reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @MauriceMur4768

Posted - September 27, 2025 at 6:58 AM

Saved - September 27, 2025 at 11:55 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The conversation centers on the dangers of digital ID systems, drawing parallels to China's social credit model. One participant argues that such systems can lead to oppressive control, citing examples from China where QR codes dictated citizens' movements and access to resources. They warn that once established, these systems can tighten their grip during crises. Another contributor expresses extreme opposition to anyone adopting digital IDs, labeling them as enforcers of authoritarianism. The discussion emphasizes the need for resistance and oversight to protect individual freedoms.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

20 reasons why digital ID must be resisted at all costs. "Over time, this is going to become a Chinese social credit style system." "The Chinese model—digital ID tied to a social credit system—shows where this system inevitably goes." "Once in place, systems like this never shrink. They expand until every aspect of life is going to be conditional on state approved digital identity." Credit: @Kingbingo_

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker argues against digital IDs, listing 20 concerns: functionality creep into immigration, healthcare, banking, voting, driving, and travel; loss of anonymity; government overreach; it won't stop illegal immigration; it would rely on phones; enforcement could be undermined by cash-paying employers; single point of failure; government as the nexus of verification; a state surveillance honeypot; inevitable future abuses by any regime; massive cost and bureaucratic drag; marginalization of those unable or unwilling to comply; UK previously rejected ID cards; examples of failures in other countries (India ANWA, EU database); authoritarian temptations; excuses for illegal immigration and labor; burden shifting to citizens; ratchet effect; not for stated reasons but globalist aims; alternative is zero-knowledge proofs where individuals hold ID; digital IDs from the state are a horrendous idea and must be stopped.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: 20 reasons why digital ID must be resisted at all costs. First of all, functionality creep. They say they're introducing it for immigration, but invariably, it's gonna expand into health care, banking, voting, driving, Internet use, travel. Over time, this is going to become a Chinese social credit style system. Second, loss of an anonymity. Everyday life is going to be logged and it's going to be tracked. Cash, transportation, movements, communications, It's all going to be tied back to a central profile. So the government can decide not to like any aspect of that and it can restrict you. Number three, government overreach. Shifts the balance of power further from the to the state from the citizen. We must now constantly prove who we are instead of the state proving any guilt. Number four, of course, this is not gonna stop illegal immigration. Digital IDs don't prevent people from crossing borders. It simply makes it harder for the people who are living here legally. If you want to stop illegal immigration, what you do is you leave the ECHR and you immediately remove people who come here to an offshore territory, something like Saint Helena's as Australia has already demonstrated. That is the only thing that works. Number five, it makes us more dependent on a phone. Thousands, hundreds of thousands of phones are snatched in The UK every year and now they want a digital ID which is accessible only on your phone, which over time is going to be the only way to get anything done and we know that's going to happen. Number six, an enforcement sham. Employers who are willing to employ illegal immigrants are going to carry on doing what they're doing now. They just pay cash if they need to. If you want to stop a lot of this illegal, employment, start with DoorDash and Deliveroo and start delivering massive fines to them or other employees. Go into kebab shops, go into, all the places where people work at the moment as illegal immigrants, and they're paid cash or they're paid through some other means with some voucher system, go after that, don't come after the rest of Now number seven is a single point of failure. Hack the database and every citizen's personal identity is compromised at once. Number eight, it makes the government the nexus. Yes, it's true. We already use a lot of digital services and, you know, big big tech has lots of information on us. But all of those are one to one relationships. And if we if we lose any one of them, it doesn't particularly matter. We walk away from any one of them, it doesn't particularly matter. What's going to happen over time is all of these services are going to want to link to this because it is cheaper than building their own verification systems. So once government is the nexus of everything, they can then restrict or deperson you across the board as they see fit. Number nine, state surveillance honeypot. This is going to enable mass data collection on travel and purchases, medical history, political activity, the lot. It's going to be this massive honeypot, which governments or anyone who has access to it, their partners or after any leaks is gonna have access to all of this. Number 10, future abuses are inevitable. Any government that inherits this infrastructure to control populations at the flick of a switch can do so. So even if you are a labor bootlicker who who thinks you need to defend this, just remember that a future nationalist government can use this for whatever the hell it wants. Number 11, massively expensive. Billions has already been wasted on bureaucracy, IT systems, databases, hardware rollouts, and this is not gonna be any different. It's not gonna work as intended, so they're gonna spend more billions on this just like they did with NHS systems and countless others. Number 12, administration drag. Businesses are gonna be constantly forced to verify customers, clients, employees slowing down normal activity as if we haven't got enough drags on the economy already. Number 13, it's gonna marginalize people. People who are unwilling or unable to comply, lots of elderly people who aren't au fait with phones and all the rest of it, or people who simply want to live off grid. They're going to be excluded from the system. Now my heritage in this country goes back thousands of years. I am not misspeaking. I can demonstrate that. I know that my line goes back at least that far. I do not need to ask permission from a government, from a temporary globalist government if I get to live here or work here. My claim here supersedes yours government. 14, The UK has already rejected, ID cards. Blair's government tried this. Blair tried it when he was in power, and the the backlash was so fierce that he had to drop it. Now we've already been offered it, and we've rejected it. 15, other countries' failures. You can look at India's ANWA system, the leaked datas, the the EU database on digital wallets, and that showed that they were, you know, they were creeping towards, IDs for payments, speech online, Internet access. It's gonna be that all over again. Number 16, authoritarian temptations. The Chinese model digital ID tied to a social credit system shows where this system inevitably goes. 17, the excuse is just a a smokescreen. Illegal immigration, black market labor exists because the government refuses to enforce borders and existing laws. Adding something else which just happens to give the globalist all the control they've ever wanted is not gonna change any of that. Number 18 is shifting the burden to citizens. Instead of fixing state failures, the government is using this to justify more and more control over ordinary people. 19, the ratchet effect. Once in place, systems like this never shrink. They expand into every aspect of life is gonna be conditional on state approved digital identity. And number 20, this is obviously not for, the stated reasons. There is no attempt being made to even manufacture consent here. It's just a hugely unpopular government that knows at the next labor, the the next election, this could be the last labor government. This is purely about winning globalist brownie points and lining up favors and synagogues after being booted out. And finally, I'd say this. Okay. There is actually a case for making, digital ID because actually in a digital age, it might actually be quite helpful. But you know what does that? A technology called zero knowledge proofs. It's a digital identity which the individual holds, and you can prove your identity with this technology while remaining in control of the digital ID. It is not dependent on the state and eliminates all of the problems I've said above. So even if you think that there is a use case that you can find the digital ID, go down the zero knowledge proof routes which sits with the individual. Digital IDs from the state are a horrendous idea, and it must be stopped.

@MauriceMur4768 - Maurice Murphy 1215

Digital ID a world of convenience or your digital cage. China’s digital ID and social credit experiment was sold as “convenience,” but it proved how quickly technology can morph into a cage. During the pandemic, millions of people lived under QR codes that decided whether they could leave home, buy food, or travel to another city. Entire neighborhoods were sealed off health passes were flipped from green to red at the touch of a button sometimes even to silence protests. Bank accounts would be frozen without warning. The protests that broke out in late 2022, rarely shown abroad, revealed just how much people resented living under a system that monitored every move and punished every deviation. Beijing later dismantled the codes, but the infrastructure remains. And once a digital net like that has been thrown over society, it can always be tightened again. Nor is China an outlier. Canada froze bank accounts during the truckers’ demonstrations. Nigeria rolled out a digital currency and restricted cash withdrawals, sparking unrest. Across Europe, the UN, and the World Economic Forum, “digital identity” frameworks are advancing marketed with words like safety, sustainability, and inclusion. But the lesson from China is clear once digital ID, payments, and mobility are fused together, it takes only a policy shift or a political crisis for those tools to become digital shackles. The warning is simple what was imposed once can be imposed again. Resistance, transparency, and genuine democratic oversight are not luxuries they are lifelines. Because once your identity, your wallet, and your freedom of movement sit on a single switch, it only takes one decision by the state to turn citizens into subjects.

@TheNoma21555964 - The Nomad

@MauriceMur4768 @wideawake_media Not only NI DIGITAL ID, but if you know anyone that gets one, get them out of your life, by any means necessary. They are the grey shirt enforcers of the red shirt communists. They would rather you are dead than resist their commands. They are the enemy!

@MauriceMur4768 — Maurice Murphy 1215

Posted - September 19, 2025 at 12:00 AM

Saved - September 19, 2025 at 5:29 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In an interview, Mariana Mazzucato revealed dissatisfaction with the Covid vaccine rollout, noting that vaccination rates fell short of expectations. She hinted at a future focus on global water resources, suggesting we should brace ourselves for another manufactured crisis.

@MauriceMur4768 - Maurice Murphy 1215

Mariana Mazzucato contributor to the world economic forum let the cat out of the bag while speaking in an interview. As she said, they were not happy with the Covid vaccine rollout. Vaccinations rates were far too low and not as high as they had expected. They must’ve been very unhappy when they did not vaccinate the entire planet. Their next goal is to go after the worlds water. So get ready for the next manufactured crisis

Video Transcript AI Summary

Did we solve global vaccination? No. Highlighting water as a global commons and what it means to work together from both global commons and self-interest perspectives. The speaker ties this to the global commons idea and relates it to self-interest. It's important because we haven't solved problems with similar attributes, and water is something people understand. Climate change is abstract for some; water is understood—'Water, every kid knows how important it is to have water. When you're playing football and you're thirsty, you need water.' The speaker urges citizen engagement and experimenting with the common good. Can we deliver this time in ways we have failed miserably other times? And hopefully, we won't keep failing on the other things.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Nation and globally. Did we solve that? Like, did we actually manage to vaccinate everyone in the world? No. So highlighting water as a global commons and what it means to work together and see it both out of that kind of global commons perspective, but also the self interest perspective because it is it does have that parallel. It's not only important, but it's also important because we haven't managed to solve those problems with which had similar attributes, and water is something that people understand. You know, climate change is a bit abstract. Some people understand it really well. Some understand it a bit. Some just don't understand it. Water, every kid knows how important it is to have water. When you're playing football and you're thirsty, you need water. So there's also something about really getting citizen engagement around this and really, in some ways, experimenting with this notion of the common good. Can we actually deliver this time in ways that we have failed miserably other times? And hopefully, we won't keep failing on the other things, but anyway.

@MauriceMur4768 — Maurice Murphy 1215

Posted - January 16, 2025 at 1:35 PM

Saved - January 16, 2025 at 3:59 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I believe mainstream media today engages in more gaslighting for the government than in the past. Elites and legacy media have long manipulated public opinion through propaganda, often with minimal scrutiny compared to grassroots misinformation. Historical examples, like Operation Mockingbird and the Iraq War, illustrate how media can amplify false narratives. The profit-driven model prioritizes sensationalism, allowing elites to control narratives and suppress dissent. This results in a polarized public, where misinformation thrives and corrections rarely reach the same audience.

@MauriceMur4768 - Maurice Murphy 1215

The mainstream media today does more gaslighting for the government then the Victorians ever had The Pervasive Propaganda of Elites and Legacy Media Media outlets and elites have long been significant purveyors of propaganda and misinformation, using their vast resources and centralized control to shape public opinion for political, economic, and social agendas. While grassroots misinformation often faces scrutiny, elite-driven narratives operate on a much larger scale, with far greater impact. Governments and elites have exploited media to influence public perception. During the Cold War, the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird embedded pro-American propaganda in major news outlets. Similarly, during the Iraq War, media amplified false claims about weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), garnering support for an invasion based on fabricated evidence. Even in democracies, elites use regulatory pressure or economic power to shape media coverage, suppress dissent, and align narratives with Modern media’s profit-driven model prioritizes sensationalism and engagement over accuracy. Dependence on advertising revenue gives corporate sponsors undue influence, discouraging critical reporting that could threaten elite interests. This relationship perpetuates narratives that reinforce the status quo, sidelining stories that challenge powerful institutions. Elites excel at controlling narratives through selective framing, often omitting key facts to present skewed interpretations. As outlined in Chomsky and Herman’s Manufacturing Consent, this ensures the public consumes stories that align with dominant ideologies, while alternative perspectives are systematically excluded. Legacy media’s vast infrastructure allows it to amplify misinformation on a global scale. Unlike grassroots sources, elite-driven narratives reach millions through coordinated messaging across print, broadcast, and digital platforms. Repetition makes these narratives appear credible, significantly shaping public opinion. Partisan media deepens polarization by catering to ideological audiences and reinforcing biases. False equivalence in mainstream reporting also misleads the public, giving undue attention to fringe perspectives while distorting the weight of evidence. Elite-driven misinformation often faces minimal consequences. Corrections, when issued, rarely reach the same audience as the original falsehoods. Instead, legacy media frequently deflects blame onto grassroots sources, ignoring its own significant role in shaping flawed narratives. The Iraq War is a stark example of elite-driven propaganda, where false WMD claims went unchallenged, leading to widespread public support for an unjustified invasion. Similarly, during the 2008 financial crisis, media failed to scrutinize risky financial practices, protecting Wall Street interests. More recently, conflicting COVID-19 narratives have shown how even reputable outlets can contribute to public confusion through negligence or framing.