TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @MidwesternDoc
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a 75-year-old blind since birth who suddenly regained sight after using DMSO for sinusitis. DMSO, I claim, has repeatedly healed eye issues—blindness, macular degeneration, floaters, cataracts—by concentrating in the eye, restoring blood flow and drainage, reducing inflammation, refolding degenerative proteins, and reviving dormant tissue. Murray's case isn’t unique; many similar cases were documented but forgotten, along with other so-called incurables that disappeared after DMSO use.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
This 75 year old who'd been blind since birth suddenly regained his sight after using DMSO to cure sinusitis. DMSO has been repeatedly shown to heal eye issues medicine still can't solve like blindness and macular degeneration along with eliminating floaters and cataracts by it's unique affinity for concentrating within the eye, restoring both blood flow and drainage, rapidly eliminating inflammation, refolding the degenerative proteins which characterize many eye disorders so they can be eliminated and reviving damaged tissue so it can resume working—even after being dormant for 75 years. In fact, Murray's case is not unique, and as I show in the article below, many similar ones were documented but then essentially forgotten, as were the myriad of other challenging eye conditions which rapidly disappeared following DMSO use, and still remain "incurable" fifty years later.🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a dramatic improvement in vision in his left eye after using DMSO. He states that his left eye had been nonfunctional since childhood; one eye was blind for seventy-five years. At age 5–6 it became clear to his parents, and at age 10 he underwent cataract surgery that removed the lens, which left him effectively blind with only light perception, shapes, and movement.
About ten years ago, after a clinician suggested there was nothing more to do for the left eye, he learned about DMSO through Mercola and a Midwestern doctor. He began using DMSO for sinus problems, and the sinus relief was immediate. After about two months of use, he became aware that he could see color with his left eye, which he attributes to using DMSO in his sinuses. He continued using DMSO, applying it topically to his upper and lower eyelids daily with his finger.
Since then, he reports continued improvement in the left eye: he can see color quite distinctly, he can see detail, though he cannot read, and he can count fingers. He can cover the right eye and walk around the house without bumping into things, and he can see well enough to navigate familiar spaces. Night vision is limited to lights but not shapes; he notes that in the dead of night shapes are not visible anyway.
He has seen an eye doctor during this period and told the specialist over the last two visits that the vision in the left eye is improving, but the doctor has not asked about the improvement nor inquired about why it might be improving. He remarks that doctors tend to be dismissive of DMSO, describing such dismissal as ignorant, and notes that it has benefited some people. He repeats that he is 75 years old and was born in 1919.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The DMSO has definitely improved the sight and an eye which was blind for seventy five years which I find to be unbelievable. When I was five, six years old it became clear to me and my parents had noticed a lot earlier that one of my eyes was non functional. So this went on for some time. I visited specialists and eventually when I was 10 years old they operated on my eye to remove cataracts and in those days they just removed the lens from my eye. So that cleared the cataract but obviously at that point I was blind so it didn't matter what they did.
I was unable to see very much basically a little bit of light and dark all black and shapes only some movement I could detect movement if it was fast enough and vigorous enough. About ten years ago a specialist took a look at my left eye and he said well if I could do anything I would but there's really nothing I can do. Through Mercola I became aware of a Midwestern doctor and when I started reading his articles I found them enlightening and very eloquent and beautifully written, beautifully researched. His articles on DMSO stood out. I was having sinus troubles at that point and so I thought, oh well I'll try the DMSO.
So I used that and it cleared my sinuses instantly. I'd been using that for about two months and I became aware of the fact that I could see color with my left eye which I found to be interesting and I attribute it then and still do to using DMSO in my sinuses and so I've continued with it except that I apply it to my eyelid top and bottom on a daily basis just wipe it on with my finger and it's continued to improve the side of my left eye. I can see color quite distinctly now, I can see detail, I obviously can't read, I can count fingers which I could never do before and it's improved to the point where I can cover up my right eye and walk around the house without running into things. I can see well enough to navigate around the house. Clearly I know the house since I've lived here for thirty years.
However, can see and avoid bumping into tables and I can go through doors without hitting the sides and so forth. So it has to be reasonably good light. At night I can see lights but I can't see shapes. But in the dead of night you can't anyway. I find it amazing that I can now see with my left eye.
Have you been to an eye doctor since all of this started? I go to a specialist, yes. I've told her in the last two visits over the last year or so that the vision of my left eye continues, is improving. She hasn't bitten on that. She looks in my left eye with her instruments and so forth, measures the pressure and looks in at whatever they're looking at with a magnifying glass and a bright light.
But she hasn't ever asked me how the vision of my left eye is improving or why it's improving so I haven't bothered volunteering the information. Doctors tend to be very dismissive of DMSO, they tend to say, oh well it's some proven technology which I find to be particularly ignorant, particularly when it's pointed out to them that it has benefited some people. However, that's the medical profession. Okay, I'm 75 years old, born in '19
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim these triplets, all severely autistic hours after a pneumococcal vaccine, prove vaccines cause autism. I note they also lost cranial reflexes, and I cite decades of data that vaccine‑induced microstrokes cause brain damage, SIDS, and autism by making blood cells clump and obstruct tiny brain vessels. I add these microstrokes are easy to detect once you know what to look for and are surprisingly common.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
These triplets who all became severely autistic hours after the same pneumococcal vaccine is irrefutable proof vaccines cause autism. Notably all three also lost their cranial reflexes, mirroring decades of data vaccine-induced microstrokes cause brain damage SIDS and autism by causing the blood cells in the body to electrically clump together, thereby obstructing the smallest blood vessels in the brain (along with . Remarkably, these microstrokes are very easy to detect once you know how to look for them, and it eye-opening how common they are.🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have triplets, two boys and a girl, Richie, Robbie, and Claire. Every day in our life was a party. Every single day, they were smiling and laughing and looking at each other, engaging in each other. On 06/25/2007, we brought him in for the pneumococcal shot. My daughter still has the mark on her leg from the shot. She was the first one to get it, and she screamed and never really stopped screaming after that. But we continue we didn't know. We did the boys as well. By noon, Claire shut completely off. It was as if she was blind and deaf, and all she did at that moment was stare at the ceiling fan. So that was at noon. We had the shot at 10AM. By 02:00, we watched Richie shut off. They lost all their reflexes. I'm an educational audiologist. I actually did the test for the stapedial reflex, which is a little muscle in the middle ear just to see if a muscle they can't control was still working, and it it didn't. The stapedial reflex dampens sound so your ears don't hurt from a really loud sound, and both of them had no stapedial reflex. They stopped blinking, stopped yawning, stopped coughing, stopped sneezing.
The worst is when we saw the final one shut down. We were told it was genetic, and then we were told by geneticists that there's no possible way three children would shut off on the same day. So we had severe autism spectrum disorder for all three kids entering kindergarten. We have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to recover them. The only person that we got back is Rich Robbie, the one that was last to shut off.
Richie can only say single, maybe two words together. Claire is still completely nonverbal, not potty trained, and Robbie is approaching grade level but severe OCD.
Let me tell you what a day in our life isn't. So you got, say, a six or seven or eight year old child who's not potty trained, and at two or three or 04:00 in the morning, they fill their diaper. I want you to assume that's pretty uncomfortable, so they take it off. Pretty soon pretty soon it's all over them. It's all over the bed. In short order, it's all over me. It's all over her. Mhmm. I'm snapping at her. She's snapping at me. We're both snapping at the kid who is the only innocent party in the whole scenario. And the one thing that's conspicuously absent from that scenario is is anybody who told you that shot was safe. They're all asleep in their bed. They haven't got a problem in the world.
There were lines down the block everywhere we went. Look at this crowd behind me. Look at this line. It goes on and on and on. In fact, the very first day we screened at Angelica Film Center in New York, I wanted to know why there's this giant line down the block. What are these people here for? Can every parent or someone, you know, if you have a family member with autism, would you please stand up right now? Like, see. Three quarters of the room stood up. I remember feeling like the air just got sucked out of the room. I had no idea that there was this many people suffering from this issue. I ended up asking that question three screenings a day, five days a week, for an entire year. And every single time, three quarters of the room stood up. I realized I had stumbled on something absolutely massive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have triplets, two boys and a girl, Richie, Robbie, and Claire. Every day in our life was a party. Every single day, they were smiling and laughing and looking at each other, engaging in each other. On 06/25/2007, we brought him in for the pneumococcal shot. My daughter still has the mark on her leg from the shot.
She was the first one to get it, and she screamed and never really stopped screaming after that. But we continue we didn't know. We did the boys as well. By noon, Claire shut completely off. It was as if she was blind and deaf, and all she did at that moment was stare at the ceiling fan.
So that was at noon. We had the shot at 10AM. 02:00, we watched Richie shut off. They lost all their reflexes. I'm an educational audiologist.
I actually did the test for the stapedial reflex, which is a little muscle in the middle ear just to see if a muscle they can't control was still working, and it it didn't. The stapedial re reflex dampens sound so your ears don't hurt from a really loud sound, and both of them had no stapedial reflex. They stopped blinking, stopped yawning, stopped coughing, stopped sneezing.
Speaker 1: The worst is when we saw the final one shut down. We were told it was genetic, and then we were told by geneticists that there's no possible way three children would shut off on the same day. So we had severe autism spectrum disorder for all three kids entering kindergarten. We have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to recover them. The only person that we got back is Rich Robbie, the one that was last to shut off.
Speaker 0: Richie can only say single, maybe two words together. Claire is still completely nonverbal, not potty trained, and Robbie is approaching grade level but severe OCD.
Speaker 2: Let me tell you what a day in our life isn't. So you got, say, a six or seven or eight year old child who's not potty trained, and at two or three or 04:00 in the morning, they fill their diaper. I want you to assume that's pretty uncomfortable, so they take it off. Pretty soon pretty soon it's all over them. It's all over the bed.
In short order, it's all over me. It's all over her. Mhmm. I'm snapping at her. She's snapping at me.
We're both snapping at the kid who is the only innocent party in the whole scenario. And the one thing that's conspicuously absent from that scenario is is anybody who told you that shot was safe. They're all asleep in their bed. They haven't got a problem in the world.
Speaker 3: There were lines down the block everywhere we went. Look at this crowd behind me. Look at this line. It goes on and on and on. In fact, the very first day we screened at Angelica Film Center in New York, I wanted to know why there's this giant line down the block.
What are these people here for? Can every parent or someone, you know, if you have a family member with autism, would you please stand up right now? Like, see. Three quarters of the room stood up. I remember feeling like the air just got sucked out of the room.
I had no idea that there was this many people suffering from this issue. I ended up asking that question three screenings a day, five days a week, for an entire year. And every single time, three quarters of the room stood up. I realized I had stumbled on something absolutely massive.
reSee.it AI Summary
The FDA's history reveals a troubling pattern of corruption and betrayal, dating back to its first chief, Harvey Wiley, who was ousted for exposing harmful food additives. Despite his warnings, the system has allowed thousands of toxic chemicals into our food supply through loopholes like GRAS. Effective treatments like DMSO have been buried to protect Big Pharma's profits. The FDA's failures extend to vaccines and drug approvals, highlighting a need for public demand for change, as the system is unlikely to reform itself. I'm committed to exposing these issues and advocating for better healthcare.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The FDA’s War Against You: Exposing a Century of Lies, Poison, and Profit The first FDA chief tried to protect Americans from deadly additives. He was forced, and Big Industry has been poisoning us ever since. Today, the corruption runs deeper—and you’ll be furious when you see how they rigged the system with fake “safety” loopholes. 🧵THREAD
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
📌 Before we dive in, bookmark this thread. Only by uncovering the past can you truly understand how to repair the broken, corrupted system we’re living with today. Let’s start at the beginning...
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Harvey Wiley, the first FDA chief, proved that food additives like formaldehyde, borax, and copper sulfate were harming Americans. The food industry panicked. So they hijacked the government and, in 1912, they forced Wiley out—along with all of his concerns.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Wiley later wrote a book about it called The History of A Crime Against the Food Law, where he exposed exactly what happened. He warned that “the government would not protect the people” and said only “an outraged public” could defeat Big Food and Big Pharma. https://seleneriverpress.com/images/pdfs/HISTORY_OF_A_CRIME_AGAINST_THE_FOOD_LAW_by_HW_WILEY_MD_1929.pdf
Page not found - Selene River Press
seleneriverpress.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Wiley's warning was clear. The government won’t save you. Because every time lawmakers tried to regulate dangerous products, industry lobbyists crushed the effort. Every time. And that’s still happening today. More than 100 years later. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-fdas-war-on-americas-health
The FDA's War On America's Health
Why do so many innovative therapies never see the light of day
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
And now, thousands of chemicals—aluminum, benzoates, nitrates—have been greenlit without proper safety testing They’re “generally recognized as safe” and if you’re paying attention, you’ve probably realized GRAS is a scam. Wiley even proved those three were toxic a century ago!
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Since 2000, 99% of new food additives have entered the food supply through the GRAS loophole. And chronic illnesses have continued to skyrocket.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
These “safe” additives aren’t just useless, filler ingredients—many of them are literally toxic. Long-term exposure can damage organs, disrupt hormones, and accelerate aging. And one of the worst offenders? Aluminum. It’s everywhere. And it silently wrecks your blood, your brain, and your body.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In 1962, the Kefauver–Harris Amendment gave the FDA sweeping new powers. It sounded good on paper, but it turned drug approval into a pay-to-play scheme. You can probably see where this is going. Big Pharma spent billions on trials... and the FDA gave them what they wanted.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
With the FDA’s new power, they began requiring extremely costly randomized controlled trials and framed this as the “gold standard.” In reality, they just made it impossible for small innovators to compete—and let Big Pharma rig the system. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-fdas-war-on-americas-health
The FDA's War On America's Health
Why do so many innovative therapies never see the light of day
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Innovation suffered, and science became a business model. And it’s been a business ever since. But we’re told to trust it. And questioning it makes you a “science denier.”
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Since bringing awareness to DMSO a year ago, I've received thousands of life changing reports from readers who've used it. What happened to it is a perfect example of the FDA’s war on America’s Health. Learn more here:
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
BANNED: The Forgotten Miracle Cure for Eye, Ear, Nose, Throat and Dental Disease The FDA has known since 1964 that DMSO could treat “incurable” conditions like blindness and tinnitus. Instead of embracing it—they banned it. And buried the evidence for decades. Now, people across the country are rediscovering DMSO—and the results are absolutely jaw-dropping. This is the powerful, natural healing breakthrough Big Pharma tried to erase from history. 🧵 THREAD
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
DMSO is a cheap, natural, miracle-like treatment. It can help with strokes, paralysis, chronic pain, infections, diseases, and even cancer. So why haven’t most people heard of it? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-is-a-miraculous-therapy-for
DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries
The decades of evidence DMSO revolutionizes the practice of medicine
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Because in the 1960s the FDA declared it “dangerous” with no evidence. Not because it didn’t work. But because it worked too well. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-fdas-war-against-dmso-and-america
The FDA's War Against DMSO and America
The Forgotten History That Led to the FDA Again and Again Keeping the Things We Most Desperately Need Away From Us
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
DMSO threatened the drug market—and the FDA didn’t want to process the torrent of new applications it was creating. So they buried it for 30+ years. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-cancer-cure-hiding
The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight
How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The FDA has spent decades attacking therapies that work. Especially things that are free or cost effective and heal, not just mask symptoms. The list is endless, but here are a few: • GHB (natural sleep aid) • Sunlight • Raw milk • Umbilical stem cells • Chelation • Psychedelics for PTSD • Even seed-oil-free baby formula
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Hopefully, with Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s leadership, we’ll finally see some progress in the right direction. He’s right. The war on public health has been going on for decades. And it needs to end.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Public health agencies looking the other way when vaccine harm has been obvious didn’t start with COVID. This massive betrayal of trust had people asking, “How could this have happened?” What many of them didn’t realize was that this isn’t new. It happened because this is how it’s supposed to happen. This is always how it happens.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Whistleblowers highlighted in vaccine history include Sir Graham Wilson, The Hazards of Immunization (1967), who argues many vaccine accidents were not reported and that important records were buried; he credits RA O'Brien and others for uncovering hidden data. Joseph Anthony Morris of the Division of Biological Standards in Bethesda found influenza vaccine effectiveness ranging from zero to forty percent in the Caroline Islands, faced harassment, and prompted a 1972 Senate hearing that investigated vaccine irregularities and 32 vaccines released by DBS; Morris was transferred after DBS was remodeled into the FDA. Bernice Eddy of the NIH exposed problems with Salk polio vaccines and early adenovirus vaccines, linking SV40 to tumors in hamsters and to kidney disease, with higher SV40 positivity in FSGS patients. Maiden-Darby kidney cells are used to make flu vaccines and are described as tumorigenic by FDA documents. Merck scientists are suing under the False Claims Act over MMR vaccine potency since 2000. Outliers face suppression.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question that arose fairly early for me was, why do doctors know next to nothing about what aluminum does inside the body? What other misinformation and gaping holes in knowledge do doctors have? And had anyone ever written about the problems with vaccination? Was I trailblazing or were there physicians who had gone before me and had ignored similar resistance? I was treated by the hospital administration as an outlier with radical and unwanted views.
To my astonishment, close scrutiny of medical and vaccine history showed plenty of other outliers, not just Semmelweis and Oliver Wendell Holmes of Purple Fever Infamy. When it comes to vaccination issues, it's useful to know about the following whistleblowers. The first outlier on my list is Sir Graham Wilson, who wrote a book called The Hazards of Immunization in 1967. Of course, I never knew of this book in my conventional years. Sir Graham Wilson was not a nobody, nor was he considered a quack.
Though he does say that he was once totally ignorant. The book was a revelation, not just because of its content, but because of the fact that Sir Wilson was only able to write the book because of contributions from people that he mentions in the preface and the introduction. First he talks about how the anti vaccination as he heard of were highly emotional and irrational people, But then he learned of an opposition that had sprung up amongst scientific workers who were moved by factual evidence. He thanks a former director from Welcome Pharmaceutical Labs, Doctor. R.
A. O'Brien, who had amassed records of various vaccine disasters which he felt unable to cope with, and handed them over to Sir Graham, who said that it was doubtful whether the book would have been possible without those records. He mentions other people who helped him dig out long overlooked journals that were not obtainable elsewhere. This is what Roman and I had to do in order to write our book. So, how are practicing doctors supposed to know about vaccine problems if the literature is buried in basements and then books like sir Graham's are tossed out from medical libraries?
Sir Graham mentions a lecturer, a top health officer who was totally ignorant of the long series of vaccine accidents in the late eighteen hundreds and early nineteen hundreds because of almost complete absence of information in textbooks. Sir Graham says the large majority of accidents have never been reported in print. Why not? He says, for fear of compensation claims or of giving a weapon to the anti vaccinationists. It's risky for any medical doctor to reveal unpublished material, but it's downright dangerous to talk as an industry scientist, which is also why RA O'Brien waited so long after his retirement to give welcomes disaster files to sir Graham Wilson.
Unfortunately, because most scientists never talk, the arrogance of ignorance is prevalent in academia as well. The same situation exists today, which is why medical students and doctors are in the dark. According to sir Graham Wilson, there were many more reports of injury and death in soldiers from vaccines than any of us know about, because they are not mentioned in the medical literature, but remained hidden in the records of vaccine manufacturers. About the same time as Sir Graham was writing his book, a doctor by the name of Joseph Anthony Morris, who worked for the Division of Biological Standards in Bethesda, Maryland, was involved in an internal struggle which would later become the subject of a published senate inquiry. This quote can be seen on the internet.
But how many people know about Doctor. Morris, who is undoubtedly one of the most important whistleblowers ever to have worked at the FDA? His work has considerable historic and medical significance. The uptake of the first influenza vaccine in 1945 was very poor. Doctor.
Morris was headhunted by the Division of Biological Standards because of the outstanding nature of his research skills. One of his jobs was evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. However, Doctor. Morris did not turn in results favorable to the flu vaccine. When he tested it on the Caroline Islands in different populations, he found that the effectiveness was anywhere between zero percent and forty percent.
He reported to his superiors that the vaccines lacked potency and that the side effects were significant. To his astonishment, his superiors ignored those results and released vaccines as safe and effective. This continued between 1963 and 1970. Doctor. Morris was harassed, silenced, and demoted, forced to destroy thousands of lab animals and hand over all of his records.
Publications of his results were blocked, his door lock was changed, the phone removed, and visitors were screened. Like today's Merck whistleblowers, doctor Morris said that the DBS used dubious techniques to test the vaccines and that the results were tampered with, which permitted the watered down vaccines to be falsely labeled as more potent than they were. Unhappy that he was unable to protect the public, doctor Morris decided to take action. Because he wasn't prepared to accept anything other than scientific fact, while his bosses ran interference to shore up the profits of drug companies, Doctor. Morris hired a lawyer and went to the Senate.
The result was a well publicized hearing. In memoranda leading up to that hearing, it became obvious that other scientists were also harassed to the point where they were forced to leave the DBS. The Senate hearing s thirty four nineteen in 1972 was conducted at the highest level, and vaccine irregularities were investigated. The hearing covered many topics raised by Doctor. Morris, including SV forty, flu vaccines, and the 32 useless vaccines listed here that were licensed and released by the DBS twenty years prior to this hearing.
How these vaccines were made and what exactly was in them is anyone's guess. The information you see here was given to the Senate hearing by Doctor. Peter Isaacson. Those vaccines, as a result of the hearing, were taken off the market. But Doctor.
Isaacson made a pertinent observation that the 32 vaccines were known to cause serious side effects, and that the dollar value of vaccines sold was astronomical. Doctor. Isaacson also noted, on page 349 of the public record that physicians and scientists have a very marked discipline conceit and seem to think they can make all sorts of judgments on anything that is beyond their training. And before someone accuses me of doing the same, my comments today are based on years of real education so that now I have what I talk about in my hand in black and white. The only reason we know about the vaccine issues in the congressional hearing in 1972 was because Doctor.
Tony Morris, who was about to be kicked out of the DBS for insisting that scientific principles and methods regarding vaccines be adhered to, decided to go public. According to sworn public testimony given in s thirty four nineteen, memos were quietly exchanged inside the bureaucracy over dangerous vaccines and ineffective drugs, yet nothing was done to protect the public. The Senate record also included statements from other harassed DBS scientists who had less courage than Doctor. Morris, but were still prepared to give evidence to the Senate. The DBS tried but failed to fire Doctor.
Morris after legal challenge. As a result of the Senate hearing, the DBS was remodeled into what we know today as the FDA, and Doctor. Morris was transferred there. Unfortunately, that change was just a cosmetic facelift. If you would like to listen to some videos of Doctor.
Morris from after he retired at the FDA, please go here. If you read the news today about whistleblowers from Merck and from the CDC, you can see that nothing has really changed. After his transfer to the FDA, influenza was still Doctor. Morris's specialty. In February 1976 in Fort Dix, New Jersey, a swine flu strain was found in a soldier who died during a march.
Doctor Morris was asked to help with the investigation at the same time that there was a manufactured scare over the possibility of another nineteen eighteen flu pandemic striking. But doctor Morris found that the virus the soldier died with was just an ordinary pig virus, not a pandemic virus. It rarely infected person to person. He also found in prior years that the 1918 flu was caused by p r eight, another strain of influenza that was discovered in Puerto Rico many years before. The vaccine that was created for swine flu was a hybrid between PR eight and swine flu.
Why? Because they couldn't make a vaccine with that swine flu strain because it grew too slowly. So the slow growing swine flu strain was hybridized with PR eight, which meant the swine flu vaccine virus took on the fast growing properties of the dangerous nineteen eighteen virus, and the viral antigen used in the swine flu vaccine, wasn't the ordinary pig strain from the soldier, but a fast growing hybrid. It turned out that the vaccine was both ineffective and unsafe. Again, his bosses wouldn't listen to him and told him to shut up.
So he went on the Phil Donahue show and gave public lectures stating his findings. Forty million people were vaccinated. The injuries Doctor. Morris predicted were a sad reality. Hundreds were reported to be paralyzed and dozens died.
Guillain Barre syndrome was a reality from the flu vaccines. The father of infectious disease epidemiology, Doctor. Alexander Langmuir, confirmed that causation. By 1982, there were 1,571 lawsuits filed just for swine flu vaccine victims. This fiasco cost the government untold millions.
The one thing they couldn't say was that doctor Morris didn't try to warn anyone. The swine flu program was stopped, but not before 46,000,000 doses of that vaccine was sold to the public. How people responded depended on their agendas. The organized crime underworld took doctor Morris very seriously and saw an opportunity to change the power base of the mafia. Infamous mob boss Carlo Gambino took a flu shot just before he died.
Apparently, someone from a rival mob heard one of doctor Morris's lectures on the side effects. Knowing that Gambino had a heart problem and having heard that the shot was potentially dangerous for such people, a Gambino insider was persuaded to convince Gambino to take the swine flu shot, which is widely believed to have pushed him into his grave. Make of that what you want. Many pro vaccine people today consider the nineteen seventy five swine flu vaccine incident to be much ado about nothing. However, if you talk to older adults who lived in the cities that vaccine was widely administered, you'll see that most of those people know of or have a family member that was affected by that vaccine.
The third outlier whistleblower you should know about is Doctor. Bernice Eddy, also mentioned in the Senate hearing about Doctor. Morris. Doctor. Eddy and Doctor.
Morris worked on the same floor of the National Institutes of Health, and were colleagues and friends. You may have heard of her work in discovering problems with the Salk polio vaccine, but did you ever hear about the early adenovirus vaccines? At her memorial service, Doctor. Morris said, One of our shared interests was the fact that adenovirus vaccines were capable of producing tumors in animals. Pursuit of this work did not receive enthusiastic support from the NIH administrators.
Every obstacle placed in the path of this work was for Doctor. Eddy an obstacle to be overcome. The result was a discontinuance of the use of adenovirus vaccines in children. Doctor. Eddy was the first to notice that Salk's polio vaccine after mass manufacture was paralyzing monkeys.
Her report was ignored, and the result of that was the infamous and misnamed Cutter incident. But the story of the cancer virus is even more shocking. Because their kidneys turned out to be a convenient source of cells for growth and amplification of poliovirus, rhesus monkeys were imported to The United States by the millions for slaughter and experimentation through the nineteen fifties and the nineteen sixties. Doctor. Eddy noticed that monkey kidney cell cultures would often degenerate spontaneously, even when kept under the most favorable conditions for cell survival.
She suspected an unknown virus. In 1959, she skimmed cell free liquid from the surface of monkey kidney cell cultures and injected that into newborn hamsters. Less than four months later, the majority, seventy percent of them, developed tumors. The experiment was repeated in generations of hamsters with the same results. Administrative clearance for publication of this important 1959 finding was not granted until scientists at Merck had recovered previously undetected virus in monkey kidney cell lines they were using to make polio vaccine.
Samples of this virus were given to doctor Eddy, who injected them into newborn hamsters and obtained identical results to those she had obtained in cell free extracts three years earlier. She found that the virus induced sarcomas in hamsters not only at the subcutaneous injection site of viral inoculation, but also at a distance in the lungs and in the kidneys. When people think of polio vaccines in the nineteen fifties, they think of the hero, doctor Salk, and the miraculous vaccine because the media made sure that that was how history would remember it. But from 1959 through 1961, government health officials were frantically seeking means to remove a tumor inducing factor from polio vaccines. At the same time, these health officials were also vigorously conducting a campaign to inject contaminated polio vaccines into millions of people without telling them that it contained a tumor inducing factor.
That factor has been referred to today by one of the world's leading virologists as the perfect war machine. The Division of Biologic Standards used very similar silencing and intimidation tactics on Doctor. Eddy as they did on Doctor. Morris. Her laboratory was downsized, and her staff was removed.
She had to develop innovative and time saving ways of completing her work. So she too was shut down for her findings instead of rewarded for potentially saving many innocent people from being injected with cancer viruses. Why is Doctor. Eddy important to me? That monkey virus was called SV40, and today you can read in medical journals about the tumors and kidney disease that have been associated with that cancer inducing virus.
SV40 is something that all nephrologists should know about, but for some reason they don't. SV40 is found in both healthy and sick people of all ages today, but people with a specific type of glomerular disease called focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis or FSGS, which is very difficult to treat, are more likely to have SV40 in their kidneys. Ask any nephrologist about the toxic drugs used to treat FSGS and what the cure rate is, and how frustrating it is for doctors and patients alike. It is documented widely in medical literature that this kidney trophic virus came from polio vaccines in the nineteen fifties and nineteen sixties, and since then has been documented to circulate in the human population. Humans can pass it to each other, and we can also pass it to our children before birth.
Nephrologists today don't know much about SV40 because they are interested more in two related polyomaviruses called BK and JC, which become active in people given a transplant who have their immune system suppressed. The possible role of SV40 in FSGS just doesn't come on their radar, but FSGS is a leading cause of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, and most people with the disease eventually require dialysis. FSGS as a percent of the underlying disease among dialysis patients has increased 11 fold from zero point two percent in 1980 to two point three percent in February. Just to give you a visual of what FSGS is, look at these images. A single kidney contains around 1,000,000 nephrons, and each nephron has a filter.
The circular images shown here are glomeruli, or filters in real life. They're spherically shaped. What you're looking at are stained cross section images from human kidneys. The first one is normal, and the second and third ones show FSGS problems, which are obvious even to the untrained eye. The filters are not functioning properly, and proteins that should remain in the body leak out into the urine instead.
Because of that, FSGS is associated with several other derangements in the body, like high blood pressure, edema, and lipid alterations. While SV40 virus is found in both healthy and sick people, it is known that a certain antigen from SV40 virus results in FSGS in experimental mice. We also know that human kidney is a reservoir of more than one strain of SV40 virus, and that people with kidney disease tend to have higher rates of SV40 viral shedding. This slide shows the rate of SV40 presence in urine and kidney of FSGS patients, patients with other kidney disease, and of normal healthy people. You can appreciate that the FSGS people have far higher rates of SV40 positivity.
Just looking at urine excretion, you can see forty one percent of FSGS, ten percent of other kidney disease, and only four percent of normals have SV40 positivity. Kidney biopsies, as previously shown, have the highest rates of infection in FSGS sufferers. We have seen a considerable increase in FSGS in kidneys between the 1970s and the late 1990s, which continues on today. Nephrologists see so much kidney injury from drugs like nonsteroidal anti inflammatory agents, antibiotics, chemotherapy, and in my and others' experience, even vaccines. Research in animals and humans shows that SV40 can initiate kidney injury and can also render kidneys susceptible to injury.
Most people recover clinically after drug insults, but how many patients are susceptible to drug induced kidney damage because they harbor variants of SB40 in the kidney? SB40 is also thought to reactivate as a result of kidney inflammation and with kidney injury from various toxins. This is an area of research that is largely untouched. Medical articles state that SV40 virus was vaccines only up until 1963, but Rizzo and Carboni in 1999 showed that with better testing, SV40 could have been detected in seed stock for vaccine manufacture long after 1963. Attorney Stanley Kopps in 2000 gave evidence from legal documents that there was no guarantee that SV forty was not in Letterley's polio vaccines up until the year 2000 when Kopps wrote his article.
FSGS, as we have just seen, is a serious potential consequence of SV40, but equally troubling is the potential for malignant kidney transformation in those who harbor SV40. Malignant transformation of normal cells infected with SV40 is a proven reality. Enders and Schein published in the 1960s that SV40 virus causes pathology and transforms human kidney cells in culture. That means that it causes disease and cancer in those cells. And Doctor.
Eddy showed that hamsters injected with SV40 developed kidney tumors. After 1964, the medical literature is devoid of SV40 kidney cancer research. But kidney cancers rose significantly after 1964. Look at this astonishing increase in incidence of kidney cancer in The UK. Similar trends are documented in Europe, Canada, and The USA.
You may be saying, correlation doesn't equal causation. Certainly other cofactors may exist, but the research of Doctor. Eddy and the finding that SV40 transforms human kidney cells is compelling. Causation was considered by Mortimer et al. In 1981 in a New England Journal of Medicine article, which summarized the results of the largest cohort of SV40 exposed children.
Over one thousand of those children were followed. They had actually traced eighty seven percent of that population of those children in 1981. Mortimer's concluding sentence says that because of mounting complexities and obstacles in tracing the subjects, cancer surveillance was terminated when they were teenagers. According to Doctor. Anthony Morris, that would not have been the time to stop this study, but really to start it.
Have vaccines anything to do with this trend we see as nephrologists? Because I can tell you, nephrologists and urologists have never been so busy, and business has never been so good as it is today. If you want to know why there are so many gaps in knowledge over SV40 in cancers, like kidney cancers, ask Drs. Key and Carbone. According to them and others, the controversy over the implications of SV forty damage has paralyzed the scientific research.
Doctors Key and Carboni also said that SV forty was in Italy's polio vaccine supply up until 1999. Doctor Carbone expressed his thoughts about the suppression of his findings over SV forty and tumors in an interview to Bookchin and Schumacher. Unfortunately, as doctors Eddie and Morris would tell you if they were here, you certainly can be punished for talking science, especially if it might make the public less willing to have blind faith in the safety of all vaccine programs. Let's look at another concern of mine. In order to make enough flu vaccine to vaccinate the world and do it quickly, a new way of making flu vaccines had to be developed.
Making them on chick embryos, which is the old way, is too slow and time consuming. So the new solution is cocker spaniel kidney cells, which were first cultured in 1958 by Maiden and Darby. Those same cells have become mysteriously immortalized. More recently, a sanitized term has been used, continuous cell lines. These cells are now deemed safe for human vaccine production.
The FDA says nobody knows just how these cells were made immortal. I can only speculate, but the textbooks clearly state that an oncogenic transformation occurred and that there has been chromosomal mutation. This particular vaccine substrate just happens to be tumorigenic in humans as stated by FDA personnel. These are screenshots from FDA documents stating that neoplastic maiden derby cells are used in flu vaccine production and that those cells may cause tumors in recipients. They say if the cell is not intact, it will not likely be a problem, but other FDA documents, such as pedin and the panel discussion among scientists in that paper, documents the real concerns discussed behind closed doors at FDA meetings regarding transferring even nanogram amounts of genetic material via injections.
Tumorigenic made in Darby kidney cells are now used to make flu vaccines distributed in The USA, which brings me to the most recent whistleblowers. If anyone thinks hidden vaccine problems, like Doctor. Morris reporting that the DBS lied about flu vaccine potency, DBS and Merck scientists finding SV forty and polio vaccines are all in the past, think again. Two of Merck's own scientists today are suing under the False Claims Act, saying that Merck lied about the potency of its mumps vaccine. The lawsuit documents list Merck's alleged efforts to defraud The United States through Merck's ongoing scheme to sell the government a mumps vaccine that is mislabeled, misbranded, adulterated, and falsely certified as having an efficacy rate that is significantly higher than it actually is.
Merck allegedly did this from 2000 onwards in order to maintain its exclusive license to sell the MMR vaccine and keep its monopoly of The US market. Merck attempted to have the case thrown out. It's pretty amazing when you think of the money and the medical and political power that Merck's lawyers have, yet not one of them could come up with an argument to convince the judge to dismiss the case. When you read the judgment, you get the feeling that Merck's lawyers really annoyed him. Science in the world of Merck vaccines could mean throwing out results that don't fit the desired outcome.
It could mean throwing out evidence before the FDA comes to inspect. It could mean offering bonuses to scientists to deliver the necessary results. But what do you expect when you have the vaccine manufacturers in charge of proving that their own vaccine is potent? Science in the general vaccine research world includes placebos that are vaccines, or placebos that are carrier fluid with aluminum, studies done on healthy people under optimal circumstances, and then those results are applied to everyone. Other outspoken journal reviewers and scientists admit that results favorable to the vaccines are built into the study designs.
Anyone who has written a funding application knows that to receive money, you have to be pretty convinced that you can produce results that will enhance the aims and objectives of the financier. I knew none of this as a nephrologist, because the system makes sure that medical students don't even think to look for information that might warn them that not all is well with these one size fits all vaccines. Yet that information is right under their eyes if they only knew where to look. Of course, the CDC and FDA would prefer that we all just relax and believe the authorities are looking out for us. When is the ignored science going to be taken seriously?
It never will, so long as people who talk about problems are called outliers and then hounded, vilified, character assassinated, and said to have psychological problems.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Here’s a brief rundown of vaccine cover-ups and failures by the FDA and the CDC: • 1976 swine flu shot caused paralysis • Gulf War vaccines triggered lifelong illness • The HPV shot causes autoimmunity and cancer • COVID vaccines are contaminated with DNA-altering plasmids are still doing untold damage still today. • The polio vaccine gave the cancer-causing virus SV-40 to up to nearly 100 million Americans, never warned the public, and buried the resulting spike in cancer rates And the FDA knew. The FDA knew all of it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The flu season is upon us. Forty six million of us obediently took the shot. By far, the greatest number of the claims, two thirds of them, are for neurological damage or even death allegedly triggered by the flu shot. Judy Roberts, healthy in 1976, "Two weeks later, she began to feel a numbness starting up her legs" and was "totally paralyzed"; the diagnosis: "Guillain Barre syndrome, GBS for short." There are "300 claims now pending from the families of GBS victims who died, allegedly as a result of the swine flu shot." They are "asking $12,000,000, though they don't expect to get nearly that much." The vaccine was called X53A; "Was X53A ever field tested? I can't say." "No. I had never heard of any reactions other than a sore arm, fever, this sort of thing." "Did you know ahead of time... Absolutely." "The consensus of the scientific community was that the evidence relating neurologic disorders to influenza immunization such that they did not feel that this association was a real one." "The swine flu vaccine has been taken by many important persons, ..." "Mary, did you take a swine flu shot? No." "4,000 others like her are still waiting for their day in court."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The flu season is upon us. Which type will we worry about this year, and what kind of shots will we be told to take? Remember the swine flu scare of 1976? That was the year the US government told us all that swine flu could turn out to be a killer that could spread across the nation. And Washington decided that every man, woman, and child in the nation should get a shot to prevent a nationwide outbreak, a pandemic.
Well, forty six million of us obediently took the shot. And now four thousand Americans are claiming damages from uncle Sam amounting to 3 and a half billion dollars because of what happened when they took that shot. By far, the greatest number of the claims, two thirds of them, are for neurological damage or even death allegedly triggered by the flu shot. We pick up the story back in 1976 when the threat posed by the swine flu virus seemed very real indeed. This virus was the cause of a pandemic in 1918 and 1919 that resulted in over half a million deaths in The United States as well as twenty million deaths around the world.
Speaker 1: See how easy it is to
Speaker 0: Thus, the US government's publicity machine was cranked into action to urge all America to protect itself against
Speaker 1: the swine flu menace. Influenza is serious business. During major flu epidemics, millions of people are sick and thousands die. Well, this year you can get protection. The vaccines are safe, easy to take, and they can protect you against flu.
So roll up your sleeve. Protect yourself.
Speaker 0: One of those who did roll up her sleeve was Judy Roberts. She was perfectly healthy and active woman when in November 1976, she took her shot. Two weeks later, she says she began to feel a numbness starting up her legs.
Speaker 2: I joked about it at that time. I said I'll be numb to the knees by Friday if this keeps up. By the following week, I was totally paralyzed.
Speaker 0: So completely paralyzed, in fact, that they had to operate on her to enable her to breathe. And for six months, Judy Roberts was a quadriplegic. The diagnosis? A neurological disorder called Guillain Barre syndrome, GBS for short. These neurological diseases are little understood.
They affect people in different ways. As you can see in these home movies taken by a friend, Judy Roberts' paralysis confined her mostly to a wheelchair for over a year. But this disease can even kill. Indeed, there are 300 claims now pending from the families of GBS victims who died, allegedly as a result of the swine flu shot. In other GBS victims, the crippling effects diminish and all but disappear.
But for Judy Roberts, progress back to good health has been painful and partial. Now, I noticed that your smile, Judy, is a little bit constricted.
Speaker 2: Yes, it is.
Speaker 0: Is it different from what it used to be?
Speaker 2: Very different. I have a greatly decreased mobility in my lips, And I can't
Speaker 1: drink
Speaker 2: through a straw on the right hand side. I can't blow out birthday candles. I don't whistle anymore for which my husband is grateful.
Speaker 0: It may be a little difficult for you to answer this question, but have you recovered as much as you are going to recover?
Speaker 2: Yes. This is it.
Speaker 0: So you will now have a legacy of braces on your legs for the rest of your life?
Speaker 2: Yes. The weakness in my hands will stay and the leg braces will stay.
Speaker 0: So Judy Roberts and her husband have filed a claim against the US government. They're asking $12,000,000, though they don't expect to get nearly that much. Judy, why did you take the flu shot?
Speaker 2: I'd never taken any other flu shots, but I felt like this was going to be a major epidemic. And the only way to prevent a major epidemic of a really deadly variety of flu was for everybody to be immunized.
Speaker 0: Where did this so called deadly variety of flu, where did it first hit back in 1976? It began right here at Fort Dix in New Jersey in January when a number of recruits began to complain of respiratory ailments, something like the common cold. An army doctor here sent samples of their throat cultures to the New Jersey Public Health Lab to find out just what kind of bug was going around here. One of those samples was from a private David Lewis who had left his sick bed to go on a forced march. Private Lewis collapsed on that march, and his sergeant had revived him by mouth to mouth resuscitation.
But the sergeant showed no signs of illness. A few days later, Private Lewis died.
Speaker 2: If this disease is so potentially fatal that it's going to kill a young, healthy man, A middle aged school teacher doesn't have prayer.
Speaker 0: The New Jersey lab identified most of those soldiers' throat cultures as the normal kind of flu virus going around that year, but they could not make out what kind of virus was in the culture from the dead soldier and from four others who were sick. So they sent those cultures to the Federal Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia for further study. A few days later, they got the verdict, swine flu. But that much publicized outbreak of swine flu at Fort Dix involved only Private Lewis who died and those four other soldiers who recovered completely without the swine flu shot.
Speaker 2: If I had known at that time that the boy had been in a sick bed, got up, went out on a forced march, and then collapsed and and died, I would never have taken a shot.
Speaker 3: The rationale for our recommendation was not on the basis of the death of a single individual, but it was on the basis that when we do see a change in the characteristics of the influenza virus, it is a massive public health problem in this country.
Speaker 0: Doctor. David Sencer, then head of the CDC, the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, is now in private industry. He devised the swine flu program, and he pushed it. You began to give flu shots to the American people in October '6. October 1.
By that time, how many cases of swine flu around the world had been reported?
Speaker 3: There had been several reported, but none confirmed. There had been cases in Australia that were reported by the press, by the news media. There cases
Speaker 0: in None confirmed. Did you ever uncover any other outbreaks of swine flu anywhere in the world? No. Now nearly everyone was to receive the shock in a public health facility where a doctor might not be present. Therefore, it was up to the CDC to come up with some kind of official consent form, giving the public all the information it needed about the swine flu shot.
This form stated that the swine flu vaccine had been tested. What it didn't say was that after those tests were completed, the scientists developed another vaccine, and that was the one given to most of the forty six million who took the shot. That vaccine was called X53A. Was X53A ever field tested?
Speaker 3: I can't say. I would have to
Speaker 0: It wasn't. I don't know. I would think that you're in charge of the program.
Speaker 3: I would have to check the records. I haven't looked at this in some time.
Speaker 0: The information form, the consent form, was also supposed to warn people about any risks of serious complications following the shot. But did it?
Speaker 2: No. I had never heard of any reactions other than a sore arm, fever, this sort of thing.
Speaker 0: Judy Robert's husband, Gene, also took the shot.
Speaker 4: Yes. I looked at that document. I signed it. Nothing on this said I was gonna have a heart attack or I can get Guillain Barre, which I'd never heard of.
Speaker 0: What if people from the government, the Center for Disease Control, what if they had indeed known about it? What would be your feeling?
Speaker 2: They should have told us.
Speaker 0: Did anyone ever come to you and say, you know something, fellas? There's the possibility of neurological damage if you get into a mass immunization program.
Speaker 5: No. No one ever did? No.
Speaker 0: Do you know Michael Hatwick?
Speaker 3: Yes. Doctor.
Speaker 0: Michael Hatwick directed the surveillance team for the swine flu program at the CDC. His job was to find out what possible complications could arise from taking the shot and to report his findings to those in charge. Did you know ahead of time, Doctor. Hatwick, that there had been case reports of neurological disorders, neurological illness, apparently associated with the injection of influenza vaccine? Absolutely.
You did? Yes. How'd you know that? By review of the literature. So you told your superiors, the men in charge of the swine flu immunization program, about the possibility of neurological disorders?
Absolutely. What would you say if I told you that your superiors would say that you never told them about the possibility of neurological complications?
Speaker 4: That's nonsense. I can't believe that they would say that they did not know there were neurological illnesses associated with influenza vaccination. That simply is not true. We did know that.
Speaker 3: I've said that Doctor. Hatwick had never told me of his feelings on this subject, that he's lying. I guess you would have to
Speaker 0: make that assumption. Then why does this report from your own agency dated July 1976 lists neurological complications as a possibility. I think the
Speaker 3: consensus of the scientific community was that the evidence relating neurologic disorders to influenza immunization such that they did not feel that this association was a real one. You didn't feel it was necessary to
Speaker 0: tell the people that information?
Speaker 3: I think that over the years we have tried to inform the American people as as fully as possible.
Speaker 0: As part of informing Americans about the swine flu threat, doctor Censer's CDC also helped create the advertising to get the public to take the shot. Let me read to you from one of your own agencies' memos planning campaign to urge Americans to take the shot. The swine flu vaccine has been taken by many important persons, he wrote. Example, president Ford, Henry Kissinger, Elton John, Muhammad Ali, Mary Tyler Moore, Rudolf Naraef, Walter Cronkite, Ralph Nader, Edward Kennedy, etcetera, etcetera.
Speaker 3: True? I'm not familiar with that particular piece of paper, but I do know that at least of that group, President Ford did take the vaccination.
Speaker 5: Did you
Speaker 0: talk to these people beforehand to find out if
Speaker 5: they plan to take the shot? I did not know. Did anybody? I do not know.
Speaker 0: Did you get permission to use their names in your campaign? I do not know. Mary, did you take a swine flu shot?
Speaker 6: No. I did not.
Speaker 0: Did you give them permission to use your name saying that you had or were going to?
Speaker 6: Absolutely not. Never did.
Speaker 0: Did you ask your own doctor about taking the swine flu shot?
Speaker 6: Yes, and at the time he thought it might be a good idea. But I resisted it because I was leery of having the symptoms that sometimes go with that kind of inoculation.
Speaker 0: So you didn't?
Speaker 6: No, I didn't.
Speaker 0: Have you spoken to your doctor since?
Speaker 6: Yes. And? He's delighted that I didn't take that shot.
Speaker 0: You're in charge. Somebody's in charge. There are This is your advertising strategy that I have a copy of here. Who's it signed by? This one is unsigned.
But you'll acknowledge that it was your baby, so to
Speaker 3: It could have been from Department of Health Education and Welfare. It could be from CDC. I don't know. I'll be happy to take responsibility for it.
Speaker 0: It's been three years now since you fell ill with GBS.
Speaker 2: Right? Right.
Speaker 0: Has the federal government, in your estimation, played fair with you about your claim?
Speaker 2: No. I don't think so. It seems to be dragging on and on and on, and really no end in sight that I can see at this point.
Speaker 7: With respect to the cases of Guillaume Barre allegedly
Speaker 0: Former secretary of HEW Joseph Califano too was disturbed that there was no end in sight. So a year and a half ago, he promised that Uncle Sam would cut the bureaucratic red tape for victims suffering from GBS and would pay up quickly.
Speaker 7: We shouldn't hold them to an impossible or too difficult standard of proving that they were hurt. Even if we pay a few people a few thousand dollars that might not have deserved it, I think justice requires that we promptly pay those people who do deserve Who's making the decision to
Speaker 0: be so hard nosed about settling?
Speaker 7: Well, assume the Justice Department is.
Speaker 0: Griffin Bell before he left?
Speaker 7: Well, the Justice Department agreed to the statement I made. It was cleared word for word with the lawyers in the Justice Department by my HEW lawyers.
Speaker 0: And that statement said, in effect?
Speaker 7: That statement said that we should pay Guillaume Beret claims without regard to whether the federal government was negligent if they re if they resulted from the swine flu shot.
Speaker 4: I think the government knows it's wrong.
Speaker 2: If it drags out long enough, then people will just give up. Let it go.
Speaker 4: I I am a little more adamant in my thoughts than my wife is because I asked told Judy to take the shot. She wasn't gonna take it, and she never had had shots. And I'm mad with my government because they knew the facts, But they didn't release those facts because they if they had released them, the people wouldn't have taken. And they can come out tomorrow and tell me there's gonna be an epidemic, and they can drop off like flies next to me. I will not take another shot that my government tells me to take.
Speaker 0: Meantime, Judy Roberts and some 4,000 others like her are still waiting for their day in court.
Speaker 5: I don't need another flu shot. I had a flu shot last year.
Speaker 8: A swine flu epidemic may be coming.
Speaker 9: Swine flu shot? Well, I don't know.
Speaker 8: I've been thinking about it. It could make you very sick.
Speaker 5: Swine flu? Man, I'm too glad for them to catch me.
Speaker 0: You'll want to be protected. I'm the healthiest 55 year old you've ever seen. Hey, I play golf every weekend. Get a shot
Speaker 8: of protection, the swine flu shot.
Speaker 9: Joe brought it home from the office. He gave it to Betty and one of his kids and to Betty's mother. But Betty's mother went back to California the next day. On her way to the airport, she gave it to a cab driver, a ticket agent, and one of the charming stewardesses. At school tonight, Joe's kid gave it to some other kids and missus Merrill got it and gave it to her husband.
In California, Betty's mother gave it to her best friend, Dottie. But Dottie had a heart condition and she died. But before she died, Dottie gave it to her girlfriend, the mailman, the paper boy, and the vet when she went to pick up her chew eye.
Speaker 8: If a swine flu epidemic comes, this is how it could spread. You'll want to be protected, especially if you're elderly or chronically ill. Get a shot of protection. The swine flu shot.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
And here’s a short list of other disastrous drug approvals: • SSRIs got approved even though trials showed they cause suicide and violence. • New Alzheimer’s drugs were greenlit after the advisory committee voted no. • Ozempic was rushed to market—with no long-term safety data. It’s all about profit over people.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
So, what’s the real problem here? Well, the FDA has 4 fatal flaws: 1. Corruption (regulators have endless Big Pharma ties) 2. No accountability (they never revoke approvals, even when there is evidence of harm) 3. Inadequate resources (they can’t do their job, effectively regulating all foods and drugs in the U.S. is just too big of a task) 4. Selective prosecution (they only go after people who can’t fight back— which is typically the treatments that actually heal)
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Great, now we know the problem. But can it be fixed? Yes—but not by trusting the system and making some massive changes: • Ban conflicts of interest • Create separate approval tracks for natural vs pharma • Make all trial data public • Let the market decide what works • Revoke unsafe drug approvals faster But one thing is certain…
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The FDA will never fix itself. Change only happens when we the people demand it. That’s why the MAHA movement is so powerful. Because it’s not just a vote. You’re refusing to be poisoned. You’re refusing to be lied to. And you’re refusing to be silenced. This isn’t just about health. It’s about freedom.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
SUMMARY • The FDA was hijacked over 100 years ago when Harvey Wiley, the first chief, was forced out for exposing toxic additives. • Wiley warned that the government wouldn’t protect the people — only public outrage could stop Big Food and Big Pharma. • Today, thousands of chemicals enter the food supply through fake “safety” loopholes like GRAS, fueling a surge in chronic illness. • The FDA buries cheap, effective treatments like DMSO to protect Big Pharma’s profits. • From vaccine disasters to deadly drug approvals, the FDA’s history is a trail of corruption, coverups, and betrayal. • Real change will only come when the people demand it — because the system will never fix itself.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Thanks for reading! This information was based on a longer report and synopsized in collaboration with@VigilantFoxKey details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-fdas-war-on-americas-health
The FDA's War On America's Health
Why do so many innovative therapies never see the light of day
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Once discovered, DMSO's miracles made it the most popular drug in America and researchers embraced it. The FDA then banned all research, outlawed it, and for decades dismissed thousands of desperate patients and their senators. That's why so many suffered https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-fdas-war-against-dmso-and-america
The FDA's War Against DMSO and America
The Forgotten History That Led to the FDA Again and Again Keeping the Things We Most Desperately Need Away From Us
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
We need a better healthcare, so I've dedicated myself to exposing healthcare corruption and revealing life-changing therapies the medical cartel buried. If you want to support this mission please give me (@MidwesternDoc) a follow and visit me on Substack! http://www.midwesterndoctor.com
The Forgotten Side of Medicine | A Midwestern Doctor | Substack
The Forgotten Side of Medicine exposes pharmaceutical corruption and remarkable therapies lost to time for the health of humanity. Click to read The Forgotten Side of Medicine, by A Midwestern Doctor, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers.
midwesterndoctor.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I've come across compelling stories of individuals who have found relief from COPD and asthma using DMSO, a treatment that has been overlooked by the FDA despite decades of evidence supporting its effectiveness. One reader shared their journey from severe lung damage and dependency on supplemental oxygen to regaining mobility and health through DMSO. Many others have reported similar successes, including treating their pets. I’m committed to exposing the pharmaceutical industry's corruption and sharing life-changing therapies that have been hidden.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
This is an incredible story of a man curing his COPD with DMSO which matches what many readers have told me DMSO did for their asthma or COPD. Incredibly, 50 years of data shows DMSO heals the lungs, but the FDA has buried it and left many to suffer in silence for decades.🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
Daniel Stringfellow, 74, has stage three COPD, causing labored breathing and impacting his motivation. He states that prescribed nebulizers and inhalers provided no significant improvement. His neighbor, Rebecca Cunningham, suggested a DMSO solution for his nebulizer after researching it.
Stringfellow reports experiencing a big difference in three days. He says his breathing improved, his color returned, and he could talk without losing his breath. He is now able to perform tasks like carrying groceries, which he couldn't do before. A future CT scan will determine if the treatment has stopped the progression of his COPD.
Cunningham adds that Stringfellow's ability to talk at length is miraculous compared to his previous state. She says she read articles by Midwestern Doctor about DMSO and its potential benefits. She also notes that Stringfellow had expressed a readiness to die due to his condition before starting the DMSO treatment. She wanted others to witness the positive changes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Daniel Stringfellow. I'm 74 at the August and I live next door to my neighbor Rebecca Cunningham. I've got stage three COPD. My symptoms are labor of breathing, doing any kind of small task, walking to my truck, even putting my clothes on in the morning. It's it's I just even any any small task, I labor at breathing, which is like working to just to breathe, which I hate.
I made some notes because I wanna cover everything. And so with that, walking to my truck 40 feet, have to stop halfway and catch my breath. And that's just carrying me, nothing else. So, you know, you don't have, I don't have any motivation to do anything when when my, it was like that. I have no willpower.
And then after a while depression sets in because you, you, you can't do things you used to and you get tired of trying to breathe. And so on my stage one they gave me a nebulizer. I think that must be their first rule of thumb these pulmonologists. It's this stuff here it's in a box. It says you do it four times a day.
I'm sure if you all have it, these little things here. And you I try I've been using I I've tried using that for over a year. It doesn't work for me. I could no notice no difference. I might as well just be putting water in it.
So I quit using it. Okay. Now, of course, you know, they're gonna give you some inhalers too, like, oh, you know, Trelegy, maybe your, albuterol emergencies, which I I I still use the Trelegy, but I don't know. I I don't yeah. I don't can't see no significant improvement.
Okay. Well, Rebecca, my neighbor, mentions this about this DMSO. Okay. She's been researching it. And she asked me for the paperwork for these nebulizers I guess to see what amount goes in the nebulizer.
I don't know. You'll have to ask her about that. And so, you know, at that point I'm ready to try anything. And so Rebecca gives me a solution to put in my nebulizer. And good lord, I think in third I don't know if it's it was yesterday, Saturday.
Has it been two weeks or three?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Two weeks I took.
Speaker 0: Two weeks?
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: In three days I noticed a big difference. Unbelievable. Everyone I know says my color is bad, I'm breathing, and I could talk without losing my breath. And I've done things that I haven't been able to do in a long time. I carried my groceries from my Jeep to my house, RV, whatever.
And I've never had them that in a long time. I I you know it's just it was my I really I used to labor to get dressed in the morning. It'd take me a while. That's just no life. Yeah, I mean, the improvements, if they're gonna work on me, they'll work on anyone.
They have to have COPD. I just can't believe it. I'm blessed to have a neighbor that thinks of me, that cares. So I have a future CT scan coming because all the other CT scans I've had up until I started doing the DMSO there wasn't any improvement. So it appears they've stopped me at stage three.
I don't want to get any worse But with what she gave me, I'm getting a lot better. So I don't know. And then I'll go see my pulmonologist after the CT scan. So I know there's gonna be improvement when they see the CT scan. There's gotta be a lot of improvement.
So you know I have nothing to gain by this. I just know what it's like to have COPD and you know it's not pretty at all. It just feels like sometimes I'd go to bed and I don't even know why I wake up the next morning. So y'all, all, you ain't got nothing to lose. You sure won't kill you, but if you don't I'm a think you are gonna die.
So listen, just, just do it. That's, that's about all I got to say. That I
Speaker 1: think. Well, I'll I'm I'm off camera back here, y'all. I will add a little bit
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: That just the fact that you're able to sit here and talk about this at the length of time that you have been talking is miraculous compared to how you were.
Speaker 0: I agree.
Speaker 1: You know, just wouldn't be having a meeting to sit and talk to I mean, had gotten to the point where I timed my questions. I knew you needed to sit down and rest a minute if I needed to come talk to you about anything, because you needed that time. And even then, most of your answers would be two or three words, and then you'd have to catch your breath a while and then come back. And just being able to talk to you again and have you talked to me is awesome. It is
Speaker 0: It's it's just I I I can clean my house. I I just man, it's just unbelievable. It's great.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Wow. It's
Speaker 1: And I I know I I have seen the the depressed side too.
Speaker 0: Have been
Speaker 1: a few times where you had said, you know, you're just ready to die. And I'm and in me, I'm going, no. I'm not ready to give you up yet. Well, you gotta just cut that shit out because I'm keeping you.
Speaker 0: Well, you you figure figure out something good. You you ought to be a doctor. So Well Anyway, we'll we'll we'll Rebecca will give you the results of my CT scan and my visit with the pulmonologist because and that way because I know I want to prove to y'all and to myself that this is the only stuff that's ever worked for me. So I urge you to do it. Listen to her because she's the one that came up with it and mixed it, everything.
Speaker 1: I read the articles that Midwestern Doctor wrote. And he because he has gone in very much in-depth into a lot of the things that DMSO can do, as well as some other medications that he's really researched. But lately he's been researching the DMSO, and I've lately I've been reading all of those articles and a lot of the medical studies too. And if I hadn't noticed that, I mean Yeah.
Speaker 0: Would I would still be in misery.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: I'd still be living in it's a miserable life, y'all. You if you got COPD, especially stage three, then you'll you'll know what I'm talking about. You really will, it sucks. Yeah. Well anyway, y'all have a blessed rest of the day, okay?
I am. I might even start exercising. I'm leading up to that, y'all.
Speaker 1: I'll pull you into it. Next thing you know, you'll be walking up Mount Baldy in the morning.
Speaker 0: Oh, wow. This don't get carried away.
Speaker 1: So this is me. I'm the one behind the camera, and I'm not dressed for it or anything. I've been tearing my son's my grandson's bicycle apart to rebuild it. But I just that post on x picked up so much traction. I just I wanted y'all to see the person and for you to be able to see that he has color in his face because he didn't before.
He's a treasure, and we all have those in our lives. And I've lost a few treasures lately and I didn't want to lose him too. The DMSO is working. It's really working, and I wanted y'all to witness that. So thank you.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Here I show the wealth of data that DMSO heals the lungs and treats a wide range of lung disorders along with instructions for how to safely use it at home. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-heals-the-lungs-and-cures-chronic-35a
DMSO Heals the Lungs and Cures Chronic Respiratory Diseases
How DMSO treats Asthma, COPD, Pneumonia, ARDS and Pulmonary Fibrosis
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
This is another COPD story I received from another reader: Okay, decades of smoking and drinking ruined my lungs - I knew it, but I was unable to stop at that point in my life. I'd had an operation to cut off some of the ruined parts of my lungs, (____ Univ Hosp) and that did not go well - Bullous Emphysema. Long and short, I was bedridden and on 4 liters of supplemental oxygen. Trying to get upstairs in my home to shower was the biggest impediment in front of me at that time. I had gained weight, (I've lost 45 lbs and still need to lose about 5 lbs more) and my muscles had atrophied tremendously. I was tremendously depressed and ready, (in my mind) to die. Then, my motivation to get better was put into overdrive as [my wife was] diagnosed with Stage IV cancer…I was all she had and I had to learn to cook and manage all other duties in our household. I was lugging around physical tanks of O2 and this simply was not a possibility - even with help from friends and family. Through various exercise programs focused upon breathing, I was able to get off the supplement, but I knew I would not be able to continue without the extra O2 unless I did something else [and over the next two years tried everything I could but nothing worked]. I had joined an online group, where folks were talking about alternative medicine approaches. On this forum, it was suggested drinking DMSO which I tried; unfortunately, it left a scent on my breath that seriously bothered my wife. Then, I realized I had a nebulizer packaged up and sitting in storage. Wise or stupid, I decided to try it as everything I'd heard, read, or experienced led me to believe this solution would benefit me more than harm me [and through trial and error figured out how to do it correctly]. [Before long] I was finally able to make it to our basement, (we had purchased an elliptical back when we were healthy) and "walk" for 30 minutes [on an elliptical]. I can, slowly, accomplish most any household chore as well as shopping, light yard work, etc. [and] do see my blood O2 increase to 100% which I could not achieve before and a lower heart rate accompanying that.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Here are some examples of how readers shared it's treated Asthma
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
All of these testimonials (and more) can be accessed in this article, where I show the decades of evidence DMSO treats lung diseases and how to safely use it at home for each respiratory disorder https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-heals-the-lungs-and-cures-chronic-35a
DMSO Heals the Lungs and Cures Chronic Respiratory Diseases
How DMSO treats Asthma, COPD, Pneumonia, ARDS and Pulmonary Fibrosis
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
All of this has to change so I've dedicated myself to exposing Pharma corruption and revealing life-changing therapies the medical cartel buried. If you want to support this mission please give me (@MidwesternDoc) a follow and visit me on Substack! http://www.midwesterndoctor.com
The Forgotten Side of Medicine | A Midwestern Doctor | Substack
The Forgotten Side of Medicine exposes pharmaceutical corruption and remarkable therapies lost to time for the health of humanity. Click to read The Forgotten Side of Medicine, by A Midwestern Doctor, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers.
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
When I saw Maddow's clip about Trump forcefully removing uteruses of immigrants I doubted it was true (as sensationalistic but improbable stories tend to be fake). The fact libel suits for these types of claims are now succeeding indicates the MSM has lost a lot of its power.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Do you think this leaked call proves Karen Bass had foreknowledge of the fires and didn't want to be there when they happened? If anyone has familiarity with California and Los Angeles politics, I would greatly appreciate your input.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered alarming information about prominent politicians, particularly Democratic Senators, who have suffered unusual brain injuries linked to COVID vaccines. Notably, 8% of them experienced severe neurological issues, including Dianne Feinstein’s rare shingles case and several strokes among others. Despite these health crises, many continued to advocate for vaccines, even in the face of personal tragedy. This raises concerns about the extent of cognitive impairment among legislators. I’m committed to exposing pharmaceutical corruption and advocating for overlooked therapies.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
🧵Many prominent politicians (ie. 8% of Democrat Senators) had unusual brain injuries identical to those caused by the vaccines. Yet, rather than do the right thing, they covered it up and pushed the vaccines (ie. this applies to many of RFK's detractors). Those Senators were unfortunately just the tip of the iceberg, as we also came across many cases of neurological injuries which were never reported. For example: •I learned through a trusted source that Gavin Newsom disappeared at the end of 2021 because it was impossible to cover up the side effects of his vaccine induced Guillain-Barré Syndrome. •I learned through another trusted source that numerous senators have had COVID vaccine injuries they never publicly admitted. In this thread, I will go through some of the most noteworthy cases, particularly since all of them pushed the vaccines (ie. mandates) and were extremely hostile to RFK Jr. and in many cases defied the existing expectations to vote against RFK Jr.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. Social Security is crucial for many Americans; for 40% it's the foundation of their retirement savings, and for 28 million, it's their sole retirement income. We must ensure its protection. No one in the Republican-controlled House and Senate will challenge us on this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't worry. No one on the Republican side in the house and senate who control both the house and senate is going to speak up and challenge us. But we need to protect Americans' privacy and their social security. For 40% of all Americans, Social Security is the basis for their retirement and their retirement savings. And, for 28,000,000 Americans, Social Security is the only thing that they have, and that's why we have to make sure that we are protecting it as well.
The gentleman's time has expired. The letter that
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In this article, I showed that 4 of the Democratic Senators (8% of them) had unusual brain injuries which in many cases severely impaired their ability to function and collectively was almost statistically impossible to have ever happened by chance. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-can-the-us-senate-teach-us-about
What Can The US Senate Teach Us about the Dangers of the COVID-19 Vaccines?
A review of the common forms of spike protein injuries and the profound consequences of denying them.
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Dianne Feinstein had an incredibly rare (1/50,000 cases) form of brain inflaming shingles strongly linked to the shot that mentally incapacitated her. Remarkably, despite having no idea what was going on around her, she continued to vote and push the vaccines until she died.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In early 2022, three different Democrat Senators were hospitalized for strokes. Two (in Fetterman and Luján) each had a 0.175% annual chance of happening, while the third (in Van Hollen) was a more unusual brain bleed that happened in the middle of a speech.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Many noticed Fetterman's 2022 stroke, as after it happened, he began to act erratically and no longer dress like a usual senator (which suggests brain damage). Remarkably however, despite often breaking from his party, he's stood against RFK Jr. to protect vaccines.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Brain injuries also crossed the aisle. Many noticed Senator Mitch McConnel (a fervent defender of vaccines) began freezing while speaking and freezing up to the point he had to step down as majority leader. Not surprisingly, he's also the one Republican who's tried to stop RFK
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Likewise, as I show here, a very strong case can be made that Biden had a massive decline in cognition each time he had a vaccine or booster. Fortunately, due to the presidential debate, it was no longer possible to hide it and then he had to drop out. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/is-joe-bidens-brain-vaccine-injured
Is Joe Biden's Brain Vaccine Injured?
How the Democrats became consumed by their own product
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In John Larson's case, he most likely had a microstroke that went away on its own (a TIA). As I show here, this is a common side effect of vaccines (especially the COVID-19 ones) and very easy to spot once you know the signs. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-all-vaccines-so-dangerous
What Makes All Vaccines So Dangerous?
Exploring the forgotten but critically important science of zeta potential
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In one of the most remarkable cases (covered here) a Democrat representative's teenage daughter died suddenly. Both of them aggressively promoted the vaccine, but despite his beloved daughter dying, Casten was still not willing to step pushing the vaccine https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-can-the-us-senate-teach-us-about
What Can The US Senate Teach Us about the Dangers of the COVID-19 Vaccines?
A review of the common forms of spike protein injuries and the profound consequences of denying them.
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
All of this has to change so I've dedicated myself to exposing pharmaceutical corruption and revealing life-changing therapies the medical cartel buried. If you want to support this mission please give me (@MidwesternDoc) a follow and visit my Substack! https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/
The Forgotten Side of Medicine | A Midwestern Doctor | Substack
The Forgotten Side of Medicine is a leading Substack newsletter. Here I expose pharmaceutical corruption and remarkable therapies lost to time for the health of humanity. Click to read The Forgotten Side of Medicine, by A Midwestern Doctor, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers.
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Lastly, this is most likely just the tip of the iceberg. As I show here, cognitive impairment is the most common side effect of COVID vaccination, so for each overt stroke we see, there are likely far more impaired legislators. That is a big problem https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/do-the-covid-vaccines-impair-your
Do The COVID Vaccines Affect Your Ability to Think?
Examining some of the common neurological injuries caused by vaccination
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
We now know the Senators parroting the anti-RFK talking points have taken millions from Pharma. In 2019, we saw the author of Colorado's mandatory vax law repeat what a Pharma lobbyist wrote on her laptop. Sadly, as this video shows, lobbyists have bought out our Democracy.🧵 https://t.co/oELn4Je2cV
Video Transcript AI Summary
For years, there’s been a growing realization that America’s government doesn’t truly represent its citizens. A Princeton study revealed that public support for an idea has little impact on whether it becomes law. While the average American's preferences barely influence policy, economic elites and lobbyists wield significant power, often pushing through legislation that benefits them, regardless of public opinion. This system allows special interests to legally buy political influence, leading to policies that result in expensive healthcare, a flawed tax code, and widespread poverty. Despite the perception that this issue arose from the 2010 Citizens United decision, corruption has been entrenched for decades. The solution is straightforward: make corruption illegal. Since Congress is unlikely to act, we need a grassroots approach to address this issue ourselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the last few years, I've had this sense that everything I learned as a kid about how America's government works is completely wrong. But I had no idea how bad things actually were until I saw this one graph. Researchers at Princeton University looked at more than 20 years worth of data to answer a pretty simple question. Does the government represent the people? Now, this is what they found.
This axis here represents public support for any given idea. On the left at 0% are ideas that not a single American wants. On the right at 100% are ideas that everyone supports. This axis represents the likelihood of Congress passing a law that reflects any of these ideas, from a 0 to a 100% chance. On this graph, an ideal republic would look like this.
If 50% of the public supports an idea, there's a 50% chance of it becoming law. If 80% of us support something, there's an 80% chance. You get the idea. Now, most Americans would probably agree that with a few exceptions, we should be as close to this ideal as possible. Unfortunately, the way America actually works doesn't even come close.
Take an idea that nobody supports, literally nobody, and it has about a 30% chance of becoming federal law. Now, take an incredibly popular idea, the most popular idea this country has ever seen and there's also about a 30% chance of it becoming law. This means that the number of American voters for or against any idea has no impact on the likelihood that congress will make it law. Put another way, and I'm just gonna quote the Princeton study directly here, the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near zero, American appear to have only a miniscule, near 0, statistically non significant impact upon public policy. So if you've ever felt like your opinion doesn't matter and that the government doesn't really care what you think, well, you're right, but there's a catch.
This flat line only accounts for the bottom 90% of income earners in America. Economic elites, business interests, people who can afford lobbyists, they get their own line. Look at how much closer their line is to the ideal. When they want something, the government is much more likely to do it, and when they don't, they have the power to completely block it from happening, no matter how much the rest of the country supports it. They get what they want and guess who ends up paying for it.
We pay for it with the most expensive health care in the world. We pay for it with a tax code that's a complete mess. We pay for it with Internet that's slower and more expensive, with wasteful spending, a floundering education system, a catastrophic drug war, and 1 in 5 American children born into poverty. Almost every major issue we face as a nation can be traced back to this graph. How does this happen?
Well, just follow the money. Right now, it's perfectly legal to buy political influence in America. Here's how it works. Let's say a big bank wants a law that would force taxpayers to bail them out again if they repeat the exact same reckless behavior that crashed the global economy in 2008. Not exactly the most popular idea with the public and congress knows that.
That should be the end of it, but that's where the money comes in. It's perfectly legal for our bank to hire a team of lobbyists whose entire job is to make sure that the government gives the bank what it wants. Then those lobbyists can track down members of Congress who regulate banks and help raise a ton of money for their reelection campaigns. It's perfectly legal for those lobbyists to offer those same politicians $1,000,000 jobs at their lobbying firm. Then those lobbyists can literally write the language of this new bailout law themselves and hand it off the politician they just buttered up with campaign money and lucrative job offers.
And it's perfectly legal for those politicians to take the lobbyist written language and sneak it through Congress at the last second. So now you've got a law that greatly benefits the banks and the whole process can start over. This is how a bill becomes a law. A special interest hires some lobbyists. Those lobbyists collect campaign contributions, offer jobs, and then write the laws that Congress then passes to help those same special interests.
This happens every day on every single issue with politicians of both parties. In the last 5 years alone, the 200 most politically active companies in the United States spent $5,800,000,000 influencing your government. Those same companies got 4,400,000,000,000 in taxpayer support, and that's trillion with a t. And that's just the top 200 companies, never mind every other special interest, every union, every trade association, and every billionaire. Every single one of them can use their money to buy political influence.
You know, there's this idea out there that this only became a problem after the Supreme Court Citizens United decision in 2010, but the data goes back almost 40 years and the results are clear. Corruption is legal in America. And as long as it is, anyone who can spend money to buy political influence will. The solution here isn't rocket science. Make corruption illegal.
We already know congress won't do it. I mean, one look at this chart will tell you that. What we need is a plan that lets us go around congress and do what the American people do best, fix this mess ourselves. Well, good news. News.
We have that plan and it's already working. Now that we've got the problem covered, let us show you how to be part of the solution.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Many key votes for RFK have said they will not confirm him unless he promises he will say all vaccines are safe b/c the public trusts him and trust in the vaccine program needs to be restored. It's amazing they don't see how much their actions are destroying trust in vaccines.
reSee.it AI Summary
I observed the hostility directed at Robert Kennedy Jr. during his hearing, which seemed tied to the Pharma money received by each senator. The attacks mirrored media narratives and raised questions about the influence of medical industry funding. Many senators made false claims about RFK's role in a measles outbreak, while ignoring the broader health issues affecting Americans. Despite the frustration, there was applause for those calling out this corruption. I’m committed to exposing pharmaceutical corruption and advocating for transparency in healthcare.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Like yesterday, the hostility @RobertKennedyJr experienced at his hearing was directly proportional to how much Pharma money each Senator received. In fact, each of them simply repeated the same attacks we just saw flood the mass media (all of which were blatant lies). 🧵
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Sadly, this is just the tip of the iceberg, as when you factor in how much each senator gets from the entire medical industry (eg., drug manufacturing, insurance and hospitals) it's 7x as much. This raises a huge question, what does all that money pay for?
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
As I show here, a left wing group and then a right-wing one (both created to hide Pharma money) publicly announced a campaign to take RFK down, after which the lines they concocted flooded every news publication and countless politicians repeated them. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whos-trying-to-stop-america-from
Who's Trying to Stop America From Being Healthy Again?
Untangling the century of dark industry tactics that have poisoned the health of America
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
For example, they (and the senators) kept claiming RFK caused a deadly measles outbreak. In truth, it was due to children being killed by the vaccine, nurses covering it up, and the Samoan government banning it, and until recently no one blamed RFK. https://www.sensible-med.com/p/is-rfk-jr-to-blame-for-the-samoa
Is RFK Jr to blame for the Samoa measles outbreak? An empirical analysis of published scholarly papers and news stories
Was RFK Jr blamed contemporaneously or only in retrospect?
sensible-med.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
@SenMarkey falsely accused RFK of causing a measles outbreak that needed "tiny coffins" and said we could not afford the "tiny coffins" RFK would bring in the future. Markey got $2,378,719 from the medical industry and his line most likely came from a corporate PR firm.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The measles outbreak in Samoa resulted in 83 deaths, with volunteers from New Zealand sending tiny coffins for the children who died. The Samoan health director noted that influential figures like Robert Kennedy can sway public opinion, leading to a devastating impact on vaccination efforts. This misinformation slowed the public health response, causing unnecessary deaths. There is concern that similar misinformation could arise in the U.S. if you were confirmed as the top health official. Seventy-five Nobel Prize winners and many in the Boston medical community oppose your candidacy, fearing the consequences of your influence. Therefore, I cannot support your nomination, as it poses a dangerous risk to public health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That caused the outbreak in Samoa in the same year you visited Samoa. And I replied that Let me let me just finish. The death count in Samoa grew to 83. And ultimately, volunteers in New Zealand sent tiny coffins to help bury the dozens of children who died. And the Samoan director general of health later said, with his last name and the status attached to it, people will believe him.
People will believe Robert Kennedy. And a New Zealand vaccinologist later said, the impact of your role was devastating. So your name and your profile helped fuel a measles outbreak. You scared people from taking a vaccine. It slowed the public health response and children died.
You've taken no responsibility thus far. And if an outbreak occurs in the United States, I have no evidence that you would not use your role as secretary to spread dangerous misinformation. So that one incident, from my perspective, disqualifies you from holding any position in healthcare, much less the number one health official in the United States. And 75 Nobel Prize winners in science have said very clearly that you should not be confirmed, that it would be dangerous for you to have And you should look at their conflicts. So You should look at the conflicts of those individuals.
Well, 75 Nobel And you should look at who financed that letter. 75 Nobel Prize winners. And by the way, of a high percentage of the medical community in Boston, the health capital of the United States and the world have said the same thing about your qualifications. They're they're saying to me they don't want tiny coffins as well. Neither do I.
So that's the basis of my reservations about you. And the reason why I'm going to vote no on your candidacy, because I just think it's too dangerous to run the threat that that misinformation has spread in our country in the same way it was in Samoa.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
If you think about, it's absurd so many Senators felt America was in danger from 83 measles death in Samoa, but simultaneously, had no concern for the millions of Americans with chronic (and often lethal) diseases and only cared about getting money to treat more and more of it.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Here, @SenTimKaine uses his limited time to protect America's health to...attack RFK over 9/11. He also falsely claimed RFK would make millions from vaccine lawsuits and thus could not enforce drug safety. Turns out Tim Kaine got $3,320,984 from the medical industry
Video Transcript AI Summary
You posted on your X account about conspiracy theories regarding 9/11, stating it's hard to distinguish between fact and fiction. Why address this in July 2024, amidst your presidential campaign?
The decline in trust in government, particularly the CDC, is concerning. You mentioned you won't take sides on 9/11, which raises questions about your analytical skills.
Your father taught you to be skeptical of authority. You admit you haven't investigated 9/11 but will consider evidence presented.
Regarding Gardasil, studies show its positive effects, yet you have a blog post claiming it's harmful. You have a financial interest in litigation against Gardasil, which raises trust issues in your independence. You claim to have given away any rights to fees from those lawsuits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just a couple of months ago, you posted this on your x account. On 9 11, it's hard to tell what is conspiracy theory and what isn't. I'd like to introduce that for the record, mister chair. We take that kind of stuff pretty personally. Virginians know what happened on 911, We don't need folks given oxygen to conspiracy theories about 9eleven.
Now, one thing I noticed about this post is it was in July of 2024. It was 23 years after 9/11. You had a lot going on in your life. You were running for president then. What made you decide in the midst of everything going on in this country, in this world, in July of 2024 and your own candidacy for president, that now was the time to say it's hard to tell what is conspiracy and what isn't about 911.
What what was so important about making this point in July of 2024?
Speaker 1: Senator, the dramatic drop in trust in our government, and this is particularly one of the templates of that is what happened at CDC.
Speaker 0: Yeah. No. No. I I wanna move aside from that. Because you say, you go on to say, I won't take sides as president.
I won't take sides on 9eleven. Wow. I won't take sides on 9eleven. Let me ask you this. As a general matter, do you find it hard to tell what is a conspiracy theory and what isn't?
Is that kind of a general deficit that you find in your own analytical abilities?
Speaker 1: My father told me when I was 13 years old, he said people in authority lie and that the job of a citizen in every democracy is to make a fear of skepticism.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. I get it. And you're an authority and you're an authority, but you wouldn't take sides on 911, and you're admitting,
Speaker 1: you know, I have a hard time
Speaker 0: telling what is an conspiracy theory and what isn't.
Speaker 1: Senator, I haven't investigated it. If the things that I investigate, I take sides on. People are allowed to hold that opinion.
Speaker 0: They're allowed
Speaker 1: to I'm not gonna tell them they're crazy for holding that opinion. I'm going to say, what is your evidence? And if I hear the evidence, I'm going to say that doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 0: So you won't take sides on 9:11. Wow. Senator Murray asked you some questions about Gardasil, and this is a vaccine that's manufactured in Virginia. There's other HPV vaccines. I'm going to enter into the record a whole series of studies from many, many nations that talk about the dramatic positive effect of Gardasil.
Could I introduce those in the record, Mr. Chair?
Speaker 1: Those studies are Wait, let me ask a question.
Speaker 0: These are studies from Scotland, Sweden, the UK, Australia, the United States, multiple studies. And then I'm going to introduce the record, I guess it's a blog post of yours. The verdict is now inescapable. Gardasil is killing girls. And I'd like to introduce that into the record as well.
Without objection. You have a pretty significant financial interest in litigation against Gardasil. You have received contingency fees and payments for referring people to lawyers suing the manufacturer. And in your ethics vetting
Speaker 1: I've never received any money from any Gardasil or any other vaccine lawsuit. Let me
Speaker 0: read let me read a quote. This is your words. In your ethics vetting for this nomination, you said quote, pursuant to the referral agreement, I'm entitled to receive 10% of fees awarded in contingency cases referred to the firm. How can folks who need to have confidence in federal vaccine programs trust you to be independent and science based when you stand to gain significant funding if lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers are successful?
Speaker 1: I have I have given away all of my rights to any fees in that lawsuit.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Here @PattyMurray decides to spend her limited time to "protect America's health" to falsely accuse RFK of sexual assault (without even understanding the accusation). It turns out she's received $5,887,453 from the medical industry.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Parents seek guidance from health leaders regarding vaccine decisions. I want to address a serious matter about character. You were accused of sexual harassment and assault by Eliza Cooney, who was initially hired as a babysitter. When confronted, you mentioned you weren't a "church boy" and acknowledged having "skeletons in your closet." You later texted Ms. Cooney an apology but claimed no memory of her account. Can you respond to these accusations in front of this committee? Did you make unwanted sexual advances toward Ms. Cooney?
No, I did not, and that story has been debunked.
Why did you apologize then?
I apologized for something else.
That’s not my understanding.
You can read the text she published; it was not for that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Parents look to our health leaders for advice on these decisions. You would be a health leader and for the record, I would like to put into the record his previous statements on these vaccines. I do want to ask you a question about character. I still believe character matters, and I I wanna let you respond to this. You were accused of sexual harassment and assault by Eliza Cooney, who was first hired as a part time babysitter by your family.
When you were confronted about this accusation, you said you were quote, not a church boy and that you quote, have so many skeletons in my closet. You then texted Ms. Cooney an apology and indicated you had no memory of what she described. Mr. Kennedy, I'm asking you to respond to those accusations, seriously in front of this committee.
Did you make sexual advances towards Ms. Cooney without her consent?
Speaker 1: No, I did not. And that story has been debunked.
Speaker 0: But why did you apologize to her then?
Speaker 1: I apologized for something else.
Speaker 0: That well, that's not my understanding. Are there let me just ask
Speaker 1: you All you have to read is the text which she published is not for that.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Here, @SenatorBaldwin accuses RFK of lying when he said we weren't monitoring for vaccine safety once they reached the market but silences him when he tries explain that CDC has hidden that data from the public. It turns out she's received $4,981,513 from the medical industry.
Video Transcript AI Summary
When we discussed vaccines, you mentioned a lack of post-approval safety monitoring, which suggests you may not be aware of the ongoing safety measures in place. Are you aware of the monitoring conducted by Health and Human Services after vaccine approval?
I know about the VAERS system, which captures less than 1% of vaccine injuries.
Are you familiar with the FDA's post-approval monitoring?
I’m aware of two systems.
What about the Vaccine Safety Data Link?
Yes, I know about that.
And the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project?
As I mentioned...
Are you aware of v-safe?
I know those systems have issues, and I can explain. It's essential to ensure we have gold standard science without conflicts of interest.
The measures I listed are crucial for ensuring vaccine safety and effectiveness, supported by extensive studies and independent reviews. Dismissing this undermines the value of vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When we talked, you we were talking a bit about vaccines at the end of our meeting, and you said, really, to me that there's no post approval safety monitoring. And that led me to believe that you're not aware of the significant and ongoing safety monitoring that occurs after years of rigorous studies showing vaccines to be safe and effective. So I wanna give you the opportunity to set the record straight here. Are you aware of the measures in place throughout, Health and Human Services to ensure vaccine safety after approval? Yes or no?
Speaker 1: I'm aware the VAER system, which CDC admits, captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.
Speaker 0: So you are aware of the safety monitoring. Are you aware of the FDA, post approval monitoring?
Speaker 1: I I'm aware of only 2 systems.
Speaker 0: Are you aware of the vaccine safety data link?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. I'm very aware of that.
Speaker 0: Are you aware of the vaccine adverse event reporting system?
Speaker 1: I'm aware of the vaccine safety data link that CDC keeps under lockbox and will not let independent scientists Are
Speaker 0: you aware of the clinical immunization safety assessment project?
Speaker 1: As I said
Speaker 0: Are you aware of v safe?
Speaker 1: I I'm aware that they're broken, and I can explain to you how each one of those is broken if you're interested. What I wanna do is make sure we have gold standard science. We get the conflicts off the panels so that people, you know this is congress.
Speaker 0: What I listed right now are just some of the guardrails that are in place to ensure that lifesaving vaccines are safe and effective. And this is after numerous clinical trials, rigorous studies, and review by an independent panel of experts that show vaccines are safe and effective, which is available to all the public. If you wanna take a second look at the science, like you have said, well, it's here. It's available, and it's conclusive. And saying anything else is undermining vaccines.
To a different,
Speaker 1: issue. Repeating what congress found in the 2003 investigation.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Here, @Sen_Alsobrooks tells RFK he is not qualified to determine if a scientist is corrupt because he's "not a doctor" and insinuates he's dangerously racist for knowing blacks benefit from lower vaccine doses (to avoid autoimmunity). She got $990,181 from the medical industry.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I ask if you intend to substitute your judgment for that of professional scientists.
I won’t substitute my judgment for science. The New York Times reported on fraudulent studies by NIH regarding amyloid plaques and Alzheimer's.
Are the scientists who disagree with you considered bad?
The corrupt ones, like those behind the fraudulent amyloid studies.
Do you have a medical degree?
No.
Your failed presidential campaign has raised money. How much from HHS's issues?
Zero.
I want to enter emails about your fundraising into the record.
Without objection.
You previously stated that Black people should not follow the same vaccine schedule as whites. Can you explain?
Studies show Black individuals may have stronger reactions to certain antigens, suggesting they need fewer.
That’s dangerous. Your views could mislead parents.
Do you think science is dangerous? These are peer-reviewed studies.
I yield.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I ask the questions. And the question is, really whether you intend, as you said, to to substitute essentially your judgment for the judgment of these professional scientists and doctors.
Speaker 1: I never I'm not gonna substitute my judgment for science. Of course, I'm not gonna do that. What I'm gonna do listen, the New York Times just did an article last week talking about the fraud, the 20 year fraud, 800 fraudulent studies produced by NIH on amyloid blacks and not allowing any other hypothesis about the cause of Alzheimer's
Speaker 0: disease score. Decide, mister Kennedy, which scientists are bad scientists? Are they the ones who disagree with you?
Speaker 1: The ones who are corrupt. The ones who have been doing science like the Amyloid Black Studies that were fraudulent. We we should
Speaker 0: not Let me ask you a question. Do you have a medical degree?
Speaker 1: Do I? No.
Speaker 0: Let me just ask you, another question. Now your failed presidential campaign has been raising money, to try and cover your debts. And you were questioned about this yesterday and failed to answer a question, that senator Warren asked you. And so I wanna ask you again, regarding these emails that you have sent to raise money, how much has your presidential campaign made fundraising off of this administration's complete disregard for the workforce at HHS?
Speaker 1: 0.
Speaker 0: Okay. Mister chair, I'd like to ask unanimous consent to enter into the record 2 emails, from this week and the week before regarding fundraising that you are currently doing through your presidential
Speaker 1: Without objection.
Speaker 0: And finally, I want to ask you, I have a you you said to you were on a show on February 26, 2021, an interview with doctor Judy Micklewicz where you said the following, and I quote, we should not be giving black people the same vaccine schedule that's given to whites because their immune system is better than ours. Can you please explain what you meant?
Speaker 1: There's a series of studies, I think most of them by, Poland, that show that to particular antigens that, blacks have a much stronger reaction. There's differences in reaction to different products by different rates.
Speaker 0: So so I have I have 17 seconds left. Let me just ask you then. So what different vaccine schedule would you say I should have received? What what different vaccine schedule should I have received?
Speaker 1: I mean, the the the Pollen article suggests that blacks need fewer antigens, than This is so dangerous. The same measles vaccine.
Speaker 0: Mister Kennedy, with all due respect, that is so dangerous. Your voice would be a voice that parents would listen to. That is so dangerous. I will be voting against your nomination because your views are dangerous to our state and to our country.
Speaker 1: I mean, do you think science is dangerous, senator? This is published, peer reviewed
Speaker 0: studies. I yield.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
For context, at the previous hearing, the Democrat Senators tried to derail RFK's nomination by insinuating he was both "too pro-life" and "too pro-choice" (to take away Republican votes). People saw through that, so the next day, they defaulted to personal smears.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
@SenatorHassan became incensed over the guilt RFK had given mothers of vaccinated children, and then gave the most remarkable line of the day: "Sometimes science is wrong ... And when you continue to sow doubt about settled science, it makes it impossible for us to move forward"
Video Transcript AI Summary
Science can be incorrect, but progress is made by building on previous work. When doubt is cast on established science, it hinders advancement and keeps us stagnant. The issue lies in continuously questioning and revisiting settled science, which prevents us from moving forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sometimes science is wrong. We make progress. We build on the work, and we become more successful. And when you continue to sow doubt about settled science, it makes it impossible for us to move forward. So that's what the problem is here.
It's the relitigating and rehashing and continuing to sow doubt so we can't move forward, and it freezes us in place.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
As you might guess, while all of them berated RFK for being close minded and unwilling to change his mind to follow the evidence, all of them immediately used the hearing to justify RFK being "disqualified" from being the Secretary of H.H.S.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Sadly, this was extremely predictable, the exact same thing happened the day before (detailed within this thread) https://t.co/K2kZPy7Q0G.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Fortunately, people are seeing through this and when RFK and the Republicans there called out this corruption, they were met with applause. @SenSanders became incensed when it was pointed out and denied getting Pharma money despite it being shown throughout the media.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm committed to making America healthier than other countries.
Will you guarantee the same healthcare coverage that other major countries provide?
Corruption isn't just in federal agencies; it's in Congress too. Many members here, including you, accept millions from the pharmaceutical industry to protect their interests.
I ran for president and received millions in contributions, but none came from pharmaceutical executives or PACs.
My support comes from workers, not corporate interests.
You were the largest recipient of pharmaceutical donations in 2020.
No, I received support from workers across the country, not from corporations.
You still haven't answered the last question.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm gonna make America healthier than other countries in the world right now.
Speaker 1: Will you guarantee do what every other major country does? That's a simple question.
Speaker 0: And by the way, Bernie, the, you know, the the problem of corruption is not just in the federal agencies. It's in congress too. Almost all the members of this panel are accepting, including yourself, are accepting millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry. Oh, no. And protected their interests.
Speaker 1: Oh, I thought that that would come. No. I ran for president like you. I got millions and millions of contributions. They did not come from the executives, not 1 nickel of PAC money from the pharmaceuticals.
Speaker 0: They came in workers. 2020 in 2020, you were the single largest
Speaker 1: Because I have received the pharmaceutical money. From technicians from workers all over this country. Workers. They're not not a nickel from corporate tax.
Speaker 0: You with the single largest extractor of pharmaceutical dollars. No. From workers in 150,000,0.0.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Out of 200,000,000. Alright. But you have not answered last question.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
That said, while all of this was immensely frustrating to watch, yesterday @BernieSanders inadvertently had one of the funniest moments in Congressional history when he became enraged RFK would not denounce antivax onsies. Sanders has gotten $23,193,451 from the medical industry
Video Transcript AI Summary
You founded the Children's Health Defense, which is currently selling baby onesies with anti-vaccine messages for $26 each, like "UnFAXed Unafraid" and "No Vax, No Problem." You claim to be pro-vaccine, but this raises questions about your stance. Can you commit to having these products removed from the market?
I have no control over that organization; I resigned from the board.
You founded it just a few months ago. Are you supportive of these onesies?
I support vaccines and want good science to protect our health.
Will you ask your organization to stop selling that product?
Thank you, mister chairman.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have started a group called the Children's Health Defense. You're the originator. Right now, as I understand it, on their website, they are selling what's called onesies. These are little things, clothing for babies. 1 of them is titled, UnFAXed Unafraid.
Next 1, and they're sold for $26 apiece, by the way. Next 1 is, No Vax, No Problem. Now you're coming before this committee, and you say you're pro vaccine. Just wanna ask some questions. And yet your organization is making money selling a child's product to parents for $26, which casts fundamental doubt on you on the usefulness of vaccines.
Can you tell us now that you will now that you are pro vaccine, that you're gonna have your organization take these products off the market.
Speaker 1: Senator, I have no power over that organization. I'm not part of it. I resigned from the board.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I was just a few months ago. You founded that. You certainly have power. You can make that I have How are you supportive of this?
Speaker 1: I've had nothing to do with me.
Speaker 0: Are you supportive of these onesies?
Speaker 1: I'm supportive of vaccines.
Speaker 0: Are you supportive of these this clothing, which is militantly anti vaccine?
Speaker 1: I I am supportive of vaccines. I will, I I want good science, and I wanna protect
Speaker 0: our health care. The organization you founded not to continue, selling that product. Thank you, mister chairman.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
I can only imagine what it's been like for RFK to selflessly fight for our health and environment for decades, only to be disowned by his party because he threatened their sponsors and then be accused of simply doing all of it for money.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
All of this has to change so I've dedicated myself to exposing pharmaceutical corruption and revealing life-changing therapies the medical cartel buried. If you want to support this mission please give me (@MidwesternDoc) a follow and visit me Substack! https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/
The Forgotten Side of Medicine | A Midwestern Doctor | Substack
The Forgotten Side of Medicine is a leading Substack newsletter. Here I expose pharmaceutical corruption and remarkable therapies lost to time for the health of humanity. Click to read The Forgotten Side of Medicine, by A Midwestern Doctor, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers.
midwesterndoctor.com
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1993, CNN highlighted the dangers of pregnancy ultrasounds, prompting the FDA to acknowledge these risks. Despite this, the FDA increased the maximum allowable ultrasound dose significantly, ignoring the potential harm. Ultrasound can cause various injuries to fetuses, including genetic damage, organ impairment, and even fetal death. Studies have linked ultrasound to miscarriages, infertility, and developmental delays, with no evidence of improved pregnancy outcomes. Instead, it often leads to increased anxiety and unnecessary interventions for parents. I've compiled over 200 studies supporting these findings.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In 1993 CNN warned against pregnancy ultrasound and had the FDA admit it was aware of its dangers. Remarkably, the FDA raised the maximum allowable ultrasound dose by 8 times (despite data showing the old dose was too high) and all those dangers were forgotten. Ultrasound causes a dose dependent injury to the organs and cells that fetuses are particularly susceptible to (especially early in life when ultrasounds have no medical value). Those harms include: •Genetic damage, significant damage to cellular structures (e.g., mitochondria, microtubules and the nucleus). •Initiating programmed cell death. •In mice and monkeys, significantly impaired learning, memory, activity, and sociability. •Fetal death. •Hemorrhages. •A wide range of congenital malformations. The Chinese in turn conducted a series of studies showing the low doses of ultrasound created those injuries in the placenta, pituitary gland, eyes, immune system, kidneys, liver, ovaries, testicles (and sperm), and the brain’s neurons and glial cells. Additionally, in humans, ultrasound has also been linked to miscarriages, premature ovulation, male infertility, fetal growth restrictions, altered neurological function, developmental delays. Conversely, ultrasound has not been proven to improve pregnancy outcomes (rather it just leads to more frequent C-sections, prenatal testing, anxiety for the parents, abortions and neonatal distress) Rather, all it can do most of the time is (sometimes erroneously) tell parents to abort their baby or subject it to invasive (and harmful tests), all of which creates immense unnecessary anxiety and anguish for the parents. I complied the 200+ studies proving all of this in the article below.
Video Transcript AI Summary
New pregnant women often consider ultrasound scans, which use high-frequency sound waves to create images of the fetus. While doctors generally deem ultrasound safe, concerns are emerging about potential long-term risks, including genetic damage and low birth weight. Some studies suggest ultrasound may cause subtle birth defects and affect fetal development, although no overt malformations have been detected. Experts urge caution, noting that ultrasound is often overused, with many low-risk pregnancies receiving scans unnecessarily. The FDA acknowledges it cannot guarantee ultrasound safety, and ongoing research is needed to understand its effects on human fetuses. Overall, while ultrasound is a valuable tool, its routine use should be reconsidered until more is known about its long-term implications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. New pregnant women think twice today about getting an ultrasound scan. Even lady Diana had one and found she's going to have a boy. It's an instant moving picture of the fetus made by high frequency sound waves. You can see the baby's heartbeat, spinal column, skull, even the tiny valves of the heart.
Doctors call ultrasound a new medical wonder, a way to spot birth defects, improper growth, and problems that may interfere with birth. Ultrasound is a type of radiation. But unlike x rays, ultrasound is called non ionizing. That's what makes doctors almost universally believe it's absolutely safe. That unlike x rays, it causes no damage to the fetus.
Speaker 1: I do not tell my patients that there's a potential harm because I do not feel there is evidence that there is a potential harm.
Speaker 0: But a CNN investigation reveals growing evidence that ultrasound is not entirely harmless. Some scientists and government officials are concerned that it may be dangerous over the long term. They fear ultrasound is grossly overused on pregnant women, may harm the fetus, and should be limited until they find out whether their suspicions are true. Here's what they say may be the problem. Genetic damage to the fetus that could persist for generations, possibly cancer and subtle birth defects that might not show up for years.
Speaker 2: But, potentially, it can produce damage to the genetic material, and some of these early studies are suggesting that there is in fact damage induced by diagnostic levels of ultrasound in human and, little rodent cells.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Mhmm.
Speaker 2: So our concern is growing.
Speaker 0: Doctor Arthur Bloom is a renowned geneticist at Columbia University and an expert on radiation.
Speaker 2: If it becomes established that ultrasound is in fact a mutagen, it would also, and most importantly perhaps, or at least equally as important, raise the question as to whether or not it is a cancer causing agent because a very high percentage of agents that are mutagenic are also carcinogenic. We're not suggesting on the basis of the evidence that there is a major effect of ultrasound in terms of doubling the rate of birth defects or anything of the sort. We're simply saying that there may be a low level effect there that's increasing the rate of congenital malformations, that we may never be able to detect on clinical grounds.
Speaker 0: Doctor Bloom and other experts stress that so far they have no evidence ultrasound radiation causes harm in human fetuses, but they say we should avoid routine ultrasound examination because we're beginning to see signs of danger, warning signs that in the past predicted medical disaster. One early warning sign is genetic damage to cells in test tubes. We're now seeing this for the first time from low levels of ultrasound. Next, harm to laboratory animals. This too is showing up.
Another clue is evidence in humans that something may be wrong. Now, a new government study not yet released does indicate that the unborn exposed to ultrasound weigh less at birth. That's a significant signal, experts say, that ultrasound may interfere with normal development. The one thing scientists do not suggest they're finding is blatant deformities of the type caused by potent drugs like thalidomide.
Speaker 3: We do not detect any congenital malformations after ultrasound. So whatever we're doing, we're doing something extremely subtle if anything at all. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: What you're saying is that you detect no overt crimes of malformations the way we think of them as deformed limbs or missing foot or,
Speaker 3: missing organs.
Speaker 0: The main researcher who has triggered new concern about ultrasound is doctor Doreen Leibiscond, a radiologist at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. She exposes animal and human cells to ultrasound waves. She finds abnormal changes in the way the cells look and behave. She won't say the cells are genetically damaged, but she does say the changes look the same as damage caused to cells by 29 rads of ionizing radiation or x rays. That's the equivalent of about 250 chest x rays.
Here's how normal cells look without ultrasound, growing apart from each other in neat rows. Here's how they look after ultrasound, a tangled mass growing wildly all over each other. Here are other normal cells in motion with smooth edges moving in a clear direction. After ultrasound, 100% of them become phonetic and distorted.
Speaker 3: Things are happening. They're happening to the DNA of these cells. They're happening to the behavior. They're beginning to grow in a funny way. They're beginning to behave in a in a barren fashion.
And in some cases, they're becoming tumor cells. There are some long lived effects on the DNA of the cells and the behavior of the cells and on the cell growth that persists in many, many generations after a single exposure. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: In fact, as I recall in, your papers, you were showing that you had effects after 10 generations.
Speaker 3: Yes. And even longer than that
Speaker 0: Doctor Bloom says it looks as if ultrasound causes genetic mutations.
Speaker 2: If a chemical were doing that, we would call that a mutagen.
Speaker 0: Government officials are well aware of and also concerned about doctor Leiboskin's findings. Food and Drug Administration officials candidly admit they cannot say diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy is safe. No. I don't think FDA can say
Speaker 4: I don't think anybody can say that ultrasound is absolutely safe.
Speaker 0: In fact, the FDA for several years has been worried about the effects of ultrasound and done much research on it. In these tanks, they expose pregnant mice to low levels of ultrasound. They find that the offspring of mice who get ultrasound weigh less when born. More important, CNN has learned the FDA has just finished a new study on pregnant women monitored by ultrasound.
Speaker 4: We've been looking at a population of children of about 2,000 children who have been irradiated, about half of whom have been irradiated in the Denver, Colorado area. And the, indication there is that those children that have been irradiated have a reduced birth weight.
Speaker 0: Low birth weight may not sound very serious, but in some cases it's another word for premature. And premature babies more commonly suffer brain damage and mental retardation and are much less likely to survive. Doctor Bloom says confirmed evidence that ultrasound produces low weight babies would be serious cause for alarm.
Speaker 2: Could represent the effect of ultrasound slowing down the rate of cellular growth and maturation. And if that's the case, clearly, that's a very undesirable effect. If that were proven to be the case in humans, I think it would really put the brakes right on the use of this of this procedure for routine monitoring. We dance. Yes.
I definitely do.
Speaker 0: Doctor Harold Fox, an obstetrician also at Columbia University says there's no need for restrictions on ultrasound. He believes warnings about the technique would scare the public unnecessarily.
Speaker 1: Alright. The public often becomes very scared, really anxious, petrified in one sense or another. And I think it's absolutely inappropriate to apply that kind of a warning technique to diagnostic folks. And I think
Speaker 0: None of the experts we talked with wanted to abolish ultrasound for pregnant women, but they believe it's overused often frivolously. For example, just to see the baby.
Speaker 2: Our general feeling is that the use of ultrasound ultrasound to monitor pregnancies that have a clear risk of some kind of birth defect or some kind of pregnancy problem that that sort of use is appropriate. In other words, where the pregnancy is a so called high risk pregnancy, The danger that I see is that ultrasound is now being used for the routine monitoring of many pregnancies that have no particular risks and no particular problems.
Speaker 0: Doctor Bloom says only 20% of the pregnant women are high risk and need ultrasound, yet more than 50% now get it. That's quite a dramatic overuse.
Speaker 2: Yes. I think it is. I think it is.
Speaker 0: We would have, certainly, more than a 1000000 women getting it we probably don't need it
Speaker 2: That's correct.
Speaker 0: Right now.
Speaker 2: That's correct.
Speaker 0: What scientists and officials are saying is that they really don't know whether ultrasound is dangerous to human fetuses, but they have new clues that suggest we should go easy on its use until we know more because overuse today is not worth the risk of long term terrible genetic effects in the future.
Speaker 3: When a female fetus is born, all her ova, in other words, all the eggs in the next generation are present at the time of birth and therefore, when you subject a female fetus to ultrasound near term, you have not only subjected her cells to ultrasound, but also all her eggs for this next generation.
Speaker 0: Jean Carper, CNN, Atlanta.
Speaker 5: The ultrasound radiation described in this report is widely used in American obstetrics today. Ultrasound is used in 3 types of devices. The first is the ultrasound scan. The second, the ultrasound stethoscope or doptone, often used in place of a real stethoscope at prenatal visits and in labor. The third device is the external electronic fetal monitor, often used for many hours in late pregnancy or in labor.
You can identify an ultrasound device by the necessity to use a gel to conduct the radiation from the device to your skin. Regular stethoscopes do not use a conductive gel. For more information, see the Journal of Nurse Midwifery, July August 1984 issue.
Speaker 6: Doris here, president of the American Foundation For Maternal and Child Health. You're about to see a film or actually a tape that was produced by Gene Carper for Cable News Network entitled Fetal Effects of Ultrasound. It's a particularly important tape because it documents the growing concern regarding the safety of ultrasound when used in obstetric care. These findings have a relationship to the use of ultrasound when it is used in the form of a duct tone, for a sonogram, and for electronic fetal monitoring. Neither the National Institutes of Health, the World Health Organization, or the International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has recommended that ultrasound be used routinely in obstetric care.
While many physicians contend that the fact that ultrasound has been used over a 20 year period would justify its use as a safe modality, The fact is that there is not a single control study today that is looking into the long term effects of ultrasound on human development. I introduce the fetal effects of ultrasound.
reSee.it AI Summary
I worked as a nurse in NYC during the height of COVID and witnessed the devastating impact of flawed medical protocols. Many patients died due to a system that prioritized speed over care, influenced by financial incentives. I recorded conversations revealing how doctors adhered to ineffective treatments, even when alternatives could save lives. The media sensationalized the crisis, and fear led to mismanagement and unnecessary intubations. It's crucial to share these experiences to hold accountable those responsible and prevent future tragedies.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
🧵Nurse Erin worked in NYC at the hardest hit COVID hospital in America. She witnessed a horrifying number of needless deaths and exposed why so many people actually died. This secret recording shows how doctors would not treat patients they knew would die with anything except the standard protocols (which had a 90% fatality rate), even when she begged them to use the off-patent therapies which were saving lives around the world. This demonstrates the perverse incentives in medicine. If you do what you are supposed to, you get paid generously and never have to worry about getting in trouble, even if you kill all of your patients. In contrast, if you do the right thing and fight for your patients (saving their lives), the medical profession and the legal system will target you, even if you're the only one saving lives. Many stories like Erin's happened throughout the pandemic, but her recordings provide the critical proof of what actually happened throughout the pandemic.
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's frustrating that effective treatments used globally aren't considered here. A doctor mentioned that many treatments don't work, and with a high mortality rate, there's little to lose by trying new options. Patients often present with severe breathing difficulties and thick mucus in their lungs, visible on X-rays. Proven treatments exist, like high-dose IV vitamin C, which has shown success in trials, but these are often dismissed. Instead, patients are frequently sedated and placed on ventilators. Despite the historical skepticism surrounding vitamin C, it has potential benefits that are overlooked, leaving many to question the current medical approach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I mean, when you think about it, it's sickening. It's the same reason they won't use, like, other treatments that are being that are successful around the world. And I had a conversation with a doctor about this.
Speaker 1: Are you guys doing, like, different sorts of, like, treatments? Because I know, like
Speaker 2: Nothing works.
Speaker 1: They have yeah. But I mean, there's, you know, they're coming out with different things
Speaker 0: that are
Speaker 1: in the testing phase.
Speaker 2: It's the same thing they come with a platinum. That's 2 more people than actually say. Uh-huh. So that's 1.
Speaker 0: And he said that they don't work anyway. And I told him, well, obviously, what you guys have going on here isn't working. So what's the harm in trying?
Speaker 2: I don't expect any of these people survive. 90% of them would die.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just maintaining. So I figured if it's assumed, they're gonna die anyway.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Just try and
Speaker 1: not throw a few.
Speaker 2: Well, it's, you know, I I don't know. That's that's always an issue in medicine whether if you just do it and whether they're dying anywhere or not. I
Speaker 0: But if you could find a cure,
Speaker 2: you have been like cure. So there's no antivirus therapy. The only way to do it is cure. But I there's no Or treatment,
Speaker 1: I should say.
Speaker 0: Re rephrase treatment.
Speaker 2: You could treat it, but but, you know, it's you have to have some scientific basis for whether these things are worse or not. It just thrown everything at them. You could make them worse. Uh-huh. So
Speaker 1: Yeah. Worse than death. Worse than death?
Speaker 2: Well, we said 90% maybe that 10% maybe. Maybe they're true. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: So but, I mean, if there's no basis for it working, I mean, you wanna just try things just because I mean
Speaker 1: I would. I might. It could save
Speaker 0: my life. Yeah. Hell, I do.
Speaker 3: So with these actual COVID patients, they they present by not really being able to breathe. Maybe they've, as you say, they've probably waited too long. They're not able to breathe, and some of that's anxiety. And and what else so what else do they what how how else do they present?
Speaker 0: So their lungs, if you look at their x rays, you can immediately see that these patients are affected by COVID because they're white. Their lungs are white and the secretions are really, really thick mucus y and white. And that's what the the photo or the x-ray of these lungs look like.
Speaker 3: And what so what does a white lung look mean? What is that is that just is that mucus?
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's coated. It's almost like their lungs are coated.
Speaker 3: So so that makes it hard to obviously transfer oxygen into the bloodstream. And so okay. So they've got very mucus y lungs. And how how do you deal with that? Is that what hydroxychloroquine and zinc do?
Or I
Speaker 0: mean, those treatments are for beginning stages. Like, once you get to the stage where your lungs are looking like that and you're having a lot of trouble breathing, there are proven treatments that have passed the three trials in Asia through doctor Chang. He's a US board certified physician. Is this, like, extremely high dose IV vitamin c. He successfully treated people with that.
And what that's doing is it's giving your body essentially your lungs, like, the power, the antioxidant power to kick it out while you can be getting IV antibiotics to be treating this and getting rid of it. But they don't wanna have anything to do with it here. What they wanna do is just throw them on a vent and sedate
Speaker 1: them. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Have you done the high dose IV vitamin c that is successful in Asia?
Speaker 2: Or really other stuff. There's a people trying to sell this stuff. There's no But it basis for vitamin CQ working here. And then
Speaker 0: Well, the doctor Chang, he was the one that it went through the the that high dose. I'm talking super high dose IV vitamin c. That's super antioxidants. Tell it's your body fight that.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: It passed 3 three trials, and it's being effective. It's just weird how, like, everybody just, like No. No. No. Shuts it down immediately.
Speaker 2: Because it's vitamin d vitamin c story has been around for a very long time.
Speaker 0: Oh, that's weird because I take it daily
Speaker 2: and I'm I'm a second. Just a good gene if you're not getting sick. I don't think somebody doesn't see
Speaker 3: any.
Speaker 2: Just a good gene.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The horrific events we witnessed during COVID were a result of what began during Obamacare. To save money, hospitals no longer focus on saving everyone, rather they are paid to get everyone out as fast as possible and sacrifice the vulnerable to do so. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-hospitals-so-deadly-and
What Makes Hospitals So Deadly and How Can We Fix It?
November's Open Thread
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The hundreds of COVID deaths at Elmhurst hospital were sensationalized by the media to justify the lockdowns. Here, Erin shows that the entire disaster was manmade but no one else questioned the abhorrent COVID protocols. To prevent another COVID-19, her story must be heard so we can hold those who caused it responsible.
Video Transcript AI Summary
New York, particularly Elmhurst Hospital, became the epicenter of the COVID-19 crisis, facing overwhelming patient numbers and dwindling supplies. Nurse Erin Olszewski, who worked there, observed troubling practices, including mislabeling patients as COVID-positive despite negative tests and the aggressive use of ventilators on patients who may not have needed them. She noted a high percentage of patients from marginalized communities and highlighted the lack of experienced doctors on the floors. Erin documented her experiences and raised concerns about protocols that seemed driven by financial incentives rather than patient care. She witnessed patients being treated without proper isolation, leading to increased infections. Ultimately, Erin felt compelled to speak out against these practices, believing they contributed to unnecessary patient deaths.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Almost from the onset of the coronavirus epidemic in the United States, New York has been described as the epicenter of the outbreak, and Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, the epicenter of the epicenter.
Speaker 1: Obviously, Elmhurst Hospital in Queens is right now the epicenter within the Elmhurst Hospital is the epicenter of the epicenter.
Speaker 2: And Elmhurst Hospital is really at the center of this crisis here in the city and in the country with doctors desperately trying to keep up with the growing number of patients as supplies dwindle.
Speaker 3: When
Speaker 4: you see the black body bags, you say, what's in there? It's Elmhurst Hospital? Must be supplies. It's not supplies. It's people.
Speaker 0: Also from the beginning of the crisis, ventilators were described as essential life saving equipment initially in short supply.
Speaker 5: You picked the 26,000 people who are going to die because you only sent 400 ventilators.
Speaker 4: I knew that every person who needed a ventilator and didn't get one would die.
Speaker 0: But why does New York and Elmhurst in particular appear to have been hit so much harder than other places in the United States? And were ventilators ever the right approach to treating COVID nineteen, especially once we realized that 60 to 90% of those vented do not survive? The experience and observations of nurse Erin Olszewski seem to offer some answers to these pressing questions while simultaneously providing frontline information about a number of other hot button topics, including the disproportionate number of COVID deaths among Americans of color, the distortion surrounding do not resuscitate orders, the disregard for personal protective equipment standards, and the clustering of COVID positive with COVID negative patients, which she witnessed again and again, and the tremendous amount of nosocomial or hospital acquired infections that resulted. Perhaps most urgently of all, she speaks of the therapies and protocols employed in her home state that did work. Erin was brought from Florida by a service funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
She spent almost a month at Elmhurst. What she saw there compelled her to become a reporter and whistleblower alongside her already extensive nursing duties. She made recordings, posted warnings on social media, and spoke through proxies about the nightmare condition she witnessed. Erin was raised in Wisconsin and enlisted in the army when she was 17, just before 911. She deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003.
Part of her duties involved overseeing aid disbursement and improvements to hospital facilities. While in country, she received the Army commendation medal for meritorious service and was wounded in combat. Erin eventually retired as a sergeant and became a civilian nurse in 2012. A mutual friend who was helping her make hidden camera recordings introduced us to Erin. After working a long shift at the hospital, she agreed to do an impromptu interview in her room at the Marriott Marquis overlooking Times Square.
We encourage the viewer to leave aside their preconceptions about the nature of what is happening, to hear firsthand from an eyewitness who, at great personal expense and without political prejudice of any kind, now openly reports what she discovered in the hopes that the information will be put to good use to save lives. She began by telling us one of her most disturbing findings, that people who had repeatedly tested negative for COVID were being described as COVID confirmed.
Speaker 6: Okay. So if you look close, I'm in my patient's chart. I am pulling up, like, their laboratory results. So if you look here, you'll see COVID 19 bio reference lab. Here are the test results.
As you can see, 512020 at, 1716 not detected. They test for a second time. 5 42020, at 1759 not detected. So both of those are negative. Scroll up to the top.
This is my patient. They are on a vent, and they are being called COVID 19 confirmed. Droplet in contact and eye protection. So this person is droplet in eye. COVID confirmed.
Positive a click not detected. No result in the above.
Speaker 7: No. Oh.
Speaker 6: How are you? Pretty good.
Speaker 0: While Erin was using her hidden camera to document another chart showing a patient with negative test results who nonetheless was labeled COVID confirmed. Another travel nurse entered the room. They began to discuss what Aaron was seeing.
Speaker 7: So some file reference Yes. Here.
Speaker 6: Done here. So not detected here, but they're presumptive.
Speaker 7: Now they're all but they are detectives.
Speaker 6: They're saying it's positive. Not detected, but it's not detected. Where's it going? So I
Speaker 0: You said that they were vented immediately upon being brought in? Is that
Speaker 6: Yeah. So the thing is is they're coming in with difficulty breathing. And a lot of these patients are really coming in with anxiety because everybody is they're scared. And when I was back home, I was working in the ED out in the tents. And most people that were coming through were coming through with, like, symptoms of just, you know, anxiety or, you know, they're worried and they're breathing fast, then they get all nervous.
So this is how the people are, like, coming in. Now I'm not saying that some of them, you know, don't have COVID. Like, there are there is there are people that come in, and they really do need help. Not to the extent of event, but they need help. But these other people, like this person who wasn't COVID multiple times, you know, and a lot of them are on either medic Medicaid or Medicare.
They're poor. They're from, you know, a lower class. We're at a public hospital. They need the funding. So take them.
They take them. And they tell them pretty much that if they don't get an event, then they're probably not gonna survive. But the reality is if they get on that vent, the likelihood of them walking out the hospital is slim to none.
Speaker 0: And can I ask you, what, like, peep are they on? And is that being mandated or specified what the pressure is on the vent?
Speaker 6: Here's the thing with this. So you don't have actual doctors that know critical care, ICU doctors on these floors. There's a dentist, and there are residents with these. So residents are essentially students, and they have no idea what they're doing. Like, I had to police actually, today, I had to police a resident.
Because he wrote an order for me to run, Versed, which is a medicine that you have to be very careful with because it can kill someone at, like, quadruple the speed of what you should be running at the dose. And had I not known that, then I would have easily killed the patient. And it would have been okay under their covid standards. So everything is kind of a wash. Nobody is held accountable for anything.
And these people that are at events are essentially being like they're these residents are, like, practicing their skills on them. So they're practicing central lines. They're practicing, like, invasive procedures that are really unnecessary.
Speaker 0: What is the percentage of black, Latino, white? What what what's the racial composition?
Speaker 6: Hispanic and black for the majority.
Speaker 0: And what's the age range?
Speaker 3: And Asian.
Speaker 0: And Asian. And what's the age range?
Speaker 6: 20 year olds all the way up to 70, 80 year olds. Very few I should say very few 80 year olds. But the majority of people, I would say, are in their forties or fifties.
Speaker 0: Wow. And what percentage of the people that are in there do would you say actually have tested positive for COVID?
Speaker 6: Half. Probably half.
Speaker 0: But everyone is being treated as though
Speaker 6: The entire hospital is COVID. So half the hospital is not COVID, but there were on COVID floors.
Speaker 0: So let me just ask you about nosocomial infection. So you're saying they're putting non COVID or COVID rule out with definite COVID patients.
Speaker 6: Yes. So I was only wondering because, like, I was looking at, like, all the patient rooms and, like, this patient is in with, like, a non COVID. I don't I don't understand why they're doing that.
Speaker 7: I know. There's 4 patients in a row here
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 7: Non COVID. And this is supposed to be the COVID
Speaker 6: Yeah. Because 7th floor, like, shut it down. That's right. I'm confused. They're gonna have non COVID there.
Speaker 7: Yeah. This is gonna be the only COVID, so they shouldn't put any non COVID here.
Speaker 6: Well, that's what they've been doing. They're banking on the fact that they'll get it because they're already immunocompromised. So they're just they're and they'll put them in the same room. So there's double rooms. So you have a COVID with a non COVID.
They don't even care. We have enough rooms where they can be separated now because it's not as busy as it was, you know, 4 weeks ago. But they don't care. They're just putting them together. I have that right now happening.
And, like, the guy over in They
Speaker 7: said 220 Yeah. That were 2 negatives.
Speaker 6: And they're they're in the positive. Like, the guy over in 29, I had him upstairs. So I was in CCU before it. Yeah. And he came in with a with a stroke.
I know. That's what 26 one was, a stroke. And no COVID. Nothing. And now he's got COVID, and he's on a vent.
Speaker 7: Oh, because we gave it to him here.
Speaker 6: She I don't know how this ended up being full circle. I know. But she she literally came in with a broom and then she left, like, 5 minutes later. My patient had died of COVID and she didn't lock the floor. She was cleaning, getting prepared for my next patient, and she didn't
Speaker 3: mop the floor. I was like, that is the least
Speaker 6: That's a standard. Mop the
Speaker 3: I didn't think
Speaker 6: I had to tell her that. Right. People don't know how to properly wear their PPE. Let's go back to Ebola. Like, when Ebola was here, people took that very seriously.
You have, you have a nurse in the room and all the head to toe PPE. This is Ebola. This is this is I'm gonna compare it. And you have another nurse that's outside the room handing supplies, you know, the the clean nurse and the dirty nurse. Right?
Going and when they're taking their their outfit off the you know, one nurse is unzipping the back so she can take it out, walking out. They're not doing that here. We're wearing, like, our scrubs, and then we have maybe, like, a net top. Our pants are exposed. They're wearing booties over their shoes, but the booties are going room to room to room, and then people will wear them through the hospital.
Speaker 0: So there's massive spread just through the the improper use of the PPE?
Speaker 6: I mean, that's it's a no brainer. Everyone it looks good. It looks good. Looks like you're super safe, but in reality, it's ridiculous. So you're gonna go to you'll go room to room.
You'll maybe take that top off, put a new top on, but the rest of you is still exposed. But, I mean, why are they doing this? You know? I don't
Speaker 7: know what the
Speaker 6: suspected suspected and then there's,
Speaker 7: like, principal hospital. Is that meaning, like, a nosocomial? Is that what that means?
Speaker 6: Like, we have in the United States, and we've had it for a while, a rapid test. It's 45 minutes. Do you have COVID, don't you? They're not they're not doing the rapid test here.
Speaker 0: They're not? No. They Mhmm. Okay. I I At Alherst, you've never seen them.
Speaker 6: Nope. They don't do it. It's too expensive. They do 5 day. It's like 5 to 7 day turnaround.
In the meantime, they admit them onto COVID units. So non COVIDs, the rule outs are going to COVID units and waiting for the results. Even though we have a rapid result, which is 45 minutes, and they're not doing it. No. Not one.
Speaker 0: But when you say it's too expensive, I mean, isn't this all getting charged to the fund anyway? I mean, why not do it? Why not? Are you are you saying that
Speaker 6: I don't know why. It doesn't make any sense to me. I asked the doctor about it. How come you guys don't do the rapid test here?
Speaker 1: I see the claims. I mean, it it exists. It's just they don't have access to it. There's only limited supplies. So if you have deep pockets, you get first.
Speaker 6: Oh, so money.
Speaker 1: Most times it's money above everything. Yes. That's sad. No way. It's a reality.
Speaker 6: I compare this hospital to a 3rd world country. I've been in a 3rd world country hospital in Iraq. The Iraq hospital is better than this one, and that says a lot. I've been there. I I've had I've been in both hospitals, and we're this is in the United States.
And this hospital is treating low income mostly, people. And it almost makes me feel like they think these people are disposable. And they're not. They're they're they're people. You know, everybody people are not disposable.
You know, especially especially these the ones that are struggling day in and day out, the hard workers, you know, like trying to reach that American dream and they're not given a chance because they're brought to this place where nobody cares.
Speaker 0: And is there, an understood financial incentive to diagnose COVID?
Speaker 6: Yeah. Of course. So in the hospital that I'm in right now, it's all COVID at this point. Every single floor is COVID, and they need it that way, obviously, for a reason, in my opinion. But the a person cannot come to the floor unless they have a COVID diagnosis.
Speaker 0: Is the reason did they not wanna cross contaminate? Is that would that be the legitimate reason why to you would create an all COVID floor?
Speaker 6: Here's why I will say no to that is because they're admitting people for, quote, COVID rule out. So this guy was probably admitted COVID rule out, tested him. They saw that it came back negative. They probably already did something where they needed to now call him COVID in the hopes that if they're putting him on a COVID floor and there's nurses going room to room to room, he will get it, and then they'll be, you know, they'll be backed when he does pass that he did have COVID.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, that's that's I know. That's quite a charge. I mean, what what makes you think they really want them to to get COVID? Because it
Speaker 6: Money. Money. It's I think it's at least $29,000 per per patient. And then you have to think, you're also charging supplies and more supplies and more supplies. That's just like a bonus money.
Speaker 0: But what did the but the residents aren't getting that. Right? I mean, why why?
Speaker 6: That's the thing. And I actually had a I've went
Speaker 3: at
Speaker 6: it with a a lot of residents already, and, they're they're order followers. So there was resident and I have this on tape. I video I taped it because it was just so disgusting to me. A 37 year old, which is my age, was not a DNR. It's a full code.
His family in-depth discussed with the doctors that they want us to do everything they can to save him. He came in talking. He was very terrified. He was just, like, you know, totally alert. Knew what was going on.
And they convinced him to be on a vent. Now he's dead. But the doctor said when I got into shift that, if he codes that we are not to resuscitate or try to save him. And we flipped This is important. I just asked them if they could put
Speaker 8: a DNR order and they said no.
Speaker 6: That's up
Speaker 8: to the attending.
Speaker 6: Okay. So we're gonna call them?
Speaker 8: That's what I said and I said no. We're not. I said yes. We are. We're obligated to.
Alright.
Speaker 6: So then I You gotta say something though. Like, it's our license. Unfortunately, you guys gotta put in an order. Just something That's
Speaker 8: what I said. I said, I'm obligated. Yes.
Speaker 6: What did she say?
Speaker 8: She's like the higher up said. I said, I don't care what they said.
Speaker 6: What higher up god? We don't have a god here making I said
Speaker 3: I said
Speaker 7: I don't
Speaker 6: care what they said. So we're supposed to he's not DNR, but we're treating it as DNR. Basically. Did his family know?
Speaker 7: So
Speaker 0: So what was that?
Speaker 6: So that was we were just getting on shift because we're starting the night shift at 7. And that was the nurse from the day shift saying pretty much we shouldn't code him if he's going to code. And then I turned my glasses on. Why are we being told not to decode him essentially? Like he said.
Speaker 8: I mean, because I'm gonna tell you right now, if he's on his out, I'm jumping on his chest.
Speaker 6: Period. Point blank. It's gonna happen.
Speaker 8: Okay. Because until that status is changed in the computer, that's what I'm obligated to do under my nursing license.
Speaker 9: Right. I mean,
Speaker 6: because you guys aren't gonna pack me
Speaker 8: up and protect me.
Speaker 9: Well, Elmhurst does have a a policy given, like, a COVID policy given their scarcity of Right. Dialysis and blood.
Speaker 3: It could
Speaker 6: be a chem code. It could be whatever.
Speaker 9: It's not there's not a it's a difference. Normally, the standard is what the family says. Like, we just do so if they would say code them for about 5 years, like, we just do that. Right. Total data.
It's a little bit different now because of the new policy in place with our we're putting in place, which is that you don't need full family cons like, you can just tell someone that it's medically futile, that we're not willing to just pour blood and resources into something that isn't would be impossible to get
Speaker 8: back. Right.
Speaker 9: But I look, it's He's 37. I mean, it's brutal.
Speaker 6: Well, so they tried.
Speaker 8: Well, our higher ups have agreed and our attendings agreed that this is futile care at this point. He is not gonna
Speaker 6: make it. I said, he doesn't have
Speaker 8: an epidural going. He doesn't have anything to sustain going. And I said, and who decided this? And I said, can you put a comfort care order in that? No.
We can't do that. Can you put a DNR order in? No. We can't do that. I said, so what's our plan?
Speaker 6: Do we have a modified She
Speaker 8: goes, well, he's dying. And I'm like, I understand that. But there needs to be an order indicating that either I'm doing compressions or I'm not doing compressions.
Speaker 6: Well, I can say that we can all be in agreements that we will do it.
Speaker 8: I will definitely Yeah. Because I'm gonna jump on
Speaker 1: them. Yeah.
Speaker 6: So will I. I will write with you. I don't care. That's what we that's what we're here for. I'm not
Speaker 8: Like, until they change his status that he is a DNR, and they can do it through physician consent if they talk to the family. Yeah. But until they change it, and I see it,
Speaker 1: he's a full code to me.
Speaker 6: What if we know when someone is we're close. We'll pull the code card up and be ready. You know, we're ready. I had the epi ready. That's one of the first things we do, and she wouldn't let me give it.
So this was that woman. And the entire time and this was over his over his body. His alive body. And we're arguing and she's laughing. She was smirking.
And how that how this this man died was the nurses arguing with the doctors over him as he was dying. And she's smirking the entire time. I was so it was probably one of the worst experiences in my entire life. But all I can think about is that at least he knows that we were fighting for him
Speaker 0: when he died.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 6: But this is my conversation after after what happened. And the guy I told you about earlier that had pulled his tube out, he was up at that point. Like he was on the same floor. He had pulled his he was the one that they wanted to sedate. So at that point, he was doing better where he could walk.
This doctor put a diaper on him and told him to poop in his pants. So after the code, I went to go check on him, and he's poop. He has he goes, I have poop in my pants. I'm like, why do you have
Speaker 10: poop in your pants?
Speaker 6: And he said that because the doctor told him that he has to do that. And I've just lost it. It was her. This is wrong. It is straight up.
This it is wrong. And I have been I am 37 years old. I have been in a hospital since I've been 16. Military hospital is that well.
Speaker 11: Aspect of it was wrong to you. I I agree that there were parts of it that were wrong too.
Speaker 6: Calling a patient a DNR when there's no order for it and telling us like, straight up telling us, you're not doing anything. That's wrong. If that was my brother or my father or anybody, I would be furious. And I guarantee you if I called his family right now and told him what what happened, they would be furious too. I flipped.
I we were all crying. There's a lot of nurses that that were that that know that this is wrong, but they're afraid to, like, say anything publicly. She said when I was talking to her, she said, afraid to, like, say anything publicly. She said, when I was talking to her, she said, we don't always we're not always getting the orders that comes from the top down. And I was thinking, that's the exact problem with everything.
Where is it coming from? What's the purpose? Are you guys really trying to kill everybody like everybody thinks? Within our unit, we it was a big fight and ultimately, the kid died with us over his body arguing about this. That was over there?
Yeah. And the doctors but he's like the doctor will just write it up that we that we, you know,
Speaker 1: hold us. I don't know.
Speaker 6: Because I don't know him. I'm sorry. I'm not doing that. There's a doctor that came upstairs that I had worked with prior. He was working in the ED.
Heard what happened. He came into the room with me and told me that what I did was good. And then so there are good doctors in here. You know, I guess the word traveled after this.
Speaker 0: You mentioned earlier that this that this is a common occurrence where people come in able to speak and they just have low oxygen levels and then and they're put on a vent. Is so what what's what's going on there?
Speaker 6: I don't know. I honestly I I have no idea how they're assuming everybody is just the same. There's no individuality anymore. These residents, I think a lot of them are just stone cold. You know, there's no emotion, and they don't view people as people anymore.
And it's really sad. Like, we came I came a little bit later, you know, after the big rush, but there was still a lot of people coming in. And a lot of us were just in shock. Within the first couple days, you could see exactly what was going on. My bigger problem with this whole scenario is when they intubate people that don't need it.
Yeah. And it looks very clear to me that they're just pushing it. You almost feel like you are literally living in the twilight zone. And you feel like you're the only sane one in a bunch of insane people. And it's scary because these are the people that others are trusting to take care of them.
And they're really doing the opposite. I'm to the point where I'm afraid that I'm gonna start thinking that this is normal. I don't wanna ever get to that point because they think that. Like, the people I work with that are local nurses and doctors don't see anything wrong with this.
Speaker 0: Really? I mean, they they don't is do they see was was it just, like, kind of a hard past few months? Is it or
Speaker 6: This has been like this. And from what I hear, like, from I I mean, there are really there are good nurses that work there too. Like, I have made good friends with a lot of the nurses that do work there. There's good people, but they're outnumbered.
Speaker 0: What so what happens? People come in like this 37 year old, and what was he complaining of or what was going on?
Speaker 6: Respiratory distress. He didn't have COVID either. He he did not have COVID.
Speaker 0: And how do we know that?
Speaker 6: I I took care of him. I have the same type of, results from his chart as I do with my other patient. It was like the day before intubation who was fine on the air breather. And then they intubated, and then he had a normal, and then they put in a test tube. And then it's really sick.
And now he's 37 years old and dead. Yes. That's what I'm seeing. Like, all these negative tests, and they're and they're putting them on these fence. It hopeful that they'll get it.
They'll be put on these COVID floor is murder. It straight up is it is setting these people up for failure based on money.
Speaker 0: Medicaid is who pays out or who's paying this bonus of 29,000?
Speaker 6: I do I believe it's medic Medicaid Medicare. It's government money that I don't know exactly where it's coming from, but I know that it is. But I know the orders are coming from, the above, someone above. And everybody says that it's someone higher up. I'm like, good.
Call them. Like, during that DNR when they're telling us or the the full code when they're telling us not to, you know, do CPR. I'm like, alright. Call your higher ups then. Let's talk about and they wouldn't.
Because they're all scared. Everybody's scared. And everybody's scared to stick up for themselves. And I've called a lot of doctors unethical to their face. And they deserve it.
I'm a nurse. I'm an advocate for my patients. Absolutely. And to
Speaker 3: the I'm
Speaker 11: not the flip side of it, but I totally agree.
Speaker 6: But no no no. This way. That there's a DNR. You you were laughing and you thought it was funny. You were like smirking.
You're being really rude to all of us.
Speaker 3: I
Speaker 6: And I thought that was really good.
Speaker 11: Since I'm not being rude
Speaker 3: in that.
Speaker 6: It was really yeah. You are. It was very disrespectful. Okay. And I don't think that you're gonna be a very good doctor.
Okay. I understand. Thank you. You're welcome.
Speaker 11: But
Speaker 6: I hope you learned something from this.
Speaker 0: Was this the dentist or was this or these are residents you're talking to?
Speaker 6: This one was a fellow. She was a CCU fellow. Cardiac. She's a cardiac fellow.
Speaker 0: What killed him? Was being did the vent kill him?
Speaker 6: Yeah. Oh, yes. They're so sedated. He had probably 8 or 9 drips. It's all sedation.
It's all sedation and, paralytics. So you are asleep. It is essentially like you're you're under you know, you're in surgery, you know, and they put you under like that, for a good month straight. There's no way you can recover from something like that. You'll be brain dead if you do.
Speaker 0: So so can you list some of the drugs that they're put on on the drips?
Speaker 6: Yeah. There's propofol, Fentanyl, Nimbex, Versed. Gosh. Hang on. I have a list.
I think a list from this is one of my one of my patients was on this. Just one patient. So Nimdex, a 100 milligrams. Presidex, 400 milligrams. Fentanyl, 25 100 micrograms.
Heparin, 25,000 units. Versed, 50 milligrams. Levofed, 16,000. Neil 50 milligrams, propofol 10 milligrams, vesopressin 100 units. This is one person, and there are all these drugs are running at the same time into them.
Speaker 0: So in the case of this 37 year old, he comes in complaining of some respiratory distress. Did he have low ox blood oxygen?
Speaker 6: Totally healthy guy. And he was sat in, like, such like, this oxygen saturation in like 88, 89.
Speaker 0: So a little low.
Speaker 6: I mean, yeah. But people do that. You and I probably do that. We're we're not monitoring our oxygen, you know, all day long.
Speaker 0: But he but he felt shortness of breath, so he came in?
Speaker 6: Yes.
Speaker 0: And and what was the next step? What what what would have happened next?
Speaker 6: He went to a step down unit, among other
Speaker 0: What does that mean? Sorry.
Speaker 6: It's just a unit that where people aren't quite on the vent yet. And I say on the vent yet because that's I should call it a step up unit to the vent.
Speaker 0: So are was he do they what's the phrase you used? COVID,
Speaker 3: COVID
Speaker 0: rule out. COVID rule
Speaker 6: out. So that's how they admit everyone to the floor that doesn't have a positive COVID immediately.
Speaker 0: Okay. So he's put in the step down unit, which is a euphemism for step up unit. Yeah. And what happens to them there? What's going on there?
Speaker 6: Oxygen, I wasn't in this unit. My friend was,
Speaker 0: So just normal oxygen, a nasal?
Speaker 6: No. They'll do, like, a high pressure.
Speaker 0: So what does that mean exactly?
Speaker 3: What does
Speaker 0: it look like?
Speaker 6: Pretty much like a forced it's a big it almost looks like a big thick nasal cannula, and you put it in your nose and it forces the pressure in. It can almost be like, you know, it's still causing your lungs to expand. Right? But what they really need to be doing is, like, the non rebreather mask, but they just skip it usually. They go right to the high pressure.
So your their lungs are already, you know
Speaker 0: So and tell just tell us what a non rebreather mask is.
Speaker 6: So that's just there's a a bag that is on the end of these masks. It's not forcing air down your lungs.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 9: It's more natural. Okay.
Speaker 6: You know? And you can put a 100% oxygen. That's what people need.
Speaker 0: That okay. So and and that really is not the protocol. It's not the protocol to start people on that.
Speaker 6: I mean, it should be, but it's not how they're doing it now.
Speaker 0: I mean, in in your prior experience dealing with people with low saturation, would would that be what you would do?
Speaker 6: That's what we were doing, you know, in my my hometown.
Speaker 0: And were you having better outcomes there?
Speaker 6: We didn't have this because we treated them properly. You know?
Speaker 0: What was what would you say the kind of the case fatality rate was
Speaker 6: in your No. 0. Yeah. By me, 0.
Speaker 0: And what's what what is the likelihood of coming out of the hospital you're in?
Speaker 6: I'll tell you that the unit that I've been on, the only person that survived ironically is a guy who pulled his own, tube out.
Speaker 0: So he woke up enough to be able to do that?
Speaker 6: Yeah. He wanted it out. He should never have been on in the 1st place. That's another that's a whole another story.
Speaker 0: So let's just keep going with this 37 year old. So he's on the step down unit, and he's give being given semi pressurized oxygen. It's not a rebreather mask. And then what happens to him?
Speaker 6: They'll start treating them with medications, you know, that will I
Speaker 0: I can't And are they checking his saturation at this all the time? Does he have
Speaker 6: Yeah. He's on a continuous pulse ox. But, you know, the minute that he desats, like, they'll see, like, oh, no. He's at 87 now. Or, oh, look at this.
Oh, he's gonna need more help. And then they go tell them that they need more help even if they don't. You know, it's it's ultimately what it comes down to is, like, people being just lazy and wanting to treat. They just wanna treat, treat, treat, treat. You know?
Speaker 0: Is there is there any incentive to the okay. You're saying that the incentive for the residents is kind of experimental almost.
Speaker 6: They're order followers.
Speaker 0: And they're uh-huh.
Speaker 6: You know, like they wanna please. That's what they're doing, they wanna please. And like the protocol of that hospital is to treat.
Speaker 0: To treat in invasively according to this protocol. And do we know where this protocol originates? I mean, because obviously the governor was talking about getting vents, vents. Everyone was talking about getting vents. So this seems like this comes from very high up.
Speaker 6: Yeah. I mean, if you're gonna tell somebody the well, the entire world essentially in especially the entire United States when they're like, we need the vents. Like, if you tell people something enough, they're going to start believing it. So that's exactly what happened. Tell me why Cuomo immediately thought 2 months ago that they'd need 30,000 pens.
How do you just promote remember the number?
Speaker 8: Clint was an idiot
Speaker 6: too. Well, 29,000
Speaker 7: of that.
Speaker 0: So our 37 year old, when what what happens to him next? So they say, okay. It looks like he's 87. He needs more. And so they do they that is that the point at which they would intubate him?
Speaker 6: Yeah. That's when he went to the that's when he stepped up. So he stepped up to the ICU.
Speaker 9: He steps up to the ICU?
Speaker 6: More care. Right? They start off with a little bit of like muscle relaxer and, you know, he's woozy. You have to remember there's no family with these patients. So they're alone and in hospital by themselves during a pandemic that they're terrified of already is likely what brought him in in the first place.
He's totally healthy otherwise. And then you have doctors, they think they're doctors, but they're they're resident. Technically, they're doctors with absolutely zero experience. I've had to teach residents several, like, nursing skills. Telling them that they have a choice.
You know? Like, they could likely die from this or they can be saved by, you know, getting a tube and that will help them breathe. They don't call it ventilator. You can give you a little help breathing. And that's it.
Then they get then they get the sedation and they went they go to sleep, and that's it. They don't wake up. He's in a body bag.
Speaker 0: And do you so the drugs have a deleterious effect on the body, on the brain, but is there something about the pressurization of the lungs that is also causing harm?
Speaker 6: Yeah. They're they're having the pee that's the pressure in his lungs, which is causing this barrel trauma of peep it's blowing people's lungs out. So when that happens, what do you gotta do? Turn it up more. You know, you just you just keep
Speaker 0: Because the membrane expands so that you need in order to fill them and deflate them, you need more pressure.
Speaker 6: Yeah. You're gonna have to max it. I mean, we have a guy right now who's maxed out on everything. There's nothing more you can do. So then what?
You just wait for them to die? I mean, there's nothing you can do.
Speaker 0: Can you tell us what PEEP levels are they started on?
Speaker 6: It depends. It they're always usual well, they'll start there's some good there's I can't say everybody's bad.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 6: There are some good doctors that'll start them out on 5, which people should be at about 5.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 6: But that doctor goes home and the next doctor comes on shift and cranks it up. Then what? It's hard to go back down.
Speaker 0: And what, what oxygen level are they put on?
Speaker 6: It depends. I mean, as they start to deteriorate more and more, then the oxygen obviously is going up. Here's a guy right now. I have him on a 100%. And I'll have to come in and, you know, give him a little bit more rush of, 2 minutes of even more oxygen just to keep the stats up.
I mean, that's what happens to people.
Speaker 0: In your home state where you were treating people, what would the protocol be?
Speaker 6: I mean, it it varied upon each individual. Mhmm. You know? But we we definitely would never go immediately to, you know, you're gonna need a vent.
Speaker 0: You didn't feel pressure to diagnose people? People there wasn't a pressure to diagnose people COVID?
Speaker 6: Not at all. No. We're not a public hospital too. That makes a huge difference. I I what I'm seeing is it's the public hospitals.
And this is like in other states too. If you look at all the hospitals, most of them are public that are needing money. But our hospital would just treat them based on the individuals,
Speaker 9: you know.
Speaker 6: And they were using the hydroxychloroquine and the zinc and, you know, that protocol for sure.
Speaker 0: At your hospital?
Speaker 6: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: And that seemed to work?
Speaker 6: Yeah. We didn't have anybody that died. I think there was one patient that was admitted and went home, like, the day day later. And we're in a I'm in a, you know, a pretty big city. So
Speaker 0: And were these people with who were elderly with comorbidities who were having good outcomes?
Speaker 6: Yeah. Actually, one guy came the the one guy that was admitted came from a nursing home. And he was obese, like, severely over be obese.
Speaker 0: And he and he and he left fine. He left after a day?
Speaker 6: I think well, I think it was, like, a night. Maybe maybe 2 nights max. But
Speaker 0: And and what do you remember what he was treated with?
Speaker 6: I didn't have him on the floor, but, I can't I can imagine he was treated with the protocol that we would prescribe the patients before they left the emergency room.
Speaker 0: Which was?
Speaker 6: Which the hydroxychloroquine drink.
Speaker 3: Why do
Speaker 0: you think that's been demonized so much?
Speaker 6: Because it's working and then people wouldn't need them. I don't know.
Speaker 0: Only on 2 tonight, a Houston hospital's having success treating the coronavirus patients. In fact, its recovery rate is perfect. Fascinating, isn't it?
Speaker 12: To treat patients here, doctor Varon is using an experimental drug protocol. It's a cocktail of vitamins, steroids, and blood thinners. Each patient also is getting hydroxychloroquine, the malaria drug touted by president Trump. The protocol is controversial because there hasn't been time for extensive testing, but doctor Varon says it works.
Speaker 5: We've treated over 40 plus patients with this, treatment, and we haven't had a single complication.
Speaker 12: So far, he says, none of his patients have died.
Speaker 5: This is time of work. There is no time to double blind anything. This is, this is working. And if it's working, I'm gonna keep on doing it.
Speaker 13: What we're finding clinically with our patients is that it really only works in conjunction with zinc. So the hydroxychloroquine opens the zinc channel, zinc goes into the cell, it then blocks the of the cellular machinery.
Speaker 9: You're prescribing it and it is working for COVID 19 patients?
Speaker 13: Every patient I prescribed it to has been very, very ill and within 8 to 12 hours, they were basically symptom free. And so, clinically, I am seeing a resolution that mirrors what we saw in the French study and some of the other studies worldwide. But what I am seeing is that people are taking it alone by itself. It's not having efficacy.
Speaker 0: Okay. What can you tell us about any confirmed COVID cases that you've seen? What I mean, in both in your home state and here in New York, what what what have you noticed about them, and what what what what are their stats look like?
Speaker 6: Okay. So the real the real confirmed COVIDs that come in, like, you immediately know that they're COVID because they cannot, like, they can't breathe. They literally can't breathe. So they do need that non re breather mask or their sass will, like, quickly drop to, you know, 60, 70. So you wanna be at around, you know, 90 to a 100.
Speaker 0: So they can't talk even?
Speaker 6: Some of them can talk. A lot of this is anxiety. But the problem with this is they're be they were being told the public has been told to self quarantine. Right? Stay home.
That's a problem because these people could be getting early, early treatment.
Speaker 14: There's clinical trials emerging that appears to show that it decreases severity early in the game before you end up hospitalized, before you end up on a ventilator.
Speaker 6: And they're not because they're told to stay home. So then now they're getting really, really sick, and they come in on an emergency status. They waited too long. And if they didn't wait too long, they're easily treatable.
Speaker 0: And and easily treatable you feel with some of these treatments Yeah. Like the zinc and hydroxychloroquine and,
Speaker 3: you
Speaker 0: know, any yeah.
Speaker 6: It's working. I mean, it's been it's been proven to work. There's a doctor, I think, in Texas that's, you
Speaker 3: know, using that protocol and a shot in
Speaker 6: the butt, you know, of, pharmacist now is calling her every time that she prescribes, you know, the the hydroxychloroquine and asking what the diagnosis was of the patients in order to give it to them. I'm like, that's a doctor patient relationship. So the pharmacist, I guess, was told to do this. And, you know, in New York, the the governor said, you know, pretty much put a ban on it. So why?
Why what made him, you know, a medical professional now to make these decisions and intrude on the doctor patient relationship.
Speaker 0: Because you're
Speaker 6: saying I know. You know, I've seen it. It's it's they they wanna vent. He wants to be right. They requested all these vents.
They wanna use them.
Speaker 0: As part of the same executive order that granted hospitals near blanket immunity from malpractice litigation during the epidemic, governor Cuomo singled out hydroxychloroquine as the one drug that could not be used as an off label therapy for COVID 19, except as a part of approved studies. The order was issued ostensibly to prevent hoarding so that those who take this decades old, inexpensive treatment with a long safety record for approved conditions like lupus would have access to it. He later amended the order to allow hydroxychloroquine's use in later stage patients in hospitals, but not in early outpatient treatment. Both hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine had shown efficacy in the prior SARS coronavirus epidemic, and studies in France and other countries had already shown its effectiveness for COVID 19. But instead of making research and production of a promising therapy a priority so that there wouldn't be shortages, Vence became the near exclusive focus along with the search for a vaccine.
This has been true even of president Trump, who despite his public cheering for hydroxychloroquine, has not made it the focus of warp speed funding and testing. A number of US studies have shown the promise of hydroxychloroquine based therapies, most recently, a Yale University study focused on early treatment. And in what may be the most scandalous retraction in recent memory, a Lancet paper that purported to show hydroxychloroquine alone or with other therapies was, in fact, dangerous has been shown to be based on fraudulent data. Aaron's home hospital system confirmed in a phone conversation with perspectives on the pandemic that they have used a protocol involving hydroxychloroquine and zinc to great effect. Because in your view, this should be an individually decided doctor patient choice.
Speaker 6: Everything should be that. I mean, there is no reason that any government should get in between, doctor patient relationship. That that's none of their business. You know? The if anything is HIPAA protected, it should be that.
I mean, when you think about it, it's 16. The same reason they won't use like other treatments that are being that are successful around the world. And I had a conversation with the doctor about this. Are you guys doing, like, different sorts of, like, treatments?
Speaker 11: Because I
Speaker 1: know, like Nothing works.
Speaker 6: They have yeah. But I mean, there's, you know, they're coming out with different things that are
Speaker 8: in the testing phase.
Speaker 1: It's the same thing they come with a flat one and that's killing more people than actually saved. Uh-huh. So that's 1.
Speaker 6: And he said that they don't work anyway. And I told him, well, obviously, what you guys have been going on here isn't working. So what's the harm in trying?
Speaker 1: I don't expect any of these people survive. 90% of them would die.
Speaker 6: I mean, it's just maintaining. So I figured if it's assumed they're gonna die anyway
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Just try and not throw a few.
Speaker 1: Well, it's, you know, I I don't know. That's that's always an issue in medicine whether this this whether they're dying anywhere or not. I
Speaker 6: But if you could find a cure, yeah, there's no cure.
Speaker 1: So there's no antiviral therapy. The only way to do it is cure. But I
Speaker 6: Or treatment, I should say. Re rephrase treatment.
Speaker 1: You could treat it but but, you know, it's let's have some scientific basis for whether these things are working or not. It's a strong everything at them. You could make them worse. Uh-huh. So Worse than death.
Speaker 6: Worse than death.
Speaker 1: Well, we said 90% maybe that 10% maybe. Maybe that too. I don't know. Yeah. Yeah.
So but, I mean, if there's no basis for it working, I mean, you wanna just try things, just because. I mean
Speaker 10: I would.
Speaker 3: Oh, I might.
Speaker 6: It could save my life. Yeah. Hell yeah.
Speaker 0: So with these actual COVID patients, they they present by not really being able to breathe. Maybe they've, as you say, they've probably waited too long. They're not able to breathe, and some of that's anxiety. And and what else so what else do they what how how else do they present?
Speaker 6: So if their lungs, if you look at their x rays, you can immediately see that these patients are affected by COVID because they're white. Their lungs are white, And the secretions are really, really thick mucus y and white. And that's what the the photo or the x-ray of these lungs look like.
Speaker 0: And what so what does a white lung look mean? What is that is that just is that mucus
Speaker 6: in the lung? It's coated. It's almost like their lungs are coated.
Speaker 0: So so that makes it hard to obviously transfer oxygen into the bloodstream. And Yeah. So okay. So they've got very mucus y lungs. And how how do you deal with that?
Is that what hydroxychloroquine and zinc do? Or I
Speaker 6: mean, those treatments are for beginning stages.
Speaker 0: Like,
Speaker 6: once you get to the stage where your lungs are looking like that and you're having a lot of trouble breathing, there are proven treatments that have passed the three trials in Asia through doctor Chang. He's a US board certified physician. Is this, like, extremely high dose IV vitamin c. He's successfully treating people with that. And what that's doing is it's giving your body essentially your lungs, like, the power, the antioxidant power to kick it out while you can be getting IV antibiotics to be treating this and getting rid of it.
But they don't wanna have anything to do with it here. What they wanna do is just throw them on a vent and sedate them. Yeah. Have you done the high dose IV vitamin c that's successful in Asia?
Speaker 1: Work really. There are other stuff that people are trying to find this stuff. There's no But it basis for
Speaker 3: And then
Speaker 6: well, the doctor Chang, he was the one that it went through the the that high dose. I'm talking super high dose IV vitamin c. That's super antioxidants. Tell your body fight that.
Speaker 3: Yeah. It
Speaker 6: passed 3 three trials and it's being effective. It's just weird how like everybody just like shuts it down immediately.
Speaker 1: Because it's vitamin d vitamin c story has been around for a very long time.
Speaker 6: Oh, that's weird because I take it daily, and I'm I'm a second.
Speaker 1: Just a good gene if you're not getting sick. I don't think it's done by the disease. I mean, just a good gene.
Speaker 0: So how quickly how quickly does so if you have a a COVID and a COVID rule out or a non COVID right next to each other on vents, Will the COVID patient die more quickly than the non COVID patient?
Speaker 6: If they're on vents, no. They're both the same at that point. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Really?
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 0: So even though the COVID patient with the, you know, presenting with a very mucus y lung I mean, are their lungs filled or they're just coated?
Speaker 6: I shouldn't say that. I'll take that back. It really depends on the person, how healthy they were before. That really determines how long that they're gonna be able to sustain the paralytics and, you know, sedation and multiple different procedures. Even when you're, like, sleeping or you're, like, you know, knocked out, sedated, and they're putting you through, like, these central lines that they're putting
Speaker 3: in and
Speaker 6: Trachs. They're doing trachs even though they're practicing essentially. Your body knows what's going on. It's still going through a trauma. It's very traumatic even when you're under.
That's why surgery, it takes a while to recover from. You'll feel it for, you know, how long do you feel that way if you've ever had a surgery. And so they're putting their bodies through, you know, through horrible things and that's adding more stress. It's killing them. Yeah.
So the guy that pulled out his tube is really unique, because I saw him from the minute he he got to our unit. I didn't agree with him coming to the ICU, but he was admitted with, hyperglycemia, which is high blood glucose, at, like, 700. So it was pretty high. I learned later that it was high because they were treating him with a lot of different psych drugs, and that increases he it was the treatment that got him to the 700. And when you have a blood glucose that high, you're automatically gonna have altered mental status.
So now they called him crazy. Okay? So he's admitted to the ICU and everyone's like, well, why is he here? Because he was acting, you know, he was acting out. He didn't know where he was.
He was confused. And I went in there and he wasn't my patient, but, you know, we help each other. And I went in there and I tried to talk to him and calm him down. Like, hey. He's just like, I just wanna get out of here.
I wanna get out of here. He has soft restraints on. So he's they they restrain everybody. We have soft restraints on all of our patients, the majority of them, for sure, which is I think is crazy. But it goes with it goes with the territory because everybody's really lazy, and it's easier to just treat them with drugs or tie them to their beds.
So he was tied up, obviously, what is that gonna do? It's gonna you're tied up in a hospital. You don't have any family. What do you think? You're gonna you're gonna freak out.
So he was. And his oxygen was sitting at, you know, 88, you know, 87, doctor comes in. I should say fellow comes in and she says that if he can't get his if she goes, if you can't get your breathing under control, we're gonna have to put a tube in you to help you with that. And I go, what? I'm like, he doesn't need a tube down his throat.
Like, he doesn't need a vent. She goes, well, yeah, he's he's d statty. And I said, no. Like, absolutely not. He does not need that.
We need to get his blood sugar under control, and he will be fine. And maybe not tied to this bed. And she goes, yeah. We'll talk about it. We'll we'll respond it to him.
And this was I was working night shift. This was probably around 6 AM. At quarter to 7, we had a code down the hall. Did the the code pass. Had to do all that.
Got out of there. I come back for a shift, and guess what? The guy is on a vent. I was so upset. They did it.
I guess the the nurses that took over said they did it literally as I left. So I come back in
Speaker 8: the morning and he's on a vent. And I'm like, you have to
Speaker 6: be kidding me. He did not need a vent.
Speaker 8: They waited for you to leave. They did. We literally we literally that was the morning we coded 28 for 3 minutes. That we know sooner took it out of that room. Cleaned it and put it in here.
Yeah. A tube temp. Yeah. They
Speaker 6: said his name. After he died, what happened on him? So they waited until I left because they know how I feel about this stuff. Same thing with bed 9. They didn't need to to intubate him.
He was progressing. I don't think that he I don't know what happened after. We tried by that and then they brought him here and I thought, well, cross my fingers and see. And no one survives. He did.
He was the only one that I got. That's what happened with him. But he pulled off his tube out and so he has a chance again. Oh. Oh, he did?
He had excavated himself.
Speaker 8: Oh, he did?
Speaker 6: I don't know that. I thought he was excavated.
Speaker 0: And how did he wake up, Kim?
Speaker 6: Turns out that he did drugs
Speaker 0: So he was resistant
Speaker 6: He was
Speaker 0: to Fentanyl.
Speaker 6: All of this stuff that we give normal people didn't cut it for him. So he end up yeah. I'm like, you just oh, I'm like, you just saved your own life, you know. It's crazy. Don't put that on.
Don't put that on. But I mean, it did. You know what's sad? So he pulled it out, and, they're like, oh, you know, so and so's excavated. I'm like, no way.
They don't excavate anybody. I'm like, that's so weird. Here, it turns out he excavated himself. And now he I mean, he's fine. He's home now.
This was just a couple days ago. But he you know what's sad is that he thinks we saved his life. You know what I mean? So he's like, you saved me. And I I couldn't you know, I don't have the heart to be like, no, man.
You saved yourself. You have like 9 lives because had he had he not pulled that out, he would definitely he would definitely be dead. For sure.
Speaker 3: They don't excavate anyone. Here's the problem.
Speaker 6: Not a single excavate anyone.
Speaker 1: Here's the problem. Not a single station here since this thing began. Has been discharged or or successfully excavated.
Speaker 6: I asked the, nursing supervisor for a sitter for the guy that pulled this tube out because when they're waking up, they can be they they can be extra, I should say, where they need a little bit of extra attention. And I asked her for a sitter, and she told me that I didn't utilize all my resources first, which was held all all the psych drugs to, like, chemically chemically, you know, put him to bed.
Speaker 0: Your Florida hospital was literally having to furlough people?
Speaker 6: Yes. What was happening is, obviously, they shut down all elective procedures. But they were also waiting for the wave. They called it the wave. So we were preparing, and we were in tiers based on our experience.
So we were tier 1, tier 2, tier 3, tier 4. And I was tier 1 because I have the, you know, military trauma experience, ICU experience, so on and so forth. So I was working, you know, throughout the hospital, training in other units, cross training. Ultimately, it was to get hours.
Speaker 0: It was what?
Speaker 6: There's to get hours. Yeah. Yeah. Right. This is what the hospitals were doing.
They're like, okay, we're gonna give our employees hours this way to cross train them for when the wave hits. And then that wave would get pushed back another week, and then it get pushed back another week. And the units that we were floating to, like, cross training, they're like, what are you doing here? We don't need you. You know, for so I felt like I was wasting my time and taking up other other people's time that we're trying to get ours to.
And this opportunity presented itself, and I took it.
Speaker 3: Do you
Speaker 0: think that the reason you never got a COVID wave in Florida was because of any of this lockdown? Or I mean, what I mean, I mean, I know you're not an epidemiologist, but what what do you think was
Speaker 6: going on? I am I live right by and that was like worldwide news. People were at the beach. I was one of those people at the beach with my kids. Sunlight is vitamin d.
It's good for your immunity. Fresh air, salt water. All these things are really good for anyone's, you know, immune system. You have to be out. Mental health.
You know, we were all at the beach.
Speaker 0: And so people if there was a lot of transmission going on
Speaker 6: Wouldn't you think our hospitals would be flooded? I'm right at the beach. I'm right by the beach. Didn't happen.
Speaker 0: Because the lockdowns happened after all that. And
Speaker 6: It was spring break. You know, the beaches were bad. I mean, there's people from all over the world. They were people are all I mean, tons of New Yorkers live by us. What do you what do
Speaker 0: you if you I I know I'm asking you to speculate here because you you really feel there is something, a new disease called COVID 19. A new do do you feel that that's the case, or do you think that this is I mean, I know there's a lot of mislabeling, and I know all that. And and and but there really is something new. Right? And and Yeah.
So okay. Yeah. Okay. And and how why do you think it you know, places like New York got, well, okay, we can see that what you were describing at Elmhurst was that they were packing people in together. And so that would cause spread.
But what why do you think place like New York got hit so much harder than other places?
Speaker 6: I thought about that already. What I found is that before this happened because it did make sense to me. I'm like, I'm sitting at home. I'm waiting for work. I'm stressing out.
A lot of my friends are doing the same. So I'm like digging in like why is New York like what what is it because there's that many people crunched in together? But ultimately, what I found is that the hospitals here were already struggling. I think they shut down, like, multiple hospitals because they couldn't afford to keep them open. So that made sense to me, Even though I didn't want it to make sense.
You know, like, there's really no other rhyme or reason. Because, like
Speaker 0: But do you think we have do you think we really do have many more cases regardless of whether or not, you know, people went to the hospital.
Speaker 6: I think they're forced cases. I mean, sure, people are coming in with COVID, whatever that may be. It is something, but not everyone. But they're admitting these people. That's the difference between New York hospitals or these, you know, Michigan, you know, the the states that were, you know, hit the hardest quote, they're admitting these patients as possible COVID, calling it COVID.
Speaker 0: Or rule out COVID.
Speaker 6: Rule out COVID, when they maybe just had a little congestion.
Speaker 0: If there was, something you would wanna tell everyone in the country and everywhere else, what would what one last thing, what would it be?
Speaker 6: I have a lot. I would say this as this is the one thing that I've had a struggle with is if someone like me or anybody is trying to tell you something that might go against your beliefs. Like just listen. You know, like really just take it in and instead of jumping on it, like think on it for a night or a day and like look into this stuff. Because and ask people about it.
Like not every nurse is gonna have the same experience. A med surg nurse that's on the floor, even in my
Speaker 3: own hospital, has not had the same
Speaker 6: experience as the ICU nurses We see that because we'll send them to your you know, so just like just think about it, you know, and and be be respectful and like, we don't wanna I don't no one wants to put themselves in a situation like this, you know? And it's really hard. And this is the reason that a lot more people and nurses are afraid because people are so quick to, you know, defend something that they don't really understand.
Speaker 0: What are you referring to in particular? Like this protocol or what?
Speaker 6: Like I referred to earlier, if you tell people, like, something and off over and over like the media was telling people, you know, fence, fence, fence, fence. And then you say as a nurse, no offense. You know, it's not a good Right. It's not a good position to be in because I'm going against what the government says. But does the government really have everybody's best interest in mind?
You know? Are they thinking of, you know, the 57 year old grandma that, you know, wasn't didn't have to die? Or the 37 year old that was totally fine when he walked into the emergency room and he didn't have to die. You know, are they thinking about, you know, maybe the guy that had a drug problem that didn't have to be vented but he saved his own life? I don't have anything to gain.
I have everything to lose by sharing what I'm sharing right now. You know, but so be it. You know, I think it's important that these families get closure and I hope that someday they'll be able to, you know, hold them accountable
Speaker 3: Mhmm.
Speaker 6: For what they did.
Speaker 0: A few days after we recorded this interview, Erin began to feel that her time at Elmhurst was drawing to a close. Her vocal questioning of hospital procedure and her efforts to get the word out on social media were getting noticed. She made this recording on what ended up being her last day at the hospital.
Speaker 10: I've been taking care of a patient for, like, a week right now, and who is this my and I called them? And he's been doing great. He had a trach put in and he's been doing great. He's been talking and like or communicating with me. He's telling me, like, laughing at my jokes and talking to his kids on FaceTime a couple days ago.
And I told him that. I told his kids that he was doing fine. And he and he was. And today, I was given him, and they came in, and they told me that I need to leave the room, and I have to give report to somebody else. They took me from that unit.
They put me in the emergency room. And they don't need me there, but they put me there. And I'm not even there, like, 20 minutes. I'm not even there 20 minutes, and I hear a code being called in my room that I was just left. And it's him.
And he was fine. He was fine. I don't understand. Nothing makes sense. Like, why would they take me out of his room and put me in the ED, and then not 20 minutes later, he's dead?
It doesn't make sense. Like, did they kill him? He was my one patient that was gonna live. He shouldn't have died. I don't know what they did to him.
Something's not right.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
This resulted from medical training now only teaching doctors to follow protocols and to believe anyone the protocols don't help could never be saved. Here I show how real doctors constantly look for solutions and always find a way to help their patients. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-doctors-give-up-on-patients
Why Do Doctors Give Up On Patients?
Exploring the Psychology Behind the Greatest Medical Disaster in History.
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Here, another nurse also shares how gross medical mismanagement killed many NYC patients. COVID hospital survival depended upon the skill of the caregivers and in many cases clueless healthcare workers killed patients. Sadly, Medicare incentivized this by paying more for deaths.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Patients are being harmed and dying due to gross negligence in medical care. Examples include incorrect intubation, inappropriate defibrillation on stable patients, and mismanagement of blood transfusions. Staff are failing to provide basic care, such as monitoring vital signs and addressing acidotic blood levels, leading to preventable deaths. Despite being aware of these issues, management and other staff are unresponsive, dismissing concerns about patient safety. There’s a lack of accountability, with patients often receiving inadequate treatment, particularly in a facility serving marginalized communities. The situation is dire, and there is a desperate need for intervention to prevent further loss of life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am literally telling you that they're murdering these people, and nobody will listen to me. These people aren't dying from COVID. They don't care what is happening to these people. They don't. I'm literally coming here every day and watching them kill them.
It's like going in the fucking twilight zone. Like, everyone here is okay with this. The only way I can kind of put this into context for everybody is and this is gonna be kind of an extreme example. This is, like, really the only thing I can come up with. It's like, if we were in Nazi Germany and they were, like, taking the Jews to go put them in a gas chamber, I am the one, like, there saying, hey.
This is not good. This is bad. This is wrong. We should not be doing this. And then everyone tells me, hang in there.
You're doing a great job. You can't save everybody. But these people aren't dying from COVID. Let me give you several examples here. An anesthesiologist, intubated the patient's, like, I think it was right bronchi and of a patient, and they couldn't get the stats up.
And for about 5 hours, like, we were waiting on a chest x ray to confirm that the placement was wrong. And in the meantime, while we're waiting for that and we've told the anesthesiologist that it was placed wrong because, like, literally only one side of his fucking chest is, like, inflating, He dies. A patient had a heart rate of 40 and the resident starts doing chest compressions on him, which is not what you do. You just externally pace them or you give him some atropine. And then, you know, I run-in there to stop him from doing chest compressions on somebody with the fucking pulse.
And then he decides to push epi. He throws some pads on them on him to to defibrillate the guy in bradycardia. Okay? He has a heart rate of 40 and a stable, you know, bradycardic rhythm. We just need to give him, like, somatropine and pace him.
He fucking defibrillates him and kills him. And I was literally ran out of, like, the patient's room to get, like, the director of nursing who was standing out there. And I'm like, can you stop him? He's going to kill that patient. He's going to kill that patient if he defibrillates him with bradycardia and a heart rate of 40.
And the director of nursing just shook his head, and I turned around, and he killed the dude. There was a nurse who played it placed an NG tube into, into some guy's lungs and filled his lungs with tube feeding. There was a nurse who confused a long acts acting insulin with a short acting insulin and gave 30 units of a fast acting insulin and killed the guy. It's just here they're just gonna let them rot on the vent. They're medically mismanaging these patients.
And, like, I'm not a doctor, guys. I'm not professing to be a doctor by any means. But there's, like I said, basic standards of care that we have to do. When somebody's low on blood, like, literally on the brink of a critical low blood level, we should replace the blood. But I asked the residents, and they're like, does does he have internal bleeding?
And I said, no. Then they're like, well, we're not replacing the blood. Well, here's the thing. In these COVID patients, they all eventually need a blood transfusion. Their blood like, if you don't have enough blood to actually oxygenate your body, the vent settings don't fucking matter because you have no oxygen carrying capacity of your blood.
We have a nurse who fell asleep at the fucking nurse's station while we were all in rooms, and her norepinephrine ran out. And the guy had no fucking blood pressure and didn't profuse his brain, and I'm pretty sure he's brain dead. That same nurse is now running a CRRT machine, a dialysis like machine that she has never done before. She said she'll figure it out. I'm pretty fucking smart, and I figure a lot of shit out, but I would never attempt to try and figure out a CRRT machine on the fly.
We are adequately staffed. There's a shit ton of staff in there, like and we have a nurse who does CRRT in there. She has a different patient loan. We told them, like, hey. Let's just swap these nurses so the one that knows how to work this machine can work this machine, but they didn't wanna do that.
So I'm pretty sure that patient will be dead here in a couple hours. Nobody is listening. They don't care what is happening to these people. They don't. I'm literally coming here every day and watching them kill them.
I mean, we're not gonna save everybody. That's fine. Like, come on, guys. We're not God. Some of these people are just on sedation to keep them on the vents.
Nothing else. I have a lady on a tranq on a vent, and she's not even fucking cognizant. She's not even on sedation. You know what we give her every day? We give her breathing treatments, albuterol, and, she gets insulin.
And that's it. We're not treating the COVID, guys. For real. We're not treating the COVID. You know, every day, we try and get these guys off the vents.
Right? Because, you know, there's criteria for weaning. Every day, the day shift nurse will wean them down to minimum sedation. Every night, we come in and we get the same 2 residents, and they fucking max out all the sedation again and undo all the work from the day shift. And the day shift attending will come in and they'll all do rounds, And they'll be like, he wasn't synchronizing with the vent, so we had to turn all the sedation on.
And I'm like, he wasn't synchronizing with the vent because it's in the wrong vent mode. I even tried getting a hold, like, of black advocacy groups here. They just put me on hold or hang up on me. Tried talking to management. Now I got new units.
Can someone come up with, like, some type of solution for me? Because I'm kinda out of ideas. You know what? I I try and talk with some of the other nurses here, and they're like, well, you can't save everybody. And they all know what's happening.
They all agree with me, and they all just shake their heads. And I'm like, am I the only one who is not a sociopath to think that this is okay? I mean, guys, they literally don't even know when they're dead. Like, how many times have I told you they've assigned me a dead person? Like, how long have they been dead?
Nobody knows. Like, how is anybody assessing anything without a stethoscope? Normally, we have, like, those disposable stethoscopes, but I knew what we were coming into. So I brought my old chunky one. Nobody nobody has listened to anybody's lungs as long as I've been here, even with disposable stethoscopes.
I keep telling them that, you know, the guys are like, the my patient's going acidotic. We need to do something about this before his kidney shut down. You know, give him some bicarb or something like that. And this is what they do. They let the patient's blood get acidotic.
Their kidneys shut down, and then at the last minute, they finally decide to run bicarb. So they run 5 liters of bicarb into a person who's gained £20 of water weight and completely throw him into heart failure, and he dies several hours later. That was one of my patients. So I let them home. Like, they had me start the bicarb, like, before I left one night.
And by the time I had come back in, the next shift, he was dead. And they assigned him to me, and he was already in a body bag. Like, guys, they're not dying of COVID. I am literally telling you that they're murdering these people, and nobody will listen to me. I mean, like I said, I'm not a doctor, but I'm pretty sure that when you defibrillate somebody with a heartbeat of 40 and a stable rhythm and you kill them, that's murder.
And I'm pretty sure that when you put somebody's peep up to, like, 25 and PEEP doesn't go past, I think, like, 15, 20, and you blow their lungs out and they die, I'm pretty sure that's murder. And I've just watched a doctor drop a central line and fucking rupture, like, the sub like, clavian, like, vein, and the guy fucking bled to death. I mean, COVID didn't place that central line. COVID didn't kill that guy. I mean, he was a COVID patient.
I mean, every single patient I've taken care of, guys, is a COVID patient. Like, I've never had a non COVID patient. Watch the anesthesiologist placed an ET tube and rushed for their esophagus, and then guy choked to death on his own blood. COVID didn't place that ET tube incorrectly. Nobody cares because they're all minorities, and we're in the fucking hood.
You know, and that's just not okay. What I need is someone to help me save these people from being killed, from gross negligence and complete medical mismanagement. Yeah. My lead at the other hospital who advocated for the patients too, like, the first day I got there, that was an orientation, like, that crash course orientation. He warned me that I was gonna have a problem.
He would advocate for the patients too. They fucking moved him too. He's at a completely different hospital. I tried reaching out to him, but he hasn't texted me. Like, I what if you think I saw what was bad?
He saw way worse shit than that. Alright, guys. I'm going in the unit. Let's see how they kill him there. Okay?
Stay safe. Stay out of NYC for your health care.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
From having talked to numerous doctors in NYC, I believe the death rate there was so high because: •Medicare did not incentivize saving patients and paid more if they were put on lethal protocols or died. •Many of the people in NYC had immense psychosocial stress and pre-existing health conditions which made them much more vulnerable to COVID. •A collective fear and anxiety took over the area. Because of this, many patients went to the ER early in their illness and were aggressively put onto ventilators by panicked staff, who then accepted this was a once in a century plague and that those deaths were "innevitable." •Likewise, one of the greatest things that worsens respiratory distress is anxiety or fear, and that essentially spread like a contagion through NYC during the early days of COVID-19, causing many borderline COVID patients to go into respiratory failure. •Because the doctors were terrified of COVID (as they saw coworkers die), they avoided the COVID patients (e.g., putting them alone in ICU rooms), which caused the patients to get less care and attention than they needed. •The media (and the DNC) greatly benefitted from stoking as much fear about the pandemic, so the people in NYC were effectively sacrificed to cement a belief is this national emergency. •There was such a large surge in patients requiring COVID-19 care that many of the healthcare workers who treated them were simply not prepared to handle critically ill patients, resulting in them grossly mismanaging the cases and killing the patients (as these nurses attested). •The COVID-19 quarantine protocols kept COVID-19 patients from having patient advocates who would normally prevent these incidents. •Because the US medical system ignored what was happening in China and then Europe, they were grossly unprepared for COVID-19. As such, the early treatment protocols they used were totally inappropriate for the disease (e.g., it took a long time for American medicine to recognize steroids helped). •One of the unusual aspects of COVID-19 is that its spike protein has a high positive charge density that collapses the physiologic zeta potential of the body, causing microclots throughout the body. Because of this, it rapidly obstructs the circulation in smaller blood vessels which can't pass those microclots (whereas larger vessels like the ones you require to stay alive are relatively unaffected). Since blood oxygen levels are normally measured in the fingers (which lost much of their blood supply), this resulted in COVID patients having very "low" blood oxygen levels, which in standard ICU care requires immediately intubating the patients to pre-emept respiratory failure. Over time, ICU docs realized that COVID-19 patients with low O2 sats were actually fine (e.g., "happy hypoxics") and because less aggressive with intubating them (as it was then clear the risks of ventilating them greatly outweighed the benefits), but during the early waves this was not known. I explain the final point (zeta potential and COVID-19) in more detail here (and how it relates to vaccine injuries): https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-all-vaccines-so-dangerous
What Makes All Vaccines So Dangerous?
Exploring the forgotten but critically important science of zeta potential
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
A key issue with COVID was that the spike protein caused microclotting. Since blood oxygen is measured in the fingers (which get blocked by microclots), patients who were fine appeared to be critically hypoxic and were erroneously intubated, killing them. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-all-vaccines-so-dangerous
What Makes All Vaccines So Dangerous?
Exploring the forgotten but critically important science of zeta potential
midwesterndoctor.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I worked as a nurse in NYC during the peak of COVID-19 and witnessed countless unnecessary deaths. I recorded instances where doctors refused to treat patients with effective off-patent therapies, adhering strictly to protocols that had a high fatality rate. This highlights the troubling incentives in medicine: following standard procedures ensures financial rewards, while advocating for patients can lead to professional and legal repercussions. My recordings serve as crucial evidence of the realities faced by healthcare workers during the pandemic.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
🧵Nurse Erin worked in NYC at the hardest hit COVID hospital in America. She witnessed a horrifying number of needless deaths and exposed why so many people actually died. This secret recording shows how doctors would not treat patients they knew would die with anything except the standard protocols (which had a 90% fatality rate), even when she begged them to use the off-patent therapies which were saving lives around the world. This demonstrates the perverse incentives in medicine. If you do what you are supposed to, you get paid generously and never have to worry about getting in trouble, even if you kill all of your patients. In contrast, if you do the right thing and fight for your patients (saving their lives), the medical profession and the legal system will target you, even if you're the only one saving lives. Many stories like Erin's happened throughout the pandemic, but her recordings provide the critical proof of what actually happened throughout the pandemic.
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's frustrating that effective treatments aren't being utilized. A conversation with a doctor revealed that many current treatments aren't working, and there's skepticism about trying new methods. Despite the high mortality rate, some believe it's worth exploring alternatives. Patients often present with severe breathing issues and thick mucus in their lungs, which complicates oxygen transfer. Proven treatments, like high-dose IV vitamin C, have shown success in trials but are dismissed here. Instead, patients are often sedated and placed on ventilators. There's a reluctance to accept these treatments, despite their potential benefits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I mean, when you think about it, it's sickening. It's the same reason they won't use, like, other treatments that are being that are successful around the world. And I had a conversation with a doctor about this.
Speaker 1: Are you guys doing, like, different sorts of, like, treatments? Because I know, like
Speaker 2: Nothing works.
Speaker 1: They have yeah. But I mean, there's, you know, they're coming out with different things
Speaker 0: that are
Speaker 1: in the testing phase.
Speaker 2: It's the same thing they come with a platinum. That's 2 more people than actually say. Uh-huh. So that's 1.
Speaker 0: And he said that they don't work anyway. And I told him, well, obviously, what you guys have going on here isn't working. So what's the harm in trying?
Speaker 2: I don't expect any of these people survive. 90% of them would die.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just maintaining. So I figured if it's assumed, they're gonna die anyway.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Just try and
Speaker 1: not throw a few.
Speaker 2: Well, it's, you know, I I don't know. That's that's always an issue in medicine whether if you just do it and whether they're dying anywhere or not. I
Speaker 0: But if you could find a cure,
Speaker 2: you have been like cure. So there's no antivirus therapy. The only way to do it is cure. But I there's no Or treatment,
Speaker 1: I should say.
Speaker 0: Re rephrase treatment.
Speaker 2: You could treat it, but but, you know, it's you have to have some scientific basis for whether these things are worse or not. It just thrown everything at them. You could make them worse. Uh-huh. So
Speaker 1: Yeah. Worse than death. Worse than death?
Speaker 2: Well, we said 90% maybe that 10% maybe. Maybe they're true. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: So but, I mean, if there's no basis for it working, I mean, you wanna just try things just because I mean
Speaker 1: I would. I might. It could save
Speaker 0: my life. Yeah. Hell, I do.
Speaker 3: So with these actual COVID patients, they they present by not really being able to breathe. Maybe they've, as you say, they've probably waited too long. They're not able to breathe, and some of that's anxiety. And and what else so what else do they what how how else do they present?
Speaker 0: So their lungs, if you look at their x rays, you can immediately see that these patients are affected by COVID because they're white. Their lungs are white and the secretions are really, really thick mucus y and white. And that's what the the photo or the x-ray of these lungs look like.
Speaker 3: And what so what does a white lung look mean? What is that is that just is that mucus?
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's coated. It's almost like their lungs are coated.
Speaker 3: So so that makes it hard to obviously transfer oxygen into the bloodstream. And so okay. So they've got very mucus y lungs. And how how do you deal with that? Is that what hydroxychloroquine and zinc do?
Or I
Speaker 0: mean, those treatments are for beginning stages. Like, once you get to the stage where your lungs are looking like that and you're having a lot of trouble breathing, there are proven treatments that have passed the three trials in Asia through doctor Chang. He's a US board certified physician. Is this, like, extremely high dose IV vitamin c. He successfully treated people with that.
And what that's doing is it's giving your body essentially your lungs, like, the power, the antioxidant power to kick it out while you can be getting IV antibiotics to be treating this and getting rid of it. But they don't wanna have anything to do with it here. What they wanna do is just throw them on a vent and sedate
Speaker 1: them. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Have you done the high dose IV vitamin c that is successful in Asia?
Speaker 2: Or really other stuff. There's a people trying to sell this stuff. There's no But it basis for vitamin CQ working here. And then
Speaker 0: Well, the doctor Chang, he was the one that it went through the the that high dose. I'm talking super high dose IV vitamin c. That's super antioxidants. Tell it's your body fight that.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: It passed 3 three trials, and it's being effective. It's just weird how, like, everybody just, like No. No. No. Shuts it down immediately.
Speaker 2: Because it's vitamin d vitamin c story has been around for a very long time.
Speaker 0: Oh, that's weird because I take it daily
Speaker 2: and I'm I'm a second. Just a good gene if you're not getting sick. I don't think somebody doesn't see
Speaker 3: any.
Speaker 2: Just a good gene.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned about the misinformation surrounding vaccines, particularly regarding whooping cough and COVID-19. The CDC director's comments about vaccination choices highlight a misunderstanding of how these vaccines work, as they do not prevent transmission. This mirrors the misleading claims made about the COVID vaccine, which also did not prevent transmission. Biden's speech incited division based on these inaccuracies. Additionally, the flu shot mandates for healthcare workers lack evidence for preventing transmission. The history of vaccine marketing often relies on misleading slogans, creating unnecessary fear and disruption.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
🧵Here a CDC director says it "scares him" parents could legally chose not to vaccinate because they're "hearing all of this misinformation" and infect other vulnerable children with whooping cough. The whooping cough vaccine DOES NOT prevent transmission. It only reduces your reaction to the pertussis bacteria's toxin (hence preventing the whooping cough), making individuals "silent" spreaders. Because of this, whooping cough cases are often not diagnosed (as doctors are erroneously trained to assume only the unvaccinated can get it) and there have been numerous whooping cough outbreaks at vaccinated schools. Anyone who works in the CDC should know this basic immunological fact and saying anything else is deliberate misinformation.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccination should be a collective responsibility, not just a parental choice. In America, we have a social contract that emphasizes public health, where vaccinating our children protects not only them but also others in the community. When children go to school, it's crucial to ensure that they are not at risk of diseases like measles or whooping cough due to misinformation leading some parents to opt out of vaccinations. This is especially important for children with immune issues who rely on herd immunity. We vaccinate our kids out of care for our families and our community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the idea that that receiving vaccines would be parental choice, scares me. You know, one of the things that we have in America is a contract between each other. And an important part of that in public health is vaccination. I vaccinate my children to protect them but also to protect other people's children. You know, sending a child to school, you you need to have that confidence that the child sitting next to them isn't gonna give them measles or whooping cough because their parent decided that they didn't wanna get their child vaccinated because they're hearing all of this misinformation.
We count on it. What if that child had an immune problem, and they're in there and their parent and their children who decided not to be vaccinated? We vaccinate our kids because we care about our children, our our families, and our community.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
It's the same as how they all told us the COVID vaccine prevented transmission even though: •It was also only designed to reduce your symptomatic reactions to COVID, not prevent you getting colonized by COVID. •It was never tested for its ability to prevent transmission. •Evidence quickly emerged of COVID-19 being spread amongst the vaccinated.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
On the basis of those lies, Biden then issued one of the most chilling speeches in American history where he incited widespread hatred for not vaccinating to justify his mandates—even though his claims were known by the CDC to be lies at the time of this speech.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
This is also very similar to how healthcare workers are forced by Medicare to get the flu shot to "protect" their patients from the flu, even though, as I show here, the influenza vaccine has never been proven to prevent transmission (or even work). https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vaccines-consistently-fail
Why Do Vaccines Consistently Fail to Prevent Disease Transmission?
Many of you have been treated in horrific ways by your friends and family throughout the pandemic for refusing to adopt the nonsensical or dangerous pandemic management strategies that were force-fed to us by the media.
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
If you study the history of vaccines, you will find over and over a nonsensical (but effective) marketing slogan is developed and then repeatedly reused. For example, prior to the COVID-19 vaccines, I had many distressed grandparents contact me to share that their children's pediatrician had banned them from seeing their grandchildren because they refused to be up to date on their DPT (whooping cough) vaccine. Yet, despite this being absurd and highly disruptive to the families it worked, leading to the read being pathed to use the same lie on the public.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
If a vaccine can only "protect" you if the other person is vaccinated as well, that means the vaccine doesn't work. However, thanks to a corrupt media, they've been able to sell that nonsensical lie to the public for decades. I provide all that data here: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vaccines-consistently-fail
Why Do Vaccines Consistently Fail to Prevent Disease Transmission?
Many of you have been treated in horrific ways by your friends and family throughout the pandemic for refusing to adopt the nonsensical or dangerous pandemic management strategies that were force-fed to us by the media.
midwesterndoctor.com
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 1960s, DMSO emerged as a groundbreaking treatment for chronic pain, injuries, strokes, and spinal cord paralysis, but the FDA suppressed it. Despite extensive evidence supporting its safety and efficacy, the FDA claimed it was dangerous. I compiled toxicology data to highlight DMSO's safety. If approved, it could have saved millions from severe health issues. Since sharing my insights on DMSO, I've received incredible stories from readers who tried my protocols, showcasing its potential benefits. I encourage others to share their experiences.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In the 1960s a miraculous treatment for chronic pain, traumatic injury, strokes and spinal cord paralysis was discovered that spread across America like wildfire—until the FDA buried it. Here, 60 Minutes exposed the FDA using the same playbook they used throughout COVID-19. A🧵
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In this article, I show how DMSO safely freed millions from chronic pain and was proven to rapidly treat 80-90% of injury. Yet, despite decades of incredible data and widespread protest for it to be legalized, the FDA still buried it. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-is-a-miraculous-therapy-for
DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries
The decades of evidence DMSO revolutionizes the practice of medicine
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The FDA's justification for prohibiting DMSO was that it was incredibly dangerous. In truth, the evidence showed DMSO was one of the safest substances in existence. Here I compiled all the existing toxicology data on DMSO for anyone wishing to use it. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkable-history-and-safety
The Remarkable History and Safety of DMSO
Please share your experiences with DMSO with the readers here!
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
If DMSO was used for strokes and spinal cord injuries, millions would be spared from death, paralysis, and disability. Here I provide the evidence that show's just how unconscionable to FDA's prohibition of DMSO was. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-could-save-millions-from-brain
DMSO Could Save Millions From Brain and Spinal Injury
The decades of evidence showing DMSO revolutionizes the care of many "untreatable" circulatory and neurologic conditions.
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Since writing about DMSO a few weeks ago, I've received many almost unbelievable stories (ie. for injuries, chronic pain, Down syndrome and Parkinson's) from readers who decided to try the protocols I presented. Please take a look at them and share yours! https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkable-history-and-safety
The Remarkable History and Safety of DMSO
Please share your experiences with DMSO with the readers here!
midwesterndoctor.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I've noticed a troubling trend where liberal outlets are calling for the elimination of the Constitution, reminiscent of past tactics to distract from wealth inequality by framing class issues as racial ones. The growing wealth gap has made life unaffordable, leading to protests against the upper class, which in turn has fueled divisive narratives promoted by major media and academia since 2013. The DEI industry has thrived on this, creating a false sense of pervasive racism. I believe exposing these grifters could significantly impact the upcoming election.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Many liberal outlets have begun calling to eliminate the Constitution. This is very similar to how they flooded us with stories about racism and funded DEI in 2013 after Occupy Wall Street took off—protecting the upper class by pitting everyone else against each other. A 🧵
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
This biggest story of our time is the upward shift in wealth which has transformed America from a country where a single high school graduate could easily support a family and buy a house to one where both parents with college degrees can't imagine either.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
As the entire economy became unaffordable, people began protesting against the predatory upper class that was gobbling up its wealth for themselves. In response, they used a tried and true tactic—reframe a class issue into a race issue and pit the workers against each other.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
@DavidRozado has done remarkable work showing how our media was bought out in 2013 to push this divisive through saturating us with terms like "racism" "white supremacy" "sexist" "transphobic"
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In turn, the New York Times and The Washington Post were some of the most aggressive promoters of this ideology.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Likewise, @DavidRozado showed how the academic press was bought out in 2013 to promote this narrative
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In turn, once it was established, with the help of corporate America and Blackrock, this was transformed into a push for DEI which has now eroded our most critical institutions (e.g., the military).
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Because of how much money there in fighting racism (but very little racism left), the DEI industry has had create more and more "racism" out of thin air. Here @MattWalshBlog and @jimmy_dore expose the DEI hustlers for the grifters they are.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
As a child, I was told the upper class would usher an era of economic feudalism where everyone would be forced to submit to their corporate masters to just barely survive. All of that came true, especially during the DEI and COVID era. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-were-the-economic-consequences
What Were the Economic Consequences of the Unjustifiable COVID Lockdowns?
Exploring the decades of "You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy"
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
This graph, in short, explains why: •Companies like Blackrock are buying up America's housing while simultaneously forcing DEI on the country. •Kamala Harris keeps citing DEI to justify her election and refuses to provide a single concrete way she'll fix the economy.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
As the economy worsens, the upper class's sway over the people does as well. In turn, they've pivoted from labeling everything as "racism" to calling all dissent "political extremism" and now are going even further and trying to abolish the Constitution.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
For example, Peter Hotez, one of the chief apologists for the vaccine industry is continually hosted by the national to claim any skepticism of his industry is "far right extremism" or "deadly antiscience" law enforcement must be mobilized to silence. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/peter-hotezs-war-against-science
Peter Hotez's War Against Science
Approaches for dealing with those who promote falsehoods and seek to silence the truth
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
"Am I A Racist" exposes the grifters behind the DEI industry who are being subsidized by corporate America to create a national hysteria over non-existent racism. I believe if this movie was widely seen it would tip the election as this madness is what Harris is running on.
reSee.it AI Summary
During the COVID lockdowns, health officials recommended avoiding physical intimacy, yet many were caught breaking their own rules for personal pleasure. I highlighted absurd guidelines from health authorities, like maintaining distance while engaging in solo activities or using Zoom for sex. The rationale behind lockdowns often lacked evidence, with some officials justifying their hypocrisy by claiming stress relief was necessary for their jobs. This situation reveals how leaders can act without accountability, and I believe humor is an effective way to expose their contradictions.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
During the COVID lockdowns, health officials were so drunk with power they recommended completely avoiding physical intimacy. Simultaneously, the most zealous officials got busted for secretly having sex parties or breaking curfew to visit a mistress. A 🧵
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In this article, I collected examples of global health authorities (like the CDC) advising: •Being at least 6 feet away from your partner while masturbating together. •Only having "sex" over Zoom. •Practicing "solo sex." •Using glory holes. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/this-is-real-advice-from-the-cdc
This is Real Advice from the CDC
For those of you who had any doubts on if you should trust this fine organization
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
However, the justification for the lockdowns was non-sensical, no evidence existed for social distancing. In fact, the fear-mongering professor who pushed all of this took them so seriously he got caught breaking his lockdowns to visit his mistress. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8292249/Scientist-Neil-Fergusons-lover-said-lockdown-strained-marriage.html
Scientist Neil Ferguson's lover said lockdown 'strained' her marriage
Professor Ferguson, 51, asked Antonia Staats, 38, to travel across London from her £1.9million home at least twice despite lecturing Britain on the need to stay apart to stop the spread of the virus.
dailymail.co.uk
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Similarly, in the Atlantic article, the health official (who had stated he wanted to do all he could to pressure people to comply) justified his actions by stating the lockdowns created a lot of stress so he needed to blow off steam to keep doing his job. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2024/09/jay-varma-covid-sex-parties/679983/
Public-Health Officials Should Have Been Talking About Their Sex Parties the Whole Time
An absurd lesson in transparency and hypocrisy
theatlantic.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Sadly, as I show here: •Social distancing came from...a high school science fair project •The lockdown model was completely non-sensical •Places that locked down had higher COVID deaths •Approaches that did prevent COVID were routinely suppressed https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-were-such-terrible-approaches
Why Were Such Terrible Approaches Chosen to Handle COVID-19?
We must understand what happened so it can't be done to us next time
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
To me, the key lesson from all of this is that leaders are often immensely hypocritical, particularly when they are given a blank check to do whatever they want and not held accountable for their failures. In turn, I believe humorously exposing them is the best way to stop them.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Simultaneously, the thing that really struck me about this is that the health officials knew how much the lockdowns were harming the public and were willing to break the stressful rules for themselves...but simultaneously would not relent on what they forced the public to do.
reSee.it AI Summary
I was surprised to see RFK invited to Fox to discuss the dangers of seed oils, food dyes, and pesticides, highlighting the corruption behind these products. It feels like there's a real opportunity to Make America Healthy Again. On another note, Ozempic, touted as a solution for weight loss, has significant drawbacks: many users experience side effects, digestion issues, and the weight often returns after stopping. An interview with Calley Means and Tucker Carlson further exposes the corruption in our regulatory system, particularly regarding Ozempic.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
RFK was just invited to Fox to tell the nation about the dangers of Seed Oils, Food Dyes and Pesticides while exposing the immense corruption behind these products. I never expected to see this in my lifetime and I now believe there's a real window to Make America Healthy Again
Video Transcript AI Summary
Seed oils are unhealthy ingredients linked to serious illnesses like body-wide inflammation, but are used in processed foods because they are heavily subsidized. The government subsidizes unhealthy foods due to corruption, with 75% of the FDA's budget coming from regulated industries that profit from a sick population.
Food coloring, like yellow food coloring, is a petroleum product associated with depression, autoimmune injuries, and ADHD. While Europe uses natural coloring, the US uses almost 1,000 chemicals in food that are banned or discouraged in Europe. 70% of the food stamp program subsidizes processed foods.
"Natural flavors" are chemical products, and ingredient labels cannot be trusted due to government corruption and agencies being captured by the industries they regulate. Non-organic produce like kale and strawberries are contaminated with pesticides, with the Environmental Working Group identifying the "dirty dozen" worst offenders. Unless certified organic, these foods can be harmful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why should people be worried about these kind of products?
Speaker 1: Seed oils are one of the, the most unhealthy, ingredients that we have in foods. And seed oils, The reason they're in the foods is because they're heavily subsidized. They're very, very cheap, but they, they are associated with all kinds of very, very serious illnesses, including, body wide inflammation Right. Which affects all of our health. It's one of the worst things you can eat, and it's almost impossible to avoid.
If you eat any processed food, you're gonna be eating seed oil.
Speaker 0: Right. And it's interesting the government subsidizes it. Why would the government wanna subsidize something that's gonna make people sick? And then in the end, we all end up paying for that in in terms of health care costs, which are skyrocketing.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Because that that is a direct result of corruption. 75% of FDA's budget comes from regulated industry, and that means food processors and pharmaceutical industry, all of them profit from a sick population.
Speaker 0: You know, the a big item that and and by the way, it's getting very expensive, are cereals. Why is the food coloring in particular bad?
Speaker 1: Food coloring, you see your yellow food coloring, that is a petroleum product. Mhmm. It's associated with really, you know, with with depression. It's associated with autoimmune injuries and ADHD. Yeah.
These and red dye also is, you know, is very bad. In Europe, the same companies are producing the same products, but they're using natural coloring. But here, they can get away with it. We have about almost a 1,000 chemicals that are in our food that are either outright banned in Europe or actively discouraged. So you wouldn't be able to buy this kind of stuff in Europe.
You ask about why it's so cheap, why it's so, ubiquitous. It's because we subsidize the worst foods. We subsidize it with about 70% of our food stamp program is to process foods, which are all poison.
Speaker 0: Right. One other thing that's interesting is you'll see on on labels, natural flavors, which is this catch off phrase that I guess was lobbied for, but the ingredients in natural flavors are not really natural.
Speaker 1: No. In our country, natural flavors are are chemical products. So you can't trust what's on the ingredient label, and the reason for that again is government corruption. It's that the agency, the USDA, the FDA have been captured by the industries they're supposed to regulate, and they all have an interest in in subsidies and then in mass poisoning, the American public.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I wanna talk about pesticides, and then let's talk to the about the policy. So let's talk about the pesticides and the and the things that worry you about. I mean, this looks like fresh food. Right?
What should I be worried about here?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, the irony is, like, for example, my wife loves kale, and she had the impression that kale is actually good for you. If it's organic, it's very good for you. But most kale and strawberries, for example, grapes are contaminated with pesticides and and particularly the environmental working group has found what they call the dirty dozen, some of the worst pesticides on these products. So, you know, I wanna I look at a strawberry and I think, oh, this is a healthy food.
But in most cases, unless it's organic, certified organic, you are getting something that's actually hurting you.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Unfortunately, Ozempic, the "solution" to this new epidemic: •Gives half of users side effects and over 30% quit in a month •Paralyzes digestion and raises the risk of severe GI issues (ie pancreatitis) by 50-900% •The weight lost returns once you stop https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-ozempic-scam-and-safer
The Great Ozempic Scam and The Safe Ways to Lose Weight
The Immense Dangers of the GLP-1 drugs and the Scandalous Corruption That Led the FDA to Push Them Upon America
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
This except for @calleymeans interview with @TuckerCarlson lays how bare how corrupt our regulatory system has become (through showing exactly what's happened with Ozempic) https://t.co/LSmW4NjcsU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The average 65-year-old in the US takes about seven drugs. 95% of people on the USDA nutrition guidelines had conflicts of interest with food companies, influencing school lunches, where the USDA serves 3 billion meals yearly. Kraft Heinz is brokering deals to put Lunchables in schools, a top growth area.
Novo Nordisk, the Ozempic manufacturer, is now Europe's most valuable company, with almost all revenue from the US due to a broken system. 30% of Americans with insurance coverage stop using Ozempic within three months, despite it being touted as a lifetime drug. Lawsuits are emerging regarding gastrointestinal issues and stomach paralysis, which may persist after discontinuing the drug. The EU is probing suicidal ideation linked to Ozempic.
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends Ozempic as a first-line defense for teens based on a 68-week study. Pharma is the largest TV news ad spender, and Novo Nordisk is a major funder of obesity research, medical groups, and civil rights groups, including paying the NAACP, who claims that not supporting Ozempic is racist. Analyst reports assume increased obesity rates, and loans for obesity treatment centers project growth in obesity. Weight Watchers, now an Ozempic prescriber, shifted from personal accountability due to Ozempic's superior business model.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The average, say, 65 year old person in this country is on how many drugs?
Speaker 1: The about about 7.
Speaker 2: 95% of people on the USDA nutrition guidelines for America 2020 to 2025 had a conflict of interest with food companies. These studies are used to influence what the u d USDA is basically saying can go in school lunches. The USDA controls the US school lunch program, which serves 3,000,000,000 meals per year to students. The largest fast food chain in America is the USDA school lunch program. And, you know, just this past year, Kraft Heinz is brokering deals with the USDA to put Lunchables in schools.
Speaker 1: These It's a top growth area for Kraft. So all you need to know is that Novo Nordics, the company that makes this drug, recently passed LVMH to become the most valuable company in Europe. They don't allow this drug for obesity in Europe. Almost all of Novo Nordics revenue is coming from taking advantage of Americans. They are saying on their stock calls that their all of their growth is coming from the US.
They're taking advantage of a broken US system in the United States. And when you dive into it, even people in the United States who are getting government funding, insurance funding for this drug don't have to pay for it. 30% of them go off the drug within 3 months. So even though they're fully being paid for and we're being told this is a lifetime drug, there's lawsuits coming just reported in the past couple days on gastrointestinal issues and stomach paralysis. The drug itself essentially is, stomach paralysis, to to make you not be able to process food correctly.
And there's studies now saying that that stomach paralysis, the really, messing with your ability to digest food, actually stays after you go off the drug. So there's lawsuits now with people with severe gastrointestinal issues after coming off the drugs. Additionally, you're consistently seeing patients who go off the drugs, gain the weight back. Additionally, the EU, again, where this company is based, just launched a, a probe into suicidal ideation caused by Ozempic because there's so many reports of increased depression and increased suicide. The problem is where the rubber really hits the road is there is an all out assault to convince us that this is the appropriate drug.
Again, this is the target market. This is why the stocks are popping and why Wall Street's going crazy. It's the biggest TAM, the biggest target market for any drug in American history. It's 80% of American adults, but it's being fast tracked. You wouldn't believe this, but the American Academy of Pediatrics recently said that they recommend this as a first line of defense for teens.
And the study basing that decision for the American Academy of Pediatrics to say that every obese or overweight teen, which is 50%, should take this drug, was a 68 week study. We had a 68 week study for a lifetime recommendation to 50% of teens in America to to receive these injections. Just step back and think about it. Pharma is the largest spender on TV new ad news ads. It's the largest spender.
Novo Nordisk, specifically, is the largest spender on foundational obesity research. It's the largest spender on, medical to medical groups like the AAP. It's one of the largest, funders of actual civil rights groups. So you actually can't even believe this, but Novo Nordics is paying the NAACP to say that not supporting Ozempic is a civil rights issue.
Speaker 0: So you're racist if you're against giving kids a diabetes drug?
Speaker 1: It's on the n, double, a c p website, and the n, double, a c p is a registered lobbyist for Ozempic, saying that you are a racist because there's disproportionate issues, with obesity in certain communities, that you're a racist for not supporting government funding for Ozempic. We're being asked to trust pharma when 80% of the American people, their bodies are, like, rebelling against them, with obesity, which are clearly a sign of of underlying issues, where Ozempic and daily you know, weekly shots is not the root cause. This just, on its face, doesn't make sense. And then you trace the corruptions. Again, Ozempic is paying off everyone.
They are one of the 5 largest funders the company itself, one of the 5 largest funders of news ads, one of the, you know, top research funders of obesity research, largest funders to university on the obesity topic. And and the thing I, you know, kind of kind of ram home here, Tucker, is you just have to look where the money is. So if you actually look at the analyst reports that are propping up these stocks, they're assuming an increase in obesity. So you talk about all the, like, the Novo Nordisk's largest company, in Europe. They literally in in the where the money hits the road, where people are investing 1,000,000,000 of dollars, they're assuming increased rates of obesity over the next 10 years in America.
You actually, I was talking to a a a doctor at Harvard. They you know, they're underwriting a loan for a new obesity center where they can where they can treat an issue as Ipic. Those loans have projections for growth of obesity. They're not projecting that increased Ozepic is gonna decrease obesity. The loans that are underpinning these medical centers if you go to any any city in the country, the biggest, most beautiful building is is, you know, some kind of new pediatric, you know, obesity center or cardiology center.
The the loans assume increased rates of conditions. So, fundamentally, we have the largest energy in the country, health care, not asking imagine the leader saying, how do we reverse obesity? How do we cure they're not asking that. They're saying, how can we actually say obesity is not your fault? Oprah, who's involved with rate Weight Watchers, just apologized for preaching her personal accountability over the past decade.
She said it's not personal accountability. We're supporting Ozempic. Yeah. Weight Watchers has shifted from a personal accountability organization that it's been, preaching for decades and is now a prescriber of Ozempic. They've totally changed because Ozempic is a better business model because you never go off of it.
This is insane.
reSee.it AI Summary
The smallpox vaccine had negative consequences and failed to prevent outbreaks. Governments blamed these outbreaks on insufficient vaccination and enforced strict mandates, which faced resistance. Similarities between smallpox and COVID vaccines include the cover-up of injuries and breakthrough infections. Mandates were only lifted after public protests, and a successful alternative approach was adopted globally.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The smallpox vaccine was never proven to work, and quickly injured a lot of people. Worse still, it not only failed to prevent smallpox but caused outbreaks. Governments (like now) attributed those outbreaks to "insufficient vaccination" and enacted increasingly harsh mandates that met widespread resistance from the populace (and the dissident doctors). This quote for example captures the mood of the time:
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
There are a remarkable number of parallels between the smallpox and COVID vaccines (e.g., doctors and hospitals back then also covered up injuries or breakthrough infections to protect the vaccine). I listed them here in the hope this cycle can end: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-can-the-smallpox-vaccine-disaster
What Can The Smallpox Vaccine Disaster Teach Us About Spike Protein Injuries?
Reviewing the critical but largely forgotten lessons from early pioneers in medicine
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
One of the most surprising things about this was that the mandates were only ended by large public protest from the working class, and when a city was forced to enact the "antivaxxers" proposals, rather than be overrun with smallpox, its approach worked and was copied globally.
reSee.it AI Summary
Slovakia's Prime Minister is in the hospital after being shot multiple times following his announcement to investigate the government's COVID response and corruption. A video captured the aftermath of the assassination attempt, showing Fico being restrained by citizens.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Recently, Slovakia's Prime Minister made headlines around the world by saying he would criminally investigate his government's COVID response and the corrupt policies that killed his countrymen. He was just shot multiple times and is now in the hospital. Pray for his survival. https://t.co/6au9n2bkRz
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The above speech happened on Jan 23 2024 and is important for everyone to see. This is a video that was shot today (May 15) immediately after the assassination attempt where Fico was reportedly shot in the head and abdomen. You can also see citizens restraining the gunman. https://t.co/PqoLseh8FY
reSee.it AI Summary
Concerns about mRNA gene therapy's cancer risk were ignored, but evidence suggests these vaccines may cause aggressive cancers. Leaked documents revealed Pfizer skipped required cancer studies. People experienced unusual and fatal cancers after vaccination. Despite data showing a significant increase in cancer rates, experts denied the problem. Research indicated mRNA spike protein impairs DNA repair, but the NIH retracted the paper. A campaign defamed and silenced vaccine skeptics. Major publications are now covering the mysterious rise in cancers. Wealthier countries are most affected. A Japanese study linked mRNA vaccination to increased cancer deaths. Mainstream media is starting to acknowledge the issue. Regulatory failures and cover-ups must be addressed.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
One of the largest concerns with the mRNA gene therapy was its cancer risk—yet Pfizer was exempted from testing for it. Since then, we've seen many signs these vaccines cause aggressive cancers. Recently, a Medicaid whistleblower showed us cancer rates went up 2.5 times. A🧵
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The complete data Kirsch received from the Medicaid whistleblower can be viewed below. In addition to being statistically significant, it also showed only specific cancers increased, and many of those were the highly aggressive cancers. https://kirschsubstack.com/p/turbo-cancer-evidence-in-california
Turbo cancer in New York
Cancer cases increased by 2.5X in 2023 over the 2017-2019 baseline.
kirschsubstack.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Right before Pfizer's vaccine hit the market, its regulatory documents were leaked. I immediately checked what they said for the required cancer, autoimmunity and fertility studies. Remarkably, none had been done. I took this as a tacit admission the real data was very bad.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Once they came out, numerous people I knew began having unusual new cancers or old cancers suddenly come back—many of which were fatal. One young non-smoker had a stable lipoma begin growing which had a very rare lung cancer within it. Another got a sarcoma where he was vaxxed.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Before long, data emerged showing we had a huge cancer problem. Nonetheless, the "experts" insisted we were imagining things. Contrast that, for example, with this chart @EthicalSkeptic has been continually updating since this tragedy began.
@EthicalSkeptic - Ethical Skeptic ☀
Cancer Mortality continues to be elevated, featuring a novel CAGR. Not 'skyrocketing' - don't use that term. Rhetoric specialists shift the focus to that word and distract from the critical path issue, as would a stage magician. "Cancer exhibits a 6.7% elevation in excess mortality, along with a novel 2.7% growth rate." This is extraordinary... because of the nature of cancer.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In tandem to this, research began emerging showing the mRNA spike protein impaired the repair of damaged DNA and concentrated in the nucleus. Rather than heed this red flag, the NIH got the paper retracted. Arkmedic discusses the scale of this crime here: https://www.arkmedic.info/p/welcome-to-gilead
Welcome to Gilead
A scientific scandal with huge implications for women's health is brewing and you weren't going to hear about it - until now.
arkmedic.info
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In parallel to this, a vast multi-million dollar "non-profit" campaign was deployed where many fake "experts" were deployed to defame, ban and delicense anyone who questioned the safety or efficacy of the vaccines. Recently we exposed who funded them. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-vast-pharmaceutical-conspiracy
The Vast Pharmaceutical Conspiracy to Silence Online Dissent
Millions of dollars were spent to weaponize the public against all of us
midwesterndoctor.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
However, no amount of gaslighting or wishful thinking can change what's happening, and now major publications are being forced to cover this "mysterious" increase in cancers. •https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00720-6 •https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13275835/American-Cancer-Society-warns-tidal-wave-tumors-coming-cases-set-rise-80-2050.html
Why are so many young people getting cancer? What the data say
Clues to a modern mystery could be lurking in information collected generations ago.
nature.com
American Cancer Society warns that a 'tidal wave' of tumors is coming
A tidal wave of cancer cases is expected to sweep the globe by 2050, jumping 77 percent between now and then, a new study says.
dailymail.co.uk
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
One peer reviewed study found this epidemic has only hit the richer countries (and not say Africa). This mirrors the WHO's "inexplicable" discovery that COVID death rates were the highest in the countries that followed the WHO's costly pandemic policies. https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21834
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Most recently, a peer-reviewed Japanese study found that a significant rise in cancer deaths occurred directly in parallel to the mRNA vaccination of Japan. https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/
Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan
During the COVID-19 pandemic, excess deaths including cancer have become a concern in Japan, which has a rapidly aging population. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate how age-adjusted mortality rates (AMRs) for different types of cancer in Japan changed during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022). Official statistics from Japan were used to compare observed annual and monthly AMRs with predicted rates based on pre-pandemic (2010-2019) figures using logistic regression analysis. No significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer (including ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer) after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022. AMRs for the four cancers with the most deaths (lung, colorectal, stomach, and liver) showed a decreasing trend until the first year of the pandemic in 2020, but the rate of decrease slowed in 2021 and 2022. This study discusses possible explanations for these increases in age-adjusted cancer mortality rates.
cureus.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In the face of this data, the dam is breaking and the mainstream media is beginning to allow publication of articles which touch upon this inexplicable rise of cancer. Consider for instance this recent OP-Ed by @PierreKory https://www.realclearhealth.com/blog/2024/04/25/as_cancers_in_the_young_rise_the_pandemic_response_must_be_probed_1027539.html
As Cancers in the Young Rise, the Pandemic Response Must Be Probed
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently released findings of seizures in toddlers and pulmonary embolisms in adults that may have been caused by Covid vaccines. Statistical
realclearhealth.com
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
However, all of this still dances around the real issue. We witnessed the greatest regulatory failure in history, and each time concerning evidence came out, they didn't listen and just covered it up. Those officials are now now employed by the manufacturers. This has to stop. https://t.co/I1f8FBhRoI
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
In the 1980s the media would discuss vaccines concerns about existing vaccines and have experts debate vaccination. After realizing the vaccines were too dangerous to stand up to scrutiny that never happened again. Just imagine if we could have a debate like the one here now. https://t.co/9cMQWErY8B
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the need for public awareness about the benefits and risks of vaccines. They question the effectiveness of vaccines in eradicating diseases like polio and suggest that autoimmune diseases may be caused by immunizations. They mention the difficulty in getting responses from organizations regarding adverse reactions to vaccines. One speaker expresses frustration about having to fight for the choice not to vaccinate their children. They also mention the different vaccination requirements in certain states. The video ends with a mention of returning after a break.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's just that I think the public needs to be informed. We need to be told the benefits versus the risk. We need to know what we're facing.
Speaker 1: Well, the darker side of a and how many cases, Bob? Would you not interrupt me for a second? I know I know that I know that doctors are used to interrupting patients, but not another doctor.
Speaker 0: Right. That's exactly another doctor. Point.
Speaker 2: Chief I think,
Speaker 0: but anyway, let's get he does make
Speaker 2: a point that, we should also say Sabin is live the live vaccine itself is, is inactive. Is inactive, as we say, in the laboratory. Alright. How many was it, they ask?
Speaker 1: Well, how many people poll know that that the European epidemic of polio, there were about 20 or 30 cases in this country. Now first, the American doctors will argue that the reason why polio disappeared in this country was because of the vaccine. But then why reason why polio disappeared in this country was because of the vaccine. But then why did it disappear in Europe in the 19 forties and 19 fifties without mass vaccination. Why doesn't it occur in the 3rd world, where only 10% of the people have never been immunized against polio or anything else?
Speaker 2: So in other words, we may fighting a tiger that died.
Speaker 0: That's quite correct. Ask the people in Great Britain, ask the people in Japan who
Speaker 1: point. Back here,
Speaker 0: gentlemen, if you
Speaker 2: please, I've got probably the smartest audience we've ever had.
Speaker 0: Point. I have a question. How long a delayed action, if any, would you connect this with, like, MS?
Speaker 2: With MS a possibility. Would multiple sclerosis be one of the, possible results?
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, there's a new publication that just came out from John Hoffman, the close associate of Toni Morrison, that gives the references linking MS in later life to the early production of live virus vaccines like measles and like some of the others, there were live viruses. Now present time, I would I would at the present time, I would recommend that anybody who has MS or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or many of those degenerative neurologic conditions of later life carefully review their vaccine histories.
Speaker 0: I would also like to comment to that because In connection with my case, I've been doing some research
Speaker 2: Let me tell them once again, Miss Gundy, that you're a Guillain Barre victim, contracted following poem, your receipt of the swine flu vaccination. Yes.
Speaker 0: I am in the process of writing a book about my experience. And in the process, I've done considerable research. And from what I have learned, it looks as if immunizations frequently cause autoimmune diseases, not only Guillain Barre syndrome, but lupus, Pulmonary arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and other types of things. Now I have no data at this point. Yes.
Speaker 2: We should also we should also say that there's a good good deal of evidence suggesting that multiple sclerosis may be the result of distemper in an animal that the victim received during Childhood. Now none of this is absolutely nailed to the wall, but that's the problem with this. How's a what's a mother to do with all of these balls in the air and nobody really certain.
Speaker 0: I would just like to also comment that we had 46 poll. 1,000,000 people vaccine vaccinated with the swine flu shot. And I have written to Ralph Nader's organization. I have written to some of the Organizations trying to get them to do a survey, an ongoing survey to see if these vaccinations do cause autoimmune diseases or What the reactions are. I can't even get a response because I'm not a doctor.
I have no clout. I'm a nobody.
Speaker 2: Mrs. Grant, why were you shaking your head?
Speaker 0: Quote. It is known with that vaccine. It's a law vaccine. They are not interested in the adverse reactions. As a matter of fact, if I may, I'd like to invite anyone to write to me If they've had an adverse reaction, I'd like to help the government because they don't want to know but I would like to know.
I am a mother of 3 children and I have been informed and I've read court. On these things. And I chose not to vaccinate my children, but when they get to school, why is it that I have to fight for my rights as a mother and the choice I've made?
Speaker 2: Just quickly, we're along, but that's a very important question. Here are the states in which, you either have the totally free court? Decision about whether or not to vaccinate or there's we're calling them loophole states, states where they're not going to send your child to, solitary if You don't have his card tonight. Alright. California.
Not all children must be immunized in these states. Some require religious reasons. Some places, places, there is a bureaucratic you have to go through to prove that you're this or that. And others, it's probably easier. So just for the sake of simplifying Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin, if your state is not on there, it means that your child is going to be left at the kindergarten door feeling very, court very, very much an outcast because he didn't get his immunization shots, and we'll be back in a moment.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
When Bush invaded Iraq, he sold an unneeded vaccine to America (Saddam had no smallpox) that ended after too many were injured. It was a prototype for COVID with absurd lines like: "they don’t want their children getting destroyed the way the World Trade Center was destroyed." https://t.co/snw4dSdP0T
Video Transcript AI Summary
The threat of smallpox as a weapon of terror has resurfaced, with evidence suggesting that Soviet scientists who weaponized it during the Cold War may be working elsewhere. Smallpox is highly infectious and can spread through the air, potentially infecting and killing a large number of people. However, there is a lack of vaccine supply in the United States, with only 15 million doses available. Congress aims to produce an additional 200 million doses, but the necessary legislation has not been sent to the president yet. A French company recently discovered over 70 million doses of smallpox vaccine in its freezers. Research shows that the existing vaccine can be diluted and still provide adequate protection, potentially stretching the supply to 150 million doses. The question now is who will receive the vaccine and when, as the consequences of a bioterror attack with smallpox could be devastating, resulting in estimates of 100,000 to 1 million deaths.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Weapons of mass destruction. What the documents published today show is their clear objective to create as much human suffering as possible. Tom Fenton, CBS News, London.
Speaker 1: It has been more than 20 years since smallpox was declared eradicated worldwide And even longer since Americans stopped being vaccinated. Now the threat of smallpox is back as a weapon of terror. But Jim Stewart tells us Americans have little protection against it.
Speaker 0: The only remaining stocks of smallpox are supposed to be locked away in research labs at the Centers For Disease Control in Atlanta And similar ones in Russia. But with evidence that Soviet scientists who successfully weaponized it during the Cold War may now be working elsewhere, Smallpox gets top billing for a threat capable of killing 1,000.
Speaker 2: You know, I lose my sleep on smallpox. I think that's the worst because it's infectious. Our society is very, very mobile. All you're gonna need is a few handful of cases.
Speaker 0: The smallpox virus spreads through the air from person to person, And so the very 1st smallpox victim to walk into a hospital could potentially infect every person there. Unvaccinated, an estimated third of them would die.
Speaker 3: I want to see the vaccination made available. I want to see it made available soon, and I want my children to get it.
Speaker 0: After September 11th, Marsha Jordan Burke asked her pediatrician to vaccinate her children against smallpox.
Speaker 3: Their sense of urgency Is they don't want their children destroyed like the World Trade Center was destroyed. Take some big breaths, Christian.
Speaker 0: But doctor Barnett had to tell her and many other parents since That there is no vaccine. The reason is a lack of supply. The United States has 15,000,000 doses of old vaccine seen on reserve in case of an emergency, and congress wants to produce another 200,000,000 new doses, but the anti terrorism legislation that would pay for all that has yet to be sent to the president.
Speaker 3: I think maybe they're stalling for time until they have more vaccine and they figure out what to do. I think a voluntary small Vaccination program is inevitable.
Speaker 0: But even after manufacturing begins, getting the new vaccine will take at least a year. For some anxious parents and doctors, that's simply not soon enough. Jim Stewart, CBS News, Washington.
Speaker 4: The deadly smallpox virus thought to be obsolete, but now there is Growing anxiety about a possible new bioterror attack of some sort, which is why it was such big news that a French company Has just revealed an astonishing find more than 70,000,000 doses of smallpox vaccine long forgotten in its freezers. Also tonight, new research that the shows the small amount of vaccine available in the US may be available to protect many more people than originally thought. NBC News chief science correspondent, Robert Bazell, tonight on the growing debate over the best way to protect Americans from this awful disease.
Speaker 5: The studies out today on hundreds of volunteers prove the existing vaccine can be diluted extensively and still provide adequate protection.
Speaker 6: The supply of vaccine can be stretched considerably at least 1 to 5 and perhaps 1 to 10 times to give us perhaps as many as a 150,000,000 doses.
Speaker 5: And hundreds of millions of fresh doses will be ready by the end of the year. So now the questions are, who gets the vaccine and when?
Speaker 6: If in fact there is a bio terrorism attack with smallpox, The potential consequences could be devastating.
Speaker 5: Expert estimates range from 100,000 to a 1000000 deaths.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Prior to COVID, Gardasil was the most dangerous vaccine pushed on America, and like now, the US gov knew just how bad it was. In 1997 Clinton legalized TV drug ads and that money silenced the media. It's still illegal in Europe, so this Danish network instead exposed Gardasil. https://t.co/pw3JWSGyMJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss various topics related to vaccines and COVID-19. They mention the importance of vaccination campaigns and the potential side effects. They also talk about different regions and their response to the pandemic. The speakers touch on the issue of vaccine hesitancy and the need for accurate information. Overall, they emphasize the significance of vaccines in combating the virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In grobe Pia, auung, Quena Sahnes, Und zusammen ist in Mohamayenne privat zu London. Und gehellet ist mein Schüler. Familien Hasel gezählt vor Behandlingen, deri Dancegesonnenswesen EG Harkonegojamel Girask. Mit von Natsrailoselens geht er der Neuma hin, Auze Kehl, hohe PW Vakzinen. Vakzin.
Der Risiko bezog im Hintergrund hätte ich Senna in die Urwegler Lehmoorhelskraft.
Speaker 1: Die Herweg und Urwegfach erwachsen im Drillkraftsüddern.
Speaker 0: Möllt ich hier eine bis Ludasa vor Präparal, Garosin. Erkraftens Bekämpelse kö eine Ablüftungskampagne, Da Opfer oder Pia im Molgroben, CFO, Vakzin.
Speaker 1: Hier kommen unsere Klappen. Ja.
Speaker 0: Melederhauer E-Zugsen Pia, er ihn beradert sie Sonnenstürsen mit Mui Bewirkinger. Erwachsenen. Eline Söder Peskügels Vakzin.
Speaker 1: Ja, wir haben sie mit den Zahn gewährt, die können eine Vakzin
Speaker 0: Geld. Insi Hohenmödel lädt ihn her. Er warxes Sommeral. Luise Brent Misthenga happy eine Symptome, Stama Frau Vakzin.
Speaker 1: Die Verzeder des Sandens, die kaum auf das Geld, die auf allen Ländern, der Folge, kein will, wer die anderen sagt.
Speaker 0: Hier ist bei Milsen Forstingslieder, ein Overlebe Synchroncenter. Aus der Hennmäina, der ein Muli Sam hängt mit einem Vakzin ab hier eine Symptome.
Speaker 1: Ja, sieht man die Herr Nuritz halt auch. Wir haben den
Speaker 0: Da. Luise Brentha aus der Oppel, Edinel Philestrak Hospiane. Die war mal Sport, Die Stögerhans Misttage Civakzin. Laura Hoffmann höre Zölia Atelier erung ums Vulvelsbela.
Speaker 1: Beginnen ich aber direkt die See. So die
Speaker 0: Die Region Wenn er formen von Sonnensolveni elite Regionen. Die weit zuckzugsnerfjorden. Wie Hanno Wurzel war's Aktensicht vor Sone Justyussen. Wie bei dem Szene, Es müssen Covid sind die PoffreExper aus Bezirk am HPW Vakzinen. Mit Daniel Geld.
Jagdinsekten
Speaker 1: Nur genug.
Speaker 0: Wie BRD der V am Markt erzählt, Horst Felix Bezirk. Hier habe ich Franco bei DIA Cent Saisongestößen. Familien Rainer Melsko Bru, achthundertju schubsen Corona Popbehelliger in London. Simone Kenfeld.
Speaker 1: Also, in dir springt wir mal wieder für sonen. Ja. Auf den Detalks.
Speaker 0: Dalingsbehandlung er. E. G. Enerkind. Erwergend.
Der Hund Stellin Mangler Enkelin Munger den Molinger. Wenn einer sieht, erzählt eine Frau Blätter anderer Simone Kennfeld. Kent Jelbe.
Speaker 1: Die haben hier die von Zelle.
Speaker 2: Ja, die gerade bestimmt für
Speaker 3: die, was man kikapu wird auch eher in den Planning.
Speaker 0: Da wachsen Sie schon. Mit den Store ohne Asylse frequente HPW Vakzinen. Fahrtwerks gilt Ihnen langreiges Südamen. Stayden Seum Institute Raúinsge Institute der Sveaye verliert dort Studie Kiegel Potate von nächsten elf Millionen Pia. Die Vilsee und die HPW Vakzinel Pia, Hell Ölrisiko von Lappley, El Voli, Südromi.
Ich vorholte Pia, der Ekel war Vakzinel. Die. Resultierte VISA in den Frostgeld melden vaginieren, eine unwachsenäre Person. Wir wachsen das schon. Leid die Flieste die hier
Speaker 1: Problem ist ja, es sind ohne Schürze.
Speaker 0: Ulfra, Däne und Asyl, sie kommen kototär. Am Emily außen in Lider.
Speaker 1: Den Ei Grudel wäre als Verlenketer Bär. Den zwei Ex sieht in meinem Fall. Den Nee, dem also wie wie vor die der Nein, Teddy, Teddy. Wie wie
Speaker 0: ist das sei, sagt eine Zemitejurist Olaf Janssen?
Speaker 1: Die Bürger sind Reuschlör, Also auch CPA Haller mein Fakt ist die wichtigste Dokumente.
Speaker 0: Luise Brentzehner mit vier Mails, warum Elva Sonnenstösen am Pianis Tillstein. Aber er möchte seine Arbeit handle. Die Sonnenszene Luise Brent In waren Opfer der Sonnenstößen, sehr versammelten Strebexperte, sehr belügste Probleme.
Speaker 1: So die vier Mails vor vor Luisa. Ja, ja, will gerne.
Speaker 0: Klar Diagnose,
Speaker 1: Zum
Speaker 0: Ulla Erstman. Sie fällt die wie. Ostkräften Hiller ihn in Gang.