the plantations.
They were often very importantly positioned in other aspects, not necessarily the plantation aspects but things like, say, the importation of slaves, things like the warehousing of slaves, things like the auctioning of slaves, things like the provisioning of slaves, things like mining slave ships, provisioning slave ships. In New England, for example, at the height of the Atlantic Slave Trade, rum became economic venture in New England, places like Providence, Rhode Island, places like Boston and so on. And RUM was a major factor in the slave trade because rumble was one of the major items of trade, one of the major items that, slave ships carried when they went to West Africa to trade in exchange for slaves and so on. And I believe that at one point all the Rambus stories in Boston were owned by Jews. I think there was something like 18 or something like that from the stories.
So in all of these areas, both directly and in terms of ancillary industries feeding the slave trade, Jews were very, very important. Apart from Brazil, Jews were again dominant factors in many other parts of the area for example in Curacao, Curacao a Dutch Island in the Caribbean, you know, the majority of folks involved in the slave trade in Curacao were Jews. At one point in Suriname which again was a Dutch colony right next to Brazil in South America, Jews were again a very important part of the slave trade in Suriname. There was an English soldier by the name of John Stedman who went to Suriname in the late 1700s as part of a mercenary force raised by the Dutch to try to fight against the maroon slaves, those were the escaped slaves who established an independent existence in the interior and gave the slave regime a lot of trouble. And Stedman wrote a very fascinating book concerning his experiences in Suriname and there are several references in Stedman's book to the presence of Jewish slave owners and so on.
There was one large plantation area in Suriname called Jew Savannah, Jew Savannah. And according to Stedman, the Jews were very often the most cruel of the slave owners, they played a very prominent role in torturing slaves and so on. He has several little vignettes that he mentions in there concerning the kind of cruelties that were meted out to slaves by both Jewish men and women. There's one case he describes there of a maroon slave leader, a man called Jolicaire, French Jolicaire, beautiful heart, don't know where he got that name from, Jolicaire, but apparently Jolicaire again, was a rebellious slave. He led a slave uprising and on one occasion, apparently, the Maroons were fighting against some of these people from Jewish savannah.
And according to Stedman, they captured a Jewish slave owner named Shos. And apparently Shuss was the man that, Jollicare, you know, the slave owner that Jollicare had escaped from as a young boy and Jollicaire remembered that this guy shows that apparently ravaged his mother and so on. And as Stedman describes very, very, very harsh vengeance that was wrought by Jollicare on shows. He, felled him, cut his skin off, then, used his his skin to keep the powder, dry powder for his cannon or whatever, and used his head to play football with. Jews were also very prominently present in non Dutch parts of the Caribbean, places like Barbados, places like Jamaica, St Thomas and many of the other islands as well.
There's been a big debate that has arisen concerning whether Jews were the dominant element or not or whether they were even an important element. But much of that discussion has taken place in the context of the United States of America. In the U. S, it may not be correct to say that slaves were as that Jews, sorry, were as dominant in the slave trade as they were in parts of say the Caribbean or Central America. Nevertheless, Jews were an important part of the slave trade in this country in the U.
S. Of A anyway. In fact, in the US of A, Jews partly played a role in the slave trade that was greater than the numbers in the overall population would suggest. Just as in 1992, a study done based on the Forbes Magazine list of the richest people in America for 1992, a study based on that list discovered that something like 33% of the billionaires in the U. S.
Of A were Jews based on the Forbes list of 1992 at a time when Jews claimed to be 2.5 percent of the United States population. So just as in 1992, they were overrepresented in the high echelons of this country just so during the slave trade even though their numbers may have been relatively small and many of the people who have tried to refute the suggestion that Jews will prominently involve in the slave trade in this country, many of those people have put forward figures suggesting that Jews were only a very minute portion of the overall American population. Yes, they were a very small percentage of the American population but that has nothing to do with their role in the slave trade, the importance of their role. Their role was much greater than their numbers in the overall population would suggest. As a matter of fact, a Jewish historian has done a study of the 18/30 Census in the South and has come up with the conclusion that something like 75% of Jewish households in the south in this country in 1830 owned slaves, Whereas the percentage for white households, generally was only something like 36%.
So the Jews were approximately twice as likely as non Jews, as the right population to own slaves in this country in the South in 18/30. So again, we're talking here about proportions rather than absolute figures. Some of the most important slave ship owners in colonial America were Jews. Perhaps the best known of these is a man called Aaron Lopez. I noticed that many of these persons had Spanish or Portuguese sounding last names and that's because there were Sephardic Jews.
When this whole question arose, you know, around my involvement and all this, many Jews were here to say that there were no Jews in America prior to the 18 eighties. In fact, Nathan Glaser, a very famous academic out of Harvard University who should know better, he actually wrote that there's no way that Jews could be responsible for the slave trade in America since there were no Jews here he said before 18/80. Of course, there were European Jews here in the 19th century before 18/80, German Jews and so on. But there were Sephardic Jews here, from the very beginning. From 17th century there were Sephardic Jews coming in here to New York and later to other places.
So hence the Spanish sounding names, names like Nunez, names like Lopez, names like Castro interestingly enough, names like Ferrera, Herrera, Gomes, Gomez. All of these names, interestingly enough, suggested Jewish origin in colonial times. Somebody was saying to me yesterday, you could usually, get a hint of their Jewishness from their first names. The last it was you. Okay.
The last name might be Gomez or Nunez or Pastor, but the first name might be, Jacob or David or something like that. Aaron. So Aaron Lopez was out of Newport, Rhode Island. He was one of the largest slave ship owners in colonial America. This man had a fleet of ships for many years.
He sent his ships to West Africa. They traveled from West Africa to the Caribbean to Barbados to Jamaica, St. Thomas, places like that. He had members of his family situated in the Caribbean. He had a whole network going on and he bought slaves back here as well.
Many of his slaves helped to build some famous synagogue in Newport, Rhode Island in colonial times. Despite the fact that by the way, Jews were also involved in other aspects of the trade. My time is running out, so I'm going to be quick here. For example, they were involved again in provisioning slaves here in this country as they were in other areas as well, providing the kind of cloth that slaves wore, things like that. They had a hand in providing the kinds of restraints and handcuffs and chains and padlocks and those kinds of things that were used to sort of enforce servitude of the Africans as well.
Interestingly enough, despite the prominence of Jews in this African slave trade in this country, in the U. S. Of A, their prominence in the African slave trade was not matched by a similar prominence in the abolitionist movement. In fact, some of the Christian abolitionists noted this apparent contradiction. In fact, let me quote you here a very interesting statement put out by Christian abolitionists.
This is 18/53, it's from the American and Foreign Anti Slavery Society Report 18/50 3, The Jews of the United States have never taken steps any steps whatever with regard to the slavery question. As citizens, they deem it their policy to have everyone choose whichever side he may deem best to promote his own interests and the welfare of his country, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. This statement concludes as follows: The objects of so much mean prejudice and unrighteous oppression as the Jews have been for ages, surely they, it would seem, more than any other denomination ought to be the enemies of caste and friends of universal freedom. Such, however, was not the case. They were very few and far between as far as the abolitionist movement was concerned.
So this then is the reality of Jewish involvement in the slave trade and that's the reality that I faced then in 1993 when I stumbled into this controversy simply by exposing my students to the fact that Jews like everybody else had been involved. And of course, I did not deny the involvement of anybody else. I did not even deny the involvement of African collaborators. You know, for years, I had taught Christian involvement. And up to now, I am still somewhat surprised that everybody else seems willing to acknowledge the involvement in this trade.
But for some reason, this is the only group that not only refuses to acknowledge the involvement but becomes very, very, very, very upset when that involvement is mentioned. I won't have time to go into my particular situation. It's all here in in in the Jewish onslaught. I'll just say very briefly before I wrap up. I was just told I have about 3 more minutes But, this controversy assumed enormous proportions.
I'm I'm still surprised. You know, here was something as simple as my teaching this information, which is all well documented. The book that I was using, The Secret Relationships Between Blacks and Jews taught by the Nation of Islam that book relies almost 100% on Jewish sources. But what is interesting though is that even though the Jewish academics and authoritative sources like the Judaica, even though these sort of academic, esoteric Jewish sources were quite forthcoming in acknowledging their role in the slave trade. The popular Jewish press and the popular Jewish populace I guess, many of them either unaware of all this or refuse to believe it.
I remember some Jewish alumni writing into the to the Guernsey College alumni magazine suggesting that my teaching, you know, the Jewish involvement in the slave trade was akin to suspending the rules of grammar in an English class. The end result of all this is that the role of Jews in the slave trade, something which was unknown to many folks prior to 1993, something which was largely unknown to me because of the hullabaloo created by the, by the Jewish media and so on. I think that has, in a sense, had an effect that they perhaps did not anticipate. And that is something which was in fact a secret relationship is no longer secret. The whole world is now aware of the fact thanks to the hullabaloo created by the Jewish media of the Jewish involvement in the slave trade.
And even though there has been an incredible effort since 1993 to on the part of the Jewish media to sort of counter attack. For example, the Amistad movie was part of that counter attack. The Amistad movie very subtly suggested that Africans were the ones responsible for their own enslavement. The Amistad movie, you know, put out by Steven Spielberg actually had actually had an African slave. Imagine this.
Steven Spielberg actually had an African slave in the Amistad movie saying I did not see the movie, by the way. I refused to see it, but I was told that Spielberg actually had an African slave in this movie saying that he was so sorry for the great suffering that, you know, the Jews had gone through, you know, and whatnot. Nobody in the world. This was an African slave, A man who was on death row in jail, fighting for his life as an African slave. And Spielberg has this man saying that he had just read the bible and these folks have suffered so much, etcetera, etcetera.
Nobody in the world has suffered as much as they had. The whole question of late of an alleged slave trade in Sudan, now there may indeed be a Muslim slave trade in Sudan. The main I don't I don't doesn't bother me one way or the other. But the whole attempt to elevate this into a new great antislavery crusade, that too is one of the the means by which the Jewish establishment has tried to to kind of smother up smother or cover up, you know, their own involvement in the slave trade. I don't know how many books on the slave trade have been published by Jews in the last 6, 7 years.
I've lost count but it could easily be a dozen that they keep just churning all these books. But the more noise they make, the more people become aware of the fact that, you know, that there is a Jewish involvement in the slave trade. So I think that to that extent, I think they have kind of shot themselves in a foot this time around. They have let the genie out of the bottle. I don't know how they'll ever get that genie back in the bottle.
I don't think they'll find a way. So let me again end right here by thanking you for giving me this opportunity. And thank you, David Irving.
Speaker 1: Yes. It is indeed true that Jews invented the Hamidic myth, whereby it was said that Ham, the son of Noah, was cursed in the book of Genesis. And somehow it was said that Ham was the progenitor of the African race, and that all Africans would be cursed and enslaved for time immemorial because of this so called biblical curse on hand. We now know that it was Jewish scholars who invented the story of the Hamitic myth which has plagued black people From that point on, yes, it is true. We now know that Jews were very importantly involved in the slave trade and medieval times, both as professor Tucker said, in the Eastern Arabic areas and also in Europe.
That is even before our African slave trade to the Americas. Yes. It is true as we now know. The Jews were the ones who invented what came to be known as white slavery, whereby Jewish entrepreneurs in Europe in the late 19th century, prostituted their own Jewish women, sent them around the world as prostitutes, what came to be known as white slavery. Yes.
It is true, as we now know, that Jews were heavily invested in the Dutch West India Company. The Dutch West India Company, that company which was a private corporation doing the job of colonizing, which was responsible, in large measure, for the African slave trade. The Dutch West India Company that owned the Armenia fort in what is now Ghana. The Dutch West India Company that brought slaves from Africa to the Caribbean to South America. The same Dutch West India Company that brought the first slaves to New York, but it was still New Amsterdam.
Yes. It is true, as we now know, that the Jews with a major element in the slave trade in Brazil in the 1600, in Suriname, in Curacao, in Barbados, in Jamaica. Yes. It is true as we now know that the 2 largest single shipments of slaves coming into this country in 18th century were on ships owned by Jews. It is true, as we now know, that Erwin Lopez, biggest slave ship owner in the United States of America was a Jew.
It is also true as we now know that all the rum distilleries in Newport, Rhode Island, in the era of the slave trade were owned by Jews. Rum, as we know, was a very important item in the transatlantic slave trade. Yes. It is true as we now know that there was a higher per capita ownership of slaves in the United States of America by Jews, done by white Gentiles. We now know from the 18 30 census of the US of 8 that something like 75% of Jewish households owned slaves, as opposed to just 30 odd percent for the white population as a whole.
All of this information is contained in the secret relationship between blacks and Jews. And all of this information is based on the work of Jewish historians. So how come that we have a situation, an amazing situation developing here, where the Jewish leadership in this country is trying to deny the undeniable. And the only reason why the Jewish leadership has been able to place itself into this untenable and indefensible possession, it seems to me, is because they have become drunk with power. We have gotten into the habit of easy victories over our people.
Professor Clark said no more easy victories. We have won some easy victories in the past, and we have become so drunk with the power coming out of those easy victories, and they've become so arrogant and so conceited that they have come to the point now where they believe that they can, in fact, defend the indefensible. The Japanese case has shown that the time has come to an end. But from now on, they will be forced to deal on an intellectual level with an aroused black community. And once we fasten the deal on an intellectual level, the Jefferies case has shown, and I hope that my case will show that they cannot win.
Jewish power over black institutions in this country is based in large measure on the apparent liberalism of Jews in relation to black people in the 20th century. And what this book does by showing the Jewish role in slavery and the slave trade, it punctures that balloon, that liberal balloon. It shows that Jews were, in fact, not a liberal community as far as black people were concerned for most of the history of Africans in America. And so as soon as that balloon is punctured, the whole apparatus of Jewish power over black people, which rests on this alleged Jewish liberalism, then becomes, in in a very perilous situation. And that, to my mind, partially explains the frenetic, crazy, insane way in which the Jewish community has tried to defend the indefensible by trying to deny their involvement in the African slave trade.
Now Jewish liberalism, like I said, is a 20th century phenomenon. Apparent Jewish liberalism is a 20th century phenomenon. Clearly, they weren't liberals during the slave trade if 75% of the Jewish households had slaves, and if they own the largest shipments of slaves coming to this country, and if they own all the rum distilleries in Newport, Rhode Island. The major initial apparently liberal activity of the Jewish population in relation to African Americans was in the formation of NAACP in 19 09. Much of that claim to liberalism lies in the fact that many major influential Jewish persons were among the founders of the NAACP.
Some of the founders of the NAACP were not only prominent Jews, but were actually leaders of the American Zionist Movement. Yeah. You had the leaders of the American Zionist Movement founding You have the leaders of the American Zionist Movement founding the NAACP. Could you imagine if Marcus Garvey had founded the ADL? Would anybody have taken Marcus Garvey seriously as a Pan Africanist if he had founded the American Jewish Committee?
They would instantly have looked at his motivation for so doing. Now we have discovered what the motivation is. Even as I speak for the last 2 or 3 months, amazing revelations have been coming out in the press. Revelations suggesting that Joel Spingarn, the Jewish chairman of the NAACP, was actually spying under his own black NAACP membership? Spying for US military intelligence?
Yes. What kind of a liberal was that? Marcus Garvey, our most perceptive leader. Brother Ilome was talking about race first, but this is amazing. Race first, as Ilome said, was written 20 years ago as a PhD dissertation.
But in race 1st, there's a quotation that goes something like this. And here, Gavi is talking about white liberals. He didn't zero in on Jews per se, but he was talking about the white liberals in the end of Mississippi, many of whom, as we know, were, in fact, Jews. And Garvey said that the white liberals were only about what he called disarming, disvisioning, and disambitioning the Negro, as he put it. He said to the white liberals who are only about removing the African from the path of self reliance and self determination.
And then Garvey went on to make a very significant statement. He said, the liberals in the NWACP were nothing but spies. These are the exact words of God. We quote, spies for the rest of the white race, unquote. If one wants to really see the liberalism, of the whites and other on Jews in the NAACP, one has to look not on the front the defund of the NAACP.
1 has to look at their attitude towards Mark Asghavi at the Universal Negro Improvement Association. In the UNIA, we had, at the very same time, the major organization in our history attempting to provide for us self reliance and self determination. And the white liberals, Jew and Gentile, in the NAACP targeted Marcus Garvey's effort to self reliance as their major their major objective to attack. So here you find the rare liberal agenda of the whites and Jews in the n double a c p in the attitude to Marcus Garvey. The man is has been said earlier who here, who sent Marcus Garvey to jail in his famous, case of 1923 was Julian Mac.
Mac. And Julian Mac wasn't only a duke. He was also an influential member of the NAACP. At the beginning of the trial, Marcus Garvey and his lawyers asked judge Mark to disqualify himself. Here was this man who was a member of the NAACP, which had been waging a campaign against Marcus Garvey, the Marcus Garvey must go campaign.
Members of the very same NAACP had written right around the time that Garvey was indicted. We had written a letter to the attorney general of these United States telling him that Gabi was a criminal, asking him to put Gabi in jail and or deport him. And here you had a representative of that very same organization sitting now in judgment over Marcus Garvey. And as brother Ilome said earlier, not only was judge Mark Aji too, he was also a leader of the American Zionist movement. Over the years, many misguided people over the years have called Gavi a, quote, unquote, Negro Zionist.
Nothing could be further from the truth. If Gavi was a, quote unquote, Negro Zionist, then the Zionist judge would have let him off. You got a rare Zionist judge giving Gavi the highest possible file, the longest possible term of imprisonment. And as if that wasn't enough, then charging him the entire costs of the trial, which was about 10 times the maximum fine. So that was a real Zionist now dealing with the person who they call a Negro Zionist.
And if you ever wanted any proof that there was nothing Zionist about government's organization, Here is the proof. During the civil rights movement, especially the early phase of the civil rights movement in the 19 fifties early 19 sixties, the Jewish claims to liberalism again came to the fore. The Jewish historians now tell us that something like 75%. They say I have no reason to argue with them. They say that something like 75% of the funding for the Congress of Racial Equality called for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, SNCC.
For SELC, Martin Luther King's Organization, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, they now tell us that something like 75% of the funding for those organizations in the fifties early sixties was coming from Jewish sources. 75%. Right. They're now telling us that Martin Luther King's most influential adviser was a Jewish man by the name of Stanley Levinson. They're now telling us that Stanley Levinson drafted Martin Luther King's speeches.
I suspect he must have drafted his books as well, because if you look at Martin Luther King's last book, Where Do We Go From Here, you find a very strange attack on what he calls black antisemitism.
Speaker 0: So it might very well
Speaker 1: be that Levinson must have helped draft that book as well. We are now told that Levison was in charge of King's Finances. We are now told that that Levison was King's, quote unquote, chief strategist. So they had a an incredible position of power and influence in the Black Civil Rights Movement. And much of what has happened in the last 20 years in Jewish black relations can be explained around the question of that incredible power and influence which the major Jewish organizations had during the early phase of the Black Civil Rights Movement.
Because what happened when the Black Power Movement came into being in the middle of 19 sixties was that the Black Power Movement, without necessarily focusing on Jews per se, but the Black Power Movement, just because it insisted on self determination and self reliance to black people, it began to look clinically at the role of white people. And, again, I don't I'm not aware that the Black Power Movement focused in on the white people as Jews, but they began to look at the role of alien people and the incredible influence which they had within our movement. And the Black Power Movement, thanks to people like like Carlos Cooks, people like Malcolm X, people like Stoke Michael, Don Kwame Ture, H. Pat Brown, that whole generation, Asata Sakur, that whole generation, that black power generation began to say, the time would come. As Marcus Darby said in his famous essay on African fundamentalism, the time would come for us to take control of over our own affairs.
And so without necessarily targeting Jews as Jews, the Black Power Movement in so far it excells white people for the movement, automatically shot a very severe blow at that incredible Jewish pawn, which had developed within the civil rights movement. And my suspicion is that once the Jewish establishment realized from the mid sixties on that they could no longer direct the black struggle from within, They seem to have taken a strategic decision that the next best thing was to try to destroy it from without. And so from the late 19 from sixties on, you find a whole string of incidents bearing out my pieces. You had the Ocean Hill Brownsville business back in 1968 in in Brooklyn, where the Jewish teachers and the Jewish community generally destroyed the efforts of black parents to control the curriculum of their own schools, to control the education of their own children. You had the Bakke case among other cases.
The Bakke case is the most, well known of several court cases. In the in the in the Bakke case, it was 1977 where you had a a white man in California challenging the whole concept of quotas for black students in medical school. The case didn't involve Jews. The major Jewish organizations, the Anti Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress, they inserted themselves into the case. The case didn't concern them.
They voluntarily entered the case as so called friends of the court to argue, to file briefs, and to argue against the concept of affirmative action quotas for black people. Here you had major Jewish organizations representing Jewish people who today are the recipients of perhaps the largest reparations in history. The Jewish state of Israel has received 1,000,000,000 of dollars in reparations from Germany over the last few decades. 1,000,000,000 of dollars. Yeah.
And we have a black people struggling to maintain the absolute minimal reparations, a few quarters in medical school. And here were the recipients of the world's greatest reparations in history, entering into this backy case to destroy even that little of reparations the black people were getting, via a few little extra places in medical school. You had the duplicate the duplicate case which, Milome mentioned earlier at Stony Brook, where the South African professor greatest class of series of essays. 1 of the essays was Zionism as racism, which at the time was a very topical question. It was being debated.
In fact, the United Nations, I believe, actually passed a resolution to that effect. It was it was a very topical academic issue at that point. All the man did was to insert this among a whole list of possible essay topics. The result, he lost his job. You had the case of Andrew Young in 1979, the darling of the integrationist traditionally poor Jewish establishment.
And even Andrew Young fell victim to Jewish wrath in this period. Andrew Young was the US ambassador to the United Nations. Yes. He was the US ambassador to the United Nations trying to mediate a problem between Jews and Palestinians, and he decided, as any rational person would do, that the only way to mediate a problem between 2 people is to talk to both of them. He had a meeting with the PLO.
The result was that he lost his job. Around the same time that Andrew Young had his meeting with the PLO, a Jewish US ambassador to Austria, a man named Wolf, also met with the PLO. Did he lose his job? No. He was not.
He was a Jew. He could do what he wanted. Andrew Young was judged by a different standard. He wasn't supposed to do what the Jews didn't like, even though the Jews could do what the Jews didn't like. But Andrew Young, as a black man, couldn't do what the Jews didn't like.
You had the ongoing situation of Crown Heights. I I I I recall, and I'm sure everybody here in this room is much more familiar than I am with the case. I think it was in the seventies with a young young black man was, was was was killed by, Jewish vigilantes in in Crown Heights. Of course, you had the more recent situation in Crown Heights again, over the last couple of years. Even Nelson Mandela was not exempt from Jewish wrath in this period.
When Nelson Mandela came here to New York in 1990 on Ted Cooper's Nightline show, I distinctly recall. So I distinctly recall. Ted Cooper telling Nelson Mandela that he better go along with the Jewish agenda or risk losing support in America. And that in itself was a very revealing statement from Ted Koppel. Because what Koppel was saying in effect was that we Jews, he was saying, have the power in this country to deny you aid unless you go along with our agenda.
That is what Koppel was, in fact, saying. It's what he precisely articulated, but if you read between the lines, that is what he was saying. And Mandela, all praises due to him, had the courage, the strength to tell Ted Koppel on international TV. Mister Koppel, he said, your enemies are not my enemies. By some strange coincidence, Jesse Jackson was sitting in the front seat as this exchange was going on between Ted Koppel and mister Mandela.
And I remember sitting by my TV and looking intently at the face of Jesse Jackson, and wondering what was going through his mind, and if perhaps he was learning something he didn't know before. Something about something about dignity and self respect. Yes, sir. Of course of course, Jesse himself is another example of this incredible Jewish onslaught against black folk for the last 20 years. In both of his presidential campaigns, Jesse Jackson was harassed by the Jewish community.
In fact, the Jews became perhaps his largest single opponents during both of his campaigns. So my own case comes in that kind of an historical context. It doesn't come out of nowhere. It comes out of that context. Here I am, using a book, a well documented scholarly book, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews in my African American survey class, and somebody decides a black folk aren't supposed to use this book.
For several months before I I used the book, the organized Jewish leadership had been very assiduously and systematically attacking the book and the press. And all of us know how the Jewish establishment operates. By attacking the book, first, they attack the book. They call it anti Semitic. Then they got a few Negro stooges to get up and attack the book too.
And what they were doing was serving notice. And all the other black professors out there, y'all better not use this book. That's what they were saying. Well, of course, I haven't been studying the honorable Marcus Garvey for the last 20 odd years to let Jew or Gentile tell me which book is appropriate for my class. And so, naturally, I I paid no heed to their warning.
1 of the Jewish newspapers, I believe it was the New York Forward Newspaper published by the Jewish community, After my my situation arose, they had a an article in there in which they said that I was defiant. Quote, unquote, defiant. They called me defiant. And that too is very very illustrative of what's really going on here. That proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that what they had done, the strategy was to tell black folk preemptively, as we say in Trinidad, from in front.
Not to use that book. So by my using the book, I was defiant. Who the hell are these Jews to tell me that I am defiant? They're not with mother, they're not with father. Define her.
The right term is so, brethren, of arrogance, defile. In other words, I am not supposed to use the book unless I get the permission. And having used the book in spite of the lack of permission, I was therefore being defiled. Can you imagine that? I was being defiled.
My situation, I believe, is a very fascinating situation as a historian on the one hand, and also the person in the middle of it on the other hand. It gives me a very unique perspective on this whole situation because as a historian, I can stand back and look at the situation objectively, almost as though I'm not the one involved, as though somebody else over there. I can stand back and look at it through the perspective of
Speaker 0: a historian, you know, and see
Speaker 1: it in context, historical context. Of course, as the person involved in it, I get a very intimate feel for the Jewish, politics in these kinds of areas. And so it seems to me that my situation has illuminated, for me at least, you know, many of the basic principles upon which, the Jewish onslaught has been practiced over the last couple of decades or more. First of all, there's the incredible arrogance. In my case, you had 2 students from the Hidal Organization, which is the student arm of the ADL.
That's right. Clearly, they have been primed by their superiors that this book was anti symmetric, quote, unquote. They came and started my class the 1st day of the semester, unknown to me. An incredibly arrogant thing. The students then did what their elders have always done.
It's very interesting. When the Jewish establishment moves on you, we move straight to whoever they perceive to be your superiors. In this case, the Jewish students who have learned very well from the elders, they went straight to the president and the dean of the college. You never talk to me. They went straight to the president and the dean.
The president sent them to the chairman of the department. The chairman sent them to me. That's when they came to me. Only when they couldn't deal at any other level did they come to me. The Jewish organization has waged and struggled against us over the last several decades, also because of its great influence in the media.
And here again, my case illustrated this. We had 4 Jewish organizations getting together. The Anti Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the Jewish Community Relations Council. 4 Jewish organizations stuck together and issued a joint press release against me, pardon me, saying I was anti American, bigger, etcetera. I I I have a copy of the actual press release, and it's the most amazing press release I've ever seen, and I have seen many press releases in my time.
This press release is on a piece of paper this big. It has the logos of all 4 organizations across the top. It has the signatories of the various executives of each organization. The piece of paper is so big that I I like it to a medieval scroll. I'm sure in the movies, you have seen those medieval scrolls where King Arthur and the rest of them, you know, so one of the knights at the round table would come to King Arthur, and he would roll out this big, long proclamation.
Well, this is the proclamation they issued against me. We actually went on record as saying it's the first time that 4 of the organizations ever got together to issue a single press release against, I know, a single individual. And the question, why is this over killed? And again, the reason has to be because they see a loss of power over black people. Yes.
We're banned on doctor Jeffries. As soon as they figured, well, doctor Jeffries was, you know, in the throes of struggle, somebody else popped up on the side. You know, they're getting to the point now where there are no more easy victories. In fact, where there are no victories at all. Right.
For the first time for the first time, we are at a point where we are beginning to win victories. Yes. And this makes them them not only frantic and frenetic, but it almost makes them lose their mind. It pushes them into situations where they can't win. They have no time.
In both doctor Jeffrey's situation and in my situation, they have gotten themselves into fights that they cannot win. They can't possibly win, and only a fool picks a fight that he can't win. And the only explanation for this is their great loss of power and that frantic that frantic desire to maintain what little power they have left, but they see it slipping away. History is moving against them, and they are beginning to act irrationally. And in that lack of rational action, of course, we have our opportunity.
Mhmm. In my case too, I saw the tendency, the ability, the historical ability of the Jewish leadership to resort to lies and distortions. That's right. The Boston Globe published 4 articles against me, including an editorial, in 6 days. And it was a great a great learning experience for my students because here with the luckily, the class was still in session.
So here we had students had a whole class full of students who had actually read this book, who knew what the issues were. And I was able to, you know, bring these articles and show the students, you know. And the students could see for themselves the lies and distortions, you know. They were seeing things written in a
Speaker 0: paper, in an editorial.
Speaker 1: It was just totally devoid of any truth. One of the greatest distortions which has been, greatest distortions which has been, manufactured around this particular case is that the book, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, alleges, they say, the Jews were genetically disposed towards slave owning. Couple nights ago, Ted Koppel before Ted Koppel got into the little Wesley section Yes. By the way, Koppel, Koppel's people, not Koppel himself, interviewed me for something like 30 minutes in my office, but only about 2 seconds got on to that show. And they made sure they prefaced that 2 seconds by saying, Tony Martin is teaching this book that says the Jews are genetically disposed towards slavery.
Then they gave me my little 2 minute clip. Of course, I had no means of responding in that type of situation. And that is a is a prime example of of the result to lies and distortions. Absolutely shameless. Another mode of operation of the Jewish leadership, which my case illustrates, is their use, the shameless use of the outer term element within our race.
Amen. Practically, every single article that has been published on my situation in the Jewish press and many of those in the non ostensibly Jewish press, you know, almost every single article has quoted poor Skip Gates. If I was Skip Gates, by this time, I would be just sick and tired of being quoted. Yeah. Oh, as Skip Gates says or the great Harvard University professor says.
Skip Gates is not a historian. Never wrote a history book in his life. He
Speaker 0: he wrote, you know, an op ed
Speaker 1: in the New York Times about a book that showed no evidence that he had ever read the book. But the fact is that he has allowed himself. He has uppered himself up to be used in this way. On my own campus, we have some of this element who are also falling over themselves in the rush to, also offer themselves up in the hope I presume that they too will be rewarded as Skip Gates has been rewarded with fame and fortune. Another element of the tactics of the Jewish organizations, which my case illustrates, is their tendency to suppress free speech.
We operate in the name of free speech, but they, in fact, suppress free speech. The question is free speech for the Jews and their and everybody else, if possible, is to be excluded from the media. We saw it on a Ted Talk show, like I said, you know, they biased the segment dealing with Wesley, and of course, I had no opportunity to respond. The Boston Globe, as I said, wrote an editorial attacking me. I wrote a letter responding that they refused to publish it.
Even my very school newspaper refused to publish my response to all of the Jewish allegations. The school newspaper also refused to publish a black student's response to the allegations of the Jews. We also see in my case, the tendency of the Jewish organizations to resort to dirty checks. I discovered just 2 days ago that the Halal Organization on my campus has sent a packet of information to the parents of black students in my campus. A packet of information very prejudicial to me.
Of course, I will respond. I have the ability to respond, and I will respond. But it just goes to show the level of dirty tricks that these organizations will resort to. Perhaps the most important element of the Jewish tactics, which my case in this case, is the tendency of these Jewish organizations, where they disagree with anyone, to go for the person's economic livelihood. Jubei lost his job at Stony Brook.
Andrew Young lost his job at the United Nations. Many black principals and teachers lost their jobs when the Ocean Hill Barnesville thing went down. They removed professor Jeffreys from the chairmanship of the Black Studies Department at City College. In the press release, which the 4 Jewish organizations put out against me, they called upon the college to fire me. Imagine that.
They came for, you know, the they they asked College to quote unquote review my tenure. In other words, they didn't like my perspective, so I'm supposed to be fired for using a book that tells the truth because they don't like the truth. But it concerns them. Fortunately for us, like I said, the tide is turning. History is running against the Jewish leadership and their onslaught and their oppression, their manipulation of our movement for the last several decades.
It is moving against them because we have an aroused population. We are in the midst of a black box revolution, whereby our people, for the first time in our history, are now able to write books, publish them, distribute them, sell them without going through any dual gender distributor. The power of the ability to publish their own material was very, very, very, very well demonstrated in my little broadside. Here was a broadside. This is a little 4 page broadside.
But I had the means, I had the ability, I had the experience, I had the know how to publish several thousands of these broadsides and spread them around the country, get them directly into the hands of my people. And I was very heartened by the response of black people in this country. Everywhere the roadside went, people took it upon themselves to run off copies. Brother Chicago told me he run off 700 100 copies. He went to a a rally against mayor Daley there and was just handing them out in his street.
Right. But then in Montreal told me he ran up some 100 of copies. Another brother in Chicago ran up 100 of copies. Brother in Washington DC told me you run off 100 of copies. And interestingly enough, when the 4 Jewish organizations got together and issued their press release against me, at that point, they said in the press release that the book was no longer the problem.
They said the broadside was a problem now. After having attacked me for 3 weeks for teaching the book, when the broadside came out, that blew their minds to such an extent that this great medieval scroll of a press release was put out, an unprecedented thing for organizations, same press release. They call the broadside the most anti Semitic thing they've ever seen in a college campus. There was nothing anti Semitic about the broadside. What they meant by anti Semitic was that for the first time in a long time, they saw a document which, in a very articulate, succinct, direct, and clear fashion, expose the role of the Jewish establishment in the black struggle for the last several decades.
In other words, the truth the truth was not presented in a way that could easily be assimilated by large numbers of people. The world was getting out. It did not go through Jewish distributors. There was no way they could prevent it getting out. And so, amazingly enough, I actually debated one of the leaders of the, American Jewish Committee the other night on radio in Boston, and he was actually saying, oh, Tony Martin can teach whatever he wants, you know, we don't, you know, deny his right to teach a secret relationship, but the broadside.
So if the broadside could cause this amount of trouble, just imagine the kind of problems they will have at the end of the summer when, hopefully, I will finish writing my book on the Jewish question. I'm gonna call it the Jewish question, a black perspective. Dealing with the Jews for the last 2 months has made me an expert. Expert on the Jewish question. So I say, in conclusion, I say, like brother Ilome said, we're not gonna back off this one.
We're not gonna back off from this point on. Let the Jeffries case be the first in a string of victories for African people in this country. As professor Clark said, there must be no more easy victories for the Jews. There must be no victories at all for the Jews. This is the beginning of our victories.
I'm so thank you very much again for this wonderful occasion. 1 God, 1 aim, 1 destiny. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Our next speaker, Tony Martin, has taught at Wellesley College, Massachusetts since 1973. He was tenured in 1975 and has been a full professor in Africana Studies since 1979. Prior to that, he taught at the University of Michigan Flint and the Cipriani Labor College in Trinidad and Saint Mary's College in Trinidad. He's been a visiting professor at the University of Minnesota, Brandeis University, Brown University and the Colorado College. He's also spent a year as an honorary research fellow at the University of the West Indies Trinidad.
Professor Martin has written or compiled and edited 11 books. In 1965, he qualified as a barrister at law at the honorable society of Grazie in London. He also holds a bachelor of science honors degree in economics at the University of Hall in England and a master's and PhD degrees in history at the Michigan State University. His articles and reviews have appeared in the Journal of Negro History, American Historical Review, African Studies Review, Washington Post Book World, Journal of Kirribenny History. I'm done I'll be done in a minute here.
Hang on. Journal of American History, Black Books Bulletin, Science and Society, The Jamaica Journal to name a few, and he has contributed to several anthologies and encyclopedia. Professor Martin is currently working on a study of European Jewish immigration into Trinidad in the 19 thirties. For some now years now the IHR has sold his book, The Jewish Onslaught Dispatches from the Wellesley Battlefront, which we have on sale in the back, which deals with his experience that came about in part from his using the book, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, which we also have for sale there, as one of the, source sources for a course he was teaching. Ladies and gentlemen, it gives me great pleasure to introduce doctor Tony Martin.
Speaker 0: First of all, thank you very much, Greg, for the introduction. I'd like to thank also the IHR and Mark Webber particularly for inviting me here. I'm very happy to be here to be part of this event. I like long winded topics, at least topic titles. So I'll read the topic which I have selected for today.
It's as follows. Jewish tactics as exemplified in the controversy over Jewish involvement in the Transatlantic Slave Trade. That's Jewish tactics as exemplified in the controversy over Jewish involvement in the transatlantic slave trade. So I won't be speaking that much on this on the controversy itself. What I'm trying to do is to use my subjective experience.
That is the experience I've had for close to a decade now in dealing with this controversy. And what I'm gonna try to do for the next half hour or hour or whatever is to use my concrete subjective experience on the firing line, so to speak. And I'm gonna try to extract from my experience certain, basic sort of tactics that I think that the Jewish Lobby has used over the years pertaining to my particular situation. But in trying to extract these sort of principles or tactics from my subjective situation, I suspect that I may very well resonate with the experience of some other people here because my suspicion is that there tends to be a generalized practice which transcends, you know, particular situation. So that even though in my case, I was dealing with a specific situation, the transatlantic slave trade, my suspicion is that the kinds of tactics which were used against me may be not very dissimilar to many other folks who have been involved in other kinds of disputes with this particular lobby.
The first thing I should do by way of introduction is just to basically summarize precisely what my controversy was. I know it's familiar to many people here, but I'm sure not to everybody in this audience. As was mentioned a minute ago in the introduction, by Greg Raven, I teach at Wellesley College in Massachusetts. For many years, I've taught a survey course in African American history. And in 1993, I introduced into my course, this is a 1 semester course.
It moves very rapidly over the whole gamut of African American, history. And I introduced in 1993 a book which is on sale at the back, a books a book which then was fairly new, a book which I myself had only just recently become introduced to. That is a book published by the historical research department of the Nation of Islam. The book is entitled The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. And what that book did relying primarily on the, on sources written by Jews, Jewish sources of a variety of different types, that book tried to sort of synthesize the existing information on Jewish involvement in the slave trade, the bringing of Africans as slaves from Africa to the so called New World.
There wasn't that much in the book that was new in the sense that all the information practically was secondary information, which had been already published, although hidden away of, to a large extent in very esoteric Jewish journals, which the average Jew, I discovered later, had no idea about. Nevertheless, it wasn't new information. It was new to many people, including myself. And I found it very interesting that I had taught African American history for many years, but had only been dimly aware of the role of of of Jews in that slave trade. What I discovered was that the Jewish role in that slave trade had been very cleverly camouflaged for for many, many years.
Where Jews were involved, usually, they tended not to be identified as Jews, whereas, you know, where Christians were involved, where Muslims were involved, you know, there was ready identification, you know, of of such, persons by their ethnicity, by their religious affiliation and so on. In the case of Jews, they would be called other things, Portuguese, Spanish, Brazilian, whatever. But, you know, that crucial identification tended to be obscured. So as a good professor, I think I'm a good professor, you know, I'm always on the lookout for new information to enrich my classes. So I was very fascinated by this new information and decided to add a few readings from this book in my class.
And that's when as the saying goes, all hell broke loose. Apparently, I didn't realize it, but I actually stumbled into a controversy which was already, you know, brewing because the book had apparently caused some consternation in Jewish circles. And it's only afterwards when I went back and did my research, I I discovered that 1 or 2 editorials had already appeared, you know, you know, by way of the Jewish, power structure, in a sense, warning people like myself to stay away from the book. There already apparently had been a full page op ed in The New York Times. I was told the largest, the longest op ed that had ever been published in The New York Times.
It was actually typeset in the form of a star of David. It was written by someone called Henry Louis Gates, one of the black spokesman for the Jewish Lobby, somebody at Howard at Harvard University right now. Even, the paper from my basic hometown, the Boston Globe, had carried an editorial, which I was unaware of at the time. But we had carried an editorial not long before I began to use the book. And in a sense, you know, the purpose of these editorials and op eds was to warn folks to stay away from that book or else.
But, me, in in my full heartedness, ignored the warnings, being largely unaware of the warnings in the first place. And so I stumbled into this problem. Now it so happens again, I wasn't totally aware of all this, but by way of background, I know a little bit now more than I did then. But now I realize that Jews had in fact been involved not only in the African slave trade, but they had been involved in a variety of other slave trades too for a very long period of time. Apparently, they had actually dominated slavery and the slave trade in medieval times.
On the plane on the way here, a couple of days ago, I was rereading a dissertation, a PhD dissertation from 1977 by a man called Harold d Brackman, who is a functionary of the Simon Wiesenthal Center of all Places, and he did a PhD dissertation detailing black Jewish relations from ancient times up to 1900. And he actually mentions in his dissertation, he acknowledges the fact that Jews were the principal slave traders in the world for several 100 years. Although in typical fashion, he puts a very interesting spin on it. He acknowledges, as I guess he has to, the Jews were the major slave traders in the world, trading slaves everywhere from Russia to Western Europe to India to China, but he says that they dominated the world trade only for a few 100 years only. He says they remain slave traders from the 8th century to 12th century, but that was no big thing.
It was only a few 100 years. I discovered also that the Jews were very instrumental in the ideological underpinning for the African slave trade, the, notorious Hamitic myth, which more than any other single single, you know, event provides or provided the the sort of ideological underpinning, the rationale for the slave trade, that this comes out of the town and this was in fact, Harold Brackmann himself acknowledges that this was the first the first, explication of of of the so called story in Genesis about ham, you know, being about Ham, the progenitor so called of the African race being cursed by Noah and so on. But apparently, according to Blackmun, the, the the Talmud was the first place that put a a racist spin on this story. The biblical story was racially neutral, but the the time you would apparently put a in a very awful racist spin on the story, which later on became the the basis, the ideological underpinning for the African slave trade. So all of this I was to discover as as I became embroiled in in this controversy.
One of the things that interested me too was was that the the the the Jewish element was partly also a major element in what came to be known in 19th century as the white slave trade. The white slave trade apparently was a major, multinational, you know, international trading in in in in in in in in women and for sexual, you know, for immoral sexual purposes. We we are trafficking of women internationally as prostitutes and so on. And apparently, the the Jewish entrepreneurs in Europe, apparently, were also major figures in that so called slave trade. There are apparently many of the women that trafficked were some of their own women as well.
So all of this, you know, I became aware of. As far as the African slave trade was concerned, the, just to summarize briefly what I discovered in the book, the secret relationship between blacks and Jews and and in the subsequent readings, I discovered that once the African slave trade got going in the 15th century, then again, Jews were a very important part of it. And again, the book was not suggesting, neither have I ever suggested that the Jews were the only people involved, or even the major people involved. But but, you know, my my my basic, you know, point has always been that everybody else that I'm aware of who has been, you know, who was a part of the slave trade has acknowledged the idea of being part of the slave trade. Many of the people who were part of the the genesis of the slave trade also became part of the of the abolitionist movement to end the slave trade.
But as far as I know, the the Jewish, element is the only element that has, you know, resisted acknowledging the the the participation in this trade. And in fact, I've gone beyond merely resisting knowledge of this information coming out, but have become very upset when this information has has, you know, has has has has come to the fore. And that has been my basic, problem, you know, why? What's so special about this group that places them beyond the the the pale, so to speak, no pun intended, beyond the pale of, of criticism, you know. Any other group can be criticized, but it seems to me that this group is beyond criticism.
And especially for me as a black person, you know, I I become very upset if someone tries to walk into my classroom to tell me that I, as a black person, teaching black history, you know, has to that I have to to sort of regard their involvement in my history as somehow out of bounds. So they then went involved in the history in via the hermetic myth. There were some of the important financiers of the of of the slave trade in in in the very early periods. One of the major multinational corporations that financed the Atlantic slave trade very early was the Dutch West India Company. And of course, as as as we know, the Jews, had been chased out of Spain, chased out of Portugal, and the Netherlands was the one area, Holland, you know, which we should welcome them to some degree.
And this was right around the same time, 15th century, that the slave trade was gearing up. So they were geographically positioned and positioned in other ways to become an an important element in the financing of the Dutch West India Company, which was a major multinational corporation, you know, involved in the slave trade. In the early days, 17th century, they were among, you know, in fact, they were a major element in in in the slave trade in in places like Brazil, places like Suriname in South America, places like Curacao in the West Indies, places like Jamaica, Barbados and other places as well. I discovered that they were also very well positioned in this country that many of the slave traders, many of the people who brought slaves across the Atlantic from this country in in colonial times were, in fact, Jewish ship owners and unslave traders. Some of the best known names in in in that traffic coming out of colonial North America were people like Aaron Lopez, one of the best known names of all from Newport, Rhode Island and others.
I discovered the Jews owned many of the ancillary corporations that sort of fed into the slave trade. For example, rum distilling was one of the major, you know, areas that was ancillary to the slave trade because rum was used as as a as a trading, you know, an item of trade, you know, to exchange for slaves in West Africa. And I I believe that most or all of the rum distilleries in places like Boston and elsewhere in New England were owned by Jews and so on. I discovered that according to the 18/30 Census, that even though Jews were a small proportion of the population in in North America, nevertheless, they were inordinately represented among the slave owners. Yes, they were a small portion of the population overall, but on a percentage basis, apparently, Jewish historians themselves have analyzed the 18/30 Census and have discovered that whereas for the white population as a whole, something like maybe 30 odd percent of the white population may have owned 1 or more slaves in the South.
For Jewish households, it was over 70%. So on a percentage basis, Jews were more than twice as likely to own slaves according to the 18/30 census, according to an analysis of the 18/30 Census of the US done by Jewish historians themselves. I also discovered that Jews, despite their their involvement in the slave trade, were very few and far between in the abolitionist movement. They were less much, much less likely than other groups to be involved in the abolitionist movement. So that in a nutshell then is is is the, you know, the set of facts that caused me to become involved in this interesting controversy.
And what I want to do then is to dwell not on the facts themselves, but on what I perceive to be the main tactics that were used, you know, because I I I found myself, like I said, on on the front line of the situation, and I became very fascinated looking at the tactics. And and the more I began to read around this question, the more I discovered that I I I I saw parallels, you know, emerging in other kinds of situations as well. The first and major tactic that I discovered in their attack on me was the the the reliance on lies. That's straight up lies. There's no other way to describe it.
Just telling lies. Many of the categories that I will enumerate overlap, and many of them could also come under this general rubric of telling lies. But I think that if one had to had to to isolate a single tactic, it was a tactic of, you know, telling lies. I think they've we have elevated telling lies to a very, high artistic form. For example, very early in my controversy, the major Jewish organizations became involved.
And this is very fascinating. Here am I, a professor in a very small college, teaching a class of about maybe 30 students, but they, you know, they attached such great, you know, importance to to this that within a very short space of time, you know, the major Jewish organizations became involved, and it became a national, a national, event, you know. For example, you found that on a Sunday morning of the week with David Brinkley and ABC TV, you know, would would have a whole segment dealing with this question, with my telling my students that the Jews were involved in the slave trade. After now, I'm still a little astounded, you know, you know, considering, you know, considering the prominence that what to me was a totally inconsequential thing was given. Now shortly after all of this started, 4 of the major Jewish organizations issued a joint press release attacking me.
The ADL, the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, and the Jewish Community Relations Council of of, Boston or Greater Boston or something like that. They themselves said afterwards that this was somewhat unprecedented that 4 of these major Jewish organizations should have combined the efforts to attack 1 little obscure professor in a small school. They themselves admitted that this was, you know, somewhat unprecedented. They also admitted that apparently this press release was was issued in the middle of one of their high holidays, of which there are quite a few I understand, and it was somewhat unusual for them to to to to to sort of disturb the sanctity of this high holiday by issuing something along these lines. Now I actually saw, you know, one of the original press releases, and I have likened it to a medieval scroll.
It was it it reminded me of the movies I saw as a boy with Robin Hood, where the sheriff of of Nottingham would go into Sherwood Forest, and he would, you know, he would, unroll a long proclamation, and he would tuck it on a tree, you know, saying Robin Hood, beware you're looking for you, that kind of a thing. But this is literally a scroll, literally. You you you couldn't read it without having to unroll it. It was literally. I've never seen anything like it.
And it was signed with it had the logos of all of these 4 organizations and and and and this, you know, opened my eyes to the the proclivity of of of of these folks to tell lies. Now this proclamation told the world that I was refusing to let my students discuss this information. First of all, it presented me as providing wrong, you know, information, blatantly false information as another Jewish person described it to my classroom. And it said that I was refusing, you know, you know, here was I in a classroom, apparently, running this stuff down my students' throats and forbidding any discussion, which was absolutely, you know, hideously untrue. It said that I had a history of, you know, of of of all kinds of problems with my school and that my colleagues had, you know, had had been complaining about me for many years.
Up to now, I have have no inkling of what these complaints could possibly be. I know of no such incidents, certainly not before this time. I was able to take, you know, this press release to my class and read it to the right class and it was a very good learning experience for the students, you know, because here are the students who I was accused of misleading and whatnot, and I was able to show them themselves the kind of information that that makes it into the major media. One of the interesting lies that came out around this time was the the the the rabbi, the, the the campus rabbi. She came to my office.
It is it's a she actually. She she came to my office, you know, complaining about my teaching this information. So I told her, well, look, you know, if you think this information is false, why don't you come to my class? I will, like, you know, I will invite you to my classroom and you can come to my class. You can I I I'm gonna allow you to stand up in front of my class and, explain to them what's wrong or what this this information, and then we can have a debate in front of the class?
And she agreed. But, of course, she quickly changed her mind. And not only did she change her mind, but then she put it out that I had refused to discuss to discuss the material with her. So point number 1 is the proclivity to 10 lies. Point number 2 was a a very interesting proclivity towards attempting to damage one's professional credibility.
You know, there was a tendency to to to libel and slander whoever they were, you know, upset with. In this case, it it was me. There was one Jewish gentleman aboard 50 years old who began making anonymous calls, random calls to the campus. He would call the dorms, he would call people's offices just randomly, and he would tell them he was a Jewish student at Harvard University. He would tell them that he had discovered that I did not really have a PhD and that I was not qualified to be teaching at Wellesley College.
This is one of the more bizarre examples of the attempt to discredit me professionally. There was a gentleman who I subsequently bought a liable case against and I lost I bought about 3 cases, lost them all. But but this gentleman suggested that I was an affirmative action PhD. The only reason I got a PhD was because, you know, of affirmative action. He said the only reason why I got tenure at Wesley College I was one of the youngest, professors ever tenured at Wesley College.
But he said the the reason why I got tenure at Wesley College was because they were afraid of me. I know I was this great, black, loud mouthed person. So just to keep me quiet, they decided to give me tenure. One of the most interesting of these efforts to discredit me was by a gentleman called Leon Wieselter or maybe Wieselter. I don't know.
He describes himself as a literary editor of the New Republic Magazine. Now the Washington Post book world in 1994, I think it was, at the height of this, and afterno, I'm I'm I'm kinda surprised at this, but at the height of of of all the hysteria around this question, the Washington Post book would invited me to review 4 new books, you know, for the issue on Sunday, which I did. They gave me a very a lot of space. It was it was the longest book review, in that issue. And predictably, in the in the very next week's issue, there were 2 or 3 outraged letters from Jewish individuals asking the the Washington Post book world, you know, if they weren't aware who this person was, that they had allowed to grace their pages.
This was the great anti semite Tony Martin. Don't you know who this is? How can you let him write in this kind of a prestigious journal? And this guy, Wieseltier, went a step further. Now the the title of my book is The Jewish Onslaught and the subtitle is Dispatches from the Wellesley Battlefront.
Speaker 1: Now I
Speaker 0: spell dispatches, d e s. Most Americans spell it d I s. I grew up in a British tradition, in a British colony. And, you know, up to this day, I spelled honor, h o n o u r. Most of you do not.
So the e is the British spelling. And this idiot, obviously, didn't realize that there were alternative spellings of the word dispatches. And then, again, so anxious are they to try to discredit people who they disagree with. This guy actually, you know, told the the Washington post post book world in his letter, that I was so ignorant and stupid, I couldn't even spell the word dispatches. Look how stupid I was.
This was a stupid kind of a person that they were allowing to publish in their in their journal. Luckily for me, the editor of of the Washington Post book will was one of those rare persons who was apparently not too cowed by the Jewish onslaught. And she wrote a very nice letter back, a rejoinder, telling Wieselje that she had checked 2 dictionaries and in both of them, she saw dispatches spelled with an e, you know, as one of the optional spellings of of of the word. Then there was Mary Lefkowitz, great the great Mary Lefkowitz, one of my colleagues at Wellesley College, who wrote in a little literary magazine that I'd never seen before, but she wrote in this magazine. She actually alleged that I had pushed I'd physically assaulted a white student.
Now I teach at a women's college. So, you know, so here is she playing into, I guess, you know, all these perceptions of this big black rapist or whatever. But she actually alleged that I actually physically pushed down a a white, student. This would would be a young white woman, and and the and the woman fell down. Then she said, I I bent over her and raged.
That that was the word she used. I raged. I bent over her and raged. You know, one had this vision of this raging animal, you know. So, of course, I brought a liable suit against her.
And one of the things I discovered was that, you know, these folks are very, very well positioned in in in the court system. So in fact, after having lost, well, lost, I guess, 2 liable suits, I'm beginning to think that they must have had something to do with with with fashioning the libel laws in this country. Because because in in in this case, you know, left governments actually acknowledged that what she said was wrong, you know, and she acknowledged that she had not taken due care in ascertaining the facts. And even those acknowledgments were not enough for me to win the case. I know I had to prove that she had acted with reckless abandon and all kinds of things, but it was a very interesting learning experience for me, you know, how the libel laws because once especially once they identify you as what they call a a public person, the way the libel laws in this country organized, once you are identified as a public person, people basically have car crash.
They can say anything about you. It can be true. It can be false. They don't have to do their research. They can say anything they want.
Almost. I mean, it's almost almost that bad. So these are some of the efforts to to to discredit you. Of course, I don't think that that that they succeeded, but but again, this was the the the, you know, in a very persistent effort to to to to sort of, tarnish your image. And and very much aligned aligned to this, of course, was the generalized question of of of character assassination.
This was part of that, effort to to to to damage one's credibility. There was also the tactic of what I describe as dirty tricks. Of course, these tools are subset within the general rubric of lies, I suppose. For example, there's a group at Wellesley College called the Friends of Wellesley Hillel. Hillel is a Jewish student organization which exists around the country on, I guess, most campuses.
I remember reading in Paul Findlay's book, The Dare to Speak Out, he says in there that the Hillel groups are actually, trained. They are formally trained apparently by the ADL and other organizations in in tactics, you know, how to disrupt meetings, how to, you know, push false propaganda on campuses and so on. And so I don't know for a fact, but certainly those Hillel students who, were part of the campaign against me did appear to have been people who were professionally trained. In fact, the whole campaign against me was initiated by students from the Hillel Group. They sat in on my class on the 1st day of the semester just for one day.
And, somehow from that one day's class, where I didn't really even talk about the subject, they somehow figured out that I was teaching this book as as fact. Apparently, they figured that if I was teaching the book as hate literature, quote unquote, that would be okay. But the fact that I was teaching the book as just any other book, you know, having, you know, basic academic credibility, that, of course, they consider to be a grossly anti Semitic thing, and they were the ones who raised the the hue and cry. But there's a group on campus called the Friends of Wellesley Hillel. This is a group of faculty and alumni who work very closely with the with the with the Hillel students.
And in the midst of this campaign, they actually put together a packet of mostly, library's information and mailed it to the to the mother of of, one of the students who was very, very vocal, you know, on my behalf. The students rallied around me and these folks, you know, it's it's quite incredible the the the limits that we see, you know, the the extent towards, you know, towards these folks would, operate. They you know, this this is a group of grown people. In fact, people like like deans of the college professors, people like that, take the time to sit on, put together a package of basically lies and misinformation to sell it. You know, they actually targeted this one student because she was a leader of the, you know, of the group of students who were supporting me and send this information to her her mother.
Somebody came and tucked up a flyer, around my office one day. I wasn't in the office alleging sexual misconduct between, myself and the same student because she was so, you know, vocal on on my behalf. Of course, it it didn't, work fortunately for me. They started a rumor at one point that if I wrote recommendations for his students, the students would not get jobs and would not get, you know, entry into graduate school or anything. But but these are some of the kinds of what I call dirty tricks.
There was also the tactic of what I call going for the economic juggler. You know, from very early, the events, a very, you know, a very concentrated effort to try to to to to remove my my ability to to to survive economically. One of the one of the things, for example, that that joint press release call for. It called for my expulsion from the college. It called for my tenure to be rebooked.
So again, you know, it seems to me that that's one of the hallmarks of of of the tactics here, and I am sure that this is a wider application than just my subjective case. There was also the tactic of what I call great presumptuousness. I heard somebody last night mentioned the word chutzpah. I call it presumptuousness. You know, the idea that there are, you know, a rabbi, you know, the the student chaplain could come into my office to demand, you know, why am I teaching this information?
That to me is share presumptuousness, you know, and my my response basically, even though I was polite, but but the the the intent of my response as well, who the hell are you, you know, to come in come into here to to tell me what I must teach, you know, in a black studies class. I'm an expert on black studies. Who the hell are you? You know. I didn't say it in those terms, but that was the importance of what I was saying.
I remember and I mentioned this, I believe, in the introduction to my book, but before this Jewish onslaught began with me, just by sheer coincidence, a few months earlier, I was doing some research in a Jewish archive in New York City. And at that time, a case similar to mine similar to mine had just erupted concerning professor Len Jeffries at City College in New York City. He had made a speech in Albany, New York in which he had pointed out that the Jews had a very large hand in fashioning Hollywood. In fact, there's a book by a Jewish author called, an that's right. An Empire of Our Own.
And the subtitle, interestingly enough, is how the Jews invented Hollywood. This is a Jewish writer. His name is Neil. Neil Gabler, an empire of our own, how the Jews invented Hollywood. What could be more explicit than that?
He is boasting in the book, you know, the way the Jews basically shaped American popular culture. So Len Jeffries in his speech in Albany said, well, okay, so you all invented American popular culture. You have to take, you know, a large portion of the blame for the negative stereotypes, you know, considering black folk that have been nurtured by Hollywood over the years. But of course, they want to have their cake and eat it. They want to invent Hollywood, but they don't want to take responsibility for the negative, you know, elements coming out of Hollywood.
So he was branded as anti Semitic as usual for having said that. So when I went to this Jewish, archive, my own case had not yet, you know, emerged. But, you know, they they, you know, tried to put me through this litmus test. It was almost as though they would not let me use the archives unless I, you you know, disavowed any kind of knowledge and so on. And the woman in charge, she asked me, you know, do you know Len Jeffries?
You know, I said, yes. I know him. He's a good he's a good friend of mine, a colleague of mine, and she was very upset. But, but, you know, but but again, there's this there's this this presumptuousness, this this feeling that they have a right a right to to put you through all these litmus tests, a right to demand of you why you are doing something which which is totally correct and totally inoffensive and would be inoffensive to anybody else. Another tactic which I I think I I can distill out of my experience is a tendency to to sidestep the real issues.
I discovered that throughout this whole it's almost 10 years now, they'll almost never engage me under facts of the matter. They will say, okay, Jews weren't involved in the slave trade. You're a big anti Semitic. So I'll say, okay, discuss it. You know, were Jews indeed half of the slave owners in Brazil in the in the 17th century?
I'll say, look at your own encyclopedia Judaica. It says the Jews were half the slave owners in in in, in in Brazil. You know, but they'll never they'll never engage that kind of factual debate. Never. They will always go off on a tangent, try to besmute your character, try to take away your economic, you know, where we fall and so on, But they will almost never they studiously avoid ever engaging, you know, the actual facts of the matter.
I had a graphic illustration of this just a few weeks ago when this question flared very briefly again on my campus. You know, somebody mentioned that I was that I had, 10 years ago, taught these blatant falsehoods and whatnot. So I responded in the newspaper And, some Jewish students a couple of Jewish students wrote back, you know, responding to me. And again, you know, and and and in my my response, I laid out, you know, several examples of Jewish historians acknowledging the involvement in the slave trade. There was no reference to this at all.
Instead, they began talking about about stories of, of of of coming out of Europe in the Middle Ages or sometime about about about, Jews killing white kids to take their blood and put it in Matt's souls and and stories about their Jewish holocaust, all kind of stuff, you know, but had nothing to do with anything. You know, and in fact, I'd I responded asking them, what does all of this have to do with the point that I'm making? Did you not read my article? Did you not see the evidence I gave you concerning Jewish involvement in the slave trade? What does somebody, you know, killing somebody for their blood to put in the matzo have to do with the slave trade?
But this is always their tendency. They will studiously avoid the facts, avoid the issue at hand, but bring in all kinds of, you know, of what what what we call in popular corners, red hearings, off the wall stuff, red hearings. And this is a very persistent tactic that I was able to discern. Another tactic and this is similar, I guess, maybe saying the same thing in different ways. But but but that is the tendency to introduce, you know, men of straw, strawmen.
You know. For for example, I'm discussing Jewish involvement in the slave trade, but somebody is going to write an article saying that I alleged, which which is not true, the Jews were genetically free dispositioned towards enslaving others. This has nothing to do with anything that that I was talking about, but they again, you know, they will totally, disregard the the facts of the case and introduce something totally different. And what they tend to do is they would introduce a man of straw, put the straw thing on the record, and then they will proceed to attack the man of straw that they have created. That's correct.
Yes. And of and because they have such great influence in the media, this man, this trauma and this false information, all of a sudden becomes part of the record. Even the courthouse, you know, they they are going to court and reference the same lies that they put in the newspaper as though this is some disinterested source, some third party. And then this brings me to the next point I was gonna make, and and that was precisely that, the the the ability to to to plan misinformation on the record and then use that information as though it it is some kind of a, you know, a a well documented primary source. Point number 10, what I call the use of quisling, surrogates and what in the black community we call Uncle Tom's.
They have developed this art to a very high level, at least, you know, in my case, around around the black community. I mentioned Skip Gates at Harvard University. There are many other notorious figures like that in the black community who were all too willing to to do their bidding. I must say that these folks were very, very, well, recompensed. You know, these folks have been given an incredible, prominence.
These folks now go around, you know, the world speaking on, you know, for $15,000 in our time. These are the kind of honorariums these folks get now. They've all been given endowed shares in the universities. Many of them are very, very big scholars, you know, hardly can hardly put 2 sentences together. But because they've been willing to play this game, they have been innovated to prominence.
Every time you pick up the New York Times, you will see them on the cover of the Sunday Magazine. Any issue that comes up pertaining to black folk and doesn't matter what it is, it could be history of Africa, it could be contemporary politics in the Caribbean, it doesn't matter what it is. They are quoted as the authorities and so on. You know, you see them on PBS hosting, you know, all kinds of multimillion dollar programs and documentaries and so on. But but this element, I think, has has been a very effective tactic on their part to to to identify people from within, in this case, my own group, but people who are willing to, in a sense, you know, sell themselves for the, you know, admittedly very ample rewards that that that they were given as a result.
Another tactic is their ability to leverage to leverage off of the influence which they undoubtedly have in high places. At Wellesley College, for example, you know, we had a new, president coming into Wellesley College just as my thing was moving to to its climax, so to speak. And and this new president came into the college not knowing anything about what was happening before, and somehow these folks got her to to to to write a letter, which I suspect they must have drafted themselves because she had no real knowledge of the background of what was happening. But this letter, it is said based on newspaper reports, was sent out to maybe 40 to 60,000 people. This was a letter condemning for teaching the Jews who were involved in the slave trade.
So you have the incoming president of Wesley College sending out 40 to 60,000 letters. This must be unprecedented in the annals of American Higher Education. I think I think this is something for the Guinness Book of World Records where a president of a university sends out possibly 60 this is 6 zero,000 letters condemning one of our own professors for teaching something that is historically true. I've never ever heard of such a case. In fact, maybe I would indeed write to the Guinness Book of Records and see if they can immortalize me by putting this in there.
Then there was the American Historical Association. 3 of these Jewish historians actually went to the American Historical Association and got the American Historical Association to decree. That's the only term I can use, to decree my executive fiat that Jews were not involved in the slave trade. I've never ever heard of any such thing, you know. This is just totally antithetical to the way that academia operates.
You know, who has ever heard of such a thing, you know, historical fact being determined by presidential decree from the American Historical Association. We decree.
Speaker 1: You know,
Speaker 0: it's like the paper bills in the middle ages, you know, it's a paper bill. You know, we we decree that Jews were not involved in the slave trade. You know, it is absolutely amazing, but they actually they actually they actually succeeded in having this done. Then there's one of the most amazing cases of all, where I was invited to speak in the city of Worcester, Massachusetts by Worcester State College, round about 1994 or 95. And the the Jewish groups were actually able to get the mayor of Worcester.
Worcester is one of the largest cities in Massachusetts. In which he had the leaders of all the major religions in the place. He had, the Roman Catholic head. He had a Baptist head, you know, heads of various Palestinian denominations, various, you know, rabbis, ADL types, and so on. This man assembled an entire coalition of religious and apparently civil rights organizations for what?
To denounce me prior to my appearance at Worcester State College. We are trying to put pressure on the college and and and the and the people who invited me to their great credit, you know, they were strong, they said they refused to bow, you know, and they invited me and I spoke. But here with these groups, powerful enough to get the mayor of a major city, you would think that the mayor had, you know, important things to do. You know, the mayor to put together a special conclave and a huge press release to denounce me about a day or 2. And, of course, the result was that my speech, when it did indeed take place, drew the largest audience in the history of the school.
Actually, I didn't include this in my talk, but I really should have included as one of the tactics, their tendency on occasion to shoot themselves in the foot because with this whole incredible story of the Jewish involvement in the slave trade, I mean, if if they'd left me alone, I think the only people who would have known of their involvement would have been my 30 students on the South. But, of course, now the whole world knows about it, and the question of African, you know, slave slavery will never ever again be raised without the question of the Jewish input being part of the discussion, whether they deny it or not. But it is now in the forefront, you know, of people's consciousness. And and this is due to them. I mean, I could never have promoted this idea the way that they did.
Another tactic I'm gonna end up in a couple of minutes, but another tactic is is the, of course, the the the use of the major media. They become very agitated when one speaks of their control of the of the media. I mean, that's one of the most anti Semitic things that it is possible for anybody to say. And yet, as in the case of the Jewish environment in Hollywood, they themselves, you know, they boast about their about their, prominence in the media. In fact, in my book, in The Jewish Answald, I quote Charles Silberman, a Jewish author.
He wrote a book back in the eighties, I think, called A Certain People. And he boasts in that book about in the fact that he said at that time, there were 7 major, top editors of The New York Times. He said all 7 were Jews. He talked about the major TV networks where I forget the precise figure, but the majority of the senior producers in the TV stations were all Jews, he said. And the the producers are are the people who are ready to dictate, you know, what gets on the news, what stays out, what spin is put on information and so on.
So the people who are crucial to to to spinning the news, he was saying were primarily Jews. He named names and I quoted him in my book, but, you know, but but I became anti Semitic for quoting him, which was not unusual. When that huge scroll, that press release scroll, you know, was issued by the 4 major Jewish organizations, the Boston Globe, the major, in the newspaper in in in Boston, the Boston Globe published 4 major articles, including editorials and op eds within about 6 days attacking me on that question, including an op ed in the Sunday paper, including a a an editorial. This is a major editorial on the editorial page, A major editorial. Again, fought with, lies and and and distortions.
I sent in a letter responding to them. They refused to publish my letter. So they had 4 letters well, not one good letter, 4 editorials, you could say, attacking me in less than a week. I refused to publish my rejoinder. And and and so that that's a that's a that's a great a a great sort of, you know, a tactic because these folks have such, you know, such such such a sway over the major media.
It gives them a very great advantage. I remember being interviewed for the for the Fox front page program. They interviewed me for over an hour, but I guess that my my responses to their questions were so tight that they could not find, you know, any sound bite to extract and make me look bad. And so what they did is they gave me a couple of sound bites, maybe half a second each. But instead of letting me talk, we had some kind of a narrator who spent about 5 minutes telling folks what I had said but not letting me say anything practically, you know, and and and that too is one of the the tactics.
The the use of organizations is another tactic. Of course, I don't have to tell this audience about the, ADL. I heard Brad Smith talking about the ADL's, you know, mention of him on their website. I think I also have pride of place on their website. For several years, I haven't checked recently, but for several years, I used to have honorable mention every year in the list of anti Semitic you know, occurrences and so on.
They would they would list the anti semitic occurrences of the previous year and there would be something like Tony Martin gave a lecture at XYZ College, and that would that in itself would be an anti Semitic event, the fact that I gave a lecture some place. The ADL actually wrote a book about me, which I haven't read yet. I've had it for years. I haven't got around to reading it. It's called something like, something like I think that they tick my title and turn it around, something like the Jewish onslaught of of Tony Martin or Tony Martin's onslaught against the Jews, something like that.
It's a whole big book, one of their so called reports, an ADL report. Another tactic is what I call the unseemly histrionics. When I spoke at Worcester State College, there was a Jewish lady I think her name was Schneider or something. But there was a Jewish lady who was on the board of trustees of Worcester State College. And she resigned from the board of trustees amidst great fanfare because of the of the school's invitation to me.
And and that's what I call nothing but stupid histrionics, but it got a lot of press, of course. It created a lot of interest in the media. But again, it was a case of shooting herself in the foot because I I remember they had me initially scheduled for an auditorium that held about a 100 people. But when the hysteria, you know, generated by themselves developed, they had to change it to the, the venue to the largest auditorium they had which held about 300 people and that wasn't big enough. So eventually, when I turned up on a cold wintry morning in February, they had that that 300 capacity auditorium full to, you know, full, totally full, then they had to run closed circuit televisions outside for another 300 people to hear what I had to say.
And, of course, my speech got to be front page news and and we're still telling government, Gaza next morning and so on. But all of that aided by these ignorant histrionics. One of the things they do too is to try to to pin what I call a nickname on you. They they try to find some little slip of tongue or some little thing they can take out of context. And if they find it, then every time your name is mentioned in the media, they they stick that on you.
For example, minister Louis Farquhar from the Nation of Islam, he made a a slip a slip one month. He was talking about the fact that I mentioned earlier, the fact that 75% of, Jewish households, you know, in 18/30 owned slaves. But he kind of got it wrong, you know, as one often does in the midst of a speech, you know, a little slip of the tongue. And he it when he said that it came out as of, as Jews owned 75% of the slaves. Yeah.
It was obviously a slip of the tongue. But, you know, every time they mentioned him since, they always put that sword bite and make it look like he she was a great distorted the truth. Here was minister Farquhar and saying that, you know, Jews owned 75% of the slaves and so on. In my case, fortunately for me, the the most they could find on me was controversial. So every time they mention me, I get to be the controversial professor.
They're also very good at the good cop, bad cop kind of a thing. While some are trying to destroy you on one side, another one will come on the other side and, you know, smattering and whatnot. But beware of the good cop. Very often, it's better to deal with the bad cop because a good one will get you in jail very often much more quickly and smoothly than the bad one will. Sometimes too, they they they they try to to to play you for a fool, you know, and they'll be trying to destroy you and at the same time they're trying to destroy you, they're they're trying to give you advice.
For example, last year when when when I decided to, you know, to to accept David Irving's invitation to speak in in Cincinnati, You know, there there was a guy whose name I don't recall, but but he, sent me an email, you know, telling me what a racist David Irving was. He he sent me this this copy of some poem that David Irving had written saying he didn't want his his daughter, Termaya, Rashtriya or something, you know, which is neither here nor there as far as I'm concerned. You know, that's that's that's that's that's, you know, doesn't mean anything to me. It's neither here nor there. If you don't if he wants his daughter to marry us or fear anybody else or not marry them, so what?
You know, that has nothing to do with anything as far as I'm concerned. But again, you know, here are people who are trying to destroy me, people who have spent the last 10 years trying to portray me as all kinds of things, trying to take my livelihood away, you know, and and these same people, you know, can can have the, you know, the the the, I guess, foot spa, I guess, the the China to tell me to warn me against somebody else. You know, the the the whole the whole idea of it is just totally amazing to me. Of course, I didn't, you know, pay any any great attention to what these guys were trying to say. One of the tactics too was was hate mail.
I discovered that their propensity for hate mail was absolutely amazing. Up to now, I still get a lot of hate emails. I get just about a few days ago, I I got a hate a hate postcard. You know, on on the one hand, they they they try to portray themselves as, you know, as these great liberal types, but there's this sort of a underbelly, you know, at the same time. So while in the public, you know, in the public light, they're trying to portray themselves as as as liberals and nice folks and whatnot.
At the very same time, simultaneously, it's like a 2 pronged attack, you know. But at the very same time, you're getting this this other, kind of stuff, which also reminds me of the, tendency towards violence. There was one Jewish guy. He said he was a Russian a Russian Jew, he said he was. A man called Alexander Nechevsky, who actually came onto my campus, said he came to get me.
Luckily, I wasn't there to be gotten that day. I was somewhere out of town, but he came to the office saying he had come to get me and whatnot. They had they had to call the campus police for him, and he was given an an order not to a trespass order, I think they called it, not to appear on the campus again. So these then are some of the kinds of of of tactics and there are others, but I know my time is up. But these are some of the kinds of tactics that I have been able to distill from my subjective interaction with these folks over the last maybe 9 or 10 years.
And again, I've been very fascinated by the fact that as I've become more broadly aware of similar situations involving different kinds of circumstances that it seems to me that many of these kinds of tactics may in fact be tactics of much more generalized application. And I'll end by saying simply that I don't know what's the necessarily the best way to respond, but I can just maybe outline very quickly the ways that I have tried to respond. I have tried to respond, first of all, by by trying to stand in principle. From the very beginning, I've said that, you know, as far as I'm concerned, I'm talking the truth. Jews were indeed involved in the slave trade.
I'm not aware of what your problem is. And as long as I am convinced in my own mind that I'm talking the truth, then that's it. You know, that I've I've tried to disregard all of the other foolishness, and I've tried to to stand on the truth. For example, I've been on TV many times debating people from American Jewish Committee and so on. And again, in that face to face debate, all of these tactics come into play.
They try to attack your your credibility, your character. But what I've always tried to do in those exchanges is to ignore as far as I can the all of the ad hominem attacks and so on and concentrate on the facts. So let's say Tony Martin is an anti Semite. I'll just ignore it. I'll say 75% of Jewish households own slaves according to 18/30 census.
I'll stick to the facts, and I'll use those kinds of media appearances as an opportunity to inform whoever happens to be listening. I've I've I've also tried where I could, to myself, leverage off of their media power. There have been times when they have unwittingly given me an opportunity, you know, to to to, appear before the mass media, and I've used those opportunities to do the help. Again, to push facts. I know I only have 30 seconds, and I try to ram as many facts and into those 30 seconds as I can and just forget all the anti Semitic stuff, deal with that later.
I've also tried to to develop to my limited resources, you know, some kind of an independent response. I find that independence is a very, very, very great benefit, you know. You know, I I started my own little publishing company. It's a little company, but it was very, very effective. You know, the Jewish onslaught got out there and sold like hotcakes, and and it really made made a difference, you know, just to have some kind of an independent medium.
It didn't matter. It wasn't a major corporation or anything, but it was independent. I control it, and I was able to to to fight back to some degree. I think it's important too to have some kind of a support structure. Was very fortunate.
They attacked me at a time when I already had established a pretty good, you know, sort of support structure in academia. I was relatively well known. It wasn't as easy for them to destroy my credibility as it might have been for people who are perhaps less accomplished, but I found that having a support structure and being able to avail oneself of the support of that structure was very important. And finally, in my case, I tried wherever possible to take the battle to them. I didn't sit back and wait.
You know, once the battle was joined, I found it I found in fact, I think in the early days especially I think that they weren't used to having people fight back the way that I did. I think it sort of threw them off balance. They came at me with all the usual bag of tricks expecting me to fall immediately. But once I was able to fight back and once it began to appear to them they had that they had a long protracted struggle on their hands and not an easy victory, it took them a while to actually try to regroup and figure out what to do. So I just offer these as perhaps, you know, things for folks to to to think about in in in their response.
Thank you very much.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
Nathan Mayer Rothschild (16 September 1777 – 28 July 1836) was an English-German banker, businessman and financier. Born in Frankfurt am Main in Germany, he was the third of the five sons of Gutle (Schnapper) and Mayer Amschel Rothschild, and was of the second generation of the Rothschild banking dynasty. In 1798, at the age of 21, he settled in Manchester, England and established a business in textile trading and finance, later moving to London, England, beginning to deal on the London Stock Exchange from 1804. In the aftermath of the Slavery Abolition Act 1833 with the Slave Compensation Act 1837, Rothschild and his business partner Moses Montefiore loaned the British Government £15 million (worth £1.51 billion in 2022) with interest which was subsequently paid off by the British taxpayers (ending in 2015). This money was used to compensate the slave owners in the British Empire after the trade had been abolished. Nathan Rothschild, who controlled the Bank of England after 1820, notoriously declared: "I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets." The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
IDF executes two Palestinians by burying them with a bulldozer while they try to return to Gaza through Al Rasheed street. #IDF #Israel #Palestine #Gaza https://t.co/9zFD4fRN3p
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
Show me a man that will sacrifice his life in defense of his ancestral land and I’ll show you a hero. https://t.co/grIKq1vc6h
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
The son of an Israeli general completely contradicts the western narrative on Gaza. “There was no Hamas terror attack on October the 7th” https://t.co/1f9r70g0n6
Video Transcript AI Summary
There was no Hamas terror attack on October 7th. Palestinian fighters from the oppressed Gaza Strip retaliated against Israel after years of suffering. They managed to take over half of Israel and paralyze the state for weeks. Israel, feeling humiliated, is now seeking revenge by killing innocent civilians. This is not about self-defense or protecting Israelis, but rather about brutality and proving a point. However, the killing has not stopped the Palestinian fighters. Israeli ground forces have already suffered casualties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How you see things at this moment. Drew, thank you for having me. I wanna start off by saying that there was no Hamas terror attack on October 7th. Palestinian fighters came out of the Gaza Strip, one of the most oppressed and poor places on the face of the earth, and, and after, you know, decades decades of of suffering, violence and brutality, not to say savagery at the hands of Israel. And a in a cruel, and Unreasonable and needless, siege on the on the Gaza Strip.
They came out and they managed to, almost take over The, you know, half of half of what what is Israel today, and to paralyze the state of Israel for weeks. And so that I that is That is, I believe, a a more a more accurate, description of what took place. The state of Israel was caught off guard. Israeli military has been, once again, shown to be nothing more than a paper tiger. And now because, like, you know, like a gangster that's been humiliated, They're taking their vengeance on innocent civilians killing, you know, 1,000 upon thousands of civilians, only for the sake of revenge.
No strategy here. There's no real, there's no real understanding of how to solve. There's no there's no real, intent to Protect Israeli, so to speak, to provide safety. It's not a question of self defense. It's a question of brutality and revenge because Israel was humiliated.
And now they need to prove a point, so they're killing as many Palestinians as possible, which by the way, has not Stopped the Palestinian fighters from continuing to fight. And, you know, the they they they entered with ground forces just, I don't know, a day or 2 ago, and they've already got close to 10 or 12 Israeli forces that have been, that have been killed. Right. Madrigo, I I I have to
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
White House spokesman John Kirby restated today that there is no limit to the number of civilian casualties the US will accept in Gaza. #US #Gaza https://t.co/RROjtFNQgJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if the administration still has no red lines. Speaker 1 confirms that it is still the case. Speaker 0 refers to a previous statement made in late October about the administration not drawing red lines for Israel as civilian deaths in Gaza increase. Speaker 1 confirms that it is still the case, mentioning that airstrikes continue and civilians continue to die from them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is that still the case that the administration has no red lines?
Speaker 1: That is still the case. Okay.
Speaker 0: And this in late October, you had referred to the fact that the administration is not drawing any red lines for Israel as the death trail for civilians in the Gaza Strip has gone up. I wanted to ensure, is that still the case that the administration has no red lines?
Speaker 1: That is still the case. It's also true that air strikes continue and it's also true that civilians keep dying from these air
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
London police have arrested an elderly Jewish woman who lost her family in Auschwitz for claiming that Israel is committing a new Holocaust. #Gaza #Israel #London #Palestine https://t.co/25JRrH9UW0
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
The Israeli police chief states he will ship all anti-war protests to Gaza on busses. You know, the place where they say there aren’t any innocent civilians left and where they drop bombs by the second. Jewish protesters in Israel get the death sentence according to this guy. https://t.co/XYmq5iBcgR
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces a landscape expert at a green hotel. They mention a character and a deal in Korea. There is talk about a positive texture and white color. The speaker refers to someone as an expert on the other side. The transcript ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Aramızdan yeşil otelinde olm manzara uzmanı yani o taraf topu şimdi tanıyayım şu. Karakterdığ anlaşma yok et ollar bu. Kore. Loşa ortayya başdığndan. Evet El iş, ama pozitif doku çoğu beyazma olacak vele app sonra aradan iş otelinde olduğ uzmanım yani o tarafta şimdi tane çal.
Yani los
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
“Death to America LALALLALALA!” This man is currently the most relatable person on the news. #Israel #Palestine #Hamas #Gaza https://t.co/78Q490p4l2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is asked if they condemn Hamas, to which they respond that they do not condemn them and want them to kill everyone. However, they later clarify that they condemn violence on both sides. The conversation becomes heated as the speaker accuses the interviewer of unfairness and racism. They discuss the conflict between Israel and Palestine, with the speaker condemning the death of innocents and calling for a peaceful resolution. The interview ends with the speaker expressing frustration at not being able to answer questions and accusing the media of dividing people. The interviewer thanks the speaker for coming on the show, despite their use of inappropriate language.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hammes.
Speaker 1: Do I condemn Hamas is the question. Right? Yeah. No. I don't condemn Hamas.
I want them to kill everybody.
Speaker 0: Well, I should
Speaker 1: Is that is that the sound bite you wanted? Of course, I condemn that. I condemn I condemn the violence on both sides. Right. So I can't but I've seen this on TikTok.
I can't believe you actually started with do you condemn her mask. What do you think? Do you think I'm Hamas?
Speaker 0: Right. Look. You're not on TikTok now. I know. TikTok.
You're, obviously, you know
Speaker 1: Okay. Let me ask you a question. Do you condemn Israel?
Speaker 0: I'm condemning people who
Speaker 1: Do you condemn Israel with a question?
Speaker 0: Hang on a second. You're here to answer the questions.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Sure. But if
Speaker 0: you if you ask silly questions, I can ask And I didn't ask Silly questions. I'm glad to hear that you're not connected
Speaker 1: to them. How must
Speaker 0: Well, of
Speaker 1: course, I condemned the death of innocents.
Speaker 0: That's
Speaker 1: right. Release the hostages, but also release the Palestinian hostages. 15,000 of them. But, actually, sorry. My bad.
There's 2,000,000 of them in Gaza and another 3,000,000 in the West Bank. If we wanna talk about hostages, how dare you insinuate that I'm a terrorist? That's what you're trying to do. I'm not doing anything wrong. Mean by do you do you condemn Israel?
Do you condemn You
Speaker 0: are talking, you know, on your own.
Speaker 1: That is so unfair.
Speaker 0: No. Nothing is unfair.
Speaker 1: We just call them and leave you up.
Speaker 0: Balls, both sides they are. And what we need to do and what we need to do in a sensible way is so how do we resolve it? How do we resolve this matter? And when you have people like the ex Hamas foreign secretary saying we want to annihilate, Israel, and we want to bring more October 7 attacks.
Speaker 1: I think that's terrible.
Speaker 0: Do we therefore get to peace and
Speaker 1: a solution? With all due respect, I know it's your show, but I'm not gonna let you just gloss over what you just tried to do.
Speaker 0: I'm not glossing over
Speaker 1: the camera. Speak without being interrupted?
Speaker 0: Yes. And you have for a while.
Speaker 1: So what you've just done what you've just done is start off just like every other racist this media publication.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 1: a this is supposed to be an accredited media source. You're interrupting me again. Can I speak?
Speaker 0: Please do.
Speaker 1: May I speak?
Speaker 0: Jupe, can
Speaker 1: I speak?
Speaker 0: Yes. You can. This is As you are.
Speaker 1: This is supposed to be an accredited media source. Right?
Speaker 0: It is.
Speaker 1: Okay. So have you seen how you guys report on the protests? Have you seen it? What you type in go to everyone at home, type in GB News Palestine. Tell me if it's not the most sensationalistic coverage of the protests that you've ever seen in your life.
The only things you these guys are doing are trying to get clicks, and they're trying to fool you and hoodwink you into thinking that we're animals, and that we're racist, and we support terrorist organizations.
Speaker 0: If you ask people, you ask person who wants to speak. Is you because you do, as you just
Speaker 1: Yeah. I do want to click. Do you know why? Do you know why? Because there is unfair representation by the British media.
Check out GB News Palestine's racism ice cold. How dare you
Speaker 0: Think that there is extremism
Speaker 1: Of course. There is.
Speaker 0: Some of your groups.
Speaker 1: Of course. My groups. What do you mean by my groups? Arabs, Muslims, content creators.
Speaker 0: In the ones that have taken the street Listen. In a 100,000 There is
Speaker 1: there is extremism in every facet of the world. If listen. If someone head headbutted a police officer at the football? Should we ban football for the weekend? Should we call all people that go to the football games violence and thugs?
No. We shouldn't. So what you've done is disingenuous. You started with, Do you condemn Hamas? For what reason?
To frame the conversation in a light that I am sympathetic with terrorists. Did you know that my family are dying in this insulting. I'm So do you let me ask you a question. Do you condemn Israel? We are Do you condemn Israel?
I You asked me if I condemn Palestine. Right? Because I'm a terrorist sympathizer. Do you condemn Israel for what they're doing?
Speaker 0: I believe Israel has the right to defend Do you condemn them? That should Okay.
Speaker 1: But do you condemn them for killing innocents? Be fair here. Esther, I've been fair. Be fair. Do you condemn them for killing innocents?
Speaker 0: Saying the only way forward is to make sure we don't have the terrorist attacks that we did, and I'm asking you Okay. Because you're taking to the streets, fair. And I'm asking you the streets of the UK, and I'm asking how do we then get this peace settlement you want both sides. How we're gonna do it? Would you know, give us your answer.
Speaker 1: The first thing we'll do is we'll have to sack off any media publications that pretend Pretend that they're trying to speak the truth, but in actual fact that what they want to do is divide us. I think you're amazing, Esther. I really do. You're actually one of the best at on at GB News. I I'm sorry if I seemed aggressive.
My family are dying. And when you start off with a question like that, what that does is frame the conversation in a light that I'm a bad person. Doesn't. And you know it. Don't be disingenuous.
It's too smart.
Speaker 0: No. Listen. My final question to you. When Hamas did those strikes on the 7th October. Yeah.
Did they know, and they must have realized what the retaliation was going to be by Israel? So Hamas, No. I'm asking about the incident, and you're here to talk about the What connection was Hamas? No. Listen.
I'm saying they must have known that the what the retaliation would be. So they have put Hamas has put both the lives of Israelis and Palestinians at risk. Is that right?
Speaker 1: I would agree with you. I think they have done that. But would you also agree? See, look how I answer your questions. Now please offer me the same thing.
Just answer the question. What about what Israel are doing? Would you say that they've put the lives of, Israelis and Jews all over the world by ethnically cleansing, by kicking people out of their homes, by and you know this is a fact, continuously lying online.
Speaker 0: Hang on. Hang on. Please don't put things as fat continuously lying online.
Speaker 1: So is it not a okay. Is it not a revenge? What? They've done. Well, this is
Speaker 0: so unfair. Themselves.
Speaker 1: This is so unfair. It is unfair because what you're trying to what you're doing unfair. What you're doing
Speaker 0: I want to thank you for coming.
Speaker 1: Of course, you do. Alright. Have a nice day, guys. Thank you for letting me come in. I don't get to answer a bloody question.
She gets to lambaste me with bullshit and paint me as a terrorist. This is absolutely ridiculous. Where's the free media? Is this You just you media?
Speaker 0: You're doing
Speaker 1: Dustin, people are dying, and I'm acting apparently. Thank you, Esther. Thank you for having me on the show. Barely ask me any of my questions. Take this right off me, bro.
This is racism one zero one. Have a nice day, Esther.
Speaker 0: You've done a racist. Thank you for coming on the show. It was a pity about his language. It's a pity that he couldn't keep his cool.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
Get a behind the scenes look at Israel on Campus Coalition, one of the official organizations directing smear campaigns and information warfare designed to curate information available to students and reduce the credibility of dissenting voices #Israel #IDF #Mossad https://t.co/fZx9R9lg8Y
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Israel on Campus Coalition is a coordinating group that fights against BDS. They use psychological warfare by conducting opposition research, creating anonymous websites, and running targeted Facebook ads to drive anti-Israel individuals crazy. They also smear and threaten those critical of Israel, warning them that their careers will be destroyed if they don't stop. Canary Missions, a similar anonymous group, aims to ensure that today's radicals don't become tomorrow's employees by passing on smears to prospective employers. The Israel on Campus Coalition claims to monitor the students for justice Palestine and their allies, although they deny any direct contact with Canary Mission.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Israel on Campus Coalition is a coordinating group at the front line of the battle against BDS.
Speaker 1: With the anti Israel people, it's most effective. What we found, at least in the last year, As you do the opposition research, put up some anonymous website, and then put up targeted Facebook ads. Every few hours, you drip out a new piece of the opposition research. It's psychological warfare. Drives them crazy.
Speaker 2: They're picking out individuals who they think are critical of Israel, and they're smearing them. And they're telling them that what's gonna happen here is if you don't cease and desist from acting like this, we, in the end, will do much to destroy your career.
Speaker 1: Few years later, these individuals are applying for jobs within your company.
Speaker 0: Canary Missions promotional video threatens to pass these smears on to prospective employers.
Speaker 1: Ensure that today's radicals are not tomorrow's employees. We do it securely and anonymously, and that's the key. It sounds very similar to, like, a Canary Mission and that kind of thing. Is that Yeah. Yeah.
Are you guys, like, in touch with them at all, or is there any kind of no? No. Canary Mission is totally anonymous stuff. Yeah. Yeah.
It's hard to hard to figure out who's behind it. And our mission is highly, highly effective, to the extent that we monitor the students for justice Palestine and their allies. Them for doing it back. I mean, not we, but, there's some anonymous group.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
In 2002, Netanyahu assured an American congress that Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons so that we might be his “useful idiot” in that region. 20 years later and he is now leading us toward a war with Iran. #Iran #Israel #Palestine #USA https://t.co/Ma43oyZK0K
Video Transcript AI Summary
Saddam Hussein is actively pursuing the development of nuclear weapons, with support from Russia and other countries. He no longer needs large reactors, as he can produce the necessary materials in hidden centrifuges. Inspections will not uncover these portable manufacturing sites. While it is unclear when he will attack Israel, it is not difficult for him to deceive inspectors and hide his activities. The application of power is crucial in winning the war on terrorism, and the more victories we achieve, the easier the next one becomes. The choice to target Iraq is the right one, as Saddam's acquisition of nuclear weapons would have immediate and dangerous consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is no question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons. No question whatsoever. And there is no question that once he acquires it, history shifts immediately. The dangers posed by a nuclear armed Saddam were understood by my country 2 decades ago, well before September 11th. In 1981, the late prime minister of Israel, Menachem Begin, dispatched the Israeli Air Force on a predawn raid that destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak.
This probably took place months away from Saddam's ability to assemble the critical mass of plutonium for the 1st atomic bomb or more than one. And today, the United States must destroy the same regime because a nuclear armed Saddam will place the security of our entire world at risk. And make no mistake about it, if and once Saddam has nuclear weapons, the terror network will have nuclear weapons. 2 decades ago, it was possible to forts Saddam's nuclear ambitions by bombing a single installation. But today, nothing less than dismantling his regime will do.
Because Saddam's nuclear program has fundamentally changed in those 2 decades. He no longer needs 1 large reactor to produce the deadly material necessary for atomic bombs. He can produce it in centrifuges the size of washing machines that can be hidden throughout the country. And I wanna remind you that Iraq is a very big country. It is not the size of Monte Carlo.
It is a big country. And I believe that even free and unfeathered inspections will not uncover these portable manufacturing sites of mass death.
Speaker 1: To your knowledge, has Iraq, kept its team of nuclear slanders together? And, is Is that an indication that they're gonna continue to develop nuclear weapons? Also, what nations are aiding Iraqi, if you know, in the nuclear program? And of course, finally, if you might elaborate a little bit further on what you think is first your first use of nuclear weapons might be.
Speaker 0: I can only give you the information, that I can divulge from my, My tenure as prime minister and it is, 3 years old. The information we had was that Saddam was pursuing all avenues of developing, weapons of mass destruction, he, and the means to deliver them. I I have to say that he was enjoying in this effort, the support of, Russian technology, and I should say Russian technologists, on-site. They were a principal source, and other regimes, including North Korea, we're supporting that effort as well. There is no question that he, had not given up on his nuclear program.
Not whatsoever. There is also no question that he was not satisfied with the arsenal of chemical and biological, weapons that he had and was trying to perfect them constantly. Is perfect as the the word to describe this, ghoulish enterprise. So, I think it's I think fair frankly, it is, not not serious to assume that this man who 20 years ago, was very close to producing an atomic bomb spent the last 20 years sitting on his hands. He is not.
And every indication we have is that he is, pursuing pursuing with, abandon, pursuing with every, ounce of effort the establishment of, of, map weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons. Saddam is hell bent on, achieving, atomic bombs, atomic capabilities as soon as you can. But I also say that if you connect the dots, you know here's a here's a man who from the minute he has achieved powers is trying to create a nuclear weapon. 20 years ago, he's very close to producing it. He's foiled.
He changes the technology to centrifuges that will prevent him being foiled again. We know that he's he's taking in, nuclear technologists and nuclear technology from various various countries. We know that, he's developing the means to deliver these weapons. We have defectors who describe, how, committed he is to this, above all else. So we have all these dots, And, we say, well, we don't know exactly what is happening.
You know? It's, like you're about to see somebody plunge the knife into someone. You're looking through a keyhole. You followed a murderer. You know that he's suspected of, he's already killed a few people, and you see him trailing somebody, and you're trailing him.
You go, he shuts the door, you're looking through the keyhole, and, you see him grasping the throat of this person, raising the knife, and then the light goes out, and the next thing you know is a body is found. And you could say, well, you know, I didn't actually see him, on Fragrante in the Act, if you will. But, but I think, mister Cruzini, is that it is simply not, reflecting the reality to assume that Saddam isn't feverishly working to develop nuclear weapons as we speak.
Speaker 2: The the question I had though, do you have any indication that Saddam Hussein is going to attack Israel?
Speaker 0: Or if he will attack Israel.
Speaker 2: Absent a preemptive launch by the United States.
Speaker 0: I think it's, I cannot, you that he will attack Israel at a particular time. My friend, my respect a great deal, the Pulitzer Prize winning, writer Charles Krauthammer said that in the 19 nineties, America slipped and Israel dreamed. And he said that on, September two thousand. Israel woke up with the, beginning of the terror campaign launched against it. And a year later in September 2001, America woke up with the the bombing of, New York and Washington.
It's a cat and mouse game, and he'll he's the cat. And he's successful successful care. It is not very difficult to, to deceive inspectors. It's not even very difficult to deceive satellite inspection. You can burrow tunnels and hide, hide the earth.
Did you ever see The Great Escape? The movie The Great Escape. Remember that movie? You know, where all these guys come out and they have the the sand in which they distribute, through the, the trousers while they're walking the yards. That's essentially what, dictators do.
They can create, tunnels and, labyrinths that you never discover that are impervious to radar and other means. They can, when you have an entire country to hide, portable, centrifuges that are a little bigger than those 2 cameras. It's not very difficult. You can get away with it, and he has gotten away with it, frankly. The application of power is the most important thing in winning the war on terrorism.
If I had to say, what are the 3 principles of winning the war on terror? It's like, what are the 3 principles of real estate, the 3 l's? Location, location, location. The 3 principles of winning the war on terror are the 3 w's, winning, winning, and winning. The more victories you amass, the easier the next victory becomes.
The 1st victory in Afghanistan makes a 2nd victory in Iraq that much easier. The 2nd victory in Iraq will make the 3rd victory that much easier too, but it may change the nature of achieving that victory. It may be possible to have implosions taking place. I don't guarantee it, mister attorney, but I think it makes it more likely. And therefore, I think the choice of Iraq is a good choice.
It's the right choice. There is no question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons. No question whatsoever. And there is no question that once he acquires it, history shifts immediately.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
“Bring Netanyahu before the International Criminal Court so that he can be tried for what he is, a war criminal.” —Ione Belarra Spain’s Minister of Social Rights https://t.co/2D7mg1VDtq
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are here today to support all the decent people in our country and across Europe who demand an end to the planned genocide and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people by the State of Israel. We believe that European leaders, including our own, are not taking the gravity of the situation seriously. We refuse to be complicit in this planned genocide and believe that Europe must act urgently. The hypocrisy of preaching human rights while doing nothing when it matters is unacceptable. The citizens are shocked to see how the EU aligns itself with the interests of the United States and Israel. We can take action today by suspending diplomatic relations with Israel, imposing economic sanctions on Netanyahu and his political leaders, implementing an arms embargo, and bringing Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court to be judged as a war criminal. We need the European Union to take action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hoy estamos aquí acompañando a toda la gente decente de nuestro país y también a toda esa gente en toda Europa que quiere pedir y exigir que termine de una vez por todas este genocidio planificado, esta limpieza étnica al pueblo de Palestina que está llevando adelante el Estado de Israel. Pensamos que en este momento los líderes europeos, incluido el nuestro, no está a la altura de la gravedad de las circunstancias. No queremos ser cómplices de este genocidio planificado y pensamos que Europa tiene que actuar con urgencia. Creo que Europa va a pagar muy muy cara, muy cara esta hipocresía. La hipocresía de ir pregonando los derechos humanos en todo el mundo y pues, cuando hay que dar la cara, cuando hay que estar a la altura, no hacer absolutamente nada.
La ciudadanía está estupefacta, viendo cómo se supeditan a los intereses de Estados Unidos y del Estado de Israel todo el posicionamiento de la Unión Europea. Podemos hacer algo y podemos hacerlo hoy mismo, suspender las relaciones diplomáticas con Israel, aplicar sanciones económicas ejemplares contra Netanyahu y toda la cúpula política, también llevar a cabo un embargo de armas y, por supuesto, llevar a Netanyaku ante la Corte Penal Internacional para que se le juzgue como lo que es, un criminal de guerra. Insisto, no con nuestro silencio y no con nuestra complicidad. Necesitamos que la Unión Europea actúe.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
CNN cuts off a soldier for being critical of Israel and none other than the great Ron Paul brings him back onstage to let him finish. https://t.co/WTWUqMZCIk
Video Transcript AI Summary
A military veteran expresses support for Ron Paul's idea of bringing soldiers home and having a peace time army. They argue that starting wars with other countries is more dangerous. The video cuts to a technical issue and then introduces Jesse Thorson, another military veteran who supports Ron Paul's foreign policy. Thorson praises Paul's vision for the country and believes his foreign policy is better than any other candidate's. He urges people to get involved and help make Paul the next president. Ron Paul himself speaks and emphasizes the importance of preserving liberties at home, having a sound economy, and setting an example for the rest of the world. He believes this is the road to peace and prosperity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I'm I'm really excited about a lot of his ideas, especially when it comes to bringing the soldiers home. I've been serving for 10 years now, and all years of those have been during wartime. I'd like to see a little peace time, army, and I think he has the right idea.
Speaker 1: Now you have done 2 tours in Afghanistan. You told me you're gonna go back for a For a third tour, I mean, if you can see your your neck right there, what you have on your tattoo, 911, remember, and that picture of the Twin Towers. You know, some Republicans out there have been saying that Ron Paul would be very dangerous for this country because he wants to bring troops like you Back from your post from all over the world. Well, I think
Speaker 0: it would be even more dangerous to start nitpicking wars with other countries. Someone like Iran Israel is more than capable
Speaker 2: Alright. We just lost our tech connection, unfortunately, with Danna. Danna, stand by. If you can hear me, we're gonna get back. You wanna go to Kenny Crowley Over at Mitt Romney headquarters, people are beginning to
Speaker 3: Now time. I have, I have another speaker, a special guest tonight. He's been with us this evening. Matter of fact, he's been with us in our campaign for quite a few years. And you may have met him because he's been around here this evening, but I'd like him to come out and and say a few words.
He's been serving in the military for 10 years, and he's been overseas a lot. A lot of it was in Iraq and Afghanistan. And he was on TV tonight. He didn't quite get to finish his statement, so I've asked him if he would get come out and make his comments about why he supports our foreign policy, why he is fighting for the constitution, and what he thinks we should do. But I would like to invite Out now, Jesse Thorson, to come out and say a few words to you.
Thank you. How about Ron Paul?
Speaker 0: If there's any man out there that's had a vision for this country, it is definitely him. His foreign policy is by far, hands down better than any candidates out there, and I'm sure you all know that. We don't need to be picking fights overseas, and I think everybody else knows that too. I I'm I'm flabbergasted right now. It's an incredible moment for me.
I can't believe it. It's like meeting a rock star. But you know what? We're gonna go to New Hampshire. We're all gonna get involved.
We're gonna keep getting online. We're gonna keep talking to people, and we are gonna make sure this man is the next president of the United States.
Speaker 3: Thank you much very much. And that is a powerful message. And once again, we all know where the active military people send their money when they're campaigning. They send it to our campaign for liberty, our campaign for the constitution, our campaign for the liberty of government, Our campaign for personal liberty and privacy and a wise foreign policy. The most important thing the most important thing we have to remember is, we want to have influence in the world.
That's very important. We want to be active in the world. We want to talk to people and work to peep people, trade with people, and be friends with people. But, what we need to realize It's our ways. You know, there's people who say that, we are an exceptional nation, and we certainly are and have been, but we're slipping.
But this idea that our exceptionalism, out of desperation, say that we are so exceptional, what we must do is prove it to the world. We have to Send our troops around the world and force it down their throats. If they don't do it, we'll, you know, invade them and occupy them and force election on them. I'll tell you the best way to spread our message, And that is do our job at home, preserve our liberties at home, provide a free market, have a sound currency, balance a budget, Set an example and get them the rest of the world to emulate us. That is the road to peace And prosperity.
Thank you very much. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Alright. So Ron Paul, you hear hear him speaking to his supporters there in
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
“A gentile and a Jew are not supposed to even eat at the same table” An interview with a Zionist, where she expresses that she is not concerned with human rights because the Torah says they can have Palestine. #Israel #Gaza #Palestine https://t.co/WVYYQlljKE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Some people argue that those who have lived on this land for generations may feel a strong sense of ownership. However, the speaker dismisses this perspective, stating that according to the Torah, the land belongs to them and they don't care about anything else, including laws or human rights. They believe that the Torah encompasses true human rights. The speaker concludes by mentioning their plan to build a significant structure called the Bismikdash.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But can you, I mean, can you see it from their perspective of some of them have lived here for generations, how they might feel like this land belongs to them? I don't care. I mean, according Torah, this is. It belong to us. I mean, you don't think there's any way that Arabs and Jews can live here it it it it's all it's all according to to him.
I don't care anything else. This is all You don't care about laws. You don't care about, like, human rights or any of that. It's all according to the Torah. The Torah has also human rights, the real human rights.
You know, in the end, after we build our big, Bismikdash,
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
The IDF is running ads on YouTube in Ukraine to recruit members of the Ukrainian army into the IDF. How long until we see our first Azov battalion of the IDF and the mask fully drops? #Azov #IDF #Ukraine #Israel https://t.co/BGmjmnp6aS
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hello everyone! I recently returned from the front and started thinking about my future prospects. I saw an advertisement for joining the army, specifically in Ukraine where there are many skilled professionals with real experience. In my home country, I served as a sergeant in the artillery. I am currently a private, but my application for citizenship is being reviewed and will soon be completed. The army here is powerful and modern, offering quick career advancement opportunities. Your family will also find their place in Israel. Click the link in the description for more information. See you soon!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Хлопці всім привіт. Нещодавно я повернувся з фронту і задум про свої перспективи. Мені трапилася реклама про вступ до ц ха. Їм дуже потрібні фахівці з реальним бо досвідом. Саме в Україні таких людей зараз дуже багато.
У нас на Батьківщині я служив у арт артилерії сержант. Тут я став ряд, але отримую три і незабаром закінчиться розгляд заявки на отримання громадянства. Потужна сучасна армія. Тут ви зможете швидко просунути кар'єр сходами і ваша родина обов'язково знайде себе місце в Ізраїлі. Перейдіть за посиланням за значенням в описі.
Побачимося.
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
Israeli spokeswoman accidentally says the truth on CNN. “We are not targeting anyone else but civilians” The subconscious mind speaks the truth quite often. #IDF #Israel #Gaza #Palestine https://t.co/lws9JyeaK1
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
Jimmy Carter in 2013 said he met several times with Hamas leadership, and they would be willing to accept the existence of Israel but Netanyahu was intent on imposing a "one-state solution," which would make negotiations impossible and be "a disaster for Israel" #Hamas #Israel https://t.co/8mywD4BT8q
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 believes that the situation in America is adversely affecting peace in Israel. Speaker 1 asks if a deal can be made without involving Hamas. Speaker 0 states that they have met with Hamas leadership and believes they are willing to accept Israel's existence within the 6 to 7 borders. However, they emphasize the need for Hamas and Fatah to come together for an honest election. Speaker 0 criticizes Netanyahu's move towards a one-state solution, which previous prime ministers have condemned. They believe this is a mistake and that Israel is heading towards a disaster by insisting on control from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think more than any other episode or incident or situation on earth, this is a most directly affecting adversely America and not bringing peace to Israel and justice and peace to the thing is yes.
Speaker 1: Can any I mean, you obviously were very successful in bringing peace with Israel and Egypt. Can any deal be done That doesn't involve sitting across a table with Hamas.
Speaker 0: I've met several times with Hamas leadership, and I think they are willing to accept Israel to exist peacefully within the 6 to 7 borders or some modification of those borders. But the first step has to be to bring Hamas and Fatah together so they can have another honest election. That is a major premise, and I think the 67 borders between the 2 with some modifications, will lead to a 2 state solution. Netanyahu now, I believe, has decided unequivocally to move to a one state solution, which every one of his predecessors in the prime ministership have condemned that's a disaster for Israel. And I think Israel is now moving toward a disaster for itself in insisting that all the way from the Jordan River to the to the Mediterranean Sea has to be Israeli controlled.
That is a mistake
@LivingDadJoke - Dylan Griffith
Israeli President Netanyahu has declared a state of preparedness for war this morning after an infiltration of Hamas attackers into southern Israel. The IDF is preparing to move ground forces into Gaza in an escalation that almost certainly means all out war.
