TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @MichelleMaxwell
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell ™
This will give chills. Imagine the pain and shame she has endured 💔 I will pray she is able to escape alive🙏 https://t.co/ogIWiH17QJ
reSee.it AI Summary
I read about John Eisenman, who lost his daughter to sexual trafficking in Seattle. He researched, investigated, and rescued her himself. The man who sold her was her 19-year-old boyfriend; John abducted and killed him in November 2020. The boyfriend’s body was found in a car trunk in 2021, abandoned. John is in jail now, but I hope he finds freedom someday. I’ll send him commissary money, hoping he experiences freedom with his daughter.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell ™
How many Dads would be willing to do the same thing for their kids? I pray he knows freedom again 🙏 This is John Eisenman. He lost his daughter to sexual trafficking—she was sold for $1,000 in Seattle, Washington. Like any father would, John took matters into his own hands. He researched, investigated, and uncovered the truth behind her abduction. He RESCUED her himself. The person who sold her was her 19-year-old boyfriend. In November 2020, John confronted him, abducted him, and ultimately killed him. Authorities later found the boyfriend’s body in October 2021, abandoned in the trunk of a car. Now, John sits in jail, but he knows his daughter is safe and growing up. After living 60 years of his life, I believe he rests easy. Live your life fully, and do everything in your power to give your children the same chance, no matter the sacrifice. I’ll be sending John some commissary money, hoping he one day experiences freedom alongside his daughter.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Thinking the main reason Dems want to increase our taxes is so that they can spend more of our hard earned dollars on enriching themselves and increasing their power over us. The more you learn the more you realize they are the money laundering party. https://t.co/mEr3WKtsxB
Video Transcript AI Summary
A $500 million bribery scandal involving USAID has resulted in four guilty pleas. According to the Justice Department, USAID official Roderick Watson sold his influence beginning in 2013. Contractors Walter Barnes and Daryl Britt funneled payoffs through subcontractor Paul Young. Barnes' company, working with another firm, continued receiving federal funds, including $5,000 for HR consulting and later, after suing the government, a contract worth up to $800 million. The Justice Department's Matthew Gagliotti stated the scheme violated public trust by corrupting the federal procurement process. Cutting waste, fraud, and abuse has been a major priority for House Speaker Mike Johnson. USAID has been a target for those seeking to trim government spending, with some alleging the agency funneled taxpayer money into ideological projects. The Justice Department says this kind of fraud erodes public trust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, four people are pleading guilty, all part of a half billion dollar bribery scandal involving USAID. Mike Emanuel has the story from Washington.
Speaker 1: Bill, good morning. The scheme involving cash, NBA tickets, and a country club wedding. According to the justice department, USAID official Roderick Watson sold his influence starting back in 2013. Contractors Walter Barnes and Daryl Britt funneled payoffs through subcontractor Paul Young to hide their tracks. It doesn't end there.
Barnes' company working in conjunction with another firm kept receiving federal funds. $5,000 for human resources consulting late last year, and then later after suing the government, a contract worth up to $800,000,000. Matthew r Gagliotti, head of the justice department's criminal division saying, quote, their scheme violated the public trust by corrupting the federal government's procurement process. Anybody who cares about good and effective government should be concerned about the waste, fraud, and abuse in government agencies, including USAID. Cutting waste, fraud, and abuse has been a big focus on Capitol Hill across government, a major major priority for house speaker Mike Johnson.
The US Agency for International Development has been a target for those looking to trim government spending with some suggesting the agency funneled taxpayer dollars into ideological projects.
Speaker 0: When USAID blew it, they show themselves completely irresponsible. It needs to be redone, and and the funds need to be directed properly.
Speaker 1: Back to the scheme, the justice department says this kind of fraud erodes public trust. Bill?
Speaker 0: Wild story, Mike. Half a billion dollars. Remarkable. Mike Emmanuel, live in DC Forest. Thank you, Mike.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently learned about the California Democratic Party's controversial purchase of 200 pallets of construction-grade bricks, revealed in their May 2025 expense report. This expenditure has raised eyebrows due to the lack of associated construction plans and documentation. The timing of the purchase aligns with protests in Los Angeles against immigration enforcement, where bricks have been thrown. While the party claims the bricks are for future infrastructure projects, many remain skeptical without clear justification. This situation highlights the need for transparency in political spending.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
California Democratic Party Faces Scrutiny Over Brick Purchase Amidst LA Protests By Jonathan Gregory Los Angeles, CA — June 11 2025 A recent review of the California Democratic Party's May 2025 expense report has uncovered a significant and controversial expenditure: the purchase of 200 pallets of construction-grade bricks. Notably, this acquisition lacks any associated construction plans or public documentation, raising questions about its intended use. The absence of a clear purpose for such a substantial purchase has prompted calls for transparency and accountability from both political opponents and watchdog organizations. The timing of this purchase coincides with widespread protests in Los Angeles, which erupted in early June following aggressive immigration enforcement actions by the Trump administration. These demonstrations have been marked by clashes between protesters and law enforcement, with reports indicating that some individuals have thrown bricks during the unrest. While there is no direct evidence linking the pallets purchased by the Democratic Party to the incidents in Los Angeles, the proximity of these events has intensified public scrutiny. In response to the controversy, the California Democratic Party has stated that the brick purchase was intended for future infrastructure projects. However, without detailed documentation or a clear plan, the justification for such a significant expenditure remains unconvincing to many. As investigations continue, the incident underscores the need for greater transparency in political party expenditures, especially when such purchases coincide with sensitive and volatile events. @newsmax
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
This needs to be shared far and wide. They will not stop until they have brought America to its knees. Pray for people to open their eyes to this evil. https://t.co/15uYNPrhIv
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Thank God for DOGE 🙏 https://t.co/kUI6qZMRVz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is advocating for a US taxpayer refund due to information released by the Department of Government Efficiency, claiming Elon Musk and Doge revealed there are over 60,000 federal employee millionaires. The speaker states that when Joe Biden took office in 2021, there were approximately 70,000 federal employee millionaires, but by September 2024, that number more than doubled to 55,334, and is now estimated to be around 60,000. The speaker questions how this increase occurred, given the average federal employee salary is $86,000. The speaker notes that even the highest-paid federal employees, such as medical officers and cybersecurity personnel, earn around $250,000-$260,000 annually. The speaker expresses distrust in federal agencies and opposes paying down the deficit under these circumstances.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. People keep asking me why I am insisting that US taxpayers get a refund from our federal government. It's because of the information that's coming out of the Department of Government Efficiency. Today, Elon Musk and Doge released the information that there are now over a 60,000 federal employees that they think are millionaires. When Joe Biden got into office in 2021, there were only about 70,000.
But in just four years' time, that number more than doubled. They said by September of twenty twenty four, there were a 55,334 millionaires, more than double millionaires in four years. And then by now, they are assuming or estimating it to be about a 60,000 millionaires. As a taxpayer, I want to know how it happened and why did it happen. The average salary for the for a federal employee is only $86,000.
How do you take $86,000 and then all of a sudden, you become a millionaire? And that many people to become millionaires. Do you know how odd that is and how almost impossible that is? The highest paid people in the federal government are people that work in the what they call the medical officers, and those people only make about over 200,000. So you're talking about the medical offices and then people in cybersecurity, they all average about $2.50 or $260,000 a year.
But now in just a four year period of time, we are supposed to believe that they had an extra what is that? Over 70,000, 80 thousand, I'm sorry, people that became millionaires that work for the federal government. Because of that, because we are still sending our money to all of these agencies that none of us look it does not appear that we can trust any of them. It is so mind boggling to me. And they want Americans to just sit here and not say a word and say, let's just pay down the deficit.
I do not trust
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Those that scream the loudest have the most to lose! https://t.co/bU44gFMHr4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The US government runs a $2 trillion deficit annually and is almost $40 trillion in debt, yet cutting spending is difficult. The speaker claims the money is "round tripping" to various entities.
The New York Times, Politico, Bill Crystal, and Ukraine are allegedly getting paid. Eleven out of twelve publications in Ukraine are also supposedly recipients. Viktor Orban's political opposition in Hungary and the left-wing political opposition in Poland are allegedly funded by USAID. The BBC is also purportedly getting paid.
The speaker asserts that USAID, which disperses about $50 billion a year, funds every left-wing organization globally. This allegedly contradicts the left's image as a grassroots movement, suggesting instead an "astroturf" operation where money flows from Washington to fund groups worldwide, thus questioning the true level of local support for left-wing policies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So we knew the US government runs a $2,000,000,000,000 deficit every year. We're in debt almost $40,000,000,000,000. And we also knew that anytime anyone tries to cut anything in Washington, the whole city screams bloody murder. Okay?
So the question is just why? Well, now we know. The money is all going to them. It's like round tripping to them. New York Times Crazy.
Getting paid. Politico, getting paid. Bill Crystal, perennial warmonger, getting paid. Ukraine, getting paid. Like, 11 out of 12 publications in Ukraine getting paid.
Incredible. Viktor Orban is the prime minister of Hungary who was saying that he's very popular in Hungary. His political opposition funded by USAID. In Poland, the left wing political opposition funded by USAID. And on and on and on it goes.
BBC. BBC. You wonder why everyone in The UK is so yeah. Yeah. Like, believe that BBC is getting paid.
Every left wing organization in the world seems to be getting paid by this slush fund, USAID, which disperses about 50,000,000,000 a year. That's a billion dollars a week. That's actually a lot of money. And so it it just it makes you wonder, you know, the left in general tries to portray itself as a movement of the people, that it's grassroots. This is the exact opposite.
This is astroturf. This is basically money coming from the top down out of Washington to fund all of these groups, maybe not even in The United States, like, all over the world. So it makes you wonder what is the real level of local support for these left wing policies all over the world.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
And the Bidens will never be held accountable. https://t.co/6S1feQdmQa
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 states that the Biden family engaged in influence peddling, resulting in tens of millions of dollars. He claims his legitimate businesses became illegitimate through alignment with Hunter Biden, which involved selling the "Biden name."
Speaker 1 alleges that Joe Biden was aware and involved, citing his participation in at least two business phone calls. He asserts that Joe Biden's claim of never discussing foreign business deals with his son or brother is a lie, supported by documents and evidence.
Speaker 1 further alleges that Joe Biden negotiated with the Chinese Communist Party on a golf course to secure a board seat and receive money from the Chinese. He references a WhatsApp message and a billion dollars in Ukraine, conditioned on removing a prosecutor investigating Hunter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me ask you. You were sentenced to a hundred and eighty nine months in prison. The Biden family got preemptive pardons. How much money do you believe based on your understanding of their business practices do you believe the the Biden family made, and how much of it do you believe was related to influence peddling?
Speaker 1: A % of those influence, Vinny. I saw it firsthand. It was part of our game plan, and I say our game plan because at some point, my legitimate businesses became illegitimate by aligning with Hunter Biden. And the alignment included the Biden lift or Biden brand, and that that was selling the Biden name. By definition, I think that's influence peddling, and it resulted in tens of millions of dollars with the intent Do do
Speaker 0: you know for a fact that Joe Biden was Joe Biden aware of all of it?
Speaker 1: I can tell you firsthand he was. He was on at least two phone calls, business phone calls that I was directly, participant in.
Speaker 0: And he when he said that he never once spoke to his son, his brother, or anybody about their foreign business deals, was that a lie?
Speaker 1: Sean, that's a lie. That is an outright lie. Documents have proven it. Chairman Kovner has proven it. Chairman Jordan has proven it.
That the the corroborating evidence that I produced that Mark Paoletta, who fought tirelessly for me, for the committee, for the country, produced corroborating evidence that that is a lie. Quid pro quo. Joe was on the golf course negotiating with the Chinese Communist Party to be able to sit on the board and take money from the Chinese. It's absolutely a lie.
Speaker 0: And that WhatsApp message says a lot, doesn't it? And you're not getting the billion dollars, leveraging a billion dollars in Ukraine, unless, of course, you get rid of a prosecutor investigating Hunter. Jason Galanis, glad everything worked out for you. Certainly, the Biden family was not looking out for you.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
It is becoming more obvious by the day which party is truly that of inclusivity. For years the Democratic Party has tried to paint Republicans as racist when in actuality they were projecting what they demonstrate on a daily basis. Democrats only care about controlling you. https://t.co/Y3QUusqd03
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
The more we learn… https://t.co/m8TnxhcymA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 claims that most past presidents for the last 20 years have been aware of corruption within USAID but chose not to act, alleging that many were complicit. Joe Biden, as head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, oversaw USAID, which allegedly funded Burisma. Barack Obama's mother worked for USAID, and the Bush family also has connections. Speaker 1 suggests the Trump revolution challenged this system, which is why there was such a strong reaction against him.
Speaker 1 further alleges that USAID funded the OCCRP, providing $20 million to journalists who then found damaging information on Rudy Giuliani. This information was purportedly used as the basis for the impeachment of President Donald Trump in 2019.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. I I gotta I gotta go. This is amazing. I need to have you back on really soon, Mike, but really quickly, if you can tell me fifteen or twenty seconds, has every past president for the last twenty years known how known about this corruption with USA than just chose not to do anything about it?
Speaker 1: Well, most of them are on the take. Joe Biden was the the head of the senate foreign relations committee, which directly oversees USAID. USAID was funding Burisma. USAID gave money to Burisma at a formal partnership agreement with Burisma. Barack Obama's mother worked for USAID.
The Bush family runs right through it. Bush Bush's, you know, vice president Dick Cheney, Liz Cheney worked for USAID. They're all in on it, and this is the reason that the Trump revolution was so revolutionary is because it defeated both sides of the USAID snake, and now we're going to see just exactly how the snake bites back when it's cornered.
Speaker 0: I wonder if all of the the lawfare and the everything that they threw at president Trump in his first term, the Russian gay, the collusion, all the stuff. Wonder if that was just to try to keep him on his on his heels enough to not look at USAID.
Speaker 1: But Wait. But that's a USAID
Speaker 0: thing too.
Speaker 1: Appreciate you. Can I say this one thing real quick? Thought I had to say this. Yes. Okay.
USA funded a group called the OCCRP. Everyone can look this up. They paid $20,000,000 to a group of hit piece journalists who turned around and dug up dirt on Rudy Giuliani and then used that as the basis to impeach the sitting president Donald Trump in 2019.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
So glad I watched this! It really breaks down how this CR is completely different from any other and why it is important for Republicans to pass. Let me know if watching this helped you as well. https://t.co/Z0YIK8Mrbu
Video Transcript AI Summary
This CR is different. Unlike traditional ones, it decreases spending by about $7 billion and doesn't lead to an omnibus bill. It restricts funding but helps fund border enforcement, gives raises to enlisted military personnel, increases food allotment for women, infants, and children, and boosts VA spending.
I believe we have the votes to pass this, just like we did with the debt ceiling increase. These cuts come from places like the Commerce Department's slush fund and eliminated earmarks, redirecting those funds to the VA and our troops. We're increasing food programs and VA benefits, not cutting them. NIH funding continues. We're aiming for an efficient federal government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's right. Well, I'll tell you. The traditional CR usually leads up to a big omnibus bill. And, obviously, since this is a CR until the end of the fiscal year, there's gonna be no omnibus bill this year for the first time in years. The other thing a CR normally does is it actually increases spending a little bit.
This one actually decreases spending by by about $7,000,000,000. So that's what the CBO will probably score this as. So this is a very different CR. It it restricts funding. It actually helps the president fund his border enforcement.
It gives a raise to our enlisted men and women in the in the military. It increases the the food the food allotment in the women's infants and children program. Again, it increases spending at the VA. This is a good CR. It's fiscally responsible, and the president needs it in order to continue the work of Doge and Elon Musk.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's a very, very important part. There's a lot of progress being made, and you wanna codify that progress before the next budget bill. Are what is the outlook among the membership among the Republican caucus? Is there enough votes to get this over the line before Friday?
Speaker 0: I think there is. I I do believe that we're gonna we're gonna see exactly what we saw two weeks ago, when when people said that you couldn't pass a debt ceiling increase with only Republican votes, and we said, no. You actually can if it's combined with good fiscal policy. This is the same way. People say you can't pass a CR with only Republican votes, but I say, yes.
You can as long as it's combined with good fiscal policy, and this is good fiscal policy.
Speaker 1: That's great. The $7,000,000,000 in cuts that you mentioned, where does that come from?
Speaker 0: Well, it comes from a variety of places. We actually clean out the, commerce department slush fund that, Joe Biden wishes he could have spent all that money, but he didn't. So we we emptied that out. We also, eliminated the earmarks in this CR, and we took the monies that would normally be spent on earmarks and did things like spend it on more money for the VA and more money for our enlisted men and women.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a winner. I think that's going to go well over well with the American public. You have done a great job over the last several days knocking down some of the fear mongering. People said they're zeroing out the toxic exposure fund at the VA. That's not true.
They're hurting NIH just the opposite. Can you knock down some of your favorite demagoguery that's been out there by the Democrats and their media allies?
Speaker 0: Well, again, you know, they they say we're cutting food programs. We're actually increasing them. They say we're cutting the VA benefits. We're actually increasing the VA. The bottom line, you know, NIH is not part of this.
We continue the funding for the NIH. The administration, as you know, does want to cut the amount of overhead that are charged on these research projects just so we can actually do more real research instead of paying for bloated overhead at universities that have, you know, $4,050,000,000,000 dollar endowments who will have their hand out to the federal government, for for indirect administrative costs on grants. Again, we we you know, we'll discuss all these things as we take an approach to providing an efficient federal government. That's what the president promised. That's what Elon Musk is working at.
That's what the Republican conference in the house and the Republicans in the senate. That's what we're working toward.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
This young lady is amazing! She is so knowledgeable on the history of medicine. I completely agree with her and just today my daughter and I were talking about finding a local homeopathic doctor. Credit to @neequa_09 on IG America is ready for RFK Jr. and MAHA https://t.co/FkWbzvDlVU
Video Transcript AI Summary
I keep seeing comments about Robert Kennedy not having the credentials to be head of the Department of Health and Human Services, but maybe that's what we need. Back in the early 1900s, Rockefeller saw an opportunity to control the medical industry by using petrochemicals to create patented drugs. Natural medicines were popular then, so he bought a pharmaceutical company and hired someone to submit a report to Congress that discredited natural healing modalities. Congress then changed the laws, making allopathic medicine the standard, and diet and natural treatments were removed from medical programs. Rockefeller and Carnegie then funded medical schools on the condition that they only taught allopathic medicine. They demonized natural medicine through the media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So RFK, Robert F. Kennedy, has been announced head of the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary. I keep seeing all these comments. He has no degree. He has no medical background.
He's a quack. That's probably exactly what we need. During the early nineteen hundreds, I'm taking you back. Scientists were working to understand the basic process of life and human health. It was during that time that most of the vitamins were discovered like c b one b two vitamin d and more.
Science took a huge step forward, enabling vitamin revenues that were able to cure conditions that were caused by vitamin deficiencies, such as scurvy and a rickets. Sounds like a good thing. Right? Nineteen thirty five. Vitamin C, which the human body cannot make, became the first vitamin to be artificially synthesized in Switzerland.
Guess who pulls up? John D Rockefeller saw this as a big opportunity with the possibility that vitamins and medications could be developed from petroleum, which was his line of work. He saw the chance to control and monopolize multiple industries at once. Chemical, petroleum, and medical. Petrochemicals were ideal from a business perspective because they could be patented, owned, and sold for high profits.
Now there was a small problem with Rockefeller's plan. What was the problem? Natural and herbal medicines were way more popular in the early nineteen hundreds. Almost one half of the medical colleges and doctors in America were practicing holistic medicine using extensive knowledge from Africa and of course Native American traditions. Rockefeller knew that he had to get total control of the medical industry.
He would have to obliterate the competition. So Rockefeller used his oil wealth to purchase part of the German farthest pharmaceutical company, it's called IG Farben. Now that he controlled a drug manufacturing company, he moved forward with his plan to eliminate the competition. Around this time, a variety of healing modalities like homeopathy, naturopathy, chiropractic, herbal medicine, and obviously holistic medicine. These were what was going on right right now.
To eliminate the competition, Rockefeller hired a contractor named Abraham Flexner to submit a report to Congress in 1910. This report determined that there were too many doctors and medical schools in America and that all natural healing modalities which had existed for hundreds and thousands of years were unscientific quackery. The report called for a standardization of medical education whereby only the American Medical Association, AMA, would grant medical school licenses in The United States. Rockefeller's goal was to modernize modernize medical education and to improve the practice of medicine in America. Congress acted on this report and changed its laws related to the medical practice.
Teachers on diet and other natural treatments were completely removed from medical programs. So what now? Allopathic medicine becomes the standard of treatment in America With new laws in place, Rockefeller teamed up with the OG Andrew Carnegie and started funding medical schools all over America on the strict condition that they only taught allopathic medicine. Andrew Carnegie was a wealthy industrialist known for making huge investments, but this team systematically dismantled the previous curriculums of medical schools removing any mention of healing power of herbs or natural treatments. Not to lock in this monopoly, they launched a smear campaign against natural medicine, discrediting them, demonized them through newspapers and other media outlets.
Some doctors were even jailed for using natural medicine treatments that had been used safely and effectively for decades prior. So in a very short time, medical colleges were homogenized. All the students were taught the same allopathic system, and medicine became defined as the process of prescribing patented drugs, a pill for an ill.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
This young lady nails it!! We are awake. https://t.co/RK0Tar0weJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Everything Trump is doing right now is why they tried to take him out. They spent years trying to prosecute him over a misdemeanor paperwork crime they made into a felony. It should be obvious by now. These people are throwing money at random things, like $2,000,000 for sex changes in Guatemala. They are laundering it and pocketing it. Trump called out this corruption, which is why they wanted him gone. They lose money, credibility, and get exposed. But we're awake now, young and old, all of us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She just exposed the Democratic Party. Everything that Donald Trump is doing right now at this very moment is precisely why he was nearly assassinated twice. It's precisely why they spent years trying to prosecute him for a misdemeanor paperwork crime that they bumped up to a felony, and I don't understand how it hasn't clicked for y'all. These people are literally throwing money at random $2,000,000 for sex changes in Guatemala. Get the out of here.
No. You're laundering it and you're pocketing it. And you knew that Donald Trump was the one who's calling out this corruption. That's why they wanted him dead because they lose money, they lose credibility, they get exposed, and they were not going for it. We are awake now, the young ones, the old ones, the all of us.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
I don’t understand why all Americans aren’t rejoicing in finally knowing how our tax dollars are being spent. Are you glad DOGE is shining a light? https://t.co/5ycjSMmUy1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doge's government transparency initiative is an accountant's dream. For the first time, we're seeing exactly where our tax dollars are going, and it's shocking. We've always been told what people *wanted* to hear, not necessarily what we *needed* to hear. Now we have the documentation to see the reality. I'm baffled by the lack of public outrage. This is our money, earned through a lifetime of paying taxes. Where our money is being spent is unacceptable. I'm astounded by the misuse of funds. We need to understand where our tax dollars are being allocated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Y'all. Doge is an accountant's biggest dream to go into the government and go through every single piece of dollar and tell the American people where it's going. I this is commendable. From an accountant standpoint, I'm like, nobody has ever told us where our tax dollars were going. They told us what we wanted to hear.
They didn't necessarily tell us what we needed to hear. And now that we're in this position to where they're telling us what we need to hear and me just viewing the documentation and seeing where this money has been going, I don't understand why people aren't outraged. This is our money. We spend our life paying taxes, and this is where they decide to spend it? We're dead, Carlos.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
This beautiful young lady spells it out perfectly as to who originally asked federal employees to go back to the office to work. Dems are using Trump as a scapegoat for what they weren’t able to accomplish. President Trump has the 🏀🏀 to follow through. https://t.co/WYLzYdXKDs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump is often blamed for ordering federal workers back to the office, but he wasn't the first to do so. Biden has been urging federal employees to return to work since March 2022, yet many have refused. Trump, however, is more insistent, stating that employees must return or risk losing their jobs. The narrative that Trump is solely responsible for separating families is misleading; Biden has been advocating for a return to the office for years. If federal workers are unwilling to work in person, they may need to consider different employment. The attitude of demanding things go a certain way reflects a childish mindset, and it's essential to recognize that Trump is not the originator of this call to return to work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So they tell us that Trump is the one who ordered federal workers back to the office, and he's to blame for separating mothers from their children. Oh. Do you see this date? Daddy. March 1, 2022.
He used his State of the Union to call feds back to work. And again, February '20 what is this? August 2023. Urges federal workers to return to office this fall. August 2023.
He begged again for you all to go back to work. He's just been begging. And then federal employees just flat out told Biden no. In they said no, we're not coming back to work. So here's the thing, Trump isn't the first person to tell y'all butts to go back to work.
Here's the thing, he said it was chess because Biden begged y'all for years to go back to work. He begged you to come back to work. And because you all didn't actually respect him or care what he was talking about, you just said no, we're not going. But see Trump isn't taking no for an answer. So either you go back to work or you don't have a job.
That's the difference. But he was not the first person to tell you all to go back to work. Biden has been begging for years, literally Check the receipts and stop lying. I'm doing these videos because I really do think it's the strangest thing to watch how liberals lie. My comments have been flooded with people saying that Trump is separating mothers from their children and forcing them to go back to work.
That is not the case. Biden wanted people to go back to work a long time ago. And if you are a federal worker, that is your job. You don't just work for the state, you work for the federal government. Yeah, you need to go back to work.
It's like I don't understand what the disconnect is. If you don't wanna actually go back to work in person, then you need a different job. It is as simple as that. This liberal mindset of if I don't like how something is going, I'm just gonna force them to do what I want. That is a toddler mindset.
And I'm seeing a lot of this in the way that people comment back and talk in general, they act like toddlers. It's like a mine, I want my way type thing. No, you're not gonna have a job. But at the end of the day, I do want you all to understand that Trump is not the first person to say this. He didn't just all of a sudden demand that federal workers come back to the office.
Biden's been begging for years and you all sat in his face, your face.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
This young man nails the explanation of tariffs and breaks it down in layman’s terms what is currently going on between the US, Mexico and Canada. Definitely worth watching the whole thing! https://t.co/v4kop0Trdc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tariffs have become a hot topic, raising questions about their implications for the US, Canada, and Mexico. The current situation highlights the leverage the US holds in negotiations. Mexican exports to the US account for 35% of their GDP, while Canadian exports make up 22%. In contrast, US exports to Mexico and Canada are only 1.2% and 1.5% of their GDP, respectively. This disparity suggests that Mexico and Canada cannot afford to prolong a trade standoff. The US is pushing for negotiations, not out of bullying, but in response to serious issues like the fentanyl crisis and illegal immigration, which have significant impacts on American society. The message is clear: those contributing to these problems must face consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So tariffs have been a trending topic for the past few days, and people are asking questions about what this means for the US, what this means for Canada and Mexico, and some people simply just don't understand what the play is here. So let's talk about it. These new tariffs are simply a game of understanding leverage. Who has it and who doesn't?
Right now, we have business leaders in office who understand the art of negotiation and they understand that the ball is in America's court. Now what does that mean? Let's look at it from a perspective of GDP. For those who don't know, GDP is essentially a big scoreboard that totals up all of the money that a country makes from everything that it sells. That includes cars, fruits, clothes, etcetera, even things like haircuts.
So what does that mean for each of these countries? Well, let's just take a quick look at the numbers to see who has the leverage here and who doesn't. Mexican exports to the US as a percentage of their GDP is 35%. For Canada, that same number is 22%. Or in other words, 35% and 22% respectively of everything that those country sales goes directly to the US.
Now let's look at it from the perspective of the US. US exports to Mexico as a percentage of GDP is a whopping 1.2%. Not to say that it's insignificant, but it's 1.2% compared to 35%. Now if we look at Canada, US exports to Canada as a percentage of GDP is an even larger 1.5% compared to 22%. Who do you think can afford to play this game longer?
Do you think that Mexico is going to risk 35% of their GDP? No. No. It's not going to happen. And we have leaders in office who understand this.
And what we're doing is we're forcing them to the negotiation table. And let's clear up some misconceptions here because I see a lot of people saying this too. This has nothing to do with America wanting to be a bully, but it has everything to do with Americans finally saying we're not going to be bullied anymore. To put more context to that, drugs like Fentanyl, which are manufactured in China and then smuggled into the US through our southern and northern borders in Mexico and Canada, have become the number one killer of Americans aged 18 to 45. That means 100 of thousands of people are dying from this drug.
Not only that, we're dealing with an illegal immigrant crisis that's the worst in American history. It might actually be the worst in world history because no other country on earth has open borders like America has had for the past few years. We have tens of millions of people coming into the country illegally, taking up resources that Americans can use, committing crimes, and bringing drugs in. To say that these three things are not happening is just simply to deny reality. And all America is saying now is, hey.
Since you wanted to kill 100 of 1000 of our citizens, since you wanted to flood our country with tens of millions of illegals, which you facilitated, now you have to pay the consequences.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Another perspective. I am going to call my Dad tonight and get his perspective as well since he spent his whole 40 year career working with the FAA and dealing with ATC and flight patterns. Will let you know what he thinks as well. https://t.co/3u07sWEIZj
Video Transcript AI Summary
Last night, a tragic mid-air collision occurred involving a Blackhawk helicopter and a CRJ 700 regional jet near Reagan Airport. The helicopter, PAT 25, had accepted visual separation from traffic but mistakenly focused on an American Airlines flight behind the CRJ instead of the CRJ itself. As both aircraft approached runway 33, the helicopter collided with the CRJ, resulting in a crash in the Potomac River. The tower quickly initiated emergency protocols, closing the airport and dispatching rescue teams. Unfortunately, there were no survivors, and the situation has turned into a recovery operation. The incident highlights the importance of maintaining visual separation and will lead to further training to prevent future tragedies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's what happened last night. I'm able to secure the actual audio from the incident over the Potamic last night. Let's listen in together.
Speaker 1: We have 79 projects on parts today. Okay. American Southern 130 for the final.
Speaker 0: You're gonna see a back and forth now between Reagan Tower and the various aircraft that they have lined up on approach into the airport. This happened at about 8:46 PM last evening, and, you can see there are several airplanes lined up as typical coming in about that time of night at Reagan. They're talking to American Airlines 31 of 30, which I think is number 2 for the runway. They're telling them to slow down to their final approach speed because they're separating everybody on the way in. It's gonna turn out that American 3130 is a key player in what happens here.
Speaker 1: Well, on next 3130. That's 25. Jeff, this is off to work for you to see our case.
Speaker 0: That's 25 is the helicopter that ran into the CRJ 700. It was a PSA flight. The flight number is 5342. It would go under the call sign blue streak. Blue streak 5342.
You don't ever hear them talking to tower. They've already been cleared to land on runway 33. So they would come in on an approach on runway 1, and then they would kinda circle the land on runway 33. It's a little shorter runway, but they take some of the regional jets and they put them on that runway. PAT 25 is the Blackhawk helicopter, that is just south of the Woodrow Bridge and they're ask or excuse me, They've just taken off their airborne.
The tower is saying to them there's traffic. It's a CRJ. It's a 1200 feet lined up for runway 33. Do you have that traffic? Pat 25 is gonna call back and say yes.
Speaker 1: It's 1,000 towards the feet, circling way through
Speaker 2: 3. Pat has the traffic inside requested.
Speaker 0: Pat 25 says, has the traffic in sight request visual separation. What that means is that they're going to take responsibility for visual separation from that aircraft. What happened? Here's what I think happened. This is not the final word on it, but what I think happened was it was at night, there's several airplanes lined up.
There is that Blue Streak 5342, which is a CRJ that they ran into. Right behind them just a few miles is American 3 130. Everybody has their lights on as they're coming in. I believe the helicopter looked at the American 3 130 and said, I've got the traffic in sight and they never saw the airplane, the CRJ that was right next to them. That's my conjecture on what happens.
Speaker 2: This is for.
Speaker 1: This is for. American 16threet tower, homemade 1 lock 4, check through out part of hallway 33, just check 1, 6, off funnel.
Speaker 0: So this is typical stuff that's going on in a busy airport. They're lining somebody up to take off. They're saying pay attention. I'm gonna give you an immediate takeoff here. I've got traffic lining up for runway 33.
That's the CRJ that got ran into, and he's on a 6 mile final. It might be somebody even behind him, but they're lining everybody up to take off and delay.
Speaker 2: Line of way runway.
Speaker 1: 26307. Keep rolling out for November Southport today.
Speaker 0: They gotta come out a little bit wider and come in. But remember, PAT 25, which is up here, the helicopter at the at the middle of your screen, they've already said we we accept responsibility for visual separation.
Speaker 1: American 1630 1 star 3 2, Jordan 14, Gulf Street 5, Chevy 2 mile up from a 33, another leg from a 1 strip for vehicle There's only American take off American 1630. Your target CRJ in sight.
Speaker 0: Now the tower is seeing what's happening. They're saying, do you have the CRJ in sight? Because you guys are getting kinda close. And the the PAT 25, the helicopter says once again, yeah, and I'm asking for visual separation. Okay.
The responsibility is on you then.
Speaker 1: PAT 25. PAT 5 is CRJ.
Speaker 2: It's not as a aircraft in sight versus separation.
Speaker 0: K. So patching 5 says, has the aircraft in sight? Request visual separation. I don't think they have these guys in sight. I think they had the airplane behind them in sight.
That's why this is such a tragedy.
Speaker 1: American 4782 by Bass Power and Visual. American 472, officer, 1, star 3, 2, 0, and 7.
Speaker 0: So you hear somebody in the tower go, oh, and they see what just happened. As you can see in your screen here, the collision took place. The tower has seen it happen in real time. Their human beings are reacting just like you and I would. The helicopter ran into the CRJ.
The CRJ's airspace was their airspace. In front of them, behind them, on both sides of them, it was the responsibility of the helicopter to maintain visual separation. They even told him a couple times, do you got him in sight? Do you got him in sight? He said, yep.
Got him in sight. I'm accepting responsibility for the separation. And I think just like when you're driving in a car and you you look and you see a car behind the one that almost hit you, You see that car and you didn't see the one right here. And when you turn out in front, sometimes there's a collision. It's really tragic when this happens, in an airplane.
Again, it's been decades since there's been a a mid air collision, in this country. This is such an unusual circumstance, to take place. It's such a tragedy. It's been 12 years since there's been a fatality in a commercial airliner, here in the United States. That's unprecedented.
And that wasn't a mid air collision. That was just an accident. This is a mid air collision, and this hasn't happened in forever. So now we know what's going on here. Pat 25, the helicopter accepted responsibility for visual separation.
They probably had their eyes on the airplane behind them, and then they tragically ran into these guys.
Speaker 1: So did you see that? 472 man, I could 3130, go around some left hand, 250, 5, 19 for a 1000.
Speaker 0: So now what happens from the tower's perspective is they have to work through denial pretty fast. They just saw this happen in real time in front of them. They're human beings like the rest of us. They're kind of in shock, but they still got airplanes coming in. They've got American Airlines 1630, which just took off.
They've got to hand them off to departure. They got American 31 30 that's coming in. They got American 472 behind them. They've gotta they gotta do something with these airplanes. The airplane port is gonna be shut here in a second.
So they're gonna start telling all these guys to go around while they're trying to handle the emergency and get the emergency equipment out, And all of that is everybody's kind of in a little fog for a few seconds here while all of this is taking place. The the tragedy of it hits you hard, and they're very professional. Watch how they handle this, but, man, it's they're busy.
Speaker 1: K. Let's see. 3503000American3130. Tower Booth Street, 5347 is on final request, rolling 33 circle to 33. K.
Take him heading. I reckon 31, 30. Correct. 31 is already going out. So less than 270, if I make 3,000.
270, the heading. 3000.
Speaker 0: See how fast he's talking? He's trying to get all these other airplanes on here.
Speaker 2: Crash, crash, crash. This is alert 3. Crash, crash, crash.
Speaker 0: Okay. What's MWAA? It's the Metro Washington Airport Authority. Every, airport has, some sort of governing authority over it. Many times, it's called the port authority.
Up in Boston, it's mass port, right? In New York, it's the port authority. Down here in Washington, it's the metro Washington airport authority. They're now announcing officially there's a crash. So they go over the radio and they broadcast to everybody.
The tower is the main recipient of this. If there's been a crash, he's going to repeat that. That puts a whole bunch of things into motion all at the same time. The fire crews now are going to jump in their uniforms. They're going to get in their fire trucks.
They're going to drive to where the crash is. There's gonna be details about this coming, but this whole thing is very frenzied and happens very fast, but these are really highly trained professionals. They do a really terrific job.
Speaker 2: The alert 3. Crash. Crash. Crash. This is an alert 3.
Speaker 0: An alert 3 is a a crash.
Speaker 2: Okay. I'm reading it. Oh, shit. And where's the alert 3? It is off the, the approach on the runway 33.
Approach and the runway 33. Helicopter crashed.
Speaker 1: Helicopter. Copy.
Speaker 2: Copy. Copy. Copy. Crash. Crash.
Is it letter 3? 2 helicopters?
Speaker 0: Okay. So again, fog of war. The first report that they get is that it's 2 helicopters. They're gonna clarify this really quickly because the tower is talking back and forth to them. The tower is gonna say, no.
No. It was a CRJ and a helicopter. So they get this because it's cleared up pretty fast.
Speaker 2: Well, helicopter CRJ approach in a runway 33.
Speaker 0: That's really fast.
Speaker 2: Runway 33 a mile long final. Yeah. So that's correct. Correct?
Speaker 1: You get
Speaker 2: to vote? Yeah. He was CRJ approach in 33. Stop. Okay.
How many tools on board? We don't have any inform we don't have any of that information. And the initial power tower is reporting a CRJ in a helicopter crash to heat whatsoever.
Speaker 0: So they're passing the information back and forth to the the first responders who need it. Everybody's trying to clarify while they're jumping in their trucks and they're heading out there. Now they know exactly where they're going. It's at the approach end of runway 33. It's somewhere in the Potomac.
Now they're gonna have to coordinate boats and and other things. Eventually, they're gonna get helicopters involved.
Speaker 2: Can we go ahead and hold all operations till we have emergency units respond? We're going to go ahead and show the aerodrome close.
Speaker 0: They might close the airport so they can Yeah.
Speaker 2: That's affirmative. I'm home. Operations air drum closed. Are these closed?
Speaker 3: And everybody just,
Speaker 1: hold your position, please, on the field right now. K. So this is the
Speaker 3: ground controller. Now the ground
Speaker 0: controller is the one that's gonna get all these trucks going where they need to go. But the ground controller needs to stop all the airplanes. So the she just makes a blanket broadcast. Everybody stop right where you are. Every once in a while, you kinda half hear that and then you say, okay.
I'm sorry. And there's also people asking to to be released from their gate to go. They haven't they're they're not into what's going on yet because they just put their headsets on, and they're just getting ready to go. One aircraft's gonna ask to do this, and she's just gonna say, everybody stop.
Speaker 1: South South 438. We're in for tax.
Speaker 3: Everyone's gonna have to hold, for down.
Speaker 0: For now.
Speaker 3: I'll get back to you just as soon as I can. Fire command. The accident happened in the river. Both the helicopter and the plane crashed in the rivers, east of, the approach end of runway 33.
Speaker 0: It's amazing to me how much clarity they have about actually what happened and where it happened. Many times in an accident like this, it takes 5 to 10 minutes just to get everything sorted out. They're very good here at getting it all very concise. And so the response time was phenomenal on this.
Speaker 1: Is the airfield closed?
Speaker 3: Yes. The airfield is closed. The airfield is closed.
Speaker 1: Runways as well?
Speaker 0: ARF is the aircraft rescue and firefighters. That's the actual fire chief that's in the fire truck. He's asking, is the airport closed and are all the runways closed as well? That way he does he can expedite getting out there. He doesn't have to stop and ask, can I cross this runway?
Can I go on that taxiway? She's about to tell him the whole place is shut down. You go. You you own the airport now.
Speaker 3: All runways are closed. Nobody's landing. No one's moving at all.
Speaker 1: And we have clearance across all taxiways and runway. Correct?
Speaker 3: Yes. You have clearance through the whole field, all taxiways and runways.
Speaker 0: So basically, she's saying to these guys, go. And at that moment, the fire trucks take off. What we know about the accident at this point is that there were no survivors. It's now a recovery operation. That's the sad part about all of this, and that's the part that really hits us hard, right here.
But I I know you wanted to hear what happened and maybe my response to how they handled the this emergency and what led to it. It looks pretty clear at this point that the helicopter had accepted visual separation. That's when they they make that call when they're cleared for that. They said, yep, we've got the airplane in sight, and the airplane they had in sight was the wrong airplane. There was another one in between that and the one that they were looking at.
And, sadly, they ran into, that aircraft. So folks who are hoping that this never happens again, I know that, my annual training, I will certainly get some training on avoiding mid air collisions I have over the my career, but, they will refresh this as more details about this situation comes out. And the really wonderful part about that is they share all of the information they get the FAA with every other airline around the planet, so we all, can avoid having a tragedy like this happen in the future, we will train to make sure that this never happens again. Well, there you go. Sorry for this, but, pray for these people.
Right? I'm captain Steven. I'll see you.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
This is who the REAL Karen Bass is, are we actually surprised? No wonder she didn’t bother to offer an empathetic response to her constituents. She needs to be fully investigated!! https://t.co/Ym13f1fRku
Video Transcript AI Summary
November 7, 1983, is a significant date. Karen Bass, a community activist, made at least 15 trips to Cuba in the 1970s with the Ben Soremos Brigade, a Marxist group established by the Castro regime to promote communism. This group attracted radical leftists and trained members in guerrilla warfare and bomb-making. Bass attended Fidel Castro's speeches and praised him upon his death, despite his dictatorship.
Another group, the M19, escalated from robberies to terrorism, bombing various locations, including the U.S. Capitol on November 7, 1983, after warning the switchboard to evacuate. Members of M19, like Susan Rosenberg, were radicalized by the Ben Soremos Brigade, which Bass led in South Los Angeles. Today marks 40 years since the Capitol bombing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: November 7, 1983. Remember this date, but first, let me introduce you to Karen Bass. Back in the 19 seventies, community activist Karen Bass went on at least 15 trips to Cuba, many with a group known as the Ben Soremos Brigade, a Marxist group started by the Castro regime to subvert American interests, weaken democracies, and spread communism around the world. Founded in 1969, the Ben Saramos Brigade organized trips to Cuba every year for half a century. They attracted the most radicalized and delusional segments of the American left, including overtly Maoist and pro Soviet communist groups.
In fact, a Los Angeles police investigator who infiltrated the group testified to congress saying that to be a member of the brigade, you had to be confirmed as a Marxist Leninist, as a brigadista, and then moving up the ranks to organizer for the Ventura Mosque Brigade. Karen Bass visited Cuba every 6 months. Their mission, to radicalize young impressionable American leftists in terrorist tactics and guerrilla warfare. Members of the Bensa Ramos Brigade were even taught how to make bombs. Jesus Christ.
Karen Bass admits, on her many pilgrimages to Cuba, she went to see Fidel Castro speak several times even calling him charismatic. And upon his death, praised him saying the passing of commandant and hefe is a great loss to the people of Cuba. Even though the people of Cuba see him as a dictator who impoverished their island. Another group, the m 19, took its belief in revolutionary anti imperialism to extremes, violent extremes. The m 19 was the first and only women created and women led domestic terrorist group.
Since their founding in 1978, m nineteen's tactics escalated from robbing armored trucks and abetting prison breaks to building their own explosives and carrying out terrorist bombings. From 1983 to 1984, m 19 bombed an FBI office, the Israel Aircraft Industries Building, the South African consulate in New York, DC's Fort McNair, and Navy Yard, which they bombed twice. But that wasn't enough for them. On 9th November 7, 1983, the m 19 called the US Capitol switchboard and warned them to evacuate the building. Minutes later, the m 19 bombed the north wing of the US Capitol.
November 7, 2023 marks 40 years since the m nineteen's bombing of the US Capitol. Members of the m 19, like Susan Rosenberg, traveled to Cuba with and were radicalized by the Ben Seramos Brigade. The South Los Angeles Ben Seramos Brigade was led by Karen Bass, who is now mayor of Los Angeles.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Not scary at all 🤯 Topic:Assisted Suicide https://t.co/8B7HUCsOK1
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016, Canada and California legalized medical assistance in dying. Despite having similar populations, California has seen only 893 cases of assisted suicide, while Canada has reported over 50,000. This stark difference raises concerns about Canada's approach, which some view as predatory. Critics argue that instead of providing palliative care, Canada is expanding eligibility for assisted dying to vulnerable groups, including children as young as 12, the mentally ill, homeless individuals, and addicts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Give you one stat to prove my point. Just one. Oh, go ahead. It's just it takes one. This is how ridiculous this is.
Okay. Ready? In 2016, Canada legalized medical assistance in dying, so did California. California has the same population as the entire country of Canada. Okay?
In that time frame, California has only made it, meaning assisted suicide, 893 people. Cool. How many do you think Canada have in Canada? I'm gonna assume it's ridiculously high. Give me a number.
Come on. Play with me here. 12,652. Over 50,000. Oh, smokes.
Canada is a predatory behavior include they're trying to include children down to the age of 12, mentally ill, homeless, and addicts instead of giving them palliative care.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Very important history lesson. https://t.co/oNYQsRIQZW
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1872, Rockefeller eliminated 90% of oil companies, leading to a Supreme Court ruling in 1911 that broke up Standard Oil into 34 companies for violating antitrust laws. Despite this setback, he aimed to dominate the market. Concurrently, he recognized the potential of petrochemicals for pharmaceuticals, viewing natural health as a threat. To gain control, he funded medical schools and hired Flexner to evaluate their curricula. This effort helped establish allopathic medicine, which relies on synthetic substances for treatment, ultimately shaping the foundation of Western medicine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in 18/72, Rockefeller bought up, shut down, or bankrupt 90% of the oil companies. Our good old constitution came into place, and in 1911, the Supreme Court found Rockefeller in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and split Standard Oil into 34 independent companies, so they said you can't have the monopoly on this, you're done. You think that changed who he was? No. He promised to bankrupt America.
At that very same time, they were learning how to turn Petro chemicals exactly what he had at his fingertips with the oil into pharmaceuticals. Now, John d Rockefeller's biggest threat was natural health. So what does he do? Being the businessman he is, he donates money to the medical schools because he wants to control. And What do you do when you wanna control someone?
You give them money. And then, he hired a guy by the name of Flexner to study the school's curriculum, to figure out what they were teaching everybody, and to persuade the government to establish allopathic medicine which use the unnatural substances to treat diseases. This is how western medicine was founded.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Definitely worth resharing. Wish more Democrats realized President Trump is a good man with a huge heart ❤️ https://t.co/qRKfF0hGQH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Thank you for joining the Gutfeld show; it was a lot of fun. I owe you an apology for my past criticisms; I didn't understand your motivations. Meeting you backstage changed my perspective. You connected with my daughter, showing your family man side.
You’ve done significant things, like helping Nelson Mandela, but you rarely discuss them. It's important for people to know the real you beyond politics. Your charitable actions, like donating to dog rescues and helping employees in need, reflect your character.
We need strong father figures and a return to values like religion, which has been under attack. Your humility is admirable, but sharing your positive contributions could help others see the man behind the policies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've I've got an issue with you, and I really, I and when you gave me this opportunity, first of all, thank you for coming on the Gutfeld show. It was hilarious.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It was a
Speaker 0: lot of fun. It's a good show. And, I I actually owe you an apology before we start. I've been very critical about you, how you fight all all through the campaigns. I voted for you because I like policy.
Right. I didn't know you as a man. And I think when you don't understand what a man fights for, you can get lost, especially with all the noise we're seeing from fake news, etcetera. Come on. Created these pictures from you.
Speaker 1: There's noise.
Speaker 0: So gut feel shells over. Cameras are off. We go backstage, and I expected you to be like every politician or anybody, everybody celebrity I've bodyguard for, and you met my family. And you talked to my daughter. Mhmm.
My daughter is 10 years old. Her name is Georgie. You guys talk for 20 minutes. If I didn't if nobody knew, you could have been her grandfather. And you were talking about her horses and her dreams.
And I was sitting there, and I was like, I have been so wrong about this man because I never understood why you fight the way you fight. You're a family man.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I am. Well, I am. You're a father. And your daughter's a gorgeous, really and your wife, the whole thing.
I mean, you have got some setup, I'll tell you. But your family's great, and you're great, and you've really done something, and you've captured a certain spirit. You know, a friend of mine who's very smart, he's also a very big guy. He said, because I'm big and strong, people think I'm not the smartest guy.
Speaker 0: Oh, I know.
Speaker 1: Okay? You are a really smart guy. And I see it, and I've watched it, and I like the show. And we have the privilege of having had the highest rating in the history of the show when I did it a couple of weeks ago. That was his
Speaker 0: Of all time.
Speaker 1: Of all time. Yeah.
Speaker 0: We beat network television. You'd be heavy And they were up 35,000,000 homes, and and it was a a landslide. Yep. Now you're you're putting it on me. I'm throwing it back to you, mister president.
Speaker 1: Go ahead.
Speaker 0: Why do we not hear more about Donald Trump, the father, the grandfather, and the the d I I did a deep dive. There are some of the things you have done that when they say those horrible things like he's Hitler, he's a racist, did they not forget in 1991 what you did with Nelson Mandela? Yeah. Would you care to share that? Because I would love to hear that.
I never talk
Speaker 1: about it.
Speaker 0: No. You do not. And I know why because you're a man.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I just have great relationships with a lot of people. People say that, you know, a little bit like you do. I don't think it's a narrative the press likes. Maybe it's not even a narrative that I should have.
We have to protect our country, or maybe we should let the, the other side I don't even call him the enemy. I think we have more of an enemy from within than we do from outside. You know, if you have a smart president, they talk about China and Russia and everything else. If you have a smart president, they're not gonna be the problem. We have a bigger problem from within, and they hate it.
I noticed, today, they were saying, he said the enemy from within. Of course, it's Adam Schiff. These are bad people. These are sick people and bad people. And, it's true.
But I think it's a narrative that they don't like, frankly. I think, the fake news, a term I think I came up with, I'm very proud of.
Speaker 0: Oh, you did. You quoted It's
Speaker 1: not tough.
Speaker 0: Probably trademarked it. But, you know, I'm not gonna give you Yeah.
Speaker 1: I'll shoot. I'm not
Speaker 0: gonna give you business tips.
Speaker 1: But, you know, it's it's funny because it it's a great term, but it's actually not strong enough because it's beyond fake. It's really bad. Nelson Mandela and Adi Aviscuszczuk were trying
Speaker 0: to come to the United States. Yeah. The United States government wasn't helping him. No one was helping him. You charted a 727 plane for their entire trip.
Yep. How was somebody? And that's crazy because you can talk about anything, and you why is it hard for you to talk about the things you've done? It runs in your family. Your father helped build a synagogue.
I mean, why do we not know those things?
Speaker 1: It's something that I've never I I love doing it. I don't need praise for it. I I don't, we all like, a certain level of praise, but I've never, I just like helping people. I help a lot of people and I enjoy doing it and I never talk. It's nice that you bring it up.
I also think it's not a narrative that the press likes talking about
Speaker 0: for me. But I think it would help a lot of the American people who have been misled. I, myself included. Now listen. I'm voting for you now because of the man you are, not just because of the policies.
Because not every American will get the opportunity that I had to solve who you were backstage. And that's why I have this list. I mean, I can I have testimonials? I we can't go through all of them because I wanna
Speaker 1: see them.
Speaker 0: Now this was this was I had to dig deep
Speaker 1: I like
Speaker 0: that. You donated a $100,000 to raise dogs? You're not even a dog guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Explain that. Well, that's, Lara. So I have a wonderful the wife of of Eric, and she's a terrific person. You know, she's actually now a very big, and important person in the in getting elected in the Republican party.
Comes from North Carolina. She loves the dogs, and I did that in her honor, actually. And, you know, if you listen to her, boy, dogs are treated very badly. They're, you know, some evil people having to do even with dogs. So I did that for my daughter-in-law.
Yeah. More so than me. I don't know that much about dogs, but I wanna take care of them. And I had an opportunity. You know, as president, you can do a lot of things.
I did a lot at the size of the kennels, the size of the you know, there's, like, cages that they're in, and it it's terrible. It's like you have no room, no nothing. And she came in with a whole group of people. These are people that really fight hard for dogs. I mean, you have people that fight, And she's a good person, so I did it for her.
Speaker 0: I have 100, 100 of employees who have said things like, you've paid medical bills. You you paid mortgages, rents. You've helped get family members. There is there is one story in here, though, where a a brother came in with a business plan. Nobody would hear him.
You gave him 10 minutes. You shook his hand, and you cut him a check. Yeah. Why is it so hard for you and even your team? I I I'm a little upset.
These are things that I think the American people Maybe like and I get it. You're humble because you're a father first Yeah. And a grandfather. And that's something again, one thing we need in this country is we need a father figure again. We need husbands and and boyfriends and young men.
Needs is we need to see that fathers are capable of great things because we've dealt with it, especially in the last three and a half years Right. A complete dismemberment of what it is to be a man. We're under attack for everything.
Speaker 1: We are. Well, actually manhood
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Under attack. I see things that are so beautiful. And the next day, I see they're knocking the hell out of somebody for doing something that a day before I said, what a wonderful thing. Now we have to get back a little bit more. You know, the other thing under attack is religion.
Religion was like the glue that kept this country together, and so many people are mocking it. They mock it. And it just kept our country together, but it's absolutely under attack and under attack by this administration.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Video Transcript AI Summary
A bomb threat was reported at a Home Depot in Wichita, Kansas, after a customer alerted employees. A man in the restroom claimed there was a bomb, stating he was "fixing to blow it up," but insisted he meant it as a joke and did not intend to cause panic. He mentioned that others in the restroom laughed, understanding his humor. Police located the man and confirmed he posed no real threat. Home Depot has decided not to press charges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Moments for customers at a Kansas Home Depot. Police responded to reports of a bomb threat at the store in Wichita. A customer alerted employees. A man inside the bathroom said there was a bomb in the building. Police were able to locate the man responsible for those comments, and that man told police he warned other guests to leave the restroom because he was, quote, fixing to blow it up, but had no intention of causing a panic.
Man also told police others in the room laughed, understanding his joke, which I'm just now getting. Home Depot says they will not be pressing charges. But I could tell you right now, you asked the producer for me to read that big note. To Ethan now, please. No.
Oh my god. I have to go to a convention. No. We're gonna get it. We're gonna get it.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
The current DOJ is pure evil with the goal of destroying the lives of those they disagree with. They are going to regret their actions once they are held accountable. https://t.co/2OntUKMVP6
Video Transcript AI Summary
The DOJ leaked allegations against Matt Gaetz, claiming he was involved in child sex trafficking. They have a legal obligation to charge him and prove it in court; otherwise, they should remain silent. Instead, they allowed the accusations to circulate, with media figures amplifying the claims. The DOJ admitted they lack evidence to support these allegations, yet they still spread the story. Gaetz denies the accusations, asserting they are false, but there’s no acknowledgment from the DOJ that these claims have been disproven.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: DOJ leaked that he was a child sex trafficker. So at that point, they have a moral, I would say, legal obligation to charge him for child sex trafficking and prove it in court. And if they can't, shut the f up. But they didn't do that. They leaked that Matt Gaetz, a guy they didn't like, whose views were a threat to them, is a child sex trafficker.
Speaker 1: Then they just
Speaker 0: let it hang in the air and all their repulsive little minions like Joe Scarborough. He's a child sex trafficker. Really? You wanna live in a world where the secret police can just slander you through the media? I read
Speaker 1: in my bible this morning that you don't believe something unless 2 or 3 people are witnesses and say and there is none of that. In fact, the weaponized Department of Justice said we don't have the proof to pursue these allegations. I know. They accuse it. They they make the case, and then they say it should be known that Matt Gaetz denies that these allegations has occurred.
Of course, he denies it because they're not true in the Department of Justice. There's no accounting of the fact that these things have been proven not to be not to be true.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Love this! What an amazing artist🇺🇸 https://t.co/iTyC4GK5VW
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're at Victor Garcia Park in Pharr, Texas, right in the heart of the neighborhood. It's 1:38 AM, and we came across some impressive street art. Check out this mural that says "We the People." It's really clean and represents positive change in the community. There's even a Tesla parked nearby, adding to the vibe. The detail in the artwork is incredible, especially the eyes—photos don’t capture it well. The artist behind this piece is Bangers dot 1, showcasing talent unique to the valley. This is truly a special spot.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, we're over here at the Victor Garcia Park here in Pharr, Texas. We're literally in the hood. Like, this is the hood. You know Cyprus? You know Wright?
You know Egli? You're in the hood here. So it's currently 138 in the morning, but we're driving and we saw some damn. Look at what's in the hood. We the people.
You like that? How do you feel about that? That's clean. That's clean? That's your boy?
Making change in the community. Dude, his Chetronpas. We even got his homeboy, Elon, over here. We got a little Tesla. Juno, but let's be real.
Look at like, this is crazy. Look at the detail on this. His eye, like, the camera does not do justice. This is the the artist, Bangers dot 1. Only here in the valley, dude.
This is some valley.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
We are literally and figuratively on the right side of history. Thank God for X 🙏 https://t.co/HvPtinJ0Jd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Democrats argue that Elon Musk's support for Donald Trump gave him an unfair advantage. They point out that Kamala Harris had the backing of major platforms like Google, YouTube, Facebook, and numerous news outlets, as well as a long list of celebrities including Beyoncé, Taylor Swift, and Barack Obama. In contrast, they claim that Musk's platform, X, somehow outperforms this extensive support from various media and high-profile figures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The democrats claim that Elon Musk's support of Donald Trump gave him an unfair advantage when their Kamala Harris only had the support of Google, YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, The New York Times, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, The Hill, NBC News, CNN, MSNBC, CBS News, ABC News, PBS NewsHour, BBC News, CNBC, NPR, The View, Beyonce, Jennifer Lopez, Taylor Swift, Ariana Grande, Lady Gaga, Megan d.
Speaker 1: Sally, and Cardi B. Eminem, Billy Ellis,
Speaker 0: Daniel Lado, Katy Perry, Stevie Wonder, James Taylor, John Legend, Neil Young, Stevie Nicks, Usher, Magic
Speaker 1: Johnson, Willie Nelson, TV, Bruce Springsteen, Lizzo, Rihanna, Samuel O'Brien,
Speaker 0: Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Michelle Obama, and Barack Obama. Yeah. You're right. You're right, Democrats. Our one little social media platform x outperforms your dozens of platforms, cable news networks, and your celebrities.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Get out and Vote 🇺🇸 Trump/Vance/Kennedy 2024 to Save America 🇺🇸 https://t.co/05vIsl45O2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump has faced numerous challenges, including hoaxes, impeachments, FBI raids, and court appearances. Despite these obstacles, he stood resilient, urging his supporters to fight for a brighter future. He envisions a stronger, freer, and more united America, emphasizing the importance of making America great again. The only negativity he sees comes from his opponents, not his supporters. If Trump can endure all of this, it’s crucial for his followers to get out and vote.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think about all they've done to Donald Trump. First, it was hoaxes, witch hunts, and impeachments. Then it was FBI raids, courtrooms, and mugshots. Finally, there was bullets in a Pennsylvania field. And after all that, this man stood up with blood draining down his face, pumped his fist in the air, and told us to fight.
Fight. Fight. America's future will be bigger, better, bolder, brighter, happier, stronger, freer, greater, and more united than ever before. And we will make America great again. We know what they think of us.
The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters. So if Donald Trump can get through all of that, we can get out to vote.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Since we are probably on a Watch List for our posts we should probably follow this woman’s lead if they show up at our door! This is a 🚨MUST WATCH🚨 https://t.co/VeBzGRbUnY
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
How come the media stopped talking about this? https://t.co/4ALXeFZBd1
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
This should be a wake up call to all parents/grandparents regarding vaccines. https://t.co/cyiZSNEaWH
Video Transcript AI Summary
We analyzed all patients in my practice, no cherry-picking. Stratified by vaccines, 500 had 0, 3,700+ had some. Results showed more vaccines correlated with worse outcomes: infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, anemia. Data is powerful. Access to this info would have changed my choices for my daughter. Every parent deserves all information for informed decisions.
Translation: We examined all patients in the practice without bias. Results showed a correlation between more vaccines and negative outcomes. Access to this data would have influenced my decisions for my daughter. All parents should have access to complete information for informed choices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were definitely looking at every single patient born in my practice. There's was no cherry picking. There was no we're gonna exclude you for this or that. Every baby born was looked at, and we looked at every single office visit. We stratified them according to the number of vaccines they had.
Okay. So, basically, we had over 500 who had 0 vaccines, and then we had another 3,700 and some who had some vaccines. And what we found, Dell, was spoke for spoke for itself, and you're showing your viewers the grass. Those orange lines are over time, over that ten and a half years, the more vaccines you had, the worse you were for whether we looked at infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies. It doesn't matter what we looked at.
Even just plain old anemia skyrockets in the vaccinated when compared to the unvaccinated. Wow. This data is so powerful.
Speaker 1: If I had access to this information before my daughter was born, I would have made very different choices. Every parent wants the best for their child. Every parent deserves access to all the information to make an informed choice.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
This is hysterical 😆 Enjoy my friends ❤️ https://t.co/VBeM4sRCoy
Video Transcript AI Summary
I used to trust the news blindly until I discovered a brain. A brain helps you think for yourself, question news sources, and resist celebrity advice. It can bring awareness, accountability, and a better understanding of various topics. Consider a brain if you want to stay grounded in reality. Visit tryabrain.com for more details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Track 3. I used to believe everything I'd see on the news, but that's before I discovered a brain.
Speaker 1: A brain is meant for everyday use. Those living with brain. Talk to your doctor about what news sources you obey. A brain may also lower your desire to take life altering advice from celebrities.
Speaker 0: Getting lectured about my carbon footprint from people with 3 private jets used to make sense. But thanks to a brain, now I can think for myself every day. When my disregard for 3rd grade biology began to flare up, I knew it was time for a brain.
Speaker 1: Do not try a brain if you're allergic to a brain. Common side effects may include accountability, discernment, homeschooling your kids, a better understanding of economics, awareness of the stupidity of socialism, and diarrhea.
Speaker 0: For tethering yourself to reality, the only no brainer is choosing a brain. Ask your doctor if a brain is right for you.
Speaker 1: For more information, visit tryabrain.com.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Saw him talk live at #CPAC This was so powerful 🔥🎯🔥 #Facts #VoterID #NotRacist #PhotoID #FreeandFairElections #Elections #Voting If you agree please RT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the idea that black and brown people cannot obtain IDs to vote, calling it racist and a form of low expectations. They emphasize that voting in the country is easy and that they, along with their family members who served in the military, have never faced difficulties in obtaining IDs. The speaker urges others to focus on voter integrity and not let the issue be framed as a racial one. They promise to fight for the people's right to have their votes counted in Congress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most racist thing that I have seen over the course of the past few years is the insinuation that black and brown people can't have an ID or can't get an ID to go vote. Voting in this country is actually very easy. It's a very low bar. And the reason why I call them racist is because They think so little of a group of people that attaining an ID or being a citizen of this country To vote for our leadership for the future is in some way impossible for black and brown people to be able to do. Now that's why I am a conservative because I don't prescribe to the soft bigotry of low expectations.
Mhmm. Well done. Well done. I'm a West Point grad. My brother's a West Point grad.
My sister's a West Point grad. Thank you for our freedom. There's 60 here's what the military service is just in my immediate family. And why do I tell you that? Because my father and my mother would look at me like I was crazy if I told them that I couldn't get an ID to vote.
That needs to be our message to the left. It's not about being racist. It's not about anything else outside of what do you want to see and from the voter integrity and having an ID to go vote don't let them call you anything else. You make sure that you that you hold their feet to the fire and you say, it's not about race. We're all Americans here.
I just wanna know my vote counted. And I can assure you all, I will fight for you tirelessly in the halls of Congress to make sure that your