TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Miserei_

Miserei_
Posted - August 16, 2025 at 1:39 AM
Saved - August 24, 2025 at 11:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the official narrative surrounding the Holocaust is fundamentally flawed, lacking credible evidence and scientific support. Historical claims, such as the repeated figure of 6 million Jewish deaths, seem inconsistent and symbolic rather than factual. Many testimonies from the Nuremberg trials were coerced under duress, and inspections revealed no evidence of gas chambers. Documentation and statistics suggest that deaths were primarily due to disease and starvation, not execution. Moreover, translations of key speeches may have been misinterpreted, further complicating the narrative.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

There is a 0 % probability that the official narrative on the holocaust is remotely close to being accurate. It fails in math, forensics, science and the documentation is either fake or missing. Long thread 🧵

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The term 6 million Jews is repeated in over 200 articles leading up to WW2. One article even claims that 6 million Jews had already been murdered 7 months prior to WW2. https://www.torahtothetribes.com/teaching/the-hebraic-book-of-revelation-part-2c/

The Hebraic Book of Revelation - Part 2C - Torah to the Tribes 6,000,000 has its origins in an ancient Babylonian sorcerers prophecy straight out of the pages of Torah. Lev 25:10 And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family. תשבו ‘Ye shall return’ = ‘TaShuVU’ - תשבו Tav-Shin-Vet-Vav and it seems to be spelled incorrectly…it’s missing another ו Vav and should be spelt תשובו Tav-Shin-Vav-Vet-Vav תשובו 6,000,000 is the mystical and magical conjure number associated with ushering in the Balaam oracles of return to the land of Israel. The magic: the letter ו Vav is missing;ו Vav = 6. conjure up the vanishing ו Vav and the spell will be set. The return will only happen upon the manufacture of the missing ו Vav. The missing ו Vav is what enables the return to happen torahtothetribes.com

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Up until 1989, the number of deaths at Auschwitz was over 4 million. Then it was reduced to 1.1 million. Majdanek also reduced its death count by nearly 2 million. Somehow the 6 million number did not change which shows that it is symbolic and not at all accurate.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Although the executions by gas chambers were mentioned in the Nuremberg trials among other outlandish claims, the general public weren’t made aware of its use for executions until the late 1960s.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Before the late 1960s, we were told that Jews were turned into lampshades and soap which ended up being complete nonsense.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The NS officers that testified at the Nuremberg trials were tortured into confessions. This makes their testimonies meaningless as people will say anything under torture.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

After judge Edward Van Roden allowed his words to be printed in a press article, he then had to backtrack after receiving too much pressure. He later claimed that some German captives had been kicked in the testicles but that he did not know how many.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

After conducting an inspection, the western military police found no evidence of homicidal gas chambers.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The Soviets had orders to fabricate German atrocities in order to stir up hatred. They also refused to allow inspectors into the alleged death camps.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

After forensic tests failed to prove that hydrogen cyanide gas was ever used in the homicidal gas chambers, we were then told that the gas chambers were reconstructions done after the war by the same Soviets who had orders to fabricate German atrocities.

@pfmerino - Peter Herrera-Merino

@RegeremBoss Take a look at this video I edited together. This is the David Irving I choose to remember

Video Transcript AI Summary
“Say, it is also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction.” “If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian.” “That is what I would call a fake.” “And if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake.” “And I find $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment.” “The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the school children the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruling just down the road three or four miles away?” “The psychological warfare executive were behind the entire gas chamber story.” “We've had a good run for our money with this gas chamber lie, but really we've got to be careful because eventually it's going to be exposed and then our entire psychological warfare effort will be brought down with it.” “And here we are in 1988, and that hare is still running.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say, it is also totally wrong to call Speaker 1: that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald three days ago. To which my to which my response is, if this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for fifty years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building busloads of shuddering school children from all over Europe, telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews, Speaker 0: and if they haven't had Speaker 1: the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it's a reconstruction which makes it a fake. And I find $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the school children the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruling just down the road three or four miles away? Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd. Ruins of a gas chamber, but I think what even maps I've seen this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. Poor crematorium in Auschwitz because they had immense typhus problem. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of the inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing men injustice because there was undoubtedly a crime. But we're arguing about scale. We're arguing about intent. We're arguing about the high or how and the why and the wherefore. And this is what we are not allowed to That our own psychological warfare executive were behind the entire gas chamber story. And once again, we're quoting from the archives. They're in the British archives, how the psychological warfare executive decides quite cold bloodedly and cynically to start putting out over the radio waves the allegation that the Germans have built special gas chambers for gassing the Jews and getting rid rid of them. And later on in the files, round about 1944, you find the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, who is responsible for the psychological warfare executive, writing a handwritten minute. His name is Victor Cavendish Bentink, an eminent banker, an industrialist, still alive in England now in Lord Portland as he is now, chairman of the joint intelligence committee, writing and handwriting in 1944, words to the following effect. We've had a good run for our money with this gas chamber lie, but really we've got to be a bit careful because eventually it's going to be exposed and then our entire psychological warfare effort will be brought down with it. So isn't it a bit isn't it a good time now to distance ourselves from this particular story? We've set the hare running. Now we ought to let it go off by itself. A good run for their money in 1944. And here we are in 1988, and that hare is still running Speaker 0: 40

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Actual quotes.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The propaganda went as far as producing doctored photos to make the Germans look as evil as possible.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The narrative keeps changing as new evidence emerges. They used to say that 1944 was the height of the genocide in Auschwitz. Aerial photographs proved this to be false. No piles of coke for the crematories, no smoking chimneys, and no line ups of people.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

There are no scientific proofs of homicidal gas chambers ever existing.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The official narrative stands and falls on the eye witness testimonies of around 20 people. Some of whom often times directly contradict one another.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

You can’t have a crematorium adjacent to a non hermetically sealed gas chamber. You wouldn’t be able to run the place for more than 20 minutes before it exploded, let alone running it 24/7 for 3 years straight. https://www.unz.com/pub/jhr__the-leuchter-report-vindicated/

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

The Leuchter report, authored by American execution technician Fred A. Leuchter, may provide an in-depth understanding on why it is illegal to question the holocaust in 17 European countries today.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that before going he told “mister Zundle and his defense team” that if he found facilities that could have supported executions, he would testify whether or not they could have sustained gas executions. He says photographs were produced and “the video photographer” documented that “the forensic samples … were properly taken, packaged for submission to the laboratories.” He states he examined the facilities and “made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise.” He adds that “the reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report.” He argues that “None of these ever existed” and that if used, “they would have been blown to bits.” He concludes with “there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I told mister Zundle and his defense team prior to my going that if I did, in fact, find facilities that could have supported executions, not only whether they did did support the executions, but only whether or not they could have sustained gas executions. I would make that very clear in my report, and that is what I would testify to when I testified in court. With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify verify measurements. Measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lausing facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged, for and packaged for submission to the laboratories. I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to in fact confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never in fact contained hydrogen cyanide gas. What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities? The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design and fabrication of these facilities. The requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etc. None of these ever existed. We're talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers. Speaker 1: Well, we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Well, one of Speaker 0: the things that was necessary for me to do, Kirk, at the outset so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports so I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gassing. So the long and the short of it is there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The doors of the gas chambers in Auschwitz aren’t even realistic. If millions of people were killed with hydrogen cyanide, there should’ve been countless eye witness testimonies claiming to have seen cadavers with red skin, and yet there is little to none of those claims.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Multiple ground penetrating radar tests failed to show evidence of mass graves in Treblinka, but new experts were brought in and claimed to have found evidence of mass graves. Shortly after the ground on site was paved with boulders and concrete so no further tests could be made.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The vast majority of deaths in concentration camps were from Typhus and starvation near the end of the war when the Allies destroyed the supply lines. In comparison, a small fraction of these deaths were from shooting and hanging.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The Red Cross and the Soviet documents show that total death count of all concentration camps to be between 200 000 and 300 000.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

There are no documents in the German and British archives that talks about killing people with gas. https://odysee.com/@Zefrenchman:3/e5eae64447f995cb.mp4-(480p):d

David Irving View on Odysee: David Irving odysee.com

@Miserei_ - Miserei

There’s been many attempts to fake NS documents but the archivists used to spot them quickly. Here we have a classic example of a fake document where the style of writing and the ink is different than usual NS documents. The numbers on the file are mathematically impossible. https://t.co/yjMzYAa3pE

@Miserei_ - Miserei

This is a genuine document demanding that everything be done to reduce the death rates in concentration camps. https://t.co/ubdiWRClRe

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The Jewish population had not decreased in the official statistics during the late 1940s. https://t.co/SZFCEl4mfF

@Miserei_ - Miserei

When the Red Cross inspected German concentration camps it was reported that the prisoners were receiving 3 meals a day and were living in descent conditions overall. https://t.co/PK5Xm72caT

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Testimonies of people admitting there were no gas chambers. https://t.co/AEPwaaulX1 https://t.co/9kwXqW1hUC

@NoahsArk1000 - Noah’s Ark 🚢

Rare🚨 ‘Reality of Gas Chambers’ “We all had to sit in a row and what happened eventually is that they rained soap & water—Because we were so full of lice” Listen to one of the ‘survivors’ Must watch & share https://t.co/jdRRbxjp2y

Video Transcript AI Summary
We were all put into what looked like a big bathroom, with shower things at the top. We were put onto benches. We were all stark naked, old and young. The sexes were separated, but we sat in a row. Eventually they rained from the showerheads. They rained soap and water on us. The reason was that we had to be the last. We were so full of lies through that when we hair was cut, and they rained soap and water on us. I do not remember if there were towels. So when I hear about the showerheads and the holocaust and all of that, I know exactly what it was. That was soap and water raining down on us to be lousy. That's what it was. And where the story came from that those were dangerous showerheads, I don't know. That must have come out of the Russian
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were all put into what used to what looked like a great big bathroom, I guess, because they had these shower things at the at the top. And we were put onto onto benches. We were all stark naked, old and young. Of course, the the sexes were separated, but we all had to sit in a row. And what happened eventually is is that they rained from the showerheads. They rained soap and water on us. And the reason for that was that we had to be the last. We were so full of lies through the through that when we our hair was cut, and they rained soap and water on us. And I do not remember if there were any towels. So when I hear about the showerheads and the holocaust and all of that, I know exactly what it was. That was soap and water raining down on us to be lousy. That's what it was. And where the story came from that those were dangerous showerheads, I don't know. That must have come out of the Russian

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The speeches and texts are often times mistranslated. Here we have a speech from Himmler calling for the extermination of Jews. But in reality, he is calling for the uprooting of Jews. The word Ausrottung has various meanings depending on the phrase that comes first. https://t.co/zlbwgFXAuL

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Ausrottung can be translated into, eradication, extermination, stamping out or uprooting. When looking at the phrase (the evacuation of the Jews), the correct translation should be uprooting instead of exterminating.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Let’s say the genocide by gas chambers is true. The math simply doesn’t work. Up until 1943, there was one crematorium with 6 muffles operating in Auschwitz from 1941 to 1943.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Then 4 crematorium with 46 muffles were added from 1943 to 1944 before the camp was turned into an air raid shelter. It takes an average 2 to 4 hours to cremate a body. That’s roughly 8 bodies cremated per muffle every 24 hours.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The cremation capacity in the first 2 years would be around 17 000 bodies and in the short year of 1943 to 1944. 150 000 bodies could have been cremated if crematorium operated 24/7. This gives us roughly 170 000 in total. Far from the 1.1 million in the official narrative.

View Full Interactive Feed