TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @MAGAStormX
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting Dr. Oz’s claim of a MASSIVE Medicare fraud ring in LA: 42 hospice centers in four blocks; one boarded up, the owner stole $16M and got 2 years. He cites about $3.5B in hospice/home-care fraud in LA tied to organized crime. Doctors were recruited to write fake prescriptions; hundreds involved. Over 100,000 patients were tricked or used with Medicare numbers. This isn’t random—it's a coordinated racket. Thoughts?
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🚨 HOLY CRAP — Dr. Oz just exposed a MASSIVE Medicare fraud ring in Los Angeles. In just a four-block area, investigators found 42 “hospice” centers. One of them was boarded up. The owner stole $16 MILLION… and only served 2 years in prison. Let that sink in. DR. OZ: “42 in four blocks. They stole $16M. The main guy did two years. For criminals, that’s a great deal.” And it gets worse. He says about $3.5 BILLION in hospice and home-care fraud is happening in LA — much of it tied to organized crime networks. Doctors were systematically recruited to write fake prescriptions. Hundreds involved. Over 100,000 patients were tricked or paid for their Medicare numbers… so the scam could keep going. This isn’t random fraud. It’s a coordinated racket. How many more billions are being stolen right now? Thoughts? 👇
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Los Angeles, there are 42 hospices within a four-block radius, with Cyrillic and Armenian/Russian writing on buildings and little visible patient care activity. A major case involved $16,000,000 stolen, with the main organizer going to jail for two years. The area had an apparently empty hospice center and claimed services for people at home that were not actually provided.
The speaker asserts roughly $3.5 billion in fraud is taking place in Los Angeles hospice and home care, run largely by the Russian Armenian mafia. The narration notes the presence of language and dialect behind the speaker as indicative of this organized crime. The operation allegedly recruited hundreds of doctors to write false prescriptions and paid or tricked 100,000 patients into giving them their beneficiary numbers to perpetuate the fraud. Criminals allegedly run the organization and quickly evade when law enforcement prosecutes them.
California has not given much attention to these problems, but that is changing, according to the speaker. The US attorney and FBI are now focused on the issue in a state with about $30,000,000,000 worth of home and community-based services, most of which, the speaker claims, might be fraudulent. The statement concludes that the President is not going to tolerate this anymore.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you can see these are medical buildings. They've got Cyrillic writing, Russian, Armenian writing. On both sides, there's lots of action, it seems. I don't know how many patients are getting care. But in this four block area in Los Angeles, there are 42 hospices.
So either there are lot of people dying here or you've got a fraudulent activity that is so good that everyone wants to get in on it. I'm in Ben Nyez in Los Angeles, and this boarded up area above my head here is a big hospice center. There are apparently quite a few hospices around here, 42 within a four block radius. And these guys stole $16,000,000, listen carefully, the main guy went to jail for two years, stealing $16,000,000, which is good trade off for a lot of folks. And if you look at it, it's pretty indescript, there wasn't anyone really in there, they weren't doing any services, they just got an address they could claim was a hospice, and then they ran the business claiming people were at home getting services, which they really weren't.
What we have learned is there's roughly three and a half billion dollars of fraud taking place here in Los Angeles in hospice and home care. It's run quite a bit of it by the Russian Armenian mafia. You notice the lettering and language behind me is of that dialect. And it also highlights the fact that this is an organized crime, you know, mafia deal where you've got folks who have systemically recruited doctors to write false prescriptions, hundreds of doctors participating. They've got 100,000 patients who they've tricked or paid to give them their beneficiary numbers so they can perpetuate the fraud.
Then the criminals are just running the whole organization and quickly scurrying away when law enforcement does get around to prosecuting them. Unfortunately, in California, there has not been a lot of attention on these problems. That's going to change. The US attorney, the FBI, everyone's now focused on the fact that in this state, which has about $30,000,000,000 worth of home and community based services, most of it might be fraudulent. Those are big numbers and we're taking this seriously.
President's not gonna tolerate this anymore.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting that Nick Shirley warns America will face a UK-style power play. He says Labour courts mosque leadership to deliver bloc votes, leveraging Muslim communities’ social conservatism while claiming Sharia supremacy. The result, he says, is a Muslim mayor, Muslim-majority towns, and Sharia-style courts, with fraud in childcare schemes as an example of a political power system reaching the US.
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🚨 HOLY CRAP… Nick Shirley went to the UK and came back with a WARNING for America. He says after seeing what’s happening over there, he knew the same playbook was coming to the United States — and now we’re watching it unfold. According to Nick, this is how Keir Starmer + Labour stay in power: •Tommy Robinson was thrown into solitary for over 100 DAYS just for exposing what was happening inside his own country. •And Nick says it all connects back to one thing: votes. Power. Control. Nick explains that Tommy Robinson told him the real strategy is brutally simple: Labour allegedly tells Muslim communities: “Do whatever you want — we’ll look the other way… just vote for us.” He points out something that shocks a lot of people: Muslim communities are often more socially conservative (not pro-LGBTQ, pro-family, etc.) — BUT Nick says Labour doesn’t care, because: “They have Sharia law, so it’s above everything.” Then comes the political machine: •Labour makes deals with mosque leadership •“Deliver the votes” •Election day comes… •The entire community goes and votes as a bloc Nick says this is how you end up with: •A Muslim mayor in London •Muslim-majority towns nearby •And even Sharia-style courts operating in parts of the UK And here’s the part that hits home… Nick says: After seeing Europe, he knew this would reach America too. He points to Zohran Mamdani as an example — pushing “affordable childcare”… And what do we now know about childcare? 🚨 The daycare system is FULL of fraud. Ghost daycares. Scam centers. Taxpayer robbery. Nick’s message is clear: This isn’t random. This is a political power system. And America is next.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims that someone was put in solitary confinement for more than a hundred days for speaking about what was happening inside his country. He says he knows why this is happening: purely for votes and to keep people in power.
Speaker 0 adds that after visiting Europe and making videos about what was happening, he anticipated similar moves in the United States. He recounts a sit-down interview with Tommy Robinson, who explains that the Labour Party in the UK, and the Democrat Party in the US, stay in power because they “tell these Muslims they can go ahead, do whatever they want.” He says a Muslim “should be more conservative than they would be a liberal” because they don’t stand for much of that progressive stuff, and that “they have Sharia law” above everything. According to him, if someone goes to a mosque with a thousand people, the mosque leader is told, “we’re gonna let you guys do whatever you want, just make sure you vote for us.” He asserts that, as a result, the leader of the mosque will lead everyone in the mosque to voting centers to vote for that candidate. He claims this is why in London the mayor is Muslim and many surrounding towns are Muslim, and that they actually have courts practicing Sharia law. He says he anticipated this would happen in America as well, and mentions Mundami as an example.
Speaker 0 then notes Mundami advocated for making childcare more affordable when running for office. He questions what is known about childcare now, describing daycare centers as “complete frauds.” He says he anticipated the current development and that people are now starting to see it in America.
Speaker 0 explains that after he was pressed to give his opinion, people began loving it, even though he had not intended to speak out. He says he was originally just going to ask people questions, but they turned his journalism into activism, which he says forced his hand. He says he feels compelled to continue.
Speaker 1 cautions, advising not to let them force him into something he thinks they don’t want him to do, referencing what he is currently doing. He concludes that they would rather have an activist than a competitor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They put him in solitary confinement for more than a hundred days for speaking about for showing people what was happening inside his country. Man. And I know why it's happening. Why is it happening? Just for purely votes and to keep people in power.
And it's also I kinda knew what was gonna I kinda knew this was gonna happen in The United States after I'd gone to Europe a couple times, do videos on what was happening because Tommy Robinson, I had a sit down interview with him. He goes, the reason why the Labour Party, the the Democrat Party in UK, the reason why they're able to stay in power is because they'll tell these Muslims they can go ahead, do whatever they want. A Muslim actually should be more conservative than they would be a liberal because they don't stand for a lot of that progressive stuff.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Not pro LGBTQ plus, they're pro family. Right? And so he he he goes, well, it it doesn't matter to them because they have Sharia law. So that's above anything. And so if somebody goes to that mosque where a thousand people go, they tell the mosque leader, we're gonna let you guys do whatever you want.
Just just make sure you guys vote for us. So then when it comes day to vote, the leader of the mosque, everyone in the mosque will then go to the voting centers and go vote for that candidate. That's why in London, the mayor's Muslim, a lot of the towns around it are Muslim as well, and they actually have courts that are practicing Sharia law. And so I kinda knew that was gonna happen inside of America as well. You have Mundami, for instance.
Another thing Mundami advocated for when he was running was making childcare more affordable. What do we know about childcare now? These daycare centers, they're complete frauds. And so I kind of knew what was gonna start happening. Now you're kind of starting to see it happen here in America.
So and now after they kind of forced my hand to start giving my opinion, which I wasn't doing, they asked for it. People are loving it Now that I'm kind of speaking out against stuff. But I was originally just gonna keep asking people questions, but now they've kind of turned my act now they've kind of turned my journalism into activism in a way where you forced my hand. Now I like, I'm compelled to do this now.
Speaker 1: Be careful. Don't let them force you into something that you think they don't want you to do. Like what? Like what you're doing. Yeah.
Well They'd rather have an activist than a competitor.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m fed up and want to abolish the income tax. Rep. Burchett says Congress funds Democrat-connected billionaire donor NGOs, run in part by UN staff, with millions of taxpayer dollars. Elon Musk/DOGE describe an NGO scam: billionaires seed groups, they appear legit, then they get billions in federal funding. Afghanistan has 1,000+ NGOs, possibly thousands via the UN network—a global money-laundering machine. Abolish the income tax, cut the NGO pipeline, audit and prosecute. A) YES B) NO
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🚨 ENOUGH. It’s time to ABOLISH the Income Tax. Rep. Tim Burchett just confirmed Congress has been laundering MILLIONS of our tax dollars straight into Democrat-connected billionaire donor NGOs. And it gets worse… 🔥 Burchett says UN staff created THOUSANDS of NGOs… and WE’RE FUNDING THEM ALL. Elon Musk + DOGE nailed it: “Here’s how the NGO scam works… A billionaire who hates everything we stand for throws $1 million into some fancy-sounding group like ‘Feed the Children’ — pocket change to them. Then that group applies for federal money… And some unelected bureaucrat in Washington goes: ‘Oh wow, they raised a million? They must be legit!’ And BOOM — they end up getting BILLIONS upon BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars.” ⚠️ Afghanistan alone: Burchett says there are over 1,000 NGOs operating there — and once you factor in the UN network… 👉 it could be MULTIPLE THOUSANDS of organizations running “projects” and feeding off YOUR money. This is the definition of a global money-laundering machine. Abolish the income tax. Cut off the NGO pipeline. Audit everything. Prosecute everyone involved. Do you support ENDING this scam? A) YES — Abolish it 🔥 B) NO — Keep funding it
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 contends that NGOs (nongovernment organizations) are not truly nongovernmental because they are funded by borrowing money and by money from donors, including billionaires. He claims they receive a large amount of funding, and the process involves borrowing funds and then distributing them to NGOs.
He uses Afghanistan as an example, noting that there was a bill to defund the Taliban and that in the Senate there was opposition to adding NGOs to that effort. He argues that billionaire adversaries of the United States will put money into groups with fancy names (citing “feed the children” as a possible example)—a million dollars to start, which is "pennies on their dollars" for these donors. He asserts that these NGOs apply for federal money, and then an unelected bureaucrat in Washington declares them legitimate, leading to billions of dollars flowing to these organizations.
Speaker 0 states that in Afghanistan alone, there are over a thousand nongovernment organizations operating there, and when combined with United Nations operations, the number could be multiples of thousands. He questions whether the money is being spent on certain events, asking, “do you really believe we're spending $10,000,000 on a dadgum drag show?” and asserts that the money ends up back in politicians’ pockets, with a paper trail that someone will uncover, though he believes it probably goes into dark money campaigns that oppose good Republicans as well.
He concludes that this situation “has got to stop.” He ends by thanking Donald Trump and JD Vance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the deal with those bad gum NGOs? Nongovernment organizations. They get a heck of a lot of your money, though, and here's how it works. They're not nongovernment because you and I fund it. We borrow the money to send to them.
Afghanistan, for instance, where we had the bill to defund the Taliban. In the senate now, but and the other side, oh, man, they pitched a fit when we added NGOs. We're cutting them off. Because here's what happens. You got these billionaires who hate our guts, want every destroy everything we stand for.
They'll put a million dollars in some group that has some fancy name feed the children. I don't know. Maybe that's not an accurate one, but anyway, you get the picture. And so they'll put a million dollars in there, is nothing to them, pennies on their dollars. And so they they they apply for this federal money, and then they the unelected bureaucrat in Washington says, oh, they got a million dollars, and they're legit.
And so then they literally have put billions upon billions of dollars in these things. Afghanistan alone, over a thousand nongovernment organizations are working out there. And you add the the UN stuff, and we think it could be multiples of thousands of organizations working out of there, all this bogus stuff. I mean, do you really believe we're spending $10,000,000 on a dadgum drag show? Where's the money go?
Right back in the pockets of politicians. Probably some in Washington. That's it is so there's a paper trail. Somebody's gonna find out about it, but we know it probably goes into dark money campaigns, fighting good Republicans as well. And, anyway, it's gotta stop.
And thank you Donald Trump and JD Vance. Dadgummit.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told the White House alleges more than $100 million flowed from taxpayers into Antifa protests, routed through a funding network of NGOs and foreign donors. Named: Soros/Open Society, Arabella Advisors, Tides Foundation, Neville Roy Singham, Hansjörg Wyss, Reid Hoffman, plus foreign cash. Officials say non-citizen funders and a Riot Inc investor network backed “an industry,” not activism.
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🚨 JUST IN: The White House just dropped names — and it’s explosive. Officials say over $100 MILLION was funneled into Antifa, protests, and political violence across America. Yes. Taxpayers funded their own chaos. “We uncovered a massive NGO funding network.” Here’s who’s named as part of that ecosystem: •George Soros and the Open Society Foundations •Arabella Advisors Network •Tides Foundation •Neville Roy Singham and his global network •Hansjörg Wyss •Additional foreign cash •Reid Hoffman (named directly) Officials didn’t mince words: “Some of the biggest left-wing funders aren’t even U.S. citizens. Hansjörg Wyss in Switzerland is pouring money into this entire ecosystem.” And it gets worse. “We identified dozens of radical organizations — far beyond decentralized Antifa — that received over $100 million from what we’re calling Riot Inc investors.” The most damning line of all: “More than $100 million in U.S. taxpayer money flowed directly into these funding networks.” Read that again. Americans paid for the unrest. Democrats laundered the money. Foreign billionaires helped bankroll it. This isn’t activism. It’s an industry.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: This is not just a story about violence and chaos; this is a money story. At the Government Accountability Institute, Peter Schweitzer and I followed the money to the top of what we call the protest industrial complex, Riot Inc. We found a network of NGOs—not just the Soros/Open Society network, but also the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, Foreign Cash, and other big left-wing funders, including Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland. They’re pouring money into this ecosystem.
Here are three money facts about Riot Inc. Number one: Riot Inc. has many divisions like any corporation. It doesn’t just have the Antifa boots on the ground division; it has PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a well-funded legal division to get these boots back on the ground as quickly as possible. It has investors I mentioned.
Number two: We have identified dozens of radical organizations—not just decentralized Antifa groups, but dozens of radical organizations—that have received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors. These include lawyer groups and groups that advocate for calling good honest Americans fascists, etc.
Number three: More than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to these very groups themselves. There was an event in Atlanta called Stop Cop City; over 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism. These groups received money for that from both the billionaire class and taxpayer money. Additionally, this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms that support Antifa, the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork (which had links to the ICE facility attack), the Socialist Rifle Association, and others. Even though some groups don’t have LLCs or EIN numbers, they can still get paid. Some funding platforms are funded by this network that we call Riot Inc.
Speaker 1: Do you know the name of any of the funders? Do you know the names? Because if you do, I’d like you to give them to Cash or Pam—or Christie?
Speaker 0: Absolutely.
Speaker 1: Or Christie?
Speaker 0: Yes, we’ll do that.
Speaker 1: As soon as you can. That’s all of you. Because you probably know the names after a certain period of time, you tend to find out. But these are people that do not have good intention for the country and that’s treasonous probably. So if you could, it would be very important if you could do that, it would be great.
Speaker 0: it
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That this is not just a story about violence and chaos as you alluded to, mister president. This is a money story. And at the Government Accountability Institute, my colleague and I, Peter Schweitzer and I and our team, we followed the money and we followed it to the top of what we call the protest industrial complex, Riot Inc. And we found a network of NGOs. It's not just the Soros network, the Open Society network, it's other funding networks, the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, Foreign Cash.
And it's also big left wing funders. Some of them are not citizens of this country. Mr. Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland. They're pouring money into this entire ecosystem.
And so I want to share three money facts with you about what we call Riot Inc. Number one, like any corporation, Riot Inc. Has many divisions. It doesn't just have the Antifa boots on the ground division. It has PR divisions.
It has marketing divisions. It has a very well funded legal division to get these boots on the ground back on the streets as quickly as possible. But it does have those investors that I mentioned. Number two, we have identified dozens of radical organizations, not just the decentralized Antifa organizations, but dozens of radical organizations that have received more than $100,000,000 from the Riot Inc. Investors.
These would be the lawyer groups. These would be the groups that advocate for calling good honest Americans fascists, etcetera. And then three, think the most shocking thing is that we have found that more than $100,000,000 in U. S. Taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to these very groups themselves, not just Antifa types, but there was an event in Atlanta called Stop Cop City.
Over 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism. These groups received money for that from both the billionaire class as well as taxpayer money. So one other thing, this money helps fund the decentralized crowdfunding platforms. These are ways that Antifa, the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork, which had links to that attack on the ICE facility, the Socialist Rifle Association and just because they don't have LLCs or EIN numbers doesn't mean they can't get paid. Some of these funding platforms, crowdfunding platforms are funded by this network that we call rioting.
So again, I want to thank you for your leadership, for the whole cabinet's leadership on this. We're going to keep following the money and appreciate everything you're doing, sir.
Speaker 1: Do you know the name of any of the funders? Do you know the names? Because if you do, I'd like you to give them to Cash or Pam?
Speaker 0: Absolutely.
Speaker 1: Or Christie?
Speaker 0: Yes, we'll do that.
Speaker 1: As soon as you can. That's all of you. Because you probably know the names after a certain period of time, you tend to find out. But these are people that do not have good intention for the country and that's treasonous probably. So if you could, if you very important if you could do that, it would be great.
Nobody would know better than you, you'll figure
Speaker 0: it
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall a former government fraud investigator warning, in 2015, that millions in taxpayer dollars were siphoned through daycares. Asked how big it was, he said, “Massive. They didn’t want a fraud unit touching it. It was a cover‑up. We found companies pulling millions in public subsidies for fake childcare services—a full‑blown criminal enterprise.” Ten years later, people are shocked.
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🚨 WOW — this was exposed a decade ago… and buried. Back in 2015, a former government fraud investigator sounded the alarm: millions in taxpayer dollars were being siphoned through daycares. When asked how big the problem was, his answer was blunt: “Massive. They didn’t want a fraud unit touching it. It was nothing but a cover-up. We found evidence of companies pulling millions in public subsidies for fake childcare services. At its core, this was the construction of a full-blown criminal enterprise.” Ten years later… and suddenly everyone’s “shocked.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The investigation into fraud in public daycare subsidies is described as massive and deeply obstructed. "Massive. They don't want a fraud unit to do anything. They want a fraud unit on paper." The discussion centers on Halicki, who was fired in 2013 while in the midst of a large probe. The county’s account of Halicki is that he was an insubordinate bully whose tactics hampered efforts to catch welfare cheats, while supporters call the firing part of a broader effort to suppress accountability. One side frames the situation as a cover up: “They don't wanna point fingers at various organizations and people. This is nothing but a giant cover up.”
The reporting highlights deco daycare centers, with evidence that the company collected millions in public subsidies for providing bogus child care services to low income families. The overarching assertion is that, in essence, this scheme was a criminal enterprise. In December, Ramsey County charged the owner of Dico with fraud. The daycares shown are described as billing the county at rates over $100,000 a month.
Halicki says that before his dismissal he was tracking a similar scheme in Hennepin County involving multiple child care centers. One building is noted as housing its third daycare center in as many years, with a new license granted despite concerns. The two previous centers had their public subsidies stopped by the county because of billing irregularities. Halicki recounts footage of centers with questionable visibility: “7AM to 6PM. There are no lights on.” He and the team visited centers that had no signs outside and, during posted business hours, no one answered. They checked state inspection records for each center on Halecki's tour, finding licensing violations—the kind that are red flags to the state's Department of Human Services.
The core accusation is that this is a deliberate attempt by officials in Hennepin County to deceive taxpayers. Halicki claims to possess emails and documents proving knowledge of the wrongdoing and deliberate inaction. He cites an email to the supervisor of the fraud unit where the stated goal was to stop the bleeding quickly and protect taxpayer money from going out the door; the supervisor replies with a plan to tackle the centers, and Halicki reiterates, “It's nothing but a giant cover up.”
Officials emphasize that the focus is on prevention, but they do investigate and take action with the county attorney when fraud occurs. In the two years since Halicki was fired, not one case has been prosecuted by the county. The report notes that most metro counties aren’t actively investigating daycare center fraud; instead, they’re handing those cases off to a DHS special team that was ramped up more than a year ago. Public frustration is voiced: “Nobody is more frustrated with the amount of time it's taking than we are.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How significant is this problem?
Speaker 1: Massive. They don't want a fraud unit to do anything. They want a fraud unit on paper.
Speaker 0: Halicki was fired in 2013 while in the midst of a big investigation. The county claims he was an insubordinate bully whose tactics were hampering efforts to catch welfare cheats.
Speaker 1: They don't wanna point fingers at at various organizations and people. This is nothing but a giant cover up.
Speaker 0: Reports on deco day care centers. We uncovered evidence the company was collecting millions in public subsidies for providing bogus child care services to low income families.
Speaker 1: In essence, this scheme was really involved creating a criminal enterprise.
Speaker 0: In December, Ramsey County charged Dico's owner with fraud.
Speaker 1: The daycares that I'm gonna be showing you from this point on all bill over $100,000 a month.
Speaker 0: Halicki says before he was fired, he was tracking a similar scheme in Hennepin County involving multiple child care centers.
Speaker 1: 7AM to 6PM. There are no lights on.
Speaker 0: This building is housing its third day care center in as many years.
Speaker 1: They just put it got a new license.
Speaker 0: The two previous day cares had their public subsidies stopped by the county because of billing irregularities.
Speaker 1: Hour after hour, I would sit here and document nothing.
Speaker 0: Alicki discovered one center was charging the county for kids who were never dropped off. He took us to center after center that had no sign outside to indicate it was a daycare. When we knocked on the doors during posted business hours, no one answered. So we checked state inspection records for each of the centers on Halecki's tour. They've all been cited for licensing violations, the kind that are red flags to the state's Department of Human Services.
Speaker 1: This is a cover up. This is a deliberate attempt by the officials in Hennepin County to deceive the taxpayers. I have emails. I have documents. I have everything to prove they knew it, and they looked the other way.
Speaker 0: Here's an email he sent to the supervisor of the fraud unit. The goal was to stop the bleeding as quickly as possible and protect taxpayer money from going out the door. Now you wanna stop the process? I know you're motivated and rightly concerned, she responds. Let's get a plan together to tackle these centers.
It's nothing but a giant cover up.
Speaker 2: Our focus is really primarily on prevention, but certainly we investigate and take action and work with our county attorney's office whenever there is actual fraud that has occurred.
Speaker 0: In the two years since Halecki was fired, not one case has been prosecuted by the county. We found most counties in the metro aren't investigating day care center fraud. They're handing those cases off to a special team with the Department of Human Services that ramped up more than a year ago. Public's wondering, what's taking you guys so long?
Speaker 1: Nobody is more frustrated with the amount of time it's taking than we are.
reSee.it AI Summary
New York just passed the COPA Act—forcing homeowners to offer their property to the government or NGOs before they can sell. Councilwoman Vickie Paladino calls it theft by policy—ridiculous and shameful. If you own a home, it’s YOUR property. You earned it. You should be able to sell to whoever you choose. Instead, this law makes you go through bureaucrats, wait six months, give nonprofits first dibs, and ask permission. This is government overreach. What do you think—protection or outright theft?
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🚨 This is real. And it’s happening right now. New York just passed the so-called “COPA Act” — a law that would force homeowners to offer their property to the government or NGOs before they can sell it freely. And one city councilwoman blew the whistle. Councilwoman Vickie Paladino didn’t mince words. She flat-out warned this is theft by policy. She called it “ridiculous and shameful” — and she’s right. Her message was crystal clear: If you own a home — whether it’s a two-family, three-family, or four-family — it’s YOUR property. You earned it. You own it. You should be able to sell it to whoever you choose. Instead, this law forces homeowners to: • Go through city bureaucrats • Wait six months • Give nonprofits first dibs • And ask permission to sell what they already own That’s not regulation. That’s government overreach on steroids. Paladino called it exactly what it is: 👉 “Maniacal.” She said no homeowner who worked their entire life to buy property should be told they must offer it to a nonprofit first — while their neighbor across the street could’ve bought it outright. Her closing line hit hard: Everyone supporting this should be embarrassed. This isn’t housing policy. This is the government inserting itself between you and your property. If they can do it in New York… They can try it anywhere. What do you think — protection or outright theft? 👀
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that COPPA and related policy proposals wrongly take individual rights away from homeowners. He says the idea that a homeowner must consult with the building department and provide a six-month period for another party to make an offer is outrageous and constitutes government overreach, which he describes as 100% true. He states that this is “absolutely maniacal” and questions how this body operates when it comes to individual citizens, calling the measure overreach at its best. He identifies as a homeowner and asserts that no one will tell him or others who have worked hard to own a three- or four-family home that they must submit the ability to sell their house first to the building department and then offer it to a nonprofit, especially when a neighbor across the street may want to buy it and they must wait six months.
He further adds that it is ridiculous and that everyone in the room should be terribly embarrassed for stripping veterans bills today from today's hearings. He asks why the men and women of the country deserve better treatment and asserts that the city has failed to come through for veterans, stating that the veterans bills were stripped totally off the record for today. He ends by calling the situation absolutely ridiculous and expresses shame: “Shame. Shame on all of you.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In regard to, what we're just talking about now, COPPA, how wrong can a person be or a body of a government be when we start to take the individual rights away from the homeowner, whether it's a two family house, three family house, four family house, what does it matter? The fact is the person owns the home. They have the right to sell the home to whomever they please. The idea that we have to consult with the building department and give a six month period of time for someone else to make an offer is absolutely outrageous. And to say it's government overreach is 100% true.
This is absolutely maniacal. I do not understand how this body works when it comes to individual citizens of this city. This is overreach at its very best. I'm a homeowner homeowner, And no one is going to tell me or anybody else I know that's worked so damn hard to own a three or a four family home that I have to submit the ability to sell my house first to the building department and then offer it up to a non for profit when my neighbor across the street may wanna buy it. And they have to wait six months?
Nonsense. This is absolutely ridiculous. And also, I wanna just add to this hearing today, this this meeting today, that it's absolutely ridiculous and and everybody in this room should be terribly embarrassed that we stripped off veterans bills today from today's hearings. Why? Why?
When the men and women of this country deserve better treatment and our city today that we passed in committee has failed to come through for our veterans, stripped it totally off the record for today. Absolutely ridiculous. Thank you very much and shameful. Shame. Shame on all of you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a powerful warning from former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss: we’re not debating policy tweaks, but confronting a movement that seeks to tear down Western civilization. The old playbook—negotiation, compromise, bipartisanship, media charm—no longer works because the opposition has changed. Trump understands better than anyone that you don’t reason with destruction—you confront it head-on. She points to Orbán and Bukele, with Trump as the clearest model to fight the modern deep state. Civilization vs collapse.
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🚨 POWERFUL WARNING from former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss She’s not mincing words. This isn’t about mild policy disagreements or higher taxes anymore. According to Truss, we’re facing a movement that openly seeks to tear down Western civilization itself. She says the old playbook is dead. Negotiation. Compromise. Bipartisanship. Media charm offensives. All of it worked decades ago — not now. Why? Because the opposition has fundamentally changed. Truss argues this is what Donald Trump understands better than anyone in the Western world. You don’t reason with forces that want destruction. You confront them. Head-on. She points to leaders like Viktor Orbán and Bukele as examples of resistance — but says Trump stands out as the clearest model for how to fight the modern deep state. Bottom line from Liz Truss: This is no longer left vs right. It’s civilization vs collapse. And that warning is coming from a former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. 🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that winning in political struggle is currently nearly impossible, and that Donald Trump grasped this reality in a way that others have not. They say, perhaps uniquely in the Western world, Trump understands how to handle the confrontation with the deep state, and they acknowledge Viktor Orban and Bekailly Malay as potential examples of others who have challenged entrenched power. However, the speaker emphasizes that Trump embodies “the playbook of how you need to behave,” suggesting that his approach is a model for contemporary politics.
The speaker contends that many politicians are clinging to a dated strategy. They describe a past era—the seventies and eighties—when the prevailing belief was that it was possible to reason with the opposition, find compromises, be bipartisan, persuade people, and sell policies in the media through traditional pitching and persuasion. According to the speaker, that strategy cannot be adopted today because the opposition has changed.
In contrast to those bygone expectations, the speaker asserts that the current opposition is not composed of social democrats who merely want to raise taxes or increase public spending. Instead, they describe the current opposition as aiming to destroy Western civilization. The speaker emphasizes the severity of this shift in aims, framing the opposition as having existential goals that go beyond ordinary political disagreement.
Throughout, the core claims center on a diagnosis of a strategic pivot in modern politics: the old playbook of negotiation and persuasion is no longer viable because the opposition has fundamentally changed its aims, adopting objectives that are presented as existential threats to Western civilization. The speaker positions Trump as an exemplar of the new, effective approach to navigating this transformed political landscape, highlighting the perceived necessity of a more combative and uncompromising posture in confronting opponents who, in the speaker’s view, seek to undermine foundational Western values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You just can't win. And this is what Donald Trump understands. Perhaps uniquely in the Western world, I think there are others who have taken on the deep state. You might point to Viktor Orban. You know, you might point to Bekailly Malay.
But really, Donald Trump to me is the playbook of how you need to behave. Because a lot of people in politics think, because it was the case in the seventies, eighties, that you could reason with the opposition, you could find a compromise, you could be bipartisan, you could persuade people, you could sell it in the media, you could roll the pitch, that that strategy can be adopted now. And I think they're wrong because the opposition have changed. You know, we're not dealing with a load of social democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization.
This is what their aims are.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m following a troubling pay-to-play pattern in Arizona: Sunshine, a foster-care operator, dumped about $400K into Hobbs’ campaign, inauguration fund, and the Arizona Dems. After the money landed, Hobbs’ administration approved a 60% rate hike for Sunshine—the only provider to get such a deal—raising payments from $195 to $234 per kid per day and expanding the contract from 280 to 322 kids. The timeline—donations, rate hikes, and a Bloomberg-like exposure—suggests bribery, conflicts of interest, and possible RICO violations. Arizona deserves answers.
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🔥 Oh man… this Katie Hobbs scandal is WAY uglier than people thought. Arizona’s Democrat governor is now facing a full-blown racketeering investigation — and the receipts are brutal. A foster-care group home operator quietly funneled $400,000 into Hobbs’ campaign machine, her inauguration fund, and the Arizona Democratic Party. And right after the money landed? Hobbs’ administration approved a massive 60% rate hike for that same company — the only provider to get such a sweetheart deal. That hike took payments from $195 → $234 per kid, per day, unlocking millions in taxpayer money for one politically connected business. They even expanded their contract from caring for 280 children to 322 children, multiplying the payout. The timeline is damning: •Sunshine drops $200K during Hobbs’ campaign. •State denies their rate hike. •Sunshine donates $100K to Hobbs’ inauguration. •Suddenly the rate hike is approved. •Sunshine sends another $100K. •The Arizona Republic exposes everything. Lawmakers are calling it exactly what it looks like: a pay-to-play operation — riddled with bribery, fraud, conflicts of interest, and even potential RICO violations because of the pattern of donations and state favors. If this happened in any other state, people would already be in handcuffs. Arizona deserves answers.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker pressed the Governor with questions, asking what the Governor wants after vetoing a bill a week ago. The questions included why the Governor won’t take questions in four weeks, why the Governor is avoiding the public and the press, and why there has been no gaggle for four weeks. The speaker repeated the questions to the Governor, noting “In four weeks, governor.” The scene closes with “That’s the sound of a suburban door.” Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been taking questions today. I'm very sorry. How are helping me? Governor, it's been a week since you vetoed a bill. What do you want?
Why won't you take any questions in four weeks, governor, since you've had a gaggle? Why are you avoiding the public? Why are you avoiding the press, governor? In four weeks, governor. That's the sound of a suburban door.
Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that 20 CIA and FBI agents confirm Barack Obama personally worked with former CIA Director John Brennan to create the “Russia Hoax,” hiding the operation inside a CIA vault for nearly a decade. Twenty agents, one conspiracy, a President caught red-handed. The Obama administration didn’t just spy—they manufactured lies, weaponized intelligence, and buried evidence to protect themselves. This isn’t theory—it’s confirmation. Obama is finished.
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🚨 BREAKING: 20 CIA and FBI Agents have just CONFIRMED Barack Obama personally worked with former CIA Director John Brennan to create the fake “Russia Hoax” — and then hid the entire operation inside a classified CIA vault for nearly a decade. Twenty agents. One conspiracy. A President caught red-handed. The Obama administration didn’t just spy — they manufactured lies, weaponized intelligence, and buried the evidence to protect themselves. This isn’t a theory anymore — it’s confirmation. Barack Obama is absolutely finished.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false." "They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true." "There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again and form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt." "One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump." "That the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign." "Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey." "60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House." "Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in our country." "It's time for people to pay the price."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News alert the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election.
Speaker 1: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't.
Speaker 0: Gabbard got her hands on a house intel report that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born, interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns out that the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move.
John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing. And only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was nothing routine about this, and it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in. Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies either.
Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama. There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again and form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt. One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump.
That was the Steele dossier. And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of any of this was ever true. There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted that they be pushed, even without verifiable evidence.
The Obama administration cherry picked the intelligence, lied about their sources, misquoted sources, didn't corroborate their claims, suppressed intelligence that ran counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings. Rank and file CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own tradecraft standards. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump knows, that the Russians helped him win in 2016.
Speaker 2: Putin hated secretary Clinton so much that that the flip side of that coin was he had a clear preference for the person running against the person he aided so much.
Speaker 3: It was Russia in a very systematic way, in trying to interfere in the election and to try to advance the prospects of Donald Trump being elected.
Speaker 0: This was such a malicious disinformation campaign perpetrated on the American people that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House. What this report actually shows is that the Russians just wanted to create chaos and undermine Americans' faith in democracy. Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir Putin didn't care who won. He had no preference. But like most people, expected Hillary to win and had a little docket of compromising dirt on her, dirt that he never released.
Now if Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn't Putin drop the dirt?
Speaker 1: There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. Then CIA director Brennan and the intelligence mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a, quote, unquote, clear preference for Trump.
Speaker 0: Now if Clinton was on tranquilizers like the Russians believed, why didn't they leak it to help Trump win?
Speaker 3: How credible was the information about Hillary Clinton's health?
Speaker 1: All I have seen is what, the intelligence, committee have reported through their investigation. I think the the the underlying point there is is that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that they had. And the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election, as president Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan and everybody said they were doing in order to support Donald Trump's election, they would have released the most damning of that information. Obama and his
Speaker 0: spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did. Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with Trump and that he didn't even direct his people to help Trump win, but they put it out there anyway. In a sense, Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in our country. Barack Obama, the CIA, and the FBI were the ones doing what our enemy wanted.
Speaker 4: Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former president Obama in criminal behavior?
Speaker 1: We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI, to investigate the criminal implications of this.
Speaker 4: For even for president Obama?
Speaker 1: Correct. The evidence that we have, found and that we have released, directly point to president Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.
Speaker 0: Even two years later after the election, Barack Obama was still pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true. And he knew it wasn't true because he helped manufacture it.
Speaker 4: They're undermining our alliances, cozying up to Russia. What happened to the Republican Party? They're cozying up to the former head of the KGB, actively blocking legislation that would defend our elections from Russian attack. What happened?
Speaker 0: Now I don't know if it's possible to indict a former president for actions he took while in office. I'm not a lawyer, proudly. But Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe liability. Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact that Brennan committed perjury when he lied to Congress.
Speaker 5: Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier?
Speaker 3: I don't. Do you know if
Speaker 5: the bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier as any as part of any court filings, applications?
Speaker 3: I have no awareness.
Speaker 5: Did the CIA rely on it?
Speaker 3: No. Why not? Because we we didn't. We it wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence, information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done.
It was it was not.
Speaker 0: Well, that's a lie. Whatever happens to these guys is not revenge. It's accountability. And it's time for people to pay the price.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a shocking revelation about Barack Obama's use of USAID, which allegedly served as a front for laundering money through the Cayman Islands under the guise of foreign aid. According to Mike Benz on Joe Rogan, during Obama's era, $1.2 billion was funneled into activist groups in Cuba, teaching them to utilize social media for protests. A secret Twitter clone, Zunzuneo, was created to spread propaganda and organize dissent. This operation reportedly transformed into a tool for orchestrating uprisings, raising serious concerns about how tax dollars were utilized.
@MAGAStormX - MAGA Storm
🚨 INSANE BOMBSHELL 🚨 Barack Obama was using USAID as a front to LAUNDER money through the Cayman Islands — all while pretending it was “foreign aid.” 👉 That money didn’t go to help anyone. 👉 It went straight into creating and training “Rent-a-Riot” mobs used to overthrow governments. Mike Benz on Joe Rogan: “During the Obama USAID era, we were running rogue operations in Cuba. USAID pumped $1.2 BILLION into activist groups, teaching them how to use Facebook, Twitter, hashtags, and coordinate street protests. All of it was structured to fool the American people, Congress, and even the White House.” Obama even secretly funded a Twitter clone for Cuba — called Zunzuneo (slang for hummingbird) — built to look like it came from Cubans. First it pushed harmless content like sports and weather… then it flipped to political propaganda, organizing dissent, and fueling mass protests. The kicker? 💰 They routed the money through Cayman Islands accounts — claiming it was “Pakistani aid” while secretly funding digital psy-ops and street uprisings. Once enough users were onboard, the entire network was turned into a tool for manufactured uprisings — creating “Rent-a-Riots” on demand. This is how governments were toppled. This is how your tax dollars were spent. And this is only the surface of what Mike Benz breaks down in detail. ⚠️ This is one of the most INSANE scandals of the Obama era.
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Obama era, this was a scandal about rogue USAID operations in Cuba. Zunzanillo, an online social networking microblogging service created by USAID and marketed to Cuban users, ran from 02/2009 to 02/2014 as a Cuban Twitter clone; the network reached about 60,000 Cuban subscribers. USAID and the State Department pumped $1,200,000,000 to sponsor activist groups to learn Facebook, Twitter, hashtags, and how to coordinate protests, aiming to spark Arab Spring–style social media revolutions. Funds were concealed as humanitarian funds designated for Pakistan; contractors funded by USAID, main contractor Creative Associates International, designed the network and used a Byzantine system of front companies with Cayman Islands bank accounts, recruiting unsuspecting executives, “according to the AP.” Data would be used for micro targeting towards anti and pro government users in Cuba, building a vast database of Cuban Zunzanillo subscribers, including gender, age, and receptiveness and political tendencies. Initial content included “noncontroversial” sports, music, and hurricane updates; once subscriber mass was reached, political messages via social bots would be introduced to encourage dissent in this astroturfing, aiming to organize “smart mobs” and mass gatherings to topple the regime—“renegotiate the balance of power between state and society.” Guardian coverage and internal documents describe the plan, noting “this is classic CIA work.” If US fingerprints risk diplomatic blowback, “we need a formal intelligence agency.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was a scandal during Obama the Obama USAID era. Now we were running a number of of rogue USAID operations in Cuba at the time. By the way, I have to say for the record, I'm no fan of the Cuban government. I I I'm and I'm not even weighing in on whether it's the right or wrong thing to do, you know, in terms of regime change there or, you know, liberating people there from autocratic excess by that government. I'm simply showing the American people where your tax dollars are going and how these things are structured in order to systematically fool you and to fool congress and to fool the White House.
So for example so this is this is and and I'll I'll show a couple other things in a second here, but it so this is Zunzanillo. If yeah. So if you just scroll for a second, we'll start with this. Right? So it was an online social media just scroll up one second.
We'll start at the top here. It was an online social social networking microblogging service created by USAID and marketed to Cuban users. This was a a Twitter knockoff. See, the background of this is this is 02/2009, 02/2014, that period. The state department in USAID were gangbusters gung ho on the promise of Arab Spring style social media revolutions to topple other governments.
You know, that the Arab Spring was a Facebook revolution and a Twitter revolution. USAID pumped $1,200,000,000 in, you know, and we we sponsored these activist groups and these civil society organizations to learn how to use Facebook, learn how to use Twitter, lose learn how to use hashtags, learn how to coordinate street protests so that everyone knows where to go, what street to show up on, you know, what kind of slogans to, you know, to to use in order to create the pro democracy, you know, predicate for it. But the problem was at the time Cuba did not allow US social media in. So they said, so they're not allowing Twitter in. How can we get a Twitter there but without calling it Twitter, without making it look like it's coming from The US?
So what they did is they took the exact same thing as Twitter. Same user interface, same like and retweet button. Zunzanillo is the the Cuban slang word for for hummingbird. So just it means it's it's bird. It was the the Twitter bird.
The whole thing. But the whole trick about it was you have to make it look like it's coming from the Cubans if you're going to do this operation. So what you'll see is, it began running so this is 2010. This is right, you know, during the Arab Spring. And what you'll see is they took funds, millions of dollars of funds that were concealed as humanitarian funds designated for Pakistan.
Now I don't know if, Joe or or the audience, if you looked at a map lately, but Pakistan is not exactly a next door neighbor of Cuba. Right? So and this is the this is the Wikipedia whitewashing, and we can get into the deeper layers of this. But contractors funded by USAID, I should note the main contractor was Creative Associates International, who's a frequent one. It's CAI CAI, not CIA.
I promise. So they they concealed in the budget from senate, from congress, from the White House National Security Council. They said that that these were humanitarian funds for Pakistan, and then they ran that to their contractor, CAI, to, quote, set up a Byzantine system of front companies using Cayman Islands bank accounts and recruiting unsuspecting business executives who would not be told of the company's ties to the US government according to the AP. Private companies like Creative Associates International, designed the network. The idea arose after, they were given 500,000 stolen Cuban cell phones that are available on the black market.
And then what you'll see if you scroll down is, okay. The network dubbed the the Cuban Twitter reached about 60,000 Cuban subscribers. The initiative appears to also have had a surveillance dimension allowing a, quote, vast database of Cuban Zunzanillo subscribers, including gender, age, and receptiveness and political tendencies to be built with the Associated Press noting such data would could be used in the future for political purpose. By the way, these are all in quotes from the internal documents, and we can go through that. The data would then be used for micro targeting efforts towards anti and pro government users in Cuba.
The developers aim to, at first, use noncontroversial content such as sports and music and hurricane updates, by the way. They they used hurricane updates in the internal things. You know, basically, a humanitarian front that if you sign up to this app, you'll you'll know about natural disasters in the area. Meanwhile, what was the plan the whole time? Once they built up enough subscribers, they would begin to introduce political messages through social bots and encourage descent in this in this astroturfing.
There's a great Guardian write up on this. If you if you go to Guardian Zunzanillo so you can see see how crazy just type in Zunzanillo smart mob Guardian. You'll see the internal files explicitly said, we're gonna lure them in with music, sports, and hurricane updates. You have to join you have to join, you know, this you know, Twitter in Cuba if you want, you know, to be relevant in the culture and see what's trending in sports and music. If you wanna be safe in your homes, if you wanna know where hurricanes are going, Twitter you know, Cuban Twitter is the the fastest place to get this.
It's humanitarian work for you know, that's we're saving lives by doing this. But the whole point is once they hit a critical mass, they would create rental riots. And and they would use this the same way they used it in Egypt and Tunisia to topple those governments under the Obama administration. They would organize smart mobs, rental riots. And if and if you if you scroll down, there's some you know, the this this is a fantastic article.
Highly recommend. There's a lot more there. But but okay. Stop right there. Oh, scroll up a little bit.
Scroll up a little bit. Okay. Documents show the US government plan to build a subscriber base through noncontroversial news content, news messages on soccer music and hurricane updates. This is in the Guardian. Later, when the network reached a critical mass, perhaps hundreds of thousands, operators would introduce political content aimed at inspiring Cubans to to organize, quote, smart mobs.
Mass gatherings called at a moment's notice that might trigger a Cuban spring or as one USA document put it, quote, renegotiate the balance of power between state and society. And, you know so one more thing if if you wanna look up on this to see how they how they conceal it. If you just type in, USAID, Zunzanillo, and the word and discrete or or discrete action. And you'll see how USA when when this scandal popped off, everyone said, what the hell? How did this happen?
This is classic CIA work. You're using Cayman Islands bank accounts. You're saying it's you're earmarking it for Pakistan you know, Pakistani aid. This has clear implications for US statecraft if this gets busted. This is what the c this is why we tasked the CIA to do this.
Plausible viability. If something has diplomatic blowback and we don't want US fingerprints on it, we need a formal intelligence agency because there's diplomatic blowback if US fingerprints are revealed.