reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @MediasLies
reSee.it AI Summary
I just heard Chicago Mayor Johnson declare that war with Trump is "on the table" after signing an executive order for "no ICE zones." He warned that if deportations continue, "everything" is on the table. He also mentioned the right-wing's desire for a "Civil War rematch."
@MediasLies - Media Lies
Chicago Mayor Johnson just declared that war with Trump is "on the table" during a press conference after signing an EO establishing "no ICE zones" across the city. When asked what’s on the table if the Trump administration continues deporting noncitizens, he replied, "Everything." He escalated further, reminding the press that he thinks the "right-wing" in America wants a "Civil War rematch," adding that the "President of the United States has declared war." Sickening and unhinged.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Take even more dramatic ash action if this administration continues to escalate. What exactly does that mean from a city perspective? Everything. Meaning? Everything. Whatever is necessary to ensure that we're protecting people. Look, I've already signed. This is the third executive order. The most sweeping executive orders from any executive office pushing back against this administration. We are looking at every single way in which we can protect people. And as the coming days come forward, there are many ideas that have already been placed, in in our collective circle, and I'm giving serious considerations around another potential executive order later this week. Can you give an example?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take even more dramatic ash action if this administration continues to escalate. What exactly does that mean from a city perspective? Everything. Meaning? Everything.
Whatever is necessary to ensure that we're protecting people. Look, I've already signed. This is the third executive order. The most sweeping executive orders from any executive office pushing back against this administration. We are looking at every single way in which we can protect people.
And as as the coming days come forward, there are many ideas that have already been placed, in in our collective circle, and I'm giving serious considerations around another potential executive order later this week. Can you give an example?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our corporate counsel has been in constant communication with our attorney general for several months now. "the right wing in this country wants a rematch of the civil war." the president of The United States Of America has declared war on the people of Chicago and people across America. "He's more interested in giving billions of dollars to other nations while farmers in urban cities around this country, are literally being destabilized." we literally have people who are volunteering in this city, on the Southwest Side, the Northwest Side, all over this city to make sure that we're protecting children from being separated from their families. "volunteers who are literally putting themselves at risk of being shot and killed by the federal government." And if they won't do it, then the city of Chicago will using every single tool that's available to us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, look, our corporate counsel has been in constant communication with our attorney general for several months now. And I just want to offer this up. A couple of years ago, I I I said very candidly that the right wing in this country wants a rematch of the civil war. I just I want that to sit in right now because the president of The United States Of America has declared war on the people of Chicago and people across America. That's right.
He's more interested in giving billions of dollars to other nations while farmers in urban cities around this country, are are literally being destabilized. And so whether it's the legal system, whether it's through executive order, or whether it's through the brave women and men who are serving as rapid responders, we literally have people who are volunteering in this city, on the Southwest Side, the Northwest Side, all over this city to make sure that we're protecting children from being separated from their families. And and we're talking about volunteers who are literally putting themselves at risk of being shot and killed by the federal government. And so whether it's the legal system, whether it's our continuous struggle for liberation through organizing, and whether it's through executive action or whether it's through law, it would be nice if we actually had lawmakers in Washington that would actually hold this president accountable. And if they won't do it, then the city of Chicago will using every single tool that's available to us.
reSee.it AI Summary
CNN's reaction segment on the murder of Iryna Zarutska focused on expressing sympathy for the suspect while criticizing social media commentators. Van Jones specifically called out @charliekirk11 for alleged racial hate mongering, stating there is "no evidence" that the suspect's actions were racially motivated. However, the suspect's own words in the released video, where she mentions "I got that white girl," contradict this claim. It raises questions about whether Van Jones is misinformed or intentionally misleading.
@MediasLies - Media Lies
CNNs reaction segment tonight about the horrific murder of Iryna Zarutska tonight was to express sympathy for the suspect and harshly criticized social media pundits. Van Jones decided to weigh in, criticizing @charliekirk11 due to alleged racial hate mongering. He claimed that there is "no evidence" showing that the suspect did it because she was white, but during the video released, the suspect explicitly says: "I got that white girl, got that white girl" Van Jones is either knowingly lying or doesn't know the facts.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Discussion centers on media response to violence against a white woman. 'A white Ukrainian refugee was murdered just because she was white.' 'If random white person simply walked up to and stabbed a nice law abiding black person for no reason, it would be an enormous national story.' 'Megan Basham, no one seems to care when a white woman gets stabbed to the death.' Mental illness is discussed: 'the balance is taking away people's freedom versus evaluating their mental illness.' In New York City there are programs 'but they have to wanna be there' and it's 'about forcing them to be there.' Critics say Charlie Kirk engages in 'race mongering' and note 'Where is the George Floyd policing act? It didn't pass' and 'not one law was passed at the federal level.' The cashless bail debate cites 'Hurt people hurt people' and 'Charlie Kirk ... should be ashamed of himself.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Voters once they called attention to it.
Speaker 1: So certain people have been looking for an opportunity to find a case like this, to make a point like this. I wanna play this is Charlie Kirk. Why he says this hasn't gotten a lot of attention.
Speaker 2: A white Ukrainian refugee was murdered just because she was white. Everybody knows that, obviously. If random white person simply walked up to and stabbed a nice law abiding black person for no reason, it would be an apocalyptically huge national story used to impose national sweeping political changes on the whole country. Instead, Megan Basham, no one seems to care when a white woman gets stabbed to the death.
Speaker 0: Wow. Wow. He said white a lot. Well, we are talking about it here. So guess True.
I I mean, I don't think that's fair. Look. Being in the system, because I have represented people who are mentally ill. And here's the balance. The balance is taking away people's freedom versus evaluating their mental illness.
In New York City, there are a lot of programs for people who are mentally ill, but they have to wanna be there. Yeah. And it's it's about forcing them to be there.
Speaker 1: When you are mentally ill, you have a hard time knowing that you are mentally ill. But, also, I mean, people like Charlie Kirk fan, they've been looking for opportunities to make this some sort of, like, reciprocal George Floyd situation. And I that's the part that I think he's almost giving away the game, and it it's sad to see a lot of people going along with it.
Speaker 3: You know, let just say a couple of things. One is and what happened to that young woman was horrible, and it's everybody's nightmare if you're in a in any public space, subway, whatever, that something bad is gonna happen to you or somebody you care about. So it does strike a chord. We don't know why that man did what he did. And for Charlie Kirk to say, we know he did it because she's white, when there's no evidence of that.
It's just pure race, race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong. Then he says that if something like that had happened the other way, there'd be sweeping changes imposed on society. Where is the George Floyd policing act? It didn't pass.
Even when you had a white police officer murder a black man on live television, the whole world saw there were no sweeping changes. In fact, not not one law was passed at the federal level. So that's that's I think that's an important thing to point out. The other thing is, you mentioned the thing about cashless bail. I think this is a big challenge that we have.
Would you have felt better if there had been cash bail and the mom had come and put down a thousand dollars to let him out? It's not about cashless bail or no cashless bail. It's about the fact that we don't know how to deal with people who were hurting in the way this man was hurting. Hurt people hurt people. What happened was horrible, but it becomes an opportunity for people to jump on bandwagons.
And then for someone like Charlie Kirk, he should be ashamed of himself. Then No one mentioned the word race, white, black, or anything except him. What people mention is the the horror of what happened to this young woman.
@MediasLies - Media Lies
MSNBC guest Molly Jong-Fast claims the consequences of Trump's tariffs "will likely be far larger than any of us can calculate." Shortly after this segment aired, Mexico's president agreed to Trump’s terms by sending 10,000 of their troops to the border. The media is lying. https://t.co/ZI5NkCpgZR
Video Transcript AI Summary
American consumers are facing challenges due to inflation and strategic decisions regarding USAID. Shutting down USAID undermines U.S. soft power and intelligence efforts against threats like Al Qaeda and ISIS, while also allowing adversaries like China and Russia to exploit the situation. Additionally, imposing tariffs could push allies such as the EU, Canada, and Mexico closer to China, potentially benefiting those who view the U.S. as an enemy. The broader strategy seems aimed at dismantling the federal government by replacing nonpartisan officials with loyalists, leading to unintended consequences that could be more significant than anticipated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, American consumers will suffer exactly or be inflation. But, you know, Molly, let's just put us to to the side, the moral concerns. There there are grave moral concerns about what's happening with USAID, but let's just talk strategy for a second on on two things. One or three things. I'm gonna go three things really quickly.
One, on shutting down USAID. I mean, we use our USAID, as I said before, to help us with soft power, to help us strategically, to help us chase down Al Qaeda, to help us get insight and intel on ISIS, on what China's doing on the continent. You'd look at the FBI, a purge inside of the FBI. Who's cheering that? Al Qaeda, ISIS, drug gangs, China, Russia, Spies that are gonna be able to run rampant in The United States because they're looking inward and and and and starting a war there.
And finally, on these tariffs, listen, you you don't have to be smart economics to know. This pushes the EU Twenty
Speaker 1: five percent tariffs.
Speaker 0: This pushes the EU. This pushes Canada. This is pushes Mexico into the arms of China. And say, okay. Well, if The United States is gonna do this, let's figure out how to deal more with China.
So all of these seem to help those who consider The United States an enemy.
Speaker 1: Well, these are the unintended consequences. Right? I mean, part of this was and that's the thing I think that a lot of us should be the most worried about are the unintended consequences here. Look. The intention here was always to strip down the federal government.
They wrote about in project twenty twenty five to remove nonpartisan government actors and replace them with loyalists. That was always the play. Right? To strip it down to the studs, to do what Elon did with x to the federal government. And and that's what we're witnessing in real time.
The unintended consequences of it, we don't know yet and they will likely be far larger than any of us can calculate.
@MediasLies - Media Lies
CNN is accusing Elon Musk of doing a Nazi salute on stage. Full context shows Elon was gesturing that his heart goes out to the crowd. They’re grasping at straws today. https://t.co/g0sMXQytEr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk is increasingly involved in politics, influencing both U.S. and European parties, including a far-right party in Germany. His ambitions are vast, as he aims to take Dogecoin to Mars and emphasizes the importance of government funding for space exploration. The crowd at a recent rally is fully engaged, viewing Musk as a hero, especially during moments like when President Trump mentioned Mars, which drew a standing ovation. This event highlights the unique role billionaires are playing in politics today, with Musk rallying support and connecting with the working-class coalition. The atmosphere inside the arena reflects this intense engagement and admiration for Musk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Browsing lines for this crowd.
Speaker 1: This is one of his browsing lines indeed. And, yes, that's salute, was evocative of things that we have seen, through history. And, of course, we do wanna, bring it up to, be able to to take a little bit of a closer look. But I think it's worth noting that Elon Musk has started to play in politics not just here, in the United States, but across Europe as well, including a far right party, in Germany that he has, pushed. He's, of course, pressured, Keir Starmer, the prime minister, in the United Kingdom.
This is something there there are some themes here, for him. And as we heard here, his ambitions are sweeping. He came in, he said, this is what winning feels like. He also says we're gonna take Doge to Mars. That, of course, an ambition of his, of his entire life.
I do find it interesting that he's touting government spending on the one hand. What got us to the moon and what's gonna get us to Mars is gonna be government money. We should be clear
Speaker 0: to that. Just it absolutely will be. As it so to just to look at this again, this crowd, every single person here is paying attention and they are fully engaged. He is a hero. He is a hero to them.
I just wanna look at that salute that he gave again just if anybody missed it, we'll just show it again. He's just wrapped up here, you can hear the there. Alright. So we just we just showed that. We just showed that.
Speaker 1: Right. Absolutely. It was quick. I think our viewers are smart and they can take a look at that. But it certainly was it's not something that you typically see in American political rallies.
Put it that way.
Speaker 0: No. No. It was not something that you usually would see. And it was quick. As you point out, it was very quick, but it was it was in a moment of intensity for him as he came out dancing and then he did that.
He is a hero here in the speech, when president Trump mentioned going to Mars, that was also a standing of a ovation. And when Elon Musk was mentioned, he is a hero for every single person in this room. And we're inside the arena as you can see that's the outside. But inside here, this is the the this is the atmosphere and this is the tone.
Speaker 1: And, you know, I have to say to, Erin, you know, I'm just struck when we were talking about this a little bit earlier. Yes. These billionaires, right, the role that they are playing, and I know you've covered business for years years. I have never seen as a political and campaign reporter, a Capitol Hill reporter, billionaires, business people play the kind of public role that we have seen them play today both in the ceremony and then to have one of them come here and essentially function as someone rallying the crowd from a political perspective. I think it's it's worth stopping and and and dwelling on it for a moment, especially because this is, again, the working class coalition.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come across a claim that Biden and Harris are pushing for more border patrol agents while Trump is obstructing this effort. However, the reality is that the border bill includes billions for various initiatives unrelated to border security. This includes $60.06 billion for Ukraine, $14.1 billion for Israel, and funds for humanitarian assistance and military support in multiple regions. In total, $94.46 billion is allocated to non-border crisis related efforts, overshadowing the actual funding for border security.
@KamalaHQLies - KamalaHQLies
CLAIM: Biden and Harris want more border patrol agents but Trump is “standing in the way.” REALITY: The border bill was packed with billions of dollars of initiatives that had nothing to do with the southern border. Here are some of the items included in the bill that do not effect border security: $60.06 billion to support Ukraine in its fight against Russia. (Roughly 3x more than what the border security would receive.) $14.1 billion in security assistance for Israel. $2.44 billion to support operations in the U.S. CENTCOM and address unrest and combat expenditures in the Red Sea. $10 billion in humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza and the West Bank, Ukraine, and other populations caught in conflict zones across the globe. $4.83 billion to support Indo-Pacific allies and deter Chinese aggression $2.33 billion to continue support for Ukrainian refugees displaced after the war against Russia. $400 million for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program in aid to help nonprofits and places of worship enhance their security. TOTAL: $94.460 billion US taxpayer dollars going to non-border crisis related endeavors.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Vice President Harris is promising to hire thousands more border agents, raising questions about President Biden's effectiveness on border issues. However, it's assumed that Harris believes Biden is ineffective, which isn't accurate. The President supports increasing border patrol agents, but faces opposition from Republicans in Congress and former President Trump, who have hindered progress. There was a bipartisan agreement that Biden worked on for months, but it was blocked due to political motives. The President remains committed to addressing border security and believes in the need for more agents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wait. Say that one more time.
Speaker 1: Well, she's now promising to hire thousands more border agents than there are now under president Biden. Wait.
Speaker 0: But start your question again.
Speaker 1: How long have you guys known that vice president Harris does not think that president Biden is effective with his border.
Speaker 0: I mean, that you're you're making a huge jump. What why she did not say this. This is something that you are assuming. I don't understand why you would assume that. It's not true.
Speaker 1: She has a campaign ad where she is saying they need more border patrol agents. If president Biden's doing such a good job, why do they need any more border
Speaker 0: patrol agents? Believe that. The president does want more border patrol agents. You know who's getting in the way? You know who's getting in the way?
Republicans in Congress. They're getting in the way. You know who else is getting in the way? The former president. Donald Trump.
He's getting in the way. I mean, I don't there's no daylight here. I'm not understanding the question because there's no daylight. The president believes that as well, and he's worked towards doing that. There's a bipartisan I know you guys probably get sick of me saying this, but there was.
There was a bipartisan agreement that was on the table that the President worked through for a couple of months with Republicans in the Senate and Democrats. They were told not to move forward because it would help Joe Biden by the former president. That's their decision.