reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @MaajidNawaz
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
And they will claim that they never said any of it But we have ALL the receipts
Video Transcript AI Summary
Investing in vaccines is crucial for stopping COVID transmission and returning to normalcy. Vaccinated individuals are protected from severe illness and can resume activities without masks. However, reports show a decline in immunity over time, necessitating booster shots. The goal is to increase immunity levels to minimize infections. The effectiveness of vaccines against variants is emphasized, highlighting the importance of getting vaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been over a 20 to 1 return.
Speaker 1: If you had put that money into an S and P 500 and reinvested the dividends, you'd come up with something like $17,000,000,000 but you think it's $200,000,000,000. Here, yeah.
Speaker 2: You're okay. You're not gonna you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations.
Speaker 3: These vaccines are highly, highly effective.
Speaker 1: Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick.
Speaker 3: They're really, really good against variants. Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back to normal.
Speaker 1: Get your first shot and when you're due for your second, get your second shot.
Speaker 3: A key goal is to stop the transmission to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on whatsoever. When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected.
Speaker 2: If you're vaccinated, you're not gonna be hospitalized, you're not gonna be in ICU unit, and you're not gonna die. If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, without wearing a mask or physical distancing. But what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission.
Speaker 3: You know, we didn't have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines that help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce transmissions. We need a new new way of doing the vaccine.
Speaker 4: The level of virus in the nasopharynx of a person who's vaccinated and infected is the same level as the level of virus in the nasal parents of an unvaccinated person.
Speaker 1: Reports from our international colleagues, including Israel, suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early.
Speaker 4: And if you look at Israel
Speaker 3: Mhmm.
Speaker 4: Which has always been a month to a month and a half ahead of us, they are seeing a waning of immunity, not only against infection, but against hospitalizations and, to some extent, death. The booster might actually be an essential part of the primary regimen that people should have.
Speaker 2: The plan is for every every adult to get a booster shot.
Speaker 3: Clearly one of the best investments, I've ever been involved in.
@BretWeinstein - Bret Weinstein
“The facts didn’t change. They were just banned.” https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/vaccines-never-prevented-transmission-covid-alex-gutentag
Covid Vaccine Does Not Prevent Transmission
The Covid vaccine does not prevent transmission. Censoring the news and spreading vaccine misinformation in the name of 'science' is a danger to public health.
tabletmag.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Maajid Nawaz suggests that it's easier to label critics as terrorist sympathizers rather than addressing their grievances. He claims that Netanyahu funded Hamas to prevent a Palestinian state. James Beckmeyer asks for evidence, and Nawaz provides a link in response.
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
Q Card: It’s easier to dismiss your critics as terrorist sympathisers than to engage the substance of any grievance they may harbour. Because introspection is uncomfortable. Netanyahu funded Hamas to prevent a Palestinian state. So who’s the terrorist sympathiser now?
@James_Beckmeyer - Jim Beckmeyer
@MaajidNawaz What receipts do you have which indicate Israel literally funded Hamas? I think this is correct but I don't have anything to back it up.
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
NEW Radical Dispatch: Netanyahu Funded And Supported Hamas for War - RECEIPTS —-> https://maajidnawaz.substack.com/p/netanyahu-funded-and-supported-hamas - Israel Must Remove Netanyahu For Peace
Netanyahu Funded And Supported Hamas for War - Receipts
Israel Must Remove Netanyahu For Peace
maajidnawaz.substack.com
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
20/Oct/2023 London British MP @ABridgen stands ALONE in Parliament raising alarming state of UK EXCESS DEATH since Covid period The public viewing gallery was full but the chamber was EMPTY MPs who we pay do NOT CARE that we are DYING AT AN EXCESS RATE https://t.co/2IyOhEVGtQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker raises concerns about excess deaths and the lack of attention they receive. They discuss the pattern of excess deaths across countries and the need for data transparency. The speaker questions the accuracy of excess death calculations and highlights the failure to collect data on deaths referred to the coroner. They also discuss the increase in deaths among younger age groups and the potential link to vaccination. The speaker calls for a suspension of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines and a thorough investigation into their harms. They argue that the regulators have failed to protect the public and that evidence-based medicine and basic ethics should be prioritized.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Andrew Bridgeland. Thank you, mister deputy speaker. We have experienced 4 excess deaths since July 2021 in the whole of 2020. Unlike the pandemic, however, these deaths are not disproportionately of the old. In other words, the excessive deaths are striking down people in the prime of life.
But no one seems to care. I fear history will not judge this house kindly. Were still in a country supposedly committed to free and frank exchange of views, it appears that no one cares that no one cares. Well, I care, mister deputy speaker, and I credit those members here in attendance today who also care. And I'd also like to thank the honorable member for Lincoln for his support, and I'm sorry that he couldn't attend today's debate.
It's taken a lot of effort and more than 20 rejections since we are allowed to raise this topic. And at last, we are here to discuss the number of people dying. Nothing could be more serious. Numerous countries are currently gripped in a period of unexpected mortality, and no one wants to talk about it. It's quite normal for death numbers to fluctuate up and down by chance alone.
But what we're seeing here is a pattern repeated across countries, and the rise has not let up? Will you give way? I'll give way to my honorable gentleman.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm very grateful. And can I commend him for his The tenacious way he's he's battled on this particular, issue? I I certainly admire him, for that. I just I just wonder where where we found the media was in all of this because, of course, during the COVID pandemic, every day, the media, particularly the BBC, couldn't wait to tell us how many People have died in that particular day without any context of those figures whatsoever, but they seem to have gone strangely quiet, over these, excess deaths now.
Speaker 0: Gentleman, for his intervention, he's absolutely right. The media have let the British public How badly. There will be a full press, pack going out to all media outlets following my speech with all the evidence to back up all the claims I made in that speech, but I don't doubt there'll be no mention of it in the mainstream media. You might think that a debate about excess deaths is gonna be full of numbers. This speech does not have that many numbers because most of the important numbers are being kept hidden.
Other data has been oddly presented in a distorted way, and concerned people seeking to highlight important findings and ask questions students have found themselves inexplicably under attack. Before debating excess deaths, it's important to understand how excess Death is determined. To understand if there is an excess, by definition, you need to estimate how many deaths it would have been expected. The Organisation Nominate cooperation development used 2015 to 2019 as a baseline and the government's office of health disparities and improvement uses 2015 to 2019 baseline modeled to allow for aging. And I've used that data here.
Unforgivably, the Office of National Statistics have included deaths in 2021 as part of their baseline calculation for expected deaths, as if there was Anything normal about the deaths in 2021. By exaggerating the number of deaths expected, the number of excess Deaths can be minimised. Why would the ONS want to do that? There's just too much that we don't know and it's not good enough, mister deputy speaker. The ONS published Promptly each week the number of deaths that were registered.
And while this is commendable, it's not the data point that really matters. There's a total Failure to collect, never mind publish, data on deaths that are referred for investigation to the coroner. Why does this matter? A referral means that It can be many months and given the backlog, many years before a death is formally registered. Needing to investigate the cause of a death is fair enough.
Failing to record when the death happened is not. Because of this problem, we actually have no idea how many people actually died in 2021. Even now, the problem is greatest for the younger age groups where there's a higher proportion of deaths are investigated. This data failure is unacceptable. It must change.
There's nothing in a coroner's report that can bring anyone back from the dead, and those deaths should be reported. The youngest age groups are important not only because they should have their whole lives ahead of them. If there is a new cause of excess mortality across the board, it would not be noticed so much in the older cohorts because the extra deaths would be drowned out amongst the expected However, in the youngest cohorts, that is not the case. There were nearly 2 extra deaths a day in the second half of twenty 21 among 15 to 19 year old males. But potentially even more if those referred to the coroner were fully included.
In a judicial review of the decision to vaccinate yet younger children, the ONS refused in court to give anonymized details about these deaths. They admitted that the data they were, withholding was statistically significant. And I quote, they said, the ONS recognises that more work could be undertaken to examine the mortality rates of young people in 2021 and intends to do so once more reliable data are available. How many more extra deaths in 15 to 18 year olds would take to trigger such work. Surely, the ONS should be desperately keen to investigate deaths in young men.
Why else have an independent body charged with sounding mortality data. Surely, the ONS has a responsibility to collect data from the coroners to produce timely information. Let's move on to old people because most deaths in the old are registered promptly and we do have a better feel for how many Older people are dying. Deaths from dementia and Alzheimer's show what we ought to expect. There was a period high mortality coinciding with COVID and lockdowns, but ever since, there have been fewer deaths than expected.
After a period of high mortality, we expect and historically have seen a period or if they have seen a period of low mortality because those who have sadly died cannot die again. Those whose deaths were slightly premature because with COVID and lockdowns died earlier than they otherwise would have. This principle should hold true for every cause of death and every age group, but that's not what we're seeing. Even for the over 85 year olds, according to the Office of Health Improvement and Disparities, there were 8,000 excess deaths, 4% above the expected levels for the 12 months starting in July 2020. That includes all of the autumn 2020 wave of COVID when we had tiering, the 2nd lock down, and it includes all of the 1st COVID winter.
However, for the year starting July 2022, There have been over 18,000 excess deaths in this age group, 9% above expected levels, more than twice As many in a period when there should have been a deficit and when death from diseases previously associated with old age were actually fewer than expected. Mister speaker, I've raised my concerns around NG 163 and the use of midazolam and morphing, which may have caused and may still be causing premature deaths in the vulnerable. But that is, sadly a debate for another day. There were just over 14,000 excess deaths in the under 65 year olds before vaccination from April 20 twenty to the end of March 2021. However, since that time, there's been over 21,000 excess deaths ignoring the registration delay problem.
The majority, 58% of these deaths, were not attributed to COVID. We turned society upside down before vaccination for fear of excess deaths From COVID, today we have substantially more excess deaths and in younger people. And there's complete and eerie silence, mister deputy speaker. The evidence is unequivocal. There was a clear stepwise increase in mortality following the vaccine rollout.
There There was a reprieve in the winter of 2021, 22 because there were fewer than expected respiratory deaths. But otherwise, the excess has been incessantly at this high level? Ambulance data for England provides another clue. Ambulance calls for life threatening emergencies were ringing A steady 2,000 calls per day until the vaccine roll out. From then it rose to 2,500 daily, and calls have stayed at this level since.
The surveillance systems designed to spot a safety problem have all flashed red, but no one's looking. Claimers for personal Dependence payments for people who've developed a disability and cannot work rocketed with the vaccine rollout, and it's continued rise ever since. The same was seen in the USA also started with the vaccine rollout, not with COVID. A study to determine the vaccination status of a sample that such payments would be relatively quick and inexpensive to perform. Yet nobody seems interested in ascertaining this vital Information.
Officials have chosen to turn a blind eye to this disturbing, irrefutable and frightening data. Much like Nelson did. For far less honourable reasons, he would be ashamed of us, mister deputy speaker. Furthermore, data that has been used to sing the praises of the vaccines is deeply Only 1 COVID related death was prevented in each of the initial major trials that led to authorisation of the vaccines. And that is taking their data are entirely at face value, whereas a growing number of inconsistencies and anomalies suggest we ought not to do this.
Extrapolating from that means that between 15,020,000 people had to be injected to prevent a single death from COVID. To prevent a single COVID hospitalisation, over 1500 people needed to be injected. The trial data showed that 1 in 800 injected People had a serious adverse event, meaning they were hospitalised or had a life changing or life threatening condition. The risk of this was twice as high as the chance of preventing a COVID hospitalisation. We're harming 1 in 800 people to supposedly save 1 in twenty thousand.
This is madness. The strongest claims have too often been based on modelling carried out on the basis of Lawed assumptions where observational studies have been carried out, researchers will correct for age and comorbidities to make the vaccines look better. However, mister deputy speaker, they never correct for its socioeconomic or or ethnic differences that would make the vaccineers look worse. This matters. For example, claims of high mortality in less vaccinated regions in the United States took no account of the fact that this was the case before the vaccines were rolled Now that is why studies that claim to show the vaccines prevented COVID deaths also showed a marked effect of them preventing non COVID deaths.
The prevention of non COVID deaths is always a statistical illusion, and claims that prevented COVID deaths should not be assumed when that illusion has not been corrected for. And when it is corrected for, the claims of efficacy for the vaccines vanish with it. COVID disproportionately killed unfortunately killed people from ethnic minorities and lower socioeconomic groups. During 2020, During the pandemic, the deaths among the most deprived were up by 23% compared to 17% for the least deprived. However, since 2022, the pattern has reversed with 5% excess mortality amongst the most deprived compared to 7% among the least deprived.
These deaths are being caused by something different. In 2020, the excess was highest in the oldest cohorts, and there were fewer than expected deaths amongst the younger Even the youngest age groups are now seeing substantial excess with a 9% excess in the under fifties since 2022 compared to 5% now in the over 75 group. Despite London being a younger region, the excess in London is only 3%. Whereas it's higher in every more heavily vaccinated region of the UK. And it should be noted, Mister deputy speaker, that London is famously the least vaccinated region in the UK by some margin.
Studies comparing regions on a larger scale show the same thing. There There are studies from the Netherlands, Germany, and the whole world, each showing that the highest mortality after vaccination was seen in the most heavily vaccinated regions. So we need to ask, what are people dying of? Since 2022, there has been 11% excess in ischemic heart disease deaths, and a 16% excess in heart failure deaths. In the meantime, cancer deaths, only 1% above expected at levels, which is further evidence.
This is not simply some other factor that affects deaths across across the board, such as a failing to account for an aging population or a failing NHS. In fact, the excess itself has a seasonality with a peak in the winter months. The fact it returns to baseline levels in summer is a further indication that this is not due to some statistical error or an ageing population alone. Doctor Claire Craig from The Hartbrink first highlighted a stepwise increase in cardiac arrest calls after the vaccine rollout in May 2021. And Hart have repeatedly raised concerns about about the increase in cardiac deaths.
And they have every reason to be concerned. 4 participants in the vaccine group of the Pfizer trial died from cardiac arrest compared to only 1 in the placebo group. Overall, there were 21 deaths in the vaccine group up to March 2021 compared to 17 in the placebo group. And there are serious anomalies about the reporting of the deaths within this trial with the deaths in the vaccine group taking much longer to report than those in A placebo group. And that's highly suggested, mister deputy speaker, of a significant bias in what was supposed to be a blinded trial.
An Israeli study clearly showed an increase in cardiac hospital attendances among 18 to 39 year olds that correlated nation not with COVID. There have now been several postmortem studies demonstrating a causal link between vaccination and coronary artery disease leading to death up to 4 months out vaccination in coronary artery disease leading to death up to 4 months after the last dose. And we need to remember The safety trial was cut short to only 2 months, so there's no evidence of any vaccine safety beyond that point. The decision to un Blind the trials after 2 months and vaccinate the placebo group is nothing less than a public health scandal. Everyone involved failed in their duty to, the truth, but no one cares, mister deputy speaker.
The one place that can help us understand exactly what caused this is Australia. Australia had almost no COVID when vaccines were first introduced, making them the perfect control group. The state of South Australia had only a 1000 cases of COVID across its whole population by December 2021 before omicron when arrived. What was the impact of vaccination there? For 15 to 44 year olds, there was historically The 1300 emergency cardiac presentations a month.
With vaccine rollout in the under fifties, this rocketed to 2,172 cases in November 2021 in November 2021, in this age group alone. A 67% more than usual. Overall, there were 17,900 South Australians who had at a cardiac emergency in 2021 compared to only 13,250 in 2018, a 35% increase. It is clearly the vaccine that must be the number one suspect in this, and it cannot be dismissed as just a coincidence. Australian mortality overall has increased from early 2021 and the increase is due to cardiac deaths.
These excess deaths are not due to an ageing population because there There are fewer deaths in the diseases of old age. These deaths are not an effect of covid because it's happened in places where covid have not reached and they're not due to low statin prescriptions or undertreated hypertension, as Chris Whitty would suggest, because prescriptions did not change and in any effect It would have taken many years and been very small. The prime suspect must be something that was introduced to the population as a whole, something novel. The prime hypothesis must be the experimental COVID nineteen vaccines. The ONS published a dataset of deaths By vaccinated and unvaccinated.
At first glance, it appears to show that the vaccines are safe and effective. However, there were several huge problems with How they presented that data. One was that for the 1st 3 week period after injection, the ONS claimed there were only a tiny number of deaths. The number the ONS would normally predict to occur in a single week. Where were the deaths from the usual causes?
When this was raised, the ONS saying that the sickest people did not get vaccinated and therefore people who were taking the vaccination were self selecting for those least likely to die. Not only is this not the case in the real world, with even even hospices heavily vaccinated from their residents, but the ONS's own data showed that a proportion of sickest people was equal in the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. This inevitably raises serious questions about the ONS's date of presentation. There were so many problems with the methodology used by the ONS that the statistics regulator agreed that the ONS Data could not be used to assess vaccine efficacy or safety. That tells you something about the ONS.
Consequently, Hart asked the UK Health Security to provide the data they had on people who had died and therefore needed to be removed from their vaccination data This request has been repeatedly refused with excuses given including the false claim that anonymizing the state will be accruent of creating it even though there is case law that anonymisation is not considered creation of new data? Mister deputy speaker, I believe if this data was released, it would be damning. Some claim that so many lives have been saved by mass vaccination, that any amount of harm, and death caused by the vaccines is a price worth paying. They're delusional, mister deputy speaker. The claim of 20,000,000 lives saved is based We saw now discredited models which assume that COVID waves do not peak without intervention.
There have been numerous waves globally that now demonstrate that Straight that is not the case. And it was also based on there having been more than half a 1000000 lives saved in the UK. That's more than the worst case scenario predicted, the beginning of the pandemic. For the claim to have been true, the rate at which COVID killed people will have to have taken off dramatically at the beginning of 2021 with the in the absence Vaccination. This is ludicrous, and it bears no relationship to the truth.
In the real world, Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea had a mortality rate of 400 deaths per million up to the summer of 2022 after they were first hit with Omicron. So how does that compare? With the Wuhan strain, France and Europe as a whole had a mortality rate of under 400 deaths per million up to the summer of 20 twenty. Australia, New Zealand and South Korea were all heavily vaccinated before infection. So tell me, where where was the benefit?
The UK had just over 800 deaths per million up to the summer of 2020. So twice as much. But we know that Omicron is half as deadly as the Wilham variant. The death rates per million are the same before and after vaccination. So where was the benefits of vaccination?
The regulators have failed in their duty to protect the public. They've allowed these novel products to skip crucial safety testing by letting them be described as vaccines. They failed to insist on safety test in being done in the years since the 1st temporary emergency authorisation. Even now, no one can tell you how much spike protein is produced on vaccination and for how long. Yet another example of where there is no data for me to share with the house.
And when it comes to proctor recording deaths due to vaccination, Nation, the system's broken. Not a single doctor registered death in a rare brain brain pot before docs in Scandinavia forced the issue, and the MHRA acknowledged the problem. Only then did these deaths start to be certified by doctors in the UK. It turns out that doctors We're waiting for permission from the regulator, and the regulators are waiting for the alerted by the doctors. This is a lethal circularity.
Furthermore, coroners have written regulation 28 reports highlighting deaths from vaccination to prevent further deaths, yet the MHRA said in response to an FOI that they've not received any of them. The system we have in place is clearly not functioning to protect the public. The regulators also miss the fact that the Pfizer trial in the Pfizer trial, the vaccine was made for the trial participants in a highly controlled environment in stark contrast to the manufacturing process used for the public rollout, which was based on a completely different technology. And just only just over 200 participants were given the same product that was given to the public. But not only was the data from These people never compare to those in the trial for efficacy and safety, but the MHRA have admitted that they dropped the requirement to provide the data.
That means there was never a trial on the Pfizer product that was actually rolled out to the public, and that product has never been compared to the product that was actually trialed. The vaccine mass production processes use vats of Escherichia coli and present a risk of contamination with DNA from the bacteria as well as bacterial cell walls, which can cause dangerous reactions. This is not theoretical, mister, deputy speaker. This is now sound evidence that's been replicated by several labs across the world, and the mRNA vaccines, were contaminated by DNA which far exceeded the usual permissible levels. Given that this DNA is enclosed in lipid nano particle delivery system, it's it's arguable that even the permissible levels have been far too high.
These lipid nano particles and then to enter every organ of the body, as well as this potentially causing some of the acute adverse reactions seen, there is a serious risk that this Bacterial DNA inserting itself into human DNA. And will anybody investigate? No, they won't. I'll give well on that point.
Speaker 2: We're conscious that time is tight. I I I recognize that the honorable gentleman is making a very, very powerful case. Does he agree with me that the government should be looking at this properly and should Commission a review into the excess deaths partly so that we can reassure our constituents that the case he's making is not in fact valid and the vaccines have no cause behind these excess deaths?
Speaker 0: I thank the The honorable gentleman for his support on this topic and of course that is what exactly any responsible government should do. I wrote to the prime minister on the 7th August Not 2023. We've all the evidence of this, but sadly, mister Lippier speaker, I'm I'm still awaiting the response. What will it take to take to stop these products? The The complete failure to stop infection was not enough, and we all know plenty of vaccinated people who've caught and spread COVID.
The mutation of the virus to a weaker variant, Omicron, that That that wasn't enough. The increasing evidence of the serious harms to those of us that were vaccinated. That's not enough. And now the cardiac deaths and the deaths Young people, it's apparently none of either. It's high time these experimental vaccines were suspended in a full investigation into the harms they've caused initiated.
He should all be a harsh judge If we don't start using evidence based medicine, we need to return to basic science, basic ethics immediately, which means listening to all voices and investigating all concerns. In conclusion, mister mister speaker, the experimental COVID nineteen vaccines are not They are not effective despite there only being limited interest in the chamber from colleagues. And I'm very grateful for those who have attended. We can see public gallery, there is considerable public interest. I would implore all members of the House present and those not support calls for a 3 hour mate, on this important issue.
And mister deputy speaker, this might be the 1st debate on excess deaths in our parliament. Indeed, it might be the 1st debate on excess deaths in the world. But very sadly, I promise you, it won't be the last.
Speaker 3: Thank you, mister deputy speaker. Can I Start by congratulating the honorable member for Northwest Leicestershire for securing, this important debate? I do only have 5 minutes of the 30 minutes, a debate to respond, so I will try and cover all the points, if I can. Can I start by acknowledging that He's correct? We have seen an increase in excess deaths in the last year.
However, his analysis is, something I I will disagree with Because the causes, that he refers to, are are simply, do not, bear to to the statistics that we have. There have been a combination of factors contributing to the increase in excess deaths, including in the last year, high flu prevalence, the ongoing of COVID nineteen, we had a strep a outbreak and, conditions such as heart disease, which he touched on, diabetes and cancer, because we had Actually, a lockdown of routine health services over a 2 year period. Many of those are now coming forward with, as a a result of that. And starting with winter flu, the number of positive tests last year peaked 0.8% the highest seen in the last 6 years and interim analysis from the UKHSA indicated the number of deaths in England associated Flu was far higher than pre pandemic levels so excess deaths due to flu last winter is sadly part of the answer. And he touched on the independent body of The ONS.
Well, their figures show that the leading cause of death in England is still dementia, which accounts for about 10% of all deaths. But they do also look at the cause of excess deaths. And if you look at the figures, as of June this year, the top three causes of Excess deaths are respiratory illnesses, dementia, and ischemic heart disease, which is often caused by, an increase in cholesterol, smoking, not having a Bug question. So there's a number of reasons and they are often chronic conditions that people have had for years, decades in fact, some people, and they're not, acute illnesses. Now just to touch on on on some of the points, that he has, made in in his points, in the 3 minutes I have left, to respond.
Firstly, turning to, the importance of vaccination. I think, you know, it it's very easy to say that there's a a prevalence of high rates of COVID vaccination in people who have died, and that is correct. When 93.6% of your population has had at least 1 dose of the vaccine, there will be a high rate of vaccination in excess deaths. That is different to causality. I completely agree with them as a high prevalence rate.
That is not the same as saying that that is the cause of those deaths. And the office The NASA statistics, has looked, then actually those who've been vaccinated generally had a lower all cause mortality rate than the unvaccinated people, since the booster introduction in 2021. And a recent study in Singapore actually found that, When they looked at, patients who, recovered from COVID who were unvaccinated, they showed an increased risk of by 56% more, to be at risk of cardiac complications a year later compared to those who were vaccinated. So there is conflicting data on this, and I'm not necessarily disagree with him, but I think we need to have a robust conversation on this and not to assume that 1, side, necessarily has, all the answers. Now just to touch on a couple of points that he made around vaccine safety.
Now the regulator has been, taking account of those who report adverse events, and I would encourage anyone who's had a side effect from any of the vaccines to use the yellow card system report it to their GP because when they have been reported, the MHRA has taken action. If you look in April 21, the MHRA reacted to rare cases of concurrent thrombosis and thrombocytopenia following the AZ vaccine, which resulted in, adults under 30 not being offered that vaccine and in May 21 that was increased to the adults under 40 and particularly to the m r a vaccine in June 21 following reports of a link between, COVID vaccines and myocarditis, the Commission on Human Medicines conducted An independent review which found the incidence of this side effect was rare, but it was between 1 and 2 cases for a 100,000. So when there are concerns, absolutely, We must, investigate those. There is no doubt about it. And for those that have experienced, rare side effects from the vaccine, we had to debate earlier this afternoon about that.
We do have the vaccine damage payment scheme, which, offers a payment of 120,000 if that is, one showed to
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion on the cause of a large explosion. @MaajidNawaz suggests it could be an Israeli air strike due to the scale. @BrandonLesco6 accuses BBC of wanting war.
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
BBC: “It is hard to see what else this could be, really, given the size of the explosion, other than an Israeli air strike, or several air strikes, because when we’ve seen rockets being fired out of Gaza, we never see explosions of that scale” https://t.co/8609kyA8cF
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Israeli military is being investigated for a massive explosion, possibly caused by airstrikes. Rockets fired from Gaza have never caused such a large-scale explosion, resulting in only a few deaths. The video of the explosion is still being verified.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israeli military has been contacted, for comment, and they have said that they are investigating. But, you know, it is hard to see what else this could be, really, given the size of the explosion other than an Israeli airstrike or several air strikes, because, you know, when we've seen rockets being fired out of Gaza, we never see, explosions of that scale. We might see, half a dozen, maybe a few more people being killed in such rocket attacks. But we've never seen anything, on the scale of the sort of explosion on the video I was watching earlier, which as you say, is still to be verified.
@BrandonLesco6 - Sooners Dog
@MaajidNawaz BBC wants war.
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
BBC: “It is hard to see what else this could be, really, given the size of the explosion, other than an Israeli air strike, or several air strikes, because when we’ve seen rockets being fired out of Gaza, we never see explosions of that scale” https://t.co/8609kyA8cF
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Israeli military is being investigated for a massive explosion, possibly caused by an airstrike. Rockets fired from Gaza have never resulted in such a large-scale explosion, typically causing fewer casualties. The video of the explosion is still being verified.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israeli military has been contacted, for comment, and they have said that they are investigating. But, you know, it is hard to see what else this could be, really, given the size of the explosion other than an Israeli airstrike or several air strikes, because, you know, when we've seen rockets being fired out of Gaza, we never see, explosions of that scale. We might see, half a dozen, maybe a few more people being killed in such rocket attacks. But we've never seen anything, on the scale of the sort of explosion on the video I was watching earlier, which as you say, is still to be verified.
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
“I served in the (Israeli Defence Force) Gaza division during the 2014 Gaza war..listen to me and listen well. There’s no way in hell that someone can approach the border WITHOUT US KNOWING ABOUT IT”
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker briefly mentions something about a situation and then moves on to talk about a group of people called "entrectorim" in a place called "Arabamortish." They mention that something happened to them, but it is unclear what exactly. The speaker ends by mentioning "the African lost some nerve."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That as a that as a. But, actually, tov. In Matzav, Okay. I'll I'll nichnessu entrectorim, Arabamortish, the African lost some nerve. The last
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
BBC Security Correspondent @FrankRGardner: “With the combined efforts of Shin Bet, Israeli domestic intelligence, Mossad, its external spy agency & all the assets of the Israel Defense Forces, it is FRANKLY ASTOUNDING that nobody saw this coming.” https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67040221.amp
How did Israeli intelligence fail to stop major attack? - BBC News
Israeli officials tell BBC an investigation into Gaza's surprise attack will go on for years.
bbc.com
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
.@efenigson: “I served in the IDF 25 years ago in the intelligence forces.. there’s no way, in my view, that Israel did not know what’s coming…Something is very wrong here”
Video Transcript AI Summary
On October 7th, 2023, the Israel-Hamas war began with Hamas terrorists breaching the border fence and carrying out attacks and kidnappings in Israeli towns. Over 100 Israeli citizens have been kidnapped, with some villages being set on fire. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) were not adequately prepared, leaving the Gaza envelope unoccupied. Media reports lacked transparency, and the IDF spokesperson restricted information. Questions arise about Israeli intelligence and whether this event was planned to justify a prisoner exchange. The speaker criticizes the government's corruption and suggests a conspiracy involving higher powers. The situation is seen as a failure to protect Israel, comparable to the Yom Kippur War 50 years ago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: October 7th 2023. This is a flat fennings on, and I'm here to share an update from Israel Hamas war, which started this morning. I'm going to share some key details and concerns mostly based on Israeli citizens voices from the ground and based on official statements. This is a very tough day for me and for us in Israel, and it is tough for people of Palestine too, especially now that Israel is starting to attack back. This war and every war is a horrible thing for everyone involved, a accept for those who get rich from it.
Right? This morning, around 6 AM, around sunrise, hundreds of Hamas terrorists, at least 300 breach the border fence in multiple places, completely unimpeded, leading to terror attacks and kidnappings in Israeli towns or villages. The terrorists infiltrated a significant number of dry land outposts as well as a Naval infiltration point in Zikim. As we speak, Israel is actively engaged in combat in 22 outposts. This is from the IDF statement, the official statement.
The attacks have already resulted in over 100 casual and more than 100 kidnaps of Israeli citizens. In one village, 50 Israelis have been taken hostage. Leaving people locked in shelters for long periods of 8 to 9 hours without rescue. By the way, the 100 kidnappings is not the official number. It's what we hear from people on the ground.
I think official numbers talk about 30 or 40 people, but we know there are more. In some places, the terrorists were burning the village and people didn't know if to leave the shelter and surrender or stay and pray for the fire to not reach them. Many young people who were in a big outdoor party near the Gaza envelope villages were attacked there. Some ran away. Some were injured.
And some are still missing. Apparently, Israeli defense forces that were supposed to be around Gaza were placed around the West Bank because of security concerns so that the the Gaza envelope was left unoccupied with military. They say around 60 to 80% that area was left without the idea of forces that were supposed to be there. Soldiers are being recruited for reserves as we speak from, this morning, but because of stupid reasons such as no public transport, they're waiting hours to get to the bases. Main Street media, this is an interesting point.
Apparently, admits that IDF spokesperson is forbidding them to tell the complete truth about what's happening, highlighting a lack of transparency. And this is to the Israeli citizens. I'm not even talking about overseas. I'm talking about to the people of Israel here. For hours and hours, the reports came from the mainstream media were completely lacking and people started to rely mostly on the news from each other, from people on the ground.
Only now 6 PM, Israel time. Oh, it's actually 7 already. 12 hours after the event started, we received the first formal statement from the IDF spokesperson, and I will include an article with that statement in the notes. A year ago, there was a military operation in Gaza to prepare for such events. And, unknowingly, there are trainings for these kind of scenarios.
This raises serious questions for me, anyway, about Israeli intelligence. What happened? 2 years ago, there were, There was a successful deployment of underground barriers with sensors to alert exactly on these kind of terrorist breaches. Israel has one of the most advanced and high-tech armies. How come there was zero response to the border and fence breaching I cannot understand that.
Personally, I served in the IDF 25 years ago in the intelligence forces. There's no way in my view that Israel did not know of what's coming. A cat moving alongside the fence is triggering old forces So this what happened to the strongest army in the world? How come border crossings were wide open? Something is very wrong here.
Something is very strange. This chain of events is very unusual and not typical for the Israeli defense system. With the recent normalization efforts of Israel and Palestine led by Saudi Arabia, I wonder whether a prisoner's exchange deal is something that could only be seriously considered by Israel if a shocking event like that happened. Is it a possibility? That only with Israel hostages, it can be justified to release dangerous prisoners from Israeli Prizes.
I don't know. Mainstream media reported that deputy Hamas leader Salah Allah suggests using Israeli prisoners for leverage in negotiations. So maybe a point about the situation in Israel in the past few years, which I wanna make is related to, and those who follow me know that there's a general sense of insecurity in Israel. There's political and social instability and unrest. Public funds are being misused on agendas such as COVID, climate, judicial reform, abolishing cash and many more.
The current government is highly corrupt in my view, while the previous one was no better. I don't care about having a popular opinion. I care about exposing Evo forces wherever and whomever they are. So to me, this surprise attack seems like a planned operation on all fronts. This is a failure to protect The people of Israel, for sure.
Perhaps the biggest failure since the yom kippur war exactly 50 years ago, if not bigger. By the way, is it a coincidence? It's exactly 50 years ago, almost on the day. The Kippur War was on October 6th. 1973.
If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would say that this feels like the work of the deep state. It feels like the people of Israel and the people of Palestine have been sold once again to the higher powers that be. At the same time, this is still very, very difficult to fathom. Have a good evening.
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
BREAKING: UK POLICE @metpoliceuk have raided @thereclaimparty party leader @LozzaFox’s house after what he said with us on air below for WARRIOR CREED & said he would destroy the ULEZ cameras & the surveillance state HOLD THE LINE
Video Transcript AI Summary
In London, a 15-year-old girl was fatally stabbed. The speaker criticizes the police for focusing on social media instead of solving crimes. They also claim that the surveillance cameras outside of London are a scam, with no scientific evidence to support them. The speaker accuses Sadiq Khan of rewriting evidence to serve his own agenda and warns of the beginning of a surveillance state. The transcript ends with the speaker mentioning spending their day in the Clink.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Morning, guys. In London's knife ridden capital city, where
Speaker 1: a 15 year old girl was stabbed to death with a sword. We've got 1, 2 you can show them. 1, 2, another 3 upstairs, stealing, going to my house to intimidate me. They can send, this is what the police are, they don't police with consent anymore, they police with fear and intimidation. That is the style of the police force that we've got nowadays, instead of being on the streets solving crimes like the murder of the poor 15 year old girl, they're all over social media.
I'd take it, the U. L. A. Scam cameras outside of London are a complete the outer U. L.
A. Zone is a complete scam. There's no scientific evidence. Sadiq Khan rubbished the evidence and had it rewritten to serve his own needs. No one voted it.
It's the beginning and bringing in of a surveillance state. And he's trying to make noises so that I can't say that. It's the beginning of the surveillance state and these boys are the stars who to
Speaker 2: the stars who bless them. So have a lovely day. I'm going to spend my day in the Clink, in
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
WARRIOR CREED @LozzaFox on Blade-Runners: "TEAR DOWN every single CAMERA there is..I'll be joining them...I will be out there with my angle grinder...I would encourage MASS REMOVAL OF THE SURVEILLANCE STATE...I would happy to be ARRESTED myself" Full show: https://rumble.com/v3mghsj-warrior-creed.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses support for the Blade Runners, a group that removes surveillance cameras. They believe that these cameras are a form of digital fly tipping and should be taken down. The speaker plans to join the Blade Runners in removing cameras and even offers financial support for others who want to participate. They are willing to be arrested for their actions and will carry their phone to document their whereabouts. The speaker also questions the legality and reasoning behind the installation of surveillance cameras. They mention ongoing court cases but remain committed to their cause.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're aware of the Blade Runners. Is there any any particular message, that you'd like to give about the ULS cameras, about the Blade Runners, about what's being done there, cutting down on the cameras? It's in the press every day. The police are now looking for them. They've arrested a couple.
What is your as we claim, what
Speaker 1: is your start on the Blade Runner's? Well, again, this is where Andrew gets a bit annoyed with me, because he says you can't encourage criminality. But I say it's Digital flight shipping. The that is sticking up these cameras and stuff like that. It's just digital flight tipping.
It's it's it wasn't there 5 minutes ago. Why should it be there now? I encourage them to tear down every single camera there is and I will I will be joining them to tear down cameras as well Because I have to I'm one of those people that puts my money where my mouth is. So I, I'm pretty close with several. And then I will be Yeah.
I'll I'll be out there with my angle grinder. I had a guy the other day phoned me up and say, a very, very wealthy guy. And he said, I want to put, I'll put $10 behind the counter, you know, several Wixes in London. And anyone who wants to go and do some removal of this digital fly tipping wants to go and clean up their community can go and get an angle branded for free. They can get all the gear that they need for free, and it's all on me.
So I would encourage mass, mass removal of the surveillance state because once it's there, you cannot remove it.
Speaker 0: Are you interested in testing the law around this if some people get arrested?
Speaker 1: I I would happy to be arrested myself. So, yeah, I I I won't be I won't be when I go out and take their cameras down, which will be going. I won't be I will be taking my phone with me so they know exactly where I am because the big runners are clever. That, you know, they they they they know what they're doing, but II would happily sit there and go sit and call that who voted for this. What's your evidence for the London clean air zone?
What's your evidence for that? Why are you doing this? You know, I like to sit there and do it, but I do that. I've got, you know, several court cases going on as you know. But, yeah, I
WARRIOR CREED - GB News, Laurence Fox & Captured OfCom - When Justice Only Goes One Way Beware the Joker
A weekly lifestyle livestream
rumble.com
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
WEF agent posing as fake spiritual man, Sadhguru at WEF: “‘Unless you reduce the human footprint on the planet, there is no solution for anything'. 'How do you reduce the human footprint?' ‘You have to REDUCE the NUMBER OF FEET. That's the only way'."
Video Transcript AI Summary
At the Economic Forum, a speaker addressed population concerns, acknowledging the reluctance of others to discuss the issue. They highlighted the ecological impact of agriculture and textiles, emphasizing the violence inherent in our way of life. The speaker pointed out the exponential growth of the human population, predicting a disastrous outcome with nearly 10 billion people by 2050. They suggested reducing the human footprint by limiting the number of children. The speaker also warned about the threat of declining insect and worm populations, stating that the planet would flourish without humans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in the session we just attended here at the Economic Forum, I think there was a sense of relief actually in your frankness. You brought up some issues that others are reluctant to bring up. That's my story. Always.
Speaker 1: All the religious groups are against me because I'm talking About population, they want more souls. I want less on the planet.
Speaker 2: For example, I'm picking on agriculture because it is the biggest land user and also biggest water user on the planet. The way The way we eat is ecologically disastrous. The way we dress is ecologically disastrous because the 3rd largest polluter on the Planet is textiles. Most people don't know this. So everything that we do has become violent in the world, the very way we exist.
Speaker 1: In the beginning of 20th century we were just about 1,500,000,000 people. Today we are 7,300,000,000 people. The United Nations making predictions that by 2050 We will be 9,700,000,000 people. 9,700,000,000 people or nearly 10,000,000,000 people on this planet It's for sure going to be a disaster. I was in a conference and, I said, see unless you Unless you reduce the human footprint on the planet, there is no solution for anything.
Then they asked me a brilliant question, how do you reduce the human footprint?' I said, you have to reduce the number of feet.' That's the only way we can take it upon ourselves That we will not push the human population. You can have a dog. I am not saying children are bad, they are wonderful, But it's just too many. We as human beings, we are wonderful, but we are too many. We are so many that the insect population is going down.
No, no, it's not a joke. It's very it's very threatening. If the insect population disappears, the planet will be destroyed. Yes. The worms disappear, the planet will be destroyed.
If you and me disappear, planet will flourish.
@MaajidNawaz - أبو عمّار
President Donald Trump on 11/Sep/2001: “I said how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or a 747 … how could it POSSIBLY GO THROUGH STEEL? I happen to think they had not only a plane, but they had BOMBS that EXPLODED ALMOST SIMULTANEOUSLY”
Video Transcript AI Summary
A person questions how a plane, even a large one like a 767 or 747, could have caused the destruction seen on 9/11. They suggest that bombs may have been involved due to the difficulty of a plane penetrating the building. The speaker also mentions that most buildings have steel on the inside, but this one was built differently. Another person agrees, mentioning the explosion on the other side of the building. The first person believes that the planes were not only carrying fuel but also something else, as they seemed to be going very fast and descending into the building. They emphasize the immense destruction caused by taking out the heavy steel used in the buildings. The speaker concludes by stating that the events of 9/11 have forever changed the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I said how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or 747 or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this deal? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steelers on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have and it was almost just like a, like a can of soup.
Speaker 1: You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into, building number 2.
Speaker 2: And when you see that, approach the far side and then all of a sudden within a matter of millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side. Right.
Speaker 0: I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think obviously there were very big planes, they were going very rapidly because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on a building, I mean these buildings were rock solid and you know it's just it's an amazing thing. This country is different today and it's going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.