TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @LouDobbs
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Thanks to the great folks at @CPAC and special thanks to @mschlapp and @mercedesschlapp for hosting a great event! Next year at this time, Donald J. Trump will be our President once again! #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/SFQ9n00i52
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Why does the National Border Patrol Council support the Lankford immigration bill? The President of the union, Brandon Judd joins Lou to defend the decision to continue to allow millions of illegals to keep coming each year. #LouDobbsTonight https://t.co/Qc78UC1aVL
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Homeland Security admits it cannot track millions of illegal immigrants released into the U.S. interior. Emails uncovered by a watchdog group revealed that once immigrants board buses, their whereabouts are unknown. An estimated 14 million illegal immigrants have entered the country this way in the past three years, allegedly benefiting Mexican drug cartels.
Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, explains that cartels exploit border policies by using migrants to distract agents and create openings for smuggling drugs and criminals. He says the cartels are a business, and current policies allow them to thrive.
The speaker criticizes the Border Patrol for not effectively securing the border and enabling the entry of illegal immigrants and fentanyl. Judd defends the Border Patrol's endorsement of the border bill, arguing it would raise credible fear standards. The speaker argues that the bill was a "sellout" and an "amnesty bill." A heated debate ensues, with accusations of rhetoric and vilification. The speaker asserts that existing laws should be enforced and questions the Biden administration's willingness to do so.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back. The Department of Homeland Security admitting it has no idea where those millions and millions of illegal immigrants that they've allowed to enter The United States, no idea where they are now or what they're doing or, for that matter, who they are. They they're released into the interior of the country, and the Department of Homeland Security says, good luck. We know that thanks we know that because of emails uncovered by the protect the public's trust, the watchdog group. They, did so through a FOIA request.
In one exchange, a homeland security official telling a Washington Post reporter that once illegal immigrants board buses for the interior of the country, they simply cannot track them. There's no telling where these people end up, what they're doing, or as I said, who are they? There are an estimated 14,000,000 illegal immigrants entering the the country just that way over the course of the past three years. It's a big deal because it leaves Americans open to depredations of the Mexican drug cartels that effectively control both our border and the lives of many, if not most, of those illegal immigrants they smuggle into this country. The the traffickers of narcotics, sex trafficking, who could ask for a better administration that than this this administration boosting as it is by the billions of dollars, the Mexican drug cartels.
It's it's it's outrageous. And yet homeland security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. Mayorkas insisting that neither he nor president Biden is responsible for what they have done, responsible for a 2,000 mile long border that they turned over to the Mexican drug cartels, responsible for 14,000,000 illegal immigrants who've entered the country or for the almost 400,000 Americans who have been killed in overdoses of fentanyl and other deadly drugs. It's an insult to the intelligence of everyone. And with with at least a working brain, you would think that everyone would understand this.
We must admit that would exclude most of the officials of this administration. Joining us now is Brandon Judd. He is the president of the National Border Patrol Council, and he is the the man in charge representing all of those great Americans who are defending the nation or at least who were defending the nation and protecting our our ports and our borders. Brandon, great to have you with us.
Speaker 1: No. I'm very glad you're back. That's that's good for all the American people. Your your news coverage has has been second to none, so I'm I'm very happy that you're back.
Speaker 0: Well, I appreciate that. I I wanna turn to what is going on right now. Give us a sense of what the border patrol is doing if they're not protecting the border. If the border is in the under the control, which obviously it is, of the drug cartels, what in the world is the border patrol actually doing? And give us a sense of what border you know, the average every every day, work a day agent is doing with his or her time.
Speaker 1: So to understand the mindset of the cartels, the first thing that we have to understand is that they're a business. They have stakeholders. They have to create and generate a profit. That's the first thing that we have to understand there. Now they're an illegal business, but they are a business.
What we're seeing right now is because they're all fat and happy. We don't have turnover at the tops of the cartels, and that's what we always wanna see. Law enforcement always wants to see that that there are turf wars with the cartels because if that's happening, we know that they're having a hard time generating that profit that they need. But right now, we're just not seeing that. What we're seeing is we're seeing a very effective business model.
They know that all they have to do is flood our resources in any given area. So let's just let's just say that that 25 miles of border, we've got 25 agents that control that border. At mile 10, they cross a large group of a thousand people. They know that that's going to force us to deploy, you know, all 25 of our agents to that one mile area leaving the rest of the 24 miles wide open. And so what they're doing is they're they're using these illegal immigrants.
Well, it's common what they are. They're illegal aliens. They cross our border illegally, and they're using them as pawns to open up gaps in our coverage. And when they open up that those gaps in our coverage, that's when they cross our higher value products, whether that's criminal aliens, whether it's aliens from special interest country, fentanyl, methamphetamine, cocaine. That's when they're crossing their higher value, but it's all generated based upon our policies here.
They recognize that they can advertise their services around the world and get people to put themselves in their hands and cross our border illegally being used as pawns based upon our policies that that require that we ultimately end up releasing.
Speaker 0: Chad, I have to be honest. I mean, that sounds like a nice I that would make a nice pamphlet for the cartels to hand out. Here's the reality. We all know that they're winning. There estimated 14 to 15,000,000 have crossed into this country illegally in the last three years.
Those by the that by the estimate of people I trust, 100%. And what I asked was where where is the border patrol because they're not patrolling the border. Not effectively, and apparently no one's learning any lessons. If the border patrol is being played like that by the cartels moving illegals, think what they're doing with this stuff that really counts, and that is fentanyl and all of the deadly drugs they're bringing in. I'm I'm I'm fresh out of excuses for the border patrol, honestly, Brandon.
This is this is a disaster, and the border patrol isn't raising voice isn't even raising their eyes to the American public to say, this has to be fixed now. I and I don't understand why.
Speaker 1: Well, Lou, I I mean, unfortunately, for for our agents, our rank and file agency, that's that's what I am there for. I am there to raise the voice for them. You know, there are certain laws that they have to abide by, and and we are law enforcement, so we're we're going to abide by those laws. But you're right. As far as the upper level echelon, I mean, we can go back we can go back in the Obama administration.
You know, these individuals had a bully pulpit. You know, they they wouldn't be able to go out on TV in uniform because they would have to give the Obama administration permission, but they could go out as regular citizen. They still have constitutional protections. And so that's that's what I am trying to do. That's what Art Del Cueto is trying to do.
Hector Garza. Now all of these all of these people, that are my vice presidents that are elected by our rank and file agents, we're going out there, and we're trying to, inform the people of exactly what's going on and create proper policies so that we can get this under control. And, unfortunately, because border patrol agents are executive branch employees, we are subject to what this administration will do, which is disgusting to every single one of us.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So I'm gonna ask you a couple of questions to follow. You the Border Patrol Union endorsed the border bill, for crying out loud, which was a complete sellout. It was a amnesty bill. It was a sickening, disgusting piece of legislation, and you supported it.
I I mean, I don't even I don't even think Lou,
Speaker 1: I can, Lou, I can go point by point and defeat every single argument. It raised credible fear to Trump level errors, which exact which is exactly what we need. It required that all
Speaker 0: Brandon Brandon Brandon, I don't have time for this. I gotta tell you. If the border patrol is not embarrassed by that support of that bill No.
Speaker 1: No. Okay. Okay. Look. I mean, if you wanna debate it honestly and openly, let's debate it.
Speaker 2: But if we're going to use rhetoric, then the the American No.
Speaker 0: No. We're gonna no. We're you know what? You don't wanna use rhetoric? You know what?
You tell me. I ask you one question to begin this conversation. What is the border patrol doing? And your answer was what was it? It was rhetoric.
Nothing but rhetoric.
Speaker 2: Lou? No, Lou. It was absolute
Speaker 0: You're telling me that the border patrol hasn't learned anything in five years. I mean, are you kidding me?
Speaker 2: Luke, who who is the border
Speaker 1: patrol controlled by? Please, by all means, tell me. Who is the border patrol
Speaker 0: Alejandro Mayorkas and president Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Exactly. Thank you very much. So what is what are border patrol agents that you are you are absolutely vilifying border patrol agents?
Speaker 0: I'm not vilifying them. I'm vil You just did.
Speaker 1: You just said, and the
Speaker 0: border patrol Well, listen. If you don't think if if you don't think that the
Speaker 1: what they need to do.
Speaker 0: If you think I'm the one vilifying the border patrol, you're not paying attention to the cartels and a hundred thousand people a year dying because we're not securing that border.
Speaker 1: Tell me. Did you just tell me that we're not doing anything?
Speaker 0: I just told you you're not doing nearly enough.
Speaker 1: I Exactly. You're vilifying
Speaker 0: Oh, is that vilifying? To to be criticize excuse me. Excuse me. I criticize the border patrol, and that's vilifying? Excuse me?
Speaker 1: When you say that we're not doing enough?
Speaker 0: I see. You're not even coming close to doing enough.
Speaker 2: We're not doing everything.
Speaker 0: How the hell did 14,000,000 illegal aliens get in this country in three years?
Speaker 1: You might as well join Black Lives Matter.
Speaker 0: Okay. You know what? Vilified. That's great. Okay.
I'll be glad to join them. You just answer me one question. You How did 14 how did 14,000,000 illegal immigrants get into this country?
Speaker 1: Biden's policies based upon our current laws allow him to look
Speaker 2: at the Supreme Court decision in 2023. The Supreme Court, a conservative Give me controlled by a conservative
Speaker 0: Brandon, you know better than to do this with me. Come on, man.
Speaker 2: Lou, again, again, rhetoric. I am giving you
Speaker 0: Rhetoric? Are you getting you've you've enrolled me in the Black Lives Matter movement. Wait a minute. I didn't enroll you in the Black Lives Matter movement. You've you enrolled me.
Speaker 2: And all you're doing is giving rhetoric. We can go through point by point on that bill.
Speaker 0: You can go through
Speaker 2: rhetoric, Lou.
Speaker 0: It's all rhetoric. It's all rhetoric. It's all nonsense. You know who wrote that bill? Who wrote the bill?
Continue Brandon. Brandon, who wrote the bill?
Speaker 2: James Lankford wrote the bill. He is constantly rated as one of
Speaker 1: the most conservative members of the senate.
Speaker 0: You didn't get he didn't get my rating. The man is a phony rhino, and it has been ever since he got to congress. And he he follows he want he follows Mitch McConnell around like a puppy.
Speaker 2: Constantly rated as one
Speaker 1: of the most conservative senators.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Good.
Speaker 2: Wrote a bill he wrote a bill that point by point
Speaker 0: It's a joke.
Speaker 2: They can go through. Yeah. Again again
Speaker 0: It's a joke.
Speaker 2: Point Lou, Lou, point out. Point out what section of
Speaker 1: the bill is a joke, and I
Speaker 2: will point out what sections Oh,
Speaker 0: I I can I'll tell you which section of it. You wanna know what section? Please. Every section in that thing is a joke. It is a joke.
Speaker 2: Exactly, Lou. You can't You what is
Speaker 0: I will No. No. Let me ask you let me ask you one question.
Speaker 2: Take a point. One question. Single one of your orgies.
Speaker 0: Okay. Then take this point. I have a point for you to take care of then. Alright? We have we have all of the power necessary right now on the books.
All that has to happen is that Mayorkas and Biden follow the law. So you tell me what makes you think that the Biden administration and Majorcas and Biden will follow the law, that new law, that that border bill, which, by the way, primarily was a a foreign aid bill they finally admitted.
Speaker 1: Pass HR two, which you supported.
Speaker 0: I mean Oh, HR hey, RHR two.
Speaker 1: Let's let's let's let's again again, let's use
Speaker 0: No. We're you're you're not answering my questions.
Speaker 2: Let's oh, I'm going to answer your question, Lou, but I'm
Speaker 0: We haven't got time. You're using so much rhetoric.
Speaker 2: I'm going to use I'm gonna use facts. Under our current law, oh my heavens, you brought the bill up.
Speaker 0: Yes. I I did. I did. It's and you're going to have a Now that you're arguing I'm worried about your blood pressure. I want you to calm down.
I I really I'm I'm worried about it. You're using too much rhetoric. You're getting carried away.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Facts
Speaker 0: And by the way, I will never forget I will never forget I will never forget that you enrolled me in the Black Lives Matter movement. Yep.
Speaker 2: Was Vilify vilify the corporation. Way to go.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I've qualified. Yeah. Way to vilify I think you've done that well enough yourself, partner.
Speaker 2: That was a good
Speaker 0: Go out there and support some more RINO legislation.
Speaker 2: Good job.
Speaker 0: Maybe you get a job with the Biden administration. Great work. Vilified law enforcement. You got it.
Speaker 2: Way to go, Lou.
Speaker 0: Thanks so much. I appreciate it, Brandon, for your judgment. Alright. Brandon Judd, he represents the border patrol. The border patrol, by the way, has somehow, imagine this, allowed in 14,000,000 illegal immigrants and have been facilitating a welcome wagon at the border instead of securing it.
Not all their fault, but that is what they've been doing, and that's what we've got to deal with. And their support of that border bill is disgusting to
Speaker 2: me
Speaker 0: and appalling.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Cartel Crisis. @LaraLogan shares her shocking account of the horrors caused by the cartels at our Southern border. #AmericaFirst #MAGA #Dobbs https://t.co/Xfs738ikIm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Laura Logan's Fox Nation show investigates the situation at the southern border, revealing that drug cartels, not the US, control it. These cartels have evolved into global organized crime syndicates involved in extreme violence, with 80% of Mexico influenced or controlled by them. They possess military training, tactics, and weapons. Jason Jones tracks the cartels' transformation, but was disappointed when the president deferred designating them as terrorist organizations.
The discussion shifts to Iran and the killing of Soleimani. Logan questions the criticism from senators like Mike Lee, pointing out inconsistencies in their reactions compared to the Obama administration's assassinations of American citizens associated with Al Qaeda. She emphasizes the need for accountability and specific legal challenges to the president's actions. Logan recalls an incident in 2007 where Iranians, disguised as American soldiers, killed and kidnapped American soldiers in Karbala, questioning where the critical voices were when Soleimani was orchestrating such attacks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Laura Logan. Great to have you with us. Congratulations on the new show. And I wanna talk because you've spent considerable time in The Middle East and, and Iraq. But I wanna turn first to, the Fox Nation, show.
Give us a sense of what you, are are focusing on, what has been your, your reaction to what you found in your in your reporting.
Speaker 1: Well, there's one thing I was most surprised about, you know, spending time down on the border and talking to people on both sides, both Mexico and and and in The US. And when I would ask, like, who's in control of the southern border? No one ever said The US. Mhmm. Right?
I mean, wouldn't you expect that? So if the answer is, well, the cartels control it, both on the Mexican side and the American side, How is that possible? So that's how, you know, as a reporter, you begin this journey, right, of curiosity. And what I learned was that the the drug cartels of old have transformed in Mexico over the last few decades, and they're now amongst the most powerful organizations in the world. But perhaps what's, like, so striking is is that, they're they're global.
So, you know, someone who's buying cocaine on the streets of Moscow or in, South America or in Europe or in Africa, they're buying it from the Mexican cartels. Mhmm. And they've also diversified. And so you to me, it's it's impossible to understand what's really happening on the border if you go don't go to the heart of where the power lies and why people are crossing where they're crossing and when they cross and who makes those decisions.
Speaker 0: There there is such a naivete, and it's a purposeful naivete. I think, and certainly on the part of public officials in this country. They they want to condescend toward Mexico and say the corruption is all the cartels. It's all on the southern side of the border. But the reality is, as you found, that that corruption is on both sides of the border, and the control certainly rests with the cartels, not the US government and certainly not the Mexican government.
And one of the most striking numbers that I have seen is that 80% of Mexico is either influenced or actually under the control of the drug cartels. That I mean, that should be chilling to every American.
Speaker 1: Well, they're not drug cartels anymore. Right? Because they're they're global organized crime syndicates who carry out the most extreme form of violence that you will see anywhere in the world. I mean, it's not enough, you know, just just behead people. They have beheading videos where they then take sledgehammers and obliterate their skulls.
And then the Human Rights Watch has actually come up with a new term called femicides as to try to explain the extreme rate of at which women are being murdered and disappeared in Mexico today. Mean, there's no one has suffered more
Speaker 0: than that. By the way, literally for decades. We are just now awakening to what has been going on.
Speaker 1: Well, it's
Speaker 0: The murder rate in Mexico
Speaker 1: is greater historical.
Speaker 0: And is greater than any combat zone, including Iraq, Afghanistan, anywhere in the world.
Speaker 1: But there are people, and I spoke to one of them, a former captain with the Texas Department of Public Safety, which is a crazy term for a law enforcement body that actually only exists in Texas. And he he ran the cross border operations at the cross border center. Very smart. And what he said what he has done is track what he calls the tripwires and triggers. Jason Jones.
You can find it tripwires and triggers. And he can literally map out the transformation of the cartels for you. They have military training now, military camps. They use military tactics and and weapons. Mean, they mount operations with twenty fifty caliber machine guns.
Speaker 0: And no one was more excited than Jason Jones, who I think is the most knowledgeable person in terms of the narco crime syndicates, you wish. I just call them drug cartels, that are now international. He has and I have not talked to him since the president deferred designating those cartels as terrorist organizations, like him. I hope the president changes his mind.
Speaker 1: Well, he was gutted. I talked to him after that.
Speaker 0: I I'm sorry. You talked to whom?
Speaker 1: I talked to Jason Jones right after that, and he was gutted. Yeah. Because he's worked on this for very long. He gave up his career and literally goes the length of birth of this country to talk to policemen so they know what they're really dealing with.
Speaker 0: Well, when you, when you're watching, Laura Logan on Fox Nation, and she has no agenda. Just the facts, ma'am. Let me ask you this because you spent far too much time in The Middle East to ignore your expertise in that experience. Your thoughts about Iran and listening to senators like Mike Lee. I I I mean, it is pathetic to me to hear a US Senator suggest that the United States government did wrong when killing a terrorist.
The constitutional authority of the president is clear. The the national interest is clear. My god. What are we dealing with here?
Speaker 1: Well, it's really interesting because where was senator Mike Lee when the Obama administration assassinated Anwar al Alaki? Remember the inspirational leader of Al Qaeda who was really one of the, you know, main recruiters for Al Qaeda? Alaqi was an American citizen. So was Adam Gaddan, another American who joined Al Qaeda. The Obama administration assassinated him as well.
So why do we hear nothing from Mike Lee and other senators at that time? You know, that's always my question as a journalist. Right? Is I look for consistency and inconsistency. I look at motivation.
Speaker 0: The swamp is a terrible place to look for consistency.
Speaker 1: Well, and and, you know, and the troubling part is where's the accountability? That that's that's what's really, troubling for me because where's the accountability for all of these statements? Why what's the if you're gonna challenge the president's legal authority to act, then tell us the law that's been broken. Tell me specifically what that law is so I can look it up, and I can see whether that's a valid argument or not.
Speaker 0: I think Mike Lee stands as, if you will, as a as an avatar for all in Washington, in the senate and the house, by the way, who are questioning this president, and his judgment in foreign policy when he has done more in three years and achieved more success than any president in three first three years of his presidency, it's remarkable to me that there wouldn't even be an issue over, Soleimani, who is what he is. He was a vicious, vile
Speaker 1: terrorist. Do you remember when Iranians, posing as American soldiers, went into, a base in Karbala in 02/2007? Do you remember when they they, killed one American there with a grenade and took four Americans with them? Two of their bodies were found hand cuffed together in the back of a car. They executed those four as they fled.
I mean, they had American style uniforms on them. That was a sophisticated operation, by the way, that that the US government says was carried out with training from Lebanese Hezbollah because they did a similar operation against the Israelis on that border. And this where were those voices when Qasem Soleimani, was orchestrating those attacks and killing Americans? Where were they then?
Speaker 0: A great question and a lot of answers on Fox Nation. Laura Logan, catch all of her reporting, on Fox Nation. We look forward to it. Thanks a Great to see you.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Subverting America: Lou says the Radical Dems and Natl Left-Wing media are running down our country & aligning themselves with America’s enemies while @POTUS fights the Wuhan virus pandemic. #KAG2020 #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/1NeXyAMS77
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that President Trump faces constant attacks from the "party of hate" despite overcoming challenges to the U.S. They criticize Democrats for undermining Trump's administration and aligning with America's enemies.
Former President Obama is called self-serving for criticizing Trump's response to the Wuhan virus pandemic, and Hillary Clinton is accused of pushing outdated ideological views. Both are said to be seeking a return from irrelevance instead of rallying America during the crisis.
The speaker also criticizes the head of the World Health Organization, Dr. Tedros, for being an enthusiast of China and for criticizing President Trump. The speaker claims that these individuals are upset because the global health crisis has exposed the failures of globalism, which is portrayed as a vulnerability that threatens American superpower status. They praise President Trump for prioritizing America First.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, now a few comments, if I may, on the president and the constant unrelenting attacks against him and his presidency. The party of hate is attacking the president once again. That's right. As our historic president is repelling and overcoming every challenge, every threat directed at The United States, Radical Dems are idle in support of the nation and the American people. Instead, they're busy doing what they do best, running down our country, aligning themselves with America's enemies, and viciously assailing President Trump, working to subvert his administration, his policies at every opportunity.
Suddenly, we hear from former president Barack Obama, who criticized the Trump response to the Wuhan virus pandemic. Obama's remarks were self serving nonsense to say the least. Nothing helpful, nothing inspiring, and Obama's rhetoric as hollow as his eight miserable years in the Oval Office. Who else choosing this fevered moment of crisis to speak not in support of our president, not to call on all Americans to work together? Who else but Hillary Clinton, trying eagerly to push her own ideological views that are as outdated as she.
Obama and Hillary, the nation in crisis, hundreds of Americans dying every day. They refused to rally America. They sought only their return from irrelevance. They and the left wing national media that suckers them seek only to frustrate the leader who has accomplished more in the first three years of his presidency than any other, who is historic by any definition despite the evil that would tear him and his administration asunder no matter that our nation be destroyed. President Trump even has to contend with the inept and arrogant head of the World Health Organization, Doctor.
Tedros Adhanom. Doctor. Tedros is not only a fervent, clawing and devout enthusiast of authoritarian China, but also its repressive response to the Wuhan virus that has now infected the world. Doctor. Tindros has also chosen to alternately criticize and lionize President Trump.
He is now criticizing, a critic of the president who is truly leading the free world, and, yes, putting America First. Thank God. Obama, Hillary, Tedros, what has these people so upset? What has upset them in the midst of this global health and financial crisis is truly the realization that they and their shared one world ideology have been exposed in this time of trial and peril. Globalism has made this deadly Wuhan Virus Outbreak into the pandemic that has invaded almost every nation.
That globalism has been revealed to be more vulnerability than strength, more dependency than shared vision and values. And globalism is being demonstrated daily to be an idea whose time has not only passed, but one, if further nurtured, could deny the future of even the great American superpower. Globalism is dying. And thank God President Trump has put America First in this perilous time we all share.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Dirty Money. @jsolomonReports on George Soros’ corrupt ties to Ukraine. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/y9XMuJTZgq
Video Transcript AI Summary
John Solomon reports that the Durham probe has shifted to a criminal investigation due to evidence of wrongdoing, now able to subpoena and compel testimony. He notes House Speaker Pelosi initially saw "no need for a vote" on the impeachment inquiry, but changed course after President Trump's foreign policy victory.
Solomon claims the "Russia collusion story" is being repeated with Ukraine via inaccurate reporting. He states records show Hunter Biden's firm received $166,000 monthly, not $50,000. Solomon says that on the day a Ukrainian prosecutor was fired, Biden's legal team contacted the prosecutor's office to settle a case. He claims Ukrainian prosecutors raided the home of an individual and planned to interview Hunter Biden.
Solomon alleges George Soros has a large footprint in Ukraine, including funding the Anti-Corruption Action Center with the State Department. He claims the State Department sent a letter telling prosecutors to not prosecute that group. Solomon attributes attacks against him to Soros' funding of ProPublica. He says he will continue reporting facts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And joining us tonight, award winning investigative reporter, Fox Business contributor, John Solomon. John, good to have you with us.
Speaker 1: Good to be with you, Lou.
Speaker 0: Let's start to your reaction. If you will, the endorsement, the outright endorsement of Christopher Wray who, you know, of whom I think it can be said, many have thought he was dragging his feet and not being particularly helpful to the Durham investigation.
Speaker 1: Well, if you remember early on, Attorney General Barr said that some of the answers he was getting from his lieutenants like Chris Wray didn't add up. But it appears now with mister Durham working behind the scenes, is good cooperation. And that is why now, in the in the face of some criminal evidence of criminal wrongdoing, this probe has gone from an administrative rude review to a criminal investigation. That is a significant development, particularly because it now gives mister Durham the ability to subpoena and compel testimony in ways that an administrative review couldn't. So it's good to hear that the FBI and the DOJ are on the same page and that there's good cooperation going on.
Speaker 0: It's also, interesting to watch the House of, Representatives or at least, the Speaker of the House announce that there will be a vote, by the House Thursday, on going forward. It's unclear whether she will have the the principal encouraged to call for a full vote of the House on articles of impeachment or a process of inquiry. What we're hearing sounds like it's going to be just a discussion about going forward rather than whether or not there should be a quote unquote inquiry.
Speaker 1: Right. Well, keep in mind a couple weeks ago, the same speaker said there was no need for a vote. Mhmm. It only appears that that need for a vote arose after the president scored a major foreign policy victory in in the, death of al Baghdadi. And so I think, people look at this in the real world.
I just came back. I was a couple days out visiting in outside of the Beltway, and the people in the real world see the political nature of this inquiry, and they're deeply concerned about it. There there's no one that's gonna pull the wool over the eyes of the American people. Yeah. They're pretty smart.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I agree with you 100%. And it appears that that may be dawning on some of the radical dims. And for a while, we thought Nancy Pelosi had a had a grip, but she obviously did not. And we're almost a month and a half into this farce that should you know, they're trying to call an impeachment a legitimate impeachment process.
Right. Again, built on a transcript of a call between Zelenskyy and the president, the president of Ukraine, you know, and so called whistleblowers that are evaporating faster than they can come forward. Well Ukraine represents, well, it's a target of the national left wing media, and they keep Yeah. Well, putting forward just crazy, to me at least, assertions. But among them that Hunter Biden's firm got paid $50,000 a month.
Only $50,000 a month. Yeah. Your thoughts. Let's go through a few of these claims.
Speaker 1: It it is fine. If you remember, the greatest, conspiracy theory ever woven by the American journalism community was the Russia collusion story. Right. We're beginning to see that go on with Ukraine. And how does he how do we go from something that's factual, Russia interfered in the election, to something that was completely silly like, collusion between Trump and Putin?
You get it by inaccurate, reporting and misinformation, and we have a lot of that now in the Ukraine scandal. A lot of the early Ukraine scandal looks a lot like the early Russia scandal.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Start with Hunter Biden. I have the records, that the FBI sees from Hunter Biden's firm and that the Ukrainian prosecutor sees from the, company Burisma. Both show that his firm was getting 166,000 and some change each month. Not 50,000, 1 hundred and 60 6 thousand. That's three x what, vice president Joe Biden likes to use as the lowball figure for what his son has got.
Even at $50,000 a month, it's a big salary. But just think about the the difference in that, and you have to ask yourself, why are people understating the amount of money that flowed to Hunter Biden's firm?
Speaker 0: And and and why are they reporting that that there was, you know, no active investigation of Hunter Biden know, Burisma, you know, was They were? Hiring had him on the payroll and the his father was calling for the firing of the the general prosecutor and to end the investigation.
Speaker 1: Yeah. A couple weeks ago, had a story, Lou. March twenty ninth, the day that the prosecutor general of Ukraine, the attorney general of Ukraine was fired, a guy named Shokin, that same day, Hunter Biden's American legal team was calling the prosecutor's office, trying to meet with the new guy and see if they could settle the case. There was a case, and here's something that a lot of the media ignored because they haven't done the spent the time that I have spent trying to research this. In February, '1 month before Joe Biden effectuated the firing of this prosecutor, Ukrainian prosecutors raided the home of Boris Mazondar, Zulcheski.
They seized this property. There was a very, very active investigation, and Hunter Biden was going to be one of the people they plan to interview, according to mister Shokin, someone I interviewed. And that's when the vice president left in action. Whether they're related or not, the appearance issue is clearly there, and anyone who says that there wasn't an active investigation hasn't been on the ground reporting in Ukraine.
Speaker 0: And, John, you've been under some considerable attack, from some quarters. Your thought about the origins of those attacks and the purpose?
Speaker 1: Well, listen. Part of the reason liberals are so involved in Ukraine is that one of their largest mega donors, George has a very large footprint. In fact, he had a group called the Anti Corruption Action Center. It was jointly funded by the State Department, that embassy in Kyiv, Ambassador Yovanovitch, and George Soros. They funded that group together.
It was that group that the United States State Department sent a letter to prosecutors said, do not prosecute that group. We want you to get hands off. Now remember, we have all these state officials running around saying, we didn't tell the Ukrainians what to do. I have the letter. It happened.
There's a lot of liberal interest in Ukraine because one of their mega donors is there. And if you look at the most recent attack by me today, or a few days ago, excuse me, by ProPublica, who funds ProPublica? George Soros and the Open Society Foundation. Not hard to figure out why I'm being attacked.
Speaker 0: And, and I thought we'd just give you an opportunity to respond to that, because I I know you, and I know your work, and I know that you are. Thank you. Absolute aces. The craft is Yeah. I'm very fortunate to have you.
Speaker 1: All you can do when you have these sort of character attacks is to just keep reporting the facts. Don't let it distract you. Stay focused on the facts, and the truth will ultimately came out. It did in Russia, and I believe at the end of the day, it will come out in Ukraine as well.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. And the next time, we'll take up why you and I and Sean Hannity and a few of our other folks ended up on a something of a an attempted enemies list led by apparently the former ambassador to the Ukraine. Yeah. That's for
Speaker 1: another on that still. Absolutely. Thank you, sir.
Speaker 0: John Solomon, thank you.
Speaker 1: Appreciate it.
Speaker 0: Thanks. Great work as always.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Media’s Medical Bias: @DrOz says he is stunned by the media’s politicization of medicine rather than looking at the facts on hydroxychloroquine. #AmericaFirst #KAG2020 #Dobbs https://t.co/7ktYqAy6Ak
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Oz expresses concern over the politicization of medicine, particularly regarding hydroxychloroquine. He wishes the drug had never been mentioned by politicians. While clinical trials are still underway, a Chinese study showed statistically significant improvement in clinical symptoms and blood markers for inflammation when the drug was administered, though it did not clear the virus. Dr. Oz questions why these findings are being ignored, while other studies with different results are highlighted.
He emphasizes the need for honest data presentation, rather than biased headlines. Dr. Oz highlights Georgia's technology-driven approach to managing the virus among first responders, involving easy access to testing and information. He is encouraged by Abbott's plan to produce antibody kits, which could reveal the extent of asymptomatic cases and inform future decisions. He suspects there is a broader asymptomatic population.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining us to take up all of this and more, Doctor. Mehmet Oz, host of the Doctor. Oz Show, Director of Columbia University's Integrative Medicine Center. Doctor, good to have you back with us. And first, your reaction to the divergency and the divergence of headlines, whether you're left or right in the country or for that matter in the world.
Speaker 1: I'm stunned that we have politicized medicine. You at least think within the medical community, we could agree that fact should win the day. And that unfortunately, as you point out, it gets stunningly more diverse. I mean, I really do wish this product hydroxychloroquine, had never been mentioned, by the president or anybody else. It's remarkable because the drug's been around and loved by many approved in this country in 1955.
And does it work to The US standards? Everyone should say the same thing here is we haven't actually done the clinical trials. I had the the chief investigator from the University of Minnesota on my show today. He's the most advanced of any trial. We're helping him enroll people.
I'm trying to pull the oars with them. That's what we should all be doing. Get people enrolled. We'll find out. But take this report from China that you mentioned.
I was so surprised when I saw the headline. I got a preprint of the paper yesterday. I read it. It's pretty clear. The researchers had a 50 patients.
Listen carefully. They didn't give the pills until seventeen days after symptoms. That's pretty late. But they were honorable. They studied all these patients, and they actually stopped the study prematurely because they wanted others to see it.
Why? Because there was a statistically significant improvement in clinical symptoms and the blood markers for inflammation, including something called c reactive protein, was statistically significantly improved. And they thought that's something we wanna know. Now, there was no improvement in the viral load of the patients, which is a nice thing to know, but I care about symptoms too and so do most doctors. So what the researchers are arguing is not a pro or con against president Trump or anybody else.
They're saying, listen. Maybe one of the ways hydroxychloroquine works is by changing how the inflammatory process responds to the virus. And by preventing it from overreacting, it can help patients feel better, recover quicker, and it might explain some of the other symptoms found, for example, in another randomized trial that in China was released last week showing that the CT scan images improved. And likewise, in those patients, they got symptomatically better. Why would you ignore that?
Why would you focus on studies that show other aspects? By the way, not everything's positive. There was another randomized trial, didn't show a benefit. The French study you mentioned, which was given, by the way, to people who are very, very ill, which is not when this medication, according to experts, are using it But then we can given. They say give it early.
Right? But so I'm not sure why we would begin hyping the truth. It is what it is. Just present the obvious reality. Just you know what?
If you just quote the researchers of this Shanghai study, just quote them, it is readily evident what they're saying, which is this is not a panacea. It didn't clear the virus, but it did a lot of things we like a lot. We liked it so much. We really think it needs to be investigated more. Here, world.
Take our data. That's not how it got reported. And quite the opposite, people were opining saying this proves we shouldn't look any further. I'm I'm rooting for Americans to feel better and get better. Wouldn't we all wanna root for that?
Speaker 0: Well, and there there are so many instances of people the symptoms improving. And I I will tell you as a layman, if your chest is filled with congestion, you can't breathe. And one of the things that this drug does apparently is to relieve that congestion it's one of the symptoms. I I mean, that's a marvelous result in and of itself if it did no more than that because that's the way a lot of people
Speaker 1: are dying. Well, the fact is, Lou, we won't know for sure till we finish our US trials. There are several running. I just was with the governor of, the South Dakota, and they have the great Sanford health care system there. They're spearheading it, the biggest rural system in the country.
We've got Americans trying to figure this out. But in the meantime, why would you create more controversy, dis dismissing a medication that might be beneficial and might not be? But right now, for many doctors, it's their best tool. And you introduce a a sense of suspicion and subterfuge into the process that's unwarranted. Let the doctors review the data by giving them the honest opinion of not the headline that makes it look like this stuff is toxic and poisonous, and you definitely shouldn't try it.
Speaker 0: And what you're talking about, the deceit, the duplicity, the deception that's going on in the national media, because that's who we are talking about here with these headlines. These aren't just random headlines. This is it's a clear delineation between the left and right and also between objective journalism. And at the best you could call it would be advocacy journalism. It's propaganda in many respects, but that's what's happening throughout our society, whether it's medicine, whether it's business, whether it's politics.
And that's where we are today in this country. We're also, of course, involved in this pandemic. We were, we are looking at reaching, we hope, this week, a peak, some sort of peak, in the, in the progress of the disease, and perhaps then soon thereafter a plateau or hopefully a decline. Where do you think we are? What is your assessment?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm intrigued that the testing has dropped thirty percent, as you mentioned earlier. One of the reasons that might be happening is because less people are feeling ill and going to seek treatment. There are other hypotheses as well. I personally believe part of it is we've been educating Americans and physicians not to send every patient to get tested because we didn't have enough. And now that we've actually been able to contain a little bit with our, social distancing, this outbreak, now we have enough tests, We should sort of free it up a little bit to get people tested.
They shouldn't have to hold back like they did in the past. But here's my thought. I did a fascinating interview today, with the governor of Georgia, governor Kemp. And, you know, tech Georgia's become the technology hub of the Southeast. They've got Georgia Tech there, a lot of great technology companies.
My partner, Sharecare, is there, and they're ruling out this cool idea that they're gonna take care of the first responders who are the ones who did not get to stay home. They had to go arrest people, and they exposed themselves. So the Atlanta Police Department and Dave Wilkinson, who, by the way, was president Bush's head of security on nine eleven. So he was there at the school when nine eleven happened, and he can very clearly relate what's happening now to back in nine eleven. He's rolling out this idea that doesn't take away the freedom of anybody.
He says, hey. Listen, first responders. If you're feeling any of these symptoms, we'll get you just click here. We'll get you a test. Automatically tells you where to go, tells you how to get there, then rapidly tells you what to do if you test positive.
Who do you tell about being positive? How do we make sure that you're informed so you don't run away from information that should shed a light? And this is one of the reasons I think that that state's done a pretty good job handling this virus. You know, many police departments are just ravaged with infections. The Atlanta PD has done a pretty good job.
That's a good example. We're not taking away civil liberties. We're letting technology with testing start to lead us forward because this is really about data. Right? It's not dates.
We can guess what they were gonna be open, but we need the data to support it and make the right decisions. And I'm very encouraged by Abbott who announced this morning. They said, that they're gonna start making about a million of these antibody kits this week, 4,000,000 this month, and the 20,000,000 by June. Now think about this. That means we can begin to figure out who's actually had the virus.
I'm of the belief that there may be a lot more people who've been either ill enough, but not ill you know, sick, but so they suspect something, but not enough to go do anything about it or never knew they were ill, but still had COVID nineteen. If that number's large, it gives us more confidence moving forward.
Speaker 0: Doctor. Oz, always good to have you with us, I agree with you. A number of physicians and public health officials I'm talking to are suspicious of exactly what you expressed, that there is a broader asymptomatic population in the country that perhaps didn't even know that they've had it. Anyway, we'll hope that everyone is asymptomatic in this country very soon. Thank you so much.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Fighting Coronavirus: @DrOz says people with chronic illness should avoid public places during the outbreak, but the rest of the U.S. population shouldn’t panic. #KAG2020 #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/9fRgdzWSly
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mehmet Oz discusses the coronavirus, stating he's less concerned about a pandemic than an endemic virus that is always present. He believes the virus is mutated, not man-made, and has the right amount of virulence to be contagious without being deadly.
Oz expresses concern about rushing a vaccine, citing potential unforeseen consequences, such as affecting fetuses or hastening death in chronically ill individuals. He references data from Korea indicating a lower death rate, questioning the necessity of a risky vaccine if the virus's impact is similar to the flu.
Oz says the US government is doing everything possible to address acute issues like hospital beds, ventilators, and testing, but acknowledges there are not enough resources. He urges the public to take preventative measures like social distancing while the government focuses on providing resources and developing vaccines. He advises those with chronic illnesses and those in the 60-80 age group to practice social distancing and avoid major trips.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what's going on? Doctor. Mehmet Oz, host of the Doctor. Oz Show, director of Columbia University's, Integrative Medicine Center. Great to have you with us.
Speaker 1: Thanks, Willough.
Speaker 0: There you heard, the CEO, say, with the designation because I've been asking this question of everyone, whether it's Alex Azar, HHS, whether it's doctor Fauci, whomever. Why not make it a pandemic? Because it is a pandemic by any other definition than that of the World Health Organization.
Speaker 1: I think it got caught up in the internal nomenclature battles within the WHO. And why it hasn't happened, colleagues of mine have been arguing the same thing you've been saying. I don't know if it makes that much of a difference anymore. I'm not concerned about an epidemic or a pandemic. I'm concerned about an endemic virus, which means the virus is always with us.
Right? SARS was all over the place, scared us, but it disappeared by itself. There was no vaccine made. It literally died out. It burned out.
MERS, these these tend to die out because they're too virulent. This virus, and it is a mutated virus. It's not man made. That I'm pretty confident based just on the studies that I've seen. But this thing somehow came about where it had just the right amount of virulence.
So it doesn't kill you because viruses that kill you kill themselves. Right. But it's incredibly contagious. So we gotta get out with these vaccines. I think the US government is already pushing as hard as they can, but the real worry is that we'll rush a vaccine out, give it to a few hundred million people, and run into consequences we never anticipated.
What? You could affect, for example, the fetus in a pregnant woman, and that's a population that's at risk. You could hasten the death in some people with chronic illnesses. They're the ones that are at risk. And here's the thing.
I just before walking out on the stage saw some of the data from Korea, which is very different from the data that the China CDC shared us. It's a much lower incidence of death, which means if I've got a population that's not dying any more commonly than the flu virus kills us, why would I take a big chance with a vaccine? I don't want to slow it down. Certainly, we don't want waste time, but otherwise, we're just in a bureaucracy, but move it along, but expect it to take a year, which is what everybody I trust in this space has told me is a reasonable expectation.
Speaker 0: A reasonable expectation, doctor Fauci, saying very clearly, Doctor. Anthony Fauci of NIH, head of the infectious diseases program, saying that he expects a year to a year and a half, even though we hear others saying that they have a ready to go vaccine. And the definition, by his reasoning, his firm, with a vaccine that's ready to go, is that that WHO designation, or designation by the Centers for Disease Control, makes it possible to expedite. And you know one of the great political issues here will be. When we're in a few months ahead, we're looking back on what was decided, what wasn't.
They're going to be asking, did we do everything we can as quickly as we can if we have, God forbid, a huge number of fatalities?
Speaker 1: Well, spoke to Sima Verma today actually on Fox News, and she's pretty clear about the fact that they're doing everything humanly possible to deal with the acute issues, like do we have enough hospital beds, do we have enough ventilators, and do we have enough testing?
Speaker 0: Do you think we do?
Speaker 1: No. We don't have enough of any of those things But
Speaker 0: I I mean, you're they're not dealing with a problem if they're not solving the problem. They have another They're aware of a problem. That's quite difference.
Speaker 1: And it's been about fifty days since the first case, so people were starting to a bit agitated. But long term, you wanna make sure the vaccine you put out there is effective, or you really undermine the confidence of the public. Yes. Here's my argument.
Speaker 0: Surely.
Speaker 1: We're telling people not to panic. It's really hard not to panic. It's difficult to Nike doesn't say just don't do it, they say just do it. So, our arguments ought to be, we're a can do population. Americans out there, we mobilize, we get things done.
Give us our marching orders, let's do what we can do for ourselves. This one sheet that I noticed is on your desk Is that you know, we're putting it out on all of my social sites. You should pull it out if you don't mind. It's a one sheet primer on the simple things to Let me interrupt you. Please.
Speaker 0: This sheet that Doctor. Oz is referring to is up on blue dibbs on Twitter and available to you, and it'll be on Instagram and everything, and, Facebook.
Speaker 1: So do those things while the American public is doing what they can to become a firewall for the virus, including social distancing. The US government has an obligation back, which is to deal with the things I mentioned, plus making sure this gets out. And there are a bunch of companies developing vaccines. I know of a few that have gotten enough promising data they're gonna move into animal Let's get these guys going. I don't think a nomenclature designation is gonna be a game changer here.
That's just a matter of US government
Speaker 0: We're gonna have to solve that issue because that issue is now very much alive for the first time. And it's the only thing that explains to me rationally and effectively why there would be such an institutional reticence to use a designation for what is Obviously, this is not a game. This is, you know, this is not a place for PC nonsense. A pandemic is what this is, and I think you agree with
Speaker 1: me on this. It's spread
Speaker 0: to the more than it is In line with what you're talking about, we're dealing with adults here, and we don't need to be worrying about them panicking. I say it a different way. America is not a nation of buttercups and daffodils. Right. We are used to being treated with respect to citizens and adults, and we expect our government to do the same.
Your thoughts as we look at this now, with its cruise ships, now Doctor. Fauci has said, no cruises in the cruise thing right now. Your thoughts about what people, particularly in the sixty to eighty age group, should be worried about.
Speaker 1: The age is important, but whether you have a chronic illness is even more important. So if you've cardiovascular disease, lung issues, asthma, diabetes, that population should social distance, which means don't go in the subway and rush hour if you don't have to. Don't go to big ball games. I would avoid major trips. But I don't want the rest of The US population shutting down.
Don't want them panicked about what they may have heard.
Speaker 0: Alright. Doctor. Oz, great to have you with us. Thanks so much. And as I said, on Twitter, at blowdobbs.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
A New Age: Lou says China’s cover-up of the Wuhan virus will challenge America’s political and corporate orthodoxies, and puts our national security and way of life under threat. #KAG2020 #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/i1mA7XvoWy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Developments in the US-China relationship are challenging American policies and practices, posing a threat to national security. There is growing evidence that communist China is directly responsible for the deaths of 140,000 people worldwide and the infection of almost 700,000 Americans by the Wuhan virus, which has cost 22 million Americans their jobs.
Government sources express high confidence that communist China is covering up the origins of the Wuhan virus and question whether it came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where they were working with a coronavirus carried by horseshoe bats. It is believed that patient zero worked at the lab. The Wuhan laboratory was reportedly operating below its biosafety level four designation, and the US embassy in Beijing had warned of safety issues.
President Trump stated that the US is doing a thorough examination of the situation. Defense Secretary Mark Esper said China has been lying from the start, and there is no reason to believe anything they say. While some administration officials believe the virus was of natural origin, they cannot dismiss the possibility that it was engineered. China deliberately covered up the severity of the Wuhan virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tonight, we will be examining issues that are taking on new importance and greater urgency as the result of developments in The US China relationship that have arisen in just the past twenty four hours. These developments bring into serious question the assumptions that have guided US government policies and corporate America's international business practices for the past two decades. We have entered a new age, an age in which American orthodoxies are being challenged from within and without. And nothing less than our national security and way of life are clearly now under threat. This age is also no less perilous than previous decades.
No less is at stake. This evening, there is growing evidence that communist China is directly responsible for the deaths of a hundred and forty thousand people all around the world. The Wuhan virus infecting almost seven hundred thousand Americans, killing at least thirty one thousand more. This pandemic has so far cost twenty two million Americans their jobs, and many of the world's economies are near a standstill. A number of government sources say there is a high level of confidence that communist China is covering up the origins of the Wuhan virus, and they now are comfortable in questioning whether the virus came from a laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
That is a question, of course, that we have raised on this broadcast for the past number of weeks. The sources say the laboratory was working with a coronavirus that was being carried by horseshoe bats from Southern China in Yunnan province. It is believed by these same sources that patient zero worked at the laboratory and somehow carried the disease into the Wuhan population. How or exactly why that occurred if it did occur is still unknown and far far from certain. We're also learning that the Wuhan laboratory was operating far below its biosafety level four designation And sources have confirmed that two years ago, officials from the US embassy in Beijing sent cables back to the state department in which they warned of those safety issues.
President Trump with this reaction.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't wanna say that, John, but I will tell you, more and more we're hearing the story. And we'll see when you say multiple sources, but, we are doing a very thorough examination of this horrible situation that happened
Speaker 2: In your many conversations with president Xi, mister president, did you ever discuss with him state department concerns about lax safety protocols that had been reported to the state department?
Speaker 1: I don't wanna discuss what I talk to him about the laboratory. I I just don't wanna discuss it. It's inappropriate right now.
Speaker 0: And in response to the report, the Communist Chinese Party today once again used the World Health Organization to shield their culpability. The Chinese said, quote, the head of the WHO has stated many times that there is no evidence that the new coronavirus originated in the laboratory. End statement. Defense secretary Mark Esper this morning said China has been lying from the start, and there is no reason to believe anything they say.
Speaker 3: I can't speak to intelligence matters, but I find it hard to trust much of what comes out of the Chinese Communist Party. And they've been misleading us. They've been opaque, if you will, from the early days of this virus. So I I don't have much faith that they're even being truthful with us now.
Speaker 0: Well, number of administration officials have publicly said that they believe the virus was of natural origin. None of them none of them thought that they could dismiss entirely the possibility that it was engineered. Nothing is conclusive quite yet. What is conclusive is that for months, China deliberately covered up the severity of the Wuhan virus and unleashed it on an unsuspecting world.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Policies from Hell: @RobertJeffress says the Radical Dems’ socialist policies will not work in America. #AmericaFirst #MAGA #Dobbs https://t.co/KhYbvuqZ1x
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pastor Robert Jeffress believes Democratic candidates demonstrated during debates that they are on the wrong side of faith issues like school choice, religious freedom, Israel, and abortion. He says Democrats blocked a bill requiring care for babies who survive abortions, which he calls barbaric.
Jeffress claims President Trump won the evangelical vote in 2016 by 81% and will exceed that this year because he has kept his promises to the faith community. He notes little media coverage of the defeated abortion bills, including one preventing abortions after twenty weeks. He says Democrats are unwilling to place any restrictions on abortion.
Jeffress argues that claims of Jesus being a socialist are false and that people are worshiping an imaginary Jesus. He says socialism is antithetical to Christianity, and while some are drawn to the idea of free things, a majority of Americans and Christians would not vote for a socialist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pastor Robert Jeffress, who's member of the White House faith initiative, pastor of the First Baptist Church of beautiful Dallas, Texas, and a Fox Business contributor. Pastor, always great to see you. Thanks so much.
Speaker 1: Thanks, Greg.
Speaker 0: Why is it do you think Americans don't think the Democratic candidates are very religious?
Speaker 1: Well, you had the answer to that question this week in the debates. Look, a couple of the candidates could spout off some bible verses, but in their answers, they all demonstrated they're on the wrong side of just about every faith issue, whether it's school choice, religious freedom, Israel, and certainly the abortion issue, Greg. I mean, just this week, the Democrats blocked a bill requiring doctors to provide care for a child that survives an abortion. To most Americans, that is just barbaric. And you know there are a lot of issues that I think are gonna cause evangelicals and conservative Catholics to vote for president Trump in a record number in November, but the gut issue that is going to move them is the abortion issue.
Never in history have we had a more pro life president than Donald Trump, and never in history have we had a more radical group of Democrats when it comes to abortion.
Speaker 0: So if if we accept as true, and I have no doubt that it's true, what you're saying here, that means the Democrats are gonna lose the evangelical vote. They're certainly gonna go to president Trump and his faith based policies and initiatives.
Speaker 1: Well, yes. And I've said the president every time I've seen him, I said, you won the evangelical vote in 2016 by the largest margin in history, 81%. I believe it's gonna be an even higher percentage this time. Because again, Greg, he's demonstrated all of these accomplishments he promised the faith community in 2016, he has met and exceeded those promises.
Speaker 0: Now you mentioned the two abortion bills that Democrats defeated with the aid, by the way, of two Republican senators, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins. And what was interesting about this is that there was very little media coverage about it. Did you notice that?
Speaker 1: Oh, I did notice it. The left does not want you to know about these votes. The one we just mentioned that would require doctors to provide care for a child who survives an abortion, I mean, that's what Ralph Northam was talking about. The governor of Virginia, just let them die. That's infanticide.
And the other bill would have prevented abortions after twenty weeks. And look, what this proves, Greg, is it's what, president Trump demonstrated in his debate with Hillary Clinton in 2016. The Democrats are unwilling to place any restrictions on abortion. They won't restrict the reasons. If you don't like the gender of your child, murder it.
They won't restrict the time. You can murder the child up until the time it's in the birth canal of the mother. That is not where most Americans are.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Now, there was a left lane reverend, and I put my glasses on because I wanna make sure I got his name right. Dee Dawkins Hegler, he appeared on Fox and Friends. He suggested that Jesus Christ is more of a socialist than a than a capitalist. That that strikes me as wrong since socialism is really antithetical to Christianity.
Speaker 1: Well, it is. She and I were actually in the debate on Fox and Friends about that. And look, you know, people a lot of people wanna argue that Jesus was a socialist. They're worshiping an imaginary Jesus, not the Jesus of the Bible. I mean, Jesus did say we ought to care for the poor.
Yes, we should. But he also said, the poor you will have with you always. You don't hear that quoted very much. There's a better way than socialism than to care for the truly needy. I think about what Ronald Reagan said.
He said socialism only works in two places, in heaven where it's not needed and in hell where they already have it.
Speaker 0: How do you account then for I mean, Bernie Sanders, you know, appears at a convention center. There are huge crowds, mostly young people, but but some others as well. How do you account for that popularity for a guy who is quite clearly a socialist?
Speaker 1: Well, look, the message will give you things for free will always appeal to a segment, a non thinking segment of the American people. But look, crowds can be deceiving. Mitt Romney found that out in 2012 at rallies. The truth is Gallup shows 53% of Americans are will not vote for a socialist and even a higher percentage of Christians. Socialism is antithetical to everything the Christian, faith teaches.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I you know, I'd like a lot of free stuff, but I realize a, that somebody's gotta pay for it and eventually, as Margaret Thatcher said, run out of other people's money. And and b, I appreciate things more if I work hard and actually earn them. So, I'll leave it at that because I'm out of time. But, pastor Robert Jeffress, thank you for being with us.
Hope you have a great weekend. We'll see you soon.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
MS-13 Murders @USCISCuccinelli on the deadly consequences of Sanctuary Cities. #AmericaFirst #MAGA #Dobbs https://t.co/CJYMTLG2Ue
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ken Cuccinelli discusses sanctuary cities, focusing on a King County case where two men accused of murder were not deported due to local policies. One suspect, an MS-13 member, allegedly killed a high schooler after previous arrests for auto theft didn't lead to deportation. Cuccinelli claims such sanctuary policies harbor criminals, leading to more crimes.
He notes that local and state governments can exercise the tenth amendment, but argues law enforcement should set politics aside to ensure community safety. He states that sanctuary policies hinder ICE's work, endangering officers and law-abiding citizens.
Cuccinelli addresses a ruling questioning his eligibility to be DHS secretary, deferring to the White House's judgment. He expresses his commitment to working with whoever the president chooses, praising the president's leadership and willingness to address these issues aggressively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, joining us tonight is acting US citizenship and immigration services director, Ken Cucinelli. Ken, great to have you with us. I I are Good
Speaker 1: to be with you, Lou.
Speaker 0: You are right now, getting a lot done. The border is improving, and yet we're looking at sanctuary cities, most recently King County Sanctuary.
Speaker 1: Boy, I'll tell you.
Speaker 0: Two men weren't deported, accused of murder. Now, what in the world? What can we do?
Speaker 1: Gruesome, gruesome murder. I I you know, one of these characters had been, grabbed for, auto theft before, and ICE sought to deport him. The local law enforcement there in Seattle, King County, wouldn't share information or turn him over. They arrested him two more times after that, and they still wouldn't turn him over to ICE. And he ends up with a baseball bat in his hand, bludgeoning a high schooler to death.
He's an MS thirteen member along with his cohort who used a machete to chop the kid to pieces and, another MS thirteen member. And, and this is this is the fruit of Seattle's and King County sanctuary policies, and they are not unique. This is what happens when you harbor criminals. Shockingly enough, they commit more crimes.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And ICE official Timothy Robbins, who's in charge of, I believe, deportation and detention
Speaker 1: as well. Does great job.
Speaker 0: Pointing out in his testimony where they were getting a hundred of these ill these illegal criminal illegal immigrants referred to them. They're now being released onto the streets, in Los Angeles alone. I I mean, that is frightening.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: What can be done?
Speaker 1: It is frightening, and, like I said, it has consequences. The the first consequence remember, this this is part of, the exercise of the tenth amendment. These are local and state governments that can do their own thing. But this is the only the second time in American history I can think of, Lou, when law enforcement at every level, federal, state, and local, didn't completely set politics aside. And I worked in law enforcement for a number of years, as you know Mhmm.
As an attorney general. Just setting politics aside to keep our community safe, whether it's local, state, or or our whole country. And what are the consequences? The consequences are death and crimes that don't have to happen. And the federal government's tools here, other than actually going ahead and ICE exercising their powers to remove people, are very limited.
I would point out to you though, it is harder for ICE to do its job, and this is why these states and local politicos do this, when they don't have cooperation or at least Yeah. A backup from the local authorities. And this has puts officers at risk. People who are obeying the law, enforcing the laws congress put on the books are being put at risk And the radical are saying that. Where this happens.
Speaker 0: Yeah. The radical dims telling everyone they don't care about open borders. They don't care about illegal immigration. They don't care about sex trafficking. They don't care about the tens of billions of dollars that the drug cartels are making up all of the drugs, deadly drugs, that are being sent across that border.
I wanna ask you about a ruling on who could be the next DHS secretary. A hundred conservatives and conservative groups advancing your name to be the DH as secretary. What is your thought about the ruling that you and and Mark Morgan over customs and border protection aren't eligible, under the law? It sounds like pretty fine micromanagement on the part of congress.
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, you know, the president is it's his decision, and, it's an honor to serve in this administration. As you've noted, Lou, we've been being very aggressive. There's still more to do, but we've been very aggressive and I believe very successful. So I'm gonna work with whoever the president chooses. With respect to the legal boundaries within the within which the president has to operate, honestly, obviously, I'm a lawyer.
I do constitutional work, but federal employee law is not my thing. I rely on others for that. So I'm not really in a position to say. I I'm gonna accept the the judgment of the White House, and I'm gonna work with whoever the president chooses to follow on behind Kevin McElhinen in the secretarial role. And we're we have a lot more to do, and we have a lot of opportunity to do it with this president's aggressive willingness to lead, which, frankly is unlike any of his predecessors, Republican or Democrat.
And I, as a manager working in that environment, as a leader in that environment, relish the opportunity that he gives us to do that. Well
Speaker 0: and the country relishes his leadership and the results that you and Mark and all of the good people at DHS are are bringing to the to the challenge. We appreciate it. Good talking with you, Ken. Ken Kuchino. Good know
Speaker 1: with you, Lou.
Speaker 0: Thanks so much.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
The Left Hijacks Civil Rights: @BobWoodson says the radical left has twisted the civil rights movement to focus on anger and grievance instead of individual responsibility. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/TmKfE5ijDg
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bob Woodson discusses the exploitation of the civil rights movement by the left, contrasting it with Martin Luther King Jr.'s principles of non-violence and inclusion. King equally opposed the violence of the KKK and the Black Panthers, advocating for peace even when his own family was threatened.
Woodson argues that unlike previous eras with debates between figures like Nat Turner, Marcus Garvey and Booker T. Washington, the black community has seen no debate in the last 50 years, with the civil rights leadership failing to challenge the radical left. He criticizes the left's move away from fighting for justice for blacks to attacking foundational institutions like the church and the nuclear family, which historically helped black people survive.
He highlights an incident of a white woman wearing a Black Lives Matter t-shirt attacking a black mother with a baby stroller, questioning the lack of outrage and the decline in societal values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, joining us now is Bob Woodson, former civil rights activist. He headed the National Urban League Department of Criminal Justice. He's the founder of the Woodson Center, which helps residents in low income neighborhoods, and he has a new book called Lessons From the Least of These. We recommend it to you highly. And, Bob, it's good to have you with us.
Let's let's start with the, your op ed in The Wall Street Journal in which you talk about the exploitation by the left of the civil rights movement, both in terms of the era of slavery and the, Jim Crow, era.
Speaker 1: Yeah. As you know, doctor King fought in the civil rights movement for inclusion, but he also was against violence. He was against the violence of the Ku Klux Klan and the White Citizens Council, but he also spoke out with equal vigor against the retaliatory violence of the Black Panther Party. Even though his own home was bombed and his wife and small child nearly killed, he was surrounded by hundreds of armed blacks who were ready to tear the city apart. Even under those very trying circumstances, King counseled peace.
He counseled nonviolence. And so his very witness to what he believed helped propel the nation to focus its energy on destroying your enemies by making them your friends, see, that King stood for. But that's being all hijacked.
Speaker 0: Stood he stood. Yeah. It's hijacked. You you also and he was a man of God. People forget that strong influence on everything that he did.
And this is an era in which God is returning to the public square, but has been away for some time. That that is one area where the left is losing. God in the public square, God in public discussion on public policy. You also took an interesting tact, and I and I like the way you put it, talking about the the the tracks that blacks in this country have have followed. That is through voice in this great country of ours, an exit that is a return to Africa, and to to instead of the third option, which is revolt and to act against the nation.
I thought that was a a great history lesson that you brought forward as well in your op ed.
Speaker 1: Yeah. What I was saying, Lou, is that in every major era, there was vigorous debate in the black community. They were the the insurrectionists on Nat Turner. They were those Marcus Garvey. Should maybe we should return to Africa.
They were the accommodationists, Booker T. Washington. These these are dynamic forces, but each one of them talked about agency. It said what we must do to determine our destiny and direct our our course to to the future. And and King and and his movement dominated that and and brought it forward.
There has been no debate, Lou, in the last fifty years in the black community as the the civil rights leadership have advocated their responsibility for direction and allowed the radical left occupy that space. And in fact, when you talk about God, the that when they were supposed to be fighting for justice for blacks for for George Floyd, what they did was quickly migrate from fighting for justice for black to burn Bibles in Portland, denigrate the kiss the Christian cross, and said that the cross is a symbol of white supremacy. They said that the nuclear family is Eurocentric and therefore racist. These are the foundational institutions and principles that help black to survive slavery and discrimination. And yet the and they are and so the question is, where are the voices of challenge of this migration away in undermining the very values and principles that define black survival all these years?
They're silent about that.
Speaker 0: And that question and that question should be asked of whites, every American as well. Large measure because of what Martin Luther King achieved with his movement, we have come a very long way on this journey. And to have the radical left trying to distort history while they derail good and strong efforts to do even better and to and to watch corporate America go along with this exploitive left is sickening, certainly to me. And, Bob, I thank you for your your op ed.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 0: You get the last word here, Bob, very quickly.
Speaker 1: Balood, there's sometimes, something small symbolizes all of what you're trying to say. I saw a white woman on the mall with a Black Flies t shirt beating a black mother pushing an infant in a stroller. And others were trying to keep this woman. But there was no outrage. It wasn't reported.
Now that's I just don't understand how we have declined to the point where this kind of outrage can occur. It doesn't matter what your political philosophy, the left, right. But for me, to see a mother attacked, pushing a baby in a stroller by a white woman who is supposed to represent an organization, Black Lives Matter, supposed to be pursuing justice for blacks,
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: I I just don't understand it, why we permit this.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, we it's to me, Bob, in some ways, it's even worse than that. The the left has tried to make this a see something, say something society. This great nation was founded on people who did not see something, say something. But when they saw something, they stepped in.
They interceded Yes. On behalf of whoever was being attacked. They didn't tolerate gangs. They didn't tolerate unfair and ambitious public conduct. We've had better times.
We can restore those values and those times to our great nation. And because of people like you, Bob Woodson, I'm I'm optimistic that we'll do so. Thanks so much, Bob. Great to see you.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Optimistic Outlook: @DrOz says it appears the U.S. is in good shape in the fight against the Wuhan Virus, but cautions that the battle’s not done. #AmericaFirst #KAG2020 #Dobbs https://t.co/65jejdKo9M
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Oz acknowledges the heavy toll of COVID-19 in the New York/New Jersey area, emphasizing the success of social distancing but cautioning against complacency. He suggests some states with strong leadership and responsible citizens should consider easing restrictions first, learning from countries that prioritized social distancing over complete shutdowns.
Dr. Oz highlights the importance of states coordinating supply chain management to avoid shortages. He notes regional differences necessitate tailored approaches, referencing the CDC guidelines and various state coalitions.
He stresses that 90% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients have chronic conditions, urging vulnerable populations to remain cautious during reopening phases. Dr. Oz emphasizes personal responsibility in managing chronic illnesses to improve COVID-19 outcomes and facilitate earlier participation in the recovery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Mehmet Oz, host of the Doctor Oz Show, director of Columbia University's Integrative Medicine Center. Doctor, good to have you with us, and it's particularly good to have you with us when there is demonstrable good news and evidence of a decline. What do you make of the decline, particularly in New York, which has been the hottest of the hot spots in America?
Speaker 1: Well, to remind everybody, half the deaths in this country are in the New York, New Jersey area. And so our area has been hard hit. It was the area where we all had the the biggest fear, and it was the area where we had the biggest trial to see if social distancing works. We've proven it does, and it takes a toll. It was painful in the ICUs and in these hospitals to have to revamp and more than double their capacity in a very short time.
The remarkable administrative power of the health care business and system in this area would dem demonstrated itself. That stated, don't wanna repeat this. And so in the best case scenario, we will not do this anywhere else in the country nor repeat it here in The United States. And concerns over what we went through here in New York will ripple through the fabric of the American health care system as they've gotta deal with one of the key elements of the CDC guidelines the task force guidelines on how we open America, which is to make sure we have enough capacity so we have a safety net no matter what.
Speaker 0: Is it your sense that we now have adequate capacity, the the the federal government, the Trump administration, providing the ventilators that were necessary, masks that are necessary? We're not hearing the horrible stories of shortages for nurses and doctors and health care workers in this country that we were hearing, just weeks ago. The response has been tremendous, and and the effect, terrific. But at the same time, are we, are we in in good shape as it now appears?
Speaker 1: It appears we're in good shape in, pretty much the entire country here in New York City, thankfully because the volumes are coming down of new patients who are getting ill. It makes it easier to predict that we'll have enough equipment going forward. Of course, I would say I say this knowing the battle's not done. The governor used the word halftime, and I think that's probably the right way to think about it. We don't wanna have a relapse because we still are pretty full in our ICUs.
The many of the deaths you're seeing now are people who've been ill for a while, and so they were already in the system. Ideally, we would not have anybody else come into the system who's that ill and certainly not in the volume that had was experienced. That stated, right now, the it's it's everything that we had hoped. The question then becomes how do we transition? Where do we go from here to make sure we don't have a relapse?
Speaker 0: Well, to avoid that relapse, I suppose the easy answer is everyone stay in quarantine and stay at home. But that's not really practicable, is it? In fact, we have to get back to work. Lives depend on it.
Speaker 1: I don't think the right answer is to stay quarantined. In fact, quite the opposite. I think there's some states that have not been hard hit, that have strong civic leadership and a a culture of people being smart about how they take care of themselves. And I'd love to see those communities start to break out first. Let's see what actually works.
Let's be clever about social distancing. There are other countries around the world that have not shut down and only social distance. They're different from us. I mean, you can't compare Sweden to New York City, but they were able to get through this as far so far so good. We'll see if it continues that way.
And so there's examples around the world where people have been able to do this. So we may, in less crowded areas, again, of major urban areas, start to try this. Over the next two weeks, it'd be great to see if we can continue to keep case load down there. If that's the case and we have the testing that we all know is essential, then you start to get more comfortable about doing the same thing in other parts of the country, eventually getting to the major urban areas.
Speaker 0: Well, doctor Oz, there's also been a lesson here in federalism. The president saying that the the federal government has a role, but testing and other activities in fighting this contagion belong to the states because they are proximate. They have the greatest sense of what is best for the folks who reside in their states. I think that's been quite a lesson for the health care industry as well, health care providers as well. Your thoughts.
Speaker 1: Well, one big issue that folks need to get clever on is supply chain management. Without question in our area, they were hospitals that had a little bit of something, but not a lot of the other thing that they needed and vice versa. That's been the case in testing. Basically, they have a bunch of people putting together jigsaw puzzles, but they're missing some pieces that someone across the street has. So states need to be able to coordinate this endeavor, and it's not as easy as it seems, which is why you don't wanna have to replicate that over and over again.
That stated, fundamentally, the states are so different from each other. At least the regions are different from each other that they're gonna use different tactics to get through this, which is why I'm really happy that you've got a an Eastern Northeast Corridor group of states. You've got a West Coast group of states. You're gonna see other coalitions build together. I was speaking to the governor of Georgia, last week on the show, and, you know, they the Southeast is probably gonna, you know, look a little different.
So you see the opportunities for states to figure out how they could take the basic principles, are well laid out in the CDC document that was released by the White House with the White House on Thursday evening, and begin to roll that out to give people the flexibility required. All that stated and done, it's it is still essential for us to change how we think about public health. At its very core, 60% of the American public is not in any way really influenced as we open up because they have chronic illnesses that make them vulnerable. And, Lou, I'll emphasize this. Ninety percent of people with COVID nineteen who get admitted to the hospital have a chronic condition.
That's why these vulnerable populations, obese, hypertension, diabetes, they're not really supposed to leave in phase one or even in phase two, as the country opens up. So while people are sitting at home, they also have some personal opportunity and responsibility. They should do it anyway. But the more you take care of yourself, the better you're able to manage your own personal chronic illnesses, the better you will fare if, god forbid, you do contract COVID nineteen. And for that reason, the earlier you can leave your home and be a part of the recovery.
Speaker 0: You know, it it's a it's a lesson for an entire nation, for an entire people. We cannot we we have tremendous responsibility for our own lives, but we also have tremendous responsibility for the life of this nation. And for those, who would consider, ever again permitting outsourcing of critical, critical pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, I hope that, the lesson is learned without further tragedy. Doctor Mehmet Oz, always great to have you with us. Thank you, doctor Oz.
Good to see you.
Speaker 1: Thanks, Lou.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Big Tech Bias: Lou condemns Silicon Valley executives for their relationship with the Radical Dems and their censorship of information vital to the American people. #AmericaFirst #MAGA #Dobbs https://t.co/vLCm8LFiGO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Big tech companies like Twitter and Facebook are censoring a damaging story about Joe Biden and his family reported by the New York Post. According to the speaker, these companies are blocking the president's campaign, cabinet members, and Republicans in Congress from sharing the story. The speaker claims that Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg intend to decide the election's outcome by silencing anyone or any media outlet that threatens Joe Biden.
The speaker notes that executives from Facebook and Twitter recently joined the Biden transition team, including Twitter's public policy director, Carlos Manier, and former Facebook executive, Jessica Hertz. The speaker presents a photo from 2011 of President Obama dining with Silicon Valley executives, including Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, Reed Hastings, Dick Costello, and Larry Ellison, as evidence of big tech's relationship with the left.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These damaging reports are about Joe Biden and his family are not being seen in their entirety by all of the American people. The big tech oligarchs running Twitter and Facebook censoring this critically important story broken by the New York Post, one of the country's largest newspapers, one of the oldest newspapers in this country. Indeed, the tech titans and social media socialists have blocked the president's campaign, his cabinet members, and Republicans in congress from sharing the New York Post reporting. Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of of, well, Facebook, has made it clear to all that they mean to decide the outcome of this election. And they will do so by silencing anyone or any media outlet that threatens their chosen candidate, Joe Biden.
Their censorship comes just weeks after executives of both Facebook and Twitter joined the Biden transition team. Twitter's public policy director, Carlos Manier, recently left the social media company to join the Biden team. Can you believe this? Former Facebook executive, Jessica Hertz, also joined Biden's transition team this month as its general counsel to oversee ethical issues. Big tech has a history of supporting the radical dams.
Nothing makes the relationship with the left any more vivid than this picture from 02/2011. And, yes, that is president Obama in the center of the assembled tech titans. It's almost a secret society that you're watching there of Silicon Valley Executives dining with the former president. In this photo, you see to the left of the president at that time, Steve Jobs, Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg to to his right, Apple Apple's former CEO, Steve Jobs, as I said, Netflix founder, Reed Hastings, former Twitter CEO, Dick Costello, and Oracle CEO, cofounder, Larry Ellison, and many others.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Curbing the Contagion: @DrOZ says he is pleased with @POTUS’ response to the Wuhan Virus outbreak and shared his confidence in quickly creating a vaccine. #AmericaFirst #KAG2020 #Dobbs https://t.co/nC9OyyQbGd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Oz discussed the coronavirus outbreak, referencing South Korea's successful strategy of aggressive, early action, strict testing, and quarantining. He suggests focusing on problem areas instead of broad measures that could cause more harm.
While vaccines are 15 months out, repurposing existing drugs for HIV, Ebola, and malaria could slow the virus's growth, especially for high-risk healthcare workers. Chloroquine, an old malaria drug, may help. Oz highlights public-private partnerships advancing treatments for virus complications.
He also emphasized "digital vaccines," using technology to identify and protect high-risk individuals, with companies like Sharecare, Apple, Google, and Facebook involved.
Dr. Oz mentioned using plasma from recovered patients to transfer antibodies to those afflicted, a method used during the Spanish flu and recently in China. He advocates leveraging recovered individuals' antibodies to save lives while pursuing better solutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well joining us tonight, Doctor. Mehmet Oz, host of the Doctor. Oz Show and director of Columbia University's Integrative Medicine Center. Great to have you with us, Doctor.
Speaker 1: Thanks, Lou.
Speaker 0: It's great to see you. We had reaction to our last discussion and also your terrific decision tree graphics on whether, for example, you should go to the doctor and what you should expect. I want to turn and we're going to put that up on Twitter at Lou Dobbs, for our our folks to and we recommend, that you go to that to, to see it. And we're gonna put it up here, on the broadcast tonight as well as we're talking. The death toll is rising, and twenty two deaths suddenly in one day putting into stark focus just how this is exponentially moving ahead.
Your thoughts about what we should be considering tonight.
Speaker 1: Well, it's easy for a clinician, a doctor to say shut everything down. It's the the safe move, but I'm aware of the social impact of all that. I I gotta say, there you don't have to reinvent the wheel. The South Koreans have done a fantastic job limiting the spread of this virus there. Case totals continue to drop.
They start reopening basically for business, and they didn't shut down the country. They were aggressive. They acted early. They learned from a bad experience they had with prior virus outbreaks, but they were very strict about two things. They made sure that if you were sick, you got tested, which we've had trouble doing.
Right. And then once you tested positive, they were very strict about quarantining you. So they focused where the problem areas were. They they went to where the money was and dealt with that
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: Instead of to take making a a a doctrine that they felt would do more harm than good in other parts of the country. I think at least for now, that's a wise step for the entire country. There are parts of the country, epicenters, New York City, San Francisco, others that we can point to where the virus has gotten a bit out of control, and you have to get more aggressive. And the steps that have been taken in those areas, for example, closing down schools. Ohio's done the same.
Many other states are considering it as well, have reflected the concern that exists both among the the elected officials, but also they always have a medical adviser with them. And they're looking at the same epidemiologic curves that I'm seeing and other experts are seeing. So just some of the countries clearly moved over the last week since I've been with you in the direction of a more disciplined approach. Right. And you're these are tough, but they're necessary.
Speaker 0: We can call it discipline. We can also see it as acknowledgment and implementation of the the know the understood necessity to fulfill our civic duties to one another, to the nation. And I and I'm very proud of what we're seeing so far. I you know, there are a lot of people who are doubting the the millennials, but I think that they're starting to show that discipline you were talking about. And all of us older folks appreciate that.
I wanna turn to to where we are with the the vaccines. Moderna, for example, moving ahead with its attempts and others. Gilead with antivirals. Are you are you pleased? Are you optimistic about what you're seeing from the private sector public partnership that the president has put together?
Speaker 1: I'm pleased for a couple of reasons. The vaccines are nice, but, Lou, let's be honest, they're at least fifteen months out probably in that range. What's really important are a couple of things. We actually are developing ways of repurposing existing drugs, ones that work for HIV. They work for Ebola.
Mhmm. It's actually a drug family that works for malaria that seem to show benefits against this coronavirus. And fantastic solution for right now would be to just slow down the growth of the virus in people who are at high risk. And this this drug, the chloroquine that is effective from malaria, it's an old drug, may actually be one of those things we might be able to give to help health care workers in particular become a bit more resilient, resistant to getting the infection because that's the real link weak link in the system. We also have advances occurring with the treatment of people who are having complications of the virus.
So both of those are private public partnerships where I'm seeing huge opportunities, and that's what we're really good at. But, Lou, don't forget the digital vaccines, which is essentially using technology to identify people who are ill, who are at high risk, get around them with protective measures early on. That that kind of a dashboard helps governors manage their states more effectively, and we have that technology now. We have Sharecare. We have, Apple.
We have Google that was asked by the president to put this together. Facebook has programs. So we've got large companies that have the wherewithal. Let's use those to to guide our targeted hits on this virus.
Speaker 0: And and doctor Ian Rifton from your center talking about the possibilities for simply plasma of to bring the antibodies of those who've survived the disease into those who are afflicted with it. That sounds like it may sound antiquated, but it sounds like if it works, let's get it going.
Speaker 1: It was used in the Spanish influenza. Ian Lipkin is an iconic leader in this field. He's a virus hunter. And what he's saying is absolutely right. It's an old therapy, but it was used in China, when they were in the throes of this epidemic.
And it's possible you may wanna take antibodies from people who recovered. There's tens of thousands of folks who recovered uneventfully from the coronavirus. Let's have that blood save the lives of others while we're getting better ideas out there.
Speaker 0: Doctor Oz, as always, great to have you with us. We appreciate it, and thanks for being with us.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Undermining America: Lou says the radical Dems’ Coronavirus bill is a manifesto and any congressional Republican who accepts it, should not be re-elected in Nov. #KAG2020 #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/3DvDJEoSWk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Lou Dobbs states that Joe Biden is unraveling as a candidate and is incapable of connecting thoughts. He criticizes Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer for pushing a "manifesto" disguised as a bill during the pandemic, which he considers an outrage against the Constitution. Dobbs asserts that any Republican who accepts any part of this "manifesto" should not be reelected.
Dobbs accuses the national left-wing media of attacking President Trump, who he says is working tirelessly. He claims the media's attempts to downgrade the administration's efforts are failing because the American people see Trump as the strong leader needed to handle the crisis.
Dobbs also claims that Dr. Fauci initially wouldn't acknowledge China's lack of cooperation in the early days of the pandemic, and that Trump made the right decision to impose a travel ban despite accusations of racism. Dobbs concludes that Trump consistently does what is right for the American people, regardless of political considerations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining us now by Skype is the host of this show, Lou Dobbs. Lou, great to see you. It's much better than a phone call. Know, we had we had Biden today talking about how the president was unprepared when, in fact, the president was moving to isolate the virus in China before Biden said one word about the virus in China. And and you also now have a bill coming out of congress that is is more concerned about diversity than it is about saving lives.
Your thoughts on all this.
Speaker 1: Well, in order, Biden is actually unraveling as a candidate, and that should be worrisome to everyone, the Democrats first and foremost, but all of America. The man is obviously, his time has passed. He's incapable of connecting thoughts and putting them into sentences and then even, you know, god forbid, a paragraph. So I I I I feel badly about Joe Biden, and I and I really mean that. I I sympathize with him and his family.
So I wouldn't worry too much about what he's saying because most people are disregarding it out of just respect. The the rest of it, Nancy Pelosi is acting bizarrely. She and Schumer have suddenly taken on manifesto, not a not a bill. When you go through all that that is suggesting, that so called bill, it it it just it's insane to think in the midst of the worst pandemic in almost, well, over a hundred years, just over a hundred years in this country, we are listening to the tripe that these two, Schumer and Pelosi, are are spewing. And worse, the national left wing media is, in most cases, doing so without comment, let alone criticism, for crying out loud.
So I think we should be very worried. I would say this to the Republican Party. If you accept one element of that manifesto, Pelosi's manifesto, that of the radical Dems, I don't think a single congressional Republican should be reelected in November. This is an outrage, an affront against the constitution and the American people, and it should not be tolerated.
Speaker 0: Well, and and it's it's an affront to to American business and restarting business. Imagine in the middle of coming out of of a dead stall, businesses are forced to write these five year diversity plans and and construct
Speaker 1: the whole I'm not even I'm not even no, David. I'm not even gonna consider that nonsense. That is, as I said, I it is a an insult They can live or die by it, but I'm not even going to discuss that. I mean, it is so abhorrent and disgusting what they're doing to working men and women and their families. And to think that the national left wing media daily attacks this president, who is working tirelessly, and I mean tirelessly, day after day, week after week, while, these schools are playing pure politics and insisting on an ideological outcome when what we need desperately is help for the American people.
Speaker 0: Well, meanwhile, Lou, all of the media's attempts to downgrade this administration's and its efforts are falling on deaf ears because he's doing pretty well at the polls.
Speaker 1: The American people are watching what's unfolding before them. This is a crisis, and there's one man strong enough to deal with it. His name is Donald Trump. He's the president of The United States no matter what, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and the radical Dems, would have us think otherwise. The national left wing media will not treat him or his office with respect and thereby insult us all.
It is astonishing to me that there is no one in the left wing media who wants to be honest enough to say that precious doctor Fauci, the head of infectious diseases at NIH, is among those who would not, for a moment, acknowledge that the Chinese refused to cooperate with The United States in the early days. And I pressed him on it time after time after time. And finally, he relented after about a month of further delay on the part of the Chinese. And those were the three to four weeks that were so important, and it is so important that that this president decided to put in a travel ban despite the cries of racism, xenophobia. He had the judgment and the and the intelligence to do what is right for the American people.
And if you will know, that is the hallmark of his presidency. He does what is right for the American people, irrespective of the politics, irrespective of the nonsense and the orthodoxies that form on the left or the right, and no matter how venal, ambitious they become.
Speaker 0: Mister Lou Dobbs, great to see you, Lou. Terrific to see you in person Thank you very much. Hope to
Speaker 1: see you back
Speaker 0: here soon.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Congressional Challenge: @RepMoBrooks calls out the GOP’s Surrender Caucus, who refuse to join in with his plan to challenge fraudulent electoral college votes. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/G4WLPSrvOO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Moe Brooks plans to challenge the election results on January 6th, claiming the House and Senate have the authority to reject electoral college votes from states with flawed election systems. Brooks believes that Donald Trump won if only lawful votes were counted.
Brooks asserts that an honest voting system is the bedrock of a republic. He states he will object to submissions from states with flawed systems and needs a senator to join him to force a vote. He urges the American people to contact their representatives and demand they co-sponsor objections to flawed electoral college vote totals, or risk losing their vote.
Brooks has not spoken with Republican leaders Kevin McCarthy or Mitch McConnell. He claims millions of illegal votes were cast, citing illegal aliens, non-citizens, and violations of article one section four of the United States constitution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining us tonight is congressman Moe Brooks. He plans to challenge the election results on January 6 when congress convenes to officially tally the votes by the electoral college in an effort to install Joe Biden as president of The United States. Congressman, it is great to have you with us. Some would say that this is an extreme move that you are making to challenge the electors. Give us your thinking, your philosophy behind it.
Speaker 1: Well, it's happened many times in the past. Apparently, some folks have not done their history. By way of example, the Democrats in the House tried it in 2017 when they tried to strike Alabama's votes for, Donald Trump. Georgia, the same way the House Democrats tried to strike it. Barbara Boxer tried to strike, Ohio for George Bush, back in 02/2005.
So, this is not unusual. The law is very clear. The House of Representatives, combination with the United States Senate, has the lawful authority to accept or reject electoral college vote submissions from states that have such flawed election systems that they're not worthy of our trust. And in this instance, with what has happened nationally, I'm quite confident that if we only counted lawful votes cast by eligible American citizens, Donald Trump won the electoral college, and we should not be counting, illegal votes and putting in an illegitimate president of The United States.
Speaker 0: We're well, well into the process now. As a matter of fact, it's been tomorrow six weeks since the election. There are cries of fraud from almost every quarter in the country. It is the most contentious election certainly in my career, my lifetime, bar none. We've had some close ones, but nothing like this.
Your sense about where we're headed, what the likely prospects are going forward right up to January 20.
Speaker 1: Well, where we're headed as a country is this, quite simply. We're a republic, and the bedrock of a republic is an honest and accurate voting system. And if you don't have an honest and accurate voting system, then you may as well throw out the claim that you're a republic. You've you've lost that right. You've lost the control of your government.
And under those circumstances, those who can steal the most votes, who can engage the most voter fraud and get away with it, are gonna be the ones that rule the roost in Washington DC. That's not what our founding fathers wanted. That's not what a million or so Americans who have lost their lives in wars wanted, giving us, this republic, this democracy where we could control our own fate and our own destiny. So I have a choice. I can either sit back and surrender and be a part of the surrender caucus, or I can fight for our country.
And that's what I'm gonna do. So on January, I'm gonna object to the submissions of electoral college votes from various states that, in my judgment, have such flawed election systems that their, vote counts are unworthy of our ratification in the United States Congress. What I need is a United States Senator who will join me. If we have a house member and a senator, then by golly, that forces a house vote and a four vote on whether to accept this systematically flawed election system or to reject it. I want to reject it so that we can have an honest and fair and accurate election.
Speaker 0: Well, I salute you in standing up for for what you believe is right so million so many millions of Americans do. The the issue is you bring it up. Where are going to get that senator? Who will it be? Will it be Mitt Romney?
Will it be Mike Lee? Lindsey Graham? I'm just going through a list of names that come to mind who seem flexible on certain issues. I I suspect I'm being I'm being facetious here. I suspect they're not quite that flexible.
Speaker 1: Well, let me be real clear. This effort for it to succeed requires the participation of the American people who do not want their vote negated by an illegal vote someplace else in some other part of the country. And the remedy for them, if they wanna stop voter fraud and election theft, is to contact their congressmen and senators and demand, demand that they get active on January, that they cosponsor these objections to various state submissions of flawed electoral college vote totals, and state quite plainly to their senators and congressmen that if you don't fight for America, I will never vote for you again, and I will fight against you. That is the only way for us to get the votes needed on the House floor and the Senate floor is for the American people to rise up and say, we support our country, we support our republic, and we demand an honest and accurate election system, not the systemically flawed one that we saw in this past November.
Speaker 0: Where is the Republican leadership in the house, Kevin McCarthy? The Republican leadership in the senate, Mitch McConnell?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I've not spoken I've not spoken with either one of them. This is an organic type effort. It will only work not because I ask a senator or a congressman to do something. It will only work because the bosses of those senators and congressmen demand that their employee, their congressman, their senator do what is right to reject a systemically flawed election system that has allowed millions upon millions of votes to be illegally cast in this past election.
Now if we had more time, Lou, I'd go into the itemization. When I say millions, I mean millions, and I can back that up. And it's not just illegal aliens and noncitizens, although that's in that ballpark. It's also the violations of article one section four of the United States constitution, the election clause, by so many government officials who are not empowered to do it. But they did it anyways resulting in huge masses of illegal votes.
Thank
Speaker 0: you, congressman Moe Brooks. Thank you for standing up for what you believe for what's right. We appreciate having you on. Look forward to talking to you soon.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Global Pariah: Lou says the Chinese Communist party will have consequences to pay for their lies about the Wuhan Virus, and questions what else they're hiding. #KAG2020 #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/D9ylsOqxXb
Video Transcript AI Summary
China is allegedly on the verge of becoming a global pariah for its handling of the deadly contagion. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Xi Jinping are blamed for the spread of the virus. Xi allegedly ordered the director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology to deny the virus originated in Wuhan.
The CCP is accused of failing to warn the world and potentially engineering the virus in the Wuhan laboratory as a biological weapon. The virus has allegedly infected almost two and a half million people worldwide, killing at least 168,000. The price of crude oil fell more than 300% as demand collapsed.
President Trump is galvanizing allies to hold China accountable and called for an expanded investigation of China's lies. Australia is joining the White House in calling for a thorough investigation of the origins of the contagion. Trump stated that if China was knowingly responsible, there should be consequences. Trump invoked the Defense Production Act to produce more testing swabs. Governor Cuomo stated that testing is up to the states, supporting the president's position.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, everybody. China is on the verge of becoming a global pariah. The Chinese Communist Party's cover up of the deadly contagion they unleashed on the world will bring consequences for the government of China and its leader Xi Jinping. Xi's lies and deception have been exposed to the entire world. Xi's so desperate, he ordered the director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a member of Xi's Communist Party, to go on state television to deny claims the Wuhan virus originated in Wuhan, a lie that grows only more outrageous every time Chinese government officials resort to it.
Xi and China's Communist Party are clearly to blame for their refusal to warn the world of the deadly virus they've spread all around the world. What else are they responsible for? Did they engineer the virus in the Wuhan laboratory? And if so, for what purpose? Were they conducting research, or did they engineer a biological weapon, a weapon of mass destruction?
The actions of the CCP and Chi's government imply guilt, and their stream of lies are inexcusable as are their conscious decision to deny the truth when they could have saved millions of people from sickness and death. The Wuhan virus infecting almost two and a half million people around the world. It has killed at least a hundred and sixty eight thousand more. In this country, more than forty one thousand Americans have been killed by the disease, more than seven hundred and seventy six thousand infected. The Wuhan virus taking a toll on the global economy as well.
At one point today, the price of crude oil fell more than 300% as demand collapsed. And on the final day of the trading contract, crude oil fell to a record low and the price actually turned negative. As the Wuhan virus has wreaked havoc around the world, president Trump has galvanized America's allies in the effort to hold China accountable for its reckless cover up of this deadly pandemic, a pandemic for which they are responsible. Australia's government, for example, joining the White House in calling for a thorough investigation of the origins of the contagion as well as taking full account of the Communist Party's actions. Australia's Foreign Minister declared that an independent international investigation is the only way to learn the truth about this pandemic and declared Australia will absolutely insist on that.
His words echoed president Trump's who called this weekend for an expanded investigation of China's lies, and he reaffirmed his commitment to the intelligent community's ongoing investigative efforts.
Speaker 1: We're talking to China. We spoke to them a long time ago about going in. We wanna go in. We wanna see what's going on. But if they were knowingly responsible, yeah, then there should be consequences.
You're talking about, you know, potentially lives like nobody's seen since 1917. They said they're doing an investigation, that they're doing an investigation. So let's see what happens with their investigation, but we're doing investigations also.
Speaker 0: Well, the president also taking steps to protect American lives to move closer to the reopening of our economy. President Trump invoked the Defense Production Act again to produce more testing swabs. This time, the move following days of radical dim governors attacking the president for suggesting testing is, is not a federal issue, but a state issue. New York governor Andrew Cuomo today supporting the president.
Speaker 2: The president is right. The state's, testing is up to the states which will implement the tests, and logistically coordinate the tests. So I think the president is right when he says the states should lead.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Ballot Smuggling: USPS contractor and whistleblower Jesse Morgan describes how nearly 200,000 completed ballots were secretly transported from New York to Pennsylvania only to disappear days before the election. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/KxECujMMpD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Truck driver Jesse Morgan, a U.S. Postal Service subcontractor, claims under sworn affidavit that he transported approximately 200,000 completed mail-in ballots from New York, which then disappeared. According to Morgan, he picked up boxes of ballots and was told he wouldn't be taking mail and ballots back. He noticed some ballots were visible within the packaging.
Morgan states he drove 24 boxes of ballots from Bethpage, New York, to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on the night of October 21st, two weeks before the election. Upon arrival, he was redirected to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and was refused proper paperwork for the delivery. Morgan alleges that many things have happened to him since coming out, and that he has been told to be quiet on some things for investigation. He believes the system is corrupt and challenges law enforcement and congressmen to stand up for the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nearly 200,000 completed mail in ballots were smuggled from, New York before they inexplicably disappeared. Those are the charges of Jesse Morgan, a truck driver. He's a subcontractor working for the U. S. Postal Service and he joins us here tonight, Jesse Morgan, who has signed a sworn affidavit charging that those 100 of thousands of ballots were taken across state lines.
Jesse, I wanna say first of all, I commend your courage for standing up and speaking truth. I know that it's got to be tremendously, difficult for you, and I admire your strength in so doing and your concern for your fellow citizens who depend on, a an electoral process of integrity. Good to have you on the broadcast. I I wanna start, if I may, with the how it happened that you were picking up these, these boxes filled with ballots?
Speaker 1: How how did it happen? Is that what you asked, Lou?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir.
Speaker 1: Alright. First, I just wanna say thanks for having me on your show. Greatly appreciate it. How it all happened was that just one day, I I went in. I, normal process.
I walked up, gave my my slip to the expediter. She was gonna go cut off the seal. And, as she was doing so, she made the comment that I won't be taking mail and ballots back. And I was like, oh. I said, that's pretty cool.
You know, I'm like, you know, cool. And, and then I went back, and then she made the comment again about taking the mail and ballots back. And I said, okay. And then, I went to my trailer, watched them unload, and then they brought up the the the gaylords, and they they had the the ballast in it. And I watched them be loaded on onto the trailer.
Speaker 0: Those are boxes of those are boxes containing, what turned out to be ballots, gay lords.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So they have the gay lords, and then inside each gay lord was like a tote. Those totes, and they were stacked on top of each other. And then each tote had envelopes which was, the ballots And and then as they're bringing them in, some of the the ballots, like, kinda came out of how they had them stacked in there. You can see them, laid on top.
And as they I wasn't looking for addresses. Be honest, I thought I was doing something, to help out the presidential election. You know? That's how it came across. I was I'm like, oh, sweet.
This is this is this is awesome. You know? Like, cool.
Speaker 0: Absolutely.
Speaker 1: Doing something to to help out here. You know?
Speaker 0: Well, you are helping out probably in ways in which a lot of people, did never never expected. The the boxes, you saw that they were ballots. Did you see all of the boxes and their contents? Did you see that they were in fact filled out?
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes, sir. I saw I saw them all loaded. I saw now look. This is how it is.
It's like I couldn't see every single ballot. Okay? I wasn't even really paying attention to it. What I saw was so how they had them in the the the totes. Okay?
And then as some as, like, as the as the pallets were being or the gay lords were being bumped around, the toads were being bumped around, some of the envelopes kinda came out of how they had them lined in there, and they're laying on top. Right. Now I probably seen, say, 5 or 6 in the 1, 1 pallet. Then 3 pallets later, there might be 20 of them that I saw. Then 10 pallets down, there's 20 more, you know, like, all the way up to to to lay put the last box in.
And If you get what I'm saying.
Speaker 0: At this point, I I I do get what you're saying. And I'm I'm, I'm sitting here thinking about the time we've got here. I'm going to ask if you would to stay with us through this commercial break as we continue your journey from New York to Pennsylvania and what happened to that trailer load of ballots. Can you do that, Jesse?
Speaker 1: Absolutely, sir.
Speaker 0: Appreciate it. We'll be right back with Jesse and his story and more on the legal advances for the president's legal team. We'll be right back. We're back now with whistleblower Jesse Morgan, a US Postal Service subcontractor who drove completed election ballots in boxes from New York to Pennsylvania. Jesse, I wanna turn to the route that you took.
And if we could put up that, that map going from Bethpage, New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, which was to be your destination. But when you got to Harrisburg, they wouldn't check you in. They wouldn't give you a a slip, for delivery, and instead, they directed you to Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. That is correct. It was it was absolutely I've been I've been hauling mail now for about 16 months. And 16 months, I have never never had this happen to me before. I was made to wait in the yard, and I sat there and I waited, roughly, like, about 6 hours until I went in, and I was like, what's going on here, guys?
Like, what's the hold up? You know? Like, I'm I'm getting I was pretty pretty upset, and my brother just moved up from Texas, but I wanted to go hang out with him. And,
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: If if finally, they couldn't give me a, an answer. And then finally, like, a a transportation supervisor came down and told me to basically leave leave and take the load to Lancaster, which never never I've never talked to that man, never talked to a transportation supervisor. The whole time I've been doing this, I've strictly dealt with the expeditors. They're the ones that would I would see when I came in. I checked in.
They're the ones I checked out with, And, he he told me to leave to go to Lancaster.
Speaker 0: Now this is the night of 21st October, 2 weeks before the election. You're carrying 24 boxes.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Tens of 1,000, perhaps 100 of 1,000 have completed ballots by all appearances. You get to now Lancaster. Did you ever get the paperwork, the proper paperwork, for running that delivery?
Speaker 1: No. And that's that's the thing is that once again I never leave a place without paperwork and the man refused to give me this paperwork. He refused to get me the slips. And his his reasoning was I'm not getting unloaded there. And,
Speaker 0: and then
Speaker 1: I said, well, I said, well, let me get a late slip at least so that way people know that I've been here. He refused to give me that too.
Speaker 0: So I've got to ask you this. 2 weeks, you've stepped forward. Were you treated differently? Did anything change as a subcontractor to the US Postal Service? I I want to know if you've been threatened as well.
Speaker 1: There's let's just say this, Lou, that there's been a lot of things that have happened to me leading up to yesterday since I've come out. There's a lot of things that we aren't talking about that I've been told to kinda be quiet on just for, investigation. Right.
Speaker 0: Well, you have excellent legal counsel, and, I wanna say again to you, Jesse, thank you so much. Senator
Speaker 1: said this thing?
Speaker 0: What you've done is very brave. Yes, sir. You may.
Speaker 1: I just wanna say, like, if there's anyone else out there that's been in the same shoes as I have, but don't be afraid to come out. They're just intimidating you. Don't be scared to come out. And I will say, Lou going through this whole experience, I will say that this this whole system is really corrupt. It is really corrupt, and I'll put that right out there.
And I challenge I challenge everyone, law enforcement, the Congressman, I challenge people to do something different. Do something different for your country. Stand up for your country.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Appreciate
Speaker 1: it. Welcome, Lou. Jesse, you have a good night.
Speaker 0: Patriot. You too. Thank you.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Finding Votes: @jsolomonReports says Dominion Voting Systems may have given Democratic campaign operatives the capability to "find" the votes they needed to defeat @realDonaldTrump in cities like Philadelphia and Detroit #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/BN6OFVOW25
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dominion, a company with Democratic ties, is suspected of potentially allowing late votes to be added to favor Biden. Lawsuits in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan are being closely watched for potential constitutional violations and vote discrepancies. The administration may have a chance of prevailing in these states.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining us now, Just the News editor in chief, John Solomon, author of Fallout, Nuclear Bribes, Russian Spies, and the Washington lies that enriched the Clinton and Biden Dynasties. John, great to have you with us. Let's, let's start with the the outfit that appears to be at the center of this, contentious and, deeply troubling, battle for the White House, and that is Dominion. Give us your thoughts on your reporting and what you have found to this point?
Speaker 1: So, you know, there's a lot of myth and there's a lot of truth about Dominion. And some of the truths are very simple. Dominion was a donor to the Clinton Foundation. It's tied to the Democratic establishment through things like that. It was actually the Clinton Global Initiative, which was an arm of the foundation.
It did hire as a lobbyist Nancy Pelosi's former top chief aide. So it is integrated into the Democratic establishment. It's also integrated into the bureaucratic establishment through these, security establishments in the Homeland Security Department. So this is a Democrat establishment connected company. Now it has people on all sides of the fence, but its Democratic roots are there.
I suspect when from the work we're doing at Just the News, we've been doing, we've contacted in Canvass tens of thousands of voters now. We believe that there may not have been, yeah, thus far. We've not found any evidence that computers change votes specifically, but Dominion system was primed for people to understand how they could use it and calculate, hey. President Trump's up at 20,000 votes at 11 o'clock at night. Let's find 20,000 votes somewhere and run them through the system in the dark of night.
That is a scenario that when we talk to voters, election observers, even some city election workers in Philadelphia and Detroit, that appears to be a realistic scenario. And I think we'll find out that Dominion, beyond its democratic connections, its systems gave the democratic establishment machines in these cities the capability to find votes late to try to make up a difference. I think that's the narrative we may find out to be true when we keep digging.
Speaker 0: And the lawsuits that you're you're following as we all are, which in which states do you believe the administration might well prevail?
Speaker 1: Well, listen. In, Wisconsin, where remember the Washington Post claims 17 points, down, Trump was going into election day. There's a 20,000 vote spread. There are more than 230,000 people that were given a special designation to avoid voter ID rules this year. This was something done by unelected bureaucrats, not by the legislature.
That's one state. I think Pennsylvania, there's a very good case already brewing where you can see the secretary of state has overstepped the bounds of of what the legislature said. If the president can win on the constitutional argument there, then he has to show there's enough votes to close that 50,000, gap that he sees in Pennsylvania. Michigan's another place where, there are widespread not only irregularities and claims by even a city election worker, Jesse Jacob, a fraud, but you do see a lot of changes were made in Michigan without the legislature's, blessing. And I think those are the 3 states where the constitutional arguments are very strong.
And now the question is, can they go to the court and say, we can show the difference in votes is made up by the evidence that we've we've provided. John Solomon, great
Speaker 0: to see you. Thanks for being with us.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Throwback Thursday: This report is from 16 years ago. Even then, Dems knew how dangerous voting machines were to Democracy. #TBT #Dobbs #TheGreatAmericaShow https://t.co/zCvWtFCpQZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Election workers are facing issues with e-voting machines, including a manual mode allowing multiple votes. Activists are concerned about security and Venezuelan technicians working on the machines. Congresswoman Maloney calls for American oversight of elections. The lack of accountability and transparency in the voting process is alarming. The need for independent reviews and standards is emphasized to ensure fair elections. The potential for election manipulation and lack of voter registration accuracy are highlighted. Monitoring and reporting any irregularities are encouraged to safeguard the integrity of the electoral system. Congresswoman Maloney's efforts to investigate the sale of voting machines are acknowledged and praised.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Election workers are scrambling all over the country trying to deal with an avalanche of last minute problems with e voting machines with this information just pouring in. It's difficult to understand how the electorate can feel any sense of confidence in our upcoming election. Katie Pilgrim reports.
Speaker 1: You really can't miss it. The yellow button at the back of the Sequoia voting machine. Tens of thousands of machines used in 16 states and Washington DC. That button puts the machine in manual mode, so anyone can vote and repeatedly cast as many votes as they want. Activists say it's a major problem.
Speaker 2: I worry about the poll captains having access. They're temporary workers. There in many cases, there aren't background checks done on them, and it's easy for them to go back there, make those changes, and vote repeatedly and not be
Speaker 1: noticed. Sequoia says this button is a standard and deliberate feature. The California secretary of state's office says they have security guidelines to alert poll workers to keep a close watch on the button and any tampering. All across the country, activists have called attention to vulnerabilities on all kinds of electronic voting machines, but few of those vulnerabilities have been fixed.
Speaker 0: We're at the 11th hour, and it's too late to do anything to stop the use of these evoting machines, but it's not too late for voters to do something about it. And we're here to train volunteers so that they can get out there and observe the process and document, shine a light on the problem that e voting is causing in this country.
Speaker 1: All sorts of electronic glitches are showing up. Screens display the wrong candidate when a button is pushed. Today in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, large print options didn't work properly, cutting off candidate names. And election officials struggled with other electronic snafus.
Speaker 0: We just got notice from the, secretary of state's office today that some of our voting units will not be reflective of daylight savings time.
Speaker 1: Potentially causing the machines to close down early. Technicians from the voting companies are working to sort out the last minute problems. Today, activists pointed out that Sequoia will again have Venezuelan nationalists as support workers on the electronic machines. That's in Cook County, Illinois. And the workers are project managers from Smartmatic, the Venezuelan company that bought Sequoia.
Election officials say they have no way of knowing how many Venezuelans will be there on election day, but they've seen some around. Sequoia today said 8 to 10 Venezuelan nationals will help with the voting machines during the elections. Lou?
Speaker 0: Hugo Chavez is sending, observers and monitors for our election, I take it.
Speaker 1: I have you know, Venezuelan Nationals taking a look at our, the
Speaker 0: That's wonderful. I mean, I it's there are times I keep expecting the country to sort of go into a group scream over these evoking machines because it does not make any sense that we could be in this kind of vulnerable, absurd position this close.
Speaker 1: Activists are in a group scream, and, I think it's important to just everyone document anything that goes wrong so that it can be known.
Speaker 0: Is there a sense among those activists in particular that we're going to have enough people monitoring these elections to be aware in time that something has happened?
Speaker 1: They're trying to set up hotlines and and volunteer organizations.
Speaker 0: Millions of Americans will be voting Tuesday on e voting machines almost wholly owned by nationals It's a company 90% owned by 3 Venezuelan's. We It's a company 90% owned by 3 Venezuelans, we think. The owners deny any connection to the country's anti American government but more than a few people have their doubts. Among them is my guest tonight Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney. She pushed to initiate an ongoing federal investigation of the sale.
Congresswoman good to have you with us.
Speaker 3: Well I'm delighted to be here thank you for having me.
Speaker 0: Let let let's start with Katie Pilgrim's report tonight that we have machines out there in 16 states in Washington DC, Sequoias, Smartmatic, the Venezuelan company in in which someone can push a button and vote as many times as they want to. What in the world is going on?
Speaker 3: Lou, this story just keeps getting worse and worse. Big yellow buttons on machines that allow people to vote as many times as they want. We've always heard about people trying to steal elections or game elections, but it seems like the technology is allowing it to go to even higher level. Vinci reports that more Venezuelan technicians are coming in to run the machines. So my question is, why can't Americans conduct their own elections?
Why can't Americans be the technicians that look at our voting machines? Why can't we have standards and an independent review that make sure that these voting machines are accurate?
Speaker 0: Could these be more jobs that president Bush says that Americans simply won't do?
Speaker 3: I think, every American would be very proud to be part of, supporting, honest elections in our country.
Speaker 0: They the Help America Vote Act, the law, the 1,000,000,000 of dollars put forward. 4 years ago, we get to this stage today and I I'm sitting here frankly tonight I'm I'm laughing because is a friend of mine says when you cross the penumbra of the absurd there's only one thing to do and that is to laugh. But I mean, this is scary. What the potential disaster that we're facing here, isn't it?
Speaker 3: I I agree. And it's election season. I don't usually quote, former president, Ronald Reagan. He used to say trust, but verify.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 3: And what we're seeing in our election process is very little, audits. There's there's no oversell. There's no accountability. We can get a paper trail when we buy a cup of coffee in the morning, but we can't get a paper trail on our votes with our voting machines. This is outrageous.
I think that we should have, standards, an independent panel to review these machines, and certainly we should not have big yellow buttons that allow someone to vote as many times as they want. It's it's truly, scary.
Speaker 0: The contested presidential auction of 2,000. These e voting machines which some people thought might be helpful rather than a potential disaster initially, we're headed to a point where the electoral system is being laid bare for all to examine. And first and foremost amongst them there are the voting machines that are unreliable can be manipulated and and frankly election stolen. But we have also the issue of not knowing who is registered to vote. In New York, 77,000 dead people registered to vote.
We have all sorts of issues surrounding this this election. Do we do both parties have enough people involved in monitoring themselves to assure an honest election?
Speaker 3: Well we certainly need to do much more and there's no question about it but everyone should vote because if you don't vote your votes not going to be counted But as Kitty pointed out, and that everyone should report if they see anything that they feel is not, accurate or accountable. And, we're moving forward. But, your series, and I congratulate you on it, has really pointed out many things that we need to do in government to make the system more secure. The the more I study it, the more questions I have. And, your report tonight, or rather Kitty's, was was truly astonishing.
Right. More more technicians are being sent in from Venezuela. Why? Why can't Americans conduct American elections?
Speaker 0: It's I I think that is a wonderful question, but I have that question about so many jobs in this country. I wanna congratulate you too for taking the lead and and calling upon Cephas, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, a treasury arm, to investigate the sale and without you that would have gone all but unnoticed. So congratulations to you and keep up the good work. Thank you very much Congresswoman.
Speaker 3: Well thank you very much Lou.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Lou says the Big Tech oligarchs pose a direct threat to our democracy and are working to suppress any dissent of China Joe Biden. #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/4tyjdiO3zW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Big tech and social media are accused of censoring news critical of Joe Biden, potentially influencing the election. Professor Epstein warns that companies like Google and Facebook could sway up to 15 million votes without detection. Silicon Valley's immense power and bias towards Biden pose a threat to democracy. Urgent action is needed to prevent further manipulation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, everybody. Big tech and social media have made the American public keenly aware this week of their sinister efforts to shut down the freedom of speech in this country and to suppress any dissent against their presidential candidate of obvious choice, China Joe Biden. They've made it clear to all that Silicon Valley now poses a direct threat to our democracy and this great constitutional republic. The technology and social media oligarchs have become merchants of darkness and they will trample our first amendment rights until there is no freedom at all. They will put this great republic on the trash heap of history if they have their way, if our government does not act and act immediately.
Both Facebook and Twitter this week censoring the New York Post bombshell reports linking Joe Biden to his son Hunter Biden's corrupt business dealings in Ukraine and China. Facebook censored the stories. Twitter censored the stories. Facebook saying they needed to be fact checked. And Twitter called the stories quote potentially harmful, whatever in the world that means.
Within minutes both social media platforms had put an end to the free flow of information in this country. The free flow of information that underpins our very democracy. They blocked millions of their users including myself to simply slow down the distribution of the New York Post exposes of the Bidens. Twitter said their decision to censor the New York Post links fell under what they called their hacked materials policy. It is a policy that Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey ultimately claimed would be changing.
Social media's outright manipulation of the American voter is outrageous. It's also against the law and it is worsening and it is a deep rooted practice in Silicon Valley. A prominent behavioral psychologist and professor has been warning us of the perils posed by the oligarchs of Silicon Valley to our election for some time. That election now, 18 days away. Professor Robert Epstein told senator Ted Cruz that Google, Twitter, and Facebook use search engines to manipulate votes in the 2016 election, swaying between 2.610,400,000 voters in 2016 to Hillary Clinton.
If that's not stunning enough, professor Epstein says there are 1,000,000 more votes on the line in next month's election. 15,000,000 votes that could be shifted and shifted without anyone's knowledge.
Speaker 1: In subsequent elections, Google and Facebook and Twitter and big text manipulation could manipulate as many as 15,000,000 votes in a subsequent election?
Speaker 2: In 2020, if all these companies are supporting the same candidate, there are 15,000,000 votes on the line that can be shifted without people's knowledge and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace.
Speaker 0: And just how would big tech and social media manipulate this year's vote? Here's doctor Epstein again.
Speaker 2: If on election day in 2016, if Mark Zuckerberg, for example, had chosen to send out a go vote reminder, say, just to Democrats, and no one would have known if he had done this, that would have given that day an additional at least 450,000 votes to Democrats. But the point is, in 2018, I'm sure they were more aggressive. We have lots of data to support that. And in 2020, you can bet that all of these companies are going to go all out, and the methods that they're using are invisible. They're subliminal.
They're more powerful than most any effects I've ever seen in the behavioral sciences, and I've been in the behavioral sciences for almost 40 years.
Speaker 0: Big tech, social media influence, wide ranging, and powerful. A recent Pew study shows 26% of American adults get their news on YouTube. Their parent, Alphabet, also a parent of Google. Alphabet, Google, Facebook, and Twitter have a combined market cap of close to $2,000,000,000,000. By comparison, the other media powerhouses that effectively control of the national left wing media, Comcast, Disney, Viacom, CBS, AT and T, and Verizon have a combined market cap of $894,000,000,000 along with Disney.
In short, Silicon Valley has chosen Joe Biden to be their candidate and to be our president, and they have the power to put him in office. And under protections provided to them by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, they will continue to engage in censorship of articles reporting. They will discriminate against conservatives and republicans who don't support Joe Biden and independents, of course, without any fear of legal repercussions because they are a protected class if you can imagine. That is unless republicans and president Trump move and move now to change all of that. It is urgent and the remedy must be immediate.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Electoral Fraud: @SidneyPowell1 says she has firsthand evidence that Smartmatic voting software was designed in a way to change the vote of a voter without being detected #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/lP5PmSgTu1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dominion Voting System bid for Philadelphia's voting machines contract in 2018, but redacted foreign connections info. Trump's executive order against foreign election interference raises questions. Sidney Powell reveals evidence of Smartmatic software manipulation in Venezuela. Smartmatic chairman is on Biden's transition team. CIA involvement suspected. FBI reportedly investigating election. Concerns raised about state-run elections and vote manipulation. Powell criticizes government inaction. Election integrity questioned. Willful blindness to corruption alleged. President Trump committed to uncovering truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: News now. Documents show that Dominion Voting System submitted a bid to the city of Philadelphia in 2018 to be considered as their contractor for voting machines. Those same documents reveal very little about the company's foreign connections. When asked by the city to list any foreign ownership or investors in either the parent company and or its subsidiaries, Dominion had something to say, but nothing to show. The section you see there on your screen is entirely redacted, blacked out because Dominion ultimately was denied the contract.
In just 3 months before Dominion's bid, President Trump signed an executive order against foreign interference in our elections. In that order, President Trump wrote quote, the assessment shall identify to the maximum extent ascertainable the nature of any foreign intervention interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, information to the President. The question is, was the President ever informed of this attempted bid by a company with foreign ties? And why are they being so secretive? Joining us now by phone, Sydney Powell, a member of President Trump's legal team.
She is also general Michael Flynn's attorney, former federal prosecutor, best selling author, one of the country's most prominent appellate attorneys. Sydney, good to have you with us. Dominion Voting System seems to be figuring larger and larger in the interest of your your legal team, and what is the latest?
Speaker 1: Oh, definitely, Lou. I've just gotten some stunning evidence from a firsthand witness, a high ranking military officer who was present when Smartmatic was designed in a way that the, and I'm gonna just read you some of these statements, if you don't mind, so I'll get them exactly right from from the affidavit. Designed in a way that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their thumbprint or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter's name and identity of as having voted, but that voter would not be tracked to the changed vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be set up but not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict that the name or the fingerprint or thumbprint was going with a changed vote.
Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produce the software and hardware that accomplished the result for president Chavez. After the Smartmatic electrical manage electoral management system was put in place, he closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated using the Smartmatic software. One such election was December 2006 when Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over Rosales, a margin of nearly 6,000,000 votes for Chavez versus 3,700,000 for Rosales. In 2013, he witnessed another Venezuelan national election where the Smartmatic management system was used to manipulate and change the results for Chavez.
And it it goes on and on. He was in the current control room where multiple digital display screens were shown for results and voting. The actual voting results were fed into that room and onto the displays over an Internet feed, which was connected to a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. People in that room were able to see in real time whether the votes that came through the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one looked at any particular screen that could determine that the vote from any specific area or as a national total was going to be against either candidate.
Persons controlling the vote tabulation computer had the ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one candidate to another by using the Smartmatic software.
Speaker 0: And Smartmatic, the relation Smartmatic The city I yes. And, Smartmatic, the the chairman, is admiral, Pete, Neffenger, who is also transition team. That's an extraordinary situation as well, isn't it?
Speaker 1: Yes. It is. So here's the other kicker. When the smart machines are when somebody's losing, like, for example, when Maduro and his supporters realized the size of the other guys' lead, they were worried that they were in crisis mode and would lose the election. The Smartmatic machines used for voting in each state were connected to the Internet, reported their information over the Internet to the Caracas control center real time, so the decision was made to reset the entire system.
Maduro's and his supporters ordered the network controllers to take the Internet itself offline in practically all parts in Venezuela to change the result. It took the voting operators approximately 2 hours to make the adjustments in the vote from Radomski to Madero. Then when they turned the Internet back on and the online reporting was up and running again, they checked each screen state by state to be certain they could see each vote was changed in favor of Madero.
Speaker 0: Sydney, you tweeted earlier, today about CIA and its association. What have you discovered there?
Speaker 1: Well, other than the fact there's no way all this was happening over around and around the world without the CIA knowing about it. I mean, that's just logic. It's been this affidavit also explains it's been used to change election results all over the world, and it's all Venezuelan and Cuban and essentially communist money that's been doing this. It's a foreign owned company, as you mentioned earlier. The president of it is mister Neffenger, who is on Biden's very presumptuous and immediately failing transition team.
And people have been reporting this to our government for for several years, including Democrats, and nobody's done a damn thing about it, Lou. I can't even express how furious I am over this.
Speaker 0: Well, I I I share your your your fury and frustration, but I do have some news to break here at this moment. I have, now, received word from a, highly reliable source that the FBI does have an investigative team that is now, looking into this election. Now what that means beyond that, but at least it's confirmation that they are investigating, and we'll see what, moves because there had been no indication that indeed publicly that they were involved, they are now. To that point, I'd just like to show if we could put up the full screen under what, their authorities are when we talk about these state run elections, even though they're federal elections, for at least the, a a sizable number of the candidates. As you see there, the ballot includes 1 or more federal candidates, an election of polling place, official took action.
Your thoughts?
Speaker 1: Well, my other thought is that as soon as the Smartmatic system changed the votes that they wanted for their desired candidate, By the time they finish, they achieve a convincing but narrow victory of a certain number of votes they want for their candidate. This person saw Yeah. By what his own experience exactly what was happening there, what's happening here.
Speaker 0: It's, it is a deeply, deeply troubling, election. As I said earlier, the worst in this country's history, bar none. And we have seen official, official investigative and justice, department, officials slow to move, and it is infuriating to everyone. The president tonight
Speaker 1: willful blindness. They have adopted a position of willful blindness to this massive corruption across the country. And the Smartmatic software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company software and system.
Speaker 0: Yes. And it is, it is more than just a willful blindness. This is people trying to blind us to what is going on. We don't even know who the hell really owns, these companies at least most of them. That's gotta change and we've gotta find out exactly what's going on.
And thank God we've got a president who will stay in the fight all the way through until we get those answers. Sidney Powell, thanks so much. We appreciate
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Foreign Election Involvement:@RudyGiuliani says votes in 28 states were sent to Germany and Spain to be counted by Smartmatic #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/fmSJdwvFq8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Rudy Giuliani discusses legal battles in Pennsylvania and Nevada, highlighting irregularities in the election process. He criticizes the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision on observer presence during ballot counting. A whistleblower alleges similarities between election manipulation in Venezuela and the US using Dominion and Smartmatic software. Giuliani emphasizes the foreign ties of these companies and their potential for fraud. The discussion concludes with concerns about the left-leaning bias of Dominion and Smartmatic, suggesting a deliberate effort to cheat in favor of Democrats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining us this evening is Rudy Giuliani, the president's attorney, former mayor of New York City, federal prosecutor, and now leading the fight, for a free and, fair election. Rudy, great to have you with us. Let's let's start with where are you now? Where Where is the campaign in Pennsylvania?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm in, I'm in Washington now. The campaign in Pennsylvania, the judge is considering all the papers that he's been given. So he'll take a few days to decide on what the next step is. Today, we had some significant victories.
Speaker 0: We had
Speaker 1: a significant victory yesterday in Nevada, where count a 5 member county board of elections in Clark County, which covers Las Vegas, decertified as the winner a Democrat replaced with a Republican based on irregularities. So those are the same irregularities that we have, except only maybe 1 fifth of them because he only was running in about 1 fifth of the district. And, irregularities there have to do with the signatures being, being improperly identified. Many, many signatures that were improperly identified. To the point that it would easily, if the same criteria is applied to the Trump campaign as the 5 Democrats applied to that campaign, it would, pretty easily overturn the election.
Speaker 0: Well, in Pennsylvania, you also had another positive, development as well, in which, what was it, about, 8 1,000 illegal, ballots. You wanted to toss them out. The the supreme court is going to hear that, case. That's very positive. The issue of also observers, in Pennsylvania, the suggestion that observers don't have to watch.
They just simply be have to be present. That seemed to be the conclusion of the court. What was is that was that your takeaway?
Speaker 1: Lou, of all the, political decisions and the kind of awful things judges have to do when they act like political hags, this may be the worst. The law of Pennsylvania says that when you're counting these ballots, you must have both Republicans and Democrats present. So when we were thrown out en masse, we went to court. And the 1st judge, Democrat appointed in Philadelphia said, Well, you're present, you don't have to see. Well, of course, that's ridiculous.
What's the point of being there? We're not there for fun. We're not there to, you know, play video games. So then it went up on appeal. And to her credit or their credit, that panel, which was also Democratic, said, well, present has to have meaning.
They have to be able to see, observe, like in all the other 49 states. And finally, we went to the Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court, 5 to 2, voted that all they have to do is let you in the room. And you could be a 1000 feet away, it doesn't matter, as long as you're in the same room. Making it making the statute of absurd, ridiculous, irrational, stupid, dumb.
And and Pennsylvania is now the only state in the country. And in fact, even, contrary to the law of Tanzania, it doesn't allow inspection of mail in ballots. So this is a ridiculous decision. I want you to guess, Lou, if it was 5 to 2, how many were Democrats and how many were Republicans? Just guess.
Speaker 0: Unfortunately, that has been the, the pattern we've seen in courts after court.
Speaker 1: And it's Terrible. It's also
Speaker 0: it's made a it's made a laughing stock out of the chief justice of the US Supreme Court who said there's no such thing as a Bush justice and a, Obama justice. There's you know? Exactly.
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 0: They you know, there's such a people getting a little tired of being treated like, you know, slow witted, children. It's, it it's nonsensical. It's an insult. And indeed, this whole fraud is an insult against this, this country. I wanna I wanna share, with the audience a one of the affidavits, that, that has been given to us by an unidentified whistleblower, and it pertains to dominion.
A whistleblower who also saw what happened in Venezuela. And the and the very similar events that took place in the United States on November 3rd. If we could put this up, please, to share with the audience because it is, indeed alarming. The whistleblower says this, if we ever get it up. I am alarmed because of what is occurring in plain sight during this 2020 election for president of the United States.
The circumstances and events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software electronically changing votes in the 20 13 presidential election in Venezuela. What happened in the United States was that the vote counting was abruptly stopped in 5 states using Dominion Software. At the time that vote counting was stopped, Donald Trump was significantly ahead in the votes. Then during the wee hours of the morning, when there was no voting occurring and the vote count reporting was offline, Something significantly changed. When the vote reporting resumed the very next morning, there was a very pronounced change in voting in favor of the opposing candidate, Joe Biden.
That, from a whistleblower who was present both in Venezuela in 2013 and, in this, country as we were counting votes, overnight on November 3rd. Your thoughts.
Speaker 1: Well, Lou, I don't know if people can appreciate this, but I think when they do, they're gonna be outraged. Our votes in 27, 28 states that are counted by dominion and calculated and analyzed, they're sent outside the United States. And they're not sent to Canada. They're sent to Germany and Spain. And the company counting it is not Dominion.
It's Smartmatic, which is a company that was founded in 2005 in Venezuela for the specific purpose of fixing elections. That's their expertise, how to fix elections. They did it a number of times in Venezuela. They did it in Argentina, And they messed up an election to a fairly well in Chicago. And there's a whole congressional record that you can go look at about what a terrible company this is.
Well, that's the company
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: That was counting and calculating on election night. And they did all their old tricks.
Speaker 0: Well, we've
Speaker 1: They stopped it. They also switched votes around, subtly, maybe 10 per district so you don't notice it. They got caught in Antrim County, which is how we found out about them. And we are in the process now of investigating this in great in great, great detail. But but I mean, just the mere fact that we have a foreign country, we have this in a foreign country, done by friends of an enemy of the United States, Maduro, is outrageous Mhmm.
And has to stop
Speaker 0: immediately. Outrageous. And it's all the more outrageous because Dominion, and, Smartmatic, were denied use in the state of Texas, which called them out for what they are. They have a clear record. Democratic senators sending letters, in 2019, joining with Republicans now in depriving the reliability and, the and the ability of that system to avoid manipulation and fraud.
Without any one of these secretaries of state in various states responding and shutting them down.
Speaker 1: Well, Lou, the amazing thing is, Carolyn Maloney, a congresswoman from Manhattan, wrote a letter in 2006, 2,007 explaining everything I just said. We shouldn't be using this company that was founded by Chavez to call votes in America because their specialty in Venezuela is cheating. Well, apparently, the governors signed them up and never bothered to do any due diligence of any kind. Also, the company Dominion is a far left radical company. Some of their people have written and tweeted the worst things about Trump and Republicans than you could possibly imagine.
They've since take it taken it down, but we have it. So we've got a very radical far left, company with some of their high level people supporters of Antifa. Can you believe that? And they're using a Venezuelan company as the, as the vote counter, which is known for changing votes and also known to have the most insecure, computers in this business. I think you'd only pick them.
Speaker 0: We're gonna have to
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to Because you wanna cheat.
Speaker 0: We're gonna have to wrap here. You get the last quick word here.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say, you know, the conclusion you have to come to is you either picked them because you're grossly negligent or you don't mind if you're cheating. And they're only gonna cheat in one direction. After all, the the chairman of of Smartmatic is very, very close to none other than mister Soros. So how do you think they're gonna cheat? They're gonna cheat democratic.
They're gonna cheat left wing. They're gonna cheat radical. That's what they are.
reSee.it AI Summary
A federal judge has ordered Georgia's secretary of state to defend the state's computerized voting system in court. The trial will determine if the system is secure enough to be used in the upcoming presidential primary. Critics point to a security breach in Coffee County, where unauthorized individuals accessed and posted secure software online. Concerns about potential hacking and malfunctioning ballot marking devices have been raised. The defendants have failed to provide endorsements from cybersecurity experts. The trial is scheduled for January.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
This Federal District Court ruling is HUGE NEWS on electronic voting machines in Georgia: ATLANTA (11 Alive)— A federal judge has ordered the Georgia secretary of state into court to defend the state’s use of computerized voting, due to take place in a presidential primary four months from now. Judge Amy Totenberg has ordered a non-jury trial to decide whether Georgia’s computerized voting system is safe enough from potential hackers to keep using next year.Critics of Georgia’s computerized election system point to a security breach in south Georgia’s Coffee County – documented on surveillance video – where unauthorized people spent hours with computer systems, scanning and copying secure software, then posting some of the material on the internet. Totenberg writes in the trial order that the “2021 Coffee County election equipment breach … presents a substantial risk that … votes will not be counted as cast.” Breaches like that, critics say, can lead to Georgia ballot marking devices going haywire – as happened earlier this month in a local election in Pennsylvania, where voters using Dominion ballot marking devices printed paper ballots with QR codes that didn’t match the candidates’ names chosen by voters. Numerous cybersecurity experts have contended in and out of court that hackers can undermine or alter the outcomes of elections dependent on computers and that election officials may not be able to identify when such hacking takes place. In her order putting Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office in a civil trial in January, Totenberg writes the “defendants fail to identify a single cybersecurity expert who endorses the current configuration of Georgia’s (ballot marking device) system.” "There is this very long, extensive and frankly alarming record of him not addressing election security, and not understanding it, and not wanting to understand it," said Susan Greenhalgh, a consultant for plaintiffs whose suit has been in court since 2018.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a surprising turn of events, Emmer secured the Speakership with just 107 votes, surpassing Jordan's 200 votes. Questions arise about the GOP's explanation for this outcome. Concerns grow over the alleged corruption, as Emmer is accused of working for Soros and betraying Jordan. Closed doors and secret votes contribute to the GOP's struggle in the Swamp.
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
Don't have to wait 'til 2024 for another rigged election--Emmer with 107 votes wins Speakership in the 5th round ---how do the Republicans explain how that beats out 200 votes for Jordan? This is ugly stuff--How will the GOP survive their corrupt election, the election of a RINO who worked for Soros, and who played a major role in the betrayal of Jim Jordan? Closed doors, secret votes and the GOP is drowning in the Swamp!
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden administration, according to critics, is seen as a corrupt entity, with various departments allegedly complicit in the Democrats' agenda. From Homeland Security to Border Patrol, DOJ to FBI, State Department to Intel agencies, concerns are raised about their alleged corruption and alignment with Marxist policies. The Republican opposition questions why anyone would support such a regime. #BidenAdministration #Corruption #RepublicanConcerns
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
The entire Biden Regime is a nest of snakes, evil to the core. Why on earth would any Republican consider giving this puppet President a dime? Homeland Security doesn't secure America, Border Patrol doesn't patrol the border--the DOJ and FBI, the State Department and Intel agencies--I can't think of a single Department that isn't corrupt and complicit with the Marxist Dems in their policies to target citizens and destroy America. #TheGreatAmericaShow
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
These shipments of tens of billions of dollars increasingly look like Biden is using taxpayer money to pay off his Ukrainian blackmailers: What do you think? #TheGreatAmericaShow Reports: Biden to Ask for Another $25 Billion in Ukraine Aid https://breitbart.com/politics/2023/08/10/reports-biden-to-ask-for-25-billion-in-ukraine-aid/ via @BreitbartNews
Reports: Biden to Ask for Another $25 Billion in Ukraine Aid
President Joe Biden will ask for $25 billion in aid for Ukraine, according to multiple reports released this week.
breitbart.com
@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs
BREAKING: Joe Biden Used Secret Global Cell Phone While He Was Vice President – Paid For By Hunter's Firm! #TheGreatAmericaShow https://thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/breaking-joe-biden-used-secret-cell-phone-while/ #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/breaking-joe-biden-used-secret-cell-phone-while/
BREAKING: Joe Biden Used Secret Global Cell Phone While He Was Vice President - Paid For By Hunter's Firm! | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila | 42
Peter Schweizer on Sunday dropped a bombshell during an appearance on Fox News with host Maria Bartiromo.
thegatewaypundit.com