TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Mericamemed
@Mericamemed - MERICA MEMED
A bug made in a lab btw https://t.co/4KzPTaO8pH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: If you live in these parts of the country, which is practically half of The US, you should start taping up your legs like this guy every time you go outside. There's this tiny little bug called the Lone Star tick causing massive problems. A single bite from this guy reprograms your entire immune system causing Alpha gal syndrome, which makes you allergic to red meat, and it can be life threatening. Now, what's crazy to me is that these ticks have apparently been around for over two hundred years, but there was no recorded cases of Alpha gal syndrome until just about twenty years ago, and now we're seeing a hundredfold increase in cases. The official explanation is that these ticks are spreading because of climate shifts and growing deer populations, but I find it awfully ironic that the same people pushing the global warming agenda while simultaneously investing in the solutions for it are also pushing the agenda to eat lab made and plant based meat, which are miserably failing.
We also know about Lyme disease, another devastating tick borne illness, and its relationship to Bioengineering Lab two fifty seven on Palm Island, just nine miles away from Lyme, Connecticut. Now, don't know about you, but it's interesting that as thousands of people are healing and feeling better incorporating red meat back into their diet, there just so happens to be this exploding population of ticks that could forever prevent you from eating it.
Speaker 1: We can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins. And there's actually analogues of this in life. There's this thing called the long star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you live in these parts of the country, which is practically half of The US, you should start taping up your legs like this guy every time you go outside. There's this tiny little bug called the Lone Star tick causing massive problems. A single bite from this guy reprograms your entire immune system causing Alpha gal syndrome, which makes you allergic to red meat, and it can be life threatening. Now, what's crazy to me is that these ticks have apparently been around for over two hundred years, but there was no recorded cases of Alpha gal syndrome until just about twenty years ago, and now we're seeing a hundredfold increase in cases. The official explanation is that these ticks are spreading because of climate shifts and growing deer populations, but I find it awfully ironic that the same people pushing the global warming agenda while simultaneously investing in the solutions for it are also pushing the agenda to eat lab made and plant based meat, which are miserably failing.
We also know about Lyme disease, another devastating tick borne illness, and its relationship to Bioengineering Lab two fifty seven on Palm Island, just nine miles away from Lyme, Connecticut. Now, don't know about you, but it's interesting that as thousands of people are healing and feeling better incorporating red meat back into their diet, there just so happens to be this exploding population of ticks that could forever prevent you from eating it.
Speaker 1: We can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins. And there's actually analogues of this in life. There's this thing called the long star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat.
@Mericamemed - MERICA MEMED
Covid proved that most people do not have the ability to reason. They’ll do what they’re told. https://t.co/36pNV2HIog
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains a distinction between absolute risk and relative risk and shows how both can be technically true but convey different impressions. Absolute risk is described as the real chance of something happening, while relative risk compares two small numbers to emphasize one as much larger than the other, often making the risk appear much bigger or smaller than it truly is.
Using a jar example, absolute risk is the chance of drawing a red marble from a jar with 10,000 marbles and only one red marble—a one in ten thousand chance. Relative risk, by contrast, compares two jars: if another jar has two red marbles, the statement would be that you have a 100% greater chance of drawing a red marble in this jar than in the first jar. Although the numbers are both small, the relative risk has doubled. The speaker argues that relative risk is a favorite tool of fearmongers because it makes tiny numbers sound large, whereas absolute risk shows the real-world odds.
The speaker then applies this to headlines. A headline claims you are 800 times more likely to get sick from raw milk than from pasteurized milk, labeling this as a relative risk number. It is technically true, but the absolute risk of illness from raw milk is about 1 in 13,000 for the people who drink it, which is less than one one-hundredth of a percent.
A similar framing is discussed with COVID-19 vaccines. The Pfizer vaccine is described as 95% effective in headlines, which the speaker notes is the relative risk reduction. In the trial data, the absolute risk reduction—the actual difference in risk between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups—was about 0.8%, less than one percent. The speaker asserts that this shot lowers actual risk by less than one percent, but the media emphasized the 95% figure. While not called a lie, this framing is characterized as incredibly misleading and capable of influencing public decisions.
The overarching message is that statistics can be technically true yet used to manipulate public opinion through framing. The speaker urges readers to compare whether a number refers to relative risk or absolute risk whenever confronted with alarming or astonishing headlines. Relative risk is said to sell headlines; absolute risk is said to tell the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you don't understand this trick, you will be easy to manipulate. It's been used by the government, by big corporations, and by the media to control public thought and behavior. This is how people use numbers that are technically true to make things sound way scarier or way safer than they actually are. Here's the trick. Absolute risk is the real chance of something happening.
Think about a jar with 10,000 marbles in it and only one of them is red. Your chance of picking the red marble is one in ten thousand. That's the absolute risk. Now relative risk compares two tiny numbers to make one of them sound huge. So if there's another jar and it has two red marbles, they'll say, you have a 100% more chance of getting a red marble in this jar than you do in this jar.
Well, your chance went from one in ten thousand to two in ten thousand, both small numbers, but your chance has doubled. Relative risk is the favorite tool of fearmongers because it makes a tiny number sound huge. Absolute risk shows the real world odds. Now watch how this plays out. You've seen the headline, you're eight hundred and forty times more likely to get sick from raw milk than from pasteurized milk.
That's a relative risk number. It is technically true. But the absolute risk of getting sick from raw milk is about one in thirteen thousand for the people who drink it. That is less than one one hundred of one percent. They pulled the same move with COVID vaccines.
Do you remember the headlines? The Pfizer vaccine is ninety five percent effective. That number was blasted everywhere. But here's the truth. That was the relative risk reduction.
When you dig into the actual trial data, the absolute risk reduction, the real difference between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated groups was about point eight percent, less than one percent. They could have said this shot lowers your actual risk by less than one percent. But they didn't. They went with the bigger, scarier sounding number, ninety five percent. And people made life changing decisions based on that framing.
It wasn't technically a lie, but it was incredibly misleading. And that should make you angry because it shows how much public opinion can be manipulated by the way statistics are presented. So whether it's food safety or medicine, statistics can be technically true but still used to trick you. Next time you hear a scary or amazing number in a headline, ask, are they talking about relative risk or absolute risk? Relative risk, it sells headlines.
Absolute risk tells the truth.
@Mericamemed - MERICA MEMED
Child?! I want this for me. https://t.co/ZZot9eK7ae
Video Transcript AI Summary
Discusses a toy gun that "may not look like a real one, but it functions like a real one" and could be "a good educational tool to teach a child about firearm safety." It teaches to "clear a chamber, how to carefully handle one, where to point it, where not to point it." Features include: "It'll hold six rounds." "It fires the little bullet and the casing ejects." "Mag release for rapid reload." "Front and rear sights." "The slide locks back after the last round." "This little red bullet fires out of the barrel, to reload it, you just push it in." "It even has a Picatinny rail." "So you can mount your laser or your tactical light." "It's a toy that can be on the good side of the force, but it depends on how you use it." "Should this be for sale?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lock and load. Let's talk about this because a lot of you got triggered in the last video I made on it. I asked if parents would get upset if this was given as a gift to their child and a lot of you rightfully pointed out how this could be a good educational tool to teach a child about firearm safety. Because it may not look like a real one, but it functions like a real one. Teach them how to clear a chamber, how to carefully handle one, where to point it, where not to point it.
It'll hold six rounds. It fires the little bullet and the casing ejects. Mag release for rapid reload. Front and rear sights. The slide locks back after the last round.
This little red bullet fires out of the barrel, to reload it, you just push it in. It does come with extra bullet tips in case you lose any. It costs a lot less than I thought it would. It even has a Picatinny rail. So you can mount your laser or your tactical light.
Pretty cool It's a toy that can be on the good side of the force, but it depends on how you use it. Pretty fun. If you wanna check it out, I'll put a link to it down in the comments. But tell me what you think. Should this even be for sale?
@Mericamemed - MERICA MEMED
Aliens watching as they see a manhole cover plowing through their ship's core at Mach 162 https://t.co/hQ3LSF01zk
@Mericamemed - MERICA MEMED
Canada - be sure there is a full tank of gas in the car too https://t.co/1thMAmOWdL
Video Transcript AI Summary
To avoid home invasions, leave car fobs at the front door, as intruders primarily target vehicles. In Santa Rosa County, residents are permitted to shoot home invaders. The county encourages this and offers gun safety classes every other Saturday to improve shooting accuracy, potentially saving taxpayer money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To prevent the possibility of being attacked in your home, leave your fobs at your front door. Because they're breaking into your home to steal your car. They're they don't want anything else.
Speaker 1: If somebody's breaking in your house, you're more than welcome to shoot them in Santa Rosa County. We prefer that you do, actually. We have a gun safety class we put on every other Saturday. And if you take that, you'll shoot a lot better, and hopefully, you'll save taxpayers money.
@Mericamemed - MERICA MEMED
Just Islam being Islam. Import the 3rd world; you become the 3rd world. https://t.co/1ntUzuIL4X
Video Transcript AI Summary
Germany is at the center of a significant issue largely ignored: the transhumanist agenda promoted by the EU, UN, WEF, and World Health Assembly. This agenda seeks to undermine national sovereignty through a global vision. At the UN Summit of the Future in September 2024, the pact for the future was adopted, which includes the Global Digital Pact and the Declaration on Future Generations. This framework aims to address global challenges while pushing for centralized governance. The agenda is seen as totalitarian, reducing individuals to mere cogs in a system. Additionally, the UN's frequent condemnation of Israel raises questions about its motives, suggesting that Israel may obstruct their plans. The narrative blaming Jewish people for world control is viewed as a distortion of the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How busy? Come to Germany. Our next station is Do you want to know why this is happening? This is actually the most important issue that's getting the least attention relative to its importance, and it is all orchestrated by the transhumanist folks over at the EU, UN, WEF, and World Health Assembly who prioritize their ideology of a global vision. This ideology is in alignment with Western leftist governments in order to destroy national sovereignty all over the world.
Recently, in September 2024, in their New York headquarters, the UN Summit of the Future adopted the pact for the future with 2 key annexes, the Global Digital Pact and the Declaration on Future Generations. The pact for the future serves as a comprehensive framework to supposedly solve all of our global challenges, including peace and security, sustainable development, climate change, digital cooperation, human rights, gender equality, and finally, centralized global governance. That's the goal. This is the transhumanist agenda in a nutshell. Now, I know it sounds nice on paper, but in my view, the transhumanist agenda is satanic to the core because it aims to inorganically control people that will be totalitarian on a such a scale that has never been seen on this planet before.
We will be treated like soulless robots and our existence will only be to feed their system. This is what I call the hijacking of the Gaian timeline. Now, if the UN is going to be its governing body, why are they disproportionately condemning Israel all the time? It seems to me that they are helping to destroy Israel perhaps because the entity that is Israel will somehow be in the way of their agenda. So you see, it's funny why the Jewish people are being accused of controlling the world when actually it's the complete opposite.
They have been inverting the truth in order to scapegoat the Jews.
@Mericamemed - MERICA MEMED
Homegirl reverted back to factory settings in the presence of masculinity. 6 years of “women and gender studies” down the drain. 😂😂😂 https://t.co/Y5sbIk6i2l
Video Transcript AI Summary
I went on a date in the artsy part of LA and had a different experience. Usually, there's a negotiation about who pays, but this time I went out with a stereotypical "guy's guy" from Santa Monica who insisted on paying for everything. It triggered something in me, and when he went to the bathroom, he handed me his credit card and told me to get whatever I wanted. It made me think about getting away from the liberal mindset of the east side.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As I went on a date this week, and I felt the feminism leaving my body. I live on the east side of LA. And if you don't know what that means, it's sort of like the artsier part of LA. You know? It's as people say, it's like Brooklyn and New York.
Like, so I go on dates with a lot of men and women who, you know, live over here. There's always a negotiation about who pays, and that's it's the Asian about who pays, and that's great. I like to pay for people, all that. But what I will say is that I sort of it's fell into going on a date with the most guys guy I've ever been on a date with. And he's from west west, you know, Santa Monica.
He's a bro. Right? It's a guy's guy is usually not my type. Like, I cannot remember the last time that I went on a date with, like, a straight bros, bro. You know what I'm it's hang, but it befell me.
It befell me in an organic fashion. So I'm on this date with this guy, and the thing about a guy's guy is he's it's putting his card down. He's paying for everything, and I really just it sort of activated something feral in me,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna lie.
Speaker 0: I went to like another bar and he went, he was gonna go to the bathroom. So I was getting prepared to pay for our drinks because he's been paying all night. Of course, I'm gonna pay for the next round. But as he's it's going to leave for the bathroom. He turns to me and he hands me his credit card, and he goes, here's my card, get us whatever.
It's it
Speaker 1: might be time for me
Speaker 0: to get away from all these, you know, liberal snowflakes on the east side.