TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @MaxEvansUMP

Saved - March 18, 2025 at 6:41 AM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

The REAL Thomas Massie @gc22gc @liz_churchill10 @DC_Draino https://t.co/UVjENfPI3z

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on Congressman Thomas Massie's political actions and stances. Rachel Maddow suggests Trump's refusal to concede and his continued political involvement are significant. Massie voted against Trump's national emergency declaration for the border wall. Despite being a staunch ally of Mitch McConnell, Massie advises against attacking the senator. Massie emphasizes the importance of not alienating any members in the House. He anticipates voting for a rule, suggesting the House floor is the place to express ideology. Massie voted yes, which was a relief to Speaker Kevin McCarthy. He is litigating a federal lawsuit against Pelosi over a salary reduction for refusing to wear a mask. Massie has endorsed Ron DeSantis for president, highlighting DeSantis's handling of the economy during COVID-19, contrasting it with Trump's urging of governors to shut down their economies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rachel Maddow, if he would just go away, if he would just sign an agreement that he would not run again for public office, this would all stop. And what has Trump said? Nope. I'm all in. Now why is that? He understands this moment, the urgency of this moment. He understands. That's why I said Thomas Massie in this theoretical talk about the constitution. The constitution has been shredded. That's a feat, intellectualism. That's reading National Review. It doesn't matter anymore. That's just con that's salon conversation. We're beyond that. We're beyond that. Speaker 1: In a tweet sure to garner the ire of president Trump, Thomas Massie wrote on Twitter today, in order to be consistent in preserving the constitutional structure of our republic, I will be voting for the resolution to prevent the president from using a national emergency declaration to reappropriate money for the wall. Speaker 2: A staunch ally of fellow Kentuckian Mitch McConnell, Thomas Massey attended a rally today to support his campaign warning fellow conservatives to back off from attacking the veteran senator. Speaker 3: But, you know, some say that, you know, Jeff Blake is is not on board with the agenda, and they are critical of him. So do you think the president would be wrong to try to primary him and try to get him out of there? Speaker 4: What I've learned serving in the House of Representatives, there's four thirty five members. Don't alienate any of them, not a single one. Speaker 3: Why not try to stop Paul Ryan from becoming speaker? After the election, you said he didn't have your vote, but he was approved unanimously Right. For speaker. Speaker 5: Well, John Boehner was approved unanimously too. I anticipate voting for this rule. And Speaker 6: for peep when people wanna express their ideology, the floor of the Speaker 5: house on the actual final passage of the bill is the place to do that. Speaker 7: Thomas Massey of Kentucky announced he is a yes. Speaker 8: You heard probably just now a sigh of relief from speaker Kevin McCarthy at getting that yes vote. Speaker 1: 20 Republicans chose to side with Democrats, did not sit your adam ship, including Thomas Massey who tweeted, I'm still litigating a federal lawsuit against Pelosi over a salary reduction she imposed on me for my refusal to wear a mask. Speaker 6: They can introduce all the resolutions they want. It can be 16,000,000 or a hundred and 60,000,000. I'm not gonna stop defending our democracy. Speaker 9: Joining me now is Kentucky congressman Speaker 10: Tom Massey, who has endorsed governor Ron DeSantis for president. Speaker 11: Congressman Well, Ron will be able to talk about the economy because he didn't shut his down, Speaker 12: and Trump was urging governors to shut their economies down. Speaker 0: Oh, they gotta put him on prime time on Fox. Let's get him on Laura Ingram, and let's have him talk about some decent nomads. You were the one in the rules committee that let the the debt ceiling go forward. You.
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 8:01 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

Uniparty RINO from Mississippi, ROGER WICKER (nominated by OBAMA in 2010) not only votes with DEMOCRATS re. Ukraine but says he has no problem with a NUCLEAR FIRST STRIKE AGAINST RUSSIA! https://t.co/6bp0Z8ugoO

Video Transcript AI Summary
I wouldn't rule out American troops on the ground. But I sure as hell am not interested in a nuclear war with Russia. These people are insane; we don't rule out a first use of nuclear weapons. They take about thirty minutes to reach their target, just like ours. This is not an exercise. Over 300 missiles are inbound right now. Some Democrats are saying we need to be tougher, and I support that. Anyone who would propose a nuclear attack is insane, a sociopath, or a sadist. They're saying, let's launch a nuclear attack that would destroy the American people, our country, the world, and the Ukrainians, all to save Ukraine's democracy. As the war approaches its second year, Congress must ramp up military aid to Ukraine to drive toward victory. Lately, with this nuclear war stuff, I have been having anxiety attacks. I'm pissed off. There's a really good chance we're all gonna die. I'm sick of the new world order and the criminals that run Washington. I just pray to God for a global awakening and peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would not rule out American troops on the ground. Speaker 1: And I sure as hell am not interested in a nuclear war with Russia. First strike. First strike. These people are insane. Speaker 0: You know, we don't rule out, first use nuclear. Speaker 2: First use nuclear. Speaker 0: They take about thirty minutes to reach their target. So do theirs. Right? This is not an exercise. Over 300 missiles inbound now. Do you know we don't rule out first use nuclear? First use nuclear. First use nuclear. Speaker 3: Question. How fast Speaker 2: is this new Russian missile? Speaker 3: Did you see that? Neither did I. You know why? It's so fast. Even the photographers don't seem to be able to follow this thing. Speaker 0: That you had Democrats on the show right before me being quoted as saying we need to be tougher. I support that, and I appreciate that. I think they they represent the fear that we have, the realization that we have in the congress. Speaker 4: Anyone who would propose or even consider what he is saying as an option must be insane, a sociopath, or a sadist. Because let's just understand here. So he's saying, let's go and launch a nuclear attack that would start a war that would destroy the American people, our country, and the world, and, oh, also the Ukrainians so that we can save Ukraine's democracy. Speaker 0: Mister president, the courage of Ukrainians presents us with an opportunity. As the war approaches its second year, congress must once again lead the administration to ramp up military aid to Ukraine to drive toward victory. We should all want Ukraine to win the Speaker 2: war. Lately with this nuclear war stuff, I have been having anxiety attacks. And I started having one at the start of the last segment when I looked at the news and was about to cover it. I I just couldn't do it because I have children, and I'm pissed off. And there's a really good chance we're all gonna die. And I'm I'm I'm tired of this, and I'm sick of the new world order, and I'm sick of the criminals that run Washington. See, I'm sorry. And and and I'll tell you, it's because I'm not turning this desk over and I'm not smashing stuff. Because that's what I really feel like doing. But instead of doing that, you just take a deep breath and just pray to God to cause a global awakening, which is starting to happen, and that we just have peace.
Saved - September 17, 2024 at 4:36 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

Chris Cuomo makes an impassioned apology to President Trump https://t.co/766vty0nkt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reached out to Trump to express sympathy for what he's going through, not because of political agreement, but because "he doesn't deserve this," referring to someone pointing an AK-47 at him. The speaker believes most people couldn't endure what Trump has faced recently and questions how he copes, especially considering his family. The speaker is critical of those who mock Melania Trump, particularly in light of the assassination attempt on her husband. The speaker believes it's time for apologies and warns against playing a "dangerous game." The speaker rejects the idea that Trump is desperate and emphasizes the importance of caring when anyone is harmed, stating, "Either you care when anyone is hurt or you'll never really care about anyone."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't get it. That's why I reached out to Trump. I wanted to just say, listen. I'm really sorry that this is going on and it's being dealt with this way. Not because I'm in favor of his politics or what he says. I criticize him all the time. That's my job, and he deserves it. But he doesn't deserve this. A guy point an AK 47 at him while he's playing golf, And we take solace in the fact that the guy didn't get any rounds off. If I had been through what that guy's been through in the last 2 months, you would not know where I am. You would never see me on TV again. No way I would do that. I don't know how he does it. He's got kids. They're adults, but he's got grandkids. He's got a wife. People giving she giving crap to Melania Trump, worrying about whether or not there was a plot around his husband. How could she not? People mock her? And then her husband has a guy pointed with an AK 47. Where are those people apologizing? That's what it's time for. We are playing a dangerous game with ourselves. He is not a desperate in waiting. Okay? I don't buy it. You gotta care when somebody tries to kill somebody. I've told you this before, and I've learned the lesson so many times myself around the world. Either you care when anyone is hurt or you'll never really care about anyone
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 8:41 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

This is the greatest concern after yesterdays debate β€” bar none https://t.co/CUApToG0gM

Video Transcript AI Summary
This man has the power to decide what happens if North Korea fires a missile. Are you okay with that? Let's all go home and reflect on it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This man has the finger on the button. He is the only man that can decide what happens if North Korea launches a missile. Do you feel comfortable with that? We should all go home and just think of that.
Saved - June 5, 2024 at 2:19 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

"What happened to Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro when they decided to defy a subpoena of the Congress?" https://t.co/TNOOmERwgB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 is aware that a majority of the committee has marked up a contempt resolution. Speaker 1 acknowledges the majority seeking contempt. Speaker 0 emphasizes the importance of the majority's actions. Speaker 1 asserts he will not be intimidated and cites the need to protect separation of powers. Speaker 0 questions the consequences of defying a subpoena, mentioning past criminal referrals. Speaker 1 argues his case is different and highlights the lack of compliance and absence of executive privilege in previous cases. Speaker 0 warns of potential prosecution if Speaker 1's decision to not cooperate is baseless. Speaker 1 affirms the importance of following the law.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You went on to say that certain members of this committee and the oversight committee are seeking contempt. You're aware that a majority of the of this committee has marked up a contempt resolution. Aren't you, sir? Speaker 1: Fertinent members includes the majority. Yes. Speaker 0: It's a big difference. Isn't it, sir? Isn't that significant? Speaker 1: The fact that a majority of the committee charged by the Congress to inquire into the grounds for impeaching the president of Speaker 0: the United States has issued a has marked up a a contempt resolution. That's more important than certain members. Isn't it, sir? Majority? Institutionally. More important. Speaker 1: A majority has sought contempt. Yes. Speaker 0: You said that you will not be intimidated. Speaker 1: Are you the arbiter? I'm sorry? Are you the arbiter, the decider of whether or not those tapes will be provided Speaker 0: to this congress at the instance at the subpoena of its committee to investigate the president. Constitution requires me to protect the separation of powers. Speaker 1: Let me ask you this. Speaker 0: What happened to Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon when they decided to defy a subpoena of the congress. Speaker 1: We we received, 4 referrals criminal referrals. 2 were prosecuted, 2 were not. The 2 that were prosecuted, as the published court opinions made clear What will what will Speaker 0: what will happen to you if your decision is based? Speaker 1: May I continue to answer? Speaker 0: No. I I know what happened. You know the what happened too. They're in mister Navarro is in prison. What will happen to you if your sole determination, that you're not gonna cooperate with this committee subpoena is? Speaker 1: Back to the 2 people you asked, the court made clear they did not comply in any way, did not even appear. And second, there was no executive privilege. Neither of those is true in my case. Speaker 0: If a future department of justice follows the facts and the law as you're fond of reciting even to the point of prosecuting the former president, then if your decision is baseless, you should be prosecuted. Right? Attorney General will follow Speaker 1: the law.
Saved - February 7, 2024 at 11:54 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

We don't need no stinkin' TUCKER interview with Zalensky when we already have this from CNN! https://t.co/pwAi4vpkrk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people look up to the speaker, who acknowledges the difficulty of their role. They find solace in moments of silence and solitude, particularly in the early morning when there are no sounds or people around. During this time, they enjoy reading, thinking, and listening to music, particularly ACDC. The speaker finds energy and motivation from music, often incorporating it into their morning workouts. They consider it a miracle that provides them with energy for the entire day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a human being, so many people look up to you. They rely on you. No one can imagine how hard that is. Do you do you do anything for your to yourself? Are you ever able to take a minute to to read or to listen to music or something to sort give yourself that, a moment? Speaker 1: I have such moments. It's important to be in silence, to be alone. And early early in the morning when there are no Sounds and sounds. No people. No. No. Nobody. I mean, the people people our staff. I mean, no nobody is is is in my Even if nobody I can just read, think, think, and the music helps, really. Speaker 0: What music do you like? Speaker 1: Oh, I like ACDC. ACDC, I don't understand all the words because of Speaker 0: but I You like the music. Speaker 1: Yeah. I like energy. Maybe it's it's too old music for Speaker 0: I understand more with the they're the same. I love it. Speaker 1: No. No. It's it's important to have some some sometimes at 6 to 7 in the morning, some some trainings. Workout? Yes. Workout. Or to do something with, with with music, It's such a miracle which gives you energy for all the day.
Saved - February 5, 2024 at 4:36 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

"We're being lied to about EVERYTHING on an epic scaleβ€” and UKRAINE IS AT THE CENTER OF IT ALL!" https://t.co/0NCrq5xw8R

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration with the polarized views on Vladimir Putin and Ukraine, comparing it to the binary choices between white supremacy and the Democratic narrative. They mention interference, lies about COVID, Russia collusion, and Ukraine impeachment. The speaker questions whether Ukraine possesses chemical or biological weapons and criticizes the media for not discussing it. They also mention the selection of leaders and the potential for election fraud. The speaker believes the focus on Russia and Ukraine is a lie, claiming that Putin has warned against globalist control. They criticize money laundering in Ukraine and highlight Lieutenant Colonel Vindman's influence on US policy. They accuse Maria Yovanovitch of being a traitor and highlight the hypocrisy surrounding the impeachment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're being corralled into this box where we either have to hate Vladimir Putin and believe everything evil that said about him and love Ukraine, and there's no in between. And that reminds me a lot of you're either a white supremacist or you go with the democrat narrative on everything under the sun. The most lethal terrorist threat to the homeland today. White supremacy. And I'd I wanna understand white rage, and I'm white. I mean, there's This is much interference yet as you could possibly imagine before it even gets to Hunter Biden, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Mitt Romney, and all of their who are millions from Ukrainian people. Pointing. These days, it's hard to believe anything because they've lied about COVID. They lied about Russia collusion. They lied about the Ukraine impeachment trial. And there's so much more going on in Ukraine that nobody is talking about. Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons? My job as a journalist is to try to understand what is the truth here. I don't like being lied to, and we're being lied to on an epic scale. When we're Hold your only choices. You have to be a 100% with Zelensky. Oh, God. Who's a puppet who you can find on the Internet in black stilettos and leather pants. Zelensky was selected like so So many of our leaders. And, honestly, with big tech and with election fraud these days, we don't know how many leaders all around the world have been selected it for us. And we're actually voted in. How to build back better. We have to build back better. Build back better. If Donald Trump gets the Republican nomination. There are many of us that will move heaven and earth to ensure he doesn't win. We are fighting the same battles all over the To pretend that this war is about Russia and Ukraine is a bare faced lie. Putin has been warning for 15 years that he is not going to stand by While the globalist take over the world, build bioweapons facilities and whatever else they're doing in Ukraine, Ukraine has been a center of money laundering for many of the leaders in this country. 1,000,000,000 of US dollars have been laundered through Ukraine, and we say nothing about it. Does nobody question these things? We have like lieutenant colonel Vindman. Mister Vindman Lieutenant colonel Vindman, please. Do you always insist on civilians calling you by and sits there as a lieutenant colonel. He didn't even make colonel. And he's telling the president of the United States what his policy should be. You have a traitor In the form of Maria Yovanovitch, who was Obama's ambassador, who's telling Ukrainian government officials, don't listen to the will of the American people. In his July 25th phone call with Ukrainian president Zelensky. The president badmouthed Yovanovitch, calling her bad news. I was shocked. Absolutely shocked. And then She's given a cushy job for life at Georgetown University, and we're told that the president of the United States cannot say to his foreign counterparts that we want you to look into something. If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch. And they put in place someone who was solid. So much hypocrisy and dishonesty here, and Ukraine is at the center of it all.
Saved - January 27, 2024 at 4:57 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

BREAKING: At long last, this scumbag is being investigated! https://t.co/Co8gOkPuLS

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brian Kemp's victory over Trump-endorsed candidates suggests a dynamic shift in the state. Georgia purchased new voting machines under a reform bill, with Dominion Voting Systems winning the contract. Kemp's primary win should signal to those claiming election theft that voters want to move on. Truth and integrity matter. Georgia's machines tabulate votes, proving no manipulation or foreign interference. The more likely explanation is that there was no algorithm or domestic actor flipping votes. The systems performed as intended.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the fact that you won, the fact that, Brian Kemp won over Trump endorsed candidates, I mean, what does that suggest about that dynamic? Speaker 1: Tell me about the state's experience and history with Dominion. Speaker 2: As soon as I was elected, We had a new, election reform bill that allowed us to go ahead and purchase, new voting machines. Speaker 3: As soon as I was elected, we had a new, A election reform bill that allowed us to go ahead and purchase, new voting machines. Speaker 1: This this was on your watch? On my watch. Uh-huh. No war. Uh-huh. Speaker 2: Came down to 2 bidders, ES and S or Dominion Voting Systems. So then we entered in negotiations, signed a contract with Dominion Voting System for What contract? And do Speaker 0: you think that your, victory in this Republican primary can, you know, do you think that that message can get to those who are still claiming that the election was stolen. In other words, should your victory be assigned to them that, voters are wanting to move on? Speaker 2: I think people really are trying to move on. I think that truth matters, integrity counts. Speaker 1: I did an interview 2 weeks ago with Chris Krebs, And every time I asked him, how do you know what you know? How do you know the election has integrity? Virtually every time he said, look at Georgia. Look at Georgia. Speaker 4: Just look at what happened in Georgia. Georgia has machines that Tabulate the vote. And that tells you what? That tells you that there was no manipulation of the vote. There is no foreign power That is flipping votes. There's no domestic actor flipping votes. I think the more likely explanation is that there is no algorithm. I did it right. We did it right. The systems Performed as intended. The systems performed as intended.
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 11:57 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

Where is the accountability for all those who KNOWINGLY poisoned babies in the womb? https://t.co/qhXp1l8GiQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Experts, including the speaker, believe that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe for pregnant women based on extensive research. The vaccines have been proven safe and effective in the general population, without affecting fertility rates. They also provide protection against COVID-19 for pregnant women. The speaker, if pregnant, would definitely get vaccinated as the risks of the vaccine are much lower than the risks of the disease itself. Even children are eager to get vaccinated to regain their normal lives. However, another speaker raises concerns about fetal and chromosomal malformations, premature births, and respiratory issues after mRNA injections. They accuse pharmaceutical companies of hiding information about the deaths of two babies due to transplacental exposure to the vaccine. They call for attorney generals to investigate these claims. The Moderna documents are said to contain similar shocking information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why are experts so convinced, including you, that the COVID nineteen vaccine is safe for pregnant women? Speaker 1: So what we really know now with thousands of pregnant women is these vaccines are safe and effective. They're safe and effective in the general population. They don't change your rates of fertility, And in fact, they're safe and protective against COVID nineteen among pregnant women. Speaker 0: If you're gonna put on your mom hat and go back in time and say you we're pregnant. Would you get the vaccine right now? Speaker 1: Absolutely. The risk of the vaccine is so much Lower than the risk of the disease itself. I mean, I've had so many kids say, like, I want the vaccine. I want Speaker 2: the vaccine. Speaker 0: Oh my god. My 8 year old grandson is, like, he's trying to sign up for a trial. Exactly. Speaker 1: Exactly. The kids want it themselves. They want their lives back. Speaker 0: Thank you so much. Speaker 1: Indeed. Get vaccinated and and, take good care of Speaker 2: Fetal malformations, chromosomal malformations, babies born prematurely, babies born unable to breathe. Up 40% after this mRNA injection. So these are absolute criminals who have taken over the treatment, the care of The most vulnerable population, which is pregnant women. And when you're pregnant, you trust your obstetrician. You trust your OBGYN, and you do what they tell You are scared not to do what they tell you to do, and they've been thoroughly incentivized to lie and lie and lie to pregnant women in a way that We know from the Pfizer documents, murders babies in the world. Speaker 3: I'm sure there's a lot of hard charging, young prosecutors Out there throughout the country, either attorney generals or state level, that would find the evidence and be pretty shocked by it. Would it not? Speaker 2: I hope so. So and I hope they're listening right now. I wanna mention another even more shocking piece of evidence in the Pfizer documents, which is they knew that 2 babies died in utero, and Pfizer's words were that they died due to quote, Trans placental exposure, end quote, to the vaccine. And Rochelle Walensky, 3 days later gave a press conference from the White House stating that pregnant women should take the mRNA vaccine, that it was safe and at any time, there was no bad time to take it before your pregnancy, during your pregnancy, after your pregnancy. And she knew these 2 babies died. Speaker 1: No No safety concerns were observed for people vaccinated in the 3rd trimester or safety concerns for their babies. As such, CDC recommends that pregnant people receive the COVID nineteen vaccine. Speaker 2: And also other babies had convulsions and 1 baby died Due to exposure in breast milk to, mRNA. So they knew, yeah. Okay. Everyone listening who's an attorney General, I need your help. Now the Moderna documents our team has started in on the Moderna documents and found equally shocking.
Saved - November 27, 2023 at 3:21 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

"Arrest the entire J6 Committee for this fraud upon America!" https://t.co/AoxatzC0vi

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses whether the FBI had confidential human sources among the January 6th protesters. Speaker 1 denies this claim. Speaker 3, the former chief of the Capitol Police, suggests that the crowd on January 6th included federal agents. Speaker 1 questions the seriousness of conspiring to defraud America, comparing it to past instances like the weapons of mass destruction claim and financial collapses. They argue that many others have defrauded America without facing trial. Speaker 3 criticizes the Jan 6th committee, stating that if intelligence had been reported correctly, the situation could have been prevented. Speaker 1 believes that everyone involved in the committee should be on trial themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did the FBI have confidential human sources embedded within the January 6th protesters on January 6, 2021? Speaker 1: That's categorically false. Speaker 0: Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol on January 6th prior to the doors being opened? Speaker 1: Again, I had to be very careful. Speaker 2: It should Speaker 0: be a no. Speaker 3: And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, good. In an interview that was never aired on Fox, by the way, I was fired before Kader, worked for Nancy Pelosi. I mean, this is not some right wing activist. He was the chief of the called police on January 6th. Then he said, oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That crowd was filled with federal agents. It sounds like they were hiding cool. Intelligence. You know, it's it's sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about it. Speaker 1: And it plagued me all through the evening. I thought about this thing that CNN said, the conspiracy proceeding to defraud America. Okay. Well, if if conspiring to defraud the United States of America and its evil. It's now something that people need to stand trial for in a federal courtroom. Let's go back to the weapons of mass destruction. Speaker 2: Less than a teaspoonful of dry anthrax in an envelope shut down the United States Senate. Speaker 4: We are going to the Capitol. It's that direction. Speaker 2: This is evidence, not conjecture. True. Speaker 4: Where our problems are. Speaker 2: We have amassed much intelligence indicating that Iraq is continuing to make these weapons. Speaker 4: Please spread the word. Speaker 2: Let me take you inside that intelligence file and share with you what we know from eyewitness accounts. Speaker 4: I will now swaying our witnesses. Witnesses will please rise and raise their right hand. Speaker 1: And the defrauding of America there. Let's go considered, you know, now the 2nd largest world transfer during the, 2008 financial collapse and who who defrauded America there. Let's go back true. And big pharma and see who's been defrauding America there. You know, there are countless and countless examples. I could do a tirade of about an hour long of the people who have institutionally, intentionally, and and maliciously defuded America and should be standing trial in that DC courtroom or any courtroom, over the last several for all decades. And the one that we hear about is what? This thing where some little fight broke out on Capitol Hill, and they didn't even call the chief of police on Capitol Hill to testify in the Jan 6th committee. Speaker 3: If people were reporting intelligence correctly, if I was allowed to do my job as the chief. I got a significant experience. But I was allowed to do my job as chief. We wouldn't be here today. Well, the Speaker 1: Jan 6 committee was a fraud upon America, correct. Every single person who participated in that Jan six committee should be standing trial themselves.
Saved - November 3, 2023 at 3:28 AM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

"Is your testimony one of the key reasons Jack Smith can't and won't indict President Trump for insurrection?" @KashsCorner https://t.co/TNfTDSBgOM

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump's authorization was needed for the deployment of National Guard troops on January 6th. However, the mayor of Washington DC, in a letter, stated that no additional troops were required. Kashyap Patel testified about this before the January 6th select committee, but his testimony was not made public. Despite negotiations, the committee refused to release the transcript until the eve of its dissolution. Patel's testimony may be a key reason why President Trump was not indicted for insurrection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think we were gonna start with, president Trump. Are they ready to call their 1st witness? Speaker 1: Yes. We have called Kashyap Patel. To your knowledge, did any senior DOJ leader ever state words or substance that they felt they needed more different authorization from president Trump before they could deploy National Guard troops to keep the peace on January 6th. No. So why didn't we have 10,000 National Guard troops suited up and armed guarding the capitol in the morning January 6th. Speaker 2: There's a multitude of reasons, but namely, step 1 was the commander in chief's authorization, which we had. Step 2 was a Quest by the governing body, the local governing body. It's the mayor since it's Washington DC and or the heads of the Capitol Police the bureau. Speaker 1: And mister Patel, I would ask you, if you recognize this letter? Speaker 2: I do. It's the letter I referenced from mayor Bowser, I believe on January 5th, the Department of Defense, where she specifically stated, we would not be requesting any additional National Guards men and women. And That was her letter to us. That was the declination of a request, and so we were on standby. Speaker 1: Did you testify before the January 6th select committee? I did. Were you questioned in a public hearing? Speaker 2: No. They declined my request for a public hearing. Speaker 1: Was your testimony public when given. No. Did you tell them what you told us today about the president and the deployment of National Guard troops? Speaker 2: I believe so. Speaker 1: Did the committee ever call you to testify about those issues in public session? Speaker 0: No. Some of the senior officials, Speaker 3: people like Kash Patel, apparently, not available. Speaker 2: We felt it appropriate that the transcript should be made public at some point. And after months long negotiations, they refused to do so and publish their final report. And to my memory, it had been excluded. Think on the eve of the dissolution of the committee, my transcript was the last one released. Speaker 1: I have no further questions, sir. Sir, thank you very much. Speaker 4: You called their bluff. And what's shocking to me, because I didn't even really understand this, is that you gave this testimony. Liz Cheney and and and Kinzinger and you guys, out. He gave this testimony essentially to j six, and they buried it. Speaker 0: Some of the senior officials, Speaker 3: people like Kash Patel, Apparently, not available. Speaker 5: Point blank. Is your testimony Basically, one of the key reasons that Jack Smith can't and won't indict president Trump for insurrection? Speaker 2: You know, I believe so. It's the truth. If if they could've, if anyone could've charged president Trump at this direction, this special counsel, Jack Smith, would have done it.
Saved - October 19, 2023 at 10:01 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

SON OF HAMAS LEADER: It's time to win the war against the most brutal terrorist organization in the world today! @liz_churchill10 @gc22gc https://t.co/IrULb7Xwr2

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was born in the heart of Hamas leadership and witnessed their disregard for Palestinian lives. I realized I couldn't support them if they became rulers and destroyed Israel. Now, after 25 years, they rule Gaza and we see their capabilities. Israel didn't start this war, Hamas did. We should encourage civilians to leave Gaza, cut the strip into two parts, and impose a solid siege to deplete and starve the enemy. We may need to consider using gas in the tunnels, but timing is crucial. After destroying the tunnels, we must remove Hamas from power and replace them with the Palestinian Authority, Egyptian government, or Arab League. Aid should only be considered once Gaza is free from Hamas. The Palestinian people just want a normal life, without missiles launched from populated areas. We can't convince protesters who support Hamas, but it's important to defeat this brutal terrorist organization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, I was born at the heart of Hamas leadership, you know, and I know them very well. They don't care for the Palestinian people. They don't regard, the human life. And this is when I decided that I I cannot be together with this movement. In fact, I asked myself a question, what if they become a ruling party at some point? What will they do if they succeed in destroying Israel and building their state? What will they do? They will kill our people. And today 25 years later, they are the rulers of Gaza, and we see what they are capable of doing. You know, this is an ugly war, and Israel did not start it. Hamas did. First of all, we need to encourage civilians to go into Egypt, possibly men and children, maybe men over 50 years old. These need to get out of the picture. You know, then the strip need to be cut 2 exist north and south, 2 parts. The northern part, this is where most of the tunnels are. We need to have a solid siege, okay, for long enough to deplete the enemy and to starve them. After that, we may need to explore using gas. Ask. This is like sounds horrible, but I don't see any other option. The tunnels are interconnected, and gas be one of the solutions, but this has to be in the right time. We cannot just rush into Gaza, you know. There is no modern army that is prepared for this type of war. Know. After we destroy the tunnels, we need to finish Hamas rule in Gaza Strip. This is priority number 1. Then we need to replace the regime. Could be the Palestinian authority. Could be the Egyptian government. Could be Arab League, force. We need to replace their, rule in Gaza. After that, we can talk about aid. But as of now, sending any aid is a stick. They lie about nationalists that they are a national movement and they care for the Palestinian people. Look at them. They are using Palestinian people as human shield. We need to free Gaza from Hamas. This is what Israel is doing. He's doing the Palestinian people the greatest favor by bringing Hamas down. Then the Palestinian people, they just want to live a normal life. They don't want missiles in the most populated area on Earth to be launched from under hospitals, from crowded areas, and going suicidal, and endear endangering the life of the entire population of Israel. Who does that? Who's gonna be insane do such an operation. Right. Well, what do you say to those protesters? What is it about their mindset? Okay. Listen. I I cannot convince, the the have a world of truth. It's not, the time to win the public opinion. It's the time to win the war accuse the most brutal terrorist organization living today.
Saved - October 8, 2023 at 7:19 AM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

A message to President Hillary Clinton from Steve Bannon and Eli Crane @liz_churchill10 @gc22gc @RepEliCrane

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea of deprogramming extremist cult members. Speaker 1 mentions President Clinton's comment and questions if she actually won the 2016 election. Speaker 2 talks about the Russian interference in the election. Speaker 3 discusses their nomination and becoming attorney general. Speaker 2 praises the listener for their efforts in saving the country and criticizes the elites. Speaker 1 asks about a formal deprogramming process, referring to Hillary Clinton's comment. Speaker 4 responds to Clinton's criticism and expresses their dislike for her. They mention her evil nature but don't elaborate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And sadly, so many of those extremists, those mega extremists, you know, maybe there needs to be a formal deprogramming of the cult members, but some needs to happen? Speaker 1: Something needs to happen. Maybe at some point, that's President Clinton talking, maybe at some point, there needs to be a formal programming. Oh, excuse me. That's right. I I I I I made I made her slip up there. She didn't actually win in 16. Did she? Speaker 2: So help me God. Congratulations, Mister President. Speaker 1: Choose 1 is up by 4 points with 100 days ago. That one. Speaker 0: There is no denying that the Russians interfered in the election, right? Speaker 1: Supreme court justice, Mayor Garland? Speaker 3: When I'm standing with the the president and the amounts of my nomination, I I I try we'll feel a little bit like some other body experience. My mother will walk on to you. She's still alive, she's crying. Now my father has been very proud. I want very much speed to kind of attorney general that you're saying I could become. Speaker 2: It guaranteed. This is the accelerated collapse of the country. And you have been that rock underneath there, whether it's Ukraine or the debt, the spending, or the invasion on the southern border. And you know who tells me that? New York, Frickin' Times, the paper of record, the most progressive paper outside the Guardian in the world. They put you in this center and the stories around us to edit the New York Times stuck on that. These people are with who are saving the country. Saving this nation and the elites in this country are the source of chaos, and you've made more money on the way down, you made on the way up, and that's gonna stop, and we don't care. You have caught as the destruction of this nation. And the American people are not going to tolerate it. Hillary Clinton and her pumped up nature may says the deplorables have to be de prob what what FEMA can't be gonna do it? Hey. I'm not conspiracy theorists, but you said a formal process. Can you please that reporter, when you say formal process, the deprogramming of the cult members, can you please tell me that? Speaker 1: This is Hillary Clinton referring to your your constituents Eli, I would like to play this and get your response. Speaker 0: You know, maybe there needs to be a formal deprogramming of the cult members. Speaker 4: Well, I think you just heard a modern tyrant right there. Anytime Hillary Clinton is criticizing me, I must be doing something right. That's all I got to say about that. And that actually, lifts my spirits quite a bit because to me, that that woman is, about as evil as as they come. We could go. We could go into that, but I know your audience, we don't need to.
Saved - September 16, 2023 at 12:38 AM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

Paxton defense lawyer Tony Buzbee: The Bush Regime ENDS TODAY! @liz_churchill10 @gc22gc @LoriMills4CA42 @RepStickland

Video Transcript AI Summary
Maxwell provided no evidence to support the case against the attorney general of Texas, despite 17 lawyers working on it for months. The lack of evidence led to assumptions and a failed attempt to impeach the attorney general. Lobbyists and disgruntled ex-staffers got involved, spending millions of dollars to try and remove him from office. However, their efforts were in vain. The speaker urges the audience to side with the 4.2 million Texans who elected the attorney general and vote not guilty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They figured out real quickly once they talked to Maxwell that, you know what? We don't have anything. We need to beef this up. We don't have anything. And even though it's been 3 years, They still don't have anything. And 17 lawyers over there working since May. It's $500 an hour for each of them. 100 of 1,000 of dollars wasted. Taxpayer money wasted and they still don't have anything. How did this happen? Well, They made some assumptions. Then they figured out they had no evidence and it was too late to turn back. Recall that one of the witnesses said, well, once we went to the FBI, we were signing our death warrant. Rightly so. You go to the authorities with no evidence and accuse your boss of a crime and there has been no crime and there's been no evidence of any crime and it's all a bunch of supposition and guesswork? Rightly so. And so they they took a long walk on a short pier. The house managers did the same. The house managers did the same. They, in a A 4 hour hearing decided to impeach the attorney general of the state of Texas, and then they spent months months trying to collect evidence to support it, and they did not. They failed. And then the lobbyists got involved. The text of support. TLR, yeah. We we were against Ken Paxton. We spent $6,000,000 against Ken Paxton. We couldn't beat him at the ballot box. Maybe we can beat Maybe we can beat him in an impeachment trial. George p. Bush decided, let me re up my Law license because maybe I can be the attorney general now. I couldn't beat him in a in a in a fair fight. Maybe I can beat him here. And every one of these so called whistleblowers, which are nothing but disgruntled ex staffers, they all hired the same lawyer It just happens to be in the Ashcroft law firm. It just happens to be a protege of the Bush regime. The Bush era ends today in the state of Texas. I'm asking you to agree with the 4,200,000 Texans who put this man in office as attorney general, to put this man back to work And vote not guilty.
Saved - June 14, 2023 at 8:59 PM

@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY πŸ‘‘

Indictment Day Miami @liz_churchill10 @gc22gc @MayraJoli @JoliMayra @Blacks4Usa @ForgiatoBlow47 @BenBergquam @RealAmVoice @LoriMills4CA42

Video Transcript AI Summary
They are trying to remove Trump before the election, which should upset you. The indictment is indefensible, along with a recent rape conviction in New York. There are also concerns about what's happening in Georgia. Mainstream media reporters were allegedly mocking and laughing at Trump, which angers the speaker. Trump's support is growing, with 61% favorability compared to Ron DeSantis' 23%. The speaker believes Trump will never quit and wants to remove "rhinos" from the Senate and House, as well as defund the DOJ and FBI. Trump is seen as a savior in the political arena. The speaker praises Trump for uniting Americans from different backgrounds. They express frustration with the media and believe Joe Biden will be remembered as a corrupt president. The speaker questions if Biden accepted bribes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They are trying to take Trump out before you can vote for him, and that should upset you more than anything that's happened in American politics in your lifetime. Speaker 1: What is detailed in this indictment is completely indefensible on top of of a conviction around Rape charges that just happened out of the state of New York, and we don't even know what's happening in Georgia yet. Speaker 2: Natalie has said she's got Sources inside that said a lot of the mainstream media reporters and people that were in there were smirking at president Trump, mocking him, and laughing at him. How does that set with you, sir? Speaker 3: They mock and make fun of a guy that's given his whole life. He doesn't Trump doesn't need to do this. It it pisses me off that They just so casually mock him and laugh and kinda point the finger at us like you guys are idiots. No. We're the educated ones. We're the ones who can defend our point Speaker 2: and our position. Speaker 3: So Don't do what you want. Endy Speaker 2: 61%. Former president Trump's support appears to be growing. Trump has 61% support. That's up three percent from April. Florida governor Ron DeSantis in 2nd place way behind with 23%. Speaker 4: Trump will never quit. He will never quit. Why would he quit? He he loves America, and so now It's time to take our country back, get rid of all those rhinos that are in the senate, in the house, dismantle and defund the DOJ, FBI, all of them, and start fresh with real MAGA people. Speaker 5: The Democrats and Ryan are together to get Donald Trump out. They figured if they get Jesus out of church, nobody's gonna go to church. You have something that's coming. He is our savior in the political arena. Donald Trump is our guy, our president, and we're gonna be here supporting him because He pulled his neck out to save America. Speaker 2: They understand this. No matter where you go, they understand the facts. They understand the details. They can't be spun. He He truly has united an American. If you look at these are working class and middle class people from every different part of the country, every different region, and it's just It's stunning. And today in Miami, I think it showed, fully where it really was MAGA Pride Day. Your thoughts. Speaker 6: You know what? We're sick of it. We're done with it. We're not gonna take it anymore. Speaker 7: And we're Speaker 6: as in particular, to the fake news propaganda media out here, we're not buying your lies anymore. That's where you, Steve, come in. The thanks that we get from people across this country who say, You open my eyes. You're educating us. Unlike the propaganda media, Speaker 7: this day will go down and infamy and Joe Biden will forever be Remembered as not only the most corrupt president in the history of our country, but perhaps the president who together with a band of his closest Thugs, misfits, and Marxists try to destroy American democracy, but they will fail, and we will win bigger and better than ever before. Speaker 2: Are there tapes that you accepted bribes president Biden? Is that true?
View Full Interactive Feed