reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @MarkAttwood
@MarkAttwood - Mark Attwood
Suicide weekend incoming https://t.co/JE4ezwLgJy
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that unvaccinated individuals entering hospitals were deliberately killed. According to the speaker, every unvaccinated person they interviewed who went to the hospital reported not receiving the same treatments as vaccinated patients. Instead, they were allegedly given remdesivir, ventilation, and fentanyl, leading to their deaths.
Another speaker adds that hospitals had financial incentives to produce COVID-related deaths, allegedly receiving up to $500,000 per death in California. The first speaker agrees, stating that hospital coders and whistleblowers revealed that patients were repeatedly tested for COVID until a positive result was obtained, triggering payments. They claim hospitals received additional payments for each drug and piece of equipment used, totaling over $500,000 per person. One person allegedly said their daughter was worth more dead than alive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These people were going into hospital. They had not taken the COVID nineteen shot. And this is really important because every single person that sat on that bus or virtual story, I asked them the question, first of all, did you take the COVID nineteen shot? No. They did not.
And it was becoming increasingly clear that the unvaccinated, as they're called, were being targeted, and they were being killed. And the people who were speaking to me used the word murder. It seems to me, Mike, that you came into hospital, if you and the first question they asked, did you take the shot? And if they said yes, they did take the shot, they went and got different treatments. The ones who did not take the shot out of vaccinating was straight into remdesivir, ventilation, fentanyl, a cocktail of drugs, and killed on those ventilators.
That Over and over again.
Speaker 1: Okay. That that's a very strong accusation, but let me add to it that I've interviewed other guests, lawyers who have pointed out that the hospitals were financially incentivized to produce COVID related deaths because some of them received in California as much as about half a $1,000,000 per death if if someone was diagnosed with COVID beforehand. Do you think that that kind of financial incentive played a role in this flow chart that you're describing right now?
Speaker 0: A 100%. And we have coders and whistleblowers, people working inside the hospital telling us that they were just jabbing people for this COVID test, and they will keep going over and over again till they got a positive. The minute they got a positive, tick that box, that's some money. Onto the next thing, remdesivir. Big tick for that.
And they were showing us on the death medical records how much they were getting paid for every single drug and cocktail and equipment that was used on them. And it was half a make plus per person. Big money. And as one person told me, my daughter was worth more dead than alive, and they took her.
@MarkAttwood - Mark Attwood
This is a recording of a phone call from an MI5 Officer to Retired UK Policeman Mark Sexton @XPCBirmingham regarding criminal allegations against the UK Government. Wednesday 20th March 2024 PLEASE SHARE! WE DEMAND JUSTICE FOR HUMANITY GOD BLESS US ALL https://t.co/YeA5aUF5yX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Sexton receives a call from Alex, who works for MI5. Mark discusses various claims related to terrorism, COVID-19, and vaccines. He alleges that there was no pandemic, PCR tests were fraudulent, the elderly were murdered in care homes, and vaccines are causing harm and death. Mark insists that the evidence is credible and urges the police and security services to take action. He also requests a roundtable meeting with experts to present the evidence. Alex takes note of the information and promises to follow up. Mark emphasizes the importance of not ignoring the evidence and asks for a response.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello?
Speaker 1: Hello. I'm calling for Mark Sexton, please.
Speaker 0: Hello. You're speaking to him. How can I help you?
Speaker 1: Oh, hello there, Mark. My name is Alex. You sent an email yesterday at 2/21 into Mi 5, and that's where I'm calling from.
Speaker 0: Oh, hello, Alex. Good morning. Thank you for calling me back.
Speaker 1: No. That's quite alright. Is now is an okay time to talk? Because I know I called you out of the blue.
Speaker 0: You called me with a nice little post, but it's so important that that post can wait. Yes. Thank you, Alex.
Speaker 1: Alright. No. No problem at all. I I've got, time and, when we get to you like that, obviously, we want to get to the bottom of it quickly. So do you wanna just tell me what's on your mind and I'll make sure I make a good note?
Speaker 0: Alex, can I ask are you a policeman or are you, a
Speaker 1: civilian? No. I'm a civilian. I'm an MI 5 police officer. Yeah.
Sorry. MI 5 officer, not the police officer.
Speaker 0: Alright. Okay. Well, I know this might sound a little bit far fetched, but can I just read something to you? It'll take about 7 to 8 minutes.
Speaker 1: You can take as long as you like.
Speaker 0: Okay. Excuse the sniffing.
Speaker 1: That's the right thing to call. No.
Speaker 0: No. It's just when I wake up in the morning, I don't know what it is. But, I'm fighting for it. I'm really grateful that you called me back. Okay.
The the terrorism act, I am I have the points to prove for terrorism, including domestic terrorism, is something that's designed to intimidate the public for a political advancement or ideological cause and that includes engaging a person's life or creating serious risk to the health or safety of the public or section of the public. And obviously, this includes involvement in planning and testing, collecting information and funding. So, the law, we are all equal in the eyes of the law, no man or woman regardless of position, title or financial status, no business, public or private or corporation are above the law. Do you agree with that?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I do. Yeah. And where crimes
Speaker 0: are evidence having been committed by any of the above, doesn't matter who they are, they have to be treated the same as you and I. And I think that's that's that's a paramount importance. So evidence, there is evidence now to prove terrorism against the British public. And I'm just gonna list a few things, and I'm just gonna ask you to bear with
Speaker 1: me. Yeah. Sure.
Speaker 0: So number 1, there is there was no pandemic. We are in possession of a number of Freedom of Information Replies. There were no more cremations or burials in 2020. In fact, less in 2020 than in 2015 and 2019 in many boroughs, especially in Birmingham where there was less cremations and burials in 2020 in the previous 5 years, how is that possible in a pandemic? The hospital admissions were low, the hospitals were empty and the Nightingale hospitals were never used.
Number 2, the PCR tests that were being used are and were fraudulent. 40 to 45 cycles of amplifications were being used. Now, it's been proven that they are useless and only pick up dead nucleotide anything over 35, which means nobody is infected. Now, lots of freedom of information required and request and videos in our possession prove they were total a total waste of time and there's also a court case in Lisbon in Portugal on the 11th November 2020, where the judge agreed anything over 35 cycles is useless. We've got multiple pieces of evidence, our government and the UK and NHS was using 40 to 45 cycles, which means the whole PCR testing system was fraud and they knew.
Number 3, we now have a massive amount of evidence and proof that the elderly were murdered in the care homes using the Dazalan and morphine, do not resuscitate orders and nil by mail. We've got so much proof, it's horrific. Number 4, the 20 fourseven campaign of psychological warfare by the government, NHS, the television, social media and advertising campaign and using high profile world renowned celebrities to make sure we did as we were told and they told us to do. Number 5, Safe, cheap and effective therapeutics, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, were deliberately withdrawn, deliberately, to make way for emergency use authorization of the vaccines. Hydroxychloroquine, the trials for that were deliberately compromised giving the recipients 10 to 12 times the dosage, killing dozens of them in the trials.
That was the make way for the vaccine. We have that evidence, that proof. Number 6, there has been a base and switch. The approved vaccines that was rolled out by the MHRA is not the same vaccine that we've been given, We have proof of that. Number 7, the vaccines are causing harm, injury and death on a catastrophic scale, and it is a national emergency.
The evidence has been seen by government ministers and they knew in 2021, and they did nothing to stop it. I have that evidence. I held those meetings with 16 world experts and the information was ignored. The excess deaths in the 100 of 1000 in the UK and the injuries from the vaccines are actually in the 1,000,000. Everything is blamed on climate change, how fast things excuse my vulgarity, but it's the vaccine.
Number 8, we now have an undeniable proof, safe and effective was a complete lie. We now have 4 contracts. Those contracts are between 4 governments and Pfizer. They are unredacted. The contracts are from Albania, Brazil, South Africa and the European Commission.
They are signed between November of 2020 and April of 2021. And they all say, the purchaser acknowledges that the long term effects and efficacy of the vaccines are not currently known, and that there may be adverse effects that are not currently known. That is in all of the contracts, so where on earth does safe and effective come from? And more to the point, 95% effective, where did that come from? Now, it's important, we had a Freedom of Information request reply returned with a copy of the UK contract with Pfizer.
And surprise, surprise, it was very heavily redacted. But we guarantee it will say the same in the UK contract, they didn't and don't know the efficacy. There is evidence also and we have this evidence, Pfizer hid and altered their trial data that shows deaths and cancers have been caused in their trials. We have further evidence that's come to life with many experts who are in contact with. Thus, the ingredients and contaminants in the vaccines are huge, and there are omissions in the safety data surrounding s v forty and cancer causing issues.
They don't know yet if this is deliberate or a mistake, but there are many mistakes. So for that very reason, the experts are saying this is possibly deliberate foul play. Number 9, it is now being proven, and it's been in the media, long COVID does not exist. So all that fear mongering has turned out to be, yet again, untrue. Number 10, evidence, we've got evidence the regulators put profits and favors to their funders before the people's safety.
And this was recently brought up by 25 MPs who demanded an urgent investigation into the MHRA in June. Number 11, informed consent. This is the single most important part. Informed consent was never given to any VACS recipients. In Montgomery versus Lanarkshire Health Board of 2015, the ruling of the courts states that informed consent must be given regarding any benefits, harm or risks, and they must discuss alternatives.
The alternatives, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, were deliberately withheld and had the public been told that there were safe alternatives, they would have had that option. Likewise, were the public told that they were taking part in a 3 year medical trial and experiments, no they weren't. Were they told that there were long term safety effects were not known, no they weren't. The side effects of which there are Menoz, no they weren't. There are over 1,000 listed adverse events in their own trial data.
They weren't told us. Were they told that serious harm may occur? No. Were they told that death may occur, which is listed in these trial data documents? No, they weren't.
Were they told that the mRNA vaccines had never been used on humans before and many of the animals in the trials had died? No, they weren't. The manufacturers have full legal indemnity if the vaccines injure or kill people. Nobody is told about that and they don't get compensation. In all of any rulings and any decisions made, a reasonable person test applies.
Had the public been told there was safe alternative treatment and had they been told about all the dangers of the vaccine, do you believe they would have taken them? Because I know. Number 12, there are 1,000 now experts from across the world who are silenced, struck off, ridiculed and canceled because they dare to raise the alarm. I was right, there is only one point of view, no debate is allowed and no other professional opinion is permitted. Number 15, there is now strong evidence and serious concerns about the 5 gs infrastructure, the street lighting, the traffic lights, radars and the cameras.
They are detrimental to health and the impact in health and safety studies have not been carried out. It also comes to life that a number of the companies who are installing this equipment are not identifiable or registered, and this is causing or will cause issues with regards to public indemnity insurances. Number 14, anybody who speaks out is called anti vaxx, tinfoil hat wearers, conspiracy theorists and crazy. Yet the evidence clearly points to the preplanned, well funded attack, not just in the UK, but around the world against the people. This is with the knowledge and forethought of government, civil servants, regulators and the media, and we can prove that.
Publicly paid servants civil servants and the police and security services are here to protect the public from harm, injury and death. The evidence is vast, it's credible, it's irrefutable. It's now time for the police and the security services to sit down with the experts and see this proof of terrorism firsthand and then arrest those responsible and most importantly, take the vaccines out of circulation because that is a weapon deliberately being used against the people. Number 15. How does the anti terrorism organization and MR5 plan to deal with this misinformation?
Because it is a clear act of terrorism. Can I please suggest that you make a nationwide public announcement to alert the public once all the evidence will be seen and all UK wide chief constable? It's also my recommendation that due to the size of this crime, all forces set up major incident rooms fully staffed with detectives, doctors, nurses and mental health professionals to deal with the many victims of these very serious and undone crimes. I also ask the Antiterrorism and Security Agency liaise immediately with Special Crime and Counterterrorism Division in the Crown Prosecution Service to seek advice and guidance. This evidence can no longer be disputed because it's coming from multiple independent sources in many different countries around the world.
I'm in contact with thousands of these experts, all are proving and showing these clients are taking place, they were well planned and well thought out. We are ready to provide this evidence to you, to the security services and the police and we are demanding an urgent roundtable meeting where a number of experts will attend and provide this evidence to you. I must add that the British public are fearful, they are worried, they feel hopeless, heavily in death, they are worried for theirs and their children's future and are seeing their loved ones dying and suffering, never more so than since the rollout of the vaccines and the start of the pandemic. We are urging it is now time to stop this. Terrorism is clearly identified, We must have halo tried to hide it, deny or ignore it.
In law, it is a criminal offense to fund terrorism either directly or indirectly. Paying money into a criminal organization of any kind. This includes into the government, a corrupted criminal cartel with outside influences from non governmental organizations, corporations and foundations. We never voted for this and we never proved of it. It's a criminal offense.
In my opinion, based on the facts and the other few couple of evidence and in law, we are all victims of terrorism. As a result of the criminal acts that's being perpetrated against us with knowledge by the government civil service regulators and unelected corporations. I would suggest that we all get together, we have a look at this evidence, and we must remember, it's not just our family and friends who are suffering, our neighbors, our colleagues, dying and hurt from these vaccines, and this terrorism attack against us. It's yours and everybody else's too, nobody's going to be spared. We ask that you and the police do your job.
These criminals need to be arrested regardless of who they are or what title they have or how much money they have, and stop following unlawful orders by pretending this isn't happening and protecting the criminals. Because anybody who protects these criminals is complicit in these crimes. Everything I stated can be evidenced, we have the evidence, the experts can prove and show, and we would urge you to sit down with us so this evidence can be given to you and identify the offenders. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Alright. Thanks, Mark. I've taken a really careful note of all of that. You won't be surprised to know that wasn't what I was expecting when I called. I've got a few call members of the public.
It's very different. But I get yeah. So I put it into the system, and I've done that. But your contact details are in there. You refer to hour and week during it as the contact details you want on it.
Yours that you put in your original, email yesterday?
Speaker 0: Yes. Of course. What what I'll say is when I say we, it's because I'm I'm working with a a number of, cancer experts, heart cardiologists, there's MPs involved now who I'm working with directly. There is some of the best people out there in the world who are raising the alarm, have got proof of patency, they've got so much information and evidence to show this is a preplanned attack and the weapon of choice is the vaccine and fear. So it's all there.
We've got it. There's 1,000, but there's a hard core of that 15 or 20 UK based who are anxious to sit down with the police and the security services, show them what they've got and prove these crimes are being committed. This is not frivolous or vexatious. This is not an attack on any individual organization to try and discredit or defame. This is proof that the men, women and children are being subjected to a terrorist attack by their own authorities, and it has to be stopped.
Speaker 1: Understood. Thank you. I'll take you a careful note, and, I've got your details. So thank you very much. I'll let you get back to your site, which is probably cold by now, I'm afraid.
But, yeah. Can you give me your call, Mark?
Speaker 0: Can you promise me that this will be followed up and not ignored? This is this is evidence. We we we can evidence this to you. Okay. So I have recorded this.
So if there's anything that you didn't catch, let me know, and I'll send you the recording because it's vitally important that this is followed up and not ignored because we can prove this criminality against the people of this country. That's against you too, not just me.
Speaker 1: I understand. And I've got a good note. I have to go down all, but thank you for your call.
Speaker 0: Please continue to get back to me either way. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Bye bye. Bye bye.