TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @MarkFriesen08

MarkFriesen08
Posted - March 19, 2023 at 9:20 PM
Saved - November 15, 2024 at 11:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted @PierrePoilievre about his stance on the sustainable development agenda, specifically the SDGs. He lied to me and the 500k viewers of the video. I can back this up with his voting record on the relevant law.

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

So when I asked @PierrePoilievre his position on the sustainable development agenda, the SDG’s. He outright lied to me and 500k people that have seen the video. How do I know he lied, here’s his voting record on said law. https://t.co/UH15iKjpFx

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

https://t.co/mlPeBnrRvy

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

https://t.co/7ovLRx4M70

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

https://t.co/lwQrofrec3

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

https://t.co/qNpKkQNclh

MarkFriesen08
Posted - May 6, 2024 at 12:45 AM
Saved - May 6, 2024 at 1:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Canadian Federal Corruption in the Regina Bypass Project: Allegations of high-level corruption in the $2 billion P3 project, potentially the largest case in Canadian P3 history. Evidence suggests the Saskatchewan government provided aggregate for free, only for it to be sold back at retail prices, totaling half a billion dollars. Amarjeet Sohi, Trudeau's former infrastructure minister, is accused of facilitating a trucking company linked to his brother and election donors. Concerns about nepotism, favoritism, and contractual anomalies have been raised.

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

EXPOSED: Canadian Federal Corruption in the Historic P3 Regina Bypass Project in Saskatchewan High-level corruption within the Public-Private Partnership (P3) project of the Regina Bypass Project. The project, costing taxpayers $2 billion, is now under scrutiny for potentially being the largest documented case of corruption in Canadian P3 history. Bob Rai, a Canadian aggregate supplier, armed with leaked documents, secret recordings, and other evidence, alleges that the Saskatchewan government and federal officials were involved in corrupt practices in the Regina Bypass project. Evidence suggests that the Saskatchewan government silently provided aggregate for free, only for VINCI-RBDB to sell it back to the government at retail prices, summing up to a staggering half a billion dollars. A significant focus of the investigation into the Regina Bypass scandal is the alleged involvement of Amarjeet Sohi, Justin Trudeau's former infrastructure minister with a background of terrorism-related charges in India. Accusations center around Sohi's purported facilitation of Whiterock Ventures Inc. (WRV), a trucking company linked to his brother and election donors. "He came to the trucking company from Ottawa. He did not list his travel and expense it to the federal government," Rai claims, suggesting that Sohi's visits were deliberately kept off the official records. "The reason that he came is because he is personally involved in the loot of taxpayers' money." Further intensifying the allegations, Rai points out potential nepotism and favoritism in the project. "We have somebody that is completely uneducated, can barely speak broken English, overseeing a multibillion-dollar project. So when Amarjeet Sohi became the infrastructure minister, his head was full of dollar signs, all he wanted to do was make projects compromised by using his authority and his power as the Infrastructure Minister of Canada." Another layer of complexity involves the executive committee member for Vinci-RBDB, Gordon Pasini, a Canadian whose name appeared in the Panama Papers. The investigation into the Regina Bypass project has uncovered several alarming contractual anomalies, each raising significant concerns about the project's transparency and execution.

MarkFriesen08
Posted - September 22, 2023 at 5:52 PM
Saved - April 15, 2024 at 4:09 PM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

#Agenda2030 and what it means to YOU! And who’s who in the political zoo. https://t.co/EA6UQwLMcV

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1992, Mulrooney and Harper committed Canada to Agenda 2030 without informing the public. This agenda, created by foreign entities, aims to control all aspects of life and erode individual rights. Mainstream parties in Canada support this agenda, except for the PPC and some provincial parties. The World Economic Forum serves as a support mechanism for this globalist agenda, consolidating power in the UN. Multinational corporations are coerced into compliance through ESG requirements, leading to corruption. Rejecting Agenda 2030 is crucial to preserving rights, freedoms, and sovereignty. It's time to be aware and take action.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Just a couple of questions I need to ask. In 1992, when your conservative prime minister, Brian Mulrooney, went to Rio de Janeiro to commit Canadians to an agenda created by an unelected, unaccountable foreign entity. Did he return to Canada and task all of his MPs to go do town halls to explain to the people what it is he committed to? Did that ever happen? No. The exact opposite happened. They framed it as a conspiracy theory so that you wouldn't pay attention and so they could dismiss people like me. It's reality now. Did Stephen Harper task all of his MPs after he signed it in 2015. And prior to that, he made it law in this country with the Sustainability Act. And after he did that, did he task his MPs to go back to their constituents and tell them about what they've committed to and what law they created, making it binding in this country. Where we're now compelled as a government in this country to report our progress in achieving the goals of sustainable development to an unelected, unaccountable foreign entity. Did they explain that to any of you? No, they didn't. In 2015, when Harper signed again agenda 2030, September 27, 2015. Did he task all of his MPs to go back to their constituents and inform them of what they committed to? No, they didn't. And there's still people running around calling it a conspiracy theory, even though we all know it's reality. An agenda created again by an unelected unaccountable foreign entity hell bent on destroying Western civilization and everything that we cherish, and controlling everything that you do. Everything from the time you wake up in the morning to the time you go to bed, they wanna control it all through this agenda. Did any of them tell you about this? Did any of them of these MPs, these elected officials in parliament, go back to the constituents and inform the people of what this represents, what the consequences to this committing to this agenda really are. Did they do that? No, they haven't. They framed it as conspiracy theory because of people like myself, they need to dismiss. And when you talk about SOGI, it's completely connected. This agenda was first conceptualized in 1968 through funding by the Rockefellers, by the Rothschilds, by the Warburgs, and the ships, all the big bankers, because they want to centralize all control within the UN. Look what the World Health Organization is doing. They wanna dictate to you health policy. And our politicians in this country, all of them are on board with it, including the Conservative Party of Canada. The Conservative Party of Canada is the only party in this country that is committed to that agenda. And then they pass the baton onto the liberals to implement it. That's how this all comes together. I encourage you to look at my pinned tweet. Dennis Meadows, founding member of the club of Rome, and what he says on my pinned tweet, and what this all represents. All of this is about control, controlling all aspects of your life. That's what this agenda represents. They want control. They've ceded our sovereignty to, again, an unelected, unaccountable foreign entity. And is there policy in the conservative party platform that denounces agenda 2030? No. Is there policy in the Sask parties policy package that denounces agenda 2030? No. There's one party in Saskatchewan that has it in their policy to reject agenda 2030. There's 1 federal party in Canada that has it in their policy to reject agenda 2030, And that's the PPC. That's it. There is no other option. If you continue to support the only party that's ever committed us to this agenda, then you're setting our country up for enormous failure. That's gonna be on you. This agenda, as I've said, is meant to control all aspects of your life and take individual rights and throw them out the window. That's what this agenda represents. It's hyper centralization of control and power into the UN. And understand, when Pierre Polovera denounces the World Economic Forum, understand this. When this agenda was first conceptualized in the late sixties, they tapped Klaus Schwab to create the World Economic Forum in 1971 As a support mechanism for the greater agenda. The World Economic Forum is not the pinnacle of this globalist agenda. The UN is, Which is why they're attempting to consolidate power through the World Health Organization. And through this agenda. That's where the power is going to lie. If we continue to allow these politicians to continue to seed our sovereignty to this unelected, unaccountable foreign entity. It's time to wake up. It's time to understand who's who in the zoo. None of these parties have denounced agenda 2030 on a formal basis with with party policy. None of them, and they won't. This is the loss of your rights, your freedoms, your prosperity, your liberty, your freedoms, rule of law. The corruption is running rampant because what they've done through the World Economic Forum, excuse me, is they've managed to co opt multinational corporations who require capital to run their operations. In order to get their capital, they have to employ this ESG, environmental social governance. That's the only way they're gonna get capital from the people like BlackRock. That's the corruption that we're seeing. And there isn't a party other than the Buffalo party and the PPC, and maybe the the BC Conservatives that has the denouncement and rejection of agenda 2030 built
MarkFriesen08
Posted - February 10, 2024 at 4:07 AM
Saved - February 11, 2024 at 10:00 AM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

#ClimateScam. Nice job @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU https://t.co/mO8OCQCSuq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the idea of carbon dioxide (CO2) being pollution is flawed. They state that CO2 is a natural part of the environment and that the proportion of human CO2 emissions is very small. They believe that the notion of CO2 destroying the planet or changing the temperature is ludicrous. However, they suggest that labeling CO2 as pollution allows for regulatory control over all human activities. They mention that CO2 has actually been beneficial for the environment, as stated by a climate adviser. The speaker questions whether CO2 is truly pollution and suggests that the alleged environmental benefits are fictional if it is not.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This environmental question depends on, I think, a very flawed fundamental presupposition. It depends on the idea that carbon dioxide is pollution. And I would argue, after interviewing hundreds of scientists, including many who've worked for the UN IPCC, many of the leading scientists in the world, that the notion that c 02 is pollution is absolutely preposterous. We exhale about 2 pounds of it every single day. The the proportion of greenhouse gases made up of human c o two emissions is a fraction of a fraction of 1%. The idea that that is going to destroy the planet or change the temperature of the earth, is frankly, in my opinion, totally ludicrous. But from a totalitarian perspective, if you can convince people that CO2 is pollution. There's no human activity that doesn't result in CO2 emissions, including living, including dying, Turning on a light switch, every single aspect of your life then, if we submit to the idea that CO 2 is pollution, then comes under the regulatory control of the people who claimed to be saving us from pollution. So when they do these environmental studies and they say, well, your CO 2 footprint will be smaller if you eat bugs or you do this, that or the you drive an The car, that doesn't show anything about whether that's gonna benefit the environment or not. In fact, c o two has actually been very beneficial for the environment. In interviewing, Trump's climate adviser, doctor William Happer, a physics professor at Princeton University, he said the Earth is starving for more c o two. And since we've had a little bit of an increase in Pure CO 2 over the last 100 years or so, plants have gotten much greener, agricultural yields have improved. So I I think we need to also Talk about the fundamental presupposition here. Is CO 2 really pollution? If it's not, then all these alleged environmental benefits are completely fictional.
MarkFriesen08
Posted - February 8, 2024 at 6:26 PM
Saved - February 8, 2024 at 8:12 PM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

Here is @DrTedros, he’s not even a doctor. He’s a communist attempting to acquire guns for the liberation front in Ethiopia. Hey may go down! His credibility is in the toilet. https://t.co/nwMqTbaPEa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Ted Ross is facing growing accusations of siding with China and supporting the Tigray rebels in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian military claims that he is backing the rebels by helping them procure arms and providing diplomatic support. The conflict in Ethiopia began when the Tigray People's Liberation Front refused to recognize the authority of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, leading to a civil war. Doctor Ted Ross, a Tigrayan and the director general of the World Health Organization, was previously accused of covering up cholera epidemics and of involvement in human rights abuses during his time as foreign minister. The conflict in Ethiopia has resulted in deaths and forced displacement, and if the accusations against doctor Ted Ross are true, it could further destabilize the region.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charges against doctor Ted Ross is growing. He has been accused of siding with China for denying Taiwan a platform, and now he is being accused of backing the Tigray rebels in Ethiopia. Yes. You heard that right. The Ethiopian military is accusing doctor Ted Ross of practically Beijing a war against the government of Ethiopia. How? By supporting the rebels, trying to procure arms for them, and providing diplomatic backing. Listen in to what the Ethiopian army chief has to say. Speaker 1: This fellow is himself part of that team. As you know, he's a member of the central committee. Now that his members, those who have a similar kind of thinking, what do you expect from him? We don't expect he will side with the Ethiopian people and condemn them. So he has left no stone unturned to help them. Will he be successful or not? That's another issue. He has worked in neighboring countries to condemn the war. He has worked for them to get weapons. Speaker 0: So what is all this about? Let me explain. Earlier this month, a domestic conflict began in Ethiopia, a conflict that now increasingly looks like a full blown war. 2 sides are fighting each other. On one side is the Ethiopian government led by the Nobel Prize winning prime minister, Abiy Ahmed. On the other side is the Tigray People's Liberation Front. They ruled Ethiopia for 27 years before Abiy Ahmed came to power. Now the Tigray People's Liberation Front has refused to recognize the prime minister's authority. And this has triggered a civil war. So what role does doctor Ted Ross have in this? He allegedly is backing the Tigray People's Liberation and the charges against doctor Tedros are serious. The Ethiopian military says doctor Tedros is a member of the Tigray People's Liberation and he is trying to procure arms for them and providing diplomatic support as they wage this war against the army government. Doctor Ted Ross is a Tigrayan. In fact, he's the world's most high profile Tigrayan. He was the health minister in the previous Ethiopian government that was led by the Tigray People's Liberation Front even as health minister, doctor Ted Ross, was not immune to controversy. This report came out when doctor Tedros was contesting the election for director general at the World Health Organization. He was accused of covering up not 1, not 2, but 3 cholera epidemics in Ethiopia. Doctor Tedros said that this was, I'm quoting, a last minute smear campaign to derail his candidacy. The controversy did not die there. Another report came out at that time. It referred to doctor Tedros Sosnoyour as foreign minister from 2012 to 2016. In that period, protesters were allegedly jailed or killed in Ethiopia. The accusations gave birth to the hashtag no Ted Ross for WHO. The accusations, though, did not affect the outcome of the election. Doctor Tedros won and became the director general of the World Health Organization in 2017. The victory made doctor Tedros a household name in Ethiopia. He was even ranked as one of Time Magazine's most influential people. And now he is being accused of playing a role in destabilizing the government in Ethiopia when the world is still gripped by the Wuhan virus. The conflict in Ethiopia could trigger a major crisis. 100 have died in the conflict in Tigray since the beginning of November. At least 30,000 people have been forced to leave the country and move into neighboring Sudan. There is a possibility that this conflict could spill outside Ethiopia. If the charges against doctor Tedros are indeed true, his acts would have contributed towards the destabilization of the Horn of Africa. The WHO chief has not issued a statement in his defense yet. But one thing is clear, the crisis of credibility for doctor Tedros just turned uglier.
MarkFriesen08
Posted - September 27, 2023 at 12:05 AM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:26 AM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

Because there is a lot of talk about #Agenda2030. People will be asking questions. Feel free to share this interpretive series on the SDG’s. https://ffcs.info/sdgs-interpreted

Forum for Canadian Sovereignty ffcs.info
MarkFriesen08
Posted - December 14, 2023 at 7:01 PM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 2:14 AM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

236k views. Soon it going to be a conversation you can’t avoid. @PremierScottMoe@PierrePoilievre @JustinTrudeau @theJagmeetSingh @ABDanielleSmith @KevinWaugh_CPC @NadineWilsonSk @fordnation @Dave_Eby @premierbhiggs

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

Excess death rate in Canada. And not one of our politicians says a word about it. Federally provincially or municipally. It’s time to fire them all. https://t.co/lDB7hzeten

MarkFriesen08
Posted - December 13, 2023 at 8:33 PM
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 8:35 PM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

221k views. When will any of you MP’s address this? @PierrePoilievre, @JustinTrudeau, @theJagmeetSingh, @PremierScottMoe, @ABDanielleSmith, @fordnation, @Dave_Eby, anyone?

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

Excess death rate in Canada. And not one of our politicians says a word about it. Federally provincially or municipally. It’s time to fire them all. https://t.co/lDB7hzeten

MarkFriesen08
Posted - December 12, 2023 at 6:40 AM
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 3:49 AM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

If they know it’s coming, you know they are creating it. This is all to bring in digital id, CBDC’s, and the surveillance state.

@TheRedactedInc - Redacted

Journalist @_WhitneyWebb uncovers a #WEF plot: A planned 2024 cyber attack, potentially a false flag, setting the stage for a Middle East regional war. #WEFPlot #CyberAttack2024 #MiddleEastTensions https://t.co/LXpaSyp0bk

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Economic Forum predicts a massive cyber attack before 2025 that will cause a collapse of the banking industry and infrastructure. The forum has been involved in simulations called Cyber Polygon, collaborating with Russian government, US federal agencies, and major banks. The World Economic Forum Partnership Against Cybercrime seeks a regulated internet and a digital ID tied to internet access. The goal is to eliminate online anonymity and privacy. The CTI League, a cybersecurity group, has access to critical US infrastructure, including hospitals, dams, and nuclear reactors. The group's main focus is protecting critical infrastructure, but its affiliation with foreign intelligence agencies raises concerns. The possibility of a false flag operation to blame Iran and justify military action is alarming. The CTI League's partnership with CISA, an agency under DHS, allows access to critical systems without proper vetting. The Israeli government's involvement in cybersecurity companies like Clear Sky and Cyber Reason further complicates the situation. The potential for a US cyber attack on Iran is a long-standing goal for Israeli intelligence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the World Economic Forum, yes, run by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum says that we will experience a massive cyber attack that will hit before the year 2025, which will lead to a massive collapse of the banking industry, infrastructure, and so much more. How how do they know this? It's unbelievable. Someone who's been following this very, very closely, and it ties even more directly into the story that we've been covering here on the show about the CTI League files that Michael Shellenberger, released files about the, cyber spying on Americans. We're gonna get to that part of the story with independent journalist Whitney Webb, who I'm thrilled to welcome back to the show. Whitney, welcome back to Redacted. Speaker 1: Hey. It's great to be here after a a long absence. Thanks for having me back. Speaker 0: Of course, we wouldn't miss the opportunity. So thrilled to have you back here. So let's talk about this World Economic Forum idea that at the 2nd in command at the World Economic Forum that we are going to see a massive cyberattack hitting before the year 2025. Pointing out, you know, in in great detail, yeah, like, this is going to happen, so you better be prepared for it. Why are they saying this, and who are they going to try to point the finger at? Speaker 1: Right. So this was said at the WEF annual meeting earlier this year in January by, the WEF managing director, Jeremy Jurgens. And, Juergens, as well as the WEF itself, has been involved in a series of simulations for several years now that I'm sure a lot of people in your audience are familiar with, called Cyber Polygon, which has been directly affiliated with, Russia's government as well as some of Russia's biggest banks and some of the biggest commercial banks, in the world with and also backed by a lot of US federal agencies, which is ironic when you consider, you know, about alleged Russian hacks over the years. They're very willing under the guise of the WEF to collaborate with the, you know, supposed hackers, responsible for everything bad, you know, for several years ago. So that's quite revealing. But aside from cyber polygon, there's a lot that the WEF seeks To accomplish, as it relates to the cyber realm, and they've been collaborating in a lot of ways with the same bay big banks And also American intelligence agencies in unprecedented ways that has not really gotten any coverage over the past several years. And a lot of this is housed within a public private manages called the World Economic Forum Partnership Against Cybercrime. And, these, this particular organization, back a few years ago, gamed out with the Carnegie Endowment, along with the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, some of the biggest central banks in the world, as well as some of the biggest commerce in the world, like Bank of America and JPMorgan, How essentially the US financial system was due to be the victim of a massive cyber attack. And if you're familiar with how things have been going in the US financial or banking system recently, things are not in a very good state at all. And regardless of if in You know, if there would be or will be a cyberattack in the near future, the banking and financial system in the in the United States is in, deep doo doo. Right? So, if you're the big banks and the intelligence agencies, you want to avoid what happened after the 2008 economic Crisis where there was unprecedented anger at Wall Street because the whole hope and change Obama, SIOP essentially is probably not going to work again. So how do you allow that collapse To happen because it has to happen in such a way that the banks and the government are essentially blameless. Well, a Cyberattack happen, and you can literally blame any any nation state or group, for that hack. And we know this because of what WikiLeaks published right before Julian Assange was completely silenced and then later, arrested and dragged out of the Ecuadorian embassy in London, Vault 7, which revealed things like the umbridge program among other things that US intelligence And other intelligence agencies that are affiliated with this WEF partnership against cybercrime have the ability, to place The fingerprints of any nation state actor they wish, including Russia, China, Iran, and really North Korea, any other group, as well, not just nation states, put their fingerprints in a hack they actually commit themselves. And this is very significant because this offers, You know, these intelligence agencies unprecedented ability to have, to conduct false flag operations in the cyber realm. And, this group specifically has a lot of solutions aside from, you know, things with the banking system that They cannot really justify implementing unless there is some sort of large cyberattack. So what is the WEF partnership against cybercrime want? They're very open that they want a regulated Internet, and they're essentially seeking a policy that was, efforts were made to implement During the Obama administration in the US, they called it a driver's and it's for the Internet. So, essentially, what this, Public private partnership at the WEF is pushing for is for every person's access to the Internet to be tied to a digital ID, or a government issued ID, but presumably a digital ID just because of where government issued ID programs are all, going essentially around the world. And the goal of that, of course, if your ID is linked to your Internet access, intelligence agencies know exactly what media you are consuming, in terms of, you know, what you read and also what you post online. And that has been the goal for a very, very long time. So people aren't necessarily going to consent to that unless, they are made to believe that anonymity and privacy online are dangerous. So, how exactly can you convince people that that needs to happen? Well, you have some sort of event where anonymous hackers, do something online that causes major disruption globally, and then the consent can be manufactured through fear and panic as as is often done. That anonymity and privacy needs to be eliminated, that we need to know exactly who is doing what online to prevent A calamity of that scale from ever happening again. And this is the exact solution that these guys have been cooking for a very long time. And the intelligence agencies involved are Israeli intelligence, British intelligence, and then the US Secret Service, FBI and Department of Justice. And you have several of the biggest banks in the country, like Bank of America, involved directly with this group, as well as major US tech companies like Microsoft And Amazon, partnered with all of this. And, this is exactly what they're seeking, and they have all the tools to allow something like this, to happen. And when you have the fact that some of these actors want a re a war where the US, for example, goes to war with Iran, Among other things, and they have the ability to attribute, you know, cyber attacks of any scale to any entity at all. And, this is a big problem because when these alleged hacks take place, whether it's blamed on Russia, Iran, or China, the headline will blame these Countries, but if you actually read the article itself, they don't actually have the evidence to make that case. They say, we believe it's this country, or that it's a group affiliated with this country, and their reasoning ranges from you know, they'll say things like we have medium probability that it's you know, They're tied to Iran. And, you know, all these, you know, phrases that show that they don't actually have evidence, and then there's an effort to manufacture consent, Potentially for military action based on based on all of this stuff. So it's definitely very alarming, and people Should be paying attention to it when you consider that you have the biggest banks involved, the biggest intelligence agencies, and some of the biggest tech companies in the world. And another thing that this WEF Group group is is seeking, is for banks, banking regulators, and intelligence agencies to essentially fuse their operations under the guise of Cybersecurity. And the more you think about that, the more insane it is. I mean, it's just an insane policy. Speaker 0: Bringing it together under 1 umbrella. And, of course, we even heard Nikki Haley, who's a you know, certainly, the NeoCons absolutely love Nikki Haley right now, pushing her big time. She, over the past couple of weeks, has called for this lack of anonymity on the web, wants everyone to be registered as you're using the Internet. Right? Speaker 1: Yeah. And so have people, you know, media personal personalities like, Jordan Peterson, for example, has pushed for the same end of anonymity online. And you also have people, like Elon Musk, who bought Twitter. You know, why he was buying Twitter saying that we have To verify all humans and essentially, you know, allegedly to control the bot issue on Twitter. But there's this broad push, essentially everywhere you look, from the power elite to end online anonymity, and people are obviously resisting that because it changes the nature of the Internet and supercharges the surveillance capabilities already built into to a hugely significant degree. And it it's a bigger problem when you consider that the Department of Justice specifically has a precrime program that they've been operating since the Trump administration called Deep, where people have literally been arrested for things they've posted on social media. Someone was even killed, I think, a few months ago for, Facebook Post he made about Joe Biden and then was swatted and shot in the street in front of his house for posts he made on social media. Tying all of this to your government ID, considering, you know, all of those factors as it relates to US law enforcement and the Department of Justice, which again is partnered with all of these things, Is is an extremely awful idea. And the idea that and the fact that you have all these financial services entities involved at the same time, there's this push for digital ID, not just for the Internet, But to tie your digital ID to your banking, through a central bank digital currencies or heavily regulated stablecoins and deposit tokens, I mean, programmable money. I mean, the the implications here are huge. And there's obviously a lot of resistance from certain quarters of the US Population and and elsewhere against the digital ID push and the CBDC push, but have the Internet go down for x amount of time, because of some massive Cyberattack, and they bring it back and say, oh, well, we have to know who you are. Now the only way to get online is to use our digital ID. You know, they're going to Get the kind of fast rapid onboarding and mass adoption that they are seeking for those programs. Speaker 0: Wow. Now you believe that this Cyberattack is a false flag operation. Is it is it your concern that Israel would want the United States to attack Iran first, that they wouldn't be able to do this. What does your reporting show on that side of it? Speaker 1: So it's not really just my reporting. You know? It's Reporting from mainstream media outlets and also, things that Mossad directors have openly said in interviews is that for the past 20 years, they have all Mossad has had almost unlimited funding, and energy directed towards Iran regime change policy. And that a key component of that, according to former Mossad director, mayor Degan, among others, is getting the US to strike Iran first. And there's been a push for a long time from, you know, the NeoCon sectors, within the United States to have, the US Preemptively strike Iran, among other things. And you had pushes, coming from some of the biggest donors to the GOP. For example, Sheldon Abelson, when he was still alive, the biggest, donor, to the Republican Party and also to Trump, was also pushing for preemptive military action against Iran. You know, he isn't necessarily around anymore, but that type of Policy idea has been floated for a very long time. And after the assassination of Qasem Soleimani, the IRGC, The, general who are who was very famous. There was a rhetoric coming from Mike Pompeo when he was CIA director and also Trump that if Iran launched any sort of retaliation, including a cyberattack, they would respond with military action to Iran. So there has been a lot of, Fearmongering about exactly this. And, of course, it's important to keep in mind that next year, the exact year when the the WEF, managing director has predicted this attack is going to Take place is an election year in the United States. Right. And a lot of the same rhetoric about some imminent cyber attack, whether from Iran, Russia, and or China, was being what was being utilized to a significant degree in the 2020 election as well. And you actually had, What I've argued is an Israeli intelligence front company, a cybersecurity company called Cyber Reason, was gaming out and conducting simulations with DHS And some of our top law enforcement and intelligence agencies, how hackers could disrupt the 2020 election, have the election canceled, and martial law Clear exactly what hackers would need to do for those conditions to be met. So there is a lot of stuff going on in the cyber realm that not enough people are paying attention to. And the most Concerning thing about this, I would argue besides the WEF warnings, is that you have a series of entities, many of which are tied to Foreign intelligence, sitting on our on the most critical infrastructure systems in the United States, have to those systems, and other groups have given access to those systems to people that haven't even been vetted by our own government. It's madness. Speaker 0: And is that tied to the c CTIL files, which Michael Shellenberger journalist Michael Shellenberger, released Earlier this week, we covered it extensively here on the show yesterday, the revelations that these c t CTIL files stand for Cyber Threat Intelligence League. And he claims that these revelations are, like, worse than the Twitter files, worse than Facebook, and that basically, They they, has a it's a global plan for censorship, according to these documents, the United States and UK military contractors. But I think is that all tied to this? And I think you believe there's a huge piece missing from the reporting from Michael Shellenberger. It's almost like they conveniently left out One major piece of this story, can you enlighten our audience as to what that is? Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. So I read about the CTI League in August of 2020, because of, this was before they really even got into the misinformation games. So they were founded in March 2020, and their main founder and the public face of the organization for years is a Israeli intelligence operative called Ohad Zdenberg and, Who also has been attributed numerous times in in US mainstream media reports is blaming various cyber attacks Iran while working for a cybersecurity company tied to the Israeli government called Clear Sky. But the CTI league wasn't created. Its initial mission was was not related to to targeting mis alleged misinformation at all. It was, a alleged Volunteering to protect, the critical infrastructure of US hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and health insurance companies, and other corporations in the United States pro bono for free. It's very odd that you would have a group right as the crisis hits. Right? The COVID nineteen, crisis starts, and you have this company, run by a former Former intelligence agency is still collaborating with intelligence, foreign, by the way, not American, offering to protect critical American health infrastructure For free. People like this do not work for free. And the other people that cofounded this group with him Speaker 0: Well, so so an Israeli intelligence guy, forms this company, is the head of this company, and says we're gonna take care of American hospitals, dams, water infrastructure Speaker 1: come later. Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Speaker 1: Dams come later. But it was First Health Infrastructure, and they partnered with CISA, which is the independent agency operating under DHS, that's supposed to protect Critical structure, including election infrastructure, but also things like, water systems, the power grid, All sorts of things like that as well as hospitals. And the CTI league created by Zdenberg, partners with them directly to protect all of this Critical infrastructure misinformation, what Schellenberger and Taibi have covered, is the side gig of the CTI league. Their main thing is to get on all these critical infrastructure systems allegedly to protect them, but no one knows who works For the CTI league, really, because in order to join it and get access to all of these systems, you don't have to be vetted by Seesaw or the US Federal Government. You have to be vetted by Ohad Zdenberg and the other cofounders, who play a much more minor role than him who are affiliated with either, Microsoft or a US government contractor called Okta. So you have these These guys deciding who gets access to these systems, and, you know, who doesn't. But it's it could anyone could get through that, Essentially, you know, it's it's extremely reckless, extremely reckless. And beyond that, it's not just hospitals anymore. As you mentioned, it's expand to dams. It's expand to water systems and also nuclear reactors in the United States. So you have a foreign intelligence Founded or nonprofit being offered access to all of these critical systems in the United States. It's insane. And it's not really the only company that's like this. So the other, company I mentioned earlier, Cyber Reason, That did these simulations about election doomsday, with DHS and and the FBI and And and whatnot. They have access to some of the most critical infrastructure of the US military and a backdoor to all of it, essentially. And, it's not run by American Citizens. Speaker 0: How is this being allowed? I mean, how is this being allowed? And, I mean, we know the deep connections between Israel and the United States, and we know the Israel lobby in the United stage, but this is this goes deeper than that. And why do you think it's why would Michael Shellenberger leave out that part of the story? It sounds to me like a limited hangout. I mean, I know that your website is called right? Like, I mean, this is like, you know, the distraction over here. Let let's just focus on misinformation. But this other massive piece of the story, that they have access to American infrastructure. Foreign governments have access to American infrastructure. Israeli government has access to American infrastructure. Speaker 1: Well, it's not just the Israelis either because, again, we don't know who was given Access through the CTI League to these systems. Any nationality could have it. You know, we have no idea because they're not open about. Yeah. It's it's an an extremely reckless policy. It's worth pointing out too that the head of Seesaw that oversaw this partnership with CTI League is an ex, Ex head of cybersecurity at Microsoft, and you have the soft affiliations, with some of the other cofounders and, of course, Microsoft Soft being, arguably heavily heavily compromised by Israeli intelligence by Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. I've done a lot of reporting on that with, Ghislaine Maxwell sisters being heavily involved, with Microsoft through some of their companies, and then, Jeffrey Epstein going on Microsoft Russia conferences, being very involved, of course, with Bill Gates and also the chief technology officer of Microsoft for many years, Nathan Mervold, Just totally unreal. So, what's going on here with CTI League is, I think, is very significant, and I'm I'm very, disappointed that I mean, I would like to give Shellenberger the benefit of the doubt and just hope he was not aware Of what the CTI League does beyond misinformation. But, I mean, if you go to the CTI League website, it's very obvious that they do a lot more beyond, You know, the missing side of things, that their main focus is this alleged pro bono protection of critical American infrastructure. And what's also significant about this happening in the COVID era is that just as CTI League partnership with CISA, the h HHS in the US Cut hospital budgets, that were supposed to help pay for their cybersecurity and IT's, maintenance. So, you know, at the same time that all this COVID stuff is going on, they don't have people protecting their IT systems. And then this group comes along and offers their Services for free. So a lot of hospitals, maybe that one of them necessarily taken that offer, took it because, You know, government policy made it essentially a necessity for them to do so. And, also among In the pharma world, they ended up partnering, you know, with Pfizer, with Merck and some of the bames, there as well. So this is not just the corporate. This is not just, you know, like, the public sector, that they're, protecting from cybersecurity. So, you know, given what's been revealed with the DTI League as it relates to censorship and their malfeasance there, why would they not practice similar malfeasance with their alleged protection of critical systems in the United States? Speaker 0: I was gonna say, yeah, to bring it all back to the World Economic Forum. So if you have if you launch this cyberattack or you hear, oh, there's a cyberattack coming, I I mean, it's like the perfect cover. You've literally got the the assets in place to turn off critical infrastructure with your back end team Speaker 1: that you've Speaker 0: already put together and then blame it on Iran. Right? I mean, is that the plan here? And then we launch attack against Iran? Speaker 1: Ohad Zdenberg's whole career has been focused on Iran and cyberattacks. And, he's just been focused on Iran his entire career within Israeli intelligence. And now after he formally left and is working for this, group affiliated with, you know, Israeli government owned entities and other intelligence operatives. And a lot of his more recent attributions of cyberattacks to Iran have no evidence. It's thing, he says things like, this group acts like another Iranian cyber group used to act. Therefore, it must be Iranian and doesn't provide any more detail than that. I mean, are we going to get roped into a war over something that's so devoid of any actual evidence? But, unfortunately, mainstream media reporting about cyberattacks in general, regardless of whether it's attributed to Iran or another nation, very rarely have any actual, tangible evidence to make that claim. And then even if they did, you know, there's this whole factor of of Vault 7 as revealed by WikiLeaks and that you can frame any country or any group for a cyberattack. And as is often the case when these crises happen, there is no investigation until after the fact. And often of, like, the 911 commission, for example, is heavily compromised. So Who knows what will happen there, but it's obviously very concerning. And as far as the World Economic Forum is related, that public private partnership I was talking about earlier, the partnership Cybercrime is led by a career Israeli spy named Tal Goldstein, who developed this policy, while Netanyahu, who's still prime minister, was Prime minister back then in 2012 that operations that Mossad used to conduct in house are now going to be conducted by private companies, particularly in the realm Of cybersecurity, and that is when these groups, including Ohad Zdenberg's Clear Sky and Cyber Reason, were created. And a lot of them with people with continuing affiliations to Israeli intelligence. And when you consider, again, That it's a directly known and admitted policy of Israeli intelligence to get the US to strike Iran first at the time that is the Israel security state It that it's time to begin open hostilities and armed hostilities with Iran, which seems quite soon, given the conflict in in Gaza and how that's escalated and likely to escalate into a regional war, they have wanted for For decades, the US to strike Iran first. And how will they do that? This is I mean, I'm not Saying they're definitely going to do it, but the fact that we're giving that exact government and people linked to that exact government Access to our critical systems and all the means to do that is not a good idea. Speaker 0: Right. Yeah. You don't need to you know, it's Occam's razor. Right? It's the simplest explanation for what's going to happen. And I hope that by, you know, having you on here and exposing this, talking about we've been warning from the very beginning of what happened on October 7th, watch out for false flags. Watch out for us being dragged into a regional war. Watch out for us being dragged into a war with Iran. You know, we have a long history in the United States of false flag operations, going back to the Spanish American war and before. So this is not an this is not something new that the United States would pull off here, in coordination with the Israeli government. Whitney Webb, know you've been working very, very hard. You have some explosive new content coming out here very, very soon. We'd love to have you back on, perhaps after the holidays when you when you have those reports. We always appreciate it. It's always a tour de force, and you blow our minds, every time You're on the show. So I just wanna say thank you so much. Great to have you back on. And, it's been a real pleasure to see you again. Speaker 1: Yeah. Likewise. Great to be back on, Especially after such a long hiatus. So, really appreciate the invite. Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you so much for watching this segment here at Redacted. We are live every day at 4 PM EST trying to share the stories that the mainstream media will not cover. You should also come over and join our community of redacted rebels over at redacted.inc. That's our private that locals community where we can share exclusive content that we simply cannot share here on YouTube. Come over and join the rebellion together right now by going to redacted.inc. We'll see you next time.
MarkFriesen08
Posted - December 13, 2023 at 12:05 AM
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 3:34 AM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

When will the @rcmpgrcpolice initiate an investigation of our government when they knew they the jabs were going to kill and harm people? It was done on purpose, obviously. With forethought and purpose. @rcmpgrcpolice do your job. 37,000 Canadians have been harmed by this experiment. If not more. All by design. If Italy can do it so can we!

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

Spittin f’n angry! Is it enough now? https://t.co/ehpjtjLpFE

Video Transcript AI Summary
We were right to refuse the jab, as a recent report from the Western standard reveals that the government and Privy Council knew about the harms it could cause. They deliberately concealed this information and used propaganda to manipulate us into compliance, forcing us to wear masks and destroying our businesses. The government's complicity in this genocide, along with the media's collaboration, has resulted in countless deaths. When will we finally say enough is enough?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So here we are. We are on the right side of history. All of us who said no to the jab, that it is our bodily autonomy that gives us the right to say no. We were right. Report just came out of the Western standard That the Privy Council, along with the government, knew that there would be harms to people who took the jab. But they put out messaging to cover that off. To avoid Telling the people the truth. I'm I'm spitting fucking angry. Do we Understand now how evil this government is? Do we get it? Do we understand That all of this was connected to get you to comply, to get you to wear a diaper on your face, to get you to shut down your business, destroy your livelihoods. Do you get it now? The government is complicit in this genocide. They knew. They knew all about it, And they said nothing with the help of the media whores, the prostitutes That went along pounding this propaganda into the minds of unwitting Canadians. And how many people are fucking dying because of this? How many people have died because of the jab that they knew would kill people? When are we gonna say enough? When is it enough?
MarkFriesen08
Posted - August 26, 2023 at 6:23 AM
Saved - August 26, 2023 at 6:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Taxation without representation: victims of our healthcare system. Those who paid taxes for healthcare coverage were killed by the state for non-compliance with the jab. History shows the consequences of no representation. Accepting this insanity is beyond comprehension. #HealthcareHorror

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

We have entered the era of taxation without representation. Two victims of our health care system. People who have paid taxes to ensure they get healthcare coverage were killed by the state because they didn’t comply with the jab that is killing people around the world. What happened last time when the people were not represented when paying taxes. This is absolutely insane! How anyone accepts this in this country is beyond me.

MarkFriesen08
Posted - August 22, 2023 at 6:19 AM
Saved - August 22, 2023 at 3:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Residents in the Shuswap region urgently seek assistance. A back burn was initiated without warning, endangering homes. Firefighters initially responded but left when the situation worsened. Locals were left to defend their properties. Now, heavy police presence restricts access to essential supplies. Authorities seem to be hindering efforts to combat the fire. The truth needs to be shared to garner support. Contact 2505090400 for more information.

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

Copied from another post Posted 45min ago... We need to get the story out about what’s happening in the Shuswap. Can you guys please post this everywhere. Send it to everyone you know. Please help us. My name is Stef and my husband Jorne and I own a home at the end of Meadow Creek road in Celista BC. The fire department and forestry lit a back burn around 4pm on Thursday Aug 17th knowing there were 30km winds coming. No news outlet is talking out this. My husband has been monitoring the winds and the Adams creek fire for weeks. On Tuesday Aug 15th we knew the winds were coming. The fire was approx 15km away from us. We don’t know who decided to light a back burn knowing the wind forecast. They lit a 14km back burn right to our back door and never notified us. My dad who lives in Kelowna knew about a “out of control back burn” before we did. They didn’t even come to tell us. They notified the locals by posting it on a piece of paper at the gas station. At 845pm we saw the fire just over the ridge. And by 12pm it had reached meadow creek road and was in back yard. Without the back burn we could have had a whole day to prepare. We did have sprinklers up, water tanks loaded and generators ready to go. We knew we were pretty much on our own and would not receive much help. The fire department did come down the road and were there briefly. Once they deemed the fire out of control they left. When the fire came into the valley we watched it burn up the sides of the mountain due to the humidity dome created with all the sprinkler and water. The fire department abandoned us. About 2 hours had passed when some locals came down our valley with resources and help. I was notified the fire department was sitting in a field having coffee so I went t to get them. When I got there I asked them to come help us, told them the situation. One of the firemen told me they wanted to help but had orders to sit. I yelled at them to get in their trucks and come help us. They said they would. I went back down the road to notify our crew they were coming. I sat and waited but no one came. About 15 minutes had gone by so I went back up the road and found them sitting about 1km away. They told me they were assessing the situation. I asked how they could assess if they couldn’t see it? I again asked them to come help and they finally did. Everyone ran around putting hot spots out. We wore water packs and half masks with headlamps for the next 3 days making sure our houses made it through. In the initial days after the “superfire” the locals were able to get water, gas and supplies but now there is a heavy police presence. They have the roads blocked off saying they are preventing looting. The locals are being told to return to their homes. They are not allowed to be helping at all. There are spike strips on the roads. Police blocks everywhere. There are people trying to get essential supplies in such as water, gas and food by boat. They are being turned away. Police are patrolling the roads and water. They have the gas stations blocked off. We need the real story to get out so we can get help. We are more than equipped to help put this fire out but are being stopped. We need resources such as gas, diesel to keep us going. They’re trying to starve us out so they can let it burn. My number is 250-509-0400 Please feel free to post my number. I’m willing to talk to anyone who can help us.

View Full Interactive Feed